19991453 Ver 1_Complete File_20000804

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
MEMORANDUM
To: John Dorney?j
From: Dave Penrose(,l? ? .
LTTWA
nowk
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
4 August, 2000
Subject: Edsel Place Stream Restoration
DWQ Project # 991368, Mecklenburg County
I've reviewed the most recent information concerning the Edsel Place Stream Restoration
and although it appears that the project really doesn't fit our definition of restoration that we
are committed to accepting the project as it's written. CSWS has addressed our concerns in
a response letter from Julie Stahl (7 July 2000). I've looked over the Monitoring Plan and
find it acceptable. However, there are some additional questions or concerns that should be
addressed. According to the monitoring plan water quality parameters will be collected and
analyzed annually from three stations. CSWS needs to understand that these water quali
data are only a very brief snapshot of the water quality conditions of this stream and are
ow-
probably extremely variable. Rather than a snapshot-like approach to monitoring water
quality, it would be preferred that samples are collected following spate events or on a
regular monthly or bimonthly basis. The monitoring plan contains a suite of metals to be S
analyzed and includes 12 toxics. I'm not sure what they mean by the 12 toxics. The plan
indicates that the monitoring will begin in May 2000. Has this occurred or has it been S
delayed? Finally, CSWS notes that a vegetation survivability rate of 80% will be used as a
goal. However, they do not mention the number of plants per plot. As I understand it they
need to insure that 320 plants per acre survive as a goal. I don't think that these additional
concerns should slow up the Certification process, rather they can hopefully be addressed
either informally or as conditions of the Certification.
Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
r
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources •
14
Division of Water Quality _
James B. Hunt, Jr.; Governor NCDE R
Bill Holman, Secretary
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Kerr T. Stevens, Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 7, 2000
Mecklenburg County
DWQ Project # 991453
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Ms. Julie Stahl
City of Charlotte-Stormwater Services
- 600 E Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28204
Dear Ms. Stahl:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 2,747 linear feet of -
streams for the purpose of conducting a stream restoration project at Edsel Place as described in your application dated December 28, 1999.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3109. This
certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 27 when the Corps of Engineers issues iL In addition, you should get any other
federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal
Stormwater. Non-Discharge and Water Supply Water shed regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA
permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If you change
your project. you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a.
copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project
(now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. DWQ will need to be copied on a finished mitigation plan which clarifies the final points:
a) Which " toxics" will be analyzed?
b) A revised monitoring plan schedule and
c) The number of trees per acre goal to be achieved.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of
the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a heating, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina - .
General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are
final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions,
please telephone John Domey at 919-733-9646.
_ Si rel
Steven
Attachment
cc: Cotes of Engineers Asheville Field Office
Mooresville DWQ Regional Office
File copy
Central Files
Dave Penrose
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
FW: Edsel Place
Subject: FW: Edsel Place
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:51:10 -0400
From: "Stahl, Julie" <[e-mail]>
To: "'[e-mail]"' <[e-mail]>
Here it is..
Let me know if any questions.
Julie
-----Original Message-----
From: dave penrose [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 4:37 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: John Dorney
Subject: Edsel Place
Hey Julie,
I had a chance to talk to John Dorney about the Edsel place project and
he agreed with our assessments and that the work falls within our
definition of restoration.
He would like for you to write him a letter (please carbon me) to:
-address the comments of the 19 January letter from us
-include a signed copy of the FONSI
-a summary of our meeting Wedsnesday including a discussion of the
monitoring plan.
We will then triage the project and I think it will be approved in short
order.
^? ?N" / ?tP /S ?72IW?
?J
D

1 of 1 7/20/00 4:04 PM
CbalodeMedla?bury
STORM
WATER
SW*OS
July 7, 2000
A ?oot
I., nA. --,/
' s..
Mr. John Dorney
NC Department of Natural Resources (0
/ J
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit l [e?
4401 Reedy Creek Road f v!
Raleigh, NC 27626 v Ad P C,
Re: Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project (DWQ # 991368), /
City of Charlotte Storm Water Services, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Dorney:
This letter has been prepared in response to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources Division of Water Quality's (DWQ) letter dated January 19, 2000 regarding the City of
Charlotte's Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project (DWQ No. 991368). The DWQ January 19' letter
raised three issues to be addressed by CSWS for 401 Water Quality Certification of this project. CSWS
met with and discussed these issues with Mr. Dave Penrose, DWQ on May 3, 2000. The remainder of this
letter presents the DWQ "comments" followed by our responses, which are reflective of the discussion
with Mr. Penrose.
1. Comment:
Has the FONSI been issued for this project? As you know, the 401 Certification cannot be issued
before the FONSI.
Response:
The FONSI was issued on April 27, 2000 and a copy thereof is attached.
2. Comment:
Is monitoring proposed since this project is proposed to be used as compensatory mitigation?
Response:
A full-scale stream mitigation monitoring plan is proposed for this project. The Edsel Place Stream
Mitigation Monitoring Plan is attached for your review. -
3. Comment:
How does this project meet the definition of stream restoration in our new General Certification for
Nationwide Permit 27? If it does not meet that definition (and it appears not to meet that definition),
then an application and fee will be required for Certification.
Response:
As discussed with Mr. Penrose and concurred by you (per additional written correspondence from Mr.
Charlotte Stonn Water Services 600 East Fourth Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-2844
Telephone[phone] FAX[phone]
Page 2 of 2
Penrose, e-mail dated May 4, 2000), the Edsel Place Project falls within the DWQ's definition of
restoration based on the following:
• The restoration design as presented is based upon sound ecologic, hydrologic, and
geomorphologic principles that will convert a degraded system to a more natural and stable
state. The design uses a natural restoration approach based upon the Rosgen Priority 2 Level of
restoration for incised streams in an urban setting, which calls for the re-establishment of the
appropriate stream type and its floodplain at the existing stream level. With consideration of
present and future watershed conditions, the proposed design affects the restoration of the
dimension, pattern and profile of the stream through the relocation of approximately 745 linear
feet of channel, the restoration of floodprone areas, and the reestablishment of natural riffle-
pool sequences. The stream will be restored from a G5c stream type to a C5 stream type under
the Rosgen Classification System.
• The biological and chemical integrity will be restored to the maximum extent practicable based
on the direct benefits of reducing/eliminating the excess sediment load and the indirect benefits
of restoring the in-stream habitat of the channel. The sediment load and in-stream habitat
should improve as bank erosion and mass failure is minimized, sediment transport is improved,
and the deposition of fines is transferred to the floodplain. CSWS proposes that through
monitoring of this project, greater insight will be revealed as to the potential of "restoring"
individual segments of urban streams where watershed retrofits were not feasible to address
water quality concerns.
• The project also proposes to restore, enhance, and preserve the adjacent riparian zone through
revegetation and the acquisition of protective conservation easements.
CSWS trusts that this submittal will provide you with sufficient information to complete the processing of
the 401 WQC notification. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me
at [phone] or JSTAHL(a_),Ci.Charlotte.NC.US.
Respectfully submitted,
Juh E. Stahl
rmitting Administrator
Enclosures: Copy of FONSI
Edsel Place Stream Mitigation Monitoring Plan
cc: D. Penrose, DWQ
S. Wilkerson, Project Manager, CSWS
Charlotte Stone Water Services 600 East Fourth Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-2844
Telephone[phone] FAX[phone]
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Environmental Assessment - Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
An Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared, pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act, for the proposed streambank stabilization along portions ofa 2750 linear foot
unnamed tributary to Briar Creek in the City of Charlotte. The stabilization project is being proposed by the
Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS). The upstream limit of the project is located at Sudbury Road and
is roughly bounded by Central Avenue to the south, Sharon Amity Road to the east, Shamrock Road to the
north, and Kilborne Drive to the west. The project consists of streambank stabilization and debris removal.
As part of the project, CSWS also plans to implement both an educational outreach effort and a
biological/water quality monitoring program, at the project site.
The preferred project alternative is a combination of stabilization methods; along with debris removal.
Installation of an upstream detention facility was also considered for potentially reducing downstream
flooding and erosion. This option was not selected because the only potentially available favorable site
would not have provided the needed peak flow attenuation. Using stone rip-rap along the entire length of
the tributary was also an alternative considered. However, it was not selected as the preferred alternative
because of the impacts it would produce to stream habitat. With the preferred alternative, areas where a
stable stream bank already exists, the "no-build" alternative will be used. In areas where velocities and
shear forces are'within acceptable ranges and lateral constraints are less restrictive, stream cross-sectional
and planform dimensions will be altered to provide for more gradual bank slopes and a "floodplain shelf."
Slopes will be graded more gradually after accommodating the flood shelf and will be covered by coir fiber
matting and live stakes. A riparian buffer will be planted with containedzed'trees and shrubs. In areas
where high and steep banks cannot be made shallower because of lateral constraints, a technique will be
used which places stone at the bank toe and in the channel substrate, and coir matting and woody vegetation
on the banks.
This project is expected to help maintain and potentially improve water quality and aquatic habitat in the
unnamed tributary. Additionally, this project serves to fulfill a commitment by CSWS to the residents in the
project area of minimizing or eliminating damage to property from erosion of streams within its
jurisdictional boundaries.
To mitigate any temporary adverse impacts that may result during construction of the project, work will
be limited to the amount that can be stabilized, seeded/bio-engineered, and mulched within "one day's
work" (approximately one hundred to one hundred fifty feet of stream bank at a time).
This EA and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) are prerequisites for the issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification by the Division of Water Quality for stream bank stabilization activities.
It is concluded that the proposed project will not result in significant impacts to the environment provided
that it is carried out in accordance with the impact avoidance and mitigation measures contained in the EA
and requisite permits. Pending approval by the State Clearinghouse, the environmental review for this
project will be concluded. An environmental impact statement will not be prepared.
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte Storm Water Services
DWQ #991368 / COE # 200030332

The Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project will serve as 1:1 mitigation edit for one or
more Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) projects as agreed upo by and between
the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), US Army Corps of Engineers,
and CSWS on a project-by-project basis. CSWS will monitor the progress and success of
the Edsel Place Project as a stream restoration project and as compensatory mitigation.
The monitoring plan (Plan) includes monitoring of geomorphic characteristics,
biological-chemical-habitat characteristics, and vegetation survival and will cover a five-
year period. The five-year period begins with a pre-construction event, continues with
the in-construction year and concludes with 3 consecutive years following the year in
which construction was completed. A summary of the Plan is provided in the attached
table and is further detailed in Sections 1.0 through 4.0 below.
1.0 Geomorphic Monitoring
The City of Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) will perform geomorphic
monitoring of the Edsel Place channel to determine the stability of the channel cross-
section designed as part of the Edsel Place Restoration Project as well as to insure proper
maintenance of any degrading sections. The geomorphic monitoring will be
accomplished by establishing permanent cross-section locations and performing pebble
counts upstream, within, and downstream the restored reach. These cross-sections will
be surveyed immediately after construction and at least once a year for three consecutive
years. The cross-sections will be surveyed immediately following a storm event of
significant magnitude (1-year or greater storm event) as well as close to the anniversary
of the initial survey. Pebble counts will be performed at stream locations that roughly
correspond to the survey cross sections that will be established. The pebble counts will
be performed by using the Wolman Method as outlined by Rosgen and will be conducted
on an annual basis beginning a year after construction is completed. Data sheets similar
to those presented by Rosgen will be used.
Five cross-sections will be established following construction for the Edsel Place Project.
Table 1 indicates the location and purpose of each cross-section to be established. The
proposed cross-section locations are shown on the attached drawing.
Table 1: Cross-sections for Geomorphic Monitoring, Edsel Place
Cross-Section Location (station) Purpose
CS-1 Just downstream of
Sudbury Rd (26+25) To act as a control. No improvements will be
performed to this reach.
CS-2 Relocated Reach 4 To evaluate the stability of a relocated reach in
Page 1 of 3
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte Storm Water Services
July 2000
(24+50) a high shear stress area with rock toe.
CS-3 Relocated Reach 3 To evaluate stability of a relocated reach in a
(17+50) low shear stress area with coir fiber toe.
CS-4 Downstream end of To evaluate stability of non-relocated reach near
project (4+50) end of project with rock and coir fiber toe.
CS-5 Just downstream of To evaluate the effect of project on downstream
project reach (0-50) reach's stability. _
2.0 Biological, Chemical, and Habitat Assessment Monitoring
The City of Charlotte will monitor the biological, chemical and habitat characteristics of
the Edsel Place channel to gain insight into the stream restoration techniques used and
their affect on the biological and chemical integrity of an urban stream as well as to
determine the success of the project as mitigation. All sampling and
analysis/identification for this project will be performed by Mecklenburg County
Department of Environmental Protection (MCDEP). Biological monitoring will include'
fish and benthic macroinvertebrate analysis per the NCDWQ's standards. Monitoring of
the stream's water chemistry will include evaluation of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg
ambient monitoring suite, which includes pH, temperature, specific conductance,
dissolved oxygen, turbidity, biological oxygen demand (BOD), alkalinity, fecal coliform,
total suspended solids, total dissolved solids, total solids, ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, total
keijdal nitrogen, total phosphorus, and a select suite of metals (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, and 12
toxic). MCDEP's Habitat Assessment Protocol will also be implemented in the project
reach.
1
r? .
Three bio-chem-habitat monitoring locations were chosen based on state guidance and
/ site conditions:
• upstream (the control/reference, correlates to Geomorphologic Monitoring Cross
Section 1 [Station 26+25] area located just downstream of Sudbury Road),
• within the project reach (representative of relocated area, located at Relocated
Reach 1 [Station 7+00], access from Early Court), and
?? • downstream of project (secondary control to evaluate effect of project on
p downstream habitat and water quality, correlates to Geomorphologic Monitoring
k Cross Section 5 [Station "0-50"] area located just downstream of project, access
from Cole Drive at Aldersgate - Methodist Home Retirement Center)
These locations will be monitored annually beginning (n May 2000 r - nstruction)
and resuming in May/June 2002 (post-construction, after comp e e growing season and
construction recovery period) for 3 consecutive years.
3.0 Vegetation Survivability Monitoring
CSWS will perform vegetation survivability monitoring of the Edsel Place channel to
determine the success of the bioengineering methods and hardiness of the plant species
Page 2 of 3
Mitigation Monitoring Plan Charlotte Storm Water Services
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project July 2000
used as well as to insure proper maintenance of any vegetation performing poorly. As
part of CSWS' contract with the Habitat Assessment Restoration Program (HARP) for
the installation of soil bioengineering materials on this project, the vegetation's survival
will be monitored, and replaced as necessary, by HARP.
Three plots (approximately 200 square feet each) will be established along the project
reach following the first growing season after construction. The vegetation within each
plot will be examined with respect to survival and health. The first two events will
examine survival of each live stake, shrub or tree planted as well as the percent cover for
grasses or ground covers. The subsequent two events will consist of examining the aerial
coverage for all vegetation types. A survivability goal of 80% will be used; mortality
greater than 20% will be replaced. Monitoring will occur in the late summer/early fall
(target September 1) of each year, starting the same year as the planting occurred. This
will allow for replanting, if necessary, of any portions of the bank that have failed over
the previous growing season. Photo-documentation will also be performed during each
event in order to show the typical conditions associated with the site. The photograph
stations will be identified during the initial event and will remain constant throughout the
monitoring period so that year-by-year comparisons can be made.
4.0 Reporting
Annual reports detailing the findings of our above-defined monitoring will be prepared
by CSWS and submitted to the NCDWQ beginning in December 2001 and continuing for
a total of 4 consecutive years (2001 - 2004). Each report will focus on the findings of
that year's monitoring as well as include a cumulative account of all monitoring to date.
Any corrective measures performed, or needed, will be discussed and the success of the
project will be summarized. Each report will include supporting documentation such as
photographs keyed to a site plan and data forms.
Page 3 of 3
tl?
V
?O
a
s?
0
i.i
a
8
O
R1
Tai
0
b
C43
a
o?
0
9
A ?
o ?
?a
OA ?
W
y
O
V
3
0
U

Eli C)
N
O O
O O
O O

ti c
O O O O N
Ocq N N
N

ON
N
=I N .-- N
cd C7 ?? ??

v 0
v O 2
V
I
I
0
" O
tn d
N O ?
+
P-i
0 `r N cn
I I C
b
?NM
M
-4 en
NN
b

U
O
C?l
Ci C/) C40
? U x x
U 0
o ???U U U
?
O
rr ?? M
y
Cd N W) kn ID O . N w N 0 0 O
+
NNIIt O CI VI
U
Nt- O Cd P+ Cd
?
?
a DU cn

A :D A 3 CO) CO)

o
rA
Cd
E'' U O A 32
U ? U U
.--? U Cd
?
x
o
0 ?
0,0 ?U
C)

Cd
oU cu
oP-' orz'Pq o
C? to
C7 C7 GA 05
0
2g ?
M ? <
z n
ws z D
N Z_

k >

m
;u

m
>
R
?
CJ?
+
X
v

o
m
C) z L
O n
(? o -I

Fn
z
O
z C

a
'a
O
I
1010
c?
x
a
x
r
0
H
y
t?7
b
M

?z

g
3` yF> i
wr
? .
h of
V ?
V b
cS?
-a n
Z G
Z ?
? z

-A,
? o
?o
0
XM M (A"N N _ Z
? I I I DD
_ I K
I ? v
I N N
X co
? n
W
OMT0000ON
oo??o?z°<
WOZ D
cnoZp z K ?N m m
f/7zG70? r (n
mo -0
z z
o?= oi
Z?z m m
U) C) R, q N
T
M
O
z '1
N r
m
d
H ?

Z
D °
(7)
rTl m
n
MM
N
M o
N

0
X 0
.. o
td
'"d
\

z z ~
0
D M
Z Z co
co V1
? r ? O
=
Z X
D
O
I
Z
rr,
? D

z coo
°
m °
z Z

z

Z
m ??..q
V
z
0
V1
O
T of t?J y
I I I
I '
? I
!7 I
i I ?k00®®®oo R?°z
I !
z
i I I °
I
N
x
n °
z -
vi m
ux- O A
o C 2
( A 2
m 0 j?fFci < mvg'o mm?mn z
(n
z C z z N O A W 1 I -i 1 11 1 N?
W r m = 1 A n N y
1
r*1
Cl) ,I
o mm
O
m c j

m i ;o XIQ DN
Dj Xp

O C) C) ?? Z
A M I
m O O n
=, iq
mlr-0
x
m Z

x(-
m ? ? m ?
';?
<?"
omzmO
~
Z
?
?r0 ooz
D D y r
cn m o m H
< y
2: M
AM
0 O ? OZ N
m a r-4 m
O
D
n
g x= Z O
mm D rn ym
N _-j o
D r m 2 D N D

C
Z r
r N j
m N A
o z s; n
Z Z A
o o v
O
z
.y m m
i

L J
t?
e'
I
I?•
Lai
.,
Page 2 of 2
Penrose, e-mail dated May 4, 2000), the Edsel Place Project falls within the DWQ's definition of
restoration based on the following:
• The restoration design as presented is based upon sound ecologic, hydrologic, and
geomorphologic principles that will convert a degraded system to a more natural and stable
state. The design uses a natural restoration approach based upon the Rosgen Priority 2 Level of
restoration for incised streams in an urban setting, which calls for the re-establishment of the
appropriate stream type and its floodplain at the existing stream level. With consideration of
present and future watershed conditions, the proposed design affects the restoration of the
dimension, pattern and profile of the stream through the relocation of approximately 745 linear
feet of channel, the restoration of floodprone areas, and the reestablishment of natural riffle-
pool sequences. The stream will be restored from a G5c stream type to a C5 stream type under
the Rosgen Classification System.
• The biological and chemical integrity will be restored to the maximum extent practicable based
on the direct benefits of reducing/eliminating the excess sediment load and the indirect benefits
of restoring the in-stream habitat of the channel. The sediment load and in-stream habitat
should improve as bank erosion and mass failure is minimized, sediment transport is improved,
and the deposition of fines is transferred to the floodplain. CSWS proposes that through
monitoring of this project, greater insight will be revealed as to the potential of "restoring"
individual segments of urban streams where watershed retrofits were not feasible to address
water quality concerns.
• The project also proposes to restore, enhance, and preserve the adjacent riparian zone through
revegetation and the acquisition of protective conservation easements.
CSWS trusts that this submittal will provide you with sufficient information to complete the processing of
the 401 WQC notification. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me
at [phone] or JSTAHLna,Ci.Charlotte.NC.US.
Respectfully submitted,
(Juli E. Stahl
rmitting Administrator
Enclosures: Copy of FONSI
Edsel Place Stream Mitigation Monitoring Plan
cc: D. Penrose, DWQ
S. Wilkerson, Project Manager, CSWS
Charlotte Storm Water Services 600 East Fourth Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-2844
Telephone[phone] FAX[phone]
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Environmental Assessment - Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
An Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared, pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act, for the proposed streambank stabilization along portions ova 2750 linear foot
unnamed tributary to Briar Creek in the City of Charlotte. The stabilization project is being proposed by the
Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS). The upstream limit of the project is located at Sudbury Road and
is roughly bounded by Central Avenue to the south, Sharon Amity Road to the east, Shamrock Road to the
north, and Kilbome Drive to the west. The project consists of streambank stabilization and debris removal.
As part of the project, CSWS also plans to implement both an educational outreach effort and a
biological/water quality monitoring program, at the project site.
The preferred project alternative is a combination of stabilization methods, along with debris removal.
Installation of an upstream detention facility was also considered for potentially reducing downstream
flooding and erosion. This option was not selected because the only potentially available favorable site
would not have provided the needed peak flow attenuation. Using stone rip-rap along the entire length of
the tributary was also an alternative considered. However, it was not selected as the preferred alternative
because of the impacts it would produce to stream habitat. With the preferred alternative, areas where a
stable stream bank already exists, the "no-build" alternative will be used. In areas where velocities and
shear forces are'within acceptable ranges and lateral constraints are less restrictive, stream cross-sectional
and planform dimensions will be altered to provide for more gradual bank slopes and a "floodplain shelf."
Slopes will be graded more gradually after accommodating the flood shelf and will be covered by coir fiber
matting and live stakes. A riparian buffer will be planted with containerized trees and shrubs. In areas
where high and steep banks cannot be made shallower because of lateral constraints, a technique will be
used which places stone at the bank toe and in the channel substrate, and coir matting and woody vegetation
on the banks.
This project is expected to help maintain and potentially improve water quality and aquatic habitat in the
unnamed tributary. Additionally, this project serves to fulfill a commitment by CSWS to the residents in the
project area of minimizing or eliminating damage to property from erosion of streams within its
jurisdictional boundaries.
To mitigate any temporary adverse impacts that may result during construction of the project,, work will
be limited to the amount that can be stabilized, seeded/bio-engineered, and mulched within "one day's
work" (approximately one hundred to one hundred fifty feet of stream bank at a time).
This EA and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) are prerequisites for the issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification by the Division of Water Quality for stream bank stabilization activities.-
It is concluded that the proposed project will not result in significant impacts to the environment provided
that it is carried out in accordance with the impact avoidance and mitigation measures contained in the EA
and requisite permits. Pending approval by the State Clearinghouse, the environmental review for this
project will be concluded. An environmental impact statement will not be prepared.
It
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
April 27, 2000

Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte Storm Water Services
DWQ #991368 / COE # 200030332
The Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project will serve as 1:1 mitigation credit for one or
more Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) projects as agreed upon by and between
the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), US Army Corps of Engineers,
and CSWS on a project-by-project basis. CSWS will monitor the progress and success of
the Edsel Place Project as a stream restoration project and as compensatory mitigation.
The monitoring plan (Plan) includes monitoring of geomorphic characteristics,
biological-chemical-habitat characteristics, and vegetation survival and will cover a five-
year period. The five-year period begins with a pre-construction event, continues with
the in-construction year and concludes with 3 consecutive years following the year in
which construction was completed. A summary of the Plan is provided in the attached
table and is further detailed in Sections 1.0 through 4.0 below.
1.0 Geomorphic Monitoring
The City of Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) will perform geomorphic
monitoring of the Edsel Place channel to determine the stability of the channel cross-
section designed as part of the Edsel Place Restoration Project as well as to insure proper
maintenance of any degrading sections. The geomorphic monitoring will be
accomplished by establishing permanent cross-section locations and performing pebble
counts upstream, within, and downstream the restored reach. These cross-sections will
be surveyed immediately after construction and at least once a year for three consecutive
years. The cross-sections will be surveyed immediately following a storm event of
significant magnitude (1-year or greater storm event) as well as close to the anniversary
of the initial survey. Pebble counts will be performed at stream locations that roughly
correspond to the survey cross sections that will be established. The pebble counts will
be performed by using the Wolman Method as outlined by Rosgen and will be conducted
on an annual basis beginning a year after construction is completed. Data sheets similar
to those presented by Rosgen will be used.
Five cross-sections will be established following construction for the Edsel Place Project.
Table 1 indicates the location and purpose of each cross-section to be established. The
proposed cross-section locations are shown on the attached drawing.
Table 1: Cross-sections for Geomorphic Monitoring, Edsel Place
Cross-Section Location (station) Purpose
CS-1 Just downstream of
Sudbury Rd (26+25) To act as a control. No improvements will be
performed to this reach.
CS-2 Relocated Reach 4 To evaluate the stability of a relocated reach in
Page 1 of 3
J11W

Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte Storm Water Services
July 2000
(24+50) a high shear stress area with rock toe.
CS-3 Relocated Reach 3 To evaluate stability of a relocated reach in a
(17+50) low shear stress area with coir fiber toe.
CS-4 Downstream end of To evaluate stability of non-relocated reach near
project (4+50) end of project with rock and coir fiber toe.
CS-5 Just downstream of To evaluate the effect of project on downstream
project reach (0-50) reach's stability.
2.0 Biological, Chemical, and Habitat Assessment Monitoring
The City of Charlotte will monitor the biological, chemical and habitat characteristics of
the Edsel Place channel to gain insight into the stream restoration techniques used and
their affect on the biological and chemical integrity of an urban stream as well as to
determine the success of the project as mitigation. All sampling and
analysis/identification for this project will be performed by Mecklenburg County
Department of Environmental Protection (MCDEP). Biological monitoring will include
fish and benthic macroinvertebrate analysis per the NCDWQ's standards. Monitoring of
the stream's water chemistry will include evaluation of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg
ambient monitoring suite, which includes pH, temperature, specific conductance,
dissolved oxygen, turbidity, biological oxygen demand (BOD), alkalinity, fecal coliform,
total suspended solids, total dissolved solids, total solids, ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, total
keijdal nitrogen, total phosphorus, and a select suite of metals (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, and 12
toxic). MCDEP's Habitat Assessment Protocol will also be implemented in the project
reach.
Three bio-chem-habitat monitoring locations were chosen based on state guidance and
site conditions:
• upstream (the control/reference, correlates to Geomorphologic Monitoring Cross
Section 1 [Station 26+25] area located just downstream of Sudbury Road),
• within the project reach (representative of relocated area, located at Relocated
Reach 1 [Station 7+00], access from Early Court), and
• downstream of project (secondary control to evaluate effect of project on
downstream habitat and water quality, correlates to Geomorphologic Monitoring
Cross Section 5 [Station "0-50"] area located just downstream of project, access
from Cole Drive at Aldersgate - Methodist Home Retirement Center)
These locations will be monitored annually beginning in May 2000 (pre-construction)
and resuming in May/June 2002 (post-construction, after complete growing season and
construction recovery period) for 3 consecutive years.
3.0 Vegetation Survivability Monitoring
CSWS will perform vegetation survivability monitoring of the Edsel Place channel to
determine the success of the bioengineering methods and hardiness of the plant species
Page 2 of 3
?4r

Mitigation Monitoring Plan Charlotte Storm Water Services
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project July 2000
used as well as to insure proper maintenance of any vegetation performing poorly. As
part of CSWS' contract with the Habitat Assessment Restoration Program (HARP) for
the installation of soil bioengineering materials on this project, the vegetation's survival
will be monitored, and replaced as necessary, by HARP.
Three plots (approximately 200 square feet each) will be established along the project
reach following the first growing season after construction. The vegetation within each
plot will be examined with respect to survival and health. The first two events will
examine survival of each live stake, shrub or tree planted as well as the percent cover for
grasses or ground covers. The subsequent two events will consist of examining the aerial
coverage for all vegetation types. A survivability goal of 80% will be used; mortality
greater than 20% will be replaced. Monitoring will occur in the late summer/early fall
(target September 1) of each year, starting the same year as the planting occurred. This
will allow for replanting, if necessary, of any portions of the bank that have failed over
the previous growing season. Photo-documentation will also be performed during each
event in order to show the typical conditions associated with the site. The photograph
stations will be identified during the initial event and will remain constant throughout the
monitoring period so that year-by-year comparisons can be made.
4.0 Reporting
Annual reports detailing the findings of our above-defined monitoring will be prepared
by CSWS and submitted to the NCDWQ beginning in December 2001 and continuing for
a total of 4 consecutive years (2001 - 2004). Each report will focus on the findings of
that year's monitoring as well as include a cumulative account of all monitoring to date.
Any corrective measures performed, or needed, will be discussed and the success of the
project will be summarized. Each report will include supporting documentation such as
photographs keyed to a site plan and data forms.
Page 3 of 3
wlk?
V
a
rn o .?
Z
a??
0
O ? C/1
o C
po
W

C) r,
O
O

N
O N

O ^?
4?
i
O O 0
Y
v? O y.i
21 O

O O N O O
O ~ ? NO
? N

r,a
O 00 N -- N
d
? v1
N
d
d --
4) c c
c C
W ?
O
0
(1)
o
U
? I
C,3 w
O 0 N N
a ? ?
l??
b I M o
,4 N M M - M N N
b

^ o
U
CI VJ C1
V
I x x
o UU?U n ??U
U c
? N?? 0 '
N S
N O
0 v
?
? O
,.,a NN.??o 000 N?O ?cn?

a)
?-4 Q)
lb
C
C,

3 rn In
P?

?D
Q P4

?D

A

a?

v)

° o
lc?d Cd
?
U U U U
.
r+ C ' U

U a
o s
C7 C7 al ? v? ?
N
2 2 O C,'
F-
r
Z <
m
-W ; z cn Z_

Z
°
;o
m o

i
;o to
f
m
3 n m
P.9 ?
D _C .z W
5
NM

Ui

z

r? O

?l z C-
0 m

O
O o
-I
D
OZ

z m -{
O

C

D
v I
O
N
a I
•
0
i° v ??-1
N
•
CID
o r
? O
? y
y
a ?
v
N
ON i
C ? 1
1 ?
Z G
1 ?
^ c
(AS
r ?
O C-
oZ,
t

? >R s e
a=
QQ a
r
MA
? ? i .y M??i
`,off
>
r
1f, ? w yl0 i

V \

I c
?o
o
n
X A Oo W f N N
DD = Z
I I I
'n M
21 x
I J
I N N Z
X CO ri
O
(A
om-000 a 08 -4
oo?DO?Z<<<'
(n (n z v K D (Tl ITl
NzZ?rnD?
V) ? ? r=
o o
V) 0
vZZZm lim
N X N pr N
r
-o ?
0
O
z -n
N r -
M
d

v S
?
D
Z
O
m
m
v m
m
?
m o
z
ILI) O
N
?
0
O

° 0 H--?
D I
o Z ul
go r I

Z xM

y -q

0
M
?J

? <
o
? y
cf)
M
V

< L
0

m
K:
m
z
2
0
z
M
z
c?
V1
U? y
? O
i
j C ®®D??Zgo®®•o'??k00®®®•o z
m
Z
Z

1

X

N
O O m
?< m
x

In
A
o v
A

o O <n
c 2
-< vl yy yy y-I
x A .ll f?l 2 2Fc r C1 < C) s F O 0. F N In
m m r F
O
m
?t V m m m v m In

O
m G7
Z

V7
i
-_
z y ?
z 0 O 0
o c
m m m m I D 2
uiDOZ
c
W = 1 1 --I I 11 1 1 -1 $
$ m
in in cnx
1 m O v
-
y -
m D D m m m z Am O ?Or DyND N? E y
1
A0 z o O AGZ'> Z
z O
z O m
m j v _?O?mA«p =1m?D
z
Z
z m0 rD- m?i > ?A
xm
p
o
-
m
C m
Z
1
- y m
m z
2 Dm
m
D ~
- N
d m Z m < r- K C,
r O r
3 0 z
z
Z
D D A y r
-
I
< m A O
o 1) 1 ? mom y Z D S 2 3 A ??N

(//

m

O m
1 3:
m x I O
A
1
z 00 O z
Z
A
r D O
p y
p F S_ --1 m m> N A
Am
N O O Dr Dz C) M OA
<

m
O z r- cn In
{
z m A m
N
D
y D
= m
_
O O o
o
z
.y m
m
e7i

0
FV
G?
y

i
lee
c?

?r
:,,;
?'
,;r
?:
`_ a
?..
S
1
? ?.4
Fe
4 i
State of North Carolina
'Department of Environment
-and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Ms. Julie Stahl
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Stormwater Services
600 East 4'h Street, 14" Floor
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Dear Ms. Stahl:
1••
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DW # 991368 ???fe tT
Mec o ounty
On 29 December 1999 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) was notified by receipt of
your applications regarding your plan to fill wetland for the purpose of conducting the Edsel
Place Stream Restoration Project in Mecklenburg County. Approval from DWQ is required to
disturb these streams.
Please address the following issues:
1. has the FONSI been issued for this project? As you know, the 401 Certification
cannot be issued before the FONSI,
2. is monitoring proposed since this project is proposed to be used as compensatory
mitigation; and
3. how does this project meet the definition of stream restoration in our new Generation
Certification for Nationwide Permit 27? If it does not meet that definition (and it
appears not to meet the definition), then an application and fee will be required for
Certification.
Please call me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions or would require copies of our
rules or procedural materials. This project will remain on hold as incomplete in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H .0502(c). The processing time for this application will begin when this
information is received.
cc: Mooresville DWQ Regional Office
Wilmington Corps of Engineers
File Copy
Central Files
Gloria Putnam; DWQ
Wetlands/401 Unit 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
Re: Edsel Place
Subject: Re: Edsel Place
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 08:35:37 -0400
From: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
To: dave penrose <[e-mail]>
thankx. print off a copy of this email and put in the file.
dave penrose wrote:
> JD, I got a voice-mail message from Julie Stahl concerning the letter we
> had written about the Edsel Place project. We have not received a
> response from them. Julie noted that a letter has been drafted but
> she's waiting for a monitoring plan from HARP.
1 of 1 7/6/00 8:47 AM
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Pete Colwell
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Rex Gleason
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Date: 6/2/2000
Facility Name Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project County Mecklenburg
Project Number 99 1453 County2
Recvd From APP Region Mooresville
Received Date 12/29/99 Recvd By Region 5/11/2000
Project Type stream restoration
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
F 27 F__O Y O N F- 11-137-8-2 ?-? 30,834. F-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y OO N Did you request more info? Q Y (0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y 6 N Recommendation: Q Issue O Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 351339 Longitude (ddmmss) 804612
Comments:
The existing stream is shaded to a great extent by mature bottomland hardwoods. The removal of
this forest cover and wildlife corridor should be minimized as possible during_groject construction,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
'port
S
Subject: Re: RO Reports
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 20:36:36 -0400
From: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
To: Rob Ridings <rob.ridings@ ncmail.net>
CC: Peter Colwell <Peter. Colwell@ ncmail.net>
rob - please pull these files. thankx
Peter Colwell wrote:
> John,
P-9-f
2
> If I need to forward these to someone else during 's absence,
> please let me know.
> The RO reports for the following projects sf file maker now:
> 000577 NCDOT Meck. NC 49
> 00390 NCDOT Rowan I-85
> 991453 Edsel Place Stream Restoration, Meck
> 000534 NCDOT Cabarrus, NC 49
> Also, have you heard anything about any DWQ folks going to the Stream
> Restoration meeting in Boone in August. I think Penrose was going. I
> have reserved a spot but need to know if a BDA is being pu together.
> I heard that you been inflicted again! I am going to send you some tick
> collars to wear. Hope you are feeling better.
> Pete
> Pete Colwell - [e-mail]
> 9TITLE$
> North Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources
> Div. of Water Quality
> 919 N. Main St.
> Mooresville, NC 28115
> Ph: 704.663.1699 Fax: [phone]
r?a

1 of 1 6/12/00 8:30 AM
i
31, Guilf.Co.Schools/Road Crossings
4Subject: Re: 00 0631, GuilLCo.Schools/Road Crossings
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 20:36:56 -0400
From: John Domey <[e-mail]>
To: Rob Ridings <[e-mail]>
CC: Jennifer Frye <[e-mail]>
rob - please pull this file. thankx
Jennifer Frye wrote:
> (John, I'm not sure how you all are handling things while Cyndi is away,
> so I am sending this to you)
> Staff report completed.
> Recommending issuance; however, FYI - they have also submitted two more
> PCNs. Same project, different consultant. One for utility line
> crossings (00 0756) and another for additional impacts due to dry
> detention basins (00 0757). It is my understanding (which, I know, is
> frightening) that the basin impacts are an additional 0.07 acres and 130
> LF of intermittent channel. The 130 LF is questionable in the sense
> that it may not even be considered a stream by the Corps; it may just be
> wetlands. (The 0.07 acres includes the "channel").
> Let me know if you have any ???s.
> Jen
1 of 1 6/12/00 8:51 AM
El-
9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John R. Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: May 11, 2000
SUBJECT: Review of an Application by City of Charlotte, Storm Water Services (CSWS), Unnamed
Tributary to Briar Creek, Edsel Place, Mecklenburg County
CSWS is requesting a 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality. The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has reviewed the information
provided by the applicant, and field biologists on our staff are familiar with habitat values of the project
area. These comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33
U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C.
661-667d).
The NCWRC previously commented on this project during the Finding of No Significant Impact
process. The CSWS proposes to provide stream "restoration" for the section of stream below Sudbury
Road. The "restoration" will include 2747 linear feet of stream. Existing development and existing
stormwater drainages will limit the proposed "restoration". The NCWRC will concur with the 404/401
issuance nrovidina this section of stream is not utilized for mitigation as the result of this "restoration"
We recommend that the City
continue to provide efforts to maintain existing hydrographic conditions after this "restoration" is
completed. The "restoration" should not be allowed to fail (continued flooding and bank erosion) due to
poor planning or poor storm water management if public funds have been utilized in this effort.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions
regarding these comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453.
Cc: Julie Stahl, CSWS
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] ext. 281 • Fax: [phone]
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
fflk1?WAA
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
18 April, 2000
MEMORANDUM
To: John Dorney
From: Dave Penrose
Subject: Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project, Mecklenburg County
DWQ file number 99 . g c / Vsr_?
This project was initiated to address flooding and persistent bank erosion along 2750 linear
feet of a small tributary of Briar Creek in an urban/residential section of Charlotte. I
reviewed and commented on the Environmental Assessment 3, January 2000. I've attached
a copy of my initial comments and the response to comments authored by Julie Stahl of the
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Group. These comments adequately address
my concerns; however, it does appear that there are some differences of opinion concerning
the potential sources of perturbation. I agree that the project will address sedimentation and
therefore habitat characteristics of the stream. My concerns are watershed-scale issues with
urban/stormwater runoff and non-point source pollutants such as heavy metals and how
these types of pollutants will affect the stream. The placement of rock/stone at the
stormwater outlets is another example of the difference of opinion. My concerns are the
pollutants typically contained within the stormwater, not the reduced effects of erosion and
headcutting because of placement of dissipation devices. The effects of urban stormwater
may have a much more impact to the biology of stream systems than bank stability. It may
be that the effects of this type of perturbation are beyond the scope of this project; however,
the applicants need to be aware that these pollutants may overwhelm the improvements in
stream stability to the biological components of the stream. I recommend that the 401
certification be approved but that the monitoring plans are submitted for our review within
30 days.
CC: Julie Stahl, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Stormwater Services.
Robert Bailey, KCI Consultants.
Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
MEMORANDUM
To: Gloria Putnam
Through: John Dorney
From: David Penrose
1 ? •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
3 January, 2000
Subject: Environmental Assessment Review for the Edsel Place Stream Restoration
Project. Mecklenburg County.
This office has reviewed the referenced document. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is
responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities which
impact waters of the state including wetlands. This Environmental Assessment has been prepared
prior to pursuing a 401 Certification. As noted in the EA, the intent of this project is to address
flooding and persistent bank erosion along 2750 linear feet of a tributary to Briar Creek. This small
catchment (0.56 square miles) is located in an urban/residential area Charlotte.
Based on the descriptions given in the EA, the preferred alternative (bioengineering) appears to be
superior to each of three other alternatives (no-build alternative, upstream detention alternative and
stone riprap alternative), although I do have some comments that should be addressed by the
applicant. Many of these comments will need to be addressed during the 401 Certification process.
Perhaps a key issue is that the water quality problems of this catchment are in part due to the flashy
nature of this urban/suburban catchment. For example, due to the imperviousness of the soils
within the catchment, runoff during storm events results in very high overland flows and
accelerated bank erosion. Restoration efforts within the 2750 linear feet of the UT to Briar Creek
will not address water quality perturbation catchmentwide as a result of this runoff. Therefore
improvements in water quality (which is one of the project goals) will be limited without
addressing the effects of urban runoff.
Other comments and questions include the following:
• Is the USGS gage illustrated in Figure 1 active and would it be possible to have the applicant
include a description of the hydrograph?
• Two bioengineering stabilization techniques are discussed in the EA: techniques used where
velocities are within acceptable ranges and lateral constraints are limited and techniques used
where there are steep banks and lateral constraints. Is there a way to indicate how often (what
percent?) each of these methods will be used along the 2750 feet of stream?
Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post consumer paper
PPPPPP'
Other than for stabilizing stream banks, how will the application of rock/stone at stormwater
pipe outfalls improve water quality?
Several of the photographs illustrate the presence of invasive Kudzu along the banks of the UT
Briar Creek. Is there a plan to remove this exotic species, or, if not, will it interfere with the
stabilization of the stream banks by killing native plant species?
The City of Charlotte is to be complimented for the implementation of biological monitoring
and educational outreach programs associated with this stream restoration project.
DWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the EA. The City of Charlotte is
reminded that issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfaction of water quality
concerns, to ensure that water quality standards are met and no wetland or stream uses are lost.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification process should be directed to Cyndi Bell at 919/733-9721
in DWQ's Wetlands Unit.
Cc: Michael Parker, Mooresville Regional Office
Jeff Jurak, Wetland Restoration Program
Files
ChadoBe'Mecklenburg
STORM
WATER
services -
December 28, 1999
Mr. Steve Chapin
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 143
Asheville, NC 28801

