20081167 Ver 1_Application_20080730

TAL M" & B-PIGHT
July 28, 2008
Ms Kim Garvey
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington NC 28402
RE: New Hanover County Airport Authority
Wilmington International Airport
Fence Line and Channel Repairs
0 8 1 1 6 7
opy
TBI No. 3301-0703
Dear Ms Garvey:
Enclosed please find the PCN application package for NW Permit 3 coverage for the referenced
project. The project is needed to restore the integrity of the airport's security perimeter, stabilize the
channel banks in the vicinity and restore hydraulic capacity. Thank you for taking the time to discuss
the project with Sam Cooper, Steve Beck and myself. As you know, the airport hopes to proceed
quickly with this repair work. An expeditious review would be greatly appreciated.
By copy of this letter, we are forwarding courtesy copies of the PCN package to Cyndi Karoly and
Chad Coburn of DWQ. It is our understanding that formal notification is not required for coverage
under WQC #3624.
If you have any questions on this matter, please call.
Yours ,,
<- -1?1
f'. Eric M. Stumph, E.
C (w/encl.): Ms Julie Wilsey, ILM
Ms Cyndi Karoly, DWQ
Mr. Chad Coburn, DWQ
Mr. Steve Beck, CZR
ENGINEERING & PLANNING CONSULTANTS
Lei l`_'7 R! 0 V rLEM
JUL S 0 2008
Dbi R - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
WWW.TALBERTANDBRIGHTCOM
4810 SHELLEY DRIVE WILMINGTON, NC 28405 910.763.5350 FAX [phone]
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA • CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA • RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
-ice
U
kr?

0

N
?
?3a

.
O
O ? U

C
?' O
'
0 ? O
O

C
00
U °o0)
O 0 E
? _ O
O O O

€
? x N ?
a
O O

N ' '-' N O

N dam, I?
[d3

?
^C . rr
r
7:1

o

w
a?
U
o.a
J
43
n
pCL
u
n
?r + Yy J n
Office Use Only: Form Version March 08
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 08 1 1 6 7
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing COURTESY
Copy
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project.
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3, WQC #3624
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: @f9 V L5
II. Applicant Information jU? 3 0 2008
1. Owner/Applicant Information DENR.WATER,QUAUTY
S AND STORMWATER BRANCH
Name: New Hanover County Airport Authority/Ms. Julie Nay
Mailing Address: Wilmington International Airport
1740 Airport Boulevard, Suite 12
Wilmington, NC 28405
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. Eric Stumph
Company Affiliation: Talbert & Bright, Inc.
Mailing Address: 4810 Shelley Drive
Wilmington, NC 28405
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: (910 762-6281
E-mail Address: estumph(a),tbiilm.com
Page 5 of 13
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Fence Line and Channel Repairs, Wilmington International Airport
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): R04200-001-025-000
4. Location
County: New Hanover Nearest Town: Wilmington
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Site is within Airport Security
perimeter. Proceed to Airport offices, on the second floor of the airline terminal to arrange
escorted access. Follow 23rd Street north from MLK Jr. Parkway (US74) to Airport
Boulevard.
5. Site coordinates (Lat/Long or decimal degrees): 34.2799°N 77.9059°W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 1620.8 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Smith Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear.
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The project site is the Wilmington International Airport.
The total airport area is 1600+ acres with 279 acres impervious/built-upon. Land use outside
the property boundary is residential with some agricultural and commercial.
Page 6 of 13
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Repair of the fence line/drainage channel crossing located northeast of the runway
intersection at the airport. The channel and bank lines have eroded. A reconstructed fence
crossing complete with bank and channel stabilization is necessary Typical construction
equipment is expected to be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The reconstruction and stabilization is needed to
restore channel stability, airport security and discharge capacity. The design will facilitate
routine maintenance and security check efforts. This is a safety and security project.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. No permits have been requested for this project.
The following Jurisdictional Determinations have been made since 1999 at the Wilmington
International Airport:
200200962 6/9/2003
200400216 1/23/2004
200400807 5/26/2004
200400951 9/14/2004
200401259 9/29/2007
200500605 10/17/2005
The following projects at the airport have involved USACE Actions:
(A) Airfield Drainage Rehabilitation Phase I (complete)
- Issuance of NWP 3 (Action ID 199901525, 20 August 1999)
- Water Quality Certification 3127
(B) Airfield Drainage Rehabilitation Phases IIIA, IIIB and IV (complete)
- Issuance of "No Department of Army Authorization Required" (Action ID 200300399, 11
February 2003)
(C) Runway 35 Approach Clearing (complete)
- Issuance of "No Department of Army Authorization Required" (Action ID 200001610, 22
September 2003)
(D) Airfield Drainage Rehabilitation Phase II (complete)
- Issuance of NWP 18 (Action ID 200100810, 29 June 2001) for fill of 0.01 acres of
wetlands (no mitigation required)
- Water Quality Certification No. 01-0892, 14 June 2001
(E) ILS/MALSR Project for Runway 6-24 (complete)
Page 7 of 13
- Issuance of NWP 39 (Action ID 200400216, 16 September 2006) for fill of 0.0085 acres of
wetlands.
- Water Quality Certification No. 04-1231, 3 August 2004
(F) Runway 6-24 approach clearing (complete)
- Issuance of "No Department of Army Authorization Required" (Action ID SAW-2006-
40574-065, 5 September 2006)
(G) Perimeter Road Phase II (complete)
- Issuance of NWP 18 (Action ID 2004951065, 9 May 2007) for fill of 0.028 acres of
wetlands and 0.239 acres of Waters of the U.S..
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: 50 linear feet of stream impact
(including some wetland plants within the channel) for removal of old culverts and
installation of new culverts including bank stabilization and fence
installation.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Page 8 of 13
Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
46.3 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
A NW Prong Acorn
Branch Culvert
Replacement P 8' 50' 0.009

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 50' 0.009
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.009
Wetland Impact (acres):
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.009
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 50'
7. Isolated Waters
Page 9 of 13
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The purpose of the project is to
make channel repairs including bank and channel stabilization which is needed to restore channel
stability, airport security and discharge capacity. Precast endwalls will be used in the design to
minimize the length of new pipe and therefore reducing the length of the channel
impacted.
VIII. Mitigation - No Mitigation Proposed
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
Page 10 of 13
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm.gide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation proposed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page three and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Page 11 of 13
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact Required
Zone 11______ Multiplier 1 KI-*.._a]--
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The total Airport property is 1620.8 acres with
279.22 acres of impervious area (existing) @ 17.2%. This project does not add impervious area.
Page 12 of 13
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
lla?(ca
Applicant/Agent's Si nature Date
s signature is valid if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
ATTACHMENT 1
Location and Vicinity Map
qk
_ �s ..s1 F
Wilmington International Airport (ILII)
New Hanover County, North Carolina
r+
i
MM
—' Miles
0.5 1 2 F Figure 1
Location Map

