HomeMy WebLinkAbout20000846 Ver 2_Mitigation Site Visit_20090129
Date of Office Review:
Date of Report: .J~ c..
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
~/1q . Evaluator's Name(s): ~l .
rec:d ly..o/o~) Report for Monitoring Year: (2.008)
Evaluator's Name(s):
Date of Field Review:
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site: Five miles north of Liberty in southeastern Guilford County
I, Office Review Information:
,---
I Project Number: 20000846a
I
I Project Name: Causey Farm
i County(ies): Guilford
I Basin & subbasin: Cape Fear 03030002
i Nearest Stream: N, Prong Stinking Quarter Crk
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C; NSW
Mitigator Type: Private
DOT Status: non-DOT
Proiect Historv
I
I
:~~::~ate I
2/14/2007
2/512008
2/15/2008
2/19/2008
2/19/2008
12/10/2008
12/15/2008
Total Miti!:aation on Site
Wetland: 10.3 acres
Stream: 7670 linear feet
Buffer:
i'-'
I,Event
Report Review - Streams
i Report Review - Wetlands
I Report Review - Streams
I Report Review - Wetlands
i Site Visit - Wetlands
Site Visit - Streams
Report Receipt: Monitoring
Report Review - Streams
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
I ~~ ~~ . ~~ ------- ---~ -- ~ ~
Mitigation required on site: I *Add significant project-related events: reports,
I
Associated impacts (if known): : received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
-- - -- --.-- --.. ,.------- ~._-~_._-- ..._--.
- During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
- On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
1.------
Monitoring Success Success
Year (report) (field)
20000846a-1 10.3 acres Wetland Restoration
20000846a-2 7670 linear feet Stream
4
,
I
i
Resolved.
!
!
!
, Mitigation Component
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)
Page 1 of 2
- f......
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
, MlllGA liON SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007)
Page 2 of 2
...~
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
_ Saturated in upper 12 inches
I Monitoring report indicates success ~ No Drift lines
I Observational field data agrees? Yes No _ Drainage patterns in wetlands
I based on mitigation plan? Yes No _ Sediment deposits
L--- based on wetland type?n~:~ No Water marksn___._.Mn!
I List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g, remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.): 'lC:k4
ir~(.LC"(i) b2CYDj5~'O)~1-65%4>~~ "d
I 5 9o.....rae~ Q) q - "'" 0,. -'>cnl4 19~ "\)
"- 12.50/0
n.n"',. " _nu'..______~ .nnnn_ ..__,._____n___~_~__",______n~_.__n__nn_n...__'
Component: 10.3 acres Wetland Restoration Component ID: 20000846a-1
Description: NOTE: 6,3 acres wetland rest. not allocated to PTI (avail for other impacts)
Location within project:
III, Success Criteria Evaluation:
I HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria:
! Saturation within 12" for >= 12,5% of GS
l~______ _.,.
SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: na
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
l_
-----:
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria:
, 320/290/260 TPA in years 3/4/5
i
Dominant Plant Species
Species StOry TPA/% cover
Monitoring report indicates success? ~ No
Average TPA for entire site (per repo~
Observational field data agrees? Yes No I
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
!
I Vegetation planted on site? Yes No I
Date of last planting: i
~ Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No ~
, Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
!
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
I List any remaining vegetati~~~Ie:slto address (e,q. plant survival, concerns, etc.): l
i-pri\k:..+- In W~ ~ ~1- L~ lndi,,(~ ~V-E9 P Dt~D
I:,.~~~CJ~- --- - ..---:"'0'2
......
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
-----_______. -.-.------ .--- .-----...,'. __un,
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: I NCWAM Type on Site: !
na Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No _ Riparian
i Observational field data agrees? Yes No i _ Non-riparian (wetter)
i Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. L _ Non-riparian (drier) I
i List any remaining NCWAM issues to ~ddress (e.g. functionality, developing we~p;'-~tc.)~ - I
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is:
i List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
- During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
- Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations,
- Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1,0 (August 22, 2007)
Page 2 of 2