19970972 Ver 1_Mitigation Plan_20010120

n

1

1

f

DRAFT
PROJECT NO.: R98-632-686
MAY 1998
ATTACHMENT2
REPORT
WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN
ANSON COUNTY SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT FACILITY
WADESBORO, ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
CHAMBERS WASTE SYSTEMS OF NORTH CAROLINA
A SUBSIDIARY OF ALLIED SERVICES, LLC
WADESBORO, ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ALIVIES & ASSOCIATES INC.
CO N SU LT I N G E N GI N E E RS
PITTSBURGH, PA
BECKLEY, WV
RALEIGH, NC
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Carolina Region TRANSMITTAL FORM
111 Commonwealth Court, Suite 104
Cary, North Carolina 275114464
[phone] Fax: [phone]
Allik
To: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attention: Mr. Alan Davis
Project No. R98-632-686
Date: May 15, 1998
If enclosures are not as noted,
please inform us immediately
We Transmit:
¦ Herewith ? Under Separate Cover
For Your:
? Approval ? Record
¦ Review & Comment ? As Requested
? Use ? Signature
The Following:
? Drawings ? Laboratory Data
? Specifications ? Field Data
¦ Document(s) ? Other
Copies Date No. Description
1 05/98 -- Draft Report - Wetland Mitigation Plan
Anson County Solid Waste Management Facility
Remarks: Mr. Davis,
Enclosed is a draft copy of the above referenced plan for review. Please contact me at
919-319-1187 if you have any questions.
By: William S. Almes, P.E.uXW
Copies To: R98-632-686 File, B. Gard. S. Roberts, D. Maltese
Mid-Atlantic Region, 124 Philpott Lane, Beaver, WV 25813 [phone] Fax: [phone]
Northern Region, Four Triangle Drive, Suite 200, Export, PA 15632-9255 [phone] Fax: [phone]
1

G

REPORT
WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN
D2AFT
PROJECT NO.: R98-632-686
MAY 1998
' ANSON COUNTY SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT FACILITY
WADESBORO, ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

