20061052 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20060627

O?.T
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS D 6 ? D 5 2
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200600280 County: Harnett USGS Quad: Lillington
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: Springhill Associates, LLC Agent: Spaulding & Norris, PA
Address: 1207 Roseneath Road attn: Shawn Guyer
Richmond, VA 23230 972 Trinity Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone No.: 804-358-5768 919-854-7925
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The 145.92 acre tract to be known as
Springhill Subdivision is located 1.25 miles west of_Lillington off Hwy 27 at the terminus of Samual McKov Road
adjacent to an unnamed tributary of Indian Branch, Harnett County.
Description of projects area and activity: The project will impact 0.4713 acres of jurisdictional wetlands for
subdivision infrastructure.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: NW-39
SEE ATTACHED SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND NATIONWIDE CONDITIONS.
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans signed 6/26/2006. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your
submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified,
reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a
public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the
date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or
revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit. If, prior to the
expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid
until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all new and/or modified terms and conditions. The District
Engineer may, at any time, exercise his discretionary authority to modify, suspend, or revoke a case specific activity's authorization
under any NWP.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910-251-4611.
Corps Regulatory Official D'l (X.,r, Date: 8/28/2006
Expiration Date of Verification: 3/18/2007
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit hgp://www.saw.usace.army.mil/WETLANDS/index.html to
complete the survey online.
Copy Furnished:
ll?l
NCDENR-DWQ attn: Cyndi Karoly 1601 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
r
NCDENR-DWQ attn: Ken Averitte 225 Green Street Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301-714 S E P 2 2006
L;ENR - M'i'l ER Q) UA:LiTY
WcRk.''uS r'u 5 T CFah`a`a,V,1 ER BRQ41C`1
Springhill Subdivision
Harnett County
AIDn 200600280
Special Conditions:
1) In order to compensate for impacts to 0.4713 acres of wetlands the permittee shall make payment to the
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) in the amount determined by the NC EEP,
sufficient to perform the restoration of 0.4713 acres of riparian wetlands in the Cape Fear River Basin,
Cataloging Unit 03030004.
Construction within jurisdictional areas on the property shall begin only after the permittee has made full.
payment to the NC EEP and provided a copy of the payment documentation to the Corps, and the NC EEP
has prodded written confirmation to the Corps that it agrees to accept responsibility for the mitigation
work required, in compliance with the MOU between the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, dated November
4,1998.
Corp Regulatory Official C.?„,? Date 8/28/2006
wr F

Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 200600280
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY O Co - 1 O
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PO BOX 1890
WILMINGTON NC 28402-1890
Springhill Associates, LLC
1207 Roseneath Road
Richmond, Wfg- inia 23230
Dear Sir or Madam:
August 22, 2006
PVG ? ? Zpp6
vow

On June 28, 2006, this office received a pre construction notification for Department of
Army (DA) authorization to discharge fill material into 0.4713 acres of Section 404 jurisdictional
wetlands, 26 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel and temporarily impact 0.1073 acres of
wetlands and 43 linear feet of stream near Poorhouse Creek, for the purpose of constructing a
subdivision to be known as Springhill Subdivision, located off NC 27 west near Lillington,
Onslow County, North Carolina.
After an initial review of the PCN application the following items need to be addressed
before processing of the request can continue:
a) Additional avoidance and minimization information needs to be evaluated to concur
with the stated findings that all avoidance and minimization efforts have been taken.
This information should include;
o Please explain the need for fill on Lot #52.
o Please further explain the need for the crossings at areas 4 and 5 and why at
least one if not both crossings can not be eliminated.
o Please explain why the road requiring impact at areas 1,2, and 3 can not be
moved further east to avoid all impacts. Also it appears that the road which
borders lot 260+ could turn back to the south and utilize the existing crossing.
b) Please provide a cross section of the impact areas in order to understand how the fill
areas will abut the wetlands and uplands. It's important to see the proposed retaining
walls and to what degree slopes are proposed.
c) Please explain why there are no available on-site mitigation options. It appears that
the current plan could utilize preservation of the remaining on-site wetlands as a
viable mitigation option.
F.
-2-
d) Please better clarify what impact is proposed at impact area # 7.
e) Section VIII of the PCN discusses the amount of mitigation you are requesting from
NC EEP. Currently there does not appear to any stream impact requested, will you
utilize a different option to address the 26 linear feet of stream impact? Also please
recognize that mitigation is required for the permanent conversion of forested
wetlands to herbaceous wetlands to offset the functional loss associated with a
maintained area.
f) Please resubmit the package with the NC EEP approval if this is the decided
approach. The permit can not be verified until mitigation acceptance is finalized.
Currently the application is considered incomplete. Please clarify and provide the additional
l in?brma ion within tfiirty days ofreceipt of this notificaTiori or we will consid-er your Wli" ion
withdrawn and close the file.
If you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Copies Furnished:
A s. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Attn: Ken Averitte
225 Green Street Suite 714
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5094
Brad Shaver
Regulatory Specialist
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Spaulding and Norris, P.A.
Attn: Shawn Guyer
972 Trinity Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607

O
WATF9
?f?QG

Springhill Associates, LLC
1207 Roseneath Road
Richmond, VA 23230
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 30, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-1052
Harnett County
Subject Property: Springhill Subdivision
Poorhouse Creek/UT to Indian Branch, [030607, 18-17.5, WSIV]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Sir or Madam:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 0.5047 acres wetland (0.3272 acres permanent impacts,
0.1775 acres temporary impacts), and 69 linear feet of intermittent stream (26 linear feet
permanent impacts, 43 linear feet temporary impacts), to construct the proposed residential
subdivision at the subject property, as described within your revised application dated August 8,
2006, and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on August 8, 2006, with more
information received August 30, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have decided that
the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3402 (GC3402). The
'Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW39, when issued by the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any
other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but
not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and other regulations. Also, this
approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as
depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify.us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands

An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Springhill Associates, LLC
Page 2 of 4
Augu;>t 30, 2006
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
Conditions of Certification:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved nits Plan Location or Reference
404/Wetland 0.5047 [(acres) 0.3272 acres permanent PCN page 9 of 15
impacts, 0.1775 acres temporary impacts]
Stream - 69 [(linear feet) 26 linear feet permanent PCN page 10 of 15
intermittent impacts, 43 linear feet temporary impacts]
2. Sediment and Erosion Control
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North
Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in tae most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. Th, devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) ?* )rojects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures
and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
3. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401Permit Application. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur;
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to fle
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands
and Nvaters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six
months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
Springhill Associates, LLC
Page 3 of 4
August 30, 2006
5. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning
fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe
within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance
with 15 NCAC 211, Section.0500;
6. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional
wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland,
water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any
wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and
Authorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can be downloaded from the
401 /Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands. The text of the sample
deed notification may be modified as appropriate to suit to this project;
7. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of
Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program,
an NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically
issued to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land
disturbing construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is
covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres],
full compliance with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-
monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit
and monitoring report forms may be found at
http://h2o. enr.state. nc. us/su/Forms Documents. htm.;
8. Certification of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return
the attached certificate of completion to the 401 /Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of
Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters
as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
Springhill Associates, LLC
Page 4 of 4
August 30, 2006
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
Nvetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-1786 or Ken Averitte in the DWQ Fayetteville Regional
Office at 910-433-3300.
AWK/gm
Enclosures: GC3402
Certificate of Completion
cc: Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Sincerely,
C Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Shawn Guyer, Spaulding & Norris, P.A., 972 Trinity Road, Raleigh, NC 27607
Filename: 061052Springhi11SD(Hamett)101
Transmittal
4e: o8.28.2Oo6
Job. No: 576-o5 DWQ Project # o6-1052
AU G 2 I2006 To: NC Division of Water Quality - 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
DENR - WATER QUALITY 2321 Crabtree Blvd D&60 l7A11- SGZ-ACE G ->r2
WETLMMANDSTORMOTERBRANCH Raleigh, North Carolina 276o4 kG50-1
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Re: Response to Request for Add. Info. for Springhill Subdivision, Lillington, NC
Sending:
S Attached ? Under separate cover
via
the following
items:
? Prints/Plans ? Shop Drawings ? Specifications ? Samples
? Other:
Copies Date Description
1 o8.28.20o6 Response Letter
Transmitted for:
? Your use
? As requested
? Review and comment
? Approved as submitted ? Resubmit ? Copies for approval
? Approved as noted ? Submit ? Copies for distribution
? Returned for ? Return ? Corrected prints
Remarks Ms. Karoly - Please find enclosed our response to your Additional Information
Request for Springhill Subdivision.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions.
Copy to:
Shawn Guyer
972 Trinity Road TEL [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 O U Q S 2 FAX [phone]
OU-ID52.
SPAULDING & NORRIS, PA
Planning • Civil Engineering • Environmental
August 28, 2006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Response to Request for More Information for Springhill Subdivision !s
In Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina AU6 2 8 2006
USACE AID# 200600280
DW Pro ect # 06-1052 F '
?itias'arrQ sr?1'?ll'ER
Dear Ms. Karoly, eR,.B
The following is our response to your August 15, 2006 Request for More Information.
1) You indicated in your correspondence dated August 8, 2006, and received by DWQ on August 8,
2006, that Impact Areas Nos. 4 and 5 "have been removed and the subdivision layout has been
modified to allow the traffic access to the western portions of the project via an alternate route",
however, these crossings still appear on your plans. Please address this in your re-submittal.
We stated that the street crossing impacts were removed but that the sanitary sewer line and
sanitary forcemain still cross in that area. We changed the impact from a 50+ foot wide permanent impact
with impervious surface and culverts to a maintained easement. We stated this change in the cover letter,
the Proposed Impacts and Impact Justification sections of the PCN, and as labeled in drawing sheet WL-
2.0.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have additional questions, comments or concerns about
this response.
Sincerely,
7 '
d
Shawn F. Guyer, E.I.T
Environmental Engineering Assistant
Phone: [phone] ? Fax: [phone] ? 972 Trinity Road ? Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
AUG-28-2006 10:32A FROM:SPAULDING NORRIS 9198547925 TO:7336893
SPAULDING & NORRIS PA
Planning • Civil Engineering • Environmental
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Date: OR 2A. ?ace-
To: TAN rt'X'"'%w
Company: Nc. 11,1-J4
From: S'iA"
RE: 'fO "Cn IrKL4- 5v4D%v+ S ico"
>WQ0 O4-toy2
Project No.: S-14-0$
Office No.: IV$ - g441
Fax No.: -433 - (as?3
Number of Pages: 7, (Including this cover sheet)
Remarks: Q4_14t,WAL IM kiA,e--.
Ck" LF AMY Q0iasrcoASS
Copy To:
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] Trinity Road # Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
AUG-28-2006 MON 09:28 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWO-WETLANDS
P.1
P. 1
RUG-28-2006 10:33A FROM:SPAULDING NORRIS 9198547925 TO:7336893
SPAULDING & NORRI
Planning *Civil Engineering •Environmental
August 28, 2006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Response to Request for More Information for Springhill Subdivision
In Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina
USACE AID# 200600280
DWQ Project # 06-1052
Dear Ms. Karoly,
The following is our response to your August 15, 2006 Request for More Information.
1) You indicated in your correspondence dated August 8, 2006, and received by DWQ on August 8,
2006, that Impact Areas Nos. 4 and 5 "have been removed and thesubdivivlon layout has been
modyled to allow the traffic access to the western portions of theproject via an alternate ronte",
however, these crossings still appear on your plans. Please address this in your re-submittal.
We stated that the street crossing impacts were removed but that the sanitary sewer line and
sanitary forcemain still cross in that area. We changed the impact from a 50+ foot wide permanent impact
with impervious surface and culverts to a maintained easement. We stated this change in the cover letter,
the Proposed Impacts and Impact Justification sections of the PCN, and as labeled in drawing sheet WL-
2.0.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have additional questions, comments or concerns about
this response.
Sincerely,
U
Shawn F. Guyer, E.I.T
Environmental Engineering Assistant
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] ? 972 Trinity Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
P.2
AUG-28-2006 MON 09:28 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 2
- ?0V M? • Cnn 1V11cn4ci r. muluy, vuva11V1
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
ri
0 ?. Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 15, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Springhill Associates, LLC
1207 Roseneath Road
Richmond, VA 23230
DWQ Project # 06-1052
Harnett County
Subject Property: Springhill Subdivision
Poorhouse Creek/Ut to Indian Branch, [030607, 18-17.5, WSiV]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Sir or Madam:
On June 27, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated June 26, 2006,
to impact 0.5786 acres of wetland (0.4713 acres permanent impact, 0.1073 acres temporary impact) and
69 linear feet of intermittent stream to (26 linear feet permanent impact, 43 linear feet temporary impact)
construct the proposed residential subdivision. On August 8, 2006, the DWQ received additional
information from you, however, the DWQ has determined that your application remains incomplete
and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional
information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the
subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have
to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506 and will place this project
on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following
information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. You indicated in your correspondence dated August 8, 2006, and received by the DWQ on
August 8, 2006, that Impact Areas Nos. 4 and 5 "have been removed and the subdivision layout
has been modified to allow the traffic access to the western portions of the project via an
alternate route", however, these crossings still appear on your plans. Please address this in your
re-submittal.
Please contact the DWQ within three weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have received this
letter and that you remain interested in continuing to pursue permitting of your project and will be
providing the DWQ the requested information at a later date. Please contact this office in writing. If we
do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project
and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-733-
1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone:; 919-733-1786 / FAX [phone] / Internet: http?//h2o.enr.state.nc,us/ncwellands
One
Carolina
N AM111y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/] 0% Post Consumer Paper
Springhill Associates, LLC..
Page 2 of 2
August 15, 2006
CBK/Ym

Sin re ,
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
cc: Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Shawn Guyer, Spaulding & Norris, P.A., 972 Trinity Road, Raleigh, NC 27607
Filename: 061052SpringhillSD(Ha rnett)Oo_Hold2
DWQ 06-105,2 Springhill SD
. -
Subject: DWQ 06-1052 Springhill SD
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:43:23 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information
related to your recent application. Please note that this message is being
forwarded to you electronically so that you may expedite preparation of your
response. Please do not send your response as a reply to this e-mail or via fax.
The hard copy is being sent via US Mail. All response correspondence is to be
mailed via hard copy to the 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604 unless otherwise noted.
p g Content-Type: application/msword
10610525 rin hi11SD Harnett On HoldIdoc
Content-Encoding: base64
1 of 1 8/16/2006 8:43 AM
Transmittal
Date: 08.08.2006 Job. No: 576-05 DWQ Project # 06-1052
To: NC Division of Water Quality - 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Re: Response to Request for Add Info for Springhill Subd, Lillington, Harnett Co., NC
Sending:
® Attached ? Under separate cover the following
via items:
? Prints/Plans ? Shop Drawings ? Specifications ? Samples
? Other:
Copies Date Description
1 08.08.2006 Response Letter, Revised PCN, & Drawings
Transmitted for:
? Your use
? As requested
? Review and comment
? Approved as submitted ? Resubmit
? Approved as noted ? Submit
? Returned for ? Return
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND 5TOfttIWATER BRANCH
? Copies for approval
? Copies for distribution
? Corrected Prints
Remarks Ms. Karoly - Please find enclosed our responses to your request for additional
information for Springhill Subdivision, located in Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions.
CODV to:
Shawn Guyer
972 Trinity Road TEL [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 FAX [phone]
SPAULDING & NORRIS, PA
01N Planning *Civil Engineering + Environmental
a[R@TV191
August 8, 2006
pir o 8 zoa
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality WETLMDSN NO d_m IUERBf NM
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
F?>
RE: Response to July 5, 2006 Request for More Information for Springhill Subdivision J? %I
In Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina t }
USACE AID# 200600280
DWQ Project # 06-1052
Dear Ms. Karoly,
Please find attached, the revised Pre-Construction Notification Application packet for proposed
stream and wetland impacts associated with the development of Springhill Subdivision, located in
Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina. The Harnett County tax PIN for the site is 0549-77-2324.000.
The site covers 145.92 acres to the west of NC Highway 27 and is located in the Cape Fear River Basin.
Although the subdivision layout has been finalized, construction drawings have not been prepared for the
majority of the subdivision. The preliminary storm drainage system has been laid out, but it has not been
s4 designed. Vertical alignments for the streets have not been designed, so a grading plan is not available at
this time. Included with this application are drawings of the subdivision layout and details of the specific
impacted areas of the site.
Our responses to your additional information requests follow:
1. Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan. In particular, we believe that
construction of homes on lots 251-253 will result in additional impacts. Please address this issue
with your resubmittal.
The lot layouts on the site plan include the lot setbacks. A fifty-foot by fifty-foot box was added to each lot
to insure that at least this amount of area was available for building. The developer has indicated that there
are some thirty-five foot deep products available for this subdivision. Thirty-five foot products on these
lots would allow there to be fifteen feet or more of yard between the back of the building and the edge of
the wetland. This is the case for lots 216-218, 220-221, and 316-317 (please note that lot numbering has
changed). On lot 219, the fifty by fifty box extends into the wetland. We have proposed impacting the
wetland area within the fifty by fifty buildable area. The building itself would be fifteen feet from the
wetland line following the proposed impact.
2. The road crossing labeled as 4 or 5 on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please
eliminate either road crossing or provide additional information as to why it is necessary for this
project.
The street crossings at Impact Area #4 and #5 have been removed and the subdivision layout has been
modified to allow traffic access to the western portions of the project via an alternate route. The sanitary
sewer lines that were running in the street have not been moved and are now temporary impacts to the
wetlands. Removal of these two crossings reduced the permanent wetland impacts for the project by thirty
percent.
Phone: [phone] ? Fax: [phone] •972 Trinity Road ? Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
3. This office believes that the road crossing labeled as 3 can be moved or reconfigured to avoid
impacts to the wetland. We believe that the road can be relocated so as not to have an
intersection on the wetland. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
The intersection at Impact Area #3 is vital to traffic flow and emergency services access to the subdivision.
It is located where the subdivision's two main thoroughfares meet, providing direct access to NC Highway
27 and SR 1291. The intersection also provides direct access between the westernmost portions of the
subdivision and these two access points. The intersection is located in the most upstream portion of the
wetland and does not interfere with flow through the remainder of the wetland on the site. Flow from the
watershed above the intersection enters the wetland just below the intersection. Removal of the road
crossing at Impact Area #5 makes the impact at Impact Area #3 the only major impact to this wetland
complex.
Comprehensive measures were taken to avoid the wetlands located on the site and minimize the
impacts necessary to develop the site. These measures were applied as a whole to the entire subdivision
and on a smaller scale at individual impact areas. The layout of the subdivision has changed several times
in an effort to avoid the abundant wetlands on the site. The changes included several realignments of
streets and lots and redesign of the preliminary storm drainage system to work around wetlands. Following
these changes, the majority of the wetlands on the site were located in Open Space areas and at the rear of
lots.
Specifically, the first round of changes reduced the wetland impacts at Impact Areas #3 and #5 by
half and completely removed a storm drainage easement through the wetlands near Impact Area #9. The
second round of plan changes resulted in the realignment of the street at Impact Area #8 to cross the
wetland at a narrow location. Similarly, the street at Impact Area #7 was realigned to completely avoid the
wetlands in that area. The sanitary sewer easement at Impact Area #6 was shifted outside of the wetlands
where possible. Headwalls were included at each of the street crossings to minimize the impact on the
adjacent wetlands. A sanitary sewer line was relocated and extensive grading was added at Impact Area #2
to reduce the impact to the wetlands above the street crossing. Originally, the entire wetland area above the
street was impacted. Now, with headwalls and lot grading, the impact is minimal. Additionally, all of the
stormwater outlets in the subdivision were pulled back from wetlands so that outlet dissipater pads would
not encroach into the wetlands.
The third and most recent set of changes involved the removal of two residential street crossings
of wetlands. Three cul-de-sacs were added to the plan and an additional street was realigned to increase
access to the western portions of the subdivision.
These measures have reduced the permanent wetland impacts to less than 41/o of the total wetlands
on the site.
Ile total proposed impacts for this site include: l
Temporary Wetland Impacts 3Z
S
Accumulated area: 7,728 sqft (0.1775 acres) T-
Permanent Wetland Impacts
Accumulated area: 14,251 sqft (0.3272 acres) `
Temporary Intermittent Stream Impact: 431f
43 sgft (0.0010 acres)
Permanent Intermittent Stream Impact: 261f
26 sgft (0.0006 acres)

As compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts, we proposed payment to the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program's (EEP) In-Lieu-Fee Program. We have received approval from EEP
and have attached the approval letter to this submittal.
Also, attached, please find revised impervious surface calculations.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions, comments or concerns about these
responses. Thank you in advance for your time spent reviewing this information.
Sincerely,
Shawn F. Guyer, E.I.T
Environmental Engineering Assistant
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2 Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide Permit #39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ? ??? R
H. Applicant Information ?? \Yf
AUG p 8 2006
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: S rin hill Associates LLC -A Keystone Co an N • wAT?6TMRANCH
Mailing Address: 1207 Roseneath Road
Richmond, Virginia 23230
Telephone Number: 804.358.5768 Fax Number: 804.358.6976
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Shawn Guyer
Company Affiliation: Spaulding; & Norris. PA
Mailing Address: 972 Trinity Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone Number: 919.854.7925 Fax Number: 919.854.7925
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 15
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad. Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Springhill Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0549-77-2324.000
4. Location
County: Harnett Nearest Town:_ Lillington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Springhill Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
Traveling south on US401, approaching Lillington, turn right onto North Main
Street/NC-27 West. After the third stoplight, turn right onto West Old Road/NC-27
West. After approximately 1.25 miles, site is on right (West) side of road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.38971 ON 78.83983 °W
6. Property size (acres): 145.92
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Poorhouse Creek (Stream ID 18-17.5. WS-ID.-
UT to Indian Branch (18-20-26-I WS-IV)
8. River Basin: Cape Fear (Subbasin 03-06-07: 03-06-13) [USGS HUC 030300041
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 15
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The site is comprised of approximately 5-10 year old cutover, mixed pines and
hardwoods. The several of the bottoms have some larger trees and are filled with
Arundinaria gigantea and Smilax. The site is bisected by Samuel McKoy Lane, a dirt
road that leads to several homes located to the west of the site. Parcels to the south of the
site consist of agricultural land and residential homes. North of the site are
agriculturallresidential areas, an automobile junkyard, and an elementary school.
Residential homes dominate the area to the east of the site.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project entails the development of a residential subdivision and the associated
infrastructure, including: roads, water supply, and sanitary and storm sewers. Equipment
used will include, but is not limited to trackhoe excavators, bulldozers, rollers, asphalt
pavers, and other grading and road construction equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The purpose of the proposed work is to provide the necessary infrastructure to support a
residential subdivision of single family homes.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Initial site concurrence was held on December 13, 2005 with Mr. Brad Shaver of the US
Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Office. A second site meeting was
held on January 17, 2006 with Mr. Ronnie Smith of the same office. A Jurisdictional
Determination was issued by the USACE on February 7, 2006.
A PCN application was submitted to the DWQ and USACE on June 26, 2006. On July 5,
2006 the DWQ issued a Request for More Information. These revisions are in response
to that request.
Page 7 of 15
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future permit requests anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The proposed impacts include temporary stream and wetland impacts resulting from
utility installation and permanent wetland impacts resulting from installation of
residential streets.
Page 8 of 15
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
Impact Area #I Road grading & Forested No 1000+ 0340
0
[Permanent] storm drainage .
Impact Area #2
[Permanent] Lot Fill Forested No 1000+ 0.0020
Impact Area #3 Road grading & Forested No 1200+ 0
1977
[Permanent] storm drainage .
Impact Area #4 Sanitary sewer Forested No 150+ 0
0360
[Temporary] installation & easement .
Impact Area #5 Sanitary sewer Forested No 150+ 0
0350
[Temporary] installation & easement .
Impact Area #6 Sanitary sewer Forested No 0 0
0398
[Temporary] installation & easement .
Impact Area #8 Road grading & Forested No 150+ 0
0573
[Permanent] storm drainage .
Impact Area #9
[Temporary] Sanitary sewer
installation & easement Forested No 450+ 0.0554
Impact Area #10 Water line installation Forested No 0 0
0113
[Temporary] & easement .
Impact Area #11 Road grading & Forested No 300 0
0286
[Permanent] storm drainage .
Impact Area #12
[Permanent] Lot Fill Forested No 750+ 0.0076
Total Wetland Impact (acres) Temporary: 0.1775
Permanent: 0.3272
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: -9.25 acres
Page 9 of 15
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact t
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres
Impact Area #6 UT to Indian Utility installation Intermittent 1' 21 0.0005
[Temporary] Branch
Impact Area #7 UT to Indian Road grading & Intermittent 1' 26 0
0006
[Permanent] Branch storm drainage .
Impact Area #10 UT to Indian Utility installation Intermittent 1' 22 0
0005
[Temporary] Branch .
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) Temporary: 43 0.0010
Permanent: 26 0.0006
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

?
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): Temporary: 0.0010
Permanent: 0.0006
Wetland Impact (acres): Temporary: 0.1775
Permanent: 0.3272
Open Water Impact (acres : N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) Temporary: 0.1785
Permanent: 0.3278
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): Temporary: 43
Permanent: 26
Page 10 of 15
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands [stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: NIA Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Comprehensive measures were taken to avoid the wetlands located on the site and minimize
the impacts necessary to develop the site. These measures were applied as a whole to the
entire subdivision and on a smaller scale at individual impact areas. The layout of the
subdivision has changed several times in an effort to avoid the abundant wetlands on the site.
The changes included a complete realignment of streets and lots and redesign of the
preliminary storm drainage system to work around wetlands. Following these changes, the
majority of the wetlands on the site were located in Open Space areas and at the rear of lots.
Specifically, the changes reduced the wetland impacts at impact Areas #3 and #5 by half and
completely removed a storm drainage easement through the wetlands near impact Area #9.
The second round of plan changes resulted in the realignment of the street at Impact Area #8
to cross the wetland at a narrow location. Similarly, the street at Impact Area #7 was
realigned to completely avoid the wetlands in that area The sanitary sewer easement at
Impact Area #6 was shifted outside of the wetlands where possible. Headwalls were
included at each of the street crossings to minimize the impact on the adjacent wetlands. A
sanitary sewer line was relocated and extensive grading was added at Impact Area #2 to
reduce the impact to the wetlands above the street crossing. Originally, the entire wetland
Page 11 of 15
area above the street was impacted. Now, with headwalls and lot grading, the impact is
minimal. Additionally, all of the stormwater outlets in the subdivision were pulled back from
wetlands so that outlet dissipater pads would not encroach into the wetlands.
The third round of changes, following comment from DWQ, resulted in the realignment of
several streets and the removal of two residential street crossings through wetland areas. The
sanitary sewer line that was located in the street continues through the wetland, but the street
ends in cul-de-sacs short of the wetlands.
These measures have reduced the permanent wetland impacts to less than 4% of the total
wetlands on the site.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic ;esource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr. state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide. html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 12 of 15
As compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts, we propose payment to the NC
Ecosystem Enhancement Program's In-Lieu-Fee Program.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.3272 acres
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? . No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes El No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
Page 13 of 15
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multinliers.
Zone* s wImpct are feet Multiplier Retquired-
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
• Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
There is no existing impervious acreage on the site. The proposed impervious acreage
includes streets, sidewalks, driveways, front walkways, houses, and patios. The overall
estimated impervious acreage for the project is over 20 percent of the total site area.
Detailed calculations of the proposed site impervious acreage are attached to this
application. The total proposed impervious acreage is 38.1 acres or 26.1 percent of the
total 145.92 acres. The impervious acreage breaks down as follows: 14.1 acres of street,
2.0 acres of sidewalk, 0.1 acres of Highway 27 widening, and 21.9 acres of lot
impervious area. The lot impervious area represents the proposed impervious acreage of
the largest building footprint available in the subdivision with the driveway, patio, and
front walkway included. Only a portion of the lots in the subdivision will have the
largest footprint. The 26.1 percent impervious percentage is a conservative overestimate
of the overall site impervious acreage.
XU. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated within Springhill Subdivision will be conveyed to the City of
Lillington Sanitary Sewer system and from there to an appropriate wastewater treatment
facility.
Page 14 of 15
XIU. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This project will not result in additional future development or future impacts to nearby
water quality. The project only provides access to adjacent parcels that already have
access to state roads.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
D?.08.Zoo Co
Applicant/AgVent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 15 of 15
July 6, 2006
Shawn Guyer
Spaulding & Norris, PA
972 Trinity Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Project: Spring Hill Subdivision (Lillington) County: Harnett
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404
Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CAMA permits to NC EEP. Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an invoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) (Linear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Cape Fear 0.4713. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
03030004
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 ratio, (buffers, Zone 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the compensatory
mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or CAMA Permit. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between, the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact David Robinson at [phone]
S' cerely,
am D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Todd Tugwell, USACE - Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ Regional Office - Raleigh
File
LV?Iwo
Prot", our .jtR& l?C
EN
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
KeVISed Springhill Subdivision Impervious Calculations

Streets:
Impervious Street Impervious Impervious
Width Length Area Area
(FT) (LF) (SQFT) (ACRES)
80' ROW 35 225 7,875 0.2
60' ROW 34 1,890 64,260 1.5
50' ROW 34 15,893 540,362 12.4
Total Street Impervious Area: 14.1 ACRES
Width Length Area Area
(FT) (LF) (SQFT) (ACRES)
80' ROW N/A
60' ROW 5 1,890 9,450 0.2
50' ROW 5 15,893 79,465 1.8
Total Sidewalk Impervious Area: 2.0 ACRES
Widening:
Total Widening Impervious Area: 3,998 SQFT
Total Widening Impervious Area: 0.1 ACRES
Lots:
Largest Building Footprint with Driveway 2,500 SQFT
Total Number of Lots: 381
Total Maximum Potential Impervious Area for All Lots: 952,500 SQFT
Total Maximum Potential Impervious Area for All Lots: 21.9 ACRES
Total Impervious:
Total Accumulated Impervious Area: 38.1 ACRES
Total Site Area: 145.92 ACRES
** Total Site Impervious Coverage: 26.1
1O?OF vvn/r,AQG
Vj rte..
o ?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 5, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-1052
Harnett County
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Springhill Associates, LLC
1207 Roseneath Road
Richmond, VA 23230
Subject Property: Springhill Subdivision
Poorhouse Creek/Ut to Indian Branch, [030607, 18-17.5, WSIV]
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Sir or Madam:
On June 27, 2006, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated June 26, 2006,
to impact 0.5786 acres of wetland (0.4713 acres permanent impact, 0.1073 acres temporary impact) and
69 linear feet of intermittent stream to (26 linear feet permanent impact, 43 linear feet temporary impact)
construct the proposed residential subdivision. The DWQ has determined that your application was
incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will require additional
information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or streams on the
subject property. Therefore, unless we receive the additional information requested below, we will have
to move toward denial of your application as required by 15A NCAC 21-1.0506 and will place this project
on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional information. Please provide the following
information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan. In particular, we believe that
t construction of homes on lots 251-253 will result in additional impacts. Please address this issue
with your resubmittal.
2. The road crossing labeled as 4 or 5 on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate
either road crossing or provide additional information as to why it is necessary for this project.
3. This Office believes that the road crossing labeled on the plans as 3 can be moved or reconfigured
to avoid the impacts to the wetland. We believe that the road can be relocated so as not to have
an intersection on the wetland. Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
Please contact the DWQ within three weeks of the date of this letter to verify that you have received this
letter and that you remain interested in continuing to pursue permitting of your project and will be
providing the DWQ the requested information at a later date. Please contact this office in writing. If we
do not hear from you within three weeks, we will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project
and we will consider the project as withdrawn.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit 1,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httu://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
NcT` Carolina
?atura!!
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Springhill Associates, LLC
Page 2 of 2 `
July 5, 2006
This letter only addresses the application review and does not authorize any impacts to wetlands, waters
or protected buffers. Please be aware that any impacts requested within your application are not
authorized (at this time) by the DWQ. Please call Ms. Cyndi Karoly or Mr. Ian McMillan at 919-733-
1786 if you have any questions regarding or would like to set up a meeting to discuss this matter.
Sin re , O yndi Karoly, Superviso kr
1.411-) _,401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
CBKI?fm
cc: Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Shawn Guyer, Spaulding & Norris, P.A., 972 Trinity Road, Raleigh, NC 27607
Filename: 061052SpringhillSD(Harnett)On_Hold
DWQ 06-1052 Springhill SD
P
Subject: DWQ 06-1052 Springhill SD
From: Laurie Dennison <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 13:54:56 -0400
To: [e-mail]
Please see attached the Division of Water Quality's request for more information
related to your recent application. Please note that this message is being
forwarded to you electronically so that you may expedite preparation of your
response. Please do not send your response as a reply to this e-mail or via fax.
The hard copy is being sent via US Mail. All response correspondence is to be
mailed via hard copy to the 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Raleigh, NC, 27604 unless otherwise noted.
Content-Type: application/msword
061052SpringhillSD(Harnett)On Hold.doc
Content-Encoding: base64
of 1 7/5/2006 1:55 PM
2 0 0 6 1 0 5 2
M'

06.26.2006 Job. No: 576-05 USACEAID# 2006o028o
Date:
To: NC Division of Water Quality - 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Re: PCN Application for Springhill Subdivision, Lillington, Harnett county, NC
Sending:
S Attached ? Under separate cover the following
via items:
? Prints/Plans ? Shop Drawings ? Specifications ? Samples
? Other:
Copies Date Description
1 o6.26.2006 PCN Application Packet
1 o6.23.20o6 Application Fee $200.00 (Chk 8189)
Transmitted for:
? Your use ? Approved as submitted ? Resubmit ? Copies for approval
? As requested ? Approved as noted ? Submit ? Copies for distribution
? Review and comment ? Returned for F] Return ? Corrected prints
Remarks Ms. Karoly - Please find enclosed the PCN application for Springhill
Subdivision, located in Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions.
Cony to: S??C ia?2t?-1
Shawn Guyer

972 i`
T a' mtyRoad
t s m TEL [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919.854.7925
Transmittal RECEIVED
Civil Engineering & Planning
r
June 26, 2006
Mr. Brad Shaver
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
X33 ?':? -^ ' Y PS y ?,
20061052
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality f- ,
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Pre-Construction Notification Application for Springhill Subdivision
In Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina
USACE AID# 200600280
Dear Mr. Shaver and Ms. Karoly,

Please find attached, the completed Pre-Construction Notification Application packet for proposed
stream and wetland impacts associated with the development of Springhill Subdivision, located in
Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina. The Harnett County tax PIN for the site is 0549-77-2324.000.
The site covers 145.92 acres to the west of NC Highway 27 and is located in the Cape Fear River Basin.
Although the subdivision layout has been finalized, construction drawings have not been prepared for the
majority of the subdivision. The preliminary storm drainage system has been laid out, but it has not been
designed. Vertical alignments for the streets have not been designed, so a grading plan is not available at
this time. Included with this application are drawings of the subdivision layout and details of the specific
impacted areas of the site.
Comprehensive measures were taken to avoid the wetlands located on the site and minimize the
impacts necessary to develop the site. These measures were applied as a whole to the entire subdivision
and on a smaller scale at individual impact areas. The layout of the subdivision has changed several times
in an effort to avoid the abundant wetlands on the site. The changes included a complete realignment of
streets and lots and redesign of the preliminary storm drainage system to work around wetlands. Following
these changes, the majority of the wetlands on the site were located in Open Space areas and at the rear of
lots.
'JV
Specifically, the changes reduced the wetland impacts at Impact Areas #3 and #5 by half and
completely removed a storm drainage easement through the wetlands near Impact Area #9. The second
round of plan changes resulted in the realignment of the street at Impact Area #8 to cross the wetland at a
narrow location. Similarly, the street at Impact Area #7 was realigned to completely avoid the wetlands in
that area. The sanitary sewer easement at Impact Area #6 was shifted outside of the wetlands where
possible. Headwalls were included at each of the street crossings to minimize the impact on the adjacent
wetlands. A sanitary sewer line was relocated and extensive grading was added at Impact Area #2 to
reduce the impact to the wetlands above the street crossing. Originally, the entire wetland area above the
street was impacted. Now, with headwalls and lot grading, the impact is minimal. Additionally, all of the
stormwater outlets in the subdivision were pulled back from wetlands so that outlet dissipater pads would
not encroach into the wetlands.
These measures have reduced the permanent wetland impacts to approximately 5% of the total
wetlands on the site.
Phone: [phone] ? Fam [phone] ? 972 Trinity Road ? Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
The total proposed impacts for this site include:
Temporary Wetland Impacts
Accumulated area: 4,672 sgft (0.1073 acres)
Permanent Wetland Impacts
Accumulated area: 20,528 sqft (0.4713 acres)
Temporary Intermittent Stream Impact 43 if
43 sqft (0.0010 acres)
Permanent Intermittent Stream Impact: 261f
26 sqft (0.0006 acres)
As compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts, we propose payment to the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program's (EEP) In-Lieu-Fee Program. We have submitted for approval from
EEP and have not received it at the time of this submittal. When approval is received, it will be forwarded
to the USACE and the DWQ.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions, comments or concerns about this application.
Thank you in advance for your time spent reviewing this permit application.
Sincerely,
atz7L
Shawn F. Guyer, E.I.T
Environmental Engineering Assistant
t-
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
20061 052
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
T"T
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
A- n
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershe ftiu er Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
1 ® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
H.
i
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide Permit #39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page n
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal j?men? Ares, of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check her - ? i < J
Applicant Information
iult4::% ! Niu5
11"Y
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Springhill Associates, LLC - A Keystone Company
Mailing Address: 1207 Roseneath Road
Richmond, Virginia 23230
Telephone Number: 804.358.5768 Fax Number: 804.358.6976
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Shawn GWer
Company Affiliation: Spaulding & Norris, PA
Mailing Address: 972 Trinity Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone Number: 919.854.7925 Fax Number: 919.854.7925
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 15
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Springhill Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0549-77-2324.000
4. Location
County: Harnett Nearest Town: Lillington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):Springhill Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
Traveling south on US-401, approaching Lillington, turn right onto North Main
Street/NC-27 West. After the third stoplight, turn right onto West Old Road/NC-27
West. After approximately 1.25 miles, site is on right (West) side of road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.38971 ON 78.83983 °W
6. Property size (acres): 145.92
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Poorhouse Creek (Stream ID 18-17.5. WS-IV);
UT to Indian Branch (18-20-26-1, WS-IVJ
8. River Basin: Cape Fear (Subbasin 03-06-07: 03-06-13) [USGS HUC 030300041
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 15
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The site is comprised of approximately 5-10 year old cutover, mixed pines and
hardwoods. The several of the bottoms have some larger trees and are filled with
Arundinaria gigantea and Smilax. The site is bisected by Samuel McKoy Lane, a dirt
road that leads to several homes located to the west of the site. Parcels to the south of the
site consist of agricultural land and residential homes. North of the site are
agricultural/residential areas, an automobile junkyard, and an elementary school.
Residential homes dominate the area to the east of the site.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project entails the development of a residential subdivision and the associated
infrastructure, including: roads, water supply, and sanitary and storm sewers. Equipment
used will include, but is not limited to trackhoe excavators, bulldozers, rollers, asphalt
pavers, and other grading and road construction equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The purpose of the proposed work is to provide the necessary infrastructure to support a
residential subdivision of single family homes.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Initial site concurrence was held on December 13, 2005 with Mr. Brad Shaver of the US
Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Office. A second site meeting was
held on January 17, 2006 with Mr. Ronnie Smith of the same office. A Jurisdictional
Determination was issued by the USACE on February 7, 2006.
Page 7 of 15
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future permit requests anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The proposed impacts include temporary stream and wetland impacts resulting from
utility installation and permanent wetland impacts resulting from installation of
residential streets.
i Page 8 of 15
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) es/no linear feet
Impact Area #1 Road grading & Forested No 1000+ 0
0340
[Permanent] storm drainage .
Impact Area #2 Lot Fill Forested No 1000+ 0.0020
[Permanent]
Impact Area #3 Road grading & Forested No 1200+ 0
1977
[Permanent] storm drainage .
Impact Area #4 Road grading & Forested No 150+ 0.0775
[Permanent] storm drainage
Impact Area #5 Road grading & Forested No 150+ 0.0666
[Permanent] storm drainage
Impact Area #6 Sanitary sewer Forested No 0 0.0398
[Temporary] installation & easement
Impact Area #8 Road grading & Forested No 150+ 0
0573
[Permanent] storm drainage .
Impact Area #9 Sanitary sewer Forested No 450+ 0562
0
[Temporary] installation & easement .
Impact Area #10 Water line installation Forested No 0 0
0113
[Temporary] & easement .
Impact Area #11 Road grading & Forested No 300 0
0286
[Permanent] storm drainage .
Impact Area #12 Lot Fill Forested No 750+ 0
0076
[Permanent] .
Total Wetland Impact (acres) Temporary: 0.1073
Permanent: 0.4713
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: -9.25 acres
Page 9 of 15
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres
Impact Area #6 UT to Indian Utility installation Intermittent 1' 21 0.0005
[Temporary] Branch
Impact Area #7 UT to Indian Road grading & Intermittent 1' 26 0
0006
[Permanent] Branch storm drainage .
Impact Area #10 UT to Indian Utility installation Intermittent 1' 22 0.0005
[Temporary] Branch
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) Temporary: 43 0.0010
Permanent: 26 0.0006
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): Temporary: 0.0010
Permanent: 0.0006
Wetland Impact (acres): Temporary: 0.1073
Permanent: 0.4713
Open Water Impact acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) Temporary: 0.1083
Permanent: 0.4719
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): Temporary: 43
Permanent: 26
V,

