20090761 Ver 1_Application_20090709

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BEVERLY PURDUE P. O. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611-5202
GOvERNoR PHONE: [phone]
June 29, 2009
?Qv?R• p1
'f4?s 9T?R pp9
EUGENE CL??JR.
SECRETAR y
Mr. Monte Matthews
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587 090761
Subject: Nationwide Permit #14
SR 1123B (Laurel Creek Road)
Watauga County, North Carolina
Project Number: 11C.095093 (DWQ Permit Fee: $240)
Dear Mr. Matthews:
The NC Department of Transportation is scheduled to grade, drain, base and pave SR 1123B,
Laurel Creek Road in Watauga County. Total project length is approximately 1.4 miles. The
improved section will be widened from 16 feet to 20 feet with impervious surface area increasing
by 0.68 acres. This project will require the replacement of three wet pipes as shown below:
Stream Impacts:
S

4a ..
•.Station'Number Earstmg Pipe'

y?
''s tS?ze..,..,t. _Pr6pjDjjd Pip
a
, r k
r ;Size
ILprap

Im seta' feet
,Total Impacts at

this Station ft. '

34+45 40'x 18" 50'x 24" 10 20
37+00 100'x 24" 100'x 36" 10 10
43+70 40'x 18" 40'x 18" 10 10

Total Stream Impacts = 40 feet
The replacement of the above noted wet pipes will require temporary dewatering. An impervious
sandbag dike will be constructed upstream of the existing culverts to create a small pool. Clean
water will temporarily be pumped around the construction areas and will be discharged
downstream. Any dirty water located inside of the construction areas will be pumped into a silt
bag if necessary. Total dewatered distance for all wet pipe replacement areas will be
approximately 120 linear feet (40 ft./pipe). Once the new pipes are in place, the impervious dikes
P. O. Box 250, N. WILKESBORO, NC 28659
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
Mr. Monte Matthews
SR 1123B (Laurel Creek Road)
Page 2
June 29, 2009
will be removed and preconstruction streambed elevations will be restored. Note that due to the
low flow nature of the streams at stations 34+45 and 43+70, installing dikes alone may sufficiently
dewater the construction areas.
The wet pipes in question carry different unnamed tributaries to Laurel Creek (Class: C, Trout).
This project was reviewed for the presence of threatened and endangered species on June 11,
2009. This project will have no effect on any federally listed endangered plant or animal species.
The State Historic Preservation Office has reviewed this project and did not request any survey
work.
The project impacts are not significant in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water
quality uses. Pipe sizes used will be the minimum necessary to create a safe roadway. By
utilizing the erosion control measures outlined in the attachments to this application, downstream
water quality standards will be protected. All appropriate BMPs will be used during construction.
Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets with proposed erosion control
measures, a marked county map, a marked topography map and photographs.
By copy of this letter, it is requested that Mr. Ron Linville, Mountain Region Coordinator, with
the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission comment directly to you concerning the 404
Nationwide Permit application with a copy sent to me.
By copy of this letter, I am forwarding five (5) copies of this application package to Brian Wrenn,
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, for his review. It is requested that any
comments related to the 401 certification be forwarded directly to me with a copy sent to the US
Army Corps of Engineers.
We would like to begin construction as soon as possible. If further information is required, please
let me know. Your early review and consideration will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Heath Slaughter
Division Environmental Officer
Enclosures
cc: Monte Matthews, US Army Corps of Engineers (I additional copy)
Ron Linville, Western Piedmont Region Coordinator, NCWRC
Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality (5 copies)
Amy Euliss, Division of Water Quality
Mike Pettyjohn, PE, Division Engineer
Mr. Monte Matthews
SR 1123B (Laurel Creek Road)
Page 3
June 29. 2009
Michael Poe, PE, District Engineer
Kevin Whittington, County Maintenance Engineer
Heath Slaughter, Division Environmental Officer
Scott Pipes, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Technician
OF W A T?c9
o'?: ?oG
>PJJG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: X Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. 14 or General Permit (GP) number.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verged by the Corps? ? Yes X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): -
x 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
le.

