19890017 Ver 1_Complete File_19890101

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor June 16, 1989 R. Paul Wilms
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Parker JC1l?,n?, S? (gip ?FF
FROM: Steve Tedder
SUBJECT: Application for CAMA Permit
Bay River Metropolitan Sewage District
Pamlico County
This memo is in response to your memo of April 20, 1989
requesting an update on the NPDES permit issues related to the
proposed discharge of treated effluent from the Bay River
Metropolitan Sewage District. The NPDES permit for this facility
was issued on March 3, 1987 and revised on October 29, 1987. The
permit requirements for this discharge are considered to be
sufficient for the protection of water quality standards and uses
both in Bay River at the point of proposed discharge as well as
downstream waters such as the SA waters which begin approximately
three miles downstream. This proposed discharge of treated
sewage will eliminate a number of inadequate existing discharges
in this area as well as malfunctioning septic tanks systems.
Specific information on these sources is contained in the
Environmental Assessment for this project.
The disturbance of waters and wetlands associated with this
project is covered under General Certification No. 1179 issued
January 25, 1977 for construction of sewer lines and outfalls for
facilities constructed under an approved 201 Facilities Plan.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please
contact Bill Mills at 733-7015, Ext. 573.
ST:BM/kls
BayRiver.Mem/VO1.D-1
cc: Boyd DeVane
J' Mulligan
ill Mills
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
mvmnuArmrnm
TO: Steve Tedder
Chief, Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: John Parke??
Chief, Major Permit Processing Section
SUBJECT: Bay River Metropolitan Sewer District
DATE: April 20, 1989
1
-
C'?A,Cp i?
r r_,
Stec77 JN ?f 7
The subject project has been on the drawing board for a few years as I am
sure you are aware. I recall a few false starts but on March 13 the CAMA/D&F
application was accepted by our Morehead City office. It is my understanding
that an NPDES permit was issued some time before our present day knowledge and
fears of that which is now happening to the greater Pamlico system. Certainly
you are closer to the various studies and problems than is our office.
In addition to "all other" input that DEM will provide the CAMA review, I
am requesting an update on the related NPDES. I feel we will receive agency
and citizen questions, perhaps actual objection to the discharge. The
discharge is, after all, the issue. Wetland crossings for pipes, etc. can
usually be worked out.
In the simplest of terms, I must ask for the CAMA record, is a Bay River
discharge the way to provide sewage treatment for the neighboring community.
Here in the spring of 1989 is a sewer outfall what should be happening to a
slow moving, wind tide affected estuarine head water known as Bay River.
Shellfish are reportedly harvested a few thousand feet from the proposed
outfall. Can stormwater runoff be worse?
JP/aw
cc: Bill Mills
RECEIVr_D
APR 2 4 1989
WATER QUALITY SECTION
OPERATIONS BRANCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Tedder
Chief, Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: John Parke??
Chief, Major Permit Processing Section
SUBJECT: Bay River Metropolitan Sewer District
DATE: April 20, 1989
The subject project has been on the drawing board for a few years as I am
sure you are aware. I recall a few false starts but on March 13 the CAMA/D&F
application was accepted by our Morehead City office. It is my understanding
that an NPDES permit was.issued some time before our present day knowledge and
fears of that which is now happening to the greater Pamlico system. Certainly
you are closer to the various studies and problems than is our office.
In addition to "all other" input that DEM will provide the CAMA review, I
am requesting an update on the related NPDES. I feel we will receive agency
and citizen questions, perhaps actual objection to the discharge. The
discharge is, after all, the issue. Wetland crossings for pipes, etc. can
usually be worked out.
In the simplest of terms, I must ask for the CAMA record, is a Bay River
discharge the way to provide sewage treatment for the neighboring community.
Here in the spring of 1989 is a sewer outfall what should be happening to a
slow moving, wind tide affected estuarine head water known as Bay River.
Shellfish are reportedly harvested a few thousand feet from the proposed
outfall. Can stormwater runoff be worse?
JP/aw
cc: Bill Mills
NKDATA I" : l.: f i l 9 f i % , :: ! REV DATE
ACTION .I.ND P'.I.L..E > DI "R.:AMA401P
J
I'`S!t(.E. FORMA T NRt?I"CAI"IA NE XT Rt.....i'1 006K.-
RECORD
HAS BEEN CHA NGED, I':1::.i.: E.)1'';1.' NO 00605 1"•1':x..+ DATA
I ,..t.l.._ :;• . 00605 r'r;+..JI: :fai"i `i R:I:'d'!'R i°i ED CO(I,.1..: ... .. ::O
;...
REGION:
A SSIGNED TO: Dt , Wit- `' .... O.,. {...I',1.1 .:. NOTIC E:
i YP[c: CERTIF ICATION RECOMM END l: A TE,-.?' ''(v H{°;ph
404 PH: 40i RE l:.l : Y ISSUE: Y RFC C I:..i ' F+
i..: Al'I A ON LY: GC: SE WER EXT. DENY: INITIAL 3 "; E'. f'' OL: T. 89049:-'.
D : C A I'1 t i : i t:. t.: I"' : I P r;'::. t>! l.f L.. ). I::' .,. !'':F A I... RE PORT: 89000,'
RECEIVI NG STREAM: BAY RIVER CLASS: ,:°CS I.( BASIN: PEI J
COMMEN K:
?. .i I,. r, l i •:;;, i? ;:?I.il:'i.. :!r JHI-f NC H,.; r, r r.. I:•{
PROPOSA
SEWE L 1li ',iI`. f ht
R L I I'd E ..- 20 ACRE ,t..,.!?.+1, AND 1., I , 4:-,,?..{I.;.
I i ;
•', Ti.: ,..,,,;> i...(r? ti''...,
.
.... <. 411 0 ;;

ONE OF .
THE BOOSTER : PU
MP STATIO
NS ON A 5

... SITE
0050'

WILL . Di`' Sf

TO
TYPE WETLANDS. THE RE WILL B E MINIMAL IMPACTS K P E R i.; i. E, OF THES E &FA1-AN%:
SEWER L INE CROSSINGS: MOST OF THE DISTU RBANCES WIL L BE TEMPORARY IN !HE !K00
t:1I'•(
1::.!L..-1i`IJ. j ;.:i{'?!",.a;
.ra
'(i:::?i1...(ii''t:D
1+'L:.t.r:. ;.E;CiIJ
l. ;..
D r=;EPI..EN E` H
SITE IN VESTIGATION ON 4/27/89: FILL IN WETLAND (AT PUMP STATION) IS WATER DEK
AND UNAVOIDABLE
COPIES: !;:fAl".(:....t.;i:::NTRAL...... r`I:i:i._I...,:.....i,+..:;°!
RECEIV D
F,1 AY 0 2 089
WATER QUALITY SECTION
OPERATIONS P.RANrN
NKDA 1 r; DF/CAMA/40i ''si
'

ACTION
- ;::;DD FILE ` DF? t:;AMA.c; to iP P:>liD `• FORMAT ::
:C,
i 1F;Df= C;AMA NEXT
? i.
., 1;060;
r" C f:CiaN ADD, ?::. rJTER DATA, REC. ADDED IS 00604 F RD DATA
Pi-;t:i,.! O: 00605 f='Rt:1,.r : T:{;::r'r' RIVER H'1:; t:::C?t.lNTY: Pr`;f°if....f. i:;t:? REGI ON: 0
ASSIGNED TO: DAE ,.. to :4: N.?.. NOTICE: N
TYPE CER TIFICATION RECOMMEND YYMMDD
404 PN: 401 RED: ISSUE: RECEIVED: 090321?
CAMA ONLY: GC: NEWER I:::.:..t. DENY: INITIAL RF::F'ta{;; .}..: 89040,;
CAF/C;Fif' A : Y SEC P: ;:;'WPRE Q : HOLD: Y FINAL REPORT:
RECEIVING STREAM:
COMMENTS: BAY RIVE!:,,' CLASS: '" C:: W BASIN: ' ? '::: U
SITE LOCATED ALONG NC HW`r' 304 AND NC Hl'1'( 55 FROM :t:+A r B ORt.1 O MEET C
PROPOSAL TO t::tailST.,
NEWER LINES A 20 bit::RE i...At:'!ClON r"'ti'd;( TREATMENT SIT E AND LAY OVER 6 MILES 01::'
far'iE OF THE :taCJC:ISTi:R Pt.J{'P 'TAT:f:t:Ji''S ON A 50 ':-<50' I}:?:"iE WI LL BE C't:J1?i!,`iT. IN "404'
TYPE WE::Ti...AND,`.i':. THERE WIf_.L.. :Bf..: MINIMAL IMPACTS (PER CisE::) OF THESE WET LAND.-
SEWER LINE CROSSIN GS: MOST OF THE DISTUR BANCES WILL B E TF::i`4f'(il;;ARY IN TH E t ; ,`r& ;
SOFT WETLAND AR EA
HOLD FOR SITE INVE STIGATION
C;OP:f.f:::S: WAi;.O..-i::I°:t!7R Af....._i`fIL_L..,` ....DCH
10 6
LAGOON SITE
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Lat:35009109"
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT Long:76°44131"
1. APPLICANT'S NAME Bay River Metropolitan Sewer District
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE from Bayboro to Mesic along NC Hwy 304
and NC Hwy 55, Bay River, Pamlico County;
SEE 1984 AERIAL PHOTOS: LAGOON SITE - J157-1285, M-16;
DISCHARGE SITE - #57-1283 (G-21)
3.
4.
LAMA X
12-88 1-89
Nu
NO
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: APPLICATION RECEIVED 5/11/88; 5/16/88;
10/7/88; 10/19/88; 12/6/88; 2/13/89; 3/13/89
---- OFFICE Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION: (A) LOCAL LAND USE PLAN Pamlico County
LAND CLASSIFICATION FROM LUP Transition
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS IDENTIFIED IN LUP NONE
(B) AEC(S) INVOLVED: OCEAN HAZARD ESTUARINE SHORELINE X
COASTAL WETLANDS X PUBLIC TRUST WATERS X
ESTUARINE WATERS X OTHER
(C) WATER DEPENDENT: YES X NO _X
(D) INTENDED USE: PUBLIC X PRIVATE COMMERCIAL
(E)' TYPE OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT: EXISTING septic tanks
PLANNED sewage treatment plant
(F) TYPE OF STRUCTURES: EXISTING NONE
PLANNED_ sewage treatment plant, effluent station, booster
pump stations, sewer lines and discharge lines.
(G) ESTIMATED ANNUAL RATE OF EROSION -0- SOURCE N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:

