19970972 Ver 1_Amendment_19930406

b VANCE E. GULLEDGE o .y
inistrator
Ad
i
m
es
Utilit
HUGH JAMES
Water Distribution y? : w
Sewer Collection's Supv. Cl+?
Anson County Utilities
907 N. Washington St. - Wadesboro, N. C. 28170
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
April 6, 1993
Denise Lee
CACTUS
Rt. 2, Box 286
Wadesboro, NC 28170
Dear Ms. Lee:
BONNIE M. HUNTLEY
Administrative Assistant
ELLEN DOSSER-County Engineer
letter of March 30, 1993,
Per your request, I am amending my
explaining the procedure used to measure the water level in the
monitoring wells at the proposed'"landfill. If, when the weight
was dropped into the monitoring well, we could not hear the
water, a small stone or pebble was thrown into the well. If we
still could not hear the water, and the weight was not visibly
wet, we assumed the well was dry or that the water level was at
the bottom of the well. If we did hear the water splash, we
dropped the weight into the well again until we could get a
measurement. As you will note at the top of the data sheets, it
is noted that these readings are approximate and this will be
taken into consideration by the state in their review of the
landfill design.
The county has since purchased a water level indicator, which
will be used to determine purging volumes, during sampling,'at
our existing landfill and to determine the water levels at the
proposed landfill. The next measurements will be taken in May.
should you need any additional information or if I can be of
further assistance do not hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
LAI?`?'l? GZ?yp,SL9??V?
Ellen Dosser-Huntley

0

i
i
V.-

ca
E
0
4

c >
oQ
i
r
OdW

U C:j
N N
Y

w to

CO ,

r- +?- CO
j
cd
CL

20 co
31 0)

0
C?
r"
i"

ca
r rrrA
¦[mi
cc
?Y
¦ rr?
E
cn
0
c?
U
Z
cq
5
01

tuft
ty ? O Q

rn
a?
r
0
`o
m
0
Q.
Q?
Q
X
4?
4.
k
a
0
Chapter 3 - Causes of Impairment and Sources of Water Pollution
3.2.:1 Sedimentation
Introduction
Erosion is a natural process by which soil and rock material is worn away by rain, wind, and ice.
Natural erosion occurs on a geologic time scale, but the process can be greatly accelerated when
human activities alter the landscape. The sediment produced by erosion generally winds up in the
surface waters.
Some of the activities that increase sediment loads to waterbodies include: construction activities,
unpaved private access roads,' state road construction, golf courses, uncontrolled urban runoff,
mining, timber harvesting, agriculture, and livestock operations.
Some of the adverse impacts of sediment include:
• StrPambank erosion: Streams with high sediment load have a much greater potential to scour
the streambank. Also, as the streambed fills in with sediment, the stream will widen to carry
the flow. Streambank erosion causes the loss of valuable property.
• Damaged aquatic communities: Sediment damages aquatic life by destroying stream habitat,
clogging gills, and reducing water clarity.
• Polluted water: Sediment often carries other pollutants with it, including nutrients, bacteria,
and toxic/synthetic chemicals. This pollution can also threaten public health if drinking water
sources and fish tissue become contaminated.
• Increased costs for treating drinking water: Sedimented waters require costly filtration to make
them suitable for drinking. Water supply reservoirs lose storage capacity when they become
filled with sediment, necessitating expensive dredging efforts.
Programs and best management practices aimed at addressing sedimentation are briefly described
in Chapter 5. General recommendations to reduce sedimentation are listed in Chapter 6, Section
6.5.
North Carolina does not have a numeric water quality standard for suspended sediment. However
all point source dischargers must at a minimum meet federal effluent guidelines (e.g. 30 mg/l for
domestic dischargers) for total suspended solids (TSS). The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)
limits required for most point sources usually necessitate a degree of treatment that assures the
removal of solids to a level below federal requirements. A TSS limit of 10 mg/1 is required for
discharges to those High Quality Waters (HQW) which are trout waters or primary nursery areas,
and a limit of 20 mg/l is required for discharges to other HQWs.
North Carolina has adopted a numerical instream turbidity (measurement of water clarity) standard
as follows:
• 50 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) in streams not designated as trout waters;
• 25 NTU in lakes and reservoirs not designated as trout waters;
• 10 IVTU in trout waters.
Land disturbing activities are considered to be in compliance with the standard if approved best
management practices have been implemented.
E ets of Sedimentation
Sedimentation is often divided into two categories: suspended load and bed load. Suspended load
is composed of small particles that remain in suspension in the water. Bed load is composed of
3-2
Chapter _3 - Causes of Impairment and Sources of Water Pollution
over a whole watershed or county or state area and thereby give the impression that the problem is
less significant than it actually is in the immediate area. It makes much more sense from a
management perspective to target sediment reduction in a high impact area from 40 tons/acre to 2
tons/acres, rather than reduce erosion from cropland in general from 6.5 to 6.3 tons/acre. This
points to the need for targeted management efforts coupled with a monitoring strategy which
effectively measures sediment transport under both average and extreme conditions.
Table 3.3 USLE Erosion on Cultivated Cropland in North Carolina
1982 1987 1992
Cropland land Area (1,000 acres) 6,318.7 5956.8 5538.0
Gross Erosion (1,000 tons/ r) 40,921.4 37475.3 30,908.3
Erosion Rate (Tons/Yr/Ac) 6.5 6.3 5.6
While there is an overall 10-year downward trend statewide in the erosion rate on agricultural
lands, the erosion rate per acre and the 10-year trends vary by region as shown in Table 3.4. The
greatest decline in erosion is seen in the Southern Piedmont and Sand Hills with a small uptrend in
the tidewater area and a significant increase in the mountains. In the mountain region, it is noted
that while the 10-year trend is up, the five-year trend from 1987 to 1992 was down. The reasons
for the dramatic changes in the mountain basin erosion rates are not fully known.
Table 3.4- North Carolina Erosion on Major Land Resource Areas (MLRA)
1982 1987 1992
Blue Ridge Mountains 12.7 20.8 18.3
Southern Piedmont 12.3 12.0 10.5
Carolina and Georgia Sand Hills 6.0 5.6 5.1
Southern Coastal Plain 3.9 3.9 4.0
Atlantic Coast Flatwoods 3.2 3.1 3.2
Tidewater Area 1.4 1.5 1.6
Sedimentation Trends in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin
A number of streams in the basin are impaired by sedimentation. These include the Ararat River,
Fourth Creek, Brushy Fork, Hamby Creek, Brown Creek, Coddle Creek, Goose Creek
Richardson Creek, Lanes Creek, Hitchcock Creek and North Fork Jones Creek. The water quality
of many other streams in the basin is threatened by sedimentation and erosion. The following
discussion on erosion, sediment loads, USGS gaging station data and sediment fate and transport
relates specifically to the Yadkin-Pee Dee River basin. Suggested general management strategies
for reducing sedimentation are presented in Chapter 6, Section 6.5.
Historic Rates in the Basin
In 1979 the USDA conducted an erosion and sediment inventory for the entire Yadkin-Pee Dee
basin. While the results of this inventory do not necessarily reflect erosion rates in the mid-1990s,
they do provide us with a picture of historical conditions. Based on 1978 land use data, the USDA
study estimated erosion from agricultural and urban areas, as well as other sources.
As shown in Table 3.5, erosion rates ranged from 5.6 tons/acre per year in Yadkin County to 1.5
tons/acre per year in Montgomery County. Erosion rates were considerably higher for subbasins
and counties in the upper portion of the basin than for most areas in the lower basin.

