20070298 Ver 1_401 Application_20070207

Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
2 0 0 7 0 2 9 8
RE: 401 Water Quality Certification Application for Huff Property
Onslow County, NC
LM G
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP irrc.
Environmental Consultants
TO: Ms. Joanne Steenhuis
Dear Joanne:
February 14, 2007
j'--`
Enclosed is a 401 Water Quality Certification application for your review. This application is
submitted on behalf of Mr. D. Ralph Huff, III fora 161-acre site located off of Highway 210 in
Sneads Ferry, NC. The applicant is proposing to build a residential subdivision with single-family lots
and multi-family units within the site. Although he has attempted to minimize impacts through cazeful
site design and the installation of elevated bridges where possible, one road crossing at the entrance to
the site will impact 0.49 acre of 404 wetlands. To mitigate for these impacts, the applicant proposes
to preserve remaining wetlands on site and buy into the EEP for the restoration of 0. 5 acre of non-
riparianwetlands.
The Pre-Construction Notification form, associated maps, and site plan showing the proposed
development are enclosed for your review. In addition, the $200 application fee has been submitted to
DWQ's Raleigh office. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance
with this project.
Sincerely, -
Kim Williams
Wetland Scientist
Encl.
C: Mr. D. Ralph Huff III
Mr. Billy Sutton
Mr. Dave Bartone
Mr. Brad Shaver, ACOE
Mr. Ian McMillan, DWQ
1 "'!
~~~ ~ 1 9 ~%:1(~ 7

www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 • P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
20070298
February 14, 2007
---~ .__.
RE: NWP 39 Application for Huff Property (aka Folkstone Road Tract)
Onslow County, NC
LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP irrc.
Environmental Consultants
TO: Mr. Brad Shaver
Dear Brad:
Enclosed is a NWP 39 application for your review. This application is submitted on behalf of
Mr. D. Ralph Huff, III fora 161-acre site located off of Highway 210 in Sneads Ferry, NC. The
applicant is proposing to build a residential subdivision with single-family lots and multi-family units
within the site. Although he has attempted to minimize impacts through careful site design and the
installation of elevated bridges where possible, one road crossing at the entrance to the site will
impact 0.49 acre of 404 wetlands. To mitigate for these impacts, the applicant proposes to preserve
remaining wetlands on site and buy into the EEP for the restoration of 0. 5 acre of non-riparian
wetlands.
The Pre-Construction Notification form, associated maps, and site plan showing the proposed
development are enclosed for your review. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you
for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,`
~~ ~`'
Kim Williams
Wetland Scientist
Encl.
C: Mr. D. Ralph Huff III
Mr. Billy Sutton
Mr. Dave Bartone
Ms. Joanne Steenhuis, DWQ
Mr. Ian McMillan, DWQ
www.lmgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403 P.O. Box 2522, Wilmington, NC 28402

PAID 2oo7o2sa
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 39; GC3402
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII, and
. check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page 4),
and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check he~r2e: ^ nM
0 L~ ~ ~ L1 ~A
II. Applicant Information
FEB 1 9 2007
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: D. Ral h Huff III o~rv~c - wH7~k u i
Mailing Address: 2929 Breezewood Avenue #400 ~ ~'~~ ~
Fayetteville, NC 28303
Telephone Number: 910-237-7869 Fax Number: 910-485-0463
E-mail Address: n/a
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Kim Williams
Company Affiliation: Land Management Group, Inc.
Mailing Address: PO Box 2522
Wilmington, NC 28402
Telephone Number: 910-452-0001 Fax Number: 910-452-0060
E-mail Address: kwilliamsnlmgroup.net
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local landmarks
such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries
and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map and site plan
must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings, impervious
surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should include the
appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property boundaries
outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion, so long as
the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the USACE requires
information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format; however, DWQ may
accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction drawings rather than a
sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are reduced to a small scale such
that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that the project has been placed on
hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: HuffPropertp
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 426804827647
4. Location
County: Onslow Nearest Town: Sneads Ferry
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): n/a
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Wilmington take US
Highway 17 North to Onslow County. Turn right on Folkstone Road. Property is on the
corner of Old Folkstone Road and Hwy 210 on the right.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately
lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34° 31' 33" °N 77° 26' 09" °W
6. Property size (acres): approx. 161.4 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Goose Bay
8. River Basin: White Oak 03020106
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at
the time of this application: The project site is currentlyundeveloped. Vicinity land use
includes undeveloped. residential and commercial land. Residential properties are located to
the south and commercial properties to the north. A US Marine Broadcasting Tower Site is
located to the east of the subject property.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the Type of equipment to be used: The
applicant proposes to create necessary infrastructure to access a residential subdivision. There
will be a total of 7 wetland crossings. Bridges will be constructed at six of the wetland crossings,
resulting in no wetlands impacts. The entrance road will be partiall~ged (approx 220+/- lfl.
Wetland fill will be required for the remaining 475 linear feet. Fill material will be placed within
the wetland areas (see attached plan). Additional material may be trucked in if needed. A track hoe
and bulldozer will be used to level fill material. Road construction will follow sedimentation and
erosion control plans. Silt fences will be used to reduce erosion into adjacent wetlands.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To provide access for future residential
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this project
(including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include the
USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. 404 wetlands were delineated by LMG and approved by Mr. Brad Shaver
of the US Army Corps of Engineers in the field. The wetland survey has been sent to Mr. Shaver
for his approval and sig~,nature.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional wetland impacts are anticipated on this site.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be listed
separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from riprap
dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an accompanying
site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) should be shown
on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be included
at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream mitigation,
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 8