(A) A
VEGETATED WETLANDS DREDGED REA
FILLED OTHER
coastal wetlands - 1030 sq.ft.
tem porarily displaced
(B) NON-VEGETATED WETLANDS:
shallow estuarine bottom 7400 sq.ft.
(C) OTHER:
hig hground - lagoon site 20+ ac.
sewer/discharge lines 46 miles
(D) TOTAL AREA DISTURBED: Approximately 20 ac. + 46 mi. of lines
INVESTIGATION TYPE: DREDGE & FILL X
INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE:
(A) DATES OF SITE VISIT 5-88 10-88 _
(B) WAS APPLICANT PRESENT NO NO
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT - BAY RIVER 14ETROPOLITAN SEWAGE
DISTRICT, PAMLICO COUNTY
PAGE #2
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The proposed project is a public regional
sewage treatment system in the Bay River area of Pamlico County.
The project will have over 46 miles of sewer lines and a 20 acre
lagoon and treatment site.
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The Bay River Metropolitan Sewer
District is proposing to construct a regional (approximately
1200 homes) wastewater collection system and a 187,200
gallon per day sewage treatment plant which will be located
approximately 2 miles east of Bayboro on N.C. Highway 304.
After treatment, the wastewater will be discharged into the
Bay River from an 8" discharge line which runs approximately
2100' out into the Bay River, off of Swan Point, near the
end of SR 1219.
The proposed treatment site is located on the south side of
NC Hwy. 304, approximately 2 miles east of Bayboro in an
existing farm field.
At this 20 ac. site, a chlorine/effluent pump building and a
lagoon will be constructed. The lagoon will have a volume
of 14.6 million gallons with a 78 day detention time. In
addition to the lagoon/treatment site, six (6) booster pump
stations on 50' x 50' sites will be constructed. All of
these will be on highground except one (1). The booster
pump station located near the upper end of Vandemere Creek
is planned for construction in an area which the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers has designated as 1404' wetlands.
However, in an October 2, 1987, letter from the COE (see
attached), there are approved construction methods to allow
construction of this 110 gpm substation with minimum wetland
impacts.
Approximately 42 miles of pressure sewer line and 4.3 miles
of discharge line are proposed. The pressure sewer line
will require 15 creek or stream crossings. Of these 15,
seven (7) are currently bridged, and eight (8) have
culverts. The following is a brief summary of each
crossing:
[1] There is an existing bridge at this site and no marsh
will be disturbed.
[2] There is an existing culvert at this site and no marsh.
[3] There is an existing culvert at this site and no CAMA
jurisdiction.

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT - BAY RIVER METROPOLITAN SEWAGE
DISTRICT, PAMLICO COUNTY
PAGE #3
[4] There is an existing culvert at this site but no CAMA
jurisdiction.
[5] There is an existing bridge at this site but minimal
impact is anticipated at this crossing.
[6] A new bridge has recently been constructed at this site
(CAMA Major #174-86) and there will be some temporary
disturbance to about 190 sq. ft. (2' x 95') of
primarily Juncus roemerianus with some Spartina
cynosuroides and Cladium iamaicense.
[7] There is an existing bridge at this site and there will
be some temporary disturbance to approximately 380 sq.
ft. (2' x 1901) of mixed Juncus romerianus and Spartina
cynosuroides.
[8] This is a culvert crossing with a scattered area of
Juncus romerianus.
[9] SAME as #8 (This location on Chapel Creek is a Primary
Nursery Area.)
[10] SAME as #8 (Also a Primary Nursery Area.)
[11] SAME as #8 (Smith Creek is a Primary Nursery Area.)
[12] There is a 2-3' fringe of Juncus romerianus and
SSpartina patens that will be temporarily disturbed at
this site.
[13] No significant impact is anticipated at this bridge
crossing.
[14] There are some old existing docks at this bridge
crossing, but no significant environmental impact is
anticipated, although this location on Bennett Creek is
a Primary Nursery Area.
[15] There will be some temporary disturbance to about 100
(2' x 501) sq. ft. of Spartina alternif lora,
Distichlis spicata and Spartina patens at this culvert
crossing.
Of all the above crossings, Site Numbers 6, 7 and 15 will
cause some temporary disturbance to approximately 670 sq.
ft. of high marsh when the sewer line is trenched in. All
of the crossings will temporarily disturb a total of
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT - BAY RIVER METROPOLITAN SEWAGE
DISTRICT, PAMLICO COUNTY
PAGE #4
approximately 1100 sq. ft. of shallow estuarine bottom. The
proposed 15 subaqueous crossings will be in areas ranging
from 10' to 190' in width, and the minimum depth below the
existing bottom contours will be -21.
Wooden mats will be used to gain access over marsh areas
which cannot be reached from the road. A trencher, clam
shell bucket or dragline will be used for excavation.
Spoils will be placed directly in a truck and hauled off to
a highground area.
The proposed 2100' of discharge line into Bay River will be
buried into a trench 6' below the existing bottom contour.
The trench for this line will either be constructed with a
dragline with the materials being placed on a barge or
excavated with the hydraulic dredge and spoils being pumped
to an approved diked highground disposal area. The proposed
discharge line will be marked with buoys to prevent damage
from anchors, drawlers, etc. The discharge line will
temporarily disturb approximately 360 sq. ft. of Juncus
romerianus marsh, and about 6,300 (2100' x 31) of shallow
estuarine bottom.
The 8" discharge line will cross approximately 180' of marsh
which is primarily Juncus romerianus before extending the
2100' into Bay River. The outer 100' of the discharge line
is a perforated diffuser.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: Approximately 1030 sq. ft. of coastal
wetlands marsh will be temporarily disturbed during
construction of the sewer and discharge lines. Once the
lines are in, it is anticipated that the marsh will
naturally re-vegetate. No net loss of coastal wetlands is
expected. Approximately 7400 sq. ft. of shallow estuarine
bottom will be temporarily disturbed in the placing of
lines.
The area of the Bay River, where the discharge line is
located, is classified as 'SC' by the Division of
Environmental Management and is closed to shellfishing by
the Division of Health Services. However, the waters of Bay
River are open to shellfishing approximately 2,000'
downstream from the end of the discharge line.
The highground construction will occupy approximately 20 ac.
for the lagoon site and over 42 miles of pressure sewer line
and 4 miles of discharge line.
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT - BAY RIVER METROPOLITAN SEWAGE
DISTRICT, PAMLICO COUNTY
PAGE #5
The proposed project is designed to provide sewer service
for existing homes but is not designed to accommodate future
growth. The existing homes are currently serviced by septic
tanks, many of which are improperly functioning. A Finding
of No Significant Impact by the Environmental Protection
Agency is attached.
The Pamlico County CAMA Land Use Plan classification for the
project area is 'Transitional'.
PREPARED BY: W. DAVID NOBLE
DATE: MARCH 27, 1989
It JAN yf?( P
-------------------- --- - 3?'
UNITED STATES EN`?IriGNMENTfn PRCTECTICN .GENC`t A--
REGION IV
345 COURTLAND STREET
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30355
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Approval of the Bayboro 201 Facilities Plan
Pamlico County, North Carolina
/:.I !G . i .-rn