C

1

f33 CAR 3251 I Expires October 1996
blic reporting burden for this c-zilection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions.
arching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed. and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
omments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information. including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information0perations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite
204, Arlington. VA 22202-4302: and to the Office of Management and Budget. Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Washington, DC
0503. Please DO NO RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
risdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
utharity: 33 USC 401, Section 10: 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting,
avigable waters of the United States, the ni charge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged
material for the purpose of dumping it into ocaan waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application
f r a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be
rocassed nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (sae sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
ctivity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
t APPLICATION NO. 12. FIELD OFFICE CODE 'I 3. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
117EMS SELCW Ta SE FILLED SY APPLICANT
. APPLICANT'S NAME W. Brian Card, Regional Engineer 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE fan agent is nor•requfredr
Chambers Waste Systems of North Carol' , Daniel Maltese, Wetland Specialist
subsidiary of Allred Services, LLC
?. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS
3358 Highway 51 North S. AGENT'S ADDRESS
Almes & Associates, L-.c.
Fort Mill, SC 29715 111 Commonwealth Court, Suite 104
Cary, NC 27511-4464
APPLICANT'S P40NE NOS. W/AAEA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. WrAREA COOE
a. Residents a. Residence
b. Business [phone] b. Business [phone]
m i. STATEhII!N OF AUTHORIZATION '
1 hereby authorize, Almes & Associates, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
?urnish, upon request. supplemental intibrmation in support of this permit applica::cn.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
2. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE tsee lnsuuc:iensl
Anson County Solid Waste Management Facility
Proposed Wetland Mitigation
13. NAME OF `lIATERSOOY, IF KNOWN ar,pwk are 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS atiasi eaorer
The proposed mitigation is located adjacent to an
existing wetland which discharges to Brown Creek
MIS. LOCATION OF PROJECT N/A - see enclosed figures
Anson North Carolina
'. COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, lseeinsrrueacmi
Latitude: 350 00' 10" Longitude: 80° 10' 25"
The site is approximately 1 mile east of Polkton, NC, just South of the existing CSX railroad.
7. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
' From the East: Go through Wadesboro on U.S. Route 74. Approx. 5 miles on the right imm kto Boylin
Road. Turn left before you cross the railroad tracks onto the dirt road. The site is 0.9 miles
from where you turn onto the dirt road.
From the West: U.S. Route 74 to Polkton. Approx. 2 miles past Pokon, turn left onto Boylin Road (follow
directions above).
?ENG FORCA 4245, Feb 94 EDITION OF SEP 91 IS OESOLETE_ lrrapanent: l cam -
Id. Nature of Activity (Desenpnon of poiecr. indude e// /?arurey
Allied will construct approximately 3.3 acres of wetlands as a result of the construction of a municipal '
solid waste landfill. The wetland construction will result in the unavoidable fill of 1.6 acres of wetlands in
which Allied will replace at 2:1 ratio. The mitigation site is located in an upland area and will tie into an
existing wetland, which is located adiscim to Brown Creek.
19. Project Purpose !Describe the meson or purpose of the proiect see kuvo gtia w
The purpose of the wetland mitigation pmj.= is to compensate for the loss of existing wetland habitats. '
Although it would be very difficult to si6e a large landfill in the region without impacting any streams or
wetlands, Allied intends to minimize unavoidable fills and provide compensation for wetlands that will be
lost.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Construction of the landfill, supporting facilities, erosion and sedimentation control str,es '
(Refer to the attached Wetland Mitigation Plan)
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Some wetlands areas will be excavated in order to achieve base grades for the proposed landfill and some
wetlands will be filled depending on the landfill footprjnt.
2:. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled ism lasoucrions/
1.6 acres of wetlands are anticipated to be filled. Wetlands soils will be excavated, stockpiled and reused
within the mitigation area. '
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners. Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach'a suppiemental list).
All property surrounding the mitigation site is owned by Allied. CSX has a right of way through the '
property and a 150-foot setback from the center of the railroad tracks (on both sides) will be recognized.
25, tut of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED '
Allied submitted a Construction Plan Application for the proposed solid waste management facility to the
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources in August, 1996 (revised December 1997
and January 1998). Permit approval is pending. ,
'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this
application is complete and accurate. 1 further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
duly authorized agent of the applicant.
S1 /9e.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly '
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or ,
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
'U.S.GPO:1904.52 0-4 7 8/8 20 1 8 ¦

0

n

u

WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN
ANSON COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
CHAMBERS WASTE SYSTEMS OF NORTH CAROLINA
A SUBSIDIARY OF ALLIED SERVICES, LLC
WADESBORO, ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
3.0 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
4.0 IMPACTED WETLANDS
5.0 CALCULATION OF WETLAND ACREAGE
6.0 DISCRIPTION OF PROPOSED MITIGATION SITE
7.0 WETLAND CONSTRUCTION
7.1 EXCAVATION TO BASE GRADES
7.2 PLACEMENT AND PREPARTION OF WETLAND SOILS
7.3 PLANTING, SEEDING AND MULCHING
7.4 WILDLIFE AMENITIES
8.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATING OF SUCCESS CRITERIA
9.0 CLOSING
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE
I VICINITY MAP
2 U.S.G.S. SITE LOCATION MAP
3 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS MAP
4 SITE PLAN
5 SEEDING AND PLANTING PLAN
6 CROSS SECTIONS
DAFT
PAGE NO.
1
1
1
2
3
4
5
5
6
6
8
8
9

n
0
n
DR,AFT
WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN
ANSON COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
CHAMBERS WASTE SYSTEMS OF NORTH CAROLINA
A SUBSIDIARY OF ALLIED SERVICES, LLC
WADESBORO, ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1.0 INTRODUCTION

f]

