The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20170432 Ver 1_Bridge 110131 Burke Permit Application_20170411 (2)Corps Submittal Cover Sheet Please provide the following info: 1. Project Name:_Bridge 110131 SR 1258 Rose Creek Road 2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: NC DOT 9 3. Name of Consultant/Agent: *Agen[ au[horization needs to bc a[[ached. 4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): 5. Site Address: N/A 6. Subdivision Name: 7. City: Tablerock 8. County: Burke 9. Lat: 35.85020 Long: _ 81.78712 (Decimal Degrees Please ) 10. Quadrangle Name: _Oak Hill _ 11. Waterway: Simpson Creek 12. Watershed: Catawba River 13. Requested Action: X Nationwide Permit # 14 General Permit # Jurisdictional Determination Request _ Pre-Application Request The following information will be completed by Corps office: AID: Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date Authorization: � Section 10 � Section 404 Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose: Site/Waters Name: Keywords: _ �y.STATmoN , O : � c j a *s2,, ;3 :� �`- -�: �,;Wy c: r, +�; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPAR"1'MENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROY COOPBR GOVI�.RNOR April 1 l, 2017 Ms. Lori Beckwith US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Subject: Nationwide Permit #14 Bridge 110131, SR 1258 Rose Creek Road State Project No. 17BP.13.R.134 Burke County, NC Dear Ms. Beckwith: JAMESH.TROGDON,I❑ SF.CRETARY I have enclosed a set of plaus, a PCN application for NWP #14, and a vicinity map relative to the proposed bridge replacement project on SR 1258 Rose Creek Road, Burke County, NC. We propose to replace the existing 16'6" timber bridge with an aluminum box culvert (25'2"x 6'2") with low flow channeL Stream slope at the cidve�t site is 1.8%. Culvert installation will result in permanent impacts to 36 linear feet of Simpson Creek with an additional 50 linear feet of floodplain bench/stabilization. Temporary impacts to 90 linear feet of the stream are necessary for dewatering/diversion during construction. The stream is approximately 12 feet wide with predominately gravel aud cobble substrate. Russell Creek is classified as WS-III, Trout. Existing chamiel morphology will be maintained upstream and downstream of the culvert. Riparian vegetation will be reestablished along disturbed areas associated with the project. Stormwater will be dive�ted through grass-lined ditches or vegetated buffers prior to entering streams. This project may impact potentially suitable northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) (NLEB) summer roosting habitat via tree clearing. Following the SLOP�S from NWP Regional Condition 3.13, the project is located outside of a red HUC and a survey found no evidence of bat presence/usage at the site. No trees will be cleared for the project. No effect on the remaii�ing Burke County list of federally protected species (threatened or endangered) or desig��ated critical habitat will occur. Mniling Address: NC DEPARTMBNT OFTRANSPORTATION DIVISION THIRTEEN POST OFFICE 60X 3D9 ASHCVILLGNC 28802-3279 re�evna,�e� <szs� zs i� i� i Fnx:(828)251-6394 Q�smmer Sen�ice: 1-877368-49G8 {Vebstfe: www ncdotgov co�a�m,,. 55 ORANGF STREET ASHEVILLF,NC 28801-2340 Lari Beckwith Page —2 Bridge 110131, Burke County April 11, 2017 As a pa�t of the 401 Certification process, the project was processed through the DOT Programmatic Agreement for Minor Project as required by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and GS 121-12(a). No Historic Resources will be affected. These forms are attached for the Corps file. By copy of this letter, we request Marla Chambers, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Western Region Coordinator, to comment directly to the Corps concerning the permit request. By copy of this letter, we are asking the Area Roadside Field Operations Engineer, to comment on the above project. Simpson Creek is classified as trout. The project will not require a trout buffer variance. By copy of this letter, I am forwarding one electronic copy of the application package to Kristi Lynn Carpenter, NC Division of Water Resources, Teansportation Permitting Unit wiYh cc to Kevin Barnett, NC DWR Asheville Regional Office for review and comment. Please charge the application fee of $240.00 to WBS element # 17BP.13.R.134. Please forward comments directly to the Corps with copy to Division 13 Environmental Officer. Your earliest consideration for this request would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions or information needs, please contact me at (828) 251-6171. Sincerely, ��. � �,�-- Roger D. Bryan Division 13 Environmental Officer Enclosures cc: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E. Chris Medlin, P.E. Reid Whitehead, P.E., CPESC Kevin Barnett Marla Chambers Kristi Lynn Carpenter O�QF WATF9OG h � > o < Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit Corps: 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? X Yes ❑ No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes X No ❑ Yes X No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation X Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes X No below. 