The National Environmental Policy Act requires Federal
agencies to determine whether a proposed major agency action
will significantly affect the environment. One such major
action, defined by Section 511 (c) (1) of the Clean Water
Act, is EPA approval of a facilities plan prepared pursuant
to Section 201 of that Act. In making this determination EPA
.assumes-thaf all facilities and actions recommended by the
plan will be implemented, whether or not EPA grants are..
issued to fund construction of any facilities. If our
analysis concludes that implementing the plan will not
significantly affect the environment, EPA issues a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FNSI).
This FNSI precedes full approval of the Bayboro 201
Facilities Plan (partially funded under EPA grant C370533-
01).
Attached is an Environmental_ Assessment containing detailed
information supporting this action in the following sections:.
A) Proposed facilities and actions, grant status; B) Existing
environment; C) Existing wastewater facilities; D) Need for
proposed facilities and actions; E) Alternatives analysis; F)
Environmental consequences, mitigative measures; G) Public
participation, sources consulted.
Comments supporting or disagreeing with this proposed EPA
action received within 30 days of the date of this FNSI will
be evaluated before we proceed. If you wish•to comment,
phone [phone] or write:
Ernesto A. Perez, P.E., Chief
Facilities Planning Unit
Water Management Division
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, N. E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Sincerely yours,
?2'? ?i?GGv?{
Jack E Ravan
Regional Administrator
XC C, • ?.?? tJ ??
Environmental Assessment
A. Proposed Facilities and Actions, Grant Status
1. Pressure Sewer System - Figure 1 shows the planning area.
Figures 2 and 3 indicate the location of the pressure sewer
system. Figures 4 and 5 identify the location of the
treatment plant and the septage disposal site. The effluent
discharge line is identified in Figure 6. Figure 7 shows
stream classifications for the Bay River.
A pressure sewer system will be constructed to serve the
wastewater needs of Bayboro, Alliance, Mesic, Vandemere,
Stonewall,..and unincorporated portions of Pamlico-County.
The pressure sewer system will serve 1,200 households. and
businesses. The project will consist of pumping, inspecting,
and cleaning septic tanks, as well as replacing ones that are
badly deteriorated. Each home/business will require a STEP
(septic tank effluent pump) unit, a service.lateral to
connect the septic tank to a collection line, and possible
modifications to household electrical wiring to operate the
system. Approximately 116,100 l.f. of 2 to 4 inch force main
will be required. Of this amount, 3,500 l.f. will be bored
and jacked under highways and railroad tracks. Twenty spare
STEP units will be included in this project. The pressure
sewer system will have three 30 gpm grinder pump stations
located in connection with two schools and a mobile home
park.
Grant Status: The proposed facilities are included in
the scope of EPA grant number C370683-04, scheduled for
funding in 1986. The total cost of the pressure sewer
system is $3,390,416, with $3,234,416 being grant
eligible for 75 percent EPA participation. EPA's share
is $2,425,812. The State and local share is $964,604.
The reserve capacity cost ratio is 1.0. The project
will be implemented to meet only existing needs. Homes
and businesses constructed after December, 1977 will not
be eligible for EPA funding. However, the communities
will assume responsibility for funding ineligible homes
and businesses so that a comprehensive pressure system
can be completed.
2. Septage Collection and Disposal - This portion of the
project will include the purchase of 10 acres of land, one 10
ton cab, one 1800 gallon tanker with pumping and spreading
equipment, and one 52 hp tractor with disking equipment.
Septic tanks will be pumped every four years. Approximately
225,000 gallons of septage will be pumped annually. Local
farmers will be contracted to perform the necessary field
work•at the septage disposal site.
Grant Status: These proposed facilities are included
in the scope of the grant referenced above. The
total cost of the septage requirements is $88,784,
with the entire amount being grant eligible for
75 percent EPA participation. EPA's share is $66,588,
and the State and local share is $22,196. The reserve
capacity cost ratio is 1.0.
3. Treatment Plant and Transport Facilities - The
Farmers Home Administration will be responsible for funding
the treatment plant, transport lines, and pump stations.
This will require 10,400 l.f. of 8-inch, 4,600 l.f. of 6-
inch, and 4,500 l.f. of 4-inch force main with cleanouts and
gate valves; two 50 gpm, one 75 gpm, one 150 gpm, one 200
gpm, one 475 gpm, one 675 gpm pump station; and a two-cell
lagoon with standby power, reaeration, chlorination, and
monitoring equipment. The lagoon system will be designed to
treat 0.1882 mgd. The effluent will be pumped through 19,400
l.f. of 6-inch force main and diffused into the Bay River at
Chapel Point. The lagoon will be'required to meet the
following effluent limits: BODS.= 30 mg/1, TSS = 90 mg/1,
and D.O. = 5 mg/1. The Bay River Sewerage District will own
all facilities and manage wastewater operations for Alliance,
Mesic, Bayboro, Vandemere, Stonewall, and areas where sewer
facilities traverse parts of Pamlico County. The total
project cost of the pressure sewer system, the septage
disposal site, and the treatment plant is $5,744,000, with
EPA's share being $2,492,400. The Farmers Home
Administration and the local share is $2,990,000. The State
share is $261,600.
B. Existing Environment
Topography and Soils. The Bayboro 201 Planning Area is
located in the northern central portion of Pamlico County.
The topography is generally flat, with some slope toward the
Pamlico Sound. Most of the area has an elevation ranging
from 4 to 16 feet above the mean sea level, with no slopes
exceeding 25 percent. The soil associations in the area are
Renansville-Dragston, Lenoir-Craven, Leaf-Bayboro,
Portsmouth-Turhunta, and Tidal Marsh. All of these soils,
except the Renansville-Dragston soils, are severely limited
for septic tank drain fields due to the high groundwater
table.
Surface Waters. The planning area is located in sub-basin 10
of the Neuse giver basin. Bay River is the major water body
in the area. This river is responsible for draining numerous
streams, bays, marshland areas, and canals. Both the Bay and
Neuse Rivers drain into Pamlico Sound. Most of the small
streams and the Bay River are classified SC - tidal salt
waters. This classification indicates water should be
suitable for fishing, fish and wildlife propagation, and
-2-
secondary recreation. The Bay River is classified SA -
shellfishing waters - approximately three miles from Chapel
Point. Water quality in SC classified waters is generally
fair to good. Some shell=ishing areas have been closed
because of pollution problems. This can be attributed to
malfunctioning septic tarts, surface discharges, and
non-point pollution sources.
Groundwater. Surface waters are not used for domestic
purposes in the planning area. However, surface waters are
used for cleaning fish in the seafood industry and for
recreational activities. Pamlico County operates a system
which supplies water to Alliance, Bayboro, Mesic, Stonewall,
Vandemere, and rural areas along highways connecting these
towns.. Other residents in the planning area utilize private
wells. Odor and taste problems are generally encountered
by those who rely upon private wells.
Additional Environmental Parameters. All significant
environmental parameters to be impacted by the proposed
project are discussed in Section F (Environmental
Consequences, Mitigative Measures).
C. Existinc Wastewater Facilities
Bayboro, Alliance, Vandemere, Stonewall, and Mesic are
incorporated areas without central sewer systems. The
Pamlico County Board of Education operates two sewage
lagoons, and the Pamlico County Board of Commissioners
operates a package treatment facility. Wastewater from these
three sources will be diverted to the central sewer system.
Industries in the area utilize individual treatment
facilities which will not be connected to the central sewer
system.
D. Need for Proposed Facilities and Actions
Septic tanks in the Bayboro planning area are generally
unsuitable because of inappropriate soil conditions and high
groundwater tables. The Pamlico County Health Department
estimates that 70 percent of the septic tanks malfunction
during the winter. Washing machines and kitchen sink drains
are discharged from many homes directly to the surface in an
attempt to avoid overloading septic tanks. Malfunctioning
septic tanks and surface discharges from homes result in the
impairment of water quality. They also lead to the
degradation of shellfishing areas. Therefore, a pressure
sewer system and a treatment plant are required for this area
to avoid public health problems and to protect water quality.
-3-
The chart below lists population figures and wastewater flows
for the individual components of the Bay River Sewerage
District.
1985 2005 1985 2005
Service Sewered Sewered Domestic Domestic
Area Pop• Pop. Flow (gpd) Flow
600 740 40,920 45,880
Alliance
790 845 48,980 52,390
Bayboro
Mesic 400 450 24,800 27,900
365 410 22,630 25,420
Stonewall
335 410 20,770 25,420
Vandemere
Rural Areas
of BRMSD 390 650 24,180 40,300
2,940 3,505 182,280 217,310
Total
5,900 5,900
Infiltration/Inflow
Total Design Flow 188,180 223,210
E. Alternatives Analysis
The Bayboro 201 Facilities Plan
collectionamendments
system, ctheltreatment
several alternatives for the Some of the
plant, and the sludge disposal method.
alternatives were determined not to be practical and were
eliminated. For example, the "No-action" alternative is nt
acceptable because soil conditions and the high groundwater
table would continue to produce septic tank failures, and
these adversely impact surface water and groundwater.
Treatment and reuse of wastewater for municipal or industrial
purposes is not feasible because of t1he processing costs
in
involved and the availability of adequate supplies
the planning area.
tewater Descriptions
most viable wastewater
1. Alternative wastewater collection systems.
a. Gravity Sewer System - This alternative would
require gravity sewer lines, force mains, PumO. -
stations, and manholes to be constructed to c..- --=
-4-
and transport the wastewater. Individual septic
tanks would be abandoned and laterals would ie
used to connect homes and businesses to an
interceptor or force main. The coastal area has a
high water table and the topography is fairly flat.
Construction costs would be very expensive as a
result of the line excavation which would be
required to maintain gravity flow and because of
the need for continual pumping. There would be the
potential for an infiltration and inflow problem
due to the high groundwater table. This
alternative is not the most cost effective or
environmentally sound.
b. Pressure Sewer System. This system will
require all of the septic tanks to be pumped,
inspected, and cleaned for further use. Those that
are badly deteriorated will be replaced. Some
households will require electrical modifications.
The system will require STEP units to be installed
and laterals to be constructed to transport
wastewater to a force main. Three grinder pumps
will also be required for this system. This
alternative has the lowest capital cost and present
worth value. it is more compatible with
environmental conditions in the area than the
gravity sewer system. (Selected Alternative)
2. Alternative Wastewater Treatment Techniques. It was
determined during the early stages of.the planning process
that a regional treatment plant would be more cost effective
than individual plants or a combination of plants for several
communities. The facilities plan addressed a land
application system, an Aero-Mod plant, a sequencing batch
reactor, and a lagoon system. Several streams were evaluated
for the most feasible discharge location. Different
techniques were considered for handling septage and sludge.
Factors such as the environment, operation and
maintenance, cost, effluent limits, implementation, and
system reliability were considered in the selection of a
final plan. A land application system was rejected due to
the high water table requiring a massive underdrain system.
An Aero-Mod plant would qualify for innovative and
alternative funding, but the mechanical plant would require
increased operating skills. This type of facility would be
vulnerable to upsets and power outages. The sequencing batch
reactor is the most sophisticated alternative evaluated.
This facility would require a highly skilled operator. The
plant would be sensitive to upsets and power outages. These
alternatives were rejected due to not being cost of ec ive.
The selected alternative is to construct a two-cell lagoon,
and discharge the effluent to Chapel Point in the Bay River.
The selected septage disposal method is land application.
EPA will fund the septage disposal facilities and the
pressure sewer system. The Farmers Home Administration will
fund force mains, pump stations, the treatment plant, and the
effluent line.
F. Environmental Consequences, Mitigative Measures
Force mains, pump stations, and grinder pumps for the
pressure sewer system will he constructed along highway
rights-of-way. All septic tank work will take place on
private property. The proposed 18-acre treatment plant will
be located on a cleared site. The 10-acre septage disposal
site will be on land presently used for agricultural
purposes. There are no adverse impacts anticipated to
threatened or endangered plant or animal species. The
proposed project activities will result in limited temporary
impacts to noise, odor, and fugitive dust levels.
Construction activities will cause some sedimentation
problems. Their impact will be.minimized by adherence to a
sedimentation and erosion control plan. The Department of
Cultural Resources has determined that no cultural resources
will be impacted by the selected alternative. The project
will not require any relocation activities. The Bayboro
Community Park and the Pamlico County recreation complex will
not be adversely impacted by construction activities. The
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has evaluated the project and
determined that a 404 permit will not be required. The
proposed force main route requires lines to be located in
designated rural areas. This does not appear to be
inconsistent with the Pamlico County land use plan because
the existing development follows the linear growth pattern of
existing highways and other public utilities. The purpose of
this force main system is to eliminate a public health hazard
rather than act as a catalyst for growth. Approximately two-
thirds of the area to be served by the pressure sewer system
is located in a 100-year flood plain. The proposed lagoon
and septage disposal sites are not located in the 100-year
flood plain. Locating elements of the pressure sewer system
.in the flood plain is unavoidable. The sewer system will not
be designed to encourage additional growth in the flood plain
but to alleviate a public health problem. Some of the force
mains will traverse small streams. Precautions will be taken
to assure that stream beds are restored to their original
grade. A request for a determination of need for a CAMA
permit for the effluent line and stream crossing will be
obtained prior to the completion of design work. The Office
of Coastal Management concurs that the purpose of the project
is to solve wastewater problems rather than promote growth in
the area. The project will require motorists to be
temporarily inconvenienced by the disruption of traffic.
Roads and highways damaged from construction will be properly
-6-
repaired. The lagoons will be clay lined to avoid an adverse
impact to the groundwater. The lagoons will be constructed
above ground since major excavation is prohibited due to the
high groundwater table. The discharge location at Chapel
Point is approximately three miles from water classified as
SA - shellfishing. The plant will have disinfection
facilities, standby power, and two cells to provide adequate
protection for SA waters in the area. The effluent will be
diffused at the discharge point to assure thorough mixing.
The shellfish sanitation has reviewed the relocation of the
discharge line from Harper Point to Chapel Point and has no
objection to the proposed project. The discharge force main
will be constructed along highway rights-of-way except for
the final one thousand feet to Chapel Point. There is an
existing unpaved road which traverses much of the one .
thousand feet. Efforts will be made to place the force main
within the road corridor. If the force main cannot be
located in a previously disturbed area, an immature forest
and marsh area will have to be traversed. This portion of
the project will require a biological survey to confirm the
presence of endangered or threatened species. Minimal
grading and vegetative disturbances will help protect the
marsh area. The final plans and specifications will include
requirements for controlling erosion and restoring areas to
natural contours. The Division of Ecological Services of the
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service has no objection to the
proposed project. The Endangered Species Field Office
concurs that a biotic survey must be performed on the portion
of the project which traverses the segment from the road
rights-of-way to the discharge location at Chapel Point.
G. Public Participation, Sources Consulted
Public hearings were held May 5, 1977 and August 25, 1977
on the Bayboro 201 Facilities Plan. Topics covered included
%existing problems, alternative treatment plants, different
collection systems, various discharge points, user cost, and
environmental impacts. Immediate implementation after the
public hearing was not feasible due to limited financial
support. Asa the lead agent for this project, Bayboro
prepared an addendum to the facilities plan in 1985. The
Farmers Home Administration indicated financial support would
be provided. Subsequently, a public hearing was held
December 21, 1985 to readdress; issues covered in the original
facilities plan. Citizens were apprised of the user cost and
the responsibility of the Bay River Sewerage District in
operating the system. The North Carolina Department of Human
Resources - Shellfish Sanitation Office objected to the
decision to locate the discharge line at Harper Point. This
portion of Bay River was classified "SC". However,. the water
had been declared open for shellfishing, and the discharge a=
Harper Point would have resulted in the closing C. the
-7-
portion of Bay River. Another public hearing was held July
9, 1986 to advise the citizens of the proposed change in
discharge location from Harper Point to Chapel Point. There
was no opposition expressed at the meeting. User charges
have been calculated and it has been determined that the
selected alternative for the entire project will cost $3.21.
per 1,000 gallons. The EPA portion of this total amount is
$1.32 per 1,000 gallons. The average monthly user charge
will be $15.25 per month. This is not be a high cost
project. The estimated annual user charge is 1.15 percent of
the average annual median-household income ($15,977) for the
townships of Mesic, Alliance, Bayboro, Stonewall, and
Vendemere.
The proposed project is in compliance with the State's Air
Quality Implementation Plan and the Statewide Water Quality
Management Plan.
Sources consulted about this project for information or
concurrence included:
a. Towns of Mesic, Vandemere, Bayboro, Stonewall, and
Alliance.
b. Pamilco County
C. North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and
Community Development
- Water Resources Planning
- Wildlife Resources Commission
- Parks and Recreation
- Geological Survey Section
- Groundwater Section
- Air Quality Section
d. North Carolina Department of Human Resources
e. North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
f. Neuse River Council of Governments
g. North Carolina State Clearinghouse
h. Pamlico County Soil Conservation Service
i. U. S. Corps of Engineers
j: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Division of
Ecological Services
k. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Services - Endangered
Species Field office
-8-
Bayboro 201 Facilities Plan
7lmmact
Construction Activities
Pipeline Construction
Mitigative Measures
A sedimentation and erosion control
plan must be izplerented to avoid
significant adverse in pacts.
The Office of Coastal Management must
be contacted prior to completion of
design work to detemine the impact the
outfall and transport lines will have on
wetland areas.
Endangered Species A biological survey must be perfomed
if the effluent force main cannot be
located in previously undisturbed areas.

