20041563 Ver 1_Complete File_20040922

?6? wAr?gQt:
a ?i
D ?
0
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 23, 2005
DWQ # 20041563
Guilford County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
New Castle Investment Company, Inc.
Attn: Barry Siegal
Post Office Box 19972
Greensboro, NC 27419
Subject Property: Cottesmore Subdivision, intersection of Willard Dairy Rd and Barrow Rd.
UT East Fork Deep River
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWL
Dear Mr. Siegal:
On October 18, 2004, you requested a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) for your project. We wrote to you on November 15, 2004 discussing concerns that
we have regarding the design of the project and stating that it would be placed on hold for three
weeks giving you time to address DWQ's concerns. As of today, DWQ has not received a response
to this request. Therefore, your file is hereby considered withdrawn and will not be reviewed until
DWQ's earlier concerns are addressed. Once you have collected sufficient information to have a
complete application (please see our November 15, 2004 letter for the missing information), you will
need to reapply for DWQ approval. This includes submitting a complete application package with
the appropriate fee.
Please be aware that you have no authorization under Section 401 of the Clear Water Act for this
activity and any work done within waters of the state would be a violation of North Carolina General
Statutes and Administrative Code. Please call Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-715-4631 if you have any
questions or concerns.
or
Revie Permitting Unit
0
cc:
Daryl Lamb, Winston-Salem DWQ Reg al Office
Raleigh Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Westcott Engineering, 4135 Mendenhall Oaks Parkway, Suite 140, High Point, NC 27265
Filename: S:\2005 Correspondence\04-1563 Cottesmore Subdivision (Guilford) Withdrawal.doc
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.cnr,st ite.nc.us/ncwctlands
One
Carolina
Ntima!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
OF W ArFRQ Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 15, 2004
DWQ Project # 04-1563
Guilford County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
New Castle Investment Company, Inc.
Attn: Barry Siegal
Post Office Box 19972
Greensboro, NC 27419
Subject Property: Cottesmore Subdivision, intersection of Willard Dairy Rd and Barrow Rd.
UT East Fork Deep River
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Siegal:
On October 18, 2004, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) re eived your letter responding to our
request for additional information. This information is in regar?,to your application dated September 20,
2004 to impact 148.9 feet of streams to construct the proposed residential subdivision. The DWQ has
determined that this response was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below.
The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to impact protected
wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information
requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H
.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information.
Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested (3 copies):
1. Storm Water Management Plan
Because this project lies within the Critical Area of a water supply watershed a complete storm
water management plan is required (reference GC 3402, Condition 4 located for your
convenience at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/GC3402.pdf). This shall include extended
detention wetlands, bio-retention areas, and ponds followed by forested filter strips (designed
according to latest version of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual) be
constructed as part of the stormwater management plan. While you may have met the City of
High Point requirements, you must still meet the State's requirements. For example, the plant
material you are proposing for the bioretention area must be a minimum of 2.5" caliper for trees
and 3-4' height, 18-24" spread for shrub material (DENR 1999, p. 53).
a. Please provide all calculations and a completed BMP worksheet for each storm water
management device.
b. Please enclose a signed and notarized Operation and Maintenance Agreement for the
stormwater management BMPs (one original and two copies).
The DENR Stormwater BMP Manual and the BMP worksheets can be found at:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto.html.
401 Oversite/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone]/ Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.no.us/ncwetlands
None hCarolma
Ntum!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/101% Post Consumer Paper
New Castle Investment Company, Inc.
Page 2 of 2
November 15, 2004
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing
and Daryl Lamb of the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three
(3) weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project
as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Cynthia Van Der Wiele or Mr. Bob Zarzecki at 919-
733-9726 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
C?__1114? ?J4
Cyndi B. Karoly
401 Oversite / Express Review Permitting
CBK/cvdw
cc: Daryl Lamb, DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy \
Central Files
Westcott Engineering, 4135 Mendenhall Oaks Pkwy, Ste 140, High Point, NC 27265
Filename: 04-1563 New Castle Investment (Guilford) On 11old2
mailbox: ///C I/D ocume nts%20and%20 S ettings/bob_zarzecki/App lic at...
Subject: Re: please review Cottesmore S/D
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 09:03:26 -0500
To: Cynthia Van Der Wiele <[e-mail]>
CC: daryl lamb <daryl. lamb @ncmail.net>
Cynthia,
I've put the file back in your office. You're letter looks fine. The only thing
that I would add is that they appear to be reworking the existing pond as a
stormwater pond. I think that GC3402 and the buffer rules would require them to
convert this pond to a constructed wetland, bioretention or pond followed by a
vegetative filter strip if they plan to incorporate it within their stormwater
management plan and directly discharge through the buffer. It's also not clear to me
why the pond is not buffered. We'll need to send this to the WSRO and possibly Scott
