19970972 Ver 1_More Info Received_20010120 (7)

1
0

1
1

1
Beckley, WV
Raleigh Cty Airport Ind. Park
124 Philpott Lane
1 Beaver, WV 25813-9502
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1
Report
Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Plan
Anson County Solid Waste Management Facility
Wadesboro, Anson County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Chambers Waste Systems of North Carolina Inc.
Wadesboro, Anson County, North Carolina
Project No.: R98-632-686
March 1999
ALM ES & ASSOC IATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Bristol, VA Pittsburgh, PA Raleigh NC
111 Piedmont Avenue Four Triangle Lane, Suite 200 111 Commonwealth 3ourt, Suite 104
P.O. Box 939 Ecport, PA 15632-9255 Cary, NC 27511-4464
Bristol, VA Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]

Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] ,
Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Northern Region
Four Triangle Lane, Suite 200
Export, PA 15632-9255
[phone] Fax: [phone]
To: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
TRANSMITTAL FORM
Project No.: R98-632-686
Date: March 11, 1999
If enclosures are not as noted,
Attention: Mr. Allen S. Davis please inform us immediately.
We transmit:
¦ Herewith ? Under Separate Cover
For Your:
¦ Approval
? Review & Comment
? Use
The Following:
? Drawings
? Specifications
¦ Document(s)
? Record
? As Requested
? Signature
? Laboratory Data
? Field Data
? Other

w
c
Copies Date No. Description
1 3/99 - Report Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan, Anson County
Solid Waste Management Facility, Wadesboro, Anson County,
North Carolina

Remarks: Mr. Davis, enclosed please find the referenced report for your record. A copy
has also been forwarded to Mr. John Domey at the North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. If you
have any questions or comments, please call.
By: Daniel A. MalteseD"
Copies To: John Dorney (DENR, DWQ); Brian Card (Allied); Steve Roberts (Allied):
David Hildreth (Allied); Mona O'Bryant (Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P.);
Bill Almes (Alines)
Mid-Atlantic Region, 124 Philpott Lane, Beaver, WV 25813-9502 [phone] Fax: [phone]
Carolina Region, 111 Commonwealth Court, Suite 104, Cary, NC 27511-4464 [phone] Fax: [phone]

r

REPORT
' STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN

1
ANSON COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY

WADESBORO, ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN
ANSON COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
CHAMBERS WASTE SYSTEMS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
WADESBORO, ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
3.0 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
4.0 IMPACTED STREAMS
5.0 IMPACTED WETLANDS
6.0 DISCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED MITIGATION SITE
7.0 CONSTRUCTION
7.1 CLEARING AND GRUBBING
7.2 EXCAVATION TO BASE GRADES
7.3 PLACEMENT AND PREPARATION OF WETLAND SOILS
7.4 BIOENGINEERING MATERIALS
7.5 PLANTING, SEEDING AND MULCHING
7.6 WILDLIFE AMENITIES
8.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATING OF SUCCESS CRITERIA
PAGE NO.
1
1
2
3
3
4'
5
5
6
6
7
8
10
10

TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
PAGE NO.
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE
I VICINITY MAP
2 U.S.G.S. SITE LOCATION MAP
3 GENERAL SITE LAYOUT
4 GRADING, SEEDING AND PLANTING PLAN
-H- -

STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN
ANSON COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
CHAMBERS WASTE SYSTEMS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
WADESBORO, ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1.0 INTRODUCTION
' On behalf of Chambers Development of North Carolina, Inc. (Chambers), Almes & Associates,
Inc., Consulting Engineers (ALMES) has prepared this Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan
' (Mitigation Plan) for work related to the proposed construction of the Anson County Solid Waste
Management Facility located near Wadesboro, Anson County, North Carolina.
Construction of the proposed landfill will result in the unavoidable fill of 0.49 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands including 1,084 feet of perennial stream. This Mitigation Plan has been
revised from the "draft" May 1998 submittal(') to include both stream mitigation and wetland
mitigation.
' Although it would be very difficult to site a modern landfill in the region without impacting any
streams or wetlands; the purpose of this plan is to minimize unavoidable impacts and provide
compensation for those areas that will be lost. It is Chambers' intent to provide "on-site"
mitigation for stream and wetland losses in lieu of making payments into the Wetland
' Restoration Fund or providing other forms of off-site mitigation.
2.0 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
This Mitigation Plan is the result of numerous conversations and field visits with both the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the North Carolina Department of Environment and
' Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality (DWQ). This plan provides details of the
mitigation work and is intended to satisfy the mitigation requirements of both agencies.
(1) Almes & Associates Inc. Consulting Engineers report entitled "Report, Wetland Mitigation Plan, Anson County
' Solid Waste Management Facility, Wadesboro, Anson County, North Carolina" dated May 15, 1998.