Mr. John Dorney
NC Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
9914 53
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification for Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte Storm Water Services, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Chapin and Mr. Dorney:
By submittal of the above-referenced Pre-Construction Notification application and associated
attachments, the City of Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) requests authorization to use
Nationwide Permit 27 and 401 Water Quality Certification to restore 2747 linear feet of an
unnamed tributary to Briar Creek. Information provided in the enclosures has been prepared by
KCI Technologies, Inc. and US Infrastructure, Inc. for CSWS. Please also utilize the
Environmental Assessment document currently in review by the NC Division of Water Quality
for additional reference, including site photographs (a copy has been enclosed herein for Mr.
Chapin's reference).
Please note that this project is being proposed by CSWS for use as compensatory mitigation
credit for other CSWS projects. Specifically, the Twin Lane Storm Drainage Improvement
Project proposes to use 1780 feet (i.e., a 2:1 mitigation for 890 linear feet of pipe). If you have
any questions or comments, please contact me at 704-336-4626 or [e-mail].
Respectfully submitted,
Julie E. Stahl
Enclosures
cc: S. Wilkerson, Project Manager
S. Buchanon/K. Labadorf, Twin Lane CIP Manager
KCI/USI
600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
[phone]
To report drainage problems: 336-RAIN
Printed on recycled paper.
DEM ID:
CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #): 27
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFI TION APPLICATION
914 53
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT c n?'?
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN (7) C?T3ES
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE NC DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY
ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: City of Charlotte, Storm Water Services (Attn: Julie Stahl)
2. MAILING ADDRESS: 600 E. Fourth Street
CITY: Charlotte
ZIP CODE: 28202-2844
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE): 2747 linear feet of unnamed tributary to Briar
Creek. Located immediately downstream of Sudbury Road. (See vicinity and
location maps, attached)
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME):
(WORK): [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE; AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: See Items 1 thru 3, above.
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Mecklenburg
SUBDIVISION NAME:
STATE: NC
NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Charlotte
Edsel Place Stream Restoration (Phase I of Enfield Road Storm Water CIP)
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): 2747 linear feet
of stream channel in an unnamed tributary to Briar Creek. Located immediately
downstream of Sudbury Road and paralleling Edsel Place on the west. (See
attached vicinity and location maps.)
i
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Unnamed tributary to Briar Creek
(NCDWQ Identification No.: 11-137-8-2)
RIVER BASIN: Catawba (Sub-basin 34)
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER (SA), HIGH
QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW), WATER SUPPLY (WS-I
OR WS-II)? YES ? NO ® IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES ? NO
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR LIST OF
COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? YES ? NO ® IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE?
YES ® NO ? IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK: The Edsel Place
Stream Restoration Project is Phase I of a larger CIP. A future phase of
the CIP is anticipated to include culvert/pipe replacement and bank
stabilization. The remainder of this application only addresses the current
phase of the project as identified in Item 5, above.
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN DRAINAGE AREA: 0.56 sq. miles
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS AND LINEAR FEET OF SURFACE
WATERS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
WETLANDS (AC): 0 SURFACE WATERS (LF): 2747
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: EXCAVATION:
FLOODING: OTHER:
DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: 0
2
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF RELOCATED,
PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE (LF): 2747 LENGTH AFTER (LF): 2783.94
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): FT
WIDTH AFTER:
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: FT AFTER:
FT
FT
*Dimensional changes as per attached restoration design plans.
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: ® PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL: ?
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: ® CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING: ?
OTHER: ® Natural channel restoration
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE WATERSHED
DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA?
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 1/2" X 11" DRAWINGS ONLY):
See attached "Project Design Narrative" and "Design Plans". Typical
mechanical equipment anticipated may include wheeled/tracked backhoe, dump
truck and excavator. Specific equipment to be used dependent upon selection
qualified contractor.
13. PROPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: See attached "Project Design Narrative".
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OUT
IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS):
See attached "Project Design Narrative".
3
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS) AND/OR
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET)
REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING
ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
DATE CONTACTED: July 7, 1999 * (ATTACH RESPONSES FROM THESE AGENCIES.)
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO)(SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC
PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
DATE CONTACTED: July 7, 1999 * (ATTACH RESPONSES FROM THESE AGENCIES.)
*KCI conducted a map and file review with both the NC Natural Heritage
Program (RTE'S and critical habitats) and the NCSHPO and State Archaeology
Office (historic properties and sites of cultural significance). All
findings are detailed in the project-specific Environmental Assessment
that has been submitted in accordance with NC SEPA requirements.
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF PUBLIC
(STATE) LAND?
YES ® NO ? (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
ACT?
YES ® NO ?
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES ? NO
IN PROGRESS. Being conducted concurrent to Permit Request Submittal.
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE STATE
CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE
WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE DIRECTED
TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603-
8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION OF PROPOSED
ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES AND PONDS ON
THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26, 29, AND 38).
ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON
THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100
FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY
PROJECT.
c. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY?
Residential and Transportation (surface streets) associated with
urban/suburban development.
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL? N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE: WETLANDS OF WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
7_8 1
LD OWNER'S/AGENT'S SIGNATURE tz DATE
AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM THE OWNER IS PROVIDED
(18g.)
5
EDSEL PLACE STREAM RESTORATION DESIGN NARRATIVE
Enfield Road Storm Water CIP
City of Charlotte Storm Water Services
PURPOSE AND NEED
An unnamed tributary (second order stream) to Briar Creek was identified for stream restoration
by the City of Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) due to increasing problems of erosion
related damage to public and private infrastructure, significant loss of in-stream habitat due to
excessive fine particle deposition, and periodic flooding. US Infrastructure, Inc. (USI) and KCI
Associates of North Carolina (KCI) were contracted to perform a channel assessment and
develop a stream restoration plan. The main goals of the assessment and restoration design were
to provide flood relief, to reduce bank erosion, and to improve in-stream habitat and water
quality. USI and KCI identified several problems along the Briar Creek tributary including
floodplain encroachment, channel incision, and bank erosion. Channel incision has increased the
bank height, bank steepness and reduced the floodplain access. For most of the channel length,
the channel is confined by residential lots and a sanitary sewer-line, both of which likely reduced
the available floodplain and valley width required to accommodate the flows from this channel.
The channel is also adjusting laterally causing impacts (erosion) to the adjacent land owners
property, fencing and revetment measures. As a result of the erosion and degradation along this
section of the channel, in-stream habitat is of poor quality.
CHANNEL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES
Morphological stream characterization data was gathered to further describe the subject project
site and determine the appropriate restoration solution. These investigations included the field
identification and measurements of stream characteristics, which indicate the degree of
impairment such as slope, bank height, vegetative cover and quality of in-stream habitat. The
determination of impairment severity was based on comparisons of the impacted reach to the
relatively stable reaches within the project area and reference reaches downstream of the project
site. Use of empirical data of natural stream types as a means of assessing stream condition at
the project site was determined an inappropriate approach because the project watershed
condition is in an unnatural or urbanized state.
A cursory overview of channel and bank materials revealed that the majority of the sediment in
the channel was consistent with the bank material, a fine loamy soil. A Wolman pebble count
analysis was deemed inappropriate due to the relative homogeneity of the channel materials.
However, it was evident that excessive bank erosion was overwhelming the channel with an
abundance of fine materials that were deposited in the channel during the falling limb of storm
flows.

Edsel Place Stream Restoration
Design Narrative
Cross sectional and longitudinal survey measurements were conducted at several reaches along
and downstream of the study area to identify relatively stable features along the channel. These
measurements were entered into FlowMaster PE 6.0 to calculate discharge utilizing Manning's
equation. FlowMaster is used as a tool to estimate discharge at-a-station from field surveyed
cross-sections. The Manning's coefficient of roughness was assumed to be .035, a typical value
for a sand or gravel bottom stream with a small to moderate slope. This value can vary
significantly as flow transitions from in-channel to overbank flow and due to changes in channel
geometry and substrate. However, KCI assumed a consistent value of .035 to incorporate the
general features of the active channel; all out of bank features identified were not considered in
determining the n-value.
Riffle-pool sequences and pool depths were examined in the field. These relationships were
utilized to develop and enhance riffles and pools in relocated reaches. Typically a reference
reach with an average or ideal riffle-pool sequence would be identified and emulated in the
relocated reaches. However, a complete reference reach was not found in the study area,
therefore the proposed changes in pool depths at the relocated reaches are based upon ecological
improvements to the existing features.
GEOMORPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
The Project site is located in an urban residential area in eastern Charlotte. The project site
consists of approximately 2750 linear feet of a tributary to Briar Creek. The upstream limit of
the project site corridor is Sudbury Road with the stream paralleling Edsel Place on the west.
The contributing drainage area of the project site is approximately 0.56 square miles. It is
roughly bounded by Central Avenue to the south, Sharon Amity Road to the east, Shamrock
Road to the north, and Kilbourne Drive to the west.
The design channel, as one representing the channel forming flow, should be able to transport
it's sediment load from the contributing drainage net. In the study area, Briar Creek exhibits a
strongly bi-modal distribution or one with a significant amount of fines and lesser amounts of
large gravel without much in between. This may be due in part to the developed and stabilized
nature of the watershed, which has reduced exposed surfaces in the watershed to erosion. In
relation to design, this channel appears to deliver more sediment in suspension than by bedload
so channel design is less concerned with competency to move the larger materials at the design
discharge. As such, design consideration focused more on reducing shear stress on the bed and
banks versus sediment transport mechanics.
The following morphological characterization data was obtained during a detailed field analysis
of the entire reach. Channel dimensions and associated data were collected at multiple locations
throughout the project corridor to accurately evaluate the dynamics of the entire system.
• Channel slope of .002-.01 (ft/ft)
• Width / depth ratio of 5.1 (based on the field selection of a bankfull feature)
2
Edsel Place Stream Restoration
Design Narrative
• Sinuosity and meander pattern is modified and unnatural
• The channel shape is roughly trapezoidal, characterized by 9 ft bottom width and 15 ft top
width
• The modeled bankfull discharge is approximately 100 cfs and approximates just below the 1-
year event
Based upon this analysis, the project reach can be characterized as a G5c stream type under the
Rosgen Classification System.
Design Discharge Determination
Channel Geometry relationships such as width to depth ratios and measurements such as cross
section area were developed in relation to the selected design discharge (100 cfs). Design flows
for channel restoration can be determined based on a selected recurrence interval from a known
gaging station or from field indicators; preferably both. Recurrence intervals for channel
forming flows vary from region to region and with watershed development with a range from 0.2
years to 30 years for rural areas (William 1978). The overall average (though relatively broad)
for a bankfull channel forming flow or effective discharge is approximately the 1-1.5 year event.
Field indicators that often represent these flows include:
• Inflection points
• Sediment distribution changes
• Vegetation changes
• Point bar surface
These field indicators are often difficult to discern in more urbanizing watersheds, particularly
where the channel has lost floodplain access. As such, KCI expected that the targeted design
discharge for the Edsel Place channel would rely more on available gage data for this and other
watersheds in the Charlotte area. However, from our field cross-sections an inflection point was
identified (described as a low bench) that seemed relatively consistent, at least in the less
disturbed reaches.
The analysis of several cross-sections, utilizing FlowMaster, revealed a design discharge of
approximately 100 cfs. In order to verify the calculated design discharge, an analysis of the gage
network in the vicinity of the Enfield Road project area was completed. The Little Hope Creek
at Seneca Place gage station was selected as the most appropriate comparison to Briar Creek
through the study area. The analysis revealed an approximate 1.5-Year discharge of 174.3 cfs
and a 1-Year discharge of 137.2 cfs at the study area. The 100 cfs design discharge flow was
equated to be a .67 year discharge event. In urban channels, recurrence intervals typically
associated with bankfull discharges can vary significantly. In addition, based on current
hydrologic models, the 100 cfs appears to be close to representing the one-year discharge. KCI
was comfortable with the selection of the 100 cfs discharge as the design discharge due to the
consistency of the discharges associated with field indicators and that sediment transport
capacity would not be compromised.
Edsel Place Stream Restoration
Design Narrative
DESIGN CONCEPTS
In order to address problems and achieve project goals, USI and KCI developed a stream
restoration design that would incorporate bank stabilization techniques, the reduction of bank
and bed shear stresses, and flood alleviation.
Flood Prone Areas
To address the identified problems, the primary goals of the Concept Plan were to
provide/restore flood-prone zones to the channel and stabilize the banks with
bioengineering techniques. These flood-prone areas would serve to reduce the tractive
forces on the bed and bank for a given storm event (e.g. 1 year storm) reducing the
stresses on the opposing banks. The flood-prone areas or shelves would also allow for
the differential sorting of the channel sediments by providing areas for deposition of fine
materials. The current channel condition, as an entrenched channel, is that of a
"transport" system or one that moves all material through. In the absence of depositional
floodplains, transported fines will often deposit in the channel bottom as the flood stage
drops, reducing quality (size and depth) of the riffle and pool habitat areas. The proposed
floodplain would serve as depositional and storage areas for the fines that would
normally be deposited in the channel under it's current condition. Under the proposed
condition, the in-stream habitat quality should improve as the deposition of fines is
transferred to the floodplain. As the watershed is fully developed, the expected accretion
rates of fines on the floodplain should be minimal, thus available storage for fines should
remain relatively constant into the near future.
Channel Realignments
As stated in the Enfield Stream Restoration Design Concept Narrative, a few reaches of
the existing channel exhibit severe bank erosion (often > 10 feet high), particularly
adjacent to the residential lots. In these areas, the design concept is to realign the channel
planform away from the affected area. The re-alignments will be made without
significantly altering channel length and will include the re-establishment of riffle pool
sequences. In areas where bank height and bank erosion were less than severe, channel
relocations were avoided to minimize in-stream disturbance, any additional impacts to the
established vegetation, potential of damage to existing infrastructure, and grading work
and cost. Channel relocation de-stabilizes large segments of the stream and often the bed
and bank stability is based upon the rapid establishment of bioengineering materials. If
large storm events occur in the relocated reach before live stakes and plantings have
established, the risk of large slope failures and channel instability are increased. In
degraded streams where adjustments to planform are limited by infrastructure, the
existing channel structure likely represents a suitable skeleton to complete a restoration
effort. While the stream may not be able to be restored to pre-development conditions,
the in-stream habitat can be greatly improved and restored with the implementation of
bank stabilization techniques, improved floodplain access, and minor channel re-
4
Edsel Place Stream Restoration
Design Narrative
alignments to introduce variability and stabilize severely eroded reaches. Therefore, the
term relocate is not synonymous with the term restoration. In both the relocated and non-
relocated reaches, stabilizing the stream banks and creating flood-prone areas to reduce
bank stress and to allow for the differential sorting of material along the flood shelves
will restore the in-stream habitat. These improvements will reduce the amounts of fines
deposited in pools and runs, thereby increasing pool depth and variability, improving in-
stream habitat. The stabilization of the streambanks will prevent mass failures and
reduce the amount of fine sediment deposition in the stream.
Riffle-Pool Sequences
Riffle-pool sequences are typically taken from existing relationships along a reference
reach. However, a complete reference reach could not be identified along Briar Creek in
proximity to the study area. Therefore existing pool and riffle slopes were examined and
the placement of riffle and pool features along the relocated reaches was considered
consistent with the range of existing features. The addition of variability to a natural
system is essential to emulate natural features. In order to be consistent with naturally
occurring riffle-pool patterns, pools were created on the outer apex of meander bends and
riffles were generally placed along crossover or straight reaches. In addition to being
consistent with the range of natural features, localized slopes along the project area were
not compromised but variability was introduced. Base flow pool depths in the existing
channel ranged from 1.0 to 2.1 feet with an average depth of 1.36 feet. Typical pool depth
in the relocated reaches averaged approximately 1.6 feet during base flow. KCI intended
for the increased average pool depth to introduce pool depth variability to the system.
Natural scour and fill patterns associated with stream sediment transport will adjust to
transport rates and discharge capacities over time to fine tune the riffle-pool sequences.
The addition of the floodshelves will allow for particles in suspension to settle outside of
the active channel and reduce deposition in runs and pools to improve the existing
conditions and increase pool depths and variability.
Grade Control
At the re-aligned channel areas, grade control structures were incorporated to reduce
abrupt (negative) channel adjustments at its new location. The selected grade control is
sub-surface and will function as a "skeleton" to maintain channel configuration without
impeding surface flow and deposition.
Outfall Treatments
To reduce direct impacts on the channel from storm drain outfalls, outfall treatment areas
have been incorporated into the design. These treatment areas will serve to reduce
erodible velocities as well as provide improved water quality treatment prior to entering
the channel system.

Edsel Place Stream Restoration
Design Narrative
Bank Treatments
As there is a relatively significant amount of bank stabilization work required along this
channel segment, the proposed treatment methods were chosen to reduce complexity,
improve constructability and keep construction costs at a minimum. The primary
treatment along the residential lots includes slope regrading to a minimum of 1.5:1 with
natural fiber matting and riparian grass seed mix and riparian shrub plantings. On the
western bank of the stream, the riparian planting zone incorporates trees as well as
shrubs. The channel toe (below and just above the channel invert) will be protected with
rock in high stress reaches and with COIR fiber rolls in low stress reaches. In areas
where no toe protection has been specified, the existing banks are either not going to be
disturbed and are stable or the area is expected to be a depositional area (e.g. point bar or
existing flood shelf). Within the active channel, slopes will be stabilized with natural
fiber matting and seeded with a riparian grass seed mix. The flood shelf will also be
seeded with the riparian grass seed mix. Slopes on the west side will be graded more
gradually after accommodating the flood shelf and will be planted with containerized
trees and shrubs.
CONCLUSION
To address the concerns of the CSWS, KCI and USI developed a restoration plan that
incorporates hydraulic engineering and stream ecology principles in order to improve in-stream
habitat and water quality, alleviate flood damages, and stabilize eroding banks to prevent further
damage to existing sewer lines and private properties. KCI utilized geomorphic principles and
measurement techniques to collect and analyze data involved in creating a detailed ecologically
sound stream restoration design. The designated goals for the stream restoration were addressed
by incorporating flood prone areas, channel realignments, riffle-pool sequences, grade control,
stormwater pipe outfall treatments, and bank stabilization treatments into the channel. The
design uses a natural restoration approach while minimizing rock and structural components
added to the channel.
6

K
_o C
D
m o f-- Z
U)
4 - 0
m
w ? F -9 m
N = x
I O;u n m
CA ?m H °
0
0: m
j r,
zcn
00
N _
W ?-
?O ?
Qo
Qo
U7
CIO
D
Z
D
CIO
a
m
C)
?1
C7
O
71
Cl)
D
a I
v
0
rn
a I
•
M
z
L=1 ^
? l 1
n ..
m y
? z
7
(D
r
O
M?
L J
a
N .fir
H
z C7
O -
z
0
N
M ?
O
z C-
0 o n
-I
DF-
m
O
--i
a N D
v
C£ us?ne
x m 00 W N" tQ Z
O D
0 m °
I I m
X

I N N
Co
-
X O Ti
?O

I S

w m
q
N
nm?c?c?pc?n?
m 00 xs- xmm m 0=1
DO--z<
?(n Z p D m m m
to0ZZgu) D M ;0
to z C) ;o r (n
M n p-u z m
?r7
?z? 2 ° -i
z-4 zzm m
U) ;u
r
X
0
Z m
N r
m

p ?
D_
z Z7
D 00
C)
m m
n
? n
m o
R- U)
U) -4
x
c 0 0
C7 -Ti
4
m C) Z#z
D
Z Z
V) F-+
C) C7
? D
z z Q0
m .0
? r
n X
Z D O
z D Ca
fTt >
r ?
? z
-o W
o O
m z
K G7
m z
z m
m
z
v 1
r?
1
f
XC
I
m
X C7
O m
?< m
X 'o
A 'o
A 0 (n N ?
C S S A ' ' {' SSr*'47:1 O'*NIn" m ? m m'm'
A M A <«3 W-pDCO20 'M X X OX m

fn z cn rn O O -[ m 1< 11 1 1 I N m z I m O m
-
-I
C
G'J z
0 O
m O
m `L m m I-
m r Z = m I A
O DN AXO?DD? IrTl T1 A = Z Z Z 'n
A? (7 O G1 G7 ?G)O

v O m m '' °m oo m mV'tnm m r0 m< m4 m N mT/
m
O
O
z o O m Z p O Z A D 3 A z? S
3? 0?
r Z
z
z A S S A U
3

N -<

m A Or

m r
N I S D tai D p
D D 0 A
z O O O{ O Z
m D U7 y T7
(A
r O r
O::E S-
:
Z M
z m C,) Co
'
m A m ? D co
Z 2 D
D
O z Z D
m
O
m D
Z Z W
O O v
0
O
z r
m m
0
O
z
m
z
0
D
r
V)
c?
N

d
?d
O
y
C

lee

N
D
Z

r
O
S O
Ar 00-I D
A
D-
-0
N <m
z
m
0
O
0 0
O-I?0
M O m
0
m
O
'N-' `L `? `? `? `?? <-i? ?U)U1 N(n In AAAA AAA
\«r 0onAm Co-1?V)U)o\n?A-100 AA KK
0D-i-1 K: Kr ? z 00 S mm mmm 00 00 0 0
S>-9 <Ar Om{. X0F:AAOW? 0 0 000 O O oDJD
-U)U)SOK Kcil -0 ?NNNN
00000 7, co
o ? z m
CO.N co 00 W (n -iz
??-P C4 D M o
N (n N A1KK0DK K*AOO 0
A <rr
i O -0 U) O G A- m
m AArzC r Am
o 0
D ONN N N
?cOJNW --l O • p W . Z A 0
(7)
O')?
O
mom
Z U) 71- S S ce
- m m
x P
O G z 0 ?
?
?
A
0
o Z
00 m
< ?<
o 0
D ? Z ? z
0 W>>o,
O
Z O Z 0(ZA X:E

z O A0>
D
O (f)
o A
?o?o

rZ>D
(7.-. r A
O
z
7 U)
ED (

I <-I11(11(nU1(n w AA A A A A A A A K K
DDD00?Amm-i?DD-i?mZAOODODmm K Kr?ZC?c?=m m m m m 000000
DDZCGAD-rAXom OAComc 00 non n 000 W D
AOOSo=mSD.?A ?OA??CI
A<?A= A
A o3WWA m0-0>
AS ?7 'ern -iO(- Ti-a
_
A<
-
0
-i -im -i r r <
2ZD0A
mm _ImD *mmrOr K
A
Arr
CZ
0 A ZAZT
OAWD
000
A A A A A A 00?
0000DD?
?O
0
Z Z A A D Z U)
pA ?
00
:gA
om
m
w
O O O?
r r ^f_
P
--r
ZO
GZi-no 0
O Z m
D Omom S
p
C
Z
1
ZDDr m0=0tmox -u
DA?=? A
c O
Q?KZ
A7 =OD A?
m
O
«r
DDA
DmZU)^ rnAAO ?jAmm oo Z
-4 S Z
rn
?
0
mDm U)Z Az `z OOA
? m-{?zmmmmDCD OAZOD (7) (
mzom U)0 Z
AWE
m <
m mfmrlrA?{ mmZ?OO DC C o ? z
O {oA < ?? -i m°m°m ?z
ZNm nO
A ?OD -o)>
?n0 mA om?O m m m DoA oA
m m -
< x
m -A m m 1
wom m
m OD
?U)
z Cor ro 0m
m

m?z <
A? 0 AA? Z Zm D
O0m m m A o
--+ -?
mm0 oT.> o T
m
m C)
0
o =m ,D
O
m(z7 _i m, o
O
o 2 m
?mA m0 N m z
mom No;u DZS
?< ?A?
'mm
'
r
r D
n K: O
= m m m Z Z AA Z z
W z m mm ?m DooA
m Z>
r
, f
"
ZZ Z A
D z O A
r m?
c
r*)m Aox y -, ?
U) OD r O
o Z
Q7 oo??
000 v m m

v z ? O G) m <A

K M
-i m
"m0 m D W Om

t m
m A c r
O D
S
Z
z Ao
>mo ADW?
z
A
0 r
0 1 A m

w m z: m* m

o m m Z m z
m O oo XG7<F-
U)
0
m
u
m
0 0
O
m
inz
co z-6 ED
m m O- Z c
y r0 m>-A
m

m z A? >?Do
Z m z
r
A oo
m
z
z ?
o
0 0 = 0
c zoom
r o co
m Q co z
A m
O
A A
z
U
p 0 S
D 0
D
A
O
r -
z
D
c
-1
D o 0
A A
F O
7-\ D <

c
A-0 -4
mzm
0A
Om
-1 ADO D0-10 U)0 A -i
Omo>0>OONOAS
?O(A A0 O 0O) K:
=Omc A 020 A -1
m0?0 m
0000
Dm r
zx r_
m00
zz;0 Z • • • S
> -I D
m OED
Om1: DOr >
m

z0 G7

O
O
O Z0

W A-c m C zm zom

AmCU)ZU)'?-1- U)<
r
= m > c oT. o D

A?Km D ?A
2
!'i O z

0A0-?
OA
o
OU)
-1 Z
P 0
r D
z-CO ?
-iZ
O ACAAm m(AO U)
A-I
G7
O K
D O -i
.A0
Z AOU)m -Im
x CO
OA?OIAO ->Or-O ?r
M
0 _Z r
O m A
o
N
D
z
O o
? ZD
Z mZ
m
0 m m
>o W
o->00 AA
AZ
O
?z
? ?? Z
O-i? C
n
, «? AOm-i z o
o
-<
W
O?zOD -iA
0
m
W
m00 n
?
m Z? U)o
Z
0?z?70 S
z0 mA
- -um 0 (A
r D C<
<oC=cZio
??
z?
m OWD --
i
z
OD ?
c
m =
oz
-i 2 -IA ?Ap m
rn
z
A I M>70 O W A
m p
DACA
oo
z
pOm , - ?
c Mtn>mz 06>
>
Oo
SO m0
*
0 z
C (AW -imOr AZ
O?(AADO
D?A
S? Km z o)Z-1 m
0mr Co 0 u0S ? O o
opal A
A? x<
>? A Z{

"i mG7 _ (A
m 00
mA z
r0A
r ?A
> C
I
-io OUZi?D Zrn Om
A
- DOT. Ao 'i NNo m
A
>
S mm OZD O-
O OD-
0-4
z (n AZO p mmD
o
A
Z

x
(A
OS

-i V)
2

*1=rr o
Z?J
mSf
, Im
, ."[ 0 ?O-
>

a A ?
r I
r
N
z D
m

? r
S
O

O
o

m
?n

A
GAA m?
M
a xm

DD
< =
m rnmD
o
20 mrm
x
(7AOA'ocooAAO-
>
Z m
z
-1
o G)Z oNm
V< A
-DoO
m
o?
?D ?mm< -
o
>? mS
D`
zp
Dm
i A
m
m ? > 0U)0>o-i
OZm D
?
A
m Z
-? 0
Z I A
C
A D N ?Zzo
o
'
?
? o{ 0oz
m
o ? 2
o
ca "<D
Z m
0 --i
oC
lp "Ar
o
20 m? ?_
0-
I -I G7
<
zxzZDZmZ070 O .
f
J
2oDD CAS ?D O 0
?Z?U1m ODD
D A `C A m
S =
A 2 A O U)
00 Z O N A r
C O m W A m z
ZO
0A m0
mm-
DA p m moo
O
oommDA'1D = r AOAZ
AA O A
DD zW?
mm> o coI W
SODA- O
m
o(ZjiD Om
m rAi-Z-imOc?mO=> Cm
o { D 6?TT
A
O W Z
? 0>0 2
moz?
>
X
O
Az
0 m
Z A
mrn (ul>u =7:0n ?rF
(7?mOz00=z=jw r
rri
A
-4 D
?Srm
r I =
co
0D m0?
(AC A
z> c
NU) p Ar
2
N
r
A A -i
c) xm
VIz 0 ?2xrwzmmpm 2
mOOU)o>xTZ?ul ? D
(ml7 Om
oC>D
Zz mN W
zMO m
*i a)
(
G7?Orn?) co
-irrI
z0 DD zD
0? to m2ooOmoz
m m zFo? OF
Zr
X
moz -u zmr O_
o
01
mm
-o zo
O`c
m
Of<rl \-icx ?O
mS-A
D-mooo?Kx-z
z
A
A z ?

o W=i D
?-<
Az o
(A Cp
A m
x ZN Am
mom= Oo
-
D-i
mD o
O? D
OC r D m
) r?x -i A
Z
O
(mj)K-(A0
?-00
=

G7 C O

00, ro

z§ Z

G7?-I z =--I D Z

C)r.mpm ?p
DZ

O
m

OZ

K
D? O
.
S
z
m orn
o0mG7?DzOZmO
0
- m
z

O

O -<
oo
OA o

2

S
(70m o

U) z O -P,
m -
`:COm m=
o
m
x 0-1
w z

m ?
x Ar
(
j)A
S o-
mo
D c zo=o

ymo
v

O 00A

o r z .ccum ?m

DEC m

U) O
iA
m N um
?
Z
-d m m A A m z c z
S
W
A
.? D z
m
p m U) I D
M
Z
' CA A
A D
-1 m W mo --q -
m
U)
rn U) ? ?N
'< 0 Oc U)
C) W O zo
G
)
C -0ir
o m
Z mo
00mA,z
=Amp T`-i
WmZm A
O ?
=
O? m
I
O o oO U)
20
?O
o
z> -I ?
?o A0D2 G)Opz m r0
m > m
Z ?
v
(/)-u
r-o
m
o `2 O* D r m z A A 0 r 0 m m r
m o c

A
rz
0 -4

M
A ?mCAZSD

W A A ;D

D

NZ

O) W OJ
O r
O
A D' FDO m--IC
0 z r >
A
m rc
O O r oD m K0
Z o0 O mOZ-ooO :m
0 z--i r C))m I m<

c c
U)N
z m < U ?O
m
o o?cS-Ii
(
c z
O
oA
N ?y
F K 0 0K(
D
f)
O o x D m
2 D m0 r
p
m r 0 = @ n N ={
m Zz o i
K--4 m
,J: E z0 o> 0
C ?C
N
o U) O C
A 1
U) r m 0 C O o < o
D zm o
O D
--1 O
z V7
m
U) -I A
Sm z
O
o r
m
Z >?
o z W z A?-
i- roz
m
Dp
Om- -i U)
m mU)
D D
A
n
0 S D
Z =
?
O
A 0 m Z 2 0_
5 ?> A
A A
C
Z A
Z o m m>
m r A -1 z C
O m
m m G7 A { r 0 O A
A D
Z A
--l
m
o z
<
m

cd
m

@I
Z
D ?
m fQ Z
F! D
- 9
G)
M
Z
M
A
D
r
Z
0
M
N
(n
0 Z
A -rl
?m
? O
:p
D 0
?ZD
= D 0
D ?\
?m
m?z
- -p C7
00
<A
M
Z A
10-
J
?I
O
o
7 =
°a >
O 0
O O
dim
0
2 O ?1
0
O
0? y
0u) ?
O? n
DM y
o-mi C_-
r( ?:u
z n
D c ,?
O?
N0 7
M m D D m
0
A
A N
A o
DD N
Ar (A
C>) -M- O
(AASp z
U7-NU)- --1U)O? U)
m2NS==SZS V) m
A D n
Cr
OZO
mco c N
>U7 -(Cj
DC m
?0?
DOD
ACO?
Am
-iD
or
C* '_o?0?
2DAS>S
Ay
AZ
O mr
-9 mmoz
? O DDrnmp m S
-<`
o
oz= W r O
?
Z Orz
mw Za) D
me - ZZ-1 0=-1
6 r
W m-1mrnAm
V)? omm
ZOIZ
0
U) --4
O Z 7 0
Amm?.Z
M Z A Z D D
G
O C
z O= m0 m ?
=> ;a
O U) D 9
S A yxM
r D 0M

m
` D

D-1 G OZ

r-z .
N
-1-0
M
0 0
m m O -o?o A
m o ->--I 0 mA>ADo Z W
o m o- Z Z Z C? mm A
O m O m n
A0 0 m Z
\ n m nD
p o ?
z O` A o
m
A m m A? z 0 0
Ul U) 0 Z- x F D
O A 0 0 D m, D D Z W o > S A S rn A
m A m
0 m C O O D A = "i
r
= A
A O
-<rO
Z2 0 U) V)?SZO O
WK?m?O
= -<
OO f<M .'[ )
? Tt `2=
D
A N
S? _AA
zp3 ?D
m D?O?T.D
r=ZOZA M A

M
r2

D O
rZOD

Dr S
U)
ADSw D SADA m
Amrr
m
0

OA
mU)D

ZM G
Om D

?N
Dm

rA
U)Am

-1
-1 0G
m
-<
1'1 'AO mm

mA
z
0
m -i
So ?r
fri o
D
DD
z Drug
;0
S G)
m oZ
r
<

O
-1 r
o
Z? O
Z
r
r p
DNm -1N
O. o> w
OC U)Dm
A
A` G7
O
?
= 0
T
S U) o D a)
Cr
M Ti
W
f
-I
m ooO(nAD V) r u)
AD G7
zy N m
oz rm U)
o :E
? 2
0-I D
?-10rorn Z
o
r -10 M
OWC?A OOWC?Ammr
I S o* m0 rm 0p0A
C mm ?mAr Z(An
o GzjD

'
W SO
z zm>om
oZ 0 OOz DXCn U)
SmC
om
< D
r ?O
oC ?z
U) O?
?A Z
m
W mA
Z S U)?
OAy KOZ A
Omr
D? m
D(A -
x >
M 7:
,mrnp?Z
m
o O O
D 0rn O
m ,
S
m NomoAO O
D mC ,
A
M ADO O
m M
?Omz
D
U Wm -
i
zm C0 -
1
m m m -
i
A Oh
-DImD ?
? fil
2 1
OT -Z- )
Zo
M
AA
Z? -u -i U)
? z 0m mmA 0
G7 Co m
D rZD7m
D m" A m
_0
0 (
i
0z = 0
?O K
Z D
?
(?Oj O rn r= W M m
M G) D
U)0 -0 m0r DO r
r ?(>7AS? zz
m mr >G)ZD ?y
p ?u MWM oD 0D OZ my? o? ?mmmmz
A 0m
p m
O? r z
D
y D
mr m --I
=rrm? Km D S N
z
2 <
2D O
n O D
XOm
?z z>
m
D V! \Z
=W
z DU) A
W -IA-
moZ ?OAmOU)?o
O
'm m? =
m (
Ti
mD
Ar mr
> m
(nom (A 0
(A o O
A?o-D
Dzm m A C
U)
r

--l
OD

MA
D C

6=M
i M
D

D

c
? < K -i

mD

DC=Z C)

?
M
A
D? A
¢)-i -i0 A
D0
r Co Z m O
A U)
DZ m
U)m 00
OC fT,
A N
0
O rn
mK mz
o C
Dr
D ?m NZ(AO OmA??z 0(A D T ?? AA OZ U)z A Aom-
o
c {-i
-<

-- z -< p
D- MAD
=ZO MM 0= S S??
r
mmA OS A= .-[7
M CA D?
0S x0
m D
Zr AD
DC A Z
mOAZ -i V)
O
f
U)A
m
ymOO S
>o(/) Cv)m DfTl
A
y
o
z
mN O
AS
or
?
or
0 U)
m 0rn
? m
`*A
Z

U) M

-4 D

A -
EAU)i.

AAA
oCoCw C-)-i

y "1Spm

A
=

>0
O

O A

Z
V) (f)
A

<?

-

U)m
0m
K? mo

?D
A
OD 70 O no Z
m
D OOH O m mm r m Om > --A
zc om U)O
> M= Om
A
?r7 U)
- 00
<
M > D
0K0
-Di ?(n Z U)
AO o'
Am
O
mNN `
0 Wm
m ={
0--, 0o
zi A
(A =
M m
m m
?U) A O 'Dz

D D
z
0 0 <
moIz0 Zr
-
?
oW Srn m fmj.x
-1m
00 o N
- c
A U) 0z 0
U) 0? ( 7 2zr m o U
Z
? )
S
?u mD
CO
j m
z
? zz
?
00
-o m rn
A
rn z
A m
OD S
m '
> m mr
Dr O
U) ?z
Z
-> m-A r
M
D v)
S S U) o V)?)
*i
-A
AZZ A O DSO0
O
?m
o
oZ
? W
M 00 X
«M>

W
o
m0
Z -i o
S=AO
m0O
nD000-A<m ?0
?Oz
z
?n
2
? r
KA
A
z
[n 0
A

O
C
0
z?lSr?
C-)
m
A W
m

'< D
A m ?
A?zp u
i
c
*,
O C) O U)-
A
O
m ?
Z Z
O
A
M -V O
O< _i
0 2
Z
mm0m z
0
O op 0 r-
o
o A N
)
0 x
U
A ?m
A^ C n o

CD m A

A
(Dj
0 ?0 ?
?o

U) S
A (m*i V) mmM iZ -? O(npp
'-1 O. 0 O0 0 _
00
D y --4 D Om2 r0r m
z Am D = M .
znOGZ')z -u mmm
O z mA A -
-1m 10 M
D U)mmDr 0
z A o SZ OMX mOD
r
m xm
N S
> z °z D>A>o
0 O W

N D
DZ?m
m
A
D
?0
r
m
?>
m m
oz?
11
S
O
NS G
7 mo
0 _ ?z z mm O C
MM
rn D A A
A W
O
S
D
0
D
r
0
D
D
W
m
N
41
rn?
II
m?
II
D
O
I? -I
V/
d
W
d'
O
W
O>
N
O W pm
T/ -NIm'NOr
<
f ??? n m m m
_ A0 f0T1 A 0?
8
Z = O O
O
y Z `z O A
z m
p
Z
Z N N N
o,

m O m
? N

<z N ® a mm

cn N?
n p -a
N C ® Z m o
.. ?

mm W Ozu=XD T
D^'?
I
I ®
p
0
A N m m O m I
p
o T D
"
? ...
?
z
0
??
mo?
O rTT ® ® y
Dy
m
O
G J p m -a m m Om
O
m o
O n z 3 W W 1 /?1 I I ® N
O
? \'
N
ti= N
' A o A
_ ' o ~i
DAD
Ago C? _M-

O A Z m Im Z

0 Z
r-
m
°
o
OO O?
N < o
y o
T

A O= Z
o
O N
V
>, m

? 'p A
c A p yry co
A
r
2
O O
D O
- `
V 1
Z A
.T`
G7 m D0 -0m m D
J
O z p L
1N
NCO C m?

m OC
z ??l

- D

I x T

m
=v
2 W
o
m m A O
N 7 /
m
\ I m
N ( ®
N
r
C I
N
Z
Z ? D Z0 N y
- A ®D ® Z m?
mA O Z z m m z m
0 0 m N X N C
-

r 0 M
2 OZ
J ®

I ,

mm
cz?m
m 3 m C D

0
?
D Z
C
W D -u

®
0
'D

? A O<
0
z 0
?z I ® 0I Z DA
N
>
z =
® G>
®
rn O

V)
O
A
O
m
W
z
x
FABRIC WIDTH VARIES
z -0 z
omo
mom
O -?
N T
V
n r
O D
z z
N V1
x O
C z
nr
f1
O
z
z

r
m

c

W =<

00
tic

OZ W
N
_

n
Z N
DD
A
m

C
?--i m C

m A
N -I
A m
>
A

z (/)
0
0
0 D

N T
m
0
m

D 3'
r

N7 22

K
z
0
E
G7
Z y,..{
m 0C?
p?
x
Z ?' .Zrl N z N
y OK- A
C7 ?
?T Z , mph A
O C A
m
O a O
o
70 Ar
v ZD m 0-z <
70
"
$m

D

y
Dm\ o
-i
r N
- Z K >C
N z Nm
m
7o c)
m 00
AO
m
c

\
x
z \ D, \ ; oz
r D M\// r
D
zOOA
0 ~i ' 0 f< -Q :E
y A
mK
*m // r X rm--1 N
A y z ??n
>? z ? O D
CJ X 0 ? 'mC m
m
..??y[ N O 0 - VmZ
o m N
z \ m Z N A
A 3 A
/ O ? Z
y n
?\ T N x m
C ? _ .= z
c?
m
\ 3.5' TYP.
pM =A
`L mz=
'Z O
mN
O IM
Z O

z
m D DOZD'*?0
N 0p Z-O
O ?

r AD
D
000 0 0

WT.
Co mZAn?O n-m!
O
m yZ0°°
x X. prA
Amz

0

\>?s coo()
0 x

rrl>
z r`

O nD m0 \/\?-
' •" - zoom
o -,x . Mo
;om
>z
m- =N

-_ D > ACmm
?i
A m rAN
oDrN
ZN

I N
N
w
m
m
\ ? z
m
m A

D
?i
r A
0
?/ x z

ti
x

Z
f
7
r \ .

v

\\ 3.5' TYP.
o?xA
m y 0
'L
DO
A
0 mN
p r0
ti
wm
n?

m 20 c? w C 'n
x o y
yyyy
Z y
x ?NZ Z
to
s OZ D O ?0 m
$ ?m
6 D ?M zmc
C
0
O >
t- °F
o
xNm m

Cy
2DD° -o p
-I -?
?mn
M zN
fn -7? Z
?y 9:
Z DS
m
?
c)
m 0

o0
0
H mm
z

w
m
r
z
0
0O
cf)
O
D
m
O ?
°WZ"
?O
_ <m
M
M
Z
z
(-)
°-
- -moo
z
m m? 70
?J 700
? O
X
O
1 0

G7 C)
I O
m
_
I

Om
;0
0
o
I ox
W&j -
m
m W::j
r-z "
m0 0

` J 2,:?o z

O N
N<
Z z oM

O -uz
r Om
1 m?
1 r?
m
I 1 u)
c>m
V) >>
m OA
D 1 0Di
^
l J
lm 1
? 1
O z0
no
Z ? X
? 1
_O

< Z?

m °A
D°
L

z
cc
m
r-

Z
< -10
m I S I
?]
1 r
' I VA
RIES

1 I
O o <
DI I
'm ' AI A I
?
O (? I m I
? O I I

m
I

° °
I I
I
O
?

r O
z
O
D

Z >
Z

? o oa W
O ,?O rn
-
cn

D
r D
m o
O O
O
O
Ti
2'

m
r
O O

°>
<

m ?<
m
Z < < N
O Z A m O
-? m r )
O
U) A U) -Ti Z
0 0
Cf) r
O ? i m cn
D ;0 C
M co
yr co
m <D
D
?
Z)

n m
m
O
m
z

O

C

l
C)
--i
C

O
m
C
W O O O W M K
O m c :0 ? X D
D -- D D -'I
-i Z co ° m m -i
omo°r°z I
r N M O
D m °
0 --q
A
Tim >- --A O
> O co
m ! t*''
C) m
m ° O z z
C) m
cr) D p ° O J
O O O m
z z Z
I m 0 <
D O
m C7 /
D m I
m
O Z 0 :0 O7
^
J Z (" OO
D D Dm°
r -. Zoe
O O ° m
Z >
U) m
D a: Cf)
D I
? X O
m
z
m x O Z z
C) D O ° C D
Sk
Dm mD F,
O z m mr N
)m 0m 1
;;u m
Z
U)m0 X?a r I ?'
(n ° r s <
r K m
X : >I U) I
Z Z
I
G) m
w I
? I
v (
v I
I
Z
z°D
N >
z Z
O C
A
rmi
Z C _A
? W D
Z Z
G1
U)N (1)S -pt
D
Iz
Dx D.Z
O O
O
M
m ?
O = \/\
-
z
00
N
Z
m

o
-0 -rj C
D

O O W
m mN
Cc) co-
Z m
m
m
N
0
M
°K / ;00 O
_O
D Oz ?x D
m
W
m

r
r
° z
O z 0 c?
Z r <
z
m

A
W
W
W
W
N
N
N
N
' a
_
Z
O
C

O
O
O
O
n
O
n
0
0
0 T1
<
? ?O W V O? N A W N ? m
Z
O
V U) A
5:, A
p N N N
o V
o
o N
o ,'p
g
0 0 0 0 0 0
i 0 0 6
o ? N Cn N m
N N N Z
V
-
O
O b
-' 00
O 0
-i
n
C

> N N W N m
) A O N (O
W p
')
?
?
U cn
V o
N A r
i D

It w 0 _ D
N O N
W
W
D
A ? V j? G)
m
Z
I
w w w o

jZ5
(A i N
e N
e'
°
?°

'2

C2

O
W O
N O
S
0
1 A N O w

-
N
=
- O
m m m m m -
rn m m m m

"
o D

A
+ O ? <O rOa O

s.
v
c
m
m
a
0
Lo
W
(n
m^U
Z1?
-I .0
DO47a
00 ~ O
~ U
OD?
nmr3
00 ? m-
U
n
E
a
s

? S e

z 8
_

o I.
m
Z
c?
z
m
m
A
Z

s

?
OZ O
z
?
? m o
$ O ?
O ? O
? ? Z D m

m .?

m s
D
CD
m
m
D
s m

N W
A O
m
a
O
Z
O
y
Z
O
)A W N -' ?