Carpenter (DWQ Planning) once we have a complete application and before we send out
any final approval. Generally the plan and buffer avoidance (except for one road
crossing) looks good. Keep in mind that the locals should be doing the primary
buffer review under their ordinance.
- Bob
Cynthia Van Der Wiele wrote:
Bob,
This one slipped thru. We received more info. on Oct. 15. I've found deficiencies
that warrant a 2nd more info letter. Please see if there are other items so that
we don't have a 3rd on hold letter. They've got Randleman buffer impacts, but it
doesn't look like they put it in the application.
Thanks. File is in shared drive, but I've also attached it.
Cynthia
1 of 1 11/13/2004 9:03 AM
`Xjestcott
? Engineering
?.?onsulting, PC
October 14, 2004
Mr. John Dorney
NCDWQ
Parkway Building
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Cottesmore Subdivision
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Dear John,
212@[Royeb
OCT i s zooa
1Sc11gEpN,SAFrD A77FRQU??UTy y?1
v V(-Z-A}g CR BU1,1NI
I am writing in response to your Request for More Information dated September 28,
2004.
Your requests and my responses are as follows:
Plan Details
1. Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on a full size set of plans. A
full size preliminary plat is attached.
2. Please provide detail for the Stormwater management practices as required by
GC 3402 using DWQ 1999 Stormwater BMP manual. The pond plans are
attached. They have been designed to comply with City of High Point design
guidelines. They have been reviewed and approved by the City of High Point.
3. Please indicate the diffuse provision measures on the site plan. On the
attached Pond Plans the rip-rap outlet measures are indicated and detailed.
Again, they have been designed to City of High Point standards and reviewed and
approved by the City of High Point.
Buffers
1. Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. I have attached a copy of the
preliminary plat which indicates the locations of the stream buffers in green. The
darker green indicates the areas of stream impacts to include impacts in zone 3.
The lighter green indicates stream buffers where no impacts will occur. The
proposed lot line for lots adjoining the buffers is at the buffer line. This insures
that the entire buffer is located in common area and controlled by the home
4135 Mendenhall Oaks Parkway Suite 1,40, High Point, NC 27265 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Westcott
REngineering
;onsulting, PC
October 14, 2004
Mr. John Dorney
NCDWQ
Parkway Building
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Cottesmore Subdivision
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Dear John,
OCT 212@20WRY
18 2004
E71JD1NEDSRAHD ??QWTY
STC?R,,ATER 6rZ11,',CH
I am writing in response to your Request for More Information dated September 28,
2004.
Your requests and my responses are as follows:
Plan Details
1. Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on a full size set of plans. A
full size preliminary plat is attached.
2. Please provide detail for the Stormwater management practices as required by
GC 3402 using DWQ 1999 Stormwater BMP manual. The pond plans are
attached. They have been designed to comply with City of High Point design
guidelines. They have been reviewed and approved by the City of High Point.
3. Please indicate the diffuse provision measures on the site plan. On the
attached Pond Plans the rip-rap outlet measures are indicated and detailed
Again, they have been designed to City of High Point standards and revietived and
approved by the City of High Point.
Buffers
1. Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. I have attached a copy of the
preliminary plat which indicates the locations of the stream buffers in green. The
darker green indicates the areas of stream impacts to include impacts in zone 3.
The lighter green indicates stream buffers where no impacts will occur. The
proposed lot line for lots adjoining the buffers is at the buffer line. This insures
that the entire buffer is located in common area and controlled by the home
4135 Mendenhall Oaks Parkway Suite 140, High Point, NC 27265 • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
f
owners association.
2. Please indicate the location of the protected Randleman buffers as overlays on
the site plan. See my answer to number 1 above.
I hope the enclosed information is satisfactory for your use. Should you require any
additional information or have any questions please feel to call me.
Designing to meet your needs,
WESTCOTT ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, PC
Michael B. Westcott PE
President
cc: File
CL-1p- F W Arl' Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
D r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
-? Alan W. Klimck, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 28, 2004
DWQ Project # 04-1563
Guilford County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
New Castle Investment Company, Inc.
Attn: Barry Siegal
Post Office Box 19972
Greensboro, NC 27419
Subject Property: Cottesmore Subdivision, intersection of Willard Dairy Rd and Barrow Rd.
UT East Fork Deep River
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Siegal:
On September 22, 2004, the Division of Water Quality (DWQJreceived your application dated
September 20, 2004 to impact 148.9 feet of streams to construct ,the proposed residential subdivision. The
DWQ has determined that your application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as
discussed below. The DWQ will require additional information in order to process your application to
impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the
additional information requested below, we will have to move toward denial of your application as
required by 15A NCAC 211.0506 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your
project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Plan Details
a. Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on a full size set of site plan.
b. Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC 3402 using
DWQ 1999 Stormwater BMP Manual.
C. Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
2. Buffers
a. Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
b. Please indicate the location of the protected Randleman buffers as overlays on the site plan.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me in writing