JUI 3 0 2008
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
ATTACHMENT 2
Project Plans
SNOISIA3a
Woo,vnme10W11HU INK3 31YO NOI1dIHOS30 'ON 'A38 133HS 31111 .••,,?,.••?"°"••/Y
OS£S-M-018 :3NOHd 19Z9-Z9L-Ole "A
SOW ON 'NOIDNIWIIM 3AWO kTn3HS Ol9f
` a
SINVL-InSNOOONtNNVId19ONI'MNIDN3 SalVd3?3 -13NNVHD 4NV 3NI-1 30N33 N? 3 x
.. d-d Z d
.LHJI2Ig I2IHSZVL Y:.o .. ?.
VNIl021V0 HlaON 'NOlONIWIIM .........
F.E`,,•••' Y ? ? ? ? $
1NOd?JIV 1VNO11VNN31NI N019NMW IM u`
r CO
_.-
r- E3
1L
N ?.-C
B
n ? t7
t.U
?- tnYVunl
CJ ?
r?t_T
S
co a0 co co w aD
0
10
cn
Of I. f
LL- a a
O
W
LL O z In a
Q
7
Z a p ?
W J L-
Z ui Qo
QZ J?
?QN
J z Z U c?
It
Q -
z = <?
zooti
0 C) ? W z CM
p i- z CY)
z zo0-
z ?-- Q
Q o
o
ry W z
?- _
Z z
?
Z -?
J ?
Lu
O
z s R Z
i
? U
< F
W
a
?0
z?
of ?
?Za
f

p g
N
J g
N
r g
N
J N g

J $
N
J o
N
J
N
'
V
Z

O Z
Q

O 0 J
J
H p Q. o
w
J
~ En a `J
p
2 y~j
? O p

O F_

p V)
to
W
J
U
<
~ Z
W
w
'p N K 2 N
F a w 3 ?
?