list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for listing or
description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The applicant proposes to permanently
impact 0 49 acre of 404 wetlands.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to mechanized
clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list
impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) (yes/no) (linear feet)
1 fill forested no ~3200ft 0.49

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.49
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: ~prox. 66.3 ac
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must
be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
n/a

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) n/a
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
n/a

Total Open Water Impact (acres) n/a
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 8

6. List t
he cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres):
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.49
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only applies
to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation N/A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should be
described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of draw-
down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. In the site design of this project,
wetland impacts were avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. The applicant
took great care in creatin a site plan that fits within the uplands of the tract. However, the location
and extent of wetlands where the property meets Highway 210 result in unavoidable impacts.
Wetland impacts are needed to provide access into the property (see attached site plan). Please
note that the applicant evaluated the option of placing the road against the northern property
boundary, but there is existin dg evelopment (bar/restaurant) located adjacent to this property line.
Placing the only entrance road right next to this development would decrease the marketability of
the subdivision. In addition, the applicant wants to place a sales office at the entrance and there
would not be enough room at this location to do this.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 8

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC Division
of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to freshwater
wetlands or greater than or equal to 1501inear feet of total impacts to perennial streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors including
size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted aquatic resource
will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable mitigation as
proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include, but are not
limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland and/or upland
vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of aquatic resource
functions and values by creating; restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values,
preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order for
USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application lacking a
required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete. An
applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's Draft
Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2 0. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide as
much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a description
of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach a separate
sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant proposes to preserve remaining on-site wetlands and is currently preparing the
restrictive covenants. In addition, the application will buy into the NCEEP for the restoration
of 0.5 acre ofnon-riparian wetlands.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating that
they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For additional
information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wtp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please check the
appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): n/a
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): n/a
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 8

Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.5 acre
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach
a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify
)? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If
buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. n/a
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 8

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. There is no existing impervious cover on site.
Total proposed impervious cover will be less than 25% with pockets of hi density. The
applicant will install silt fencing_around the construction area to reduce erosion into wetland areas.
The engineer for the proposed project is currentl developing a stormwater plan.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The lots will tie into the local sewer system.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Isthis anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: This
project consists of a residential subdivision and will not provide access or utilities to other tracts.
In addition all remaining wetlands within the site will be preserved.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may choose
to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on work
schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and Threatened
Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
I \ G Z
\,J /~c~ ~a -~-
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 8

. ~ ,
~~ + 'r~, 3 t72 '''~f~Rll
/~~
~,l ~~= ~'~_~w 4 ti ~~. 210 r ~_ ' ,'1'. ^,' r.
a
> ,~ -.t.., 8 ~ c nte~ ,.
i Po:nt
s si ~'~ .,.;• s. n~ ~brm Pr~.~~ Cr~eb
_ n ' vam w,
~ - .. ~. , - ~ . Y ~ ~ ro.,errr Pr
_ ,{,~ \ ~~r ! i ~MfM atMEpst:S fa~d6g
+..~VY po
ii ~,Cry~ r' ~ 1r,re.1..
, 'i
E
.~ ~ ~ ~~..,~,; ~ SITE , ~,
,t , - z ,_
,.
. ~ ~r. b
'~ ~
. _R
i
f '~, '•
,._ " r i - ~~ ~ /!^J, l:~o ChaAWicL Rc!Man
Ary~ndq./M
~ swi ~,.,, r~~ !a t
1 a:
' - . ~ ~ kiulb. RMge ~" 1
.r. - ~ -.1~ 4~ndup f~"
""~;~ ... , ~ ,h. ,, ,
L ~--- 1~Hg7I
~" ~~ "~ ~ ~~~ ~r I
~'
s t i . t ~.. 'one. es"°~.
\ <.
l~l- ~ ! ~` ~ Mc.rrla -
J (((
_ t.~agta Patn.uJa IMf
;; pns ,~ t i ` ,u,r..d 210 3J.
/ ~ ( Iwr, 1~t '7
\,
. ~ ^- r ~ ~~~ ~ r, ~Gy`~! t n ran (;i1y
210 ~". ,^•-'. ~ a ~'~` ,yo~o ~F:.laing Pier
~, - ,ef
iowfeK ~' ~`~C~ rt.,., t.
~ " ~ ~~' ~,d s ~.sN;.L Bennet P+rr
! ~ ~
a~ ~.`~ th•I Mef
~•" ',~ tSr•at,h
J
S.rH ° .:.+ Darns; k• 6i10's ~.
-Niatu I ish!ng i'~r
l:irq
t. a>rdfryr ~ . a ~ ~ '~~~t c ay t. ~ can pir~r
~" + 50
_~~
¢ ~~ [ ;. _
- ~. ~ ~' ~.
i
- 20070 298
~:
s ~ .
o ~~~a~
Fps ~ ~ zr~a~ ~.
rE ~ero~ VvA7~k
*i3oundanes are approximate ana are ww~T~.nN~k9n~Ig3T0I41WAi~t
not meant to be absolute. SCALE 1" - 1 Mile
Map Source: North Carolina Atlas 8 Gazetteer. Pg 84 8~ 85.2003
D. Ralph Huff, III
Huff Property LMG Figure 1
Onslow County, NC LAVDMANAGEMENTGROUPisc Vicinity Map
40-06-321 ~ Environrnentnl Consultants
February 2006

~j l , ~ \ V v L.~/ ~ ~ `7Y ~ , ~%-' it ,~~ ' /,cam .i
~~~ ~ !
~~ ~ _ ~~ ~
~. ~.
! ,~ _
~~1, es `~ If ~ ~. ~"- V •- r
_ ` ~ - ^ ,~ '
~ 1 ~ rs ~ • .
;,
_ 1 _
' , ~- ....
\~\\~ , h
a _
._. _._ .,- _. __~.. 2
~~iz14 ?.T30" tj5 Y5PlCER BAYI z7j J
_ 5557 rv uw ,- ,.~
a ~4
~ ~
F~~3 1 9 2()~l7
f E i~reNR • wA~rl-~ QUALI
.~?'I.Aw~! AND $TAgAMli1~L~R AIiANCr~
*Boundanes are apprexirna~e anU are
not meant to be absolute. SCALE 1" - 2000'
Map Source: Sneads Ferry & Spicer Bay Quadrangle 7.5 minute (topographic) 1990.
D. Ralph Huff, III
Huff Property LMG Figure 2
onslow county, Nc L^"°"'^h^~~M~rT~KO~Pr°` USGS Topgraphic Map
Environrnenrol Consultants
40-06-321
February 2006