and Daryl Lamb of the DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office. If we do not hear from you within three
weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as
withdrawn.
401 Oversite/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h 2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Noy` Carolina
,11 mmallif
New Castle Investment Company, inc.
Page 2 of 2
September 28, 2004
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Cynthia Van Der Wiele or Mr. John Dorney at 919-
733-1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
Dorney,
4 1 Oversite /Express R iew Permitting
JRD/bs
cc: Daryl Lamb, DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Westcott Engineering, 4135 Mendenhall Oaks Pkwy, Ste 140, High Point, NC 27265
Filename; 04-1563 New Castle Investment (Guilford) On Hold
Office Use Only: f orm Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Barry Siegal / New Castle Investment Company, Inc. SEP 9 p 2pg
Mailing Address:__ P.O. Box 19972
Greensboro, NC 27419 VMIER QUA' ITY QEnT,QN
Telephone Number: 336-632-8900 Fax Number: 336-632-0834
E-mail Address: N/A
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Michael B. Westcott, PE
Company Affiliation: Westcott Engineering & Consulting, PC
Mailing Address: 4135 Mendenhall Oaks Parkway
Suite 140
High Point, NC 27265
Telephone Number: 336-812-3546 Fax Number: 336-812-8075
E-mail Address: mwestcott(iDnorthstate.net
Page of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Cottesmore Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 7804906021
4. Location
County: Guilford Nearest Town: High Point
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Cottesmore Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From the intersection of I-40 and
Hwy 68 take 68 south. Turn right at Willard Dairy Road. Project is at the intersection of
Willard Dairy Road and Barrow Road on the Northeast corner of the intersection.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): NAD 27 N 3990035 E 17591526
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 70.76
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Unnamed Tributary to East Fork
Deen River
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at litti)://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The Site is currently a farm. The Southern portions of the
Site are farmed and the remainder is wooded. There is a Plantation Gas Company pipeline
crossing the property in the vicinity of Impact #1.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proiect is the construction of a 254 unit Subdivision on a 70.76 Acre parcel. The 254
units consist of 177 single family homes and 77 town homes. The impacts are due to stream
crossinus for roadwavs, sewer lines and BMP outlet protection.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose is to construct the roadways and
utilities necessarv for a 254 Unit Subdivision
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USAGE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date pen-nits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future impacts are expected.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 7 of 12
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There are three stream impacts.
Impact 41 is 10.3 LF of stream for a proposed sewer crossing. Impact #2 is 135.5 LF of stream
for a culvert crossiniz for a roadway. Impact #3 is 4.2 LF of stream impact for the placement of
a BMP outlet protection as required by the City of High Point. The total impact is 149 LF.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(yesino) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httn:Hwww. fema.,,!ov.
**'? List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., fresh water/sa I twater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.25 Ac
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0 Ac
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please secify)
#1 Rip-Rap 10.3 UT E. Fork Deep River Perennial
#2 Culvert/Rip-Rap 135.5 UT E. Fork Deep River Perennial
#3 Rip-Rap 3.2 UT E. Fork Deep River Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
darns (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, tip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
Page 8 of 12
www.us?s.fov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tonozone.com,
www.map(tuest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 149 LF
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankinent, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
We have attempted to minimize the impacts as much as local development ordinance allows.
The -Trades at the roadway crossing are as steep as allowed to minimize this crossing. We would
have liked to have less impact by the Rip-Rap outlet protections but thev are attain required by
the City for all pipe outlets.
VIII. Mitigation
Page 9 of 12
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://Ii'-)o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetIands/strm,2ide.iitm1.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preserv ation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No Mitigation is planned at this time
Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.litm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federaUstate) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Y. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify Randleman Rules)?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 7404.6 3
2 5298.2 1.5
Total 12702
Lone 1 extends out 3U feet perpendicular trom near oanx of channel; Gonc s extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
No mitigation is proposed for these impacts.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The existing ISA is less than 1 acre. The proposed ISA is approximately 24.5 Acres or 34.7%
Three wet ponds and one biocell are proposed on site that meet City if High Point Requirements
for the development.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
All lots will have City of High Point sanitary sewer lines extended to them as part of this project.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
TYPE b' LA NDSCAPE I ?rt
?
W/LANDSCAPE BERM b `tl""`"' RµN49q'ro,M / ?>un ?