The goals and objectives of the proposed mitigation are as follows:
The wetland mitigation will provide at least twice as much wetland habitat (2:1 ratio) as
that which will be lost as a result of landfill construction. In addition to providing greater
diverse
ill
id
tl
d
l
e a more
s w
prov
acement we
an
surface area, it is anticipated that the rep
habitat than what is currently available. The wetland will include wildlife desirable
t
bit
di
h
i
d b
.
a
ng
a
ree
ng, an
species of vegetation that can be used as resting, feeding, nest
' The stream mitigation will restore a highly eroded and incised streambed into a more
' natural configuration. The meandering stream system that will be constructed has been
designed to limit erosion and provide increased habitat for wildlife and benthic
macroinvertebrates. The stream mitigation will replace 1,084 linear feet of perennial
' stream with approximately 1,285 linear feet of perennial stream.
' 3.0 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
' The proposed landfill site is located off U.S. Route 74 between Polkton and Wadesboro, North
' Carolina (refer to the Vicinity Map presented in Figure No. 1 and a U.S.G.S. Site Location Map
in Figure No. 2). The proposed landfill site is bordered to the south by the existing CSX
Railroad right-of-way, to the north and west by Brown Creek, and to the east by Pinch Gut
Creek. All drainage from the proposed landfill site eventually flows into either Brown Creek or
Pinch Gut Creek via numerous unnamed tributaries. The drainage patterns for surface water
flows are shown on Figure No. 3 - General Site Layout map along with the property boundaries
and other site features. The streams and associated wetlands that will be lost as a result of the
proposed landfill are also shown on the drawing.
The proposed stream and wetland mitigation sites are located within an unnamed tributary to
' Pinch Gut Creek located on the northeast side of the proposed landfill.

1 -2-

71

F

4.0 IMPACTED STREAMS
The impacted stream is an unnamed tributary to Pinch Gut Creek. The middle and upper
portions of the impacted tributaries include wet weather channels and intermittent streams that
carry surface water during periods of heavy rain. The lower section of impacted stream is
perennial (typically flow year-round). Stream mitigation is required only for impacts to the
perennial streams.
During a February 4, 1999 field visit, Mr. John Dorney of the DWQ determined the limits of the
perennial stream. The limits established during the site visit were subsequently surveyed by
Harrington & Associates P.A. during the week of February 8, 1999. The total length of impacted
perennial stream is 1,084 linear feet.
In general, the perennial stream to be impacted is deeply incised, has little to no bottom substrate
and is highly eroded along the banks. This section of stream contains very little riffle, run, and
pool habitats that are typically associated with higher quality streams. Minimal benthic
macroinvertebrate life was observed within the stream and most likely could be attributed to the
lack of bottom substrate and low flows. The stream bottom is typically 2 to 4 feet in width.
5.0 IMPACTED WETLANDS
The wetlands to be impacted are located along the banks of the unnamed tributaries described
above. These wetlands provide some level of wildlife habitat; however, due to the sparse
vegetation, small size of the areas, and limited composition of vegetation, these areas are not
considered significant (in terms of providing food, cover, nesting, or resting habitats). Other
wetland functions, such as storage of floodwaters, nutrient cycling, groundwater recharge,
pollution filtration, etc. are probably being provided, but to a very limited or negligible degree.
Vegetation within the wetlands to be impacted consist of the following species:
1 -3-

J

0
n

Common Name Scientific Name Stratum
Wild Rose Rosa sp.
._._.._.__._-__._.__..__.._._.-.- _._......
.
_
.
._._....._........_._. Shrub
...... _..._.........
.._.._......_._._.........---....._.._._._.._...._._.__.....__.._..._.._................._..
_
Greenbriar .__....
.. .............
_
:
Smilax sp.
_._....._.-......._...._._.__....._ .__...