F
On behalf of Chambers Waste Systems of North Carolina, a subsidiary of Allied Services, LLC
(Allied), Almes & Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers (ALMES) has prepared this Wetland
Mitigation Plan for work related to the proposed construction of the Anson County Solid Waste
Management Facility located near Wadesboro, Anson County, North Carolina. Construction of
the proposed landfill will impact some areas of jurisdictional wetlands. This plan is intended to
provide details of the proposed mitigation work.
2.0 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The objective of the proposed mitigation is to provide wetland habitat that will compensate for
the loss of wetlands. It is the Owner's intent to construct at least twice as much wetland habitat
as that which will be lost as a result of landfill construction. In addition to providing greater
surface area, it is anticipated that the replacement wetlands will provide a more diverse habitat
than what is currently available.
Although it would be very difficult to site a large landfill project in the region without impacting
any streams or wetlands, the purpose of this plan is to minimize unavoidable impacts and provide
compensation for those wetlands that will be lost.
3.0 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
' The entire proposed landfill site is located off U.S. Route 74 between Polkton and Wadesboro,
' North Carolina (Refer to the Vicinity Map presented in Figure No. 1 and a U.S.G.S. Site

fl
0
n

'I
Ll

DRAFT
Location Map in Figure No. 2). The proposed landfill site is bordered to the south by the
existing CSX Railroad right-of-way, to the north and west by Brown Creek, and to the east by
Pinch Gut Creek. All drainage from the proposed landfill site eventually flows into either Brown
Creek or Pinch Gut Creek via numerous unnamed tributaries. The drainage patterns for surface
water flows are shown on Figure No. 3 - Existing Site Conditions Map along with the property
boundaries and other general site features. The wetlands that will be lost as a result of the
proposed landfill are also shown on the drawing.
The proposed mitigation site is located just south of the existing CSX railroad tracks on the
western side of the property. The property borders the eastern edge of a large existing shrub-
scrub wetland along the banks of Brown Creek.
4.0 IMPACTED WETLANDS
The wetlands that will be impacted are located adjacent to several small unnamed tributaries to
Pinch Gut Creek. In general, the tributaries are wet weather channels carrying surface water
during periods of heavy rain. Some of the channels are deeply incised (up to 5 feet) and contain
little to no substrate. It should be noted that the Owner does not intend to develop, or in any way
disturb, the forested wetlands located adjacent to Pinch Gut Creek or Brown Creek. In addition,
this project will not disturb areas within the floodplain which have been identified at or below
the 250 foot contour elevation (refer to Figure No. 3).
The impacted wetlands along the banks of the unnamed, intermittent, tributaries provide some
level of wildlife habitat; however, due to the sparse vegetation, small size of the areas, lack of
substrate in the stream bottoms, and limited composition of vegetation, these areas are not
considered significant (in terms of providing food, cover, nesting, or spawning habitats). Other
wetland functions such as storage of floodwaters, nutrient cycling, groundwater recharge,
pollution filtration, etc. are probably being provided, but to a very limited or negligible degree.
The impacted wetland acreage along the intermittent stream banks includes approximately 0.5
acres.
-2-
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS \\ALMES-RALEIGH\AAIPROJ\Oocuments\Allied-686\Anson Co. LF\R98.632\R98-632.rpt.doc

f

1

D?-,%,AFT
The wetland to be impacted at the base of the unnamed tributaries occupies approximately 1.1
acres. The area has been created as a result of the previous construction of an access road across
the tributary. Water flows beneath the road via a culvert and eventually discharges into Pinch
Gut Creek. This wetland area has a higher value and provides more functions than those
wetlands along the stream banks.
Vegetation within the wetlands to be impacted consist of the following species:
Common Name Scientific Name Stratum
- ^
Red Maple Acer rubrum Tree