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes X No 2. ProJect Information 2a. Name of project: Bridge 110131, SR 1258 2b. County: Burke 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Tablerock 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 17BP.13.R.134 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if N/A applicabte): 3d. Streetaddress: N/A 3e. City, state, zip: N/A 3f. Telephone no.: N/A 3g. Fax no.: N/A 3h. Email address: N!A Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (If different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: North Carolina Department of Transportation 4b. Name: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E., Division Engineer 4c. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 55 Orange Street, P.O. Box 3279 4e. City, state, zip: Asheville, NC 28802 4f. Telephone no.: 828-251-6171 4g. Fax no.: 828-251-6394 4h. Emaii address: rdbrvanCcDncdot.gQ 5. AgentlConsultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: N/A 5b. Business name N/A (if applicable): 5c. Streetaddress: N/A 5d. City, state, zip: N/A 5e. Telephone no.: NIA 5f. Fax no.: N/A 5g. Email address: N/A Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.85020° N Longitude: - 81.78712° W 1c. Property size: 0.1 acres 2. Surtace Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Simpson Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-III, Trout 2c. River basin: Catawba 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Existing bridge on SR 1258 surrounded by nursery and forest. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 100 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Replace the existing 16'6" timber bridge with an aluminum box culvert (25'2" x 6'2 x 36') with 12' wide low flow channel. The channel configuration is shown in the plans. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: A permanent impact to 36 linear feet of Simpson Creek will be necessary for culvert installation with an additional 50 linear feet of impact for floodplain bench/stabilization activities. In addition, a temporary impact to 90 linear feet will be necessary for an impervious dike/diversion to dewater the work area during construction. Equipment used will include excavator, crane, and trucks. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NC DOT Name (if known): Roger Bryan Other: N/A 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. PJD completed by NC DOT on April 11, 2017 and submitted with this permit application. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes X No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Sb. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes X No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands X Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem ora T W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ WZ � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3 b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3 g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ❑ P X T Impervious Simpson Creek X PER X Corps 12 90 Dike/Dewatering ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Floodplain Bench/ X PER X Corps S1 X P❑ T Stabilization Simpson Creek � �NT ❑ DWQ 12 50 Aluminum Box X PER X Corps S1 X P � T Culvert Simpson Creek � INT ❑ DWQ 12 36 S2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 90 3i. Comments: 36 feet of permanent culvert impact, 50 feet of permanent floodplain bench, and 90 feet of temporary impacts for dewatering. The total project footprint is 90 linear feet. Page 4 of 10 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Tem ora T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total Sg. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T im act re uired? 61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 82 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 63 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Minimized length of culvert and has low flow channel within the structure to maintain natural stream bottom. Floodplain bench will be constructed to maintain stream channel stability. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. N/A 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for X Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ X Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this X Payment to in-lieu fee program project? ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. X Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 36 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool X cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes X No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes X No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? X Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The project will use BMP's to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) in compliance with NCDOT's NPDES Permit No. 000250 Post Construction Stormwater Program ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? X DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? N/A ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed X Other: N/A 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been N/A attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 X Other: N/A 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? N/A Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surtace Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes° to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � yes � No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? Field survey of the project area and evaluation of current distribution data. With regards to Northern long-eared bats, the project is located outside of a red HUC and the bridge was surveyed and no evidence of bat presence/usage were noted. No trees will be removed during construction. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? � Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? Current Maps/Database 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Current Maps/Database 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project will not impact water passage or flood zone beyond existing conditions 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Current FEMA Maps Roger D. Bryan —�� 4/11I2017 ApplicanUAgenYs Printed Name pplicanUAgS. Ys Signature Date (AgenCs signaWre is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. Page 10 of 10 Name: OAK HILL Map Center: 035.8519002° N 081.7855861" W Date: 04/10/17 Horizontal Datum: NAD27 e: 1 inch = 2,000 ft. i. �� .� '�� ' ,.� ,m � __.r �. � r � r Z �� J��7i r I81 � �/ /�� . � � - o 1�/� i �u/�; P �G.- .� t �� '�i �� o \i—% � ^ �� 1 � � / I ' \ ' • \ ' ro � �' � � ��. /// �� ' �i .'.\� � ��. �,rMh o ..iszc� � 1 ��N i, � � �� ( q� � � " � �i t Bi � _CenB'8� ^ � 5 1 �.� � , � %� 'i�� M � � i � � / � . � ``�.. - � � e�a � \ 1\ \ \�.. l� ...... ; � .. / \ ^�/ (_' 1J Il/ / �� ' \� �\� �� \J..` � / ' /�_.. ��J I. \ �`�0��. C% ^� \ % , 7\ -,..UT�9t��• /i ` �'•, .` J ✓I 20D:� � � Euk `V%'�-�. �� ' j �� %-�� i . b � �� l r� � .'V�� ., � � _ it ` // _ �� I(� �- � 1G9C. � / >> � � .-- Z � � \\_� ��j�'�C � r �—�:\ _ � �0� l � � id� ` � � � o 0 - . - / . J_� . `; � /) �o � II '�_ ��, i o i � � :. i i t % � , •�� w l� - �� / i � ' Ce tepf/, /// i,i ;� /i . ' E /� � �� !�� m � � � . , ` � � � �� no--,. .� - . � \_ �� ,I � . l , �v � A Creek �� ,'\� �.. j, ��L � ";� �` `� � � ., \\ , `- ' o _ � . -� � ; --- ✓�� - �✓ � �`_�� - — � � "l,� '�,_,`� \ ;I� / �-/_, �'`\� /Je Il�/^.� ,.. , oJ 'v z �-._ \� 11• V Q ,_ . . (LJ �/\ �f e_. G �.� o � �1� �,A , . �./� d _e-.� ` o �iii � � �� f i �l �11V1J1 \ � .♦ . - o � / N : j � ._ �,/�,�' J '.,e �� '1' ` � � , .., j ... '1/' 'i �/ � . . Q \-'___ �/ n� �� M \ ` t-�.�� :` l �i.., � �/ f \I�� _ i�zc � i `J �1 ! _'� � !� `n / � \,1 � ` / / /•'I � � .. �. �� / ) S r � '. � ' \ \ V � ', - � 1 � V I � �� . � . � ; �/ � �`B Pt � � � �A.__��Q 11 L- � � A I � l i_ 11 GGG / � ' / A �7 � � I � � V�� .� I . �y I � � � �� j� �A �� . .� V 1 � �� / �� 1r� ��izx�. � Z ' i i � '� o �' � � �'� . �� ; � � /� \. � o �2 0 � .. � � /L{ o ,��. �� ' � � _ I � � \�� .. ��. o �11� �i � . �i� �� .. � � � , � �•� � ��. �� m , .Tableroc �, ;!/ � �� ., � ( r� �_J' �9 \ JI �- 1 ` �� ' ; � � � �, � ;�f '� ` \ �� , , 1� � -� , ' � � , �, ��r � � i �� 3 n. , � ( o ��,, � �� ,� , ,„ �,�� ,— ' � �� 1`� i n _ �-�'�.: '� � i, o , � � ' „� �� '�� ( ��o� i v z � i' ' / � o . / J ), ' \\•---.� � a� o 1 ` � ` � / / ' �J -�� a�� , �- =��. o , � v, - K+ co �� n� c zoos M� S " osi.�s00000° w oai.�s00000° w oai.��00000° w SCALE 1:24000 N E o i000 z000 a000 a000 soao s000 FEET Figure 1. Bridge 330131, Simpson Creek above and below the bridge, Burke County, NC. � �- . ,� - ^ ,.� _ �. _ �' .fJt� p.h, ... Figure 2. Bridge 110131 Roadway and Structure photographs, SR 1258, Burke County, NC. r�l Environmenta! Qualrty ROY COOPER Governor Mr. Roger Bryan NCDOT Divisian 13 Environmental Supervisor North Carolina Depar[ment of TransportaCion Post O�ce Box 3279 Asheville, North Carolina 28802 Dear Mr. Allen: April S, 2017 Subject: Mitigation Accep[ance I.etter: Division 13 Project, Replace �ridge Number 110131 over Simpson Creek on SR 1258 (Rose Creek Road), Burke County; WBS Element 17I3P.13.R.134; DMS ID 24370 The purpose of this letter is to notlfyyou that the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Mitlgadon Seivices (NCDEQ-DMS) will provide the compensatory stream mitigation for the subject project. Based on fhe informa[ion received from you on April 5, 2017, the impacts are located in CU 03050101 of the Catawba River basin in the Northern Mountains (NM) Eco-Region, and are as follows: Catawba Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Fc) U3050101 Non- Coastal NM Cold Cool Warm Riparian Ri arian Marsh ��ne 1 Zone 2 impacts 3G.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 feet acres This impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2017 impact data. NCDGQ-DMS will [ommi[ to implement sufficient wmpensatory stream mi[igation credifs to offse[ the impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulamry agencies using the delive�y timeline lis[ed in Section F.3.c.iii of the In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. ff[he above referenced impact amounts are revised, then [his mitigalion acceptance lettcr will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from NCDGQ-DMS. If you have any questions or need additlonal information, please wntact Ms. Beth Hannon at 919-707-8420. Sincerely, � James B. tanfill Credit anagementSupervisor cc: Ms. Lori Becicwi[h, USACE �� Asheville Regulatory Field Office Mr. Christopher D. Medlin, P.E., Division 13 Bridge Maintenance Manager Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT - PDEA File: SR 1258 - Oridge 110131- - Division 13 �'�Nothing Compares � Stateo(NwthCarollna f EnvlronntenlfllQuallly 217Wes�Jone>Street I160I1.1ail5erviceCentcr I Raleigh,Nr�rthCarnlina]]69916UI 91Yl07P600