0
z

3
p N M < N 0
SNOISA38
VIOO'Vn11HWr1119L ' 11VV13 3LV0 NOUdQQS3O 'ON 'A3N .•``•"„' "" •. o
0909-C9[-016 3NONd 19Z9-Z9L-016 %V3 Mdld .k13AVS ONIV ino),dl 103rO8d •?r,P?•••••••.;d
90t9Z ON 'NOLOWNIVA 3AW0 A3T[3N9 019t ; O!? d t c
o ?:,".
SINV?ZnSNODC)NINNV'la-19OND NIDN3 S81Vd38 l3NNVH3 aMd 3NIl 33N33 0 W? G;Z x W R N
VNIl021V0 H12JON 'N019NIWUUA ''-°ti E?`.•`° z°
HJI2Ig .L2IHgZ?1.L
..
A0d81V ?VNOLLVM131N1 NO1`JNINTM 0 6 it 6i
8
m M V
MM MM bW y
aaaam °o
aa'rern o a wU w wFN l,z?y
v1
??0Q MMYDnM Q J 1.?~ ly1 Q ?VaW1 Z 0 IwiO Vi 00 m pJ 11 w
w
O QZ UV1Q ZJO?UWO 1pOa ZI~i ?ocl? F41Wy ?Q LL Z?Fa.
V1Qz UO¢ Z7W OQ 7mF rMF <<Z QaJW ¢° F-OU r.'
<iQ } vYiaOa ago 10, ?Q i ?o w<° a1 aow?a wv p <FOZa'
1QiQZ fW/IdOw Q?O ¢F¢ 7Zayo Sd ¢Z FQFU Ny OZ mow-. vyig ?FW ((('''{{{,,,yyy+++LLL
?U0 rpQO Jy? ¢03 NOa:?UyLL ZO'?W Vio 0'a JIjFO JZ?W VaQQ°
Wa U O QOZ ooUw WF,V)o FNaW ZoF Q?= < i7F? Z?F7 F M' wZ, F- WQJ pYY QU <2 1W ZQQWp4 7OZQ aWFF 3yUm V10F0 WyaZy ? - e
¢v'wwm z k go z?npaY F07< Qo}l? 1000 o? w os t?
zo<U }oo w?F a?wzOw ay Wo1.? 2 OgFJF F-y?z w -Fw
OWZO V10'0: 0'K Jay OZF ZmWUKQy2 ?F?F Wm wa'¢
U F JQ WO7w NVIFQ
o?-z ??>.s a saz <w? a oo -? U ?a aK a i? NoU?z
O0QOF W oJw 0Jp V,y rW moo ?x0 y W .. wya
0Y(7 5 000 a Jo < JJKmFW2 Wa}¢ <? ¢\UO< FWOz QZ?Q?
J Q S9 J F W J J Q J Q J W p< a F
Oa W Z Z WaZ ZWNYC i F D:VO
93 y ap aW as 0' Jw OmaW Z Q- W m O o FQ
U ¦\???]//1 _
N Z CL CL l "I
X < N N W K Na W O W Z d V) O F p F? J F aLL W J 3 0¢ U 7 Q O z X
F Z 9 N
QF?} am LL7 < -0-- -? '
a.<Wa. aW 0: Z 0'ZW 0'WO' Q01J -Z.0' a m
OZTQ Oil O , OyEi} Z? ? V., LL 41yp O: p ZZRFO
UW K y¢ UI Po
QZZ U1, 0: UOVIQa OQU WJ.LL oz y?< 3 la? U K na?aaz
Q?ZO Q 1?W?3 QV~iFF aQa QJQp?yJ?LLO_1. a?W ZQ D' Q Zt- 0:0 Q F-N? p0
f? W (~J7 UU ?JyV) ?a'0'LL>K7p ?JWO Ul, O zFJ 0002- I<:D U O •:L.. ILI M C, p?WW OF }¢O Z°Q77 zO¢FM Zoyt-? OOUOON Oa?y YLLQ W< Q< FK_yaQ} ~ KH1-r-wF- 3.
L' 1. a s H a y ZO y U w U W j F U J N (W, QJ<< W W I 1 z 3 M y K W Q 0 r W Q J Y R K a
W 7 Q Q O 0_ Q W W O W <w J W LL <0 MWM
U:R ?<Zm FH uQ F2w F0MulW Wo 00 V) m 0 W 7 Q O Z W ?il < Z W 2 0¢ F W W W w 7
«UK mmLLa 0 o<?-s i-aUV ?I 1 0
?2O a ui e
moQ
-oa
W
I z z U F
a F W
r U< W
Z Q Z~ WW p O ? Y O Z W=W U y W W O o
Vl
F W1? FW Q wW W mU W y mJ ?-
4O?y FV?mIJj?Ka0 JQm LL FQ ? Z0 W
I am U WY SJO Z_ WLL
p0 JWZ w JUS m
QZ?m ZQZJ y0. W WFO ZOU OQ 1?J Oy ZF0! V1W} 0'J < a' O ULL JSlaJO J F W?U (n y IF= mLL
y0'QW W<?WJ ZZ?y }W 0 > ?F Z 866 yW0'm O<LL ?Ya QQVlW=>?K z0 mow wzt-j
J
Q- Nl, F 2 F <I 0, 0' 7 2 0 J O
ZOO ???? =FKY F FWSo-y NZ U tr OJ Z7 V) U} ¢Vl Kw ?y Wa OWF JaUy U77W W 3 QOV)
UOU ??- yDO WMW f?0<yjFaOW Q ZN? go mJUa <O?OQ W-W 2F OFQ V7FN V) 1?
0_OZy ?WV1 OO 0' NW ?O-SZ]O Q. W w Um Ja. y
Wl.? -a } J y- aM Q?U W F W?? mp JJO'J SF U F LLy?yZ pWYy KJ
wu 0F- ?O W <O ~¢¢Oy? yJ F W W O LL wa O} IF?OYpUW OUF O7 _V a-7 y W F 0Iy?- F JKF<Zr
=Q°z *SF- W y JOOm7o>?2 27(7 U Q z ?Um NW Wyz ma' ?D:Z ?. aFOS1?LWN}V o<2Q O Q -,D, zOV)o=Y U3>: rm
j Q Q U Q N F Q Q Z K 0 m 2 y O W O z8o <} M < N m a' W '"" Z W U Z Q U O Z U d J> a y N O z Q LL J O' W U 2 N a Q W
mUf, UVIW ZQO Q}o W+I W O a~ ZJQ ??-? ?ZOU SONUy Na¢ WO_HZOKSO Qr?oZ U?Wa WUO ?U°WSZ
W O U7JO WaZ_ V1Qr 3 JWO OO mW U?LL a'<w?o<
WW?W J?NQWQ }Dl?:Q?yN t<IYOQ z? N Q UQW ??2 W,ww,OF<MI x mQZNWQQS IYam FN ZUZWFVIQ o f QW>-
H I- ?F FF wZ7 O O? K-¢ <w V)Nf, < Og VIO JH? FO a.LLz p zpOV,w 30<<icoVj??}Q ZQO
Z Orjow ? 1.0? <Mz<} w OU a-Q U. m ° - a WW2 2^W Z? txxy JQyV 7QD:a QF?¢F OQaJa O??FZ OW~yL0 OpOZpK
7 U J w H W 2 O O
M F I J Fn J a Q F W o z a °} U p O J Z F V O J x H¢ a a W V m a} I Z F F a
Vl FQ Ua'UQa a0 y? Z F FU4 Wa F W 7 O F-O O7 LL <W<
°o< Q??waoLLooc~io?? ??? z? <? owm uwo ox Q?oa?Oy?? nwwd?acWi?a yFjo° =c'°xm?wom?<w~nwa
Q-' Z om ?WyW a <YOLLOZ F a FU 7 L)< y?-WMJ OZy¢J J.WWW ZLLW O y yw J?ZU 3
dWaO' Oa'O'1yW zO ?Qa'VIUa O3 Q-Z 0 .0 W z} <Ew DOwW JW>mwOJ?QaZ 2OSQ0OQ00K Q QZNaO, lY O?¢O?¢ Jm? m7WF?m
y1M72Wao °axFO??waoLLZOQWac2.? Nm y3 F?F N°? a =?a??ZiW°}o yliylI`QO wo ZVW N <mz ZV ?0 zJ Fojy<zoFw
It ,n ?Q?? yF-?p?Kw ?i WOa'QZa Ww a'a KX as YI-W 00y6 y?Z x p L) Qy Viy(wr Z?JO8680 7 ?QJy apap?W WO JUQ?
Z ¢ ?a'QKO FO=F ?101??77U4w?LL OS FOB a zWK 26' j a*VlyW Wa zl)a0 °FZ<W?Q ow ¢WmQJ 7W1.!Qa3F-°w JUWWyf z 5; Q OwHy 7w 7z UOW NUO g00 UW, UX I (n WNm Omm`t W<0O0OFU nw UOCnWo4Qz M 2K¢N<O 4<>0<27 WL,. <<Xo,
a zVl'Z py<a<?K O¢Q??WZ ?FW ?°N IU2 a'Jad, <WW'Mu,m?<Uo ?0. 0NJ QQZOOQ <W;F ONVjW?Qy l,Dy??O
, 7 0 7 z F Y W ZU J} F Z ° } < 7 Q >. W M w r F w 0] Wa 3O O F a 6 y Q a F° 0 O O Q ~ y a Z LL F W J O W p y Z C] 7 0
H H J O my O LL Z Z F? &V W .< d m p< J F O Q D
z 0' 7 F W a J F W LL W Z Z p 0 W z w W m U ¢* Z, Q Q Q
Z N W Y a j m 0 7w o o >-w 45
Q y W N? O U Q 0 3 z a U 3 a Z 00 r W O W O V) J Q U w W K W a O. n> Q N Q O Z N< 0 0 J r W m Y V V7 J F Q X: Q Z p O
wQ-? ml l who x?<w ww wz Q 7? az<a < c5 ?0 Y¢G?w M.0 ?rIy? x< W 0 1ly!x
3Q'V' <F- i IWn i2 QU ¢a 7Q Fa z < FQ - ZWLL ° = WWK Ko2W QO Oa Jrlei Qd°Q WWZOW7 aOZ? a ?ow0:r0Uw FS W >a
F ?O F?a ?Ka<a U 0mw pF U0 QmOQa00 N? F-0 Val, <,lr3Um(Q7<NQ ?MOKdQ
C
a ri 16 n la of °_
t.
O O
o ?w ?? 00
o yj b0? oQ ww
? /
° Q ..
Q
00 0-1 n
/ U tz • z Q
Q 0?
W Q U(n ' 15 /
?(
L.LJ
> z 0
` 0000
Q O ?E
U Q SEE N? / /
?0
o /
LLJ
Ow / -
C> ? z /
o /
O 0
0
9 a? a
0
?o
00 K U
a J/0
y
0
N
N
O
0
SNOIStA3N
"oo, .vra era NOUQKSM
"'A3" NVId IVAOV43N ONV SNOLUaNOO ONIISQC3
vooocs-eocND :3Na+d wL A3T 16 :L ft 90M ON 'wiarmiw? 3nW aa A3rta,s ow+
SlNVITISNOD ONtNNVla 19 ONR EHNION3 S8lVd3U 13NNVHo ONV 3Nn 3JN3u W g ??2 s
lH lNq -,,g .I NHq I` I VNno8yo HiNON 'N019NIY4IIM
iNOdNIV IVNOLLVNN31NI N010NIV41M
r
n
W
1? m
O Z 1

i?
M
El
Q
0
ry
O
O W o
o JO
1 ?m
Cf)
O
000
I Of
co cn O ?r)
10_j
0 F=- 0
14- -
o \4
0:? Z N
VA /
PRpPER /
/
LL- W
Zo
- L, vi
O UJ
O LJ
Z -H 00 F- H
Q W W
W 0 W p
WU=
0 < F-
a- Luz
W W X W W
Q? 0:? W(nW
? , NEE

m0Ucd
W Z O
WOf O
>UZN
ct? O
??C?M
Z_
fW- C/LLJ
)
O Q C)
z mm
I
W
F- ,y
Q
:2 LL U0
5<- 0 Z Z
0 U)
Q m
d J of
QJUCr)