L
r
r

Ell
r

n
3-8
Chapter 4 - Water Quality in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin
Table 4.6 Summary of Ambient Monitoring System Station Data Excursions from the NC
Water Quality Criteria by Total Samples. January 1992 to December 1996.

Station
Station ame tr uality
Classific. Sample
Total # ?'°
Exerns Ex uns
0
8
2
Number
YADKIN R AT NC HWY 268 AT PATTERSON NC C Tr
B Tr
ORW 247
187 .
2
.7
5
02111000 ELK CREEK AT NC HWY 268 AT ELKVILLE NC C 236 1.3
3
02111180
02/12000 YADKIN RIVER AT WILKESBORO NC
VR AT SR 1990 NEAR ROARING RVR NC B WSIV

WSIV 214

91 1 5 2.3

10 1
1.
02112120 ROARING R
YADKIN RIVER AT SR2327 AT ROARING RIVER NC C 1 3
1.7
02112152
YADKIN RIVER AT US HWY 21 BUS AT ELKIN NC
C
178
6
3.4
02112250
02113850
pRARAT RIVER AT SR 2019 AT ARARAT NC
T SR 2080 NEAR SILOAM NC
WSIV

,
,
89

255 3.4
3
.9
3
10
02114101 ARARAT RIVER A
LITTLE YADKIN RVR AT US HWY 52 AT DALTON NC ?
?
SN WSIV 330 9
22
02114450 YADKIN RIVER AT SR 1605 AT ENON NC C 70 8
6
02115360 SALEM CK AT A ELLEDGE WTP AT W-S NC C 238 7 2.9
02115856
02115860 MUDDY CREEK AT SR 2995 NR MUDDY CREEK NC
VR AT US 64 AT YADKIN COLLEGE NC WSN

WSIV 260

279 6 2.3

4.7
13
.7
02116500 YADKIN R
SOUTH YADKIN RVR AT SR 1159 NR MOCKSVILLE WSIII 220 4.5
0
1
02118000 HUNTING CREEK AT SR 2115 NEAR HARMONY NC C 60
10.0
6
02118500
YAD108E FOURTH CREEK AT SR 2308 NEAR ELMWOOD NC
EK AT SR 1970 NEAR WOODLEAF NC WSN
WSIV 233
292 21 9
19 6.5
02120521 THIRD CRE
SECOND CK AT US HWY 70 NEAR BARBER NC C 247 12 4.9
02120780
02120975 GRANTS CR AT SPENCER
RIVER AT NC HWY 150 NEAR SPENCER NC WSV

C 103

2
04 14 10 9.7

11 1 5.1
.1
02121031 YADKIN
TOWN CREEK AT SR 2168 NEAR DUKE NC (CRANE CREEK) C 2 26 10.8
0212140080 RICH FORK AT SRI 800 NEAR THOMASVILLE NC C 6R 2 29
0212147355 HAMBYS CRK AT SR 2790 NEAR HOLLY GROVE NC C 273 9 3.3
0212148889
02121500 ABBOTTS CREEK AT SR 1243 AT LEXINGTON NC
RK AT NC 47 NR COTTON GROVE NC B WSV

B
WSIV 379

SRS 22 5.8
.6
21
3 3
02121602 ABBOTS C
ABBOTTS CK AT SR 2294 NR SOUTHMONT DURACE B
WSIV 241
41 5.0
12
0212160350 YADKIN RIVER AT SR 1002 AT HIGH ROCK NC WSIV 2 .R
2
02122500
02123500
UWHARRIE RVR AT NC109 NEAR UWHARRIE NC
EEK AT SR 1150 NR UWHARRIE NC
WSIV
V
344
298 0.0
0
05 5.0
02123567 DUTCHMANS CR
IVER AT NC HWY 731 NEAR SHANKLE NC B WS 235 10 4.3
02123736 PEE DEE R
ROCKY RIVER AT SR2420 NEAR DAVIDSON NC C
C 138 10 5.3
02123881 IRISH BUFFALO CK AT SR 1132 NR FAGGARTS NC C 223 12 5.3
02124374 ROCKY RIVER AT US HWY 601 NEAR CONCORD NC C 53 1 1.9
02124401
0212467550 GOOSE CREEK AT SR 1524 NEAR MINT HILL NC
K AT SR 1954 NEAR ROCKY RVR SPRINGS C