........_...............
Herb

..-_.
-_...._........__.... .._.-._._..__.._._..._..._...-._......._................ _........
_.._....._._.... ........ _._...._._........._...._................ ............._
Virginia Creeper .........
l Parthenocissus_cluinquefolia Vine
- - ---__
Soft Rush Juncus effusus
- r-- _ Emergent
- -- -
__._....___.__......_._Lur id Sedge_..__......._.... ....._.-__........_._....---...._..__._Carex lurida _.._._._........_._.__._.-.. .... __.............. ..__..._..._.Emergent......................
Bristlebract
Sedge Carex tribuloides ._...._.__..__._
i ._.__._..._._._. _.__........._Emergent
_
-
............
...
_Foxtail S,edge.............._. .-...._....._.__.._...._
............._..
_...-.-._. Carex vulpinoidea
._._...._._.._._.
_.-_...._.._Emergent__._._.__.__....... _........... _.
Fowl Manna ass Gl ceria striata I Grass
Through prior conversations and field visits with the Corps, it was decided that an average width
of 5 feet along the impacted stream channels would be representative in determining the
impacted wetland acreage. This 5-foot average was then multiplied by the entire length of
tributaries affected by the proposed landfill development to calculate a total disturbed wetland
acreage (refer to Figure No. 3). The length of stream that was used to determine impacted
wetland acreage not only included areas adjacent to the perennial stream, but also areas adjacent
to wet weather channels and intermittent stream channels. A total of 0.49 acres of wetlands will
be impacted as a result of landfill construction.
Chambers proposes to mitigate for the loss of wetlands using a minimum 2:1 ratio. A minimum
of 0.98 acres of wetlands will be created. It should be noted that Chambers does not intend to
develop, or in any way disturb, the high quality forested or scrub/shrub wetlands located adjacent
to Pinch Gut Creek or Brown Creek.
6.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED MITIGATION SITE
The proposed mitigation site consists of a conifer upland forest (loblolly pine) located along an
unnamed tributary to Pinch Gut Creek. Due to its location, this area will be protected from
future development and will enhance adjacent stream and wetland ecosystems.
Surface water flow will provide the majority of water for the proposed mitigation site. The
upgradient drainage area includes approximately 127 acres that will flow into the mitigation area.
Sediment Basin No. 1, which is proposed to be located just above the mitigation area, will collec
-4-

I I

u

and slowly discharge surface water from 94 of the 127 acres. The remaining 33 acres will be
direct runoff from adjacent "nondisturbed" areas. Based on water levels from an adjacent
groundwater monitoring well, it is,expected that groundwater will contribute to the "water
budget" of the stream and wetland.
Soils within the mitigation area consist of Creedmoor Fine Sandy Loam (CrB) with 2 to 8
percent slopes and Mayodan Fine Sandy Loam (MaB) with 2 to 8 percent slopes. The
Creedmoor Fine Sandy Loam soils are gently sloping, very deep, moderately well drained to
somewhat poorly drained on uplands. They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil.
Permeability is very slow and shrink-swell potential is high. Seasonal high water table is within
a depth of 1.5 to 2.0 feet. The Mayodan Fine Sandy Loam is also gently sloping and very deep.
They have a loamy surface layer and a clayey subsoil. Permeability is moderate and shrink-swell
potential is moderate. Seasonal high water table is below 6.0 feet.
7.0 CONSTRUCTION
Site grading by the contractor will be a critical factor in the success of this project. The
following sections provide details of the stream and wetland construction. Refer to Figure No. 4
for the Site Grading, Seeding and Planting Plan related to the stream and wetland mitigation.
n?
7.1 CLEARING AND GRUBBING

1 -5-
In order to maintain as much of a natural environment as possible, only select timber will be
removed from the immediate stream and wetland mitigation area. In general, full sunlight is
required for the establishment and growth of the vegetative species selected for this project.
While the removal of the majority of overstory trees is necessary, select trees will remain, at t e
direction of the Wetlands Planner. The juxtaposition of trees, especially along the meandering
streambank, will add to the overall diversity and character of the project. All invasive species
will be removed.