O

m
Z
) N N N V)
W
?w O
< L.
o O
w
m
v
w `" D
i p N p Z
W m J
co
O D
) m m m m

:?
rn
'
V
W
oD
A
A O
(n
?

N
OD
N
_ D
Z
O
m
`,OAK \ .ca
10
0'AK . g
-7
MONKEY
BARSO
fo
SYCAMORE ,
P
°cbDO
C5
co go0 D
0 D N p
co 2
miv D
J D
D
CC);r -i
Ecn-i az
xxro
cnamr -t
m r,
ouvca'?rrnn
-4 mxm
m < N
ocna
axa
mv?io
0
c°x
roc
m x a)
cn m cn
`nxf
oo--
m0
_ O m
am
x
m ? SSMH
IM=70
fz U
?J
6 8 6E
C? x0
0
l ? l
W&\

4`.f
--4 --1
xmx
m (n --
m z
1
c
15 20
_ X3,2
--
?O
OS S HI:
MM699.3
IN, kJ6g789 4
?;u zmx
x m

Ln 0jZ
;o
l z
co
I FRCP F`-
O:
? o
??
m ST A: 1504 0
543,021.E
m E 1,471,3,0 0
Z
A
it
X
U)
CD
N
N ?
\

N

101-052-18 `
WALTER ZIMMERMAN
2800 EDSEL PL `
D B. 3914-072 8
\
A LE SYCAMORE f> \
?m
x ?

\
o•
- \
i
C
E nR n
>

m
0
?z
7c m

CA OR, ism
..cam
?m -? °Nc- ?
CJ 0c) 0E 7

Z2/ z
O z
o
-?, 1
J
z
w
?D o < N i
M

C C M,

: ° 0-) r >
J \00
?
0 ?
r
LOTHES ,
CC)
a LINE m
ti S C',MCA
HL
?`
-
GUUY LP
1 ?
co co O
0
!MAP E ?cooo
?X
; Ca W r-1 N
Ui ° -1

v_•?_}
I
°
0 M °'
U-1

Lf
!
Q
X '
J
J
r
I
'
'I ??1 ?
E 1 T r

S ARPORT P' ED DR
t 4' CH /
P bTER
Dco
Lr''ANTER ECK °
U CM ~\
ANJER
_4 -H LLAX- I _
PLANTER I -O)

AK
o 0?
I CD O
m CJ

Ym ?
OAK/ 7\
m,x m
Q'- m

°
? a C) 0 0 Ct 1
o?mC C D ,
A/C P AD
0 0
E
T,H `
4 L ?

cn -Immm -
GR --
??
x O m x m
DR
a` o o--r.
r-
A
f
c) v
0
z--m-4 <?
?Mm

C7
l
-ifs 0

- ,
N
? z
n
cn

9 ?

OCK
WD
TIN
S o
S 1? - - -

om MATCH LINE STA. 6+00
P.
C)
N
O
D]
0)
N
c?
D z
m $ v
D? o

° zmn SoCv
o C/)

o

t
+

o? O

D
=DC3

v
z
O

?

?NZ g
°Z
OD
ymrL
m
m mon m
O? a
?

y z
O)CD ?z
vp
y o o?
?'n F p

m .{. o?
< z z?m m
>, 17)
m ;v M
>m F,
Fn
m 'Z
m m
aS

b Nm
?w
00
A O
\7

C)
0
C)
m
z n
? O am
r-
0

0
0
W
°o
0
0
0
0
b

MATCH LINE STA. 6+00
m m m
o cn o
Elevation
to
?n
c00,=O
a? O 1
o?-ocn
wm-
CD M , Uri 1
0rrcD
CO C
Oov?
r=
z I
D
z-
0 N ?
cc) co 0°
N 4, m O
?N
o m -i N
ocf)0
om 1
rn r m
00 ?I
O i
z
CD CO <
w rm
JNzO
C?
Cfl 0.
cf)
oz?
m
?rC
rm
z

c
0/ ,vNy
fl-

> C)

o N N CD N
I l? r-'7 ,
v>
a o? oz?v
/ 'NOOO
:ar l %Ld lam`
rn m r-
m> '1
o' =n
O N N `
r
mr
mom
r
z /i

/ D
mc
i y
?.

4 -4 4
m
m /
1
;
L
z
m mI
a !E;z
w ,"/
l q' 764
8
?
n 2
5'2
E 4
92
I ??
3

I ?
MM4y
/
98
6
?T
8
l N
8
68
//? ? 8g • 97
Mq r?H ?
I NE S T
ONC \6
c? q/V v V
eR CD
X ? CD 'A O -D CD /
"J rr7
I a ; ri; \ lo
m aw Co
? ?q z
VALLEY
6g? S7 I , -', - D
?I ? w
\ ?A X -
p m
zm
\ rn
m -q
Tq.J \ o mi X
E S ' + ?'4s ? ?sl
14 2':10 ov i ,tea
w uocc
,'X77 Co $ a,
2 a (D X
z -I. 0)
71z
V" WN
If S ?
9 l? n• S
Z'
?c (A 1 D z
x2ro
N amr --I
m r m
(-c-..
owca-)rrn
? m;K m
m -c N
v N a
>m>
m N p
v
c°mi
r--ic
mmm
(n mN
N
X X
O 0 :?
x rn
mN --
? z
X
X
I
X
I ?
x?
J.
?rn
n\
L \
ST A: 1923
N 542,624
E 1,471,410

mt
ma a m o
z oo w
a r-
Zm
2m a r-
o rm n
x M

Z'D

a m

m

C)
° i m m Z
m
y r

orm.-
mozz
m z m N
u0A1
co a
O <
m -°
m A
fNr
m --Na
rm;(Ni+
1 a /
m -( -
mo
O N mml
a P M 'I M::/
a >;/
n ,.
o :i
O
W
/ r act
(
P
-
- c9

Z

m
Z M A n Z
z N
o
z t7 O Z Z n m? 1 , n \
3
D
ornc z I G
?> ° ° m .U Arc o
°

°'?'
?bc
o
r
=Nm m
I
+ o
°r?
= n
Sao
A p - <
mn
35
z ym\
r -I
m or
s
O m_
2
-Iz
> z
Dc
NC I y Z N!~•1
0
o CD 00
c 0
P

m m
ZZ
? m \ rn{= n y
E a:
;
S??i oto
y ? ,
o sj
r
/
7V,8
3
89

'

\
N

rn
'lJ
00
CA
w
(
ig

0
0
J
0
0
o t.n o u+
0
MATCH LINE STA. 6+00
I
I
Ex. Sta.: 6+57.48 l
Begin Re:located
Reach 1
. ?4
Ex. 8?' Son.
Inv.. 690.96
E I Y / SS 8" VCP
OOM °6gl°2Z
2' VALLEY 2'?6

n O /
O
qK ?
o
m
r
\
C7 N -
O
nx O
r, G? pJcb=
OO
r D
m (,.I O K: O
-4
0--l m 7t
v aom?N I
m Om.

D
nz
n z o _ I
N F-
?o -o y
1.
m

4' CH -

SD C7 N C-
w
0
/ o

1 NCI I m° I
\ cn
PLANTER cy M ? N
- p m cn K 1

' O m
4q
I CON
` z I
C
L E
?q v I
' -WD S <
O Q
HL oNC-o
//I pC 41V k
? e . - =
w
l
< ; ?NC qp C? C?
00 M
0 0 N

0 6,
Cu
6
o
m
/ CONC F--

xI o
m X I
OF-

C
nI D
n `I
X o? p? q
of LATER
' CHL
m
°
b
0
0
0
X m

qiC
/ NlT " C0 N m °
\ Mq0 N Qo
o
M p ?qk CD z
om N I
{P C7 ?
O

CON I
o ?

? I
?YQ r ?
'?` S
S q ?

tit,
'
O
-t-0 I
X qK
z¢ WIRES w (Do o I

'
m
o
n
c
c 00 N fTl O
«V0
(A z
N:
J
-
4 --4
W ?ImSN
?O
f a4
6
0
(Ao?
iat
cz (nCo CD
0MF-
.
m
.1 'a
'o F E 0 ? r > +
o 01 W

SE
in'
J
n
p o

o
- j
Co
m 00
S
I o
, X

r? YC
q EX. ?4" :RCP
?? MO
• ? dwmo 1
Cj
+ /NE s om
X CDO?O
I
n n?

Z
Oq J
O
K ??O
Om

?I m
p Jrn
a m
I
?qk
Eq X
R 41 -0
M
?
1 S
a
-
i
?

-l- r-
r
ao
N -n Z t`
N 24 o
TCH LINE STA. 12+00 N 0 :n
r-0-Do 0
0 N r -n
m n
m o
-4---(D rn
ao W '` -i, x x
r mmo
h? +o
'34
O cD m (D
0 at ? S . ,
Jed o
-•tn m
v 7a Z 1)n
ca?naoC`7°7
W -+ (D -•
m
0
Ex. Sta.; 8+77.95
Begin Re:located
Reach 2 .
o:
0
sta. 0+00.00
E 1 ev. 69;0.86
N 542.95;9.90
E 1.471.1332.80
Sta. 0430.00
Elev. 691.50
------- ------
;sta. 0+501:00
;Elev. 690110
I
sta. Q+75.00
1
Elev. !691. 88
7o
m

Sta. 1+09.34
Elev. 691.95
N 542.858.46

------------ --
1
I
II
I E 1.471F364.61
--------

,
Sta. 0+00.00
Elev. 692.72
N 542.755.80
1.471.39.29
-----------------------------
;Sta. 0+30100
:Elev. 692:52
I
Siva. 0+50. 00
Elev. 691.1.2
Sta. 0+70 00
I !Elev. £92:72

sta. 1-+2q.00
I Sto. 1+40.00
I ev: 691:7;1
Sta. 1+70.00
Elev. 693.36
Sta. 2+1;0.00
Elev. 653.66
--------------------
Sta. 2+33.72
Elev. 694.00
N 542.5+.04
E 1.471;486,70
I
I
I
MATCH LINE STA. 12+00
m ? n
n O N
0
clMMh C X 4, HL
/N 6969/•
21,357.3 0 RY
5 542 44
E 1471'52 I °w
19e Ck
f U1-IDZ
xxra
cnDmr?
mr m
rm?••
Z >m
oaoom
?m;m m
m -< cn
v(A>
DXD
m(L/1o
v
a°x
z ;0
rya
mmCD
VI M V1
Ln
o;?
xmx
rn in -
x z
I
STA: 24.?2.14-
NN 54-2,218 4545
E 1,471,6?5.7a
STA: 2408.76
N 542,18.5.72
E 1,471,671.60-
?-j ) 0 4 H L
M eFO ?`? ?-
b qR
I ? x \.
q o y/? ; 9)
c 0Sr
ci - n .
o! o
u, Y, -
NIER
w ;' L Y ARE A
?? p p
I
I., EGK
?? II
I ? -I
c ?iG
1
/ I
I
l`
1
Q)
II Ill Il
n
O
07 O
D r N
(o 00 r
o
Cn ? O
I
ci 0') m 1,j
cc
O
D
rJ -P r r
r
r
ow?o I
Coo= -
F- I
CO
?r?c
?cnz0
U
OD oM
D

°
° -
z I
r W
+
F 0
0
.-4' CHL
o
I
CD. ,,j
CO 0
n Mcr"
co U 0 cn 1
Ord
?o r D
0
Obi.
r r
m

'.,
p c"i +
0
N

W N
I ` cp
?Qn ? 1

°ro

n IC ? Ec`
c',, TER
Z7ro '`
'? rTl c C
?Z
7 Ax 1
O bX ?
z z z n0E?zm -px -Im .- z 2?m u, .
m x +
0
?( C r _a D C Z
Cq/ \\ IS ??z 'ram zm m
f
ss
RlMMy
IAI,6g692.08
1.98 ?b
A
C?
N
Q _
"°o
N `c7?
``4?

m ? cl Wn A
mm m 00 0
zm s r- n
Oz 0 T 0 1r7
m z m Z
-1 O
z
02
STA 26+06.8
542,012.8
E 1,471,708.

Orm•-
mozz \
rnzm?n
p ? r
<m r
m v
x n
*t0N> r-
0 (A
r m v cn --.
m
n D .4 .
A m
-n 0 A CO ? C X02
?G \
?
Z-
%

R ?

z ?

m
m o? uCv
xo?r
Z g
m ??'

N 0 z
? o
O K
s G7 O z = m o m
o v
$ ?m D p°m ZOmp m

+ D o
D O 0
A r
O m m
? m
Z
{
? 2 e
i
.
A m
) < m ?
o _
- -0 n
m
+ 0
?Cn
O
Z
D
ro

m rn mZ A m
y

Z-
-4 -4
\ ao o x.
m
CD co a r-nvp naim
F _E ONr*n J
T %0

Cl
CC E lEq
p

N
Y
I
m
m
r
O
0
D
--I
m
0
5?5 8. y
1 'J
y
O
9)
OX
O

Ilk
O
y
a (C a•,:, a?:

s

\ V ?i21
,g? RC ??
6) ?00
?
LS
5

-mz -a
zz ^ A m
O
< < 3
p

I
V
-
•
C
-4
\ N AA
Z

-4 N O r
moo• x
t0 N
?• a
mo 0

o?
O
+O
0
m
00
o ? o
MATCH LINE STA. 12+00
?
Ex. Sta.i17+17.77
Begin ReEocated
Reach 3
I
I
I
i
---------------
J
?
?
I
Sta. 0+00.00
E I ev. 697.22
N 542;.052.75
E 1.4 1.784.32
Sta.0+30.00
/ Elevi 697.27
(\ Sta.?0+50.00
Elev: 697.30
JSta.!0+70.00
Elev 697.31
MATCH LINE STA. 18+00
m m m
W D 0 O
n O O
a
d
OD
0
rn
rn
c?
w
r CD I
0co ca)m
-Im71m
m -< to
°nmD
<Oz
m(A0
°o V)
c m x
z m
r -i c
mxm
W m Vf
xE
O m
xmx
m LA --
X z
i
<' o o m m m
m z A
-? o

a?
\
CO/V(
C-? \
• r.(: r \
Ox
o O,
n o
N
Dv
G
J Q ?? Q
'A \ \
IV
O

m
m
r-
0
D
m
0
m
m
D
c7
w
rx 707, \ \
O?D S,3
07VC \ 3X2',9737\ \k \
'? DECk ,, o p(
00 -04 m 1 (? ? `\E?2? NES \
0- m
DMA tx
O
c°o? as -c J ZAX
--I r- M -/ :t x *
a0y21ON W
mm ° co
OwZ r0m.'? -4
Qn x'06 pmC:.E) °v"mo m
ln. S2 -? a m N r O?
3 3'X32, /' V -' r a s
r r , m cn
9 ED? DVO/V m N
l,1JB, ?Oo
q;p 11 ? ? "• S4
Elevation
? J J
0 O O O
o cn o cn
MATCH LINE STA. 18+00
o /
\ Sta. i1+00°00
Elev. 697.49
0
0
0
0
U,
\ m a n' o? T
1 - 3'`, N-J 1
Dr0`, 0
m < A
zom
zom <
C., n
17 ' o
r \z 0
\ ? N I
SS
1-7
OU IS)
9S' oM/
11V'6956
+??'" 9 a om z
°°N4
r
r? k1,8^ \? 1 n z r
A r,
0) r-
>
c `^
f
o-
l m
av
zz
U) o a
n mm
z
m
0m
m c?
C/) M
C7 (J) Fn < C
CDC (J) <
4?- ca fTl O N^ a
CA ::m
Cc cf)
CD `
r,) z
CDC) > o
o "_ d
z
m n
m o? 0Wc?
Z x ?NZ ?,
o?
a O ?T Z mOOy
$ ?O ?m a Dom= A
PZ p0 0 ? l ??? o
ao fir' ?? O 0 r =v,m m
+S Sn? m O Om cZ-a {
o z y m?
_ Z
NO Z > DC
C3 > W ?y Z Nm
+ COCO D
O T 0 00
T m A O
rrn Z D? m
O X
m
a
S \ zx
i 9 °v
70? m
)6? O
z /
!C7 3 EMT C Z',Z ..
'5'+ e EdS R/ ` o \
18( (SX?q C:)
O W
O
STA:?30+33.11 Tjv\63 So
N 5 ,8)5 8 8 S
00
d 4172,0 4.8 \ De S ??\(?,w77VG
02 \ ( N
o; o v ?.
\/
R ? 3? lkC N 46
\ ,S \ \ De 8 \\ /V
,5 C
0 86
6' WD 1
C 0 p o \? +
W
\ POOH \ 3gME\ 3,?p o
0
E
CONC ?Og X78 kll?\ l((lpS
-0 C,
0 --
?

NI
`

O ldW
H
•d15 ?
00+
z
xz,_ a a? gam/

o
%

Sta. ;1+40.00
Elev 697.57
Sta. 1+0.00
Elev. 6x96.08
y? Sta. :1 +60. 00
Elev 697.58
Sta.!1+90.00
Elev 697.68
Sta. 2+80.00
Elev. 695.69
Sta. i2+20.00
Elev! 697.71
Sta. 2454.71
Elev. X97.88
N 541.873.39
E 1,471.954.60
MATCH LINE STA. 23+00
01 01 J J
O O
• d IS 3N I -' H0 1dW
0p+?-z
Gn

G
0
°uIr "1 08
,
1
9 69
698 6 43
cn STA 33+07.31 ?
0
< N 541,551.85 D°.. -1
?Nr
472,178.01
E 1 -4O
, N V' D
a W

r coo 81
000
mXr :k
?D m
m D
-0 N N - r
r
W VI
0
m --

s ?o?
Ri
M
O
C/T m
-0
?
'169
C>-9
S
6 o
n
,
9
S 4 z
m
m
f
m rn

s '
/'
i
? ? o •1
==r-o
ul>mr --I
m r m
roo -I••
0 cu 0m
-imam
m -< (A
v N D
m N 0
v
C 00
?-ac
mxco
(AmN
N =
orb
xms
m(A•-
m z
I
O
O?
Z N O
? l N
,i .
-? i
m
/.' ; • 01,
p
707-0
\ D7,,N63 36 qP( E
3407 k. S
r \ °C/ N
Og. 8 66- D Ry E
m? p 00 0 7
2m D IF A
ym a rp 0
? °086 RD
m
zv " 0 rrl
i m z \
o
?o \
0 7S
7070
? ?/r'q 6335 BF
33? ( G \ p D
De 88 3 DB R y lNe 20
OS07 RD oUT ? ?

v \

00"
.
9
M
p(E 7
S

/m
0 o
03 « v
!c
7
?,• / .u,
O N 0c20 u
c: o -n D? \ Orr •'11601. co
\
^
;
n p

1
;
o Ln

M
p(
?
z E
'S3
}N
O
0
X
C?l
Go -A
v
5 m \'
r
O
' n
%` • CEa?R S 'o ?
D 1
z1 I
Y ul
7G \ coo?G-o ?: ? I \
0 \ 1
Elevation
?o o 0 Cl
0 Cl
o u, O cn
MATCH LINE STA. 23+00
j 0 a i
X 0
X
O
? X
I 0
N W
c0
moo
Ex. 8' Dip I 0
To Rem l11
Ex. Sta.23+66.60
Begin Rejocated
Reach 4
N
a
O
0
Sta. 000.00
Elev. 701.03
N 541.588.31
E 1.4721.173.3
it
sta. O?-50.00
1 Elev. 701.48
1 ,
1Sta. a+80.00
TTEIev. !701.67
la. 0+99.00
=11 ev. 69j.72
,sta. +20.00
N
Cn
0
0
pGN kcR 06 i
c (;' \\' I
C//lj o > P A/V
7 T?
N
D °? I
f `?;SS 63.3 ?-o
Map( ,•' ? 3s?y7 p_ ? ?\ I , /
80 080/ A/v k I
S
Oqk
75 `D N /
BF p Nqe SS ? II !??o
OX (0
04
- \ Cg
00
q /Aj
2? w Q ?K q
%
w ?
e
Ng0
A nl 2A AW C'V O $ T
o fTl OQ D20 ?/7r V Sf 4CiY b
------------ ----------- ------------
'?i A N Z N ? O ? ? \
707-0 o z
m D (7 AS, m?A a"*..,"i a 0i3 °2
a T Zo coo s ° ''...?'•. \\'.'•.'',
z \A,
So c
11 CD 0
o Z ?? 6g-0 CRY RD `' ?''' wq
°m
-0 r \ Q
m zN 07
° D z
Z -? ns 7 O
+ a D ..
?*°>°?-' 8Au 1.
529 DC: O? \\? ?. -
- 069 RD
0 3 d.. \ \\
N
N
d
0
10
Elev.;701.87
Sta. 1+45.76
EIev.1702.26
N 541i.463.99
I 1.472.215.45
i
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
0 0
o cn
a
0
a
O
rn
rn
02
IN=btSS.?i '? ?
k
"Ib
1 a.
1
l
MONKEY
BA.F,So
Q.
LP
?Z-
i
m AN
1 J` x
o
1 Ii z
0 N tT?WWtT
W N
m i •1 v ?° o N° ?.3c&
•? ° n 3 a ° 3
b o
I y a p N O 3 3 C y

D

r

n

C)
0
SMH
PIM=70
r0UT=6 7.. 4
`IN=686. 4
{?0
13
0"'.
2

O
R (WM
699.3
_
:4
7
?6
.
?
8

V
F
S
09 R o
1
CP

m 0-)

;TA: 15+04 p
011.5
1543
m ,
= 1,471,30 •;.
z
'
l
O Z D C7

? g+
,?,,,,,n
r
m
6 -
i
- 0 > z?
G nwCv
+
-
6z m
a: >
9m\ -I
j

?o ?n m
m 0

s m 0°
_
m o" D °'°° cS
Am
' o
rn
+ Z O C3 Z
Aram c? n c
2 m m
??z
m
m
Ds m D n n
fn ? - z C
D_
N f~.1
W
O O
> O
zzzzz
DDD?D
-
o
?
N O -
O
O
° O O
P D

J J J J J 4J
.? NNNN
N N N N p', N(TN

o p

o N
D
o j O o Z
3 W J? O ? 0 3
go3v

s `"
h 8
9
» 5
.3
o
- o
y. N
12
°
Fm
p,° ?, Q

dd m
?
F pmp
- 3
3 ?
F? ?.?'
o
spa o
a
F??? ? nom
gam-. °P
?yp9
z oro? ?ssm
F 3
f.a
m F
o? 3
a
NO mm-
DD-DD
nn nn .
o?
° DDDD
o??o DDDD
nooo
EE mo EEE EEE
N N p N N

s ssss ?
r: m p N N
s
sss m m o m
n ?i,n
ssss
NNNN N N N N N
A A
-p!4
A A A F N A A A A
1
00
0
>
00
? 3 » >
ooeoo ?_ nn
> > »
ooao o 0 0 0
?am'm
m mmmm
0 0 0 0 0 mmmm
0 0 0 0 ???iO
j F j j
?
F F F F F ? ? ??
O O 00 O o ?0 0 0 0 0 N N N N
00000 na 0000 ODOO
00000

?-
oocin
0000
noon IV)
non

NNNN
C
?O -
N
°
b
C ooao
°
I
U mn U
,
V
i aaoa

m m m n m
-
?
b N A N
3 3 33
3 933
N
,W
a;
?3
F,
N ?
p
O y
c .a`o
N ?
W?
i ?
?y
m
av
mo
? a
7o
9
3
o
N 47 ?1
O y 9
n °
?yo
0
m
0
N
N N
??N N W
z. c` ? ? OyuOOOy
?3tCi„Ci.y
O
W' `
?
v°
=FF
'F-y"'iO a n
ny
O p
y
A n n n
FEE
J g O O J
oo??p
NA??N
aa°°n
%,x_3.3.3
xxx
C 0 0 0 0
1111_
zzzzz
D DDDD
N
N
O
co
O
0
z
3
n
3
o
z
3
n
D
D
z
C)
z
m
W?
on
c °
wo
N
O
N
r
N
0
h
N N N ?
000
oaa o
O y = ° I
011
3a? 311
h
? I
y rn N n
nm£ o
{?o
o F Z
a
m
?>+o n3
ADmr ee
W W W
c
3
www
A A A
333
ann
p p
?a
N N N
000 em
000 ?-
H N
vo
o o o -
333 ?O
r
m
2s
z
c?
D
z
m
m
Z
6""
?"a oN o 0
P
G ?; xe - s
o
° ? m m F F
y a e£ £iO a F
Nl
o•
s ... 2
M n °

c
?
° n
a o
n y = y
p ab o
(?D

F " m

?m DZ
D
D
D
n

\
m
m m
m v°
° o a
? a f
F
E
? a v n

t ? p
M
W
Op

m A ?p
O
' ,
C/1
I ,o m nnaan
p m xx33'x

IOOCc
LOTHES \
I sTZs
o ° °
a LINE "

i1
1

0+
GUY
--A
1 ARPORT PAVED DR
4' CH /
TER
CC)
D.
ECK !
ANTER c,
I ?A??TER HL I P
RLANTER GOB
I
I 0
a Wire
O
T,HEI `
4 L -?- - -
6g cu
TIN SD
MATCH LINE STA. 6+00
z
z
z
d
a
a
z
w
z
0
a
z
w
0
y
A
d
a
a
m
w
0
rn
rn
l PA T
Il Cy ? I
S
/ 6'`00
o a 0 C \6
/ q . 16 \
5'
{82 p
292,3
92
I/ 356. ? ? ?
/ - ---2' VALLEY
60886'8 EARLY CT.
2' VALLEY
C-)
7,1
N 54?'J+?'? 45 ? ° _
n TQJ?7
,0 6
.3 ?
SM m
S , >
N n
/ M,6? - n =
9
HL
PLANTER?\ ?n
l 7 Y•
p 7\
Con/G
U) q ?F
-WD S P
_ ?HL
r- ? i?p? gNTF x J
f c
x
NC qpp cn
1 CONC
rk - i ? ? I
?jc
0
COo
n n i n
44A/ m
X CHL m
- -- - i6' W
/ Mq N I
STA: 1g 23
N 542,624 7\
E 1,47/1,41
CON'
?D
Y
x - \NIRES Oq?
- Ni
J.W. I co
o. d
EX. 24 RCI
o- ? x l F<M F?.? • p gMop
s OKal o
10
y o D o ' 1''. c?qk pFq?
o D ? O 7 ZJ ? Ar ° ? '%
°'? DO ? r ? =<nrn m
+? -oZD m ? c>?z
oz Dm? ? ? ??" + " " Q•Mq„
NO? m?0 ? m Nm
oy Z m MATCH LINE STA. 12+00
+ 00
? m
ME K

NA .11 A ?
o
V ? v
D
m?
y ?
A D
b m
y
Z _
y
Z Z

?
W
r-
v
u
z
z
z
d
a
a
a
d
F'
z'.
w'
z
0
z
w
a
0
A
L
VI
a
w
c?
?i
0
0)
rn
rn
N
R?MMy {? x ' 4-"Y HL ??
I
.9?. R
21 3 5 3 R y c?
542 44 01
I
1 47152 I) ow ?ECk
n ° '4' H L
- aF? X
a I I
F s;
cl ?.
O7 0
WAL .? 4' C H L
N N1, ER.
L Y AREA I
r•
P O
cl CD
-?b ELK
i
DS
C'L? -0E$ ° cn
LINE
Z 03 ?
?Aw
C3
STA: 24152.14 ` O ?n
N 542,218.45 \
E 1,471,665.7
. 4CL, o
STA; 24+?8.76 ?'' \R S qp? o (O V'
N 542,18;5.72
E 1,471,6;{1.6
\ \
04
vn \' O rr \
\ G/
SMH M f
Rini, ?_.__ a?
//V, 66gj'18 1
g $
STA. 26+06.87 \ '•: >':.,
CJ 542,012.86
\
E 1,471,70B 4 O
F ! )' g O 1
z 6H ?? O
m on =0N
x z R7
Z rNZ N D
v? " o??o v ? l7
n p Z D n mOCDn m
m C
1
D
6 D o'^
m
?
o ? 0 ? o
A

O Z
O
-1 m ?3

-?G7
ym?
{
fl O -i `?
yp'•

O?
m-? ,
eC
?
C
C)

CD c)
00
'
Z •,?S
as
C5
C)

RCP
O? I
7-A o
!-A,-
?N
S9
in c? o EqR /
RRCgNTF °
> O
ti
4?
.a
Ox
O
N.U ?J A r
O? V v G

g g g

A ?
=
A O
Z
D Z
47
C m N
m
m
z
0
7y ??
OO/V
G _
{ 0 0
? o
\ o Zo

7
i
/N 6g 6?5. ??
S. g
3g
,b

C-)
U)
(n

?7A
M
r-
0
n
D
M
0
M
D
n
Z
W

OA/C-
r
? GFO/? ,, o
:r r' p 11 co
z p? E i
° F) pF GM%
1R
Cf)

N

?
U

Ul
? m P

z 5

A oz n C)
?T O 2
D
OS
o +z ?o o r

e

m D
Zb ?
m o
$ om Dm::? -< m

m +Z OO D
° ?s rn
o 2
m
P
N
n

r?1
LJ
0wC ?
xo?g
?n A
OK
mp
zfc
olp
Ar o
o Z K
Damn
o l
2w
DS
c°po
N.Z
I m x/ r
_
o? v V <
m? Av Pa m
z z
V N GJ

c z
m D
,n
w V1

L LL J

?g S
I o
1 /
r? ?
STA:/ 30+33.11
N 5? 1,805;88
1472,074.8 /
cU ? Q
?041
Fz P p
4~~w
N 6 WD
o
POOL
?
OONC
N
J p ATE S1 ?K
.d ?NI? H
Op+(?z IS
i
m
C,7
m
Z
0
a
0
rn
rn

?pvG SS = /EX 8'
• d IS 3N I , Hp__---?
pp+?z

uv0 S
N 69 69'5 4
8.6343
cn
STA: 33+07.31
I< N 541,551.85
E 1,472,178.01
cn
RiMMy
OOT,?08
N, 6y9 6S ,3
s?
Z-
1
1
A ;
cs ?'
n
N N
m -
T /
\ 4-
\ ?F
\
\
I s - t^ Z n rn'; a
\ C pCA/-
//VV 205
\ T ? - ry

R

m zsa Cv
u
T
m .
Z 5 ?NZ g
z
Oz Z n !^O
?? O
D O ZmC A
o P
?^„? o
ao ?
o ? n =Nm m
a pAm 51
n ?O
O ym?
m - ?L { m o?
V)
o S -?Z
? Z
a5

m ZZ 7
0 0 Y n? m
?? m 00
0
m

2
m D
y 5i z

d
°
M
n Mq?<<
°
\
\
i
Nq Sys `? ?'? . I p
04)
W???c qK \
Al?
------------
O??M
\
,X

Fq 8F R S
?F
q
'.rc M 1?n '

GR. 1D
i
M
°°T=
?qqp? F
-e
S3

X
S
cj m 0 v
'' /r ?FaAR S? o ?
? I
q%cl ?Z \ , ??, I \
y -? I \
Opp
0)
TFR I
I /
O.
\ CP
W.
NA A A r
m
N6 A
' z ' N
z z H
C m

Co N
N

m
a)
m
z
v
'? N IJ N J N N A (.I N O ? m V N N ?. W N
L C«
r
Tf A R_
Am M A OD
?r
D DO
mZ Z.
N CmONOZ
vZ mx VI0
n DZ
ow OZZ
mR1N m
S x
O O
M (7 1
N
H AD
1r
r 'MI
111 OyND
CxCr ZD
NO OA VI
Om-i OD
OZ Z
O M O Fq
O N
y
D
y20
OA C)
A y
Am m0
Om U
m o
myy
D.
mz
MCD -y
ZD Vl m.y
OOD 0
O y
D O

Z M
D
m M03
m-V
3 mmMr
A A -°O

m y
ZAm
y D Z-C

A

O r y

C O
y
m y
> Z 2 G
m0 ? 1
O 03 Z Vy
' 0
y c
?
1 A
vm- wM m r
mr A 1 r
,Om y
2 A Z (? D
-i A
0n0 0
0
AZA 1n
X. 0 0
60co _
10 71ZN 0
OA
AA Z A D m 0
0 m -y
M D AmDmS mD

O
Oo
m
m
° 1 A O ?VI AyA z(Znp? ,ZOj? nZ1 O N m O
O30 -iO -1 O ? +1
D
-I Z 1U r O D1 r _
3 O 00 Z C ° ?O
Z <m< AzA
O 1y? OZ m
O N
Z
7 IZy NO < _
3 rM, D AO m ODR'y? Oo zm0 Z N D C A Om O nccjOm 3 ZmZ DO m 3 A
?n
mZ ?]
O 0 m
x z
y ?m O AO -0 0 m?+1ZmZO
<A zm 2D?
m y
C .Zyi A -I >_ WZ
° ZZZ
W
N 2~SD
Zmm N 20N
D Dm C O
D D O
ym A m 3N
0 Gm V1A r<
A C A O 3 iO1
- D A N
= OO ? O
n Om0
F Z S 3<O m Z A-m ZO rA Oiy O D O O OO Sys Or',xw Wm O<m m0 O Z
m? 0 ZZ z0
y O O y'D?mo p ?mD Z Z ?l m3 ?m? V1KD0 --I nmm Dy -`1
O Z A
y ° Z
C° m 0 sj Z
G
N °Z
y m p m, 3
<
3A S p
m W
p X
N O Z ? m
A 3 Z
3 202 O N- M
z O ?.Zml y p m m O 0
A O
C)
° A N y m 00
mZ Z f
*1
0A 0
y10('1 ?0 Z 0
m1?1
N 3 O
Z O O O y
m x
ADA 3
1D Om 0
O MO
Owl N0 O Nw r
> m?`< r A °A yC r CMZ,<
3 Ap rP° N ITmI =
F9 O ?p ODZOD mmxo
0 m OZ ,0 NOZ j Z
Z
0mr
r N A AO
r >y 3 Z-xm
A
N
m OZ A0 Z A
Z x O N
O -IZ
ry Omp
N A
z
A?A A A 3
O CV)
mA y
O ° O
?
D- m
m
m D
z
O A
1 U
T> <O
m z ?r
?rtt
D /I
C
f
m
Z O Z 0 O ?
Z mOZ
BO O 0
m A C j
j
Or VI
A
3 n
D A m
N `1 O O
ym 1 c Z D -4
°
D
- A
< AO
N ND
O C
A DDODN
<< A 3 r
m A mm-G n
- - 0( A g
- O
A I
> S?Oy

D s; 0 VI

L D-
1
m ?1
f
w =ZD

Z m
N p113
'**11
Z z
m
'
A
m
O
?*3?*1
AOm
N
n1myA
-
1
1
O
2
x
r 0
y0
O Z
y
0
z
n Nm -
m
ro <
ry ` D m
Omzrz D
Mw 1 y
pro Z D m
y D
W y
m
OZ O
m 3
<
Am p
Z W
O
30 r
D O
Z
n Oni Z O Nm 2
m 0ZV10 O 6rrz
D y
x VI
w m c
A 0
, O m
O
f? 1< ?T1 Z _
3
m N
Cm
- m 0 O m mZ
y 1
Om m?rnm
0 m
3 N y1
D O m -I m On m
N 2OZ
m ZN p.Ay
O Z
O >,0
N C o y
o ,d

C
yO m
< O
m ?
0 ZG
m r
< y
AZ?00
Z yA z
- y
m O
Z
m A
m 01 q
mAC Z
x
00m V1 fA*1 Z
O
- m
V)
M
Z
N A O
O
m O Z C°O
Z CO no >
OT. m
0 K: O r 300
rm OZO
Z O •
•A
my O O
Z
n xm
i mA A 3 ?
30 Dm
C
m O mAZ
2
0V1
O rA *iC
W ZrO
yr- 'n
O m
m N 2 m
m p
30 -
>
AZy g
m p
? Z O
A3 1 y
2 3r r
z 3
D m
O3
OOy M
O A-- A .C N
? OOD z
y N
yMD 0 m
m
m?
i NZ
m m
A m m
O"O O-
Z
fn Z
m CG-O A
mrr
zmmm v ?1 CZZ
0001
y
A Z
z <I
n?
Cy
2 N0
3my
O 3 C
AZr z A
)
y
A?
D y
O 1
A
O yA
yD
m In
my
r D yOA
F z
1yP p
A -ar
OCR
Z A
O O
A M O-mu DMA
m { D?
y y
x
m V
`L
r
?< V) Q -1
< A
Wm { Z-
S
ZmZ y 0r m
y -? y
m ZVIy
y`
x C
A
ZF W 3y
C Am f-'
Nm A? Z m
0 00 z
1 D
mOVIrO m ADm
K
m 0 ° _
Crm -
N' r X,Z
]
3m 5

° 00
D z f
l
O
=1

p 0
O

Am
1
pn'N
xZApO
A
A w
0
V
000 0
Z
m
m
`c
m
Oro
.",o
ym
021 A
1
O
Cm
3°
z m
1

A
I p z m O A 0
z m
{ Z
Z
1 O M
N
m
m
O A VI
D A
A
A Z
1 0 VI y W
m N G
m A z
N
r l
D N N m{
N° Z 1
O y
O
C
O m
N VI G 3
D m-
Z D
W 3 z D A O
x 0 0
O m D
0 o n
0m5 In-
O?m
n
S
S ?
*t rN
r N ADOAN O VAj
Z O 0 O r
N
>
m 1
O >
r m
3 OzDDO
mm
z m
y AN-
C N
y *
y
m m
Or
Dp "imy
M
D
O I Zm
Dm °
Z
0
" 00 Z A
I *1
x f
? O A m
3 0 0 r m p
? z y C A i ,?
j
A x m A VI m
3D 1 D nN mAp?m
O ti °Z -O_I D fAN ANm O
O mD
m I
i A
° Z O (mill A z x ? m0 {?
O
C
O
3 DZA
Z 0 m y-,
D 0
m D
° D
r
m ?
N< VI O
N z
O
° 3C
N NO °?01x1
N 0 D ?? my BOZO m A° A
D 2I
y
m O m0
N C
A y
DO=
D°rx p< fG*1 O'1
N m<Z
"' O Af
py x

N
'°
O z
y
N D
?
z
N O
Ar m
Z Z m
0mO
N
O
y
ZA
y
O Z
mm
D M.
Z
NOD
mm
r
p
oT D
3
mry
A
y
A Ny
Om
O
1 Om
0
0
O O 2
m ?1 O
M z
O y
?mr
0°D°3 r
f?l

D VIA
WE z
m DO
AZ O
mD0

3 D D

A A j
?
O
° m
m D
z O
z y ODm
A
0
1Nm O DZ
N{ O O
Dm 002T1
p?C z O
M A

f°n
O
o m
mZ O
j <Z
1A m °z
_
m N w V
i

?S I
Z
SSM / /
HM > I
0
bye 9e q
ri
/
4,9
v / MoRf
l pt i"
OJ /
4
Zh
QS?
P /
/
\ ? ?MH
R / \V
>y?>
00
2
hhI I ?:r ,,1 .-Y cr.
ilI \
RMMyOj © ?y\ / O
ZP c) k? C)
Ilj`II ??? c- ?
ti I I ?; \ :'y q cF ?? o
- 44
s 20
5:0 4. y N
cFo
? o
q
`i ?-? gNTFR
y C q0x x-
s
co c
z )
v D q
W I // +,? i I S Oqk x?`
m w O j
F N I I\ -
' I• O q 1 y
n m ! C? I I ` I / k ` O
[O 1 ``?.7D I
Z I / 1,
a Z
m M2< RCP
/ v SO Ar n YCA
n n D '?- D J z 8 v a V v I \ ^ .• I II ?? `? 3 0
g C) F i O Z m ?n ry V1 Z C
CO)
a M .Z1T Z O O0? 2 I ,?:': ) k?fZn x
N yo VI Fn O z* A z 0 0 oby'NH ;• / R
? z O A Z) A r "?3 O ; £$ a M4's969?' ..:?:.? 4 cc
yD mA ?mn 8 g :I RRY
_ M y '? mi Y
r N m m o y t] g g 555°tGG I W
3i >
2m m?CCD z
mz 20 N t4
?2 M? g ;:' i ?qR
m
? In m D ' Z 21 ? z SrA. 33+00 MOUCH LWE TO SHEET E=
m
w
Oq
0
C
R
H
/ OR
/ Zo
h
3 ?m
0
?n
4
o
P?
NCRORY
? ??? ? ? III o??a-•s
1 1 11 1111 ? 1` 1? 6e str
1 I II$ 1h ? ?
I? sr.1 ? ??111 / / ? $29
61
S I I \ ? /
? I
c
fSY +?`OI
C?? gaOq?
R
\ I
bR ?p?l
c O
3
fs O /
'ygb"f, m (p
1 0
qRp
R
R
h
?m
h

G
8 ?
x_
8 ?
a
1
A W N
< 3 ?x
O m
A m
m
m Z
,D
2 r m
O A t
*1
A m
r O
?
m 0 m'i ? N1? Z
~ F'l
m? ?o o *1
D t
?Z
z
GDc m
O
?
yS
N
0g
Z
O
mm z :2?
? Z r S
D ? G)
A m

O
? m
a
N N ?o
u m
0
m D

z Zo m
9
m
O m A (/) N
° m0
z o
=
m z N 10
A ti
O
Z
0
O
O
o o m
? S O =
D
Z
A c O ZN
"
?
? m
1
? A I C A
z m mm
C p 1 O
m
A O m
O
N m N O

o
m O
mm
O
O N cz)

^Z m m?

