20081153 Ver 1_Restoration Plan_20080725

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PAYM -,NT
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanley County, North Carolina
RFP No. 16-DO7033
Prepared for:
l`?( US SteII l
e !
NCDEN R- Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Submitted by:
&AM
Environmental Banc & Exchange
Submitted: July 25, 2008
©Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2008
D ? N W/1 P?
t
AR
;' cltl8
UGNR - WATER ?:v, _.
WE i ANDS AND STORMWATt=R ': ; w"M'H
Prepared by:
Kimley-Hom
and Associates, Inc.
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
Submitted by:
EBX
Environmental Banc & Exchange
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone Number: [phone] Phone Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
Project Manager: Todd St--John, P.E. Project Manager: Norton Webster, PWS
Direct Phone Number: [phone]
•
•
• DRAFT
• Restoration Plan
• Rockwell Pastures Site
• Stanly County, North Carolina
•
• Executive Summary
•
• Site Description
• The Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site (Site) is located 6 miles southeast of
• Albemarle in Stanly County (Figure 1). Rockwell Pastures lies within the Yadkin Basin North Carolina
• Division of Water Quality (DWQ) sub-basin 03-07-08 and local HUC 03040104010020. The site
• contains seven degraded unnamed tributaries (UT1, UT2, UT3, UT4, UT5, UT6, and UT7) to David's
Creek/Lake Tillery (Figure 2). Lake Tillery is listed as DWQ class Water Supply (WS-IV, CA) waters.
• As such, these streams are considered to be WS-IV streams. The project area is located in the
• Carolina Slate Belt sub-ecoregion of the Piedmont ecoregion.
• In response to RFP 16-D07033, the Site was proposed by EBX, LLC (EBX) and accepted by the North
• Carolina Division of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Ecosystem Enhancement
• Program (EEP) to provide stream and wetland mitigation in the Yadkin River Basin (Cataloging Unit
03040104). EBX has engaged Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc. as designer for the Site.
• The upper part of the watershed currently is used for agriculture and silviculture purposes. No
• appropriate riparian vegetation is present because row crops are planted to the existing stream edges
• of the upper part of UT1, UT5, UT6 and UT7. These streams also have been directly impacted and
• straightened in some areas. The silvicultural activities that included direct impacts to the stream bed
• have completely destabilized UT4 and have resulted in a removal of native bottomland or headwater
forest vegetation. Much of the buffer along the stream is in row pines, sparsely vegetated with
• herbaceous species, or inhabited with invasive species. The lower part of the project - which
• includes UT1, UT2, and UT3 - is pastureland where cattle have unlimited access to the streams. As a
• result, the streams are highly sedimented and contaminated with livestock waste, which is a source of
BOD, fecal coliform, and nutrients among other pollutants. Most of the buffer is vegetated with fescue
• or other grasses with a few areas of very sparse trees. The main tributary (UT1) was completely
• straightened and channelized in the early 1970's, according to the landowner.
• Restoration Project Goals and Objectives
• The goal of this project is to restore natural stream and wetland system functions to a site highly
degraded by historical agricultural activity and livestock management. Because of the size of the
• project and its position in the landscape, the project will address an entire watershed. The project will
• provide ecological functional lift to the existing system by restoring the stream and riparian habitat. It
• also will seek to restore and enhance non-riparian low elevation seeps. Benefits will include improved
water quality by reducing sediment load through stabilization and by reducing nutrient and other
• pollutant input by the addition of forested riparian buffers planted with native species. Additionally, the
• forested buffers and reconnection with the historic flood plain or new flood plain will improve channel
• hydraulics and system capacity. Improvements to the ecosystem include the addition of in-stream
habitat by the use of in-stream structures and bank revetments such as root wads. By providing an
• appropriate mix of native forest vegetation to create a canopy and understory, the soil structure will
• improve, a leaf litter source will be established to support aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, and
? ? d
l
• A
an Associates, Inc.
d
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
shading and cooling will be provided to improve water quality. These improvements will provide
functional uplift for the watershed as a whole. Removing the riparian and wetland areas from
agriculture will reduce sedimentation and nutrient inputs. In addition, prohibiting livestock access from
the stream and riparian area will improve stream function. Excluding livestock will prevent direct
damage from hoof shear and animal waste discharging directly to the stream. This action will decrease
sedimentation, improve bank vegetation, and reduce eutrophication and fecal coliform contamination
from animal waste.
The pattern, profile, and dimension of the channel will be adjusted to approximately match regional
curve values and reference reach conditions. Structures such as rock cross vanes, a-vanes, rock
vanes, log sills, log vanes, single- and double-wing deflectors and bank revetments will be used to
provide grade control, add habitat, and/or introduce bedform diversity. On-site wetlands will be
restored and enhanced to low elevation seep wetlands as described by Classification of the Natural
Communities of North Carolina Third Approximation by Michael P. Schafale and Alan S. Weakley.
The riparian areas at this site will be planted with a combination of Piedmont/Mountain bottomland
forest, Piedmont/Mountain levee forest, and Piedmont/Low Mountain alluvial forest communities as
described by Schafale and Weakley. The wetland areas will be planted with a mix of low elevation
seep herbaceous vegetation and bottomland hardwood forest vegetation.
Table 1: Project Restoration Summary
Project

Stream Existing
Stream
(ft) Prop.
Stream
(ft) Restoration

(ft) Enhance
Levell
(ft) Enhance
Level 11
(ft) Preserve

(ft) Wetland
Restoration
(ac)
UP 6,749 7,224 5,660 863 701 0 1.7 (W01)
UT2 635 635 0 0 635 0 0.0
UT3 717 872 872 0 0 0 0.0
UT4 4,024 5,006 3,357 982 596 72 0.0
UT5 1,075 1,075 0 0 1,075 0 0.0
UT6 1,174 1,174 0 0 1,174 0 0.0
UT7 1,313 1,419 689 0 730 0 0.0
Total Site 15,687 17,405 10,578 1,845 4,911 72 1.7
Total SMUs -- -- 10,578 1,230 1,964 14 --
Total WMUs -- - 1.7
Table 2: Mitigation Unit Summary
Contract Stream Proposed Stream Contract Wetland Proposed Wetland
Mitigation Units (SMU) Mitigation Units (SMU) Mitigation Units Mitigation Units (WMU)
(WMU)
13,427 13,786 1.5 1.7
? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Table of Contents
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
4.0
4.1
4.
Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................................... i
Site Description .............................................................................................................................................................. .. i
Restoration Project Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................................... .. i
Project Site Identification and Location ................................................................................................................1
Directions to Project Site ..................................................................................................................................... .1
USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations ................................................................ .1
Project Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................................................. .1
Watershed Characterization ...................................................................................................................................1
Drainage Area ..................................................................................................................................................... .1
Surface Water Classification/Water Quality ........................................................................................................ .2
Physiography, Geology, and Soils .......................................................................................................................2
Historical Land Use and Development Trends .................................................................................................... . 3
2.4.1 Historical Land Use ........................................................................................................................................ .3
2.4.2 Development Trends ...................................................................................................................................... .3
Endangered/Threatened Species ....................................................................................................................... . 3
Cultural Resources .............................................................................................................................................. .6
Potential Constraints ........................................................................................................................................... .6
2.7.1 Property Ownership and Boundary ................................................................................................................ .6
2.7.2 Site Access .................................................................................................................................................... .7
2.7.3 Utilities ............................................................................................................................................................7
2.7.4 FEMAIHydrologic Trespass ........................................................................................................................... .7
Project Site Streams ............................................................................................................................................... 7
Channel Classification ..........................................................................................................................................9
Channel Discharge ............................................................................................................................................. 10
Channel Morphology .......................................................................................................................................... 11
Channel Stability Assessment ............................................................................................................................ 11
Bankfull Verification ............................................................................................................................................ 12
Vegetation .......................................................................................................................................................... 12
Reference Stream .................................................................................................................................................. 12
Watershed Characterization ............................................................................................................................... 12
Channel Classification ........................................................................................................................................ 2
3
2
3
4
5
6
7
2
3
4
5
6
2
13
? ? ? Kimley-Horn
>;? and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
4.3 Discharge ........................................................................................................................................................... 13
4.4 Channel Stability Assessment ............................................................................................................................ 13
4.5 Bankfull Verification ............................................................................................................................................ 13
4.6 Vegetation .......................................................................................................................................................... 14
5.0 Project Site Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................ 14
5.1 Jurisdictional Wetlands ..................................................................................................................................... 14
5.2 Hydrological Characterization ............................................................................................................................ 15
5.2.1 Groundwater Modeling .................................................................................................................................. 15
5.2.2 Surface Water Modeling ............................................................................................................................... 15
5.2.3 Hydrologic Budget ......................................................................................................................................... 15
5.3 Soil Characterization .......................................................................................................................................... 16
5.3.1 Taxonomic Classification .............................................................................................................................. 16
5.3.2 Profile Description ......................................................................................................................................... 16
5.3.3 Hydraulic Conductivity .................................................................................................................................. 16
5.4 Plant Community Characterization ..................................................................................................................... 16
6.0 Reference Wetland ................................................................................................................................................ 17
6.1 Hydrological Characterization ............................................................................................................................ 17
6.2 Soil Characterization .......................................................................................................................................... 17
6.2.1 Taxonomic Classification .............................................................................................................................. 17
6.2.2 Profile Description ......................................................................................................................................... 17
6.2.3 Hydraulic Conductivity .................................................................................................................................. 17
6.3 Plant Community Characterization ..................................................................................................................... 17
6.3.1 Community Description ................................................................................................................................. 17
7.0 Project Site Restoration Plan ...........................................................................................:................................... 18
7.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................................... 18
7.1.1 Designed Channel Classification and Wetland Type .................................................................................... 21
7.1.2 Target Wetland Communities/Buffer Communities ....................................................................................... 21
7.2 Sediment Transport Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 21
7.2.1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 21
7.2.2 Calculations and Discussion ......................................................................................................................... 22
7.3 HEC-RAS Analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 25
7.3.1 No-Rise, LOMB, CLOMR .............................................................................................................................. 26
7.3.2 Hydrologic Trespass .....................................................................................................................................26
7.4 Stormwater Best Management Practices ...........................................................................................................26
? = ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
7.4.1 Site-Specific Stormwater Concerns ..............................................................................................................26
75 Hydrologic Modification ........................ ..............................................................................................................26
7.5.1 Narrative of Modification ................. ..............................................................................................................26
7.6 Soil Restoration .................................... ..............................................................................................................27
7.7 Natural Plant Community Restoration .. ..............................................................................................................27
7.7.1 Reforestation Scheme .................... ..............................................................................................................27
7.7.2 Planting Zones ................................ ..............................................................................................................28
7.7.3 Plant List ......................................... ..............................................................................................................29
7.7.4 Plant Sources .................................. ..............................................................................................................29
7.7.5 Schedule ......................................... ..............................................................................................................30
7.7.6 Stabilization ..................................... ..............................................................................................................30
7.7.7 Site Preparation .............................. ..............................................................................................................30
7.7.8 Planting Review .............................. ..............................................................................................................30
7.7.9 Monitoring and Maintenance ........... ..............................................................................................................30
8.0 Performance Criteria ............................... ..............................................................................................................31
8.1 Stream Success Criteria ...................... .............................................................................................................. 31
8.2 Wetland Success Criteria ..................... ..............................................................................................................32
8.2.1 Hydrology ........................................ ..............................................................................................................32
8.2.2 Vegetation ....................................... ..............................................................................................................32
8.2.3 Soil .................................................. ..............................................................................................................32
8.3 Vegetation Success Criteria ................. ..............................................................................................................32
8.4 Schedule/Reporting .............................. ..............................................................................................................32
9.0 References .............................................................................................................................................................35
Report Tables
Table 1: Project Restoration Summary .................................................................................................................... ii
Table 2: Mitigation Unit Summary ............................................................................................................................ ii
Table 3: Drainage Area and Stream Classification ..................................................................................................2
Table 4: Endangered Species - Stanly County .....................................................................................................5
Table 5: Ownership ............................................. .....................................................................................................6
Table 6: Summary of Stream Classification ........ ..................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Table 7: Project Site Streams Peak Discharges . ...................................................................................................11
Table 8: Reference Stream Peak Discharges .... ...................................................................................................13
Table 9: Summary of Shear Stress Calculations ...................................................................................................23
? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Table 10: Summary of Existing Stream Power Calculations ...................................................................................24
Table 11: Summary of Proposed Stream Power Calculations .................................................................................25
10.0 Restoration Tables
Table I: Project Enhancement/Restoration Structure and Objectives
Table II: Drainage Area and Stream Classification
Table III: Land Use of Watershed
Table IV: Morphology Table
Table V: Designed Vegetative Communities (By Zone)
Table VI: Oxbow Wetland Seed Mix
Table VII: Permanent Riparian Seed Mix
11.0 Figures
Figure 1: Project Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Project Site Watershed Map
Figure 3: Project Site NRCS Soil Survey Map for Stanly County
Figure 4: Project Site Map with Hydrological Features and Gauge Location
Figure 5: Project Site Map with Wetland Delineation
Figure 6 and 7: Reference Site Vicinity and Watershed Map
Figure 8: Reference Site Streams and Wetlands NRCS Stanly County Soil Survey
Figure 9: Reference Site Wetland Map with Gauge Location
Figure 10: Reference Site Riparian Map
12.0 Design Sheets
T1: Title Sheet
LS1: Legends and Symbols
EC01 - EC09: Existing Conditions
D01 - D08: Details
GN01: Construction Sequence and General Notes
PP01 - PP25: Plan and Profile Sheets
TYP01 - TYP03: Typical Cross Sections
M01 - M04: Morphology Table
PN01 - PN04: Planting Notes
VP01 - VP09: Planting Plans
? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
13.0 Appendices
Appendix 1: Project Site Photographs
Appendix 2: Project Site NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms
Appendix 3: Project Site USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms
Appendix 4: Reference Site Photographs
Appendix 5: Reference Site NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms
Appendix 6: Categorical Exclusion Checklist
Appendix 7: Stream Assessment
Appendix 8: Sampled Stream Materials
Appendix 9: Soil Water & Environment Group (SWE) Soil Analysis and Evaluation for Rockwell Site
Wetland and Stream Mitigation Project Site
Appendix 10: Hydrologic Gauge Data Summary, Groundwater and Rainfall Information
Vi;
? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
1.0 Project Site Identification and Location
1.1 Directions to Project Site
The Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration project (Site) is located 6 miles
southeast of Albemarle in Stanly County, North Carolina. To drive to the Site from Raleigh, you
take 1-40 West and merge onto US-1 S towards Sanford. Then, you exit off U.S.1 onto U.S. 501
S/U.S.15 S. and continue on U.S. 501 S/U.S.15 S until you merge onto NC-24 W/NC-27 S.
Follow N.C. 24/N.C.-27 S and turn left onto Indian Mound Road/N.C. 1740. Take Indian Mound
Road/ N.C.1740 and then turn right onto Alpine Road. See Figures 1 and 2 for the project
vicinity and location maps.
1.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations
The project is located in the USGS Hydrologic Unit Code 03040104010020 and all of the project
streams are located in the Yadkin Basin and the 03-07-08 NCDWQ sub-basin.
1.3 Project Vicinity Map
Please refer to Figure 1 for the Site's vicinity map.
2.0 Watershed Characterization
2.1 Drainage Area
Table 3 provides hydrological and surface water classification information for the major project
reaches.
? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Table 3: Drainage Area and Stream Classification

Reach Drainage Area
(mil) Surface Water
Classification
Stream Order
Onsite Reference (Upper UT4) 0.11 WS-IV 1
UT1-Upper 0.09 WS-IV 1
UT1-Middle 0.75 WS-IV 2
UT1-Lower 1.12 WS-IV 2
UT2 0.13 WS-IV 1
UT3 0.15 WS-IV 1
UT4-Upper 0.11 WS-IV 1
UT4-Middle 0.28 WS-IV 1
UT4-Lower 0.42 WS-IV 1
UT5 0.07 WS-IV 1
UT6 0.02 WS-IV 1
UT7 0.05 WS-IV 1
2.2 Surface Water Classification/Water Quality
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) catalogs all the Site's streams as index
number 13-10-(1) and classifies them as WS-IV streams. The WS-IV classification denotes a
Water Supply IV that is highly developed. The Site's streams do not appear on the 2008 North
Carolina 303(d) list of impaired waters.
2.3 Physiography, Geology, and Soils
The project area is located in the Carolina Slate Belt sub-ecoregion of the Piedmont ecoregion.
This sub-region extends from southern Virginia, across the Carolinas, and into a small part of
eastern Georgia. The mineral-rich metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks with slatey cleavage
tend to be finer-grained and less metamorphosed than other parts of the Piedmont and are
somewhat less resistant to erosion. In North Carolina, some parts of the region are more rugged
and hilly. Trellised drainage patterns also occur in parts of the region. The volcanic-sedimentary
2 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
• DRAFT
• Restoration Plan
• Rockwell Pastures Site
• Stanly County, North Carolina
•
•
• rock formations include volcanic slates, basic and acid tuffs, breccias, and interbedded flows. The
• volcanic slates are deeply weathered in places, forming clay and shale, and the soils generally
• have high silt contents. Georgeville and Herndon soils (fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Hapludults)
• are common.
• The NRCS soil survey for Stanly County maps the following soils within the site: Badin channery
• silt loam, Ewon very strong loam, Kirksey silt loam, Oakboro silt loam, Tatum gravelly loam, and
• Tatum channery silt clay.
• 2.4 Historical Land Use and Development Trends
•
• 2.4.1 Historical Land Use
• Historically, agricultural land and forests have dominated the landscape of the watershed.
• The land use has been split evenly between agriculture and forest (Restoration Table III).
• 2.4.2 Development Trends
• The Site's primary landowners own almost the entire watershed draining into the project
• streams. The area lies within a rural setting and the landowners have not expressed an
• interest in developing the land within the watershed. There is potential for the Dennis property
• to secure a permanent farm conservation easement that would preclude future development of
• the upper half of the watershed.
• 2.5 Endangered/Threatened Species
•
• Under the provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended,
• federal law requires that any action likely to affect a federally protected species adversely be
• subject to review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). . The USFWS database
'
(updated January 16, 2008) lists one federally endangered species for Stanly County: Schweinitz
s
• sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii). Yadkin River goldenrod (Solidago plumosa) and Georgia aster
• (Symphyotrichum georgianum) are identified as candidate species; however, these species do not
• receive federal protection. The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is protected under the Bald
and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Review of the Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database of
• documented occurrences did not reveal the presence of any of these species within a 1-mile radius
• of the proposed Site. Each species, its habitat, and its status are described in Table 4.
•
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzit)
• Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herb, usually 3 to 6 feet tall with yellow flowers that occur in
• late August to October. Schweinitz's sunflower is found in relatively open habitats such as
•
• 3 ? M ? Kimley-Horn
• M and Associates, Inc.
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
roadsides, maintained rights-of-way, early successional fields, and woodland openings. Generally,
Schweinitz's sunflower occurs on shallow, poorly drained, clayey and/or rocky soils.
Marginal habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower exists along the agricultural field edges at the Rockwell
Pastures property; however, the frequent disturbance here makes these areas unfavorable. The
majority of Site is used as open active agricultural fields, void of any native vegetation. The soils
are predominantly deep and moderately to well-drained.
No occurrences of Schweinitz's sunflower have been documented in the NHP database within a
one-mile radius of the proposed mitigation site and presence of this species has not been observed
by Kimley-Horn biologists during site investigations conducted during Schweinitz's sunflower
flowering season.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Bald Eagle (Haliaeefus leucocephalus)
The bald eagle is a large raptor that typically inhabits the shorelines of large rivers, lakes, and
ponds. Bald eagles construct nests in large trees near the shoreline and make use of the large
water bodies for foraging.
Suitable habitat for bald eagle does not exist within the proposed mitigation areas, as there are no
large bodies of water on or adjacent to the proposed project property. No occurrences of bald
eagle have been documented in the NHP database within a one-mile radius of the proposed
mitigation site and presence of this species or of suitable habitat for this species has not been
observed by Kimley-Horn biologists during site investigations.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT.
• Yadkin River Goldenrod (Solidago plumose)
• Yadkin River goldenrod is a perennial herb, endemic to the Yadkin River in North Carolina.
• Currently, plants are known to exist in only two locations, within 2 kilometers of each other, along
- the shoreline of the Yadkin River. This species is listed as a candidate species by the USFWS.
• Habitat for Yadkin River goldenrod does not exist on the Site due to the lack of flood scouring, the
• establishment and spread of invasive species, and the clearing of native vegetation for agricultural
purposes. The majority of this site is used as open active agricultural fields, void of any native
• vegetation.
• No occurrences of Yadkin River goldenrod have been documented in the NHP database within a 1-
• mile radius of the proposed mitigation site. In addition, Kimley-Horn biologists have not observed
• the presence of this species during investigations.
• BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
•
• 4 ? ? Kimley-Horn
• and Associates, Inc.
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Georaia Aster (Svmphvotrichum aeoraianum
Georgia aster is a perennial herb distinguished by its large flower heads with dark purple rays up to
2 cm long. Disc flowers are white with purplish tips on the corollas. Blooms first appear in early
October and continue into mid-November. Georgia aster is found in dry open woods, roadsides,
maintained rights-of-way, and woodland openings in dry oak-pine flatwoods and uplands in the
state's Piedmont region. This species is most likely a relic of the post oak-savanna communities
that existed in the region prior to fire suppression. Georgia aster is listed as a candidate species
by the USFWS.
Marginal habitat for Georgia aster exists along the agricultural field edges at the Site where the
frequent disturbances of the site mimic natural disturbances; however, the majority of this area is
used as open active agricultural fields, void of any native vegetation.
No occurrences of Georgia aster have been documented in the NHP database within a 1-mile
radius of the proposed Site, and presence of this species has not been observed by Kimley-Horn
biologists during investigations. The USFWS lists the record status for Georgia aster as "historic,"
meaning the species was last observed in Stanly County more than 50 years ago.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
Table 4: Endangered Species - Stanly County
Common Scientific Name
Name
Schweinitz's Helianthus
Sunflower schweinitzii
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus
leucocephalus
Yadkin River
Goldenrod
Habitat Requirement
0 en habitats such
p as roadsides,
maintained rights-of-way, early
successional fields, and woodland
openings. Generally occurs on
shallow, poorly drained, clayey
and/or rocky soils
State Federal Habitat
Status Status Present
E E
Shorelines of large rivers, lakes, T
and ponds
Solidago plumose Two known locations along the
shoreline of the Yadkin River
Georgia Aster Symphyotrichum
georgianum
Dry open woods, roadsides,
maintained rights-of-way, and
woodland openings in dry oak-pine

C
No
No
No
C No
flatwoods and uplands in the
state's Piedmont region
Notes: E=Endangered; T=Threatened; " Protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act; C=Candidate species for listing
5 Kimley-Horn
? and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
The State defines an endangered plant species as "any species or higher taxon of plant whose continued existence as a viable
component of the State's flora is determined to be in jeopardy" (GS 198 106:202.12).
The State defines an endangered animal species as "any native or once-native species of wild animal whose continued existence as a
viable component of the State's fauna is determined by the Wildlife Resources Commission to be in jeopardy or any species of wild
animal determined to be an 'endangered species' pursuant to the Endangered Species Act" (Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General
Statutes; 1987).
2.6 Cultural Resources
A project scoping letter was sent to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on December
10, 2007 to request a review of the project for any potential impacts to cultural resources. SHPO's
reply of on December 27, 2007 stated that it is not aware of any known historical resources within
the project boundary that would be affected by the project. Copies of these letters are included as
part of the categorical exclusion in Appendix 6.
2.7 Potential Constraints
2.7.1 Property Ownership and Boundary
The conservation easement for each unnamed tributary will be contained on one parcel. The
table below provides the property owner and the easement area in acres.
Table 5: Ownership

Property Owner Easement
Area
(sf) Easement
Area
(acres)
Frank J. Dennis, Jr. and wife, Marie H. Dennis 9,923 0.23
Frank Dennis and wife, Wilma M. Dennis 846 0.02
Charles R. Dennis and wife, Rebecca W. Dennis 408,015 9.37
Dennis Farms, Inc. 871,080 20.00
Deese Family, LP 483,374 11.10
Reece Vane Deese and wife, Kathie Talbert Deese 379,308 8.71
Total 2,143,738 49.4
The property boundary is shown in Figure 1 and the conservation easement boundary is shown in the
Restoration Plan Design Sheets.
6 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
DRAFT
• Restoration Plan
• Rockwell Pastures Site
• Stanly County, North Carolina
•
•
• 2.7.2 Site Access
• Tributary UT1 could be accessed from several points where there are existing farm roads and
• driveways. It is anticipated that the upper part of UT1, UT5, and UT4 as well as the wetland
• restoration will be accessed using the main road through the Dennis farm. The lower part of
• UT1, UT2, UT3, and the restoration portion of UT7 will be accessed through the main road of
the Reece farm. It is assumed that UT6 and the upper portion of UT7 will be accessed from
• the Dennis farm road. However, it also would be possible to access these streams from the
• main farm road.
• 2.7.3 Utilities
Hunsucker Surveying, P.A. located one overhead power line on the Site that has been
• excluded from the project with a 20 foot-wide corridor. The survey did not show an easement
• with this power line. The power line crosses UT4 and is assumed to sere a single residence.
The site work contractor will be advised to contact North Carolina One Call prior to beginning
• any construction activity.
2.7.4 FEMA/Hydrologic Trespass
• Based on the latest available flood mapping from NC Flood Maps, the site is outside of any
• mapped floodplains and should not be affected by any FEMA requirements.
There is a potential increase in flood elevations for all of the project site streams where Priority
• 1 restoration will be conducted. However, due to the confined nature of the stream valleys,
• any hydraulic trespass would potentially affect only the current landowners. No significant
increase in flood elevations is anticipated. There are no anticipated downstream increases in
• flood elevation.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
3.0 Project Site Streams
UT1 is a solid blue-line, second order stream based on the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map (see
Figure 2). The channel has failing banks and is moderately to severely incised for most of its
length. Much of the area of UT1 below its confluence with UT4 is open, active pasture except for a
short length of approximately 375 feet of sparse woody vegetation at the bottom of the project. The
presence of livestock and maintenance in the pasture have resulted in degraded and eroded stream
banks. The upper portion of UT1 above the confluence with UT4 is located within active agricultural
fields. Except for the 375-foot-section at the bottom of the project, the entire length of UT1 has
been historically straightened and channelized, which . has contributed to the instability. The
stream also is heavily sedimented. However, it does support a variety of aquatic life, including fish,
crayfish, frogs, and macrobenthos. UT1 would alternately be classified as a Rosgen B and a
Rosgen C with actively eroding bed and banks. The reach is considered perennial and appears to
7 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
be fed by a number of headwater seeps (Figure 4). The perennial portion of UT1 scored from 30 in
the upper reach to 48.5 on the lower reach on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form.
UT2 is a first order stream based on the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map (Figure 4). The existing
condition of UT2 is similar to that of UT1. It has been heavily impacted by livestock, is fed by an
existing pond, and is a Bc channel. The stream is heavily sedimented, but contains aquatic life
characteristic of perennial streams, including right-handed (gilled) snails, mayflies, bullfrog tadpoles,
and minnows. The herbaceous buffer along the stream has been severely degraded by livestock
access. The stream's . perennial portion scored a 32 on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form.
The low scoring of the stream is due to the impact from livestock (sedimentation and hoof-shear),
which removed much of the geomorphic features that would normally be found in a stream this size.
UT3 is a small stream that has a perennial and an intermittent portion (Figure 4). UT3 has been
heavily impacted by livestock and the buffer contains herbaceous vegetation. The short, upper
portion of the stream is considered to be intermittent and would be considered an incised Rosgen E
type channel. The intermittent portion is eroding and is subject to heavy sedimentation due to hoof
shear and livestock access. The lower portion of the stream is alternately incised and sedimented
with failing banks and has been degraded by livestock impacts such as hoof shear. The middle
portion of this stream is sedimented by livestock damage to the point that it has lost its form. The
entire perennial reach of the stream appears to have been historically straightened.. The perennial
portion scored a 43 on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form.
• UT4 is a first order stream based on the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map. The upper portion of
• the stream is impounded by three small ponds that are fed by a perennial spring. Below the ponds,
the upper portion of the stream is relatively stable; however, it is overgrown with invasive species
• such as the Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora). This portion of
the stream has an appropriate riffle-pool sequence.
• The middle portion of UT4 has been impacted by silviculture. Except for a section of approximately
• 200 feet, the stream is extremely over-wide (width-to-depth ratio of approximately 79) and braided in
• most areas (see Appendix 7 for cross sectional measurements). This has resulted in unstable
"
"
banks, as the stream appears to frequently
wander
across the valley floor. It appears to have
• been heavily altered and the buffer recently has been removed. The area where a power line
• crosses the stream is excluded from the project site. Above this area is a small riparian wetland
- with mostly herbaceous vegetation.
• The lower portion of the stream has been straightened and altered based on topographic and visual
• observation. Most of the banks are severely unstable as a result of the redirection of the channel.
A strong and unstable head-cut separates the lower portion and middle portions of UT4. It appears
• to have been historically straightened. The buffers also have been cleared recently, leaving mostly
sparse, new-growth vegetation. The geomorphic assessment of the lower portion of UT4 revealed
• that the stream is incised and is unstable because of the straightening and other alterations (see
Appendix 7).
w
•
• 8 ? ? Kimley-Horn
A
i
I
• and
ssoc
ates,
nc.
•
•
•
• DRAFT
• Restoration Plan
• Rockwell Pastures Site
• Stanly County, North Carolina
•
•
• The upper portion of the stream scored a 35.5 using the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form and,
• as such, would be considered perennial for the entire length.
• UT5 is located in an agricultural field and has been heavily impacted by crop production that has
• completely removed the buffers. Row crops are currently being planted to the stream edge resulting
• in heavy sedimentation. It also appears to have been straightened and channelized through
periodic maintenance. The bed and banks are unstable. The stream scored a 28 on the NCDWQ
• rating form, making it an intermittent stream.
• UT6 originates in an agricultural field and does not appear on a 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map
• as a stream. The entire length is considered intermittent from its origin to its confluence with UT7.
• The stream is incised in its upper portions, but because of erosion and failing banks is sedimented
• in as the topography flattens and sediments are deposited. Row crops are being planted to the
edge of the stream resulting in heavy sedimentation. The stream scored a 28 on the NCDWQ rating
• form, making it an intermittent stream.
• UT7 is bounded by an agricultural field and cutover forest along most of its upper portion above the
• confluence with UT6. The banks are unstable due to the lack of vegetation resulting in heavy
• sedimentation. It is also bounded by agricultural field and open pasture to just below its confluence
• with UT6. At this point, the stream becomes clearly perennial based on a NCDWQ score of 33 due
to its lack of geomorphology, the found biology, and the fact that it is completely bounded by active
• pastureland that allows livestock access. The entire length of the stream appears to have been
• straightened. The upper portion is incised with failing banks. The lower portion becomes heavily
• sedimented as it enters the valley bottom and has been heavily impacted livestock access and hoof-
shear. The upper portion did score a 35 on the NCDWQ rating form.
•
• 3.1 Channel Classification
•
• Kimley-Horn performed a geomorphic survey (cross sections, longitudinal survey, and pattern) and
• sampled stream materials (classification and entrainment pebble counts, bar samples, sub-
pavement, and pavement samples) on several reaches representative of the geomorphic settings
• within the project area. Table 6 below summarizes the channel classifications of the surveyed
• reaches within the project area, and Restoration Table IV provides detailed morphological data.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• 9 ? ? Kimley-Horn
• and Associates, Inc.
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Table 6: Summary of Stream Classification
Assessment
Reach Drainage
Area
(mi) Entrenchment
Ratio
AM
Wbkf
Width/Depth Ratio
K
Slope Stream
Type
UT1-Upper 0.09 1.01 0.0173 B5
UT1-Middle 0.75 3.9 12.4 8.9 6.4 1.02 0.0086 E5
UT1-Lower 1.12 4.9 20.7 18.2 16.0 1.01 0.0090 C4
UT2 0.13 3.1 4.8 8.3 14.3 1.00 0.0281 64c
UT3 0.15 2.4 6.5 6.3 6.1 1.04 0.0126 E4
UT4-Upper 0.11 2.7 4.2 7.3 12.6 1.05 0.0156 C4
UT4-Middle 0.28 - 1.03 0.0148 R
UT4-Lower 0.42 10.7 9.9 7.4 5.5 1.02 0.0115 E4b
UT5 0.07 3.6 5.0 5.0 5.0 1.00 0.0186 E6
UT6 0.02 2.6 0.9 2.5 6.6 1.00 0.0162 E4/E5
UT7 0.05 2.0 1.0 2.8 8.0 1.01 0.0184 65
3.2 Channel Discharge
The peak flows for the 2-, 10-, 25-, and 100-year storms using the North Carolina rural flood-
frequency equations for the Blue Ridge/Piedmont Region (United States Geological Survey 2003)
are shown in Table 7.
10 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Table 7: Project Site Streams Peak Discharges
Assessment
Reach Area
(acres) Bankfull
Dis( arge* 2yr Q
(cfs) 10yr Q
(cfs 25yr Q