O Z
/

Q I?
Lr) 0
W N U

Q O
Of
/ ?W
o>
OO
oQ

O=

OW
Q? z
/\
r
F-
O
Q
U
O
J
Iw "aLo"Im 'Nvm
gom om 'maLoNwa MM A3 l3HS CIG1
SLNVEICISKOD JNINNVld ? JI NH3NIJNH
1H INq -,,R .L d* Hq-I 'I
e
M
W
W
4 m
C 2 A

U

M
E
NOLLdp17S30 'N " N Id MWM
S8[Vd38 l3NNVHO 4NV 3Nn 33N3d
VNIIOMVO H18ON 'NOlONIWIIM
1210d8lV IVNOLLVN83INI NOIONIV41 M
f ' W
i!
LLI
C7ULn
ZZ? 1
3: LLI V) LLJ
(n Z W - d
w =Q O
ZN? ? ,t a
?i W 0 LLJ
(n w
O - Z
-J LLI
000
-WV) LL.
Qww
Z < 0
PR???R
F- Z W J_
y J V) O
U)
U Z LLi
W Q ?_ Z_
U (n
<?U)
M O
O w <
n- U Q
:2 Z M
F- LL_ \
Uj? ?O o'/

r
f
O
? 00 >
?z Lia,
O`EO
w

it I
N r
?r ?=
?-'"C Q
W O
"r
' i W N
W i
Lo ? m r+
/ Q ..
LLJ
LLJ
% rz=
W
W
N
r ?,. .
lo 195
6
M l .+M
Z
O
f-
LL-
O Q J_
H I M
J 0!? (n
?
w of z W
Z F-
w0X (n
0
(n U CL
0 Q (I!
LUL.I
o U
JCDW
Q
Q
co
J Z VJj
Q ?
I F-
0
cV Ow
W NW0
I

(n (n Z /
-H a0a
LL W U /
=
(D w O
LL- j
z
W
J

F-
?
U
Q W
l
2 /
/
d
W /
W
r /
F-
f N

/ r r
r r?