W
C
• <

T
C
..J
4..

?.y V

- o

0
a

' m

37

96 "p. do -SR
i
LLJ CC
?a®?am ae 7?a?-z = .• • ?? a {+ ? v? c
.47
AR." <ecx
c
. ?- .n.+(
dept x
r .. -ft ?? po ; i y - d CC
... . -? a t• • • ?r („)??"
' ?ao?.asao??avacaotaocsoa?ca ? sv. -

? 4

? ? 1//?' .//./••x•11'' ? I r- ; / •• • •:Nl•?? . .,. .?V
I ;
T?t
? iii. .? -?I ?"n•' ? I•?.?.1.•??:;: ???..;.'.••r-..
. ' ,% \?? t • \• 1

1

FIGIHE 3
`V PRESSURE SEWER SYSTEM BAY80R0
201 WASTEWATER FACILITIES
VANOEMERE- ME=:C PLANNING STUDY
_ SLUDGE;
1 S PG?A1-
D
_ 0, ?c •oa S 1T?.• Q
1
15
S.16ta1wr0 - = • ?O
-C.00 a
out
• i
scALE=2500
SLUDGE DISPOSAL SITE.
- CNEG t?L'. 3Y: LW F
pio?-rE : JUL. 198
FIGURE 4 s1acs< s V iamtrn
Englrwerg-Arcttlt=3 X0[3 No % 2 8 3 9
??' - rte:.-.;;-F _ _! _ :?.:? : ¦a
r
Creck
H C.

