19970972 Ver 1_401 Application_19971117

r 0 ,- .
199203131
?S:+C30Nw=DE P=?24T_= tL?.^ciT---D {??C'l==E NT+T_CN4T=7L 2E?.`r"- Ir 26
PRE -COvS'T' RUC==Oiv NOT 1-7 ' CAT-I

C: L7S CF
401. CZ=-
: 3) C^.CR7 =-CH r"'?• NC D v _S20N CT C=--LS'
77ON
017997
CR=G=,T;_. AM (3) C= 7T C?
.?Z7
.. CE-----=- OF = c=R s CP =iG =-?s (sue :.G?ic-? AnnR :ss-- s?.?)
(7) COPI?S S v^^Uii,D BE Sc v^' TO Dsv_s=ON OF F.w=3CN ?1'r ?i-G=?= -
(Szz AG iCY ADDRESS---S S=:) ? . OWNERS NAME

Chambers Development of North Carolina, Inc.
2. M.A=7:. C- ADDF.ESS: P.O. BOX 219
SufiDiviS=ON NAME:
C-=. Pineville N.C. z T 2 CODE: 28134
.. FsS' =NC" iG SunD=v:_CN N? (-- D_:-_.?V= _ CIS
_L--IN G :CDR= ce =Ow') : North side of uS Hi hwa ' 74
Wadesboro, Anson County, North Carolina
:. Tr-.?? ONL NuY-=- cR (woo- :) , 803-547-3184
i
N7-'''a G Fc=..=CNS -? COR_OR?LT: OFT-TCIr=_,,
o ONE NUMBER: Brian Card
Container Corp of Carolina. P.O. Box 219, Pineville N.C. 28134
803-547-3184
S. LJGTtON OF WORK ?-=, P4==FF-;LBL COPY OF IISGS TOPOCR.?= G
° OR AE -??, °-OTOGRA2!E: W"v sc;.LE) • .rv. Wadesboro, NC
COQNTY: Anson County Nc?=51 TOWN OR
1

M NkY
- O T.>+ 0 a
?. H
a- ??O •i
.o c:>
IN
y
t7 t-1 - IA > t7 C»?
1y M M 1: _f
H
io i! -1
H p
Inn
M

I
? go -V In to r-
?
? In In
?
is
-t 9=
O 7 a A C
O Q 1 7 Q to G. C.
.
to?Q}=_ Im ?!t•+ A x to
I
o
? LA :7 A iA -
10
? ti• .a
= l .o
!-
? m
.o
0
CGS 10
_
- =!
1=
?
- 0 -
DNIA A O
1^ N
D7
? MO
le N
?- J -10-1 to
7
.
1
Im ? 17 < -C is I
-• •+ O O
-- •+ IA
a -7 O
m •- 0 = Im n T = a-
J} - 11
1 fK a to . 7
+ O -1 D ?
(?
tm .
a -I -r
m w -f I--
tltl
-+ Ln a -c -
0
m w - } •a [9 u - 9 7 Ita 17 a Itn
a -- u0`o v = la u •- m
r - al nr -
I I'f a - 1 } m
I I P
:n 1 u 17 -.

- •- -1== • J -f
+ to .:!
Iln - Im
09 n=t in ?+ - <
a <> Ln N :-1
Na
-- m b Its at :F 119 u m-1 O N

1
• LO 1*3
IDO 0 N D '• O 9
7 p_
t
J }

r _
1
T?
04 O } 00 A
A IA J -t a -n rn
A NO -t
ti tm a -
In n

n Lo tJl to L! rl n } }

n r1 0 A
i7 q
?
0 - G
0 ?
l
-1
O -

•
iC?<m? `o?C?OQ-- m-1
0
C. 0 7 < 373
N
9
= V y
N O
t4 CD m

u A=
7
.1
ov ??
Y -O
0
70 - o --
L*C -_ ao

%A w - J > - } y

u0 a 7- L7
-y
O I - a _' 0 r1
=
tj <
7 u } > A
-
.. O 17
N 7 .. -
J
- -7 '7

•?
..
-
>OL7 J a yaln
- H N L! a 9 -- O- N
_
• .j>
= o - tor: rf•
_

'?-tA
i7
p-A0 -
_

Y ro Q 0 A
_ _ -
aG^p -
J J O a 0- =
R
•-

a I - 1-i r7
_
a O c* y

co LC a
y <
0 ?? A
'-f 17

• - n
z7

7 ? .q•

O L7-f-'G 7

logo-0o
y A C
•
le
a
i =DtA 17
0000 a
0- x 0 -
=
1

LTOOrf
0
1 O O w
1- N --C
L71 1 - -
?
co
.O -.. 17
O tL
a
O
--
wt -

A

IAI
??U i
rz
tti!p?.I
IV
IN
IM
--j
1m
w

S---v-- c LCC?^'=GN (--, NCZ DE ROAD
NuERS, yNilLr,.?xc? LTC,) ; North side of U.S. Highway 74, West of
Wadesboro, N.C., off of Boylin Road.
E. DACT=7 OR ITT-c.= S: STREAM/R:v:.R: Brown Creek and Pinch Gut Creek
Rs-7ER BASM1:
7a. sS = z? Oj aC'_'
(SA.) , RZGH QUIRT-7 nrre:..R5 OL-' sv Vt Z G RzSCGnC? (CR ) , W.A--
S:;.=Ly (wS OR WS-__) • `=S [ J No 0( J =_ "-_
ib. =? PRC..cC: jCC?=_ED "': =V NORT'HE OF C=AS =.
N-V :GAT RE-1 O= =NVIRCINI :i L CONC'z:cN (=.=) = [ 1 NO [Xl
7c. i. THE PROZE,CT IS iCG=T_3 WI?' =N COUNTY (S=C PAGE ? FOR
LTS"_ OF COAST_L COuM1.=C5), rr' i_ THE L;WDi USE P=-Y (ruP) i?E..=G??_ON?
N/A
Ea. HAVE ??SY S=C_CON 404 BEEN PRE"i: USLY RE?GEST=D cOR USE. ON
lV??. Cc
'_°c: PROrEcs'"v- "L_ [ J NO [X J := Y'S , _= = G?JE C.=CN T_ .0.
•.ri_OUS PsRM== AND W "?DITICN_ TNFOR-`? :: CI (INCLUDE P 4
CTED FOR ?':i:S P3CPE. =Y :N T::r.
ab. ALRE ADDITIONAL REQi",- zS Ex
uiMs_r? YES [ J NO (y, ] __ YES, DESCRIBE rV_=C=???ED WORK: .
9a. ESTnS.TED TOTAL NUMMER OF ACRES ?N. TR2SCT OF L ND: 1260 acres
9b. EST?nZED TvT?r NUMBES, OF P_C:wS OF WETI+r?175 LCC:===, ON PRWECT S--Mr
3W acres

_0a. ND-ER OF C_rS CE: W= 5 IMPACTED BY P-RC
{c r ==cN
LL"-',TG: 1.68
FLOODING:
DRA_--q; Ga : -
?.C... nC-? .O T3C ; 1.68 acres
T =ACTED 3Y .'iE PRaPaSYD PRC?T_ :T (--
- C: ? VN? .0 c
10b. (1) ST:: u _
F::DCG?1?, nar)V E DSS=??I ZC=- :_?O?Z'. e ND s 3 t2E:rCG3_=CAS .
Z,.;-VG BEFORE: Approx. 4000 A==°_-t:
Sv-=- , BEFORE (?:a_a" c wate_ ccatc s) . Approx. 1 to 3
_ r. ac.r-'?- ?'
Aye z DE. C:? ; less than 1 -- *R: -
C'?_V IV ?MV_ Iw. L• tIV--J :l?.vU?T -^?(C.-..-...rr?• i?? T` ?- ?__-J .
OP _ OF C: N-NZ.
C-WN L ZXC..V7- =CN: CC:75_3GC_=GN O? Dr l-COD_!7C--:
R: filling
_-• -- CONS==cuC?_GN OF PC P^ W? =- - -•-- _Z?
V+_'?_:=?.r': rD D!'c,:LVZVG TO ?`:_... POND? N/A
wr.;L?21 IS T:-= EX=MN-0 SuFs= C r_. NSA
}
li. DE:CFi=?_=CN OF PIZ OPCSED WORK •: =-iCLuD=VC D=S?:::5. =0N OF _'!:E Or
TO =_ USED (= -==-C PL<VS: 8 1/2" X 3 _° D:????iGS
ON•l.Y)
The discharge of fill material into 1.6$ acres of wetlands will be
conducted-with earth moving equipment.
•13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED °1ORK: to construct a solid waste management facility.
. - 3
...ems • ..
r _D T.L T TE=S 1?CT=7-TY ?-uS7 a GR_ =D
:ut7c ??4' M.r-Suxr.. T ti.v TO 1 ?t r?S W= _ ;_ND
CCT ---N WZTL.LNTDS. (-NC
rum .CTS) .
• The wetlands affected are intermittant streams created by significant
reci itation events. The ro'ect is located so as to minimize the impact
ou the surrouudin wetland acres.
YOG It-RE R.;cG-=TD TO C'.N'1' C_ =_ U.S. t =S = = VD r-LDL=
(US N T_ CNrL Sz?4=C' (NM=S) (S=E G_YCY
_wS) r?`TD/OR :... --
c-: D OR ^
:.DOR'SSES S•rIC) =R?rYG T'= _ -=-: VCE'OF ?N=' _ _ _D= RI.-_.` : -7-e
=p --- £Vi?VGE_. G= T:?= _ ==Y=D - S CR C2;_ L ==---=-
"H =__ _t T Y-_ '- : -----==D BY =`~ ==cOPOSEi? _ Cv-cCT. D ===
V _ _ - .... ^r. crc -..
P=
-
CINT=E:) : 1/15/92
YOU IRE I-" _ .CT -"=- S....- ?--r`TORT_C ? Zvrr.CN C-, _ CrR
(S ..O) (S-.=- . P? c?'IC:: O: ST 'd `C -
acre :7 r' BY 30=CS=D
P RO.: a CT . DACE ICJ92
17. DO=S =C :.JCI??a ?V ??s=.YD__v:?=. OL PTnL_Cv"DS Cc T== us- Cc _
_ _BLIC (ST??E1. lYD?
Y f I NC1 (== NC, G-C TC ? 3)
` TFr PRCTcC= _.?.?G=Rr =R=.- -=u? =CN G= tai Yv=RCl3 =?-.
NORTH C_l __r-
DCC14-M-`t_ rr:c:v'Y: TO ^'rc» Cc rHZ_
s+
:CL:CY ACT?
Yrs El No El
b . T_ Y_S .y THE DOC YT B: .'•`-T R-•i s?nLD T?iAOQGr. _NORTH G CL
... IT T O: ;om=_N-,S-RrT_O,I 5+=?:. C?,LR:?1C::OIIS??
DL:rr +
Y?S C3
NC fl
?sYSwaR TO l 7b .S YES, T:?-Y 5='-!-"= ?S-ngOg?._?°E DCC?i?_YT?==CN B' :OLD T?.
S-w?TE C:,,c?RrNG?.CUS :. TO Div_ S=ON or i..*Ttri?CNL-*I• T--• nsY?C?--'•`T= R?C -
crsI %gCE NTH Tz= NORTH C?R CLINE =30N-.YT=:L POLICY ?C=
S^•. ?1GiiCGSE R- %-:v PRCCE SS S'.C +?i.D BE
QL7EST=0N5 qr RDrYG THE . _ CGSa NORTH
DIRECTED TO F-S. C =?YS BRC aT-, D: Z I'CR S%-E CLZ;Ll INC_r:
C?ROLMST DE=?n?vT Or ?flu N=STF? =T_ON, :? n' ??EST JONES 5= .'-..? RP?c.:G'r-, .
'^t: ?ROL=Yr 2 i 60=-300' Tc2:iCNE (c1n) ?S3-c'36P.
G -?
NORM
4

'3. THE- = DIwGri_?iG =roc SHOULD BE INCLUDED n TH T: -G n-= --=C_===GN 77
PROPOSE!) '_:.D DISC?a?RG' OF EXC_'='va2*rJ Cc =i, ?u °-?`._
7T0 fTT?'-NIDS :
a. WET:"- D DE MI -7 "'=GN MA-0 SH OWT G A .Z WETT_3NDS, S..r-IMc?
',7D PONDS ON T`-= - RCP (-D?t NATIONWIDE PEpu?: N' SIRS _S, 33, 2=, 231
29, A-"M 38) . e'--• STREAMS (:?ITS:iw==TENT UM PER_MANrNT) CN '?' = PROPE3'""
MT-S'r BE SHOWN CN ??= . Ma? S?_iS SHOULD B= I L?iC = E ?Gr--'S EO --= CF I
e.QII_ v??s?1T .
ZVC EQUALS 1-00 OR T.-Z-3
b. -- A '7:--_L,=., Lv?: .5 .'iT.?`JE PH6TCG??= -- OF Wz =VDS :O _..
-u?aCTED BY •PRCv-; =.
C. _? DE:.?ir ==LION z-S PERFOAMED BY A CSNSULTAN'=, TC'jUuc r'.T. Dr?:
S'.^-... TS R.=??t;v N= TO THE P__C=-N-A OF TFZ DEL-MrTE?=T_ON L-N'r.
G. ATT C:: A COPY OF TL: E STORM-WATER L?-'?T G ?7T P1V :- :. D.
e. +WIM T =: L??tD USE CF --w-pRCUNDING PROP=_='.=Y?
agriculture, logging
rivr_R: IS P RCPOSED V. %-'-.D 0- S v= r D.S?CS? ?
NSA
v
c. SIr'?D = VD Dr___D ;LC-MIT W --- T-T rA DS CR OF THE U. S. Y-AZ NOq-q E? SR_TCR TO
1) . I SS A- C= OF A SrC:IGN 404 CCRPS O=. 2) _:-sUA-NC= OR,w7- V--.R OF A 401 D=v_C_CN OF
_.:MITT (eFMR QL-ALITY) C:: R_Sr sCA.__OIv , AIN
CAr COITN_'-'S 02711- i A = T=':c :.cCM Tom=
NCt'LITM CAROLINA DIVISION OF. COASTAL b9aAG=."?':TT Sw=sorMI iC- ?'== ??tOFCSD
ACT:YIT`r IS CGNSIS MNI T Ft_TE THE NORTE CAe'cC3LTXX CCAS"A. I??iAC »
PRC}C:rc?1M_ . ;
OWNER' S/AC-=NT' S S=C-NATURE
{a???IT' S SIGNIA-TuRE VALID ONLY
__ AUTR•OR=ULT=0N LETJ.ER FROM-
T OWNE R IS_ PROV=DED
DE='s'
5 "
«. 1 United States Department of the Interior
--?? -: FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
,,.Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3716
JF' '
TO:a? ?.
A fJA 4
R
E
f ?A 343?p INSTANT REPLY `-
r
Please excuse this form. We thought you would prefer a speedy reply a
formal letter. This form serves to provide V.S. Fish and Wildlife Se ce
recommendations pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered species Act, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543). 11 ?? •`
Res
of ?4g Cro..?.
Based on our records, there are no Federally-listed endangered OZZ
threatened species which may occur within the project impact areas
The attached page(s) list(s) the Federally-listed species which C
nay occur within the project impact area.
if the proposed project will be removing pines greater than ore al
to 30 years of age. in pine or pine/hardwood habitat, surveys sb d
be conducted for active red-cockaded woodpecker cavity trees in
appropriate habitat within a 1/2 ails radius of projact. boundari
T red-cockaded woodpeckers are observed within the project area r
active cavity trees found, the project has the potential to adver ly
affect the red-cockaded woodpecker, and you should contact this
office for further information.
Concur - Zs not likely to adversely-affect Federally-listed
endangered or threateded species.
_? Staffing limitations prevent us from conducting a field inspects
of the project site. Therefore, we are unablq to provide you
with site specific recommendations at this times.
Questions regarding this form letter may be directed to the biologist w is
handling this project.
CONCUR V

APPENDDC 5. CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DATA FORMS
v
g:!
P
41
WETLANDS DELINEATION AND PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY
OF A PROPOSED REGIONAL LANDFILL SITE,
ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Submitted to:
Chambers Development of North Carolina, Inc
3200 Highlands Parkway, Suite 400
Smyrna, Georgia 30082
Submitted by:
Garrow & Associates, Inc.
3772 Pleasantdale Road, Suite 200
Atlanta, Georgia 30340
V
Field investigation by:
Linda G. Chafin, Chief Biologist
Hugh Powell, Assistant Biologist
I
Report prepared by:
Linda G. Chafin, Chief Biologist
- 24 July 1992
ABSTRACT
A jurisdictional wetlands delineation and protected species survey was conducted at
the proposed site of the Anson County landfill. The study area consists of
approximately 1,100 acres of floodplain and highly dissected uplands in the Southern
Piedmont of North Carolina.
fx. ,
Total wetlands on the study area-equal' approximately 310 acres. Wetlands are found in
the Brown Creek and Pinch Gut Creek floodplains, and in drainages, headwaters, and
impoundments of intermittent streams. The wetland communities located in the Brown
Creek floodplain are considered significant by the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program and should be protected from development impacts. All impacts to wetlands
must be permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Habitat for four rare or protected plant species is found on the study area in ravine
heads, and on slopes and bluffs. It is recommended that ravines, slopes, and bluffs
directly associated with Brown Creek be protected from development by incorporating
them into a system of buffers surrounding the landfill operations. If these areas are to
be developed, then a growing season (April.-June and August-September) survey for
rare plant species is recommended. Current landfill design plans call for development
only in the pine plantation uplands, with a buffer between the landfill and the bluffs
and slopes . If these plans are implemented as currently presented, then no impact to
these species, if present, or their habitat should occur.
No rare, threatened, or endangered animal species were observed during the survey,
and none are believed to occur on the study area due to lack of appropriate habitat or to
distance from known populations. The Red-cockaded Woodpecker, listed by NCNI-IP
and FWS as endangered, is of special interest in the Anson County area. However, the
immaturity of pine stands on the study area and their distance from a known nesting
colony strongly support the conclusiop that there is no Red-cockaded Woodpecker
nesting or foraging habitat present on the study area.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program lists five communities in Anson County
as significant. Four of these are present on the study area within delineated wetlands.
If landfill development plans are implemented as designed, then no impact to these
communities or habitats should occur.
Rules contained in "Siting and Design Requirements for Disposal Sites" (Title 15A,
Subchapter 13B of the North Carolina Administrative Code) stipulate that a disposal
site "...shall not cause or contribute to the taking of any endangered or threatened
species of plants, fish, or wildlife" or "...shall not result in the destruction or adverse
modification of the critical habitat or endangered or threated species..." No rare,
threatened, or endangered species were encountered. during this study. No federally
designated-critical habitat is found on site; biologically significant habitat slopes,bluffs,-
and ravines--is limited to areas which are not slated for development.
Current bird populations in the area of the proposed landfill do not present a hazard to
aircraft. According to Mr. Bobby Lee Hancock, Anson County Airport Manager, the
proposed landfill site is not located in the path of landing or departing aircraft
(Hancock, personal communication 1992); increased bird populations in that area would
not pose a significant hazard to aircraft. Flocking birds could be attracted to the landfill
if additional wetlands or roosting or foraging areas were created by development of the
landfill. However, the proposed development will not increase wetland areas in the
vicinity of the airport, nor will it increase waterfowl populations in the area. Increased
bird activity at the landfill due to feeding and roosting activities should be kept to a
minimum by following standard landfill operating procedures. Chambers has notified
the FAA regional office and a response was received which concludes that the proposed
landfill "... would not be objectionable to the operation of the Anson County Airport"
(Roberts 1992).
g;.
ii
0
(o two)
2s T C
T
..Iq
/ AN
N ? O O O z
o
25 a N /
N \
co
tC T __=
T '
Z O ?` ??? m
C
\\ e w
7 a\? O ti a?+
tq d T O0 T
N ? M T • ?
CV)
v
.. "I v. XO