lq
Page 10 of 15
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Comprehensive measures were taken to avoid the wetlands located on the site and minimize
the impacts necessary to develop the site. These measures were applied as a whole to the
entire subdivision and on a smaller scale at individual impact areas. The layout of the
subdivision has changed several times in an effort to avoid the abundant wetlands on the site.
The changes included a complete realignment of streets and lots and redesign of the
preliminary storm drainage system to work around wetlands. Following these changes, the
majority of the wetlands on the site were located in Open Space areas and at the rear of lots.
Specifically, the changes reduced the wetland impacts at Impact Areas #3 and #5 by half and
completely removed a storm drainage easement through the wetlands near impact Area #9.
The second round of plan changes resulted in the realignment of the street at Impact Area #8
to cross the wetland at a narrow location. Similarly, the street at Impact Area #7 was
realigned to completely avoid the wetlands in that area. The sanitary sewer easement at
Impact Area #6 was shifted outside of the wetlands where possible. Headwalls were
included at each of the street crossings to minimize the impact on the adjacent wetlands. A
sanitary sewer line was relocated and extensive grading was added at Impact Area #2 to
reduce the impact to the wetlands above the street crossing. Originally, the entire wetland
Page 1 I of 15
area above the street was impacted. Now, with headwalls and lot grading, the impact is
minimal. Additionally, all of the stormwater outlets in the subdivision were pulled back from
wetlands so that outlet dissipater pads would not encroach into the wetlands.
These measures have reduced the permanent wetland impacts to approximately 5% of the
total wetlands on the site.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete..
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
As compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts, we propose payment to the NC
Ecosystem Enhancement Program's In-Lieu-Fee Program
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
Page 12 of 15
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.4713 acres
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes E] No El
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify. V Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) I Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
Page 13 of 15
2 N/A I 1.5 I N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
There is no existing impervious acreage on the site. The proposed impervious acreage
includes streets, sidewalks, driveways, front walkways, houses, and patios. The overall
estimated impervious acreage for the project is over 20 percent of the total site area.
Detailed calculations of the proposed site impervious acreage are attached to this
application. The total proposed impervious acreage is 39.4 acres or 27.0 percent of the
total 145.92 acres. The impervious acreage breaks down as follows: 15.0 acres of street,
2.2 acres of sidewalk, 0.1 acres of Highway 27 widening, and 22.0 acres of lot
impervious area. The lot impervious area represents the proposed impervious acreage of
the largest building footprint available in the subdivision with the driveway, patio, and
front walkway included. Only a portion of the lots in the subdivision will have the
largest footprint. The 27.0 percent impervious percentage is a conservative overestimate
of the overall site impervious acreage.
XH. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated within Springhill Subdivision will be conveyed to the City of
Lillington Sanitary Sewer system and from there to an appropriate wastewater treatment
facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 14 of 15
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes El No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. Ifno, please provide a short narrative description:
This project will not result in additional future development or future impacts to nearby
water quality. The project only provides access to adjacent parcels that already have
access to state roads.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
SI GLauuL CT r1caJr. - NO. Zte • 2co(n
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 15 of 15
Springhill Subdivision Impervious Calculations
Streets:
Impervious reef Impervious Impervious
Width Length Area Area
(FT) (LF) (SQFT) (ACRES)
80' ROW 35 225 7,875 0.2
60' ROW 34 1,890 64,260 1.5
50' ROW 34 17,157 583,338 13.4
Total Street Impervious Area: 15.0 ACRES
Sidewalk:
Impervious Street Impervious Impervious
Width Length Area Area
(FT) (LF) (SQFT) (ACRES)
80' ROW N/A
60' ROW 5 1,890 9,450 0.2
50' ROW 5 17,157 85,785 2.0
Total Sidewalk Impervious Area: 2.2 ACRES
Widenin :
Total Widening Impervious Area: 3,998 SQFT
Total Widening Impervious Area: 0.1 ACRES
Lots: - --
Largest Building Footprint with Driveway 2,500 SQFT
Total Number of Lots: 384
Total Maximum Potential Impervious Area for All Lots: 960,000 SQFT
Total Maximum Potential Impervious Area for All Lots: 22.0 ACRES
Total Impervious:
Total Accumulated Impervious Area: 39.4 ACRES
Total Site Area: 145.92 ACRES
** Total Site Impervious Coverage: 27.0%
Civil Engineering & Planning
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
ALL BLANKS TO BE FILLED IN BY CURRENT LANDOWNER
Narne:
Address:
LIL 4 -Kz
?Pvjelq-kbl? L<
1116 7V rtw, kA- -
K, Jx 7
? a 1z-2-3C
Pboae: ???' - r7 ?' Fax:
EnmH Address:
project Nam iption: Spring Dell Subdivision / Rcsidemtial Smb i n
Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Eflghwers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Attn: Mr. Brad Shavcr
Fief Office: i ' peon Field Off=
Re: Wetlands Ralated Cohabiting & Peunftft
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current property owner, thereby &94Maw and audwrize Spaulding & Norris, P.A., to act on my
behalf as my agent in the processing of pamik spp ons, to finish upon request supplemental
orrptran iht support ofapplications, eta, from"day forward. This the d day of
This notification s mc=edes any previous cmevoud=m concerning the agent for this iecl.
n rue, 04nac
PRINT Owner's Name PROPERT Owner's Signal
Cc: Ms. CYBE Karoip
NCDENR-Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/ Express Review Pmnitting Unit
1650 Maq Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Phone. [phone] • Fsa: (919) 8547925 * 972 Trinity Road ? RateW4 North C'a atna 27607

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 200600280 County: Harnett U.S.G.S. Quad: Lillington
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Mr. Jim K. Sherron Agent: Spaulding and Norris, PA
Address: 408 May Court attn: Shawn F. Guyer
Raleigh, NC 27609 972 Trinity Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone No.: 919-881-0070 919-854-7990
Property description:
Size (acres) 145.92 Nearest Town Lillington
Nearest Waterway Indian Branch River Basin Cape Fear
USGS RUC 03030004 Coordinates 35.3890°N, 78.8435°W
Location description The site is located 1.25 miles west of Lillington off Hw y 27 at the terminus of Samual McKoy
Road_adlacent to an unnamed tributary of Indian Branch, Harnett County.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property . subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The wetlands on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been partially verified by the Corps. We
strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the
Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulaons, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
X The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on February 7, 2006. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Page 1 of 2
Action ID: 200600280
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910-2514611.
Basis For Determination: The subiect area exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation
Manual and is adiacent to an unnamed tributary of Indian Branch, a tributary of the Cape Fear River, a navigable
water of the US.
Remarks: The site was reviewed with Shawn Guyer of Spaulding and Norris on December 13, 2005. The site was
reviewed a second time on January 17, 2006 with Ronnie Smith from this office.
Corps Regulatory Official: t j
C
Date 2/712006 Expiration Date 2/7/2011
Corps Regulatory Official (Initial):
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
• A plat or sketch of the property and the wetland data form must be attached to the file copy of this form.
• A copy of the "Notification Of Administrative Appeal Options And Process And Request For Appeal" form must be
transmitted with the property owner/agent copy of this form.
• If the property contains isolated wetlands/waters, please indicate in "Remarks" section and attach the
"Isolated Determination Information Sheet" to the file copy of this form.
cc: Keystone Builders 159 West Tryon Street Hillsborough, NC 27278
Page 2 of 2
' f; / 6 ,' /1+r,"P9 ?7' •:'?_ 'r? at.s1. FOG*' u ? a Z r a ?r u
i
g ?? / yy?++ i Q o
W }
F
>
s ?A ` r? 1 1'?; ` °e 1 1 0 W
m `l ?W-1 zv
•1 .. r ?+ r 2 to Dc
ff 2l 00
o ... • ? ttt ` .n
j., x"iw t, ye ?Gi <: S+ S I m ? tt j ' e. ?caa ?'?•? ?.V,4 ?=..
tl t •'?.ti + v ?: : \ ?exy? •' 1? j a•' i ? r ?,, r t ??- ti i.
} ,\ a ,1; w ?•U J` ?t _.J• • l? • I t Ec1} Ml?.
t r . • ? ? aiy, ( ' ??4 t 06 ? V . ? (' a .•. <
?` ? ? * ? z% ;?t`??? •?y -w •,j? .o-3 -? ? C "'r ,,,?rs5t•e ,• , i•.+ ?
%ir
4 t ti: • _• t - ` • h
+?? ti `! } 1 S1' t,;t ?. ` ,,,/? ? ?' ??„ ?`?! ? ? - ?sf St ?`. / fir'' ?. : «+ ,.- _..
1'1. } • 1 r?/ e . ?v ?? t l ? \ ji ? • G.+ i `? _ ? ••• ? ' t `? ? ' ~ J * O
- ??.??r ,?.,' Z' aJ ? t' ? ;. t i. +? :?(j" (' / 't r/? -?.rl"tt ' `y\ • ?t?•, ? \ ?a t .: Z z
n•>v f? 7 t /+/ + ,fV I J ,.f : ^ V..,? :\,•\ •-i ?.? I`?`?? ? "qt"r. Z M . ?`'.+ " r 1/+., r ! y 10 ?0
. be
?? ?? ?? / ? ,rte f1
t
'`? ` ?, i`? w _- r, f? e =O .` ??? i ., - / 9?3ra. 1 ,^.-.., r / t ? . • J? '\i -
-4. 71
4 a? 4t'r • it ??-1 r.' • (" ?• `?,r y _ iA
F t-?? i ? t ?? e w L 'Lo >CI ?•'? L (?,{?'? •2 .. 1`,.-?.-?- f;? `'`'as•, _' V
.. ? ? ti 3 3 o r S
/ ? ? ?• ? `\ - ? ?4 ' ? tE l r 1 f j ? i `\` t ` cy?..?, ??•.. W ? C O L ?aJ
CO W_
,Q?,`;??., ,-'. ? r f .\ t1 ,1?t'7'f E(. ? -\? ? ,"• / J. ,-?'t?.;. C Rtp C? ? f? ? O M
i ` 4s°v ' ' t \- ra?? \ / \ -^ q?? r" y O t o ?p qc cni
f, ? `. 'v. . 4a+ ? ue : J'` t,, ?;_?? / -..,- ;, ( ? _i'" 3 . ° r E O •o ? u
! V ?:..? h \\a }mot ` O
"Cc j2
a I l .. ?:'' '? 1 S ?. ` i r l \.. _ se>< 0 _ ? ._ w rp y a« gg L]
})0 `r. ?- i `\ t • -..1' 'nq sei orr?r ?y'-' .\ .. W c M 9 C u
• ?}} rte' j°?• ?? "/ , ,, ?? ..?,,r?l ~ ! • ?r ;t`-J, / ?`-++? ?/' \ wJ '^rv ? N Q Q1 g ? ,? G
W
N agd
.tti• v ? !,/ \ t. -` l - _`-??\ i+-1'... ?t41\°\ J.'' •.?; / d
?.° ttprf' Y. \ ?'/ c:iy ?,. , 1• la // .'.1 ?1 I 1.? C C) Y u
?? }+\ s-=' ?+ ? ?,( ?f/ ! J ?? y i Q d M Gay E= n
?Q ! • ti _ i e r o no+ E
40 w
; ? ? !r r , . z a M tic o . ? a
• f:. ?,- : ? '._^_ p,. .. d• '' k ?' ,)? ? l' .'•' ? v ? Y a ? dui
1 N «
OIL
$ fn
N ??J O
0

U-S. Department of Agriculture,
Ond cooperating agencies on 1973
Tained from U.S. Department of
2000
1
Scale - 1:24000
RARNETT COY Sat SURVEY
H ARNETT COIJ1•4'rY.'iC)ftlti C;ARr)LIN
MWAST 45
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Was ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ONo ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ONo Not ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liquidambar styracdlue TR FAC+ 9. Lkiodendron tulipifere SS FAC
2. Pinus taeda TR FAC 10. Arundinaris gigantee HR FACW
3' Acerrubrum TR FAC 11. Smilaxrotundifolia VI FAC
4. Liquidambar styraciflua SS FAC+ 12.
5. Pinus taeda SS FAC 13.
6. Acer rubrum SS FAC 14.
7. Cam us tiorida SS FACU 15.
8' Vaccinium co mbosum SS FACW 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC- . 91%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wand hydrology not present.
cnn c?
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Prone Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colo rs Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-10 A 2.5Y 4/3 - - Sandy Loam
10-16+ B 2.5Y 5/2 - - Sandy Loam
Hydric Sol Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sutfdic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gteyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? . OYes ?No (Check) (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Oyes ®No
Hydric Sods Present? []Yes ®No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? [:]Yes ®No
Remarks Upland above "Wetland B" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - mode
drought conditions. Data collection above flag B-10.
I
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
Forms version 1102
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner ounty: Hamett
Investiator: Shawn F. Guyer Late: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ONo ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? OYes ONo lot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.
• Liquidambar styracfflua TR
FAC+
9. Smilax rotundifolia VI FAC
Pinus taeda TR FAC 10.
3' Quercus phellos TR FACW- 11.
4. Quercus nigra TR FAC 12.
5. Comus amomum TR FACW+ 13.
6. LiquidambarWraciflua SS FAC+ 14.
T Pinus taeda SS FAC 15.
8. Arundinaria i antea HR FACW 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC- . 100%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): etiand Hydrology Indicators:
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® N
d D
A
il
bl
R
d ? W
t
M
k
ecor
va
o
e
ata
a
e a
er
ar
s
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Although it rained 48 hours prior to investigation, soil surface was primarily dry resulting in a lack of current indicators.
nnn ?
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? DYes ? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, ,
[riches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsep Moist) Size/Contrast structure, etc,
0-3 A 2.5Y 4/2 - - Clay Loam
3-16+ B 2.5Y 4/1 7.5YR 516 5% Clay Loam
Hydric Sol Indicators:
? Histosoi ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sutfidic odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gieyed or Low-Chroma Colas ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils present.
WFTi_ANn 111IFTFRMMNATION
HydrophyBc Vegetation Present? ®Yes ?No (Check) (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes ?No
Hydric Sods Present? ®Yes ?No s this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ®Yes ?No
Remarks "Wetland B" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild- moderate drought
conditions. Data collection above flag A-1.
I
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
Forms version 1/02
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ®No ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ®No lot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1
' Lquidembarstraciflua TR FAC+ 9. Quercusrubrum SS FACU
2. Acernrbrum TR FAC 10. Ilex opaca SS FAC-
3. Quercus albs TR FACU 11. Arundinaria gigantea HR FACW
4. Quercus rubra TR FACU 12.
5' Sassafras albidum SS FACU 13.
6' Lquidambar styraciflua SS FAC+ 14.
7. Acerrubrum SS FAC 15.
$' Quercus alba SS FACU 16:
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC- . 45%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation not present.
HYDROLOGY
? R
d
d D
D
i
R
k
ib W
tl
d H d
l
I
di
emar
ecor
e
ata (
escr
n
s):
e e
an y
ro
ogy
n
cators:
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Prima ry Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
N
R
ded D
t
A
il
bl ? W
M
k
t
o
ecor
a
va
a
a
e ar
a
er
s
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology not present.
??n c
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Proge Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colo rs Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-6 A 25Y 414 - - Sandy Loam
6-16+ B 25Y 616 - - Sandy Loam
Hydric Soil
Indicators: Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? Hugh Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sutwic odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aguic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil not present
WETLAND DETERUINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ?Yes ®No (Check) (Check).
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?Yes ®No
Hydric Sods Present? ?Yes ®No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ?Yes ®No
Remarks Upland abave'Wetland D" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - moderate
drought conditions. Data collection above flag D-38.
Approved by HQUSACE 3192
Forms version 1/02
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ®No ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ®No lot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acerrubrum TR FAC 9. Vaccinium Corymbosum SS FACW
2. Pinus tseda TR FAC 10. Comus Amomum SS FACW+
3' Liriodendron tulipifers TR FAC 11. Sassafras albidum SS FACU
4. Liquidambarstraciflua TR FAC+ 12. Arundinaria gigantea HR FACW
5' Acerrubrum SS FAC 13. Woodwardia Areolata HR OBL
6. Liriodendron tulipifera SS FAC 14. Smilax rotundifolia VI FAC
7. Quercua alba SS FACU 15.
8. Prunus serotina SS FACU 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC- . 79%
Remarks: Hydrophitic vegetation present.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs Welland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
:Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >14 (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Although it rained 48 hours prior to investigation, soil surface was primarily dry resulting in a lack of current indicators.
enu c

