19940975 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19950118

?l s 3? I fl?Y???
i 99?
acj
IMPORTANT
To
Date Time
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M --- - ----- - ----- -- -
of_ - -
Phone
_
AREA CODE
NUMBER EXTENSION

WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT

Message _ _ _____ __

Signed
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN

RETURNED YOUR CALL
0?'
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
o....rew .... Rnr„rlwrl Panwr
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
?EHNR
October 19, 1994
Cumberland County
DEM Project # 94975
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. Tom Ray
Fayetteville Regional Airport
P.O. Box 64218
Fayetteville, N.C. 28306
FILE CUtiAl
Dear Mr. Ray:
You have our approval to place fill material in 0.5 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
road access at Fayetteville Regional Airport, as you described in your application dated 18 October
1994. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number 2671. This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 26
when it is issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. In
addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 30 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the
Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and
its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Management under Section 401
of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Domcy at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
Po n7Par Jr. P.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Fayetteville DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Files
94975.1tr
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
P.O. Box 2478
A641 5 West Hargett Street
Suite 910, Raleigh Bldg.
Raleigh, NC 27602-2478
[phone]
To NCDE 14 N R
I? o. (fox 2°1535
NC f, 27424-- DS3S
GENTLEMEN:
WE ARE SENDING YOU L A<,;hed
? Shop drawings ? Prints
? Copy of letter ?
LOVER (DIP 4QQNISH07 L
DATE I o - I o- 9 4- JOB NO. ZK 4' 7>
ATTENTION M r. Jo (-? ??, ?pr
RE: u.S Sol - A t r )+
pzi
00 r
NG
4ni
? v

? Under seperate cover via the following
? Plans ?Samples ? Specifications
COPIES DWG. NO. DESCRIPTION
W aA:e_r (S),ucJ1 k4 ??. ?v r
J r ?wt?
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: c/?
? For distribution A. ? Approved 8. ? Approved as noted
? For your use C. ? Approved as noted - Revise and resubmit for record 00,18 EC?i
? As re d D. ? Tentatively approved - Revise and resubmit for final approval ENV/l?0/? 1994
or review and comment E. ? Not approved -Revise and resubmit MfNT
Aa; SC/?M'C?S
REMARKS
COPY TO ? /
BY SIGNED_

I 4i01 ISSUED ACTION ID:
DEM ID: c__
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT 0):
JOINT FORM FOR
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTA_;.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRON rl-- ?ALtAi'
P.O. BOX 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCE
WILMINGTON, NC 28402-1890 P.O. BOX 29535 i 8
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E RALEIGH, NC 276Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. JOHN 1
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. PLEASE PRINT.
3. OWNERS NAME: F e vi l ly Re??oma l Airpor4
2. OWNERS ADDRESS : P 0 • I3ox 64218
FaY k?v i l l a N G . ZP 3oG
3. OWNERS PHONE NUMBER (HOME): - (WORK): `910- 433 - 16v 19
4: IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER : To ri rzaY -
adak ru.s and a - ?.? as a oV?
5. LOCATION OF WORK (MUST ATTACH AP). COUNTY: (:urn W rL4tA
NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: d? L ia,
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS; LANDMARKS, ETC.): gveg
aa0rox;0u c1w s m'd¢b ?u?'? o? Fw,?' ?ila, C?? Ai r5u6mms is ri
0
6. NAME OF CLOSEST STREAM/RIVER : 5 w X4
7. RIVER BASIN: Fir P-1 VA-t" -
8. IS THIS PROJECT LOCATED IN A WATERSHED CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, SA, HQW, ORW,
WS I, OR WS II? YES [ ) NO {
IF YES, EXPLAIN.
9. HAVE ANY SECTIOYESO4 ( PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS
PROPERTY? No I q--,
10. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WATERS OF THE U.S., INCLUDING
WETLANDS, LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE: D. 5 Azv1s
6/10/92
-2-
11. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WATERS OF THE U.S:, INCLUDING WETLANDS, IMPACTED BY
THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
FILLED: 0.5 ?-?'?
DRAINED:
FLOODED:
EXCAVATED:
TOTAL IMPACTED: 0.5 ?ra.s
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK (ATTACH PLANS) : Cor?s?w?-ioh o? Goo
e.c wt u l +, - L& w 2 raa,4 wov w g_ Ola K ? a¢ rKed is a rub Gov b q ¢r'. T1c
I S Q YO i'e? L n r r rv .o
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Tna rouR? Sa h ra?i Lo'
ras?dzw4i*1 A nA com meY??%sl a e' iC.l¢¢
14. STATE REASONS WHY THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE
CARRIED OUT IN WETLANDS. ALSO, NOTE MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS. Al I aldiv 4ivi, aliariw+ohis, woul,4 rgajAirc. a CVP&S-
o rt9
e1 nct Per`" WYLS-'v'V&j%,V K . ,
15. YOU ARE RtQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) REGARDING THE PRESENCE
OR ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED
SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE
PROPOSED PROJECT. HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES [?-? NO [ I
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT?
HAVE YOU DONE SO? YES ( NO [ )
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BY DEM:
A. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, AND LAKES ON
THE PROPERTY. A?ck
B. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY
PROJECT. A-}'-iz"zA
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS
RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE. A 6e-l,,a.d
D. IF A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, ATTACH
COPY. N/A
E. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING P QPERT ? 't o??w?a I wl1. &A I exit r SI vw l? - Wt Y 261c1?2h j /1
F. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPO AL? N/A
.. ... I
OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE
YETTEVI LLE REGIONAL AIRPORT
NORTH CAROLINA
-- -- - .,
VICINITY MAP
Pro Pos ?? ? arc ??????-s