Zo'
0 - = ` .rA
? ? tl O W
{? T
Q O " W m
0
O
et , M N O ?
? fp
!I d1 Cd
111 j ?' ? ? 1p 117
0
d?•. Cd
r
I

2.-&
Dominant Plant Soecies
1. Qvercus lquri-6LZc,.
Field Investigator(s): L- I N DA G r- Q-4A F I N Date: N 0 V 19- 22- ? 19 j
Project/Site: SO ON C- C) LAN State: V G Coun AN S V C:O.
Apolicant,Owner: C HAM (3 f?f? S tw?.V Plant Community #/Name: groom C.irte n
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. -go-t-}rori• a"4'
-----------------------------------------------7rz-i-
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes -)C No ' (if no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ No C
->- (If yes, explain on back)
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
2.
3.
4.
S.
6.
7.
s.
9.
10.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Indicator
Status Stratum
f=XCW T
o t31
FAr-W
?A.cvJ S
Dominant Plant Species
Indicator
Status Stratum
&15"
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
P9rcent of dominant species that are OP-L. FAC N, and/or FAC t O O :/c,
is the hydrophytx vegetation criterion met? Yes -,,X No
1 o O% cL c-e C-AC. or
w e++c„r - -- ..
SCILS
Series/chase: U3 e6x, tc e-Q-, Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No X_ Gleved? Yes 1No
Matrix Color: 2.5 "1 10-7-2- Mottle Colors.
Other hydr;c soil indicators: 51Yo.nC Sul-tatc. Odor-
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No j'
Rationale: Lis-VC4 arx Na r So;;lc Z.+Sf' t -?iel? inc?icA'forS
;? So..e ,,,e" HYDROLOGY rr
Is :he -cund surfacs inundated? yYes No Surface water depth: 2 ? ?O
!s :he soil saturated? Yes _Z4 _ No `
Depth to free-standing water in pWsoil probe hole:
Lit other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Swoll,e^ baAo., cthd yAult;plc- 1,rcc-fyxAhk.S' Q8Ven+i41,&US rootS
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: VN r,%eroos -field. inclicAtors
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland?. Yes „,X_ No
- a m rv%e-f- _ _-
Rationale for jurisdiGional decision: .I l 3 C r-Mee e, 'et
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
- F f3. #
3-2 en 14-2-

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): L-f N OA Cc. CE-4A F l N Date: 11 f 20 - 9 1
Project/She:: Av.Sov. Co. -#? t2 State: C" County: C HA K- A SR S Z% - A C Lea?ca••t-RO-ViA16
.,ppl'icant.'Owner. Plant Community ;xMame:
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes _ No _2r (if no, explain QIW? C ItA??. ' -{t7 stem e., bank Slash St?etr,%
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No (if yes, explain on back) scc a..60 v2
VEGETATION
Indicator AbKt, 6.. „-\- Indicator
Dominant
Plant Soecies Status Stratum Owmi! k Plant Species Status Stratum
s
?. _B 10.G?C. U_)', 1(&W ;-6--L ?_ 11. 'PQnI ruw%- & GL'oic v W H
2 _ 0 "?f C2 to M GIG _? 12. '2?• a be c lra?e? t a t.?.. a a.. ?A?C _?_
3. _ td r6g e=_ 5265- -17 13.

. 14.
_ r e X cr't n ca-
S VACW } .%A_ 15.
6. _ CartX IFAC_ A_ 16.
7. XIA v.t ono S V S 1 A 17.
8. 18.
9. _ ...bvs a u- o CUt 5 19.
10. _- lrl e r b e rf!:)r- FACVJ 5 20.
Percent of dcminant.speces that are OBL. FAUN, and/or FAC 4 0
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes V - No
w fSnri?ia• -?J S60ZO ace- FAC of W?T'C e.(? -•_--_^ .'-...?- _ -
?? SCILS
Series/phase: ?+ Qw - S-?U-'1 Subgroup.-2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No )< Histic aoipedon present? Yes No k'
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No _X Gleyed? Yes No _k-
Matrix Color: Mottle Colors:
Other hydr•;c soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes Not,
Rationale: n o et.d nA? c a-t-ors r?e"?r (i S e 4S. 1nV c(? i ?. a-(yl'J
HYDROLOGY rr
Is therrourd surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth: " T ??k'`t' ^?
is the soil saturated? Yes No ;
Depth to free-standing water in ph/soii•probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes .? No ??++
Rationale: 5.VeQr, GL?Gir?htl i s i.e. -t-?OVi'?Y• ?14fra-???
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes _X No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:.
t Ibis data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to "Soil Taxonomy.'
3-2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): L I A) OA Gr. Q-4A F I N Date: N O V 19 -ZZ. I IctProjecVShe: ('N State: #V C- County A N SO/Ili LO.
Applicant,Owner: C I-IA"1 ?F?r S i??V Plant Community #/Name- 1AEffift - ? ._,n Crce1=.A0v_V11
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or afield notebook. Impou"'ary'p-4)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? `31 last- Cen.
Yes No _Y _ (If no, explain amb?eim i _eov^bed ISm r_ Crcek- • Aiso ,
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? beaver 44-0• Cclvtoip tr ve?e?{iw.
Yes _)_ No (If yes. explain C.-bSemt.
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. T 5ti o (iv- 064 it.
?rotts e"eriewS
2 OBE 12,
.
3. 5 a f-t4NJWt Of31a _Ij_ 13.
4.e?j4?a ?e,n{{.uS ?CCi ctyn ?13 ORl-a S 14.
$, a t^? vt3l? mil- _ 15.
6. 21 a K ctee t EAC10 S 16.
7. _ D A ".SuA. r-7" )sus 5ACUJ 1_ 17.
8. _'Ptt,?ctMa. Cgm4&sir, ?:AtW N 18.
9. - 19.
10. _ 20.
Percent of dominant species that a re OEL. FAC . and/or FAC (Ocislo
Is the hydrophyt!c vegetation criterion met? Yes ?c_ No
„__o; top ?c? o c+C 1=At? cN- tie-(ter
SCILS
Seriesichase: w ekcLA ke e Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes K No Undetermined _
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No Histic eoipedon present? Yes
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No )<f_ Gleyed? Yes iNo
Matrix Color: Z•S Motitle Colors:
Other hydr;c soil indicators: 5'Mo ^Q 5 `"? i t d. c- odoc-
13 the hydric soil c.'Iterion met? Yes _)?_ No
Rationale: 1a(Adnrc._ Sods Last % St~1 : circ- 1115545r" atk ---
HYDROLOGY
Is the y:cund surfacs inundated? Yes )< No Surface water depth:
s t a soil saturated? Yes X -No
Depth to free-standing water in pi /scil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes C No
Rationale: 1 / S c,-1-t,t r C.-1' too.-
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RA71ONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes k No
Sc."? i S•?ieaQ
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: ?X-jT--t-trne- c r Jn -t a Ore-
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
No ><-
R-9 _?.. tan _ GR
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1
Field Investigator(s): L I NDA Gr. CNA F I N Date: N O V 19- 22- 1 `j j
Proje&jShe: LIN State: 0 C- County: AN SON C-O.
Applicant./Owner: C HAkA 13 &?f2 S : 1>L'V plant Community ;:Mama: nutw"P% of looi-t-o N+ o vav;,%p
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? G{ e0. f-r-Lzr
Yes No X (if no. explain a r)
Has the vegetation, soils. and/or hydrology. been significantly disturbed?
Yes _?,' No - (If yes, explain am 6 s av
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. Ar,A KJ; V%ar; et i a 'l'ea, i^ACW _ H 11.
2. - M %.& r 05: 12.
r,Pl?n?S 3. i4 ra. hrur.r. ??C? ? 13.
4, _O?.ercu?o s n . _L_ 14.

S. - 16.
7. _ 17.
8. - 18.
9, - 19.
10. _ 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FAC . and/or FAC '1 S c c5
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? No
Yes )<
5 o !4 oP (4o 'If., _
a, &.s are r-A C or w e-4c cll- . .
t-ek,??r old-pew iN. vyyp c-0 SCILS Se l s ?•, mvi •.eo a re_._
Seriesiphasa: Ly.A _WC%.f4WA> Su rou2 1\0t Cl ? CrGr'?'i a'fec?
Subgroup:
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No )C Histic aoipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes--X= No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: t 0Y f2. aiz- Mottle Colors: _(o
Other hydric soil indicators: 121e11e
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes _XNo e.
Rationale: 1 a.w GH rari. eL rr. a 4y., Y, w . -K . 0,01- e-A
HYDROLOGY
is the grcund surface inundated? Yes No ?- Surface water depth:
Ix N:e soil saturated? Yes ?? _ No f
Depth w free-standing water in pit/scil probe hole:
Lit otfier field evidence of surface inundation or soil satutation.
i? ?? . - w _ _ -mow w _ .. S-0 w ...-f . . _n T I -A--4-IF-- k`w &/ APL., r', -A
Is the wetland
Rationale: _
met? yes. - No
c.r
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes _ - No
Rationale for jurisdic:ional decision: a f( 3 er i + tn'0. are. ?M@ -f"
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community "
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
13-2 c:-a c1'AA D• 15-.a-
1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): L.1 N DA Gr. CL-4A F 114 Date: N ()V 18 - 2.2-
ProjecJShe: UN State: IN C County: A N Sotlj C-10.,
Apolicant!Owner. C HR'r1 C3f,2S L>?V Plant Community #/Name: "I'll-A. /
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? S La-oA--,
Yes No X (if no, explain ' u c
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes - No (If yes, explain
---------------------------------------------------
VEGFTATION
Indicator
Status Stratum
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1.
2.
3.
4.
S.
s.
7.
s.
9.
10.
paL
SAG
V;&C-
PACW
ML=
O &Ls
?EACw+
T
S-
5
Dominant Plant Species
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
o?o
Percent of dominant species that are OEL, FAC'W, and/or FAC I O C)
Is the hydrophytic vegetation critedo.tn_ met? Yes X No
a =?:?„„o• too 6/6 e t C?e.N. A e Qn-`y -S --- -
?'+ jA SCILS
X0 QS+y,, _ S te-pe'--
1 Sa ?.S i -.
2 r-C 1 ?o a tart'
.
Seriesiphase: Subgroup:
1s the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No 'K Undetermined
Is the soif a Histcscl? Yes No Histic apipedon presant? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No _ Gleyed? Yes No x
Matrix Color: Mottle Color s: t c7? y ?z. Cc?Co
Other h
dric
l i
t awl
y
soi
ndica
ors:
Is the hydric soil criterion met?
Rationale: 5o i B o r% L4 Yes No
3---+ t a h r. P,,-4 4
rt--c 4 . L'O

C? r'o,n?ci
'.- to,--j
? ON 0%4+%Ne I HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surfacs inundated? Yes . X No Surface water depth:
s U ha soil saturated? Yes ) p?, Accts
N- pth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List o e f" evide a of surface inundatign or soil saturation. Sf1OvV-V^4e dAA ri
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes_ No
Rationale: SA,+ l1tr ) q>-
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE S
?1 W a+tfso7 y-t? o ew ? ?-
Is the plant community a wetland? : Yes X No
Rationale for jurisdi?ional decision:- I,'%+ tfen-3- c"Nza^^^ c_L.av??n2? w! '?
4d.io:ce %+ .-f a,+s a•%a . tw% a 11 +err'ctcft
17bis data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
B-2 /c ??... ri t=1n f1 P: 14S -13
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1
Field Investigator(s): L- I A) OA G-- CLAA F I N Date: N O V_ 18 - 22- 1 19-if
Projec!/She: - 'N State: / N G County: A N S O N C.O.
Appticant.'Owner. C i-IA'H f;f S ?LV Plant Community /Name: 1?wvAne w/ i..terr+„tte.? S-b ft,
Note: 9 a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook..
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes No (If no, explain on back) - r-„-t j
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ No (If yes, explain on back)
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Sredes Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. _ Pr cep Y lbw u...., T--AC- _r 11.
2. 1• i Gt b rG PAC, S- 12.
3, Ca +i s 1aevts a' 1rAr-W __ 13.
4. S1rx. Ctet d F/A"- S 14.
5. Tu„cuo FAC.W
6. _Sc i r
-P L" c e r•i • ?
O f3 V 16.
7. _ 17.
$, 18.
9. _ 19.
10. _ 20.
Psrcent of dominant species that are OBL. FAC . and/or FAG loo °lo
is the hydrophyt' ic ve gtation iten n mpt? Yes ? No
'
• :C:'. _:°: 1-0 0 /O o nn % VGA iC? S C? L '?/ArC? yY t? ?2t`4t.?

SOILS S0% S i,% fgVi'A9.._
Seriesichase: a tk 5+r, S tCV--e-2- fSubgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydrie soils list? Yes No -yX Undetermined .
Is the sail a Histosol? Yes Na Histic eoipedon present? Yes No
- Ps the soil: Mottled? Yes )C No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color. l Mettle Colors: t Q ? T?-(0 1!?
Other hydric soil indicators: t^ rr"?
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes K_ No
Rationale: 1 aks v,?-t-t'f
i?!n clnhel HYDROLOGY
Is the y:cund surface inundated? Yes _ No Surface water depth:
4 the soil saturated? Yes - 70;, f (a-y-s
nepth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation. ,
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X- No
i .? a wCt?.fi tr-?
Rationale: S44w-e, -N-V-? q L,%4_
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINA71ONgqAND RATIONALE 1?
Is the plant community a wetland?_ Yes X No r( WoL+1" '°-p 4&- 0^t 4e.0 Slci7 rf
Rationale for iurisd'te:ional decision: in?crrr.i-itee.-? ; YCAw? e.I,. hht`1

1 This data form can be uied for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI

Field Investigator(s): L I N OA Gr. COA F I N Date: N O V 1$- 22 ? 1911
ProjecuJSite; C-OUNTy 12= State: "G County: A N S O CO.
Applicant,bwner: - C HAM E FRS t->?.V Plant Community #/Name:
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ?4lVlr1? ??'1•° lot?ZL,?,
Yes --No (if no, explain dwiml* S [CAzL-, a
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes __ No (If yes, explain ? SP o?, '? i n CJVA KLA `$
----------------------------------------------------
Dominant Plant Species
Indicator
Status
VEGETATION
Stratum
1:4_
LA
A
r
Dominant Plant Species
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
HYDROLOGY
No
Percent of dominant species that are OEL, FACW. and/or FAC I C) o c?
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
1.
2.
3.
r 4.
5.
s.
7.
8.
9.
10.
SoAS ryn, Dt_.&0n_ SCILS So;" t" t?vin? Ctre. ^-t
Seriesichasa: t^?ro1 Est*rrn On s l en._ Subgroup: 2 ?Z - ere of C.--c C
..
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histoscl? Yes No Histic aoipedon present? Yes No
Is the scil: Mottled? Yes No _ Gleyed? Yes No 11: _
Matrix Color: f??Z- Mottle Colors: t C z ?e
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydriic soil criterion met? Yes 'iC No ILL-
Rationale:
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes „•)?_ No
s :he soil saturated? Yes ,X,_ No
t pth to free-standing water in pit/scii prcbe hole:.
List other field evidence of surface inunda(iQn or soil
Is the wetland hydrology criterion
Rationale -F ?OU31 r CA W
Indicator
Status Stratum
S
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE. It
I W a,?it,o dj
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisd_ional decision: ?M-
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
Surface water depth:
Zrt^ •t-?OWiegzz
3-2
8G
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1
Field Investiga or(s): L- f N [)^ Gr- C-HA t=1 4 Date: _N0 V $ - 22- (q -11
Project/Site: ANSON 'N State: #V G County: ANSON CO•
AppiicanVOwner: C HAkA R 2 S ?4--V Plant Community #/Name: RCOA11L ...
Note: N a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field not book. n
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? C(ea e-C L-t -510L, jPWoha.?J
Yes No X_ (if no, explain ewireelM
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? t
Yes ' % No (If yes. explain so"
----------------------------------------------------
Dominant Plant Soecies
` ua ++
2.
3. if
4. ?Avg _ue
6. cal S. 7. .
8.
9. .
10. .
VEGETATION
Indicator
Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species
T' C- _ 11.
'f 4 C, 12.
_ (5 8L4 H_ 13.
VACW 4_ 14.
crS b _L_ 15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Indicator
Status Stratum
l?
Percent of dominant species that are 08L. FAUN, and/or FAC 106
Is the hydrephytic vegetation criterion met? Yes_ No
Rat; . ?ia;n• 1 OO % A-f i?Gr'S?S CLM rYhf- U?" t??e- - ..
i -? 1r?2vi cry v o? ((??
??aa SCILS SD i Is
Series/chase: &0 ?jS eLi Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No C Undetermined
Is the soil a Histoscl? Yes No X_ Histic eoipedon present? Yes No >_
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes _ No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: I b y "?-- Mottle Colors: t o X Z- e 42
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes ?_ No e
Rationale: l??J 6NVV V-0- V MOL-" X WT-0-
HYDROLOGY
b 2t,e ,;rc::nd surface inundated? Yes X No Surface water depth:
Is :he soil saturated? Yes 140 4111.1-5
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil satufation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion r et? Yes No
Rationale: ir. rw.d/? ! &A+Ara4
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale for iurisdic:lonal decision:
This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
1.
2.
3.
4.
s?l?f s.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Field Investiga or(s): L' I N DA Cam-. C E-IA F I N Date: N b V i g- 22 I m j
Project./She: A\ 14 So N CC) LIN 7 -4 4L 112 State: 94 C- County: A N S V GO.
Apolicant,Owner: C H A 4 B P? S L>?V Plant Community #/Name: '13c-I#or 2- rev"ne-
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or afield notebook.
----------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ?'-?`- ko,,Q 6ec?,
Yes _ - No _ (If no, explain WNWW * Cte rA_rCc^r
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed' .
Yes _,)C_ No (If yes. explain W--"*
Dominant Plant Soecies
Indicator
Status
VEGETATION
Stratum Dominant Plant Species
t _ 11.
4- 12.
N 13.
H 14.