A N A z?

O m o
m o Z
n

= O Z D

m A

Am
O DZ
m ? O r1

O
r ?
O
O
DD
Z Z mr

O ?
O = Om
Z m zo
n
_ mn

vn
z OZ
z

o
m m
p m
A
m ? c
m

O
S
? !f ?a
e$0?
STA. 33+00 MATCH lNE 70 SHEET EC7
I I?xos/ ?4
: I I .vF P P NIERA A-A--
09 - YAR
R2
S? al I I IE A
• ??? I s
o I I G
9
I n. \ \?(?
?-l? MJ I .L ?N I I \
S2p
s96s? g ;
'yLT\J0? ? ?% 1
9g g _ i l
o /
l I N ? :?? c n
Q0
J+ \\\\\ ; qq, qA
I
I
m '
c O
1?
?I 1 IW i

g y
° n

` °

° F

m
Z

D
Z
m
m
O W c? V
xo

n

v,
.'i-7 ?n
D' Vl Z
on u

8

$
m
Z1 oz
:(1
?
m 0 ?

l)
T
Z
y
?
? Ii
g c oo °
A
0 c? o
A
?H
$ a
o Oo ?pD
D
O Dmn < 8

K S G)
o A m '-3
cn Dm
frl o
vm m?z 0

ZZ
?p n
>
omZ g
D
I m?
"O m Aoo C] z g
m £
N ?
m
w ?'

/O Lq?q? n'
N ( N
J \ \\ N I ~ 00
I `?h (F I I fOK
\ I•?' ?IIII ?
f I
SS N q?
°GMMH N [F I \ ?g• cuP
P
\ 9SI ?7 a J, I V ?91 .-.
iA
:? E L I "? )/?> III t i
• I 3.
/? ? i I M ? 1 1 1 1
4 ? I
??`I A? I t 11 t
? j `??,? 1 1 1 1
° I
I ? A.I
\ ?? 00N C J J'? 1 1
c?` ? ,gyp ?II? ? / ?
N \ ?
ppp l b r ADKINS CT.
FV / _
2" PV S ..yl,. L
? r.? 69B9BV / /-'YO I
1 VIII
SiA: 33 v.07.31
i ? 1 I ? GR /
?F
" 1111 I 1 1 .-Xf
OASA,j ate' I I /
I ?V"s99?9?
? \ ?`?? 1t x @'1"'N x /° I I III I
H C
o ST
p,iJ jOA q R `Ssq?
v g Q q Nq ?4 SUOg I I ?f °S
LT 9q 74 JPI?EY ? ° b ? CO
\ K
9 II ?\
? 1 ??? \\\\1111\ \ \\
IIII r \\\ \1 ? \ \ \
8 1 ?? 1' - s \
C
ro
x
III 0
8 O
C
t?
omy i fzo w oo Nz? ?I.Zy
z zln ?xo r+im m? ?°A O
z omx Ncmo 1 r -,,,
O O?ON ND yT

n °? "-Nia? zN nA ..??' ?..
Fm
nO

°
C+y ?N
ox qry, n na >m
y n F mF A_
A
>
m
0
n .d
0 m `_ Ap
1n
ro °?? °om
o
0 ?
z_N
it
m ,1o
> ow o '^ .
? r°
m Do = Am
i0 any ?z
m pm

mn
= ?o
zA ai_ cz
s
r z
OF mmOZ Wo N?
y m Sy 0,11
j O m
DNO mO .uKir

?N

z
C7 A Z
mw ? m
y po m 2

?
tJ °> y K?
U N V
m 0 R?iZ n? 0 o m? D O ? D D m T j
AKA ? AC OZ29f? <Z
mm
m y
°?m??yZ° OpO H.
o 9yzpwym mom 1Da F1? NcA-i
m K p O O N j K F V D
mN?D?Nf?/ ??OA mnAN
XAO?A,- <N O 1)O K2 m
N y O-11O AaAF p
O< A m° m C ? m° r xm
47
lpn°
O S T? m-
1
-TL-92.- A
N >°IS?mZOm=m
R f0?1
ays m
Fz"Om KOp IF
9m°OOOo >
z
A lnmo m °oo i
ON°nD?m mmm motim p
D o T A 2 D A N C m n p<
p p ? D A
O p A A O x r D O m GzJ D
zy o
m°r5 O > u0
O ZO
N RI
0
m
O =
? N
? N
= m
m ?^
v_
z
GJ
z n
Z M
O O
V ?
j n
Z O
r Z
{
N D>
m
z
m
5
4
? n
n
n ?
4
ki S
m
W
Im
W
30' MIN.
20' FILTER

oNz
n
'-?
om m
Z O o A m
0.-
0 SC mn A
O
"O
z
z
-
F n o
A
i> o
< x ?
m A - O
y
C m ?
00
30' MIN.
20' FILTER
FABRIC
n °
z
A ??S! > A
Z OQF ?_
A O
y O
o
0
z
m
O
D
T1
D
Z
v
D
Z
m
Z
--I
mm
m
Z
0
(n
m
m
4i
D
O
Z
V)
D

F

>1 n

F

> D

F c?
m
Z

Fl D

F

D m
O
o
m

M

m

N

m

N c?
m
z

m '+
m

m

N rn

m
'o

o

D
`^ z
>
1
I
N
N cn VI
p N o
Om
m
m N
o
m N
N
O m D N
p p? yyomm m mf nmr
io o ov
r
10 m z
y

T
Fpoz mp
O O;n?

N N0 Om y m m

A

n

D

D

f 1n
_
,
ms nm
<my mtA
N O
mD
m
FjD r
O
1)
Z

f
C
.? Oz°
°m]1

1
N

< Dx^ti
C
my
ZOA O

( - O N Nm

N

O m

2 m
O ?
A ti tiMT
t
n
y
s> y
y A
f
jm
y m
11
D .'O
O
A
o
1Z.. A r N
O _ = D <
_ N
D
o <

' D_
Z
z

so O
Z
z
W = A

D

m Z

0 N N rv

° O

A z

OR m m

n m

a r G

n
z
n
;c,
D

m
Ao x
Z m Az n
n m
y O m s
A rOAi N N

mm z
41 m?yOm?D;
pmZ
F
mp C
oom pm
A m O A A y
O A°
yi ycai O
??A'?D°p 1n D
O z0
O
?
?
O

rn mAr
m\?
oo Z
0
o oZmm
om
>
?
ony
°

z
?
o n a
g
z
Or
? Z -
CO
p
°
4
x
>

L O
n
A°
zy
N A O
H O
A
A

(A

I m
D

F<
0
_ I
Z ?
? Z O w
m (n I
F w z •
O z
m
O
Ln
, m
D
rr. D O CO
m
n
zm
(? Z
D
O
Z
--j M
X T
Km
Ol r
D .Zl
D°g
m?
vZ
0
O O
m
m D
c7
D
r
0
m
`AI
> - >
Z O
?
,y
Atn
N °? ?A
1
o?z A
mo`J m a
=`" o
-g*.. wry- S
?

Am
l
'
C
Z
c?
? m ry
N(N Z
?0.
o•
Z
O
o
n O
ma
Lr?
x
n
x
C]
?xy
V
ya
a
o?
n
m 0
a
d
C
0
z
d
a
n
x
D
x
s
z
u^
?F
as
J ?
z
Fi
o
v S
o
2 2
oa o
nm 6
n m
yz
N? n
v; -
o ?
ON D
N
zm m
No o
2
3
D
A
I
2
4 n
F
m
z
0
a
0
o
0
n
m
DA DA O Z Z
mmD =°
oyo? zor
mzAO ON
-io 0y0
Z o o 2 I-,
D -
O ; A D O
21
5O O m D m
OA ?Z e
26A N y S
NAz
p O
yzx aay
x n
m 5 0
mom z
z°z OO
nn59 10
Dmy x0
m o
A A
°yi? yo
°D Ax
pz? ?D
ym o.
O
mE
D?
X11
w
D
A
I o
A
O y ? `7
a ?
? A
= r
A
A m
P' N a ffA nlnwln1- oyo_ p
mo 2m m aiaAm c?mm
?p zmFam nomA
AZ mD m 00 N2-m2 y
rz A ?mOOD mD
D ip ro?1 rr Emma
O m
A DO
c FO A? <<-p?m ??p0
91 .101 m m AS2. 2 '2Q
A. vymo r m
z m O° ??05r5. O?°
O ZA C
m ' im o?yxc?? ?y?
OA A n? 'T1myx? yy0
m
o "gyp°o yo `rz^a °A ?mz? zmx
A py
? --
g m m -z m><zrk
O O ?fn ftA_E~x O N
D 3 ? F?Omm =Ao
5
> y AO NO
O Um ?y?y0 m
p ° Am xmU
y - 0 ? oAnOm y0
O z 9F OSOm> vyz
y m `?4 m0 .0=?.11 ODO
S O
A a Sm AOnoz n
n m O DnF 0
9 m O ?z 00 m mxac
O i ? p0 ma M.
Z O m Dy py-m °Ny
O
r Z? O-Iy> Aom
mo mm
IO
J O1 N A W N ,
oo o tN z -52 m ?n
A_Z
K O??< ZOm 1? Ay
N> N OZD o 1)Z T nm
Nmy m `S IV
A C
OnA - o
p0 Z om p
ZO ? MoD 0 z0 mm
A A
m Z ZsOil. - .-m>
cD > ° F° uz1yF pz?
?> A nyz ° Apm
OD oz n>T
ZD D ny O yNZ ° <0
o rr F? a Z' A #
m m, z-m i m
mo m = o> N
A Z. °CI D _? O ?ZD A y
A o
>Z O1
D°A O O y ]! O 0 g
1, AO n ?Z m m
zK aA M. 0? My
nm 0 z i
DN V m Z yj 0 2D
?? o -UI 0 Omm m O
O c? N n0
OO O oo C Zmr AO
K a m
N
xR' D ?y O smAm t1?
? >
o OA y N?Z
0A D m NN
A m m m
GO t
O y0 0"'~09 x" 1 1,
ZA m oNA m m
?jzi m o 0
D
AD 1. U50 N
n?z a? p
Am O m O C S
Np C ; ;op O Y
< Zyy m
- °-y yz Z
D'
zz y n
m
z
zo
?y
PUBLIC STREET
C
ay
i?
om
Z ?
Z
G.
d'
O
W
O
W
02
CV
u vI
O -I
N ?.
m z
o O
G) G)
x x
D O
0 C
m z
0
O
+
O
O
`m
Elevation
Q T 0 J
ao O o 0 0
in o cn o in o
0
0
------------------------------- ---------
0
m
0
----------------
O
- --------------- ---------------
O
- --------------------------- ------- ---------
U
O
d
0
w
---------------------------
0
0
0
0
N
O
W
O
T
O
6
O
-------------------------- ---------
O
m
O
- ---------------------------------------------
0
0
0
0 J J J
O O O O O
? O UI O VI O
Elevation
? Ot T J ?I J
m O O
(P O lT O Ut O
0-
0
- -- ------------ -------- --------
O
C
-----------------
C
I
O
N
O
d
- ------- -------
W
O
N
O
O
N
O
[1
O
N
------ ---- --------
O
------- - -- ------------
------------------- --------
O
----------------- -------
O
m
------------
O
J
-------------- -------------
O
O
O
°o
m m m _
0 ? 0 0
U O Cn O N O
O
W
O
Elevation
m o 0 0 0
in o cn o cn o
0
0
------------------------ -------
0
0
J
O
Qi
O
!P
O
----------------
a
0
- ------- ----- -------- ------- -------
w
0
0
0
0
- ---- --------- -------- ---------------
----------------- -------
0
N
O
W
- -------------------- ------- -------
-------- -------
O
In
O
-------- ------- -------
O
O
m
O
O
0
0
0
O 0 O J J J
m O 0 O O
N O VI O In O
Elevation
m m m -I -I _
i0 O O O
1 V? O UI O N O
O
O
I
O
O
O
J
O
O
P
------- ------- --------
O
I
O
I
O
O
----------------
O
N
+ 0
Ul
O
--------------------------
O
N
O
W
------ - -----
O
O
------- -----
O
O
O
O
O
°o
m m m ?I _?
?n 0 0
UI O UI O UI O
w

O ? I?u SVV ?

m p? 0wC v
2 0 ('/? r
Z ?
?
NZ ?

A G7 e p
eyy ?
C) T Z C) C? moD
?m _ ? zmc
oc ?o o =vm m
+c
° zzzo
A om2X t
if
o`?'
o y D M \ -I -I
? 9 m ?`
?
Z
+<n
O
O Z
D N
:
y W H
m
x°s?w`
CD G m w
O0 ?lO O

+
O
O
Elevation
O O 0 0
I vl o !n o cn o
0
0
---------------- ---------------
0
- - ------- ------- ---- ------- ------- -
0
r
O
O
(P
O
0
w
------------------
0
0
0
-------- - ------- ------- --------
0
0
N
O
---- --- ---- --- ---- ---
-
O ------- ---- --- -
T
--
---
----
--
-
O - --
O
O
J
O
m
O
O
0
0
0
m m m J J
J
W O
lT O O
(T O
O O
Ut
O
Elevation
T 0 J J
W <D t0 O O
i UI O N O VI
O
O
I
uJ
O
O
v
---------------- --------
O
I
O
lP
O
O
W
O
I
O
---------------
O
W
+ O
O
[1
- ------------- - -----------------
O
N
O
W
O
N
O
m
O
O
O
----------------
O
0
m m m v
m o 0 0 0
V+ O U O N
Elevation
0 O m J r
w 0 0 0 0
cn o in o In o
0
0
-------------------------
0
m
0
O
- ----------------- - ----- ----------------
0
O
(P
O
a
0
w
0
---------------
0
0
+ o
O
0
N
O
W
---------------- ------ -------
------------
-------- ------
O
(r
O
O
O
O
w
------------ -----------
O
O
0
0
0
T m m J 0 J
m t0 ?D O O
(P O N O tT O
Elevation
o+ m m J -I
i0 ?0 O O
1 lJl O VI O U1
O
O
I
O
O
----------- ------ -------
,I
O
-------- -------
O
N
O
I
O
W
O
N
----------- -------
O
I
O
W
} O
U1
O
- ------------
O
O
O
O
-------- -------
O
O
J
O
O
O
°o
m m m v
0 0
(P O N O lP
Elevation
p1 Ot p1 J J
i0 O O
1 (JI O Uf O (T
O
O
------- - ------- ------
O
O
O
------- -----
J
O
I
O
-------------- - -------
O
d
O
O
N
O
------ - ----- -------
O
+ 0
O
O
N
O
-------- ------
O
O
N
O
O
O
J
------- ----------
O
O
O
0
m w m J
m 0 o 0
(P O UI O (P
N G)
o m
-a z
m z p
O O
G7 C7
D O
0 r
m z
0
Elevation Elevation Elevation Elevation Elevation
w w O? -?I w w
w i9 ? o o 0 ? 0 0 w w N w O? 'J J 01 w N
? tD o ,n w o o ,n w 0 0
o cn o cn ? o in o cn ? o cn o , o in o cn , o ,n o u+
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
o ? ? } I o o I o
? I o 0 0
o o i
- ' '
O ). O ?; - ,
1 I I I I
.____ -------- { ------- _______ N ------ ,____ N ____.{.----- N ______ ) O O -------
0 O
O i
a a i i
----- - -------
W W w W W
0 1 ° ° o 0
,
N ______________?_._. ... _. __, N ______,_______ ____ N ______ _____ ___ N _____ _____ _ _.____
O O I O O H O
' ------- I
f ??r
U? Ln Ol O"1
O O O O O
----- ------- ------- - ----- ------ - -----
I
------ ----- ------- -
t f
---- ----------
0 0 0 0 0
------- ,.______?___ ___.__, 10 - ------- {__ ______? 0 __ _
10
,
;
- ------- ------- - ---------- - ------- --------
o o 0 0
o `-------'-----?-`------' o ------'-?---- '-------- o o -- - - ----- -------- o -----
------ ----
0 ----- ---- 0 J
w I w w
w
;
0 1- o o 0 0
0 o O O o
w w w 0 0 w w . . w w 0 0 0 w w 0
0
w 0 ,n o o 0 0 ° o 0 o o o o 0 ? 0 0
cn o in o cn o v+ o cn o cn o 0 o in o u+ o cn o in
?l Elevation Elevation Elevation Elevation
cn w w w w m -? ti w w m m N
m ?0 w 0 m m 0 U 0 o w . . 0 o 0 o 0
W , O 0 O O (Ti O (T' ? O lP O N I O lf' O 0
W
0 0-
u O O O O
W ;
¢ w + { { -- -
? o o I - o 0
p
p
------------- --------
? ° I ° I I ° ? ° I•
___ _ _.
d p fl
A
/ I. II i f I
p
- ------- ------
m a ! m
o z I I I I! Z I
r w - w
D D
?; ! ! N
m N N T- I - -{ m N
X o 0 0 ) 1 x p -'i--- i
------- ------ ------ --- -------- - -----
z z z
?' O 1 Z O O QO
c T ti ..- T $
;
- i
0.' y Sim - ?1n H l'Y Vl
.7 m? W O ------ ------- .__._. _ __ _ _ ___ O ______ _______ _____ .... O _ _ _ --------
?o x D ?- ... I D
d
y,
O C f ) o t
i
;
z I ! W
- --------- ----- - --------- ---------------
o no o ------'--F----' - o ----- ' - o
0
z o ------'--?-- 'o ----- -------------- ---- o' ------ ----- --- --- 'o -- ---- --------
A
o - ,
- --------------- ------- - -------- --------
o 0 0
Q - ,
a_
- ------- - - -------
''?S • ••' ate: 0 - , ?- 0 . ,_ . ? 0 --?---'--------I 0
C ;
N
w
0 ------ ------- -------- °
y p ° ------ --------
-------------- ------- ------
°I° a o o o
n I e m w 0
- N
o' - o u+ °o o in 0 o in °o i°n o in °o
P4
o?
CY Om D C) a A
$ ° err" Dom=
P. s 1 ° o
°
opo z»zD -6 p x?m
z D?' N SD° A -I mn
F poy ym\ O--
O -1 fm7 m-? m zvl
D C
m
P. )> CD oy Z Nwm
/ =+y C° D NW
U1 7] G
V' ? o m ? m 00
o
m ?
Z? Z
f
LV
W
O
W
N
%-1 J
-1
o m
N .-, Z
m z 0
D ?

D O Elevation Elevation
o C Elevation Elevation
m z

I

O N O ?

I
0
O N O N

I
O N O O

O N O N N

j 0
O O O O

N O N O
O
O

0 O
O O

______ __-__ _I O

______ ______ ___? ... -------
o !

----'------- --------'

° i j

-----•-------'- -
m

°

r
r
----------- 1------
r r

o

;
------ -------1------i-------i
r

0 r r ,
------ --------
:

o

------ ------ -------

r

I

o

-------------i --------

O

:

o -----

--
------
:
I'

- I

.

:

r

I

-------
--
--------
r t

-
--

o

I I I
I '
o ,
______________----
---
r
I;
I

I

'

-
-
-------
- D o

i I y...
------ ----- --- o - --- -- - -- -------- -----
.----' ---
- >
'j.

o

I

o

r
r.
r. X
O

I
O
-- -
o ------•- - ---------- o ---_-j- ---T------ I
o o o
W , : Co r .-,
0 ° ---------- -------- CD o
o ° ---
------- ° ---:----
CD ::0

o r D :
I I
r ?
r ? r
I ?

?
N

__ --
--------
N

______ _______ ____ __ -------

O r

_-__._ N

O _.____, -- -------

_______,
7
T
r

z

O

r -
-

:

O
r r r
W

r
:
I
W
r r
------_. _ ____w_______,
------- ? ?
__ __-________,
O ___ _

O
O r O r
r

;?
'
'--
'
o

---'--'

-I---;-------'

?I A

O A

o

--- -- ----- -- - -
------
-----
----
-
r r ,
I
N
- -<""-"t"
N

------- - ------
-----

N ------ ------

r ------- -----

,
r
r
,
,
r r
r
r
V l
r
1,

r r

--------
I r r
______________ r.___._.,. ____._,

r
r
r --------- _____

1
O
O O
O
O
O
m m N N

0 .o O O
O N O N O
O
m m 1

O O O O
O N O N
0
0
o o
O N O N w

co
O 0 0 j

.0 0 0 -?
N O N O
Elevation Elevation Elevation Elevation
a7 N N m m J N 0 N N m m J J
t0 O O l0 ,O O O l0 .O O O ,0 ,0 O O
O N O N O N O N I O N O N O N O N
O O O O
O O O O
00 ________w _ I __.__, 00 ______,_______ _____ _ ON ______ _______ ___?.._ 00 _____ ------ __
r ? r ? r
r
r
r r ? III
: I : F I
---
O O I
r r : r
I
I -l --- - -
0 , I O ---r--, O -- I O - I
r 1
r r ,
r
r r
:
- --------------- -
r r
O { O O I O I
r r r
I I
N ------'------- ----- N ------'--------- --- N ----------------t - N -- --- --
° ?- o - o ,r o
, r r
m
r r
------ -------
0 0 o T1 z o
r r ? r
A A --------- T----
r r ? r
I
I. : 1 I ----- - ---
,r
:
______ _ ___
-- : r------
r
X °
,
r ,
r
.n
m
, o r ,
r ,
--- --------- - -----
r
r
r
r r
, r
r ? r ,
i r
r r?
___
- ---------------- ------ --------
y W - - W 1 - ------ W ----- ------- ------- W
r
r i
r
r
r
°? r•, 0 ------ - --- -----
oA
r
ti
111 1
r
r ------ ---- -- --- -----
0 0
- - -------------------------- - -------
r r
r
m - ,
?^ r o ------- o ---- ------ -------- o ----- ------ -- --___ o
m? ® ° o o o
- --- ------- ---
? i--i o 0 0 0
z m o o °o 0 o o o o 0 w 0 0
m o? =woCv o N o N o N o N o N o o N o
o m
D N
>
70
z A n Z N
Z OZ D C7 oo4 m
n z = O
$ ?6 D Om m
o D+ y 0 -0 Q 2 m
fn Z D fTl O;0 Z
?o O Dmn
m y m O
^'-? N
[?nC? m
D D?
c?7m Z -KZ
2+N SEn Z Nrn
N O r?j. 9 C7 00
m AO
7m?
N y 7C z

a
W
6
°
0>
U
m
N
CU
-D (/) G )
O - m
Z
m z p
O C)
C) C)
x x
D O
O C
m z
O
Ul
O
Elevation
Q J J
t0 ? O O
? O O U
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
a
O
O
N
--------- ------
O
O
-- ----------
0
N
------- -------
O
W
O
O
O
0
O
J
-------------- -------
O
O
O
O
O
Q1 ? J J
?O t9 O O
O U O U
Elevation
O J J
O U O 1 O
O
O
O
m
O
N
O
0

W

O

lT
0
a
O
O
N
O
0 ------- - -----
-------- ----- -------
------------
------ ------- -------
y
fi o
x=} O
09
- K ?

Oro °' a
.?
o
- --------
------- ------- -------
, -
-
-
o ----------------
------- -------

O -------- --------------
H
N
U

ti. o
cnp n
rya CO
0
--------- ------- -------
b ? o
0
m m J J N
O U O U O

n z
I

_z fy

P Z
m
o? c?wC v
z x ?oz N

?T z C o mom
3C3 ° D m?
$
?$ D o o
0
o
y ADO
D o r
O A r 9
=? m
j
m
cn D m ca
m
? m 11
:E --4 M O
lw?
U
O -3Z Z
Dy
+y y y
Z Nm
c
O !1'1 G7
rn 00
AO

? m?
Z
N z
z
I
f l
z I
N
O
O
Elevation
Q p J J
O O
1 O O
O
O
------- - -------
D
O
O
O
0
0
------- - --- --
O
O
N
O
- - ------------- -------
O
-----------------
0
0
N
O
------ --------
W
O
O
O
0
----------------
O
J
O
O
O
O
O
T 6 J J
?0 t0 O O
O U O U
t
O
O
Elevation
D O O
i (T O U? O
O
O
------------------
O
m
O
------- - - ----
J
O
Q1
O
0
- --------------- -------
A
O
O
N
0
0
0
- --- ------- --------
0
------ ---------
0
O
N
0
m
0
- --------------------------
- ------------------
0
0
0
? J J N
t0 O O
U O U O
N
U7
O
Elevation
O O J J
O O
? O U O U O
O
O
------------------- ------
O
O
O
O
0
a
O
O
N
O
O
0
N
O
W
O

O

0 ---- --- - ---- ---- ---
O
J
O
m
O

O
O
O
Q
t0
O w
?
U J
O
O J
O
U J

O
Elevation
Q J J J
0 O O
U O U O
O
0
O
0
O
J
O
O
U
O
o'
O
N
--------------
O
Ul
O
0
0
0
0
A
O
U1
- ----------------
0
------- --------
w
0
0
0
0
J J J
O O O
U O U O
W
O
O
Ul
t
O
O
Elevation
J J J
t0 N O O
O O O
O
O
- - ----------------------- ------
O
O
----------------- -------
N
O
O
0
- ------- -------- -------
A
O
- ------- ------- --- -------
O
N
O
O
0
0
N
O
W
O
O

O ---- -------- ------- ----
01
O
J
O
m
O
O
O
O
O
w 6
O ~
O J
O

J
0 U O U O
Elevation
0 O O
' lT O U O
O
O
0
O
------ -------
O
O
O
------ ------- -------
P
0
O
N
O
0
0
I I
a
0
A
O
T
-- -----------
0
0
0
0
0
O
Q J J j
0 O O
U O In O
a
c?
0
rn
rn
b U) 1. )
o -I m
(/) - z
m z p
0 0
0 G)
x X
D O
0 C
m z
0
O
Elevation
p J
9 O
OJ
I U O N O
O
O
------- - ----
U
O
- - ----------------------
O
J
O
- ------- ------
O
n
O
a
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
W
----- - -------
O
O
N
O
0
O
J
O
W
O
O
O
O
O J
w O O J
N O N O
Elevation
? J
o O
U O N O N
O
O
O
O
0
O
0

O
n
O

------ - ----- -------
m
Z 0
D w
? o
m N
X O
Z V1 O

as

d
! N 77
?g `r0 N ?,t -I w o
y a

Q O N
O

z

W --- - ---------------
O

?
O ---------------

z 1f•
N

?y o

-------------------

0

10
1
1

0
-
/1 o
a, J ?I

o I
o N O U O N
?
z
m

z
on
wCr
x o Uj
?
n ~oy

O OZ

T
y
Zi
C7
=

?
m
!^Oy
mc
Z
?Dn p° A D O
?r D
o Ov, p
C-) T
ti
y ?s
o
O O
v r
p xln £,?, m
?_ <
Z
nm
cn
o°y =D
DO\ --?
-I e
a
om
y Q m n' I C
C < m r
N
??nn
DSO -?Z > DS
= J y y z m
p) O cc
?y
9
m 0 0

m no
w m
z
fn
L
O
O
Elevation
O J J J
?o O O
I N O N O
O
O
------- -----
tD
O
O
-------- - -----
J
O
O
n
O
O
------- -------
O
------- --------
N
O
O
O
O
O
N
---- - -------
O
O
O
J
O
m
O
O
O
O
O O
N O O
Elevation
m J J J N
I Vii O U O N
O
O
------- ------- ------
D
O
W
O
N
O
m
O
----- --------
n
O
a
0
0
N
0
O
-- --- - ------- -------
f 0
U1
O
? CO O
O
O
---- -------- -------
0
----------------
0
0
°o
Ol J J J J
i0 O O
N D N O N
UI
O
Elevation
Q J J J
o O O
U O N O
O
O
- ------- ------- -------
tD
O
O
------- -----
J
O
O
lT
O
a
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
W
O
O
N
O
O
O
J
O
0
O
tD
O
O
O
m J J
O O O
N O U O
Elevation
Q J J N
o O O
1 N O N O N
O
O
0
O
Oo
O
0
O
----- ------ ------
m
O
n
O
I
0
0
N
O
i
O o
O
? o
w o
O
-------------
O
-----------------
O
N
O
0
0
0
°o
O J J
l0 O O
N O N O N
0
Elevation
Ol J r J
co O O
1 N O N O N
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
d
O
O
N
O
- - --- ------- - -----------------
O
O
N
O
W
O
-------------------
O
N
O
O
O
J
O
W
O
O
O
O
p? J N
D O O
N O N O N
Elevation
Q J _ J
o O O
N O U O N
O
O
--------- ---
O
00
O
O
- ----------------- -------
m
O
N
O
0
- ------- ------- --
0
N
O
-------------------
+ o
UI
O
? O
----------------
O
O
O
U
O
0
0
0
°o
e o b ?
N O N O U
a
rn
CD
0)
N
N
N
o ? m
(n - Z
m z p
0 G)
0 0
m x
D O
0 C
m z
0
Elevation
? J J
io O O
N O N O N
O
O
D
O
O
J
O
- - ----------------------- -------
O
N
O
0
0
N
O
N
O O
O
-----------------
W
v o
N
O
---- --------- -------
0
0
N
O
O
J
O
O
O
O
0
0
O O O
N O N O N
Elevation
O J J J
D O O N
N O N O N O
O
O
--------------- -------- ------
?D
O
O
-----------------
J
O
----------------- -------
O
- ------- ------- ------
N
O
0
------------
0
N
O
N
+ o
O
0
W
- --- - ------- ------- -------
0
N
O
w
0
0
N
O
Q?
O
O
W
-----------------
O
lD
0
0
0
O J J J J
N O O N
N O N O N O
a

S 2 w
?4 ? N?D?
O p
e
-
O
h ?
? (+fl
\,O O
y?
^? gyp. egoee
???5 N DyOPS.
m Ht>
b
e

Z

m
H OG
xc

o
Do 9T pz p moo
O O g M
$ ? Om
7J? M
C C") SS • m
n x
Dso
N mmv)
? ?o
Zp v
m p ?
{
Z'
A
a

f n
O
2 D
? a
i c
r
??j
00 m
? m-
- ? Z
? m Z w
D c
_
Owl CD?
N
O y
y
Z Nm
N C' J y
NO O D

M N W

A
O
+ Z
CD Z K
C
m f/)
o
E o
O
O

Elevation
d J J v
0 O O
1 N O N O
O
O
- ----- ------- ---
O
O
- - ------------------- ---
O
J
O
tT
O
N
O
O
w
0
0
O
0
-------------- - -------
0
w
O
- ---------------- -------
m
0
J
------- -------
O
O
- --------------- -------
0
° °
N O N O

p
N Elevation
J J v J J
O O N O
O

O
O
------- - ------- -------

O
J
O ---------------- ------- -

O ------- - ----- ------- --------
O
m

Z
o -------------------
D I
o
?
m N
X O
n N
L 0
n
Z cn
O o
(n ,0
? W
D
v °
?

Q N
O
z

? w
o

o
O
CO N
O

O
J
O
W
O
tD
O
0
0
O
l ? J
0 O O N
N O N O N O
C#JI
O
D evotion
p) J J _ J
N O ? O N O
O
O
I
t0
O
O
J
O
O
I
N
O
---------- - - ------- -
O
w
0
0
----- - - - ------- ------- -------
O
0

0

w ---- ----- --- ---- ------- -------
O

m -

0 --- -------
--- -------
J
O
O
-

0 -------
- -------
a
0
T J
? O
N O J
O
N

O N J
N
O
N
O
O
O
Elevation
O) J J J J
N O 0 O N O
O
O
tD
O
O
J
O
O
T
O
- ----------------
0
---------------
0
N
O
0
-- --- -------- -------
0
N
O
w
0
0
N
O
---------------
O
J
O
------------
O
t0
O
0
0
Ot J J J
O O O N
N O N O N O
Elevation
J J _ J
O O
I O N O N
O
O
I
O
O
J
O
O
N
O
O
w
0
-------------
0
- - -- -- ----------------
N o
N
O
O
0
0
w
O
m
0
J
O
O
0
0
°
° o
O N O N
Elevation
J J J
0
t0 O N
OJ
N O N O N O
O -? m
m z p
0 c)
G) G')
m x
D O
0 C
m z
0
Elevation
J J j
o O
O U O U
0
0
O
------------
O
0
0
0
a
0
w
0
--------- ------
N
O
N O
N
UI
O
--------------
0
N
O
W
O
a
0
m
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
J J J
O U O n
Elevation
J J J J J J
O O 0 N N
O U O Ul O U1
O
O
- - ------------- - --- -------
0
O
C
----- -------- ------
0
------- - ------- -------
m
0
0
0
m
------- - ------- -------
0
z
- ------- ------- - -
D w
O
F1 N
X O
(n O
+ O
O
Z O
G7 0
U) ::u
N
°
z
---- - -------- ------- -------
N
W
6
? O
N
w o
yy,
Q+
m
y miZ. N•D; J
-------------
rk," oea? o
n
s ?
? o
0
0
J J J J J J
O O N N
O U O U O U
Elevation
J J ,I
O O -' N
I O U O U O
0
0
O
m
0
O
O
O
0
---------- --- ----------------
w
0
- ------- ----- --------
N
O
N °
W
t °
O
O
0
N
O
W
O
0
0
m
0
J
0
m
0
0
0
0
J J ? ? J
O U O U O
O
CP
O
:wu
9
a
C7
.?i
W
CI2
CV
L7 n O '° D en
0
i
A D N Sm ? Z ?_ ?`iSS ? m
8
Z yO Ar O -\ Npee
ooz ?o ° n ='" 75
C-) CD =D DOmcz?
G + y
tnm m-rL zo V
?7?n171? -?pZ DS \\
DD O 70y Z Nf~n
= p y O D W
C) 00
a o m '°
m
? N ? ? z
"? cn
J y +
o O
F
Elevation
J J J v J
N
O p
O 0
I
U O U O
O
O
- - - ------------- - ------- -------
O
-------------------
O
0
0
m
0
0
a
0
- ---------------------------
0
N
- ----------------- -------
O
O
0
0
N
O
0
O
U
0
O
0
0
0
00
J J J J J
O O N N
O (T O N O N
N
W
f
lJl
O
Elevation
O O 8
I O U O U O
0
0
0
-----------------
O
----------- ----
0
O
0
0
w
0
N
--------------------
O
0
0
N
O
W
O
a
------------- -------
0
00
J
0
m
0
0
0
0
O O N
J J J
O U O U O
Elevation
J J J
O p N
O UI O Ut O
i
0
0
I
0
-----------------
O
0
O
------------- -------
O
a
0
W
0
N
O
N °
U
+ °
UI
O
0
N
O
W
O
- ------------
0
m
0
J
0
0
0
0
0
J J J J
O O N
O U O U O
Elevation
J J J J J J
O O N N
O U O U O
I U
O
O
0
O
W
-----------------
O
N
-------------------------
0
-------------- -------
0
0
0
0
w
- --------------------- -- - ----- -------
0
N
O
I
f o
O
0
N
O
0
O
N
0
O
---------------
O
------ ------- ----------------
0
0
0
0
J J J J J J
O O N N
O (P O U O N
Elevation
J J J J
O O
O U O U
O
- ---------------
O
O
O
v
0
m
0
0
m
I a
0
Z
D w
? o
m N
X O
n
------- - -------
? t O
z 67
O o
(n ?
D v o
N
O
z
N 0
Ul
lO O
Cn U
N o
O
---------------
O
0
- ---------- - -------
0
0
0
J J J
O O
O V1 O N
a.
CQ
m
rn
rn
a N
O -i m
U) -, Z
m z p
0 0
C) C)
?a ;V
D O
0 C
m z
0

p? 1
X09,+?
?_° M 4oib y??o :
is ? ?•••• a r' "ra4 X09

K z
- Io
o

?
z
Z
m
z
o Z Pz 0
D c o ?
n ?o ?
° ?
o r

CD n
y \ { [ )
-im m-? M
O

+
+ O
G
m S
D
G7
m
z

n
H
OQ
x?
O?
r
L?J
e--
v
x _o (/j y
>
DZ N
0
?OC/J
m0? ?
z?C
m
z?m m
n ? Z '(
Amy
OI
zw
DC
Nm
o O
A O
N
Ul
+J1
O
Elevation
J J J J J
O O
? O to O (n O
O
O
- -----------------------
O
-------------
m
O
O
O
-------------
n
O
O
O 001

0
N
O
W
O
O

N
O ------- ------
- - -- -- ----
O -- ----
---
J
O
W
O

O
O
O
J
J
O
O O
Ut
O
lT N
O
N
O
O
Elevation
J J J
O O N
O N O In O
O
O
TI.
O
m
O
J
O
--- ------- ---
O
O
n
O
i
O
O
N
------- ---------
O
O
0
N
O
W
O
O
N
O
m
O
J
O
- - ------------ --
O
O
----------- -------
O
O
J J
O O N
O N p In O
N

11
7

EDSEL PLACE STREAM RESTORATION
PROJECT
PRE-CONSTRUCTION BIOLOGICAL, CHEMICAL,
AND STREAM HABITAT ANALYSES
r AND
' POST CONSTRUCTION
GEOMORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION D
BIOENGINEERING MONITORING
COE # 200030332
'v
r
Submitted to:
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
401/Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Contact: Mr. John Dorney
[phone] .