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Prime Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colo rs Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) SizelContrast Structure, etc,
04 A 2.5 Y 3/3 - - Loamy Sand
4-14+ B 2.5 Y 5/1 - - Loamy Sand
Hydric Soli Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sumic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: LOW chroma soils present.
WFTI Awn nPTFRYt1jOT m
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ?No (Check) (Check) .
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes ?No
Hydric Soil Present? ®Yes ?No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? [Dyes ?No
Remarks Wetland D" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - moderate drought
conditions. Data collection between flags D-32 and D-38.
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
Forms version 1/02
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
ApplicantlOwner: ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes . ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ONo ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ONo lot ID:
If needed explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acerrubrum TR FAC 9. Ulmus amerrcana SS FACW
2. Liquidambar styraciflua TR FAC+ 10. Vaccinium corymbosum SS FACW
3. Pinus taeds TR FAC 11.
4. Ulmus americana TR FACW 12.
5. Acerrubrum SS FAC 13.
6. Liquidambar slyracitlua SS FAC+ 14.-
7. Quercus alba SS FACU 15.
6. Pinus taeda SS FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
( excluding FAC- . 90%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present.
HYDROLOGY
E Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Welland Hydrology Indicators:
? Stream, lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 14+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology not present.
snit c
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Profde Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsed Mast) (Munsell Moist) SizelContrast Structure, etc,
D-4 A 2.5Y 414 - - Loam
4-14+ B 2.5Y 6/6 - - Loamy Sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Suftic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils not present
WETLAND DETERIitONATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? SYes ?No (Check) (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?Yes SNo
Hydric Sods Present? ?Yes SNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ?Yes ®No
Remarks Upland above 9Netiand L° - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - moderate
drought conditions. Data collection above flag L-16.
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
Forms version 1102
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommundy ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ®No ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ONo lot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1 ' Acerrubrum TR FAC 9. QX)T"drum arboreum SS NI
2. Pinus taeda TR FAG 10.
3' Acerrubrum SS FAC 11.
4. Pinus taeda SS FAC 12.
5. Vaccinium corymbosum SS FACW 13.
6. Smilax rotundifolle VI FAG 14.
7. Arundfnaria gigantea HR FACW 15.
8. N ssa s lvatica SS FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC- . 89%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Prima ry Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Although it rained 48 hours prior to investigation, soil surface was primarily dry resulting in a lack of current indicators.
cnn c
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:.
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Probe Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-5 A 2.5Y 411 - - Loam.
5-16+ B 2.5Y 5/1 - - Sandy Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosoi ? Concretions
? Histic EpWon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sutfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? AGuic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gteyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils present
wE I LABL I Lit I tKIKIKA 1 I V N
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ?No (Check) (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes []No
Hydric Soils Present? ®Yes []No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ®Yes ?No
Remarks "Wetland L" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - moderate drought
conditions. Data collection between flags L-4 and L-16.

Approved by HQUSACE 3192
Forms version 1/02
DIN Civil Engineering & Planning
June 26, 2006 2 0 0 6 1 0 5 2
Mr. Brad Shaver Ms. Cyndi Karoly
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Post Office Box 1890 2321 Crabtree Blvd
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Pre-Construction Notification Application for Springhill Subdivision
In Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina
USACE AID# 200600280 i t ;.• L t 4%`
Dear Mr. Shaver and Ms. Karoly,
Please find attached, the completed Pre-Construction Notification Application packet for proposed
stream and wetland impacts associated with the development of Springhill Subdivision, located in
Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina. The Harnett County tax PIN for the site is 0549-77-2324.000.
The site covers 145.92 acres to the west of NC Highway 27 and is located in the Cape Fear River Basin.
Although the subdivision layout has been finalized, construction drawings have not been prepared for the
majority of the subdivision. The preliminary storm drainage system has been laid out, but it has not been
designed. Vertical alignments for the streets have not been designed, so a grading plan is not available at
this time. Included with this application are drawings of the subdivision layout and details of the specific
impacted areas of the site.
Comprehensive measures were taken to avoid the wetlands located on the site and minimize the
impacts necessary to develop the site. These measures were applied as a whole to the entire subdivision
and on a smaller scale at individual impact areas. The layout of the subdivision has changed several times
in an effort to avoid the abundant wetlands on the site. The changes included a complete realignment of
streets and lots and redesign of the preliminary storm drainage system to work around wetlands. Following
these changes, the majority of the wetlands on the site were located in Open Space areas and at the rear of
lots.
Specifically, the changes reduced the wetland impacts at Impact Areas #3 and #5 by half and
completely removed a storm drainage easement through the wetlands near Impact Area #9. The second
round of plan changes resulted in the realignment of the street at Impact Area #8 to cross the wetland at a
narrow location. Similarly, the street at Impact Area #7 was realigned to completely avoid the wetlands in
that area. The sanitary sewer easement at Impact Area #6 was shifted outside of the wetlands where
possible. Headwalls were included at each of the street crossings to minimize the impact on the adjacent
wetlands. A sanitary sewer line was relocated and extensive grading was added at Impact Area #2 to.
reduce the impact to the wetlands above the street crossing. Originally, the entire wetland area above the
street was impacted. Now, with headwalls and lot grading, the impact is minimal. Additionally, all of the
stormwater outlets in the subdivision were pulled back from wetlands so that outlet dissipater pads would
not encroach into the wetlands.
These measures have reduced the permanent wetland impacts to approximately 5% of the total
wetlands on the site.
_iTY
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] * 972 Trinity Road # Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
The total proposed impacts for this site include:
Temporary Wetland Impacts
Accumulated area: 4,672 sgft (0.1073 acres)
Permanent Wetland Impacts
Accumulated area: 20,528 sqft (0.4713 acres)
Temporary Intermittent Stream Impact: 431f
43 sqft (0.0010 acres)
Permanent Intermittent Stream Impact: 261f
26 sgft (0.0006 acres)
As compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts, we propose payment to the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program's (EEP) In-Lieu-Fee Program. We have submitted for approval from
EEP and have not received it at the time of this submittal. When approval is received, it will be forwarded
to the USACE and the DWQ.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions, comments or concerns about this application.
Thank you in advance for your time spent reviewing this permit application.
Sincerely,
Shawn F. Guyer, E.I.T
Environmental Engineering Assistant
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
20061052
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing

1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
Section 404 Permit '
® ? Riparian or Watershed Ewer Mules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide Permit #39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page,
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal ?llanage4ientArea of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), checkhere: `
L;
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information T ` ' ```
Name: Springhill Associates, LLC - A Keystone Company
Mailing Address: 1207 Roseneath Road
Richmond Virginia 23230
Telephone Number: 804.358.5768 Fax Number: 804.358.6976
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Shawn Guyer
Company Affiliation: Spaulding & Norris, PA
Mailing Address: 972 Trinity Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone Number: 919.854.7925 Fax Number: 919.854.7925
E-mail Address: shawnna?pauldingnorris.com
Page 5 of 15
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Springhill Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0549-77-2324.000
4. Location
County: Harnett Nearest Town: Lillinaton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Springhill Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
Traveling south on US-401, approaching Lillington, turn right onto North Main
Street/NC-27 West. After the third stoplight, turn right onto West Old Road/NC-27
West. After approximately 1.25 miles, site is on right (West) side of road.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.38971 ON 78.83983 °W
6. Property size (acres): 145.92
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Poorhouse Creek (Stream ID 18-17.5. WS-IW
UT to Indian Branch (18-20-26-1, WS-IVJ
8. River Basin: Cape Fear (Subbasin 03-06-07: 03-06-13) [USGS RUC 030300041
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 15
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
The site is comprised of approximately 5-10 year old cutover, mixed pines and
hardwoods. The several of the bottoms have some larger trees and are filled with
Arundinaria gigantea and Smilax. The site is bisected by Samuel McKoy Lane, a dirt
road that leads to several homes located to the west of the site. Parcels to the south of the
site consist of agricultural land and residential homes. North of the site are
agricultural/residential areas, an automobile junkyard, and an elementary school.
Residential homes dominate the area to the east of the site.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project entails the development of a residential subdivision and the associated
infrastructure, including: roads, water supply, and sanitary and storm sewers. Equipment
used will include, but is not limited to trackhoe excavators, bulldozers, rollers, asphalt
pavers, and other grading and road construction equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The purpose of the proposed work is to provide the necessary infrastructure to support a
residential subdivision of single family homes.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Initial site concurrence was held on December 13, 2005 with Mr. Brad Shaver of the US
Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Office. A second site meeting was
held on January 17, 2006 with Mr. Ronnie Smith of the same office. A Jurisdictional
Determination was issued by the USACE on February 7, 2006.
Page 7 of 15
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future permit requests anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The proposed impacts include temporary stream and wetland impacts resulting from
utility installation and permanent wetland impacts resulting from installation of
residential streets.
Page 8 of 15
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
Impact Area #1 Road grading & Forested No 1000+ 0340
0
[Permanent] storm drainage .
impact Area #2 Lot Fill Forested No 1000+ 0.0020
[Permanent]
Impact Area #3 Road grading & Forested No 1200+ 0.1977
[Permanent] storm drainage
Impact Area #4 Road grading & Forested No 150+ 0
0775
[Permanent] storm drainage .
Impact Area #5 Road grading & Forested No 150+ 0.0666
[Permanent] storm drainage
Impact Area #6 Sanitary sewer Forested No 0 0.0398
[Temporary] installation & easement
Impact Area #8 Road grading & Forested No 150+ 0
0573
[Permanent] storm drainage .
Impact Area #9 Sanitary sewer Forested No 450+ 0562
0
[Temporary] installation & easement .
Impact Area #10 Water line installation Forested No 0 0
0113
[Temporary] & easement .
Impact Area #11 Road grading & Forested No 300 0
0286
[Permanent] storm drainage .
Impact Area #12 Lot Fill Forested No 750+ 0.0076
[Permanent]
Total Wetland Impact (acres) Temporary: 0.1073
Permanent: 0.4713
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: -9.25 acres
Page 9 of 15
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres
Impact Area #6 UT to Indian Utility installation Intermittent 1' 21 0.0005
[Temporary] Branch
Impact Area #7 UT to Indian Road grading & Intermittent 1' 26 0
0006
[Permanent] Branch storm drainage .
Impact Area #10 UT to Indian Utility installation Intermittent 1' 22 0.0005
[Temporary] Branch
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) Temporary: 43 0.0010
Permanent: 26 0.0006
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): Temporary: 0.0010
Permanent: 0.0006
Wetland Impact (acres): Temporary: 0.1073
Permanent: 0.4713
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) Temporary: 0.1083
Permanent: 0.4719
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): Temporary: 43
Permanent: 26
Page 10 of 15
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Comprehensive measures were taken to avoid the wetlands located on the site and minimize
the impacts necessary to develop the site. These measures were applied as a whole to the
entire subdivision and on a smaller scale at individual impact areas. The layout of the
subdivision has changed several times in an effort to avoid the abundant wetlands on the site.
The changes included a complete realignment of streets and lots and redesign of the
preliminary storm drainage system to work around wetlands. Following these changes, the
majority of the wetlands on the site were located in Open Space areas and at the rear of lots.
Specifically, the changes reduced the wetland impacts at Impact Areas #3 and #5 by half and
completely removed a storm drainage easement through the wetlands near impact Area #9.
The second round of plan changes resulted in the realignment of the street at Impact Area #8
to cross the wetland at a narrow location. Similarly, the street at Impact Area #7 was
realigned to completely avoid the wetlands in that area. The sanitary sewer easement at
Impact Area #6 was shifted outside of the wetlands where possible. Headwalls were
included at each of the street crossings to minimize the impact on the adjacent wetlands. A
sanitary sewer line was relocated and extensive grading was added at Impact Area #2 to
reduce the impact to the wetlands above the street crossing. Originally, the entire wetland
Page 11 of 15
area above the street was impacted. Now, with headwalls and lot grading, the impact is
minimal. Additionally, all of the stormwater outlets in the subdivision were pulled back from
wetlands so that outlet dissipater pads would not encroach into the wetlands.
These measures have reduced the permanent wetland impacts to approximately 5% of the
total wetlands on the site.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htmi.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
As compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts, we propose payment to the NC
Ecosystem Enhancement Program's In-Lieu-Fee Program.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
Page 12 of 15
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.4713 acres
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
Page 13 of 15
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
N/A
X1. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
There is no existing impervious acreage on the site. The proposed impervious acreage
includes streets, sidewalks, driveways, front walkways, houses, and patios. The overall
estimated impervious acreage for the project is over 20 percent of the total site area.
Detailed calculations of the proposed site impervious acreage are attached to this
application. The total proposed impervious acreage is 39.4 acres or 27.0 percent of the
total 145.92 acres. The impervious acreage breaks down as follows: 15.0 acres of street,
2.2 acres of sidewalk, 0.1 acres of Highway 27 widening, and 22.0 acres of lot
impervious area. The lot impervious area represents the proposed impervious acreage of
the largest building footprint available in the subdivision with the driveway, patio, and
front walkway included. Only a portion of the lots in the subdivision will have the
largest footprint. The 27.0 percent impervious percentage is a conservative overestimate
of the overall site impervious acreage.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated within Springhill Subdivision will be conveyed to the City of
Lillington Sanitary Sewer system and from there to an appropriate wastewater treatment
facility.
XM. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Page 14 of 15
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://hZo.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This project will not result in additional future development or future impacts to nearby
water quality. The project only provides access to adjacent parcels that already have
access to state roads.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
0&. ?lo - 200(0
Applicant&gent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 15 of 15
Springhill Subdivision impervious calculations
Streets:
Impervious Street Impervious Impervious
Width Length Area Area
(FT) (LF) (SQFT) (ACRES)
80' ROW 35 225 7,875 0.2
60' ROW 34 1,890 64,260 1.5
50' ROW 34 17,157 583,338 13.4
Total Street Impervious Area: 15.0 ACRES
Sidewalk:
Impervious Street Impervious Impervious
Width Length Area Area
(FT) (LF) (SQFT) (ACRES)
80' ROW N/A
60' ROW 5 1,890 9,450 0.2
50' ROW 5 17,157 85,785 2.0
Total Sidewalk Impervious Area: 2.2 ACRES
Widenin
Total Widening Impervious Area: 3,998 SQFT
Total Widening Impervious Area: 0.1 ACRES
Lots:
Largest Building Footprint with Driveway 2,500 SQFT
Total Number of Lots: 384
Total Maximum Potential Impervious Area for All Lots: 960,000 SQFT
Total Maximum Potential Impervious Area for All Lots: 22.0 ACRES
Total Impervious:
Total Accumulated Impervious Area: 39.4 ACRES
Total Site Area: 145.92 ACRES
** Total Site Impervious Coverage: 27.0% 1
Civil Engineering & Planning
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
ALL BLANKS TO BE FILLED IN BY CURRENT LANDOWNER
Name: r j ?? (L ! ; ?I,' CI'``"S ?- ?-?. h
Address: 'I U -7V Lzz V. 3 7
Phone: (L76 Fax: S
Email Address:
Project Namc/Desctiptiorr: -Sr ft HM Subdivision 1 ResideatW Subdivision
Dcparunma of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Attn: Mr. Bred Shaver
Fieid office-- 1VV'ht t'on Fr-ld Oflice
Re: Wcdands Rebut Comdting & Pcnmk ing
To Wham It May Concern:
I, the carnet property owner, hereby designate and authorize Spaulding & Norris, P.A., to 80 on ray
behalf as my agent in the processes of pemat applications, to fiaish upon requeg =Vplars: W
informatio in support ofapplications, eta, from this day forward. nis the c? day of
This notification snpemedes any previous eorrespond=m concerning the agent for this jecl.
PRINT Owner's Name ? PROPER Owner's Signal
T
Cc: Ivls. Cyndi Karoiy
NCDMa - Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Phone. [phone] • ran (919) 85¢7925 * 972 TiinityR.oad ? Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 200600280 County: Harnett U.S.G.S. Quad: Lillington
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Mr. Jim K. Sherron Agent: Spaulding and Norris, PA
Address: 408 May Court attn: Shawn F. Guyer
Raleigh, NC 27609 972 Trinity Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone No.: 919-881-0070 919-8547990
Property description:
Size (acres) 145.92 Nearest Town Lillington
Nearest Waterway Indian Branch River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030004 Coordinates 35.38900N. 78.8435°W
Location description The site is located 1.25 miles west of Lillington off Hw y 27 at the terminus of Samual McKov
Road adiacent to an unnamed tributary of Indian Branch Harnett County.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination' is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property . subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The wetlands on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been partially verified by the Corps. We
strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the
Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regula rt`ons, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
X The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on February 7. 2006. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(LAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Page 1 of 2
Action ID: 200600280
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910-2514611.
Basis For Determination: The subject area exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation
Manual and is adiacent to an unnamed tributary of Indian Branch, a tributary of the Cape Fear River, a navieable
water of the US.
Remarks: The site was reviewed with Shawn Guyer of Spaulding and Norris on December 13, 2005. The site was
reviewed a second time on January 17, 2006 with Ronnie Smith from this office.
Corps Regulatory Official: ?Lj A6r?n--
Date 2/712006 Expiration Date 2/7/2011
Corps Regulatory Official (Initial):
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
• A plat or sketch of the property and the wetland data form must be attached to the file copy of this form.
• A copy of the "Notification Of Administrative Appeal Options And Process And Request For Appeal" form must be
transmitted with the property owner/agent copy of this form.
• If the property contains isolated wetlands/waters, please indicate in "Remarks" section and attach the
"Isolated Determination Information Sheet"to the file copy of this form.
cc: Keystone Builders 159 West Tryon Street Hillsborough, NC 27278
Page 2 of 2
•?' .._ d 1?1.. . u$]t•'? N >F
i f t O o W W
?%J c.f 'a ,, </ ~ l,r r - ,:tr 4 v 'a WW W ~ y,
• 1 . •: ?a1 ?j 2 00
'?'/ rd?, 1' *' •,? "`?•• s4 v f' .% `ice.! C t? / 1, m z0
_ .+,?,`j? { • " ? ,, ,,.. i . J ? • fie. ? '•• • a "T,., , ? ` / i , !//i//!'t:?, _ t i ? <
!e+ (•-
{
I E ?[ yy
?i
!?T s ? i i ? ? / a ? i'
`'i!i ??, y!r 1; / i?? f •_:>) .+? ,1,; i/^ • yj-t-?.? y` 'tr't !r 1, '° '3
• . ? -, :. _ , , . --- i J r. ' , c? , ? is i) ; ? r ".-;? ? ? ? i
1 ? =1 i •? r ?? ?` i? • - ?.?t`._?', 11i f ?` 1 -- \\ , ? ? •. ? 'q J Y ?.. ` oz "".?.
?`t a • } ? af? • Iti w t: i 1. , ?. `t1'?/ r a ,_ ', \`.:`?,• ?'^ \? / \ ?•) ; r i•-? C°'? O = ?
f, 01
?A?'?f.- ,? j ? i ? i j ...? \\ ?`, \ ??? J1. ?.?? t?? lj? ? ' ? ?^-•., ?J? --y":l " ? i! t ? y ,o ,o
04
'77 E16
?; ?\? ? \ `'i.! \$ ??a ?, • 9 r .-..? /? G !'.,' ??j?.\ t' l`1 , J~C 3 ? l ^"/'? l > 1 t 'v`) `• ? • .° L w
i Sjl = \?? - ? _ ? ...-„"_, ice- ? . ,??, ?r, ? "?,?,,'???' -_.-` .'., ?t r? _..? _ s ? ? o c
a o i+ pp3
q
_ fZ
:i ( ? ? y? f 1` t ? 1 ? sue" P __ ? _ •, v v e V g O
F c \ \? 1? .fir, O E $• 8 X
?kb '? l ' .
u ~.+ u
Y?\ na,t. '•f \ - J <? / ?` ji .rt ????? t ?+l ?r +? W Z '62 ci
IN,
W V, p: f
t
too
06
_ .,.. - ?• ,b) '?' `\ f N ? U ?O- « d V ?0 Foy
R $b riW R R ;
N ?? 3
tyJ A
Ln
0
i
U.S. Uepartmeut of Agriculture,
a''d cooperating agencies on 1973
tained from U.S. Department of
HaNIE T C**tY Scut SURVEY
Scale - 1 :24 000
HARNETT COUNTY. fiURII i C:ARr:U
MCCT S
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjectlSite: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner: ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes 0No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ®No ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ®No lot ID:
VFr.PTATInu
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liquidambar s yraciflue TR FAC+ 9. Liriodendron tulipifera SS FAC
2. Pinus taeda TR FAC 10. Arundinaria gigantea HR FACW
3. Acerrubrum TR FAC 11. Smilax rotundifolia VI FAC
4. Liquidambar styraciflua SS FAC+ 12.
5. Pinus taeda SS FAC 13.
6. Acerrubrum SS FAC 14.
7. Comus Horide SS FA CU 15.
6. Vaccinium corymbosum SS FACW 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAG. 91%
-
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): etland Hydrology Indicators:
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
il
bl
® N
R
d D
Av
d
t ? W
t
r M
k
o
ecor
a
a
e
e
a
a e
ar
s
a
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology not present.
snn
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) S¢e/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-10 A 2.5Y 413 - - Sandy Loam
10-16+ B 2.5Y 512 - - Sandy Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosoi ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sumic odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aruic Moistxte Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? GWyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils not present.
UIIETL-ML) Ut I ttiIKIKA I IUn
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? . []Yes ?No (Check) (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? OYes ®No
Hydric Soils Present? OYes ®No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ?Yes ®No
Remarks Upland above "Wetland B" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - moderate
drought conditions. Data co lection above flag B-10.
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
Forms version 1/02
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner ounty: Harnett
Investigator: . Shawn F. Guyer late: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ONo ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? []Yes ONo lot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1 ' Liguidambar styraclBue TR FAC+ 9. Smilax rotundifolia VI FAC
2.
Pinus taeda TR FAC 10.
3' Quercus pheUos TR FACW- 11.
4. Quercus nigra TR FAC 12.
5' Comus amomum TR FACW+ 13.
6. Lquidambar styraciBue SS . FAC+ 14.
?' Pxius taeda SS FAC 15.
8. Arundinaria i antea HR FACW 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC- . 100%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present
r
HYDROLOGY
El Recorded Data (Describe in Rem
rks d
l
d H
I
di
W
tl
a
): e
an y
ro
ogy
n
cators:
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
®
No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data '
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Although it rained 48 hours prior to investigation, soil surface was primarily dry resulting in a lack of current indicators.
VV?i..V
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color
Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/
Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munselt Moist) Size/Contrast Structure; etc,
0-3 A 2.5Y 4/2 - - Clay Loam
3-16+ B 2.5Y 4/1 7.5YR 5/6 5% Clay Loam
Hydric Sol Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? HisT Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sutfidie Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils present.
U=" ALrn nC'T=0&M UAT1nM
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ?No (Check) (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes ?No
Hydric Soils Present? ®Yes ?No s this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Oyes ?No
Remarks "Wetland B" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - moderate drought
conditions. Data collection above flag A-1.
Approved by HQUSACE 319Z
Forms version 1/02
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project(Site: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner ounty: Harnett
Investigator Shawn F. Guyer tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes SNo ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes SNo lot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Lquidambar straciflua TR FAC+ 9. Quercus rubrum SS FACU
2. Acerrubrum TR FAC 10. Ilex cpaca SS FAC-
3. Quercus albs TR FACU 11. Arundinaria gigantea HR FACW
4. Quercus rubra TR FACU 12.
5. Sassafras albidum SS FACU 13.
6. Lquidambarstyraciflua SS FAC+ 14.
7. Acer rubrum SS FAC 15.
8. Quercus alba SS FACU 16:
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC- . 45%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation not present.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
? Stream, Lake, or.Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Welland hydrology not present.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class: .
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No .
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsed Moist) Size/Contrast structure, etc,
0-6 A 2.5Y 414 - - Sandy Loam
6-16+ 8 2.5Y 6/6 - - Sandy Loam
Hydric Sol Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Suffidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Solt List
? Gieyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric sail not present
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? OYes ONo (Check) (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?Yes ONo
Hydric Sods Present? E]Yes ONo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ?Yes ®No
Remarks Upland above'Wetiand D" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - moderate
drought conditions. Data collection above flag D-38.
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
Forms version 1102
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Sde: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ®No ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ®No lot ID:
If needed explain on reverse.
VFGFTATIAN
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1 ' Acerrubrum TR FAC 9. Vaccinium Corymbosum SS FACW
2' Pinus taeda TR FAC 10. Comus Amomum SS FACW+
3' Liriodendron tulipifere TR FAC 11. Sassafras albidum SS FACU
4' LquidambarstraciNue TR FAC+ 12. Arundinaria gigantea HR FACW
5. Acerrubrum SS FAC 13. Woodwardia Areolata HR OBL
6' Liriodendron tulipifera SS FAC 14. Smilax rotundifolia VI FAC
7' Quercua albs SS FACU 15.
8. Prunus serotina SS FACU 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC- . 79%
Remarks: Hydrophitic vegetation present.
HYDROLOGY
E Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): eland Hydrology Indicators:
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >14 (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Although it rained 48 hours prior to investigation, soil surface was primarily dry resulting in a lack of current indicators.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colo rs Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-4 A 2.5 Y 3/3 - - Loamy Sand
4-14+ B 2.5 Y 5/1 - - Loamy Sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Hisiosoi ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sumic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Sods List
2 Gieyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma soils present.
WFTI ANn nFTFRwNATInN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ?No (Check) (Check).
Welland Hydrology Present? ®Yes (]No
Hydric Soils Present? ®Yes ?No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ®Yes ?No
Remarks "Wetland D" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - moderate drought
conditions. Data collection between flags D-32 and D-38.
Approved by HQUSACE 3192
Forms version 1/02
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjecuSite: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner: ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ornmunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ®No ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ®No lot ID:
If needed explain on reverse.
VCCOTAT1nu
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1 ' Acerrubrum TR FAC 9. Ulmus americana SS FACW
2. Liquidamber styraciflua TR FAC+ 10. Vaccinium corymbosum SS FACW
3' Pious taeda TR FAC 11.
4. Ulmus americana TR FACW 12.
5. Acer rubrum SS FAC 13.
6. Liquidambar styraclflua SS FAC+ 14. .
7. Quercus alba SS FACU 15.
$' Pinus taeda SS FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC- . 90%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present
i4vnanr nr v
El Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): etland Hydrology Indicators:
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 14+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Rema
L--? rks: Wand hydrology not present.
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(nches) Horizon (Munsetl Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size /Contrast Structure, etc,
0-4 A 2.5Y 414 - - Loam
4-14+ B 2.5Y 616 - - Loamy Sand
Hydric Sol Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Suffdic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils not present
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ?No (Check) (Check)
Wettand Hydrology Present? ?Yes ®No
Hydric Sods Present? ?Yes ®No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ?Yes ®No
Remarks Upland above'Wetiand L' - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - moderate
drought conditions. Data collection above flag L-16.
Approved by HQUSACE 3192
Forms version 1/02
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner ounty: Hamett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes IgNo ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ®No lot ID:
If needed, a lain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1' Acerrubrum TR FAC 9. Oxydendrumarboreum SS NI
2'
Pxius taeda TR FAC 10.
3.
Acerrubrum SS FAC 11.
4. Pinus taeda SS FAC 12.
Vaccinium corymbosum SS FACW 13.
6. Smilax rotunditfia VI FAC 14.
7. Arundinaria gigantea HR FACW` 15.
8. N ssa s lvatica Ss FAC 1 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC- . 89%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present.
HYDROLOGY
El
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
? Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® N
R
A
il
d
d D
t
bl ? W
t
M
k
ecor
o
e
a
a
va
a
e er
ar
a
s
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (n.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Although it rained 48 hours prior to investigation, soil surface was primarily dry resulting in a lack of current indicators.
emit c
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:,
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(in h s) Horizon (Munsel Moat) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-5 A 2.5Y 411 - - Loam.
5-16+ B 2.5Y 511 - - Sandy Loam
Hydric Sol Indicators:
? Kistosoi ? Concretions
? Hatic Epwon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Suftic Odor ? Organic streaking in sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydra Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils present
w=" eun narci?uiueTinu
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ?No (Check) (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes ?No
Hydric Sods Present? ®Yes ?No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ®Yes ?No
Remarks "Wetland L" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - moderate drought
conditions. Data collection between flags L-4 and L-16.
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
Forms version 1/02
DWQ## Date 1 0 Who Reviewed.
7
Plan Detail Incomplete
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan. -} L Gil
I
? Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan.
1 `
go
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overfays on the site plan. P-0 S'41 bI
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan. j rw
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
Q
? Please locate any planned-sewer lines on the site plan. iQ
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC

Dercent of Uroiect imDerviousneLtmxabased on the estimated built-out
? Please indicate all stormwat,outfalls on the site phut'.
? Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan. C V
tS 4P
10 Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted.
Avoidance,and/orMrnimization Not Provided ?S 1 5
? ' The labeled as on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the . or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project
This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved, or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts. flv'"
?. This Office believes that the -labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to •tho
Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entirebuffer. If it
is not possible to achieve. diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater managempat
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through to buffer. z i -q 24 7i 21 3 I
[--? ?
Other 'T 9 EnstAi-P- 35- f ?t 4uc; t -, cite- 6" l + t r i ZZOt ZZj 1-4
D ? I i 1.Ctc Up,{ l2 l''ltl 1 tM GcL'
?. The location fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over I acre o• wetland' impacts were requested. Please
provide $- .' This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, . copies of the site plans and other supporting information:
? Please submit electronic CAD files showing, vie email to [e-mail] and CD.,
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project.: Please provide'# compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H'.0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project .
DWQ# Z? I b S 2- Date <4 ° t 3 J P Who Reviewed: I
Plan Detail Incomplete ,
? Please provide a location map for the project.
? Please show all stream impacts including all fill slopes, dissipaters, and bank stabilization on the site plan.
? Please show all wetland impacts including fill slopes on the site plan.
? Please indicate all buffer impacts on the site plan.
Please indicate proposed lot layout as overlays on the site plan. 7'o- 60&5
?? S
Com, 5- 3
? Please indicate the location of the protected buffers as overlays on the site plan. `a-e -
? Please locate all isolated or non-isolated wetlands, streams and other waters of the State as overlays on the site plan.
? Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
Ply Ck
El Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan. S SS?Q ?y?y l ? 0.( .
? Please provide the location of any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions. 1 _
? Please indicate all stormwat c? outfalls on the site plM. ?Q
`W?- cam- wa-i'
?p Db6JY- Cdo 0- -
El Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan. ?
Ql?
? Please indicate whether or not the proposed impacts already been conducted
Avoidance .and/or Mlni tion Not Provided ??.J
OK - The labeled as q or on the plans does not appear to be necess Please eliminate ? or provide additional
information as to why it is necessary for this project.
yta Grvsci?
This Office believes that the labeled on the plans can be moved or reconfigured to avoid the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to avoid the impacts.
?. This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the impacts to the
Please revise the plans to minimize the impacts.
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because
. Please revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If it
is not possible to achieve diffuse flow through the entire buffer then it may be necessary to provide stormwater management
practices that remove nutrients before the stormwater can be discharged through the buffer. .
Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetland'impacts were requested. Please
provide $ . This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the application.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
? Please provide copies of the application, copies of the site plans and other supporting information:
? Please submit electronic CAD files showing via email to [e-mail] and CD;
Mitigation
? of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The
plan must conform to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H.0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
W o
~ ~ Q o
O ~ 0
2 o ~ ti o
(n U
3 ~ O
CC W
Q
W 2
2 U
Z ~
IMPACT AREA 12
J Q
LOT FILL W
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 330 SQFT 0.0076 ACRES N
I
~
O~ ~0 ~

~ N^
C ~ Ov 0 00
0;= k
300 ~ L l~
~0 o U
U c o _ ~
t ~
~ o 'N N Z I
~ ~ Q v, w

A~~~ •W W~

0
a

0 L N ~o
} CO m vi m R
Kati QaQ W ~
p 2~ ~ ~ a y ti ~ J c°ti ~ti ~W Wa
I[I M W~ O 5Z~ O O R , U
1 W-JiW W W Z U> Oti~nO
0 ~~irO o U Z UU U~ a s ~ ~ 2 2 4>I w Q ti ~ 2 W ~ a ~ a 2OU I~ O W {Oa~ Q O cn
0 N c4n~¢ O ac"'n 4~ 4~
00 O
Q
3
0
U
0
N O I Q
r~ r J
N
0 V
r+ U N
0 0
Z 'Q
N C W h
0 Z
J Q O
0 C V
m W Q
C 0 L Z
C Q
W Z ~
m Q 2 O
M
Y 2
c J
0 J
C
J
r
L N
0 a
0 m
0 I DRAWING
r SHEET
N
U N GRAPHIC SCALE
0 L a b o 25 50 100 200 WL-4.o
0
0 to PROJECT NUMBER
i IN FEL-r 1 ~°h - 50 " 576-05
to
t