NO Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ? No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes X No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 1123B, Laurel Creek Road
2b. County: Watauga
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Valle Crucis
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 110.0951193
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: 801 Statesville Road
3e. City, state, zip: North Wilkesboro, NC 28659
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: hslaughter@ncdotgov
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(d applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable): _
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 11
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.23724 Longitude: -81.85313
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 8.49 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project: UTs to Laurel Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water. C, Trout
2c. River basin: Watauga
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: '
Unpaved Road in Rural Area
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
190
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Secondary Road Improvement
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See attached cover letter
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
? Yes X No ? Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
? Preliminary ? Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Agency/Consukant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes X No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file' instructions.
6. Future Project Plans

ased project? X No
Is this a ph
If yes, exp p lain.
r6b
Page 3 of 11
PCN Forth - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands X Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
X Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number- Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
? Yes ? Corps
W1 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W2 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W3 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W4 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W5 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
? Yes ? Corps
W6 ? P ? T ? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number- (PER) or (Corps-404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 X P ? T Pipe Replacement UT #1 to Laurel X PER X Corps 1 P-10
and Rip Rap Creek ? INT X DWQ RR-10
S2 X P ? T Pipe Replacement UT #2 to Laurel X PER X Corps 2 RR-10
and Rip Rap Creek ? INT X DWQ
S3 X P ? T Pipe Replacement UT #3 to Laurel X PER X Corps 1 RR1
and Rip Rap Creek ?INT X DWQ E
? PER X Corps
S4 X P ? T ? INT X DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S5 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
? PER ? Corps
S6 ? P ? T ? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 40
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number-
Permanent (P) or
Temporary 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ? P X T UTs to Laurel
Creek Temporary Dewatering total for
all wet pipes Streams 0.004
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts 0.004
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID 5b.

Proposed use or purpose 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no: '
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 5 of 11
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
- below. If an impacts re uire mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. ? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. ' 6e. 6f. 6g-
Buffer impact
number-
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream na me mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
?Yes
B1 ?P?T ? No
?Yes
B2 ?P?T ? No
?Yes
B3 ?P?T - ? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
All impacts are necessary to improve this roadway. All appropriate BMPs will be used during construction.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All appropriate BMPs will be used during construction
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation.
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ? No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact' 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
E. Stormwater Management and Ditfuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan

la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified j] Yes X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes - ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 40%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review

3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
El NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stonmwater management programs ? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HOW
4a . Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b . Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ? No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a . Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b . Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
I a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federallstate) land?
1b. If you answered "yes to the above, does the project require preparation of an
Y
® No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State es
?
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
d
d
S
? Yes
® No
ar
tan
s,
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in El Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered 'yes' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no,' provide a short narrative description.
paving an existing road
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a . Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
GIS and Visual Inspection
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
WRC will comment
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO
6. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ®No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? ncfloodmaps.com
J. Heath Slaughter AM& 6/29/09
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name pplicant/Agent's Sig ture Date
(Agent's nature is valid only if an authorizn letter from the applicant
. is provided.)
Page 11 of 11

It `' IZ;
Nt q
a " R?VEP Im I
ma ' ? I
1.
3.
2.
1. Upstream view at station 37+00 on SR 1123B, Laurel Creek Road, Watauga.
2. Downstream view from roadway at station 37+00.
3. Outlet view at station 37+00. This pipe is perched in very rocky terrain with a heavily
braided channel just down slope. Burial is not possible at this location.

PROJECT#: SRII23B J
o
a ? r ?-
F
rn o
, ?'_ ? to O
m
?eg a ., . e z Q s .a. 7y
rn
H
0
s,
iti?(# T qrq } t r?l?r{[i 'itir {??r t?'{{r ?? t ?{lf ? ? ? y v? ?
It 0
br {, if t { . !{ ? }#ti?{ ?1 r tit ® ? '=7 :?
1 q ? r ? ?3?r r kr{? 1 (1 [ tr :rrl .?' .?
it #ir1??{}{3[tlit{t? ?f }{ it z O
ipi[f[ [i#{ O x
`OZ r ® d >
• z
pt[{F6 {pf F p ? $ ? 0 RA??665 ?? C?u??p ad
fEQ0 ?se6G6 IF { A -1 8 ?I ?-] A ?i -1 _ -1 -1 ? 32
9
fl r k ? ?, :? oi!° ?
1 v: R
tF ;l o F : ? f ? o
r£ } ?i -1 ? 4 c JI ? 3
I l FFF? ?i{ ' m i g f
Ffff'ffir ?Pl e o
FFFFIf7 ,f{ ?' r I I } x x
F7fF.?.. ?

