20061052 Ver 2_401 Application_20080808

SPA
.A.
Design Consultants
972 Trinity Road TEL [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 Vg FAX [phone]
Transmittal r (?
PAYW-SIT
Date: o8.11.2008 Job. No: 576-o5 DWQ Project # o6-1052 nn ,
To: NC Division of Water Quality - 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attn: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Re: PCN Application Packet for Springhill Subd, Lillington, Harnett Co., NC
Sending:
Attached
? Prints/Plans
RUC; ? s?. ?.()0$
? Other:
'fLPND5 At?O 57t7R1?%?0ATE+?
1f
Copies Date Description
5 07.31.2oo8 Application Fee ($24o, Chk# 322150), PCN Packet
Transmitted for:
? Your use ? Approved as submitted ? Resubmit ? Copies for approval
? As requested ? Approved as noted ? Submit ? Copies for distribution
? Review and comment ? Returned for ? Return ? Corrected prints
Remarks Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions.
? Under separate cover the following
via items:
? Shop Drawings ? Specifications ? Samples
SPAULDING & NORRIS, PA
0.
Planning + Civil Engineering • Environmental
July 31, 2008
Mr. Ronnie Smith
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Pre-Construction Notification Application for Springhill Subdivision
Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina
USACE AH)# 200600280
DWQ Project # 06-1052
Dear Mr. Smith and Ms. Karoly,
The proposed project is a residential subdivision located in Lillington, Harnett County,
North Carolina. We are reapplying for 401/404 permits to continue the development of the
project. Only a portion of the project, including several permitted impacts, was completed prior
to the previous 401/404 permit expiration.
Project Permitting History
Initial site concurrence was held on December 13, 2005 with Mr. Brad Shaver of the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wilmington Regulatory Office. A second site meeting was
held on January 17, 2006 with Mr. Ronnie Smith of the same office. A Jurisdictional
Determination was issued by the USACE on February 7, 2006.
A PCN application was submitted to the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) and
USACE on June 26, 2006. On July 5, 2006 the DWQ issued a Request for More Information. A
revised PCN application was submitted to the DWQ on August 8, 2006. The DWQ had
additional comments, issued on August 15, 2006. A final response was submitted to the DWQ on
August 28, 2006. The DWQ issued an Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with
Additional Conditions on August 30, 2006. On August 22, 2006 the USACE issued a comment
letter. The letter was sent outside of the 30-day completeness review period and the 45-day PCN
review period. On August 24, 2006, Spaulding & Norris sent a letter to the USACE stating that
their response fell outside of the review period and that the project was going to move forward
according to the information initially submitted to the USACE. On August 28, 2006, the USACE
issued a general Permit (Nationwide 39) Verification for the project.
Project Changes
Changes were made to the project in response to comments made by the USACE
following the original PCN submittal that were not addressed, due to the comments being sent
outside of the required USACE response time. There were three major changes resulting from
this revision:
Phone: [phone] ? Fax: [phone] ? 972 Trinity Road ? Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
1) The impacts at the three remaining street crossings were based on actual design
calculations done at each crossing. Road profiles are not available at these locations, but
the culverts and headwalls were sized and located. Permanent wetland impacts extend
three feet from the face of retaining and headwalls to account for the concrete footer that
is part of the wall and temporary impacts extend seven feet beyond the footer to account
for any necessary excavation or fill that might occur during construction. Following
construction, these temporary impacts will be returned to their original grade and over
time the soil and vegetation will return to wetland conditions.
2) The utility installation and easement impacts at Impact Areas #4, #5, #6, and #10,
which were previously approved by the DWQ as temporary impacts have been changed
to permanent impacts per the USACE. The policy of the USACE is that maintained
utility easements through forested wetlands are considered permanent impacts, even
though functional wetland hydrology, soils, and herbaceous wetland vegetation can
reestablish in these areas following the disturbance resulting from utility installation.
This change has resulted in a 5,315 sqft (0.1221 acre) increase in permanent wetland
impacts over the previously approved impacts.
3) The previously permitted utility installation and easement impacts at Impact Area #9
have been removed. We were able to relocate the sanitary sewer line to go around the
wetland.
Stormwater
This project drains to WS-IV waters and is subject to Town of Lillington Watershed
Protection Ordinances pursuant to NCGS 143-214.5. The project is classified as Other
Residential (Cluster) and meets the Low Density Option criteria. An approved Watershed
Protection Permit was obtained from the Town and is attached to this application.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding this
application.
Sincerely,
Shawn F. Guyer, P.E.
Spaulding & Norris, PA
Table of Contents
Pre-Construction Notification Application 1-12
Agent Authorization 13
Impact Summary Table 14
Building Product Impervious Coverage Calculations 15
Site Impervious Coverage Calculations 16
Town of Lillington Watershed Protection Permit 17
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdictional Determination 18-19
Expired U.S. Army Corps of Engineers General Permit 20-21
Expired NC Division of Water Quality 401 Water Quality Certification 22-25
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program In-lieu Fee Mitigation Payment Receipt 26
USGS Lillington Quad map - Project Site Indicated 27
USDA NRCS Harnett County Soil Survey - Project Site Indicated 28
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Data Forms 29-40
Attachments
WL-1.0 Springhill Subdivision - Impact Summary and Overall Project Layout
WL-2.0 Springhill Subdivision - Impact Areas 1-6
WL-3.0 Springhill Subdivision - Impact Areas 7-11
WL-4.0 Springhill Subdivision - Impact Area 12