i
i - - Q
? , - 4 i ~ j ~ •
- ?
/t4 nr ~i ~ _
~.yi~C~ .a„i n^ ~ ~ ~/f t4
r~ - -
ti - ~ ~ _N-~ . _ _
3v eP - I ~p
~ •
TEMPORARY INEILAND IMPACT -
Accum~ated Area 4672 SQFi• (0.1073 Acres) i~'4 i
~~I ii~~~ p
i ~ w~ Z
ND IMPACT PERMANENT WEILA 4 x
20 528 SOFT 0.4713 Acres Accumulated Area ( ) - ,1 't
~'1-
a d
lip t
~j ~
_ ~,r'
TEMPORARY INTERMI'TT'ENT STREAM IMPACT 43 LF (0.0010 Acres) ~ `i yy I U'.v'V I j¢/ .
l~ _ - ;
0 ~ PERMANENT INTERMl1?ENT STREAM IMPACT• 26 LF (.0006 Acres) i Wr^ _ _ 5 VJ
uF ;.30~ ~sotnl} ~ ~ 1
~~~~4r. ~.y. ~:1 ,4 q.fj G G} fI J
° ~ N ~ ~ Cd G ~ ~ pI
a i i`, ~ er
u~~'' ; O ~
a~'os k ,rt b , n~
y N~ ~zd ~ 1
~ _--s~ r `I~9 ! ~ G ~ ~ i_-- _
i . ~ S i ~
_ _ _ `E ~~i;.~ J X00
- ~ - _ r - - ; ~ . 3- ~ ~
1 ~ ~ . a ~ 9 i _ 1 r' f~ ~V ~ /V`~~`'-C '~f ~ r V ~
p ! i ~ ~ . / / A C L. ~
.4 ~ .e _ - ~'I' ,J r._ ~ ~ , x y N Z
r;n ~ ~ s ~ ~ F r ~ \ i ~ / ~
i ~ ~ . ~ r wM
~ ~ t . . . . - I . _ ~
. ~ ~ ~ s i > -
~ ` ~ _ _ ~ y ~ , _o U . ~ / ~ ' ~ ~ i a ,e io?1~ ; ra ~ ~ ~
~ 1 ~ e-/, i"t ~ r . ~~'~14 Wit. fl & - ,y~ , ,~l ~ / / \~l ~ ~
i l ~ i - - I • . , A~; ~ f~" O
- `y/ - w~3~. `a ~ _ ' ~ va
A I - t i ,~i~ ~ .f. ,:W ~ j . Pis , / ~ i
~ v._ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~j~ r, . ~ 9.12', xG. i% / ~ ~ ''F ~ / \ ~ ' tl (fir} 7~~ ~ - ~ \
y, fi < - . K - v.: _ f Ai ~i i \ ~ ~ l A~i~~ - ;s-:
~ i . • . S i~ ~ j - A,,~ 5N, ~ max, / ,r. - - ~ r// ~ . . ~ ..ACV, ~ ~'L'
- ~ ~ - ~ _ , _ a ~ ~
~ _ ,:~~F t
mod`, .I. - ~ s a ! f. a~
~ ~ i ~ ,~i~% ~ ~ ~~v,r~' f ~ ~ ~
l ~ ! . ~ - ~~s~ .6'' . _ ~ - ~ y ~~\;~g v I i{.410~fp !c/
~ t - . >u~- i i , / ~ i it'd f ~ • _
- :A ..r r w - g f'. / o~ ~ ~ ' .:a i.
e 6'~ - , ~ ~\V f„~ ~.i ~ ~ ~~~u 4 i ~ - o ~ ~ , ~ a'/ ~ w
:t . ~ . ~V~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ a
3 ~i. i~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ i"/, A\ \ ~ ~ s w ys,, A ~ v ~ f ~fis 1\r ~ % /~y~` ~ aeu ~ ~ ~ ~~»syC,2 a ~ p,/ / - _
; L 4 J , cJ !j i - _ ! ~ f ~ ~ r s ~ ~ ~ ~ i / n _ , r.,, h, ~ ~ s
_ i 4 - ~ , ~ ~ ~ -
i / - ~ ~ 4
~ ~ . ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ - ~ . R . . . M ~ - - - - i
~ r - - - - - ~ ''A'-, ~ J. _ . JAVA / ~f ~ ; ~ " ~ d~ . ~ U~ ti ~ ti ~ O
~ l t~/ / s• ' ~ \y ~Y~~-~ ~ Qom; .,q .1 ~ r ~ 1~ r 4. ~ 2 z z Q~ ~ 2
• ! > < • > • 1 ~ _ ~ ' r ~ % ~r~ rM.~ . , i. ~A ~ ~ J ~ L ~ _ . co tT o U Z U U
- ~ N . i~ '~j r 4.~.. ,~i V,~~ ~~/A ~ \ ~ sAA? ,JV ~ ¢Q 4 N f~ Q ¢ f,. 2 q W ~~r
r _ - f,.. - gc,•. N ~r_-, s ~ . .j~ ' ~ j',' ,
_ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ f y... r - t_n. ~ s - _ r~ - . . . . - ~ _ C i ~ ~j.. ~f l ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - _ _ a. / i A l1` ~q ~
- _ ' Q l~ _ , i' ~ - - ~ - -
i ~ . _ ~ r r ~,a,~ ~~"ii A~ v z t.~,.,.. %
r. v , - i r. , f ~ ~ a~ ~
0 .._E? + 'ice. _ y~ ~ _ ~ , _ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i rG
_ _ ~ a _ _ ~ _ a. •
r ~ .y. ~ . -i ,y~ - i ! _ i l • • a y • f ~ ~v ~ ~ . ~ , s 4C
' ri - - ~ ~ ~ M -_r ._t- .d1~ Q r . , ~ v~~~ r ~ ~ 'F~ r~ ~o~~ , ~
Q K r„\ _ _ _
i i . . ~ i s~
- - : 4c' ~ ti - - ~ ~ a ! AAA ~ f / ~ ~"t - , . .a ~ ~ 0. e ..........i
! J ~ r i I ~ ~ 3 i ••fV . ~ `.A~ i ,r _r / ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~
ti•i r/ ~ ~ v n°i v ,c a~ •l•
- ' { i ~ ~ ~ ~.a ~ ; ,,t ,r ~ ~ ; ~ / , / Z Q masse a.~/~~ ~ ~C+'e~~ ~,5~ :5
- ~ K G - - _ / y a - - ter, I • . Y ~ ~ _ E
• - , rfr tga~ ~ ~ w~i z R w t .x.. ~ ~ L sz _ _^t /i ~ 1 _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~
1 ~ ;d _ O ~ ..y_ LL 1
Y _ __~_..-r ~ ~ Xis ~~f ~ 1,
- _ , _ - •1 ~ - _ ,sue i~ ! t~l ' A i ri f ~ ~ - i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ fee in. . _ \ ~ / / ~ r' 1~.
- ~ c o . - - - ~ ~ ~ no >s N1 ~ „ve a~i f a V ~ ~ i- r. ~ -
i i _ , - C i ~ ; - ~ _ _ _ _ r l ~ ~ _ y~~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ \ > ` ~ i. l i \ r _ ` r' i. ~ '<r . . ,~E _ ..:~-y...~ ~ i
W • • • _ _ i ~ _ t 1 r. _ • } 1 t . . ~ ~ 1 w il' ~ Q ~ ~ i' Z -a ,
- t____~ ~ i ? . i• _ _ ~
.r i~ ~ . _..r-_1 r~~. • • . • -.I~ I _ .r.... ~ i . - - - - - ,,e n , ° _ ,R~' ~ ' ~ / i f - _ ~ Q ~ . - ~ -
; - ~ - } • ~ ~jlj illy ~----~~i-~__ - ~ i\,, % 4 i ~I 1 ti . ~ , ~ ' ,G1~.r I i i m x to i ? if ~
~9,~? ~ ~ e m..'.~ ~ w ~ ~ J ~ ~7 i -~iG. •u i~ ~ aaas f - r; +p 1' Wis..+iagss,~5 sce~€.1 t ~1?." ~ ~ V
~I li~ ~ '~~I li~ ~ ; ~i ~ ~ _
~J,C I, t~? ~T5°~';S~`:;' 134.35` (R>teQ . ~ ~ - / ~ ' /y / '
L . \ c:n.99' '~j~ y~ ,
/ j ~
~i / / ,
~ , \ i , % , r ~q~
6 m \ / G'~'~
i ~ "'v \ 1~ ~
N O I \ ~ f .
~ ~ -~6,~,,, , DRAWING
/,F,~; . SNFFr
N U m GRAPHIC SCALE
0 a % 150 0 75 150 300 600 W
0 WL-10
0 0
PROJECT NUMBER IN FEET ~
1 inch = 150 ft

A ~ ~ ~ r ti' w2
_ / A ~ ~ ' ! ~ a,k , ~ ~ r , i~ s , i A~ A~
_ ~ - ~~:9~ ~ ~ ~ - ,=~.c--G~ ~ ~ fir, - u ~ ~ ~ , / , / /3' ~ r ~ ~ ~
r. ~ ~ _ ~ ~ „ - ~ ~ i-, ~ , ~ , r. ~ i ~f~ ~ / i V ` . i s~/
~ f" _ -=z _ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ - _ r ~ ~ r - y ~ . %r' i` l ~ ~ Asti ~ ~ ~ % j ~ ;~1~ ~ ~A
,i 4 i ~ ~ ~ % A ~ ~ ` - ~ ~
~ \1 /i~ 1 ~ ~ ~ _
ii ~ A / r ~ _ ~ f-.~ ~ - ~V ~ % ii i/ \ \ Fy ~ J ~ ,
t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~n W V \ ~ ~ ~ / ~ V
\ t ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ 1 ~ ! \ / ~ j' ~ / ~ ~ / t ~
~ ~ - ~ ? ~\a ~ ~ ~ o' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ 9 i/ ~ /r ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ - i ~ ~ ~ v. A `.A.'' i-- ' i . ~ i n~ 'V ~ ~ I
r-' i Ez_, r 1~
/ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,a, ~ ~ ? lid / ~V - ~~1 \f _ . ~ ~ ~ mod,' T ~ \ti f ,f~ V'~ ~ ~ ~ Z _ 1
/
- ~ C °i 4 ~l b
r ~ i t ~ Z r s i \ ~ ~ 8 ! \ ~V ~ \ ~ \ v ~ r
~ - ~ ~
~ ~ I ~ f i ~ . ~ ~ ~ - ~ _ ~ `,A ~ r % A ~ 1~ ~ ~ % `
t ~ ~ t ~ ~ ,l G ~ ~V ~ ~ r`
~ \i ~ A a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ A ~ A
~ ~ ' ~ ~ 1 f J
u ~ ' ~ ~ ~ Q _
l AREA t ~ , ~l ~~PACT
~ r ~~V ~ u ~ i` l(7
_ ~ LOT FILL ~ ~ , ; _ i'
- 3~ ~ ~ i i f r . . % ~ / , r, i ~ urn J _ ~ ~ ~ ~
_ _ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ _ ~ f`l~ . ~ 620 A~~ ~ ~ - T;INETLAN ~ ~MPAC~. 8.5 SQ ~ . _ _ - I~ANEN Q _ . rt ~ ~ ' ~ i i` it-.,. H ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ i \ A ~ /~i iii t b., A\, ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ , % ~ „V
i i ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ i _ ~ ~ ~
j /f°~ lr ~ ~ 4 ~ VA A ~~y) ~ / i~
/ _ 1. ~ _ , y ~ _ ~ i ~ \ti m~ ~ ~ / ~ ' ~ / ~ i V vJ 0 : ~ ~ ~ Ji/ ~ ~ ij C v.. Ate., A i x ~ ~ ~ ~i

r ~ ; ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ , " ~.t ~ f, r/ ~ 3 ~ 0 O v'
i ~ ~ \ 9f~ ~ x~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ SQ_ ~ i / V` ~ V r' /i' ~ ~ l /j' i ~V
~ / £ Y ~ , ~C~ AREA 1 - _ ~ k ~ ~ V ~C 0 ~ ` r'• i~ . ~
ti - R~O~~ ~ A _ _ , T 1~ 1~D S ~ 41~ RANG ~ 0 \
~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;i~ ~ ~ N Z ~
R ~~A ~ . N D~ f R M "A ~ ~ ~ ~
~ O.OV`~0 AC~~E ~ ,r, _ I~M P A~~._ 1 ~~3 T -~PERMI~~iEN~T WETLAND = ~ rn . t / ~ ~o
~ f
_ - ~ ~ j, ~ ~ S~ FT x.1977 ACRES ~ P ~R M A T CIE ~AL~D I M~PA~i ~ Q. _ ~ t ~ ~ ~ o
_ . _ --'r% , . ~
_ _ ~ , , . - - -i ~ ~ - 1 \ - ,rte /
/r - _ _ ~ ~ ~ _ \ s ~ A ~V i
. _ \ l \ ~1 ~ ~ ~}~yi ~ ~ q;~ V 't ~ ~
~ ~ ~l ~ _.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _
~ f~~~ I A l
i _ A~ . ~ _ - - f~ ~ ~ 174 \ ~i'~ 'v i ~ ~ ~ ~
- ~ i ~ _ . o ~ ~ . ~ ,l
~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ J, ~ . ,
~ ~ ~ _ _ ,t 1 - - _ ~ k ~ J., /
~ ~ ~ / ~N ti ~ ~ - ~ ~ y ~ I ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~
" ~ 4f I 4~' ; 'S • • • y ~
_ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ' ~ , ~JJ _ _ -
. , . V ~ - i~ _
a ~ : J ~ ~ ~ i i ~ . c _ ~
i r _ u _ _ - ~ ~ r----
~ ~ ~ ' r` - ~ ~ i o
i ~ `~A - i ~
~,r ' _ - ~ I ~ ~ i~ I - _ _ - f
v ~ , J 1 ~ J O kki
Jl ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ' ' i~ f ~ i • • • • • • • • i ~ U] m Q
1 ~ ~ ~ , , - , ~ ~ - - t _ . i ~ • • • ~.l.i .~iw ,r - tiOti [p qM ~ 1 ~i,t, ~ N, ~ ~ j v¢ 2 o cc~~ to
a I ~ ¢ E ~ _ _ _ _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ i c a `w ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~
r ~ _ - 4 _ ~ / N 4 ~ - E ~ ' i ii ~~z ~z v> ~z r e' ~ , ~ _ r.__ ~ w _ o
1 i ~ f _ _ ~ ~c~¢o vQ v v~ i, 1Wu
i . a,~ w ~ .a. ~ S'' ^ e y...,..~.,,,., ~ 4 ti w ~ ~ S Q w . ~ -
O - - _ v.~ _ _ T O Y, ~ ~ _ - - . , ~ ~ I .nz,,.,,~ - ~ - - - - - .,.,a Y
. _ - _ - - ~ -------_---ma-m a~~-~-$s-s , _ ~ ~ ~ ____.__-a+aea~-~u-x ~!s+~~-z-`rs-~rf ~~.u _asas~
i _ - ~ L.~: ~
i r l ~-._._.~_r_ 1
J J, _ _ ~ _
3 iY; ~ / ~ _ r 'D _ 1 ~ ~ E _ J ..Y 1 '7 ~ -
~ ~ i 1, - j ~ ~ ~ ' ~ - - ~r ~ ~ J
"i, I' Yf I A
~I ' ~ I ~ - - -
G ~ _ - I i tr S 7 - ~ -r------ - _ - - ~ , ; - _ Q < ~
I r. _ c` - O ~ _ ~ i ~ I Iii i C _ Z ~ ~ J
_ . _ C~ ,i n i ~ .L ~ - ~ _ _ ~ . Zs 1 ri • • • • • ~ i ti . ~ ~
i v~ i I f I ~ ~ ~ ~ i
I J • r ` n i i t E~a _ "j c " q C3 ~`~U 4p 1( ~ l`- ~
~ J ~V ~ ~ ~ t i ~ - - ~ ;,~i ~
U • • • • - - - - - - i A y ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ • . ~ ~ i ~ ~ I ! ~ Z rR
C ~ ~ • r t t ' v~
7 a ~ ' ` i C , ~ I! • j ~ - ! MPACT A, =EA 4 ~ ~ ~ Q _ z W
~ - - i ' ~ ~ ROAD GRADING ANDfSTOfi~tv>--f3~Al!NAG€- - - ~
0 ~ L ~ ~ J, _ ` • ~ o ~ ~ . Q
~--~__.____._______L ' I ti ~ h.
• • m i~y . . RMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: --3._~~_.S ~ -~:077~--A~~E-S--_ PE Q~
C z V ' Q Q
° AREA 6 ~ IMPACT - z a,
W WER INSTALLATION AND EASEMENT SANITARY SE ~ f ,
o ~ IMPACT ARE ACT AREA 5 z
m MPACT: 1 733 SQFT 0.0398 ACR S ` . TEMPORARY WETLAND I , J
Y ROAD GRAD G AND STORM DRAINAGE ~D GRADIN ~ J
o
PACT: 21 LF TEMPORARY STREAM IM
_ PERMANENT 21 S FT 0.0005 ACRES TLAND IMPACT: 2 901 SQFT 0.0666 ACRES ,MANENT WE ,
Q
L m
0 L.
0. IO
L m
DAA WING
O SHEET

GRAPHIC SCALE
N y U
m 0 L 50 o 25 50 100 700 WL-2.0
a
0 0 PROJECT NUMBER
IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 576 -05
LO

~ _ r G i ~ ~ ~ ~t mo''`t ~ ~ /
t r 11 a~ ~ ! , ~ ;U. ~w,V~ ~ ~i r 1 ~ ~ y Q ~ - O O ~ ~ /
i t ~ ~ / , 2~
} • • • • • ~r ~ f
J - _ l ~ e i ~ ~ ~ r. ~ 1 a 5 U ~'1. ~ C: ~ C T ~ ( ~'1
r ~ - ii ° 7 7 i ~ - '
. • • • - ~ ~r, r i ~ r / a~ _ ~ ~ ~ z . _ y ~ - o
t - - ~ ~ - - , ~ . ~ _ Ati ;f~ , < H _ ~ ~ ~ i , ; to r,
1 / A~ cry c~ ~ ~ i ~ y ~ ~ _ ~ _ ti i ? ~ i ~ l _ ~ W
- ~ - - t ~
_ ~t, i /~r' (i, I ~ ~ _ ,r r c
" ~ j i ' i-
r~ - i - _ 1~ i~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~.i r..., „-_.i i 1~ ~ ,.,-1 ~ ~ ~j ~ _ r; 7;' _ ~ ~G;
- _ li ~-s _ ~ t ~j i ~ _ ,~y, ~ / _ t
y F J i ~ ; . _..1 ~ ~ M w ! z ~ _ ~ ~
~ t ~ ~ - - - - ~ / i~ • • ~ y _ ~''~-~-~,,i 11~a+~ _ - ~ ~
_ - - ~ _ ~ r ~ ,
_ ~ ' j ~ ~ , 1 \ _ i - ~ - :r . ~ r, - ~
~ - .rv ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / _ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ f
li - _ - ;i ; - ~ ;n ~ ,
~ ~ ~ f~ 'k ~ y - t v
i' ~ • • • • . • f~ - - ~ 1 - ,r ~ _ t` _ E ~ / ~ r~ - ~ ~ , i i ti,' ! , ~ t,~ ~ l IMPACT: AREA 7 - z~ r . _ _ ~ ~ r~
- . i . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~T~ Rai RAI~NAC~E~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~
ROAa GR~~DING AND~~~- ~J 1 ' - ~ \ 1 ~ z I ~ ~~a ~ _ _ _ _ -
_ - i -
~ ~ ~ • • • - - l~~' ~ ~ ( ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~I i ~ `
r~~ ~n - ANENT ST -A~ IMPACCT. ~~~6,LF P~E~~M -RE. ~ _ r,~~ r 1 - ~ - ~ i . ~ t i' „ _ °
_A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -e. ~~26 S FT t~ ~ ~;5 ACRES - Q , ~ Q _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ i - ~ rf _
~ f I ~ ` rJ ` f _ _ - _ _ _ ~ - ~J ~ r~~ ~ _ , , J I _ _ - • ~ • s ~ ~ i ~ u li may,
1 1~ _ ,1 4, i ~ 1 A i ~
~ Q E ' ~ i i ~ _ _ _ _ - - _
- t` ~ / ` ~ j i _ , : ` E i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ' - _ ~ - ,
~ ~ _ - r r z r i -t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- ~ q i 6 _ 1 , _ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ; f... { ` 0 O 0 _ . - ~r~ ~ -
r ~ ~ C , _ i ~ ~ r 0~ k ; , ~ ~ v