C 235

2
23 28 4 1.7
2 0.9
02125126 LONG CR
RICHARDSON CRK AT SR 1649 NEAR FAIRFIELD NC C 2 I 1 4.4
02125482 ROCKY RIVER AT SR 1935 NEAR NORWOOD NC C 039 5 3.6
02126000 BROWN CREEK AT SR 1627 NEAR PINKERTON NC C 80 3 3.8
0212740615
02127500 PEE DEE RIVER AT NC HWY 109 NEAR MANGUM NC C HQW 203 1 0.5
7
0
0 LITTLE RIVER AT SR 1340 NEAR STAR NC
C C 181 .
3
0212800 PEE DEE RVR AT US HWY 74 NR ROCKINGHAM N C 122 6 4.9
02129000 HITCHOCK CREEK AT SR 1109 AT CORDOVA NC C 129 1 0.8
02129341 JONES CREEK AT NC HWY 145 NEAR PEE DEE NC C 120 8 6.7
02129527 RKS CREEK AT SRI 812 NEAR HAMLET NC C 39 1 2.6
0212955844 MA
E RIVER AT SC HWY 9 AT CHERAW SC
02130000 PEE DE
Total
Nutrient data for the mainstem sites are shown
4.7, in igures 4.7 wFh the highesthconcentFanons at the Yadkin
phosphorous distributions are shown in Figure nitro
(Figures 4.8 College site. The distribution of nitrate/nitrite nitrogen ito oncentrat loners at the genadkin College and
4.9) are similar in appearance, with the gen
- stations. )of the higher ?erosiv erosivity ratescin the upper
Spencer (below the South Yadkin River confluence indicative
nutrients at both of these sections may be
ients
concentrations
enterin of the basin. Both of these sites
portion
In addition, the High Rthe ock station just downst eam of High
High Rock Lake just downs
Rock Lake indicates the highest concentrations of ammonia nitrogen (Figure 4.10).
Sum iary of Yadkin Pee Dee River Tributary AMS Sites
Figure 4.11 shows the distribution of drssolwitdh noticeably lower concentrations
dissolved oxygena evele(m
re
River tributaries. There are four tributaries 1 These sites are
than 25 percent of the Marks Creek and two sites are on Abbotts Creek.
Brown n Creek and d
4- 12
Chapter 4 - Water Quality in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin
each year for a total of nine sampling events. Of the nine sampling events, two were oligotrophic,
five were mesotrophic, and two were eutrophic.
Lake Bunch was most recently sampled on August 23, 1994. The lake was oligotrophic and fully
supporting its designated uses.
Back Creek Lake (Lake Lucas)
Back Creek Lake (also called Lake Lucas) is the primary water supply for the City of Asheboro.
The reservoir is part of a public park where fishing, boating, and swimming are common.
Hypolimnetic aerators have been installed near the water intake structure to improve the quality of
the water before it is withdrawn for treatment. The watershed is drained by Back Creek and
Greenes Branch. Approximately half of the drainage area is wooded and the rest is cultivated.
Back Creek Lake was sampled by DWQ on July 27, 1989. The concentration of iron was greater
than the state water quality standard of 1 mg/l. Chlorophyll a was greater than the state water
quality standard of 40 µg/1 at the upstream and mid-lake sampling sites (58 and 81 µg/1,
respectively). Back Creek Lake was sampled on August 23, 1994. Back Creek Lake fully
supports its uses.
Lake Reese
The City of Asheboro impounded the Uwharrie River and Caraway Creek to form Lake Reese, a
water supply also used for recreation. Farms and residential areas exist in the drainage area and
bordering the lake shore near the upper end of the lake. Lake Reese is only used after the primary
water supply (Back Creek Lake) has a three-foot drop in level. The lake was sampled by DWQ on
August 7, 1989 and all parameters were within acceptable ranges. On August, 25, 1994, Lake
Reese was again monitored. Lake Reese was borderline eutrophic and fully supporting its uses.
Aquatic Toxicity Monitoring
One facility in this subbasin currently monitors effluent toxicity as per a permit requirement. That
facility is Furniture Illustrators, Inc.
4.3.10 Pee Dee River from Lake Tillery Dam to Blewett Falls
(Subbasin 03-07-10)
Description
This subbasin consists of the portion of the Pee Dee River and its tributaries (with the exception of
the Little River in subbasin 03-07-15) from the Rocky River confluence to the dam at Blewett Falls
Lake (Figure 4.33). Although the subbasin is located entirely in the piedmont ecoregion of the
state, Brown Creek (the largest tributary to the Pee Dee in this subbasin) and many of its tributaries
have coastal plain characteristics and very little flow during the summer. In contrast, Mountain
Creek and its tributaries have good flow during the summer and are located in hilly topography
more typical of the piedmont. Land use in this subbasin is primarily a combination of forest and
agriculture. The town of Wadesboro is the largest urban area. This subbasin contains 8 permitted
dischargers all of which are small (<0.5 MGD).
Overview Of Water Quality
There are currently two ambient monitoring stations located in this subbasin: Brown Creek at SR
1627 near Pinkerton, and the Pee Dee River at NC 109 near Mangum. Elevated levels of
manganese and iron were observed at both locations and are indicative of nonpoint runoff.
Four macroinvertebrate samples have been collected in subbasin 10 since 1983. Sampling was
conducted at Brown and Mountain Creeks in 1996. A sample collected on Brown Creek received
a Fair bioclassification, most likely due to the effects of nonpoint runoff and reduced flows during
the summer. Mountain Creek, which generally has good flow during the summer, received an
4-52
Chapter 4 - Water Quality in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin
Excellent bioclassification. Prior special studies produced a Good-Fair rating for Lick Creek in the
upper portion of the Brown Creek drainage and a Poor rating for Savannah Creek. No flow was
observed at either site during 1996 investigations.
Fish community assessments were performed at 3 sites during 1996. NCIBI ratings ranged from
Fair-Good at Cedar Creek to Good-Excellent at Mountain Creek. Fish community ratings in upper
Brown Creek and lower Cedar Creek indicated effects from siltation, habitat degradation, and
nutrient enrichment. Mountain Creek was one of only six streams in the Yadkin basin with an
NCIBI rating of Good-Excellent. Fish tissue samples were collected at Blewett Falls Lake during
1996. Sixteen samples composed of bass, crappie and catfish were analyzed for metals
contaminants. Mercury levels exceeding FDA and EPA criteria were detected in one catfish
sample.
Potential HOW/ORW Streams
The macroinvertebrate and fish data collected from Mountain Creek at SR 1150 indicated Excellent
water quality for the stream. Based on this information, the Mountain Creek catchment could be
resampled, if petitioned, to determine if the stream warrants reclassification to HQW/ORW.
Lakes Assessment Program
B,?wett Falls Lake
Blewett Falls Lake is a run-of-the-river impoundment. Land use is mostly forested, with some
agriculture and a small amount of urban development. As is true of the other Chain Lakes in North
Carolina, Blewett Falls Lake receives the majority of its inflow from the discharge of the upstream
reservoir, Lake Tillery. See Section 4.2.3 for more characteristics of the lake.
Blewett Falls Lake was one of 16 North Carolina lakes assessed in 1973 for the National
Eutrophication Survey (USEPA, 1975). Survey data indicated that the reservoir was eutrophic.
However, because of the short retention time (approximately seven days), Blewett Falls Lake more
closely resembled a slow-moving, over-enriched river.
Blewett Falls Lake was previously sampled in 1981 through 1986. During this period, the
reservoir was predominantly eutrophic. In 1981, percent oxygen saturation (182.9%) was greater
than the state water quality standard of 110% for dissolved gases. The chlorophyll a value of 43
µg/1 was greater than the state water quality standard of 40 µg/1. In 1982, chlorophyll a (40 µg/1)
was at the state water quality standard limit for this parameter and the lake was hypereutrophic. In
1983 the lake showed a dramatic change to mesotrbphic conditions. Blewett Falls Lake was most
recently sampled by DWQ on July 26, 1994. The lake was eutrophic but fully supporting its uses.
Aquatic Toxicity Monitoring
One facility in this subbasin currently monitors effluent toxicity as per a permit requirement. That
facility is Ellerbe WWTP, which had one test failure in both 1995 and 1996.
4.3.11 Upper Rocky River and Coddle Creek (Subbasin 03-07-11)
Description in Cabarrus
This subbasin includes the uppermost reach of the Rocky River watershed, primarily
County (Figure 4.34). This reach runs approximately 25 river miles from its headwaters near
Mooresville to its confluence with Irish Buffalo Creek. This subbasin contains the urban areas of
Mooresville and Concord.
Coddle Creek, a large tributary of the Rocky River, and. many of its smaller tributaries are
classified as water supply (WS-II). All other tributaries and the entire Rocky River in this
subbasin have been given a C water use classification.
4-54
7
w
M
Q)
CA
f3
W
L
a
y
Q
y
a
G
.yi
f3
a
C
Q
f
F