16.
- H- 17.
is.
19.
20.
P9rcent of dominant species that are OBL. FAC:Y, and/or FAC _
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Indicator
Status Stratum
h ?t?d? 'tom
Sariesichasa: ?U ??'` SCIL??roLp 2? ?t?2ecoc_
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
is the sail a Hisicsot? Yes No __X_ Histic epipedon present? Yes No
is the soil: Mottled. Yes No Gleyed. Yes No
Matrix Color: t c Y 2 Mottle Colors: t_ 0a 2 ro ro
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes _X No
Rationale: 10-4.0 rndk+yi & ` i i N av 0"1 eb
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surfacs inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
se soil saturated? Yes - - -No J_? S o rv?-. QreM?
Repth to Irse-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundalign, ! spit saturation.
Is the wetland Kydrology criterion met? Yes _X No
Rationale: sa'h•.,ra'h'eh. -10 SwrPc tt ,
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes > No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: G?t1 3 Cri ^`a t1rt: tv.e_ -
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy."
R-a ?----? . ^ t 'Li -7 - = cp - -?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): I-1 /V DA Cc. CHA F 1 N Date: N 0 V 1$ - 2.2? ) 911
ProjecVShe: 4'N -T,4 1 -1 State: C County: N S y GO
Applicant/Owner: C HAM [3 P,2 S L??V Plant Community #/Name: Q Qlte- r5k\j%^'S--
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or afield notebook.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sri NG?
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes 'ZC_ No ' (if no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ No _ C (If yes, explain on back) Cv?d+ cc ec.-} y,
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecies Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species
1. -A C.w1_ t c,•esY tr. w. IrAC- T_ 11.
2. kcF:PcC- -T 12.
3. 13.
4. 14.
S. _ 15.
6. _ 16.
7. _ 17.
8. _ 16.
9. _ 19.
10. 20.
Psrcent of dominant scecies that are OBL. FACN, and/or FAC LOO%
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes -Y No
.°' IOAGYO
.et743`° Amt SfJLcG mss. 4 r? r=AG- Err We--??V' --- •- .
_
- Q
Indicator
Status Stratum
SCILS _ ?Gv;ne, s 1??? no't
? Gz?OM°!Z Subgroup:2 Cif k.-e^fi?'t
Seriesichase: ?
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a Histoscl? Yes No _ Histic ecipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes Vo
Matrix Color: Mottle Colors: ---
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
!s the ;round surfacs inundated? Yes X No Surface water depth: 2 - 3 ?r
:s the soil saturated? Yes No
Repth to free-standing water in pit/scil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology cater q?n met? Yes ?C No
Rationale: -eAt?V?^A ?n S71rcOOn\ C?tiOr?L ?1l
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE 5, 44.4
!s the plant community a wetland? Ye No ,t Wctcr, tJ?•
Rationale for jurisdir-ional decision: •
I This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'-

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): LL1?J DADA CNflF( 0 t-*UC;'KH '1>0WELL- Date: I1- tom- SUN L 1951'2-
Proiect/Site: AN Sy N CO. LXNVVb 1 C t-- State: N G County: A N SU 0
Applicant/Owner; Ch htAt.'c,izS 'I>gL\J, Plant Community #/Name:
Note: If a more -d ailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes No (If no. explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes . No (If yes, explain on back)
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. rte. .L 11. -EALW -1L-
2.t?- C _ r_ 12.
3. q VAC T 13.
F-Acu/ 14.
V=A C
hi e `Vs--r- 16.
6. L UJA
7. '.. _V_ 17.
s. - -Z1is.
9.
10. B JM . ",. c,T_ AC b? _ _ 20. a`?
Psi-cent of dominant species that are OBL. FACN, and/or FAC G o
is the h dro h?t?c vepetado criterion met? Y s No
F.at9.^ e: _Sit?s+t to Sa o h?„eyt? FAG
SCILS
Series/phase: - CfCE9 ilk" ffNE so-?n4QLj0A*1'jubgroup:2.
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcsol? Yes No >V Histic aoipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyyed? Yes No /C,
Matrix Color.._ 0 )fit Z47 /oa C V?COWS Colors: :V. 7 t s/h
Other hydric soil indicators: ox.
Is the hYdric soil criterion met. Yes No
_
Rationale: _ w?a` ?c c t utooil -S &,& - COE rti??e?v?G?3 cis 1?c
HYDROLOGY
r,
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes _ No Surface water depth: a -Z
Is the soil saturated? Yes _,6__ No ;
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
?Q
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No_ t /f?
Rationale: Cant, L,.- r4,v?i-s. sL.t,t+caxta/ ; h -%t s atc
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdic:ional decision:
Eft
A g
This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
B-2
C- lLl
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes X_ No (If no. explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils. and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No _?<_ (if yes. explain on back)
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): LW DA C tAAf:' 0 t-'rU?H "?0WGt-t- Date: II- Imo-- Jy P G- 199-2-
ProjeCJShe- A1,J SV N CO. L?4 11pt=1 t_ L State: N C- County: A N .So 0
Applicant/Owner: Cti ArMB,4-RS ' s_%j. Plant Community 9/Name:
Notes: If a morel ailed site description is necessary. use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Dominant Plant Soecies
VEGETATION
Indicator
Status Stratum Dominant Plant Scecies
F-AC_ --T- 11.
-r 12.
C 13.
_z
?? 14.
FGG V_ 15.
N t _ 5 16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Indicator
Status Stratum
Psrcent of dominant species that are OBL. FAC . and/or FAC
Is the hydrophytic veget tion crtgenon met? Yes No
HHr c^aio; t:hl'Poi ` AAnA-% S d p. ?, r.aa I
e u c
Series/phase: ? mer Fa&a_ ?A?? A"1YlAACubgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcsol? Yes No X Histic e. ipedon present? Yes No X_
Is the soil: Mo led? Yes No Gieyed? Yes No ?C
Matrix Caton. u Mottle Color ESP_NT
Other hydric soil indicators: Oro
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: C16U A Z , AO M[n'rt_ES . NO QT-14L2 14YD4IL SOIL IAIDIl
HYDROLOGY
l?
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes A No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Its the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: Nyn[oi 0&,ic INO1Ci -rms Out-
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: -C SCE' F Ole- AMl?9 N'>J/ANI' OGc?4 e_4179!/4
This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2Classification according to -Soil Taxonomy.'
B-2
a.
9.
10.
- DATA FORM 4 - R 2 R
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): L- I /y DA C-c. GE-'lA F-I N . Date: JAN q l 1 19 9 2-
Projec!/She: AN S(3,J Gou )J" LANDFILL_ State: NC- County: ,AN-SON
Aoolicant,Cwner- CIAA?M B£-R S 1:E92 I iJG. plant Community #/Narne: A MUM C2.EEIC 1=1.006PLA14
Noted 1f a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook 13oTTOML NW_n
--•---------.-----------------------------------?LAV1_-?
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? TFO"i?_ e -r
yes >(_ No (If no, explain emk¦iiii0p
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ No (If yes, explain UW=*
-----------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant P!ant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Scecies Status Stratum
a fio.. T_ 11. n-.; t0.ayXt F'AcW • ^C
?bA ?Tt t2. -Q e. ?w _'T 12. E nrtA.. Cw o l i fti 4 ",e._ C
3. A C- -r 13. dl .b•.r siursc; A. joie lot T=ACW- r 1e, - 1_c , saver.. S
S. Ac-cr- mac. _r 14Z. ??cz co-oreolsbc, -?- _ V
g, . A t c.- e ?. F?{W _?_ t6. Tn , ca ?ehdra., ,raa: t?,wsC- _??
8. =1a ) c 18.
o 'AY H ?•.?Q: to tri C. 19.
10. 1?A Q w•a r. j-1..: w?.. 1 ? ? 20.
Psresnt of dominant species that are CEL. FACW. and/or FAC g? ?o
Is the hyd:ophyt:c vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: f=-A--e w- ca- '?-4?tr -- -
r SCILS
Seriesichase: Subgroup-.2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No Histic acipedon present? Yes No '
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed'? Yes No
Matrix Ccior: 110 v rz. 2. Mottle Colors: 't • S y 2 S/$
Cther hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric sod Giterion met? Yes r,V
,_ No
Rationale: l4 y 69_'C_ -50 A S ) t 5T : 1 ts•c?J t' 1., ?a-Mrs, Yka'Mi X ka ,? +1L, w??ast`+ lfd
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No i Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes X_ No
Depth to free-standing water in ph/soil probe hole:
Let other field evidence of s rface inundation or soil saturation:
.rn ?,?T t,..otes42•? c.?o•,o-t- ?. ?i ?rY+ - 5 wo 11G,.. toa?uo ? 4 ct v r „?? ?i e.r... t-va'ts . S k.r--?; ?..: e-Q r?,?
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No n
Rationale: inty 4 c' ,?G "?tnrs h?o?? . CAAovAj,,n LOS,,; C2X a-o1'afi? o
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale for judid=icnal decision:. /A 11 3 c tz t-ri tZ IA AlzeF PP,&S t.,,1T
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
?-R
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODt
Field Investigator(s): t1I N DA Cc. LE4A F1.4 Date: -TAN 1 3 1c cl 2
ProjecJShe• p' nr So,J . Clog r•t T`1 L-ANDf 1 Lt-. State: NC- - County AN S Q )J
,,/Name: 13c'tTO h o F" fZAV INS /uCp(Z
AoolicantiOwner: CWAM 81-2 S 'QS%J t?JG Plant Community -
Note: tf a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook 'gjWW N C2EE r
---------------------------------------F??oD-PLAItJ
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes X_'No (!f no, explain =WW*
Has the vegetation, soils. and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes- -- ----(lfyes, ex -----------------------------------
VEGC A T 1ON Indicator
InC1C3tCr
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Scecies Status Stratum
1. Q?Lr'G?A ?a_us?e? r-^ G4
2. _ C?.efcv?e ?L.e1 c? S ?g? T 12.
3. G v f0.- VA CA' -T._ 13.
4
OvAASI? r'^-% e 1%.a u y 11 'fA-CU 14.
.
5. telex. P ; V-:ACW S 15.
6. .C?aow?o.n :xwr. texu% 45AU _ ?A_ 16.
7. _ UIE-113 S ala-t-c- V-PrWf _'r 17.

19.
10. - 20.
Psresnt of dominant species that are CEL. FACW. and/or FAC ri 1 ° o
Is the hydrophyt:c vegetation criterion met? Yes X_ No
Rationale: g;p °
1--A-C ma
r-
SCILS
Saries/chase: t UYY-J? Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes .< No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No X_ Histic aoicedon presant? Yes No ,_
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes X10
Matrix Color. -!? -2- Mottle Colors: '1 S y R 5/ 8
Other hydric soil indicztcrs:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes -)-<- No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X_ Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes X_ -No . 3 „
Depth to free-standing water in pk/soil probe hole:
List other ffQid evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Ils the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No , i SG} ox Z? c
Rationale: K S.4 Q,.ra t,,+?dui4:!•tr -t-a.l+-2c o,
yy4o-
JURISDICTIONAL DETEMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdic Tonal decision: "? GCLt T (H• ?? ?til? -i"
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy

(?E
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1
Field Investigator(s): i- l N OA Cc. Cl:4A 1=1 N Date: JAN I - 11 ,) l9 9 2
Projec VShe: AN So A Co u t.t TY tJ4 NU1= t L 1- State: 14C. County: AN S O /V
Acolicant,Owner. C "Am B LIZ S r2EV. t ^JC. Plant Community #/Name: U PP f 2 R_AV 112 E -- I NTE fL-
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. M I TrL N -r
------------------------------------------------5rF2C_--~
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? C0-ANN C L_
Yes No (If no, explain M*=410
Has t e vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ No._X (if yes, explain JoWndoo
---------------------------------------------------
VEGE T A71ON
Indicator,
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Scecies
1.
2.
3.
4.
S.
6.
7.
t3.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
1 d.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Psrcent of dominant species that are CEL. FAC:1/, and/or FAC
Is the hydrechytic vegetation cr?ericn met? Yes No
Rationale:
Indicator
Status Stratum
SOILS
Seriesfchase: Subgroup-.2
Is the soil on the hydric sciis list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the sail a Histcscl? Yes No Histic acipedon presant?F Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: Mcrfe Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No` Surface water depth:
Is the ::cif saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/scil probe hole: '
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
b the wetland hydrology Criterion met? Yes „ No
Rationale: tti t cx:ts.? -C o2,c,???l?-c r?. a i?i''? fi??-"r C?a?,ti?2 ( w --?
1/1.3t
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland?. Yes No II Wa-?rs f" o o K1 +-CeQ 5 4 tl
Rationadle for jurisd; tional decision:

t This data form can be usedVor the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): LINDA Cc. CL4A F 1 IJ Date: 'TA N I _ I 1119 9 Z
ProjeC?Site: A' sd.J co g t.t Ty t-414 D V I t_t-. State: P45- County: A -s O /Q
Aoolicant/Cwner. C"AM Bz_t2 S DES. I*#1G plant Community #/Name* 'ToE SL-0101L- EQCx(F O F-
Note: K a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. j IF-'0w 1 C(? tr C-1C
o Z) n PL
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?.f4i N
Yes _ No (if no, explain eiM*
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes. No _ CX (if yes, explain lmdo?
----------------------------------------------------
YEGE T A 11ON
Indicator
Dominant Plant Sceces Status Stratum
!. Li t o? s reel
2. Are-w5 cA,%a% x: *1
3. ''Pi n J S IyL e-'Q ._ 'FA C 4.
5.
o.
7.
8.
9. .
Dominant Plant Scecies
11.
12.
13.
1 A.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Indicator
Status Stratum
Percent of dominant sceces that are CEL. FAC'.Y, and/or FAC 104%
Is the hydrochytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: 100 °?_c9 f "DD tint W A #N z A4E 'r Arc-- oiZ W t:-rygR
- --
Q SCILS
Sari®s/chase: W -? ??' ( C-4-0`X-4{0--' Subgrcup'2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcsol? Yes No _)C Histic eeicedon present? Yes No _X
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No X Gleyed? Yes !No
Matrix Color: ! TL?.?? Mottle Colors:
Other hydre soil indicators: Y\OV\fI
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: G11rcry' a ?k-?c-rc?. c. r vw o`i'??' ?? e lc? i nc?.? Crr."?cTrS
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No ?- Surface water decth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No _5e
.
Depth to tree-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
Lit other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrolo!y criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: y-to ?Irie..lL 1r?Z?ca'twS
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINA71ON AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland?
Rationale for jurisdicional decision:
! This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
3A-R
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field. lnvestigator(s): t-1 N OA Cam. GHA F 14 Date: JA 1J `l - l 1 ,+ 19 9 Z
Proiec'JShe: A N Se A Go u 1.r T 1 L-,hN 1J F I L L. Stale: 14G County: A S O N
Acolicant/Owner: Ct.-16M 031:.2 S 1:192 1A1- Plant Community #/Name:
Note: N a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes No (if no. explain
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ No (If yes. explain
---------------------------------------------------
Dominant Pant Scedes
VEGETA770N
Indicator
Status Stratum Dominant Plant Scec?es
9ACW- T 11.
ip^cw 3- 12.
W- _Z 13.
1=A? "T' 14.
- 15.
VACW" A 16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Indicator
Status Stratum
Percent of dominant scecies that are CEL, FAUN. and/or FAC 1 ©o
Is the hydrechytic vegetation criterio met. Yes ?)C No
Rationale: 1" ton _°,/n ,` G r. G !A U t-.,- a r-e_ -7-P, C--
7.
a.
9.
10.
1. Wuerc u.o r?? cu.c?uX?t
2. l1 M O S C....er+' c b, r 0..
3. _ ©c,.-42wo IQLS-lt G .S
A. _ AcGw %I-k; f (Arr-'
5.
6. SCILS
Subgroup-.2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No _)!L_ Hist:c apipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes 410
Matrix Color:. 110 4M ?--- . Mcrle Colors: rl : U 1z S• 1?
Cher hydric soil indicators
:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes C No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes X No
Depth to free-standing water in pFVsoii probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Q1C 1 4? + Le eQ 'C'OOT' G?nA?y??l S
the wetland hydrology criterion met? YesNo
Rationale: G Gt- 'r •?'F- ? S-70-Se- t'V S se - C?
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes _ No
Rationale for jurisdicional decision: A U- 3 Cj?-L--M2AA A el- h -.12-M
I This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