Office Use Only: Form Version March 08
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide Permit #29
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information HE_'1,
Name: Springhill Associates LLC - A Keystone Co anu v? "
Mailing Address: 1207 Roseneath Road WETLMD
Richmond Virginia 23230
Telephone Number: 804.358.5768 Fax Number: 804.358.6976
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Shawn Guyer
Company Affiliation: Spaulding & Norris, PA
Mailing Address: 972 Trinity Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone Number: 919.854.7925 Fax Number: 919.854.7925
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Page 5 of 16

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Springhill Subdivision
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0549-77-2324.000
4. Location
County: Harnett Nearest Town: Lilling;ton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Springhill Subdivision
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
Traveling south on US-401, approaching Lillington, turn right onto North Main Street/NC-27
West. After the third stoplight, turn right onto West Old Road/NC-27 West. After
approximately 1.25 miles, site is on right (West) side of road.
5. Site coordinates (Lat/Long or decimal degrees): 35.38971 N, 78.83983 W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 146.226
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Poorhouse Creek (Stream ID 18-17.5 WS-IV)..;
UT to Indian Branch (18-20-26-1 WS-IV)
8. River Basin: Cape Fear Subbasin 03-06-07.03-06-13) [USGS HUC 030300041
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 16
O
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:
IV.
The site is comprised of approximately 5-10 year old cutover, mixed pines and hardwoods.
The several of the bottoms have some larger trees and are filled with Arundinaria gigantea
and Smilax. The site is bisected by Samuel McKoy Lane, a dirt road that leads to several
homes located to the west of the site. Parcels to the south of the site consist of agricultural
land and residential homes. North of the site are agricultural/residential areas, an automobile
junkyard, and an elementary school. Residential homes dominate the area to the east of the
site.
A portion of the site was developed prior to the expiration of the previous 4011404 permits.
Infrastructure and lots have been developed in Phase 1 of the project, adjacent to NC-27-
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project entails the development of a residential subdivision and the associated
infrastructure, including: roads, water supply, and sanitary and storm sewers. Equipment
used will include, but is not limited to trackhoe excavators, bulldozers, rollers, asphalt
pavers, and other grading and road construction equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
The purpose of the proposed work is to provide the necessary infrastructure to support a
residential subdivision of single family homes.
Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Initial site concurrence was held on December 13, 2005 with Mr. Brad Shaver of the US
Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Office. A second site meeting was
held on January 17, 2006 with Mr. Ronnie Smith of the same office. A Jurisdictional
Determination was issued by the USACE on February 7, 2006.
A PCN application was submitted to the DWQ and USACE on June 26, 2006. On July 5,
2006 the DWQ issued a Request for More Information. A revised PCN application was
submitted to the DWQ on August 8, 2006. The DWQ had additional comments, issued
on August 15, 2006. A final response was submitted to the DWQ on August 28, 2006.
Page 7 of 16

The DWQ issued an Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional
Conditions on August 30, 2006. On August 22, 2006 the USACE issued a comment
letter. The letter was sent outside of the 30-day completeness review period and the 45-
day PCN review period. On August 24, 2006, Spaulding & Norris sent a letter to the
USACE stating that then response fell outside of the review period and that the project
was going to move forward according to the information initially submitted to the
USACE. On August 28, 2006, the USACE issued a general Permit (Nationwide 39)
Verification for the project.
Prior to the expiration of permits in March of 2007, a portion of the project was
completed, including two wetland impact and a portion of a third indicated in the PCN
applications.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There are no future permit requests anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The proposed impacts include stream and wetland impacts resulting from utility
installation and installation of residential streets.
Two wetland impacts have been completed (Impact Areas #1 & #2) and a portion of a
third wetland area (Impact Area 43) was impacted prior to the 401/404 permits expiring.
Impact Area #3 is a residential street impact, the only portion of the impact completed
prior to the expiration of the permits was the installation of waterline necessary for the
development of Phase 1.
Page 8 of 16

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
es/no linear feet
Impact Area #1 Road grading &
[Permanent] storm drainage Forested No 1000+ 0.0340
Impact Area #2
[Permanent] Lot Fill Forested No 1000+ 0.0020
Impact Area #3 Road grading &
[Permanent] storm drainage Forested No 1200+ 0.1977
Impact Area #3 Road grading, storm
[Temporary] drainage & retaining Forested No 1200+ 0.0112
wall installation
Impact Area #4 Sanitary sewer
[Temporary] installation & easement Forested No 150+ 0.0360
Impact Area #5 Sanitary sewer

[Temporary]
installation & easement Forested No 150+ 0.0350
Impact Area #6 Sanitary sewer

[Temporary]
installation & easement Forested No 0 0.0398
Impact Area #7 Road grading & Forested No 0 0
0146
[Permanent] storm drainage .
Impact Area #7 Road grading, storm
[Temporary] drainage & headwall Forested No 0 0.0122
wall installation
Impact Area #8
[Permanent] Road grading &
storm drainage Forested No 150+ 0.0750
Impact Area #8 Road grading, storm
[Temporary] drainage & headwall Forested No 0 0.0214
wall installation
Impact Area #9 Sanitary sewer

[Temporary]
installation & easement Forested No 450+ 0
Impact Area #10 Water line installation Forested No 0 0
0113
[Temporary] & easement .
Impact Area #11 Road grading &

[Permanent]
storm drainage Forested No 300 0.0403
Impact Area #11 Road grading, storm
[Temporary] drainage & headwall Forested No 0 0.0075
wall installation
Impact Area #12