F

U7

7.2 EXCAVATION TO BASE GRADES
The contractor will excavate the stream channels to the base grades shown on Figure No. 4. For
the wetland area, the contractor will over-excavate soils within the wetland mitigation area to 6
inches below the final grades shown on Figure No. 4. This is required so that 6 inches of
wetland soils can be placed to achieve final grades (Section 7.3). A soil berm will be left in
place between the existing stream channel and the constructed stream channels and wetlands
during construction to prevent the inflow of water. Once the stream and wetland areas have been
prepared, the separation berms will be removed.
The wetland contractor is responsible for providing all surveying services related to:
1) Establishing the limits of the stream and wetland mitigation area;
2) Establishing all site grading; and
3) Establishing the limits of each vegetative zone within the wetland mitigation area.
A rectangular notch concrete weir will be constructed at the downstream end of the mitigated
wetland. The outfall structure will maintain a standing water level within the wetland and will
the weir at the specified elevation.
have a crest elevation of 244.5 feet. The wetland contractor will be responsible for constructing
7.3 PLACEMENT AND PREPARATION OF WETLAND SOILS
Soils from the existing wetlands (along the channels) are to be removed and stockpiled until the
grades within the wetland mitigation area have been established. The re-use of these soils within
the mitigation area will provide a "seed bank" for the germination and establishment of wetland
plants while also providing organic material for new plant material. If the wetland soils are to be
stockpiled (that is, they would not be directly excavated and transported to the mitigation area),
long, furrow-like stockpiles are recommended (no higher than 5 feet high) in order to prevent
composting which would kill any seeds within the soils.
-6-

The contractor will transport, place, and grade stockpiled wetland soils throughout the entire
' wetland mitigation area according to the final grades shown in Figure No. 4. If required, off-site
soils containing at least 10 percent organic matter can be used to supplement (up to 20 percent),
but not replace, on-site wetland soils.
' It will be critical for the site to be graded as specified. To a limited degree, the plantings can be
adjusted based on slight differences in grading; however, the plants within each zone have
' specific water tolerances and too much or too little water would affect the survivability of
individual plants.
7.4 BIOENGINEERING MATERIALS
Different bioengineering materials have been incorporated into the stream and wetland
' mitigation project. The stream channels and edges of the wetland will be lined with a coir mat,
which is manufactured from coconut fibers. The coir mat functions as an erosion control blanket
while also providing a stable medium to support the growth and development of plants. The
coconut fiber material is natural, long lasting, and has high. tensile strength. After approximately
' 7 years, the coir mat biodegrades and the root systems of the plants become the primary
stabilizing element.
Prior to the placement of the coir mat, the sideslopes of the stream channels will be seeded with
' the bank stabilization seed mix as presented on Figure No. 4. Herbaceous plants along with the
shrubs and trees can be planted through the coir mat after it has been placed and anchored. U-
shaped wire staples (11 gage minimum, 6 to 12-inches long) or wooden stakes can be used to
anchor the matting to the ground.
Coir logs will also be incorporated into the stream channel around the bends and other areas
prone to erosion. The logs are typically 12-inches wide and 20-feet long and are made of the
same coconut fiber as the coir mat. The logs will be anchored in-place by wooden stakes.
-7- Alk,
?? sl
' pC
' Rocks from existing rock piles at the site will be used as bottom substrate and for erosion control
along the stream bends. In addition, piles of rocks will be placed within the wetland for
amphibian and benthic macroinvertebrate habitat.
' The rerouted stream will enter the constructed wetland via an open pool of water, 2 to 3 feet
deep, at the upper end (refer to Figure No. 4). The rock-lined pool will aid in the dissipation of
flow from the stream into the wetland. Upturned stumps from the adjacent logging operations
placed just below the pool (root mass facing upstream) will further aid in the dissipation of flow
' and will assist with the dispersion of water throughout the wetland.
' 7.5 PLANTING SEEDING AND MULCHING

I I

The vegetation proposed for planting along the banks of the stream and within the wetland
mitigation area will reflect those species native to the. area and previously identified within the
impacted streams and wetlands. A combination of seeding and planting is believed to be the best
approach for plant establishment and ultimate survivability.
In order to provide a high quality, diverse habitat, the mitigation site includes different areas that
will establish different types of vegetation. In general, emergent vegetation will become
established within soils that are inundated or saturated throughout most of the year while the
shrubs and trees will become established at a slightly higher elevation. The stream mitigation
incorporates different wetland plant species along its meandering stream banks that will
eventually become established and provide increased bank stability, a feature that is currently
lacking in the perennial stream that will be impacted. The two species of willows specified for
this project are especially good for providing erosion control along stream banks. The wetland
planting and seeding tables are provided on Figure No. 4.
It is recommended that the wetland be planted in the spring between April and May or in the fall
between September and October.
-8-