1
Charlotte-Mecklenburg
STORM
WATER
Services .--
April 24, 2002
1
Prepared By:
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
2801 Yorkmont Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28208
1
Prepared For:
CITY OF CHARLOTTE STORM WATER SERVICES
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-2844
Contact: Mary C. Murray, P.W.S., Mitigation and Permitting Administrator
[phone]

CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration
LAW Project 30100-0-0369
April 24, 2002
"As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1

Purpose and Background .............................................................................................................1
Project Site ................................................................................................................................... 2
........................................................................................................................ 3
M r ` vertbra ..................................................................................................................... 3
'Fis 4....... ..........................................................................................................................4
abitat Assessment ....................................
Stream Geomo" hology ...............................................................................................................5
Bioengineeh ............................................................................................................................. 6
Water Quality ............................................................................................................................... 6
"AS-BUILT" MONITORING RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................ 7
Macroinvertebrates ...................................................................................................................... 7
Fish ............................................................................................................................................11
Stream Habitat Assessment .......................................................................................................11
Stream Geomorphology .............................................................................................................12
Bioengineering ...........................................................................................................................14
Water Quality .............................................................................................................................15
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................17
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Station B0710 - Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Results for Reference Reach ................. 7
Table 2: Station B0711- Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Results for the Test Reach .................... 8
Table 3: Station B0712 - Macroinvertebrate Monitoring Results for the Recovery Reach ............ 9
Table 4: Overall Macroinvertebrate Species List ..........................................................................10
Table 5: Fish Summary Data .........................................................................................................11
Table 6: Water Quality Index Ratings ...........................................................................................16
LIST OF FIGURES Follows page
Figure 1- Edsel Place Stream Restoration Cross Section, Longitudinal Profile and Monitoring
Station Map ........................................................................................ I
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Attachment B - Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection Pre-Construction
Stream Bioassessment Report
Attachment C - Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program Bioengineering Monitoring Report
Attachment D - LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. "As-Built" Geomorphologic
Characterization
Attachment E - Division of Water Quality Biological Tracking Form
ii
1
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
Introduction
I Purpose and Background
The City of Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) identified an unnamed tributary (second
order stream) to Briar Creek, in the vicinity of Edsel Place, for stream restoration due to
increasing problems of erosion-related damage to public and private infrastructure, loss of in-
stream habitat, floodplain encroachment, channel incision, bank erosion and periodic flooding.

For most of the channel length, the channel is confined by residential lots and a sanitary sewer-
line, both of which likely reduced the available floodplain and valley width required to
accommodate the flows from this channel. The channel is also adjusting laterally causing
impacts (erosion) to the adjacent land owners property, fencing, and revetment measures. As a
result of the erosion and degradation along this section of the channel, in-stream habitat quality is
poor. CSWS has acquired conservation easements along the tributary and established a 30 foot
vegetative buffer on both sides of the stream.
S
Ed
l Pl
tream
ace
se
The CSWS will monitor the progress and document success of the
Restoration Project. The monitoring plan includes monitoring of geomorphic characteristics,
biological-chemical-habitat characteristics, and vegetation/bioengineering survival over a five-
year period. Monitoring of the benthic macroinvertebrate community is being conducted as part
of the CSWS mitigation-monitoring plan as related to the Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
(Division of Water Quality [DWQ] # 99)3(8 and Corp of Engineers [COE] # 200030332). The
five-year period begins with a pre-construction event, continues with an in-construction year
(2000/2001) event and concludes with three consecutive years following the year in which
construction was completed (2001 - 2004). A summary of the monitoring plan and schedule is
provided as Attachment A.

This report contains results of pre-construction stream biological, habitat, and water quality
' chemical monitoring conducted in May of 2000 by the Mecklenburg County Department of
Environmental Protection (MCDEP), post-construction bioengineering monitoring performed by
Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program (HARP), and post-construction stream
geomorphology data conducted by Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW).
Refer to Attachment B for the monitoring report completed by MCDEP, Attachment C for the
1
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration
LAW Project 30100-0-0369
April 24, 2002
"As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
detailed summary of these data are presented in this report.
The goals of the Edsel Place stream restoration project are to provide flood relief, to reduce bank
erosion, and to improve in-stream habitat and water quality.
Project Site
The project is located in an urban residential area of eastern Charlotte. The project consists of
approximately 2,750 linear feet of perennial stream. The upstream limit of the project corridor is
Sudbury Road with the stream paralleling Edsel Place on the west. The contributing drainage
area for the project is approximately 0.56 square miles. The project area is roughly bounded by
Central Avenue to the south, Sharon Amity Road to the east, Shamrock Road to the north, and
Kilbourne Drive to the west (Figure 1). The USGS Topographic map that covers the project area
is Charlotte East.
2

J

1

CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
Methodology
Several stream biological and physical characteristics were evaluated for the Edsel Place Stream
Restoration Project. The following information describes the methods utilized to monitor the
aquatic macroinvertebrates, fish, stream habitat and geomorphology, bioengineering, and water
quality for the Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project.
Macroinvertebrates
The visible aquatic insects, worms, mollusks, arthropods and other invertebrates associated with
the substrates of freshwater are commonly called benthic macroinvertebrates. These aquatic
organisms are found in aquatic habitats including very small V and 2nd order perennial stream
systems. Monitoring of the benthic macroinvertebrate community is being conducted as part of
the CSWS mitigation-monitoring plan as related to the Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
(Division of Water Quality [DWQ] # 99Y8 and Corp of Engineers [COE] # 200030332).
CSWS and the MCDEP have selected three biological monitoring stations. The most up-stream
monitoring station serves as the reference reach (designated B0710) and is located at the Sudbury
Drive crossing (Figure 1). The second monitoring station serves as the test reach (designated
B0711) and is located at the end of the Early Court cul-de-sac. The third monitoring station
serves as the recovery reach (designated B0712) and is located at the end of Cole Drive, a private
road within the Aldersgate Retirement Center (MCDEP 2000, Attachment B).
The MCDEP utilized a modified form of the qualitative sampling method developed by the
Biological Assessment Unit of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR). The MCDEP's modified qualitative sampling method describes the use
of several collection techniques to obtain a representative sample of the benthic community
including kicks, sweeps, a leaf pack sample, and visual searches of rocks and logs. The collected
macroinvertebrates were identified to the lowest practical taxonomic level and tabulated as rare
(1-2 specimens), common (3-9 specimens) or abundant (? 10 specimens), (MCDEP 2000,
Attachment B).
For each monitoring station, taxa richness for the pollution intolerant groups Ephemeroptera,
Plecoptera, and Trichoptera were calculated and used to assign an NCDENR biological
3
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report'
(NCBI) value was calculated based on procedures written by Dave Lenat in 1993 (MCDEP
2000). "Taxa richness is assumed to be inversely related to the degree of stress, whereas biotic
indexes attempt to summarize information on the tolerance of the macroinvertebrate community"
(Lenat 1993).
Fish
The three biological monitoring stations described for benthic macroinvertebrates were also
sampled during the pre-construction event for fish. The structure and health of the fish
community is evaluated utilizing a modification of the NC Index of Biotic Integrity (NCIBI),
initially proposed by Karr (1981) and Karr, et al., (1986). The NCIBI analysis of fish provides a
cumulative assessment of the fish community by incorporating information about species richness
and composition, trophic composition, abundance, and fish condition. A total of 12 parameters or
metrics are used to derive scores that would be expected for streams in a specific river basin or
ecoregion. The scores for all metrics are summed to obtain the overall NCIBI score. This overall
score is used to determine the ecological integrity class as proposed by Karr (1986) (MCDEP
2000, Attachment B).
At each monitoring station, fish were collected using a backpack electroshocker within a 150 -
200 meter stream reach. Collected specimens that are easily identifiable were field identified,
measured to the nearest centimeter total length, and released. Other specimens were preserved in
10 percent formalin and laboratory identified. Sampling was conducted at these three monitoring
stations on May 30, 2000. Specimens were identified to species using Menhinick (1991),
(MCDEP 2000, Attachment B).
Stream Habitat Assessment
An evaluation of the pre-construction in-stream habitat and riparian zone quality was also
conducted by MCDEP. The Stream Habitat Assessment Protocols developed by CH2M-HILL
and MCDEP were used (MCDEP 2000). These protocols are similar to those developed by
Barbour and Stribling in 1994 and are found in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) protocols presented in the 1997 Revision to Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for use in
Streams and Rivers (MCDEP 2000, Attachment B).
r

0

CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration
LAW Project 30100-0-0369
April 24, 2002
"As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
An analysis of the aquatic habitat includes the following ten parameters:
1. Instream Cover for Fish
2. Epifaunal Substrate (benthic)
3. Embeddedness
4. Channel Alteration
5. Sediment Deposition
6. Frequency of Riffles
7. Channel Flow Status
8. Left and Right Bank Vegetative Protection
9. Left and Right Bank Stability
10. Left and Right Bank Vegetated Buffer Zone Width
Stream Geomorphology
Scientists from Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW) documented five
stream cross sections of the "As-Built" Edsel Place tributary for Rosgen Level I and Level II
characterization. A substrate pavement composition analysis for the purpose of identifying the
D16, D35, D50, D84, and D95 particle size was performed upstream, within, and downstream of
the Edsel Place tributary. In addition, a longitudinal survey was documented to identify the
stream's current pattern and profile characteristics using Rosgen Level II methods (Attachment D
and Figure 1).
The location of the five stream stationing cross sections are shown on Figure 1 and described as
follows:
• Cross Section 1 - located just downstream of Sudbury Road, station 26+25. No
improvements will be performed upstream of this reach.
• Cross Section 2 -located adjacent to 3400 Adkins Court, station 24+50.
• Cross Section 3 - located just upstream of Clardy Court, behind 3100 Edsel Place, station
17+20.
• Cross Section 4 - located downstream of Early Court, behind 2824 Edsel Place, station 4+50.
• Cross Section 5 - located downstream of Early Court at station 0-50. No improvements will
be performed downstream of this reach.

1
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration
LAW Project 30100-0-0369
April 24, 2002
"As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
The bioengineering efforts for the Edsel Place stream restoration project began on December 7,
2000 and were conducted by the Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program (HARP). Both
banks of the restored stream were live staked, using a total of ten species, from the top of the rip-
rap, or coir fiber logs, to the top of the stream bank. Live staking was completed on March 28,
2001. The riparian zone was planted on March 23, 26, and 27, 2001 with 45 container grown
trees and 16 bare root trees, comprised of two species, which were placed in random clusters. In
addition to woody species, approximately 1,225 herbaceous sedges were planted behind coir fiber
logs and around plunge pools (HARP 2002, Attachment Q.
On May 7, 2001, the first monitoring event was conducted of the riparian zone trees to establish a
base line for future monitoring. On October 2, 2001 a second monitoring event for the riparian
zone was conducted to determine survival after the first growing season, and to note any
problems with the live staking (HARP 2002, Attachment Q.
Water Quality
The MCDEP collected water samples at each of the monitoring stations on May 30, 2000. Field
parameters measured at the sites included conductivity, dissolved oxygen, pH, and water
temperature.
A water quality index rating (WQI) was generated for each station to determine overall water
quality conditions. The WQI method used was initially developed by Brown, et al. (1970) and
improved by Deiniger (1979) for the National Sanitation Foundation. The WQI index includes
the following parameters:
1. Fecal Coliform Bacteria - colonies/100ml 8. Total Solids - TS mg/L
2. pH in standard units 9. Dissolved Oxygen - DO ppm
3. Biochemical Oxygen Demand - BOD ppm 10. Nitrite - N02 ppm
4. Total Nitrate - N03 mg/L 11. Conductivity - COND l mhos
5. Total Phosphorus - TOT-P mg/L 12. Alkalinity - ALK ppm
6. Water Temperature - degrees Celsius 13. Ammonia - NH3 ppm
7. Turbidity - NTU 14. Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen - TKN ppm
6

C

1

CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration
LAW Project 30100-0-0369
"As-Built" Monitoring Results and Discussion
Macroinvertebrates
April 24, 2002
"As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
The MCDEP sampled macroinvertebrates for a baseline/pre-construction analyses of the Edsel
Place tributary on May 16, and 30, 2000. The collected macroinvertebrates were then
taxonomically identified to the lowest practical level and tabulated as rare (1-2 specimens),
common (3-9 specimens) or abundant (> 10 specimens). A taxa richness for the pollution
intolerant groups Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera were calculated and used to assign
an NCDEHNR biological classification (Excellent, Good, Good-Fair, Fair or Poor). Also a North
Carolina Biotic Index (NCBI) value was calculated. In addition, several invertebrate metrics
were incorporated in an effort to quantify the benthic community assemblages both spatially and
temporally. Tables 1 through 3 provide lists of macroinvertebrate species collected at the three
monitoring sites, as well as a summary of invertebrate metrics (MCDEP 2000, Attachment B).
Table 1: Station B0710 - Macroinvertebrate Pre-Construction Monitoring Results for
Reference Reach (May 30, 2000)
ORDER FAMILY GENUS/SPECIES TV NO. ABUNDANCE
Coleo tera Elmidae Stenelmis s pp. 5.10 1 Rare
Diptera Chironomidae Chironomus spp. 9.63 19 Abundant
Conchapelopia group 8.42 16 Abundant
Cricotopus bicinctus 8.54 1 Rare
Cryptochironomus spp. 6.40 1 Rare
Parametriocnemus lundbecki 3.65 1 Rare
Phaenopsectra spp. 6.50 1 Rare
Psectrotan us d ari 10.00 1 Rare
Di tera Simuliidae Simulium s pp. 4.00 32 Abundant
Di tera Ti ulidae Ti ula s pp. 7.33 6 Common
E hemero tera Baetidae Baetis intercalaris 4.99 17 Abundant
Limno hila Anc lidae Ferrissia s 6.55 1 Rare
Odonata Coena rionidae Ar is sedula 8.46 16 Abundant
Tricho tera H dro s chidae Cheumato syche s . 6.22 37 Abundant
Summary of Invertebrate Metrics:
Taxa Richness = 14 Biotic Index Value = 6.92 Bioclassification = FAIR
EPT Abundance NEpT = 20 % Tolerant Organisms = 46
Ephemeroptera Taxa = 1 % Hydropsychidae = 25
Plecoptera Taxa = 0 %Baetidae = 11
Trichoptera Taxa = 1 % Dominant Taxa = 25
EPT Index = .29 % Chironomidae = 36
`TV = Tolerance Value (Keterence NUOLNK, April avui)
7
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
indicates the Edsel Place tributary may be within a stressed ecosystem. The benthic community
at this site is predominately comprised of pollution tolerant taxa; midges Chironomidae, blackfly
larvae Simulium, and the filter-feeding caddisfly Cheumatopsyche (MCDEP 2000, Attachment
B).
The biological monitoring reference reach site has an overall low taxa richness with 46 percent of
the aquatic organisms found to be tolerant, i.e., a tolerance value of 8, 9 or 10. The MCDEP
reports the North Carolina Biotic Index value to be 6.92, with a site bioclassification of FAIR
(MCDEP 2000, Attachment B).
The test reach (B0711) also received a bioclassification of FAIR (Table 2). The MCDEP reports
the NCBI value. to be 7. 10, and a total taxa of 19 species (MCDEP 2000, Attachment B) .
Table 2: Station B0711- Macroinvertebrate Pre-Construction Monitoring Results for the
Test Reach (May 16, 2000)
ORDER FAMILY GENUS/SPECIES TV NO. ABUNDANCE
Diptera Chironomidae Chironomus spp. 9.63 11 Abundant
Conchapelopia group 8.42 12 Abundant
Cricotopus bicinctus 8.54 7 Common
Eukiefferiella claripennis 5.58 3 Common
Phaenopsectra spp. 6.50 1 Rare
Polypedilum convictum 4.93 5 Common
Psectrotanypus dyari 10.00 1 Rare
Zavre4rn is s pp. 9.11 1 Rare
Di tera Simuliidae Simulium s pp. 4.00 32 Abundant
Diptera Tipulidae Antocha spp. 4.25 1 Rare
Ti ula s pp. 7.33 6 Common
E hemero tera Baetidae Baetis intercalaris 4.99 26 Abundant
Iso oda Asellidae Asellus s pp. 4.20 1 Rare
Limno hila Ph sidae Ph Sella s pp. 8.84 3 Common
Odonata Coenagrionidae Argia spp. 8.17 11 Abundant
Ar is sedula 8.46 31 Abundant
Odonata Gom hidae Pro om hus obscurus 8.22 1 Rare
Trichoptera Hydropsychidae Cheumatopsyche spp. 6.22 37 Abundant
H dro syche betteni 7.78 1 Rare
Summary of Invertebrate Metrics:
Taxa Richness = 19 Biotic Index Value = 7.10 Bioclassification = FAIR
EPT Abundance NErr = 21 % Tolerant Organisms = 49
Ephemeroptera Taxa = 1 % Hydropsychidae = 11
Plecoptera Taxa = 0 %Baetidae = 16
Trichoptera Taxa = 2 % Dominant Taxa = 19
EPT Index =.21 % Chironomidae = 34
8
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
The test reach (B0711) is similar to the biologically monitored reference reach in that it is also
comprised of predominantly Chironomidae, Simulddae, and Cheumatopsyche spp. The overall
taxa richness at this site is slightly better than the upstream reference reach site (MCDEP 2000,
Attachment B).
The recovery reach (130712), received a slightly better Biotic Index Value of 6.30, and a
bioclassification of GOOD/FAIR (Table 3). This may be attributed to the slightly higher habitat
assessment score (MCDEP 2000, Attachment B).
1

t

Table 3: Station B0712 - Macroinvertebrate Pre-Construction Monitoring Results for the
Recovery Reach (May 16, 2000)
ORDER FAMILY GENUS/SPECIES TV NO. ABUNDANCE
Coleo tera Elmidae Stenelmis s pp. 5.10 1 Rare
Diptera Chironomidae Chironomus spp. 9.63 11 Abundant
Conchapelopia group 8.42 12 Abundant
Cricotopus bicinctus 8.54 7 Common
Cricotopus infuscatus group 9.04 7 Common
Cricotopus vieriensis group 4.35 4 Common
Eukiefferiella claripennis 5.58 7 Common
Paratendipes spp. 5.11 1 Rare
Phaenopsectra spp. 6.50 1 Rare
Rheosmittia spp. 7.00 1 Rare
Thienemaniella s pp. 5.86 2 Rare
Di tera Culicidae Anopheles s pp. 8.58 1 Rare
Di tera Simuliidae Simulium s pp. 4.00 32 Abundant -
Diptera Tipulidae Antocha spp. 4.25 7 Common
Ti ula s pp. 7.33 3 Common
E hemero tera Baetidae Baetis intercalans 4.99 36 Abundant
Iso oda Asellidae Asellus s pp. 4.20 1 Rare
Limno hila Anc lidae Ferrissia s pp. 6.55 1 Rare
Odonata Coenagrionidae Argia sedula 8.46 35 Abundant
Gom hidae Gom hus s pp. 5.80 1 Rare
Trichoptera Hydropsychidae Cheumatopsyche spp. 6.22 8 Common
H dro the betteni 7.78 3 Common
Summary of Invertebrate Metrics:
Taxa Richness = 22 Biotic Index Value = 6.30 Bioclassification = GOOD/FAIR
EPT Abundance NEvr = 16 % Tolerant Organisms = 31
Ephemeroptera Taxa = 1 % Hydropsychidae = 7
Plecoptera Taxa = 0 %Baetidae = 24
Trichoptera Taxa = 2 % Dominant Taxa = 24
EPT Index = .24 % Chironomidae = 30
There was a noticeable decrease in the abundance of Cheumatopsyche spp. for the recovery reach.
The larvae of this species of caddisfly construct catchnet structures to obtain suspended organic
particles in the water column. A reduction in numbers of Cheumatopsyche spp. may indicate a
h
9
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration
LAW Project 30100-0-0369
April 24, 2002
"As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
May 30, 2001 (Attachment B). Results for fecal coliform bacteria at the upstream reference reach
site were 7,900 colonies/100m1. Downstream at the test reach, fecal coliform values decreased to
6,600 colonies/100ml, and further decreased to 3,600 colonies/100ml at the recovery reach. This
represents a reduction in fecal coliform bacteria levels from the reference reach to the recovery
reach of 54 percent.
The majority of the benthic macroinvertebrate community at each site was comprised of pollution
tolerant organisms, including Chironomidae (Chironomus spp., Conchapelopia group and
Cricotopus infuscatus group), Tipula spp., Argia sedula, and the filter feeding Trichoptera
Cheumatopsyche spp. (Table 4) (MCDEP 2000, Attachment B).
Table 4: Overall Macroinvertebrate Species List
ORDER FAMILY GENUS/SPECIES Site B0710 Site B0711 Site B0712
Reference Test Recovery
Coleo tera Elmidae Stenelmis s pp. RARE ABSENT RARE
Diptera Chironomidae Chironomus spp. ABUNDANT ABUNDANT RARE
Conchapelopia group ABUNDANT ABUNDANT COMMON
Cricotopus bicinctus RARE COMMON COMMON
Cricotopus infuscatus group ABSENT ABSENT COMMON
Cricotopus vieriensis group ABSENT ABSENT COMMON
Cryptochironomus spp. RARE ABSENT ABSENT
Eukiefferiella claripennis ABSENT COMMON COMMON
Paratendipes spp. ABSENT ABSENT RARE
Parametriocnemus lundbecki RARE ABSENT ABSENT
Phaenopsectra spp. RARE COMMON RARE
Polypedilum convictum ABSENT RARE ABSENT
Psectrotanypus dyari RARE RARE ABSENT
Rheosmittia spp. ABSENT ABSENT RARE
Thienemaniella spp. ABSENT ABSENT RARE
Zavrelim is s pp. ABSENT RARE ABSENT
Di tera Culicidae Anopheles s pp. ABSENT ABSENT RARE
Di tera Simuhidae Simulium s pp. ABUNDANT ABUNDANT ABUNDANT
Diptera Tipulidae Antocha spp. ABSENT RARE COMMON
Ti ula s pp. COMMON ABUNDANT COMMON
E hemero tera Baetidae Baetis intercalaris ABUNDANT ABUNDANT ABUNDANT
Iso oda Asellidae Asellus s pp. ABSENT RARE RARE
Limnophila Ancylidae Ferrissia spp. RARE ABSENT RARE
Ph sidae Ph Sella s pp. ABSENT COMMON ABSENT
Odonata Coenagrionidae Argia spp. ABSENT ABUNDANT ABSENT
Argia sedula ABUNDANT ABUNDANT ABUNDANT
Gomphidae Gomphus spp. ABSENT ABSENT RARE
Pro om hus obscurus ABSENT RARE ABSENT
Trichoptera Hydropsychidae Cheumatopsyche spp. ABUNDANT ABUNDANT COMMON
H dro the betteni ABSENT RARE COMMON
10
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
Fish
The three biological monitoring stations described for benthic macroinvertebrates were also
sampled during the pre-construction event for fish. The structure and health of the fish
community is evaluated utilizing a modification of the NC Index of Biotic Integrity (NCIBI),
initially proposed by Karr (1981) and Karr, et al., (1986). The NCIBI analysis of fish provides a
cumulative assessment of the fish community by incorporating information about species richness
and composition, trophic composition, abundance, and fish condition. A total of 12 parameters or
metrics are used to derive scores that would be expected for streams in a specific river basin or
ecoregion. The scores for all metrics are summed to obtain the overall NCIBI score. This overall
score is used to determine the ecological integrity class as proposed by Karr (1986) (MCDEP
2000, Attachment B).
A total of four species, all pollution tolerant fish, were found at all three monitoring sites. Fish
(E
i
bl
)
k
h
b
k
fi
L
i
i
d
h
d
h
d
b
i
l
d
er
r
ongus
,
s aur
tus), cree
c
u
suc
myzon o
epom
reaste
sun
s
(
e re
-
nc
u
e
t
rosyside dace (Clinostomus funduloides) and the creek chub minnow (Semotilus atromaculatus).
The lack of fish diversity may be because the stream monitoring sites are very narrow and often
lack the deep pools that are required for a diverse fish community (MCDEP 2000, Attachment B).

Table 5: Pre-Construction Fish Summary Data (May 30, 2000)

SITE DATE TOTAL TAXA COUNT NCIBI BIOCLASSIFICATION
Reference: 5/30/00 4 77 32 POOR
Test: 5/30/00 4 116 30 POOR
Recovery: 5/30/00 3 117 26 VERY POOR/POOR
Stream Habitat Assessment
An evaluation of the pre-construction in-stream habitat and riparian zone quality was also
conducted by MCDEP. The Stream Habitat Assessment Protocols developed by CH2M-HILL
and MCDEP were used (MCDEP 2000). These protocols are similar to those developed by
Barbour and Stribling in 1994 and are found in the US Environmental Protection Agency
protocols presented in the 1997 Revision to Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for use in Streams
and Rivers (MCDEP 2000, Attachment B).

I 11
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
1 I
t
C
f
Fi
h 6
F
f
iffl
. ns
ream
over
or
s requency o
.
R
es
2. Epifaunal Substrate (benthic) 7. Channel Flow Status
3. Embeddedness 8. Left and Right Bank Vegetative Protection
4. Channel Alteration 9. Left and Right Bank Stability
5. Sediment Deposition 10. Left and Right Bank Vegetated Buffer Zone Width
Reference the MCDEP. report in Attachment B for the Habitat Assessment Worksheets completed
by MCDEP scientists on May 16 and 30, 2001. The reference monitoring site (B0710) received
the lowest of the three habitat scores. However, the test reach (B0711) and recovery reach
(B0712) had similar scores, 74.7 and 71.3, respectively. Bank vegetative protection and stability
scored very low on the reference reach site, compared with the test and recovery reaches.
Additional stream habitat surveys will be conducted of the "As-Built" stream restoration project
in May/June of 2002 through 2004 (Attachment A).
Stream Geomorphology
Scientists from Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW) documented five
stream cross sections of the "As-Built" (post-construction) Edsel Place tributary for Rosgen Level
I and Level 11 characterization. A substrate pavement composition analysis for the purpose of
identifying the D16, D35, D50, D84, and D95 particle size was performed upstream, within, and
downstream of the Edsel Place tributary. In addition, a longitudinal survey was documented to
identify the stream's current pattern and profile characteristics using Rosgen Level II methods.
(Attachment D and Figure 1).
Morphological stream characterization data was initially gathered to describe the project area and
determine appropriate restoration solutions. These investigations included the field identification
and measurements of stream characteristics, which indicate the degree of impairment such as
slope, bank height, vegetative cover, and quality of in-stream habitat. The determination of
impairment severity was based on comparisons of the impacted reach to the relatively stable
reaches within the project area and reference reaches downstream of the project site. Use of
empirical data of natural stream types as a means of assessing stream condition at the project site

12 1
t
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
was determined an inappropriate approach because the project watershed condition is in an
unnatural or urbanized state.
The pre-construction morphological characterization data below was obtained during field
struction channel dimensions and
o
P
KCI
KCI
I
h b
n
re-c
nc. (
).
,
y
analysis of the project reac
associated data were collected at multiple locations throughout the project corridor to evaluate the
dynamics of the system. The findings of KCI's pre-construction geomorphologic characteristics
are summarized as follows:

• Channel slope of 0.002 - 0.01 (ft/ft)
• Width/depth ratio of 5.1 (based on the field selection of a bankfull feature)
• Sinuosity and meander pattern is modified and unnatural
• The channel shape is roughly trapezoidal, characterized by 9 foot bottom width and 15 foot
top width
• The modeled bankfull discharge is approximately 100 cubic feet per second and
approximates just below the 1-year event

Based upon KCI's initial analysis, the project reach was characterized as a G5c stream type under
the Rosgen Classification System (KCI, Inc.).
The "As-Built" geomorphic analysis of the Edsel Place tributary for Rosgen Level I and Level II
characterization completed by LAW was conducted in June 2001. The five stream stationing
cross section data sets are shown in Attachment D and briefly described as follows:
• Cross Section 1 - located just downstream of Sudbury Road, station 26+25, NW of Sudbury
Road. Stream type is E4 with a calculated entrenchment ratio of 9.3. No improvements will
be performed upstream of this reach.
• Cross Section 2 - located adjacent to 3400 Adkins Court, station 24+50. Restored stream
type is E4 with a calculated entrenchment ratio of 2.3.
• Cross Section 3 - located just upstream of Clardy Court, behind 3100 Edsel Place, station
17+20. Restored stream type is E4 with a calculated entrenchment ratio of 5.3.
• Cross Section 4 - located downstream of Early Court, behind 2824 Edsel Place, station 4+50.
Restored stream type is E4 with a calculated entrenchment ratio of 2.6.

1 13
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
o improvements will
be performed downstream of this reach. The stream type is G4 with a calculated
entrenchment ratio of 1.6.
Bioengineering,
The Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program (HARP) conducted the post construction
bioengineering efforts for the Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project (HARP 2002, Attachment
Q. Both banks of the restored stream were live staked, using a total of ten species, from the top
of the rip-rap, or coir fiber logs, to the top of the stream bank. Live staking was completed on
March 28, 2001. The riparian zone was planted on March 23, 26, and 27, 2001, with 45 container
grown trees and 16 bare root trees, comprised of two species, which were placed in random
clusters. In addition to woody species, approximately 1,225 herbaceous sedges were planted
behind coir fiber logs and around plunge pools (HARP 2002, Attachment Q.
On May 7, 2001, the first post-construction monitoring event was conducted of the riparian zone
trees to establish a base line for future monitoring. On October 2, 2001 a second monitoring
event for the riparian zone was conducted to determine survival after the first growing season,
and to note any problems with the live staking (HARP 2002, Attachment Q.
Several problems were documented in the February 1, 2002 report prepared by HARP
(Attachment C, refer to Observations section). A heavy growth of grass on the eastern bank of
the creek could potentially result in less growth or death of the live stakes within the area. The
extent of any damage should be evident with the breaking of dormancy in the spring of 2002
(HARP 2002, Attachment Q.
Approximately seventeen invasive exotic plant species have been documented to be present
within the limits of the construction, or immediately adjacent to the site. The most noxious
species present on site are Kudzu (Pueraria lobata), and Japanese knotweed (Polygonum
cuspidatum). The other exotic species are not as noxious, but could become a problem (HARP
2002, Attachment Q. CSWS has initiated an invasive species management program to address
the exotic species problem (Mary Murray, pers. comm., April 23, 2002).

14 1

CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
Additional potential problems noted appear to be maintenance and vandalism issues. Contracted
crews that have no knowledge of the project have used weed-eaters (string trimmers) on
plantings, which may ultimately destroy some of the tree plantings. An occurrence of this was
noted at a plunge pool northwest of Early Court. Additionally, local youth have removed many
of the three foot stakes used to mark and number trees and live stakes are being trampled (HARP
2002, Attachment Q.
Four of the riparian zone trees out of 61 were documented to be dead at the time of the HARP
report. This is a survivorship of 93% at the end of the first growing season. One of the four dead
trees was girdled by a weed-eater (string trimmer), one was broken during the summer, and the
remaining two never leafed (HARP 2002, Attachment Q.
Water Quality
The MCDEP collected pre-construction water samples at each of the biological monitoring
stations on May 30, 2000. A water quality index rating (WQI) was generated for each station to
determine overall water quality conditions. The WQI method used was initially developed by
Brown, et al., (1970) and improved by Deiniger (1979) for the National Sanitation Foundation
(MCDEP 2000, Attachment B).

The WQI index represents water quality on a scale of 0 to 100 and explained as follows:
• A range of 0 - 15 represents VERY POOR water quality conditions;
• A range of 16 - 25 represents VERY POOR/POOR conditions;
• A range of 26 - 35 represents POOR conditions;
• A range of 36 - 45 represents POOR/FAIR conditions;
• A range of 46 - 55 represents FAIR (average) water quality conditions;
• A range of 56 - 65 represents FAIR/GOOD conditions;
• A range of 66 - 75 represents GOOD conditions;
• A range of 76 - 85 represents GOOD/EXCELLENT water quality;
• And a value ranging between 86 -100 is considered EXCELLENT water quality.
Water of a quality that is either GOOD or EXCELLENT is considered to support a high diversity
of aquatic life and is suitable for all forms of recreation. A stream with AVERAGE water quality
will exhibit signs of stress including reduced diversity of aquatic fauna, increased nutrients and
1 15
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
T-0-11-7 Sappuffg-a ery himited diversity of
aquatic fauna. Typically, streams with degraded water quality are experiencing pollution from
point and non-point sources and are located in highly urbanized locations (MCDEP 2000,
Attachment B). The WQI for the three monitoring stations are summarized in Table 6.
Table 6: Pre-Construction Water Quality Index Ratings (May 30, 2000)
SITE DATE WQI Water Quality Rating
Reference (130710) 5/30/00 61 FAIR/GOOD
Test (130711) 6/08/00 66 GOOD
Recovery (130712) 5/30/00 68 GOOD
The reference reach site (130710) scored a lower water quality rating of FAIR/GOOD as
compared to the test and recovery sites, which both scored a rating of GOOD. This lower result
may be attributed to the higher fecal coliform and BOD values (MCDEP 2000, Attachment B).
16

CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual Monitoring Report
References

City of Charlotte Storm Water Services. July 2000. Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project:
Mitigation Monitoring Plan.
P
k S
torm
ar
Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program. 2002. Enfield Road/Windsor
Drainage Improvements, Phase I: February 1, 2002 Bioengineering Monitoring Report,
prepared by John T. Soule.
KCI. Edsel Place Tributary of Briar Creek Watershed Study.
Lenat, D. R. 1993. A biotic index for the southeastern United States: derivation and list of
tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings. J. N. Am. Benthol.
Soc. 12(3):279-290.
Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection. October 2000. Edsel Place
Stream Restoration Project: Pre-construction Stream Bioassessment of a Briar Creek
Tributary, prepared by Tony Roux.
Murray, Mary, April 23, 2002, Personal Communication. Charlotte Storm Water Services,
r Charlotte, NC.

1 17
M

1

1
i

I

Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte Storm Water Services
DWQ #991368 / COE # 200030332
The Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project will serve as 1:1 mitigation crodit for one or
more Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) projects as agreed upon by and between
the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), US Army Corps of Engineers,
and CSWS on a project-by-project basis. CSWS will monitor the progress and success of
the Edsel Place Project as a stream restoration project and as compensatory mitigation.
The monitoring plan (Plan)- includes monitoring of geomorphic characteristics,
biological-chemical-habitat characteristics, and vegetation survival and will cover a five-
year period. The five-year period begins with a pre-construction event, continues with
the in-construction year and concludes with 3 consecutive years following the year in
which construction was completed. A summary of the Plan is provided in the attached
table and is further detailed in Sections 1.0 through 4.0 below.
1.0 Geomorphic Monitoring
The City of Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS) will perform geomorphic
monitoring of the Edsel Place channel to determine the stability of the channel cross-
section designed as part of the Edsel Place Restoration Project as well as to insure proper
maintenance of any degrading sections. The geomorphic monitoring will be
accomplished by establishing permanent cross-section locations and performing pebble
counts upstream, within, and downstream the restored reach. These cross-sections will
be surveyed immediately after construction and at least once a year for three consecutive
years. The cross-sections will be surveyed immediately following a storm event of
significant magnitude (1-year or greater storm event) as well as close to the anniversary
of the initial survey. Pebble counts will be performed at stream locations that roughly
correspond to the survey cross sections that will be established. The pebble counts will
be performed by using the Wohnan Method as outlined by Rosgen and will be conducted
on an annual basis beginning a year after construction is completed. Data sheets similar
to those presented by Rosgen will be used.
Five cross-sections will be established following construction for the Edsel Place Project.
Table 1 indicates the location and purpose of each cross-section to be established. The
proposed cross-section locations are shown on the attached drawing. _
Table 1• Cross-sections for Geomorphic Monitoring, Edsel Place
n
u

Cross-Section Location (station) Purpose
CS-1 Just downstream of
Sudbury Rd (26+25) To act as a control. No improvements will be
performed to this reach.
CS-2 Relocated Reach 4 To evaluate the stability of a relocated reach in
Page 1 of 3
1"
Y.
l;.
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte Storm Water Services
July 2000
e ocat each 3 To evaluate stability of a relocated reach in a
(17+50) loW shear stress area with coir fiber toe.
CS4 Downstream end of To evaluate stability of non-relocated reach near
project (4+50) end of project with rock and coir fiber toe.
CS-5 Just downstream of To evaluate the effect of project on downstream
project reach (0-50) reach's stability. _
2.0 Biological, Chemical, and Habitat Assessment Monitoring
The City of Charlotte will monitor the biological, chemical and habitat characteristics of
the Edsel Place channel to gain insight into the stream restoration techniques used and
their affect on the biological and chemical integrity of an urban stream as well as to
determine the success of the project as mitigation. All sampling and
analysis/identification for this project will be performed by Mecklenburg County
Department of Environmental Protection (MCDEP). Biological monitoring will include
fish and benthic macroinvertebrate analysis per the NCDWQ's standards. Monitoring of
the stream's water chemistry will include evaluation of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg
ambient monitoring suite, which includes pH, temperature, specific conductance,
dissolved oxygen, turbidity, biological oxygen demand (BOD), alkalinity, fecal coliform,
total suspended solids, total dissolved solids, total solids, ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, total
keijdal nitrogen, total phosphorus, and a select suite of metals (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, and 12
toxic). MCDEP's Habitat Assessment Protocol will also be implemented in the project
reach.
Three bio-them-habitat monitoring locations were chosen based on state guidance and
site conditions:
• upstream (the control/reference, correlates to Geomorphologic Monitoring Cross
Section 1 [Station 26+25] area located just downstream of Sudbury Road),
• within the project reach (representative of relocated area, located at Relocated
Reach 1 [Station 7+00], access from Early Court), and
• downstream of project (secondary control to evaluate effect of project on
downstream habitat and water quality, correlates to Geomorphologic Monitoring
Cross Section 5 [Station "0-50"1 area located just downstream of project, access
from Cole Drive at Aldersgate - Methodist Home Retirement Center)
These locations will be monitored annually beginning in May 2000 (pre-construction)
and resuming in May/June 2002 (post-construction, after complete growipg season and
construction recovery period) for 3 consecutive years.
3.0 Vegetation Survivability Monitoring
CSWS will perform vegetation survivability monitoring of the Edsel Place channel to
determine the success of the bioengineering methods and hardiness of the plant species
Page 2 of 3

' Mitigation Monitoring Plan Charlotte Storm Water Services
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project July 2000
used as well as to insure proper maintenance of any vegetation performing poorly. As
part of CSWS' contract with the Habitat Assessment Restoration Program (HARP) for
the installation of soil bioengineering materials on this project, the vegetation's survival
will be monitored, and replaced as necessary, by HARP.
Three plots (approximately 200 square feet each) will be established along the project
reach following the first growing season after construction. The vegetation within each
plot will be examined with respect to survival and health. The first two events will
examine survival of each live stake, shrub or tree planted as well as the percent cover for
grasses or ground covers. The subsequent two events will consist of examining the aerial
coverage for all vegetation types. A survivability goal of 80% will be used; mortality
greater than 20% will be replaced. Monitoring will occur in the late summer/early fall
(target September 1) of each year, starting the same year as the planting occurred. This
will allow for replanting, if necessary, of any portions of the bank that have failed over
the previous growing season. Photo-documentation will also be performed during each
event in order to show the typical conditions associated with the site. The photograph
stations will be identified during the initial event and will remain constant throughout the
monitoring period so that year-by-year comparisons can be made.
4.0 Reporting
Annual reports detailing the findings of our above-defined monitoring will be prepared
by CSWS and submitted to the NCDWQ beginning in December 2001 and continuing for
a total of 4 consecutive years (2001 - 2004). Each report will focus on the findings of
that year's monitoring as well as include a cumulative account of all monitoring to date.
r Any corrective measures performed, or needed, will be discussed and the success of the
project will be summarized. Each report will include supporting documentation such as
photographs keyed to a site plan and data forms.
r

1
Page 3 of 3
r

?y 4+
A 0i+ V
Aw V
a D
a
Qa?
0
???
o b OD
O Cc C
es
V
'd
W

t

y
44
c
O
? N
O
n O
N
w
0 C>
O -4 q
O
ell
.d O N O O O
y . O, N N

V N
•''
O O
a?

V a id
W (7"
'-4sP '
99
C V G ?

to `O
q. q

tt
00

R
i
N ' o
' v?
2
O O Q lot

t
U er"
o w
et ?„ r w
a `t
` w o
?
NM M N N
? M .-+
b

_ o
wC40 ?
v
.
m
Q O
C W)
+ +
+ 1-4 N v1
? CA C + OO
h a
a, ?
N N + 4 O 0 0 0 N n O ?C M

fA ? dJ ? ? ?
VJ ? V]
A ?a?A i
??A
H

d C/]
0
O
U
? v a°i v U
m
U
0 0
oU 0.a •
oa rx)y ?
°a,C4 a
C7 .
7 -0 Go >
L f

1

n

A
t
1
1
f
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
A?