AY
'
,W
°-'295 i
, 1

I !
15 UTILITY EASEMENT

f I
r.
8 l
s6 / uARrs
u
I
C : A
a'RRCxr uq e¢q,.
EiuR>E
?(
15' ELEC. EASEMENT ` 11 flo7k??i 'T/ '+rc
,N?n ' \
FtT
C l (i
W11F 9
?• 7 uzST a
4'yy num. ?I« h /` i\ WrTp ?
97 g i ?? l1I ? ?
t ? I bYT ?
0 Nn9? n,A^ ?'
N 1T17b1' E ? + be A
h 1
1096.77 R I / T6e? wH
7597 a
F Nm ? ? r•l9
TAX PR /
R¢I ??
043_,090-,
DR 982. PGWEAR ' ? / ? ? ? '01R ? n ? \\ \ i L.
drY? '•/? i ? V satin ? ?n?z ? a ? ? ?? ??
•Nw" ? e , 1 1 ? ) ?
1 ^ J M
t x,11, I?r
\? ? I4 ? N",e V 51I ! ?
15' UTILITY EASEMENT -Y / aoti? aTN? i 1
TYPE '0' LANDSCAPE YARD
W/LANOSC PE BERM
,nl,l' Y 'yF
!t \ M \ I ? ? ? r
il 7;p
'^a 9? !'+? • '"Xa? i I I ??
TYPE b' LANDSCAPE YARD
W/LANOSCAPE BERN L !
6
/
15' STREET YARD ? `\ ll
v
W/LANDSCAPE BERM i
A
5' CONC. SIDEWALK
r Jey ? NN EO 6
TN \ ?/
? y
J , y~
/ TV A
OTY LIMITS \
:? 7 3 \2tt7NrlAp?