[Permanent] Lot Fill Forested No 750+ 0.0076

Total Wetland Impact (acres) Temporary: 0.0522
Permanent: 0.4932
Page 9 of 16
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: -9.25 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact t
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Impact linear feet acres
Impact Area #6
[Temporary] UT to Indian
Branch Utility installation Intermittent 1' 21 0.0005
Impact Area #7 UT to Indian Road grading & Intermittent 1' 28 0
0006
[Permanent] Branch storm drainage .
Impact Area #7 UT to Indian Road grading,
[Temporary] Branch storm drainage & Intermittent 1' 16 0.0004
headwall wall
Impact Area #10
[Temporary] UT to Indian
Branch Utility installation Intermittent 1' 22 0.0005
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) Temporary: 59 0.0014
Permanent: 28 0.0006
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the proiect:
Stream Impact (acres): Temporary: 0.0014
Permanent: 0.0006
Wetland Impact (acres): Temporary: 0.0522
Permanent: 0.4932
Open Water Impact (acres): N/A
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) Temporary: 0.0536
Permanent: 0.4938
Total: 0.4938
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): Temporary: 59
Permanent: 28
Page 10 of 16

7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Comprehensive measures were taken to avoid the wetlands located on the site and minimize
the impacts necessary to develop the site. These measures were applied as a whole to the
entire subdivision and on a smaller scale at individual impact areas. The layout of the
subdivision has changed several times in an effort to avoid the abundant wetlands on the site.
The changes included a complete realignment of streets and lots and redesign of the
preliminary storm drainage system to work around wetlands. Following these changes, the
majority of the wetlands on the site are located in Open Space areas and at the rear of lots.
Specifically, the changes reduced the wetland impacts at Impact Areas #3 and #5 by half and
completely removed a storm drainage easement through the wetlands near Impact Area #9.
The second round of plan changes resulted in the realignment of the street at impact Area #8
to cross the wetland at a narrow location. Similarly, the street at Impact Area #7 was
realigned to avoid the wetlands in that area. The sanitary sewer easement at Impact Area #6
was shifted outside of the wetlands where possible. Headwalls were included at each of the
street crossings to minimize the impact on the adjacent wetlands. A sanitary sewer line was
relocated and extensive grading was added at Impact Area #2 to reduce the impact to the
Page 11 of 16
7'
wetlands above the street crossing. Originally, the entire wetland area above the street was
impacted. Now, with headwalls and lot grading, the impact is minimal. Additionally, all of
the stormwater outlets in the subdivision were pulled back from wetlands so that outlet
dissipater pads would not encroach into the wetlands.
The third round of changes, following comment from DWQ, resulted in the realignment of
several streets and the removal of two residential street crossings through wetland areas. The
sanitary sewer line that was located in the street continues through the wetland, but the street
now ends in cul-de-sacs short of the wetlands on both sides.
A final round of changes was completed prior to the submittal of this application to address
comment made by the USACE following the original PCN submittal that were not addressed,
due to the comments being sent outside of the required USACE response time. There were
three major changes resulting from this revision:
1) The impacts at the three remaining street crossings were based on actual design
calculations done at each crossing. Road profiles are not available at these locations, but
the culverts and headwalls were sized and located. Permanent wetland impacts extend
three feet from the face of retaining and headwalls to account for the concrete footer that
is part of the wall and temporary impacts extend seven feet beyond the footer to account
for any necessary excavation or fill that might occur during construction. Following
construction, these temporary impacts will be returned to their original grade and over
time the soil and vegetation will return to wetland conditions.
2) The utility installation and easement impacts at Impact Areas #4, #5, #6, and #10,
which were previously approved by the DWQ as temporary impacts have been changed
to permanent impacts per the USACE. The policy of the USACE is that maintained
utility easements through forested wetlands are considered permanent impacts, even
though functional wetland hydrology, soils, and herbaceous wetland vegetation can
reestablish in these areas following the disturbance resulting from utility installation.
This change has resulted in a 5,315 sgft (0.1221 acre) increase in permanent wetland
impacts over the previously approved impacts.
3) The previously permitted utility installation and easement impacts at Impact Area #9
have been removed. We were able to relocate the sanitary sewer line to go around the
wetland.
These measures have reduced the permanent wetland impacts to less than 6% of the total
wetlands on the site.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, nutigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 12 of 16
'tip
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htmi.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
On September 20, 2007, $14,675.50 was paid to the NC Ecosystem Enhancement
Program's In-Leiu Fee Program as compensatory mitigation for 0.4713 acres of riparian
wetland impacts. The NC EEP charges mitigation fees in 0.25 acre increments, so the
compensatory mitigation fee was a based on 0.5 acres of riparian wetland impacts. The
revised riparian wetland impacts are 0.4932 acres. An increase of 0.0219 acres over the
originally permitted impacts, but still under the 0.5 acres for which compensatory
mitigation was provided. We do not believe that additional compensatory mitigation is
required.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o. enr. state. nc.us/wr_p/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page three and provide the following information:
Page 13 of 16

Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet Mitigation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total I N/A I I N/A I
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 14 of 16