EDSEL PLACE STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT:
PRECONSTRUCTION STREAM BIOASSESSMENT OF A BRIAR CREEK
TRIBUTARY
Prepared by Tony Roux
Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection '
S
October 2000
A
Ik

FIRS
Introduction
A tributary to Briar Creek which flows adjacent to Edsel Place was selected by the City of Charlotte
Storm Water Services (CSWS) as the site of a 401/404 permitted stream restoration project (Edsel
Place Stream Restoration Project). The stream is located in the in eastern .quadrant of the City of
Charlotte. The stream flows through a watershed dominated by high density residential development
(0.25 to 0.5 acre residential; Figure 1). The stream is currently experiencing severe bank erosion.
Construction of the stream restoration project is scheduled to begin in the Summer 2000.
The pre- and post-construction water quality and stream bioassessment (benthic macroinvertebrate
and fish) monitoring will be conducted by the Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental
Protection (MCDEP). Three sampling sites were selected by CSWS and MCDEP. One site, at
Sudbury Drive (site B0710), is located upstream of the project. A second site, at the end of Early
Court (site B0711), is locate near the middle of the project. The third site, B0712, is at a sewer line
crossing which is located at the end of Cole Drive, a private road located within the Aldersgate
Retirement Center. The third site is located downstream of the project.
Methods
The qualitative benthic macroinvertebrate sampling methods developed by NCDEHNR (Lenat 1988,
NCDEHNR 1997) and modified by MCDEP in the Mecklenburg County Stream Bioassessment
Operating Procedures (MCSOP) (MCDEP 2000) were used in this study. This method uses several
different collection techniques to collect a representative sample of the aquatic macroinvertebrate
community including kicks, sweeps, a,leaf pack sample and visual searches of rocks and logs. The
aquatic benthic macroinvertebrates collected were identified to the lowest practical taxonomic level
and tabulated as rare (1-2 specimens), common (3-9) or abundant (z 10).
Taxa richness for the pollution intolerant groups, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera,
(SEPT) were calculated and used to assign an NCDEHNR biological classification (Excellent, Good,
Good-Fair, Fair and Poor) to each site (Table 1). A North Carolina Biotic Index (NCBI) value
(Lenat 1993, NCDEHNR 1997, MCDEP 2000) was also calculated for each site (Table 2). Streams
with better water quality generally have higher EPT taxa richness values and lower NCBI values.
E

it
1
' Edsel Place Project Preconstruction Bioassessment October, 2000
TABLE 1. Bioclassification Criteria for EPT Taxa Richness Values for the North Carolina
Piedmont for both the Standard Qualitative and EPT Sampling Methods (Lenat
1988, NCDEHNR 1997).
d
Bioclassification Standard Method EPT Metho
Excellent > 31 > 27
Good 24-31 21-27
Good-Fair 16-23 14-20
r Fair 8-15 7-13
Poor 0-7 0-6

TABLE 2. Bioclassification Criteria for the North Carolina Biotic Index, after seasonal
correction, for the North Carolina Piedmont (Lenat 1988, NCDEHNR 1997).
Bioclassification Biotic Index Values
Excellent < 5.19
Good 5.19-5.78
Good-Fair 5.79-6.48
Fair 6.49-7.48
Poor >7.48
The fish sampling method developed by NCDEHNR for use with the North Carolina Index of Biotic
Integrity (NCIBI) (NCDEHNR 1997) and modified by MCDEP in the MCSOP (MCDEP 2000) were
used in this study. This method utilizes a backpack electroshocker within a 150 to 200-meter stream
segment to collect a representative sample of the fish in the stream. The fish collected were
identified to species and measured to the nearest cm total length individually.
The NCIBI assesses a stream's biological integrity by examining the structure and health of the fish
community (NCDEHNR 1997). The score derived from the NCIBI is a measure of the ecological
health of a stream and may not necessarily directly correlate to water quality. The NCIBI includes
information on species richness and composition, trophic composition, fish condition and fish
abundance calculated in 12 metrics as described by NCDEHNR (1997). NCIBI scores and biological
integrity classes are presented in Table 3. Streams with better water quality generally have higher
NCIBI scores.

>,

El"
TABLE 3. Bioclas sifcation Criteria for the North Carolina Index of Biotic Integrity Values
(NCDEHNR 1997).
Bioclassification NC IBI Values
Excellent 58 - 60
Good-Excellent 53 - 57
Good' 48 - 52
Fair-Good 45 - 47
Fair 40 - 44
Poor-Fair 35 - 39
Poor 28 - 34
Very Poor-Poor 23 - 27
Very Poor 12 - 22
No Fish < 12

An evaluation of the stream habitat and riparian zone quality was conducted at all three sites using
the Stream Habitat Assessment Protocols developed by CH2M-HILL and MCDEP (CH2M-HILL
2000). These protocols are similar to those developed by Barbour and Stribling (1994) and found
in USEPA protocols presented in the 1997 Revision to Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for use in
Streams and Rivers (Barbour et al. 1997).
Water samples and field measurements of stream conductivity, dissolved oxygen, pH and
temperature, were taken at each site. The water quality index (WQI) developed by Brown et al. ,
(1970) and improved by Deininger (1979) for the National Sanitation Foundation, was generated
from the water samples taken at each sample site. The WQI index includes the following nine
parameters: Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Dissolved Oxygen, Fecal Coliform Bacteria, pH,
Temperature, Total Nitrate, Total Phosphorus, Total Solids and Turbidity. The WQI index
represents water quality on a scale of 0 to 100 with 0-15 representing VERY POOR water quality;
16-25 VERY POOR/POOR water quality; 26-35 POOR water quality; 3645 POOR/FAIR water
quality; 46-55 FAIR (Average) water quality; 56-65 FAIR/GOOD water quality; 66-75 GOOD water
quality; 76-85 GOOD/EXCELLENT water quality; and 86-100 EXCELLENT water quality. Both
EXCELLENT and GOOD water quality streams support a high diversity of aquatic life and are
suitable for all forms of recreation. AVERAGE water quality streams exhibit signs of stress
including reduced diversity of aquatic fauna, increased nutrients and algal growth. POOR water
quality streams are experiencing water quality problems from point and nonpoint sources of
pollution and support a low diversity of aquatic fauna. VERY POOR water quality streams have
abundant water quality problems and may support only a limited number of aquatic organisms that
are very tolerant to pollution.
3 1

U. .-
Edsel Place Project Preconstruction Bioassessment October, 2000
Benthic macroinvertebrates and fish were sampled at all sites in May 2000. Water samples were
taken at all sites in May 2000. Water samples were retaken a site B0711 in June 2000 due to
sampling errors.
Results
Two EPT species and 14 total species where found at the upstream site, B0710 (Table 4). Three
EPT species and a total of 19 and 22.species were found at the middle site (130711) and lower site
r (130712), respectively. The majority of the benthic macroinvertebrates found at each site comprised
of pollution tolerant taxa, including tolerant chironomidae (Chironomus spp., Conchapelopia group
and Cricotopus infuscatus group.), Tipula spp., Argia sedula, and the filter-feeding trichoptera,
Chematopsyche spp. The benthic macroinvertebrate results give the upper two sites a North Carolina
Bioclassification of FAIR and the lower site a Bioclassification of GOOD/FAIR. The benthic
macroinvertebrate species list for each site is in Appendix 1.
Table 4. Benthic Macroinvertebrate Total Taxa Richness, EPT Taxa Richness, North
Carolina Biotic Index and Bioclassifications for the Edsel Place Stream
Restoration Stream Sites sampled in May April 2000.
I

Site Date Total Taxa SRPT NC Biotic Index Bioclassification
B0710 5/30/00 14 2 6.92 -FAIR
B0711 5/16/00 19 3 7.10
B0712 -5/16/00 - 3 6.30 t cze??
Four species of fairly pollution tolerant fish, including the sunfish Lepomis auritus and minnow
Semotilus atromacultus, were found at all three sites (Table 5). The upper two sites received NCIBI
scores of 32 and 30, giving these sites a Bioclassification of POOR. The lower site received a NCIBI
score of 26 and a Bioclassification of VERY POOR/POOR. The stream at the sampling sites was
narrow and lack the deep pools needed by the fish community. The fish species list for each site
is in Appendix 2.
The Water Quality Ratings based on the WQI values for the three stream sites were better than the
corresponding Bioclassification (Tables 4, 5 and 6). The three sites were rated as FAIR/GOOD and
GOOD. The raw water chemistry data is in Appendix 3.

4
C]

U o er, 2000
Table 5. Fish Total Taxa Richness, Number of Individuals Collected, North Carolina
Index of Biotic Integrity and Bioclassifications for the Edsel Place Stream
Restoration Stream Sites sampled in May April 2000.
Site Date Total Taxa No. Collected NC Index of Biotic Index Bioclassification--
B0710 5/30/00 4 77 32 POOR
B0711 5/30/00 4 116 30 POOR

Table 6. Water Quality Index Values (WQI) and Water Quality Ratings for the Edsel
Place Stream Restoration Stream Sites sampled in May 2000.
Site Date WQI Water Quality Rating
B0710 5/30/00 61 FAIR/GOOD
B0711 6/08/00 66 GOOD
B0712 5/30/00 1 68 GOOD
The stream site upstream of the Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project received an average Stream
Habitat Assessment score of 57 while the middle site received an average score of 74.7 and the lower
site received an average score of 71.3 (Appendix 4). The major problems observed with the stream
habitat at the three sites was a lack of good riffles and deep pools and a signification problem with
streambank erosion and sedimentation choking the stream bottom. Also, the stream flows through
a high density residential area and lacks a good canopy cover except for the lower site where a good
canopy cover exist. The habitat assessment results indicate that the stream is currently experiencing
some streambank erosion and streambed sedimentation negatively impacting the quality of the
instream habitat.
The benthic macroinvertebrate and fish communities found at each site are typical of the aquatic
communities found in developing watersheds where streambank erosion problems
5

r?

1

fl

t
I Edsel Place Project Preconstruction Bioassessment October, 2000
REFERENCES
Barbour, M. T., and J. B. Stribling. 1994. A technique for assessing stream habitat structure. In:
Conference Proceedings: Riparian ecosystems in the humid U. S.: Functions, values and
management. March 1993. Atlanta, Georgia. National Association of Conservation
Districts, Washington, D.C. pp. 156-178.
Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder and J. B. Stribling. 1997. Revision to Rapid
bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: Periphyton, benthic
macroinvertebrates and fish. EPA/841-D-97-002. United States Environmental Protection
Agency. Washington, D.C.
Brown, R. M., N. I. McClelland, R. A. Deininger and R. G. Tozer. 1970. A Water Quality Index --
Do we dare? Water and Sewage Works. 117: 339-343.
CH2M HILL. 2000. Technical memorandum: Mecklenburg County stream habitat assessment field
form and instructions. March 15, 2000. CH2M HILL. Charlotte, North Carolina.
Deininger, R. A. 1979. A Water Quality Index for rivers. In: III World Congress on Water
Resources - Mexico, 1979. International Water Resources Association. pp. 3542-3551.
Lenat, D. R. 1988. Water quality assessment of streams using a qualitative collection method for
benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 7:222-
233.
Lenat, D. R. 1993. A biotic index for the southeastern United States: Derivation and list of
tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings. Journal of the North
American Benthological Society. 12:279-290.
r,
Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental Protection. 2000. Mecklenburg County Stream
Bioassessment Operating Procedures. Charlotte, North Carolina.
' North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources. 1997. Standard
operating procedures, biological monitoring. Division of Environmental Management.
Raleigh, North Carolina.

6

N
E C L

v W N
N H N U- W O
m roX H OD C C
E U W G W°
o O
r
NQ'
Q
o ?Q dV ° °aC tm O
i Q
N
1fl tp ' W W w t C C
ON
U

O
NN
y O
OOw N
COC A ZSS::3 3t o

W
U
Q
J
CL
J
W
(n
0
W

r
s

Fz,?
I MACROINVERTEBRATE IDENTIFICATION SHEET
STREAM: BASIN 7 -.BRIAR CREEK LOG NO: 2000 -02590
BASIN BRIAR CREEK TRIG @ SUDBURY DR SURVEY DATE: 05/30/2000
:
LOCATION: B0710
TAXONOMIST: Anthony J. Roux
COLLECTORS: Anthony J. Roux Damn M. Peine
Lonnie N. Shull
ORDER FAMILY GENUS/SPECIES TV NO. ABUNDANCE

COLEOPTERA ELMIDAE STENELMIS SPP. 5.1 1 R
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CHIRONOMUS SPP. . 9.6 1
9 A
DIPT ERA CHI RONOMIDAE CONCHAPELOPIA GROUP -.8.3 .
16 A
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CRICOTOPUS BICINCTUS .8.5 1 R
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CRYPTOCHIRONOMUS SPP. 6.4 1 R
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE PARAMETRIOCNEMUS LUNDBECKI 3.6 1 R
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE PHAENOPSECTRA SPP. 6
5 1 R
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE PSECTROTANYPUS DYARI .
10.0 1 R
DIPTERA SIMULIIDAE SIMULIUM SPP. 4.0 32 A
DIPTERA TIPULIDAE TIPULA SPP. 7.3 6 C111,
EPHEMEROPTERA BAETIDAE BAETIS INTERCALARIS , 5:A 17 A:
LIMNOPHILA ANCYLIDAE FERRISSIA SPP. 6.6 1 R
ODONATA COENAGRIONIDAE ARGIA SEDULA &6 16 A
TRICHOPTERA HYDROPSYCHIDAE CHEUMATOPSYCHE SPP. 6.2 37 A -

TOTAL # ORGANISMS: 150
TOTAL TAXA: 14
TOTAL EPT: 2
SPECIES DIVERSITY: 2.9

METHOD: STD
BIOTIC INDEX:
WATER QUALITY RATING:
5 POOR

STREAM: BASIN 7 - BRIAR CF
LOCATION: 60711
TAXONOMIST: Lonnie N. Shull
COLLECTORS: Anthony J. Roux
Lonnie N. Shull
MACROINVERTEBRATE IDENTIFICATION SHEET
EK - - - - -- -
EY DATE: 05/16/2000
Derrick A. Harris
Craig M. Miller

i
1
ORDER FAMILY GENUS/SPECIES TV NO. ABUNDANCE
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CHIRONOMUS SPP. 9.6 11 A
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CONCHAPELOPIA GROUP 8.3 12 A
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CRICOTOPUS BICINCTUS 8.5 7 C
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE EUKIEFFERIELLA CLARIPENNIS 5.6 3 C
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE PHAENOPSECTRA SPP. 6.5 3 C
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE POLYPEDILUM CONVICTUM 4.9 5 C
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE PSECTROTANYPUS DYARI 10.0 1 R '
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE ZAVRELIMYIA SPP. 9.11 1 R
DIPTERA SIMULIIDAE SIMULIUM SPP. 4.0 20 A
DIPTERA TIPULIDAE ANTOCHA SPP. 4.2 1 R
DIPTERA TIPULIDAE TIPULA SPP. 7.3 10 A
EPHEMEROPTERA BAETIDAE BAETIS INTERCALARIS 5.0 26 A
ISOPODA ASELLIDAE ASELLUS SPP. ' 4.2 1 R
LIMNOPHILA PHYSIDAE FHYSELLA SPP. 8.8 3 C
ODONATA COENAGRIONIDAE ARGIA SEDULA 8.5 31 A
ODONATA COENAGRIONIDAE ARGIA SPP. 8.2 11 A
ODONATA GOMPHIDAE PROGOMPHUS OBSCURUS 8.2 1 R ,
TRICHOPTERA HYDROPSYCHIDAE CHEUMATOPSYCHE SPP. 6.2 18 A
TRICHOPTERA HYDROPSYCHIDAE HYDROPSYCHE BETTENI _ Z.8 _ 1 R--
TOTAL # ORGANISMS: 166 .' METHOD: STD
TOTAL TAXA: 19 BIOTIC INDEX:
TOTAL EPT: 3 WATER QUALITY RATING: 5 POOR
SPECIES DIVERSITY: 3.5

i
}
{ 1
1
MACROINVERTEBRATE IDENTIFICATION SHEET
STREAM: BASIN 7 - BRIAR CREEK LOG NO: 2000 -02595
BRIAR CREEK TRIB @ COLE DR SURVEY DATE: 05/16/2000
BASIN:
LOCATION: B0712 - Cole Dr in Aldersgate Retirement Center

TAXONOMIST: Anthony J. Roux
COLLECTORS: Anthony J. Roux Derrick A. Harris
Lonnie N. Shull Craig M. Miller
ORDER FAMILY GENUS/SPECIES TV NO. ABUNDANCE

COLEOPTERA ELMIDAE STENELMIS SPP
. 5.1 1 R
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CHIRONOMUS SPP. 9.6 1 R
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CONCHAPELOPIA GROUP 8.3 3 C
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CRICOTOPUS BICINCTUS 8.5 6 C
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CRICOTOPUS INFUSCATUS GR 8.8 7 C
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CRICOTOPUS VIERIENSIS GR 4.3 4 C

r DIPTERA
PTER CHIRONOMIDAE
RO
O
D
E EUKIEFFERIELLA CLARIPENNIS
T
D
P
SPP 5.6 7 C
DI
A CHI
N
MI
A PARA
EN
I
.
ES 5.1 1 R
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE PHAENOPSECTRA SPP. 6.5 1 R
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE RHEOSMITTIA SPP. 7.0 1 R
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE •THIENEMANIELLA SPP. 5.8 2 R
DIPTERA CULICIDAE ANOPHELES1SPP. 8.6 1 R
DIPTERA SIMULIIDAE SIMULIUM SPP. 4.0 22 A
DIPTERA TIPULIDAE ANTOCHA SPP. 4.2 7 C
' DIPTERA TIPULIDAE TIPULA SPP. 7.3 3 C
•• EPHEMEROPTERA. BAETIDAE BAETIS INTERCALARIS 5.0 36 "A
' ISOPODA ASELLIDAE ASEL US-SPP.. 4.2 1 R
LIMNOPHILA ANCYLIDAE FERRISSIA SPP. 6.6 1 R
ODONATA
D
T COENAGRIONIDAE
GOMPHIDAE ARGIA SEDULA
MPHUS SPP 8.5
5
8 35
1 A
R
ONA
O
A .
GO .
TRICHOPTERA HYDROPSYCHIDAE CHEUMATOPSYCHE SPP. 6.2 8 C
' TRICHOPTERA HYDROPSYCHIDAE HYDROPSYCHE BETTENI 7.8 3 C
TOTAL # ORGANISMS: 152 METHOD: STD
TOTAL TAXA: 22 BIOTIC INDEX:
TOTAL EPT: 3 WATER DUALITY RATING: 5 POOR
SPECIES DIVERS ITY: 3.4

I
ii
r?
11
LVV NV; CVVV ' V4,v"
STATION: B0710 BRIAR CREEK TRIB @ SUDBURY DR
BASIN: 7
LOCATION: 80710
TAXONOMIST: Anthony J. Roux
COLLECTORS: Anthony J. Roux
Lonnie N. Shull
Damn M. Peine
TOT
FAMILY - GENUS/SPECIES NO. WT LENGTHS
CATOSTOMIDAE ERIMYZON OBLONGUS 1 0 12(1)
CENTRARCHIDAE LEPOMIS AURITUS 32 0 3(3), 4(1), 5(3), 6(4), 7(3), 8(3), 9(5),
10(3), 11(4), 12(2), 15(1)
CYPRINIDAE CLINOSTOMUS FUNDULOIDES 1 0 6(1)
CYPRINIDAE SEMOTILUS ATROMACULATUS 43 0 6(1), 7(14), 8(9), 9(4), 10(7), 11(4), ,
12(3),13(l)
181 SCORE: 32 WATER QUALITY RATING: 7 POOR
7
LJ

FISH IDENTIFICATION SHEET ?V'
N SHEET
FISH IDENTIF ICATIO

LOG NO: 2000 -02545 SURVEY DATE: 05/30/2000
SITE: BASIN 7 BASIN 7 - BRIAR CREEK
STATION:
BASIN: ' B0711 BRIAR CREEK TRIB @ EARLY CT
7
LOCATION: 80711
TAXONOMIST: Anthony J. Roux
COLLECTORS: Anthony J. Roux
Lonnie N. Shull
Darrin M. Peine
TOT
FAMILY GENUS/SPECIES NO. WT - LENGTHS
CATOSTOMIDAE ERIMYZON OBLONGUS 4 0 11(3),15(l)
CENTRARCHIDAE LEPOMIS AURITUS 20 0 3(2), 5(2), 6(1), 8(2), 9(3), 10(4), 11(3),
12(1).14(l),15(i)
CYPRINIDAE CLINOSTOMUS FUNDULOIDES 8 . 0 5(1), 6(3), 7(2), 8(2)
CYPRINIDAE SEMOTILUS ATROMACULATUS 84 0 4(14), 5(26), 6(15), 7(8), 8(11), 9(7),
10(1), 11(2)

IBI SCORE: 30 WATER QUALITY RATING: 7 POOR

i

i
FISH IDENTIFICATION SHEET
LOG NO: 2000 -02547
STATION: 80712 BRIAR CREEK TRIB @ COLE DR
BASIN: ' 7
LOCATION: B0712 - Cole Dr in Aldersgate Retirement Center
TAXONOMIST: Anthony J. Roux
COLLECTORS: Anthony J. Roux
Lonnie N. Shull
Damn M. Peine
i
TOT
FAMILY GENUS/SPECIES NO WT LENGTHS
CENTRARCHIDAE LEPOMIS AURITUS 35 0 3(10), 4(3), 5(6), 6(3), 7(3), 8(1), 9(4),
11(2),13(l),14(1),16(l)
CYPRINIDAE CLINOSTOMUS FUNDULOIDES 1 0 7(1)
CYPRINIDAE SEMOTILUS ATROMACULATUS 81 0 2(2), 4(7), 5(27), 6(19) 7(8), 8(8), 9(2),
10(2), 11(6)
181 SCORE: 26 WATER QUALITY RATING: 8 VERY POOR-POOR
l
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
Habitat Assessment Worksheet: Riffle/Run Prevalent Stream
stream 800-T, Cf eeI rl L4F V- a Date 5 N-oo
Point of Assessment Par &j lir 4-
U
County AYdjSL" I U 4- - River Basin an A,.j b?-
Lau Long. coordinates
Assessor. l?• '??-?T 5 Assessor. a. 44t 11 er Assessor. s f
Habitat Parameter Score Habitat Parameter Score Habitat Parameter Score Avg.
1. Insvicam Cover (fish) f 1. Instream Cover (fish) 1. Instream Cover (fish) 3
2. Epifaunal Substrate
(benthic) 2. EpifaurW Substrate
(benthie) 2. Epifaunal Substrate
(benthic) ?3
3. Embeddedness 3. Embeddedness y 3. Embeddedness 3• b
4. Channel Alteration
1 S 4. Channel Alteration I q 4. Channel Alteration
`?4
Ja:6?
5. Sediment Deposition ter S. Sediment Deposition S. Sediment Deposition 3
6. Frequency of Riffles 3 6. Frequency of Riffles 6. Frequency of Riffles Y.33
7. Channel Flow Status 7. Channel Flow Status
q-
q 7. Channel Flow Status
?P
9:O
8. Bank Vegetative
Protection 8. Bank Vegetative Protection
LB

3 S. Bank Vegetative Protection
LB
RD Ra 3 RB -? 7• ??
9. Bank Stability
LB
?o 9. Bank Stability
LB a 9. Bank Stability 3 3 b?
RB ?G RB a RB -S 3.6-
10. Vegetated Buffer Zone
Width
LB
g 10. Vegetated Buffer Zane
Widttr
LB ?

I 10. Vegetated Buffer Zone
With
LB
U,.73
RB ?5- RB 3 RB 3 3. C 7-
Total Score: Total Score: Total Score:
P11515a7 MCC)EP NANTAMNAL PROT000SNAPPE FIELD FOAMS,000

Habitat Assessment Worksheet: Riffle/Run
Point of Assessment t Ld h L, r U L)f ,j e-
County PG h ui River Basin 0aaj S
Lat./ Long. coordinates
Assessor eta ?vl k?PAssessor. Assessor.
Habitat Parameter Score Habitat Parameter Score Habitat Parameter Score Avg.
1. lastteam Cover (fish) 1. lastream Cover (fish) 1. Instream Cover (fish)
2. Epifattnal Substrate
(benthic) 2. Epifaunal Substrate
(beathic) 2. Epifaunal Substrate
(benthic)
3• Embeddedness 3. Embeddedness 3. Etnbeddedness
4. Channel Alteration Q
i 4. Channel Alteration 4. Channel Alteration
5. Sediment Deposition S. Sediment Deposition S. Sediment Deposition
6. Frequency of Riffles a 6. Frequency of Riffles 6. Frequency of Riffles
7. Channel Flow Status S- 7. Channel Flow Status 7. Channel Flow status
8. Bank Vegetative
Protection
LB 8. Bank Vegetative Protection
LB 8. Bank Vegetative Protection
LB
RB RB RB
9. Bank Stability
LB
( 9. Bank Stability
LB 9. Bank Stability
LB
RB Z RB RB
10. Vegetated Butler Zone
Width
LB 10. Vegetated Buffer Zone i
Width
LB 10. Vegetated Buffer Zone
With
LB
RB RB RB
Total Scare: Total Score: ( Total Score:

n

PAIS16P MCDEP NAWAT1RMAL PROTOCOSWPE RELD FORMS.DOC

F
-- Habitat Assessment Worksheet: Riffle/Run Prevalent Stream
Stream ?"?a ?' aree- T. 6t.-A r?i Date -J 1(¢ Od
' c? f1-Iders w -i- ??mrnunt>L
Point of Assessment
County m 2n bwf River Basin 0-O bc,
LatJ Long. coordinates
Assessor. 4. Lo rf n n Assessor. u- It Assessor. t7 (A.
1
Habitat Parameter Score Habitat Parameter Score Habitat Parameter Score Avg.
1. Irntream Cover (fish) 1. lasn-cam Cover (fish) 1. lastteam Cover (fish) g ?
2. EpUaunal Substrate
(benthic) /
lP 2. Epifaunal Substrate
(bcnthic) 2. Epifaunal Substrate
(benthic)
(P
?(P
3. Embcddedness Z 3. Embeddedncss 2 3. Embecidedness Z a 3?
4. Channel Alteration 4. Channel Alteration 4. Channel Alteration 2 I' D
5. Sediment Deposition 3 S. Sediment Deposition 3 5. Sediment Deposition
3.a
6. Frequency of Riffles 3 6. Frequency of Riffles 6. Frequency of Riffles / V. 33
7. Channel Flow Start's 7. Channel Flow Status. 7. Cbannei Flow Status 3 A3
8. Bank Vegetative
Pros°°

S 8. Bank Vegetative Protection

3 8. Bank Vegetative Protection
LB

3
RB 7 RB Z RB 3 y. o
9. Bank Stability
LB
2 9. Bank Stability
LB
i 9. Bank Stability
LB
3...
a o
RB RB 2- RB 3' 2.o
10. Vegetated Butler Zone
Width
LB 10. Vegetated Buffer Zone
Width
LB ! 10. Vegetated Buffer Zone
Witham
(
r
?• 33
RB RB 9 RB (? a
Total Score: Total Score: Total Score:
P1151567 MCOEP MAWA7%9NAL PROTOOMAPPE FIELD FORMS.DOC
i O N
z E = It cy
v
,
O o 0
d
ch E o c`3 0
= C1 coo
z a. V V

N E 0 0 0
Z 0000
Q
_ (
X E D U) w
a
I
.
Q G
Q N O N O
O co O ?
O L
E T T T-
U !
?
O
p a o0
i
I
Q O N o
!
O
0
CO x0000
?
O
i T T
N 0)
,
,^ c .
-
T T T
H ?
G
V) co

a, o T T

w U
I- 11
m o o
0
E
H ooo
0 0)
M C M v a
0 E coo
(? O O
m a N V V

W
CR `-
L = r- r- co
GL
V
0 E o
°
U a
?c
om
3
L
U
ti co. M

?
T
LL
'
' 000
C W
d
U' Q M ? M
ooo
Q
W 0 C'4
i

` mmm i

m
m
J .D
F" a IU) o 0
v v v
Vr .C
Q CL v v v
W ?
Q v v v
Z n. 000
fl. T T
V v v
G. N N N
= a 000
CL a v v v
UQ
U Q I UQ?vv
v
U a v v v
W CL O O O
m OL I V 04 04 N
V V
Q n ooo
C1 000
m C. T- T T
1 V V V
M
< CL ! 000
a i v V v
,
Ca
m a v to v
T T
O-O
N a 0 6 0
v
r Oo f?
r 0 0
Q C O G
t0 ti
E
LL .-= o O
E ooo
U a 0000
H
Q 000
52 Q 0 o O
W ! O r-N
mm GOD
X
I
Y

Enfield Road / Windsor Park
Storm Drainage Improvements, Phase I
Job # 671-99-703

Bioengineering Monitoring Report

February 1, 2002

for

Christopher J. Estes, RLA
Charlotte Storm Water Services
s
?

by
John T. Soule, BA
Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program
' P.O. Box 655
Newell, NC 28126

I
Storm Drainage Improvements, Phase I
Monitoring Report
The bioengineering for the Enfield Road / Windsor Park Storm Drainage Improvements, Phase I,
was begun on 07 December 2000. Beginning at Early Court and continuing downstream and
upstream, both banks were live staked from the top of the rip-rap, or coir fiber logs, to the top of
the stream bank. From Clardy Court and continuing upstream the live stakes were installed
according to the planting plan prepared by US Infrastructure, Inc. Using ten (10) species, live
staking was completed on 28 March 2001. See table 1. The riparian zone was planted on March
23, 26, and 27, with 45 container grown trees and 16 bare root trees. These trees are comprised
of six (6) species. The species were randomly selected and distributed evenly within the riparian
zone. This zone was also planted with 44 container grown shrubs, comprised of two (2) species,
which were placed in random clusters. See table 2. In addition to woody species, about 1,225
herbaceous sedges were planted behind the coir fiber logs and around the plunge pools. The
double plunge pool just northwest of Early Court had additional plantings. See table 3.
On May 7, 2001, the first monitoring event was completed for the riparian zone trees to establish
a base line for future monitoring. See table 6. On October 02, 2001 a second monitoring event
for the riparian zone was conducted to determine survival after the first growing season, and to
note any problems with the live staking. See table 7. A walk through was also conducted on Jan
25, 2002.
Plant nomenclature follows the Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas, by Radford et al.
Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press, 1968.
Monitoring Methodology
Beginning at the southeast end of the project, each tree was given a three foot (3') stake with an
orange painted top and a number. Numbering began with one (1) and continued to 60 at the
northwest end of the project. One tree was missed on the initial numbering, so one (1) tree is out
of numeral sequence, resulting in a total of 61 trees. Each tree is monitored for condition and
measured for height and trunk diameter at six (6) inches above the ground.

fl

11

u
t

Observations
The first problem noted in May and October 2001 was a very heavy growth of grass on the
eastern bank of the creek. This dense cover competes with the live stakes and could potentially
result in less growth in this area or death of the stakes. The extent of any damage should be
evident with the breaking of dormancy in the spring of 2002. It would be hard to determine what
stakes have survived before spring, because a stake that appears dead during the dormant season
may have died back, and will do well the second year.
Another potential problem is in the form of grass maintenance. Contracted crews that have no
' knowledge of the project have used weed-eaters on plantings. The herbaceous material can
recover fairly rapidly, but the trees are usually destroyed by girdling. This occurred at the double
plunge pool just northwest of Early Court.
' Additional problems are in the form of exotic plant species. About 17 different invasive exotic
species have been noted as being present within the limits of the construction, or immediately
adjacent to the site. See table 4. The most noxious ones present on site are Kudzu (Pueraria
lobata), and Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum). The knotweed can be fairly easily
eliminated with persistence, however, established stands of Kudzu can take as much as 10 years
to eradicate.' It produces tuberous roots at its nodes that can extend to a depth of 12 feet 2 It is
believed that the few viable seeds that it produces are able to remain dormant in the soil for
several years 3 Most of the Kudzu at this site was removed during the process of stream
' reconstruction and grading for the housing development, however, the remaining stands have had
a year to recover and produce more roots and seeds. In addition to the stand of Kudzu adjacent to
Downing Street there four (4) other small patches along the stream, and the knotweed appears to
' be spreading. The other exotic species are not as noxious, but some are insidious and could be a
large problem before anyone is aware of what has happened. See map 1.
Scouring of the banks was observed in several places and may be a problem until sufficient
vegetation is established. Bankfull events may be more common within this drainage and could
be a contributing factor to the scour observed. Most scour appears to be in the riparian grass
zone where, in accordance with the planting plan, no live staking was installed. See map 1.
' Two (2) reconstructed. areas have banks that slumped significantly, however they appear fairly
stable at this time. Additional live staking in these areas may help prevent future slumping and
' Cherri L. Smith, Exotic Plant Guidelines, (Raleigh, North Carolina, Dept. of
Environmental and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Recreation, 1998), p. 79.
'Ibid. p. 79.
'Ibid. P. 79.

the opposite bank. See map 1.
Local youth playing along the streams have also cause some damage and may do more in the
future. Many of the three foot (3) stakes use to mark and number trees have been removed for
their enjoyment. Some trees have had their lateral branches removed, debris is finding its way
into the creek, and live stakes are being trampled. Unfortunately, this is a problem that will
never be within Storm Water Services control.
Some residences have dumped gravel and concrete slabs on the creek banks. This seems to be a
recurrent problem on many streams due to lack of understanding by the owners.
One outfall from apartments on the west bank is beginning to erode a small gully across the
hillside and floodplain. Some hard structures, bioengineering, or a combination of both may
need to be installed to prevent further erosion and prevent a head cut forming. See map 1.
Volunteers of bottomland tree species are fairly dense in some areas and may need to be thinned
in the future to prevent problems with tree density. Eight (8) species were noted at the October
monitoring event. See table 5.
Live Stake Species Used
I Common name Scientific name Used
Beauty-berry Callicarpa americana little
Button bush Cephalanthus occidentalis little
Coral-berry Symphoricarpos orbiculatus in patches
Cottonwood Populus deltoides little
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis in patches
Silky dogwood Cornus amomum much
Silky willow Salix sericea much, in patches
Southern Arrow-wood Viburnum dentatum little
Sweet Pepperbush Clethra alnifolia little
Virginia willow Itea virginica in patches
Table 1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Riparian Zone Species F
Common name Scientific name Form #'s
Green ash Fraxinus pensylvanica tree 15
Hackberry Celtis occidentalis tree 5
Red maple Acer rubrum tree 15
River birch Betula nigra tree 15
Silky dogwood Cornus amomum shrub 20
Southern Arrow-wood Viburnum dentatum shrub 24
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michauxii tree 5
Willow oak Quercus phellos tree 6
Table 2
Herbaceous Species Used
Common name Scientific name Location
Arrow arum Peltandra virginica Plunge pool
Cardinal flower Lobelia cardinalis Plunge pool
Pickerel weed Pontederia cordata Plunge pool
Red hibiscus Hibiscus coccineus Plunge pool
Soft rush Juncus effusus Creek bank, Plunge pool
Yellow iris Iris pseudacorus Plunge pool
Table 3
4
Common name Scientific name Area found Control
Blackberry Rubus sp. on site
Chinese Holly Ilex cornuta buffer, on site
Chinese privet Ligustrum sinense buffer, on site
Euonymus Euonymus sp. buffer
Groundsel-tree Baccharis halimifolia on site
Japanese grass Microstegium vimineum buffer, on site
Japanese honeysuckle . Lonicera japonica buffer
Japanese knotweed Polygonum cuspidatum buffer, on site of most concern
Kudzu Pueraria lobata buffer, on site of most concern
Morning glory Ipomea sp. on site
Multiflora rose Rosa multiora buffer
Nandina Nandina domestica buffer
Oregon grape Mahonia bealei buffer
Peak Pyrus communis on site
Privet Ligustrum japonicum buffer
Thorny elaeagnus Elaeagnus pungens buffer
Mimosa Albizia julibrissin on site
Table 4
5

1

D

. Woody Volunteers
Common name Scientific name
Sweet gum Liquidamber styracflua
Box elder maple Acer negundo
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis
Green Ash Fraxinus pensylvanica
Tag alder Alnus serrulata
Black walnut Juglands nigra
Red maple Acer rubrum
Table 5
Summery
With four (4) of the riparian zone trees out of 61 appearing dead at this time, survivorship is 93%
at the end of the first growing season. One of the four (4) dead was girdled by a weedeater early
in the season, one (1) was broken at the ground during the summer, and the remaining two dead
never leafed.
Also monitored for survival only were landscape plantings installed by another contractor. These
plantings consist of Wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), Bradford pear (Pyres calleryana `Bradford%
Green ash, River birch, Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), Green-leaf holly (Ilex opaca 'Green-
leaf), and Leyland cypress (Cupressocyparis leylandii). A total of 105 plantings were counted
on 25 January and all look good at this time except the Leyland cypress. Of the 57 Leylands
counted, 31 are either completely dead or in such bad shape that they were counted as dead.
6

>
?O
?0 d O
ID
Y N N
Q? v ? m ? o U o
$oo U a •? ? ? C m
'? o a o c
?o 0
a ?
coo
Q
o° <
? O
13-
G?? T o ? 0 0

?i
cd
C
a CO
ul O
• P, 0
?Q?
u?
o
4-1 GL; A O
o
0
0-P
U)
0 U3
3 z
a Q a a
° Q
o?
3 0 ?, o
O N?
v L) oil= 22
n ti
? ? Z ? d?
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Surveyed by: J.T. SOULE
Enfield Tree Monitoring
for
Charlotte Storm Water Services
Date of visit: 07 May 2001
Tree no. Species Hght(in) Calp(in) Source Tree no. Species Hght(in) Calp(in) Source
1 Ar 39 0.3 c 31 Ar 44.5 0.3 c
2 Ar 35 0.3 c 32 Ar 36 0.27 c
3 Co 15 0.15 br 33 Ar 28.5 0.21 c
4 Q 22 0.12 br 34 Co 12 0.11 br
5 Ar 37 0.34 c 35 Bn 75 0.65 c
6 Qm 25 0.21 br 36 F p 25.5 0.2 c
7 Qm 18 0.17 br 37 Bn 71 0.55 c
8_ Ar 41 .0.27 c 38 Q 29 0.23 br
9 Bn 65 0.67 c 39 Qm 32.5 0.22 br
10 Bn 72 0.63 c 40 Bn 77 0.66 c
11 F 41 0.34 c 41 Co 10 0.18 br
12 F 36 0.38 c 42 F 30 0.24 c
.13 Ar 39 0.34 c 43 F 32 0.27 c
14 F 30 0.33 c 44 F 30.5 0.32 c
15 Bn 77 0.65 c 45 Bn 78 0.66 c
16 Ar 41.5 0.3 c 46 Ar 31.5 0.27 c
17 Ar 34 0.35 c 47 Q AD 0 br
18 Qm 25 0.22 br 48 Bn 69 0.54 c
19 Co 16 0.18 br 49 Qm 34 0.18 br
*61 * Ar 41.5 0.26 c 50 F 31 0.31 c
20 Q 37 0.25 br 51 F 39 0.32 c
21 Bn 80 0.61 c 52 Ar 36 0.3 c
22 Bn 87 0.63 c 53 Ar 34 0.3 c
23 F 38 0.38 c 54 F 14 0.27 c
24 F 37 0.3 c 55 Ar 33 0.27 c
25 F 29 0.26 c 56 Bn 70 0.61 c
26 Bn 75 0.66 c 57 Bn 77 0.6 c
27 Q 35 0.22 br 58 Co 15 0.22 br
28 F 40 0.33 c 59 F 30 027 c
29 Bn 72 0.73 c 60 Q 29.5 0.16 br
30 Bn 70 0.58 c
Notes: Ar-Acer rubrum, Bn=Betula nigra, Qm=Quercus michauxii, Qp=Q. phellos,
Co=Celtis occidentalis, Fp=Fraxinus pensylvanica
c=Container plants from Cure Nursery AD=Appears Dead
br-Bare root plants from NC Forestry Service
*no*=out of numerical sequence Calp=Caliper at 6" from ground
Table 6
8
Enfield Tree Monitoring
for
Tree no . Species Hght(in) Calp(in) Source Tree'no. Species Hght(in) Calp(in) Source
1 Ar 39 0.442 c 31 Ar 48 0.538 c
2 Ar 36 0.457 c 32 Ar 42.5 0.472 c
3 Co 29.5 0.179 br 33 Ar 29.5 0.394 c
4 Q 22.5 0.157 br 34 Co 27.5 0.246 br
5 Ar 38 0.486 c 35 Bn 89 0.781 c
6 Qm AD 0 br 36 F AD 0 c
7 Qm 5 FD br 37 Bn 89 0.793 c
8 Ar 42.5 0.485 c 38 Q 28 0.264 br
9 Bn 88 0.861 c 39 Qm 32 0.245 br
10 Bn 76 0.695 c 40 Bn 92 0.8 c
11 F 31 0.4 c 41 Co 31.5 0.254 br
12 F 36.5 0.49 c 42 F 30.5 0.29 c
13 Ar 42 0.576 c 43 F 32.5 0.292 c
14 F 30 0.339 c 44 F 30.5 0.359 c
15 Bn 86 0.819 c 45 Bn 96 0.825 c
16 Ar 52.5 0.544 c 46 Ar 38 0.423 c
17 Ar 34.5 0.413 c 47 Q AD 0 br
18 Qm 25 0.265 br 48 Bn 82 0.663 c
19 Co. 29 0.225 br 49 Qm 34.5 0.309 br
*61 * Ar 42 0.428 c 50 F 32 0.425 c
20 Q 37, 0.279 br 51 F 39 0.397 c
21 Bn 97 0.794 c 52 Ar 36 0.437 c
22 Bn 106 0.83 c 53 Ar 34.5 0.4 c
23 F 38 0.437 c 54 F 16 0.178 c
24 F 37 0.327 c 55 Ar 33 0.432 c
25 F 29 0.253 c 56 Bn 79 0.743 c
26 Bn 87 0.908 c 57 Bn 101 0.867 c
27 Q AD 0 br 58 Co 35 0.33 br
28 F 40 0.369 c 59 F 31 0.347 c
29 Bn 92 0.867 c 60 Q 24 0.13 br
30 Bn 94 0.66 c
Notes: Ar-Acer rubrum, Bn=Betula nigra, Qm=Quercus michauxii, Qp=Q, phellos,
Co=Celtis occidentalis, Fp=Fraxinus pensylvanica
c=Container plants from Cure Nursery AD=Appears Dead
br-Bare root plants from NC Forestry Service FD=From Dieback
*no*=out of numerical sequence Calp=Caliper at 6" from ground
Table 7
9
CSWS Edsel Place Stream Restoration April 24, 2002
LAW Project 30100-0-0369 "As-Built" Annual,Monitoring.Report

E

1
i

i
i
i
i
1
1
1

1

LAwGmB
GROUP
June 29, 2001
City of Charlotte
Storm Water Services
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Attention: Ms. Mary C. Murray, P.W.S., Permitting and Mitigation Administrator
Subject: Stream Geomorphic Characterization (Task 3a)
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte Storm Water Services Project Number 671-99-703
Charlotte, North Carolina
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 16
Dear Ms. Murray:
Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW) is pleased to submit the enclosed information
regarding our Stream Geomorphic Characterization, within the project area (reference Figure 1: Cross
Section & Longitudinal Profile Map). Services were performed in accordance with the Agreement for
Unspecified Services between the City of Charlotte and LAW dated April 24, 2000, and as amended on
March 26, 2001 (Contract Number 00437). Our services included:
1. Installed five permanent stream cross sections utilizing ten 4 x 8 inch concrete cylinders as
permanent monuments;
2. Performing five stream cross sections of the "As-Built" Edsel Place tributary with photo-
documentation for Rosgen Level I and Level II characterization;
3. Performing an upstream, within, and downstream substrate pavement composition analysis
for the.purpose of identifying the D16, D35, D50, D84 and D95 particle sizes;
4. Performing a longitudinal survey to identify the stream's pattern and profile characteristics
using Rosgen Level II methods;
5. Performing photo-documentation of areas potentially in need of repair by CSWS.
The study area was defined in the Stream Restoration Plan for the proposed Enfield Road/Windsor Park,
Phase 1 Storm Drainage Improvements project, prepared by US Infrastructure, Inc., (December 1999), and
provided to LAW by Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS). A mitigation monitoring plan detailing the
location of the five stream stationing cross sections was provided to LAW on May 14, 2001 by CSWS.
These locations were described as follows:
a. Cross Section I - located just downstream of Sudbury Rd., station 26+25. No improvements
will be performed upstream of this reach.
b. Cross Section 2 - located adjacent to 3400 Adkins Court, station 24+50.
c. Cross Section 3 - located just upstream of Clardy Court, behind 3100 Edsel Pl., station 17+20.
d. Cross Section 4 - located downstream of Early Court, behind 2824 Edsel Pl., station 4+50.
e. Cross Section 5 - located downstream of Early Court at station 0-50. No improvements will be
performed downstream of this reach.
LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, inc.
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100 • Charlotte, North Carolina 28208
[phone] • Fax: [phone]
Serving the Charlotte area for over 50 years

? r. ..
City of Charlotte Storm Water Services
June 29, 2001
Page 2 _
TM-r-e-ga-rUs to the photo-documentation of areas that may require "spot repairs", please note the
following:
1. Approximately 15 linear feet (if) of coir fiber log appears to have been displaced along the
left bank just downstream of cross section 1, station 25+75 (LAW photographs 3 and 5).
2. Approximately 35 if of coir fiber log appears to have been displaced from both banks and is
entering the stream channel. This area is located just upstream of cross section 3, station
17+50 (LAW photographs 10 and 11).
In addition, LAW personnel performing the stream geomorphic characterization fieldwork found no
consistent bankfull indicators within the restored reach. The existing top of bank is therefore frequently
used to approximate bankfull elevations.
i

Attached please find the stream geomorphic characterization documentation of the five permanent cross
sections, three pebble counts, one longitudinal profile, and photo-documentation. Corresponding stream
characteristics from field measurements include bankfull width, mean depth, maximum depth, bankfull
cross sectional area, width/depth ratio, width of flood-prone area, entrenchment ratio, water surface slope,
sinuosity, and channel materials (particle size index).
We appreciate your selection of LAW for this project and look forward to assisting you further on this and
other projects. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Darrin..M. Peine Michael A. la o, P.W.S
Project Environmental Scientist Project Manag r
Richard B. Darling, C.E.
Principal
Environmental Scientist
MAI/RBD:dmp
Attachments: Figure 1
Stream Channel Classification (Level II) (6)
Longitudinal Survey and Profile (1)
Stream Channel Cross Sections (5)
Pebble Count Data (3)
Photographs (14)

f!
F

o ti
eQ
C
v
W
U
W
11W..
V
Q
z.
' i
o n
to . Q E ? LL L. LL
!

y
$y ri ?
o
1I y

?
c ? 2 0

O E D1
LL LL
0 { %
Ct ?
O
? d C

E r
s

m
L L
a ? a
C a1 Im
m
> m? ? n L C $? ' a ? O
m v

m
1 .3
LL LL

' . ?LL ?a?? ? ? mgr a
$ xC ? a
2
n -a
J J J O' a m w w a
- m
z m o
o 0

m
O
a
O
to.
O
a
x g }};;
J g
,-
-
.
s 0
O
O
f O °
m O . O O O _ o E
D _
FQ- R !-
MOlS1?L?Y/O /auu y ) -77190;

1
?
Y E

k
,

eoo ? oI ??
' za
? v
? E
o' b
? of
?
ff o of
LL
a E
O ,
to
.

m
s3, e ? ? m 'i

m ma ?
o`ao ?
y ?

