20081268 Ver 3_Technical Site Review_20190930

Site Information
Site Information
Date: *
Prepared By:
Meeting Type:*
USACE AID:
9/30/2019
Erin Davis
Technical Site Review
NCDWR ID: 20081268
NCDWR Version 1
Weather:
Coordinates:
Attendees
Project Name:* Tull Wooten III
Type of Site:* Bank Stream and Wetland Site
Sponsor/Provider: *Bank Stream and Wetland Site
County:* Lenoir
HUC and Basin:* Neuse - 03020202
Degrees North Degrees West
RES -Brad Breslow, David Godley, Katie
Webber
USACE - Todd Tugwell
DWR - Mac Haupt, Erin Davis
Project Review Checklist
(provide additional detail in notes section on next Daae)

General Site Issues/Concerns
Stream Issues/Concerns
Wetland Issues/Concerns:
r Vegetation Composition or
Density
r Planted Stem Vigor (due to soil,
browsing)
r Invasive/Exotic Species
r Beaver/Feral Hogs
(management plan)
I— Soil (manipulation, compaction,
fertility)
r Livestock Present/Evidence of
Livestock Access
f- Crossings or Utility Lines
r BMPs or Alternate Approaches
r Fencing Issues or Fencing
Needed
r Ponds Within Project Area
r Incised/Entrenched
r Headcuts Present/Forming
r Stream Structures
Failing/Piping
r Excess Sediment/Aggradation
r CrosslSections
Missing/Indicate Problems
r Bank Instability/Failure
r- Bench Rills/Erosion
(constructed bench or P2 valley)
r Excess Sinuosity (lack of flow)
r Braided/Anabranch Channel
r Evidence of Excessive
Hydrology
r Evidence of Insufficient
Hydrology
r Hydric Soil Indicators/Soil
Series
r Surface Roughness or Bedding
r Channel Relocation/Riparian
Connectivity
r- Hydroperiod Length or
Start/Stop Date
r Inappropriate Credit Ratio
Proposed
r JD Needed to Confirm
Approach
r Continuity/Fragmentation
r Easement Issues (existing farm,
CE, NRCS funding)
r Easement Encroachments
(livestock, clearing)
r Easement Marking/Signage
r- Insufficient Project Size
r Adjacent Property Owner
r- T&E Species
r Section 106 (historic
listing/tribal issues)
r Insufficient Stream Drainage
Area
r Insufficient Hydrology (if raising
channel bed)
r Vegetation in Channel (stream
vs wetland)
r Flow Obstructions (undersized
pipes, fords)
f- Substrate Concerns
(embeddedness, particle size)
r Live Stakes Absent/Failing
r- Evidence of Water Quality
Issues
r Inlstream Habitat Weak/Missing
I— Stream Buffer Width Inadequate
r Missing Gauge Data
(preconstruction or monitoring)
I— Gauge Location/Placement
r Gauge Maintenance
r Drainage Ditches/Swales
Present
r Field Tiles/Subsurface
Drainage
r- Continued Ag Use Adjacent to
Wetland

Page 2 --
Notes and Sketches, etc
TW4 - significant privet in buffer and on banks; minor incision, flow
observed in lower section & ponded water in upper section,observed
wetland pockets; large bedrock headcut; supplemental planting proposed
along easement borders, remove sheet metal debris, extend easement to
capture WA, identify path in easement lower section, concern about
amount of functional uplift since system is not high quality for preservation
TW2A - incised, unconsolidated sediment - very sandy, privet, trash piles,
P2 hybrid proposed, culvert crossings to be replaced, check for tile drains
in ag field buffer area, flow observed in central section, steep slopes in
central wooded section, privet already mulched in some areas creating
open understory
TW2C - stop credit at crossing, propose crossing enhancement (culvert or
ford?)
TW3 - mapped feature looks appropriate- non jurisdictional channel at top
section, very incised
TW1 - some bedrock in upper section, significant bedrock in central
section, flow observed, incised, moderately steep valley, significant privet,
top culvert perched - not designed for replacement but needs to be, bottom
culvert ok, more stable/less incised in lower section, overall not a high
quality preservation reach, minimal functional uplift appears feasible at this
point
WF - delineation needed to cut out sand ridges along eastern and
southern extent of pathway, two upland areas were identified based on
topo & soil samples that roughly correspond with the NWI map in the mit
plan, based on drive by the preservation areas appears to contain high
and medium quality habitat, invasives present
Wrap up - change TW4 & TW1 to 1:10 enhancement reaches, add a
descriptive adaptive management plan with potential MY1-3 treatments
(supplemental planting, live staking) that could result in more credit;
Credit Release/Site Closeout Information
(For rronitoring or closeout review only)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Stream Credits
Warm Cool Cold
Requested
Approved*
Wetland Credits
Riparian Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine Non -Riparian Coastal
Requested
Approved*
"the updated credit ledger for the project, which includes this release, rust be approved by the Roject K/hnager.
Result of Monitoring Report or Closeout

Signature *
Date 9/30/2019