o F
o \
\ e) SS\
F •. O
453,500

r
+
s \ 2,3q
N? 57
'61 ?<<r1 ''•? I?`I
ss ?:
EMpV \S ??
F
.? , FENCE ss
F
9
b . FS$
FSs
? N
0
f
C
?Q
N
4"yS" CP
/Q
11

Sr .J
Orr
8R'?K E? 7-/ON
OC P
N
o)
0
N
U
N
32,, S-
mss
O F
J?Sr My 55-
affialim
a
00 Lo
14 1
12 ' 9
PR
Nop• -

ETLAND LIMITS
N
? NI
o Q•
o a
,Y, N I
N453,50Q
/ EWool
r?
6! sS
r
r J -
io
Q
i ?VQ
z f- 640 -36 31,
E
E?
_ "l1
s.

CC
c
l'?
If
sl
cr-
C
N F 4AW
Q'
O

? J
ss \ ?2.3q h?
ss\ col)
VI
F RE? SS \ci .
ilI
/ - s o
ss pRp ??.
' C -

Cp ,`
/0

F _
FSS ss
F? F A
F S
F / ? ? /
H?SET eRI? at oc%N
EN E SINK N
of
O
N N

C.)
0 \
wh

MH ss 8
L/
z
•' MC
z
C%
?INETLAND LIMITS
rho6 J' I - Loo k? n? rb?4 n -4re4 rj
Rw-ty *k2 - l-oo ka'r?y U rsl'rza,,

flvb #4 -- Loo ki n5 Was- (Ur/14- 4m i?l??