(cfs) 100yr Q

(cfs)
UT1-Upper 57.6 24.9 67.8 101 165
UT1-Middle 480 40.5 110 276 395 622
UT1-Lower 717 72.8 125 311 445 698
UT2 83 18.9 32.2 86.5 128 208
UT3 96 23.0 35.6 95.1 140 228
UT4-Upper (ref) 70 23.6 28.7 77.5 115 188
UT4-Middle 179 55.2 144 209 336
UT4-Lower 269 21.1 73.4 188 272 433
UT5 45 20.9 20.9 57.4 85.6 141
F UT6 13 2.0 8.7 25.1 38.2 64.6
UT7 32 2.1 16.5 46 68.9 115
-uarcwarea using manning s equation ana associatea -n° value for stream type.
3.3 Channel Morphology
Most of the project's restoration reaches lack the appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile for
their given valley types. These reaches were straightened and their buffers have been cleared and
historically managed to maximize usable pasture and/or farmland. The channels are unstable and
rarely exhibit defined riffle pool sequence and/or suitable aquatic habitat. The streams have
become incised or hydrologically disconnected from the floodplains resulting in increased shear
stress, velocity and the removal of hydrology from the historic adjacent riparian wetlands.
Restoration Table IV shows complete channel morphology data including channel, pattern,
dimension, and profile for all restoration and project reaches.
3.4 Channel Stability Assessment
The Site contains restoration reaches currently and historically used for pastures and farmland
(Appendix 1). The vegetative buffers have been cleared and are currently open fields with some
tree specimens along the banks. The streams also have been historically straightened to
maximize usable land. Because of these conditions, most of the restoration reaches have down-
cut, creating incised banks and accelerated bank erosion. Most of the project reaches lack the
proper dimension, pattern, profile, and aquatic habitat.
11 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
• Bank height ratios (that is, low bank height divided by the maximum bankfull depth) were
determined for the surveyed reaches. In the methodology used for this report (Rosgen, 2001),
bank height ratios between 1.1 and 1.3 are considered "moderately unstable," ratios between 1.3
• and 1.5 are considered "unstable," and bank height ratios greater than 1.5 are considered "highly
unstable" (see Restoration Table IV).
•
• 3.5 Bankfull Verification
•
• Determination of the bankfull elevation is vital to generating meaningful geomorphic values. There
were sufficient bankfull indicators on-site such as benches, point bars, sediment deposits, and rack
• lines. The reach at the bottom of UT1 and a reach below the last dam on UT4 were used as
reference streams. Cross sections of UT2 were also used to verify reference dimensions. The
• bankfull area values of all of the above project reaches were compared to the North Carolina
• Piedmont Rural regional curves (Harman, Jennings et al. 1999). The results indicate a general
agreement between the three sets of values (site, references, and regional curve), thus providing a
measure of validation (see Appendix 7).
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
3.6 Vegetation
The majority of the Site contains open agricultural row crops such as wheat or beans and
pastureland. UT4 is surrounded by Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) forest planted in rows for
silviculture. The areas closest to the stream have been recently disturbed and colonized by
herbaceous vegetation, including grasses, rushes and sedges, blackberry (Rubus sp.), multiflora
rose, and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). However, there are a variety of woody
species present, including Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis),
Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), Chinese privet, inkberry (Ilex glabra), sweetgum
(Liquidambarstyraciflua), and hickory (Carya spp.). Of these species, multiflora rose, Japanese
honeysuckle, and Chinese privet are considered invasive.
4.0 Reference Stream
4.1 Watershed Characterization
Two on-site reference reaches were surveyed for key geomorphological parameters (Figure 7).
These areas were deemed to be relatively stable with riff le pool sequences appropriate for the
stream and valley type. Both of these streams lie within in the same watershed. The upper UT4
reference stream is mostly wooded and includes a series of three small ponds. UT1 watershed is
partially wooded and mostly in agriculture or pastureland. The reference site on UT1 will be used
12 ? M ? Kimley-Horn
M and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
for the streams with drainage areas of greater than 0.25 square miles and similar valley type, the
lower parts of UT1 and UT4. The upper UT4 reference will be used for the rest of the streams that
have drainage areas of less than 0.25 square miles. Geomorphic data for dimension, pattern, and
profile also was gathered on UT2 since it is relatively stable. The watershed for UT2 is partially
cutover and includes a pond immediately upstream. The data gathered from these reach
corresponded very well with the regional curve data (see Appendix 7).
4.2 Channel Classification
The upper UT4 reference reach is classified as a Rosgen C4 channel; the UT1 reference reach is
classified as a Rosgen C4 channel; and the UT2 reach is classified as a Rosgen 134c channel.
The reference stream morphology is included in Restoration Table IV.
4.3 Discharge
The peak flows for the 2-, 10-, 25-, and 100-year storms were modeled for the given drainage
areas. These flows were calculated using the North Carolina DOT project design discharge charts.
Table 8: Reference Stream Peak Discharges
Reference Area Bankfull

arge
Disch 2yr Q 10yr Q 25yr Q 100yr Q
Reach (ac.) (c (cfs) (cfs) (cfs cfs
( )
UT1-Lower
(reference) 717 72.8 146.0 360.0 512.0 800.0
UT4-Upper
(reference) 70 23.6 28.7 77.5 115.0 188.0
t,atcruarea using manning s equation ana appropriate -n° tor stream.
4.4 Channel Stability Assessment
During site inspections, the reference reach streams appeared stable with morphological
measurements indicating stable dimension, pattern, and profile. These reaches are stable due to
combination of vegetation along the banks; proper dimension, pattern, and profile; and access to
an active floodplain. (See Appendix 4 for photographs.)
4.5 Bankfull Verification
Determination of the bankfull elevation is vital to generating meaningful geomorphic values. There
were sufficient bankfull indicators on-site such as benches, point bars, sediment deposits, and rack
13 ? Kimley-Horn
? M ? and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
lines. To verify bankfull elevations, the bankfull area values for the project reference reaches were
compared to the North Carolina Piedmont Rural regional curves (Harman, Jennings et al. 1999).
The results indicate a strong agreement between reference reaches and regional curve data, thus
providing a measure of validation (Appendix 7).
4.6 Vegetation
The riparian areas at this site should be a combination of Piedmont/Mountain bottomland forest,
• Piedmont/Mountain levee forest, and Piedmont/Low Mountain alluvial forest communities as
described by Schafale and Weakley. Two reference communities were located and are shown in
• Figure 10. Their species composition correlate well with the natural community types mentioned
• above. Common species in the natural communities include:
• Acer floridanum, Acer negundo, Acer rubrum, Aesculus sylvatica, Asimina triloba, Betula nigra,
Carpinus caroliniana, Carya cordiformis, Carya ovata, Celtis laevigata, Corpus amomum, Corpus
• florida, Corylus cornuta, Evonymus Americana, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, flex opaca, Juglans nigra,
Lindera benzoin, Liquidambar styraciflua, Liriodendron tulipifera, Pinus taeda, Platanus
• occidentalis, Quercus imbricaria, Quercus michauxii, Quercus pagoda (falcata var. pagodaefolia),
• Ulmus americana, and Xanthorhiza simplicissima (Schafale and Weakley 1990).
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
5.0 Project Site Wetlands
The project site includes three wetland areas (W1, W2, and W3 in Figure 4). Only W2 is
jurisdictional and is described in section 5.1. W1 is a proposed non-riparian wetland restoration
site. It is located west of UT6, but the two do not have any hydrologic interaction. The site also is
located high enough in the valley where it does not have any relevant hydrological interaction with
UT1. The site receives overland flow from two ephemeral drainage ways. It also appears to
interact with the groundwater table and groundwater seepage. The site is currently in agriculture
and has been ditched in two directions and crowned (see photo 15 of Appendix 1). There is a
series of ditches and crowning running parallel to the valley and one Swale running perpendicular
to the valley that has resulted in the effective draining of the site. The soils analysis performed by
a licensed soil scientist reveals the presence of relic hydric soil features (see Appendix 9). As
such, the site is considered a drained wetland. W3 is located near upper UT1 outside of the
project easement and will be used a reference for hydrology.
5.1 Jurisdictional Wetlands
UT4 flows through one jurisdictional wetland, W2 (see Figure 5). It was delineated following the
guidelines presented in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual.
The center of the wetland is located at -80 8.52, 3516.63 degrees (NAD83) and covers 0.13 acres.
14 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
This area is considered a low quality wetland because of a lack of appropriate bottomland
hardwood forest tree species or low elevation seep herbaceous species. This wetland will be
enhanced through supplemental plantings. The stream restoration in this area should not alter the
hydrology of the existing wetland because it will maintain the existing water table.
There were no other jurisdiction wetlands identified within the easement boundaries. However,
jurisdictional wetlands may be established within the pond bottoms on UT4 after they are drained.
5.2 Hydrological Characterization
5.2.1 Groundwater Modeling
The on-site hydrological reference wetland, W3, has a similar position in the valley as W1,
- since it is a seep that discharges to UTi, but does not receive the majority of its groundwater
- hydrology from UTi. As such, the reference, W3, and restoration wetland, W1, are considered
to be non-riparian. Although the soils are not mapped as the same type (Oakboro silt loam in
the restoration wetland versus Kirksey silt loam in the hydrologic reference wetland) the soils
are similar to those of the restoration area, W1. This allows the hydrologic reference to be
- used as a base for comparing quantitative criteria for a simplified hydrologic budget and to
compare groundwater elevations using groundwater monitoring gages. Rainfall, groundwater,
and surface water inputs from respective adjacent streams, evaporation, infiltration, and
ground water flows should be relatively similar for the reference site and the proposed
• restoration/enhancement site. The ratio of wetland area to contributing drainage area can be
used as a basis to determine as one indicator that the hydrologic inputs are sufficient for the
proposed restoration. The reference wetland (not including the stream inputs) to wetland area
is a ratio of 15.7:1. The ratio for the restoration area is approximately 10.5:1, which is similar in
magnitude. This data helps verify that the source hydrology and groundwater would support
- these wetlands once the hydrologic modifications are returned to reference (i.e., ditches are
removed, and adjacent channels are raised to historic or reference levels). It is assumed
based on the position of the reference and restoration wetlands that the hydrologic input from
the closest streams would not occur except in extreme flood events.
5.2.2 Surface Water Modeling
Since the restoration wetland is non-riparian, inputs from flooding will be considered
negligible. A HEC RAS analysis will be performed for UT1, but will not be used to analyze the
wetland restoration.
5.2.3 Hydrologic Budget
The proposed wetland restoration area receives hydrologic inputs through hill slope seepage,
connection to the groundwater table, and surface runoff. The proposed wetland restoration
site has been drained by bi-directional ditching designed to drain the wetlands and improve
15 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
drainage for agriculture and pasture. The wetland area also has been crowned and tilled,
which has removed the microtopography. These drainage improvements have led to the
draining of seepage and upslope runoff, lowering of the local groundwater table, and reduction
of the length of inundation.
5.3 Soil Characterization
• Kimley-Horn has engaged Soil Water & Environment Group (SWE) to provide licensed soil scientist
• services. SWE personnel investigated the project site to confirm NRCS soil survey mapping data
for the wetland restoration location, record detailed soil descriptions for the restoration areas
• representing different landscape positions across the site, and to determine the extent of hydric
soils for the purpose of wetland restoration site criteria. A series of hand augerings were
• performed across selected areas of the proposed wetland restoration site at maximum depths of
approximately 18 to 24 inches. Detailed soil descriptions including depth of horizon, color, texture,
• structure, and consistence were recorded (Appendix 9). For areas where relic redoximorphic
• features occur at a depth of greater than 12 inches due to site disturbance from farming, minor
• grading of less than or equal to 6 inches would most likely result in a change to more hydric
• conditions and an elevated water table. Typically, wetland areas include soils that have a matrix
with chroma 1 or 2 within the upper 12 inches.
•
• 5.3.1 Taxonomic Classification
See Appendix 9 for the taxonomic report performed by SWE on March 9, 2007.
• 5.3.2 Profile Description
• See Appendix 9 for the taxonomic report performed by SWE on March 9, 2007.
•
• 5.3.3 Hydraulic Conductivity
• According to the soil surrey for Stanly County, the soils found onsite in the wetland restoration
• and hydrological reference area are moderately well drained and are moderately to slowly
• permeable. Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) is moderately rapid to rapid in the stratum
and rapid to very rapid in the substratum. The index of surface runoff is negligible. Flooding is
• occasional to frequent with very brief duration.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
5.4 Plant Community Characterization
The plant communities in the restoration wetland areas W1 and W3 are currently in agriculture
(winter wheat). The plant community for W2 was mostly herbaceous grass, rush and sedge
species. There are also Loblolly pine, Tag alder (Alnus serrulata), Chinese privet, and Blackberry.
16 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
6.0 Reference Wetland
6.1 Hydrological Characterization
The hydrological reference wetland area, W3, is fed by hill slope seepage, runoff, and a connection
to the groundwater table.
6.2 Soil Characterization
For the purposes of the restoration, wetland W2 will be used for soil characterization, as the soil
characteristics will be most similar to the restoration site. The soil characteristics are described in
Section 5 (above).
6.2.1 Taxonomic Classification
See Section 5 (above).
6.2.2 Profile Description
See Section 5 (above).
6.2.3 Hydraulic Conductivity
See Section 5 (above).
6.3 Plant Community Characterization
6.3.1 Community Description
The wetland areas at this Site are low elevation seep communities. Common species in these
communities include: Saururus cernuus, Impatiens capensis, Osmunda cinnamomea,
Osmunda regalis, Boehmeria cylindrica,Rudbeckia laciniata, Ranunculus recurvatus, Chelone
glabra, Juncus spp., and Saxifraga micranthidifolia. (Schafale and Weakley 1990). These
communities also include occasional species from bottomland hardwood forests.
•
•
•
•
•
•
17 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
7.0 Project Site Restoration Plan
7.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives
The overall goal of this project is to effectively provide functional uplift to an entire watershed by
restoring or enhancing most of the stream, wetland, and riparian areas within the watershed. The
actions we plan to take to accomplish this goal will improve water quality, ecological function, and
habitat and will include:
¦ Removing excess nutrients and sediment through the use of vegetative buffers
¦ Increasing dissolved oxygen concentrations through the use of in-stream structures and the
turbulence they produce in pools
¦ Stabilizing the stream bank using natural channel design techniques
¦ Improving substrate through the use of structures and the elimination of major sediment
sources from the stream
¦ Creating habitat diversity by introducing woody structures such as log vanes and/or root wads
¦ Reducing temperature by restoring canopy in the buffer areas
¦ Reconnecting streams to their adjacent floodplains and wetlands
¦ Raising groundwater levels in adjacent streams by raising adjacent channel bed elevation
¦ Removing/plugging ditches used to drain historic wetlands
¦ Creating micro-topography by regrading and ripping wetlands
¦ Breaking up historically compacted soils by cattle to allow the groundwater to come to the
surface and wetland vegetation to flourish
¦ Improving crossings by replacing pipes and/or stabilizing outfalls
¦ Controlling the invasive exotics by removing them during construction
¦ Preserving stable on-site streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers draining into the
enhancement/restoration reaches
¦ Excluding livestock through fencing
¦ Re-vegetating the stream banks, wetlands, and riparian area to improve bio-diversity and
ecology
¦ Providing all of the above in order to restore riparian functions to the entire watershed.
18 ? M ? Kimley-Horn
M and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Site-Specific Stream Treatments
UT1- In order to provide functional uplift to UT1, we have divided the stream work to be
performed into four types of treatment. The uppermost portion will be treated using Enhancement
Level II to establish stability. Most of the remaining reaches of the stream will be treated using
restoration since the stream is incised and has been historically straightened (based on
morphological data gathered and information provided by the landowners). Restoring these
sections of stream using a Priority 1 restoration technique will re-connect the stream with its
historical floodplain, restoring the functions of the riparian buffer. One exception to this approach is
the lowest portion (approximately 375 feet) that is not incised and has a thin wooded buffer. This
area will be treated using Enhancement Level II that may include some minor bank grading. The
other exception is the reach along the upper portion just above the main farm road where property
constraints will only allow the use of buffer planting, benches and grade control structures to
provide an improved cross section and bedform (profile) step/pool features. In this section, the
eastern bank of the stream will only have a 10-25 foot buffer. This concession to the landowners
was necessary to secure the entire stream corridor. Enhancement Level I credit will be sought for
this section.
UT2 - This small perennial stream is accessible to livestock and is located immediately below a
large farm pond at the toe of a hill. The stream does not appear to have been relocated and has a
relatively stable and natural morphology with a boulder substrate. As such, livestock will be fenced
from the stream and native forest vegetation will be established to provide 50-foot buffers. This
treatment is considered to be Enhancement Level II.
UT3 - This small perennial stream with a short intermittent section at the top. The geomorphic
assessment revealed that the perennial portion of the stream does not provide appropriate
dimension, pattern, or profile. It also appears to have been historically straightened. Additionally,
the stream is accessible to livestock that have heavily degrading it by hoof shear and animal waste.
Fully restoring this channel will provide uplift by stabilizing the stream and by providing improved
stream habitat. Additionally, livestock will be excluded from the stream by fencing.
UT5 and UT6 - These small intermittent streams are located in agricultural fields. Since these
systems are relatively small, it is anticipated that they can be stabilized by re-establishing a woody
riparian buffer. As such, we are proposing Enhancement Level II for these streams. Providing a
riparian buffer to the intermittent portions of the above streams will protect the downstream areas
by removing sedimentation sources and by providing shading to reduce temperature. The stream
banks along UT5 and UT6 are unstable due to agriculture and mowing down to the stream edge.
A forested buffer will provide filtering for sediments and shading to reduce temperatures.
UT4 - The uppermost portion of this stream includes three small spring fed ponds. The stream
will be restored through these ponds by partially removing the dam structure and allowing the
stream channel to be re-established in the pond bottom. The approach is to establish the lowest,
presumably flat, portions of the existing pond bottoms as the flood plain and to create a channel
19 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
- DRAFT
Restoration Plan
• Rockwell Pastures Site
• Stanly County, North Carolina
•
•
with the appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile. Our experience is that this approach
• minimizes sediment loss and rapidly re-establishes the stream and riparian corridor.
• Immediately below the ponds and for a short section just above and below the existing road, the
• stream channel is stable with undercut banks and an appropriate riffle/pool sequence. However,
- there are invasive species that are to be removed and replanted with native tree species. As such,
this treatment is considered to be Enhancement Level II.
•

• Between the above reaches, there is a reach that had been impacted by the farmer on numerous
occasions using earth-moving equipment. This reach has multiple threads in some locations and
• the main part of the stream switches channels or forms new channels from time to time (i.e. the
• streams are laterally unstable). The reaches also have excessively wide width to depth ratios and
• are overly shallow in areas with bedrock. This area will receive a combination of Restoration and
Enhancement Level I treatment by blocking the multi-threaded areas, building benches using
• single or double wing deflectors, and adding appropriate bed-form features using log and rock
• vanes. The goal of this approach is to re-create a single thread channel with an appropriate width
- to depth ratio that is laterally stable and has better formed riffle-pool complexes. This will greatly

• improve habitat and reduce sedimentation. There is a large headcut on UT4 above the confluence
with UT5. From this point down, the stream is incised and highly eroded and will be restored using
• Priority 1 stream restoration techniques. UT4 will also be placed back into its natural valley as it
• enters the Reese property. The existing channel had been relocated to the west.
• UT7 - This stream is intermittent above the confluence with UT6. The intermittent reach has a
• rocky substrate that is sedimented. Providing Enhancement Level II treatment to this portion will

• provide functional uplift to this biologically important stream. Providing a riparian buffer to the
intermittent portions of the above streams will protect the downstream areas by removing
• sedimentation sources and by providing shading to reduce temperature.
• The perennial reach below the confluence with UT6 has been strongly impacted by hoof-shear and
• nutrient inputs from livestock access. However, because of this and the fact that the stream has
- been historically straightened, it lacks proper dimension, pattern, and profile and will be restored

• using Priority 1 restoration techniques. This reach will also be fenced to exclude livestock.
Non-Riparian Wetland Restoration
• The proposed non-riparian wetland restoration plan includes the restoration of 1.7 acres of non-
riparian wetlands. The plan will target the restoration of a non-riparian low elevation seep
• (Schafale and Weakley 1990). Based on the location of the restoration site, the main source of
hydrology is from seepage and overland flow. The site is currently being drained by a pattern of
• ditches that will be filled. Crowning will be removed and micro-topography re-established.
• Separate reference wetlands for hydrology and vegetation are located on-site and plantings are
• based on communities (Schafale and Weakley 1990).
•
•
• 20 ? M ? Kimley-Horn
• and Associates, Inc.
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
7.1.1 Designed Channel Classification and Wetland Type
The restored stream sections of UT1, UT3, UT4, and UT7 are proposed as Rosgen C or E
streams. The Enhancement Level I and Level II sections of UT1, UT2, UT4, UT5, UT6 and
UT7 are proposed as Rosgen B, C or E streams (see Restoration Table IV). The wetland
restoration is proposed as a non-riparian low elevation seep wetland.
7.1.2 Target Wetland Communities/Buffer Communities
The riparian areas at this site are designed to be a combination of piedmont/mountain
bottomland forest, piedmont/mountain levee forest, and piedmont/low mountain alluvial forest
communities and the wetlands are proposed to be a low elevation seep (Schafale and Weakley
1990)..
7.2 Sediment Transport Analysis
7.2.1 Methodology
The shields curve was used to calculate the sediment transport for UT1, UT3, UT4, and UT7
because their stream bed substrate is a gravel-like material and the stream slope is steep on
several of the reaches. Sediment transport was calculated using shear stress equations and
shields curve to verify that the designed channel will be able to transport its bedload at bankfull
without aggrading or degrading. The shields curve was used for the initiation of particle
movement and to estimate the range of particles transported for a given shear stress.
Stream power was also assessed to check for unacceptable increases or decreases in stream
power that could signify potential problems with the proposed channels ability to transport its
sediment load. Stream power was calculated using the shear stress equation multiplied by
the stream velocity to verify that the designed channel would be able to transport its bedload at
bankfull without degrading.
Two physical characteristics of the channel design that affect the stream power of the channel
are the slope of the channel and hydraulic radius. The shear stress equation is as follows:
T=yRs
Where: T= shear stress (lb/ft2)
y = specific gravity of water (62.4 Ib/ft3)
R = hydraulic radius (ft)
s = water surface slope (ft/ft)
•
•
•
•
•
The hydraulic radius equals the cross sectional area divided by the wetted perimeter.
21 ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
A
R= P
Where: R = hydraulic radius
A = cross-sectional area (ft2)
P = wetted perimeter (ft)
To determine the velocity of the existing and proposed channels the Manning's equation was
used:
k A
V = n P ^(2/3) N[S
Where:
k =1.49 (constant)
v = velocity (ft/s)
n = roughness coefficient
A = cross-sectional area (ft2)
P = wetted perimeter (ft)
S = average stream slope (ft/ft)
The stream power of the channel is equal to the shear stress multiplied by the velocity.
Ps=TV
Where: Ps = stream power (lbs/ft*s)
T = shear stress (lb/ft2)
v = velocity (ft/s)
7.2.2 Calculations and Discussion
UT1, UT3, UT4, and UT7 were designed with mean depths and slopes sufficient to transport a
range of particles. These channels are designed to eliminate bank erosion, flush fine
particles, and transport the characteristic sediments. The characteristic sediments were
determined by analyzing bed materials in comparative streams with less impacted watersheds.
Table 9 provides the results of the sediment transport calculations using the shear stress
equation and Shields curve. The results show that the proposed channel should transport a
range of materials that includes the existing or characteristic channel materials.
22 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Table 9: Summary of Shear Stress Calculations

Restoration Reach
Proposed
Slope

(ft/ft) Proposed

Hydraulic
Radius
(ft)
Shear
Stress

(lb/ft') Particle
Transport Size*

(mm)
UT1-Upper 0.0159 0.48 0.48 27.2
UT1-Middle 0.0071 1.02 0.45 25.5
UT1-Lower 0.0085 1.10 0.58 34.7
UT2 - - -
UT3 0.0103 0.65 0.42 23.1
UT4-Upper 0.0185 0.55 0.63 38.4
UT4-Middle 0.0147 0.82 0.75 46.6
UT4-Lower 0.0122 0.90 0.69 41.9
UT5 - -
UT6 - -
UT7 0.0099 0.45 0.28 15.2
The stream power was evaluated on all stream reaches. According to studies by Brookes
(1991), streams with power values less than 1.0 ft-lb/sec/ft2 fail to transport some of the finer
particles such as sand. On the other hand, streams with power values greater than 3.4 ft-
Ib/sec/ft2 will erode the channel. UT1 upper is slightly below 1.0 at 0.93 ft-Ib/sec/ft2, but does
not have unusually large sediment loads consisting of sandy material. Tables 10 and 11
provide the results.
23 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Table 10: Summary of Existing Stream Power Calculations
Assessment
Reach Existing Slope
(eft) Existing
Hydraulic Radius
(ft) Existing
Shear Stress
(lb/ft2) Existing Stream
Power
(lbs/ft*s)
UT1-Upper 0.0173 0.59 0.64 2.01
UT1-Middle 0.0086 1.18 0.63 1.51
UT1-Lower 0.009 1.09 0.61 2.16
UT2 0.0299 0.55 1.03 3.79
UT3 0.0126 0.86 0.68 2.38
UT4-Upper 0.0185 0.52 0.60 3.14
UT4-Middle 0.0148 0.33 0.30 1.07
UT4-Lower 0.0115 1.11 0.80 3.22
UT5 0.0186 0.82 0.95 3.98
UT6 0.0162 0.34 0.34 0.74
UT7 0.0184 0.29 0.33 0.69
24 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Table 11: Summary of Proposed Stream Power Calculations

Assessment

Reach
Proposed Slope

(ft/ft) Proposed

Hydraulic Radius

(ft) Proposed

Shear Stress

(Ib/ft2) Proposed

Stream Power

(lbs/ft s)
UT1-Upper 0.0159 0.48 0.48 1.44
UT1-Middle 0.0071 1.02 0.45 1.50
UT1-Lower 0.0085 1.10 0.58 2.13
UT2 -
UT3 0.0103 0.65 0.42 1.25
UT4-Upper 0.0185 0.55 0.63 2.27
UT4-Middle 0.0147 0.82 0.75 3.12
UT4-Lower 0.0122 0.90 0.69 2.77
UT5 -
UT6 - -
UT7 0.0099 0.45 0.28 0.63
7.3 HEC-RAS Analysis
A HEC-RAS model (v. 4.0) was run to analyze the existing and proposed conditions of the project
streams.
A Priority 1 stream approach was used for UT1, UT3, UT4 and UT7 to restore dimension, pattern,
and profile. An Enhancement Level 1 approach was used for sections of UT4 and UT1. These
approaches result in raising the streambed, creating an overall localized net rise in elevation
throughout the restoration areas. For the proposed stream, the channels are designed so that the
bankfull and higher flow events flood out of the channel and hydrate the surrounding floodplain.
The enhancement level II reaches of UT1, UT2, UT4, UT5, UT6 and UT7 do not raise the
streambed elevations and therefore do not result in any rise in flood elevations throughout the
restoration areas.
The lower reach of UT4 will be relocated back to its original valley location with a priority 1
restoration approach. This will increase the flooding frequency for this localized floodplain.
25 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.