SLUDGE
I •' 1 r -
plspoSp.t_
w1l)?? ?.. c
..... ..... • M
44 Z r11 t R? n
• ._.
Flo
•-? •
WwTP
so nd
Tor CO
' +\ ~' '` ' iJ . / r Bahl {q
I If
4.- t H&H Pt
16 TraK CO
?"' . p4• SR'INDELL
o-?? ?_ .? [wyu '? .,• DAY
_ ,0
WOW
C
SLUDGE DISPOSAL AND 5CALr- 1/=25,0 C
W w T P SITE c;jF-Cx:-o $r: LwP
DA-Tt J U L. 15
- stacx s arcm
Enginecrn-Archttocto c o: 2 8 35
5 J BN
• N ' l r ru ,
+\. / •v
• 'I, O o??•,,,•, O .i
% • ?,Co
?\r• a
'•.I'? ???? Asir ,
f'
01. CP
• / = Q a. a •. ?,.•••
Z • ag D
D o ?/?
z V,, Y

00
BAY RIVER SEWERAGE DISTRICT SCALE: NO SCALE
FIGURE 6
VICINITY MAP
cr+ECxEfl aY:
BLACK a VEATCH, INC. DATE
CONSULTING ENGINEE3S JOB NO.: 2839
I.SN91010. NORTH CAROLINA BOOK NO.:
=%• bmema^ OtwM•nt Of CO+w b-a
I •
C&A
• I• \ ?...........•.......? • ,, ,•`' .? /
L.?I Pt
'• ?..,•
•. •! . ea
?? '•,w t POW%(
• ` Mfi/Itr?rll
• SA
• Sn+.A cr \
u ask
Cbra
.18 • / \'?
s C. ?..?
. + Pt
??•• to ?? • •
I go-" ro.a1 Pi . ?:' ;
sew
d % Ftea Point •i '' 1 ??
I
p acMfkc*E tI j .
PotY ,
And a
STREAM WATER CLASSIFICATION 12500
cHr_cMu DY., LwP
FIGURE 7 DA-rcz : J U L. 19 8
,J013 Ka: 2 8 3 9

SECTION 7
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

7.1 VIEWS OF PUBLIC AND CONCERNED INDIVIDUALS 1
A summary of the public hearing held December 3, 1985 is included as an
attachment to this report. '
7.2 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
This evaluation applies primarily to the treatment alternatives. The pressure
sewer system will have little or no direct environmental impact since it will -
be-constructed in- exi'sting' highway rights-of-way. Of course, the benefits of
improved ground water quality and elimination of public health risks with the
provision of a sewer system will be discussed, but in conjunction with the
treatment alternatives. There will be temporary effects during construction
of the pressure sewer system (noise, dust), but this will have no impact on
the selection of an alternative. A-large portion of the pressure sewer system
will be constructed in the floodpl'ain. However, there will be no permanent
changes in ground elevations since the piping and pumping stations will be
buried. All equipment will be protected from flooding. Since the
pressure system will be designed to meet existing needs only, there isnoincentive caused by the system for development in the floodplain.
The principal environmental factors discussed in detail are surface water
quality (including aquatic habitat), ground water quality,
quality, energy use, and floodplain encroachment. No treatmentialternativeir
will have known impacts on terrestrial habitat, wild and scenic rivers, prime
agricultural farm land, public water supplies, forest resources
geological mineral resources, recreational space, archaeological resources, historical resources, or cultural resources.
7.2.1 Surface Water Quality
Surface water quality and the protection of shellfish habitat is assured by
the provision of treatment as required by the Division of Environmental
Management (DEM). Reliability of treatment is assured b the
provision
duplicate treatment units, standby disinfection facilities and standby po
y power.
The integrity of shellfishing waters downstream of the discharge is protected
by the provision of adequate treatment as defined by the DEM and by diffusing
the effluent into the river.
Surface water quality in proximity to developed areas will improve as the
result of the elimination of septic tank disposal fields and provision of
treatment. Continued inaction with the associated malfunctioning septic tank E
t
systems, direct untreated discharges, and violating discharges will assure
continued degradation of the Bay River and further closing of shellfishing
areas.
Section 7
Pamlico
120285 1
1
7.2.2 Floodplain Encroachment
With the exception of a small area in the immediate vicinity of the proposed
wastewater treatment plant site, the entire pressure sewer system east of
Bayboro (including Vandemere, Mesic, Stonewall, and much of Bayboro) is in the
100-year floodplain. As stated in the opening comments in this section, all
pumping stations located in the floodplain will be protected from flooding in
accordance with State regulations (operable in the 25-year flood and protected
from structural damage in the 100-year flood). The 100-year flood will have
no direct impact on the wastewater treatment plant since it is located out of
the floodplain and flood waters will be unable to enter the system.
The system does not induce development in the floodplain because the pressure
sewer system and treatment plant are designed to meet existing needs only.
7.2.3 Ground Water Quality and Public Health
Each of the alternatives will considerably improve ground water quality and
eliminate the previously documented public health risks by the elimination of
septic tanks and pit privies. The treatment and surface discharge
alternatives will effect the greatest improvement in ground water quality.
Again, continued inaction and dependence on septic tanks in the poorly drained
soils typical of the area will assure continued public health risks
degradation of ground water quality.
7.2.4 Air Quality
Improvement in air quality in the area will result from the elimination of
malfunctioning septic tanks and improperly designed lagoons. Continued
protection of air quality will be assured by the provision of odor control
facilities at the wastewater treatment plant. The land application system
would have the most potential for occasional odor problems.
7.2.5 Energy Use
The energy use for each of the alternatives is as follows:
Alternative I
Alternative II
Alternative III
Alternative IV
Section 7
Pamlico
120285
450,000 kWh/yr
175,000 kWh/yr
360,000 kWh/yr
310,000 kWh/yr
2

IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402.1890
October 2, 1987
r" P
?t ? ? LY fit'
?:.? ? C? ? 19JZ
0
Lili':?! ? & NygV1
Ms. Mary K. Keiser
Black and Veatch, Inc.
Post Office Box 728
Asheboro, North Carolina 27204-0728
Dear Ms. Keiser:
Reference your letter of July 13, 1987, and your recent phone
conversations with Mr. Ernest Jahnke of my staff concerning the
proposed Bay River Metropolitan Sewerage District Wastewater
Improvements in Pamlico County, North Carolina.
Our preliminary review indicates that, with the exception of
the 110 gpm pump station at Vandemere Creek and N.C. Highway 304,
the work can be authorized by our general permit for utility
lines. Submission of final plans should, unless significant
changes are made, allow us to permit the project at that time.
With reference to the pump station at Vandemere Creek, a site
review conducted on September 23, 1987, confirmed that the area is
a wetland regulated by the provisions of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act. The discharge of fill material for the construction of
the pump station at this location would require an individual
Department of the Army permit. This procedure can be avoided if
structural components (e.g., a pre-poured concrete slab or other
suitable foundation material) can be utilized in place of earthen
or other fill materials. You may wish to take this into
consideration in formulating your final. design plans.
Thank you for coordinating this proposal with us. If you have
questions, please call Mr. Jahnke at telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
C ar W. t1lis
hief, Regulatory Branch
Copy Furnished:
Mr. David Noble
Morehead City Regional Office
North Carolina Division
of Coastal Management
Post Office Box 769
Morehead City. North Carolina 28557
C-)
W
U
a
n.
U)
U)
H
Z
BLACK & SU©JECT i-Ck DATE ?3 - z8 ,g 88
VEATCH SET UP BY M IL IL
CONSULTING WORK. Oa?? R? vPr COMPUTED BY
ENGINEERS
CHECKED BY
KANSAS CITY PAGE NO. OF
DALLAS
DcnvcR PROJECT No. FILE NO.
ORLANDO
rh?l.
Ei. 17.50 I.OO
H' LL
, I
ll.oc
. 54 1.- F- 1. I'm.
?-
-rte, fi
V, -Y3 h (73 I + B . -f B, 5Z.
W
Nr
?7.
t-
O
Z
O
0
-30ilon, 13, = L I W,
W 5 L 7B7- - L2 . VIZ
L,. 828 L2: 81n8
W , = qy 0 K12 _ '-18 0
Lz - Lit µ0
h, 5
v= I/3 (s) ((82Bj('ty0) t (86,8)(y80) -+ (t3z8?CHy?)C8?8Ktiso)
1)950) 93'7.88 FTC
= Iµ.59 MG
" .
-Dervi9.. %n-F'Iuen+ 'P loka = I%0 C) pP" = - 16-7, ZOv 9 Pd
14,(P001000 c)al/ 18"li2UU 9pd - "(g denkfe,
Q
Q
ti
0
2
0
Q.

tip4 ?S?
e?o 00
1
enL P
?a? Pt 113 Q, ?
CP G G S' `??
?tea?G 5.11 Ge?••E,?
? C' ce 4?a `? x,15 ?a?eal
c° 6.1ti ??. Qta O?'et
EGGS' 1? ace"' lce? ??1?0?` Olt Pct, °41899
?. ??ab?e 6AP 4 a-,ecS
1?a GG S. F?'
VP 'pe? ,?e? anal ? 20
cNc?
?' ' .a
e nc
a?a*
aS`a? ?at'Jta
04 G° enc o4 vt-?cy
N4.10,01 °?e4a? a CA?c?
at`
G °?cces etc
loo
F A? 1
CPO ab?e o4 t?'ea?e?
?aveG?or 10 area ot???` a`et Pcc
S crate ?e e G?ear
O`5 ec?at' 04 r?`?ee
4ti
o d°° s o
• c
Se` CPS c
n
S P??vc",t