I C1 ?
? I

' ? 1

i
f '

g n
_
m
m
?c ?+

W
N

? x

N ?
H
V R
D e ? Z
n

? N
n ?

O
D n

N
z m
n
z

? ga D ? a
-
mT z o
n < z
y D

12 m m
m m
>
C a
n
m
00
tmi?N D
O o
0 N c
mm m
r
? m o n
a
n m
m
Z ?
~
m
a N O
D
O
C
D O
r c?
o c?
m a
a m
c
R
I
-1

e
> m
y
.
? ?
555
> t

m
m Z 1
g b

Q

O -
ti

n
O

h
?
G
? C

oO
?
z

z 00

x
CO)
x

o'

4

cw?
O

O

rro

Q

?
y
E
a

dd

n
m
Zr, . . _ rr
m?
o
i
i
' ' '
r r r ( l ? r r r C i
o
i m
? J ((]]11
O ? N O V J T O O
aa
?0
c V O V 0` V O 0` X 0 0 pZ
N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:
ti
c
J
O
A
V
N
J

?
a
O
V
?
V
-
O
0
N
0
N
o
ccnn
N
O
V
O
?
0
0
0
0
pp
cs O o N O O N O O O O x
a c
p P p A A A A A A A A A r ?
O?
a > w > m
A

N N N o 0 o N ? ?
(
j
0 0 0 0 N
N 11
(
N N O
o cc11??
0 ccnn
o m
N N

m

?
_
O
?
o
J
0?
N ?
mn
y
?
? o

? O d ? N m V
N (
.+ O V n
° N O ttnn -' O 0 0 0 0? 3i
A o o O N N 0 0 0 0
z
0
O
`
N
V
T
J
N
O
P
K J T m y
o
? V 0` J O? 0? O A S O a
? N o 0 o N N o N o i
w C

?
w A A A A A A A A A ?n
N y ? 71 -1 1 H
> a A >

ti
N N V N V - V N - N N t
s
J J O O - 0 ? D d J ? m
N N N N o o o o N o
7
0
» 'F
PP 00?
nnm
_ = N
m0
m Z
99v
z
0m,
M?c
m N N
zy
a?
iR
A
M m
C?
m
i
i
a
c c 3 o
m 3'?.?•X- 0c CD
C ID 7 N N N 0
_
o 7 m 0 m 0 7' 0
?? 7 n C
s1° is 3 a H a
N ? ? T S 7 w Q
J O 0 N. W
CD ° 0 0 3 H H
5 0 v
co q?? 0 a?
H- N v 3 o
a O O
CD
3 w o P O C o
D
W
O (D
W
N
Z4ZY+?3Nn ?1tlW
I
y
o
?o a zo
Z 0
m = / /
n
17+00
9 ?
&zo
m °
A
AON
D
oz
CA
N
rn
O A0

i
po
0
=r
ZZo
m -4X

m
``
N
? -
A Z

C D
m
oN
a
v ?
1

= Z h
m
m
L,
/8+00

N `0
0 S x
w
F
x /9+pp

w
? 20+00

n

I
'
21+OO
m
1
I
II

4t1TCHUNE•?3
*si
N '0 I
p ? x
V f.7 I
IJ W X
C4 y
,?3,100
Jill
jig
IN
?a?
3/+pp
3z+oo
UI
M A
Jill
sgiq
A
X0 -Z
(A L,
ozF-
m
O
v_p:,
C)
r Z T
Z X
m1p
2
m
po-
a
O?
m
v?
N
n_
xZ
r ?
Z=
mm