•
•
• DRAFT
• Restoration Plan
- Rockwell Pastures Site
• Stanly County, North Carolina
7.3.1 No-Rise, LOMB, CLOMR
None of the streams are located in FEMA mapped areas. Therefore no CLOMR, LOMB, or
No-Rise certification will be required for this project.
7.3.2 Hydrologic Trespass
There is an increase in flood elevations for UT1, UT3, UT4, and UT7. All project reaches
drain into David's Creek and the increase in on-site flood elevations will not increase the flood
elevations of David's Creek/Lake Tillery, and, therefore, will not cause any hydrologic trespass
to anyone downstream. The increase in flood elevations also is isolated to the project parcels
and will not increase flood elevations upstream.
7.4 Stormwater Best Management Practices
7.4.1 Site-Specific Stormwater Concerns
The project site is situated in a rural setting. It is anticipated that the re-established riparian
buffer will be a sufficient filter and treat any stormwater runoff from the adjacent fields. Non-
jurisdictional areas where concentrated stormwater flows enter the easement will be captured
in no-maintenance BMPs (vernal pools/level spreaders) created by grading. There are no
other site-specific stormwater concerns.
7.5 Hydrologic Modification
7.5.1 Narrative of Modification
Hydrologic modifications to the non-riparian wetland restoration area will result from a
combination of plugging of existing drainage ditches, removing field crowns, and providing
microtopography to improve surface water infiltration.
Key hydrological components for the project's wetlands include inputs from over-land flow,
groundwater seepage, infiltration of (micro-)ponded waters, and the balance of groundwater
inflows and outflows. The local groundwater elevations and the balance of groundwater
inflows and outflows will be increased by the removal of field crowns and removal of field
ditches. The jurisdictional wetland and other potential riparian wetland "restoration" areas will
be hydrologically enhanced by rising of the stream channels (in some locations), which will
elevate the groundwater table and increase the frequency of overbank flooding.
26 ? ? Kimley-Horn
• and Associates, Inc.
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
7.6 Soil Restoration
Soils within the riparian restoration areas will be treated to facilitate the growth and development of
plantings. The soils will be ripped or otherwise appropriated treated prior to planting to break up
compacted soils and create a favorable environment for new plants. Plant nutrients and soil
amendments will be applied to the soils if deemed necessary based on the soils test report
performed by the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Agronomic
Division for sample sites located throughout the project area.
7.7 Natural Plant Community Restoration
• The goal of the riparian restoration is to provide long-term improvements to ecological functions of
• the existing forest community. The Restoration Plan Design Sheets have been developed to
• provide these functional uplifts through the re-establishment of targeted natural communities. The
targeted natural communities were determined by comparing existing site conditions to established
• communities and verifying appropriate species in the proximate reference natural communities.
Based on the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program's Nature Community Classification, the
• site's riparian area most closely correlates to piedmont/mountain bottomland forest,
piedmont/mountain levee forest, and piedmont/low mountain alluvial forest communities (Schafale
and Weakley 1990).
•
• 7.7.1 Reforestation Scheme
• The goal of the planting scheme is to establish a riparian community consistent with the
• reference community, using an approach that accelerates the successional process and leads
to a mature riparian community. The planting plan will use the reference plant communities
• discussed in the previous paragraph as a base for designing a planting scheme and
developing a vegetation list.
Recolonization of cleared riparian habitats characteristically begins with the invasion of a
• pioneer species that creates an environment (e.g. shading) suitable for species typically found
- in a mature community. To initialize the proposed riparian community, the restoration area will
be planted with a mix of pioneer and climax species that have been selected and arranged to
• meet the following objectives:
• ¦ Establish mix of shade-intolerant canopy and shade-tolerant understory species
• ¦ Provide vegetative source of dominant species
• ¦ Establish local seed sources for those species less likely to migrate into the restoration
• area
• ¦ Stabilize disturbed or high stress areas
27 ? M ? Kimley-Horn
M and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Two planting zones have been developed considering site hydrology, soils, and disturbance
regimes and are referenced to natural communities. Each zone has a unique environment that
dictates species selection and community structure. A planting list has been developed for
each zone to match the vegetation in the reference community and meet the objectives given
above. The planting list only includes species that are readily available and have a reasonable
expectation of survival. For a given zone and species, a plant source and planting type are
recommended. Then, a planting schedule is developed so that site preparation and plant
installation occur at the optimal time and season. After installation, the planting will be
verified. Finally, a maintenance plan is developed to promote long-term success of the
planting. The planting plan components are described below in more detail.
7.7.2 Planting Zones
The planting plan includes five zones of distinct vegetative composition and structure.
¦ Zone 1 - Stream Bank 2.37 acres
¦ Zone 2 - Riparian/Bankfull Areas 41.74 acres
• Zone 3 - Bottomland Hardwoods 4.24 acres
¦ Zone 4 - Oxbow Wetland 0.61 acres
The zones are mapped on the Restoration Plan and are described below.
Zone 1- Stream Bank
The stream bank zone includes the stream bank from base flow to bankfull. The zone features
the steepest slopes (3 to 8%) of the zones and highest saturation levels. This environment
dictates the planting of fast-growing, obligate pioneer species to provide stability to areas at or
below bankfull.
Zone 2 - Riparian/Bankfull Areas
The riparian/bankfull areas zone encompasses the area from Zone 1 to the edge of the
easement, Zone 2 is an area exposed to regular stream flows and frequent soil deposition.
The most stressed areas are located on the outside bends of meanders. The banks will be
planted with fast-growing, deep-rooted species that will provide biostabilization and shading to
the stream.
Zone 3 -Bottomland Hardwood
The bottomland hardwood zone covers planting zones in the areas where the inundation or
saturation occurs for a long enough period of time during the growing season to select species
more adapted to hydric conditions.
28 ? ? Kimley-Horn
M and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Zone 4 - Oxbow Wetlands
Oxbow wetlands include shallow ponded areas created from channels abandoned in the
stream design. These areas will have standing water for extended periods and will be planted
with a herbaceous wetland seed mix.
7.7.3 Plant List
The plant list (see Restoration Table V) is based on the target community, reference
community, and recommendations from the North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute (Hall
2001) and the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (Smith 2004). The selection
of species also depends on availability from local nursery sources.
7.7.4 Plant Sources
The planting plan preferentially selects local genetic stock and uses three sources of plants.
Two sources - nursery stock and on-site transplants - will be tied directly to the initial
planting and will be used in numbers that will meet permit guidelines. The remaining source
- recruitment - is factored into the selection of species on the plant list, as the plant list
includes a significant portion of species not likely to become established from natural
propagation.
Nursery Stock
The planting plan may include any of the following nursery stock forms of woody species: bare
roots, containerized seedlings, and ball and burlap. Additionally, the plan may use sod or
seeds from commercial sources. The planting plan prescribes that nursery stock be grown
under environmental conditions similar to the target environment. The planting list includes
alternates in case specific species of pre-ordered plants are not available or acceptable for
installation.
On-Site Transplants
Several favorable species grow within the existing site. In the course of constructing a new
channel alignment, some individual plants may need to be removed. The individuals of a target
species that are of an appropriate size and age may be transplanted into the restoration area.
Recruitment
It is expected that the restoration sites will be populated with species from adjacent
communities. The sites will be maintained to keep the number of unwanted species at less
than 10% of the total population.
29 ? M ? Kimley-Horn
M and Associates, Inc.
•
•
- DRAFT
- Restoration Plan
i Rockwell Pastures Site
- Stanly County, North Carolina
•
•
• 7.7.5 Schedule
The planting plan will be scheduled around stream construction activities and growing season.
• Special attention will be given to stabilizing disturbed areas that include newly constructed
channels and temporary construction easements. The final vegetation planting will occur after
- proper site preparation (described below) and during the appropriate season.
- Plantings may be staggered based on surrounding activities. Live stake planting on stream
banks (Zone 1) will closely follow after channel construction to provide immediate stabilization.
• On-site transplants will be planted immediately after they are removed from their existing
• habitat. Planting of Zones 2-4 will occur from late winter to early spring, after construction, to
minimize or eliminate threats from the construction, exotic vegetation treatment, and/or
- unpredictable weather.
• 7.7.6 Stabilization
• Immediately after construction, the stream banks and all disturbed areas will be seeded with
permanent and temporary seed mixes. If the season is appropriate, permanent seeding will be
completed in conjunction with construction, and temporary seeding will be applied according to
Land Quality Section requirements. Within the stream channel (Zone 1), pioneer species that
provide immediate bank stabilization will be planted. Live stakes and bare roots will be planted
• around structure installations and the outsides of meander bends to provide an area of high-
density root mass. Coir fiber matting and live stakes will be used along the entire reach of the
• restored channels to provide stabilization until vegetation can be established.
7.7.7 Site Preparation
• Prior to planting the riparian buffer, efforts will be made to eradicate fescue and invasive plants
• such as multiflora rose, Chinese privet, and Japanese honeysuckle. A permanent seed mix
• can be used after application of the pre-emergent, and woody planting can follow during the
dormant season.

• 7.7.8 Planting Review
After the final planting is complete, the planting supervisor will verify that the site was properly
planted using stem counts and condition inspection. The planting contractor will be
• responsible for replacing damaged plants.
• 7.7.9 Monitoring and Maintenance
• Monitoring will verify that the restoration area is meeting restoration goals. Damaged plants
• will be removed and if the planting survival fails to meet restoration goals, replanting will occur.
• If monitoring indicates that an area is trending toward greater than 10% coverage by nuisance
vegetation, that area will be treated to remove the nuisance vegetation.
•
•
• 30
Kimley-Horn
• ? ?
and Associates, Inc.
•

DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
- Stanly County, North Carolina
•
• 8.0 Performance Criteria
•
• 8.1 Stream Success Criteria
•
The stream geometry will be considered successful if the cross-section geometry, profile, and
• sinuosity are stable or reach a dynamic equilibrium. It is expected that there will be some changes
- in the designed cross sections, profile, and/or substrate composition. Changes that may occur
during the monitoring period will be evaluated to determine whether they represent a trend toward
a less stable condition (e.g., down cutting, erosion, etc.) or are simply an increase in stability (e.g.,
settling, vegetative changes, coarsening of bed material, etc.).
• An initial, though not exclusive, indicator of success will be the stream's adherence to design or
reference ratios of stream geometry found in the morphological tables (Restoration Table IV) or in
• comparable stable reference systems. The channel may not adhere to design or reference ratios
of stream geometry, but can be considered stable if the following key indicators are present:
¦ Stream Type: Maintenance of the design stream type or progression toward or conversion to a
• stable stream type such as B, C, or E will indicate stability.
¦ Bank Height Ratio: Bank height ratio between 1.0 and 1.2 will indicate that flood flows have
• access to the active floodplain and that higher flows do not apply excessive stresses to stream
- banks.
Determination of true bankfull may be difficult until the stream has had adequate flooding events to
create strong bankfull indicators. A minimum of two bankfull events is required during the 5-year
monitoring period. If two bankfull events do not occur the monitoring period may be extended at
• the discretion of the Corps of Engineers.
• If a large storm event occurs before the woody vegetation has been established, isolated bank
- erosion may occur in sections where the flood-prone area has been restricted by topography.
Areas of bank erosion will be repaired as necessary.
The middle section of UT4 and the upper section that are currently impounded will receive a non-
typical stream restoration treatment described in Section 7.0. In these cases the stream cross
sections, profile and pattern will not necessarily be constructed to the typical cross section, profile
• and pattern measurements provided in the morphological measurements table and typical plans.
However, it is anticipated that these areas will form naturally and remain stable during the process.

•
• 31 ? ? I<imley-Horn
• and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
8.2 Wetland Success Criteria
• The success of wetland restoration will be measured by comparing the restored wetlands with
• similar, more functional wetlands with respect to vegetation, soils, and hydrology. Success criteria
is summarized in the following sections.
•
8.2.1 Hydrology
• Success of the restoration of wetland hydrology will be measured by improvements to the
. frequency and duration of saturated soils compared to the reference wetland. Successful
wetland hydrology is defined as the saturation of soils for a period equal to or greater than 85%
• of the period measured in the reference wetland. The minimum requirement for the restoration
• wetland hydrology will be the USACE guidelines (United States Army Corps of Engineers,
• 1987) including saturation of the upper surface of the soils for 7% of the growing season. The
• hydroperiod of the reference wetland will be measured using groundwater gauges.
• 8.2.2 Vegetation
• The prevalent vegetation should consist of macrophytes that typically are adapted for life in
• saturated soil conditions. These species should have the ability to grow, compete, reproduce,
• and persist in anaerobic soil conditions. For the restoration areas, study plots showing that the
composition and density of vegetation in the restoration areas that compare to the reference
• areas will indicate restoration success for vegetation.
•
• 8.2.3 Soil
A primary measure of the enhancement and restoration of wetland soils will be the
establishment of hydric character as defined by USACE guidelines (United States Army Corps
• of Engineers 1987). Soil enhancement and restoration also may be inferred based on
• successful enhancement and restoration of wetland hydrology and vegetation.
•
• 8.3 Vegetation Success Criteria
The success of riparian and vegetation planting will be gauged by stem counts of planted species.
• Stem counts of more than 320 trees per acres after three years, and 260 trees per acre after five
years will be considered successful. Photos taken at established photo points should indicate
maturation of riparian vegetation community.
•
• 94 Schedule/Reporting
• The monitoring plan to evaluate the success of the stream restoration project is based on guidance
• provided by The Stream Mitigation Guidelines disseminated by the United States Army Corps of
•
• 32
Kimley-Horn
• ? ?
and Associates, Inc.
-.
V
•
s
- DRAFT
• Restoration Plan
• Rockwell Pastures Site
- Stanly County, North Carolina
•
•
• Engineers - Wilmington District (McLendon, Fox et al. 2003) and recommendations from the
• Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). The collection and summarization of monitoring data
• will be conducted in accordance with the version of the EEP documents titled "Content, Format,
and Data Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports" stated in the RFP.
•
• Upon completion of the restoration project, an as-built evaluation will be conducted that documents
the following conditions:
¦ Geomorphology (dimension, pattern, and profile)
•

• ¦ Channel materials
• ¦ Channel stability and in-stream structure functionality
• ¦ Vegetation
¦ Wetland hydrology (gauge settings)
The survey of channel dimension will consist of permanent cross sections placed at approximately
• two cross sections (one riffle and one pool) per unique stream segment. The cross sections will
• represent riffles and pools with a majority of the cross sections assessing riffles. Annual
photographs showing significant site features will be taken from permanent, mapped photo points.
• The survey of the longitudinal profile will represent distinct areas of restoration and will cover at
least 3,000 linear feet of channel per reach. The profile survey will include pattern measurements
• and include all permanent cross sections. Channel material measurements will be collected by
using pebble counts for at least six of the permanent cross sections.
•
• The entire restored length of stream will be investigated for channel stability and in-stream
structure functionality. Any evidence of channel instability will be identified, mapped, and
• photographed. All structures will be inventoried for functionality and photographed.
• Wetland hydrology will be measured using groundwater gauges installed on-site and within the
reference sites. The gauges will sample groundwater elevations continuously throughout the
monitoring period.
• Successful restoration of the vegetation on a stream and wetland mitigation site is dependent upon
• hydrologic restoration, active planting of preferred canopy species, and volunteer regeneration of
the native plant community. In order to determine if the criteria are achieved, vegetation monitoring
quadrants will be installed throughout the restoration site. The number of quadrants required will
• be based on the species/area curve method with a minimum of at least three quadrants. The
• cumulative size of installed quadrants will cover approximately 1.0% of the restoration site. The
individual quadrants will be 0.01 hectare (100 square meters) in size. Vegetation monitoring will
- occur in spring after leaf-out has occurred. Individual quadrant data will be provided and will
• include diameter, height, density, and coverage quantities. Relative values will be calculated and
• importance values will be determined. Individual seedlings will be marked such that they can be
• found in succeeding monitoring years. Mortality will be determined by the difference between the
'
'
s living planted seedlings. At the end
s living planted seedlings and the current year
previous year
•
• 33 Kimley-Horn
• ? ? and Associates, Inc.
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
of the first growing season, species composition, density, and survival will be evaluated. For each
subsequent year, until the final success criteria are achieved, the restored site will be evaluated
between July and November.
The monitoring will occur annually for five years. The monitoring period should include two
separate years with bankfull events. Bankfull events will be verified using an installed crest gauge
that will be inspected during each monitoring visit. If a bankfull event has not been documented by
the end of the second year of monitoring, a mandatory quarterly check will be required. If there
are not two bankfull events, the monitoring period may be extended at the discretion of the Corps
of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Project Manager and the NCDWQ 401-Wetlands
Unit. Monitoring reports will be submitted during every year for years 1-5.
34 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
9.0 References
Hall, Karen (2001). Recommended Native Plant Species for Stream Restoration in North Carolina.
Raleigh, NC, North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute NCSU.
Harman, William A., Gregory D. Jennings, et al. (1999). Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry
Relationships for North Carolina Streams. Wildland Hydrology Symposium, Bozeman, MT, AWRA.
McLendon, Scott, Becky Fox, et al. (2003). Stream Mitigation Guidelines. United States Army
Corps of Engineers - Wilmington District, United States Environmental Protection Agency, North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and North Carolina Department of Natural Resources -
Division of Water Quality.
Rosgen, David L. (2001). A Stream Channel Stability Assessment Methodology. Seventh Federal
Interagency Sedimentation Conference. Reno, NV. w: 18-26.
Schafale, Michael P. and Alan D. Weakley (1990). Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina, Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NC Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources.
Smith, Cherri L. (2004). Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. Raleigh, NC, North Carolina
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources - Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
United States Geological Survey (2003). The National Flood-Frequency Program.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
35 ? ? ? Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
10.0 Restoration Tables
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• /^, ? ? 1<imley-Horn
• ?I and Associates, inc.
V1
CJ
7
u

y
H

v
i.. GC
C
? N
T c
M fl)
00
[?
O1 U
O In
M BN Cl
d'
cal '.
O In
V Vl1
.n (`
M A
`1
p O
f?i a
co CJ
d
.,o
L° O rl d" 00 rT ?O GO [? c `
•r

L
'J
A y
a
h'
N
10
CO
p
p
6
?n
?
O
,n
l?
N
O
M
?.
N
V
00 M O
N O
d' M
?O -.
l? vO
ffl O
ct ?F
N N
M .--, p ,-,
- M
t? o0
v',
.-. ?

w
U
0`
CE
O 04
•
O S. v,
. ty ., C

O t~
O O

y
O
?
>
m
C O O O O O O
> O
>
C O O ? a
i a
i C p ? a
i a
i C Q
?-" ca C
ue
?
c?
-=
-=
ti
N
,5
O
CC y i..,
% a) s
. Y % > ? O n O O O ? ?
f.L U n
U ?
U v,
U vi
U r
i,
U U U n
U ? n
a) U >
U U >
U U rn
aJ aJ a) Q) U U

? cli U Ca U cG m
W W W W W S W ? W W W
W W

N 00

0

0

0

d'
m

N

01

N

O

M

O

r

Vl rn

m

O

?;
U T
I Ic
?O
+ M
+ O
! Vl
+ 00
+
I M
+ l?
+ ?
+ l?
+ O
+ O [- O M N [? fry M ?
c
N
v
v
a
v
o
co
o
-? +
n +
r- +
M + +
rn +
o ?
+ +
? M
+
a N M -,I- V V d' v In
G _O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O IC O
® O N 00 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?0 0 "o _
m O ? O O
In A O O O O M
+ O
+ O 1? O M O p O p

o
m
-
'I
?
0
0
0
0
r- +
n +
r +
M + +
O O
+ -?
o M
+
D O O M ,n ?O O O O 00 O -? M Cl) O p 0
-- N M .1. V' 7t ?n p p

Z
? z
y -d v a? ? N 'C .b .b v

?D
?D
?D z3
? b
? b
?
J
H
h
[-?
H _
o
4 4 4 4 4 4 d v rte-
a ?D ?D a ?
to
?
a
?

L
v
L

Rf N N
L
i+
C
O
u

U > > > > > > > > > > >
C/? U) cn V) lh cn cn C/) C/) CA U]
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3
u
a
N
E

OJ
O O O '-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
L
G
L
Q

U
L.
U
Qj :d U
U .b N

x E 4 4
u a

H

>r
0
.y
U
8
CC
v
L
'CS
C
c?
cC
d
L
Q
u
>r
L
A
v
H
L
v
3
w
0
L
0
U
T.
R
a
u
a
w
F
r

I o
N
R
0 v
N
O
O
O o
Of o
h
p m
0
M o
') n
')
N Q m
Q M ?
c0
O _
O
O
N 0
O
O

'

1

' fD
6i
I? t0
f0 t0
'7 O) O
f0
Q
O O W N O 10 O) 0 O O
W M
' O N M N co (O O O O Q a0 O O M O) O O h h
r N
'
^
? Q N N Q
? O O O O
m O O CM N O m N
Q

U O) m ? ° ? O ° ° O h p
° N v
Q
N
h
Q
O
°
{")
tND
M
O
a' O

O) 10
m
° O
O
°
N
N
°O
O
co
O Q Q N Q (+j O O O O pi
+ O G Q

Q
u] - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
O co I I v q O
E >
° n
M 0 Q Q L6
?i o of
m m
M d 1-: m ''t I I O v0, a0 0 o In ' o
N N O M
m ? W Q) (O
= a. U O I Cl! O U0 O 10 O 10 M
U m ° N m o N
i
cq
V:
co
0
N
O
N
W
M
O

O
J
V
C
hl
i

CC

tG O

O
M V
W
O

h N

°

01

h

th
M
h

h
O

O
O
? ° M

O
O
° p
h
O
O O _
O

H
W
C

V +

Q
2 U
O
+
+
M

O
oI
O N h
p

m N
m O Q

I N Q N O

'
Q

M

N h

N

) O
O p
O p 0
O h o
O
C O
O Q
o

N
O
G

h O
O Q

°O
O

O O

O

O Q
X
W O
m C m e g C m c to
m
C
C A
C
m o C
O1 C
p/ C
Q
I C
01 C w

O C
N
Ol C
m
O)

C
N
pI

C
d N
pI C

C q C

pl c

C

p

C
?

p

O
a Sd'a? a I?f 2S Rq' a?a Kf of ? Ip ' m m `m • m m m m m d m o m d I
m m
I C
d I C
m
¢ 2 2S d
f ?S K ? 2 f d'f2 fd'f 2S ?'? z p
aa? a
m
? aa?

I M u
T O
O
O
O
O v
Q
G
L M

+ O

'1

O? M

' N

v? N

M

In

O

O

M
h

O O

N
b

Q
^

Q p

M

r O

b

O
h O

Q
O

O O

N

O

p

O

. 'O
Q 11
!
N
O
' N

Q O

N
0
O

Q
O
O O
O O
N
O
CO
O
?
O
C
a
C
'
?

M
V
U ?
f`
°
O
M
O
V
O
M
O
M

n

N

N

0 0
° tD °
O
°
ID
O

IA
°
°

O th
j
?.
m> +
Q
M M Q O
O O
O O
O
p O

C pI C
C C m C N C
q C m C q C O1 C C y C
= q d ..
= q N
C g N
C
m N
O) C m
pl C E)
OI C m N C N C N C C Oi
O) C N
O] N
C p
C N 0
C

'? ?'
O:
m
K
41
a'
K a
K

a

' a

a

o. I pI to

to c

E1 K K a d' d' a 2 f 2 d' K a f a a aq'
o m Io O
E V
0 =
6 O
Q
°
I.
: f0 r
h
?
N

I
V
I
0 Q

t0 m

p O N O
0

N w
N

? h Q
h
?
I
?
I
N
I
a:
I O
?
I O
o
I
y
Z? W
U h
O "! I o In In

V ?
O)
fV
Ih
i o
O

v h
Ni I m
o
I
rn Q
?
In
O

? p

+

+
M

O) Q

Ep

Q

?

O

N c

m

6

O

ED

?

M
N

N

Q

O)

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

N

M
M

°
N O

O O
Q O
c
0 Q m M Z Z Z Z z Z O O O O O O
?
OI
C
Z O
O

+
Q W ?
O i p t
M

- D
N

-
I

-

-

-

--
J

-

-

-
O C Ip O
O
O
° C p 0
p
O
O
O
O

w
W -
C OD C

m m
o O1 C

m m tM C N

m d o C

m W C

m d pl C
m
N Oi
O
e Ui
C C
m C g N
QI C
G m N
mI C
C q N
pI
C
C
A N
ml C
C EI U7
pI C
C g N
pl C
C q

C C

m C

m C Qi

q C N C N
pI C C)
pp C N
OI N
pI
C
C Oi
pI m
C pl C
It (
T Y

a

f o

f

o

f

0

:
f
C
C
C
4.
q C q
c q
C q
C
il C
q
C
q C m
M
M a
C Q Q N O M to h / b O
O

t
0
U
O

°+

m

O O

N

O M O

Q

p

0

O N

r O

°

N I O Q
W

N a

M D O
m

-
l'7 °
O Q

W^ N 7
O
°
N m
O

O) °
N p
O
O
m m Oi O f? ^ h N CV M O
O
O N
O O M O t0 N
? O N o I•. O ^ Q N O p 0 O m C O° Ih
Ol y
'y M co O N co i h h
(
t O °
0 O IA
N N °
N O M
O N
O N O
O O
O
d
O ? +
O G 0 p
F

M co m c
m

g C
CE C U
C I N

p
C ui

I C p
m C m

I C
q C

q N

p
C q C

? c p
m C

? C
C

C
q

p

I qC q

C m

C

C

pI C

p

I C q C

C O

O

N
C

m

m

C

q
C
Ml C C q C m C m C m C q C m C m C q C I
E c g C A O ] O

N Of of Of 2 o f
_3
0.

p

E d
41 C

N f?

r

N co

h

Q
Q
IA
M
O
N _
O

a m
w
d
Q o
Id Q
c6
`?
!