ID 7 ^? m m
m c
m

gg C
m
Q
G O m
=
m co

O ..
a
? ? c
J D_,
O

Id /auw"l > 717<i 1/ I 1 t l 'rung;
0
?M
V
N
V
C
V
d

3
o-
?v?II ? o
ry v
of °m ?
0
Q c o O^
J
? Z
? o
w °
a
m
? J
C
°
? c
Y N
w
a ?
E Z ° Z
v a
m m J H O
s - I
E
? p
S 8 s`
n n $
c ?
x? ^¢ w= t? way ;a
w O ? o
3 g t=? _ a? g? y; p'?? H=m 1 T
F x ? v L o a p?S y .? n ,?` „
3 E a? N E v '6 G 4w-. Y S ?6 .^? ? aV-3 ,•c ?' z !q °
Gf j0 Y L? Q? u^ O ,32$ S? Zl
T Qa `" . U
v m
v ? v v ?
1 4 ?
9 Q
L
N v
'N S
C a ?
F IL LL
Q
3a ?
y t
a I
W $ ?
? a K
LL LL
z
C
a
o
? W
J
LL
n
4 m
L O
p m
AlrM
A
I
g 8
f
I
gqq
E m
m
m
7 C a
m C i m m?
m m ? W °
m y C L
N
J J ID
LL C
L m
C m 2 m m
m O m E E
¢ o m a w
LL ?;, W I€W
J
O ?o oo
0 0 0 ? E
7 )
W
J
U.
LL I
L
O
a?
LL LL LL_
LL LL LL
Irs
Y

m g

U a
_
o ?
VI W r
? m
C
xID
t

LL
L
w }
Y
m Y
A

ro

II C
m
CD

o 0
a

I
m
d x
ym b#
I U CL.
7 A J
y ;
m
m o a°
LL
i
LL LL ? j
LL - LL q
n
U g
d
N ?k
' kL
5 m
° o
_y m
30 ma
co O d
m ? m o Q0
> 0 K
O
U
m
y
m
3
mrn?
m
¢
n
o
o
a
O
m #
O °
y y
im
CD 0
J
'tot ? ? s
fA y C N J
m m m L y
L ?_ t
3 ? a m ? ?m
mom o;° ? ??
m
¢ Q m y
m a L L
0g0 m:ao
y$ y O O J O
ct: IL (L
O ?O OQ O ?QO O
1
E
_E .
E
E

a
N
g
_

E S
?
y

-T
O

O
v {? Y

ID
m

?? S7VRl:l]t71_I-'uur?y ?
swum

? ? w O
g r
C $ E
? - c 3 c C E
s NS ?
W _ g g LL S u
W J ti N dd Q v, M ^ G? .? O ^ g' J
O o $ a ° ? 8 f S //
c
b) $ f F £ B E
V € n ? 3 ? ? € R W
r-m
6 3f
Ys o ° wo `a ow° ?.s cL
.29
y x vE °€ as cs a
:
CA)
o L
c c ? E ? .Cu. ??? a?: eta i?-
_ ? a??i -? ug O F ? _ E E
? ? t ca ? r 3
W `
E ?
O d m ?. _
D5 o
W m 13- C

1

I Z
`o F...o a Q '. ? ? U
3 a ?;LL
m ,
a
Q ¢ d.
x x tt
. Q a K ? 3
LL LL
C 7
V

V 3
W

A

L

C _
?
W ? m c
a n0

v
Ip LL LL L
W
? m ? ?
N
• w ?
w " `m ?
W m r
m
J
LL J
LL _
L

LL

&
?

LL

L

rn >;
LL
L m
[c a S

m J

m
t
m
°? m Y
`, o ? W
E W
E
n 9 Q > O m N
W N
w
L
00

a
J
0,

..°.i
0
E
0
E

s

r" oo i
o m
A o
•m m
b m
a 2 [ C
S K m

i
j
SL
7
m ?
a
C
J
•O
c
m
O
Q
a
0
r
7 . J
W W O #
?mo aoi?
moo
a' R 0-
LL
LL r' O.
0
U
J
m
3
W
N
Q
? o
a v7
n m o ?
0 o ao ?
? rn o 'n
=' F
_ r
CL CC
a 'r
t
E
W W
W V5 N L
N
J a w
rJn?Jin ? ? __
? $ W m -
m N 3i .W.. m
kk W
W G
}. W ell,
W r,
: O II O s 0 d m Ci
NO c a9 p ? _` _'.
of 0 (2 (D
6 O O O "O
E
E

M
L
E

_
?
m
u
= CD

Y

v
W

m
r V

N
T

i
d
1 ?
r
V
qN
V
C
I?

3
cn $ c
00 0
cb m
c o 0
J
?* a z
v
W
W J
N
C
O
C7
Y 3 jj
W
O N
of
C
m .?
W
? W
Z Q W
E Z 2
W c '? d
U
f/J m J H -
I ?

m
I^?
xi
A?
?? g
Y =
F O
i vP M
m
J
m p
U ?
o ? E
N ?
W
C
W
? s
LL
S ?aS
S
Y
c
W
m
W
qq Z
y ? E O
e3
t
?O
Q
E
r
s
? g
F$
Q x
=o
z
E

N
? _ e
N ?
H

m =
R
b _

0

66
9 g S .-. ?

W
? Ci
O 3 Z 'q
:° L
0
4
g
? g FK ?' [
71
? p Z
•N ?b .
A? wo
E O
>C o ? g ? E
H n
_

c
G
4
F
ra
i
F
x
0 4
N $2
Q€
y f
L = t $
4
c W:
Imo
_- CQQfiS
J W$?
F
g
E _
r
v/
S

d'

E

?
zg ?

v?g L
}
r J
_, .y ? LL d LL LL LL
S at s Il
o
3 g S m r _ o.
LL - LL?
1 ? U ? ? m m O E°- % ; ?
N L_ ? ? m O d k
7 O ?? g f7 s
y?? r 3 uJ 'i ? LL
g 'i aim ? m n
> ro a .? v ° ` Co. COL °
gg?
EO?wV m -o '.z § i mam.'C
LL LL i W 3 m O Q C Y: y b m 1. LL = C
m i m m P W m OO m h $$$S N m
O a A 2 J c
`m m $ °? p
a W
W m C m
i t m p ¢
3
{Jy lJL J L m ?+ m p C l0 CU
IL Lt LL g3 O) rG p j i m r ) m m m m m m
LL= r m 9 - 2 Q g¢ £ Q m e N
Ly 7
? m 8Y m 1, +U m m ?L L J-
>o " m 0 c i E u ` J g n a o, o L a. 0
W W 7 C 0 g N fi Co h ? U J O
a J > d$ mm
L 'J J F m V g m O C D C ,'m0- O Y O
a o IO O x 3 3 J £ m m o a o o ti- p
m v o o m o o `? o a a C7 C C7 a0 ? 0 n g
p LL Cl- a J `m E s! <n
? ? o b o ¢ m m m F ,? F- I m m 0 H? F- 'a F- i- F H! H H
m m?io mm mom aaa¢ m oQ¢agaa? ?¢'giaq
3
? o
N O C
O ?
C
C
ii _ ..ml O
d
? F Z
v
m J
rn
m
c
0
O
3 m
o N
•= o
- M
3 u
W
? W
E Z
Z o
U
m J F

O
M
Y
o
J
O
s
m?
m
o °' o
m
0
N
U
i
S`JF?N.I ? P71 /'!ua'?l ?

V
i
x€
F
1 t
C
N
2
N

f7
- ? yF
V ? 00 6
QQQ G^1 _ ? ? €
I? E ? t? O ?

E S ? ? 3= E e
g w
?
Z

E E

?$ z e?
? m $ o
_? a o? •a? ?
o w
3
-
f $ a
:a E
o
a
a
°
v
i>_
_ p
s N m?
A= G
? =
? Ea ?„8
?
o `?
w
0a ?? e ?
? ?
c'ci_ y
Q ?ng?
@ QQ
Cl - G _ C1] r _ L

3
E
S
s
I ?
E
i
F €?
z?a
S q >
r1
U
8 ?S
E
g U
a i
Q
v
N
L
}
L I
?_

N y D. Q O
3 c? a I'LL LL LL LL U.
s

#
#

? x HI I

x x g
i

o c

Q o ; i c
13

C _ # m 4
y ?

# L ?
v
? m a o a? €
# h
#
b & F
¢
m
'
W
W § f
L o o s
o ` o. m B v) rn
LL.

u' LL TL
t m? a' t C

R ..
Q m
? -M
ad
3 3 m
g
,
PPP;m
,
x
W W ¢ m C
J yJ W? ry N
LL
h m
V
m r? m
t? may c
N 0I l0? _
10 ? O
C
m S
Y
C rn
C
?•ti
I
L i LL LL
W A
p r
W
Q
m
G.
L m Y l0 l0 _i V J m m a L L o
a
:ma mom E
m
1
- E °m
?` ° v)kma
c-
p m m
J
°
c p
m LL
-
v
Q d
JJ J
w
c
c 3
m # a m
c
m
o v c
%
$
a
o
0
n a p p p m c
Om a s a J- C -? L f --
O O o u d ¢¢a c? m
`n - O O C7 i a°
_

.2 m m m m m §v
LL' R G' C' cr ? ro
= a R
QQ - -
1
_ .A r a/CY?IVIG lauuvy l
NU9.L7Vd /wiuny. ) /

It iii 1 /: uun??
771

? c
0
?ryI
0
I
g
- 0
cc

Q J
r

w -

J
m

°
C

V
_

V

C

ti
m co

++

y

a ?

i Lu LA
W

a 2
Z
Z °

p
m U
J
F-
E
E`
E

c - M
N

v. W
C
- C u

?
o
o
m

a,

i Ci
0

J _
-
° U.
r
v°i
ry
.i
c ?
yy
3

s ? s
M O d. V 00 G =
V N M? 14
;•

E
» E
E

g` 8
f R r

°

»
?
E 99
tt
? B Y C _
» p AR
: ? O c
Y h?

x ? ? : ° ? d a F' c '9 r
A ? v e cs q€ ww ?,°? _
LTJ
--6 q X
g o x.
- Q
g
r
-
X C ?.. ° Y a N ? E _ a r =

N
C

1rTJ,?
E-
Q
L
I?
v J
dQ ''O {? gf? U
m?
g
a
I m f0
m X
1Q 'W
a°
W LL LL
h
V
W
W
W a s

W

LL
LL
LL
ILL W
g J
&W
LL
K
? o. o m
o Ro
? ¢
?
= J
a O
o as J
O
a J
O
a
0
m p
? d o ,
K K cc

O
V
C
v
m
w
I
b
W
A
t ? 7 y
I n N ?Y
I m mpC
? C W
7 mm?q??
W ., O
m ?
? m
m ?
Lrn >' ? O
(D
= j m 1.
C W r
W E E
m w w
o _o
o m E
' m -

_ ? e L
Z 7
D F g N

x° S
W p
r ?°

a y o
_
W

C ? q
m
LL ?, ?- LL dz m
n
? o
L m 3 h

? m
y L
S ?
r W
co
y 3
m ?_
m
c
g
m m
m
§
J ? ? N
m
? 2 ? O1 ¢ Q
J c

C a ° i d
7
?
'` W a °

&
yYY o
?

J n
U
s ?'? m m
°o O fit
° ?
K O
a
O O a? '? a
$ gggg
O
o
W
W h 3 F m x m p h R F

a ca
.I'71 _C6'dlanurr?,? .
37LI0;

0
U L 3
W - D
j J ti Y
m W m y
j? m t V C
po m 0 ..-1r
m m m @ N ?,
m ??t o
ca
m o
c L O O
C7 c7 a° a°
O O O QO O
E
E.:
c c

v.
N
rn
O
G
° p
LC1

? O
0
z
o ? o

2 N 9
n

3
? c
O1 m - S,
a° LL w i w u
v ?
W °
Q ?' S
W
C , n
~ d N I? N
g -
,
` E g

a z ? - ? s
E

e
?
8 8
$ ¢ o

4.
S
S
- p
g
? a
A
?, 3 r ?g a= m E a?
_ L a ?? € a x 3 € _? ? a$ "r

g x
s
°
4
'D
? `nL.' ?
F 2 'O E
C C
o f LL a '
F
P. g` ?
_- W a
a i6

3
m as !]

3 x '
F #? o
a?
y W
A
_ c
W .o
m w v' ; n=
? E a - 5 s
C w t_ 5 _ E = C° - g gg
U - t - - G i - L - J - -
l
Z
E Z ° Z
fn ° F (-j

LL L u
? g

V Y
a i? W a i

G ? ? a n 4

s"
a
? $

E
R s` r h1
v
g
R E
g
?
ew
F

p_

xa a
z

J
A 2 -? 4 r `!7

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
Edsel Place Longitudinal Survey
Survey Team: D. Peine, B. Lcatherland
Survey Date: 6111/01
STA 4 _ HI }.. ... v F E
3.54 708.93 BM, center ofmanhole
712.47 at road's edge
0.0 Riffle at cross section]
16.0 4.76 707.71 TOD Pool
9.12 703.35 WS
9.36 703.11 DMAX
9.81 702.66 Pmax
24.6 4.03 708.44 TOD Riffle
9.21 703.26 WS
9.50 702.97 DMAX
29.8 4.04 708.43 TOD Pool
9.99 702.48 WS
10.52 701.95 DMAX
34.0 10.93 701.54 Pmax
51.2 5.32 707.15 TOD Riffle
10.06 702.41 WS
10.22 702.25 DMAX
61.8 5.78 706.69 TOD Run
10.14 702.33 - WS
10.34 702.13 DMAX
73.9 5.34 707.13 TOD Riffle
10.19 702.28 WS
10.34 702.13 DMAX
78.5 5.32 707.15 TOD Pool
10.28 702.19 WS
10.49 701.98 DMAX
83.5 10.73 701.74 Pmax
109.3 5.69 706.78 TOD Riffle
10.33 702.14 WS
10.58 701.89 DMAX
8.74 703.73 IB
1235 5.94 706.53 TOB Riffle
10.30 702.17 WS
1054 701.93 DMAX
8.66 703.81 IB
123.5 6.25 706.22 TOD Pool
10.40 702.07 WS
10.59 701.88 DMAX
126.9 10.84 701.63 Pmax
131.9 6.26 706.21 TOD Riffle
10.44 702.03 WS
10.62 701.85 DMAX
135.5 6.29 706.18 TOD Pool
10.58 701.89 WS
10.75 701.72 DMAX
138.4 11.10 701.37 Pmax
146.0 6.58 705.89 TOD Run
10.63 701.84 WS
10.84 701.63 DMAX
9.05 703.42 1B
158.2 6.88 705.59 TOD Pool
10.64 701.83 WS
10.99 701.48 DMAX
162.0 11.31 701.16 Pmax
179.4 7.13 705.34 TOB Riffle
10.60 701.87 WS x-section 2
10.88 701.59 DMAX
181.7 7.36 705.11 TOD Pool
10.75 701.72 WS
11.29 701.18 DMAX
183.4 11.30 701.17 Pmax

ST Z In, ° < p It ?r ??}lfli ?tt1R'. iiini f ATU
3.54 708.93 BM, center of manhole
712.47 at road's edge
196.8 7.23 705.24 TOD Riffle
10.78 701.69 WS
10.96 701.51 DMAX
9.47 703.00 IB
202.8 7.19 705.28 TOD Run
10.78 701.69 WS
10.93 701.54 DMAX
233.3 7.58 704.89 TOD Riffle
10.85 701.62 WS
10.94 701.53 DMAX
240.0 7.6 704.87 TOD Run
10.89 701.58 WS
11.16 701.31 DMAX
8.61 703.86 IB
251.1 7.26 705.21 TOD Riffle
10.86 701.61 WS
11.11 701.36 DMAX
253.4 7.26 705.21 TOD Pool
11.05 701.42 WS
11.42 701.05 DMAX
255.6 11.49 700.98 Pmax
269.9 9.55 702.92 Ex. 8" DIP (23+50)
278.0 7.52 704.95 TOD Riffle
11.03 701.44 WS
11.18 701.29 DMAX
300.3 7.92 704.55 TOD Run
11.65 700.82 WS
11.92 700.55 DMAX
k fiat,, Surface .Th.1
16.0 707.71 703.35 703.11
24.6 708.44 703.26 702.97
29.8 708.43 702.48 701.93
51.2 707.15 702.41 702.25
61.8 706.69 702.33 702.13
73.9 707.13 702.28 702.13
78.5 707.13 702.19 701.98
109.5 706.78 702.14 701.89
1235 706.53. 702.17 701.93
123.5 706.22 702.07 701.88
131.9 706.21 702.03 701.83
135.5 706.18 701.89 701.72
148.0 705.89 701.84 701.63
158.2 70559 701.83 701.48
179.4 705.34 701.87 701.59
181.7 705.11 701.72 701.18
196.8 705.24 701.69 701.51
202.8 705.28 701.69 701.54
233.3 704.89 701.62 701.53
240.0 704.87 701.58 701.31
251.1 705.21 701.61 701.36
253.4 705.21 701.42 701.05
278.0 704.95 701.44 701.29
300.3 704.55 700.82 700.55
Cha-l Pr?rlr

Top of Bank 0.01 t 1 1.1 It
Water Surface 0.0089 0.89
Thahye 0.0090 0.90
---f'un inpn S_ n r?
BM = Benchmark
BS = Backsight
CMP = Conugated Metal Pipe -
DIP = Ductile iron pipe
DMAX = Maximum Depth (Thahyeg) '?...
ELEV = Elevation _N
EOW =Edge of Water
Ex. = existing -''
FS = Foresight - '
HI = Height of Instrument
IB = Inner Berm . -
LBIS = Left Break in Slope
LBKF = Left Bankfull
LEW = Left Edge of Water
LIB = Left Inner Berm
LTOB = Left Top of Bank
PMAX = Maximum Pool Depth
RBIS = Right Break in Slop:
RBKF = Right Bankfull
RCP - Reinforced Concrete Pipe
REW = Right Edge of Water
RIB = Right Inner Berm
RTOB = Right Top of Bank
STA > Station (Horizontal ft.)
TBM = TI mporary Benchmark
THAW = Thah\'eg
TOD =Top of Bank
WS = Wamr Cuh rE
Riffle Slope 0.15 0.008 0.020 0.002 0.050 0.039 0.065 0
0.006 0.083 0.028
Av riffle slope 0.041
Pool Slop: 0.010 0.003 0.002 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.002
0.001
Av Pool slope 0.004

F

o ? 3
C F s
L
0
0
M
O
Vl
N
t
0
^1.4
W
?I
Colo
Q
V
A
^I
V
W
O
O
N
bQ
..r
O
i+
C?
O
O
O
h
O
O oo t- 110 v1 t1' M N O
O O O O O O O O O O
(•;j) u0111Unaja

bite Da'aw,
Stream: Edsel Place
Watershed Area: 476.34 acres (0.74 sq. miles)
River Basin / Sub-basin: Catawba / Briar Creek
Site Location: Station 26+25, NW of Sudbury Road
County: Mecklenburg, NC
Survey Team: B. Leatherland, D. Peine
Date: 6111/01
Feature: Cross-section 1

1
1
1
1
IM,
Iffi, Ill V (i) 'W0lft:5
3.54 708.93 BM-I,SSMH
712.47
0.0 4.05 708.42 left monument
4.0 3.91 708.56
10.0 3.78 708.69
15.0 3.61 708.86
20.0 217 710.20
25.0 2.90 709.57
30.0 2.49 709.98
35.0 2.71 709.76
37.4 3.17 709.30
38.2 3.76 708.71 LTOB
38.6 5.58 706.89 LBKF 706.89
39.5 8.75 703.72 LEW 706.89
43.2 8.76 703.71 706.89
46.8 9.04 703.43 DMAX 706.89
49.9 8.86 703.61 REW 706.89
53.1 5.58 706.89 RBKF 706.89
58.9 2.41 710.06 RTOB
64.0 1.97 710.50 right monument
1
Channr•I G"nietry ... i
Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Area (sq. ft.)
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.4 1.4 0.3
0.9 3.2 2.0
3.7 6.3 17.6
3.6 6.4 22.8
3.1 6.6 20.1
3.2 6.5 20.9
5.8 3.2 27.9
20.7 11 l.7

S
a. U r,
Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Area (sq. ft.)
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.9 3.2 1.4
3.7 3.2 11.7
3.6 3.5 12.0
3.1 3.3 10.4
3.2 0.0 5.2
14.5 40.8
Edsel Place Stream Restoration - Cross-section 1
714
712
710
w
c 708
> 706.
d
W 704
702
700
20
BM = Benchmark
HI = Height of Instrument
TOS = Toe of Slope
RBKF = Right Bankfull
LBKF = Left Bankfull
IB = Inner Berm

REW = Right Edge of Water Prepared by:
LEW = Left Edge of Water Checked by:
DMAX = Max. Depth (Thalweg) Modified by:
BIS = Break in Slope
RTOB = Right Top of Bank
LTOB = Left Top of Bank
DMP 06/18/01
BLL 06/28/01
Ch n-h Calculations
Area (sq. ft.) 111.7
Width (ft.) 20.7
Max Depth (ft.) 6.6
Mean Depth (ft.) 5.4
Bank'rCil-I. i""ns
Area (sq. ft.) 40.8
Width (ft.) 14.5
Max Depth (ft.) 3.5
Mean Depth (ft.) 2.8
W/D Ratio 5.2
Bank Height Ratio 1.9
FPA Elevation 710.35
FPA Width 135.0
Entrenchment Ratio 9.3
Stream Type E
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Stationing (ft.)
site
Strea
m:
_ e5
vee asin / Sub-basin: Catawba / Briar Creek
Site Location: Station 24+50, SW of Adkins Court
County: Mecklenburg, NC
Survey Team: B. Leatherland, D. Peine
Date: 6/11/01
Feature: Cross-section 2
NMI I0i III S- E%, (ft. FS : nnkf 41
3.54 708.93 BM-I,SSMH
712.47
0.0 6.67 705.80 left monument
5.0 6.51 705.96 FP
10.0 6.76 705.71
12.7 6.88 705.59 LTOB
15.0 7.31 705.16
20.0 8.33 704.14
23.7 9.16 703.31 LBKF 703.31
25.0 9.42 703.05 703.31
28.0 10.19 702.28 703.31
31.0 10.63 701.84 LEW 703.31
32.0 10.70 701.77 703.31
33.5 10.86 701.61 DMAX 703.31
34.7 10.64 701.83 REW 703.31
37.6 10.93 701.54 703.31
40.0 8.75 703.72 RBKF 703.31
42.7 6.80 705.67 right monument

3.54 BM, Closed

709
707
705

c 703

d 701

W
699
697
695
ren sq. ft.)
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.3 0.1 0.1
5.0 0.5 1.5
3.7 1.5 3.8
1.3 2.4 2.5
3.0 2.6 7.5
3.0 3.4 9.0
1.0 3.8 3.6
1.5 3.9 5.8
1.2 4.1 4.8
2.9 3.8 11.5
2.4 4.1 9.6
2.7 2.0 8.2
30.0 67.8
MENEM
Width (ft.) Viiill&II G?q'rq
Depth (ft.) ?Lry P1SIy.
Area (sq. ft.)
0.0 0.0 0.0
1.3 0.3 0.2
3.0 1.4 2.6
3.0 1.9 5.0
1.0 2.0 1.9
1.5 2.1 3.0
1.2 1.9 2.4
2.9 2.2 5.9
2.4 0.0 2.6
16.3 23.6
Edsel Place Stream Restoration - Cross-section 2
(sq. ft.) 67.8
h (ft.) 30.0
Depth (ft.) 4.1
t Depth (ft.) 2.3

Area (sq. ft.) 23.6
Width (ft.) 16.3
Mean Depth (ft.) 1.4
W/D Ratio 11.3
FPA Elevation 705.8
FPA Width 37.7
Entrenchment Ratio 2.3
Stream Type E
0
BM = Benchmark
HI = Height of Instrument
TOS = Toe of Slope
RBKF = Right Bankfull
LBKF = Left Bankfull
IB = Inner Berm
tsdK-i Pmu-h
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Stationing (ft.)
REW = Right Edge of Water Prepared by: DMP 06/18101
LEW = Left Edge of Water Checked by: BLL 06/28/01
DMAX = Max. Depth (Thalweg) Modified by:
BIS = Break in Slope
RTOB = Right Top of Bank
LTOB = Left Top of Bank
t
' Sif e>rsciption
Stream: Edsel Place
Watershed Area: 476.34 acres (0.74 sq. miles)
River Basin / Sub-basin: Catawba / Briar Creek
Site Location: Station 17+20, SW of Clardy Court
County: Mecklenburg, NC
Survey Team: B. Leatherland, D. Peine
Date: 6/11/01
Feature: Cross-section 3

3.12 702.08 BM-2, SSMH
705.20
0.0 5.02 700.18 left monument
5.0 5.35 699.85
10.0 6.02 699.18
15.0 6.40 698.80
20.0 6.79 698.41
23.2 6.93 698.27 LTOB/LBKF 698.27
26.0 7.82 697.38 698.27
27.0 8.45 696.75 698.27
28.7 9.38 695.82 LEW 698.27
30.1 9.90 695.30 Dmax 698.27
31.5 9.36 695.84 REW 698.27
32.2 8.54 696.66 coir roll 698.27
35.0 7.77 697.43 698.27
37.0 7.25 697.95 698.27
37.8 6.93 698.27 RBKF 698.27
42.0 5.13 700.07 right monument

3.12 BM, closed

Cbannd Geometry
Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Area (sq. ft.)
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.8 0.0 0.0
1.0 0.9 0.4
1.7 1.5 2.0
1.4 2.5 2.8
1.4 3.0 3.8
0.7 2.4 1.9
2.8 1.6 5.7
2.0 0.8 2.5
0.8 0.3 0.5
14.6 19.5
W ,.
n??tET? tf1..1 ??tll, ty "3
Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Area (sq. ft.)
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.8 0.0 0.0
1.0 0.9 0.4
1.7 1.5 2.0
1.4 2.5 2.8
1.4 3.0 3.8
0.7 2.4 1.9
2.8 1.6 5.7
2.0 0.8 2.5
0.8 0.3 0.5
14.6 19.5
Edsel Place Stream Restoration - Cross-section 3
704
702
w 700
c 698
d 696
694
692
690
Channel Cakulations
Area (sq ft.) 19.5
Width (ft.) 14.6
Max Depth (ft.) 3.0
Mean Depth (ft.) 1.3
)ti t''rifFf? ulations ?..
Area (sq. ft.) 19.5
Width (ft.) 14.6
Max Depth (ft.) 3.0
Mean Depth (ft.) 1.3
W/D Ratio 10.9
FPA Elevation 701.2
FPA Width 77.5
Entrenchment Ratio 5.3
Stream Type E
- Terrain
- Bankfull
U IU tJ GV G7 7V JJ •fV 9J
Stationing (ft.)

BM = Benchmark
HI = Height of Instrument
TOS = Toe of Slope
RBKF = Right Bankfull
LBKF = Left Bankfull
IB = Inner Berm
St- - 1A.1
REW = Right Edge of Water Prepared by:
LEW = Left Edge of Water Checked by:
DMAX = Max. Depth (Thalweg) Modified by:
BIS = Break in Slope
RTOB = Right Top of Bank
LTOB = Left Top of Bank
DMP 06/18/01
BLL 06/28/01
Edsel Place
Watershed Area: 476.34 acres (0.74 sq. miles)
River Basin / Sub-basin: Catawba / Briar Creek
Site Location: Station 4+50, N of Early Court
County: Mecklenburg, NC
Survey Team: A. Karagosian, D. Peine
Date: 6114/01
Feature: Cross-section 4
WAMM W=

4.01 now=

702.66 1??

BM4, SSMH
R
706.67
0.0 8.88 697.79 left monument
5.0 10.18 696.49
10.0 11.64 695.03
13.0 12.44 694.23 Flood prone
15.0 12.75 693.92
20.0 13.10 693.57
21.8 13.29 693.38 LTOB 693.38
23.8 15.42 691.25 back of bench 693.38
25.4 15.97 690.70 LEW 693.38
27.6 16.05 690.62 Dmax 693.38
29.4 16.01 690.66 REW 693.38
29.7 15.72 690.95 toe of rip-rap 693.38
32.0 15.12 691.55 back of bench 693.38
35.0 13.98 692.69 693.38
36.5 13.29 693.38 RTOB 693.38
40.0 11.34 695.33
44.0 9.28 697.39 right monument

4.01 BM, closed

699
697
695
693
691
689
687
685
0
BM = Benchmark
HI = Height of Instrument
TOS = Toe of Slope
RBKF = Right Bankfull
LBKF = Left Bankfull
)B = Inner Berm
{b?n?e1 Geometr
Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Area (s q. ft.)
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1 2.1 2.2
1.6 2.7 3.8
2.2 2.8 6.0
1.8 2.7 4.9
0.3 2.4 0.8
2.3 1.8 4.9
3.0 0.7 3.8
13.3 26.4
(i r rj
Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Area (sq. ft.)
0.0 0.0 0.0
2.1 2.1 2.2
1.6 2.7 3.8
2.2 2.8 6.0
1.8 2.7 4.9
0.3 2.4 0.8
2.3 1.8 4.9
3.0 0.7 3.8
13.3 26.4
Edsel Place Stream Restoration- Cross-section 4
Prepared by:
PEW = Right Edge of Water Checked by:
LEW = Left Edge of Water Modified by:
DMAX = Max. Depth (Thalweg)
BIS = Break in Slope
RTOB = Right Top of Bank
LTOB = Left Top of Bank
DMP 06/18/01
BLL 06/28/01
annel Qn cu 60us
Area (sq. ft.) 26.4
Width (ft.) 13.3
Max Depth (ft.) 2.8
Mean Depth (ft.) 2.0
OUNNUM V-.1
Area (sq. ft.) 26.4
Width (ft.) 13.3
'Max Depth (ft.) 2.8
Mean Depth (ft.) 2.0
W/D Ratio 6.6
FPA Elevation 696.1
FPA Width 35.0
Entrenchment Ratio 2.6
Stream Type E
S-. - rural FI-A.
5 10 IS 20 25 30 35 40 45

Jile. ?`aa tiort
Stream: Edsel Place
Watershed Area: 476.34 acres (0.74 sq. miles)
River Basin / Sub-basin: Catawba / Briar Creek
Site Location: Station 0-50, NW of Edsel Place cul-de-sac
County: Mecklenburg, NC
Survey Team: A. Karagosian, D. Peine
late. 6/14/01
Feature: Cross-section 5

2.42
699.03 - NOT);5
BM-4 SSMH
701.45
0.0 7.54 693.91 left monument
5.0 9.60 691.85 LTOB
6.3 10.33 691.12 LBKF 691.12
8.9 . 11.55 689.90 BIS 691.12
9.1 12.35 689.10 LEW 691.12
13.0 12.36 689.09 channel 691.12
17.4 12.38 689.07 Dmax 691.12
18.5 12.36 689.09 REW 691.12
19.0 10.33 691.12 RBKF 691.12
19.4 8.63 692.82 RTOB
24.5 7.95 693.50
30.0 8.16 693.29
35.0 7.91 693.54
38.1 7.83 693.62 right monument

2.42 BM, closed

I
1
i
I
,pta`rCOmei r,
Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Area (s q. ft.)
0.0 0.0 0.0
1.3 1.0 0.6
2.7 1.7 3.5
0.2 2.9 0.5
3.9 3.7 12.9
4.4 3.7 16.4
1.1 3.8 4.1
0.5 3.7 1.9
0.4 1.7 1.1
14.4 41.0
Edsel Place Stream Restoration - Cross-section 5
cn?oacl calcul>,fiua}
Area (sq. ft.) 41.0
Width (ft.) 14.4
Max Depth (ft.) 3.8
Mean Depth (ft.) 2.8
BfM I<<;YVfil '" -
Area (sq. ft.) 21.6
Width (ft.) 12.8
Max Depth (ft.) 2.0
Mean Depth (ft.) 1.7
W/D Ratio 7.5
Bank Height Ratio 1.4
FPA Elevation 693.2
FPA Width 21.0
Entrenchment Ratio 1.6
Stream Type G
699
697 - ---- -
695 -----
693 - -
691 - - -- ------
689 --
687 -- - -
685
0 5 10 IS 20 25 30 35 40 45
' BM = Benchmark
Hl = Height of Instrument
TOS = Toe of Slope
RBKF = Right Bankfull
LBKF = Left Bankfull
IB = Inner Berm

Strc+m- EJscl Nnm.ris
REW = Right Edge of Water Prepared by:
LEW = Left Edge of Water Checked by:
DMAX = Max. Depth (Thalweg) Modified by:
BIS = Break in Slope
RTOB = Right Top of Bank
LTOB - Left Top of Bank
DMP 06/18/01
BLL 06/28/01
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project June 2

Charlotte Storm Water Services _
-
ountData
mm ` Particles in Riffles Particles in Pools No. of Particles CUM. Cumulative %
Silt/Clay: 0-0.062 3 3 6 6 6%
Sand: 0.062 - 0.125 3 2 5 11 11%
0.125-0.25 2 4 6 17 17%
0.25-0.5 1 3 4 21 21%
0.5 - 1 1 3 4 25 25%
1-2 1 5 6 31 31%
Gravel: 2-4 2 3 5 36 36%
4-5.7 2 3 5 41 41%
5.7 - 8 3 4 7 48 48%
8- 11.3 4 2 6 54 54%
11.3-16 2 1 3 57 57%
16 - 22.6 3 2 5 62 62%
22.6 - 32 2 2 4 66 66%
32 - 45 1 3 4 70 70%
45 - 64 2 3 5 75 75%
Cobble: 64 - 90 3 2 5 80 80%
90 - 128 3 3 6 86 86%
128 - 180 2 2 4 90 90%
180 - 256 1 3 4 94 94%
Boulder: 256 - 362 2 1 3 97 97%
362 - 512 0 1 1 98 98%
512-1024 1 1 2 100 100%
1024 - 2048 - - 0 100 100%
Bedrock: bedrock - 0 0 100 100%
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0
Plot of Edsel Place Tributary Up-Stream
Pebble Count Data
N Vn - V 00 ?O N t w ' N w
O N ?
v1 N [? ? N
O M `D ?
N N P O
O
- L M N
6 o
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
No. of Particles
--*--Cumulative %
Prepared by:
Checked by:
DMP 06/18/01
BLL 06/28/01
Stream - Edsel PlaceAs

Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte Storm Water Services
Pehhle Count Data
June 22, 2001
LAW Project 30100-0-0369
Size (mm) Particles in Riffles Particles in Pools No. of Particles cum. Cumulative %
Silt/Clay: 0-0.062 3 5 8 8 8%
Sand: 0.062 - 0.125 2 3 5 13 13%
0.125-0.25 1 2 3 16 16%
0.25-0.5 - 1 1 17 17%
0.5-1 2 2 4 21 21%
1-2 2 4 6 27 27%
Gravel: 2-4 3 2 5 32 32%
4 - 5.7 2 1 3 35 35%
5.7 - 8 3 2 5 40 40%
8 - 11.3 3 3 6 46 46%
11.3-16 2 3 5 51 51%
16 - 22.6 2 2 4 55 55%
22.6 - 32 4 4 8 63 63%
32 - 45 1 2 3 66 66%
45 - 64 2 1 3 69 69%
Cobble: 64 - 90 1 2 3 72 72%
90 - 128 3 3 6 78 78%
128 - 180 7 7 14 92 92%
180 - 256 1 1 2 94 94%
Boulder: 256 - 362 1 1 2 96 96% ,
362 - 512 1 1 2 98 98%
512- 1024 - - 0 98. 98%
1024 - 2048 - - 0 98 98%
Bedrock: bedrock - 2 2 100 100%
Plot of Edsel Place Tributary Pebble Count Data
16
14
12
10
0.
w• 8
0
L
6
Z 4
2
0
100%
80%
c
a,
U
60% y
a
d
40%
0
E
20% U
0%
00
N - 7 00 ?p M N - ^? V
O 'n N tr ' N N
N MI No. of Particles
C N O N a, 022 M N
o ° -*-Cumulative %
Particle Size (mm)
Prepared by: DMP 06/18/01
Checked by: BLL 06/28/01
Stream - Edsel PlaceAs
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte Storm Water Services
June 22, 2001
LAW Project 30100-0-0369
s - articles in Pools No. of Particles CUM. Cumulative %
r t/Clay: 0-0.062 3 3 6 6 6%
Sand: 0.062 - 0.125 4 2 6 12 12%
0.125-0.25 2 3 5 17 17%
0.25-0.5 3 3 6 23 23%
0.5 - 1 2 2 4 27 27%
1-2 2 3 5 32 32%
Gravel: 2-4 2 2 4 36 36%
4-5.7 2 3 5 41 41%
5.7 - 8 3 2 5 46 46%
8 - 11.3 2 2 4 50 50%
11.3-16 3 5 8 58 58%
16 - 22.6 3 2 5 63 63%
22.6 - 32 4 3 7 70 70%
32 - 45 5 2 7 77 77%
45-64 3 1 4 81 81%
Cobble: 64 - 90 2 2 4 85 85%
90 - 128 2 3 5 90 90%
128 - 180 1 1 2 92 92%
180 - 256 2 3 5 97 97%
Boulder: 256 - 362 0 1 1 98 98%
362 - 512 1 0 1 99 99%
512 - 1024 0 0 0 99 99%
1024 - 2048 1 0 1 100 100%
Bedrock: bedrock 0 0 0 100 100%
Plot of Edsel Place Tributary Down Stream
9 Pebble Count Data
s
d 7
i 6
a, 5
0 4
L
d
3
0 2
Z
1
0
N In v 00 2 N

O N
O 7 ? N 0
N M

? vl
O N l?
M
vl
? N
? Vj N
O N_ - N O, LO ?O
M V
N
O O
Particle Size (mm)
Prepared by:
Checked by-
100%
d
80% ?
C
v
v
60% y
a
d
40%
0
20% D
U
0%
No. of Particles
Cumulative %
DMP 06/18/01
BLL 06/28/01
Stream - Edsel Place.xls
Charlotte Storm Water Services - Edsel Place Stream Restoration LAW Project 30100-0-0369

¦

n

Charlotte 4tnmi W itpr Cara iro > I AI PI??A cr o? r r: in`k' pro;.,,.. in inn n n? 9
Charlotte Storm Water Services - Edsel Place Stream Restoration LAW Project 30100-0-0369

I
1P11
I

1

1

1

??
Charinfte Stnnn Water ?f>rvirac - Prical Plana CtrP! - P-t-tinrl I n ? ? err ^^? ^ni nn n n,
Charlotte Storm Water Services - Edsel Place Stream Restoration LAW Project 30100-0-0369

1

Charlotte Storm Water Service- - T?,]-i Df- c.,-^^ D ?: t n W Pr^i.
Charlotte Storm Water Services - Edsel Place Stream Restoration LAW Project 30100-0-0369
a

7

r

C
t
1
1
1
r
?_

F

11
11
u

11

BIOLOGICAL TRACKING - STREAM RESTORATION PROJECTS
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit
Contact dave.penrose(Z> ncmail.net
A. Project Name:Edsel Place Stream Restoration
B. Stream Name:Edsel Place Tributary to Briar Creek
C. DWQ Project Number:991368
D. Restoration Map Number:
E. Ecoregion, County and Location Information:
Piedmont, Mecklenburg County
Eastern Charlotte, adjacent to Edsel Place
F. Coordinates and USGS Quad Name:
35 degrees 13 min. 36.37 sec. N
80 degrees 46 min. 10.44 sec. W Charlotte East
G. Stream Classification Type (Rosgen):
GSc
H. Length of Project:2,750
1. Urban or Rural Catchment:Urban
J. Catchment size:0.56 sq mile
K. Who conducted the biological monitoring?MCDEP
L. Applicant Information:
1. Name and Company:Ms. Mary C. Murray, CSWS
2. Telephone Number:[phone]
3. Email Address:[e-mail]
M. Consultant Information:
1. Name and Company:Mr. Mike Iagnocco, Law Eng. & Env. Services, Inc.
2. Telephone Number:[phone]
3. Email Address:[e-mail]
N. Project Status:
Photographs:

t

1
1

1
t
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
F
401/404 BIOASSESSMENT MONITORING REPORT
PROJECT: Edsel Place
STREAM: Briar Creek Tributary
MONITORING SITE: B0711 -100 meters upstream and 100 meters downstream at
2900 Edsel Place (6end of Earl)
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES
Pre-construction Post-construction

Sampling Date
5/16/00 -
5/15/02
EPT Taxa Richness 3 3
Total Taxa 19 27
Biotic Index 7.10 7.53
Bioclassification FAIR POOR
Species List in Appendix I
FISH
Pre-construction Post-construction
Sampling Date 5/30/00 Not Sampled
Total Taxa 4
No. Individuals Collected 116
NC Index Biotic Integrity 30
Bioclassification POOR
The pre-construction fish community was dominated by the pollution tolerant Redbreast
Sunfish (Lepomis auritus) and Creek Chub (Semotilus atromaculatus).
Species List in Appendix 11 ..