T?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD' 21 S £-P l 1991
Field Investigator(s): L- I u OA Cr. C-HA t=1 N Date:
Projec'JSite: AK SOnl Cou uT 1 tJ4NDFI LL State: NC- county: AN-SON
Aolic, ca?t/Owner: CWAM (?t:R S 'DEV. IiJG plant Community #Mame: WAy W W tTH 1NTE'RJKVrrE1JT
Note. If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. STR EAtA
----------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes 2!?_ No (If no, explain eimio
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ No .,X _ (If yes. explain
----------------------------------------------------
VEC-E T ATiON
Indicator
Dominant P!ant Soecies Status Stratum Dominant Rant Scecies
1. .
2. ,
3. .
A. .
S. .
s. .
7.
9. -
10. _
11.
12.
13.-
1 A.
15.
16.
17.
is.
19.
20.
Indicator
Status Stratum
Psresnt of dominant species that are 08L. FAC.V. and/or FAC
Is the hydrechyt!c vegetation criterion met?- Yes No
Rationale: -- --
t ?.J 2q V t N /? S
SCILS so;"
Saries/chase: GO I a 5+a,, - Sat ? s o "t s Sucgroua:2 NoT Dl F F? la -1/V TI
Is the soil on the hydrie soils list? Yes No Undeterinined
is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No Hist:c epicedon --resent? Yes No
Is :he soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: Monte Colors:
Cther hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
i n Some HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes X No; Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Deoth to free-standing water in pit/scii probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Ct?a ?nty s w?R.ll -?i S h?
Rationale: S e P T tq.A•t ^ water 1'e% 12400t.%
,TAN tga2 - wa-ltr -t`( ?1i..a?•
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
tl
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No tI +-CJ -S
-tAif-o
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: wa V K I
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

7- R
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field lnvestigator(s): L I AJ DA Cc. GNA 1=1 tJ Date: JrA N I 11 ) 19 9°! Z.
ProjectiShe: AN Soot Co u 14" tJ4N'Q t=1 Lt-. State: County: . APJ SO N
Acoticant/Cwner. C-t-1AM 5$-R S 'DEy. 1"![. Plant Community #/Narne- Ar0W A-t19.. SGED' AT
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. 14 ? a O+-
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? 1 NT C'R M l TT??'r S"TR,hI
Yes _ No _)?_ (if no, explain M*NN*
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Si
Yes _X_ No (If yes. explain
---------------------------------------------------
Dominant Plant Scec'es
9.
10.
1. _Li VS-VtA S;•%'C-
3_ -Ac<t- r -.'6 v-u r"
A. _ U( r -u S Q tKe/1 CG hck
7.
a. _ CarPi.w S C?cal??..? AuUS
VEGETATION
Indicator
Status Stratum Dominant Plant Scec:es
?/KW
!E-A?C_
PACC-
EACW ..
11.
12.
13.
1 A.
15.
16
17.
is.
19.
20.
Indicator
Status Stratum
Percant of dominant species that are CPL. FAUN. and/or FAC
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: -- -
SC1LS Sc? i tS i Yav i ^?- GY e vtm'
Series/chase: S e-'I• SucSrouo:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No His:ic eoipedon presant? Yes No.
Is :he scii: Mottled? Yes No Greyed? Yes No
4/G
Matrix Color: 'Z• S Y om- Mottle Colors: t o Y K.
Other hydric soil indic ztcrs:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes _? No
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the scs1 saturated? Yes N02?_
Depth to tree-standing water in pit oil probe hole:
List other field evidence of st rface inundation or sail saturation. oX% 4?-t
ve ? •• r, d ?- - n G C rv.^ _ -r...cf.-v??41 lu SA LG.Q C
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes ?_ No
Rationale: 6 rck'i p xs +o a rW -S yv?
Qref
1 al.
ea.
+Cth? wb ? Swo.1\e n '?YkwL+?k.o?
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes _ No
Rationale for jurisd?ional decision: r WF-- -M .4t-1- 114TZ-EI? cip-1-rQ t ?a r
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification accarding to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

Q-?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigators - L I N OA Cr. G4A'1=1 N Date: JAN I It l9 q 2.
Project/She: AN 10A co u E T`/ L-Ar"'J FILL- State: 14C- County: S O
AcolicanLOwner. CE1AM BF-f2 5 r->Sy. II1G Plant Community Shame: 1 NTH 2 /A t TTENT- 'T?R-fJ?
Note: ff a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. ell l?yjoEL_
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes No (If no, explain m i=+
Has t e vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ No. X (If yes. explain
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. _
2. _
3.
A.
-
5. _
o. _
7.
8. _
9 _
10.
11.
12.
13.-
IA.
15.
16
17.
18.
19.
20.
Percent of dominant species that are CBL. FAC:Y. and/or FAC
Is the hydrechyt c vegetation criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: -- --
r SCILS
Seriestchase: Subgroup-.2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No Histic eoicedon ;resent? Yes No
Is ate soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Craor: Mottle Colors:
Cther hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes_ No } Surface water depth:
Is the sct7 saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: LA1hT4-(t 'WW1'J G 2^ 3
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE l 1 1
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No I 1 Wca+Pm fl -T? V ht T-a d S 11
Rationale for 'urisd=ional decision:
---- t M f TTIi rJ T gi-M A-i% CK" t4E L--
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to *Soil Taxonomy.'

DATA FORM
ROUTINE CNSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): 1- I N 0A Cc. GNA 1=1 N Date: JAN `' - 11 l9 9 Z
Projec-?Site: A 564 Go v rr TY L-ok WO F I L L State: NC- County: A S o IJ
ADDIic ant/Owner: "AM B LR S TUEV . 1-42C- plant Community #/Name: I N EM M t TTG^LL-
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. STrL_SAM
----------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? WAgN E L-
Yes ?_ No (If no, explain AMINO*
Has the vegetation. soils. and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ No C {N as, explain
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecies Status Stratum Dominant Plant Scecies Status Stratum
1. - 11.
2.. _ 12.
3. - 13.
A. _ 1 A.
5. - is.
b. _ 16.
7. - 17.
8. _ 18.
19.
10. _ 20.
P9rcent of dominant scecies that are GEL. FACN, and/or FAG
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No _
Rationale:
r SCILS
Saries /chase: Suegroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcsoi? Yes No His' !c acicedon -resent? Yes No
Is :he soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Cctor: Motile Colors:
Cther hydr-c soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY 11
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes - No i Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soli probe hole:
LAt other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: " d e T:,12 -F L au7 a 1-. C k a "t^ f-
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
IS the plant community a wetland? Yes - No ) . 4•/ - Uhl .+
Sy?"?" I f
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
1 w1TS f l? -MI I T>=PJ?' S-rMer A,M CE-I.f t1i IE-7 f_
This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
1 2 -'iz
DATA FORM
ROUTINE CNSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): L- I N DA Gr. CGNA F 1 N Date: JA N "I ( < . 19 9 -2-
project/She: A ^r So PJ co u N T`/ L,k N'DP 1 LL-. state: NC- County: AN S O,Q
AcoficanLCwner: C-kAAM B E,t2 S 1E9. 1-#JG. plant Community X/Name: N Q N - 8D1z lC 'R.AV 1 N
Note. N a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook
----------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? P ?,? ? a r-eQ
Yes _ No )-C z- (if no, explain e??
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _X No {!f yes, explain
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETA r1ON
Indic3tcr
Dominant Plant Soecies Status Stratum
I. ?i n V S '1 ?eZcL _?
2. -
3. -
A. -
o. -
7.
3.
4.
10. .
Dominant Plant Scecies
11.
12.
13.
IA.
15.
16
17.
is.
19.
20.
Psrcent of dominant species that are CBL. FAUN, and/cr FAC L O O ?/o
Is the hydrochytic vegetation criterion met? Yes _ No
Rationale: 1 t o l l '-C-li •..s:_ i c,ar - y.4
110 r - ,,-e X
Indicator
Status Stratum

(?.??v SCILS 1?ct?li nttti V\J:bl" V--o-ppe-P
Series/chase: `^ "W-S fVr-,^' S(°»e!, Subgrouo:2 S a a e.?
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a Histoscl? Yes No _ Histic acipedon rresant? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes _ No Gleyed? Yes N+o, c
Matrix Color: 1el lei - Mcr.le Colors:
Cher hyd6c soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes NoX Surface water depth:
Is the scil saturated? Yes No=
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
Let other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE U \ }
-1'4J
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No ? "J 0-T Q t I Vva1-4J 'S
Rationale for judsdic:ional decision. C t4,^,Q.J eL_ a Q D'RAt NACa-E PATTI`P- S
1>1 A."-rCn •a-? r no . SC -1, v\/'t?'i>tV ^A-%I 11% St-71>n %iF--r1 _, .
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessr lent Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

4- i?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODt
Field Investigator(s): [.- I N OA Gr. GE1A F I N Date: 1-14 l C ) Z
ProjectJShe• A^t 5c4 Cou t.r.T1 L-4N'DFt Lt--_ State: NC- County AN -SON
Acolicant/Owner: CNAM 131- 2 S USy. UIC Plant Community #/Name: FIRST T ?-IZRf?rC-?
Nate: ff a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ?X No (If no, explain awkw
Has the vegetation, soils. and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ No _X (If yes, explain WoM¦dloo
---------------------------------------------------
VEGE T ATiON
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecies Status Stratum Dominant Plant Scec-es Status Stratum
1, Cfw! O? nJ S ('4 rO???i Gt CVJ
2. L_ _tv.1t 60 a r- sT . 1:-,4 _Z 12.
3. © ercuS rs?G ro- F-A - 13.
A. ?haSw.a.. .:ww. Let-;- v1 AG- _L_ 1d.
?. _ 16.-
7. _ 17.
19.
10. _ 20.
Percent of dominant species that are CEL. FAC . and/or FAC ri
Yes. N
.he hydrepnytic v?t /P-° r1la met? 1=Ac-C
r=
Rationale: - --
R
t `r? SClLS
Series/phass: W ? k"- Subgrou0:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes 1K _ No Undetermined
Is the soil a Hirmsci? Yes No 4 Histic aoipedon presant? Yes No .?
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes ?C No Gleyed? Yes No X_
Matrix Color. 110 .ere t'o 2 Mcrle Colors: V CA v 2 S? S
Cther hydric soil indicztors: r CMp
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes )_ No
Rationale: IA\A clr-'c- S o ; is us + =L- CL,r-o-V , 4, VIA K v? +AN
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No i X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes. > No (ice pto.ue )
Depth to free-standing water in pk/soii probe hole:
list other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
myt S4-ai?S tC/ -t-0 2 - St,JO ILt'n '1rc?..kn_
Is the wetiarid hydrology criterion met? Yes Z_ No
Rationale: Srew.a SGiVe-4,+-C,4 Q'reao ` Mew IAA.,- 'L Z?
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes., No
Rationale for jurisd c:ional decision:_ v-1%E&'n AzL - "r11fi-V - C-77-01--2-tAk
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
l (o -?
DATA FORM
ROU71NE ONSITE DETERMINATION METH001
Field Investigator(s): L 1 N DA Cc. C-E4A F 1 )J Date: JAN rl " l l l9 9 '2__
Projec-JSke: AN SO A co u rr T`t 1JAr t1,F I L -- Stale: NC- County AN S O /V
AcolicantlOWner. CNAM B>:t2 s X1:9. 12'45- plant Community S/Name• S EGOND 're-1Z ArGt=
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes No (if no, explain MY=11?
Has the vegetation. soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No _? (If yes, explain Vmimmi*
----------------------------------------- ----------

Indicator VEGETATION
Indicator
Dominant P!ant Soecies Status Stratum Dominant Plant Scecies Status Stratum
1. 5 e+k.1(Cam. n e t a. V:AC W
' 11.
.L%!% 5:
AC- 12.
3. Vt y s Qrtieri canes VACW 13.
4. G v U ?rCVL 14..
5. Ce-W s 1 vc rre"- SAC1nl 15.
16.
7. Wo0A-WOLrLia Serek 4l eti , 17.
OSw.v YtP-al: S Obis 18.
g, (7S rr.u+?tla cis r-01kf4 1rRCWfi 19.
10. _A9r1,y ri u.•. ctlix?+i 20.
Psrcent of ccminant scecies that are OBL, FAC.Y. and/or FAC O?1 OZn
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion /. et? Yes) No
Rationale: 100 ?Zn &d kCknr,..' jA Q n-ts Clre 'FPr c--
r SCI LS
Seriesichase: W e?^°A Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes K_ No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcsol? Yes No %Z Histic eoipedon --resent? Yes No r
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes X Na Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: 10 V t"z c? 1'2_.. Mottle Colors: t T2 8 yT R S??
Other hydric soil indic ztors:
Is the hydric soil c:iterion met? Yes _) No
Rationale: L &A,) 6, ro ,,c rro.
HYDROLOGY
b the ground surface inundated? Yes No >C Surface water.decth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No ?c
Depth to free-standing water in pWsoil probe hole:
oil saturato : w 0
Ust other field evidence of surface inundation
LJ &V,
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X_ No A ve k+ m oTS
Rationale: Tl? rvt: ?.c?Q,ar CCVMnA... Or
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No - Rationale for jurisdicional decision:. 3 Z-; t v T?(zbor eA&T-- M ?l ,
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

17-R
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): L- I Av OA Cr- GE-4A F I N Date: jA N `l - 11 3 ICU °I 2-
Projec'JSke: A>vSgA GoulJT?l t-ok14D1=1L1- State: NC' County ,ANSOIV
ADolicant,OWner C.NAM BE?R S T>SQ. I1`1G Plant Community #Mame: LCVA't?b A?Ar 1 JJ
Ndte: ff a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or afield notebook KpoDPLAW
---.------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes No-_(If no, explain MWM* T 1?'Q- ?} G`°'
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _,X No (If yes, explain jedomip,
---------------------------------------------------
v1=r,;=; A ON
Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecies Status Stratum
2, CLiriD??VS Cacdt%fWA 'FACyf
3. Ar
A. _
5. -
7. _
8. _
10. _
indicator
Dominant P!ant Scecies Status Stratum
11.-
12.
13.
1 A..
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Psrcent of dominant scecies that are CEL, FAC . and/or i=AC 1 0 se/
Is the hydrochytx vegetation criterion met? Yes V No
Rationale: 1 e>6 e/s Qx• ¢- 1r,4c ? t? w >=-tT ?^ ' i? ,- --
v SCILS
Saries/chase: v ?-? vie R l 4-a.v? Srt'o? Subgroua:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? es No X Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcsat? Yes No X Histic aoipedon presant? Yes No )_
Is the sail: Mottled? Yes No Cleyed? Yes No. *k-
Matrix Color: -7. S V *T"' - 4- 14 Ca- Mcnle Colors:
Cther hydr-c soil indic ztcrs:
Is the hydric soil crii non met? Yes No X
Rationale: ro P lc? t nd i c? c-E wS
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No i%C Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydro criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: p LA i ne -Fa?cx s -
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdic Tonal decision: 9O LS !Jo-r M EtT At,, 3 GCtI'Tt: Rtf?
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Q t"''
Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
(ED
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METH001
Field Investigator(s): L_ I /1J oA Gr- C_E-4A 1=1 N Date: JAN '7 - l 1 . I q!) '2_.
ProjeC./She: Am Sa,J Gou tJ T`/ L-,k ND1= I L. t- State: 14 C' County: A SOIV
Acolic:ant!Cwner. Ct-IAM 6 t2 S 'DI:y. t-#JC plant Community #/Name:
Note: if a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
----------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes _ No . (if no, explain ammmi?
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ No (if yes, explain UWW*
---------------------------------------------------
Indicator
Dominant Plant Scecies Status
2.
3. ! V - 0. V:A<
4. -Q-1:!A l 0,A1A r OS L
S. _=M9x CPAej&.,A_ VAC W
VEGE ii A110N
Stratum Dominant Plant Scecies
Indicator
Status Stratum
o.
7.
to

T 12,
13.
T 14.
S 15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20
P9rcent of dominant sceces that are CEL. FACW. and/or FAC 1 OCR? p
Is the hydrophytic veget-tiori criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: 1 c?r? ?v ch) '"DQ r^??a A f^-12t= 'F??c? O'Z w C--TT?y
Sarie:tlchase: W r??a? -?-- SClLS Subgroup-.2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? . Yes >< No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcsol? Yes No _ Hist:c ecipedon . resant? Yes No _
Is the soil: Monied? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color. SG min ts?? Mottle Colors: G- g
Cther hydric soil indic. ors.
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: t- ? G?"2p ttiPs M A --M t x, wt -rH
HYDROLOGY
is the ground surface inundated? Yes NoiX Surface water depth:
Is the scil saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
?T??e e-,_ w , 'H-% c s+06'k ,ed ct ?.c?. .? w o ??t
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: tM?.?? C-}-ai:?s? r.?wvrT 1no?lu oara't"a't't? C
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X' No
Rationale for jurisdi.Gional decision: U_ 3 0797 VP-tA A (Z-s S,A1-U11 lR'n
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.
IQ-'-R
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1
,) 19 ?I Z
Field Investigator(s): L I N DA C r • C - H A F I N. Date: JAN 7 It
Proiec'JShe: A ^r Sd nl Co u N TY L-414 D F I L t•- State: ? L County AN S O N
AcolicanvOwner: C NA M B Lt2 S RSV' I r iG plant Community #/Name: t NTNNMl Try NT STIZ ArM
Note: if a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook
---. ------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Ckc %N. ,el v_n tilowa_ ?ee.?
Yes No (If no, explain QMWW0* c1,?h?..elt -cod 1t9•?-v- ?w-t.
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? O b t, +rj_r_t, b? S i P r?.p .?
Yes _ No (1f yes, explain ? So r•.e qrt".
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dominant P!ant Scecies
VEGETATION
Jndicatcr Indicator
Status Stratum Dominant Plant Scecies Status stratum
ipAtr_ 'T
2 r^ 5 i ne?S c 1=Ar GG ^r 12.
3. V 9610640n= 1A 1.3
4. _ IA.
s. _ 1
7. _ 17.
a. _ is.
9. _ 19.
10. _ 20.
Psrcant of dominant scecies that are CBL. FAC:V, and/or FAC
Is the hydrochytic vegetation criterion m t? Yes X No
Rationale: ? <-o 'fn ?-p ?,. ,; ,tea ,.-t S a r-? r--- C_ e r- w -e-
r SCILS
Series/chase: At St-c0. Cr'Ce?rvt-yr Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No >C Undetermined
Is the soil a Y.istcscl? Yes No _)g- Histic apicedon cresant? Yes No
is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleved? Yes No
tz S / 8
Matrix Coicr. 2. 5 ?T2- Mcrle colors: t c5 41
Cther hydric sag indicators: n tsxrL
Is the hydric sod criterion met? Yes ) No
Rationale:
vJa'?'G' -(aoo ? Q w i .i?? Cl,MRgLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes Not Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No
Death to free-standing water in ph/soil probe hole:
Lsi other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes ?_ fro
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
fs the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for iurisdic:ional decision:
It ,+e,rs -tf, U oa 5-1-eo tl
ST9- M
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and.the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
r?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(sj: L-l N OA Gr• C-HA t=1 N Date: IAN 19 °12
Project/Site: A ^r _S64 r-o u t.r TY tJti NIJf 1 L 1.- State: NC, Couny. A 51011V
Acs licanvOwner G NAM 8F-R S 'D10. 1-#1G plant Community ;t/Name: 1A AOwArU?R SE- Ov
)Tte: d a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. -X NI-e-9-t-k11TE;-NT
- - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community
Yes _ No ,"X_ (If no, explain
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? S 1oO; \ A 1.11? S tc_? -PUS4
_ Cur,S, {? P
Yes --?- No - - (!f yes. explain "0=*-------------------------------- 1 Sare---4,
__ _
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecies Status Stratum Dominant Plant Scecies Status Stratum
1. Caro: v?v.a co?r6U1atgK Ems - 11.
2- 6 c e.r• r ktilcYu r-.' F A L - 12-
3. L ; i$? 13.
4. L.•ts 14.
?.-
s. _ 10".
7. _ .17.-
8.
9. _ 19.
10. _ 20.
Percent of dominant species that are 0131. FAC`M. and/or FAC ©O in
ls'the hydrechytic vegetation criterion met? Yes
_ No
-
Rationale: I n 0/l A2F 1^ pt-f-- b 3c t? --
--
i-?r