r'r
r. r
W
N
9 0 ma
D N c < O
C W f Q W
u ? 0:? (h W
^
3y 0 U V/
# w Q m
V
W
t
9? ?
SNOISln3a
ROO'WIIO11ornmL .11yra 3ira Nmdlama 'ON W" 01
Sllbl3a 3?N3?
GM-M-OW 7NONd mg-ZOL-Ola 7(Y! ••?r'f? ?k ''. o
COMO ON 'NUONINIMI 3ANa A MHS OIGf f d I
a
S211Vd321 I3NNdHO 4NV 3N1? 30N33 N 8? Z. ` R LO
S,LNVI-ICISNOD ONINNV Id `JNI?MNION3 ,0 mN c?:Z
' Z' %-0 o ?f
I.HJI2IS .I.2I?gZ?d.L VNIIONVO HAON 'NOiONIHIUA +; ••.•^"F?`ra'r
laOdalV IVNOIlVN831Nl WiDNIHIVA "' g & g
O O j O W
(L 0 W < W W W M
O 0: KO M F- 2 1x/lOt$W010-2 Z
W mHKw
Wa- a V) O Zh> ?wWW
U z W
W x A a-
< Z Ozpa' OOU ]0Z< W<>}Z 0Wp p
° mo:' 0040 U? OCCO?o?rJt? ?JC
z xac poQ z Wypz c?iWZZ °0g°;- c w
< -0 0JO8 m J O w33 ?FZ6t w
O O Uv mpw? W0K ?a Kz?x 0?z 6
c.Waio WmO °<°W wowi< Z J'6 ;azz Jwa O Jr,? z OO ..F1n
QCpj3F GAF 3g8<is?W*wW 0C<yF z •r " MA
°o aw J oozz m< lJ` ?wm
?Wma moom U?W<FiZrw°z Ocwia o v ?w°
® Wo$? =o? ?Ia??<oo°aSm aQ3 $1` a l ?' z U0
M
Fo zm^O 0I N0-'<pJ}m< Wod 0
i Ol?ow a 8?? oj?J?FNxU'0(/0? Ualwilm 3i U)
~ <>
Cr
M ???U HOa :3 OjzWM mWFa202 WW
1y? a o.
<w<mz <OCO W OCZ2~F<po 80oz `•M'.;•M
Mf11 ?o WU? (LBZW~o our ?W1-
Fz <0 1 2
a pw$xw WINO OO8wxp$W- OF- <0W z w
0_< o 0Z2 FU CC?Ot-O:p Z O Y J
0Oa LLI
D!~ < p<OOI-W t-O OZ}z IaZW I Z? a
O aOCO t0 Z,? `<OW yUZjmKm?? ? °o!a w° o2az N#1.11111 Z $ 00.
Z0 SQ Om xQ I`J1 aJccw.7 1y??? 01Mi (1j 'Jx<oit z
W°FpU? WN<O O OWWxWWi U ZMD 5 ?m I o 00 ppz .0-,9 0 LLI
C4 lV ZxW 2? r LLI
LLI
LL.10z o
O zZW I l i H
O NUN O •i Za
JWO WRZO I F
N <0 Z0 F WWD_ I NZ
W?
d WNz
°? acaKW`
OW NmOx?' ".i
zpa
DO 00
S U s w `
?F
QW Wa'
X m w 0 WX 0 O
KJ --
z
IC O <
W O
C Q O WTz.
W1 CZO W<O sU
W a O WF, L. O W J a'
y
W ? < zgao?aar?LLJ
a>. < F- wJ$Zw
?
O p? 3WQ CCa ?y J<
2 0 S J
1- Z <C<<? ZZHz
z Q W Z a 2 Cp20 = 2 W
W I-?OJ
?i °R z<oa3?9
c
Z m
o
LLI z?dw<a poi
() OlaBdj 30N3j ,0-,9 < W 3 w o 0 o a z o 0 0
OWW WON- Z LLI ?2¢3«?wOp OW ,I 1 I
<rF oz Lw zc01?z11?a i M M 'a
wW°<z: a
Zmy.< < f0
? p W< W O K 1?1 Z 8 W
O omUz a<p o? p Z Z WM OF -W W W fW N1< F zW Oa, Wm < yW WFK W mU 0m is m
z mZW d x °W m a0 0!w ° w? Dc?
O -X01// x yyyp???IW?W W WJU fW r OO
2mz w ZW W4 la-p(xa < NWHU COO.W
M 0w Z
OY?m
M po amw Wm yWl??1a- y m a Z
O 2 W 1/)p < U U
zW WW m. owm mW w .. W M
W~3fn Uf W ma <
zm?U? M<W po = zi! 0
Z$F - 01nD zwp o ?zoSfwla a U
< wM n z 0f° O 82z?oi
yzwzamo m zo ? °xwz< a_W7zl-
O O W
°XW8?aX <1y~1y?? mom \$oe?,<wz
?Wm0 mW y1 ?j CC (a IlIUOv ?oUiT/i
W O Jj
U W W a C w0
i ? m 2
z
m w W W< p W J W W ~ W x W 0 O= z z p Of
JJ °W3 < W x ww5 W WF EOU ..z 2
aJ 0z
r$' Ua N z> I-w Z"Oa ow W M w a0 IIZ JO_
F wo wow WmJ N ow <? OO r< z mW -W
O OJ mx$ KJ d o mW oW vw ''S W M O Op <
M a
MM < > JxOJ NN M Oa' <Z p< WO a O = <C ?V
W OZ I's 3a J W$ 3i a z- .- ?m (n M f5w LS Ua ?a
U 22 a $ wU < ~ a° 8z NU li O p Z pW
? Wi ZF3 0 °$ Ed, WW m9 -m zo cv oa < Wo
F
2 F J p U
< W.p- fAr WQ zW zW zU W a°Il 2 N 0 O W
p ZJ•? K W Q? xU a 6 0 WW
W '6 ? F $ U aZ p0 Ca Oz N W 0 m Y FW
jE WM <<0 QZ I- FJ Wl U <g z < < W z 92
< p? 680 NW O JQ a'S =W wW U 0 m aF
} aQ C W dW Z Ja p JO Wm w c W J ZU V/0
J m p O O W w J U lJ > = J< 6 p O S W U M 7 K
< gr ZJ WW ?< p< O2 ; d z p Z1i1 ?m
j ?O 0 KW a ?K Zo z_ wr U O < Y W p*< ` N-
Poo 2 Z91 W?? 0a O Jp N/1w O~ =0 ?W w Z wM OMm WD_ RR E
Z9Z p0 } 0 0 Z< .:a Oa ?z 1 U M M Fs * Zpz Z< ?p3a
J W IZ16 -No f] J2 k1a z zW ?Y p I.? 0 <<p<a Q'U
Oz p6< Z? KW oW ??' N? Ux WW O < W -C a Z oMCJjd pI NO1??K.pOU?
PM 0 zJ a x N?a1A z?
W U U<Z ~? $3 aN $ p 2 <
Q~ OJ w p p NWT <20J(
k' ooh ~ MW w = °z J$' go ?3 °z $ am w ° ?^?i ?<>m&<
1n a17x ?oz J? JV Q _cW $° O? p < a z w W WO <?cw1 Kp«aaa. w-
° JZC? »?' io < <Z $C/ ?° ?z wp 0a U p ?o < w <Mam<< o -,t .M W N iI~y? wJ} pO? w an ~t~/1 ac aWZ ai W O < d N p p72O m<^< ?° ?'W zm
Wpm Um" W Or? Na W •'•p? n3 Q Z W W K KW KQ 44123 WSW OjW06
J O ¢wp m W 3? W Ox W p W < W OJ mO iA mZ I
0 OG{?WFUOI~
< zm OmO wW Ip W? O a iU$ OU < pW ?i1 M WW O OUW d rp KN FO ME 7 -ZW F<F z o O - W W2 0< Oc "i <Xa' K?3?0
Fa x? ?W?< OT W w m p? W 0 Y Wm O N-Cr NOx6 mIl\W<
m pC/1? ?=w ZF J o° 70 w mz 00 2 O F 2 c°54? < 00-
0 N2° \ z -C Z0Z p? V)w <1n S FJ a < zr 0 < W WU < w0 <\-W
< J, O R O MW Oz O F~ J^CO6
W U" O TEXW K 62
O F-, 0 9-ON
UO mm0 0 U OF (?a 0m op na O a w w m -HW FU m? C<
p Ka ..? wo Fo< ~ <J ml<i KO 1K?Op NCL < J < F rN JWi. MCC 0 to . K;k W m<m Z1Tl6a *2o WW ZK lai2 OF W0 °O -J p O ?z N xF<
Cxj7? <O 1' p z W o0
G4?< =W<Z 11?r KUZ Op 0_ O? ZFC-Z F
c NW p0U
3 Jw .0 ON Ec WR °z o cxik 0 wFk' Uu CL N R M WW W.
?< 95
° K O J?6? w<} SU aJ «a, x14- 2*3 JZ ~O Z w < W ZJ 42 J W
< p mx OU < ?2y U - aaQ an O,a > m m <H 01 zU?
oW<J' 2am$ ?=? aZ iza y<<z ?? ~oF &:5 W cCO ?
iN OW < W g a a°I <a "W °wo'oJ_
Z w<N mZ? J NNE m} a0 OWyZ? O7 lO?.?° NW <W m yJj } N Qo2 fx?OZ<
wmm 2jW 1f?oz JO WW Wo~ *M rW WO wm J M -- - <Z Opm10ZM
UO=W QKFZ aFd- <J O mF Oz J 6 w
? V?
O p< 6W W 0<] N a O p S z¢ 08 a N Z < m O J W 0 > O OM W
m "-' x1a t?m a0< wa 0.?o yr?O =z x yW? 0 a ax O€p a
Q oz- W1+~lOF Um on 3J a^? rZ $Km <p 't" 0 N U =1 o oz <w :03z 02 0w? ?O N
wJ p 3woa m <z 06 wZ< F w22 lrha W < Q Z N WK /n?< Mz C<?2 O
x Vl I p 3?W 00 KJ ?? m<0! W6 ow a C <V < O N W w Y? ttpp99? CICO z 0O \Z-T
p m=< 2m0< PON z0 <3 <C? a< Sm Z_ do O< Q Ckt W W = mN Zj 9R3p \ w \&OMWO4,C&0 x O
U 1- ?O CO(UO 1? X<W f-W 2
W? N? dy+L° VU ?Z < m V y°j <O I <z C .AU O:NmVI Op 0 "' K0 03 W,,
W ?O2 Nw=Wa 0dU JCS yN?S 3i 1<
U (A 0WIZ? s=Wy WJ< a Q W=W= a5, 6g CFj2 JUm mO << a 1xA N O aF U0 _MW m
W Dya ma. 0M, OU Nl?i $'zW JW SmN ?\ 2a ? m y > Mo. -
W a .z -W <
W
Z I-
Ca mO< 0$2 yam J0 W JZ p a Nm_ OM N a V
M W WW W OW?O LLxzj WW Km F>0 Mo Wg W a 1 X21 W d 2 W W Wm I
w N aW < yZ?WOm AN OJ aO zW< mm <W < w W ?Y_{fy°/?1 W V Q J M< I
W mjm F <1<i 6 N W3 P< Ft 9.c 120 mCZ9m ?K FCO 7 W W N m?m
F°- Or o-??
Z CV YI a N 10 n 06 01 Cq ' 4 ' 10
V
SNOISIA321
NOO'KIIISIOMIR9L "IIVV13 3LV0 NOILdINOS30 'ON 'AM ,, ••,,,, „I•" ,•OSSS-M-M 3NOHd WZ9-M-M :I"3 S-11VAG sn03NV730SIW P.P`••••••.y N",
o
SOf9Z ON 'NOlONIPIlN1 3AI80 A3T13H5 OLBr ??; ?? ? f!?= rN S <
S1NV11CISN00 JNINNb'Id'4 JNI2I33NIJN3 SWVd36 ?3NNVHO (INV 3NII 30N3J
= ?? rno ?? ??? z " w
LHJI2Ig .L2IHg7V.L
VNI1021V0 Hl2lON 'NOlONIWIIM %1' »•••••''6?.•° $
12lOd211V 1dN011VN2131N1 NOlJNIWIIM
" o 5' &? a 38
Q
J
U N
W
n o
a
on
or
?v
C/') z
p
000
- LLJ Q 0
n 0 z F- = w W z o C/ F- 0 r
z Q?p Z > cfi
J (nZ 0 LLJ
maI- o OWU Jm __j J -< =Q dQ 0? W
Q° N Z Q W Q W p m (n 2 J
m? o 0 W= ?LLJ Q ?Q Z -
O Z
S o W U Z W J J p m C/)
O w LIJ F- LLJ Of O
o m 0 'NIA -V Q Z ?(.O F- W Li Li U 0 _Q Q C7 F-
LLI Q rY Q
W
r0 l`` : a Q N p U >O m (n (n Q m ? Z U
W X Q 0 J W LL.
o = CD W Q (n Un :: W Q = U L0100 I l O w .. Ur w J Mro? Un 0') a_ = J J J F- m (n W
W I Q LL J Q Q
U I W
F- Un Z Z p p
a < W W W Q 'S --1 W W Z (n
of o ?' Q o (n m WOO Q Q j p (1 F- F- O O
(o Q = J N Z U) C/') 0 Z .. a Z F-
w J W N W W > > C)
m inU ~ oz O Q Q Q 3: Z Ql W . Q otf U? H
co a Y O? (n z > O O _ w C) O
a•:. Q C/) J p Z Q F-p Q LL-
u 11 a. b...
>..::.;.V Q U?QZQ F < N LLJ U)
DO ZQ Hp O 0
p p Q W Z W J= Z F7- U -v LLJ 0o ?- I W J Q M N W LLJ 0 > Z p J LLJ Q W J
d p (.0 J U) z W (n J W Q _U J J Z J
w I W (n J (n Q F- > F- J J J Q
a / (.3 0 QQ? C7 O W Qli 0 U)
O ` O W U Lv N = W Z LL I CD a- F-- Y U LLI
m N z zQQ co LL W p ?Q J
U J Q U U p W J 0 Q N L L J L d m Q
Q 00 Q z m U Q LLJ 0 LLJ L? p W J
j r?LL- U? mQ- U Q(n m W Q= C) Q
W J p Z
Lli
O W W 0 J Q LLJ FL >_ W J j I W
W W Q? O p
F- W m m LL I Q p N Q U (n = V) u
Q F-Q Q~ Un0= Q J? W:2 Q W F-
c? ==Un 0Un~ W =W i C/) 0W W Q
J ?(n (n? = U Un~ Q U L?U0 W Z
Q QOCDLLJ F=Up Q mQ W_ YOU J
F- Q Z Z _I Q Ld O W p W U O Q ?
W W
W Zf- f- Z W pF- J ?= QW?- W O
I Y F- :E Q Q Q O J Q Q Q U C) W 0 U m HE Q U) U
h mcl: U 0 QWIYH LLJ O ZZ ?F: 0-1
Q = Z F- C? C? Un N L U M -1- Q Q LC) F- W co M W r- 00
G.? 0 cn rz
p
Q
I/1 U J ? 00
Z U ?
W Z
l\ ?) U 0
r? D Un Un LLJ o Q
Unzor W W J
\ z 0 Q Q
(I- z m p m m
??+ U WCnW J W .?W W Q
L?>LLOf Z m
UO mUn
0 Z p Q _ ?6
Q
(n W 0 p = 00 W I
- w U ?4
G{ {t
LLJ W W mZ pp N z
L ?aJ I
z J
{ - Q Q0-Q _
<? O
'r •ti?.' ? p ?zw
N Q F- Y Q Z
LL1
_j >- LLJ
cy- Q
U, w Q J
W
Q LLI
NWO ?° ?LLJ J=Q w
0 z (' Q W - (n
a LL- p
w w0 ?A ?Jt 0- ° O z?LLJ? O
? LLJ ? . Q ? Q a- Lo L (n
C/) W t ;.: y;, > UYm N
O Q
00
W?? tr'r W _j LYLLJC)p J O
F- W W
WOO Q OV0 a W Q LLJ
Q Q
W W
W p =
(n F-
? rz00? W
LIB Q U LLJ C/)
W _ LL.
0!? Elf a-
G^ W O
F-
W (Y
=Oww
Z U W> W W F- ^
p
z U z?MLLct? j Q p m (n ^
0-N0>LLJ W Qm z 0 Qm LLJ
U?
?G z Cf) \mQ0 _ LLI.?Z WU Q-
(??`. Q -?Q=F-
Qc) Q W Q W Z J W O p
)n4 ?W W W Q ?W?
r Q(nQ
BCD O p 0
0 U Z
W ? Q W
Y
Q LL-
ti QL0 LL. O
J O tY
m - D
Un
ry O
F- p
J U
LL z
ATTACHMENT 3
Soil Survey
00 M
O
O O
N ?..,
C N
N Q1
(? c6
Q.
co
C
O
co
.=
L N
0 d
O N
Z
T U
? C
0 O
O LL
U?
a? >
oU
c
mr
2 0
N Q
Z?
Lv
O
cn
Z-<
N
OU
N O
N?
Z >
U?
U0
) m0
0U
? c
0
.m
Z
N
?N
w O
A y
N
N
Q
Z(J
li
63
C_
O
U
? n
O N
Z
C C
7 O
U :?
`m2
o
cU
m r
2 O
P-
a)
Z Q
n-i
C v
O
U
6 N O ?
C_
U O