?

N
4
Q
m

?
o
O
°
M
y
? K W
U rn
O
N
o
In
p
N

°
U c
v of N ai o
C

OI
W
0
m m
M
l
T

m m

m

C m C

m C

ICE C

m

C

m

C

m

c m

m
m
ai
6
ID
11

C

of o
M fz w iw C m C g C C C IE c W C m C m C m C C m

m
I
I
° h
?
C
CL °o 'd Q
z z ¢
z ¢ Q
z z Q
z Q
z ¢
z Q
z ¢ Q ¢
z
z
Q
\ z z i o C p o Q Q Q Q Q Q

Q z z z
m z `z z z z z
?
m
C
.N
% o
o
+
O
r m o
O o o
O ? o

O
O
w
m G m O1
El N
Cq
Oi C m G
C m c g
Ol
r
C o1
m C
C
m C
C
m
m C N
C IE C

11
d
m c
m
m C

m
N
C
D7
to
C
C O!

m C
C d)

g r
C

m
OI C

c EI
O1

C
C N C

m c M
g C E)

C q C
q

Cq C
N

m C

m
N

C m
N

C

g
q

C m

.
of
f i of Of ry
i O
A

N
e

O

N

In Ip

N
co

N i

^

O

O

o

h

N

O') r M

N
O)

N
O

O h

N

Q h

IR

G co

G

h

O

10 '

O
N
o1

O

O
M
O
O
O
m
O

o
tf

' 10
C m
N
w
Q
U

o
I
N

O
h

I N
N

C

M

h Q

N

V
O O
O O
O Q
c0
' O
O O
co
h N
o
y N ° t0 O c7 O O
O O O
O O
N
c

0

co
G
ICE c

CE c

C

i-i

C

m

°

C m C

°

q C

C

m

rn

C

C

E ai

m c

m

m G

CE

w

O m

ui

C

d

m C m

ai E

c m C

ti

m C

ui

m C

m

ei

C m

ui

C

C

m d

I m C
2 Of
H
L
e
O m o,
C
_tt

O W
z m
` w
" t
m
E r l6 3 J
m >
a
j m o g
.
^ O
° m m
U d' o °? _
m a o 0 0
O N
x' N Q Q
R H
m ,
t Iaq
K N d
> m
m E
J «
:C o
a

° m
w

> o m
o m L
Q

p - Q r

> n
N m =
m
y? ?'

$ c
N m
o m L
U E

$

2 v

0 v
C L
Z H
J
3
L
L, m
E Y
?
C _
/) Q
o U) _°

r

o m

$
?
N

U H N

N

'E ? N

v U

„J Q O

>

> Y

m a LL rv

o vv J O y

O U m_

?'
L.
a

d y
y N a
J O
tQ _
S°
U cn
N m 2

U1

o O
O
o
( n

n O
a _
O
p
d

o

m

m L.

m
$ m o.

p
Y m

c m c
?' S

c a
L

c
m
`
.
0

r
m

m

c

o rn

J O

=

o m >>

> ^

. C E

O m >.

N II

N

O

o
_

m

E
w
n
?o 2
mG ma
3
mQm
Z c
o 3 o
?
E
am
a?
a o
-6
?
>
?
m °
o°
? m
°
?`° r o z
.?
°
s

N

M Q l

0

(O 1?

W

O

V

.

... w > Q co
K
a of E I
a
? a
( CM Q 1 A O r
O
O
N
N
N
N
N

N
O
N

N
hl

N
1 O
C m C
r C m E) N N
m O1 G O1 C
C m N

m
a C? C m
C
h c

OI
7 N tN0 M
? O ui
O
m

m. ,
l m CTuh i C mmCm
10: a

O)
N l
I

h
N a?a0:a?
° o
Q°l (0
O N
N thO V
O p
? M
N
I C W
2 d
C
5 N N
ICE O C pI Ul ai 6
C
m C g C q C
!
0
a 0265
a s X. of a of
In
m

N
N I,

N

C7 o
h
O
O
O
uj

m C pp C pI C m m m .. m
C q C q C E1
A N c g C m C
M 2 of M of
Q 7

a
47 I
N
° t?0 h
ro ID
O ? O
O
MO

m C OD C O m
A m q m
C
C
C 10 C E I C
C I
E C A C I
E C
,

O

EO I
h W
ro o
M O
O O
N ? I(j
N p
N Q

m C O) C O! G E C N m N
c q = q == m c m c m c
w
s a f
a
r

n I
N

M to
Q
o
M
--- - ---

o) C
O
C g
! C

q -
d d

C m C m ----
m m EI

C m
m
C C
C

a a a ¢ a a
z z Z Z 2 z

) C O1
q C
m N q
C
C N m m
C 1
1
C g
m 1
a X

V

IO
O

? O
Q M
N M
O m
N tV
f0 Q
h N
II
e OmI c Q, c? c m
e
°? a °?
'
q C m m EI C d q
q
m EI m d m
O'aly ax J
C
C
y
C X
e sa w
m
co
<
o a

>>a 5
t : d
Q m a L Q
a o V N
-° -° m b 6 3 m
o
EL m
o
L 0-
a a.
3 o? Q `o ? o 'oc m
m
,
a o ?
a m c o
a S2 O m
= co
a

v a m
Of E
N M M
F T CN'J I
O
C
m
j
M L
E
N
m
N
U
L
a
0
O
d
L_
O)
U
N
N
L
Q c
0
q II ?
o c
II N O
= O]
C
L C)
?- Dl d
t r 3
m m Cj
r ?
O
O
° I O
O C N
c rn o E0
m m cw
Ol a C
lE O q ?
E
O W O J
O V N
N ° a C
Q I I ?
? C U J
O
C N ~ C
c E -o E
Gov
L
> a
_o
a
c
o m m
O
D1 Oa N N
a
a
A m
o m
N
t
C U
m c
m m
a
N
r m
E y
N N
no
N M
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Q
A
U
? N
p?O w
a
C _m
r. U
W O
a ?
a
N

? °i
?D N
N
p O
V N
N
O O N
O cl
O ) O
M
? O)
p
?
et

IUa V7
d N
h
N
N
O
?O
t7
m
O
O
N to
O
'
? N
00 M
R) r
M
p N
O O
O
al°D
N O
O Ni
O O
O O

O I C
V O
fp
O M W N N N O
a O O O O O O)
? M
M m r
N c? I°

c O O U

N

N O N O D O 6 OD
O
M
.? ? 00 O M M N ? ? ? N N M
p O N
O IO C p N O

0
O
V N
O
p O
p O
N

W C v1
d C
W c d
c C p) C rn C d d
ii M C
c m C N : 6 N
O U)
°? N ff
o-
W
W p d w

2
2
2
K
2 K
K
K
K
2
2
K N
2
K
K
2 - c
c
2 IY c
2 W c W C W c W c W
m c W C W c W C W C W C@ W c W c W c

d w 2 m 2 of 2 2 0! 2 a' o: K 2 K 2
U
R K
m

K
C J
W
N
O
O -.
E N
d

a d
10

v
I?

o c
N

C
r

er
O
D

of
m

r

v

°

0 M

4 IA

o N

0 6

o vi I r O

n

K

w N

V

O

M
In
(
? (
J O N m '°
N p u)
.
d
W N N
O O
K

?
m
O:
C
0
N 4)
Ica d

0
G7
C

ca
N

C

R
N

C

A
N

C

W
N

C
N

ICa C

A
N

C
O
c W
01

O)
C

C

W
N

C
••

N
C)

C

W
Qi

C

N
N

W

El

1
0)

C N

m C

t ai
O C

N

C

C

N

D) C

N

O)

C

l
Of

C

C

O)

)

C

p

C

d
m C

C

l

C

N

N
of

? o f of

T ac

N 2 K 2 O' 2 q
1; a' W lca d

IY N

o! dW

2 lc0 m
I
K 2

f m

AM c A c
cc

K A
2

u

?

r
+

O

W

N
O

O

10

O

M

M

?

?

?

O

O

?

R

?

M

)

O

N
?

0

?

?

?

?

N

D

M

O
M
e{

O

n

?
a0

m
M
O
N °
N

")
O

M
r

N
O
p

D

p

N

O

O

O
O

?

O

T

i ?

O

LL7 O

K M
F- O

M

n
U

I

r
N
N N
m M
N
N
M
O

^
O

O
O

O
O

O

O

0 O
O N
N N
M
N O
4
7 I?

N r
O

M Vl

R
m O O O Cy h <+j
N ^ O
m
N i0

N

N V
O
M G

° N

O N 0

O O

m
d

O O

+
O

O

O

O
O
M
N
O
M
C

m

2 N N

ry 0

K 2 d

C N

A c C

c W rn

c

RI C

W

a) g

C

W C d

W
c
d W C

W
a)

c
O
W )

C
W
d Ol
c

to

C
W
a C

W W

d C

W
ICO

W O)

c 0

l
c

d
OI

c
C

W
m

C
C

W
0)
c

c W
c d

0) W e
C d

c
c

W
d

m
d

A

d

d

c
m

m

d
C
A C

m

c

C

W

Q

C

C

W

f C

0 G

l C

d

i C

1

C W

N

A

K
K 2
K
2
K
2
K
2
K
K
2
D!
2 7Y
K
2
?
D: 2
2
K
2 l
O
2 N d t
a d d N m 0 d tc0 0 C W C
C
d K 2 2 2 K 2 K 0' 0: 2 K
c 2
M
E> LO O
<
M
O
O
r
10

M d
d C
N

M
M

M v
O m

l

o
A

O)
M

f•
N

R

I

A

N

R 0 N
O

O
M

h r
r

d ?

W
U

?
p N

O M

p

N O

M
p
V7

U
m
O) N
M
7
N
`
?
O

ui
c
o o
?
•
rn
c

m drn c rn c

N d N d

( m

01
c0 ai

c
d C

C
W ui

O) c
C W ai

m
c

c
W ci
C ai

W C

A ai

0
C

) C
W ai

OJ
c

C
W ui

p)
C

C
W ai

LA
C

C
W ti

m

C

C

W m

c c

W

C
4i

W rn c

W

C
mOI
W

C
W

C
ai C
O)
ui
[A

C
ti
Ol

C
m
LA

C
ai
m

C
ui
O7

C
ai
O) C
m
m C
ai
LA G
hi

C
ui

C
ui ai

C
c
C

of
W
c W
C
W

o
C

f
W
C
W
c
W
C
W
c W
@ C W
C W LA
C
W
cOI
W C

i z c

7

1

W X

N
?
tO

+

O

O

O

V

W

p

O

I

1

t

0

O

10
M
?

M

0')
N
O
N

O

V

>

c

7

O

N

O

N

N

O

I

M

r
V

d
O

'

r

m
O

i

W

?

m

M

O

r
M

m
u

j

R

V
M

N

m

O

7

O

?
M
O
?^ M
O
O
O

' O

'

O

O

p

10

a

O

N

O

O

O

M

M

?

D

D

m

0

N

-

R

M

C

C ICIppG

d

d

0

C

C

N
C

Ui

N

G

i

N

U

i

G

i

U

0

)

C

N
C
K 2 2 a' 2 D :? Q: 2 2 Y '

d f K 2 K a 2 a ' 2 K 2 K 2 [r
_J
W
E
I Lq G O O _
?
d C
O)
a0 M
V
OD
V
IO M IA N O M r O
r
d W v O co 6 vi N m
N C
V I OD p
O p
M 10 O
M I I N
(„) C U O Of ?°
N O
M N M O
d

C u!
W uj
O ?
01
a'

0: C p

C
tp ) C m C

C W p

C p C

W d

C C

W C

d pl

N C

m

a C

d d C

N O d

N d

N
WW d

d N

ii d

C

A
aI
C
N
C

IC0
Gi

°

C
N

Ln
N

C
C
W
d

C

6 C
U)
W C

A
N
m
m
O)
N
C L

O C
d
p7

C

C

C

2
20!2
K
2
7Y
2
2
a
2
K
2
a'2
K N
2 al
2 W
K
2 N d

2

2 C C C W C W W O )
O l

m
N

tV

I
N

O
M 2 Q'

r 2 7Y

10 2 cc 2Q'
2
0 0:2 c 2 of
O
0 2 o

N 2 x
o
M 2 Q '2 2 27Y 2 2 20! 2 2O'

O
N ?N'.
D ?+

M
co

O ??
O

M
C

l

01
M

m
O

aD

O

O
N

r
M

N
N N
tD

I?
M
N N

N
?°
m

C 0

p
O N

1
N
O

r 0
f
O
O
R
O
M

O

,on
O
O r
O

V

D to

q
N

O
H
W +
x O
O
m
p
M
O
O
]
O
O
O N
b
N
N
N
W C
UI
W C A
N
C

W
a)
C

W
O1
C
C
W

c
C
W
N
C

W
4
.
N
C W
w
N
N
W

W
N
C

W
N
c

W
N
C

W
N
CI

r
d
C

W
N
C

W
N
C
4i
W C W
N
W
N
C
d
W C

A
N
C

Cai
a)
o

E
W
m

c
ai
°I
d
C O
N
C Ol

C
N
N
d
a)
2 K 2 2 2
af
2
2
2
2
2
2
x,
Z'
2
2
w
2
a
2
2 c
of
2 K
2 W
2
K W
2
K
2
Y
20 irm
No f
f
2 0

x
2-

2
of

L r
°
?
O M
UD
M
mm
m
?

W

N

V

6 ? i

N 0
N

)

O

N

o
N

t
+i ?

m
N

m
R N

N r r
t[)

O W
O

O

o
O

N p N
M

O M
O

O m
O

N ?O

i
I

O ?
N ?
M Q

m
C
d V
U
O N
O ! ?
7 N
° O O O ?q!+
V C O
co
1° N 0 v O
N
(O N n
C
W
a.
d N N O M O ?-+
O
o O O
c O n N C
n
L

C D)

W c

c D C

W c W

Ol

C

c

W

d

G

C

W

O)

C

C

W

O)

c

C

W

?

c

C

W

d C

C W

0

cm

N

A CI

W

d

C

A

aI

C

Ca

N

C

d

C

m

C

A

N

CI

A

N

C

d

A
W

N

A

d

d

W

d

C

C

d

N

)

C L
n

E

2 K
2 Q: 2 K
f
2
2
2
7Y
2
2
2 K
2
It
2
0!

2

K I
a
2

! I
a
2

2 c c C C A I
O C A C W C t
0 C W C A C C C A C A C N c n

u
0 2 5 24:2 2 4: 2 2 2 K 2 tr 2 C 2 a' 2 2 2 K 2 C 2 2 K
R

N

m

?

J

m

$
L

N

.?

Q

>

>

> c
c
c
N
C x

m w
J O U C

o J

U O d d p ¢O O Z

S r`
O
co
Q F
F 'C
W

R N
t?l N
> Qi
N E
J a
L
a ° J
d
v j
N
o
« N
2 j
) °
N d
O d
O L i4i
r
.O
3 o

A c

•U o d '?

o J
a
Q N
> c
d
O c
N E a a L N y?y L. ?y E y\
S' N
N m _p d m
¢ W L v
~ c d
'y
a) Yt
3 d U d a )
o
f Y LL Q1
t J U W > L > Y N
d
a)
o M O
o. p '
o O O
o
°
° d N
o >
O> O
°
E

W a) W

a c . >

E ^^
> C -O

?c£ ? ¢

e j E

a lc0

m o Q

` « 3 U

c N

a

0 -

5 y

o

c N

a J f°

E
N N.

m N..

u o

(A v

`o
O
a

`o
v
E

J
a

o
v
V
a

-
m

S
a
¢

-
a

a
C
c

u) ° N
x O W
N m 23 N a ;O
m a c
m l cp
Q m e
3 n
m? c x
> d oS
N° E a
3 t0
c
3 N
m
v O
A
W
A O
is W
O N
d 7 d m
c N W
> a)
!g o d
ii o N
O _
o
'¢
7i l a)
o E t

N
6 L

N _

S p C

l ¢

?
$ 7 O Y

c O Q W

m
.? w ? m o' co 2? ? > ¢ ¢ ?N a a
? e rn ? ? 2 a y ? m a K
D

N
M
d' l0
lD
ti
W
O)
O
N
M 0 a- av o a
i
10 to fr aD O)
1
-61 N N
N M
N V 1
N 0
N t0
N f?
N W
N O) 1
N 6-1
M
M M
M
M
? aw
I ? C
O W
E Z
O ? N
O p- C
I I ? '
c u ?
N T N
d F- c
E ? €
d d
w d d
J L a
> m d
O
C y y
a ?
O N ?
a -O m
° s d
a2?
a
f0 N
U L
o m
c Ir
G U
d c
a d
? m
L ?
E d
N N
NO
N M
•••••••••..•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
S
Q
e
aA
d
.V
U' rn
N
L
CL
a)
3
1 U
L? of
F
d

O m
> N O
E
M
d d
C
W
N
O)
N
A
C N N O M
1 `
d M O N M M M O
N O O O
O O
l+i N O
1

2

c
U
O
N
I N
O
10
O
o
N
M «
p
o

1

m

m

d

m

nd

m c

C

m

ICO

m

C

C0 c

W

O

A ai

W
ai

C

CC
ti

W
ci

Oi
C
ai

Of
C
ai

00

C
ui

Ol

C
ci
C 6
C

CC ui

C

ui
pl

C

ei
p

C

ai
Ol

C

m
Ol

C

ai
rn

C

m
OI

C

l

C

01 C Vd
i C

C

p
C p

ry
x S' K 2 S'
f
K
f
R'
d'
of
2'
'?
W
K
d
S'
m
m
m
d
m
m
'
w
m
m
m
w d m
W
m
m
m

W

d

m

W

m

m

d

m

m

m
c ?
K K f K ? K 2 Q' Q' w' S+ 2 S' f 0' S' K K S' K 2
m
R _'
m m m m
Q' d' _'
m
o d
m m a
m
0
d m

F

O

+

O

N

o

O

N

o

N

N

v

IA

O

N
e
N
N
•er

a

N

o

W

+f

Z

Z

Z

Z

Z

Q
Z

O

O

N

O Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q
?

y

.x
-
w o

O

o
o
N co

w o

o fo

of m c o

Z
Z
Z
z

z

2

Z

Z 2

Z

Z

Z

c

m
(m

C
E

W
a

c m
ti ai
m
C C

W
ui

O

C

C

m
ai

O C

e m
ui

C
di

m

C

W
hi

O)

C

G

m
6

Ol

C
C

l
6

O

fCQ

C

W
6

O!

C

C

W

ui

CC

d

W

ci

C

W

ui

C

W

hi ai
O1 C

C W C
m

C

W G

C

W

!

C

C

W

o
C

l

C

C

l

C

d

C

W

C

W

7 O1 C

W C W

C

C

W

1 C N

C W

Ol

W

2
K
?.
K Z'
of

N C.

O:

f W

(if

2

f d

K

?

C

'

?

?'

: G

m G

N

t`

C

O

O

O

A

N

N
.
.
Q
K
f
of

U
?j

V
d +

?

N

1
O

?

N

")

O

R

T
N

If]

D

O

N
W

N

0
M

°
(Op

^

A
V

?

O
(O

M

0 M

°
O

{p

O
N

?
N

O
fD O
M

N

N

R

N
N

O
O

M

N

O

O
O
O

O
-7

O

O
N
A

O

(0
an

J
O e

G

v
O
}

v

U

N

?
O

O

?

?

O

'

°

m

?

O M

M

O N

N
?

Q

O

O

CA
O

O
C

r

O

o

O

C

?

c

O

O

O

O
O

O
r

M
M

c7 N

N
N
O)

O
M

N
O

tT
10

a
N F r M R M O O) M N M
M
o
o
N
O
O
`
G
°
d 7
O +

N O O f
M M
M
7
C
d t
m C
d a
m C
m tm C d
w d W C
m ? C
d pl C
m m pp
c C d
m c C
m d
C
m d
m m
GO
m d
m d
O
G d
O
C O1 C m C ? C d C m r m
m
c d
w
C d
O?
C d
O) d
C OI
C d
OI
C d
Ol m
C O d
l C Ol C N
C di Qj
C aj

f
S
c
K
of
2
of Se
f
f
f
f

20

a'

f

of

2

of 2 w

f

f

f

' pi O? C

d K f d f C a' f K f K K
C ?

m
O
>

u

O

O

°
E
L d

U

W

N

n

O

R

A v of I
ci °
N
ci

M
N d A O
N W O p
M N N
7 C U O N N

U d O N tM ? N
N M I O
n
m
N I
O
O1 ?
C
dm
m C
d
m C m0 C Ui C
O C m C W pi
O1
C N
m C 4i
pl Ui
C
C 41
0)
C 0/
O)
C N
O)
C
N
O)
C
N
O]
C
Ui
Ol
C
4>
Ci
ic,
m N
d
N
N
N
N
N
O
m
C Oryo
G G
Gi
N N
N
I IY f M w2? K f w z fx f f K 2I t fI r 2 Xm 2 K f Yf 0 f K a K f W d W m m d m m lp d m m m d m
m d m
d m
K K f K K f f f

O

N

N

V.
^

M

N

N

) O
m
O
V

t

`

M
N

r

M

M

O

A

O

z

Z

Z

Z

2

Z C!

O

'

O

O

Z

z

-

q

-

I

,?

Q'

'
N J
K a
0 a
d'
w N
V
p

t d•

h

?

O O O Z z O H
0 O N O Z Z
w
F- 0

+
m 1 I I
0
C

m
O1

m
C O

d
1 C

m
0

m
1 C m C

d m m {
q

Cp
C

y
O1 C O1

m C
C d

C
C Y

W
i

C

m
Ui

C

W
d

C

m
N

C

m
C)
C
O1
C
4

S
C
b
C
6 C N
C N

C

N
O)

C

d
pp

C

N

d

d

d

N

Ci

m

d

N N

N
f w f K R f 1 K M c r M ? a I f ? f K f m m
f a m
f I A T d
f m m m d m m m d m m f m d m d W d m

O

N

V

O

O

N

?

yy

..

N f K f S K K f K g
of f
of

L
U d
I?

+

C

0

V

N

m

t

O tN D

r O

L O

7

V N
M O
M

W M
N °
' N
O

N N
O

°

p N
O

O
N

p O
O

O
O N O

tD
y 'O M 0 C W 7 M O i N O f N N O O
O 1
N M O O ) N O N W N N
'O
C ?L C'
B
(?j O
N
O
D
N
m
M

O N
O

N C
O
O O
M O
M O
O
O
N
^ O
O O N M N N N N O O
C
O
F
o O
M
M
N
m
O
N
N
M O
M
O
O N p
O O
°
Ul
d
D N O O p O N
M M
V
C C

C m pl

C G

m

C C d C

m m d m C

d d d d

m d

C d

C

W d

C

m d

C

m d

C

m d

C

R O

C l G

m m C

W iq C d C

m d C d d d m d d
N
d N
N
d
d

f
f w'
K
f
f
f
Om a C C W m m W m C m C m C m C m
W C m m
c G

d ? f ? f f of M wm 2, mm 2 f mmf K z
C ?
O m
> N
`I' p
°
°
In
A
E
N C O O m
O
O)
N ai
N
N
O
M

a d m
of c
ao
N
o
R
O
O
O
M

N

N
7 U O N h O N
c
V d O N M
O
N ? O
?
C
00
O) ?
C l G

O
W
' Ol
m

C @

C C d C 0

m C W C 7 C

m d

C

W

IG
m

G

C

m

C

m

C

m

C d

C

m d

C

m Gi

m U1

m

W N

C N

m C m m

C N N N

)

C

?

C
? R
? w ? d' S'LL'S'K ?l a' ?R' d M Q' J K S K I R
¢ f 2 S' w 2 w' 2 R+ f?a 2 2 1
( x w 2 w a w 2 K2 w 2 w 2 2Q'?w 2 W 2
2 w

A

0)
o
+
m
Q

z
Q

z
Q

Z
Q Q

z z
Q

z
Q

z

Q
z

Q
z

Q
z
Q

z
Q

z

Q
Z

Q
z

Q
Z

`

Z M
O N
o' N
o ?
o au
v
o

Q

5

Q

Q

Q

6

Q

Q
a

a

a

m rL

?

LL

N

I z
z o

? O O

M z z Z z Z z z
z Z
z
z
z
K er
W F O
O o O
O
O ?
V O
C p? C pl c

mm p?

C C d C

C W C C

m p
?
C
C
m
C
C
m
d C
c m

C
C
m
pl
C
C
I6

C
C
p?
C
m
G

C
m
C
m
p?
C
m
pl
C
W
p?
C d C
d C
m
C
C
pl
C
C
pl C
Of
C
a
C
C
C
C
p
d
d

of
2
of W
of m
w m m
it
?
? C
K
? C
ly
f C
w m C W
Mille
w'
?
?
f
K
N
' l C
C

°
O K f w ? Kf w
?K f K ?Kf K
U
m
d
C

A

ci
10
N
t
6
R LL9 N
N

01

O

N

N

M
A

O M
C`1

m
N

N A

B A
N O
O
(0
,
03
0 Ol
y'
0 O N
M 1
t+
O
O
OJ
O
In

-

i N

' v '

.
?
N
p N 0 C
M
fh
C
.n V
U
°
N
i
O
? C O O
G
? O
O O
O
? O
p
O O
?
7 N O N N
f0 u:
C
d
Of
d N N O M O
O

O
O
O

O
O
I? d.
N C

II
c
N
c

T

w

c

C
l

C

m

m

N

1

n

C

-

m

0

i

E
E

a
mw " M
f w? K
?
?
??
f
??
?
f
of
f
?
i
?
?
?
f
w
f
w?
f
of
f
K
f W- of
K
2
w
2
2
1
'
d
( ? ? Z 2 CE 2 m mi x 212 W

W

m

Z

O

G

O 1S

U

'

{

Gtt

d

C

d

A

O
L

J

Q

O

>

O

a

/ c

c
N
M W
C
F O U C7 .-
d O 0 a J `7 U W O d O y
Q 1 a '2
Q m > r a £ N ?J `o L a U) o d
0 m 3 0 °
> W m Q m ra o m y E a o m y ? ? v ?? E
am)
U) 1
- c
e p a y Q a W o

fn w
?
F d

C

N

_ a d

$ fS

D O Y LL _ J d U

w'

L 3 Y N G

J O

(n S :C m p

0
IL
O

L
O
O
U
O
O
N
O
8 0 >
>
> OI
C

m

d .

E

_

ea

$
_
Sa 5
_
5

S

e
C
W

o

`0

3

c?

6

°

2

o

S2

O
3

m`

c

W
o
E

d

m
v

a

°

w

o

v

o

°'

?, E

E
IL
v
w
..

o •

o

a

3 ai
m

a

Q

w
w
-

e

? ?

?o m

4 m m m

mQ mZ m

m

? m

m?
m
° 3

J

v
a

3
m

? m
o
m

3
i d
a
m
m
d
o
d
L
o
£
=
o

c
o
Y
C
o
m
¢ w ? d K m x w W m 2 ? mN> Q ? a ? er n a i m ? o w o w?

N
M
a
N
N A
o6
oi
O
N
M
N w m a i m a ? 8 y
O A m O N N N N N N N N N1 1 O )
N °
M
M N
M
M M
d w
-O c
O m
E Z
o ma H
n ? -
? T N
dr
E a E
' d
N G
L
>
m O
v a E
c
N W N
O
a y m
L d
a
T d
N m
U L
0 m
N d
L
C U
d C
d d
n
N w
m d
L ?
E
d N
nO
N M

6
f'n
e:
D
V N
0 ?
a
m
O
3
:• Y
? U
W ?
a
F
i 10
N N
1? lp
N
) O
V O
V O O O O
N O O
O O

U

M

O

fC

N

O

q

N

W

N

M

N

V

a

O

D

O

O

?
I?

o

9
O

I

q

?

u -

i M

O O
m
M

?