I +?I
Please type or print. Carefully II
"
d. Describe the planned use of the project.
ticipated development activiti t? _. U
J
i,n Serve the community with wastewater
lion, excavation, filling, pavin ah'd . collecti on, treatment, and disposal
stormwater control. If the request'etl-ftrtMfC66.is1•011 _ system.
not relevant to your project, write N/A (not ap-
plicable). Items 1-4 and 8-9 must be completed for
WATER_a
4 ,LAND':;AND
all projects. ;
4
CHARACTERISTICS'`$'

f
PPI;ICANT
a. Size of entire tract Acreage of Dist. =11.000
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
a. NameBay River Metropolitan Sewerage Dist. c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or Na-
Address P.O. Box 307 tional Geodetic Vertical Datum Varies
City Bayboro State NC
(s) and texture(s) of tract
d. Soil
Zip 28515 Day phone [phone] Unkno
Landowner or X Authorized agent e. Vegetation on tract Unknown
b. Project name (if any Bay River MSD
Wastewater Improvements f. Man-made features now on tract Bridges,
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give culverts, highways, where applicable

the owner's name and address.. _
What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classifica-
g'
N/A tion of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan.)
Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
T2?<LOCA.TION 0 PROPOSED?`1''?? ?. Rural Ocher
. h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
••,• ,.? , c .., , .. i? Zoning varies

ow are adjacent waters classified? SC
i. H
a. Street address or secondary road number j• Has a professional archaeological survey been
See attached vicinity map
out for the tract? No
carried
City, town community, or landmark If so) by whom?
Bay River Metropolitan Sewerage District
c. County Pamlico
d
r
"
s
rAIDDVE?-OPMENTa s
S?
PI
. Is proposed work within city limits or planning `
,
??
I
-
jurisdiction? Yes
e. Name of body of water nearest project Complete this section if the project includes any
.Bay River
upland development.
.
?
_ a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
T. .. D
.
1
3,:DESCRIPTION'AND ?PL ?TED
la? structures proposed Six booster pump stations,
t
USE'OF PROPOSED`"PROJECT7r'.;` las:oon effluent pump/chlorine build in
-
r'r .,?,+•? :. .?, o,. ??Fr,.?R. ..?•.?n la.r effluent structure
b. Number of lots or-parcels eight
a. Describe all development activities you propose c. Density (Give the number of residential units
(for example, building a home, motel, marina, and the units per acre.) N/A
bulkhead, or pier).
Wastewater collection treatment and d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed 0.1 acre for
disposal system. bps, 20 ac.for lagoon, bldg; 0.1 ac for ef.j
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than strueti
one acre of land, the Division of Land
If you plan to build a marina, also complete Resources must receive an erosion and sedimen-
and attach Form DCM-MP-2. tation control plan at least 30 days before land
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an ex- disturbing activity begins. If applicable, has a
isting project, new work, or both? sedimentation and erosion control plan been
New work submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
c. Will the project be for community, private, or Will be submitted for review
commercial use? f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet
Community of mean high water to be covered by im-
permeable surfaces, such as pavement,
There will be approximately 42 miles of buildings, or rooftops. N/A
pressure sewer line and 4.3 miles of dischar ge
line. ,
g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, b. Amount of material to be excavated from
asphalt, or concrete, to be used for paved below water level in cubic yards
surfaces. Asphalt, concrete c. TypiJof matef?al Sand
d. ]Does the aiea to be excavated include marsh-
h. If 'applicable, has a stormwater management land, swamps, or other wetlands? Yes
plan been submitted to the Division of En- e. High ground excavation, in cubic yards N/A
N/A
vironmental Management? N/A f. Dimensions of spoil disposal area
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste g. Location of s?ppoil disposal area Spoil will be true
water treatment facilities. See attached ed off to Fie disposed in a suitable manner.
sketch. h. Do you claim title to the disposal areal N/A
j. Have these facilities received state or local If not, attach a letter granting permission from
approval? Will be submitted for review the owner.
k. Describe existing treatment facilities. i. Will a disposal area be available for future
w N/A maintenance?/ N/A
If so, where? N/A
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
1. Describe location and type of dikcharges to swamoland,lor water areas? N/A
waters of the state (for example?, surface runoff, k. Will the fill material be placed below mean_
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial high water? N/A
effluent, or "wash down"). Treated waste- 1. Amount of fill in cubic yards N/A
water effluent m. Type of fill material N/A
n. Source of fill material N/A
m. Water supply?source Pamlico County o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
n. If the project is oceanfront development, wetlands?N/A trenches will be filled in on13
describe the steps that will be taken to main- p. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled See plans
tain established public beach accessways or pro- q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on
vide new access. N/A site and erosion controlled? Silt fences
will be used at bridge and culvert
crossings
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will r. What type of construction equipment will be
be the elevation above mean sea level of the used (for example, dragline, backhoe, or
first habitable floor? N/A hydraulic dredge)? flydraul i r dredge will

6 EXCAVATION',AND FILL
r ht- ttsed in most rases; backhoe may
he ns d for narrnta creeks o culvert s.
? -,?d
,< r
:
'
? ;
?` INFORMATION s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equip-
,
;.,
• ;
r ment to the project site? -e If yes, explain
the steps that will be taken to lessen en-
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excava- vironmental impacts. Wooden mats will
tion or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, be placed over the wetlands.
which are covered in Section 7).
1 Length Width Depth
Access channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below
MHW
Upland fill
areas
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION * 3
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap N/A
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water
or normal water level N/A
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months,
in feet N/A
d. Type of bulkhead material N/A
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards, to be placed
below mean high water N/A
f. Type of fill material N/A
*Material will naturally silt back into place after
Pipe is installed.
8 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims
title to the affected property. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then for-
ward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the--,q?wner claims title, plus written permis-
sion from thb,owner to carry out the project.
A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $100 made payable to the Depart-
ment of Natural Resources and Community
Development to cover the costs of processing the
application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in ocean-
front and inlet areas.
An accurate work plat (including plan view and A statement on the use of public funds. If the
cross sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black project involves the expenditure of public funds, st-
ink on 8 V2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal tach a statement documenting compliance with the
Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
description.) (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
Please note that original drawings are preferred and ! 9 CERTIFICATION AND FERMIS-.
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 16 ; SION TO ENTER ON LAND
high quality copies are provided by the applicant.
(Contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regard- Any permit issued in response to this application
ing that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site or will allow only the development described in the
location map is a part of plat requirements and it application. The project will be subject to condi-
must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency per- tions and restrictions contained in the permit.
sonnel unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include
county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like. I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the pro-
posed activity complies with the State of North
A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program
may have been developed in consultation with the and will be conducted in a manner consistent with
Division of Environmental Management. such program.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These do in fact, grant permission to representatives of
individuals have 30 days in which to submit com- state and federal review agencies to enter on the
ments on the proposed project to the Division of aforementioned lands in connection with .
Coastal Management. The applicant must advise evaluating information related to this permit ap-
the adjacent landowners of this opportunity by sen- plication and follow-up monitoring of project.
ding a copy of the permit application to them by ????..,, / JJ
registered or certified mail. This notification is re- This is he SLR! day of
quired by G.S. 113-229(d). 19,
SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION
Name X
Address Landowner or Authorized agent

Name Send the completed application materials to the
Address Division of Coastal Management Office nearest you
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. See the
Name map on the inside front cover for the appropriate
Address DCM office and addresses and phone number.