-------- d
----------
g
b
a
?
a?
NAr

USE TO BE DETERMINED
BY THE NOME OWNERS / Y?9a
ASSOCATIOR
L
n T? V\
I

1. ALL LOTS ADJACENT TO WILLARD DAIRY R
AN OAD
AND BARROW OOM ROAD AD TO HAVE HAVE A A COMMON r ' \

G i ,. '
. I \\
FENCING PLAN. '
?+ USE TO BE DETERMINED BY
7. ALL LL STREETS TO BE PUBLIC. yy
THE HOME OWNERS
3. 4CNACE TO BE ACCORDING 70 COMMON ASSOCAIION.
f PLAN.
4. TREEES? BE PLANTED ALONG qD PROPERTY UNE?
COTTESEIORE DR. AND OAK CHASE DR u L
FROM WILLARD DARY RD. TO ALDERNY PL
15' UTILITY EASEMENT
`s„a ar gI?u' PARCEL
?????yyyyyV??? \ EDWAR??-1059A3
15' STREET YA?'? Da. r1°7.'eii
w/ANOS?oAC?o \\\\Uf\RRExtL?Z AaicULtURAE
gg,
f/ 444 Er ?iE H
ata J??$
VICINITY MAP 1'-2000'
7 ? 1 USE TO BE DETERMINED ]
I BY THE HOME OWNERS f' N
b?: I I I?ASSOCATION. n'L?d'\? ? N
wr.wt ? ^J N I.
? j Acme • ,? << u ?
RBCREATIO'I AREQA/y? 9, ' LLx N
? ? ,l° aR,E"1 a ?ppp W C:
W
n ? ul
a
' SITE INFORMATON pD aq
0 2 AZ 3:0 PROPOSE N: a zooE rc o=.
PROPOSED ZONING:: (PEN7Ary 0-01) W ,9 >
CC
PROPOSED LARD OSC USE: : RESI AE9 IATLNAL0EMnP1 <
R G
AREA N N RR0
O O m 4<
Y ry /In 12.200 At
I..I ?Z rcNS?n
?' >Qry A9EAW LO1S :- 3&(L At
\ i 4 IF. OF
STRECR 10.11M! LF, r ?UO j?' W V
0 [( J
• n 9? CSTANCE TO NEAREST RYA PLODD PW: >2DOO' t.y < C ?€S nSS
NATERSISD: OTT LAIR WGA
AVERAGE SLOPE 2-328 V) 0=103 O
mc. C,Cx O9. E.O Ee Z 1x82. U
Nro60LoGx sOE aouFS 5 B. C. C. c 0
H CNf
y r C
PARKING REW6[KNfi ION RE07G10N /AN1L5: [.n Coo
iAN
P M•1<F$
p„ YV_, 1/75 DNQLNO AMTS. 2SA/35. I15PACES RED.
[r [Dw;O TOTAL PROVIDED . 19 SPAM O ? OC
O.B I
N 1 r^ i
7 7 PARKING N /DU U i2.1 . 77.S V V J C> n
RRENt 0•rE' !AR SPA[E OLUNG
RO'VED - 176T 7 • 11 N 7) • 167 jp s
CAR FRONDED • 176' fir,^z
1 ClA GNACSS t 1 D16KNAT SPACE ARE
u 1
FRONDED FOR LINTS 1-25 w C.
W d°a6a
TRACT *!: TRACT -5' TRACT 'C' I TOTAL
AKA IA0.1 3137 25.66 10.31 7076
2.n uNR 99 76 77 254
On"Nrs ¢I 112 172 7.47 167
-%E -,_1 2.47 1.95 1.97 6.35
"'(NKTA" 1.03 1.67 153 9.41
W-
N AIti) 1.56 Ill 0.52 117
0m3µ
?w
10.77
2152
9.72
6196
Nn6N1
9Mnam
96.69s
62011
a16x
90.39
v O??mz?
0 b
? Wi sBa
0
11a! WSl p?,
131%LI TY
?r Q
J .
SURVEY INFORMATION REFORRYOUDLGI
CONTACr ONR
CAU CENTT
R
PREPARED BY: TRIAD [AND SORVEYN4 P.C.
915 EAST NDUNTAN STREET, SUITE H ,
.
1 fA
N[ VU LLL N.C. 27261
PHpQ; (736)
0
OF
%
DATE OF SURVEY: II/12/07 DATE OF YAP: 11/14/03 CARpI
l
\ `
??
TOTAL AREA- 711
t
?ee•eeeee ?/?/
?'
V 5 A
IKEA BE DEDICATED, 212 Al
WT ?`
ARE&- FF,r 70.0.16 At
T PARCEL e
/J
e
t?SS/O, •N/J '
#-
TAR MAP P ?O
.
GOOD BOOK N91 91 PAq 1 ,616 _
PAM 1618