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Field Investigs, r (s) : G,J es a c re Date:. - -
Project/Sits: uK State:County: C??w Cr lewfte0v
Applicant/Owner: P ant coaunit Names
Landscape Position norms r ' Switf Ceeelc CEAsr) Acreage:
Note: It a more detai site description is necessary, use the back o data orm
or afield notebook.
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes X No (If no, explain on back)
Has vegetat n, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Yes__ NoI (If yes, explain on back
VEGETATION
Tre a Indicator status shrubs Indicator status
U
ap gs E
A
yHC` servo fo` - c
Herbs
Percent o dominant species that are 08L, FACW, and/or FAC Z
Is the Facultative Neutral Option met? Yes No
is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes Ho L
BOILS
Series/phase: C a K o? r Subgroup: Ca a c6,- S-00
Is this soil on a by is soi s list? Yes No Undstermina
Regional Indicators of Soil Saturation (San y-s Wonsan y): SoAey
Flooding duration or nonsaturata soils: is Long "I"- very Long
Soil profile description of the top 15 inches o-y'? dark rt b?w.?/o y? y/a?
Is the Rydric soil criterion met? YesNo G 4/-01c),1, war 4r Sa N?Q
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes___ No >4, Surface water depth
Is the soil saturated? Yes No L _
Seasonal high water table dept?er(=( for to county soil survey): > (o-?-f--
Hydrology field indicators:
s the hydrology criterion met? Yes__ No-2:?_
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Is the subject area a wetland? Yes NC-.X.-
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Field Investigators : 6•? ? 0-se Lc Date:. - ?a ? yoZ
project/Sites ?r Statss County: C er u?+
Applicant/Owner: Plant Community Name:
Landscape Position Ia -Lo Scvf r - Acreage:
Note: If a more detailed- site description is necessary, use the back o data orm
or afield notebook.
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Yes X No (If no, explain on back)
as thes vegstati n, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Has-
Yes No Jc (If yes, explain on back
VEGETATION
Tress Indicator status shrubs Indicator status
/ e ?a'"A / C, /a r0.
e / F,4c tom/ J"
ap qs .--
,Q c e r- / v L e yw% 1C?S`
er s
Adz-
percent o ominant species that are OBL, FACW, an or FAC mac,
is the Facultative Neutral Option met? Yes_ No
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes ? No
sous
Series/phase: Subgroup: 70k N Sun /d al?n
Is this soil on the hydric soils 11st7 Yes No Undetermined
y) /? yyc sa H c?,. , vev
Regional Indicators of Soil Saturation (San y Non
C, c?f ?
Flooding uration or nonsaturate soils I Brie ng Very Long
Soil profile description of the top 15 inches uerr dos-lc 9vay laaw
is the Hydric soil criterion met? Yes_?_ No Qo YI"j 311)
HYDROLOGY
IS the ground surface inundated? Yes-..-.. No - _ Surface water depth__
Is the soil saturated? Yes No-
Seasonal high water table dept (refer to co tv :o it survey): 4-1
Hydrology field indicators: S p'f?ra =
s the hydrology criterion met? Yes No
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Is the subject area a wetland? Yes >"- No p-? Fq C W
Rationale for jurisdictional decision-?c? aS ?1???:; r?ak? o
C ? I ??N -w- (IN'f- 7c'/o? sus
DATA FORM
ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Field Investigator(s) s (g,5, Pe-5itLR6-T,4 Date:. -ate -9'91
Pro j ect/Site: yr oa tats: /VC-County:?y „ ev-
Applicant/Owner, Plant Community Name:
Landscape Position 51,- C re? i Acreage:
Note: If a more detas a its escrsption is necessary, use the back o data orm
or afield notebook.
Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?
Zes?_ No (If no, explain on back)
Has the vegeta- t on, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
YesNo__.>< (If yes, explain on back
VEGETATION
Tr es Indicator staffs Shrubs Indicator status
;
L
ue.ru W1.1
AT sags Serbs
ue?^cvs -A./C-a.7tz'
I`?t4,,- SLoY-0 /bta- C?
ercent of ominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC -<1 4w 9p
Is the Facultative Neutral Option met? Yes No
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes -
SOILS
Series/phase: gl a u e 4 Subgroup: ati a /o sae Ho
is this soil on the by is soils list? -Yes No Undetermined
Regional Indicators of Soil Saturation (Sandy & Nonsan y): 50,md
0o q uration or nonsaturate soils: Brie _,?C_ ng Very Long
Soil profile description of the top 15 inches o- /3-vim ala.•/c 1^urii4 brvwh
Is the Hydric soil criterion met? Yes. No t 1041M y S a h yR 511,2)
HYDROLOGY
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No >4 Surface water depth
is the soil saturated? Yes No-
Seasonal high water table depth (refer to county soil survey): >
Hydrology field indicators:
s the hydrology criterion met? Yes No
JIMISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Is the subject area a wetland? Yes No >(-
Rationale for jurisdictional decision:
.l
r
Ie..n?ne,

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources

James G. Martin, Governor
Patric Dorsey, Secretary
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director

1
1

1

March 19, 1992
Mr. David Damon
Aviation Planner
Wilbur Smith Associates
P.O. Box 92
Columbia, S.C. 29202
f`
Re: New Airport Connector of US 301, Fayetteville,
Cumberland County, WSA #263940, CH 92-E-0000-0565
Dear Mr. Damon:
We have received notification from the State Clearinghouse concerning
the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no properties
of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance which would
be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the
project as currently proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at
36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
l
av_tam
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
' DB:slw
c State Clearinghouse
q
109 East ones Street 0 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
hF ?
o?'P ?y9 United States Department of the Interior MAUM
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
MACH 9 "aRaleigh Field Office ¦
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
July 15, 1992
Mr. David Damon
Wilbur Smith Associates
NCNB Tower
P.O. Box 92
Columbia, South Carolina 2.9202
Dear Mr. Damon:
This is in response to your letter dated June 8, 1992, requesting
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) to review the
Environmental Assessment for the Fayetteville Airport Connector,
Cumberland County, North Carolina. These comments are provided
in accordance with provisions of section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C 1531-1543) (Act).
Based upon our review of the information provided, the Service
concurs with the preferred alternative and we believe that no
Federally-listed endangered or threatened species are likely to
be adversely impacted by the proposed project. Therefore, the
requirements of Section 7 of the Act are fulfilled. However,
obligations under Section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if:
(1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action
that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner
not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently
modified in a manner which was not considered in this review; or,
(3) a new species is listed or critical habitat determined that
may be affected by the identified action.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments on the
project proposal, if we may be of further assistance please let
us know.
Sincerely,
Debbie Scruggs
7 jPTN Acting Supervisor
JUL 1 7 1492
ROADWAY'/A;,; ;;; J1dIS1^'i