LOCT 0 7 1986

There are six booster pump stations located where necessary in the pressure
sewer lines. Each booster pump station will be placed on a concrete slab on a
50 foot' by 50 foot parcel of land purchased by the Bay River Metropolitan
Sewerage District. Booster pump stations will be of the following size:
BPS-1 86 gpm
BPS-2 105 gpm
BPS-3 105 gpm
BPS-4 50 gpm
BPS-5 110 gpm
BPS-6 639 gpm
Package booster pump station details are shown on plan sheet 66.
e
I ??T 0 7 1988 D
uJ'U
BAY RIVER METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT
PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES
a
EPA I&A Grant
FmHA Grant
CWB Grant
S.B.2 - Chapter 480
FmHA Loan (5%)
Additional EPA I&A Grant
EPA 55% Grant
TOTAL
$ 2,603,330.00
490,000.00
69,800.00
191,800.00
2,500,000.00
339,920.00
1,000,000.00
$ 7,194,850.00
..?f i1r11?i
O FELt73? 0 7 1988 .?
nl f???ry
B?
d h
Y d _
m r ih ?• h "?.
i
y c`. ^ v =I I rh
t+.
ti ^ v W `
^ F - ?. i.I HI iJ 1.6
h W (Il ^
hl n
2.2 P
" •tZ W
m. t:i p - 8 • 9 ?.1.
W
1.3
J W ?pV • 9 C
M, cc H Jr 1
v h'
r _ lado4?
I I Q rl Ceete k
7 'r
T!
W ?• ,?
i
t ? o y ;j z ffi . „ t1s
>` 8 0 ? • ? ? 3 Y3
6•? $ - off' s ?-
o ?
Z
_i
1-4 co
f;
Q r jt% 7 ;; OL
h •(' V
W
?I M1I I ,4 ?l? •'' ? Y'
8 P. f
WA-srp-WArl5P- -1 TREArTMEMr t AG.oonl
Water Surface Area 9. ro acres
VoIur,nr- L4. (o rnilil'on gallons
Dctenf-lon Time 78 cloy 5
/ El. 18.00 EI. 15.00
' E1.1o.00
Soi I- iRntonitG
M i ktu re
4tio Ft,
828 Ph
PROPERTY OF:
MR. CLIFTON LEE ARNOLD S+ , o+ r
RT. I, BOX 233
95'bend
GRANTSBORO, N. C. 28529 __lr
aI I22'/t` Yarf ben-d a
e
'?•-Wooden bridle ?
N.C.5.R. /Zo5
(Oirt Coad
Approx. E Zoad j
PLAN-BRIDGE CROSSING
10
5
0
PROPERTY OF:
fa,o+c?.rs MS. MARGARET ANN BARNES
F ?45I, BOX 230
GRANTSBORO, N.C.28529
BLACK Q VEATCH, INC.
CONSULTING EUGINEEAS
ASHEBORO. NORTH CAROLINA
°o
C
I"-20' H0RZ.
SCALE: I"= 10' V E R T.
CHECKED BY:
DATE:
JOB NO.: 2964
BOOK NO.:
PROFILE-BRIDGE CROSSING
s R 1204 1
L', mss' lend
45° band
u q?so Surve J;nc S+oa
3 f a. 4 + 38 _ Zia• 5+1o L.B.
Survey L;nn a.4+ 9 5 L.A.
Y r \ '? I
f I l f tit i ?\\11 '? f ?
fV Yart. bcnd \ I f X11 f f r\ \11; 1 /
?. 1 1 III f , ` `
I I I I I 1\i1?\` '° hind
....22yi°Vert. bend
t 1
PLAN-CULVERT CROSSING ! 1
ff
10
5
0
-5
BAY RIVER METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRIC
WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS
0 I
0
n
°yr american blueprint of columbu
BLACK 81 VEATCH, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ASHEBORO. NORTH CAROLINA
I"= 20t HORZ.
SCALE: I 1 0 t V E R T.
-CHECKED BY:
DATE:
JOB NO.: 2964
BOOK NO.:
.4+50 _. S+oo
PROFILE - CULVERT CROSSING
SR 1204
I I
45'hcnd -?-?? ?•FS° bind
20+00 4" Surye.
/nv. 4. 0 7 2w So
Sf'a. 20+20 / ?`? -pP 5'f"a. 2 +BSL.l3.?
Suryc Llne / \ r 3j4. 2+-7o L.A.
sd ,,o
Z24z° Yc,f. b•nd
ff° b•nd 22Yi Yort, b?n-d
• r
PLAN-CULVERT CROSSING 3
of
10
5 i
?I ? ?3 - ZZrk.° Varf, head
0 -3at. n7
..20+20 tot 5o 20+90
PROFILE-CULVERT CROSSING
N
0
0
n
?1? american Glueorinl of columhu
I"= 2 0' H OR Z.
BAY RIVER METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT SCALE: I"= 10' VERT.
WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS
CHECKED BY:
BLACK & VEATCH, INC. DATE:
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ASHEIORO. NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO.: 2964
BOOK NO.:
510. 7C.t90 540. 77+(.;2 LPG=
GurvdV Inc, ?NG ;4k.Aj 66 I '5n. 77t4a LA-
PROPERTY OF: PROPERTY OF:
MR. JAMES H. WOOSTER MR. C. W. PHILLIPS
P0. BOX 49A a \ P. O. BOX 423
ALLIANCE, N.C. 28509 ALLIANCE, N. C. 28509
4?banci
aq?RcP -
fY - Yi ycrt.?cn?s 1 1 ,- \
PLAN-CULVERT CROSSING
/o
5
./S? bend /
'Yl tCXJ
soLr-aia,P
2. 22%z Ycrf. bend
PROFILE-CULVERT CROSSING
c

S? be d
'J7t50
Vert. benci
- 1°s 20r HORZ.
BAY RIVER METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT SCALE: I 10' VERT.
WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS
CHECKED BY:
BLACK Q VEATCH, INC. DATE:
CONSULTING EliGINEERS
ASHERORO. NORTH CAROLINA COi00K N 2964
COOK NO.:
?t amancan DWaDrmr or coiumou
5-to. 1,30-f-40
6urvey IInG
/90"'50
/91"00 N.C. Hwy.
S{n• 191+9n
3 O 4 /91t 70
191 t5o 45• /jnnd
I '
3_- ?x Ifr • Y?rf. bens
22%ti Yerf; ben 45° :a
???? eby •2ivcr) -
R/,
ll'/ sr bt?? -C
3 j?45" bend-/ 1/'/; Verf. bend
PLAN-BRIDGE CROSSING n
PROPERTY 0F:
MR. ROY HOLTON
237 CHAIR ROAD
NEW BERN, N.C. 28560
S
0
-S
• !d
PROFILE-BRIDGE CROSSING
PROPERTY OF:
HARRISON BOATS, INC.
RT. 2, BOX 10
ARAPAHOE, N.C. 28510
I"- 20' H OR Z.
BAY RIVER METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT SCALE: I 10t VERT.
WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS
CHECKED BY:
BLACK 81 VEATCH, INC. DATE:
CONSULTING ENGINEEMS
ASHEIORO. NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO.: 2964
BOOK NO.:
h
0
00
n
J amarican Eluaorint of columh,a
L:
L
5?n. l4 t 34 Sao. l5 tCoS L
B
'
Survey 1ne .
.
SfQ. /5+55L
A
/
l NGSQ I o
?
C
? 4
15 c? 141650 5ur'vy lire
1516 n? as'b?n

YO z9 V«f h?.,d
•
%
!
_-_-?-5?bend - a
f
1
V ert. bend
- - - - R11./
4 5• b e n d
PLA.N-QRIDGE CROSSING
PROPERTY OF: PROPERTY OF:
MR. BENNIE L. GRIFFIN MR. MARCELLUS COBB
BOX 410 N. W. 3 rd. S T. BOX 303
BAYBORO, N.C. 28515 BAYBORO, N. C. 28515
H+Sc? IS'+oo j5+5o
5

0

/45' bend
/
\ ?
?r 45'b? ?
•5 /

N
-7-4 Vert bead
IIY4'ynrt. bend

IInLF 2 5-1-1.
PROFILE-BRIDGE CROSSING
1 "s 2 0' H OR Z.
BAY RIVER METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT SCALE: I"= 10' VERT.
WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS
CHECKED BY:
BLACK & VEATCH
INC.
, DATE:
CONSULTING ENGINEE1tS
ASHESORO, NORTH CAROLINA JOD NO.: 2964
BOOK NO.:

-0?.-
..a1fe - .gyp
-_ ulc...q ee
i Imo. ?,1
PROPERTY OF: -

MS. BELVA RADCLIFF PROPERTY OF:

P. 0. BOX 354 MR. WILLIAM S. KLOTZ
BAYBORO, N. C.28515 RT. I, BOX A6
BAY BORO, N. C. 28515
PLAN- BRIDGE CROSSING
.
7
-
o ----- ---- -- ----- -

PROFILE-BRIDGE CROSSING
I"=40' HORZ

BAY RIVER METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT .
SCALE: I"=40' VERT.
WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS
CHECKED BY:
BLACK & VEATCH
INC.
, DATE:
CONSULTING ENGINEW
ASHEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO.: 2964
BOOK NO.:
=?s am.rie.n nw•o.ot of cel,...n„
I.lc Nw A- A
?. 17+ P? P? II
Survcy Uri& 11
?I
18+00 ?? Ip rSo /
S--o. 111+01 L8
3 o. !b+ O;Z Lit
l9roo
-----5 r s ¢S ben d
¢s*bdnd)

PROPERTY OF: PROPERTY OF:
MR. HUGH HARPER \? ( l MR. HERMAN GARRISON
F0. BOX 243
BAYBORO, N. C. 28515 a"F. M. I l 738 LOGAN STREET
BROOKLYN, N.Y. 11208
7----4s? bind
0
-5
22Et° Yntf: bend '
-¢s• bend - - Riv.
PLAN-CULV RT B 6" DISCHARGE
BLACK Q VEATCH, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ASHERORO, NORTH CAROLINA
N
0
0
I"-20' HORZ.
SCALE: I"- 10' V E R T.
CHECKED !Y:
DATE:
JOS NO.: 2964
COOK NO.:
PROFILE-CULVERT CROSSING

'540. 'lit e;'1 /
5Urvcy In6 `1- kj q 301 II

6d \?? ?_? ? ? 5 45•bend
PROPERTY OF: _-
MR. W. F. RAWLS ,
C/O WACHOVIA B_ K_ ?`1?
-?
?
? PROPERTY OF:
BRANCH BaT
C/O BILLY SAULS
P. 0. BOX 27Q8f
RALEIG3?N.C.27611 ?
?
22'/- Var} bcnd
/ _\ 6"F. W
45'be ?d? 4 R 0. BOX 1847
WILSON, N.C.27893
7 45• h I nd)
PLAN-CULVERT CROSSING ! o \ 6" DISCHARGE
Jw
ICS
5
0