. ~ - ~ 4 i
t ~ SC n _ _ ~ ~ , t ~ ~ ~ . 0 ,rte U _ i ~ E
~ ~ - _ ' ; ~ :a. U 0 O
r J ~ I ~ ~l~ j ~ I - - ~ _-t, ~ h ~
, . j v + ~ _ . - ~ ~ _ fl1 0 ~ , • • ~
- ~ v. 4 ~ - - It i ~ Pit e~.~~~~~ 10 , ~ , - , ,
a; , ~ ~ ~ ~ SCE ~ ~ _ - ~ ~i i
` ~ ~ i g~,~,. ~ ~ i! ~ '~,WATE, LINE INSTALLATION `,AND ~~ASEMENT ~ ~,,.-rr.-- - , , 'o~ rn
~ / ' ~ 4 ~
/~~ry~ ~ ~ ' ' t t e ~ r i
_ _ J _ I l . ~ ~RA IN,~,TLAND~~. IMPACT: 492 S FT 00 3 ACRE ' TEMPO ~ Q , ~ ~ ~ - n ~ ~ ~
v ~ ~ ~ ~ 1, ~ i o ~ _ ~ , ~ ~ ~ r
1 % ; ~ ~ „ - TREAM I`M T:', 22= L~ - a ;EMP~ --5-
~ ~ ~ - i _ ~ rte. _.i,. ~ ~ i. ti ~ ti _ 1
- - s ~ - 1 5~ FT ACRE ~ 22 Q 0.000
. ; . - ~ r i l t i ~ i / _ _ _ ~ i + - ~
_ f i _ j I! ~ y . . 1 • f r ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ \ ~
~ ~ ( j _ l E- _ . ~r ~ r~
I . ` - 1 \ ~ ~ ° ~
_ _ s? ~ 29`: ~ i" s / ~
,ti ` ~ yaw - ~ , c ; \1
~ ~ ~ ~ , " ' ~ ~
• i ;:y. - ~ 1 - , Q9
- ~ '';n ~ 1 ,11 t~;~ - - ~ ~
`,i . . > ~ 1. ~ ~ ~ f'. ~ _ ~ , V' ~ 4 \ , \ g, - - \
~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ i ~ i ! i ~ _
`i ~ f ~ i y _ 1 ~ i _ ~ i ii ~ ' ~ ~ - _ ~ ~I i X4490 =
F t~ - _ _ - j
j_ i . . $ .l. m I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ ~'v ~ Q Q Q
~ ~ V - ~ ~ - ~ R.~~ _ - o o W W ~ a - • vi >
o / - - I ~ .
_ w. - i ru , v _ _ _ ~ i~ ~ - ~ 1 . ~ / ~ 22 ~ z - ~ v i 1---' ~ J W tp W V ~ ~ - V ~ ~ i - ~~r~i-'~'~ Q~l! i O Z ~ M. z ~ U' ~ ~n
~ ~ - _ 2 o U h W O Q m
,D • . . . v ~ ~ / 1, ~ . . . - - - A~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~vWin¢ O ~ m a~
~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~ i _ i i i N \ i L

N , ~ , _ - C - ~ - 1 ~ ~ - ;
i~ I ~ , 1 ~ ~ , { . . • i ~ ~ ~ ,y ~ ~ ~ ~R - it -
_ _ ~ ~ ll - - br " ~ s'" ~ i~ i % ~ _
i~ . . i . . . . • _ _ _ ~ _ 3 _ ~ ~ % v ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~
j,' /i i ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ " - V ? . • . - . ~ ~ is '1 ~ ~ r! z r - ~ ~ ~
r + ~ • • O - 1 f ~ ~^g'~,,d''" 1v 'v ' i j ~i ~ vv ivy A ~ , Q
- ~ _
~ ~ % ~~i~ ~ 'ice _ ~ J
~ ~ - ~ . ~ y ~ i~ ~i ~i~~ r Gw'? ri % ~ it ~ j' s,
' i~
o i i i F ~ - - ' \ \ ~ ~ y 2 • v ~1 jf / i r!
- r - r ~ v ~ 1 ~ - ~ U i \ \t r~ ' ~ ~ \A ~ ~%Ai ~ ~
r _ _ _ _ ~ X.: ~ .1 ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~l ~ ~
i .r-~ ' - - I i ~ ~ ~ A ~
W Z
- ~ ~ -i A7 3 < f ~ ~ ..J _ ~ ` ~ ~ / t ~ Q
• - - ~ .~I~~IP~C.T'~ AREAS 9 , v . ,i V A A Q
_ ~ ; o ~ ~ _ . , . _ , - --w--- ____--ti
. '~LAy 10`N A~~ EaAS'E~fENT SANITARY SEUVER INSTAL , , m , ~ r, i 6 i Z
- _ - _ _ _ , ~ /i ~ r f A~ ~ ~ Q Q
~ _ - - - 'a.~~ _ f - - _ % ' ' T: 447 S T 0.052 DES ' ; i~ i ~ \ ~ Z
- ~ , - _ ARY~ uUETL,Ati D IMPAC 2 QF W _ TEMPOR N a : _ t ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ p
~ - _ _ _ _ 4 ~ o _ v i . ~ ~ ~V / ~ ~ - f, ~ \ ~ f , ~
_ - ~o - ~ - _ _ - - ~ - _ F - _ ~ ~ w
m _ l Y I ~ - - - - l ~ \ i ~ ~ ~ / /i ~ j ~ i ~ ~
t t _ _~_resea ac
• . ~ - ':r i ~ ui
~ r ~ ~ • . • • n - - _ ~ ~ i i ~ - _ ~ - • • • • - n~l. P,~CT,,AREA 11 ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ , v r ~ ~ ,
- - ` ~ i - D - - - _ AREA 8 - - - ~ _ - F CT ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~r AD 1NG fop STORM DR~A~i~NA'~~E _ ,
_ _ IMPA _ _ - _ _ . ~ ~ ~ , - _ STORM DRAINAGE ' i . ~ rr /gym - ~ . A 4 , ~ > ~ ~ ~ - % f ~r ~ ~ `v
. ~6AD ~R~N~_. AND _ _ . m ~ ~ ~ - - - _ ~
_ _ _ . - n. ~ _ _ _ 1 ~ PERMfANEN ~ WETLAN ~ ~\iMPACT~_; 1 47 SQF 0.02 6', RE Q, T ~ A ~ f
- - ~ _ _ _ ~ 5 S FT 0:~~0 73 ACRES ~ ,
ND IMPACT. 2 49 Q o ~ ~ ~ PERMANENT W~TLA , ~ . m ~ _ _ - ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ A ~ v, - .~~r A i,
~ - _ _ - _ - 1 ~ ~,rr r w , - ~ - - - - ~~v - - ; `r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~j ~ i'
d ti, ~ ^ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ BRA w~~ ~
~ _ _ S . / . t C ~ ~ ~j~ f0 - - ' , ~ _ I~ a ? - r' ~ , ~i ~ ~ , ~ SHEET
hT1TTTT/"1 M/V 1T T't
~rcxrni~
U m 50 0 25 50 100 200 WL 3.0
O L
a 0
0 (O PROJECT NUMBER ( IN FEET' )
1 inch = 50 ft,
N
L 1

v W
i O
/ ~ \ f\ 7. C'_ v. ~ is ~
v { ' ~ ~ ~
i , i,. ' v / ~ / ~ ~ Vic'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ r i ~ Z O
lr \ ~ ~ H
` ~ Vii' i ~ H
/j U.! R
! y k v _ ~ ~ ~ ~ /
~f ~ ~ % 1' ~i
„ f ~ - .~r f ~ w~ ~ ,r: ,j
~ i,, i ~ /
~r - ~ (J Z
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `ti t' i ~ i~ - . f
/'i to `F f l~~ ~ ` ~ / / ~ 'i ` %r"
i; ~ ~ ~ ~ \ .~1
~r ~ ~ z ~ j
J /i J' r' ri` ~ ~r % ~ A ~
j ~ / i
, ti;, J Q
L T FI,~L ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ W (A
_ ~ f
. ~ ~ ~ ~F~ ~6 AC N
. . ~ ~A~1 D ~~i P ACT-. N~ WETL ~ PERMANE , ~ I

~ ~ ~ ' / , 4~,, ,r O~
r" ~ 1 i W~
r / / f ^~v ~ to N ~
~ ~T 0 U0~
u+, _ _ ~ ~ t r ~ ~r ~ ~C A ~ k
% . ~~00 ~ L~
0 U
- U [ o ~ ~
- ~ ~ r ~ c ~
i ~ o~
/ ~ ~ ~ 0 N2 0 ~ d~
• • I O ~ ~M KJ
~ \ ~ l~ / n~~~ •W
• • ~ ~ ~ ~J ~G - ~ r
~ ti i~. rJ~, St,. _ ~ M . . . ~ r r //y~y Y~ ~rI
` ~ _ ` -
~a ~ - _ -F C 0
h~<; - r~. 4
~ . _
,a " i
r ~
~ ~ ~ - _ ~
~ ,
~ _
C 3 U
O L J o
W N W ti p W 2 ~ ~
Ql U2Z p ~a y~r ft~
E c°v ~ ti O W W C¢W~ N ~~p~ ~ W Jv
N N ~~W [p WZ Ua V7ti °zo° ~
~zQE wQ Uz w¢ 2 ~ W
w¢oc~~ ~ oQ o~ 4~~e o a~ 4~
O O N
N
N
C 7 7
3 U
O
U 0 ~q
Q
O ? O
i c0
n V
0
r N ~ 0
U 0 s Q
E uJ
~ ~ Z
c .3 J Q O
a L 0 V
i+
C m W Q
E C Q
L I ~
C W Z
m C O
Y Z
m Y J 1
C J
0
C
J
r m
0
d d1
L m
DRAWING
SHEET
r h T l TTTT/"1 CY lY l T T'1
to Urcxrniu
r u i 50 0 n 50 100 mo WL 4.0
m 0
CL CT NUMBER
0 0 to ( IN FEET )
I i inch = 50 ft.
15;!7;6-05
LUC)

'-5 ~ F~'_ ~
- Q
uF ,J , .//y,. - -
y ' / jam„ _ - -
- mil- 'r - _ mac„ `s._ Z
• ~ ' °1
t _ r c~`
f 5 . , . w
~~7 i~~1 ~~t~ „u. Q ~y L s =?tS t,~
_ i
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT qx
i~ ~ 5 ~n
Accumulated Area 4672 SOFT (0.1073 Acres) ,i~;~ O
,,f 2 1' ~ 9
IMPACT PERMANENT WETLAND k 1` d ~ i
i
Accumulated Area• 20 528 SQFT (0.4713 Acres) - -
K, g
IJ ~ i ~1., . ~ ~
~ ~ 19 t
~ s AX±z64lG ~ , 9 . i rY~i rJ~ v
43 F 0.0010 Acres RMITTENT STREAM IMPACT L ( ) TEMPORARY INTE +J
Q i~j
INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT 26 LF (0.0006 Acres) .~v PERMANENT -
~nF yy~, ,~o`,2.t 5fi5 3 ~ ~ r ?y: . ;;2U ~c ~ ~
:6 4 N 's ~ ~ N
'
I ' ~
n 0 ~ ~2`
~ y N~
C ~ ~
a,, . ~ ` _ ~ 0 Q ~ A ~ 0
err ~ j, . . -,i ~ ~ ~ X - y 0 O
ti ~ ~ ~ - A i , fit. ~ ~ C ~0
. 1 t ~ _ - - . ~ ~w ~ is ~ r~ ~ ~ 0 ~ V
_ _ w ~ I, o U C O ~ ~ ~ I- O~
ea • F • ~ _ ~ 1 ~ . ~ - 1 n. - ' a. ~ n
A , . l C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 i - ; N Z
~1 ~ ~ / _ ~ _ r ~ ~ 'r . r -'r ~ ti, .C ~ , A ,,c Op
^ - .J ~ §
i
_ / - \ ~•~'y fd ~ ~r ~ /~yy
i r p '/~r
_ ~ '1. y i/ ~/yi fir'. - ,jt~~ ~l ~1,`1 ~ r ~ .Y L- \ / C O ~ / ~l
~ j / _ ry~y 1 ~~~ti /r r / A, r :i~ , ~ , , 7 \ 4.
as c - ~ ~ _ _ ~b• 1~;; A~,, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '/r ~y~ A
~ / _ y.. .j. ~ ~V ~ A: ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ , / `v ,i'
A; ~ ~
- ~ y~ / - ~ < ' ~ i~ r ~ ~ r~ ? r v ° , it i ~ ~ ~ < .
_ \ ~ f ~ ~
- _ ~ /
e. - ~ - ~ ~ . I . A ~ ~~A~ ~ ~ v;~t - ! ~ ~ / i i. ~ .e tip` ~~r n~,~°=. ~ I ~ , ~ ,
- .i. ~ , tq ff,~ ~ ~ ~
/ , ~ ~
t ~
..r
_ i --..'c,-,~ j t i e ~s" -m ~ _ ~ ~ h' ~a\~ - ' ~`1` 7~ alt` a .~~i' ~A
~i ~ o ~ • • ~ `S ~ / j \ / ~ \ b R / r of ti, / _ ,
~ ~ V A\ / r C. , v ~i~ / / r/, -
~ . c ~ 11 9 c. ~e1 _ / ~ ~~V~ r r~~~a~ a
Y - / i c \a ' v%`~ f \~i ,,~nf~jF/~ f ze )\~\t ~ ~ ~rh~.~ ,f,~'., - r~Y, ~ '?i,,, Y'/. -i ~ ~ - ,
. n f ~ / ~/K~' / ,Ati/ ~ ~'s ' ~ w <v W
.f Y ,`s~,; ~r ~ t~ _ X. tip Z r ~ ~le~ n i ~ / ~ ° ~ e A,A~"' _ `i, t ~ r ~ ~V~-~- F v 2 2 Ott` a y Hye
rj ~ ~ - ~ •v - - r. . . ~f r ~ ~ r
_ - _ ~ • - - t. • . .~f i ~ ~ ~ ~ , c' i ~ ~ z s
r / ,v ~ ¢~RO V V U
° _ - / v r,~ r~ a z E W z W z W w + ~ \ `ti\ ~ Y .A~•. %t~ T-~ .~C. r ~'8~'5vo~ ~ ~ ~ i ry/ 41 R o ti ~ W S ~ ~
. r ~ ~ ,.e<, e _ ~ _ / i ",b.~ ~ A _ d / a [an ~ ¢ O ~ en v7 a ~ C o'
- i _ ~ ~ - - t , ~ / ,r _ ~ v~~ ~ u V`~ it ! ~ ~ i /~o. _ ,
N ~ ~Y' ~ ~ 4~" ~ ~ > ~a ~ - v s'' . - - - i ~J v~ . ~ .
~ ; ~ i - ' ~ i ~ ) i - w _ _ .
~,\~S - _ - - t
_ ~ _ y r ~ 2k~gl r ~ ~ i ~ ~ / 1 / ~ ~ r a r'~ r ~ r~~,(
• 4 • ' i t ~ . yr ~ yV~ ~ ~ ~ •'V i .A area '`/b'r,~ ~ , - ern ~ ~ ~ eV ` - AVM` V ~ ,~'r~ _ '~r
~ ...~,y.~ : i , / ' s. . _ f y. - = _ . _ .t.,... . " ? _ ~ p~! ~ U r
. _ _ _ j _ _ is ~ . i.
~i _ r-- • • ~ e. i . r - ~ ~ , ~ ~ A r
• . l ' - i i . l~ i / ~ \ / / a \ ~~2 _ x
. . . - - _ , r ~ F i ~ -
~ . n a a}~ ~ ~ ~ _ . G y; ~ ~ V
. . p , _ - . ~ ' . ~ F Ai .Ati%... '0. N~e¢ -
_ V _ r _ , ~~r'
t - - - v ` 3` eG x~,f ~
ri, ~ - ~ - ~ . _
~ _ E m _ _ C ~ -,r' ~ - - _ _ s:. 97 ~ r \
~ , - ~ - ~a i .t. _ ~ . ? ~ ~ f ~ , • ~ / ~ . I',
_ , . _ - ~ . /
l ~ i„ '
' 1 _ - _ li - ;!6 ~4 . - _ _ _ i y k' ~ ;r ~ .t, ~ ~r Q ..'4 ~ ~ r/v,' ~t1
Y:~ i 1. ! . _ ~ _ ~ x.
Q _ , -
. ~ _ = W ' % ~ _ ~ yr . - Z
- - y - - - - ~ ~ _ . . _ < ' C - - w i ~ -a _
p - - . - _ - ' t ~ ~I xY c ~ ` C9 _ ~ ,~ti,
- ~ . ~ ~ r v ° . _ _aas~ r~~I L. _ fill ~ ~ ~m V ~ i ~ • i~~~/./ ~ J
_ i _ i ~i ~ ~ ~ rr ~ ~ ~
O i Rcz. ~ ~ :,r J Q ' ' l ' ~r/ /
- _ _ ~ ~ / ~k t r. f f ~r.~ i
J ~ , x.83' 'A3.c,' ri a?`bi a4..359.3 ~ h.
\ \
m \ / ~ /f
0 ~ J
a m ~ ~t (~j,,
a m a ~ f/
~
~ 0 DRAWMIG ~ f
1 ~ ~ ' SHEET
~`.%F ,
LL)
4 V U m GRAPHIC SCALE
0 l` 150 0 75 150 300 600 WL - 1. 0
a !y.
0 ` PROJECT NUMBER RD
IN FEET )
1 inch = 150 ft.
LO W 576-0

~I ~ ~ ~ ; ~ w
~ ~ r
_ ` \ ~ / ~t .,"~Jy~ ~
rc~ i A, . , i
~ ~ ' c~r t ~ ~1 _ ~ i i ~i /fir ,r~ ~
- - ~ \ ~ \ - ,s, i -
. ~ \ ~ j f i ti. ~ t , ~i - ~ _ ~ f~ ~ ~t,y~J~, - i° / i / f
~ ~ _ ti . ~ -
i i 1, F ` \ ~ , ~ /i ~ e Ul ~ t `
~ t ~ ~ ~ r ~ F e- ~ ~ i ~
~ ~ ~ ` i~ \ 4 l \ ` ~ ~ \ ` _ ~ / ` ~ ~ .1 4 ~ ~ l :i ~ ~l t Z] i
i \ ~ ~ - r . ~ r ~ ~ r ~ ; i t,, _ f C yr ~ ~`q 1J i % ~ , f ~ i t . / Q ~ ~ n ~
; r r F ~ ~ _ < \ ~ t , ~ ~
~ ~ _ ~ Vi tV ~ ~ G'
- J ` . ~
i \ Z
~ ~ - ~
~4 ~ ~ i
~ ~ i\ ~ \ ti, C~. - ; i~ _ - j _ ~ i~ ? ~ /r t
~ ~ ~ n L'r~ - - / ~ A ~ ~ , A ~ ~ A %i~' r / ij V , ~ ~ i : i
~ ~ \ ~A \ ~ l _ ~ ~ ~ `tip" s^ ~ , , 4~y ~ ~ ~ i w,, r' / i
~ ~ ~ ~ • ; ~ / ~ ? k~\~ i ` i ~ ' rte` f
y'" ~ • a ~ _ ~ ~ ,x i / ~ -
- fib ~V ~ ~ ~ i V ~
• _ _ i ~ c?„ - ~ V~ ~ ,n ~ % - Q g~ ~ , , ~ ; ~ ~ w
- Itv~PACT~ AR~~A ~ - r~~ ; ~ ~ ~ , ~ tf ~
~ ~ ° _ _ ~ ,LOT FILL r' ~ ~ ~ i
w,~, .v~ ' ~ ~ ' N
it ~ - ; .
P~ERMAi~ENT WETLAN{~.1MPAC,,T: 85 SQFT 0~~20;:, AC , I
~ ~ , - - ~ ~ l~` ~ ~
/ ~ - r. ~ ,r ",z , ~ , ~ (p
_ y~ /i~ /,i ~ f - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N rn
,.z 1~ / 4 ~ ~ j'~ 6'.~ , ` \ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ C U ~
s y i t ~ r r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a,, ~ ~ r,
r. ~ a ~ f / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , a ~ ,.1 ' k
_T~ ~U. A` e u / f~ y 11,4 / , ~ C ~ 0
, ~ ,-~iMP~C:T~ AREA ~1 . 1 ti ~ ~ 0 „ U
~ . ~ ~A~~ R A D ~~N,G ~1~ D S TORS D1~A G~~~ ~ ' : " ~ ~ - R0 ~ - V %r ~ i % / ~ ~ n.,~ v~ ~ ~ r, , ~ ~
.u - , _ , , ~ ~ _ ~ ~ i,~ ~~G-T~. A A ~ 3 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~
r, , r r,, ` ~ ` ~ ~ ~ `'ti ~ N ~ R D;~~:; ~A~ ~ -~~~~N D~. ,:T R M ~ R A ~ z ~ ~
. - -N ,~f~~T WETLAND ~ M P A~T:~ 1 X83 ~~~T -D. 0 3.~~ A C R PFRM~ ~ r , , / p
- _ ~ \ 4
% - ~ ~ ~ \ ~ % ,f a PE~RMANEI~T,-~IET~A~D IM~AC;T: ~ 6; ;~~~~5 ~ FT {~:~1977 ACRES r~~ : ~ ~ n.
v- , ~ ~ ~ ~ o
~ ~j L__.__._~_._ f ~ ice; ' , ~ . ~ i ~ ' ~ ~ -"Y ~ ~ , _ ~ r--- . ~ f ~ ~ °
~r L ,.r. k ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ _ f X i, ~ ; ~ ~ ~y f 0
r- a t l 1 t ~
. %j ~t ~ < ~{71
F: \ \i 5 , f~, ~ . i ~
i ~i~ _ r - l ~ ~ ~
~ i w
- _ - h~ ~ ~ it ~ , _
_ - - ~ ~ _ f _ _ ~ 4'L i ' - - i ~ \ ~ _
_ i f . ~ _ r-~~ A . A . ~ ~ - A f/ A. ' ~ ~ \ 'e~ ~ ~ _ - ~ A ii' ..A _
- ~ t - _ .i ~ a
• • • • • ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ N • • _ - - - ~ ~ 9N, ~ r - ¢ -
• ~ 6
¢ 5 V I ~ < i l i
~ fr-_ _ _ - - - i . _ _T ;
s k - ~ _ ~ j i , i ' X11
- ~ - - ~ I' - I • . . _ i ~ ~ it A i ~ i 1~9 - - -
~ - ! ~ ' 1 p ~ .1 i - _ il i~ ! ~ ~ _ -
L • • ~ • ~ _ _ ~ ~ w