^

?
O
O

)

r
O

0

?
N

O
O

O
O

{7

)
co O
16
?
a' t ?
? r
N
U
in
I fD R ? (OD O N N ?
' O
O O
O O
p
' O
O O ~ M OC N O
N V

O] O
y
P
O
O
N
N
O
N
O
)
12
N
O
q
O
O O O
O O
O O
aD O

d
O
O
+
0 O O O
0
r

E

M
..-W

E

C

d

G

C

C

G
. f K f f ' f 2

N d a a f 1 S K M Of f m f (2 2 K K
d
C ?
p q
>
° O
i O
i
"
°
E
V N
d

m

?

r

m

I.

m

v

In a v
N
O
M .
a a ai O ui N ri ° D ° . o o u o
N ? 0 m O
a' U O N ? ? u? N M O
V
c
d N o N ?
q
O p
•? K

? E

R N

p
C

c

? N

Ol
?

C

m N

?

g N

C

R
N

?

R N

C

G
N

G

R
4)

C

R
N

C

q
N

?

R
N

C

R
N

C

W
N

C

R
N

O
C

f
Qi

G O
W C

C

R
N

C

R
N

C

g
Ui

C

A
N

C
N

q C

R
N

C

A
N

C

A
m

C

q
N

C

R
Cf

G
U)

R CI
Gl

? C

W

N

?

q
N
?

q

N

?

g

U)

C

q

N

C
Of (2 2 a'! Of
O O
D
?
O cV ni
O I o O I
' 3 I
7 } N O f V N O O Vi N Z Z Z Z Z 2 O O O Q Q Q Q m
O m O O t D t O Q Q
pl
C

W
o

O
no 10

o

I

1

O C

O
O O Z Z Z N N Z Z
O
G

R
N
O
q

C
d
N
pl
c

C
m

W
E

N
O

N
C

m

c
C

d
p?

N
C

R
O1

N
C

N
p
C

M
C

N
p?
C
pqp
C
O
°'

G
m
°?

C
p?
C
O1
C
m
C
E
p
G
N
E
N
N
Ui
N

N
N
Ol

C
m
OI

C
OI
E Ol
E
m
E
N
N
N
N

_'
f t
0
a'
f
R: R
K
f N
K N
K
f N
O_ m N
a' d
f N
2 O W
C d N
C m
'? (c0
0' d ICO
2 m
f C d
S N m
Q: d tc0
Q m A
K d
f
K m
X. C
'
f c W @@C W c W C R C
' R C A C A c A C
a C I O: C Z' a S K S = R 2'
N
d
C =
O R
E I i O
? O O O N r
y
W C
N
V
N
1
0 0
fh
C
N M M N O {?j
4 d N O L 6 M U1 O
N O O O I( ? O
N
°
W v O
Z a
U o
O I ry O
f LO O
?
?
O
U c
v O N M O (V
q
C A
O 0
O1 .
K

J C p?

R C C p?

R C C

R C

R C N

R C C N

C

R N

C

A m
00 N

R C

R U)

C

CO N

R y

C

A Ui

CI

A N

C

R Uf

A N

C

A G)

C

W Oi

C

A N

W N

N

m
6

W

G7

C

A

N

m

R

m

N

A cI

m

W CC

Gi

R

Gi

W

71

Gl

N

m

d

K
K S
e K
f
K
IY
f

a

11

2

M

K

0

f

K

f C

f C

10 C C

R
C C A C W C A C
of . 1 T g K f f K f K f f ¢ a C2 f f

r ?
O

r
+

N

O

G

O

N
N Iri

O
N v

fp
O

t0

N

0

N

¢

Z

Q

Z

Q

Z

Q

Z

Q

Z

Q

Z

O
N

O
N

O

Q

Q

a

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

C

^O
W
?
W N

O
o

W

n

i O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
Z
Z
W o+
0
cp

C

) a

l E

i
O E
W

c

i
Ol

c

i
pl

c

i
Ol c

i

c

i
W

e

i
m

a

i
Oi

c

i
pl

E

i
p

E

i
p?

E

i
O)

c

d

pl

C

i
O

C
1

i

c

i

e

i
Ol

c

iO

C

i
O)

C

i
O c

i
pl C

m

pp

i
c Ol 1

m

a
1

i

i

i

i

i

of

i

K

of 2

(2

f

K

e M 0 41

¢ 4)
C

f
C

w 4,

2

0 4.

2

1

1

1
C
11 Di
C R
C R
C W
C R
C R

C
a: 2 cr 2 K 2 1 1 R' f
Of
K
K
f
of
Of
S
e w f
L
! aD 0
M
'O
r M
rn p
m
u
?
f?
O

N

V

Ip O

N N
N

m

O

N

N

m r

°' N N

N r-
to O
C

' O
O

O N
of O

O O

? ?

1 O N
c'
`
?

'

U
?
?
O

N
N

n

N
O

O O

M

N ?

N O

V'

? O
C O
O O
O

? O

O O

Onp N V O R O
N N

d
. N N O m O O
O O O
O O f? N
N
c
?

C
R

? C
C g
q

pl C
C R

? C
c q
q

? C
c W

?
C

C
R

p?
C

C

? C
C W

?
C

G
R

?
C

C
R

pl
C

C p?
R C

C
R

pl
C

G
R

E
C

C
g

pl
C

G
W

d
C

q

?
C

G

N
C

R

N
C

R

N
C

q

N
C

R

N
C

q

N
C

R

N
C R

N
C W

R
C

N
W CI R

q
C W

Ui
CI R

m
C

N
CI

N

N

a
' f
IY
R
f
K
f
K f
IY
f
J
S K
f
f
K
2
?
S
CE
f
I
2
a
K
q'
K
K
K
C R C q C
4 2 a f f S f f K S K 'L Z K

y
W
J

Z
m

O
y
U
..
r

a

N
t

C

?'
?p
Z
J
?

O L
J

m

0
Q
m
Q
O
>
Q
O

O

`r`

/J

Q
r
:.?°
N
O
O`
O
J
U i
W
x
_
.
°
U)
N
0
N
i
¢ c
O
a

N
O rw• c ?' N c L E 'O C L Z ? L.. fn E Y\ fn 5 fq 5 0 a v `
Q q Q L
'O

r
72
Q
a 3
N

d
O

o
d

?
V°i

o
a
S

Y
O

a

A
c
N
R '
d
O
=

v
v

°
3

-
C
N
&'

?d
N f
n

I

e

(n O
?a

"O
oL >

o

'L"
s
>

o°

q to
?

°o

?

N

C E 'r[

EE ?•

L

`?$ ?C

y

? _

m

N L

C

O

J

?

O Se

C

? N

a

Vi 55

E
N
Ol

II !?

1
(

O
v

C
_o

O

O
cn

J

9
?

a

SW
-
N

a

Q
a

a
O N C 3 C ..
6 n C q
C
2 b
E G n L
C X O 3 q q 0 . -. R _ = {CO j N N 0 7 O O O E
N t ° L O Y ¢ O Y O O N
U 1 O N, m m a m
m
< yy
C. n
o l
{pp
m
`v
J
v
Q
W
N
J

?
q

m
q

m
q

m
0
q
>
>
y
d

v
c N A
R
r
>
fn
c
o

q p

8

l0 ¢

° W

Z. ?
j
m m f3

l0 p

N O

O

m

m

N
M
s?
t()
cp
I.
e
p O
)
o
N
t
o
V
I
[)
t ?
0
I
? m
W
O
i
O
N > >

N Q
N
N
N m<
N n a
N m
N m ?
N a ma a
N N ? ?
M m a

M C2
?
N
m m a
ca
M
M z
V
m 8
N R d O
O) ? U C
O ? N =
O ? N
V O O. C
II
= c u J
C N F C
E €
E d ? a
y m m N
y > '? a
= m
> a a
c
C y q y
may y
C O L ?
u 2 >
m N
V U
'y O q
L
u N ?
c ?
r ? c
m
N ID
M y
u L ?
E m
in
i O
N m

u

u u u u u u u u u u u

u u u u u u u u u u
4 W m 4 W W 0.1 m W m

U)

?
C C

o 3 u
0
a
o
?
.?
-,
0
o ? ? ? ? o a
`i' x .c 3 Q N ? ? a? 0
t'
¢ o
L i-r o
Clj N c
CC .'? /off [ ? V1
to C?3 -S4 t: !?
!

cn as a. ¢ a? CZ w co x ¢ Q cn w u
u
o as

SI.
O
''?'
N
s
ti
^?'
Q
.?
psj
-rz
s
Q

S
U
' z
S
vn
pQ 'L
? O U
N b0 U s y '? N O >
rte. C U O Q O O h +?, O Cf O O i -O O 4
J V]
? N
n

Q

i
;zs
;z
r z
Q
h

s
o

o
s
v

s F?
y{ U
N U
U U U U
y Cz s s
i
O
U
?

a,
o
Q
? Ct
? dp
s O
s
s N
s N
s N
s
? ?C
v h
o?
y
?
?
o
0
0
>
?
?
.r I
-o
?
U U U U U ?, N ? v? J ?%

)
§|,
§
/
sJJyJJJJ
-
�
o
In
In
r
%
/
\
.«
4\
w
�
&
ƒ\
§
t
m
§
�
Q
*
�
�
\
\
\
(
§

DRAFT
Resioration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
11.0 Figures
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
O DAVIDSON 1ND PII
?..?.?
.$a 49' ?t
109'
ARRUS j
5 1!
' 'N NTGOXIER MOORE
STANL'
r? i 1
NHI L? '! •' L Ll. Z ?
" EC LENBURG
got
52
UNION AN. . N
4
o 24-
27 `J'
co
??E7 2 m 1215
1785 ?Q 7Q 73
a
` 1832
Easement Boundary
o?rrrst P .<
Ra
?--? k
52 -
C3
(D
?. N (D
Ro7e? Rl 3
q?
n
?-? S?rug95'Rd
c m ?`
T la ?O
C-ooAe,Rd 3? ? I ??
tied/ vale
v
0
o
.?NallyuaY;Rd 0 Q? ply, s I 2
Pel.Rd a` ''y U ,eshor O
v kak
n 2013;?? d
c» ` 1185
_ L m _ti ?e `o? y oo PUe^?on t N U 2.500 5 000
'H
Asor7-Rd z dais ?? Feet
Title Project Site Vicinity Map
Prepared For:
Project Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Figure
July 18, 2008 012620017 1
Prepared by Josh Allen =F1 -.< 11<.

1785
1832
(787
Q-
enn,
R
c
\Q
_

P rtes 52 a h
C
r
3?G C
yL
s Rd
ea ,.? s pa a ,??
00?,
l ? l
F

I Drainage Area UT5: - 0.07 sq. miles { ,•
- UT6 i 1
UT4 UT5
Drainage Area UT6: - 0.02 sq. miles
UT7

ti
-r - Drainage Area UTT. - 0.15 sq. miles
UT1
UT3
F
Drainage Area UT4: - 0.42 sq. miles
i
A
15
D
UT3
-0
il
nage
rea
ra
:
.
sq. m
es

r -
?- i Drainage Area UT1: - 1.25 sq. miles
UT2 Drainage Area UT2: - 0.13 sq. miles

i
Legend

Existing Stream !

Q Drainage Area ?j
L
Feet
Title Project Site Watershed Map (2005)
Prepared For
.?
Project Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stanly County, North Carolina

Date Project Number Figure
` July 18, 2008 012620017 2
Prepared by Josh Allen En I
s
Prepared by Josh Allen c = n
;: ,?, y

. i

..
Y ;* ? t
k
i yr:
.,a • FF:
S3
y r *
?A UT 5 1 > • . 1 t. Y
• -'i 1 * k???'???i ' ,yam R '?"
4wk FJiTdw t k
r ,?..., .. ... ° o. tee,
r I`
a i' ? Ij .yam a y
x, <.? k,"a?, > ?r •?, fir,,;' #sy?C3.32. ? ,-•3 ,yam - ;?za `+?--]hk ''fir
r"
.r •..!« y.X 1, „'?ln 77, %
s" ? a?, ' Sat .?° "` ;t ?? ? "?' g? `?'?? F ? 'a
? ::.?Fr.. ? i, ' ;?.r .r ..u'?i fi,'. ?'? ?"'+M?tt? .t "N. a >'.rt
..
?' +',Gsra?a? `fir 1• mss"
Legend
` -
O USGS Gage Stations ? ? r'
r
Proposed Wetland Restoration
r ?
Q Reference Wetland '? , M ?xa '4 g ? .S e k
c P r '
Existing Stream '" N
? .? + ..r
---- - - Easement Boundary
dt. 1? , Feet
Title Project Site Map with Hydrological Features and USGS Gage Station Locations (2005)
Prepared For: Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
' Project Stanly County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Figure
July 18, 2008 012620017 4
Prepared by Josh Allen < a.-
c UPI
q
f
W2
"ONO,
Wt-
- r
40" 'LAI
- e ?
At' ILI
A
a" r o t` #,. s v a v4 p
'T./1. , .+? a? r':? .®y a9„yi y? ?!' ??YFi.?g ? x 4r;^?.czar?
T a„
, 41
s ++
t•
Y
rx
+? y?y
i
" ? ? .? F . ? asp "`w sl
------------
Legend ; •`; °°' ??? 1 W o r 7,f, k
t ?? ?+=
Existing Stream
y i.
Jurisdictional Wetlanc .??,t t t{rY?kr!*' , :, ,xaz
-- easement 07-15-08
f n Feet
Title Project Wetland Delineation Map (2005)
Prepared For: Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
i Project
Stanly County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Figure
July 18, 2008 012620017 5
Prepared by Josh Allen [zn ;:c-=-
Prepared by Josh Allen c=n ,??.< <
- Prepared by Josh Allen w =n
it
Prepared by Josh Allen t-
I
14.
IIT
A
r*M` i
r
MI 1 W2

5 f x4 w#
? ???? ? ??? ?? r
? ? :
) }fi t. t.'?C>I .x' p
3t
$? ?? p4 rf.) {jf,A?+Y.?)f?.?,
a?Y`?J
?eyi
'?'
a ,r•
Vj'?? ??., lR -9 -? i{
?""
"
?
g
5
Y ?
:f r
?
p
( ?''
F
:;
y?jy
Legend
4

Existing Stream A?ya p 3???`SY
?ri'.t:
Reference Wetland (Hydrology
Reference Wetland (Sods)
(

F
Pt
Title Reference Site Wetland Map (2005)
Prepared For
. I
Project Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
_ Stanly County, North Carolina

Date Project Number Figure
July 18, 2008 012620017 9
Prepared by Josh Allen c m.n K^ . .
? !_, fy?IcNeiG a,
1785
I
Deer Haven Dr
Reference Riparian
Area - RPN-R2
i
P
i
Dennis Rd
O
G
Reference Riparian
Area - RPN-R1
Sn4Ug s R
-?- ? se
G
S
Legend avers Rd na Ln
0
Reference Riparian Area
Existing Stream
""N "'O 11000 2 (RCN?
I -- Easement Boundary I I
Feet
Title Reference Site Riparian Map (2005)
Pre
lq?N pared For: Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
._ Project Stanly County, North Carolina
. Date Project Number Figure
July 18, 2008 012620017 10
Prepared by Josh Allen G=n v..,-
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
12.0 Design Sheets
(See "Restoration Plan for Rockwell
Pastures" design plan set dated 711512008)
C a Klmley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
• DRAFT
• Restoration Plan

• Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• 13
0 Appendices
• .
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• / M ? Kimley-Horn
• ?,, IM and Associates, Inc.
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Appendix 1
Project Site Photographs
•
•
•
• Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
%
%

r
t ' ? n AYR ? 3 ? 1'
? c
!`
Z z ° ,, t 4 W

c ,s
su r c ?` •.,n. y1?'3:p qx '?! p?• la' ,. ? ;w

r`^ +
vi

7 i
yv i d ?.. ak ti h`^^ .sYf. c . .x.. t -x i ",? ! f f -!-} t y.
y?V3

Y
-
-
f, ?' j' t
' "y..y `w? r?-'?
.1?
,qty
Photograph 1. Lower Reach of Unnamed Tributary I (UT1)
+ Y 9 r n ?h? ?; k ,
? w
-a ,

1?' -'w? 1 a ? i+e
_rv ,py?,w
- ?/." ??9 ?
...'` '? r ..
. bier b
. - y1

*
y
r
•-
?
3 0:
?
r
- A
Z r v A t i c y!s •'3•-...
-dt?
k -I
w
t a ; a A6
z` x } ? t r r" •'? „y' ?,? ',e .C' :: : - s'' , 4 ? `e:r i$, `? T y.
r ? •

Photograph 2. UT2
Title Site Photographs
Prepared For:
ti Project Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stanly County, North Carolina

Date Project Number Page
7/17/08 012620017 1
T:\pn\012(120017 Rockwell Pastures\Restoration Plan\Appendicics\Appcndix I - Project Site Prepared by Laura Thombrough
Photographs.doc
1
' .?l ?kiM"sr wy?yM

y .
C
? Grp w 4 ?
*-
F ;w

NIP .. .?',?r ?`??., .y ' ?" ? 9v.y- ? sp+• 1.541` a:.

gig
i'.. Sr
r'
,
i
ir

0, rOt"
,y r w
AWI

Photograph 3. UT3

.s
xx"}• h /jib
?y ..
Zp,
3 r.
M `
'
'Y'n?'!a2
(
i?t r.*r^ sM'
y .N N "? a
I tc.
..
. *
v pr9 rWM
;~ 4 r y
'
^
+ 1
.?yy ,?.,
y <
+#
tfi..
sA,, y
t t• _
_ •0.)4 ? '? ,?r'?ti'.,
Photograph 4. Surrounding pasture at the confluence of UT1-Lower, UT2, and UT3.
Title Site Photographs
Prepared For:
?
L
Project Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stanly Cou nty, North Carolina

Date Project Number Page
7/17/08 012620017 2
r:\pn\012620017 Rockwell PasturesURestoration Plan\Appendicies\Appendix I - Project Site Prepared by Laura Thombrough
Photographs.doe y ""?
?1 T ff iff
f P i_ q ? CJ 4 q ?'M"1

.?j- } 7 1
1. IF
,? ?
?1
Y
m
r I }
$'
?
?
... - r+". ,r
. ,?
.r
i
is At
i vi ? ? 4• , a . ?' a } t
?i' `rv? ? ?( r? r ?Yr?W,, ? ±." Y ?' *.fa" ? } °? Y ,

yak
'J"'
T li 5 s - .. y.? ?qn. ,{ y: a?A y, 4,?
K `, ? ?` ? i*pN A.
y I•i. wr \ f 1
?`•ytlt. ,?*
' l,. i
•, °?!S-L?? +. ? ?
+` °'wi'M''ir//
x
_t
- s
\.
y
_7
,•r
''••,"l°''?'`, ' .yam= .,,?,y ?,-r. '
. 4Q
? 1 hw
i
V
'
'?
?
,
,
.x
.i;J.a .
??Y
ig$
j
Photograph 5. Forested reach of UT4

?. I S •K?
1 1
t +
51

ze =. Px`>?x ': 3 I i ?l. \ -a•'., ?+.' qj 4tj...s? ?,?s
/"y'? t . ?, w .;• i` ?,t,1 I??s .fir i, y. .? ,..? .?? .. g i
' ? ? •p\,' .. i ? turf , ? ? f ?. "?
` ?li? ?'\li'r'gi?ly?'`\x d'+•;2;a ! "?)`ti r c 3 /
j \ ?A
A 1
Photograph 6. Section of UT4 along agricultural field
Title Site Photographs
Prepared For:
i Project Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stanly County, North Carolina

Date Project Number Page
7/17/08 012620017 3
r:\pn\012620017 Rockwell Pastures\Restoration Plan\Appendicics\Appendix I - Project Site Prepared by Laura Thombrough [ s+ ??
Pholographs.doc
14
ell,
r'! (
'
r

A
p.

V,3
v
?

-40 ? ,

Photograph 7. Forested Buffer along UT4

t

f,

rvP.ft~ 9LL Yy
y •1 - N -
?t .i F? •:F !.? A Jn
N? tvw

y y, A
$
' l l . My 3
i'e 0
s r
, •
?

! ?i
?' n
i
`i
.
V
33
t rYIt ?? 'rr?'? J\• •l f? pC#' -•;k ^' jar ?.yy,:

Photograph 8. Middle Reach of UT1
Title Site Photographs
Prepared For:
i Project Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stanly County, North Carolina

Date Project Number Page
7/17/08 0126200 17 4
T:\pn\012620017 Rockwell Pastures\Restoration Ptan\Appendicies\Appendix I - Project Site Prepared by Laura Thombrough I;un "".L'."??
Photographs.doc

z
_11M E.

a+ ??? ti
vt ?'•'

i
m q
i
- '?..? *:,3 ri ?Yr?(a. -.rp , ^ y ?• r r ,i. ??.t.. (r• 'a? r '4' .

'S"
? f ?. ^4 l'. ? aC M.. J, •?
'tY 1.. t Y *. ti^
•
•L
Y
:,?
tf G
,,k .
VV, 7 ,i, y ,(? f 11.; l,•?sj'u i .? i' a,.? a'K •? .,. ./t.
?'"
es,
e
:? ?
'1
l
:
?°'?
'?' iFL
'' '
y
,
,T , w. ri ?
;,, ,,,,_ .
r
rt .,i
.3 t r!
G•
' a
-Y: ? („!'
Photograph 9. Confluence of UT1 and UT4. UT6 and UT7 are located in the distance.
t
t y ?

4 C S
?? i "'
y
'? ? `; s?? ? w-.,rMb ?/ ? 4•• G?! ,? -?i,.? ? l.. - .? t ! -? wtt ,• •? ? {'i t'4t'i .
'rl
L Hp.'v? G A p _• A'r a141, 'I' 1. ( 1rf ?,,,y ?, Rp':• ,Py. r
t Trl• x M r-?? y,, 5
iii {? E?"? '" r< J''? ?'' 9 ,`,';r >t '?S . .Fv;.r.. ?.Af'" ? ?
y.
s
•
,
.
.

Photograph 10. UT5 and surround agriculture field
Title Site Photographs
Prepared For:
' T Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Project
Stanly County, North Carolina

klk- Date Project Number Page
7/17/08 012620017 5
T:\pn\012620017 Rockwell Pastures\Restoration Plan\AppendiciesWppendix I -Project Site Prepared by Laura Thombrough
Photographs.doc
r
• `ddF?Y ,,hh 31?{I ??r' ?„S?1\?,?It , L'§?4, !? `??Y`( ?r? § I$il ?.5
W
y?
,
l
9
t y
4
l
?
r
?
A
f
a. :
I
Cr
` "•
. '
7}R
r? L WVn
?? m? a , °? ' ?, d 4
e1• i.
s
/x'
.
w

VIV
t

y r

r

'Alt

Photograph 11. Upper Reach of UT I.
y.:
tt>
r
' ?'dt !+
4

k A
4 4.. l? r..

I
.I- ?>y? I II
?? ry
1 tI.
.Y
Photograph 12. Upper Reach of UT1 and surrounding areas.
Title Site Photographs
Prepared For:
E Project Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stanly County, North Carolina

Date Project Number Page
7/17/08 012620017 6
L\pn\012620017 Rockwell Pastures\Restoration Plan\Appendicies\Appendix I - Project Site Prepared by Laura 'rhombrough
Photographs.doc r

k+

,m
.
?, r 1 .. r
4'L5T1 ?,? • :.. t .+11?1? ,?,j _ .
1hl,•' * l 1
+
tt?Y
Q4µ
?t
"• r
!+?
d U, ?
:9 V'
'
7•?
?
?
?
?P
?
d:
t
t
?
t
ft '06".
Photograph 13. UT6

JK_

5
&I
?
, t ya11111`Y, 44y
f?
/ rlr aL
•

AV'
6
, yrn
z?' ,
a
ai 1;
•ti
?
a
?
,
?
t
?
4
?
?
.
y ?
? . ?
v,?,
y y
f M1
,
?
w
. A
3
?
r
n
R ?
? r
!
}
t "+?.lS '!
r :i,.
?,„` . dty??
1'j v 4' ?,• '? :?i?j
lV ?
s
?
Photograph 14. UT7
Title Site Photographs
Prepared For:
Project
Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stanly County, North Carolina

A?_ Date Project Number Page
7/17/08 012620017 7
T:\pn\012620017 Rockwell Pastures'Restoration Plan\Appendictes\Appendix I -Project Site Prepared by Laura Thombrough
Photographs.doc W

4
M.
-
, q ?.. tr. „ria.f ?d,gM?AbiRtNivMd.i' a.` r .'M'R?MYJ Ste,
i r•i> t ,

x A
y? - le,
.
9& 1 w?;.
Y?0 ll L??( }SJ? ! t+, r 3? 1'" _.
Y
a
(/

* aiL? VY
{?
`
+1
1 1.
.
,
Yl
.?
+
l
?
?
W1
1f1.
+
'l
1 1?L
ift, ??
'?
r
.
'L{ I
5??
+t ?
0
'
f;l; ?t,. •??7?,
'•? 1.t
1R
?t !
V3`
?. t;"{y Vt- 1
?
?i?
?
???f?
ft
Y
?'
'
?t s
,
?, l
°ej
,wk
,[ r
.
.
;?`
l 3`..
?
,±Tj
y¦
?.i "
? T g t, a ?j !. ( S .Q,7f { f`j? ?? l?
Photograph 15. W1 - Proposed wetland restoration area

Title Site Photographs
Prepared For:
=
Project
Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
S
tanly County, North Caro lina

Date Project Number Page
7/17/08 012620017 8
T.,pn\012620017 Rockwell Pastures'Restoration Plan\Appendicics\Appendix I - Project Site Prepared by Laura'rhombrough c=n
Photographs.doc
n
DRAFT
i Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
U
Appendix 2
Project Site NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms
Kidey-Horn
? and Associates, Inc.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 10/19/2006 Project: Rockwell Farm Site Latitude:
Evaluator: Todd St.John (KHA) Site: UT1 - intermittent Longitude:
Total Points: 30
Stream is at least intermittent County: Stanly Other Albemarle, NC
if ? 19 or perennial if z 30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 16.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainage way 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal= 6
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines) 1 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 7.5
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21'. Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eri h ton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizin bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAG = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; sAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
tadpoles, aquaric beetles, dragonfly larva
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 9/26/2006 Project: Rockwell Farm Site Latitude:
Evaluator: Todd St.John (KHA) Site: UT1 - perennial Longitude:
Total Points: 48.5

Stream is at least intermittent
County: Stanly Other
Albemarle, NC
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if z 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 23 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainage way 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hvdrologv Subtotal= 9
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 16.5
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eri h on 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OR = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
crayfish, frogs, amphipods, dragonfly larva

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 9/26/2006 Project: Rockwell Farm Site Latitude:
Evaluator: Todd St.John (KHA) Site: UT2 - perennial Longitude:
Total Points: 32

Stream is at least intermittent
County: Stanly Other
Albemarle, NC
if = 19 or perennial if Z 30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 11.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainage way 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal= 8.5
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or -growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
11
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines) 1 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 12
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted lants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eri h on 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
right-handed snails, mayflies, bullfrog tadpoles minnows

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 9/26/2006 Project: Rockwell Farm Site Latitude:
Evaluator: Todd St.John (KHA) Site: UT3 - perennial Longitude:
Total Points: 43

Stream is at least intermittent Stanl
County: Y Other Albemarle, NC

e.g. Quad Name:
z 19 or perennial if ? 30
if
A. Geomorphology Subtotal= 22 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainage way 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. I No = 0 Yes = 3
f9l
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal= 7.5
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
11
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines) 1 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 13.5
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eri h ton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
crayfish, frogs, amphipods, dragonfly larva
•
i
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 10/19/2006 Project: Rockwell Farm Site Latitude:
Evaluator: Todd St.John (KHA) Site: UT4 - perennial Longitude:
Total Points: 35.5
Stream is at least intermittent County: Stanly Other Albemarle, NC
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if a 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal= 18 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainage way 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes - 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal= 9
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
1i
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines) 1 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 8.5
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eri h ton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus 0 0.5 1 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; sAV = 2.0; Other = 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
crayfish, fish, frogs, salamander, amphipods crash
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 10/19/2006 Project: Rockwell Farm Site Latitude:
Evaluator: Todd St.John (KHA) Site: UT5 - intermittent Longitude:
Total Points: 28

Stream is at least intermittent
County: Stanly Other
Albemarle, NC
if >_ 19 or perennial if ? 30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal= 15 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainage way 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No - 0 Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal= 6.5
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines) 1 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 6.5
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eri h on 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
tadpoles, aquaric beetles, dragonfly larva

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 3/9/2007 Project: Rockwell Pastures Latitude:
Evaluator: Todd St.John (KHA) Site: UT6 Longitude:
Total Points: 28
Stream is at least intermittent County: Stanly Other Albemarle, NC
if z 19 or perennial if z 30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 11.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainage way 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal= 8.5
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines) 1 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 8
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eri h on 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
left-handed snails, crayfish, amphipods, chironomids, ditched
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 3/9/2007 Project: Rockwell Pastures Latitude:
Evaluator: Todd St.John (KHA) Site: UT7 lower Longitude:
Total Points: 33
Stream is at least intermittent County: Stanly Other Albemarle, NC
if z 19 or perennial if z 30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 17.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drains a way 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No - 0 Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal= 8.5
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal= 7
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eri h ton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBI = 1.5; SAV = 2.0: Other = 0
"Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
left-handed snails, crayfish, amohioods, chironomids ditched

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1

Date: 3/9/2007 Project: Rockwell Pastures Latitude:
Evaluator: Todd St.John (KHA) Site: UT7 upper Longitude:
Total Points: 35

Stream is at least intermittent
County: Stanly Other
Albemarle, NC
if >_ 19 or perennial if ? 30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 17 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainage way 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes = 3
° Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines) 1 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 10
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eri h on 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29 . Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; sAV = 2.0; Other - 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
crayfish, amphipods, strong headcut, bedrock, lower part ditched

DRAFT
Restoration Plan
. Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina

Appendix 3
Project Site USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Rockwell Date: 12/5/2007
Applicant/Owner: County:
Investigator: TC
State:
Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Y Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation?) Y Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? N Plot ID:
Vegetation
Stanly
NC
W2
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum
1. Rubus argutus S FAC 9.
2. Liguidambar styraciJlua T FAC 10.
3. Acer rubrum T FAC 11.
4. Scirpus spp. H OBL 12.
5. Juncus effusus H FACW 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Spe cies that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FACU): 100
Remarks:
Indicator
Hydrology:
RECORDED DATA:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
x No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Depth to Surface Water: >12 (in)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12 (in)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 10 (in)
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS:
Saturation in upper 12"
PRIMARY INDICATORS:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
x Sediment Deposits
M Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
SECONDARY INDICATORS:
x Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Suvey Data
Fac-Neutral Test
Other
i
•
i
i
= SOILS
- Map Unit Name
(Series and Phrase): Drainage Class:
i Field Observations
i Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? (Y/N)
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth
inches
Horizon Matrix Color
Munsell Moist Mottle Colors
Munsell Moist Mottle
Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-5 A 10YR 5/3 Loam
5-12 B 10YR 5/1 10YR 6/6 30% Clay loam

w
- HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Histosol x Reducing Conditions Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
• Histic Epipedon x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
- Sulfidic Odor Concretions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Aquic Moisture Regime High Organic Streaking in Other (Explain in remarks)
Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
i Hydric Soil Present? (Y/N) Y

i Remarks:
•
•
•
i WETLAND DETERMINATION (Y/N)
i Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Y
Wetland Hydrology Present? Y
i Hydric Soils Present? Y
- Is this sampling point a Wetland? Y
Remarks:
i
•
. DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Appendix 4
Reference Site Photos
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.