N m n

o
y `0

? o N

m `.?
N
a) H
3 c o

U O N m
Z C6
C
N O c
-: N
7 2• tLi1 N N
7 40--.
C O
N Cl)
0) C p? E
- V O
'L n >

c" t
? j

U) L
Q N .a O
(D
V)
_O
E
-O M
E Z i U
t
O
o
Z
N
a)
?y=
H
Q (6
m
N C co
N z N
N
L ,,EN
3 y
C
C
a/ O.
O
O
O O U
O Z

N N 0 7
O

U 6)
CL

O C
N

O Q
O '00
'
O
N N N
3
C 6)
`•
> O? n 0 ui
>
T

LL N
) C-)ice 0
0
? QN
Eo
°cc O
a c6 N
E
m?E?
Z L N
a) Q'
L E N = 0 N cN6 O T
O
N cm
cw ~
m a0 y
3
m m
3 S] E N
a?E
n
Q E C O
CL >, J N N Z N L C N

Z cu cu
N E
N N N N N
(n m
U -O N D
Q ?
(6 YO 'O T O
L 'O d 1]

Z3 2-
N N
CL

_ U
p- m

> GO 63

N N
Q

m

n (6 C
0-OD

rc 0) 6)
C C E
O C
"O
E E2
a)
7 T 7
C CL
N

O n U N O Q
(6
a?E6sE
N 03
O> O E O
O >
U> U L O
H . O 7
U U 03
D C O
1- U E O

d N
0
CL

o U)
N a

u c
m
U
v
d
cu
N
c
c
C m d
(e N
N d N
N LL 0 N d
d d L d 5 > L L ? d
3 o
t9
o

y

?
v
Q N

c C
c0 pd?
"2 N c.1 c0
N

c6
?
f
c
>
N
J d ?0 >> O
a+ q

Z LL O.