n

0

u

u
L

7.5.1 Planting
For the wetland area, all plants will be installed within the zones shown on the plan drawing.
The limits of these zones will be surveyed and marked in the field. The surveyed limits will
establish the limits of each planting zone and provide a boundary for the wetland planters.
Planting should occur after the separation berms have been removed along the former stream so
that specific planting locations (as they relate to water depths) can be determined in the field.
Emergent vegetation, shrubs and trees will also be planted along the 3:1 slopes of the rerouted
stream channel. The vegetation will be planted through the coir mat and will eventually provide
bank stability and habitat along the banks of the stream. The total number of plants that will be
planted along the stream banks will be determined at a later date by Chambers and the Wetlands
Planner.
Plants within each zone will be planted in such a manner as to resemble the most natural setting
possible. Plants will be installed at the same depth in the ground which they were grown at the
nursery. Plants that need to be supported will be staked in the field. Tree shelters will be used
for those species of trees and shrubs prone to foraging by animals.
If the plants are to be stored for any length of time prior to planting, a temporary holding area
will be constructed to stage plants prior to installation. The holding area will be constructed out
of 6-inch by 6-inch landscape timbers draped with an impermeable liner. All water dependent
plants will be set into the lined area and saturated with water. In addition, netting will be hung
above the plants to reduce stress and loss of moisture from direct sunlight.
7.5.2 Seeding
Seeding within the mitigation area should be in accordance with the stream bank/wetland
stabilization seed mixture specified on Figure No. 4. A temporary ground cover within the seed
-9- -
n
Ii
mix has been specified that will provide erosion control and cover until the wetland seeds can
germinate and become established. The ground cover seed mix will include rye grass and annual
' lespedeza, both of which are annuals.
' As stated in Section 7.4, seeding will be conducted prior to the placement of the coir mat. The
only areas that will not receive the seed mix are the bottoms of the stream channels and the open
water portion of the wetland.
7.5.3 Mulching
' Mulch will be provided to all areas within the mitigation area, including the banks. Mulch
application will include 4,000 to 5,000 lb/acre grain straw (or equivalent cover).
7.6 WILDLIFE AMENITIES
Wildlife amenities such as duck boxes, bluebird boxes, and roosting trees will be incorporated
into the wetland mitigation area. In addition, several areas of downed trees or snags will be
brought into the wetland to provide cover and resting areas for reptiles and amphibians. Also,
' brush piles will be placed in upland areas adjacent to the stream channel for cover and nesting
habitat for birds.
8.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF SUCCESS CRITERIA
A five-year maintenance and monitoring period will be conducted for the stream and wetland
' mitigation area. Monitoring will be conducted every six months for the first two years after
construction and once a year for the following three years. Monitoring reports will be submitted
' after each monitoring period and will contain information describing the success of the site at the
time of the inspection, analyze the functions being provided, and provide an inventory of the
plant species and percent aerial coverage. Photographs of the mitigation areas will also be

-10-

C'
1
r

I
n

provided along with a written plan to correct any deficiencies identified during the monitoring
phase.
It is noted that the project will be deemed "successful" if the wetland mitigation area has at least
75 percent coverage of herbaceous vegetation present in all areas showing such vegetation on the
plans, with at least 85 percent of that coverage being provided by hydrophytic species. However,
it is acceptable if the species differ from those shown on the plans as long as those differing are
not undesirable or invasive species.
In closing, we believe that this Mitigation Plan provides adequate compensation for unavoidable
stream and wetland losses related to the landfill construction. If you have any questions, or
require any additional information, please call.
Respectfully submitted,
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
? J x 41
Daniel A. Maltese
Wetland Specialist
J?5
fill
William S. Almes, P.E.
Project Manager
DAM: WSA/lmw
Attachments
-11-