a
?L
GL
C1
Z
Z
Z
?I
Z
?
Z CL
Z IL
?
Z
Z
?
1
?
a y L
?
r
WW _
WW
y
y
??JJ ?
yJ
?
Wyj {
W?
Y
Y
?
WyJ ?
W{J
?
WyJ
?
WyJ
WW
• W W
O
N N N N y N y y {? N N ?) y N y N N N N N N N y y N N N N N y ?jj N y N N N N N N N
: a
O = G

E
a
,
a
~

Or

a
it

s -

N
N
cn
N
?

N
{?
•
LL
LL
=
S
U)
S
LL
°
H

LL

E
E
o
a U.

$
N o
co
a
r

U m •+
LLO
r
O

4

A

A r

• r r r r r

m

m

m
. ?. LL LLy LL ?LLy LL .LL+?
b
r LL ? .? ? ? ? 8 ? ? ? O e
0
% r
%
O
e bo d0 q SO a O
C7 U N
LL C7 O
(7 O
0 O
a 0 c O
a O
C7 O
C7 f
1
W W LL
q W A
LL C, C7
f7 C7 C7 C7 LL 0 LL a 0 U.

C
O N
O

V

c ? s
r
m u ?
'
1

V m O

N
O
C c o N N N a s a T fe
i a ~
U ¢ N
a
O
A
O
.- N
N
t7
c7
A
P)
10
10
n
N
O
10
O
N
O
A
C)
m
A
0
A
:
m
N
h
0
0
•
i0
N
R
l7
t0
l'1
O
m
1
N
O

A
O
1

O
1
O

O
f

I

N
r+

O
N

O

iD
V

.-

N
01

A
O

O
m
p Ol .. O p O) Yf A 0) O N O N N A n m O Y1 R m A Y O v+ N ?' m
N N aD
N O n ?- O N
N N O - ?- N N

9
f0
A
A
A
A
0
O
0
O
0
m
0
0
O
0
m
0
m
0
0
o
0
0
Ol
a
O)
01
01 A
P.

A

A
0
d 0 0 0
n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O
o O
m
I
O P I m m
0 O N N 0
m 0
m 0
N 0
O 0
O N n O O O O n N O n O O N N O O N O N A 0 0 0 0 O O O O O m
3
N
O 'f
n
u!
h
n
I? C? ? e n v ? rr o Ri o

N
N
N
y)
'-
'0
!O
h
N
n
n
m C) n m O ? N n
h
A
t7
N ?o O ^ N 10 O l'1
O
O
?
N
0
0
m m m <7 O m 0 a m 0 m Cl Ol P) o m O ml A n A vi Ct O O N
N
A
N • ° O r, ^ N
N N
N t7
N e)
N t7
N
N
N N
N ^ 0
N 0
N 0
N 0
N A A 0
• N ?, ? ^ ? ? ^ ? r
N ,
N ^
N N N N N N N N N t7 N t7 N
O ?H
c; C; ?
n o A A N N N N N O O N N O 0 0 0 O O O O N n O ?
L N N N N N N N N N

U U U < < < <

co

U

V

b

? <

U <

U

?

? m

d

U

U

U <

U

U co

b

Z
(
j
+ > > > > Z > > _ >
N Z
N >
b Z
d !A __
(A (I) __
fh >
y ? Z
? Z
N >
N fA l%)
i
0 (Il
3
0 fA
3
0 y
3 f/
3 7 (h
3
10 to
3 fA
3
0
0
0 fA
3 fN
3 6
3
0 w
3 (!)
3
0 f%)
3 (!)
3 ch
3
3 (
3
0 (
3 )
3
0
0
0
3
0
3
3
3
0
0
3
0
3
0
3
3
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
U °
•
V
0
Z
U
U
a
n
c
m
o U
D
q .

U S v
• O
p
U L
_

U
0
U

E

E
O
E c
+
Tc ?

N
¢ S ) O NN ¢

R o
1..1

V

0 Z 9C
'?
It L m
E (? 0 0 o
_2
p
Z
O N O O C O V L yf 3 L U p o N y
C C O N V O
m ~ ¢ N N b r " C J
V e N ? ¢ $ 1fl O A ?o
Q
C U ¢ m c)
N N N A A A O °
C A A C s N A Q ¢ ¢ ¢ C tl O ¢ N N Z

^
D
O
OC
]
o
N o
? O O)
O qq
L
N
Q ¢
N
¢ N
¢ N N ^
O

¢

¢ ¢

N

n ^

¢

2 p
?i (y N N
¢
N a
N
• v
- E
m h v
n i
r o
N o N Y
O o `•
e (
j
U Y
n Q
V 2
¢ ¢
N ?
J
` ^ ¢
0 N N
0 Yoo N
'
¢
¢ ' m
'
Q
a . - N ¢ i Z ' L ¢ ¢ ¢ 4 0 "
• N N ¢
N a
N N

N N

y N
E
'

¢
N

N

N
o
e
¢
¢
N
2 N N Y y U

¢ Y
m Y
m
o
U V N N `o • U o m ¢ o ¢ ¢
N U
o N
U N
U ¢
! ¢ U U co N U U 4 C4
? o o 2

¢ 2
¢
C
p d
N ? U U
b U
b U
b LL
L U o
° LL • e
M e
M N
U U
C =
O O
O r• <
C Y .
• m .?
• S
L e
O ?
O V
Y qm m E O ? ? • fl Y U
O O L 3 B a y 4
Y
w
E ee
Y
`
O
r
+ Y
S
L
O
•
O u{?
• t
a
•
5
0 e
8
a

m

m
O o

¢
0
¢
0
Q
N J Z 3 N < < < < c o S¢ O
J J U IL LL J U U J U J m m m
W h O O iD
^
O
O