V V •C
E3
t a 7
O

* N

LL
?
d
LU

a
A
L"
3
W
J
Q
0 d n
U)
N
N
:?c m a

a

m

'o N
a
o

o

o N

Q

n
J Y •-
d
CL
m
Q O
N y
O 3

d N

N -

t

O d
c
_
c w CL
U)
d CL
U)
>` W
2,
d OL 2? CL
N U
O
¢
LL
0
cu
N
O l6 O
O C O
¢ U •
m m c) U

N

(7

N C >
>
c0 cu
C9

0

C d

UN

2

d

a

V
O
w

C
N

C
c0

>
d 1+
t
U
Y ? ?O 'O c
c - O CL 2
in ?
o
? a J J m m m m m m
c ?
® X •
o vi
?
?
?
€? 1
?
?
d
d
>
+
::
I?I
o .^:, ? pG ?a
•
m
i
--
Q N
00 M
C)
O O
N cV
LO (U
_N 0)
(° a
T
OU)
N 0
N U
Z >
U 63
o a
U °
m O
U
m
c
O
m
z
m
u
y •?
V U)
0
O C
ayi '«2
0' (6
m
7 N
a O
ZU
Ig
Soil Map-New Hanover County, North Carolina
ILM Airport CulverdFence Repair
Map Unit Legend
Now Hanover County, North Carolina (NC129)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In A01 Percent of AOI
Bp Borrow pits 1.6 0.4%
Cr Craven fine sand loam, 1 to 4
percent slopes 15.9 3.7%
Ls Lynchburg fine sandy loam 11.4 2.7%
No Norfolk fine sandy loam, 0 to 4
percent slopes 11.1 2.6%
On Onslow loamy fine sand 8.3 1.9%0
Pn Pantego loam 105.3 24.8%
Ra Rains fine sandy loam 12.3 2.9%0
Se Seagate fine sand 10.3 2.4%
St Stallings fine sand 50.4 11.9%
To Torhunta loamy fine sand 15.6 3.7%
Wo Woodington fine sandy loam 58.6 13.8%
Wr Wrightsboro fine sandy loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes 123.9 29.2%
Totals for Area of Interest (AOI) 424.7 100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 6/2512008
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENT 4
Wetland Data Forms
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: ILM Airport- Culvert and Fence Repair Date: 10 June 2008
Applicant / Owner: Talbert & Bright, Inc. County: New Hanover
Investigator: S. Beck (CZR) State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID: up
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Digitaria sp. H 9.
2. 10.
3. 11.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 0 %a
Remarks:
Maintained Lawn
Wetland Vegetation Not Present
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: >-24" (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit:>-24" in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >-24" (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology Not Present
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Seagate fine sand Drainage Class: somewhat poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Typic Ha plohumods Confirm Mapped Type? Yes-No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-24 7.5YR 3/1 sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in SandySoils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Not Present
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Point taken in maintained lawn immediately south of channel
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Site: ILM Airport- Culvert and Fence Repair Date: 10 June 2008
Applicant / Owner: Talbert & Bright, Inc. County: New Hanover
Investigator: S. Beck (CZR) State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID: wet
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.Alternanthera philoxeroides H OBL 9.
2. Woodwardia areolata H OBL 10.
3. Polyaonum saplttatum H OBL 11.
4. Carex lurida H OBL 12.
5. Acer rubrum S/T FAC 13.
6. Liquidambar styraciflua S/T FAC+ 14.
7. Myrlca cerifera S FAC+ 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks:
Wetland Vegetation Present
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
_ Other Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
X Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: >-24" (in.) Secondary Indicators:
X Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit:>-24" in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: -5" (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology Present
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Seagate fine sand Drainage Class: somewhat poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic Typic Ha plohumods Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-5 2.5Y 6/2 10YR 3/1 moderate/distinct sandy clay loam
5-24 GLEY1 7/10Y loamy sand
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in SandySoils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Is the Sampling Point
Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Point taken within channel
Wetland area located strictly within channel
ATTACHMENT 5
Stream Quality Assessment Form
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
i
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Tak btr:k, 2. Evaluator's name: ?3(aL tC 6 ZOEN
3. Date of evaluation: l.b Jjeo- ADo'% 4. Time of evaluation: r')? 0
5. Name of stream: OW V--D, u kAd- r< rz? tl 6. River basin: ?r.?
7. Approximate drainage area: -;100 s 8. Stream order: D-t
9. Length of reach evaluated: E;-6- (bo Pr 10. County: 0a ,..) Fk??,?Nr
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex 34.672312): Longitude (ex. -77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS OtherGIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): 1LOA a ?
14. Proposed channel work (if any): r• r r 2 c P 44e r , F"
15. Recent weather conditions: CAS - (0 ie>6 F -.,•? ?: • `? Z t
16. Site conditions at time of visit: tiJ?? e r - r s`
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters ,--„-Essential Fisheries Habitat
_--_,Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (1-1V)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (9 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
-5r_0/6 Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: - iS 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): t Lt ,
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends ?Frequent,meander -Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 3 Comments: eG` cx"t, r vt^t '? f'an.?dti A-er-*- WkV
- I
Evaluator's Signature _ - Date CP /6 1 i3.T
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to i_1SACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change- version 06/03. To Comment, please tail 919-876-8441 x 26.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
=.a T

ORE,. ? IO -OINT_
CK RA CTERISTICS_-
---- -? ?

SCORE
picdma>?lt?= Mountaix?