SClLS
Series/chase: w \? t, ?-e_ Is-V r'e_._ Subgrouc:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No .2<_ undetermined
Is the soil a 1-:istcsol?.Yes No =Histic aoicedon --resent? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes _> No Gleyed? Yes No
s/6
Matrix Coior: 2-S)f e/z Mcrle Colors: 126
Cther hydr•,c soil indicatcrs: more
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes K_ No
Rationale: L.ow Gttr=S= Pt njA=rrz-Ax W t -rra. K7R ('rWr t-t.OTTLJaS
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No )=
Depth to free-standing water in piUsoil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
fQV AU JA-GaF tVnc't'i EtLNi . -m-5?st S wl'Ri Ewa t r '? %ArSaS .
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETEr'tMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdc:icnai.decision: M-11 +-
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification accarding to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

2 3-?
A
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1
Field Investigator(s): L-f /VOA Cr• G!-tA 1=1 N Date: 'TIAN 1- it, t q 9 Z
SdA Cou NTl L-4t410 F1 Lt-- State: NC- Counry ,4NSON
ProjeC4 he: AM
Aoolicant,Cwner•. CkAAIM 139-11 S 'DEN. 112C Plant Community #/Narn >=`D o f= -?Pt f e -RLA2TA-t'1C1M
Note: n a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes _ No -y (if no, explain pis
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ? S t??t ?j GO 0 vRs?°Pe
Yes _)<- No (1f yes. explain uftm* -Fevy - Z 7'(420)
-- -------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
]ndicatcr Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Scec?es Status Stratum
1. ?i ntwe Ic'e-do- FC- 11,
2. _ 12.
3. 13.
A. _ 14.
5. - 15.
a. - 16.
7. _ 17.-
8. is.
9. _ 19.
10. - 20.
P'rcent of dominant species that are GEL. FAC'.Y. and/or FAC 100
Is the 4ydrochytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: t c?6, o?cy o F poj-%L-J A.u- _rs /?rzE FAc- -- --
v
a t +c.
y' SCILS
2
-
Series/chase: Sabgrouo:
Is the soil on the hydric soils iist? Yes No Undetermined X
Is Me soil a Histcsol? Yes No _ C Hist:c apipedon -resent? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gieyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: t e y rz J 3 Mcrle Colors: ?• S?V re .?/ 8
Cther h
dn
di
il'
t
y
c so
n
ca
ors: ?,.
Is the hydric soil crterion met? Yes No K
Rationale: M ATR t X Cttagg-A A t-% NoT L- OW

HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No j. Surfacs water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No K
Depth to free-standing water in pit/scil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: >c t Ew) ' / JJ Dt c 4rF R S
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No )<_
Rationale for jurisd=ionai decision: HU D i201 12 1= LeLtl .10 J?j C1t'C 6123 ARC.
i?rt?SE N 'Is SO t t_ IS M P-Cxt "AIL&
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy."

3 La)
DATA FORM
ROUTINE CNSITE DETERMINATION METH001
Field Investigator(s): L- I N OA Gr- CE-4A 1=1 N Date: JAN rl ^ 11T 9 9 Z
Project/Site: Arr SQ A Cou 1,J" L-4N1,P I t- -. State: N c- County AN Q AJ
AoolicantlCwner: CIr M 59-R S MEV. 1-44C. Plant Community ;f/Name: E 2 r,6 0 F Sotrot-LAwD
Note: lf a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. Or4tPILDW00D
----------- ---------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? rCc,6 a r c.t-j,,,e _
Yes _ No (if no, explain r i? ZN a r 3 r rk q -r-t,
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed' . O
Yes __ No (If yes, explain "OWN,* C"TL•? s fjv?..+ i S 60' ddwv?ilvpc
r ?
---------------------------------------------------
Indic3tcr
Dominant Plant Soecfes Status
1. Ace-e- rc? br4?, r-Ac-
2. UlynnyS ?rkx.b?ra: FpCW
3. _EMyin%3S :PeUn4nS4% PeCW
4.
5. _
S. _
7.
8. _
VEGETATION
Stratum Dominant Plant Spec-es
Indicator
Status Stratum
IT 11.
12.
13..
14.-
15-
16.
17.-
18.
19.
2t).
Percent of dominant sceces that are CEL. FACW. and/or FAC (0O to
Is the hydrochytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: 16O °/O OF T>Qt-(AJA tJr T'S ARE A C_ O 1? W ETTE _ --
Y SCILS
Series/chase: W e;Ac0.-a Le-e- Subgroup:2
Is the roil on the hydric soils list? Yes X No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcsol? Yes No _ Histic acipedon present? Yes No *X-
Is :he soil: Mottled? Yespp No Gteyed? Yes rlo C
Matrix Color: 10 X 3 Mottle Colors:. I. s Y R us d go Other hydr•c soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No _K _
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes Y_ No «
Depth to free-standing water in pitisoil probe hole:
List other Meld evidence of surface inundation or sod saturation.
Nt^RPHotCGLCAt- t W1)t CA-'?(2.C T2 ?' t?ArS C /4yt2? SwyLLw` /J
Is the wetland hydrolooggy criterion met? Yes , ?C No
Nationale: H-CW2 W hT e- 'Ty4$Lfc 4 /moo nH-rjLo C%J CA t_ 1 clot CA1T0 R-5
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes . No
Ad2-? 5't?RL Jet Ca- Y___._T
Rationale for jurisd=ional decision:. V t^s A N nT? u -o &Y
SQtt. LS OA/ -" ST - C147%6MA tS nIAT LOW '6UT i S MAR 4AAAL
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
(ED
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1
Field Investigators • L I nt Oq Cr• GE-lA t=1 N Date: ?'r4 N `? -' 11) 9 9 -2-
Field • " Sd A Co u rt T`1 L.J4 wD F I L L-- State: N L County: AN S O N
Aoolicant!Cwner: C WA M B JLR S REV . I -#JG plant Community ,/Name: t NTe-rt m t T" r nJ T- s iRIAM
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook W L'rL-t Fi-4-rS
--=•-------------------------------------'-----------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Tine6 -PIA . 4 V\ca,- CI,c,"'j.
Yes No '>e_ (if no, explain enni¦114 S o? P; lel- P us L-?
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? S MQ?,r? bo-t+n
Yes _ >C No (If yes, explain '•^
---------------------------------------------------
YEGE T ATION
S.
s.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1, i?rnuS tae '-Arc- T'
2 ^G
Dominant Plant Scecies
11.
12.-
13.
14.-
15.
16.
17.
is.
19.
20.
Indicator
Status Stratum
Percent of dominant soces that are Cl?L. FAC . and/or i=AC 1no. o
Is the hydrechyt. vegetation criterion met? Yes .? No
Patlonale• f bC? o o o t= l?0 Mt d1A t/1'IS ArR- i=/ O'R w YER
SClLS
Sedwohase: t+-D. V Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No ?C undetermined
Is the soil a Hismsol? Yes No _ C - Hist:c apipedon present? Yes No k-
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No .Gteyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: -Z.S *4 C o Mottle Colors: ?. S Y P? 'S?tio
Cther hydric soil indic.: ors: U^c'1%g
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes - No
Rationale: M AeGct w/ A L.LL4 L.04c Ckf RO M h Y-A A-TTL I X W L ttt I.. tZt lsru r
wnc?-rr??s
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes Noi K' Surface-water depth:
is the sod saturated? Yes No X
Depth to free-standing water in pdsoil probe hole:
List other field fence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
'D iZ.&lNh? QATTF2NS4 O X t ntzt= n 7ZoOT c_Ni4NNELS
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: D R-A LtJA-0A- i 'PperTr?a-/V O K L U I Z E n T?.00T Gt-E?Pt•N N C LS
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE ` 4tl
-rs t1 ?i ?d
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes W aters ? rt.- V
No
Rationale for jurisdic:ional decision: ,??-L- ?Tt.?S???°'R•CLE ?T
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

:S - 7-- 31-R
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODt
Field Investigators : L-l A10A Gr. CA-4A F 1 N Date:
tor 0 19 9 -2-
SAN -' (I
Projec?Site: AN d ul Go u N T`I 1-o4/JUF t LL State: t 4c-, coup ,
: Ar41J S O N
Ac IicanVOWner: -C NAM Bt t2 S Vl;'t. I )J4- Plant Community #//`Name- I *-A-nwIrTEXZ-- 0 F
Note: if a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or afield notebook. tNg"t Tl'i:^/T-
--------------------------------- ------------p--lNAr.,4F
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes _X No (if no, explain etiiw?
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _A No _)1C (If yes, explain 010111111*
-------------------------------------
--------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecies Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
t . ?i c..,e,r a w?a r' Si?ratt VAC- _Z_ 11.
2 t=A C- 12.
3.u¢rtw? Z S.M F;4 C- 13.
4. J: Lk? C ut/? a1n ilo .S faces X 14.
S. S)1 Vlk V S QLl6L-6-- F-^ CU +_ T 15.

7. Fri Inns •? 6CW S- 17.
$. C1..F rCW- 18.
19.
t 0. 20.
P9rcent of 'dominant species that are OEL. FAC`N. and/or FAC
Is the hydtaphytic vegetation criterion met? Yes
No
_
Pationale• 1DCS NA4 ^J .4- nr TS B 1r'PrC . ea'Z c.v ??L?f
S^.tLS
2
Series/phase: Subgroup-
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcsol? Yes No cX Histic epipedon present? Yes No Nr
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No -K
Matrix Color: 1 o v R 2.. Mottle Colors: "?• 5? V A, 8
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: L.[sW Cf-i(i:+0 mA M ft-mi K W t Tti iK7z.(G*1rT MOTTLES
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No=
Depth to free-standing water in pklsoil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil satur tion.
-
M
-
_1 4&"Lct?L-
ZVOT C+IANN61-
7-g,( TS O Y. t 017-e* Z . 1DiRA1NACWC ;:PA
tC42MS
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: ?Tz ES 4? ^JC 4(!>f= S? V ?7z/ri- 7-- L EL-D I /J tit C4T, 12,5
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No wp
• Rationale for jurisd?fonal decision: L- 3 G2 t 'rWU A- A`I4k E.. M E-1-
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.-
B-2 S -R %?- Ir G, G, P . 1'7-18 - F S * •2_

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): L I Iv OA Cc. C"A F I N Date: 4 -JAN l 9.9 2
ProjecVShe• Ar"50-PQ r°l?. AN01=ILt_ State: NC County .4N56N
Apolicant,`Owner: C"AJA1364;Z s -L EV• Plant Community #/Name: i+5--A'Du/A-17*J?- OF
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. 1^J-r*AX JKITTt; NT
---------------------------------------------- S?Tz-etm
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? V4
Yes _ No (if no, explain on back) 7/0 -? is 0-ppC CX
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? (,O O r Sl
Yes__ No X (If yes, explain on bacik) -.` . S i cif e c?r+ze%
- - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
L. 11.
2. 12-<?Ame7 &S 3. a 13.
4. 14.
S. 15.
6. - 16.
7. - 17.
8. 18.
9. 19.
10. _ 20.
Percent of dominant species that are 08L. FAUN. and/or FAC
Is the hydrephytic vegetation criterion met? Yes LK_ No
altnnnJo• ;;t r?C1007A 0t= yo M1Ni4ArS.S t)Ta- wt.T .R
SC1LS
? Subgroup:, Via- 2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No _X Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No X_ Histic epipedon present? Yes No ?C
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes X No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: 2• S v 1 -2 Mottle Colors: 1. S Y R 4 /te
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No . cX
Depth to fre"ta:ring water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil ?saturation.
- o 13 t lC t A L. R1 crt' - ma ArtJ1J -r= E 08' 1-s--12 P ! s
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes _?e No
Rationale: r-r-Z.S&tJC.E OP- Std M-PILSAA 6 R0011 0e MIAl "AC-3E
'PAFt't'?Rns S
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale for jurisdicional decision: ,AL-1- 3 GTZ.t.-f (Z(A A-fS f- tALI-
t Thais data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
B-2 (?fo-R Rpf P . 18 -- ?.6 Z..
g? 7-R
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigators : LL I N 0A Gc-. CNA F 1 N Date: JAN 1 99 ,R,
Project/She: L- L- State: 'N C- County ArNSON
ApplicanVOwner. C14A; M B F?RS IZA-V, plant Community shame: I M'POV NDA EN-r
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes _ No _X (If no, explain t?siw¦?
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _49' No (If yes, explain i11iMIJO
- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
VEGETA71ON
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. O I+ 11.
2. P?lnala.,-MU. s oct: d OML. S 12,
3. 13.
4. 14.
S. 15.
s. 0-K L& 16.
7. 17.
8. 18.
9. 19.
10. - 20.
Psrcent of dcminant species that are OEL. FAUN, and/or FAC l00 °?o
Is the hydrophyticve etas'°On criterion met? Yes )No
I?=t?'•,a;e; f ?
SCI LS
Seriesiphase: - May o n Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric sot list? Yes No _. Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No _?C_ His' tic spipedon present? Yes No )C
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: - Z•-S 's Mottle Colors: 5T'? 37-4
Other hydr';c soil indicators: '^ ° ^ e
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X_ No
Rationale: Lew Ct-ttz g s &&A n t ,&-rfZAX w t l- 4 'b'Rttzt#T /4 O'CTCIF-1
HYDROLOGY
Is the grcund surface inundated? Yes No _V Surface water depth:
Is V%e scil saturated? Yes x.. No T s ,?
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
S iAr_OIll 14 2S OG?aii.
?.- -
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes 25e No
Rationale: 5Ar?1A4 0M o N .- -P l_£ S 2 NC O y S u u-F t O 1 c_ A4 prrt i Att-.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? .Yes 3 Cii' t T4.R1 A ?-S- /? LI-
Rationsfefor jurisdictional decision:
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
B-2 i ? irl ?' G' q c ri f' . 1 q - . ? 6 2- .
0.8 -iZ
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI C s E p-r - 9 t,
Fled lnvesiigaior(s : t- f N DA GT• GNA F! N Date: 1 q 9 oL
Project/She: N 'J CJZUQTV LAWDFI y u- State: L County: A SO
Applicant/Owner: CJ MQ F• Plant Community #/Name: VOW N SI-MLA A 0 f
Note. if a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. JA4P0UN01-tetJT ---
( N-T? My4.7j-jl c fl PL4 W
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? tI>ZST?E sT- r D E)
Yes -?-C No (if no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes -__ No )< (If yes, explain on back)
----------------------------------------------------
Percent of dominant species that are OBL..FAC14V. and/or FAC
ifle hycrcphyi?c vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
=_,i,,.,;?le• Qc? .n 'DD tMt ?v TS 4.. ?/1-G ©tZ l??-c _T>=.tZ _
SCILS
Series/phase: Ck ?f O Ca r% Subgroua:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a His:cscl? Yes No )C Histic apipedon present? Yes No L_
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes _1e_ No Gleyed? Yes No _N--
Matrix Color: z. s y q45 Mottle Colors: -7. S =v R 3/4
Other hyd4c soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No, )C
Rationale: yArNg-Grt NALJUV L.,0 I. LA
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1• Li vs-tyt4m sine+4-S2 -S 11,
2. L erg n t a 96rc_ 12.
3. L-V copus c v S?rg L th_ 13.
4. ?? ?. r•+ker'? C 'AACkCC? EALWt - 14.
S. u S FgC* . 15.
6. L.: e- 4 ,roc- kc 4=A C- . -r_ 16.
7. r c? r c.t vz?c_ _T 17.
s, _iNy ss r, S v t vati c-a-. FA C- -_ 1 s,
9. .... 19.
10. - 20.
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes No ? Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes- No X {
Depth to free-standing water in ph/soil probe hole:
Lbt other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: L-+O L N tG Arf3S I?If?"
L. S ED l= 2 L-_ A46t `tWAL
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
3-
19
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s) : L I N OA Gr. Q4A F I N Date: Q J-,4/\f q Z"
project/She: AN Sd tJ re). LA N1> 1~ t L-L.- State: AJ C-- County: s41?ISO N
ApplicanUOwner. Pant Community #/Name: t NTbR M t TT t N T- ST-V14
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. W t Tt+ r- ,+ S
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? P .j.v Paco
a o
Yes J No X (If no, explain on back) . t
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? b f C-L'C" t-'ek S o
Yes _, ( No _jr_ (If yes, explain on back) p a,
----------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant P!ant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. Views +ae a ci Rele- _ "'f?_ 11.
2. R Q om .. 5 12.
3. - L_; 5y2s V^ m rnev%ae S 13.
4. 'P10 c-1410- C Q &0X+&'?X SAC A_ 14.
S. 1^a r kti 8 1 ?_ 15.
6. 16.
7. S n Lw.av?u rv. 17.
t3. is.
9. ._ 19.
10. 20.
P9rcent of dominant species that are OBL. FAUN, and/or FAC
IS the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ?_ No
e2 ce-
err tAjeq??
SC!LS
Sedes/chase: Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No ). Undetermined
Is the scil a Histcsel? Yes No >_ Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gieyed? Yes - No
Matrix Color: - !O TR ?4. 2- Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators: ^d ^e-
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X_ No,
Rationale: _ L-0 CkKL2rnna. Nt*T%?A1L W t.Tt4 x&o-rrua-S
HYDROLOGY
Is the grcu^d surface Inundated? Yes No K Surface water depth:
Is the scsl saturated? Yes No W
Depth to free-:landing water in phiscil probe hole:
List other field evidence Qf.surface inundation or soil saturation.
C0tip- t4Cir Dp-&c t)JA43cs-. -PAIIfs2NS
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X_ No
Rationale: SC C ct iL t N Ge 'D"2,4 t N kCz E P/4TTE t? NS
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisd=ional decision ?-t- C t MET 07Z (.+11-
ST -A-AA Ct4A tJ nJGLS A17-12-. t t W /-T2- TZS Or- Ttt E` . N t I-F- D -M 116? to
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2Classification according to'Sotl Taxonomy.'
f
B-2 J/?,
n w w / ?? 2c? r$?
30-?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI CS E PT 9 I)
Field Investigator(s): L- O V OA Gr. CE-4A t= I N Date: Q -TAA1 4 Z
ProjeCJShe: AN KO K I CO. LA.-4D r-t t-L - State: N C- County: i4c N SO N
Applicant,'Owner: -C 4kAnKI-k&-S -'p EV Plant Community #/Name: COM FL-vE NC.Q of TWO
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or afield notebook IM"LRMtT-rG J'f°
-- -------------------------------------------h-4A-&%S
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes X No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes __ No - (If yes, explain on back)
----------------------------------------------------
Dominant Plant Soecies
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. GA-c- 11.
2. V=A<- J _ r 12.
3. _F •t- Ir 13.
4. -r_ 14.
S.
S. c- s 16.
7. OILLS S 17.
8. S?13 Lb ?A 18.
9. V 19.
10. 20.
Psrcent of dominant species that are 08L. FAC`N. and/or FAC 100
Is the hydrophytic veget tion cr'
I
0? rion ((y?'?et? , Yes
? No
'
IP
C
Ot5
o d0 n.?? rta ?
tS ? A
-
C1 r c.
W