0 O

0

N O
O
o

? N
C
n

? l C
O
t C
.2
z

O

O O
o
v O
n
) n •
O
-

? p

'o n
O
n 0
C)
? 0
O
n 0

.0 0

m 0

.Yr
C A _ n 0 + O
O ° N N N N
Y
Y N N r ^ N
E
3
N
N ?
N ?
N ?
G ?
C LL
C N
O N
O N
O N
O N
0 N
0 N
0
N Z O O O O 7 7 y y
? ?
C C
m
? ? m

L e o } U U
? 2
u
m
o

` p
z
y

m Y
d

m y
m

m
d

d
Y

d
Y

d
Y

m
Y

d

y

Y
Ym

r Y
m

) C

¢

W C

¢

W

Y

Y

Q

W2

+

1
?Z ¢

W
'

¢ Y

O

U Y

O

U Y

m

U U
L

• U
j

•

oo

y

0 ¢
.!

??

L

p {f

LL Y

S

(„

0 m

ee

0 m

pp

0

$

$

++

C
r ¢{?

>
¢

Y

o

Y

e Y

O

U Y

e

0

1
N
U

D

O O
U

b
U

b
U

b
U
b O
LL O
LL U

°

L
O

q
?
¢
7

¢
Y

mm
Y
m

e
Y
m z

O V V

(
mr ¢

)
S

W

W
C

e
C C

••

2222
0

(

Y
a

C
}J.
,g
O
e

_
m

_

C

•

g

Y

Y
0

0
0

0
C

E4

u

W

O

L

C

i
O

•
C
O
m

L

3

L

3
-
A
m
C
O
D
L
O
a
=
O
z
O
L
yy??
L

E
I

L
V
G
o
Y
J
Z
?

U
Y

U
Y

U

!
Y
jy!}

j
0

??

O

W

Z

` L

` A

S

J

S

J
£

'?

y
a
=
J

2

?a

O
y
•

V
q

m
N

m

m

m

0
W C

? C

?
7
7

2

¢

¢

¢
N (!;7 < < < < m m < i J J J
U V U {
a LL V J d m m

4-78
"s^ C o/ o nl?I mud
Clgedca?mtyS
000,009:L tiepmiog Siuroj [
kM-og uq-ggnS
- ? mseg lance
UM04S Eeiv MMIt¢eg ION
Suwoddns -ION
8?s ?[1Enrea
uTSVg Tangy aaQ sad-uTNPU k Tanno-l oip Toj dtW iloddnS os jl ZV-t a.TngTd v-z1-Au,uod&S
:Sugea uod&S x
ti. c Lo-eo - puss:
9l-LO-£0 L: /?? 4,y et+ an°x=?aros "?c»o ?
/J wwwfff 4
a
a q? we W
v LO-£0
p•EGMr /
\\` Oc L00 WY
/ n • F ..
0
$ _ et-LO-£0
i
' a
cc-Lo-co
13
e.
lb ?J
a /una•ea 3 ? F°u ? $. f,7Ar j at?o ? ' Faaa ? `;_ •o
hi ? G.3\ ..i u
1b! ?Z m
°a ar
L D ? •
s ? 9o- eo , •.,? ?,
O
J6 C
. nor
S. 9VO
u ?t??.U? ? .-l N F
*`-.? ? ? ?. ate r
90-Z co
so-lo-£o
LO- U'£0
+d
40
Q L 46noJyl 8o suise44nS) N Scan 3r ra
uise8 Janis uipU k J9MO-1 TA
2yl JOl sbull2H jJOddnS asn x.-o wr" i ^_ °?wso ?. "?
y.
0 Chapter 6 - Water Quality Concerns and Recontnunded Managenurnt Strategies
4
4