0
1"- 20' HORZ.
SCALE: I"= 10' V E R T.
0
0
BLACK a VEATCH, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEM
ASHESORO. NORTH CAROLINA
,5r0. `6,lao L6=
Sto. 741-61 LA
-CHECKED BY:
DATE:
JOB NO.: 2964
BOOK NO.:
PROFILE-CULVERT CROSSING

tea. 1;2 1 + 54
l?ir? SUNGl? IIre-
T
-
45'bendN,--
PROPERTY OF: MS. TEMPIE HATRT. I, BOX 64 BAYBORO, N. C. &I r- Hwy 304 --,
-,-
II S*a. (;?4b5 LB-
?? 5 O. lpat44 LA
ia?+ 1 f6'-)
5 -?co l5• bend
PiOPERTY OF:
;AMR. WILLIAM T. BEASLtY
l 1 I , BOX 50
BA`Y?BOR0, N. C. 28515
1 r M. _
1
G DISCHARGE
` 11%+ Veit hen d
45'bendJ 45•bend RlW
PLAN-CULVERT CROSS N i n --
PROFILE-CULVERT CROSSING
BLACK a VEATCH, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ASHEIORO, NORTH CAROLINA
c
c
c
I"- 20t H OR Z.
SCALE: 1"= 10' V E R T.
CHECKED BY:
DATE:
JOB NO.: 2964
BOOK NO.:
=:!3lP pmerlCan blueprint or coiumou
II ?IJG NW y 30? 1
5 ao4+S-a
?oq+5 Surve, inn. I??o-sroo II 5 . ao5* g8 LA a?5
45° bcnd -? I?
I 4S° ben d
I

PROPERTY OF.: PROPERTY OF:
MR° JAMES N. ETHERIDGE-
-- H. H. BATE
BOX 294 5
BOX 131 A, NEW BERN
N
C
28560
VANDEMERE, N. C. 28587 ,
.
.
llY? Yar t bnnds,?

ti-- ts° b?nd3 -f ?
R/vl .
PLAN-C ULVERT cgossidL
S
S ?
0
bend
-5

_"'I f5° beh d
IY+ Ycrt Pend s
xr'tGa7
r-O L F 8 1 O/P
PROFILE-CULVERT CROSSING
I"= 20' HORZ.
SCALE: 1"= 10' V E R T.
CHECKED BY:
N
0
0
BLACK a VEATCH, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ASHEIORO, NORTH CAROLINA
.?oStSO
DATE:
JOB NO.: 2964
BOOK NO.:
Sro. a0G t ?? 5fo. '0?+ ?4 LB=
IirG ? -;
urvc
5 o a81+ eb A
kc_ Nwy 3z)4 y
d9? 1

' -r
I \ \ r 4s• band
45
bui d -1
6ulkhcod _

45" bend - ban

Copal - -

PROPERTY OF: PROPERTY OF: -
MR. MARVIN B. S LOAN MR. CLAUDE CA AWAN
515 W. CORNWALL RD. PLAN-BRIDGE CROSSING / I? 1 1508 PARK AVENUE
CARY, N.C. 27511 SAYBORO, N. C. 28515

o 77
__ - -
45" hap d -
,
1 bend
45
\
-5

-in
04"Vert banJ 114' Vin rf: bend
l? L F 4 n,P

PROFILE-BRIDGE CROSSING-
I"= 20' HORZ.
BAY RIVER METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT SCALE: I"= 10' VERT.
WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS
CHECKED BY:
BLACK a VEATCH
INC.
, DATE:
CONSULTING E:NGINEEAS
ASHESORO. NORTH CAROLINA 101 NO.: 2 9 6 4
BOOK NO.:
- s amanCan blueprint of columbia
?vGC' l1/7G r I ( /p. 37! r /5 L B°
BUrIGd br-' G (NC Hk! A, 5 o. 3'10 + 99 L
\ /Cob/ I 9 1 i y
-s
370+1-D o
¢S' bond
PROPERTY OF:
MR. RUSSELL L. JONES
RT. I, BOX 326
BAYBORO, N. C. 28515

4S• bend
`?4s•b?nd

too Lir
D!A

0
0
h
45'bend-\
s
I 5? /
45' ben d
?? ?? ?? 45•bend -l/1 /a° Yert: bend
Ovc?hcod
Coblc
PROPERTY OF: PL-AN-BRIDGE CROS N
MS. IVA MAYO POPE 13
RT. I, BOX 322
BAYBORO , N. C . 28515
5
G
37o+50 37/tG)a
I"= 20' HORZ.
'ER METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT SCALE: I"= 10' VERT.
WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS
CHECKED BY:
BLACK a VEATCH, INC. DATE:
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ASHEBORO. NORTH CAROLINA JOB NO.: 2964
BOOK NO.:

<a. 4&1 t35
6urvay ,_e NC tlkJy -'04
-40,4,-P + 43 L 8 =
-4?oa. 3n LA
-? s
9?a+nc
? 45° fiend
PROPERTY OF: PLAN-BRIDGE CROSSING I la
MR. GERRY M. CANADY
400 SOUTH ROBERTSON
CLAYTON, N. C. 27520
5
.SS udJ 4S° bind
4(0l +5n glo?toc?
I_ Go LF Stee/ pipe
PROFILE-BRIDGE CROSSING
0
0
BLACI< a VEATCH, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEUS
ASHEIORO. NORTH CAROLINA
45° bend
PROPERTY OF:
MS. VIRGINIA JONES
2007 WATER ST.
NEW BERN, N. C. 28560
i-To I
I"-2Or HORZ.
SCALE: I"= I Or V E R T.
CHECKED BY:
DATE:
JOB NO.: 2964
BOOK NO.:
7I" american blueprint of columl

is- 11
RCP I
II
? II
45' Cicnds>\ 0
PROPERTY OF:
MS. ANNIE FLOWERS
C/O MS. BOYD TUCKER
LOVINGTON , VA. 22940

C
-E
PROFILE-CULVERT CROSSING
BAY RIVER METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRIC
WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENTS
I'fs 2Of HORZ.
SCALE: I"= 10' V E R T.
CHECKED BY:
c
BLACK a VEATCH, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ASHEBORO. NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO.: 2964
BOOK NO.:
Bands
PROPERTY OF:
MR. ROBERT F. Mc COTTER
P. O. BOX 362
PLAN-CULVERT CROSSING nVANDEMERE, N.C. 28587

_ - -r
`?\ c1
v4- +"S band

o -too 0+50
Jzcp '3
`aoodc
I I b?Ix head
2'
E2 P american Dlu*pnnl of columDu
R/W I R/W

S 00.24'/7"E,
390.74
L /L L /AN BRYANT
e I I?OSA SOU/RES
SS/o/ron : 54 • 197.20
I

Sae //).fd'/
( ? i I
I I
?I I
I
r? I
vJ I
BEN 8 ETHEL G/BBS
HE/RS
RAY
? SEWER
! L/NE
L
I SPU S89'3S'43"WO w
t4 PO.00' 2
O
a
S/o%47 : 54.8720
20. 00'
' O N 89'JS
N
89' 35.43 E?}7/ ?NBy• J5'43"
/4.P0
l I /,580'
I f SCALE:
I
Re U/A -<,A--
/0' UT/L/TY /O• CIONSMUMMV
EASEMENT EASEMENT
A
A
N 199' 2/' 22"E I I I S/o% : 6'6', 45• S8
'
500
I`
S/o/iar : 66 . 9.579 -
S 45' M. 319 •'E
Ay 00'
? 619. 7.9
B/
S 45' 319' 319E ~ r. 0

372/ ,
S 190' 54 09"E ~?\
' \
/84.02
' SE{S'ER
LINE \\ \ S 4/•22'29"E
2S/
44'
.
\ GEORGE D. CAHOON
-
'
?
390.74 Cn \
5/0`A21 7
- 5
9 . 7
915
.
1
1

N99.35,43"E III I /O'UT/L/TY ) \`\\
14 I I j_S EASEMENT Z? ?\?I S/o/icw : 71 . 3/,?S
I? oZ
I I I /0' CONSTRUCTtW 11i 1
-S EASEMENT
(I I 1-11-1-14N BRYANT
IIII /,SSA SOU/RES `' ` s /oessi E
III
S 00,37100"E I I I S 00' 3T 00"E
766.99' Z I 7T6./19' '
"ool?
- - IIII I - - - - : ?..?\, ?o? •,?,r. rte,:
O IIII { .f S 00'/9'25"E
IIII BEN 8 ETHEL G/BBS
I HE/RS I R
h IIII ?,?,• I
I'II I ? R ?
III
IIII ? ? .
-- IIII -- -- .g P
?I III I
IIII R/CHARD GY..HUOSON scACE: / /00'
III ?41 In'
? III
IIII ?_
II?I '?_
IIII `?
IIII
III ( KENNETH 11010/(/NS HUOSON
O III
,III O
I
•I
S/o/ion : 66 . 4S, S9 0 - - -
PREPARED BY
S/o/icw : 66.95, 79
A. HUGH HARRIS, dR.
PROFESS/OMW EN61NEER
REG/STEREO LAND SURMEYOR
ORIENTAL , NC
DATE.' MAR. 7, 1999 ?OB NO, 420
SCALE.- As ShoWI7 ORWN, BY
?? ?; •wG1S TE?,•.•
• SEA t
o : > L•19 2 5
0.4
:y
117(`
I
Inf,
E9lYtROtr? • r rrs???»+?_N_w
A SURVEY FOR
BAY RIVZ-I? AFTROr°OL /TAN
S,6-WZ-RAGE D/SMICT
MAR/BEL , NC
NO, ,3, TOWNSHIP PAML/CO COUNTY, NC