r

r

7
I
7
e

L

L

J

0

?7

r

FIGURES

Ce`tooerks '? Enon ion Pfafft 7 #' SYllle ?j ?4 GuMird'rL' v rc -v-
Yadkinville .Lewisville s \ f„ rt?? / H. ..Elc aren Url
13 1 421 J4 ?'Guiltad/? a A4/.P MCansvil 1e sK MeD
Hampt n ?n
?nvil e 4 3 ( >3r _ College ? 1 ibsonvi r4. ? O IO R\v O
7 1 3 = , 1 - O`?' ? 70 Sedali 1 low i
_ ne?lins o al ,_ 1 ,_ ;- ? ? +?uc 6 ro= M. ,
Lone - ? - ? 5 1 ? , ?(' ,'' 311 r `Y 6 r. r 1 22^IO Whitset I 8 + 1 4 19
Hickory armin °y 9 ?" so - edge3iel 1 y + e Ala1 5 6raha10', 10
1 ? 8 lemmons `' ? 6? S ,O O1 S s ' le
21 I - - - a urg
Derr E
601 6 158 tJ;. d q 52 1 ° 2 %OWN
t
Harm iyD A 8 4 A? 11 Advan 5 E Aresdia Hig a olntl4 Z o 1 5 6 Pleasant Garden t ALAMAN 11 uj
"Ag
e 161 1 elcomq itlwa 1 10 t 6 7 ,21 Kimei v' le I6 sliaha
Tur ersbur 6 ! O ornatzer 6 Ya in 8 A Thomasville ' e Ch?a ?E 3 rm¦ lion ?i Eli it'
'`w 1 MocsvIIle 6 6 Fork 7 ge 3 8 S * [US \ =flTr it ?! Glenols 1 Vol eCross , , 19 now Camp ,I
e S Li rt
d ? r /' ti116 Ofl , ? ,220 r 71oB 2 - . .-. _ ?
I 64 7 ludbn " , p -Res t
* 6 t Sophi O onodtheme Grays Chapel Crutchfield X•rds
+. , Cooleem' Ch eland yro *t S 0 Stale 9 :? ilk Hope' g
atesville Woodwe - D A V 70 ! 0 R A N D O L 6 P' H azl
S 3El .- I Clevel d/ S 11 sr. S ti I 5 j.•6a Franklinwl U 14 I
is / be 601 nwoo / II Ramseur
1 s Amity 7 6 70 q ow 70 8 / to o r I6 ? ? ' 19 138 City 64
O 8 4} 7 II ., itll } 1 Askeker iC 31(?`
man es Pop! IQ
Oswall + i s e
4, fe Salsbur ,. ° at nmont i 1 t e
,. , '
h?hd°s nt UI 1 SDenear , e I Fa m, 220 1, Mount Vernon S 1 1, 11
8 illbndte 9 ronite Quar 5 4 Coleridge
Donlon r I, 1 9onle
5 21 I r R OW 6 N love 1111111 Sprints 14Uw ARRI 1 Herr z°.i°,'°°' 2 1 Cres
hrna"Grov 3
Faith Crescent Goltlst
MA01le .-? 4 s 7
Ile 29A ockwall 1, Hill 6 ° s 5 a (Bennett Cum
I ? 0 Gul
Mount owns andr 'S 8 2 1urArn1w S 1 r .? Seagrove 1 11 Carp ton s
nR r _ E Mille iq \ 10 rt l? G'to Hru ent? l AT. Wnynot q
42 Rr
1 Devids 10' - -- -1blAbner • 19 S Westmoore
omelrui 19 annapolis ? Misenheim r APPROXIMATE 220 Hig al GI d Stoot ?
Tramwl
17
I it LOCATION OF PROPOSED / IA WR Ro s r?•1 `L E
3 untersllle O 3 CO d+ / New L, s pies
% I a 7 Moun Pleasant LANDFILL Attie 10 S 3 7
fond 3 `t ` 29 ! /9 6 3 2 arkwood
lqAv un ..i t. 2? • rot isco i O 0 R, t 6
3 21 Rvo `x ?7 r sr 1 5 S +Cartha¢e 1
A R U S/ Ikemarl' , O T 0 f=Rl? 22D 1 '
8
Lambert amorcon Hill Crest 3
Illy C Harrisburg 601 \ 5 8
S T A r' ? ? c,nd , wni perm[
r 2 inns 5
q Nawell? 6 R d Mine
Locus
q t n Partar ? Wade ' le , 12tH 3 age , even Lakes
ed Cross ( - oAw Spnngs Eastwood a
4 4 52 t E ry Wss 7 f' l
.+ 7 + Mi land t 4 •' .i?/leru> 7 B z. Lrkevil
h` r tte DakDor Q E? ..
-•?^` Allen tanfiel ACWR 2 4 /
1 4' ,? : q R 8 Pskin ' 7 DrIngn C 2 Manly
1 MI6 IQ a Rrn I yro 1 e .° cr..A Seri"[s Pinahw:t I OU Plfi 5
xi it 4 Norman 2 fr °rld Gdl 4
5 ECKLEG: airview
+K 31 ?S-
521 ke
'v a" 7 4 t Hill --
ew S -am 3 17

e
osli --*Abet ee p s G

601
o Stallings ,o
M 'lle
nionville a
0 S Pinebluff
Yi a
,
S

meville tndran 74 ,U I

77 II 4 14 g

°.