1
h 1}
V"t

" ?
;? ~ •Wi4..r ,l r^ ?11r
' j }•«g{j$ a,k. { S L A!4 .
1 .. ??? "' ?? 't ih l ? ? `r ? ? 7 ro4{ ? ?5 ,,y .. y K -.?.:k Y p •+t:. l'r"? Lh„`'?'„ ,?

y}
}p
.
a
?M
R
.
?,,
y ? LG
?r Y . V i,
?
.. .y,?+ L M ? Q_ ? ly
,?a
f-
?"?
t
'
?
?
y(
??" w
?f y,?•zy?.?
"
:5«. ?
?,Ip??-.
? .ar t?;il
v
y T? ? ? a
?^
°"^
•1F 4? ^
.. A
, ?i'
i?
?
c%/i C'
?
J? .
,? ?`
k
x
x
,
?.
/qr
i
4Y
,;
5:..
y
??r`

r
?• ?G"9i ° ? `??? '?sn:..:.. Kay. .?5«

Photograph 1. UT2 reference cross sections

.,
A4 +
.:.Y!ip""" a,± Ar M N ; f; ix

t r
y
?
«
t1
'k t. Mtf
a. V. !
,
i y
iJ"

'
•
-
'+a ,.,y W t 'ly'x,?s?
, ? f •. ?.„?r. ,?,? x ?
?y ? r ?? ? y a r
. 'i? ..r? t e ?j ?,? ?`-'" ?9
-??
;'y?` r ''s $?+
..., .y Ys •?nlr'7 # 'a5'? _,t'3`+'?p
"' .',4? SRe a??4
?./ f max` ) S- ?? ..y; '?
.' ?w?.• , ,}d?~a
9
s J
c ?^ ?.• '?"'?u'ry ,y,''?'rl? ?aR ?,1y.?,y
ry1G. 9 Y w.? 'r ''• -
,
t....i
t • ? ' _; K aC* ? '? ;... ?':i '?" ?r?'.{ '' ?' ?,
,f
rty,
r - +?'#? 1?`,R
'??.,e•1
y
?
y
4
x ?' .. .. ?' - '?' ?. >w...... - ' r..! ?•: ? ? ?Yr . " .yam s
r,
Photograph 2. UT 1 reference cross section
Title Reference Site Photographs
Prepared For
i Project Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stanly County, North Carolina

Date Project Number Page
7/17/08 012620017 1
T:\pn\012620017 Rockwell Pastures\Restoration Plan\Appendicies\Appendix 4 - Reference Prepared by Laura Thornbrough
Site Photographs.doc
?7(V!?? ?s?."a
7
i

. f
.
t ;. 8r :`? '??•'??"'` ter ^ G : ..s
S1 ? f ?-
7 ?i K{?'
q}II
•? ? ??
??
r`e? •
?
?
„
,
,
j
,it,
J1
.
>
?
?
,?
y
+1 b
??.
]f^¢#It? ±? ? ..y• ??.?_F??? ? ,.1' N?jry\rn?yJJ/1•?1f ??/?yf ?;?yl
?
?k ° '' ?r ?
` ?? ?
lair ,
f 1
;
?
•
t y ya, ?
,yam/ ,? ,
Yp
111
I 4
?'
?
M ?.,?
N
•`'t/K.. .. ? ? ? ? ?? ?..
.

...
04i
?
i , ? ? ?
..
?'. * a??• ?
•?
K f • " a
ma
'
:
.
,.
_ ? .Y* ? • .,. A ?' Q ? i,-?.? ' fA i >?e j??r
{, .
y`
00
_- Jf !f•?: al't, :'?. `.-a S y.i? j {'. ?_Y.', ? 4;, r .r -In J? [ ?e
O
t
l
VVI,

Photograph 3. UT4 reference cross section

J

.
? d
? y?? ` h
?.
`O+i" ?.3 M ? ? I ?Kix
''n . e ,•.?
?
J
?
? ?
;
a f?
A> ?
.
. off, ri °? 4.-
' SW' ^ .?"?Y,i.. y,•,.•
.? ?.:.? ?.
yr
: r/rs t ?,JS*?• ry - ,
t
o"'•"•^s ?,
t-4
.
,
.
r MY,
]t?
c 9
ILI
`

Photograph 4. Hydrologic reference wetland in left background.
Title Reference Site Photographs
Prepared For:
i
® Project Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
--
-
Date [
Project Number Page
7/17/08 012620017 2
T:\pn\012620017 Rockwell Pas'tures\Rcstoration Plan\AppendiciesWppendix J - Reference Prepared by Laura Thornbrough [Mn nf -
Site Photographs.doe
. DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Appendix 5
Reference Site NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms
WeyHorn
and Associates, Inc.
•
r
r
r
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 9/26/2006 Project: Rockwell Farm Site Latitude:
Evaluator: Todd St.John (KHA) Site: UT1 - perennial Longitude:
Total Points: 48.5
Stream is at least intermittent County: Stanly Other Albemarle, NC
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 23 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainage way 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No - 0 Yes - 3
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hvdroloqv Subtotal = 9
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Bioloav Subtotal = 16 5
20b. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eri h on 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29b. Wetland plants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
crayfish, frogs, amphipods, dragonfly larva
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 9/26/2006 Project: Rockwell Farm Site Latitude:
Evaluator: Todd St.John (KHA) Site: UT2 - perennial Longitude:
Total Points: 32

Stream is at least intermittent
County: Stanly Other
Albemarle, NC
if ? 19 or perennial if >_ 30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 11.5 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainage way 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No = 0 Yes - 3
d Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hvdroloav Subtotal = A IS
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 12
207 Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
2lb . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eri h ton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
F257 . Wetland !ants in streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
right-handed snails, mayflies, bullfrog tadpoles, minnows
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 3.1
Date: 10/19/2006 Project: Rockwell Farm Site Latitude:
Evaluator: Todd St.John (KHA) Site: UT4 - perennial Longitude:
Total Points: 35.5

Stream is at least intermittent
County: Stanly Other
Albemarle, NC
if >_ 19 or perennial if ? 30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 18 Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score
1 a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5. Active/relic flood lain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
9a. Natural levees 0 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
11. Grade Control 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley or drainage way 0 0.5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS ma or other documented evidence. No - 0 Yes = 3
Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussion in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2 3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2 3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5 0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximor hic features resent? No = 0 Yes = 1.5
C. Biology Subtotal = 8.5
20°. Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21_b . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance 0 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; eri h ton
J 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fun us 0 0.5 1 1.5
29b. Wetland !ants in streambed IFAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
" Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the presence of aquatic or wetland plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:
crayfish, fish, frogs, salamander, amphipods crayfish
•
w
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Appendix 6
Categorical Exclusion Checklist
•
•
•
•
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
PO''", =1 Kimley-Horn
bh. I=. and Associates. Inc.
January 22, 2008
Mr. Donnie Brew
Environmental Protection Specialist
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Re: Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Full Delivery Project
Stanly County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Brew:
This letter serves to transmit a Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem
Enhancement Program Projects to your agency for the Rockwell Pastures Stream
and Wetland Restoration Full Delivery Project for your review and approval.
The Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site (Rockwell Pastures)
is located in Stanly County, approximately 6 miles southeast of Albemarle, North
Carolina (Figure 1). The project proposes restorative work on seven unstable
Unnamed Tributaries (UTI, UT2, UT3, UT4, UT5, UT6, and UT7) to David's
Creek/Lake Tillery. These streams are highly degraded and unstable due to the
channelization and straightening of the channels in the past as well as the
ongoing agricultural and livestock operations. The proposed project also includes
restorative work on a non-riparian wetland area (W1) which is currently in active
agriculture and has been drained by ditches and crowning.
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream and wetland system. Due to the size of the site and its position in the
landscape, the proposed project creates an opportunity to restore virtually an
entire watershed through restoration of the riparian areas and wetlands. Benefits
will include improved water quality by reducing sediment load through
stabilization and by reducing nutrient and other pollutant input by the addition of
forested riparian buffers planted with native species. Improvements to the
ecosystem include the addition of in-stream habitat by the use of stream
structures and bank revetments such as root wads.
The project will include the restoration of dimension, pattern, and profile to
approximately 10,757 linear feet of existing stream channel and the enhancement
of approximately 6,426 linear feet of existing stream channel. Stream banks will
9
P.0 Box 33066
Raleigh. No•fh Ca-obna
276363066
a
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
PP'' ®,I Kimley-Horn
Ilkh. M and Associates, Inc,
be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-root plantings, and bio-engineering. In-
stream structures will be constructed to increase turbulence and disturbed oxygen
concentrations. Additionally, the proposed project includes the restoration of 1.5
acres of non-riparian wetlands.
I appreciate your assistance with this matter. If you have any questions regarding
this application, please do not hesitate to call me at 919.653.5843.
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Laura Thornbrough
Environmental Analyst
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Version 1.4, 8/18/05
Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Project Part 1: General
Project Name: Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Full Delivery
Project
County Name: Stanly County, North Carolina
EEP Number: 000624
Project Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Project Contact Name: Norton Webster
Project Contact Address: 909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Project Contact E-mail: [e-mail]
EEP Project Manager: Guy Pearce
Project Description
The Rockwell Pastures Restoration Project proposed restorative work on 7 unstable streams as well as
the restoration of 1.5 ac of non-riparian wetland. Due to the size of the site and its position in the
landscape, the proposed project creates an opportunity to restore virtually an entire watershed through
restoration of riparian areas and wetlands. The project will include the restoration of dimension, pattern,
and profile to approximately 10, 757 LF of existing stream channel and the enhancement of
approximately 6,426 LF of existing stream channel. Benefits will include improved water quality by
reducing sediment load through stabilization and by reducing nutrient and other pollutant input.
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
Date EEP Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
?Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
i
Part 2: All Projects
Regulation/Question
Response
Coastal Zone Management Act CZMA
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county? ? Yes
? No
2. Does the project involve ground-disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of ? Yes
Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? No
?? N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured? ? Yes
? No
?? N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management ? Yes
Program? ? No
? N/A
Com rehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (C R CLAI
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ?? Yes
? No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been ? Yes
designated as commercial or industrial? ?? No
? N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential ? Yes
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? ? No
? N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous ? Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area? ? No
?? N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous Yes
waste sites within the project area? ? No
?? N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan? ? Yes
? No
?? N/A
National Historic Preservation Act Section 106
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Yes
Historic Places in the project area? ?? No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur? Yes
? No
?? N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved? 17 y-es
? No
? N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act Uni for m Act
1. Is this a "full-delivery" project? ? Yes
? No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate? ? Yes
? No
? N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds? Yes
?? No
? N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed: ? Yes
prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and ? No
* what the fair market value is believed to be? ? N/A
7 Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Part 3: Ground-Disturbing Activities
Regulation/Question Response
American Indian Religious Freedom Act AIRFA
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of Yes
Cherokee Indians? ?? No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians? ? Yes
? No
? N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic ? Yes
Places? ? No
?? N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered? Yes
? No
?? N/A
Antiquities Act AA
1. Is the project located on Federal lands? ? Yes
? No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects ? Yes
of antiquity? ? No
?? N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? ? Yes
? No
?? N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? ? Yes
? No
?? N/A
Archaeological Resources Protection Act ARPA
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)? Yes
? No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources? Yes
? No
? N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? ? Yes
? No
? N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? Yes
? No
?? N/A
Endangered Species Act ESA
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat ?? Yes
listed for the county? ? No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species? ?? Yes
? No
? N/A
3. Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical ? Yes
Habitat? ?? No
? N/A
4. Is the project "likely to adversely affect" the species and/or "likely to adversely modify" Yes
Designated Critical Habitat? ? No
?? N/A
5. Does the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination? ? Yes
? No
?? N/A
6. Has the USFWS/NOAH-Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy" determination? ? Yes
? No
? N/A
8 Version 1.4, 8/18/05
Executive Order 13007 Indian Sacred Sites
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory" ? Yes
b the EBCI? ? No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed ? Yes
project? ? No
? N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred Yes
sites? ? No
? N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act FPPA
1. Will real estate be acquired? ?? Yes
? No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally ?? Yes
important farmland? ? No
? N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS? ?? Yes
? No
? N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act FWCA
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any ?? Yes
water body? ? No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted? ?? Yes
? No
? N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act Section 6
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public, Yes
outdoor recreation? ?? No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion? Yes
? No
? N/A
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Ha bitat
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system? Yes
? No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species? ? Yes
? No
?? N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the Yes
project on EFH? ? No
?? N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH? ? Yes
? No
?? N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred? Yes
? No
?? N/A
Migratory Bird Treat Act MBTA
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA? ? Yes
?? No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated? Yes
? No
?? N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area? ? Yes
?? No
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining Yes
federal agency? ? No
?? N/A
9 Version 1.4, 8/18/05
Memorandum
To: Donnie Brew
Federal Highway Administration
From: Laura Thornbrough
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Date: January 22, 2008
Subject: Threatened and Endangered Species
Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Stanly County, NC
This memo is intended to document the absence/presence of threatened and endangered
species or suitable habitat at the Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) database (updated January 16, 2008) lists
one federally endangered species for Stanly County, NC: Schweinitz's sunflower
(Helianthus schweinitzii). Yadkin River goldenrod (Solidago plumosa) and Georgia aster
(Symphyotrichum georgianum) are identified as candidate species; however these species
do not receive federal protection. The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is protected
under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Review of the Natural Heritage
Program (NHP) database of documented occurrences did not reveal the presence of any
of these species within a one-mile radius of the proposed mitigation site.
A project scoping letter was sent to Ms. Marella Buncick of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
- Service (December 10, 2007) requesting any information or comments that the USFWS
may have with regards to this stream and wetland restoration project. Ms. Buncick has
not responded with any comments. Therefore, it is not anticipated that this project will
have any negative affect on suitable habitat for the threatened and endangered species
- listed for Stanly County, NC.
Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinit .it)
Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herb, usually 3 to 6 feet tall with yellow flowers
- which occur in late August to October. Schweinitz's sunflower is found in relatively open
habitats such as roadsides, maintained rights-of-way, early successional fields, and
woodland openings. Generally, Schweinitz's sunflower occurs on shallow, poorly
drained, clayey and/or rocky soils.
Marginal habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower exists along the agricultural field edges at
the Rockwell Pastures property; however the frequent disturbance of the site makes these
areas unfavorable. The majority of this site is used as open active agricultural fields, void
of any native vegetation. Site soils are predominantly deep and moderately to well-
drained.

No occurrences of Schweinitz's sunflower have been documented in the NHP database
within a one-mile radius of the proposed mitigation site and presence of this species has
not been observed by KHA or EBX biologists during site investigations conducted during
- Schweinitz's sunflower flowering season.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT.

Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
The bald eagle is a large raptor which typically inhabits the shorelines of large rivers,
. lakes, and ponds. Bald eagles construct nests in large trees near the shoreline and make
• use of the large water bodies for foraging.
Suitable habitat for bald eagle does not exist within the proposed mitigation areas, as
• there are no large bodies of water on or near the proposed project property. No
occurrences of bald eagle have been documented in the NHP database within a one-mile
radius of the proposed mitigation site and presence of this species or of suitable habitat
for this species has not been observed by EBX or KHA biologists during site
- investigations.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT.

Yadkin River Goldenrod (Solidaro plumosa)
Yadkin River goldenrod is a perennial herb, endemic to the Yadkin River in North
- Carolina. Currently, plants are known to exist in only two locations, within 2 kilometers
• of each other, along the shoreline of the Yadkin River. This species is listed as a
Candidate species by the USFWS.

Habitat for Yadkin River goldenrod does not exist on the Rockwell Pastures property due
- to the lack of flood scouring, the establishment and spread of invasive species, and the
clearing of native vegetation for agricultural purposes. The majority of this site is used as
open active agricultural fields, void of any native vegetation.

• No occurrences of Yadkin River goldenrod have been documented in the NHP database
within a one-mile radius of the proposed mitigation site and presence of this species has
not been observed by KHA or EBX biologists during site investigations.
-
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT.

- Georgia Aster (Symphyotrichum worrianum)
• Georgia aster is a perennial herb, distinguished by its large flower heads with dark purple
rays up to 2 cm long. Disc flowers are white with purplish tips on the corollas. Blooms
first appear in early October and continue into mid-November. Georgia aster is found in

2
dry open woods, roadsides, maintained rights-of-way, and woodland openings in dry oak-
pine flatwoods and uplands in the piedmont region of the state. This species is most likely
a relic species of the post oak-savanna communities that existed prior to fire suppression.
Georgia aster is listed as a Candidate species by the USFWS.
Marginal habitat for Georgia aster exists along the agricultural field edges at the
Rockwell Pastures property where the frequent disturbances of the site mimic natural
disturbances; however the majority of this site is used as open active agricultural fields,
void of any native vegetation.
No occurrences of Georgia aster have been documented in the NHP database within a
one-mile radius of the proposed mitigation site and presence of this species has not been
observed by KHA or EBX biologists during site investigations. The USFWS lists the
record status for Georgia aster as "historic", meaning the species was last observed in
Stanly County more than 50 years ago.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT.
3
L7=FJ KimleyNom
and Associates, Inc.
December 10, 2007
Marella Buncick,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Re; Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Full Delivery Project
Stanly County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Buncick,
P 0 Box 33068
Raleigh, Norlh Carolina
27636.3068
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is writing this letter on behalf of our client,
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, to request a no effect determination from
your agency regarding a proposed stream and wetland restoration project.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site (Rockwell Pastures) is
located in Stanly County, approximately 6 miles southeast of Albemarle, North
Carolina (Figure 1). The project proposes restorative work on seven unstable
Unnamed Tributaries (UT1, UT2, UT3, UT4, UTS, UT6, and UT7) to David's
Creek/Lake Tillery_ These streams are highly degraded and unstable due to the
channelization and straightening of the channels in the past as well as the ongoing
agricultural and livestock operations. The proposed project also includes restorative
work on a non-riparian wetland area (WI) which is currently in active agriculture
and has been drained by ditches and crowning.
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream and wetland system. Due to the size of the site and its position in the
landscape, the proposed project creates an opportunity to restore virtually an entire
watershed through restoration of the riparian areas and wetlands. Benefits will
include improved water quality by reducing sediment load through stabilization and
by reducing nutrient and other pollutant input by the addition of forested riparian
buffers planted with native species. Improvements to the ecosystem include the
addition of in-stream habitat by the use of stream structures and bank revetments
such as root wads
The project will include the restoration of dimension, pattern, and profile to
approximately 10,757 linear feet of existing stream channel and the enhancement of
approximately 6,426 linear feet of existing stream channel. Stream banks will be
a
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
KimleandyNom
Associates, Inc.
- stabilized using erosion matting, bare-root plantings, and bio-engineering. In-stream
structures will be constructed to increase turbulence and disturbed oxygen
concentrations.. Additionally, the proposed project includes the restoration of 1.5
- acres of non-riparian wetlands
According to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service intemet list (updated 11/05/2007;
• accessed 12/03/2007), there is one endangered species, two candidate species, and
i ten federal species of concern potentially occurring in Stanl,y County, Schweinitz's
sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) is the only species listed as endangered for this
• county.. The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is protected under the Bald and
- Golden Eagle Protection Act. It is unlikely that any of these species will be
negatively affected by this project.
Specifically, we would like information that the area described above -
• is not located in an officially designated wildlife refuge
- . will not affect listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical
- habitats; will not jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed
endangered or threatened species or likely result in the destruction or
adverse modification of proposed critical habitats, as determined by the
• Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973
Additionally, we request that you please include -
- Any known information for each species listed in Stanly County, NC
• Comments on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to
endangered species, migratory birds or other trust resources from the
- construction of the proposed project
We would appreciate a reply from you as soon as possible. Please either mail or fax
• (919-677-2050) your reply to my attention If you have any questions regarding this
request or the extent of site disturbance associated with this project, please feel free
to contact me at [phone].
- If we have not heard from you in 30 days we will assume that our species list is
correct, that you do not have any comments regarding associated laws, and that you
- do not have any information relevant to this project at the current time.
. Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC..
Laura Thombrough
- Environmental Analyst

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
z7 North. Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission PQ
Fred A. Harris, Ynterin3 Executive Director
20 December 2007
Ms. Laura Thornbrough, Environmental Analyst
Kimley-l Torn and Associates, Inc.
F.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, NC 27636-3068
Subject: Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site, Stanly County, North Carolina.
Dear Ms. Thornbrough:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject
document. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S. C. 661-667d) and North Carolina General Statutes
(G.S. 113-1:31 et seq.),
The proposed project includes restoration of dimension, pattern and profile to approximately
10,757 linear feet of stream channel and enhancement of approximately 6,426 linear feet of stream
channel on seven unnamed tributaries to David's Creek/Lake Tillery in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River basin.
Stream banks will be stabilized using erosion matting, bare-root plantings, and bioengineering structures.
The streams are highly degraded and unstable due to channelization, straightening, and ongoing
agricultural and livestock operations. Also, restoration of 1.5 acres of non-riparian wetlands is proposed.
Stream and wetland restoration projects often improve water quality and aquatic habitat. We
recommend establishing native, forested buffers in riparian areas to improve terrestrial habitat and
provide a travel corridor for wildlife species. Provided natural channel design methods are used and
measures are taken to minimize erosion and sedimentation from construction/restoration activities, we do
not anticipate the project to result in significant adverse impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife
resources.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. If you require further assistance, please
contact our office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Shari L. Bryant l
Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries - 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721}
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Z " d SZ39/1 'tibt? ' 966 auerl,aa t.aeyS -16a;00 LO 0Z 000
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
FJ KidayHom
and Associates, Inc,
December 10, 2007
Shannon Deaton,
North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission
Division of Inland Fisheries
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Full Delivery Project
Stanly County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Deaton,
P 0. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636.3068
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.. is writing this letter on behalf of our client,
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, to request review and comment on any
possible issues that might emerge with respect to fish and wildlife issues associated
with a proposed stream and wetland restoration project.
The Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site (Rockwell Pastures) is
located in Stanly County, approximately 6 miles southeast of Albemarle, North
Carolina (Figure 1).. The project proposes restorative work on seven unstable
Unnamed Tributaries (UTI, UT2, UT3, UT4, UT5, UT6, and UT7) to David's
Creek/Lake Tillery, These streams are highly degraded and unstable due to the
channelization and straightening of the channels in the past as well as the ongoing
agricultural and livestock operations The proposed project also includes restorative
work on a non-riparian wetland area (WI) which is c11r7ently in active agriculture
and has been drained by ditches and crowning..
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream and wetland system. Due to the size of the site and its position in the
landscape, the proposed project creates an opportunity to restore virtually an entire
watershed through restoration of the riparian areas and wetlands.. Benefits will
include improved water quality by reducing sediment load through stabilization and
by reducing nutrient and other pollutant input by the addition of forested riparian
buffer's planted with native species. Improvements to the ecosystem include the
addition of in-stream habitat by the use of stream structures and bank revetments
such as root wads.
The project will include the restoration of dimension, pattern, and profile to
approximately 10,757 linear feet of existing stream channel and the enhancement of
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
CmMn Kim
and AssocileyNom
ates, Inc.
approximately 6,426 linear feet of existing stream channel,. Stream banks will be
stabilized using erosion matting, bare-root plantings, and bio-engineering. In-stream
structures will be constructed to increase turbulence and disturbed oxygen
concentrations. Additionally, the proposed project includes the restoration of 1.5
acres of non-riparian wetlands.
We would appreciate a reply from you as soon as possible. Please either mail or fax
(919-677-2050) your reply to my attention. If you have any questions regarding this
request or the extent of site disturbance associated with this project, please feel free
to contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Laura T'hornbrough
Environmental Analyst
cc:
Guy Pearce
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Norton Webster
Environmental Banc & Exchange
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
JAN 0 3 2008
i<!M !_EY-HORN,
_NIVIR
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B Sandbeek, Acdminisnrator
Michael i1, Easley, Govemor Offiet: of Archives and History
Li%beth C Evans, Secretary Division of Historical Rl'SOUMUS
Jeffrey J Crow, Deputy Secretary David Brook, Director
December 27, 2007
Laura Thornbrough
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
PO Box.33068
Raleigh, NC 276.36-3068
Re: Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration, Stanly County, ER 07-2679
Dear Ms. Thornbrough:
Thank you for your letter of December 10, 2007, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no continent on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above continent,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579.. In all future
cotntnunication concerning this project, please cite die above-referenced tracking number.
Sincerely, (?
L_e" !tw ' n ?+?1Q _b'&t
eSandbeck
"7
Location: IN rmt Jones Street, Raleigh NC: 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 mail Service Center. Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: (919) HlA-65711/&17-4597
KimEeykom
and Associates, Inc.
December 10, 2007
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617
Re: Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Full Delivery Project
Stanly County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill-Earley,
P ,O Box 33068
Raleigh, Noah Carolina
27636-3066
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc is writing this letter on behalf of our client,
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, to request review and comment on any
possible issues that might emerge with respect to archaeological or cultural
resources associated with a potential stream and wetland restoration project.
The Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site (Rockwell Pastures) is
located in Stanly County, approximately 6 miles southeast of Albemarle, North
Carolina (Figure 1). The project proposes restorative work on seven unstable
Unnamed Tributaries (UT1, UT2, UT3, UT4, UTS, UT6, and UT7) to David's
CreeVL,ake Tillery. These streams are highly degraded and unstable due to the
channelization and straightening of the channels in the past as well as the ongoing
agricultural and livestock operations.. The proposed project also includes restorative
work on a non-riparian wetland area (WI) which is currently in active agriculture
and has been drained by ditches and crowning.
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream and wetland system. Due to the size of the site and its position in the
landscape, the proposed project creates an opportunity to restore virtually an entire
watershed through restoration of the riparian areas and wetlands, Benefits will
include improved water quality by reducing sediment load through stabilization and
by reducing nutrient and other pollutant input by the addition of forested riparian
buffers planted with native species, improvements to the ecosystem include the
addition of in-stream habitat by the use of stream structures and bank revetments
such as root wads
The project will include the restoration of dimension, pattern, and profile to
approximately 10,757 linear feet of existing stream channel and the enhancement of