Table 6.3 Partially Supporting or Not Supporting Monitored Waters in the
Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin*
Subbasin Watethody Use Potential Recommended Mgt. Strategy*
Support Sources
Rating
030703 Ararat R. PS NP,P Actions by 1(md governments avid agencies are needed to
below Mt Airy reduce NPS pollution. The Division will continue to evaluate
instream data submitted b the City of Mount Airy.*
030703 Lovills Cr. PS NP Further investigation is necessary to determine actions
at SR 1371 needed.*
030703 Heatherly Cr. PS & NP,P Continued monitoring will quantify improvements with the
NS removal of the Pilot Mountain WWTP discharge.*
030704 Reynolds Cr. PS NP,P Sequoia WWTP should submit an engineering alternatives
analysis.*
030704 Salem Cr. - PS NP Action by Forsyth County and the City of Winston Salem
Middle Fork are needed to improve water quality. DWQ will reevaluate the
model to determine of wasteload allocation should be revised.*
030704 Grants Cr. PS P,NP DWQ will monitor for improvement after the City of
Salisbury's discharges are eliminated. If the creek is still
impaired alter the Salisbury discharge is removed, DWQ will
identify other point sources of pollution and the options for
these sources.*
030706 Fourth Cr. PS NP Pollutant sources must be identified, along with methods to
below reduce nutrient loading.*
Statesville
030707 Brushy Fork PS NP Additional activity by local governments and agencies and the
at SR1810 Non pint Source Team are needed.*
030707 Hamby Cr. NS NP,P No new dischargers of oxygen-consuming wastes should be
at I-85, permitted. Thomasville and Lexington should serve as
SR2031 regional WWTPs for future wastewater needs.*
(Abbotis Cr.
watershed)
030708 Lick Cr. PS P,NP New dischw-vers, including the Town of Denton's proposed
at SR2351, outfall, should receive advanced tertiary limits for oxygen-
NC8 consuming wastes.*
030708 Little Mtn Cr. PS NP,P New or expwding discharges should receive advanced tertiary
limits for oxygen-consuming wastes under the current zero
flow regulations. Low dissolved oxygen levels will be
evaluated and appropriate actions pursued during FERC
relicensin g.*
030710 Pee Dee R. PS NP New or expauding discharges to the Pee Dee River below Lake
below Lake Tillery should meet limits no less stringent than 15 mg/l
Tillery BUDS, 4 tng/l NH3N and 5 mg/1 DO. Appropriate mitigative
actions will be pursued during FERC relicensin g.*
030710 Brown Cr. PS NP No new dischatrges should be permitted in this watershed.*
at SR1627
030711 upper NS NP New or expanding dischargers above Mallard Creek should
Rocky River (a por- receive lunits of 5 mg/l BOD and 2 mg/l NH3N. New or
tion is expanding discha roes below Mallard Creek will receive total
rated BODu limits 32 mg/l. Model results will be used to evaluate
support specific scenarios for future allocations in the river.
lireat- The City of 'Charlotte and Cabaurus and Mecklenburg
ened) Counties should investigate pollution sources and develop
mitigation plans to protect the river from further de gradation.*
6-7
Chapter 6 - Water Quality Concerns and Recmmnumded Managenurnt Strategies
examining the possibility of upgrading its treatment units and/or relocating its outfall to the Pee Dee
River.
R e co rnm.e n cla tt nn,s:
Observations from regional office personnel indicate that Clarks Creek has low flow during dry
periods. Considering the limited flow available for the assimilation of wastewater, it is
recommended that further evaluation and updated flow information from USGS be obtained if the
discharge remains, or new discharges locate to this creek.
J. Uwharri.e River Watershed (Subbasin 03-07-09)
This subbasin consists of the Uwharrie River and its tributaries. Monitored lakes include McCrary
Lake, Lake Bunch, Back Creek Lake and Lake Reese. This subbasin has no impaired waters,
although considerable sedimentation is evident on the upper portion of the watershed and many of
these waters are support threatened (Refer to Chapter 4, Section 4.5). Problems in these
headwaters are attributed to land use and urbanization.
Caraway ('reek (Support Threatened)
The largest discharger, Countryside MHP, has a permit to discharge 0.015 MGD into a UT to
Caraway Creek, a class WS-I11 stream. The UT has an estimated 7Q10 and 30Q2 flow equal to
zero. Occasional instream DO violations, as low as 4.6 mg/l, have been reported by the facility
during the period 1994-1996.
Recomm.enclations:
If no practical alternatives to discharge are available, it is recommended that Countryside MHP's
wasteload allocation be modified to advanced tertiary limits for oxygen-consuming wastes under
current zero flow procedures.
K. Pee Dee River from Lake Tillery Dam to Blewett Falls Dam
(Subbasin 03-07-10)
This subbasin includes the Pee Dee River and its tributaries from the Lake Tillery dam to the
Blewett Falls Lake dam, with the exception of the Rocky River (subbasins 03-07-11 to 03-07-14)
and the Little River (subbasin 03-07-15). The largest tributaries in this subbasin are Brown Creek
and Mountain Creek. The Pee Dee River and Brown Creek are impaired waters (Refer to Chapter
4, Section 4.5).
Pee Dee River below Lake Tillery (Partially Supporting) levels. The cause of the
The Pee Dee River below Le O levels as to Tillery is imaired due
related to to low es s disc,l arge from CP&L's hydroelectric
substandard D PPear
facility on Lake Tillery.
Recommendations:
DWQ, in coordination with the NC Division of Water Resources, will explore mitigative actions to
correct this problem when the facility comes up for FERC relicensing in 2008. In addition, new or
expanding discharges to the Pee Dee River in this subbasin should meet limits no less stringent
than 15 mg/1 BOD5, 4 mgA NH3-N, and 5 mg/l DO.
Additional activities and resources are needed to identify impairment sources and to develop
management strategies for this waterbody. As resources allow, DWQ intends to develop NPS
management strategies for this waterbody for the second Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin Plan (refer
to Section 6.3.3). In addition, local efforts are needed to develop a plan to reduce nonpoint source
pollution for the Pee Dee River.
6-21
Chapter 6 - Water Quality Concerns and Recommended Managenurnt Strategies
Brown Creek (Partially Supporting)
Brown Creek, the largest tributary in this subbasin, is susceptible to low flow during dry summer
conditions. Although there are no permitted dischargers in its drainage area, Brown Creek
received a Fair bioclassification rating in 1996. Low instream DO concentrations have been
reported at the ambient station at SR 1627 near Pinkerton. Water quality appears to be negatively
affected by a combination of low stream flow during dry periods and nonpoint source pollution
during wetter periods. Sedimentation is also a probable cause of impairment.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that no new discharges be permitted in the Brown Creek watershed. In
addition, additional activities and resources are needed to identify impairment sources and to
develop management strategies for this waterbody. As resources allow, DWQ intends to develop
NPS management strategies for this waterbody for the second Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin Plan
(refer to Section 6.3.3). In addition, local efforts are needed to develop a plan to reduce nonpoint
source pollution for this creek.
L. Upper Rocky River and Coddle Creek Watersheds (Subbasin 03-07-11)
This subbasin includes the headwaters of the Rocky River to above its confluence with Irish
Buffalo Creek. Coddle Creek is the major tributary. Most of the waters in this subbasin are
Support Threatened (Refer to Chapter 4, Section 4.5). The Rocky River and Coddle Creek are
impaired waters.
Dye .Branch and the headwaters of the Rocky River are significantlyunpacted by Mooresville's
discharge, which has had frequent toxicity failures. In 1993, DWQ completed a field-calibrated
dissolved oxygen model for 47.6 stream miles of the upper Rocky River area in subbasins 03-07-
11 and 03-07-12, from its headwaters to the confluence with Muddy Creek (NCDEM, 1993b).
The modeled area includes portions of Dye Branch and Mallard Creek, as well as the Rocky River
mainstem. The model was developed to evaluate the assimilative capacity of the river and to assess
the interaction between three major dischargers: Mooresville (into Dye Branch), the Charlotte-
Mecklenburg Utilities District's Mallard Creek WWTP and the Rocky River Regional WWTP (in
subbasin 03-07-12) operated by Cabar-us County. Fecal coliform bacteria levels and
sedimentation are also problem parameters in the Rocky River.
Recomm.enda zions:
Model results indicate that Mallard Creek and the Rocky River upstream of Mallard Creek have
limited assimilative capacity and that new or expanding dischargers, if permitted, should receive
BAT limits (5 mg/I BOD and 2 mg/l NH3N). This recommendation may affect both the
Mooresville and the CMUD-Mallard Creek W WTPs. Model results also indicate that
Mooresville's permitted limits for oxygen-consuming wastes are predicted to result in violations of
the DO standard in the Rocky River. However, during 1994-1996 Mooresville, on average,
treated its wastewater to well below its permitted limits and no DO violations were reported by the
facility during this period. The DO standard appears to be protected at Mooresville's current level
of treatment and waste flow. However, should the facility wish to expand in the future, DWQ will
review the limits and make modifications where they are appropriate and justifiable.
Model results indicate that there is remaining assimilative capacity in the Rocky River below
Mallard Creek. New or expanding discharges are likely to receive total BODu limits of
approximately 32 mg/l (BODS and ammonia limits will vary depending upon effluent
characteristics). The model will be used to evaluate specific scenarios for the future allocation of
oxygen-consuming wastes in the upper and middle reaches of the Rocky River.
7..d
M