Ellerbe 1 . ' ] Meytie' gr,
l
?„•

U N

?"
1 0 N r l q
Falls R 6
I C H M 0 N
D
-
in
11 'ntra
5 •
Wed ington skers
t 4Marvi Monroe. .?.;-.. kIt °
11Z r Lake . of an
220 5°ndhil4 R- A- -
t A4it . 7 1 - - ° O 74 9 RObertla Marsto 4 p7 Z$ Ti Berland
' 4 Wmtate Marshville 6 Pea bed 7 ilesville Raefor

k Hill su '< azhsw 4 Miners
? 2W • Sprints
r A
11 r ?
k* 77
/
And..
12
5 White Store
II , e Car va SCOT
Hamlet?k D
a¢ram Anl
l?x..n
'
s
' k? 601 r
Morven /
11 74 7
S e
9
8 6 ?
t.
N AOLi 13
5 1
4 52
M
F
`L? 8
, Old Hundre
5
'n t --J. _
-
S CAROLnIA
6 7 _ -
3 ? a an
c 3
6 Ghi
awel Hil I " Red 5
.
A 5 ,
I
Croghon 4
t
7 6
7 7 7 LaUff?llaknf
7 1 Wa
1.t
st
-
-
* 9
.
4 Page and 7
5 to 77 ib ' t .
tier
b
t {
2
21
9 hestarfi
* Id azton I
aw S 4 O ancaster _ 5 8 4 11 t 6
ros
7 Johns/, 5 Imai
8 l0
52 e
12 Chera •
i 7
15
9 /
1 401
3 ' R 6?
41
1 8

Jefferson t
7
McCo7 0 Hastr? 8
Si• 1 8 i
3 Roemon
?
/ .... _...-._....__?___._.._.... ._...._.__._._.__?....,, _.
rS? _._. _?.._.?,.,,,--?.?.,?_ __M. _ ._,_ _?...._.......-. _.?5,.. 10 5
_._RO . .l Ville 5
REFERENC
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAP
APPROXIMATE SCALE
17 0 17
PITTSBURGH. PA.
W
V
DRAWN BY
JAM
65/05/9
NC.
.
RALEIGH, ?IArI?NI l W
CHECKED BY DAM 5/7jQg
WETLAND MmGAT1oN PLAN
APPROVED BY DAM 5/7114
PREPARED FOR SCALE DRAWI NG NO.
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. ANSON COUNTY SOUD WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY AS NOTED 98-632-A2
CONSULTING ENGINEERS ANSON COUNTY. NORTH CAROUNA FIGURE NO. 1

-195

c
j
APPRC
LOCAL
PROP(

774
--
1
?.?: . ?.,
?4
I,
(MATE -APPROXIMATE
)N OF LOCATION OF
PIED'-LANDFILL OSED
?.r\. -
ROP r128
_..-- -P
WETLAND' MITIGATION
i.' a7
t
r _
i r
15
t`
i
J -, ?--.

a
t? I
REFERENCE
S
C A L E
U.S.G.S. 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE
MAP OF POLKTON, N.C., DATED 1970, AND

RUSSELLVILLE, N.C., DATED 2000
1971. 0 2000 FEET
PITTSBURGH, PA.
BECKLEY. WV
U
S
G
S
SITE LOCATION MAP DRAWN BY JHG 3/05/9
RALEIGH, C.
RALEIGH,
BRISTOL, VA. A.
A .
.
.
.
CHECKED BY
- EASTON, PA. WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN
3?rr??
PREPARED FOR APPROVED BY q
SCALE DRAWING NO.
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. ANSON COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY AS NOTED 98-632-A1
CONSULTING ENGINEERS ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA FIGURE NO. 2