•
LEGEND •
SEAL
IEOF7e N• 0
0 2W/-

,
b - [pL1MC WI [N[ ?- WciEA?IK ,-I
AA - Wn NUN ,19 - NTNr-a-rr i
I • (
97JC 14M(••
•
/
A/
?? `
EM - [aSTNry T,(M wm v - F!)s a rAVN9
f. - G10AA1FD Mi OM7 ? - ?TE N?NAAIIT ?
O[(3A
'
? ? V?
(/
??/l
1//?11$ 1
ISmjT
O
??;
0?

M '?TW
NR-N9T TO fYAL1
6
111
N9
°

P
?
,
/.
**Door
V

/ E N
m1
-T NDI w 012
00 -
P
`
O-A01N. 00X0. PR
DN10 TOrtll ur °°f??i90?111La011
/
/ PROJECT NO. E-263
DATE: 09/14/04
SCALE I'.100'
DWG. BY. Mew/VMS/SDT
aRL er
SCALE
1oR o x fro 2w 1 of 35
- - PRELMUNARY
I 'wh 100 11 . PLAT
I
0
• Z.

i I
J
°V
u O
N
ls/ ap
I % \
p
0
o
P
I
mil 1 J,' Sl? ? ?-- -
O .
T
O /
/ 0 /
J l . - 4 I ---?J?
1 I
II ? r
850 0
. / o
h • ?y?
pa b
0 / O 95 ?I
t
7 00
ss ? ? / • . 51
.t
O•
/-I$-

I ?h
li 850 p !? •© ?
? _
SO I I
II I
1
I I II
? ?o nll
_ ?
O o? Ix
?Jb ? I , I
8

?0 F I.
- -- 52 O
o
8•
II

CD)
0, o
I ,
w
5
0
Flo ?

IV L_ j I v
1 Ci Q\O r
p b? ? _ I O
•
64
1
- y
GUILFORD, N. C.
0 36079-A8-TF-024
1951
? REVISED 1994
`? n DMA 5056 111 SW-SERIES V842
pr,q
m

00
00
\ \ /I \ \ 6`
// \\ GPG
\J?
(j G
0
\ G
SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
l ? ( I I
1 inch = 30 ft.
DRAWN BY: JKH/MBW PROJECT H . NAME SHT. N
DATE: 09/17/04 COTTSMORE IMPACT #1
PROJECT NO.: 263 SUBDIVISION EXISTING CONDITIONS 2
REVIEWED BY: MBW
STREAM IMPACT 8" SANITARY SEWER 10.3 LF
ZONE 1 IMPACT= 1,282.7 SF
ZONE 2 IMPACT= 853.9 SF
Atz=
00
&oI

?G

1 CF= SF C4Z:Z?
SCALE
30 0 15 30 60
I I I
I -
1 inch = 30 [t.
DRAWN BY: JKH/MBW PROJECT H . NAM SHT. N
DATE: 09/17/04 COTTSMORE M PACT #1
PROJECT NO.: 263 SUBDIVISION PROPOSED CONDITIONS 3
REVIEWED BY: MBW
0
PROPOS
66?. CAAP @ 2 0 LF
• 309;
EX. GRADE
? v
00
L0
00
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