Black Willow
Salix nigra _
Tree
Wild Rose _ Rosa sp. Shrub
Greenbriar Smilax sp. _
Herb
Virginia Creeper Parthenocissus quinquefolia Vine
Soft Rush _ ?Juncus effusus _
Emergent
Lurid Sedge Carex lurida Emergent
Mstlebract Sedge Carex tribuloides Emergent
Foxtail Sedge Carex vulpinoidea u Emergent
Fowl Mannagrass Glyceria striata Grass
5.0 CALCULATION OF WETLAND ACREAGE
Through prior conversations and field visits with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), it
was decided that an average width of 5 feet along the intermittent tributaries would be
representative in defining the limits of wetlands. This 5-foot average was then multiplied by the
entire length of tributaries being affected by the proposed landfill to calculate a total disturbed
wetland acreage (refer to Figure No. 3). A total of 1.6 acres of wetlands will be impacted as a
result of landfill construction (0.5 acres for stream wetland acreage and 1.1 acres for the wetland
at the base of the tributaries).
Allied proposes to mitigate for the loss of wetlands using a minimum of a 2:1 ratio. That is, for
every acre of wetlands disturbed, 2 acres will be replaced. A minimum of 3.2 acres of wetlands
-3-
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS \\ALMES-RALEIGH\AAIPROJ\Documents\Allled-686\Anson Co. LF\R98-632\R98-632.rp1.doC

1

DRAFT
will be created. There is a relatively high degree of confidence that the replacement wetland will
be successful given the known hydrology and presence of thriving vegetation within adjacent
wetlands.
6.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED MITIGATION SITE
The proposed mitigation site consists of a mixed deciduous and conifer upland forest located on
the eastern edge of an existing wetland. The mitigation area will expand and enhance the
existing wetland and provide additional habitats for wildlife. Due to the somewhat remote
location, this area will be protected from future development and will become part of the, existing
wetland ecosystem.
The mitigation site will be located adjacent to and around an unnamed intermittent tributary
which discharges into the existing wetland. While the existing wetland will provide the majority
of water for the proposed mitigation site, the upgradient drainage area (85 acres) will provide an
additional supply of water via the tributary.
Topographic change is somewhat abrupt at the edge of the existing wetland and can be identified
by a change in vegetative communities at the wetland/nonwetland boundary. The presence of
open water within the existing wetland can also be used to assist in defining the edge of the
existing wetland.
Vegetation within the wetlands surrounding the proposed mitigation site has been identified to
aid in the design of the mitigation wetland. Specifically, the vegetation proposed for planting
within the mitigation area will reflect those species native to the area and within adjacent
wetlands. It is anticipated that, over time, additional wetland vegetation will most likely become
established within the constructed wetland. The following species of vegetation have been
identified with the wetlands adjacent to the proposed mitigation site.
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
' CONSULTING ENGINEERS
-4-
\\ALMES-RALEIGH\AAIPROJ\Documents\Allied-686\Anson Co. LF\R98-632\R98-632.rpt.doc

DRAFT
Common Name Scientific Name Stratum
i
Red Maple Acer rubrum Tree
Black Willow Salix nigra Tree
Common Alder Alnus serrulata Tree and shrub
Soft Rush Juncus effusus Emergent
Bladder Sedge Carex intumescens Emergent
Bristlebract Sedge Carex tribuloides Emergent
Fringed Sedge Carex crinita Emergent
Foxtail Sedge Carex vulpinoidea Emergent
Smartweed Polygonaceae sp. j Emergent
Lizards Tail Saururus cernuus I Emergent i
Watermilfoil Myriophyllum sp. Aquatic Bed
7.0 WETLAND CONSTRUCTION
The viability and survival of the mitigated wetland is dependent upon the proper hydrologic
conditions. Site grading by the wetland contractor will be a critical factor in establishing a
proper hydrologic setting for wetland plant survival and growth. The following sections provide
details of wetland construction. Refer to Figure Nos. 4, 5, and 6 for the Site Plan, Seeding and
Planting Plan, and Cross Sections related to the wetland mitigation.
7.1 EXCAVATION TO BASE GRADES
' The proposed wetland mitigation area will be initially cleared and grubbed. It is anticipated that
any timber with value will be removed and sold.
' The contractor will over-excavate soils within the wetland mitigation area to 6 inches below the
final grades, as shown on Figure No. 4.
The wetland contractor will be responsible for providing all surveying services related to:
1) establishing the limits of the mitigation area;
2) establishing wetland grades; and
3) establishing the limits of each vegetative zone within the mitigation area.
' -5-
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
' CONSULTING ENGINEERS \\ALMES-RALEIGH\AAIPROJ\Documents\Allied-686\Anson Co. LF\R98-632\R98-632.rpt.doc