SCILS
Series/phase: Subgroup-2
Is the soil on the hydric soils fist? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Hismscl? Yes No )C Histic epipedon present? Yes No k
Is the soil. Mottled? Yes5e*- No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color. -Z-9 i5{ s/ 1& Mottle colors: s OS-AW
Cther hydec soil indicators: '^ ?"`t -
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X_ No
Rationale: SOLL- HA-S MA-q-&tMAAj-J -W-A) C1•#26MA- W14 MOTTL.G-S
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface !nundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the sod saturated? ' Yes No
Depth !o free-standing water ki riikcii probe hole:
L:st other field avid nce of surface inundation or soil saturation. 1>R.(-Fr c-(..rEs'S.
_ 1>R=A-cwt f?4TTE02NS. 475-s-s b1V- gVMMOGKS. SU2PlC-(hL (26p! S
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes . X No
Rationale:- S S V VZA-4 --- r: 4Wt_ A i" 'n I C A-M t? -s /1-7Z /? R f.S
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes _) No
Rationale for jurisdic Tonal decision: XZ-Z-- 3 zWL-r1-4U A A-f2S? zkjG= 1 -
t this data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
6-2 ' /
3 0 - I'? .%L 1=' Z V ^ F R ? 1 -? ! ao,rz a?c^e.. Car..-?u -0# .0 i `1?..a carca
3l -iZ
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI C$EPT 9
Field Investigator(s): i- I N DA GT. CHA t=1 N Date: 9 .TA PJ q Z-
ProjecC?Site: 4NSO AJ Cam. LANn t-% L-t-- State: t 4c- County: AhJScftit
ApplicanVOwner. CH A615 611 S Plant Community #/Name• t 1 E ADW A-11-a-i 012
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. 1 NTE2M tTTG4T
-------------------------------- --- --fj1}-frtAG F
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Ay-cA USa4 S lo.,,,A•ti 4
Yes . f_ No A _ (If no, explain lteriw S o;1 '
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? P' 1 Psi... d4 41-1
Yes XG No (If yes, explain mlwo i Si }c. Qr'e'P
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. _Ace..- ru.brk..,, FA L s_ tt.
2. UINIVA Af-N¢r'iCarat. FtkC'T_ 12,
3. _Pi'n.tS -t-tXP-d0-; 13.
4. - VL_ 14.
S. Y I J S VIS7V" : 1: a. gC. \_ 15.
g, S' L.? n?a r.•N,.'u,?. 1 cti6i ti -VAX-*OJ Vh_ 16.
7, 'An ?4s?? c: s sud atnnrv ??_ __,? __ 17.
9. _ 19.
10. _ 20.
P9rcent of dominant species that are 0131., FAUN, and/or FAC 1 OO %5
Is the hydrophytic vegetattign C. iterion met? Yes 56 No
P.atier?afa• l o0 o 647- DO MI N T , S t EZ AM$- PAC, t?2. W>:.' .(Z
SOtLs
Series/phase: - Cr?e-ear" Subgroup-.2
Is the soil on the hydric soils fist? Yes No )< Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No _)C Histic epipedon present? Yes No 3e'_
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes - No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: to ; a Irp / z Mottle Colors: I 4"o T • S)? R_6?/8
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes c No P.
Rationale: L &W Cafto w1A MAr-TZ-0C W tT14 al?- GrOT 040TTLAES
HYDROLOGY
is the ground surface Inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No )c f
Depth to free-star.d:rg water in pit/scil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
J=kLrUil G 7D1ZAr1 V/kCI_e P Pr'TT IZ NS : SC.ICattC, SW o t LR4 *mA-.%& s UN' naz
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: 3"E. S It 4 t.2 O F S?v zr2A ?... t E t_17 1 AJDt c 'TO'E S
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes X No
Rationale for jurisd1Gional decision: A-L.?.- 3 ca-%IS UI AIM- t Al=-'T
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
8-2 z '3. F 13
32.-h
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI CS e P fi 5 1,
Field Investigator(s): L I N OA Gr- CHA Fi N Date:
Projec,JShe: tJ L LL..i- State: NC-- County ANStlrJ
Appiicanti'Owner: CI Mt3 'DEV. Plant Community #/Name: S HP L-L. 1 KPoVJ%JJN 44 'T
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
--------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes __No X (if no, explain on back) w; ve
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? -.
Yes. No (11 yes, explain on back) be c.k.w4*Qr QKtt. 1! Z
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator indicator
Dcminant Plant Species status stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. - AItnUS SerrL? Zt .c;iTL- ?s_ 11.
2. - g4cCa.- Y- LJ n, r• k. w. 1=ArC_ -r_ 12.
3. _ u wC .. 94na OZ / -t- _14_ 13.
4. UI.L?o? rt?w'c aercel4e, OSL. A_ 14.
5. BQEUIP-?e- 0-IS L4
S. CareLC 16.
7. 17.
8. ._ 18.
9. 19.
10.. 20.
Psrcent of dominant species that are OBL. FAUN. and/or FAC 100 VM
Is the hydrephytic vegetation crit rcn met? Yes _,X No
Rationale: ?bn ed O•?- ?onni tA? tits G re.. ACC? L Ir W t?.`? _
SCILS
Series/phase: - C???r'1 Subgrou0:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? 'fes No ?C Undetermined
is the soil a Histcsoi? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes No
is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? . Yes No
Matrix Color: z ?'7 Mottle Colors: s Y
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes _X_ No _?.
Rationale: - _LA-4,3 Gtnraw•4. W/ V-b7t •?eA
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes X No Surface water depth:
L4 the soil saturated? Yes ,•X No ;
Depth to free-standing water in pit/scil"probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes X No
Rationale: ?? n _ i S i hL..? -1-e10 tract 1CA-- +CM & e& Q_ Q r G-
1s the plant community a wetland? Yes >C No
Rationale for jurisdiaional decision:. 4t_c_. '5; G fz-4 i-EzwA- Ai?-c M E I
t This data form can be used.for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community r
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
1-2 ( 3 -a -2? = F 3 -' 8 ?- 21
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
3:s -IR
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator/-- L- I N OA CT. GENA F I N Date: 1 O JAN 4 a
Project/She: i? USo N CO. LAND t=1 LL- State: N C_.. County: A -SOW
Applicant/Owner: G44AMSEX2_ M-)>~y Plant Community IlName: 1 1VTS4-LJK I T7-c-NT 5; All
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. Ct4,4NNL=L_
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes ,_,,_ No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes __ No _X (if yes, explain on back)
Dominant Plant Soeces
1. -
2.
3. _
4. _
5. _
6._
7. _
s. _
9. _
10. .
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status' Stratum
11.
12.
13..
14.
15.
16.
17.
is.
19.
20.
Percent of dominant species that are OSL, .FAC`N. and/or FAC
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
RaVenale:
SCILS
Series/phase: r Subgroua:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic apipedon ,present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gieyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: Mottle Colors. !
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes No }
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soii probe hole:
List other field. evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale:
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for j?'uri?sd1=1onal decision: J'V
U
STi?A-M CI-EAJ1JAJ L_ 14% 114-1 S r- - 4e _
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

(ii?D
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator/-%- L l N OA CT• CNA F 1 N Date: 1 O J'AN 9 2 GS E PT'9 i,
Projec!/Site: t- N t-i- State: N C- County: A NrZa nj
Applicant/Owner: C j4AM B t:.fZ-M Plant Community #/Name: I-1MQWA4ISV S 01=
Note. If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook. INTL4z/AtTTL NT'
-----------------------------------------------5:'iz-EAM
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes .,X_ No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation. soils. and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ No X (If yes, explain on back)
VECETATION
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Percent of dominant species that are 08L. FAUN, andlar FAC Or_t
Is the h drophytic ve a ation criterion met? Yes Na
?• f_ O_?.? ? 'Do can. v??? a•?t_?. j ,?- ?L w>?._
7.
8.
S.
10.
Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecies Status Stratum
1. - fie u? r C3._ L _IV
2. _P*nv.I't' 4 _-r
4, ?A_
S. SCILS

Series/phase: { t n Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the sail a Histcscl? Yes No C Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes C No Gteyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: to /z- Mottle.Colors: -- :c??itiCZ- (0 a?..e? 'TES C2 Co1$
Other hydric sot indicators:'`'Q
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes C. No
Rationale: ?_PW C Ef'fZ01?nA, N e rI-ioust- LJ m t jam c.+ ? Vti0-r i'L?C S
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface "inundated? Yes No d'?? Surface water depth:
Is the soif saturated? Yes No
Depth to free-standing water in pitch prove hole:
List other field evidence of surface inund lion or soil saturatioqq.
,. Mnt lpr u N E3 . S UtiZ.t Cx-. '1?iZ,4 t N hC-? 'PA-TTEW- J-S M t L eS O!J
IS the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No t4UP A I- & 0 C-f4S W LI ti4UL'Y("PIJr
Rationale: _ERV-SE'ntCE- OF Sii2Vtt(LX F14Zt-D 1tJDIChT0R.S
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes K No
Rationale for jurisdicional decision: ej LA,
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

35-2
RCUTINE CNSITE OS1=-= t(HAT!CH M2THOOt
F'e:c Invest stcr(s): aW 1. L• Date: 9- i C(61 Z
1=.•CfeGr'..itB: rr•^ • "? SJ Ccunty: A /QS EN
it.ss,Cwner• t14.?n:3 c"'2i S ?faC ?, Ccr..muri-r .rNa...e: 940Wfl?EiL SEEP dF fNI?PMtiiE "'NT
.•, tt
form or a (laid notebook. ?i?.4r<'l
-nt rVC:a: ;f a more detaiied site cesc#tion is necsssaq. use Me :aCX =i data
-------------------- ------------------------------
Cc ,.crznai environmental ccndit;cns exist at :,tie plant ccmmurIfty?
Yes _ X Nc (If no,
i-as :::e vegetation, soils, and/or hyc:clc_ been s;ccr? nt fJi dorUe?V spf,f?ir mPmcmP HimAc ken- [Tty
Yes _ No (If yes, 23 ?V
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETA 7 C N
Indicator
Ccr::inart ''art Scecies Status St:at:.•n Cc.•-lrar.: ?'art Scecies
.: IME cS1eS?-_ 12.
_ i:.
C
- '.
7. FOt-Cij8-A)Mn -1A C
. 1 V•
.C• 20.
r?
•
Pert:art ci c4cmirant species that are CEL FAC:Y, arson Fri. 100%
Is Z e ::yd: ccryr^ vegetation ;r tenon met? Yes No
- z
Irclc3tcr
Status Strat::rn
Saries:c^asa: G4/?Qd it?.ct9t? Pra l?/lh2 _ SL^r•c;.?c:?
s a:a psi cn :,:a :yc:ic soils :ist? Yes _nceterminec
Ist::e sc:I a ris:csot? Yes No )_ ; is-,X- ec:: eCL.. ':9Eor•:`? Yes No X
Is me scii: Mct::ec? Yes No Gavec? Yes r 10 Magic ".zicr: 2• SY b/i 'vic=e C., ors: S
C::,er yc: z soil :nc:c tc. s: r°^
Is :he hy(:ric scii c.:terion met? Yes_ No HYORCLOGY

IS N e ;:a::rd surface irurcated? Yes No ,-,X_ Sur:acs water cecth:
Is et e scii saturated? Yes No-_,)I-
Down :c freestanding water in pit/scil probe hole:
•s,? f _ _
Lst other 5eid evicanes. of surfacs inundation or scii saturation.
Is Me Wetland hyd: oiogy criterion sstt?et? Yes ?_ No
Rationale: Joy A9l . s? • X by%
JURISDICTIONAL DETEMMINATIONAND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? . Yes X . No
Patierale for ;urisdic:lonai decision: /311 3 COOK w•To. 'Me v,.e,+ ,
t This data form can be used for the I-lydric Soil Assessment Prccsd::: a and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 C;assit:caticn ac: arcing to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
?n
DATA FCRM
ROUTINE CNSITE DETER TINA A NCH ME7HOD1
F'e:c Investi5a cr s : OViELt _ Date: AM L gq2
F-ciec.'S4e: rl` Slate: ?- Ccunty N
9 &Z.9 SEW--_p
r 06 weer: CAA P!ant Ccmmuniy #(Name4e
NC, if a more detailed site desc :ption is necassary, use the 1-ack cf data form or a fisid notebook.
---•------------------------------------------------
Dc normal environmental conditions exist at the plant communityy?? ARIA AFMAP-S Ta 14A'IG 15FEN EXcAvATel)j
Yes No - X_ (!f no, explain on back) $PotL PILES AV-E 095 C7%t- Arr a 6Mg o t= %"JETLAfAj).
Has :::e vegetation. soils, and/or hydrelccy been significantly cisturtec?OKT MAO CftcsSC-s ()DV f115TReA- 4W :;-M0
Yes _ No (If yes. explain cn bac!c) Mh'? IMPo Ji7 WAT& z
---------------------------------------------------
YECETAiCN
indicator Indicator
Dominant Part Scec:es Status SIraturn Dcrnirart Pant Scecies Status Stratsurt
! . Ac" Iybrv Mr, FAQ 19429 11.
2. ` .?` 4st0. ?$L 12.
:. ? ]CL E 13.
A. ._ SAW6 1 C.
5. ` SAC-.. VINE 1S.

a. 18.
s. 18161b. t? 19.
10. 20.
Percent cf dominant scenes that are GBL. FACW. and/or F AC
is a yc:cci-.rtic?veeoion g.stt ?cn mt?es
Y?^ ?`
N?zr?o EAG max- v?
.? .
!LS
.C,arie?i ^asa: ?• cutC:CUD:2
Is :ts soil on the hydric seiis list? Yes Nc x Unceter-minee
Is z a soli a Hismsci? Yes No Histic eacedcn presant' Yes No K_
Is « s scar: Mc:vlec? Yes _ No Glayec? Yes No Flo
Matrix Czlcr: V d, 64 Mc: ;e Colors: T%.!
l"f}2si we+rr e•ni? iw.+in.rnro• _.__-._
Is the hydric scii crterion met? Yes X_ No
'` ... _ _. .
HYDROLOGY
Is Is g -und surfacs inundated? Yes No A- Suelacs water decth:
'is :I:e scil saturated? Yes No _
Depth to free-standing water in pit/scil prcce hole:
L-4t ether field evidence of aurfaca inundation or soil satura_ngn. .
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes _>0 No
Rationale: CO&A v1s l: s ki 4be+nr
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
13 the Plant community a wetland? Yes-.,)S,- 'No
Rationale for jurisdic:ional decision: .&ti 3 .b. AvOV- 1-L4
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment F-ccadure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2Classification a rding to'Scil Taxonomy.'

(?Y?
CA7A F -::P.l.f
FOU11NE CNSiT= SET=y?Ut1A-iCN METNOOt
F?e6d investigator(s): aW SL L Gate: f 1 ?- t ?j L
=rcjec:.'Site: C, • M=l t- E L- state: tiC Ccunty: tie
A, ;,tit:=rsCwrar: Cr AA 3 IN =!ant Ccrnmuniri =r??a•^e: LN'RP1t?1- ME-7 G4"
,114 a_ :f a mcre detailed site desc-icticn is necsssar.±, usa ha acc _i data form or a fieid notebook _ _ _ _ _ -
Cc ncr.;tai envircnrtsantai ccndie.cns exist t :he piam. ccmmunrw? .•, ? ?? OR Lvja2, ,? ?
Yes NC (if no, ) MA'j -t•}A Viz: $?N (,OAN
l-:as : -.a vegetation, sciis, arctcr :.yc:ciccy heed `.I crntly cis:urec?
Yes _ No (if yes. f 0 SMOEW- ms seept OmsITEU FftA (AcA&v'-;
----------------------------------------------------
Y==cTAT,CN
Incicatcr
Stars Stm tum
IV L ??
06L'FAC
v
RCOL 39EE
IFAG UtRE
ccminam =!art Scecies
'
1
.
o Su

.
12
1.7 on e e,ra
1 a.

a.