z
ff)
cD
? l?lltlllii!/!?? //
in t?GAROj
ao ?.? 90......m. /, ?,
Ix?`CJJ?(7't?anrtan 'i
.` . w
_ SSA A -
O 9
024442
io 'N4
0mmwar?Paa@ '?, ? ?4. FGQ 46id'dgbti?6
SCALE: 1"=40' HORIZ.
1"=4' VERT.
DRAWN BY: SDT/MBW PROJECT SHT. NAME SHT. N
DATE: 09/17/04 COTTSMORE PIPE CROSS
PROJECT NO.: 263 S TBDMSION SECTION 1
REVIEWED BY: MBW ?7 V 1? 1?
STREAM IMPACT 66" CAAP 135.5 LF
ZONE 1 IMPACT= 6,121.9 SF
ZONE 2 IMPACT= 4,444.3 SF
4
\ / X
1000,
14
SCALE
30 0 15 ?0 60
I _ I ? I
1 inch = 30 ft.
DRAWN BY: JKH/MBW PROJECT H . NAM SHT. NO.
DATE: 09/17/04 COTTSMORE IWACT #2
PROJECT NO.: 263 SUBDIVISION PROPOSED CONDITIONS 5
REVIEWED BY: MBW
I? %` z " -' --, 4

\?
I

-oo
0 /

\ Q
\ i ?? \ \ \

SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
I i I I I
1 inch = 20 ft.
DRAWN BY: JKH/MBW
DATE: 09/17/04
PROJECT NO.: 263
REVIEWED BY: MBW
PROJECT
COTTSMORE
SUBDIVISION
IMPACT #3
EXISTING CONDITIONS
6
STREAM IMPACT RIPRAP PAD 3.2 LF

0
® loe
'00, 00 vo,
/ \ Q\
oo,

SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
i inch = ?0 ft.
DRAWN BY: JKH/MBW PROJECT SH . NAM SHT. NO.
DATE: 09/17/04 COTTSMORE INTACT #3
PROJECT NO.: 263 SUBDIVISION PROPOSED CONDITIONS 7
REVIEWED BY: MBW
r
Vlestcott
Engineering
onsulting, PC

Date: September 19, 2004
To: Division of Water Quality From: Michael B. Westcott, PE
401 Wetlands Unit Westcott Engineering & Consulting, PC
1650 Mail Service Center Suite 140
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 4135 Mendenhall Oaks Parkway
High Point, NC 27265
We are sending you ® attached F-1 under separate cover the following items:
? Shop Drawings ? Estimate ? Disk
® Prints ? Specifications ? Other
? Contracts ? Copy of Letter
COPIES DRAWING NO DESCRIPTION DISPOSITION
7 PCN Application for For Your Review &
Cottesmore Subdivision Approval
1 Review Fee Check of $200
REMARKS:

WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
SEP 21 ? 200:
cc: File
WATER QUALITY SECTIOPj
4 1355 ,'Mendenhall Oaks Parkway Suite 140, High Point, NC 27265 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
DWQ# D? I 5C
Plan Detail Incomplete
Date • 23 ' Who Reviewed: Cluck i
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes.on the site plan.
Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. Utz.
Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan. CtL3'+?
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage. - - - - - - - - • • -
? Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
? Please provide the location of a =proposed stormwater.management practices as required by GC
ua? l9gq
Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions. `
`•.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan. 61t410
Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.`
Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
? This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer.
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland impacts were requested. Please
provide $ This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information.
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. -Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H.0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
® Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
U Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
0 Attach this card to the back cf the ma!Ipiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
New Castle Investinent Company, Inc.
Post Office Box 19972
Greensboro, NC 27419
DWQ# 04-1563 - Guilford
A
X JUA 1:1 Agent
11 L1J(/
11 Addr:essee
0. 3c?cive (Print MG) C. Date
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ? Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No
3. Service Type
q Certified Mail ? Express Mail
? Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
? Insured Mail ? C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
2. Article Number 7004 1,1,60 0002 2706 6097
(Transfer from service labe, PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
? Yes
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
LISPS
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Certification Unit +
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
First-Class Mail
Postage ? Fees Paid
Permit No. G-10