C]=FJ Kimley-Horn
® and Associates, Inc.
approximately 6,426 linear feet of existing stream channel. Stream banks will be
stabilized using erosion matting, bare-root plantings, and bio-engineering,. In-stream
structures will be constructed to increase turbulence and disturbed oxygen
concentrations. Additionally, the proposed project includes the restoration of 1.5
acres of non-riparian wetlands.
No architectural structures or archeological artifacts have been observed or noted
during preliminary surveys of the site for restoration purposes.. In addition, the
majority of the site has historically been disturbed due to agricultural purposes such
as tilling and grazing.. Project site photographs are enclosed with this letter.
We ask that you review this site based on the attached information to determine the
presence of any historic properties
We would appreciate a reply from you as soon as possible. Please either mail or fax
(919-677-2050) your reply to my attention. If you have any questions regarding this
request or the extent of site disturbance associated with this project, please feel free
to contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Laura Thombrough
Environmental Analyst
cc:
Guy Pearce
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Norton Webster
Environmental Banc & Exchange
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
U.S. Department of Agriculture
FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
PART I (To be completed by Federal Agency) Date Of Land Evaluation Request 1211 1107
Name Of Project Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoratio Federal Agency Involved FHWA
Proposed Land Use Stream and Welland Restoration I County And State Stanly, North Carolina
PART II (To be completed by NRCS) I Date Request Received By NRCS A, , // - 2,:5hO'
Does the site contain prime, unique, statewide or local important farmland? Yes No
(If no, the FPPA does not apply -- do not complete additional parts of this form) ? Acres Irrigated Average Farm Size
rs D
Major Crop(s) 1
co/gAj Farmable Land In Govt. Jurisdiction /
Acres: 02-3 2- %'74,S Amount Of Farmland As Defined In FPPA
Acres: 1?pZ471?v a7o6
Name Of Land Evaluation System Used
S T`/4N Name Of Local Site Assessment System
a Date Land Evaluation Returned By NRCS
2---/?--a4!:?7
leted b
PART III (To be com
Fed
l A e
Alternative Site Ra
p
y
era
gency) Slte A Site B t
Site C Site D
A. Total Acres To Be Converted Directly 5816 _
B. Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly 0.0
C. Total Acres In Site 58.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
PART IV (To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Information
A. Total Acres Prime And Unique Farmland ,
B. Total Acres Statewide And Local Important Farmland , ?
C. Percentage Of Farmland In County Or Local Govt. Unit To Be Converted , QZ
D. Percentage Of Farmland In Govt. Jurisdiction With Same Or Higher Relative Value Z-.
PART V (To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Criterion
Relative Value Of Farmland To Be Converted (Scale of 0 to 100 Points) el' &3 0 0 0
PART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Site Assessment Criteria (These cdlerfa are explained in 7 CFR 656..5(b) Maximum
Points
1. Area In Nonurban Use 5'
2. Perimeter In Nonurban Use jp
3. Percent Of Site Being Farmed lv
4. Protection Provided By State And Local Government I)
5. Distance From Urban Builtup Area L
6. Distance To Urban Support Services
7 Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average 10
_
8 Creation Of Nonfarmable Farmland _
9. Availability Of Farm Support Services
10. On-Farm Investments 5 _
11. Effects Of Conversion On Farm Support Services
12. Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 160 K b5 0 0 0
PART VII (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V) 100 I) ?3 0 0 0
Total Site Assessment (From Part VI above or a local
site assessment)
160
%5-
0
0
0
TOTAL POINTS (Tolal of above 2 fines) 260 J A `G{ $ 0 0 0
Site Selected:
-+ 1
Date Of Selection ?2 ?21 1260
Site sse was A LocalYes A© ssment UNod?
Reason For Selection:
A w as o?n I Y avai la.1o(C, Site-
(See Instructions on reverse side) Form AD-1006 (10.63)
This lorm was electronically produced by National Production Services Slatl
KimleyHom
__ _ and Associates, Inc.
December 11, 2007
Alan Walters
Resource Soil Scientist
Natural Resources Conservation Service
530 West Innes Street
Salisbury, NC 28144
Re: Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
Full Delivery Project
Stanly County, North Carolina
Dear Mr Walters,
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, (KHA) is writing this letter on behalf of our
client, Environmental Banc & Exchange (EBX), to request input from your agency
regarding the proposed Rockwell Pastures Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
(Rockwell Pastures) located in Stanly County, approximately 6 miles southeast of
Albemarle, North Carolina, and potential effects it may have on farmland resources.
We have completed sections I and III of the enclosed Form AD-1006.. A location
map, USGS topographic map, soils map, and site overview map are also included.

The project proposes restorative work on seven unstable Unnamed Tributaries
(UTI, UT2, UT3, UT4, UT5, UT6, and UT7) to David's Creek/L.ake Tillery.. These
streams are highly degraded and unstable due to the channelization and
straightening of the channels in the past as well as the ongoing agricultural and
livestock operations. The proposed project also includes restorative work on a non-
riparian wetland area (WI) which is currently in active agriculture and has been
drained by ditches and crowning.
The purpose of this project is to restore the site back to a naturally functioning
stream and wetland system. Due to the size of the site and its position in the
landscape, the proposed project creates an opportunity to restore virtually an entire
watershed through restoration of the riparian areas and wetlands. Benefits will
include improved water quality by reducing sediment load through stabilization and
by reducing nutrient and other pollutant input by the addition of forested riparian
buffers planted with native species. Improvements to the ecosystem include the
addition of in-stream habitat by the use of stream structures and bank revetments
such as root wads
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
M
P 0 Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636.3068

C]MFI Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc,
'T'he project will include the restoration of dimension, pattern, and profile to
approximately 10,757 linear feet of existing stream channel and the enhancement of
approximately 6,426 linear- feet of existing stream channel. Stream banks will be
stabilized using erosion matting, bare-root plantings, and bio-engineering.. In-stream
structures will be constructed to increase turbulence and disturbed oxygen
concentrations. Additionally, the proposed project includes the restoration of 1.5
acres of non-riparian wetlands.
We would appreciate a reply from you as soon as possible. Please either- mail or fax
(919-677-2050) your reply to my attention. If you have any questions regarding this
request or the extent of site disturbance associated with this project, please feel free
to contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
Y-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
-..&. A14Uk4l4IVU61l
Environmental Analyst
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The EDR Radius Map
with GeoCheek®
Rockwell Pastures
44188 A Dennis Road
Albemarle, NC 28001
Inquiry Number: 2119602.2s
January 14, 2008
R® Environmental
Data Resources Inc
The Standard in
Environmental Risk
Information
440 Wheelers Farms Road
Milford, Connecticut 06461
Nationwide Customer Service
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Internet: www.edrnet.com
FOHMSWS/L

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
44188 A DENNIS ROAD
ALBEMARLE, NC 28001
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranver
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.278290 - 35° 16'41.8"
80.134810 - 80' 8' 5.3"
3e Mercator: Zone 17
578684.6
3904049.8
360 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map:
Most Recent Revision:
East Map:
Most Recent Revision:
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
35080-C2 ALBEMARLE, NC
1996
35080-C1 MORROW MOUNTAIN, NC
1994
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
FEDERAL RECORDS
NPL--------------- ---------- National Priority List
Proposed NPL---- ---------- Proposed National Priority List Sites
Delisted NPL------ ---------. National Priority List Deletions
NPL LIENS--------- ---------- Federal Superfund Liens
CERCLIS----------- ---------. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
CERC-NFRAP------ ---------. CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
LIENS 2 ------------ ---------- CERCLA Lien Information
TC2119602.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
•
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CORRACTS------------- ----- Corrective Action Report
RCRA-TSDF ------------- ---- RCRA - Transporters, Storage and Disposal
RCRA-LOG-------------- ---- RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG-------------- ---- RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-CESQG--------------- RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
RCRA-NonGen---------- ----. RCRA - Non Generators
US ENG CONTROLS ---- ----- Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROL ---- ----- Sites with Institutional Controls
ERNS____________________ ____ Emergency Response Notification System
HMIRS___________________ ____ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
DOT OPS________________ ____ Incident and Accident Data
US CDL_________________ ____ Clandestine Drug Labs
US BROWNFIELDS------ ---- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
DOD_____________________ ____ Department of Defense Sites
FUDS____________________ ____ Formerly Used Defense Sites
LUCIS------------------- ----. Land Use Control Information System
CONSENT --------------- ---- Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
ROD_____________________ ____ Records Of Decision
UMTRA__________________ ____ Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
ODI______________________ ____ Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9------ ----- Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
MINES___________________ ____ Mines Master Index File
TRIS_____________________ ____ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
TSCA____________________ ____ Toxic Substances Control Act
FTTS____________________ _____ FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
HIST FTTS_______________ ____ FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
SSTS-------------------- ----- Section 7 Tracking Systems
ICIS__________________________ Integrated Compliance Information System
PADS____________________ ____ PCB Activity Database System
MLTS____________________ ____ Material Licensing Tracking System
RADINFO________________ ____ Radiation Information Database
FINDS ------------------- ----- Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
RAATS__________________ _____ RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
SHWS------------------------ Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
IMD________________ __________ Incident Management Database
NC HSDS__________ __________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
SWF/LF ------------ ---------- List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI----------------- ---------- Old Landfill Inventory
HIST LF____________ __________ Solid Waste Facility Listing
LUST -------------- ----------- Regional UST Database
LUST TRUST ------ ---------- State Trust Fund Database
UST ---------------- ---------- Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST ---------------- ---------- AST Database
INST CONTROL -- ----------- No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
VCP________________ __________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
DRYCLEANERS--- ---------- Drycleaning Sites
BROWNFIELDS____ __________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
NPDES------------- ---------- NPDES Facility Location Listing
TRIBAL RECORDS
INDIAN RESERV_____________ Indian Reservations
TC2119602.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INDIAN LUST________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
INDIAN UST ------------------ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
Manufactured Gas Plants___ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC2119602.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped:
Site Name
CAROLINA SOLITE CORP/AQUADALE
MIN O PON
EFIRDS BACKHOE SERVICE (FORMER
HWY 205 @ 24/27
CANTON RD MINI MART
FROG POND 66
MORGAN MILLS (DAWSON PLANT #6)
METAL MAINTENANCE
PHILLIPS 66 FORMER
MILTONS GROCERY/GAS FORMER
DOBY TRUST - WHITE OAK RANCH F
CANTON ROAD MINIMART #2
PHILLIPS 66-HWY 24/27
SERVCO 00115 (WILCO #381)
ALLISON MANUFACTURING COMPANY
THE STORE/HOME SAVINGS AND LOA
U FILLER UP (FORMER)
PLYLER HEADEND
DOBY TRUST - EGG PLANT & HATCH
MILLINGPORT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
FAST STOP #1
BURRIS ALTON PROPERTY (FORMER)
HUNEYCUTT PROPERTY
MCCOY OIL COMPANY
FAST STOP #1
REID EFIRD BACKHOE SERVICE
NORTH CAROLINA NATURAL GAS CO
BELK 018
GREEN TOP 66
MIN O PON
CHARLES HARRINGTON
HIGHWAY 52 66 STATION
WILCO 381
QUIK CHECK 18
CONCORD ROAD GULF
ALL STAR MILLS. INC.
VERN'S 66
C.L. VICKERS TRANSFER
TIME WARNER CABLE
CONCORD TELEPHONE MICROWAVE T
HALL'S MOTORCYCLE SHOP
MILLINGPORT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
AEROQUIP-NORWOOD PLANT
REMBERT HARGROVE BLALOCK
KAISER AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL
STANLY FIXTURES CO.. INC.
JEFFERIES SOUTHERN PROCESSORS
HAWOOD PROPERTY/STROUD IMAGES
RUSSELL S AUTOMOTIVE
AREY/TAYLOR WELLS
U FILLER UP (FORMER)
CROSSROADS GROCERY
LUTHER GORDON PROPERTY
LONG CREEK WWTP
Database(s)
CERC-NFRAP
LUST, UST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST
LUST, IMD
LUST, UST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, LUST TRUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, IMD
LUST, LUST TRUST, IMD
LUST TRUST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
UST
AST
RCRA-NonGen
FINDS, RCRA-CESQG
IMD
IMD
IMD
IMD
IMD
TC2119602.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
OVERVIEW MAP - 2119602.2s
* Target Property
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
A Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
1 7fl Dept. Defense Sites
0 114 1n 1 ulles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
p Oil & Gas pipelines Disposal Sites
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Rockwell Pastures CLIENT: EBX
ADDRESS: 44188 A Dennis Road CONTACT: Norton Webster
Albemarle NC 28001 INQUIRY #: 2119602.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.2783/80.1348 DATE: January 14, 2008 12:58 pm
Copyright 6 2006 EDR, Inc. 0 2007 Tale Atlas Rat. 07/2006.
- Target Property
Sites at elevations higher than
- or equal to the target property
• Sites at elevations lower than
- the target property
- 1 Manufactured Gas Plants
t Sensitive Receptors
• !, National Priority List Sites
- Dept. Defense Sites

0 1/16 1B L4 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
i-
Oil & Gas pipelines Disposal Sites
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Rockwell Pastures CLIENT: EBX
ADDRESS: 44188 A Dennis Road CONTACT: Norton Webster
Albemarle NC 28001 INQUIRY #: 2119602.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.2783/80.1348 DATE: January 14, 2008 12:58 pm
Copyright ?0 2008 EDR. Inc. ® 2007 Tale Atlas Re 1. 07/2006.

DETAIL MAP - 2119602.2s
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Target Distance Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
FEDERAL RECORDS
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPL LIENS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CERC-NFRAP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LIENS 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-CESQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-NonGen 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
DOT OPS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
HIST FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ICIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RADINFO TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS
State Haz. Waste 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
IMD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
NC HSDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State Landfill 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
OLI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC2119602.2s Page 4
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Target Distance
Database Property (Miles)
HIST LF 0.500
LUST 0.500
LUST TRUST 0.500
UST 0.250
AST 0.250
INST CONTROL 0.500
VCP 0.500
DRYCLEANERS 0.250
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
NPDES TP
INDIAN RESERV 1.000
INDIAN LUST 0.500
INDIAN UST 0.250
EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS
Manufactured Gas Plants 1.000
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
< 1 /8 1 /8 - 1 /4 1 /4 - 1 /2 1 /2 - 1 > 1
Total
Plotted
0 0 0 NR NR 0
0 0 0 NR NR 0
0 0 0 NR NR 0
0 0 NR NR NR 0
0 0 NR NR NR 0
0 0 0 NR NR 0
0 0 0 NR NR 0
0 0 NR NR NR 0
0 0 0 NR NR 0
NR NR NR NR NR 0
0 0 0 0 NR 0
0 0 0 NR NR 0
0 0 NR NR NR 0
0 0 0 0 NR 0
TC2119602.2s Page 5
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Appendix 7
Stream Assessment
Kimley-Horn
© and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
N
O
N
O
J

_

U U)

S LL
?e
co
m
.?
m
cY)
0-
0 ? ? O I- u
(11) uogenal3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
0 c?
0
co
o ?
C?
o° ?
ti O
o ?
C? O
0 U
co
tt3
o }'
o cn
0 p
0
0
0
0
0
?1
I?
O
1
qqi-
O
1
N
r
O
4-
O
L.
n
i
N
Q.
Q.
LL
_
U)
?e
U m
O ?
?- N M 191-
a. 0- IL
+ X
0
0
N
0
O
0
0
LO
0

c?
cn
cm
c
O
m
a?
U
m
0
(11) uoilenal3
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

O
M
H
c?
LL
U)
U co
O 00.
(11) uoi;ena13
Ce) It
0- CL
+ x
0
T-
oo
rn
M ,r--
V/
E
O
4-0
cn
_O
O
U
CCS
cn
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1 IJ
O
N

_ ? ?e m m M ?
U co 0? 0- CL
O ? ? <1 + x
(11) uoijenal3

0
L?
E
n?
W
V?
cm
_o
m
W
U
C?
0
o ti
o rn
Ir-
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
oowm?%%
ti
0
1
O
1
N
r
O
O
d.

LL
U)
U ? m
O ?
(11) uoilenal3
T- N M
IL 0- IL CL
. <> <
0
00

0
Nt
0
0
low"`
E
co
4-0
cn
O
c?
a?
U
co
cn
0
O
Cl)
C
CL
co
is
N
O
O
n
1
O
? U
C C
O:3
Al m
V/
I
U)
O
L
U
C
.Q
a
a
c
0
0
0
O
m
0
r
11
W
x
W
11
44
x
A
Q
0
w
x
A
3
0
N

m
U
C
N
?L
O 2
0
(74) U01}ena13
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
-----------------------------------------------------------
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT2
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 1 - Pool UT2
Survey Date: 12/04/2007
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 91.80
1.58 0 91.02
3.68 0 90.83 BKF
4.35 0 90.32 REW
6 0 89.69
6.43 0 88.91
7.69 0 88.88
8.74 0 88.89 LEW
9.8 0 89.12 BKF
11.11 0 89.73
11.82 0 89.76
12.45 0 90.26534 BKF
27.87 0 91.33572
Cross Sectional Geometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood rove Elevation (ft) 91.66 91.66 91.66
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 90.27 90.27 90.27
Flood prone Width (ft) 27.59 ----- -----
Bankfull Width ft 8.04 4.02 4.02
Entrenchment Ratio 3.43 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 0.87 0.92 0.83
Maximum Depth (ft) 1.39 1.39 1.38
Width/De th Ratio 9.24 4.37 4.84
Bankfull Area (s ft) 7.03 3.71 3.32
Wetted Perimeter ft 8.95 5.97 5.74
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.79 0.62 0.58
Begin BKF Station 4.48 4.48 8.5
End BKF Station 12.52 8.5 12.52
Rntrmnmant (aIr-iibtinnz (Rneven MM'fii-d Chip](]- Ciinial
Channel Left Side Right Side
Sloe 0 0 0
Shear Stress lb/s ft -- -- --
Movable Particle (mm) -- -- --

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
•
w
C
0
M
(D
7
N
>N
N
N
1 0
U
N `°
a
C:
O
.}J C
U co
1
U)
0
L-
C)
m
C
O
CL
c
0
0
U'
O
I
w
x
II
w
x
A
Q
(14
O
44
X
A
3
(4) U01leAE)13
O
Cl)
O
N

U
C
co
An
0
-Fu
c
0
N
O
CD T
0

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT2
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 2 - Riffle UT2
Survey Date: 12/04/2007
Cross Section Data Entrv
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 90.35
1.33 0 90.01
3.12 0 89.18 BKF
3.45 0 88.78 REW
5.48 0 88.19
7.12 0 88.23
10.21 0 88.42
12.57 0 88.71 LEW
13.42 0 89.06 BKF
14.35 0 89.30
15.73 0 89.51
28.21 0 90.54206
Cross Sectional Geometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation (ft) 89.93 89.93 89.93
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 89.06 89.06 89.06
Flood prone Width ft 19.37 ----- -----
Bankfull Width (ft) 10.19 5.2 4.99
Entrenchment Ratio 1.9 ----- -----
Mean Depth ft 0.61 0.7 0.51
Maximum Depth (ft) 0.87 0.87 0.75
Width/De th Ratio 16.7 7.43 9.78
Bankfull Areas ft 6.18 3.63 2.56
Wetted Perimeter ft 10.5 6.17 5.83
Hydraulic Radius ft 0.59 0.59 0.44
Begin BKF Station 3.22 3.22 8.42
End BKF Station 13.41 8.42 13.41
Entrainment Calculations (Rosizen Modified Shields Curve)
Channel Left Side Right Side
Sloe 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/s ft) -- -- --
Movable Particle (mm) -- -- --
•
•
•
•
•
CD
co
Y
C
IL
U
(0
7
N
f0
N
O
ry
I N
0
M
C
O
co
U
a) m
I
O
L-
C)
ti
c
'o
a
a
c
7
0
CD
O
ri
m
m
I
W
x
.n

tl
W
x
R
0
N
00
11
w
x
3
O
N

N
U
c
ca
v/
0
-Fu
c
N
O
CD =
0
(4) u01}ena13
•
•
•
•
•

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT2
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 3 - Riffle UT2
Survey Date: 12/04/2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 92.79
1.77 0 91.68
3.93 0 91.24 BKF
5.36 0 90.96 REW
6.55 0 90.88 BKF
7.28 0 90.25
8.52 0 89.83
10 0 89.87 LEW
11.02 0 90.00 BKF
11.78 0 90.32
12.39 0 90.57
13.49 0 90.82 BKF
25.34 0 91.33
27.12 0 91.65
Cross Sectional Geometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation (ft) 91.93 91.93 91.93
Bankfull Elevation ft 90.88 90.88 90.88
Flood prone Width ft 25.76 ----- -----
Bankfull Width ft 8.27 4.13 4.14
Entrenchment Ratio 3.12 -----
Mean Depth ft 0.58 0.83 0.33
Maximum Depth ft 1.05 1.05 0.93
Width/De th Ratio 14.26 4.98 12.55
Bankfull Area (s ft 4.81 3.43 1.38
Wetted Perimeter ft 8.73 5.37 5.22
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.55 0.64 0.27
Begin BKF Station 6.52 6.52 10.65
End BKF Station 14.79 10.65 14.79
e
Entrainment Calculations (Shields Curve)
Channel Left Side Right Side
Sloe 0.0299 0 0
Shear Stress lb/s ft 1.03 -- --
Movable Particle (mm) 90.6 -- --
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ml
Nl
'DI
c wl
a xl
?Qj
o ?I
I
U I
a>
io
00.
r i
I
D I
I
Q of
O "I
n °I
41
i 0 -'4
c I
O 5 I
+-? :
U
m
? I
U
O I
L 1
V MI
of
NI
ii
xl
c 3
CL
a I
C I
0 1
CD I
o
0
Lo
N
O
N
O
M
N
O
N
N
O
N
O
O
N
O
0
0
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
CN
0
0
0-
C)
m
co
0
r
O
0
N
O
V
M
O
N
O
O

U
C
co
U)
co
C
0
N
O
2
(4) u01jeA@13
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT 1 Lower
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 4 - Pool UT1
Survey Date: 12/21/2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 90.25
135.32 0 88.00
155.55 0 87.53 BKF
157.11 0 84.82 REW
158.98 0 84.20
169.31 0 82.91
171.76 0 83.34
171.77 0 84.88 LEW
173.46 0 87.11
180.2 0 88.28
208.87 0 87.86
Cross Sectional Geometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation ft 92.15 92.15 92.15
Bankfull Elevation ft 87.53 87.53 87.53
Flood prone Width (ft) 208.87 ----- -----
Bankf ill Width (ft) 20.33 10.17 10.16
Entrenchment Ratio 10.27 ----- -----
Mean Depth ft 3.09 3.25 2.93
Maximum Depth ft 4.62 4.17 4.62
Width/De th Ratio 6.58 3.13 3.47
Bankfull Areas ft 62.77 33.04 29.72
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 24.79 16.06 17.07
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 2.53 2.06 1.74
Begin BKF Station 155.55 155.55 165.72
End BKF Station 175.88 165.72 175.88
Fntrninment Cnlcnlatinns (Rncaan Mnrlifiari QhiAAc (nrval
Channel Left Side Right Side
Sloe 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/s ft -- -- --
Movable Particle mm -- -- --
•
•
•
•
i
O
N
:
.o C 44
•
x
• a
U V
• L / oU A
• ? a
c
a--' c
co
i
• 0
• U N
I
44
• x
• w A
c 3
'o
. a
a
c
C7
• °
•
•
i
i
•
•
•
•
•
In O
co
co co
(4) UOIJena13
0
0
0
v
0
M
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
0
U
C
o ?
(0
+.
to
O
N
.L
O
O
V
O
M
0
N
0
0

In o Un o in o
In U') v v co co
co 0 0 0 0 00
o Ln o L o
of W co n r`
O co co co co
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT1 Lower
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 5 - Riffle UT 1
Survey Date: 12/21/2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 87.25
40.05 0 87.24
51.66 0 86.34 TOB L
68.9 0 86.13 BKF
69.83 0 85.57 L BKF
72.05 0 85.02
73.67 0 84.17 TW
76.15 0 84.39
78.8 0 84.32 BKF R
80.55 0 84.39
81.9 0 85.20
84.51 0 85.88 TOB R
87.57 0 86.18
91.2 0 87.07
130.24 0 86.82
Cross Sectional Geometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation ft 88.09 88.09 88.09
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 86.13 86.13 86.13
Flood prone Width ft 130.24 ----- -----
Bankfull Width ft 18.19 9.1 9.09
Entrenchment Ratio 7.16 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 1.14 1.37 0.9
Maximum Depth (ft) 1.96 1.96 1.81
Width/De th Ratio 15.96 6.64 10.1
Bankfull Areas ft 20.67 12.45 8.21
Wetted Perimeter ft 18.95 11.33 11.2
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.09 1.1 0.73
Begin BKF Station 68.9 68.9 78
End BKF Station 87.09 78 87.09
i
Entrainment Calculations (Shields Curve)
Channel Left
Side Right
Side
Sloe 0.009 0 0
Shear Stress lb/s ft 0.61 -- --
Movable Particle mm 36.8 -- --
Y
C
O
U
(0
7
U)
N
(0
M
D
N
ry
1 i
_U
C
C
O
}? C
U m
U?
O
L
U
N
C
O
CL
'D
C
7
O
0
I
LLJ
x
0
i
w
x
Q
N
I
W
X
1]
3
0
N
0
O

U
C
cu
O
N
O

(4) UOIJeAOS
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT3
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 6 - Riffle UT3
Survey Date: 12/21/2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 97.28
4.38 0 96.57
6.04 0 96.08
7.37 0 95.59 BKF
9.75 0 94.21
12.19 0 94.29
13.27 0 94.32
13.78 0 96.21
19.63 0 97.62
20.92 0 97.54
Cross Sectional Geometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation ft 96.97 96.97 96.97
Bankfull Elevation ft 95.59 95.59 95.59
Flood prone Width (ft) 14.99 ----- -----
Bankfull Width (ft) 6.25 3.12 3.13
Entrenchment Ratio 2.4 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 1.04 0.85 1.24
Maximum Depth (ft) 1.38 1.38 1.35
Width/De th Ratio 6.01 3.67 2.52
Bankfull Areas ft) 6.51 2.64 3.87
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 7.6 4.85 5.46
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.86 0.55 0.71
Begin BKF Station 7.36 7.36 10.48
End BKF Station 13.61 10.48 13.61
i
i
Fntrainmant Cnlrnlntinne tcb;AAA C,,,-.
Channel Left Side Right Side
Sloe 0.0126 0 0
Shear Stress lb/s ft) 0.68 -- --
Movable Particle (mm) 41.3 -- --

C)
M
C
O
CL
8
m
t
U)
a>
io
M
O
O
o
C
O;
U?
fQ? m
U)
V!
'^
'N
VJ
0
U
c
'o
CL
a
c
m
O
U`
O
rn
rn
I
W
x
n
W
11
w
x
Q
Ln
W
x
it
3
0
N

a?
U
C
N
L
0
O T
0
(4) UOIjena13
•
!
•
!
!
!
!
•
•
•
•
•
•
!
•
•
•
•
•
•
!
•
•
!
•
•
!
!
!
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
s
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT3
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 7 - Pool UT3
Survey Date: 12/21/2007
---------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 96.98
3.06 0 96.80
3.74 0 96.15 BKF
5.93 0 95.30
7.33 0 95.30
9.87 0 94.84
13.17 0 95.21
15.03 0 96.04
16.06 0 96.67
20.92 0 97.54
Cross Sectional Geometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation ft 97.46 97.46 97.46
Bankfull Elevation ft 96.15 96.15 96.15
Flood prone Width ft 20.51 ----- -----
Bankfull Width (ft) 11.47 6.26 5.21
Entrenchment Ratio 1.79 ----- -----
Mean Depth ft 0.84 0.81 0.87
Maximum Depth ft 1.31 1.31 1.3
Width/De th Ratio 13.65 7.73 5.99
Bankfull Area (s ft 9.59 5.05 4.54
Wetted Perimeter ft 11.9 7.76 6.74
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.81 0.65 0.67
Begin BKF Station 3.74 3.74 10
End BKF Station 15.21 10 15.21