I Presence orflow /:persistent pools3n-streAm
_
0-5 0 4 0-5
no flow or saturation.- strong., flow max points)
3
2 Evidence oipast:humau alteration : ;
0 6 0 5 0--5
extensive alteration -.0 _rio alteratioli inaX= omts .
-=

nobliffec=Q•:coiiti
fits)
:... :

4 71 -;-= Evidence of nptriel?f or. cliemicaTdunchar es- _=.-; :- -< : ===:_v _ _ : =-
extenscve_dischar es --0 no: disGhar es;:.: max: Ints .___>

?.-,.:::.:,;.-__ Gronndvvater.:d . - ...... __ -_ _ :...:... -.:•:_-
::.::.
--
M-? -;-Presence_of;edja enffloodpluiii
no:flood Tam:-=-p extensrve#loQd lain a.max> ointsv:? ;_-?? : _ - -_-
_....:.::- :Entrenchment:
aodplatn;sccess.
!
.
_ .:..
.<s:
de 1 . etlh'enolie?`= 0?'fre uentifloodip -.---max: Ints-_? ?..:::; -:.-.:-:.•,-- -:- - :...----??` .,..;?_-? `-..._.:?_

--_:
-::-: -- :--: -=.=resence:ofad acen;et ---

&W
;- -== _
:.:;=::w no_wetiands
0 .
Tar e
ad acentwetlands=max
:
,:,:::
;
------ - ------
n -
.extenslvecalplgon:-;6 natgr ttleandeme
x;

__.._..._ .__-.:exteasive_de"osition= OIittla oiIOsedimeat
=mane Dints ==-
:-:- - =_-===-- ==.---a=4'=~`
=" _ :
:
= '-' ==TSize 8?dersi ofchannel7seci substrate== =? -
fine ;homy enou 07.= 1 a=; diverse slzes- miax Bits=
_-_?=_?•--
_ .-0.8c banks m omts
_, __.:=Presence of ma?nr=banl?failares=?
--_..._.:_._..,_..: . --_(-&v- no:emsio

_
_
=:: = _==-=Root3e th>atidderrsi -oa=banks.-w. = = - __. - --= ---- - __ --- =-_=-
-
---
- 0=_-
lerobts
??dense:toatstlu'otil- taut==_naa? -"oIitts

1? _
Iiri `acrti
?Y??
p-
w?
-
`?-? =.=
?
_ Sii ?b 8n#1a?=7m aCtU -?30 eV]?enGelll - = Illtg =-- _
_ :_`
-Pcesenaf riffle-ooUrip?1r oolcom _exes?=_ -==- -w =-=:<=== " = __ _. -_=
- --
= - : -: ?0 = =QS :.--06=
=- no?nffle"s/i p esos tools=-veil=develo ed =ilis`ic :.intfi==-__- = :-_.:--mss -_._-
L7wm-o- W. Y7

blt8t Q` _ _ :- -.-'.
IttI bf n0?I8

w Wa
m..?`zontinuou
ffimu
19 ??Sabskra?e-efmbe#idedn?ss?-?==_`=-..:

-
-- 4==
-;Ow4=
_de: I em?Ieddcd = Q7ooses4cctura3naz
_ -_ _ ? nb=e.1`nd?cia=0?=commo ?attiiierous_- c+s?n:::=---Tats = -=-_?-?` =?D=?-? 0

_ - = _- =
_ -- - - = _ ccof a3n kl6ians_ _ = = = - = = - -- _- =_
=
-
=' =
--: _ :.IIO::G1Y1d811Z

?
Q
COIDIIIO ==n _- IN-
__ - _- - =
. -_
:

- - - .Wfi use ? - - - - - -
abundarrt.evtden e==inax-'oTtt --
_ r'R..... .ntq 9 lfl __ -- =-

* These ch aracteristics Are not wmeggP.fl in [!nodal et,-

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: lb )O, e a00- Project: 1_ "/? P' irgw-' _ u Latitude:
1, uk- 5enrc z,
Evaluator: ?+? CL ? Site: No off' tit,or-^ Longitude:
Total Points: Other
Stream Is at least Intermittent County: .•„? 4•y `, ;`?.
if z 19 or perennial If k 30 OL, bu a- e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 17-.5
':Absent =
;Weak; =_
' oderate= =
-? sT"5>a9
V. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 -
2. Sinuosity 0 2. 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 (W 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic floodplain 0 1 2-) 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel (0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 . 1 ) 3
9 e Natural levees CV 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 :2 .3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0. 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existina
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No = 0
Yes = 3
man-mpuv u1w 100 010 nUt 10 LOU) 000 ulawlb*1U114 Ill 11 oaf lual
R Hvriminnv IRilhtntal o t S 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 ( 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - d or rowin season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 (I.S?
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack fines 0 0.5 1
19. H ric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0
= 1.
elyes
C, Biology (Subtotal = 10-
200. Fibrous roots in channel Q 3j 1 0
21-". Rooted plants In channel 3 2 1 0
22 Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 i? 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton co 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing becterta/fungus. 0 0. 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL =1. SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
items zu ano zi mcus on me presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquattic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) sketch.
?? F .
ATTACHMENT 6
USACE Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: New Hanover City: Wrightsboro
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. ° Pick List, Long. ° Pick List.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Smith Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Smith Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Northeast Cape Fear, 03030007
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
? Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 25 June 2008
® Field Determination. Date(s): 10 June 208
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
? Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
? Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Pick List "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
? TNWs, including territorial seas
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
? Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: -50 linear feet: -15 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.
Elevation of established OHWM (if known): -20ft.
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
? Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
'Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: >50 square miles
Drainage area: -200 acres
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
® Tributary flows directly into TNW.
? Tributary flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or, less) river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 1 (off less) aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS: feature flows into a tributary to Scott Creek, which flows into the Cape Fear River.
Tributary stream order, if known: 0-1.
a Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ? Natural
® Artificial (man-made). Explain: part of ditch system to drain runaway.
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 15 feet
Average depth: 6 feet
Average side slopes: 2:1.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
? Silts ® Sands ? Concrete
? Cobbles ® Gravel ? Muck
? Bedrock ? Vegetation. Type/% cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: highly eroding at bend.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: yes, formed by extreme flow events.
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2-4 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater)
Describe flow regime: during rain events.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete and confined. Characteristics: Flow occurs during and after rain events. Very low flow
during periods of no rain.
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
® clear, natural line impressed on the bank
® changes in the character of soil ?
® shelving
? vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ?
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
® sediment deposition
® water staining
? other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
? Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by: ?
? oil or scum line along shore objects
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
? physical markings/characteristics
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? survey to available datum;
? physical markings;
? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: water was slightly discolored from organics, very low discharge at time of visit.
Identify specific pollutants, if known: most likely fertilizer, hericide, and pesticide runoff.
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): weedy shrubs/trees, 5-10 ft on each side of, and within ditch.
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: few invertebrates and gambusia present.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Pick List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
? Directly abutting
? Not directly abutting
? Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to
Project wetlands are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick List.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
? Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
? Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERSIWETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
[] TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally: Feature is a large ditch which drains airport runway, characteristics in channel indicate frequent flow (see stream
forms).
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 50 linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
? Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
? Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters .9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
? Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
? Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
? Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
? which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
? from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
? which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
? Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
? Other factors. Explain:
8See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
? Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
? Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
? Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
? Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
? Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Castle Hayne Quadrangle.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS New Hanover County 1977.
? National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
? State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
? FEMA/FIRM maps:
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
? Photographs: ? Aerial (Name & Date):
or ? Other (Name & Date):
? Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
? Applicable/supporting case law:
? Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
® Other information (please specify): NRCS Web Soil Survey.
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
ATTACHMENT 7
Photos
Downstream Fence
Downstream off property
Fence Damage
Fence Damage
Upstream Fence and Culvert
Upstream Fence and Culvert
UL of Project Boundary W1
UL of Project Boundary W1