d

7.2 PLACEMENT AND PREPARATION OF WETLAND SOILS
W-
DR, ik?? T
Soils from the larger wetland (near the access road) are to be removed and stockpiled until the
grades within the mitigation area have been established. The re-use of these soils within the
mitigation area will provide a "seed bank for the germination and establishment of wetland
plants. If the wetland soils are to be stockpiled, that is, they would not be directly excavated and
transported to the mitigation area, long, furrow-like stockpiles are strongly recommended (no
higher than 5 feet high) in order to prevent composting which would kill any seeds within the
soils.
The contractor will then transport, place, and grade stockpiled wetland soils throughout the entire
wetland mitigation area according to the final grades shown in Figure No. 4. If required, off-site
soils containing at least 10 percent organic matter can be used to supplement, but not replace, on-
site wetland soils.
Following general site grading and placement of six inches of wetland soils by the contractor,
lime and fertilizer will be applied at rates determined on the basis of soil tests.
It will be critical for the site to be graded as specified. To a limited degree, the plantings can be
adjusted based on slight differences in grading; however, the plants within each zone have
specific water requirements and too much or too little water would affect the survivability of
individual plants.
7.3 PLANTING SEEDING AND MULCHING

Seeding and planting of the mitigated wetland will include four zones: the Aquatic Vegetation
Zone (0.89 acres), the Herbaceous Vegetation Zone (0.87 acres), the Shrub/Tree Vegetation
Zone (0.75 acres) and the Bank Stabilization Zone (0.77 acres). No seed will be applied to the
open water of the Aquatic Vegetation Zone.
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
-6-
\\ALMES-RALEIGH\AAIPROJ\Documents\Allied-686\Anson Co. LF\R98-632\R98-632.rpt.doc
D

11,

n

It is recommended that the wetland be planted in the spring between April and May or in the fall
between September and October.
7.3.1 ' Planting
If the plants are to be stored for any time prior to planting, a temporary holding area will be
constructed to stage plants prior to installation. The holding area will be constructed out of 6 by
6 landscape timbers draped with an impermeable liner. All water dependent plants will be set
into the lined area and saturated with water. In addition, netting will be hung above the plants to
reduce stress and loss of moisture from direct sunlight.
All plants will be installed within the four zones as shown on the plan drawing. The limits of
these zones will be surveyed and marked in the field. The surveyed limits will establish the
limits of each planting zone and provide a boundary for the wetland planters.
Plants within each zone will be planted in such a manner as to resemble the most natural setting
possible. Plants will be installed at the same depth in the ground which they were grown at the
nursery. Plants that need to be supported will be staked in the field.
7.3.2 Seeding
Seeding within the wetland mitigation area should be in accordance with the wetland seed
mixtures specified on Figure No. 5. A temporary ground cover within the wetland mitigation
area has been specified that will provide erosion control and cover until that wetland seeds can
germinate and become established. The ground cover seed mix will include rye and annual
lespedeza, which are annuals.
For erosion control on the graded bank slope, a permanent seed mixture that includes tall fescue,
sericea lespedeza, and kobe lespedeza will be sown following grading activities
-7-
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS \\ALMES-RALEIGH\AAIPROJ\Documents\Allled-686\Anson Co. LF\R98-632\R98-632.rpt.doc

F

r.