0
0
0

r
L

r
M
6-22
Chapter 6 - Water Quality Concerns and Recommended Management Strategies
Table 6.1.5 Recommended TMDLs and Management Strategies for Addressing Oxygen-
Consuming Wastes with Reference to Subbasin Summaries.
Map Ref- Subbasin Receiving Stream Management Strategy Chp. 6
erence # Sect.
1 030704 Grants Creek If DO violations continue after Salisbury has relocated, 6.3.4-E
other sources of pollution will need to be identified.
2 030704 Salem Creek & Reevaluate QUAL2E model to determine if the 6.3.4-E
Muddy Creek wasteload allocation for the Archie Elledge Plant should
be revised.
3 030705 Cedar Creek To aid in assessing the assimilative capacity, additional 6.3.4-F
water quality data should be collected before permitting
new dischargers.
4 030706 Second Creek Field calibrated model should be considered for assessing 6.3.4-G
(North) the potential impact of new or expanding dischargers.
5 030707 Rich Fork No additional loadings of oxygen-consuming wastes 6.3.4-H
should be permitted.
6 030707 Abbotts Creek No new dischargers of oxygen-consuming wastes should 6.3.4-H
watershed be permitted. Thomasville and Lexington should serve
as regional WWTPs for future wastewater needs.
7 030708 Mountain Cr. arm Low dissolved oxygen levels in the Mountain Cr. arm 6.3.4-I
of Lake Tillery of Lake Tillery will be evaluated. Appropriate actions
will be pursued during FERC relicensin .
8 030708 Upper Lake Tillery Low dissolved oxygen levels in the upper reaches of 6.3.4-1
Lake Tillery will be evaluated. Appropriate actions will
be pursued during FERC relicensin .
9 030708 Clarks Creek Further evaluation and updated flow information should 6.3.4-I
be obtained if the Mt. Gilead discharge remains, or new
discharges locate to this creek.
10 030708 Yadkin River Low dissolved oxygen levels below High Rock Lake 6.3.4-1
dam will be evaluated and appropriate actions pursued
during FERC relicensin .
11 030710 Pee Dee River New or expanding discharges to the Pee Dee River 6.3.4-K
below Lake Tillery should meet limits no less stringent
than 15 mg/1 BOD5, 4 mg/1 N113N and 5 mg/l DO.
Appropriate mitigative actions will be pursued during
FERC relicensin .
12 030710 Brown Creek No new discharges should be permitted in this 6.3.4-K
watershed.
13 030711 Mallard Cr & New or expanding discharges, if permitted, should 6.3.4-L
Rocky R. receive limits of 5 mg/l BOD and 2 mg/l NH3N.
watershed upstrm
of Mallard Cr
14 030711 Rocky River below New or expanding discharges are to receive BODu limits 6.3.4-L
Mallard Creek equal to 32 m /l.
15 030712 Goose Creek Field calibrated model will be developed to evaluate 6.3.4-M
assimilative capacity of the creek.
16 030712 Crooked Creek Before any new outfalls are permitted, it is recommended 6.3.4-M
that additional chemical/physical data be collected to aid
in assessing the assimilative capacity of the proposed
receiving stream.
17 030712 South Fork No additional loads of oxygen-consuming wastes will be 6.34
Crooked Creek permitted. 1
6-49
cc) 0
ESTABLISHED 1881.
Rain And Floods Hit
This Section Heavily
Farmers and Others Sustain Severe
Losses in Last Week's Wet Weath-
er and High Water-Other Section;
Are Hit Harder.
Since the heavy rains and destruc-
tive freshets of the first of last week,
people of Anson county and other
sections have been busy checking up
on their losses.
While thousands of dollars in dam-
age to roads and bridges cannot he
disregarded, the loss to farmers and
stock raisers is the worst feature )f
the flood in this "county.
Experts of the various agricultural
organizations have been at wort: in
an effort to calculate the , darnaL,:e,
but no official figures have yet been
tabulated.
In response to an inc?iiry, County
Farm Arent J. W. Cameron told The
M. & I. yesterday that the agricul-
tural damage is so great that it is not
estimable. He went on to say:
. "All crops on lowlands are pra(-ti-•
call,y a total loss. Corn on the up-
lands is damaged very, badly due to
the fact that -the ears were heavy,
the•.,ground was soft after so much
rain, and hence there is more corn on
the ground than we have ever seen:
before.
"I think a conservative estimate of.
the damage to upland corn would be
around 20 percent, and I would say
the damage to upland cotton would be
lip to 20 percent-and in many in-
stance-, more. Lesnedeza is badly
damaged, clue tai the fact that it wa:;
)down over and much of it will i)e
hard to harvest either for Ceed or for
hay.;,A great,, deal will either mold,:or
rot cn account of bedding down.
Grazing also is badly damaged, due
to overflowing leaving much mud on
the grass to make it unpalatable and
not. so good for livestock.
"1 would like to say again that the
damatre is great and inestimable. as
it is they worst flood we have h'ra?