n
_~
~y -'
st
To
~, i I R
L
_~
~.: ~ ;~~ ~
f ~ ~_
~-
f~ J WaB ~
t~
~~ ~ Mu
Pa ~
/` `'~~ /
2007029 8
o C~C~~~~
r~ FED 1 9 Z'
*Bc~undanes are apprUxirriare anu are ~,~'1'IGR. ~~'~
nat n~eent tc~ be absolute. +~~t~+~~sT~i~~~CALE 1" = 600'
Map Source: NRCS Soil Survey.
D. Ralph Huff, III
Huff Property LMG Figure 3
Onslow County, NC LAND MANAGlMENT GROUP isc SOIIS Map
40-06-321 Environinenta! Consttitants
February 2006

ti~~~ ~r "i 'fie t .Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;.,jj~5 ~ R
sir's ~~ Jl ~~~';f''~ I ~ ~.~`` C~R, ~r
~~.
*~" ~- i
~.
~1*~ ~ -'
wr
{
{#' f ~. ~ `~T - yam, i~w! ) .~ ;
Y ' ~yt ~ y r.f t ,k

~. ~ s
~~
~.,~~~
iw*~
~ ~' ,
Y
' ~~
r ~~
u ~ .
r, ~

~~,
~_,~
~,r ~~
~,.t lt!
~_ -~
~.~~
•r.
*Boundanes are approximate ana are
nc~t meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1998 NAPP aerial photography
2 ~"~7'~298
D ~~~" ~ ~ i
~;
~"~ ~ of .,,-y
~~ SCALE 1" = 600'
D. Ralph Huff, III Figure 4
Huff Property LMG
Onslow county, NC L^vDM^:~^~~M~rvT~KOUrr~~. Aerial Photograph
40-06-321 Environmental Consultants
February 2006