7.3.3 Mulching
DR1i`._,t1T
Mulch will be provided to all areas within the mitigation area, including the banks. Mulch
application will include 4,000 to 5,000 lb/acre grain straw (or equivalent cover). For the 2:1
slopes, the mulch will be anchored by tacking with asphalt, roving, or netting.
7.4 WILDLIFE AMENITIES
Certain wildlife amenities such as duck boxes, nesting platforms, roosting trees, etc. will be
incorporated into the wetland mitigation area as deemed appropriate and feasible by the Owner
and the Wetlands Planner. In addition, several areas of downed trees or snags will be brought
into the wetland to provide cover and resting areas for reptiles and amphibians.
8.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF SUCCESS CRITERIA
A three-year maintenance and monitoring period is recommended for the mitigated wetlands.
Reports will be submitted every six months for the first two years after construction and once for
the following year. The monitoring reports will contain information describing the success of
the site at the time of the inspection, analyze the functions being provided, and provide an
inventory of the plant species and percent aerial coverage. Photographs of the mitigated wetland
will also be provided along with a written plan to correct any deficiencies identified during the
monitoring phase.
It is noted that the project will be deemed "successful" if the wetland mitigation area has at least
75 percent coverage of herbaceous vegetation present in all areas showing such vegetation on the
plans, with at least 85 percent of that coverage being provided by hydrophytic species. However,
it is acceptable if the species differ from those shown on the plans if those differing are not
undesirable or invasive species.
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
-8-
\\ALMES-RALEIGH\AAIPROJ\Oocuments\Allied-686\Anson Co. LF\R98-632\R98-632.rpt.doc

i
1
1
1
1
1
1

9.0 CLOSING
In closing, we trust that this Wetland Mitigation Plan is sufficient for your needs at this time.
The only warranty or guarantee made by ALMES in connection with services performed for this
project is that such services were performed with the care and skill ordinarily exercised by
reputable members of the profession practicing under similar conditions at the same time and the
same or similar locality. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made or intended by
rendition of these consulting services or by furnishing oral or written reports of the findings
made.
If you have any questions, or require any additional information, please call.
Respectfully submitted,
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS

William S. Almes, P.E.
Project Manager
Dka".c k. Mme. /wp
Daniel A. Maltese
Wetland Specialist
-9-
ALMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS P:\Documents\A111ed-686\Anson Co. LF\R98-632\R98.632.rpt.doc