13
.
i 7.
G r.
P-iresrt ci icrnirant suedes :f-at are CEL. FAC:Y. anecr =r.C $S?o
veCetaticn,:•-::ercn m@tl Yes IV -- No
>s "te Q.c 7n$-D)v 6+- -{•(,?? ?(?n.? Snea?n-{s_sa?C?P FAL 6r' 1'1j ?
Indicator
Status Stratum
'KAc ??_
ill A E?
SC:LS
Sarie&c?asa:?:.,:cc Pte ?htz` ?_ ..
La- r?u•.•.•cu?:'
Yas No rcetemmnec
Is :::e Sc:i 3 -sees:? Yes No :iistic ecsceccn .=resam? Yes No
Is :he sc,i: Mcamlec? Yes No Gevec? Yes No
`aatrix ;.ascr: Mcn!e ,Ztcrs:
*
Coder ydn
c sc:t mdcamrs..
Is :he hydrsc scii cmarion met?
e-.:---:-. IM < r wivv:-2 Yes No
mt,r i tom-- STYP - to
tS Oi VIME 0 BY A4 5r-odQeV
1 N o7k-V- AREAS S I,$ 'c '•S ` 0114
v„m-
Ip wlorN
is ?:e ;..rural surface inundated? Yes _ No Surface water decth: A -
Is ::.a sc:: saturated? Yes _ _ No
Depth :c !ree-standing water in phiscil orcce hole:
Lst ether $eid 9,dcencs of surface inundatipn pr soli saturppon.
Is :he wetland by&•oicgy citeriQQn met?" Yes ?C No
Rationale: S&AL 6,15 tt , g;J06 J-e -
JURISDICTIONAL DETERIMINA4170N AND RAIONALE "1
-vAEO Is the :cant community a wetland? .. Yes,___ No OFD J,?11! STi?rr
t Tnis data form can to used to the Hydric Soil Assessment Prccsdu:e and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification acc creing to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
a.
Ccminant ='art Scecies
K--39
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): I- I N DA CtAAFt o t-W Gtt-% "p owF-L-L _ Date: 11- t ?- J U N C 19 92-
Projec.41she• Ar r Sy N C-0, state: N C- County A N So 0
Applicant,'Ownef: - CK kr•1gE.R.1 rD.LV. Plant Community XiName:
Note: n a mote d ailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
----------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes _'0( No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation. soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No --4,- (if yes, explain on back)
VEGETATION
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species _ Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species
1. t.10 CN i FA-C- 'T 11.
2. .F?._ _T 12.
3. Cornw? ors cQor 5AC- -r 13.
4. V rhv S Q1 01t0- V--ItC -T 14.
3, a? Kn .. c.S v U's V_ 15.
6, too n?A ! -_? 16.
7. 17.
8. 18.
9. 19.
10. 20.
P9rcent of dominant species that are 08L. FAUN, and/or FAC A 3 9?0
IS the hydrophytic vegetation criterion me(? e
s 3
No
X
pa.f:=21e: -01n fn Indicator
?
?
Status Stratum

SOILS
Seriestphase: Urlee-d rAw +1^JL SQ^c)<n 1QQtA Subgroup.2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No ?_ Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic spipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color. C. o? Monte colors: t bc.,ft
Other hyd4c sop: indi„ators.
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No o
Rationale: _ LoA-J CtAv-ovAc, w; - woo ?k1Pn_
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes -?C No Surface water depth:
Is the sail saturated? Yes ?C No i
Depth tc tree-standing water in pWscil probe hole: I I&
-- AJ -+
Wt other field evidence of surface inundation or soil salutation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X_
Rationale: 11 rneA; C..'br's artt -i-o d"EC 2?.'' ?Gay -N, ?'G1ind
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jyrissiiGional decision: U-I-=I ce,
I-This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to *Soil Taxonomy.'
6-2

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METH001
Field Investigator(s): LI t.r DA C-t-N,4Ft 0 , t-+V Gct-1 I>OWGL-L- Date: I1^ t 2_ JU N e 199tZ-
Projec,JShe: tint 16N C.Q. Lf? Np?1 L- ?- State: NC- County A N .S0 ?1
Applicant/`Owner: CH I4r?lg?RS rD?y. Plant Community #/Name:
Note: If a morel ailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
----------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes „ No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation. soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No _X (It yes. explain on back)
VEGETATION
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
Aces r&,??.6rurcN + ? -r
2.
3. r. iv K:u, FACVJ ?' .
4. ?? S_
5. -?
6, o i a a rov. a uww_ ?L
7, n^ps's ro.6%can.o fit'
g, 1?.Seo andi? cter-celat? t;?
g, OSr.?...? ct nr.ann?w.eq ?-1
10.
Dominant Plant Species
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
19.
20.
Indicator
Status Stratum
Psrcent of dominant species that are OBL. FAUN. and/or FAC
b the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X_ No
SOILS
$odes/phase: CESISI^"u"' saw Loam Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a Jiistcsoi? Yes No >C Histic.spipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes _ No Gleyed? Yes No ?_ 10 Matrix Color. - Mottle Colors: 10 y fo/CD CE" A 5 k,%,f2 (Ole
Other hydr;c sail indicat s: Y% o ^e-
Is the hydric sag criterion met? Yes No xi.
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes_ No Surface water depth: - 3, t ^ ?9 ?t 8?d
k the sag saturated? Yes _ CX No i 14
Depth to free-standing water in piVioii probe hole: ,??otlo w i? :- wectcr o? V,e y%,% Mi114)
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
fay a scoke, %-.l-ki IQ-
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No.
Rationale:
Jt1RISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
lathe plant community a wetland? Yes No X_
Rational for jurisdiGional decision: sea); I e l stit- adLk ' n::1-0-s k
__b',cwot0C.i ca\ ind1:rat*W-:3 act- rela3-e6 _. +o reap __euv? r'ct?.?,o
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
8-2
A-Lic
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METH001
Field Investigator(s): I-1 DA COAFtrJ l4Vc-rH T'0WeLL- Date: !t- tom- jyN c- 199-2-
ProjeCJShe:S6 N CO. L-A NAt=1 k- L-- State: N C- County AN Sy M
ApplicanVOwner. CH A MjL4-RS 7D • Plant Community 11Name:
Note: It a morel ailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes -,X_ No (if no, explain on back)
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No -F= (if yes, explain on back)
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Soedes Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. T? ASS 4-0.ec)C._ ?. 11.
2 12.
3. 13.
4. ?-? 14.
S. 'Pw ia.e r o Gi ss u s !3v% u4-.VAC- y 15.
6, t 16.
7. 17.
8. 18.
9. 19.
10. 20.
Psrcent of dominant species that are 08L. FAUN, and/or FAC I 00%
IS the hydrophytic vegeta ion crenon met? Yes X No
F ei::.^.ale: 100 °a Q-on..??a..c a 1o?? _F? s?eci e".\
--- --- -
SOILS
Series/phase: Sc1vS84%1OQM Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No _A Undetermined
Is the soil a H'istcsol? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes No _>!c
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gteyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: o Mottle Color;.-
Other '7•ES ?.f2 4?4
Other hyddc soli indi tors:
is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No.2!;"-
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No )-C Surface water depth:
Is the sc8 saturated? Yes No X i
Depth to free-standing water in p!Vsoil probe hole: v\ o ?.
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
y\0
Is the wetland hydroiog criterk* met? Yes ' No _
Rationale: _ rya = i ?l c+ i CAA 0r'S
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: r 0 s o t
1-7bls data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
8-2
A--?l
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1
Field Investigator(s): 1_1 W DA _CN.QFt ) t-VC-1H 1 OWEL-L- Date: It- 12- J'U N L 19ri"Z-
Projec'JShe: A Sy N GD , L?4 ht1s?1 t- u- Slate: N L County: AN SU 0
Ch A'tA8E.R1 Jp?W' Applicant;Owner: Plant Community x/Name:
Note: If a morel ailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
----------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes No (If no. explain on back)
Has he vegetation soils. and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes No ? (If yes. explain on back)
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
1.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
B.
10.
Indicator
Status stratum
3$C- -17
;=AC- -r_
?--AL ?V
&_G4
V
jC- _ V
EA-C iN N
,ld3Cw1' -.14
Dominant Plant Species
it.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
is.
19.
20.
Indicator
Status Stratum
Psrcent of dominant species that are 081. FACN. and/or FAG 1000
is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? YesC_ No
Fa:ienale• t ec7 %; ca CIO, r.?'..c... t- s e c., t.._ rare.. C ov
V!SvV.
(? SOILS
Series/phase: ?? q,-,JL S44- 1Oatn Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No _x Undetermined
Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No _>C Histic apipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil:. Mottled? Yes No Gfeyed? Yes No
Matrix Color. - 10 `t 2 b Mottle Colors: : S !4a- 19
Other hydre soil indicators: r cs%-
Is the hydric soil.criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: _ % i?b drl? sOU ?.. c?t?S
HYDROLOGY .,
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes K . No i `
Depth to tree-standing water in pk/soil probe hole: so ?l eAULl rci nJ
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X_
Rationale: kw8r-O1oS t` s.-6i a('v- Clt,-c__-A-o rere,%7- naiAA
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes N
P %j xc e- o k t7t?? Sd? or-
Rationale for jurisdWonal decision: a WE t-7]tis data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
-7-his
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
8-2

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METH001
Field Investigator((s??: i- I N OA Cr. GHA FIN Date: it- (9-91
Proiec?Site: ANSo?K3 Cm. -4Vt2 State: NC- county: A N Sd
Applicant/Owner:- C-E+AW'BGA S Plant Community #/Name: 1- ExCAgA-TGWtA12 A
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant cammunit ?
Yes No >?_ (If no, explain em* e* Port o--. 6f - loodplgi n em Cgvq*-_ A. a-o bdrro-w p;+
Has the vegetation, soils. and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? probabl. _FF r C1 `4Lce,%T
Yes _?< No (lf yes, explain on back) 'T4,i s ckre-p- %.s to..,? y-?.a?r. ctd? o kee'l` woc?e ?f?dPia??
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Scecies
$.
7.
8.
9.
10.
$Ci,r S ct&perinus
2. _Ge.oa 1a n s OWL
3.. 54 i l reg.
4. _ us
5. 1.4; ta^ C-04 e% i r•i
Indicator
Status Stratum
06L
Ot, _ 5
crlpOa _r
;:ACW'? -?-_
OrMIA S
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species o•" -?l P Status
?' T rans: ?+cr ? Zohe.
u?herc ?lo v? is -f;cd:
13. 'Q i nu S + e5e3A- 'FA C-.
?COe.?tv.0 El i ?'? AG-F
15. N Cee^ r-L,%e rc.e., FPrc-
16. Sv.3-ec.•t• Gtvw+. V=AC-
, 7. 13`62A S f;q ?•e
I18.
I19.
0_
Percent of dominant species that are GEL. FAUN, and/or FAC 1 o 0 °/o
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes_ No
Rati_^ais: -100 0,42 &4 (yep- nAn•?• <szesriP__ Sa re.. 0 8 L+ ..__?AG?I _
Stratum
T'
T
T
S
M 0-"42.& aS : SCILS
Sedes/phase: - -__Cree,d M0 r -?i^P- -CO. Su roup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils iist? Yes No _X_ Undetermined
is the sail a Histcscl? Yes No .'_ Histic epipedon present? Yes No L
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes _><._ Na Gteyed? Yes No X_
Matrix Color: 10 y ri S/ S Mottle Colors•
Other hyd6c soil indicators: PAY (01--95 jLoOT Gf-i,A v? h
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes cX No
*-%-G
e r--% .
Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes No - Surface water depth:
Is to soil saturated? Yes _X No }
Depth to free-standing water in ph/scil probe hole:
Llst other field-evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is ttetfand hydrology criterion met? Yes ,?_ No
Rat' vale: _ Se e t ;S S A+t4 r A-VC cl. -t-ts S u 7-3 ace .
Is the plant community a wetland?
Rationale for jurisdic."fonal decislon:
t Titis data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): L- I !V DA Cam'- Gt-+A F I N Date: Nov 18- 2.2 I !? (
Project/She: 'N 7?j 06 State: 0 G County: A N S y CEO.
Applicant/Owner. C 1-IA'?1 ?f2 S 1>?V plant Community #/Name:
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
----------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Ayres kao (oe e, c.lerreA
Yes No _,C (if no. explain aw bm*
Has tf:e vegetation, soils, aridlor hydrology en significantly disturbed?
Yes No (If yes. explain
----------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecies Status Stratum $rwi?d Plant Species Status Stratum
1. 5cl C V-* &6V 11.
2. B,. &Ao ro soy. FACW 12. Salt X n? 0-CA, t?t3b
3. _ -for- _ A 13. L.t a .. S a
4. _ S e l o cti,cs- S o. 14 14. Iq ern., 1. -a 5. Se-1-Gri o... t.nm?na? FA=CW+ 9 _ 15. OSLO' -Q lWq
6. ^Zj-C(ylw??S? L_ 16.
7. _ 17.
a. is.
9. 19.
10. 20.
Psrcent of dominant species that are OBL. FAUN. and/or FAC G (0 C/o
b the hydrophytic vegetation criterion mpt? Yes x _ No
SCILS
Series/chase: CtAeW Qxi(3,_ Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No ?. Undetermined
Is the soil a Histoscl? Yes No Histic eoipedon present? Yes No >r--
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Se_ Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: l? V 2?C¢ Mcttle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators: v\tT%-A
Is the hydriic soil criterion met? Yes No X,"
Rationale:
PAQ HYDROLOGY 1 3 N
Is the yr cund surfacs inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes_ No '
fzepth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List gther field evidancp of surface lnunoation or soil satuiation.. _
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: %,% t..r. cQafi a+.. S a-tw+? h'? - . ,
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE

3-2
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
4- P
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSiTE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field lnvestigator(s))??• !? f /VOA Cr• GHA F I N Date. 11- 19-RI
Projec*JShe: ArSc N cot! NTh # t-2- State: N L County: A•r?SOY1
Applic:anb'Cwner: C"AW-GER4 Plant Community #/Name: 4 - ??+cct?aris -4{,iGkx?
Note. If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---•------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? 'Dew-se 'N+? cka.'t' 1 ?S?.cc?•?r? J o S-cc.eedea
Yes No K (if no, explain arrir) 'For •-t:r• -Pa= tt.,.e Se%cckti1-i s .. ?.?,..,
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly (disturbed? a, .{Y?a„?S i h• dom.. -k4-,Z S G r'@c,
Yes -% No (If yes, expiei?ei b4) See.. *ba %.-X r
--------------------------------- --- ----t' 1`'- 7 t'-pic,.??.
VEGETATION
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
3. Verwe?.ia vtbergcensit _tAC,+ 14
4. PAC. Vi_
J+'. ?A.+i Cw.. C?i`Ct+O•t'Otw??Or-w• ? ?._
s. _
7.
s.
9.
10.
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
11.
12.
13.
14.
is.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Psrcent of dominant species that are OBL. FAUN. anclor FAC
Is the hydrophytlo vegetation criterion met? Yes,XC No
P«?i_n 1 ne e% are FAC. ev- r=AdW
SCILS
Series/phase: r Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydrie soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histesol? Yes. No Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes_ No Gleyed? -Yes Nq
Matrix Color: t O y R/ Motile Colors: 2
Other hydric soil indicators: So Mt %co a., ,.?.e*+t? %44 +% o,?; poi' c KK e S
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No X
s'
Rationale:
HYDROLOGY
fa the ground surface Inundated? Yes No X Surface water depth:
:s:1-.* sc:il saturated? Yes No X t
Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
,n o nt.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No ><

Rationale: _

JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINA71ON AND RA ONALE < „,, ' CIQ;in ?l
is the plant community a wetland? Yes No? ?un'? (4 2 ??,
t ,no dreTo vw 1-C_ So
_ y ( tndr ra'{2?t'3 w°"0? •
Rationale for junsdidlonal decision: yc(,
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
3-2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): LL f N IDA Gr- CE-IA F I N Date.- N O V 19- 22 l 9
Projec?Sits: LIN -Ty 12 State: _ N G County: 0 N W
Applicant/Owner: C l-l?4'?1 t3 t;2 S D?V Plant Community #1Name: ? 00d P lad 0
Note: 9 a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook-
----------------------------------------------------
Do Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? v t 5 -} lnr-? eQ
Yes . _ No (If no, explain on back) o G 1
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed.
Yes _ No X_ (If yes, explain on back)
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant P!ant Soecies Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. QwerctAo laur;- :?2tt'- gAcW -T- 11. is for F, CH_
2. ?t 'A-e''cu.o r? . o? FA C- _%_ 12. r : i e ?G H_
3. l-? raa FAA- -1-_ 13. Cl?asr att.;.?n? I-SHWi&A E6 --J:A_
4. 2 ul i va. F?r?- _Z_ 14, A4rt4-%Xne1r1^0. 4 11tt?a. AG S
S, Cat-rt.." Caro(;,% anr-. -PAC- Sub-C 15, U %j
$. -corv"uo .dart dv- FACV :+.b=C 16.
7. _'P r-rnv -k-m S erot?n c . VACQ c..b G 17.
L? 5JACA3:t- _JaNc S 18,
g, To ci"Ge dead rad'1Can3t=AG 19.
1 o. -Loa i C er" ct- ! aA0atn i C a. r -AC- V 2o.
Percent of dominant species that are OeL, FAUN, and/or FAC ?o
Is :he hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes _)< No
'750%,o a rG V C_ o r w e?
SCILS
Series/chase: - --- Ckew oLct o- Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcsct? Yes No < Histic epipedon present? Yes No X
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No X Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: ! 0TR T Mottle Colors:
Cther hyd6c scil indicators: ne)Ae-
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No, X e
Rationale: v.or L? steel - r?o f t et i?clt Cody rS
HYDROLOGY
is t3^.e ,mu^d surface inundated? Yes No >?_ Surface water depth:
s :`.a scH saturated? Yes No _X-
1 -h is free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
L.st other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
T
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: t1 o hh 4o W &i cok i ?ZGa jND&
9.1
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE U ?-•?-c? ?Hc Ivy i ??
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurlsdiGional decision: Hy LC- -FL-0C 1'PL-A-W . Inv So..t
rvr Inks vt%Lo Cn c. i i [`_aiOrS -73VAV- )TI 2-
(-.; This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Asessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
3-2
R --T
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): i-I )V DA CT. CHA F I N Date: N O V 18_- 2 2- l J y q ?
Projec*JShe: Iw 7 )1 4f: 12 State: eye- Coun A WS CO.
ApplicanUOwner: C 1-4 A ki t3 &R S L><4 V Plant Community #/Name:. ?Z - 80.cc1,\a ri s ?tit 0--et
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form-or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? e c( y__ cr? O IC-1 P QJ +Vi-r ,
Yes No X (if no, Wlain oa.L+*) -Be CC_ a r, s
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Zd?-- L?c?wFen c.yo(a n? a
Yes _/ _ No (if yes, explain ow?iw??
--- -----------------------------------------
VEGETATION
6.
7.
s.
9.
10.
Indicator
Dominant Plant Scecles Status Stratum
1. BP C.cI,.a r i S 1^c. i M. q G S
2.- VtA^Q tXQ a c? nu-o EMSeL-t
3. 03, L-b U-0 a L$&6--t0-,n 'EA CU ±_S
>.Q1'1d2aQ-V 5(?•
. f
4
5.
Dominant Plant Species
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Percent of dominant species that are 08L. FACW. and/or FAC
Is the hydrophyd vegetation criterion met? Yes )C _ No
Indicator
Status Stratum
SC1LS
Seriesichase:P_Lr?c3ct'_ 10C71M Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes_ Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes
- No ._) Hivic epipedon present? Yes. No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes ? No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix C:o1or: 1O xgZa - Motile Colors• t V iy ??ro
i
h
d
il i
di
n
Oth o*` e-
r
er
y
cators:
c so
n
Is Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No ?C f
b SAT
4-
'
Rationale: rlna X G s
1.. rcrtis. .
g?
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes NoC Surface water depth:
!$ 014 scil saturated? Yes No -z::
Depth !c free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: ?S
List othgr ield evi nce of surface iQun?dation of soil saturation.
15
Is the wetland hydros criterion met? Yes X-'_ No
Rationale: d i r,?? VVzr C r.v? erg s
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE -? JC `os_
Ac.-
S'?Yi Gl" 01ctZ? e-j fly ?V f2a^ ???
Is the plant community a wetland? . Yes No
C???-}-e rr o.?
Rationale for jurisdictional decision. C CYe a vw'r C E4ct 73
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2Classilication according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