WATER CHEMISTRY
Pre-construction Post-construction
Sampling Date 6/08/00 5/20/02
WQI 66 65.5
Water Quality Ratin GOOD FAIR/GOOD
The primary water quality problem detected in both samples was a high Fecal Coliform
Bacteria colony count.
Water Chemistry data in Appendix III
STREAM HABITAT ASSESSMENT
Pre-construction
1 Post-construction
Sampling Date 5/16/00 5/15/02
MCHAP Score (200
maximum 74.7 71
Stream Habitat Assessment data in Appendix IV
2002 FIELD OBSERVATIONS
The stream at Early Court (behind 2900 Edsel Place) flows through a residential area and
is bordered on both sides by residential lots. This segment of the stream is located within
the 401/404 stream restoration project area. The restored stream appears to be no more
than a drainage ditch. It is no more than 2 feet wide and has sloped banks protected with
rip-rap at the toe and vegetation from the midpoint to the top of bank. The stream is
nearly entirely exposed to sunlight as very few mature trees are present. The planted
vegetation is growing well, but is short at this time. Shrubs and grasses provide most of
the shade to the stream. The streambed is mostly sandy with very small rip-rap riffles
constructed at regular intervals. The constructed riffles are too small to provide good
habitat for benthic macroinvertebrates. There were no real pools in this stream segment
and very little fish habitat. The benthic macroinvertebrate community was dominated by
pollution tolerant species.
Environmentalist:
a ?" -1
Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program
Date: July 15, 2002
07/1,1/2002 MACROINVERTEBRATE IDENTIFICATION SHEET
STREAM: BASIN 7 - BRIAR CREEK LOG NO: 2002 -01318
BRIAR CREEK TRIB @ EARLY CT SURVEY DATE: 05/15/2002
BASIN:
LOCATION: B0711
TAXONOMIST:
COLLECTORS
ORDER
FAMILY
John McCulloch
Derrick A. Harris
GENUS/SPECIES
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
DI PTERA
D I PTERA
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
DIPTERA
EPHEMEROPTERA
LIMNOPHILA
LIMNOPHILA
LIMNOPHILA
ODONATA
ODONATA
ODONATA
ODONATA
TRICHOPTERA
TRICHOPTERA
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
CHIRONOMIDAE
EMPIDIDAE
SIMULIIDAE
TIPULIDAE
BAETI DAE
ANCYLIDAE
PHYSIDAE
PLANORBIDAE
CALOPTERYGIDAE
COENAGRIONIDAE
COENAGRIONIDAE
COENAGRIONIDAE
HYDROPSYCHIDAE
HYDROPSYCHIDAE
ABLABESMYIA MALLOCHI
CHIRONOMUS SPP.
CONCHAPELOPIA GROUP
CRICOTOPUS BICINCTUS
CRICOTOPUS VARIPES GR
CRYPTOCHIRONOMUS SPP.
DICROTENDIPES NEOMODESTUS
NATARSIA SPP.
PARATANYTARSUS SPP.
PHAENOPSECTRA SPP.
POLYPEDILUM CONVICTUM/FLAVUM
POLYPEDILUM FALLAX
RHEOTANYTARSUS SPP.
XYLOTOPUS PAR
EMPIDIDAE
SIMULIUM SPP.
TIPULA SPP.
BAETIS FLAVISTRIGA
FERRISSIA SPP.
PHYSELLA SPP.
MENETUS DILATUS
CALOPTERYX SPP.
ARGIA SEDULA
ARGIA SPP.
ENALLAGMA SPP.
CHEUMATOPSYCHE SPP.
HYDROPSYCHE BETTENI
TV NO. ABUNDANCE
7.2
9.6
8.3
8.5
7.8
6.4
8.1
9.9
8.4
6.5
4.9
6.4
5.9
5.9
7.6
6.0
7.3
6.6
6.6
8.8
8.3
7.8
8.5
8.2
8.9
6.2
7.8
1
12
9
2
7
2
11
1
8
49
1
1
7
1
1
14
5
59
1
22
1
7
24
1
1
76
1
R
A
C
R
C
R
A
R
C
A
R
R
C
R
R
A
C
A
R
A
R
C
A
R
R
A
R
TOTAL # ORGANISMS: 325 METHOD: STD
TOTAL TAXA: 27 BIOTIC INDEX: 7.53
TOTAL EPT: 3 WATER QUALITY RATING: 2
SPECIES DIVERSITY: 3.5
Anthony J. Roux
Anthony J. Roux
Mark Popinchalk
Appendix 1 MACROINVERTEBRATE IDENTIFICATION SHEET PAGE NO: 1
STREAM: BASIN 7 - BRIAR CREEK LOG NO: 2000 -02631
BRIAR CREEK TRIB @ EARLY CT SURVEY DATE: 05/16/2000
BASIN:
LOCATION: 80711
TAXONOMIST: Lonnie N. Shull
COLLECTORS: Anthony J. Roux Derrick A. Harris
Lonnie N. Shull Craig M. Miller
ORDER FAMILY GENUS/SPECIES TV NO. ABUNDANCE
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CHIRONOMUS SPP. 9.6 11 A
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CONCHAPELOPIA GROUP 8.3 12 A
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE CRICOTOPUS BICINCTUS 8.5 7 C
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE EUKIEFFERIELLA CLARIPENNIS 5.6 3 C
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE PHAENOPSECTRA SPP. 6.5 3 C
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE POLYPEDfLUM CONVICTUM 4.9 5 C
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE PSECTROTANYPUS DYARI 10.0 1 R
DIPTERA CHIRONOMIDAE ZAVRELIMYIA SPP. 9.1 1 R
DIPTERA SIMULIIDAE SIMULIUM SPP. 4.0 20 A
DIPTERA TIPULIDAE ANTOCHA SPP. 4.2 1 R
DIPTERA TIPULIDAE TIPULA SPP. 7.3 10 A
EPHEMEROPTERA BAETIDAE BAETIS INTERCALARIS 5.0 26 A
ISOPODA ASELLIDAE ASELLUS SPP. 4.2 1 R
LIMNOPHILA PHYSIDAE PHYSELLA SPP. 8.8 3 C
ODONATA COENAGRIONIDAE ARGIA SEDULA 8.5 31 A
ODONATA COENAGRIONIDAE ARGIA SPP. 8.2 11 A
ODONATA GOMPHIDAE PROGOMPHUS OBSCURUS 8.2 1 R
TRICHOPTERA HYDROPSYCHIDAE CHEUMATOPSYCHE SPP. 6.2 18 A
TRICHOPTERA HYDROPSYCHIDAE HYDROPSYCHE BETTENI 7.8 1 R
TOTAL # ORGANISMS: 166 METHOD: STD
TOTAL TAXA: 19 BIOTIC INDEX:
TOTAL EPT: 3 WATER QUALITY RATING: 5
SPECIES DIVERSITY: 3.5
=Appendix 2 FISH IDENTIFICATION SHEET PAGE NO: 1
LOG NO: 2000 -02545 SURVEY DATE. 05/30/2000
SITE: BASIN 7 BASIN 7 - BRIAR CREEK
STATION: B0711 BRIAR CREEK TRIB @ EARLY CT
BASIN: 7
LOCATION: 80711
TAXONOMIST: Anthony J. Roux
COLLECTORS: Anthony J. Roux
Lonnie N. Shull
Darrin M. Peine
TOT
FAMILY GENUS/SPECIES NO. 'WT LENGTHS
CATOSTOMIDAE ERIMYZON OBLONGUS 4 0 11(3),15(l)
CENTRARCHIDAE LEPOMIS AURITUS 20 0 3(2), 5(2), 6(1), 8(2), 9(3), 10(4), 11(3),
12(1), 14(1), 15(1)
CYPRINIDAE CLINOSTOMUS FUNDULOIDES 8 0 5(1), 6(3), 7(2), 8(2)
CYPRINIDAE SEMOTILUS ATROMACULATUS 84 0 4(14), 5(26), 6(15), 7(8), 8(11), 9(7),
10(l),11(2)
IBI SCORE: 30 WATER QUALITY RATING: 7 POOR
Y E
J
Q
vJ C)
E
CO E
L to LO
;
O LCD r`
T T T
T T T
m -,F LO
I O T r
1 T T T
r r N
U) E ;
CO Q ;

m LO r` co

Z '

O O O
O
o O
O
O E O O O

O co CD
;- Z ; c0 un CO
Q Y 6- 600
p h n ;

0 0
W M E
0
Z Q v

W
U U-) V) LO
g o E ; °°°
o 0 0
a z Q; V V V
J
W ;

Q ; NLAr
W M C ; M d' "t

m 0 0 0 0 0
z E;

H '
Y 0 0 0
w E N N N
w O EL; V V V
m C

Lo "t
Q O - LO
T T T
E
m U ? ;

E LO CO
M Q
Mr?rn
x a L!) CO LO
0 ?

Z
d i
r LA T
CL U ; N N N
^
Q W
H i
' T r T
oco ';
a r? Co r?

J ; O O O
Q J E ; COp N ti
I. 000 M
; T
L U
L r
N N N
O O O
O O O
C%J 04
4-) Lf) LO
' O
O O
u O r N
? T r T
O O O
tbin co
LO Lo Lo
'
V
V V
1
1
i
LO Lo Lo
'
V V V
Q Q
1
1
CO
'
V
W .0 V ;
U) Q i
1
,
1
O O O
? i T T T
Z Q V V V
Q
1
1
N N N
U' O O O
= d i V v v
1
1
1

1
LO Lo Lo
'
V V V
Q a. Q
1
H
Lf)
' V V
V
Q U Q '
1
W
1
x
~ V V V
In p n
W
1
U a '
U '
1
J Lf) Lo Lo
'

d
1
N N
N
a V v v
m
CL'
W
U

w
1
C) C) 0
Q

_ Q ; t T T
m Q V V V
N
1.1„ 1
h i
Y O O O
w Q a v v v
i
1
U '
LO ? ?

Q i
v v v
Q
co
;
;OO0

c'i 1 T T T
Z a v v v
x °

Z O O O
LU Z CO oo LO
D- CL
1
1
p O o 0
1
0) cr) to
W
f
OC)
a
i
t
1
1
1
' V V V

U Q '
1
1
1
N N N
L U O O O

Q i N N N
'
O O O
1
i
1
W '

T
i O N
L
f T T T

1 0O
O
O
M
M
1 W W m
i '
J .0 '
P: n i
a i Lo Ln Ln
i V V V
N

Z N
? ow C:) Cl C>
Q a i
i
Ln Ln Ln
i = v v v i
i
I
_
E
o
0 o .0
W
a o0o I L

?
i
Za ? vv = aLnLnU-) i
i v v v i
Q
F
- N E
0 i 0 0
o
CL 0 0
i Z a 0 0 0 I
Z a '
i V V ,
CV)
o
i
F Y
E { co L n
CD

i f

p
I
CO) J a ; N N N
aa ; i CD CD O
w V V V
z a
° O
=
NO ° E
U z C
DL CO

C
=
i
O i i L
n-
CL Lo to Ln
i
w U i v v v i
Q ^
`r
? i i
p E a
L
o
n
?oo
pa r
` i
U a
. ,

V
i
i U
) Lo Lo
v v v

F- i ONO
O C) Q Ln Ln ~
p
? 0
0000 U a

°
NNN
I

0. i v v V
v LA v
Z
0)
2 C14 ! W -0
p f 1 co a LO LO LO
0
-
V V V
i
in _ m co Ln
I
Z CL
T- T-
i V V v
W

U r?`
° Cl) n
CL
r Ooo
Q
W W v v v
H d i
` moo ?
N
E o o O O
o O
co CL
w L
i v Lv Lv
U
Q
...i
a chi M d LN
o00 E OCO
o
0
N
?
z a
0
-J f V
w
CO) ti O O r co ti
W ` N V V
Z m a o O o o
A

• t
1
i
6
7 E ' ,;r, (D r i r N D) ;
I` C6 '
W
X V Q L Q o o
1
i
W w J i
0 o 0 0
}
i
a 3 U
Oo o00
wcDO ; o0o

Q
W L) 0 i
r- 'D M; a
0 0 0
U a
L? i i i
d ' O o 0 W O O O

W C) C:) C)
-
- cc C) 0 0
W
d
( 0 0 0 d 0 0 0
('? Q Q
C
') Q c`ML=
p ! Lc) Ln LO i 0 I LO Ln to j
Q i 000 m i o00 1
w C) C-4 w ! C)

° i
mm mm im I m
o in
TABLE B-1
Habitat Assessment Worksheet: Riffle/Run Prevalent Stream
casisQ '41C-cam' Date
Point of Assessment ~i t54
County M Pte- i-, River Basin ??-
LatJ Lone. coordinates
Assessor.` Assessor.
asibitat Parameter I Score Habitat Parameter I Score Habitat Parameter Score Avg.
1. Instrcam Cover (fish) 1. Instream Cover (fish) 1. Iastream Cover (fish)
2. Epifaunai Substrate
(benthic) 2. Epifaunal Substrate
(benthic) 2. Epifattnai Substrate
(benthic)
3
3. Embeddedness tv 3. Embeddedness t* 3. Embeddedness a
4. Channel Alteration' 3 4. Channel Alteration 4. Channel Alteration
5. Sediment 135msidon -3 5. Sediment Deposition 5. Sediment Deposition
6. Frequency of Riffles jg 6. Frequency of Riffles 6. Frequency of Riffles
7. Channel Flow Status 7. Channel Flow Status 7. Channel Flow Status
S. Bank Vegetative
Protection
LB & Bank Vegetative Protection
LB S. Bank Vegetative Protection
LB"

j
RB RB RB
9. Bank Stability
CB 9. Bank Stability
LB 9. Bank Stability
LB
RB - RB RB ?
10. Vegetated Buffer Zone

h
Width 10. Vegetated Buffer Zone

h
Width
r7

J 10. Vegetated Buffer Zone
With

LB

S
RB RB PB 3
Total Score: Total Score: ' Total Score:
i?ac /il<'5Z7? Assessor.
PAism7 MCDEP MUTATIFINAL PROTOCOSWPPE FIELD FORMS.Doc
Appendix 4
Habitat Assessment Worksheet: Riffle/Run Prevalent Stream
C,
Date 6 --N--CO
Point of Assessment f Lo-r?c,?
County 6r, River Basin
Lat./ Long. coordinates
Assessor. 1. -ffk-(T s Assessor. 0-, 4 r LIQr- Assessor. S!r c.?I
Habitat Parameter Score Habitat Parameter Score Habitat Parameter Score Avg.
1. Instream Cover (fish) r ( 1. Instream Cover (fish) 1. Instream Cover (fish) 57
_ 3
2. Epifaunal Substrate
(benthic) 2. Epifaunal Substrate
b
thi
?2 2. Epifaunal Substrate
(
en
c) , (benthic) 3-3
3. Embeddedness 3. Embeddedness 3. Embeddedness

4. Channel. Alteration 5 4. Channel Alteration I q 4. Channel Alteration

5. Sediment Deposition 5. Sediment Deposition 5. Sediment Deposition 3
7
6. Frequency of Riffles 3 6. Frequency of Riffles / 6. Frequency of Riffles Y33
7. Channel Flow Status r7
T 7. Channel Flow Status t_( 7. Channel Flow Status
T Q'
8. Bank Vegetative 8. Bank Vegetative Protection 8. Bank Vegetative Protection
Protection LB
3
RB RB 3 RB
9. Bank Stability 9. Bank Stability 9. Bank Stability
LB LB a LB 3 3 G
RB RB
01
RB
5-
6 ?-
10. Vegetated Buffer Zone 10. Vegetated Buffer Zone 10. Vegetated Buffer Zone
Width
LB g Width Q With
8'
8 33
LB t LB
RB RB 3 RB 3 3.6 T
Total Score: Total Score: 7 Total Score: 63 7--
P.AISI 87 MCDEP HABfTAT1Fit,AL PROTOCOMPPE RELD FORMS.DOC

t
LAW
I ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100 Date: November 4, 2002 Project No.:30100-0-0369 Phases 16 &
Charlotte NC, 28208 Project Name: Edsel Place and Meridian Drive Stream Restoration Proiects
[phone] FAX [phone] Attention: Mary C. Murray, P.W.S.
Re: Tasks 3c and l lb-II
TO: Ms. Mary C. Murray, P.W.S., Permitting and Mitigation Administrator
City of Charlotte
Storm Water Services
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
WE ARE SENDING YOU X Attached Under separate cover via the following items:
Plans Samples Specifications Copy of letter Change order Other
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 6/25/02. 1 Memorandum - Edsel Place and Meridian Drive Task l lb-I results, and Edsel Place
Task 3c findings.
1 6/25/02 2 Site Photographs - 8 photographs on 4 pages
1 6/25/02 3 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Data - Sites 130710, B0711, 130712, 136501, and
B6502
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
For approval _ Approved as submitted
For your use - Approved as noted
_ As requested _ Returned for corrections
For review and comment
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
REMARKS: Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. is re-submitting documentation of our findings of the Edsel Place and
Meridian Drive Stream Restoration Proiects macroinvertebrate monitoring sites The original submission provided to you on June 25,
2002 was missing the benthic macroinvertebrate taxonomic data for monitoring site 130712 Please contact Darrin M Peine at (704)-
357-8600, if you have any questions regarding this information.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
?) N"" LIM , L'
Darrin M. Peine
Project Scientist
_ Resubmit
_ Submit _
Return
Copy To: File
NOV 3 inn ,
JAI

,.:.? N.o...?"".o.,?
??-.
NC Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit
March 23, 2004
Memorandum
To: John Dorney
Amanda Mueller
From: Dave Penrose'
Subject: Project files to NCSU
I've maintained a file of stream restoration projects for my use during the EPA grant process and
my employment with the Wetlands Unit. In some instances these files contain any raw benthic
macroinvertebrate data we have (including bench sheets) and Xerox copies of other pertinent
information about the particular project. The Xerox copies of other information were made from
originals in the Wetlands files. I would like to request permission to bring these files with me to
NCSU. It is my hope that many of these projects (especially those directly of interest to
EEP/DWQ that might be used to develop biological success criteria for stream restoration) and
will continued to be sampled long-term. Perhaps there will be university personnel or students
interested in these data as well. These projects are listed below (the projects that have raw data
sheets in them are askerithed):
• Adkins Branch* • Hanging Rock Creek* • Randolph/Chatham
• Bare enhancement • Little Pine and Brush counties*
site* Cr.* • Rochester Heights
• Beaver Creek* • Lynn Haven • Sheppards Tree
• Brown Branch* • Marks Creek • Smith - Austin
• Buckhead Creek • Mt. Vernon Springs Creeks*
• Big Warrior Creek* • Mill Branch* • Starmount Park*
• Chavis Branch • Moncure/3M • Slow Creek
• Crescent Road • Meridian Road • Stone Mountain State
• Charleston Forge • Morrisville Community Park*
• Concord Mills* Park • T.C. Robeson High
• Dowdle Mountain • Murphy Farm* School
• Edwards Branch* • Pott Creek • Trillium
• Edsel Place • Payne Dairy* • Talulla Creek
• Five Mile Branch • Price Park* • Warren Wilson
• Global Transpark • Rocky Branch* College
• Hominy Swamp* • Reed Creek • Westbrook Lowground
• Hickory Quarry • Randolph Park Wike Property*
• High Vista* • Yates Mill*
North Carolina Division of Water Quality; Wetlands/401 Unit
1650 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Telephone: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands

LAW
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100 Date: June 25. 2002 Project No.:30100-0-0369, Phases 16 & 27
Charlotte NC, 28208 Project Name: Edsel Place and Meridian Drive Stream Restoration Projects
[phone] FAX [phone] Attention: Marv C. Murray, P.W.S.
Re: Tasks 3c and l lb-II
TO: Ms. Mary C. Murray, P.W.S., Permitting and Mitigation Administrator
City of Charlotte
Storm Water Services
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL,
WE ARE SENDING YOU X Attached Under separate cover via the following items:
Plans Samples Specifications Copy of letter Change order Other
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 6/25/02 1 Memorandum - Edsel Place and Meridian Drive Task l lb-I results, and Edsel Place
Task 3c findings.
1 6/25/02 2 Site Photographs - 8 photographs on 4 pages
1 6/25/02 3 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Data - Sites B0710, B0711, B0712, B6501, and
B6502
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
For approval _ Approved as submitted
X For your use _ Approved as noted
_ As requested _ Returned for corrections
For review and comment
REMARKS: Law Engineering and Environmental Services Inc is submitting documentation of our findings of the Edsel Place and
Meridian Drive Stream Restoration Proiects macroinvertebrate monitoring sites, both in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina Please contact Darrin M Peine at (704)-357-8600 if you have any questions regarding this information.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Copy To: File
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
D "';' M, ?'Z'- t;&L Darrin M. Peine Michael A. Iagn c , P.S.
.WProject Scientist Project Manager
_ Resubmit copies for approval
_ Submit copies for distribution
Return corrected prints
qk, I LAW
RESOURCES CREATING SOLUTIONS
MEMORANDUM
To: Mary C. Murray, P.W.S., CSWS
From: Darrin M. Peine DMA
Michael A. Iagnocco, P.W.S. UM
Date: June 25, 2002
Subject: Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project, Task 3c and l lb-I Results and Meridian Drive Task
l lb-I Results (LAW Project No. 30100-0-0369, Phases 16 and 27, respectively)
On June 7, 2002; LAW scientists Tom Wilda and Damn Peine conducted a walk-over of the entire reach of
the Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project following a bankfull storm event several days prior. The
objectives of the walk-over were to determine any areas of the restored reach that may be in need of repair
from evidence of bare soil or poor vegetative growth, and to measure the approximate bank-full discharge at
a representative location within the restored stream reach.
Overall vegetative growth throughout the restored stream reach is well established (see attached photographs
5 and 6). However, one area approximately 8 feet by 5 feet, located at the permanent. cross-section 2,
exhibited bare earth on the right bank. This appears to be due to a slightly steeper bank height relative to the
remaining reach (photographs 7 and 8).
A cross-section of the restored stream at 2908 Edsel Place was identified as the best visible location to
estimate stream discharge. A large wrack line with adjacent flattened vegetation was used to delineate the
approximate out-of-bank water limits (photographs 1 through 4). A width of 18.40 feet was measured across
the restored stream from a wrack line on the left bank to a wrack line on the opposite bank. The depth of the
cross-section as measured from the thalweg to the top of the pulled tape is 3.75 feet.
In addition, benthic macroinvertebrates were collected and identified from the three monitoring sites of the
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project, B0710, B0711, and B0712. The North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ) Qual-5 sampling method was used to obtain the benthic macroinvertebrates in
accordance with benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring protocols for compensatory" stream restoration
projects. The attached three MS Excel spreadsheets provide taxonomic results of the Edsel Place Stream
Restoration Project.
The Meridian Drive Stream Restoration Project was sampled for benthic macroinvertebrates on June 6, 2002.
The sampling effort was lead by LAW scientist Darrin Peine. A total of two samples were collected, B6501
and B6502. The NCDWQ Qual-5 sampling method was used to obtain the benthic macroinvertebrates.
However, due to the small channel width, a kick net sample was not able to be performed. In place of the
kick net, two additional sweep net samples were taken. The attached MS Excel spreadsheet provide
taxonomic results of the Meridian Drive Stream Restoration Project.
If you have any questions regarding this information, please call Darrin Peine at [phone].
Attachments:
Photographs 1 through 8 on four pages
Five MS Excel spreadsheets of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Data for Monitoring Sites
B0710, B0711, B0712, and B6501, B6502, Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project and Meridian
Drive Stream Restoration Project, respectively.
Charlotte Storm Water Services - Edsel Place Stream Restoration LAW Project 30100-0-0369
Page 1 of 4
Charlotte Storm Water Services - Edsel Place Stream Restoration LAW Project 30100-0-0369
Page 2 of 4
Charlotte Storm Water Services - Edsel Place Stream Restoration LAW Project 30100-0-0369

r?
-jo
kAe
Photograph 5: Current vegetation of the Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project, view
facing; up-stream. Located at 3116 Edsel Place. June 7, 2002.
"0.
.al
? : e ?i rf?- `•?
r

O

? 1 ? 9 ! i y ftrs?
' W
? MY" i
-?•
i ? E • 4) f ? , 'fir
r ; } -
w i .r a •r + ? f 4
? . S- t

Photograph 6: Current vegetation of the Edsel Pl ace Stream Restoration Project, view
facing down-stream. Located at 3116 Edsel Place. June 7, 2002.
Page 3 of 4
bL-
Charlotte Storm Water Services - Edsel Place Stream Restoration LAW Project 30100-0-0369
Page 4 of 4
CD CD
n
77-
CD (D
c. a
to to
O D
?; w
C-
U?
n
N
0 0?
H
y a a?
cr
fD o
CD c CD
n

CD
C
23
A CD
0 H CD
(TQ
C
CD
CO CD - ° O
o w
A

N CL CL sw
(D
(IQ 0)
(D CD
#_
.
*
cr §
CD w
l< CD = CA 0

'°
O . CD O =
Z =
CD
CD
O
?
o
::? m C, 03 CD
X
C
co CD
C7
A
o
n
CD O w C w
CT `wt p : C
o B 0 ",
w ry
C'
o IN
r}
?,
D
/2?'

0 CA coo
" b x a (n n (fi n ? m v -i z
' n
a =r CD z
10 °-n C) IN n o is
CL c
=: "
m o
o ° c
n
o C(D a w w i
. w c. CD
o w = w (1) CD. co
cD
w
=r';?
G
D C/',
o -t CD C'
E: O.
s- CL C. CD
C,

`G C ?
O C J
o
v
C o o 0
`
a °
- ?
co a, ° ? _
.- o
N
= v
? co O O

? CD ? b? b i n
` ba b y
. ??.? n n a n y? b b b b D n ? ? ?
• b ?
w? s e s
? o a b ?p O? ? ?? o o s a ?• s
O m ? ? ?
O p„
n ? f0 ^ p ! ?'.,' A ? ?. M S, CT ? ? ZS S A O O
.??, ti. S O r?r
* A b A a y II S A a 45 O ??„ pq ro
..

`
' S n Z A n y p
? A 'G ? ? A
p c0 A OQ
O r0. a
do S A
Z3 < y y S ,
o 'C 'C 3 3 O

H O
?

°
=
, w
7 A
1
CA
N p-
O 0 w N _ w A cn W_ r w w .1 v N N .. N rs
H+.
fp
y
CFO'

CD
CL

J oo w a\ J ?.1 N oo * oo CT w J * o0 00 t? A * `".
i .n
OO Oo
A O N
O N O
C O w O O J? .. it w
n O w O O ? N J? -- ?D -O to O w O w ? ,,,?
r Cl) n
* co a 3 Cl)
O Q
(D fD C
o CD
o v -a
O CD
O
o -
CD
W-0

N -0•.
n O
o N
rt
(D O
;:? m
m Co
v?
N 0
? O
O CD
N
(n
L
c
m
N
N
O
O
N
n `t7
S
N
n
CCD c?D
GL n.
a
3 ?
b
O
a
?o a
(D
N
R z<CD
m
G y ?
0 CCD
Cd
? y N
.7?- pq y
C1 c=D c?D
c. ?
m C
CD
o z =
O y
CCD n C7
?t O
M Q
o O
K ?
Q y'? IrD
0 n
O ?.
o fD
A a
o ?
a
CD
a
y O r?
ti v
? cp O
`< y y
y CD
n
CD
-1F y
?.
0
_I, a
O= CD
y
O ?
n =
in Q
O?
w
o CD
c o+
to
y
N ?
O CD
m
y
cD
a

o s
0
r

w a p .

.0 n (,? O n
CD H CD
y
?.
? C ? A S
0 `
C. C
D
w C
D ,a
-
sv fv -
tv .
a 0
'a C = 0)
cl) w n S n A?
O CD $D.i • ? V O n

`S O W co
A7
Y_. r.,
-
A
?'

w ti

V1 S7 ?. C? C) w C? C? C) C) C
C) C
rl C -
-i } y

? 0 03
M 0
C S
. G
Al y . _ =
- O O '?
4. O P?
d0 d D. ..
? .'3 = 0) .. o n
d

C (D

° •

0 0.

N. CD :D

CD

C

O. p' a'

CD C

p w 0)

a
A-
fD
C
D ?- 3 G

C

C co

C
p,
co

co
Cl)
CD C
D {
D
O ;D

n C
D

C
s

o c
a o. ? ; N
c?D m N .
CD CDD
?
O

b (? b to y n y O n n y y y -? b b b n r N h
t; S A c'0• S. n' p" O' ( g S S' x - G

? p
A A O v A ^
C Q
A O Q S
3 A iv cT39 a^
S
y
Z
' O O -
Z y
.
SZ! A a
?
O m Cf ti w n
IA
, n O S C `e S A 5 ti
a cn
.
M A A A p. y tC
Z c? c, p A. `%?' O
O -
co ? ?•

Ir•

M

te
: ?
p -1 00 N W w Q\ N- --• N -- ?- G .. C w N N ?- -- r
-
.
O-

F+

XX;o ;u aza

a
oo G1 00 00 -Q J o. oo v oo a,
v, rn C', rn * * 00 00
a
v
LA
00 Go
.P -1 N
w N A
ON N
N O
O W
W O
O .A --
N "o *
oo *?A O
O1 w w * * Vii O N w * J .-
r cn n
:? v ?.
-0 3 cn
o. ;a m
N CD
o -
-o
CD v v
O = CD
O "D
rn m
co 0
P!
v
o N
((D o
;L =
CD h
a' C
(D =
O -?
CD
O
7• .N .
c
CD
N
Ul
N
O
O
N
S CC"D
CD `0
(9 N
?a?y Fn?y.
W W
0
O CD
?E
c- r
o a
-?
w
a
CD 0
z<
ii
CC7 CD
C c w
? CD
^.+
w
= y N
3 UQ y
O CD CD
CL
n CD
o z =
O
1 o
CD
g
w 0
? C7 r.
O y
•t
= 'O
O-' r'
o ? CD
N
O •OS v
a `•< c
a C
CD
O
o a. V
CD O
y
H CD
CD Ot A
in
X
cn
CD
c v
? 0-
0 w
C
CA
?' OS1
CD '.
O?
? w
CD
=; w
y
N
O CCD
D
w
Ln
CA
QQ•
C l.
3 a _

o
'
w -

y co

a

O J
Or
•
N

n

o w e
? fo

w CD
Al

cn
S
to fl.. CD = O •-t
O -z
O 't
O ? ?
O w r
CD 0 1
0
=
CD
n
CL _
a
G
Q; w w w
CD
=

, fD
a
0
o -4

y O
CD CD N
K
O

b n y b (? n y y b b C?
A
%,
It S
m Z
Q• ?•
ti A O" O-
O P L S A O
O p p O?
N M O O O >
+
n ?. r ?
A A `a y S S S A O Z rte..
z ° S o d
s b u
a A y z O fD

V1

z ?
c ?
w ? ? -- w •- ,? ?-. 4?- N ..r ?. ? w .... .p O w s,
F+
N

w ON oo rn * ? oo rn rn rn U LA
Oo N
N
?1 W
w O
O * .r
LA ?O w O cn O
O J w w
-
r- cn C)
r-" cn
N
?3cn
0. Q
0 (n CA
CD
o-
0@
O O n
O 7 CD
O ?
0) CD
CO n
n O
o N
CDO
CD
CD N
6
O O
CD
O
M.
N
C
CD
N
fr
N
O
O
N
LAW
RESOURCES CREATING SOLUTIONS
MEMORANDUM
To: Mary C. Murray, P.W.S., CSWS
From:
Date:
Subject:
Damn M. Peine Dµ?
Michael A. Iagnocco, P.W.S.
June 25, 2002
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project, Task 3c and l lb-I Results and Meridian Drive Task
l lb-I Results (LAW Project No. 30100-0-0369, Phases 16 and 27, respectively)
On June 7, 2002; LAW scientists Tom Wilda and Darn-in Peine conducted a w -over of the entire reach of
the Edsel Place Stream. Restoration Project following a bankfull storm ent several days prior. The
objectives of the walk-over were to determine any areas of the restored ach that may be in need of repair
from evidence of bare soil or po vegetative growth, and to measure t approximate bank-full discharge at
a representative location within the estored stream reach.
Overall vegetative growth throughout a restored stream reach ' well established (see attached photographs
5 and 6). However, one area approxi ately 8 feet by 5 et, located at the permanent .cross-section 2,
exhibited bare earth on the right bank Th' appears to be a to a slightly steeper bank height relative to the
remaining reach (photographs 7 and 8).
A cross-section of the restored stream at 290 ds Place was identified as the best visible location to
estimate stream discharge. A large wrack line wi adjacent flattened vegetation was used to delineate the
approximate out-of-bank water limits (photograp 1 ough 4). A width of 18.40 feet was measured across
the restored stream from a wrack line on the he ank t a wrack line on the opposite bank. The depth of the
cross-section as measured from the thalweg to e top oft pulled tape is 3.75 feet.
In addition, benthic macroinvertebrates w e collected and i tified from the three monitoring sites of the
Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project, 0710, B0711, and B 12. The, North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ) Qual-5 sampling method was used to o tain the benthic. macroinvertebrates in
accordance with benthic macroinve ebrate monitoring protocols for compensatory stream restoration
projects. T ched three MS E, cel spreadsheets provide taxonomic results of the Edsel Place Stream
ra oiect.
The Meridian Drive St am Restoration Project was sampled for benthic macroinvertebrates on June 6, 2002.
ampling effort ,Yls lead by LAW scientist Damn Peine. A total of two samples were collected, B6501
and B CDWQ Qual-5 sampling method was used to obtain the benthic macroinvertebrates.
However, due to the small channel width, a kick net sample was not able to be performed. In place of the
kick net, two additional sweep net samples were taken. The attached MS Excel spreadsheet provide
taxonomic results of the Meridian Drive Stream Restoration Project.
If you have any questions regarding this information, please call Darrin Peine at [phone].
Attachments:
Photographs 1 through 8 on four pages
Five MS Excel spreadsheets of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Data for Monitoring Sites
B0710, B0711, B0712, and B6501, B6502, Edsel Place Stream Restoration Project and Meridian
Drive Stream Restoration Project, respectively.
_- -
?t??
O• ?
A ?
CD CCD
CL CL
07 CO
d d
b
? n
0
a
o a
C
CD 'I
03
CCD o
N
O
C? CCD
^G H Al
?/ .?. CD
CD P
?• dQ• 4f
o
0 0
0
O ? n
c
O D ?
CW
p m ?D
t
f1 H
O 'fi't v
O
O O
a 03
a
0
? V
O0 rD O
N
CD,
CD
Cv y
CD
"p •1F N
y ?J
O ?•
CA
'S
y O
O <
n ?
O CD
CD A?
N
N O'
O
O CD
7
En
H
(ro•
O
CD
G.

o.
0
0. -

rD
y
'
l

O

• MCI
DD
of
p
Al
A

a O o C

n 03
vi
O '
N o CD
-
C3 w A

CL

O O O O CD
O
p.
O

m
c 07
A
w
IN Al .? •
m
O ? ?
O rrA

r
n
'v C' ?o (? ? ? ?? (? (7 ? ts7 a
CA (? e9
A)
F s o CD .o E E. 3 d

M

CY
v°cD
CD
n
o
o
c:
0
C
CD
CD 7 CD CD CD
CCD N p,; C1
sw C1
P7 N ..
CD
rD
O
rD
S 3`" o
"
0 0 ?
N

CD CD

- -f ?
•
b ?' ? o ? 'y v? ? A ns ? ?b
ti a c?a
?0 ?
t
0 Zs
A A O ^•
y ?.
• O A p
S O O O
?? t0 ?•
p
5 p.
A Cy
A S p ? A Zj y ti ? -a y
C
'6 'C3 A ? 'p
?..
O' y ? w
? ` 'C 'O y
b 'O
'Lf
V1 a, y
CS

C) ?• J N J .._. C? r-r r. r-. A r.. to ?. •... J ,_,z -CN

D\ w Uft J (ON w tA (71 1.0 oo Cn Cn Ko -1
..
N
w O
0 Oo
A ._..
?++ tf
O W
w O
0 i.n
? .._. .P CN
-• O w
w
O w
O C.,
N.
D C/) n
CD
3 CD
o N "•
C' 0 Lai
O
C)
C) C
6,Q
o0
CO -
9
0) -p
n O
(7 in
0
CD
fl) n
(D
O
?= N
cc
C_
C
7
CD
N
N
O
O
N
n?
Si
X
CD a
d d
? i
3
-Q
I
G
N
o a
O = ??
? " w
td N
w
= y N
? UQ' ?n
A = II
CD f07
0 C.
oz=
n n
a 0 3
CD _
o v
K ?
0 a
...1 A
o CD
0 ti
`-° o ..
y
a
o ?
a
a
0
C a. v
CD O
ti D
-^+
CD
CD
# V!
O ?.
co
y
CD r+
et =
w p
O?
? w
CD
S
C; w
w
N
O CD
CD
r. _
w
aro'
CD
o `
? ?
a

a c?
a
w 7
CD
U1
CD CD

=
rA
4n
aC '*
w w
?
-

s., A7

Z ,? p ? an O D D a

N
n
C
q
B
n ,
S = O
CD
CD
c°. "oo °
* o ( co a c ee

v o
"
w `n
o CD
w < A7
„?
CD W

r
r
O x ? S [s7
n
a. a a
?. m (
D
-cs 3
zs `3 _ 3 g ee

n
O
=
CL
m y
0
=•
w
Q•
Mw
a m = C

CL w
CD a a

.
;
.
CL
a
n 110,
-
yu y
03 N CD co

a
w m
c
D
co 3

e?
C) C) tr? cl? ce) y:z C) C) C)
=-

O
st
A
N
C k
S
A ?j s
Z
.
s
A
a
Or
st ;

Z
?
te
? ? ?
A n•
Q ?
O 'G ?
" ? ^ ? ?'
? A `C3
? .?
` ;?i ..
r
e
?
" c1 q ? C f
D
? f0 Sa a d0 it
O $ O

n
.
I.

--
N
-
N -
a\
U N N
ON

.r Flo.

fD
Cr

UI

N

-: 5

tJ O * Cn
N N QA O w- N O O w O N
CD n
cn
-?o CCD
0 (n M.
ov
o ?
o ?
a) C.
O 0
K
M -p
o
N 0
m
g
o m
?• N
ca
c
CD
N
Cil
N
O
O
N