~ ,y ~ ~ ~ _ . - - , ~ . 17 i ~ ~ -
- _ ?r ~ ~ ' R ~ 4i ti vi w ~ y Q Q Q m ~ ~ c ~7 ~ I ~ ~ ; lt.. J r _ _ _ ~ ~ U ~ Z ~ ~ ~
_ ~ d ;t~ . . _ ~ ~ . . S~ I I 1~ i _
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti $ i i I IE ~ ~ ~ ~ t~l -~2 N 2~ <w 2 ~ _ ~ V a- y
,.a...,x _ ~ a _ • r • - =p~ ° 1.ti 4-~ Vim. cn
- _ 0 ~"'i, , i ~ ~ - ~ 4 ~~__~ij"si6-ffi-.x ~SHht-so-~6-e~•g.a-a 3a:.am ~ N - o w v, p y i- q
r m _ _ . e - - f . . if _:._tvs~-rte ,
..9,~~.. _ _ _ ~ . - - . .
N ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~~~~~;;a.a - - -
_ ~ _ ~ - - ~ _ r r - ~ _ ~ _ -
3 _ - - V _ Q _ - _ . 6
- F I ~ ~ • ~ r - ~ ~ - _ . . . r; I
. -
- ~ ~ i
ii° ~ ~ ~ - ~r
~ N T____ ~ _ - Q
~ - ii i 2 ~ ~ ` J
_ co ~ ! r _ ~ ~ ~ ~i Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
u~ ~ f - _ _ _ a ~ Q
o ~i ~ 0 V r i ~7
s ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ - ~ ~s4 S~ -
0 A ~ \ - E _ ~ p • ~ ~ Z r^
_ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ f _ o, vJ
~ C - _ ; IMPACT AREA 4 ~ Q
_ ~ f ' . - - z W
ROAD GRACING AN~D~~ST~ORI~~f~R-~ INAG€ ~ . ~
0 r 'aC _ ~
l RM N T PE A ENT WE LAND IMPACT: 3_~7-6. 5 F~ -E?-:E~7~~_A_ _ z ~
> IMPACT AREA 6 Q Q _ z
W SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION AND EASEMENT Q. _ ~ ~
< ; o
IMPACT ARf ACT AREA 5
Y TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT: 1 733 SQFT 0.0398 ACR S z a
' ~ ROAD GRAC qD GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE ,
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT: 21 LF
PERMANENT 21 SQFT 0.0005 ACRES IMPACT: 2 901 S FT 0.0666 ACRES ~MANENT WETLAND Q

L m
0 L a
L
m

DAA WING
% SHEET
U GRAPHIC SCALE -2
0 50 0 25 50 100 200 WL .0
CL O
O O PROJECT NUMBER
I IN S) , 51
LO 1 inch = 50 it. 576-0

W r ~ ~ ~ ~ - % Q
bb ~ 1~. . ; ~ _ r ! ~ ~ - P• D _ r'i
~ .1
~ n~ i - '1 i r, i ~5 _ I
• • • • • 4V - /1 ~ i ~ _ - s, f ~ ~
- -
~ \ i ~ i ,v ~ " z.~ m _ . - {'s Z - O ~ _
~ ~ ~ it - ~ . - ~ ~ ' r ~ H _
- ~ - - ~ a • • • • - - _ _ - ~ ~ - i ~ _ r H
. _ ~ Q
• • • a ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
. . - 1 ~ ~ - ~ c ~l ~ i C~,
- . ~ . ' Ca
~ _ - r i r ~ V - ~ . • . - _ - . _ - ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ - - _ _ O
~ - _ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~
L • • • _ ~ ~ ` y i , r _ ~ _ _ _ ' . _ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ - l
Oi ~ ~ - ~ ~ - , - _ _ _ ~ _ _
- - J .r ~ ~ - ~ ~ _ ~ _ _ n ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , _ _ _
r ~ i ~~,~@ > ; 74~. -
. ' ~ ~ ' ~ - a i ~ r ` -`--rte - . ~ ' _ z_ i i..
~ _ _ , ~ ~ - ~1 ~ A i ~ w r, - _ - - ~ ~ ' ' ~ _ r r fl
? ~ - I i F J' > I r. E. t r~ S
- f ~ ~ ~ ~ IMPAC~~AREA . ~ ~ i ~ 4 i { ~ I _ ~ _ i i ~
~ _ f i _ l `~~.r - - I x-_._..~_ ___.--J
~TflR~I RAI~NAGE I N G~ AND,=S- ~~p R~AD~~ G~ ~ Q I ~l l l ~ ~ - _ _ i Fe _ ~ - ~ t, ~
~ ~
~ ELI T S T . ~M~' I M P ~~C T. 6 ~ ~ _ ic, ~ a ' ~ vJ I ~ N
i= ~I' t r~' ~ ~ ~ _ _
`~26 SQF ~ ~ ~ - ~ - _ - I _ _ ,
1 _ i ~ ~ _ _ _ _ - - ~ I`r ~ '~t
V _ /i ~ _ - v i - r . - ~ ao ~ _ _ _
\ _ i - ~v` ~ r . i i i ~ i . _ ~ c0 _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ - - ~ - v
'i i 1 .J i / ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ . ~ - - _ _ _ _ ~ -
i i t / . - ~ s / .k ~ % / - - a v a. ~ - c v rn _ ~ - - _ v v~
- ~ ~ o
i , • . s' ~ / n w ~J _ - - - - _ - i - _ _ I ' ~ x - - - ~ ov
u~~ - ~ ~ , ;a ~ _ „ ; C v V
` - = 4 , n st U C_ O 1 ~ ~u. .
i 1. • , i~ - _ 01 ~L t - ~ y
j ~i ; ~ I ~ • _ . ~ - - ` - v'~ _ ~ 0 _ _ _
_ r ~ - ~ ~ _ ' 7 Il `i ~ ~ - _ r, - . ~ . _ _ r ; % ~
~ - _ - - cL ~ _ i w ~ , - U ~ _ r~. ~ ~i 1 i ~ ~ ~ -C DO - v~
~ ~ ~ _ - ~r LINE I STAL~~ATIOf~ ~~AND ~EASEMEf~T ~ WATER - a~ rn
~ _ S , t h.
1 ~ 'i - _ ~ ~ i' r ~ ~
r' , ~ - f ~ f ~ 492 S FT 4:01-~ AC,RES ° , . , . ~RAf~ W ~TLAND~ IMPACT Q . TEM~?~ r• ,
~ _ - _ - ~ ~ i _ _ > ~ _ ;
_ ~'i ~ ~ ~ - _ i~ti tx % 1' ~ ~
~ . STREAM IM T:~~ 2~ ~~f TEMP~R~
_ ~ - _ _ _ 22 SQFT 0.000 AG,RE~-~. - _
- ; , , _ _ ~ . ~ r-~ _ • . ~ ~ -
= _ ~ , _ - r _ _ - . 1
~ ~ r ' r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 0;7 i
r, - ~ , ,v = ~ - _ r ~ ;,r'~ ~ . . .
iF - " ~ y/
~ ^ ~ - -
_ - /7 _ , _
.q -
S:. ~z • ~ i 1 _ _ r - - _ 1 t ~ I~. 4,v i, :_.r
• • • ~V ~ ~ f~, ~ ~ ~ ; S^ fi r ~ ~ .
~ ~ .
3 _ -
~:4 , - . ~ . . ; . r ~ - - _ l ~ ~ ~ ~
3 ~~a , ~ ~ y - o _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ - _ f i - _ ~ ~ 2
V/ • • - -
i /y~ i i i ~ J ~ I ~ N 'r/ - ~ - ' q H ~ 111 WW ~ Q
! t p C ~ "~td
_ _ ~ rf ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ • • i - _ , . r; ~ C _ ~ ~ ~ i i i ~ i
t r _ i ~ a° - ~ ~ r ~ \ - - - • • • - - 1wy~ S o 2 F. F. C'J t~ ~n _ t i~ . ~
• • `v~ _ _ - A - • • ~ • I _ ' , ~ r. ~ ~ St i f ~ ~ 1 ' 1, . ~ m ¢ p 4 ~ 0. ~ R _ -
~ ~ • r • ~ ~ _ - ~ - _ s, ~ ;j ~ . . Y~ , ~ - _ ~ ~ ~ r -
N - ~ . . . - - I ~ , r - - l
i; f i - - e ' ~ N ~ . ~ ~ .,,j ~
„ i ~ _ ~ ~ t 1 r; s~ . . s - ~ ~ /
~ - ~ ~ - - i ~ I • ~ ~ ~ - i_ _
. . , - ~ . . 3 j - i . - . / ~ ~ ~
~ ~ _
_ _ ~ o ~ <<. / - / ie' j ~~1~ . _ i i, ~ ~ ~ t
_ ~ o ~ % /i~ 1 -
° ~ . _ v. . _ ~ ~,i, ~ Q ~ yF ,i~ ii'' i `
_ cn r ''7 OVA '.A ~ , ~ _ 2 ~ ~ ~ _ J
o . _ ~ ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ -
_ . - / ~ ~ I
o , ~ ~ _ r _ _ , ; f _ ~ _ _ _ m ~ ~
. _ r - ter: - _ • ~ . O ~ , - _ ~ ~ ! r~ ~ ` ~ A~, ~ V _ O / ~
ti ~ - ~ - _ O - , ~ ~ - j, , ~~i . _ i~ _ ~ +a " _
E - - i ~ ~E ~ Q • ~
_ _t-. _ - _ _ _ - ~ I i
p L ~
~ k ~ _ . - _I~t~lP~1CT AREA 9' Y,~ • 1' r,~ 1~.
_ - ~ INST~'LL~A~ ION A~~~ E~A~`E~EN ~ i~ / i~ f%~ /'-~~.A ~I
- SANITARY .SEWER . ~ , - ~ - _ , _ _ ~ ~ ~j l „ ~ L 1. ~ _ , i/ ~ ~ Q
a - - _ _ - , / ~ Y r' ~
_ _ _ - ~ ~ > _ , _m. - _ - - ~ - 447 S T 0.050 -A;~ ~ . TtAND fMPACT 2 Qt= - - _ TEMPORARY WE ~f ~ ~ ' ~ , ~'V ' , z ~ p A
- - - -
m ~ ~ . _ _ , , . o _ ry ~ ~ ` Z
_ fi ~ . _ _ - - - - _ ~ , « ~sn _ - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ `J ~ ~ % ~ ~ ~
m ~ ~ - - ~ " Y - ' - - - - - -
` ~ ~-°ir - ~ ~ _ _ _ ~ _ ,'i e . ~ , ~ ~ ~ /r • l~ f ~ V ~ i.1,
- _ _ ~t r _ _ i 1 1 P' CT, ~AREA% 11 ~ f ,A ,
_ • , J ' - -
- - ~ ,f - _ - ~ ~ :4 r , i ~ _ ~ , ~ ~ - l ~ ~ IMPACT AREA 8 - , A ~ , AD G1~, D1 N G f~~D STORM D R Al~NAG
~ ~ , - AGE , 5 ~ i ~ ~
- - G_ AND STORM DRAIN . , . SAD ~lN____ - ~ . ? . . m ~ - - , - - ~ - _ N WETLA .,.1 PACT:. Q - ~ , RMANE a ~ PE ~ ,
- _ _ ; - n. - _ ~ ~
- ~ _ ~ - S FT 0.0 ~ 73 ACRE~~ ~ . ~ . , PACT. 2 495 Q ~ ~ l
_ ~ PERMANENT WETLAND IM _ m _ - - - I i `r - _ _ - _ L . . i~ ~ ~ s-,~,, i
(D ~ DRA WNVG - t` ~ ~ i ~ ski y1 ',ti
In ~ ~ - - ~ . =,r 1 - _ ~ r ~ i r~ SHEfT ~ ~ ~tiv~~ yam, r,
~i ~
w _ _ _ L, . ~ y, _ s h a • . . . . . .
N
U N 50 0 25 50 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE WL-3.0
O L a
0 PROJECT NUMBER
0 ( IN eeer )
1 anon = 50 t,. 576-0 5
i~

IN FEET
inch = 50 ft,
2W
—,x
I I I 'I L4 I
ti
W
Cz
I
CO
fn
Cc Q 1,s�tipp
Eck
871
�Lu
L
UQ
Le
2
z�,
\ 1"
ti
RE
Z
4p
41-
IN FEET
inch = 50 ft,
2W
z
0
O
Cf)
oor:
Cl) Z)
Q:)
Q)
J Q
tz
Z,
Z
Emil
C
CL
Cl)
CIL
A-
WL -4.0
PROJECT NUMBER
576-05
ti
W
Cz
I
CO
fn
Cc Q 1,s�tipp
Eck
871
�Lu
L
UQ
Le
2
ti
RE
z
0
O
Cf)
oor:
Cl) Z)
Q:)
Q)
J Q
tz
Z,
Z
Emil
C
CL
Cl)
CIL
A-
WL -4.0
PROJECT NUMBER
576-05

0
W ~ ti ~ Q o
m 0
2
~ ~ o lic R~ 60 Pub cn ~
~ °a
1 Old 421 W o SR 129 ~ w
4
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT w i
Accumulated Area 7 728 SOFT (0.1775 Acres) x U
Z
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
Accumulated Area 14 251 SOFT (0.3272 Acres)
TEMPORARY INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT 43 LF (0.0010 Acres)
PERMANENT INTERMITTENT STREAM IMPACT 26 LF (0.0006 Acres) UJ
I
O~

,gin N ~
c a o 0 0~
0~ k
~ X00 ~ L~
. ~0 0 U
. U c o = rn
a c
. I. ~ o 'y N 2 I
.1. . 1 0 n ~ prn,~
•f.•. . ~ . . t~
4 j. . 0~,.~ rn
I..•.• a
I..... .I ~
1 . a~
'T f c 0
. r a
.
e
i w.....
.i...... i....
.I. .
,I. j
1 . ~
• f . .
. . i

j~• . .
c ~ J~ ..y. Q f.
r ~ o
} , ~ m ~1 m e
'r .7T ~a~ QaQ W tiOti (p 4 H ~
~ v¢2 O C~ tryti 2 N lu ~ ly W 4O'' a
r%i 6~ W~ m ti~ ~ O s ti V
- • I ~ J w ~ ~ 2 U o~~no
o 1• o ~=U' ~O o U2 UO U~ ~ ^ E i 3 ~ W t~Wu 2 O U ~ O W O c y
N ` ¢acn~¢ O R cn d cn ~ ~
~ . t ~
.
Q . 0
„ ~
~ o W `t
~ r . i3 Q ~ h~ ~ ~P~~O~
U
~`wi~,~' p~ ~''6
~ ~ Q
O ~ Q
~ n
~ J
p ~ ~
~ U z ~
~ o
2 Q
, G ~
3 o
~ z ~ 1 ~
v C , ~
01 . . ~ ~ Q O ~
C ` p Z (j~
C 6 ~ . Q Q
W 1.... ~ W
N C ~ z ~ ~ o
r+ j ~ Q
y s V
~ ~ ~
~ G J Q
.J
L m
L
L
0 m Olo - ?DS
DRAWING
SHEET
V 0 GRAPHIC SCALE
0 CL 150 0 75 150 3w 600 WL-1.0
0
0 PROJECT NUMBER
I ( IN Feer )
1 inch = 150 ,z 576-05

L~ o
~ ~ . Q o
/ O m o
~
• Z
/ O ~
- - (Q U H p
~ o ill
Q a
~ a / y
. ~ z
. U
. Z w
I..
I
• 1 .
_ IMPACT AREA #7
. _ ROAD GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE
J Q
1 ~ _ ~
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT: 26 LF 1
26 SQFT (0.0005 ACRES)
~ N 01
1 • I
•1 eh
~ O ap co
• ~ rn
N~
. ~ c v v~ ~ o o ~
oc
~ - - ~ ~o 0 rn
c o o _U
- - - - U ~c o . 'Cry
c ~ ~
- - • ~ o • •N N 2
IMPACT AREA 10 ~ ~ rn
. t~ WATER LINE INSTALLATION AND EASEMENT o,
'a~
.
- . . TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT: 492 SQFT 0.0113 ACRES
c
~ . . o
. o • TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT. 22 LF
• 22 SQFT 0.0005 ACRES
- - - - . .
~ ,

j.
-I
-
~l
.j .
U • • J J ~
. - -
.1 E - - ~ • . • W Ri ~ ti ¢~Q W cn
U R Z O 4 N ~ • O ti p W w~w ~ ~ 4 N ll1 ~ 641 W
gQW; ~ Z"R $ 'ti • ~~z ° ~°a tw
n~ j' a WWow qj W Ua 4IQ
O • O O U Z U O U~ • ~ROU FW. O a ~ c ~q
j. • an~~ o a~ ~N
j .
a 1
I
J .
I.
.I .
E \
o Q ?
% . O

~ v
E - ' ~ AA O 1\
. 2
• vJ ~ Q
o / W
J O
IMPACT AREA #9 ~ V Q
SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION AND EASEMENT ~ E l~
Z
Q Q
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT: 2,413 SQFT (0.0554 ACRES) ? . . Z
2 ~ O
i-
Z J
- - i
j. J
IMPACT AREA 11
IMPACT AREA #8 ROAD GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE
ROAD GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE 1
Q i .
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 1 247 SQFT 0.0286 ACRES
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 2,495 SQFT (0.0573 ACRES) . i ,
o DRAWING
- SHEET
N r
U N GRAPHIC SCALE
0 L CL 50 o u w 100 uo WL-3.0
0
O (0 PROJECT NUMIN f'EE'f )
I
LO `°`h - 50 ~ 576-07
i~

W o ~ ~
O ~ m
0
2 O ~
H o (n U
~ 3 ~ O
~ W
a
W 2
U
0
Z ~
J Q
. _ _ IMPACT AREA #2 W
LOT FILL
N
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 85 SQFT (0.0020 ACRES) . . I
n~
• O ap co
I~
N~
~ ~D~ . 0~
k
~ ~0 O C L L~
IMPACT ARE #1 o i-' U
ROAD GRA G AND STORM D AGE U c o _ ~
IMPACT AREA 3 c ~
~ o ROAD GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE Nz ~
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 1,483 T (0.0340 AC ~ ~
4 ~ w
~~1 PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 8 611 SQFT 0.1977 ACRES 'a, rn
~ T~ A
//~V~ V. ~I
c
,c a

- - - -
- -

- - - . .

} - . • • • • • . U J J ~
E - - - -
ti O R Q Q W ~ ti vl • • • • ti O ti ~ a M ~
N UO ~ ~2 p ~ y ti Q cn2c~ O Wh Oiu WOa
. . . . v~~¢ N ~ S ~QQ; ~ ~y¢ qqpp ~ ll J 2 O ~ 2 i W ~ 2
. Otivwio °j W c» y~
~2U' ~O o V? U~ U~
~ROU ~ O W V Q O o~-, ~Nro~ o a~ n~ n~
Q

o ~
i
N
Q ?
O

~ V
p
2
' IMPACT AREA 4 ~ Q
a Z W
SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION AND EASEMENT ~ o ~
. . ~ Q
h
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT: 1 566 SQFT 0.0360 ACRES W z V
IMPACT AREA #6 ~Q Q
SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION AND EASEMENT z ~
z ~ 0
r TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT: 1,733 SQFT (0.0398 ACRES) IMPACT fr SANITAR - TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT: 21 LF PACT AREA 5 ~ Z
J ~ANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION AND EASEMENT
J
21 SQFT (0.0005 ACRES) TEMPORA EMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT: 1 524 SQFT 0.0350 ACRES
a`
0 DRAWING
N SHEET
m y
U Ql GRAPHIC SCALE
0 L. CL 50 0 25 50 ~ WL -2.0
0
0 co PROJECT NUMBER
I IN FM i mon = so ~ 576-05
to