q -?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODt
j j
Field Investiga or(s): L f V CA Gx• Q-4A F 1 N Date: N DV 1$ - 2.2-
ProjectlSBe: O 'N Stale: ING County: AN-SON Ct)•
ApplicanvOwner: C HAM ?.&R -% r,, V Plant Community #Mame: - t A ??
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary. use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? y?? tL-ra A cz" i
-` n e urt 4 re oJJ
Yes _ No (If no, explain __.?W.* ?. 2-KCotJa"t'e? a; +,k `'' , too r c-4 e r-,'
Has thevegetatio- soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Wctl'?--r t S to a c. (CQ?d i r1
Yes _-X_ No (If yes, explain on back) do'+-r L.% ?ZecLVCr ioc) ^
---------------------------------c4,04w sq -r-eo?w.- ------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Scec:es Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. - `r r' nu O V N 11.
2. rA W 1- 12.
3. Rl o.. 0 t3L 13.
4. 11A eleini ur- -tu m-ra le FACVJ H 14.

-ClAer,
5 -211 L.# H is.
PAC
6.
_Sc4<ex Grin?ta•
VA!anLlt _ 16.
H
7. 17.
1s.
9. 19.
10. - 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OEL. FACW. and/or FAC 10 U
Is the hydrophyt:c vegetation criterion met? Yes X No
a .c„age• bolo a m V,4rC.. o r (.A-3,o SCILS

Serfesichase: C-t'eectr^Oy -`2' eln2wctcla_ Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydrtc soils list? Yes . No X_ Undetermined
is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No >_ Histic eoipedon present? Yes No >,-
Is the scil: Mottled? Yes No )< Gteyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: ' Id YR7;4?Z3 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No `
Rationale: So pis Ckrc W%,fit ?; S-k., !!! --}-W ?.•• 'E? Lnsc-?'c-
HYDROLOGY It
ii
ti "? I Z
Isthe y:csnd surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth: ya ICs
4 the scif saturated? Yes X' No
tzepth is free-standing water in pi /soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: ?4 ?u??,-h`e dt l.. u ?dc: fi ate.
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland?
Rationale for jurisdic:ional decision:
en-
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classdkmtion according to 'Soil Taxonomy.-
10-P
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): L I N DA Cc. CHA F 1 >J Date: N t) V 18 - Z2 I q j
Projec*?She: ON State: WC- County: AWS Q Co. 1
Apalicant.,•Owner: C 1-IAki 13&R S L><<1/ Plant Community #/Name: O 1 N
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the'badt of data form or a field notebook.
----------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ; ?-ct-. Ci ?a+ ?•? Ti e f ct.
Yes No 'C (If no, ej p1-iwe soft Pa ??tt l Gtr?i,? rye
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes _ Y _ No . (If yes, e0ornh. e?lt) 'e-XCgva"f .
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
• Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Soec:es Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
1. _Acew rc,? br crr, '4?' C. -1- 11.
2. u(r•%%is ameri a4a. 'T:L4C T 12.
3. - SQ l?i x 0- _ 0514 13.
4. ?. iG ue1Y4 S i n enSe ??4c. S 14.
ACU t
T7
5. R_Q'-^ y-tt u
0 5 15.
?
;
6. ?cc-kA a Is,A I;fl-' 4F 1i4
-6c- 16-
7. Soli rl SA. ?A 17.
8. 'P t Lt Ca FACW tj- 18.
9. _:Tu tncun .6 gyAc + N 19.
10. L 20.
Percent of dominant scecies that are OEL. FAUN. and/or FAC
- No
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes
y
l
l
SCILS
Seriesichase: Cc?_e CIM a Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a Histescl? Yes No V Histic epipedon present? Yes No >_
is the scii: Mottled? Yes. No = Gleyed? Yes Po
Matrix Color. to V 6:F-3 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes'. No
Rationale: r+e L M ri, t G s c"FTr e t d C Ofo r-s
Is the wetland hydrolooggy criterion met? Yes X No "
Rationale: Meld- indtCa L -a_re.se"T - G1ru;. tit. ?-e-?'- r'?•?.-
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland?. Yes ? No
Rationale for jurisdiCional decision- y t? t?-EnYYTT y ty 1•i7 ?? ?'t tZ 'R?t >:S F?/'T,
Set LS AtiL€ -rat) 'DIS7Li.I' 100 A442 "Em
t This grata form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

HYDROLOGY
Is :he grand surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth:
is 6 "ho soil saturated? Yes -No X
Depth to free-standing water in pit/scil probe hole:
List other field evidence-of surface inundation or soil saturation.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): L I Ar CA Cr. C-HA F 114 Date: N d V 19-2-Z l i y
Projer•'JSite: O N C_ OLIN -1 -4 7F 1'2- State: VG County: A N .1; V CID.
Applicant/Owner: C hIAM [; &R S Pc`V - Plant Community 4/Name: A-Z U-3, A L TGH / L?12A I/J
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes No\_ (If no, explain 2XG _\[A+e t t fiG? Y'eCL1>a_
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydroiogy been significantly disturbed?
r
I _. ? U
Yes -)-<- No (If yes. 1 Ct h Z 6Z C c,4 v' -?•?t pr b e?w? Sk J
10
------ ------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator
Dominant Plant Scec°es Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species
1. 5G{"( -7 it.
2. 14' X - age T 12.
3. _1j
4. _ GQri-4 Crr Aita, e8 eW H-
N 13.
14,
5. ._ el a ?: a nn Q kt4r n r? Q. . Fft,C{?(- W 15.
6. _Rwbus QCe%A. l lA /kC + 5 1.6.
7. L+ s+rgr-NY 5% A s VAC_ 17.

- VAC _L 18.
3. 19.
10. 20.
Psrcent of dominant sceces that are OEL, FAC . and/or FAC 496 °Xo
Is the hydrophytic vegetationg ,criterion met? Yes )C No
-
aj.; :Z SO O/ o a rP
Indicator
Status Stratum
f SCILS U) 0, Seriesichase: ,,
? Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No X Undetermined
Is the soil a Histoscl? Yes No K Histic eoipedon present? Yes No ._
Is the scil: Mottled? Yes No _,X Gleved? Yes No
Matrix Color: t o ? P_ 5z 3 Mottle Colors:
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: y\O V%_"& i G Soil ; el i n Cjcrl S l-1 4'
. V
oWee eve& HYDROLOGY
(
Is the grcund surface inundated? Yes C Not Surfacq water depth:
ft ;he soil saturated? Yes _X_ No 1°f v C&.' '
L1epth Ito free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface Inundation or. soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No _ t r _ _ n A i
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes •_ No
Rationale for jurisdic:ional decision: __;i te-h. r- c e i y
I This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
r-? r-a u _ t-? 1= R d'k -
1 5 -'?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1
Field Investigator(s): L l N DA Cr. C-HA t= I Al Date: N O V 19- ZZ I jjj
Projecusite: iN State: WC- County: -ANSOLIJ CO.
ApplicanVOwner C -IAm n f,2 S Lw?--V -Plant Community x/Name: I 5 3a?c(cvJGtars s-( "?qvp,,.
Note: Ka more detailed site description is necessary. use the back of data form or a field notebook. Suva r••.Q
----------------------------------------------------
Co r i+c
k? dl o cAj-te?? b?'
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community. %-.
Yes No - >< (if no, explain eedlm?* ` I A(irowl e?rhS c?v?ct, back e? w°
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? W ate frorte- loeauec Swar,,.
Yes _„,>L No (If yes. explain eniimi§Ot
----------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Soecies
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.
Indicator
Status Stratum
D B6_
1r.J t-t
1=Pt G
rA-GU I -F
Dominant Plant Species
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Indicator
Status Stratum
fo
Percent of dominant species that are OEL. FAC:Y. and/or FAC \ O C>
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes No
P=tic^=is: c? c? %s art? FAC- o?
SCILS
Seriesichase:. Care W ac t a- Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No C Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No Histic acipedon present? Yes No. X
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes ?_ No _ Gleyed? Yes ?No
Matrix Color: t off g Mottle Colors: S 1z
Other hydr•,c soil inc'icators:
Is the hydric soil cri erion met? Yes No
Rationale: 50 i S ?nCu s2 loco, 5 r St4 T?e t ?.S k"[?h•ci Pn'?
in Sortie aft 6DROLOGY
b the y:cund surface inundated? Yes Nq Surface water depth:
:s U ha soil saturated? Yes X_ -No
Depth to free-standing water in pit/scil probe hole:
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes J? No
Rationale: 5afiu.r a fi t? ? in u vig fi o h
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdic Tonal decision: i ?c?c r
r
des
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Sod Assessment Procedure and the.Plant Community
Assessment Procedure. .
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
0-03
16 ?
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD1
Field Investigator(s): I- I N OA Cr• GNA F I N Date: N () V $ - 22- 19 1
Projec'?Site: UN't 11 IE 0- State: -INC County: AN SQ/14 CEO.
Applicant/Owner: C 1- I A'?1 t;1=,2 S t>?V Plant Community ;:Name: t Co ' I SE Ry E2 =
Note: It a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
----------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Cr?lc_
Yes No _>C_ (If no, explain e? f a b eavQllii-
Has the vegetation, sods, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? COr.c
Yes 4_< No (If yes, explain "M640 d1vL d- dj y C&,f'Gi oQ?
---------------------------------------------------
VEGETATION
Indicator Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
, olio.
T Og1. ?_ 11.
uccA- = . S .. „_
2. - FAcW V_ 12.
5c?trIOL*,ft ca;dqQ r Lun,o
3. ! 05 13.
_
4. tSe,? 11 e.. _ oece & 14.
S. j l dc?.ai ar' c o, ti_ 15.
6..l .s i FACW N 16.
+?s:{io.?7. ??a 3 IONAIm -61s FArC S 17.

9. 19.
10. 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OEL. FAC:Y. and/or FAC 10000
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterio n met? Yes No
;:_..c.,a.e• t no C/-0 m nn,.. c?rr- '?-

SCtLS
Series;chase: W e ct cl key Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes No Undetermined
Is the soil a Histoscl? Yes No Histic aoipedon present? Yes N
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No
Matrix Color: to 411 3 s Mottle Colors: ?T L4
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes ><'_ No
Rationale: trl y dr i c_ mn : t :c t : c-I- l m Gln .rGYV?a xvy??'?vi tiC w 1 . r„?-?-k'leo i ?+
HYDROLOGY J/
Is the grct:nd surfac9 inundated? Yes _ No, Surface water depth:
is u ha soil saturated? Yes X_ No
fzepth to tree-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List her field e ' once of qurface inundation or soil saturation.
.5eyerA -tfr'?i otcl bea%/er c-t%¢A,A.,Q
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes _) No
Rationale: S c i u r a fi?rr? Ik i n t4 V1 d.a'f? a ?? * `7m= iN110- .
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
is the plant community a wetland? Yes No
Rationale for jurisdic:ional decision: , .
t This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'
?a ?? %2-7 -x--•rz +§L-A
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): L- I AIOA Cr• CHA F I N Date: N OV $ - 2-2- 1 J
Projec'JShe: S State: V C- County: A N S V CO.
Applicant/Owner- C HA'?1 f3P?2 S L??V Plant. Community #1Name: ?' C'7=0 Mar-0^ beav&r
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data formor a field notebook. SU-,Q*l
- - --- -- ---- ------ -- - - - - - - -- ---- ----- - --------------- -
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? - n
Yes No (If no, explain sail sA)llo©et,pla%n j S t?11+µ•??C ?"-'? 4,o
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been signifi ntly disturbed? to-?F 62o vc.r Ova keS
Yes _-_ No (If yes, explain ee.Lw*) s rea N,
- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
VEGETATION
Indicator
Dominant Plant Soecies Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species
1. ?FAC. -r 11, C'n rV%LA.6
'
2. -#PIC-- T AAAO H
12. T
3. F AC- -T 13. * V-A ^ i a

5. 5n[ L S 1 S.
6, f-AT-UL- - 1 16. Sa r IAA ePrp 'V'^AAo

a. I:A ej)? T 18.
9. 4-4 r 19.
1 o. _ S,- 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OEL. FAC:Y. and/or FAG q I. °/b
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes _ No

Indicator
Status Stratum
s
?
_
EA91 ? t V
PAC } H_
cra tr H
SCIL?
Seriesichase: (Oc C-U-0 ? S c 'z Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list? Yes _?___ No Undetermined
1s the soil a Histcscl? Yes No -)- Histic apipedon present? Yes No _k
is the soil: Mottfedt?? v Res c? N _ Gieyed? Yes b?-
to
Matrix Color: ----?t?? b,L=1 Mottle Colors: I? 5 R?__
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes _Y No
Rationale: ?'>o cs i (of, nn 1-1ti cl ? i L o f S C,?S?. ? Gt ygmft @; y-,A IW c w i g
in St?etib'YDROLOGY
Is the -rcund surface inundated? Yes No Surface water depth: 1 '- ?'?'
s uha soil saturated? Yes No s oYv.o_ area o,1--o S tr.rFc?ce,
N- pth to free-standing water in pitisoil probe hole: 9
List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation.
• TIY?o w ? i'u. eve ult?i a1 G 'Fru n 1e.S ? 5 w o ll er, b o? Q.d '? m 1c i ?i -r ? Yesa?' e?.,a ???
Is the wetland hydrol y criterfon met? Yes X_ No
Rationale: try' o r- !aeOL r W' c
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? . Yes A_ No
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: riu1? 3 C rt -?-e-r'Q.
1 This data form can be used for the. Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'

I8_F
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHODI
Field Investigator(s): LINDA 6c. GNA F I N Date: N O V 19- 22 1 i ci j
Proiec'JShe: 0 LIN State: V G County: _ AN S O CO.'
ApplicanVOwner: Plant Community 4IName: 12- tn1e+--i.4- -Pt ont-g+,ovt
Note: If a more detailed site description is necessary, use the back of data form or a field notebook.
---------------------------------------------------
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant communit 9
Yes No (if no. explain a.i..bi =(ox4?la?n
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes.,)( No (If yes. explain ssias$) -trA „? i ?'? z ov.s
----------------------------------------------------

Indicator VEGETATION
Indicator
Dominant Plant Scec.-es Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum
Piws -1me8o.- PAC- 'T 11.
2. V i bu rA w. d4At_CA1t M F;AG 5 12.
3. 2te)C Opaca- fAC- . - 13.
4. 6y?n. nt. ss [oBy7 H_ 14.
5. _ a rat t: o rolrl•.i au?0. A c- T_ 15.
6. yidaMb? S-}t,raGf(.?A P Plr-_ 7_ 16.
7. -I?? Z rc.?t? ?rL?rY, PAC -T 17.
8.: Rambo S c. r^c u tv?.s _
- r-A G.t_1- S 18.

?
9.
19.
10.1 _ 20.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL. FAC:Y, and/or FAC g .7 0
Is the hydrophyticv station criterion met? Yes X No
Rzt.:cnaie: ?D %o C km GAG o r .n4c d
SCILS
Seriesichase: U3 t` Inc'?l O(_ QUDA.J a CA Subgroup:2
Is the soil on the hydric soils list?'Yes _j4_ f\N0 Undetermined
Is the soil a Histcscl? Yes No _ CX Histic epipedon present? Yes No
Is the soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes NO
Matrix Color: t_? R T- Mottle Colors: S' `( f? `I / 6
Other hydric soil indicators:
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes_ No ?! p
Rationale: ?bzs i 101 , e,n N" 1d r?C. So'.1,s !~ a' 1 t3k,?1 Qt y-a ? WA ' YA X Lai I
HYDROLOGY
Is to yrcund surface inundated? Yes No, )-C Surface water depth:
!s «.a soil saturated? Yes No 1-,_ //
Depth !c free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole:
List other Veld evidence of surfac inundation or soil saturation.
vmhN? a etws S r,4 S S
Is the wetland hydro y criterion met? Yes , \/__ No
Rationale: W a G!lr2.o_- n,n e, S a
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
Is the plant community a wetland? Yes _K_ No
?Ver\ G c-eoe,o
Rationale for jurisdictional decision: vv?eetc Qll 3 Cry +?I 0,
w/ ?r i aL.l?f CL.r-O f, C V\&A_-? W a-t V- " {-0_A>An Qt- Ci rr -
1 This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community
Assessment Procedure.
2 Classification according to 'Soil Taxonomy.'