N
+ ? x am I
? W I
JJI
_ N '0 \
w m I
N m x `a
?' W I
I
I
I
I
I
E I
1
1
I
I
0
m ?V
.p a
v x Y?
j ? w o
w ?_ x
l w
L
m
de
Na
\4
1
a??l
4
45+p0
o
o
i o
z ti
Z
m m _
I 1 46+00
I j
1 /
lv
ti
a
ae
47'00 a_
v x
N
w
to
v? z
o'O
$g
o?
on
L£+ OS'dNfINo1W'1
koy.• y?
?r
?a
? O
c
.p e o
v X
w o
m x
Z y
A r O
Z .5'j?" 1
m Z
m
0 N w _ N 10 m 9
mO> /
5 F 0 v x
N r W
Jill V ()
€ v Z N w
ZZO ;? ., ? g??s4_.
m 2
m
10
vxx
W
?• w j
/ s
411 rCH4N / 3??a?^a? /; g
li
Sj ? 633
"a
Elm
WTCHLINE"63 + 72
54tpp
S
o m
c
? z
o
°
K
Z O
Z - 0
O
Z
z m m
6/22/2009
REV:6/22/09
STATION NEW
WATAUGA COUNTY SR 11236
LAUREL CREEK ROAD
EXISTING PIPE
PIPE CREEK
7+70 RETAIN 40'x 18"
10+65 45'x 18" 30'x 18" NO
13+80 45'x 18" 40'x 18" NO
19+00 45'x 18" 40'x 18" NO
22+85 45'x 18" 40'x 18" NO
27+65 45'x 18" 40'x 18" NO
31+00 50'x 18" 40'x 18" YES
34+45 50'x 24" 40'x 18" YES
37+00 100' x 36" 100' x 24" YES
39+50 40'x 18" 30'x 18" NO
43+70 40' x 18" - 40'x 18" YES
46+30 45'x 18" 30'x 18" NO
48+00 45'x 18" 30'x 18" NO
51+60 45'x 18" 30'x 18" NO
57+05 40'x 18" 30'x 18" NO
63+20 45'x 18" 40'x 18" NO
67+35 45'x 18" 40'x 18" NO
70+50 45'x 18" ADDITION YES
DOES NOT INCLUDE DRY DRIVEWAY PIPE
1'
2'
SEEP
DRIVE PIPE
CENTER LINE
STREAM NAME. LAUREL CREEK (INDEX 8-17)
RATING: C;TR
I' AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH
PROPOSED R/W
NEW EDGE PAVEMENT
- - - - EXISTING EDGE ROADWAY
?J NEW PIPE
t-?
J EXISTING PIPE
I- -
____-___--_-_r_
I a
EXISTING PIPE SIZE: 40' x 18'
NEW PIPE SIZE: 50'x 24 PIPE TO BE LAID ON A 900SKEW WITH 67 FALL
NOTE : TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES NOT SHOWN.
CONDUCTED BY. Al,GK,HR
DRAWN BY. GK
STREAM NAME: UN-NAMED TRIBUTARY OF
RATING: C;TR
2' AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH
PIPE TO BE LAID ON A 90 SKEW WITH 37 FALL
NEW PIPE SIZE. 100' x 36'
?L CENTER LINE
PROPOSED R/W
NEW EDGE PAVEMENT
- - - - EXISTING EDGE ROADWAY
-02-05 1 r----7 I NEW PIPE
LAUREL CREEK (INDEX 8-/7) L F-- -I J EXISTING PIPE

STA. 37+00
------ --------------------------
I 1 ?
11 -----------------------------?-
1
Q
------ -------------------------- Q
----------------------------- -

FX/ST/Nr P/PF S17F, 100' x 24'
NOTE: TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES NOT SHOWN.
SURVEY OA(t: 11111UD
CONDUCTED BY. AJ.GK.HR
DRAWN BY. GK
STREAM NAME: LAUREL CREEK (INDEX 8-17)
RATING: C:TR
SEEP
?L CENTER UNE
PROPOSED R/W
NEW EDGE PAVEMENT
- - - - EXISTING EDGE ROADWAY
NEW PIPE
r-?
?- J EXISr/NG PIPE
f- -l
------t------------------------------------ ----------------t--
PIPE
EXISTING PIPE SIZE: 40' x 18'
NEW PIPE SIZE: 40'x 18'
FALL -1
NOTE-TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES NOT SHOWN.
sUHvtr UAI t: I/II/UJ
CONDUCTED BY. AJ GK HR
DRAWN BY. GK