.~~:, ~~ J
~ ', ~Ca
`; ~
^~~ '~ l
~~~ , ~ .~. ...i .
p ~ ~, r p I tt • :'~+~
/ ~.
~.
0~ ^E '~ f
~~ ~ e 1
5 a f ~:
ti ,.
~ , t ,r~~ ~
~_
j
ti _- , ~ ~ ~ ~
h {]\(
I~~~ d
~~
~I r .
MAR1~~
9ROADC"A'
~W~
~~
o Qi
0
1'"7 fJDC 4
a ~~ ~
~~~ . .

i' ~' i` ~ ~}JG ( (~
~ ~;
~ '~. J ~-`-~ t
WETLAND NOTES:
WETLANDS FLAGGED BY:
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
3805 WRIGHTSVILLE AVE.-STE. 15
WILMINGTON, N.C. 28403
PHONE: [phone]
WETLAND FLAGS FIELD LOCATED BY:
JIM BLANCHARD ASSOCIATES
443 SARECTA ROAD
KENANSVILLE, NC 28349
PHONE:[phone]
PARCEL REFERENCES:
MAP BOOK 15, PAGE 34
20070298
NOTES:
-IMPACTS SHOWN INCLUDE ALL NECESSARY
TO CONSTRUCT THE PROJECT. NO ADDITIONAL
IMPACTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT
ADDITIONAL PERMITTING (IF NECESSARY)
- LAYOUT SHOWN IS CONCEPTUAL ONLY
- NO LOT IMPACTS ARE PROPOSED
I
EXISTING WETLAND
WETLAND IMPACT
Huff Property
Wetland Impact Analysis
Overall Impact Map
Ons1oW County, North Carolina
February 7, 2007
Scale: 1" _ '~
~~~
. D
~~n~
(150' PUBLIC
iC
w".:`-;.,,,,.~.,.,,.~.sV_ti{ . 45.26' ~-,..
S 05'40'46" W
--.,_..__..,.'.,`""'.---~---.~ 999.75'
GRAPHIC SC~"ugWT,T~k qty
200 0 Boa 2ao ~~h~ua
1 inch = 200 ft

~°J

v
~J
WETLAND NOTES:
WETLANDS FLAGGED BY:
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
3805 WRIGHTSVILLE AVE.-STE. 15
WILMINGTON, N.C. 28403
PHONE: [phone]
WETLAND FLAGS FlELD LOCATED BY:
JIM BLANCHARD ASSOCIATES
443 SARECTA ROAD
KENANSVILLE, NC 28349
PHONE: [phone]
GRAPHIC SCALE
120 0 60 120 240
1 inch = 120 ft.
NOTE:
LAYOUT SHOWN IS
CONCEPTUAL ONLY.
Huff Property
Wetland Impact Plan
Onslow County, North Carolina
N
O
O
O
N
C~
INSET 1 OF 2
I
O
H
t1Z
C
LEGEND
~~ EXISTING WETLAND
® WETLAND IMPACT

E~
so' R/w (PRIVATE EASEMENT)
~{p,F LANE LANE
SHOULDER
3
,fi ii~yi~~~i~i~ ~~i~~ ` a ~~~ ~ ~~
°~ ~ GROUND CROSS SECTION A-A
( NOT TO SCALE
~~ ,z..~>t WETLAND)
~~ ~.
'_:~"' ~ 0 45' R/W (PRIVATE EASEMENT)
~ z SHELF LANE LANI
~~ ~ SHOULDER
~ ~ 3
EXISTING CROSS SECTION B-B
GROUND NOT TD SCALE
(WETLAND)
EXISTING WETLANDS
LANE
SHOULDER
PROPOSED
GRADE
PROPOSED
GRADE
O
O
O
N
t.,~
.i~nnu riu. - 4iv ~r
ENTRANCE ROAD PROFILE
NOT TO SCALE
EXISTING
GROUND
(WETLAND) 3'
0
rN
3
z
0
ROAD BOTTOMLESS
SURFACE CONSPAN OR
APPROVED EQUAL
~ EXISTING ~
1 WETLANDS _I
NOT TD scALE H~ Prole TYPICAL SPANNING DETAIL
Impact Cross-Se`'.lctions NOT TO SCALE
Onslow County, North Carolina
INSET 2 OF 2

Feb. 7. 2607 3:45PM K & H CONSTRUCTORS cr•ou ~~~ 9ia4s2ooso No. 2407 P. 2 p.2
FeL .,. ... ..J: ~..r La~~.. ~w~ivF,c~nc~~~ p
2oo-ro29a
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Ilwe, the ucidecsigned, hereby authorise baud Managcrnent Group, Inc. to act as our agent in thc
preparation and representation of information related to the permit application for the
site. AIt cttiestions in regards to this project should be directed
to Land Management Crroup, Titc.
.~'incPtp~v
Pr1IIt NBInC
D
Date