3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
There is no existing impervious acreage on the site. The proposed impervious acreage
includes streets, sidewalks, driveways, front walkways, houses, and patios. The overall
estimated impervious acreage for the project is 22.6 percent of the total site area.
Detailed calculations of the proposed site impervious acreage are attached to this
application. The total proposed impervious acreage is 33.1 acres or 22.6 percent of the
total 146.226 acres. The impervious acreage breaks down as follows: 14.1 acres of street,
2.0 acres of sidewalk, 0.1 acres of Highway 27 widening, and 16.9 acres of lot
impervious area. The lot impervious area represents the proposed impervious acreage of
the average building footprint in the subdivision with the driveway, patio, and front
walkway included.
This project drains to WS-IV waters and is subject to Town of Lillington Watershed
Protection Ordinances pursuant to NCGS 143-214.5. The project is classified as Other
Residential (Cluster) and meets the Low Density Option criteria. An approved
Watershed Protection Permit was obtained from the Town and is attached to this
application.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated within Springhill Subdivision will be conveyed to the City of
Lillington Sanitary Sewer system and from there to an appropriate wastewater treatment
facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ® No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
Page 15 of 16

XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This project will not result in additional future development or future impacts to nearby
water quality. The project only provides access to adjacent parcels that already have
access to state roads.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
d?,3??
Applicant/Ate Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 16 of 16

Civil Engineering & Planning
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
ALLB .MKS TO BE FILLED IN BY CURRENT LANDOWNER
Name:
Address:
4<
Lj?
7
?. ? ?s Zee
Fes: (PC ?s? U Fax: s A71" 79
Finad Address
Project Nan=/Dcscrk*iou: Spring _HM Subdivision 1 Residential Subdivision
Department of the Army
US Arw Corps of Errs
Urdm igton District
PO Box 1890
VMmi gton, NC 28402-1890
Attn: Mr. Bred Shaver
Field O1Tim MMmmM F"reld Offx:e
Re: Wetlands Related Comilting & Pemdtrmg
To Whom It May Coamm
1, the currant property oww, hereby deeigante said and rze Spaulding dt Norris, P.A., to act on my
behalf as toy agent in the processing ofpcm& 8pplication; to finish upon request suppkmenW
h*nPwiansupport afapp[icatigr?s. etc., from this day forward. This the .?cl day of
This notification supmedes any previoas comspon cnee concerning the agent for this jest.
Mic,ka-,k Oelnndl- - f orkaC
PRINT Owner's Name PROPERTY Owner's Sigmt
Cc: Ms. Cyn g Ka oly
NCDENR--Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/ Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 MaR Service Center
Ral*A NC 27699-1650
Phony. 019) 854.7990 0 r m (919) 8547925 * 972 Trinity Read # Rntcigk Nord, Carolina 27607

Springhill Subdivision, Lillington, Harnett County, North Carolina
S&N Project # 576-05
Permanent Temporary Permanent Permanent Temporary Temporary
Impact Wetland Wetland Stream Stream Stream Stream
Area (ac) (ac) (ft) (ac) (ft) (ac)
1 0.0340
2 0.0020
3 0.1977 0.0112
4 0.0360
5 0.0350
6 0.0398 21 0.0005
7 0.0146 0.0122 28 0.0006 16 0.0004
8 0.0750 0.0214
9' 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 0.0113 22 0.0005
11 0.0403 0.0075
12 0.0076
Total: 0.4932 0.0522 28 0.0006 59 0.0014
1 - This impact was removed by relocating a sanitary sewer line.

Lot impervious area = building footprint+400 sqft driveway + 100 sqft walkway
Building Product Impervious Ar6a
Annadale 1980
Anniston 2176
Braxton4 1954
Buckingham 1785
Buckingham w/ garage 2225
Frederick 1942
Virginian 1464
Virginian w/ Garage 1778
Wynhaven 2102
Mean: 1934

Springhill Subdivision Impervious Calculations
Streets:
Impervious Street Impervious Impervious
Width Length Area Area
(FT) (LF) (SQFT) (ACRES)
80' ROW 35 225 7,875 0.2
60' ROW 34 1,890 64,260 1.5
50' ROW 34 15,893 540,362 12.4
Total Street Impervious Area: 14.1 ACRES
Sidewalk:
Impervious Street Impervious Impervious
Width Length Area Area
(FT) (LF) (SQFT) (ACRES)
80' ROW N/A
60' ROW 5 1,890 9,450 0.2
50' ROW 5 15,893 79,465 1.8
Total Sidewalk Impervious Area: 2.0 ACRES
Widenin
Total Widening Impervious Area: 3,998 SQFT
Total Widening Impervious Area: 0.1 ACRES
Lots:
Average Building Footprint with Driveway 1,934 SQFT
Total Number of Lots: 381
Total Average Impervious Area for All Lots: 736,854 SQFT
Total Average Impervious Area forAll Lots: 16.9 ACRES
Total Impervious:
Total Accumulated Impervious Area: 33.1 ACRES
Total Site Area: 146.226 ACRES
** Total Site Impervious Coverage: 22.6%
I)

r
1) A ake Om hz dqamoc ? be ? ? ?r s
,?? ? wd *s ? tbatb? 't ft
2) ju p must be camp" sled OUL
B# Adiressamcmt€m pim # w asp' sf at OF ttaw z? lfff3-r*' OF 'vRcsl- 8 4 ts.k `
7,on!M Prupcrt r. JU7A.-A jig R U C1 K IC-2, L C 3 U l -UPry m ax a 5 .•. .? 3 7-
t pro"Lbw try Ot aftactmr=
AWO$cd Uxe idpj4jj%V,Bdlftggr ftWUM St -F-A)I{tt-l' ' (? ErtttL?m suabiyis?ONS
Pray rDwad WiUm a Fluu? _ Yin v- NO
r
Tatar b t a ; -Ml At,
TQt d b id tf ici icy TOW adop of Lit OR 21-c0%
L "F9C M O)wUirf US's n u , rm- Dmd%wt Amw, oct ar M.. h w)mw
u j"
Nalm:

Tom Eolb"m
2. ONMft M OP FRt)PFRTYrLfDi&rW m rA PPUM Ot-
w ww - ? f
A.dd ! lZt?S tvArt+ t?arlt> 'Z Ala 2 2?S
Y hm-a iy cep the all tb t appfimodm i9 to # but ctf wh4?&
TJ
4qj?A"RaVW
Ej D_
& Ad trzbm
- offim vat 0* .
C0104-HR.
D ,
tIA ME-lud NOA-s -ni-E -7n waL
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 200600280 County: Harnett U.S.G.S. Quad: Lillinaton
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Mr. Jim K. Sherron Agent: Spaulding and Norris, PA
Address: 408 May Court attn: Shawn F. Guyer
Raleigh, NC 27609 972 Trinity Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone No.: 919-881-0070 919-854-7990
Property description:
Size (acres) 145.92 Nearest Town Lillinaton
Nearest Waterway Indian Branch River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030004 Coordinates 35.38900N. 78.84350W
Location description The site is located 1.25 miles west of Lillinaton off Hw y 27 at the terminus of Samual McKoy
Road adjacent to an unnamed tributary of Indian Branch Harnett County.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property . subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The wetlands on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been partially verified by the Corps. We
strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the
Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regut?'ions, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
X The wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on February 7. 2006. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at [phone] to determine
their requirements.
Page 1 of 2

NOTIFICATION OF ADMIMSTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS LLIID
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
; k

Applicant: Mr. Jim Sherron File Number: 200600280 Date: 2/7/2006
Attached is: D See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of A
_permission)
PROFFERED `PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
X APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision. Additional information may be found at htt_D://www.usace.q=.niil/inet/functions/cw/cecwo/reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return
the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of
the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your
letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your
concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having
determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the
district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and
conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal
Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must
be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200600280
County: Harnett USGS Quad: Lillington
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: Springhill Associates, LLC Agent: Spaulding & Norris, PA
Address: 1207 Roseneath Road attn: Shawn Guyer
Richmond, VA 23230 972 Trinity Road
RaleiLyh, NC 27607
Telephone No.: 804-358-5768 919-854-7925
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The 145.92 acre tract to be known as
SprinLyhill Subdivision is located 125 miles west of Lillington off Hwy 27 at the terminus of Samual McKov Road
adiacent to an unnamed tributary of Indian Branch, Harnett County.
Description of projects area and activity: The project will impact 0.4713 acres of jurisdictional wetlands for
subdivision infrastructure.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: NW-39
SEE ATTACHED SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND NATIONWIDE CONDITIONS.
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans signed 6/26/2006. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your
submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified,
reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a
public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the
date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or
revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit. K prior to the
expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid
until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all new and/or modified terms and conditions. The District
Engineer may, at any time, exercise his discretionary authority to modify, suspend, or revoke a case specific activity's authorization
under any NWP.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Brad Shaver at 910-2514611.
Corps Regulatory Official Date: 8128/2006
Expiration Date of Verification: 3/18/2007
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit bq://www.saw.usace.g=.milAVETLANDS/index.html to
complete the survey online.
Copy Furnished:
NCDENR-DWQ attn: Cyndi Karoly 1601 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
NCDENR-DWQ attn: Ken Averitte 225 Green Street Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301-714

Springhill Subdivision
Harnett County
AID# _200600280_
Special Conditions:
1) In order to compensate for impacts to 0.4713 acres of wetlands the permittee shall make payment to the
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NC EEP) in the amount determined by the NC EEP,
sufficient to perform the restoration of 0.4713 acres of riparian wetlands in the Cape Fear River Basin,
Cataloging Unit 03030004.
Construction within jurisdictional areas on the property shall begin only after the permittee has made full
payment to the NC EEP and provided a copy of the payment documentation to the Corps, and the NC EEP
has provided written confirmation to the Corps that it agrees to accept responsibility for the mitigation
work required, in compliance with the MOU between the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, dated November
4,1998.
Corp Regulatory Official &J I Date 8/28/2006

r) F yV A T
0
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
~ Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 30, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-1052
Harnett County
Springhill Associates, LLC
1207 Roseneath Road
Richmond, VA 23230
Subject Property: Springhill Subdivision
Poorhouse Creek/UT to Indian Branch, [030607, 18-17.5, WSIV]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Sir or Madam:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 0.5047 acres wetland (0.3272 acres permanent impacts,
0.1775 acres temporary impacts), and 69 linear feet of intermittent stream (26 linear feet
permanent impacts, 43 linear feet temporary impacts), to construct the proposed residential
subdivision at the subject property, as described within your revised application dated August 8,
2006, and received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on August 8, 2006, with more
information received August 30, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have decided that
the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3402 (GC3402). The
'Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW39, when issued by the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any
other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but
not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and other regulations. Also, this
approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as
depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is'for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 oversght/Express Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
NK)Dem
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
3
Page 2 of 4
August 30, 2006
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
Conditions of Certification:
L Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification. (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved nits Plan Location or Reference
404/Wetland 0.5047 [(acres) 0.3272 acres permanent PCN page 9 of 15
impacts, 0.1775 acres temporary impacts]
Stream - 69 [(linear feet) 26 linear feet permanent PCN page 10 of 15
intermittent impacts, 43 linear feet temporary impacts]
2. Sediment and Erosion Control
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North
Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina-Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures
and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
3. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the 404/401 Permit Application. All
construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control.Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur;
4. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands
and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six
months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project;