J

H
1
H

?Il

7

11
Center ^ • ;1c Enon on q /r ru-; v n v a7 Gle ?'
rooks O 7 Pfaflt 1 S ? J lrae $rlHe?• • 1Gulld' Llo Burlin on
Y sdkin ille Lewisville s \ 1 fas °/r/'? j C i T iven
3 i 421 a J, SIn d U O1' AI'I Mc?,?ansvil ibsona I'a \* JO O Meb
Hamptrnvde 1 ] 1( 1 ?. Cdlaga..Tc: I 'O wRryQ
7 1 I - -, 1 O ?„ 10 Sedah 7
r neMins i SA 66
Lone - - p -\? e 5 •' ? ? , ' 31 I ? 5 * r t 2' to WMtse6 I 6 +, ? 1 u
Hickory armor s w _ _ edge?iel 1 + Alamanc 6rahal 0
' 6 sdaf ICS PppAr?10 1 5 i, or S s Ie
21 1 601 6 158 To•.Vi-d g • urg I o TtiG1t?II ?I .. 8 \ 5/
Harmony 8 6N Advan 5 rcadla h 52 Hig olnti 0 1 5 2 PII\sant Gordon a ALAMAN 12 r 17
f 16ID A 1 12 E 9, bway 9 11 10 8? 5 6 ' 421 Klmesv Is 1s ass I
6 hen
Turgersbm' 6 1 ° ornatzer Ya in a Ic Tkomas1111! ?11Tr It / • Chdaie '\i ma J -i EI t
19
Mockswill 6 Fork ge 3 5 * gals 6 21; Glenoli eval Cross , , Snow Camp
64 5 ' 2 6d r? 3 ?• e 31l 5 = 2 Li art
e 1'°dbe go \ eed ISIl 06 4? ?'` 220 zbe - - ----
6 r J $ophi O ,yptwjl Grays Chapel Crutchfield X rtls
+ , Cooleem, Ch chland ? '*' S 0 1 $tale 9 8
atesrllle woodlear k•» D A "° 0 5 0 R l A N D 0' L 6 p 10 Fi 421 lk Hope
9` / 5 1 ) 5 Franklmvil I/
Qs5 T Elmwood Clevel irDe it
5 601 5r nwoo I , 6du ? I1
h Amity / l 10 9 5 ow 70 4 10 1 16 64 Rsmsou I- ? 6a
n 6 n a ° 4e t Ste City
Spe
o-'• Oswalt ear Popl
nm._.• /e p Satisbur o° " ''?' ' {„ " a I? I I Asbebor e I C e A
P • 7 ast\ hmont S
n? d• nt UI I SDancar e 1 Fsrmsr: 220 it 1 , Mount Vei S mQs 12
ranlts Duer 5 ! Coleridge \
e dlbrldge 9 , ?- Demon 1¦ I Bon1s 3
w 5 21 I ' R 0 W e , N raye ?? r ishng Springs I' UwARR1 .. 71 " C 2.w.a,°" I Cree
I 1 5 ? r.rl ,
hma?rov
r 1 Faith Crescent i1 pock 6 FF`1 4 5 ? IBennatt ?Idst 3 Cumn[
u4e He 29A 9 ockwell Tu. 4v.r jsc*loe Hill e 6' I •5 , 0 Gut
x Seagrove Caro ton
?Jr Mount owns soda r.u 5 r°? r II e
anon - ?e G'Id Hdl LIZ NAT 1 /
t2
1Erro h_dle • `?1 \ 10 Wnynot - nC4:
n.?;l O Dav.ds 10 - - - - - - Abner ^. 19 5 Westmoors )
Mrsmhe7',- APPROXIMATE Stoo 210 ?i HIg lly Glandryf
«12 / 3 ?ldvrell t 91? annapolis H1l LOCATION OF PROPOSED 7 ACWR Rob s ' ta ` Tramw.
ncord+ -, E
ha °••n
untefsvnle Moon Pleasant e ` 29 1 „ LANDFILL - , - press 2 3 2 ark, ood
Qrrrne FOR j Star
nrm ' 3
19 rov al 3 0 O R 501 t 6
p(/ sq
R U S,? III mark t Sl ?IONT OMER 5 9 +c.rth.ge
e // ?. zzo 7
Oily Herlsburg Rwd Lam eftT A r 5 Cand 1 HIII Crest 1 Wh
c-c 601 ' smarten
paring
t 'Newell` 6 d-' Locust II 1 Porte 1 - Wadovdle nor, 31 agl 1 even Lakes ' 2 ores 5
\ Springs
ad Cross ( 52 tO? b, 5 ?1 .eli E. Eastwood as
MI land 2 1 2 rY was 7 e Lakevn
' haf^ r?otte+ Dakbor T ?,;
Allen Lnhel ACWR c e -W,-• nt G) 7 9 5 6 1 1 r . III j 1 t 4 ,
g R: ] Pakln ,, Jackson 1(-1
? 2 Manly >!
f MIl1 III 8 R- i I ydro 7 1-n C,..? _ _ - Springs 3 •'
V?de;1.nur.t Du Pines
7 / ? I i ? Alo.•n? Norman id Gd, ? ,•.
5 ECKLE C?G? - - s,-,aw r,ailof s ,..4 W-d. P
11 ?5 ew Salami I Hill ; 17 osfi -Abor ee i YbRi SAG
521 R. ?' IllatthCW$ ' - I 3 .o i 5 Vi ago Pinebluff 1 ?
9 y _•C Stallings 601 Unlonvlne I A. Ile ey, Noy Height
1nevtlle Indio 7a 10 12 11 / 21 g za Ellerbe I 1 ?yy?,,... .
5 6 Trad 13 I Bleu'eIf 6 't' in 9
° U N I O N ' F,,,_, R I C H M O N D- , 2 Monti°„
5 I ? of Wed mQtpn sites Monroe+ I kt ill, T 220 S-dh,11. R.•. Ar•° off an
L -
xt Mil ` i - I - O O 7,1 1i r 9 Roberdel Marst r 27 8 Tim Derl and
Wingate Marahvdle 6 Pea[hland 7 Ilesville Reefor
+wadeabor - - 6 : an, '- +
k Hill 521 'it Miners .M I A * s N De `S D k*n?haD '' 401
7Washow' Springs 12 17
5 Aid... 11 white store i , 9 ya * • Hamletsk , SCOT D wagram Anl
7vt+r°? 601 I Maven 11
2 74
nnror?co7 ,
5 1 5,. P1. 9 6 1 I 13 1 e -
8 4 52 y} Old Hundre 6 s -
N AOUNA McFa an 6 Gh- 5 3 - Red S
13 e 7 S CAAIINA - - - 3 - - - - -'f - - - ' - - ?11reI Hit `s 2* l unnbnrl
z 5 1 9 t. Croghan / ' 7 7 ` ' 7 I I ' sic Eject ova
urin
? * 1 1 Page antl 2 10 77 axton
ibs +
g Y 5 hestefi Id is so 5 ?1a 2
21 lma
12 t 7 r J°hns/
aw ancaster 5 e 9 , 1s 1
521 2 10 12 e e Chera 7 1 Mccol ° ?• Hastr? ' 3 R 6?
} 6 `
Jefferson ? 10 v y ?/5 3 Raemm
REFERENC
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAP APPROXIMATE SCALE
17 0 17
PITTSBURGH, PA.
BECKLEY, WV DRAWN By JAM 5/05/9
.
RALEIGH. NC. ?ICINII 1 MAP CHECKED BY DAM 5171gq
WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN APPROVED By D11 VA PREPARED FOR SCALE DRAWING NO.
ANSON COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY AS NOTED 98-632-A2
ALIAES dt ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS ANSON COUNTY, NOM-H CAROLINA FIGURE NO. 1

