20030222 Ver 2_Power Point_20170510

Awl,
A�W'
wlt7 4.
VEW-Molkp
i -*7R " ...;r
r MM.
"AN
AL IL
14:
AW101,04pol 'M

USGS / Soil Survey Maps
z Source: Johnston County Landfill Variance Application

3
Jurisdictional Features Map
PmNny Boundary = NCDOT Parcel FEMA 100 Year Floodplain ' [nrermirw,
Eneil ily Boundary Properly Not Studied Zone I (Yr BufFcr) Pcrcnniai
Decd Breakatus YoredwWs Zrom Z (24' BuffcT)
X13 %'(' S7ainvida Aerial Pholaimlir
0 1
11
Source: Johnston County Landfill Variance Application
'
Source: Johnston County Landfill Variance Application

=Law w
am
i
r
AIP ? {
� jA{
f�GRI� ..oh If i
y=am ��'1`i- { - a � - _ _ rr• * }I
MS J4"Mt!
mow
�4 'I.
IA_M1f
.• � filtRl[r —'� fix` � I. .
�vraeig !Aced! . f W r 43Vh2APEC &
• .
�11KSF� i
49
'.L ' �! '�"• � '� +~ 'mux aeagc,.saa� } }
d1YRN,red f
r
i
6 ''• Y alPf +FIItFl r
UrAN4W SLOW
f
�`�� Landfill Ex ansion Plan

Proposed Landfill Expansion Site Plan
l' t.
tX
1 ' ~--�~'� yam.•<+ / /
0
d 5
_ °
.01 U
Ld°
LL.Z.
°
i
, o
I
Source: Johnston County Landfill Variance Application

Proposed Buffer Impacts
Zone 1 Permanent Impacts
22,046 ft2
Zone 2 Permanent Impacts
17,654 ft2
Total Permanent Impacts
39, 700 ft2
Source: Johnston County Landfill Variance Application

f�A
II s % %%J. L
1k. ('a" til
o.
If
1h
V
IS
maw" do
Lq JIP MW ;Avrr —
No Impact
Alternative Considered
67% loss of landfill capacity
Large portion of stream
watershed re-routed
Possible loss of stream function
Source: Johnston County Landfill Variance Application

Mitigation
Mitigation Required:
18,129
ft2
of Zone 1
Impacts x
3 =
14,380
ft2
of Zone 2
Impacts x
1.5 =
Total
54,687 ft2
21,570 ft2
75, 957 ft2
Mitigation required was adjusted to remove wetlands that will be
mitigated in accordance with 15A NCA C 02H. 0506.
Mitigation Proposal:
Buffer Credits from NC Division of Mitigation Services
75, 957 ft2
Department of Environmental Quality

Findings of Fact - (9) (a) (i)
Practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships are present:
A. Property was purchased for solid waste disposal.
Compliance with the Rule would result in a 67% reduction
in capacity, and no other practical alternatives are available.
B. Hardship from application of this Rule
C. Hardship is due to the physical nature of the property
D. Applicant has not violated the rule
E. Purchased property prior to the effective date of the rule
F. Property contains an existing MSW landfill with space
available for the expansion within an approved facility
boundary, which is unique to the applicant's property.

Findings of Fact- (9) (a) (ii) & (iii)
The variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the State's riparian buffer protection requirements and
preserves its spirit
• Propose to purchase 75,957 buffer mitigation credits from
private mitigation bank
In granting the variance, the public safety and welfare have
been assured, water quality has been protected, and substantial
justice has been done.
• State solid waste regulations for design and operation of
MSW landfills, buffer mitigation and stormwater
management ensure these requirements are met.
10

DWR Recommendation
DWR recommendation is that the Water Quality Committee grant
this major variance request.
If the Water Quality Committee approves this request, the
Division recommends approval with the following conditions or
stipulations:
• Mitigation
The applicant shall provide mitigation for the proposed impacts by
purchasing 75,957 buffer credits within HUC 03020201 from the Old
Savannah Nutrient Offset & Buffer Bank as indicated in their application.
• A final Site Plan including the Stormwater Management Plan is approved
by the Division of Water Resources prior to disturbance within the buffer.
• This major variance shall only apply if the USACE issues a Section 404
permit and the Division of Water Resources issues a 401 Water Quality
Certification for impacts to the stream and wetlands associated AL EEA�
with the subject buffers. ;=
11

Questions?
, .
i_�^_'