Page 3 of 4
August 30, 2006
5. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning
fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe
within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance
with 15 NCAC 2H, Section.0500;
6. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional
wetlands, waters and protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland,
water and buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any
wetlands, waters and/or buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and
Authorization Certificate. A sample deed notification can be downloaded from the
401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands. The text of the sample
deed notification may be modified as appropriate to suit to this project;
7. Construction Stormwater Permit NCGO10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of
Land Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program,
an NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically
issued to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land
disturbing construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is
covered by this permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres],
full compliance with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self-
monitoring, record keeping and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit
and monitoring report forms may be found at
&W--Ah2o. enr. state. nc. us/su/Forms;Documents. htm.;
8. Certification of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return
the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of
Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters
as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or LAMA Permit.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this
Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.

Page 4 of 4
August 30, 2006
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-1786 or Ken Averitte in the DWQ Fayetteville Regional
Office at 910-433-3300.
S* erely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/Um.
Enclosures: GC3402
Certificate of Completion
cc: Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
File Copy
Central Files
Shawn Guyer, Spaulding & Norris, P.A., 972 Trinity Road, Raleigh, NC 27607
Filename:061052Spring ISD(Hamett)401
(2)
r NO-
-dl;j
kOtem
EarC
m
ffit
_ PROGRAM
RECEIPT
September 20, 2007
Springhill Associates, LLC
1207 Roseneath Road
Richmond, VA 23230
Project: Spring Hill Subdivision
County: Harnett County
DWQ#: 06-1052
COE#: 200600280
EEP #: ILF-2006-4658
Amount Paid: $14,675.50
Check Number : 308399
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) has received a check as indicated above as payment for the
compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification/Section 404/CAMA Permit(s) issued for the
above referenced project. This receipt serves as notification that your compensatory mitigation requirements associated with
the authorized activity as specified below have been satisfied. You must also comply with all other conditions of this
certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this activity.
The NCEEP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCEEP is responsible for the compensatory mitigation
requirements associated with the project permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the NC Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the US Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998, as indicated below.
River Basin Stream Credits Wetland Credits Buffer I & 11
CU (linear feet) (acres) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Ri arian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Cape Fear 0 0 0 0.4713 0 0 0
03030004
Please note that a payment made to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is not reimbursable unless a request for
reimbursement is received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Any such request must also be accompanied by letters
from the permitting agencies stating that the permit and/or authorization have. been rescinded. If you have any questions or
need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Brad Shaver, USACE- Wilmington; Thelma Hemmi
Ken Averitte, NCDWQ- Fayetteville
Shawn Guyer, agent
File
Resto?i.?t9... .. protect OGf.Y
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
XWilliam D. Gi ore, PE
Director
ngway- Wilmington
.f??P?
SIC[ R
6Lfr. ';
r fq ? s ? ?? cK"?`f s -_?. ? ?'• ,fir Vi' (jF 7: '1 .. oy? QIk -f <
?• .. .. % r, ., ? -si '?4 t• ? L mil, ?f N } V
CD 161
r .1 ' 1,? B• :}.•ir \?: •?"fit ?'. 2? Oo
I- w
`l.r ?? Fes` .j)t?' i ?' •r •? " .?` .•? o _ ; /: ?, ?:.? i_?,? °?N ? ?- _,\?' '- o
} ? ; '•, j y t ?r t ? ? s `?..,.. ?I • • lam. f ' •?. M t S °. +3 N r
r i ` 1 ? .•f Ltr?EEi ?tt?x,,r °\ ° • y'? ? f t }? ,'. ;" 0.? ?67 • ? -tl ?...
3 1 '?' j i ee ,; `j ? t ?/' ! - \ •" ?? T tC ?^-'\.`-?/ ? tf!" • r r s _ ? ?••'-. ` f ? _,, l ? $ ~
1 Jr
? "'?>7 ' `??? •J i ?~ *>? tt.t ?.rJ?\ ` ??'`?.? " ,? ?`?l ) ?/?'at+.. 1?, ? 1 a?_•?J t ?!'• (. A?.?-. t l E
`yy err `lz ? '' a .t ??'•-,w a I':`r ; i_.i??l ?\.,?.•1J ?{t •:, ../ ' '\ ? ? --RJ ? , n
? \• ', Y ?? i- - .-.-- - -( ?'t ` J? (J C ? s? 'lf i'r 1 f 41 • S
"•\\{ ." tt .? f 1 (!1r t `\i-,\ « t _ v \ .?/-yl e f L.'-`' f t ',? ` ?•?"'`, , ? Y .! J +t b a
?? ?! '.`.: {. ?; • • ?,? i F ?; ? t t? 1?.?'?!',/?? ? `t'/??}? .(?i " ?? ? •.,??;• ` ?? J \ ,..1 i I r`??-_-ti?? t ? x (n
err f'i ??? r .._? ! t r ?_• ? :\l\ ??J . ti" (??}?\, t \ ..,? + ° ti.., f / ? f /i p z ° ?
s ° r fig y ? o ^\?':,t., ?7? J' ? ? t\`'• „?, ???'. `_ ,? ? ? > 'y }
re -
tOye+ J , ?.`?l ..e?'11?• L ?\ w l-? \ t ?} ? ?: Ry?4 `` ?? ` / / , '? i) to
1je
IV co
' ••. _ Yr ?f3 F ?`\Q `'? tt((( ..? o t "'rJ ?\ ` ?` ` ...? ^M1 ? '3 p r GJ O
]\ 1 ?? .I ??RQ 4` 'r"... .....? J r,.. \\ 1 t 1 \ .YJl?rtsrasf.? O p N V r?•1
` { v1 or\' rt\_ !•,4 ?. J h ti ?,} J g N c M $_ j2 a
.'5 v a
L
33?. / _ _. /'. \? t ?• ...1:, *S,o?'y° >`7CiFC r • l t T W G E C b c
C4 E
.! ? •7(• .` \\C' r`- _'_ i i" tiw'.:\ / ? a • 4 1 r ? %`/` ,3,? E ? O ? ? Z'
. tl tit i/•? \ 1?t, _? ;`? t1 _y ?\? r l:t ? { J'' l,i f _,.' W Vf ? Y' ? ? ? v
r 1 \`??-?±• t, !' /J?r , J/ ' ?' ?j? O to L _m o
m Y ?• ' a'. .?S
CIO,
4 , t' - '` e e u ?' ?f1CQa/ \ t, = C? o ° •+ (?cj c c u
Y
8 W R - .-. . { An
3 M n ''L
N
N 0
c•/ ~O
- ?? p