0

u

I'?\
; \ /
?y
ry
? \'
?
?
t
?./?-•. ? ?,?_ \ I,$
296
340
O BR 246 c?`?- .?
l
,"
? Vu
?
??? ? o ? •?? y
?? ',??I\???eek - ?- Asa --- - _? ,
30-0 i x, ??. ` .
t o L-., -

C uf6§ r - I
lu p
l_ .? w'? 75 ?? a ?a
?
.r- a r

74,
PRO IMF ?.
DFiL
260
_
? ?G to e Ppison: 49 .._?
am p ----??.
(c
J ?? ae 21 4
_
400
-ze

? , _330
i,

o
tiitYChaPel
Rus
ns,

REFERENC
U.S.G.S. 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE APPROXIMATE SCALE
MAP OF POLKTON, N.C., DATED 1970, AND 2000

RUSSELLVILLE, N.C. DATED 1971. 0 momili
2000 FEET
P
BECKLEY. ITTSBURGH. PA.
C.

U
S
G
DRAWN BY
JAM
5/05/9
RALEIGH, .
.
.S. SITE LOCATION MAP
CHECKED BY

WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN APPROVED BY DAM 5171Q11
PREPARED FOR

INC
CO ? ?
ANSON COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY SCALE
AS NOTED DRAWING NO.
98-632-A1
'
. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ANSON COUNTY, NOM CAROLINA FIGURE NO. 2
O O
N N
` . U)
U
QQ
. .NWZO.
a4°.E
N '
U
?S 1
I
I
I.
N
O
M
O
10
O
8
O
d
O
g
O
M
O
M
O
N
O
N
O
O
r
O
O
V-

O

0 O
0
., N
A
ill
U,
?O ? O

N

i

O o
r ?
o? m O
? ? N Z
a 62
z?
00
N '
J
0 OD
FR
U O
Z
;3 a N
a
a
Q
o ?
?a z le ?j
U % a O
9
z
g ?
v
o
M
d
M
m
N
N
Q
O N
N
V
O
O
to
0

N N
N
I I I I
^O
N c00
04 1? 0
N N

N N N