t)einges Sweep Countri.
From this summ:try, it Call be seen
tivit Anson county hits lost hundreds
of thousands of dollars in its current
crops; alone. No accurate money val-.
ue (-.in be set, in. fact, until the final
crop reports are made next, spring.
A; stated in this newspaper last
week, several head of livestock were
drowned and swept away in the swol-
len creeks and rivers. Even yet, the
stock growers have not fini,hed
checking their herein to be sure of
their standing.
Added to the farm loses, the
county must ri ure the damage to
public and industrial installation::.
The 'Caroli•na Power & Liahtt'Co.,
with its. flooded . Blewett Falls , lant,
and t'he other public utilities-will add
thousands of dollars to the high-wa-
ter bill, with reconstruction S>.r.-re'7a-
bilitation of their properties.
The working time loss figures no
small item. The Seaboard 'Railway
had its. main line' through Wadesboro
blocked from Tuesday through to
Friday at noon. As a result, no mail
or express could be handled through
usual channels. Readers of The M. &
L in many places failed to receive
their newspapers until two days later
than usual. far one example. In
:another field, the large mills driven
by electricity in this area lost consid-
ejable. time while the power systems
were being readjustd.
While the large hi?_,hways have
been made passable, ttiere are sev-
eral broken places in country roads
which must have rebuilding Jobs done
before vehic6s can travel freely.
Some time will elapse before large
bridges, such as the Rocky river,
Lanes creek and Brown creek strue-
tures. can be replaced. Here, again,
no defInite estimate of the cost is yet
available.
ova
E CHARLOTTE OBSERVER
..:'V
JOHN 0. SIMMONS/Staff
Jay Higginbotham, a member of the Anson County environmental group CACTUS (Citizens Against Chemical
Toxins and Underground Storage), pulls vines away from ap old farm silo that shows high-water flood
marks. The silo sits In the area where Chambers was supposed to open a landfill.
Legal Notices
ADVER7ISEMENfFOR BIDS
Sealed proposals wijl be received
until 3:30 PM, on. JULY 2. 1996, in
the Charbtte•Mecklenburg Govem•
ment Center, 14th Floor Coherence
Room, for the construction of
STORM WATER MAINTENANCE FY-
97 C. Project No. 514-96.127, at
which time and place bids will be
opened and road aloud,
Contract ' Documents can be ob-
tained from CITY OF CHARLOTTE
ENGINEERING AND PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT 14TH FLOOR MAP
ROOM, 600 E. FOURTH ST., CHAR-
LOTTE, NC 28202.2844.
tract Document charge:
00/Ndri-refundable.
City of Charlotte resejves the
to reject any and all proposals.
estimated cost to build this Piro.
is $350000.
QUESTIONS ' REGARDING
PROJECT. CONTACT TOM
IPBELL AT 704.938.3617, MON.
THROUGH FRIDAY, FROM 8:00
TO 5:00 P.M.
140837
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
School Board of the City. of
lmond. Virginia is seekig sealed
posals from' qualified Offerors to
vide Design-Build services nec-
NOTI
SURPL
The Gaf
mission
and me
various,
equipmf
A Pubii(
ment wil
1996, a'
Couhyl
Road, C
dens me
nutes pr
sale.
All units
with no
be mao
check.
The Cou
fact any I
For mor
County F
888-3i05
LP60408
ADVI
fat new wememary smote and the Sealed
rynovatan of one (1) existing high until 2:3(
school builtling, inducting ralatetl fi• the Chap
nandng antl o ration and main-. merit Ce
tenanca of the facilities. To obtain a - Room fo
copy of RFP #96-5071.5. contact:. FIC SIG,
Allred L. Cobbs - STALLA'
Coordinator of Purchasing at which
DN1sgn 11
PUfdhaeinngg opened T

2907 No
rthBOUIBVerd.
Richmond, VA 232304391 This pro;
[phone] - trenchmx
Proposals will be received uh8. but lead-in w
not later than 2:30 p.m.. Jura 28, and con(
1996, Any proposal received late will signal de
be returned unopened to the sender. stallation
Sincerely..

Alfred L. Cobbs, CPPB A Pre-B,
Coordinator of Purchasing uled for
(804) 7808201' AM in it
LP6039270 trade
o,
an stop
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS dens to p
Sealed PmPoeats will be received have abo
until 2:30 PM, on JULY 2. 1996, in
the Charlotte-Mecklenti Govern-
S
p
ee
4i
c
a
merit Center, 14th Floor Conference l
t
h
a
C
TM

Room, for the construction of NEERING

-STORM WATER MAINTENANCE ROOM, 6
FY-97A, Project No. 514.WI25, at. LOTTE• f
which time and pace bids will be ments ai
Dodge l
g
y
bras Documents canes be obtained The
Ct
from CITY OF CHARLOTTE ENGf-. right to rel
NEERING AND PROPERTY MAN- the an
m•
a
AGEMENT. 14TH FLOOR MAP an
ROOM, 600 E. FOURTH ST., CHAR-
LOTTE, NC 28202-2844. For more
Contract Document charge: 525.001 King, Co,
Non-refundable. -
The C(ty.d Charlotte reserves the 336-2047.
LP804679
right to rated any and all proposels,
Tfie estimated c
ild t
t t
b
i
oa
o
u
h
s pro-
5350.000•
IVQUESTIONS REGARDING THIS REOUI
PROJECT, CONTACT TOM CAMP- The City c
BELL AT 704.336-3617, MONDAY Aviation, i
THROUGH FRIDAY, FROM 8:00 AAt single ver
TO SAO PAt right to IN
LP6040914 the publi(
sion at th(
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS national A
Sealed proposals will be received shall be to
until 3:00 PM, on JULY 2. 1996. in an adi itio
the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Govern- option of t
ment Center. 14th Floor Conference compasse
Room, for the construction of services 1(
STORM WATER MAINTENANCE FY- tic pay ph
97 B. Project No..514-96126, at the airport
which time and pace bids will be
=and read aloud. Interested
Contras Documents can be ob• plate set
tained from CITY OF CHARLOTTE from the A
ENGINEERING AND PROPERTY Charlotte-[
MANAGEMENT 14TH FLOOR MAP Pont. 5501
ROOM. 600 E. FOURTH ST., CHAR• way. Chao
.LOTTE, NC 28202.2844. proposals
Contras Document charge: same 10cs
$25.00/Non-rafundable, June 27, i'
The City of Charlotte reserves the forence w,
right to rajas any and all proposals. lope-Doug
The estimated cost to build this pro• main term
ject is $350.000. Ju
rent
FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING ne
19.15
THIS PROJECT. CONTACT TOM eared tam
CAMPBELL AT 704,1363617, MON. this time a
DAY THROUGH FRIDAY, FROM 8:00 through of
A.M. TO 5:00 P.M. be oonduc,
LP6040939 LP6040784
ADVERTISEMENT
On or about 31 Maayy 1996, plans and specifications
# 39-020, and #39-022: North Charleston Term
Cranes #39.018, and #39-019. Wando Welch Tern
lesion South Carolina, will be available for distributi(
by the South Carolina Stale Ports Authority. .
A prebid conference will be held on 18. June 1996
do Activity Center. Building 419. 400 Long Poin
South Carolina. '
Bids will be received at the Wando ActNtty Center
Point Road. Mount Pleasant. South Carolina, untit :
at which time there will be a public opening of b
Center. Mt. Pleasant. South Carolina.
This project involves four (4) container cranes for
Pons Authority. Two_(2) cranes are located at the h
the other two (2) cranes are. located at the Wando
der this contract includes repair, and/or removal r
and replacement with new steel and fasteners for ,
platforms. Concurrent with the structural repairs. sT
will be cleaned and repainted: Repaired domponen
act by SCSPA's painting contractor. Additionally, M•
and electrical houses are to be replaced .
Most of the areas are elevated and will require pars(
access. Due to the degree of corrosion on some o,
by the painting contractor, inspection of these area:
nation with the Owner for these inspect ions and it