5000 4000 3000 9 1000 0
U S• f?epartrnent of Agriculture,
aild cooperating agencies on 1973 1 .s
'wined from 0
U.S. Department of
MONETT c*JWr SW L SURVEY
SKEET Js
(Joins sheet 11)
50
1
Scale - 1 :24 000
HARNETT CGIJN i-V r; ;Jf2lI I CAPC)LIN

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner: ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? RYes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes RNo ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes RNo lot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Liquidambar styraciflua TR FAC+ 9. Liriodendron tuliplfera SS FAC
2.
Pinus taeda TR FAC 10. Arundinaria gigantea HR FACW
3.
Acer rubrum TR FAC 11. Smilax rotundifolia . VI FAC
4. Lquidambar styraciHua SS FAC+ 12.
5. Pinus taeda SS FAC 13.
6. Acer rubrum SS FAC 14.
7. Comus florida SS FACU 15.
8. Vaccinium co mbosum SS FACW 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC- . 91%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): W
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other etland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines

? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology not present.
?, 1-
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Motile Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-10 A 2.5Y 4/3 Sandy. Loam
10-16+ B 2.5Y 5/2 - - Sandy Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfxlic Odor ? Organic streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils not present.
wt I LAND UETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? , ?Yes ?No (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?Yes ®No
Hydric Soils Present? ?Yes ONo
Remarks Upland above "Wetland B" - Rainfall occura
drought conditions. Data collection above flag 8-10.
(Check)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Welland? ?Yes EDNo
Within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - moderate
Approved by HQUSACE 3192
Forms version 1/02
y
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjectlSite: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner: ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer -tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ®No ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ONo lot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1 ' Liquidambar styracif/ue TR FAC+ 9. Smilax rotundifolla VI FAC
2'
Pinus taeda TR FAC 10.
3. Quercus phellgs TR FACW- 11.
4. Quercus nigra TR FAC 12.
5. Cornus amomum TR FACW+ 13.
6' Lquidambar styraciflue SS 'FAC+ 14.
7. Pinus taeda SS FAC 15.
8. Arundinaria ' antea HR FACW 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
( excluding FAC- . 100%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present.
HYDROLOGY
R
d
d D
ecor
e
ata (Describe in Remarks): Welland Hydrology Indicators:
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
? Aerial Photographs ? Inundated
Other ? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® N
o Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Although it rained 48 hours prior to investigation, soil surface was primarily dry resulting in a lack of current indicators.
Gj 1
snII s
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Muhseil Moist) SizelContrast Structure, etc,
0-3 A 2.5Y 4/2 - - Clay loam
3-16+ B 2.5Y 4/1 7.5YR 5/6 5% Clay Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? SuUidic Odor ? Organic streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils present.
wt`'[ L.ANU UETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes ?No (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes ?No
Hydric Solis Present? Was []No
Remarks "Wetland B" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hi
conditions. Data collection above flag A-1.
(Check)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ®Yes ?No
prior to data collection, mild - moderate drought
Approved by HOUSACE 3192
Forms version 1/02
;1
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
ApplicanttOwner ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer late: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ®No ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ®No lot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1 ' Liquidambar straciNua TR FAC+ g. Quercus rubrum SS FACU
2.
Acerrubrum TR FAC 10. Ilex opeca SS FAC-
3. Quercus alba TR FACU 11. Arundinaria gigantea HR F_ CW
4. Quercus rubra TR FACU 12.
5. Sassafras albidum SS FACU 13.
6. Lquidambar styraciflua SS FAC+ 14.
7. Acer rubrum SS FAC 15.
8' Quercus alba SS FACU 16:
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC- . 45%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation not present.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data Describe in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other Welland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines

? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water to Pit: 0 (in El Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology not present.
?3
snit s
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:.
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? 0Yes ? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) SizelContrast Structure, etc,
0-6 A .2,5Y 4/4 - Sandy Loam
6-16+ B 2.5Y 616 - - Sandy Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Sods
? Sutfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil not present.
INL 1 L,ANU UETLRMIINA
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ?Yes ®No (Check) (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? 0Yes ®No
Hydric Sods Present? []Yes ®No is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ?Yes EDNo
Remarks Upland above "Wetland D" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - mode
drought conditions. Data collection above flag D-38.
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
Forms version 1/02
ql
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner: ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer fate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ONo ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ONo lot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.
Acerrubrum TR FAC 9. Vaccinium Corymbosum SS FACW
2.
Pinus faeda TR FAC 10. Comus Amomum SS FACW+
3.
_ Liriodendron tulipifere TR FAC 11. Sassafras albidum SS FACU
4. Lquidambar straciflua TR FAC+ 12. Arundinarla gigantea HR FACW
5. Acerrubrum SS FAC 13. Woodwardia Areolata HR OBL
6' Lfriodendron tulipifere SS FAC 14. Smilax rotundifolia VI FAC
7' Quercua a/ba SS FACU 15.
8. Prunus serotina SS FACU 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
( excluding FAG J. 79%
Remarks: Hydrophilic vegetation present.
HYDROLOGY
? Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other eband Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines

? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >14 fin.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Although it rained 48 hours prior to investigation, soil surface was primarily dry resulting in a lack of current indicators.
3
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? DYes D No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (MuriseA Moist) (Munsell M oist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-4. A 2.5 Y 313 - - Loamy Sand
4-14+ B 2.5 Y 5/1 - - Loamy Sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulridic Odor ? Organic streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Low chroma soils present.
DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes DNo (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes []No
Hydric Soils Present? Wes DNo'
Remarks "Wetland D" - Rainfall occurred within 48
conditions. Data collection between flags D-32 and
(Check). .
this Sampling Point Within a Welland? EYes ?No
iorto data collection, mild - moderate drought
Approved by HOUSACE 3192
Forms version 1/02

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Pro)ecttSite: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
Applicant/Owner: ounty: Harnett
Investigator: Shawn F. Guyer tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ®No ransect ID:
is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ONo Plot ID:
If needed explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.
Acerrubrum TR FAC 9. Ulmusamericans SS FACW
2. LquidambarWraciNua TR FAC+ 10. Vaccinium corymbosum SS FACW
3.
Pinus taeda TR FAC 11.
4. Ulmus americana TR FACW 12.
5. Acer rubrum SS FAC 13.
6. Lquidambar styraciflua SS FAC+. , 14.-
7. Quercus alba SS FACU 15.
ti. Pinus taeda SS FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
( excluding FAC- . 90%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other eland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No Recorded Data Available ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines

? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 14+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology not present.

SOILS

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? DYes ? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
Cinches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell M oist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-4 A 2.5Y 4/4 - - Loam
4-14+ B 2.5Y 6/6 - - Loamy Sand
Hydric Sod Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon
? ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Sods
Sulfidic Odor
? Aquic Moisture Regime ?
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Li
t
d
L
l H
"S

? on
s
e
oca
ydric
oils List
Reducing Conditions
? Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ?
? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Oth
E
l
er (
xp
ain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ®Yes []No (Check) (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes ®No
Hydric Sods Present? ?Yes ®No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ?Yes ®No
Remarks Upland above "Wetland I!'- Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - mod(
drought conditions. Data collection above flag L-16.
Approved by HOUSACE 3/92
Forms version 1/02
CY)
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
ProjectlSite: Weeks Property ate: September 23, 2005
ApplicantlOwner: ounty: Hamett
Invest ator: Shawn F. Guyer tate: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ®Yes ?No ommunity ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ?Yes ®No ransect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ®No lot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.
Acerrubrum TR FAC 9. Oxydendrum arboreum SS NI
2.
Pinus taeda TR FAC 10.
3.
Acer rubrum SS FAC 11.
4. Pinus taeda SS FAC 12.
5. Vaccinium corymbosum SS FACW 13.
6. Smilax rotundifolia VI FAC 14.
7. Arondinaria igantea HR FACW 15.
8. N ssa s lvatica Ss FAC . 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAG). 89%
Remarks: Hydrophytic vegetation present.
HYDROLOGY
R
d
i
ecor
ed Data (Descr
be in Remarks):
Stream
Lake
or Tide Gauge Welland Hydrology Indicators:
P
I
i
,
,
? Aerial Photographs ma
r
? ndicators:
ry
I
d
t
d
? Other ? nun
a
e
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No R
d
d D
t
A
ecor
e
a
a
vailable ? Water Marks
? Drift Lines

? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 16+ (in.) ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Although it rained 48 hours prior to investigation, soil surface was primarily dry resulting in a lack of current indicators.
34
E~-1e7TC?

ap Unit Name
[(Series
and Phase): Drainage Class:.
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? ?Yes ? No
Profile Descriptions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsel Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc,
0-5 .. A 2.5Y 4/1 Loam. .
5-16+ B 2.5Y 5/1 - - Sandy Loam
Hydric Sol Indicators:
? Histosoi ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon
? ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Suffidic Odor
i
? ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aqu
c Moisture Regime
? R ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
educing Conditions
® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colas ?
? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Oth
E
i
'
er (
xpla
n
in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soils present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wes QNo (Check) (Check)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes ?No
Hydric Soils Present? Wes ?No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? SYes ?No
Remarks "Wetland L" - Rainfall occurred within 48 hours prior to data collection, mild - moderate drought
conditions. Data collection between flags L-4 and L-16.
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
Forms version 1/02