FntrninmPnt C5iIrnlatinnc (Rncrran Mn`l;-"-I Ch;ol i? f'--,
Channel Left Side Right Side
Sloe 0 0 0
Shear Stress lb/s ft -- -- --
Movable Particle mm -- -- --
C
O
a
0
U
(6
7
U)
N
NW
L.1..
1-
C
0
? U
a
co
C
Ocu
+? m
'v!
'U)
VJ
O
U
W
a
cc
0
0
O
<r
I
W
x
0
I
L14
x
.o
Q
O
m
I
W
x
0
M
O
N
r
0

Q?
U
C
co
U)
cl
(6
C
O
N
L
O
2
(74) uOIJeA913

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT4 Upper
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 8 - Pool UT4 Ref
• Survey Date: 12/05/2007
--------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entrv
. BM Elevation: 0 ft
. Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 101.25
6.89 0 100.24
10.95 0 100.46
13.22 0 100.15
13.83 0 99.99
14.16 0 99.80
14.3 0 98.91 LEW
14.32 0 98.68
14.86 0 98.51
16.69 0 98.69
17.55 0 98.79
17.57 0 98.90 REW
18.09 0 99.87 BKF
19.42 0 100.25
29.11 0 100.85
W
- Cross Sectional Geomet
i
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation (ft) 101.23 101.23 101.23
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 99.87 99.87 99.87
Flood prone Width ft 29 ----- -----
Bankfull Width ft 4.07 2.03 2.04
Entrenchment Ratio 7.13 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 1.07 1.16 0.98
Maximum Depth ft 1.36 1.36 1.24
Width/De th Ratio 3.8 1.75 2.08
Bankfull Areas ft) 4.36 2.36 1.99
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 5.77 4.3 3.95
Hydraulic Radius ft 0.76 0.55 0.5
Begin BKF Station 14.04 14.04 16.07
End BKF Station 18.11 16.07 18.11
a
a Entrainment Calculations (RosRen Modified Shields Curve)

Channel Left Side Right
Side
Sloe 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/s ft) -- -- --
Movable Particle mm -- -- --

cn
C
.Q
a
L)
U
`t
7
N
(6
_W
LL o`
I v
c
C
Oco
a.=+ m
U
O
1
O
L
U
N
C
O
CL
a
C
3
O
0
N
I
W
X
A
a
w
Ln
II
LW
X
A
Q
r
I
W
X
A
3
0
M
O
N

N
U
C
cu
v/
0
(0
C
N
1-
0
2
(4) U0IjOA813
•
•
•
i
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
------------------------------------------------------------------
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT4 Upper
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 9 - Riffle UT4 Ref
Survey Date: 12/05/2007
------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 100.38
4.04 0 99.65
8.81 0 99.02
9.16 0 98.45
10.05 0 98.39
10.86 0 98.46 LEW
11.9 0 98.65
12.43 0 99.51 BKF
13.99 0 99.58
17.73 0 100.22
20.07 0 100.10
Cross Sectional CTeometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood rove Elevation ft 100.63 100.63 100.63
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 99.51 99.51 99.51
Flood prone Width (ft) 20.07 ----- -----
Bankfull Width ft 7.32 3.66 3.66
Entrenchment Ratio 2.74 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 0.58 0.24 0.92
Maximum Depth (ft) 1.12 0.48 1.12
Width/De th Ratio 12.62 15.25 3.98
Bankfull Area (s ft 4.24 0.88 3.36
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 8.18 4.17 4.96
Hydraulic Radius ft 0.52 0.21 0.68
Begin BKF Station 5.11 5.11 8.77
End BKF Station 12.43 8.77 12.43
•
•
•
•

Fntrninmant (alrnlntinne fch;P]Ai f ,,,- -.
Channel Left Side Right Side
Sloe 0.0185 0 0
Shear Stress lb/s ft) 0.60 -- --
Movable Particle mm 35.9 -- --
C)
Cl)
y
C
O
IL
U
(0
7
U)
>(0
LO ,
W
LL
I ?
? U
cC
.? N
^U^,, m
U)
''^1
'V'^J
V!
0
L-
C)
42
c
.o
Q-
0
C)
O
M
O
N
11
x

w
x
A
Q
O
W
x
A
3
O
N

U
C
N_
O
N
L
O
C) Z

(4) U0IjeA813
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT5
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 10 - Riffle (2007-12-05)
Survey Date: 12/05/2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entrv
BM Elevation: 100 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
4 0 90.55
8 0 89.60
9 0 89.17 BKF
10.2 0 88.01
11.5 0 87.75
12.9 0 87.85
14.2 0 89.39
17 0 89.45
22 0 90.43
Cross Sectional Geometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation (ft) 90.59 90.59 90.59
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 89.17 89.17 89.17
Flood prone Width ft 18 ----- -----
Bankfull Width ft 5.01 2.51 2.5
Entrenchment Ratio 3.59 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 1 0.95 1.06
Maximum Depth (ft) 1.42 1.42 1.42
Width/De th Ratio 5.01 2.64 2.36
Bankfull Area (s ft) 5.03 2.39 2.64
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 6.13 4.42 4.54
Hydraulic Radius ft 0.82 0.54 0.58
Begin BKF Station 9 9 11.51
End BKF Station 14.01 11.51 14.01

Fntrninmant Cnlonlntinnc Nhialdc
Channel Left Side Right Side
Sloe 0.0186 0 0
Shear Stress lb/s ft 0.95 -- --
Movable Particle mm 76.2 -- --
O
It
C
?o
a
U
7
U)
N
(0
1
_W
i E2
? o
U
? =o
c
-?'' cco
U)
rr^?
V!
N
O
L-
C)
c
.o
IL
a
c
0
0
0
O
-r
N
I
w
x
c+i
I
w
x
A
Q
m
m
I
w
x
n
0
M

O
N V
C
(B
C
N
L
O
2
0
0
(4) UOIJeA813

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT 1 Middle
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 11 - Riffle (12-04-07)
Survey Date: 12/06/2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 94.79
6 0 94.36
10 0 94.15
14 0 93.85 TOB L
15 0 93.75
15.9 0 92.42 L BKF
17 0 92.37
17.9 0 91.74
19.3 0 91.6 TW
22 0 91.79
23.4 0 92.16
24.1 0 93.43 BKF R
25 0 93.67
27 0 94.25
29 0 94.5 TOB R
36 0 95.52
Cross Sectional Geometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation ft 95.26 95.26 95.26
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 93.43 93.43 93.43
Flood prone Width (ft) 34.22 ----- -----
Bankfull Width (ft) 8.88 4.5 4.38
Entrenchment Ratio 3.85 ----- -----
Mean Depth ft 1.39 1.32 1.46
Maximum Depth ft 1.83 1.83 1.8
Width/De th Ratio 6.39 3.41 3
Bankfull Area ftz 12.35 5.95 6.4
Wetted Perimeter ft 10.43 7.05 6.98
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.18 0.84 0.92
Begin BKF Station 15.22 15.22 19.72
End BKF Station 24.1 19.72 24.1
Entrainment Calculations (Shields Curve)
!
!
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Channel Left
Side Right
Side
Sloe 0.0086 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/s ft 0.63 -- --
Movable Particle (mm) 38.3 -- --
0
v
C
U
(0
U)
d
(V
D
O
O
n
N °
? U
a
C
O
U
? co
i
0
L-
C)
N
O
ri
H
W
x
O
r1
i
w
x
A
Q
a
0
M

O
N V
C
(0
O
N
O
2
0
O
C
CL
a
C
7
O
U
O
41
x
A
3
O
(4) u01jen913
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY

----------------------------------------------------------------------
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT1 Middle
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 12 - Pool (12-04-07)
Survey Date: 12/06/2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 94.41
7 0 94.05
13 0 93.92 TOB L
13.7 0 92.38
15 0 92.26 L BKF
15.6 0 91.62
17 0 91.56 TW
22 0 92.09
22.8 0 93.04 BKF R
23 0 93.38
26 0 93.91
28 0 94.41 TOB R
32 0 94.99
36 0 95.52
Cross Sectional Geometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood rone Elevation ft 94.52 94.52 94.52
Bankfull Elevation ft 93.04 93.04 93.04
Flood prone Width (ft) 28.76 ----- -----
Bankfull Width ft 9.4 4.62 4.78
Entrenchment Ratio 3.06 ----- -----
Mean Depth ft 1.08 1.12 1.05
Maximum Depth ft 1.48 1.48 1.37
Width/De th Ratio 8.7 4.13 4.55
Bankfull Areas ft) 10.18 5.18 5
Wetted Perimeter ft 10.58 6.71 6.62
Hydraulic Radius ft 0.96 0.77 0.76
Begin BKF Station 13.4 13.4 18.02
End BKF Station 22.8 18.02 22.8
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
F.ntrainment (alrnlatinns (Rnsaen Mndi-Fi ?A Qhi,ldl (,,,.,Pl
Channel Left Side Right
Side
Sloe 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/s ft -- -- --
Movable Particle (nun) -- -- --
O
Cl)
2
C
'o
11
a?
U
rn
m
N
_W
I `
cy)
r a
c
c
O
-1-=+ M
U m
N?
1
O
L
U
4
c
.o
a
a
D
0
0
0
rn
rn
11
IH
x
M
11
w
x
Q
00
r
N
11
W
X
.4
3
0
N

U
C
ca
_
U)
0
(6
C
N
.L
0
Z) _

(4) UOIJBAGG
i
i
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT7
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 13 - Riffle (12-04-07)
Survey Date: 12/04/2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 94.45
5.6 0 94.00
9.6 0 93.55
10.4 0 92.93 BKF
11.6 0 92.68
12 0 92.33
12.5 0 92.27
12.9 0 92.29
13.2 0 92.97
13.6 0 93.24 BNKPN
15 0 93.64
18 0 94.33
21 0 94.57
24 0 94.52
Cmss Sectionnl Genmetrv
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation ft 93.59 93.59 93.59
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 92.93 92.93 92.93
Flood prone Width ft 5.58 ----- -----
Bankfull Width ft 2.78 1.38 1.4
Entrenchment Ratio 2.01 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 0.35 0.15 0.55
Maximum Depth (ft) 0.66 0.41 0.66
Width/De th Ratio 7.94 9.2 2.55
Bankfull Areas ft) 0.99 0.21 0.78
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 3.36 1.87 2.3
Hydraulic Radius ft 0.29 0.11 0.34
Begin BKF Station 10.4 10.4 11.78
End BKF Station 13.18 11.78 13.18

Entrainment Calculations (Shields Curve)
Channel Left Side Right Side
Sloe 0.0184 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/s ft 0.33 -- --
Movable Particle mm 17.7 -- --
(n
U)
C 4-1
'o x
IL
U
f6
7
>N
II
1 w
rn x
o
? U
C C
O-3
U
? m
U)
1
0
L-
C)
N
I
4-1
x
N 3
C
0
a
c
0
O
0
M
O
N

7

U
C
(Q
N
O
S
(4) UOIJeA813
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT7
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 14 - Pool (12-04-07)
Survey Date: 12/04/2007
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 94.12
6 0 94.19
8 0 93.98
10 0 93.38
11 0 92.66 BKF
11.4 0 92.17 BNKPN
12 0 92.17
12.2 0 91.95
13 0 91.86
13.4 0 91.97
13.8 0 92.34 BNKPN
14 0 92.97
16 0 93.34
20 0 94.11
25 0 94.12
Cross Sectional Gcnmetrv
Channel Left Right
Flood rove Elevation ft 93.46 93.46 93.46
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 92.66 92.66 92.66
Flood prone Width (ft) 6.89 ----- -----
Bankfull Width ft 2.9 1.52 1.38
Entrenchment Ratio 2.37 ----- -----
Mean Depth ft 0.56 0.49 0.64
Maximum Depth (ft) 0.8 0.75 0.8
Width/De th Ratio 5.18 3.1 2.16
Bankfull Areas ft 1.63 0.74 0.89
Wetted Perimeter ft 3.63 2.6 2.52
Hydraulic Radius ft 0.45 0.29 0.35
Begin BKF Station 11 11 12.52
End BKF Station 13.9 12.52 13.9
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
F+'ntrainm Pnt (?a?rn?atinnc (R no nar. Aif.. ?7;f: o.] Ql.: „1,7., /"?......,.\
Channel Left Side Right Side
Sloe 0 0 0
Shear Stress (lb/s ft -- -- --
Movable Particle mm -- -- --
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
C)
Cl)
4
c
'o
IL
a?
U
f6
U)
at
(C
W
1 ?
Lo 0
m
? U
O
U m
1
V/
O
U
U
c
'o
CL
'O
c
7
0
0
O
rn
i
w
x
M
11
w
V
R
Q
ID
,zv
N
11
W
X
R
3
O
N

U
C
cu
In
Q
-Fu
C
O
N
O
2
0
(4) u01}en813

RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------.
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT6
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 15 - Riffle (12-04-07)
Survey Date: 12/06/2007
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 94.48
7.6 0 94.15
8.7 0 93.29 BKF
9.2 0 92.81
9.9 0 92.68 TW
10.4 0 92.84
11 0 93.18 BNKPN
12.3 0 94.06
16.6 0 93.80
22 0 94.49
Cross Sectional Geometry
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation (ft) 93.9 93.9 93.9
Bankfull Elevation ft 93.29 93.29 93.29
Flood prone Width (ft) 6.58 ----- -----
Bankfull Width (ft) 2.46 1.22 1.24
Entrenchment Ratio 2.67 ----- -----
Mean Depth ft 0.38 0.42 0.35
Maximum Depth (ft) 0.61 0.61 0.6
Width/De th Ratio 6.47 2.9 3.54
Bankfull Areas ft 0.94 0.51 0.43
Wetted Perimeter ft 2.82 2.03 1.99
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.34 0.25 0.22
Begin BKF Station 8.7 8.7 9.92
End BKF Station 11.16 9.92 11.16

Entrainment Calculations (Shields Curve)
Channel Left Side Right Side
Sloe 0.0162 0.0162 0.0162
Shear Stress lb/s ft 0.34 0.25 0.22
Movable Particle (mm) 18.2 14 12.6
•
w
C
Q.
f0
3
ON
1 N
I
N
r
N co
C
1 -
N
? 00
_O
-P-0
U
N
cn
I
cn
O
U
c
'o
IL
a
c
0
O
r
m
I
44
X
M
i
44
x
A
Q
44
x
A
3
0
v
M
M
N
M
00
N
N

O
N
O
N
U
C
cu
cn
0
-Fu
c
0
L-
0
2

w

0
(4) U01leAGIE]
RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
River Name: Rockwell
Reach Name: UT4 Lower
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 16 - Riffle UT4 (12-04-07)
Survey Date: 12/04/2007
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 94.51
8 0 94.30
12 0 93.97 TOB L
13.5 0 93.89 BKF
14.3 0 92.58
17.5 0 92.16 TW
19.9 0 92.57
20.4 0 92.85
20.9 0 94.01 TOB R
24.8 0 94.72
32 0 94.55
Cross Sectional Geometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation ft 95.62 95.62 95.62
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 93.89 93.89 93.89
Flood prone Width ft 313 ----- -----
Bankfull Width (ft) 7.35 3.67 3.68
Entrenchment Ratio 42.6 -----
Mean Depth (ft) 1.34 1.31 1.37
Maximum Depth ft 1.73 1.69 1.73
Width/De th Ratio 5.49 2.8 2.69
Bankfull Area (s ft) 9.87 4.82 5.05
Wetted Perimeter ft 8.9 6.12 6.16
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.11 0.79 0.82
Begin BKF Station 13.5 13.5 17.17
End BKF Station 20.85 17.17 20.85

Fntrninment Cnlcnlntinnc (4hielrk Ciirval
Channel Left Side Right
Side
Sloe 0.0115 0 0
Shear Stress lb/s ft 0.80 -- --
Movable Particle mm 49.8 -- --

!
!
!
!
!
!
! m
Y u
! C W
'o x
• a .n
U ?
ZF)
• O oo
! II
1 w
! ~ O Q
U
C
! ? a
! O
U?
! a
i
0
w
x
c
'o
a
a
c
! o
! O
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
(4) U01leAD13
0
v
0
M

o U
N C
co
0
N
L-
0
2

7

- RIVERMORPH CROSS SECTION SUMMARY
---------------------------------------------------------
-----------
River Name: Rockwell
. Reach Name: UT4 Lower
Cross Section Name: Cross-section 17 - Pool (12-04-07)
Survey Date: 12/06/2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Section Data Entry
BM Elevation: 0 ft
Backsight Rod Reading: 0 ft
TAPE FS ELEV NOTE
0 0 94.47
11 0 94.56
17 0 94.35 TOB L
19 0 93.87
19.6 0 92.56
20.6 0 92.26 TW
23 0 92.41
25 0 92.65
25.7 0 93.34 BKF R
26.7 0 94.01 TOB R
31 0 94.40
35 0 94.43
Cross Sectional Geometrv
Channel Left Right
Flood prone Elevation (ft) 94.42 94.42 94.42
Bankfull Elevation (ft) 93.34 93.34 93.34
Flood prone Width ft 18.67 ----- -----
Bankfull Width (ft) 6.46 3.23 3.23
Entrenchment Ratio 2.89 ----- -----
Mean Depth (ft) 0.83 0.92 0.73
Maximum Depth (ft) 1.08 1.08 0.96
Width/De th Ratio 7.78 3.51 4.42
Bankfull Areas ft) 5.34 2.98 2.36
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 7.3 4.74 4.49
Hydraulic Radius ft 0.73 0.63 0.53
Begin BKF Station 19.24 19.24 22.47
End BKF Station 25.7 22.47 25.7

•
•
•
•
FntrninmPnt Cnlrnlntinnc (Rncnan 7%AnA;f-A Ch;-]Al ! ,, .ol
Channel Left Side Right Side
Sloe 0 0 0
Shear Stress lb/s ft) -- -- --
Movable Particle (mm) -- -- --
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
C
IL
U
J
N
(0
W
x a
w=
J
L t;
co
Q m
Q.
D
r
M
11
4-4
x
FC4
co
u
x
0
I
w
x
(n A
C ?
a°
J
0
O
(4) u01lena13
Cl
M
O
N

U
C
co
An
0
-
C
N
O
C) =

w
c
'o
a
U
N
7
N
>(6
_W
N o
U_
W
^, C
W
c
m
L
1
i
44
x
r+)
11
4a
x
A
D
r
N
4-1
x
N
c
O
C
7
0
cD
O
0
LO
0
v
O
M

(D
U
C
_N
T
Q
-FU
C) a-
V c
0
N
L
0
2
R

(q) u01lenG13
a
C
V
N
O
L
U
3
4-
C
cv
m
vi
d
L
Q
L
0
d
L Q
U
c
O
NN?
I.f.
O
E
a
L
O
L
U
t
O
Z
N

Q a)
E Z
U
) U X
C C U
O O _
E E U) N
a m x
w
a a m 0

m m
O
V
N

of W D D D d

m
X
0
(Oil
c)
r
T
0
0
0
O
O
r
U!
.C
N
L
a
L
Q
CD
R
0
0
(;eel ajenbs) easy IeuOi;Oas ssOJO
0 00 0 0
0 0
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Appendix 8
Sampled Stream Materials
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Geo-rechnologies, Inc.
Job Number: Job Name: Rockwell Pastures
SamDle I.D. UT-7 Pavement Small
Sieve Analysis 200 Wash
Dry Weight of Total Sample 280.55 grams
SIEVE WEIGHT PERCENT PERCENT
SIZE RETAINED RETAINED PASSING
3.0 0.00 0.0% 100.0%
2.5 0.00 0.0% 100.0%
2.0 0.00 0.0% 100.0%
11 /2 115.43 41.1% 58.9%
1.0 202.93 72.3% 27.7%
3/4 222.34 79.3% 20.7%
1 /2 233.01 83.1% 16.9%
3/8 244.86 87.3% 12.7%
#4 256.26 91.3% 8.7%
#10 264.77 94.4% 5.6%
#20 270.98 96.6% 3.4%
#40 273.78 97.6% 2.4%
#60 275.19 98.1% 1.9%
#100 276.18 98.4% 1.6%
#200 277.11 98.8% 1.2%
ROCK 1 =64.03 grams
ROCK 2 = 51.41 grams

r
- o
u
N
? o
- N o
d
>
to o
c
0
U
O
CD
• „a/F
•
. N
cq

I I

- Ic

- f- -

a

-
m

c
j ?

-
m

I

- i

-j
- -
I
I

m

i I
j

0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
• o am e0 r w N M N o 0
NblaM A8 Jauid auaWad
I-I -
?U) wj
!N
}
Q
J
VI
V)
w
Z
I U.
d
d
c
a?
N
?n
c

W
w
N
H
J_
Fn
w
Z
U-
0
Z
Q
U)
0
w
w
U)
a
O
0
J
w
Q
w
U)
a
OI
U
O
D
Nm
LL. ?
!--
ui
N
Z
Q
j '
Q
V
? M
N m Io
m
E 00
U fn O 00
V
O c
c 00
o E N
>
0. Z
-On 0
a? -
J
a
i
U
3
R
Z
L (n
a
o ?U
d NZ
ca
w 4. 0
U ?
Z 3
Y c
m
L- 0 X ?
m (L
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
GeoTechnologies, Inc.
Job Number: Job Name: Rockwell Pastures
sample I.D. UT-7 Sub Pavement
Sieve Analysis 200 Wash
Dry Weight of Total Sample 951.94 grams
SIEVE WEIGHT PERCENT PERCENT
SIZE RETAINED RETAINED PASSING
3.0 0.00 0.0% 100.0%
2.5 0.00 0.0% 100.0%
2.0 0.00 0.0% 100.0%
1112 0.00 0.0% 100.0%
1.0 121.62 12.8% 87.2%
3/4 219.35 23.0% 77.0%
1 /2 324.35 34.1% 65.9%
3/8 374.28 39.3% 60.7%
#4 469.06 49.3% 50.7%
#10 626.84 65.8% 34.2%
#20 728.12 76.5% 23.5%
#40 770.69 81.0% 19.0%
#60 791.78 83.2% 16.8%
#100 804.36 84.5% 15.5%
#200 814.92 85.6% 14.4%
u
N
C) c
N c
N
N
d
(n c
R
?a o
v7 u
u

,It
..8/E
.,are
„vrE
N
N
i

i C

- o

II
j 1 I C

- - m

i
- N

- I o
i

i
-_ I

0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O 00 f- w to M N 0 C)
T
NBIGM A8 Jauij;uaOJad
U)
w
jN
I N
Q
J
U
(n I
w
Z,
LL
w
N
H
J_
d
d w
- I LL
c
N
c p
? a
C7 tq
' o.
w
w
co
a
4U
w
?Z
J LL
w
a
c?
w
L)
Q
O
U
Z
O
H
=
0_0
V/
0
LLI •
N
^
'
V)
Z
'LL
I
? I
? U
o '
R M
O
U iC? O 00
`o > e-
00
o a N
? O
v, rn Z
o ti ?
v, ? O D
a
a?
J
J
U
Z
i
L
0.
w (10
--? - U
6 I >
3 a?
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
GeoTechnologies, Inc.
Job Number: Job Name: Rockwell Pastures
Sample I.D. UT-4 Reference Pavement
Sieve Analysis 200 Wash
Dry Weight of Total Sample 1031.85 grams
SIEVE WEIGHT PERCENT PERCENT
SIZE RETAINED RETAINED PASSING
3.0 726.67 70.4% 29.6%
2.5 726.67 70.4% 29.6%
2.0 726.67 70.4% 29.6%
11 /2 915.88 88.8% 11.2%
1.0 950.64 92.1% 7.9%
3/4 990.76 96.0% 4.0%
1 /2 1014.51 98.3% 1.7%
3/8 1020.87 98.9% 1.1%
#4 1024.70 99.3% 0.7%
#10 1027,88 99.6% 0.4%
#20 1029.36 9916% 0.24%
#40 1029.87 99.81% 0.19%
#60 1030.12 99.83% 0.17%
#100 1030.20 99.84% 0.16%
#200 1030.23 99.843% 0.157%
ROCK 1 = 726.67 grams
ROCK 2 = 81.37 grams
•
o
0
N
N
N o
0
c
- o
a
(n
#
. ? o
•
. ..8/E
2
- „b!E
. N
O N
•
{
i

w
N
N
U
J
V)
w
z
LL
cn
w
N
N
J_
N
O N
d
LLJ
z
N C LL
C
NN
e V)
c O
z
c? I ? I
a
e
0

a

a
° o 0 0 0
0 01 m ti O N ? ? O O Or
34610M AS Jauij 3u93Jad

c

E
2
0
w
w
cn
ir
4
O
U
w
z_
LL
J
w
Q
w
Cf)
QI
O
01

O
F-

m
•
aI •
F-

LU
N
N
Z
Q

I
i

m
Cl)

N
lC
L)
n. 00
o
co
o Q O
o
- y
L N
?

N d
y
O
Z r

r°n
D cts
- I
J I
a

J J
V -
I

z I
1
L
a 1
V)

o L
?U
> u Z
w a o

6
z +-
U G) y
d ac C
- o

a
U
0
m ?
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
GeoTechnologies, Inc.
Job Number: Job Name: Rockwell Pastures
sample I.D. UT-1 Lower Pavement
Sieve Analysis 200 Wash
Dry Weight of Total Sample 3610.80 grams
SIEVE WEIGHT PERCENT PERCENT
SIZE RETAINED RETAINED PASSING
3.0 657.71 18.2% 81.8%
2.5 1368.34 37.9% 62.1%
2.0 2259.21 62.6% 37.4%
11 /2 3292.11 91.2% 8.8%
1.0 3502.81 97.0% 3.0%
3/4 3585.26 99.29% 0.71%
1 /2 3599.82 99.70% 0.30%
3/8 3604.06 99.81% 0.19%
#4 3604.98 99.84% 0.16%
#10 3606.63 99.88% 0.12%
#20 3608.88 99.95% 0.05%
#40 3609.78 99.97% 0.03%
#60 3610.26 99.99% 0.01%
#100 3610.55 99.99% 0.01%
#200 3610.66 99.996% 0.004%
ROCK 1 = 710.80 grams
ROCK 2 = 657.71 grams
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

N
? C
W
N
d
? c
-p
co
a
C
co c
14
V)
u

..al£
..z/ 6
..VI£
N
N

I ? II

i

_
I I _ v

m

--

i F A

N

O m 00 1? 60 10 V' M N - y r
14619M AG aaui j;uaaaad
i
w
N
}
U
V
w
LL
N
w
N
N
F-
J_
N
L
d
p w
E z
LL
c
d
N
cn
C p
(La ZQ
(7 (n
t ?
?o
w
Q
O
U
w
z
LL
J
w
iQ
w
.Q
O
U
O
H
?m
U -
25
w
N
_Z
LL
Q
c U
o r
w O
=
w y O
E ao
U O 00
O c6 r ?
o N
0
Z
7 0
j
a j
a
J
J ?
J
U
3
z ?I
i
i
t
? I V)
p ?U
> Z
N
m i (a
_ -U
O V
z 3 a?
c U
m CL x f//
GeoTechnologies, Inc.
Job Number: Job Name: Rockwell Pastures
sample I.D. UT-1 Sub Pavement
Sieve Analysis 200 Wash
Dry Weight of Total Sample 19790.75 grams
SIEVE WEIGHT PERCENT PERCENT
SIZE RETAINED RETAINED PASSING
3+ 10052.20 50.8% 49.2%
2.5 11383.24 57.5% 42.5%
2.0 11383.24 57.5% 42.5%
11 /2 12747.63 64.4% 35.6%
1.0 14459.36 73.1% 26.9%
3/4 15074.10 76.2% 23.8%
1 /2 15818.97 79.9% 20.1%
3/8 16221.44 82.0% 18.0%
#4 17019.93 86.0% 14.0%
#10 18068.37 91.3% 8.7%
#20 18736.55 94.7% 5.3%
#40 18944.14 95.7% 4.3%
#60 19160.87 96.8% 3.2%
#100 19401.12 98.0% 2.0%
#200 19668.76 99.4% 0.6%
3.0+ Rock = 9236.8 grams
Length x Width x Thickness = 18.75 x 9.75 x 1.55 in.
•
•
•
•
w
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
w
•
•
•
•
0
• Q
CJ
• it
• ? O
N_ O
aC
v
fn ik
• U)
• O
s
•
w ik
•
•
K
•
• A/Z
•
• N
•
• CJ
•
•
I
_ -T- c
I
I ?
I
1
i
i
I
O O O O
O O? c0 h.
N
O
N
m
0
O O O O O?
•f ("] N r
ay6iaM A8 jauid;uaajad
w
CIO
?Q
J
U
7 N
1
w
z
w
N_
_J
L
d

E w
z
= LL

c
IN
N

C Q
R zQ
r
n
V
I
I?

D
w

CI
I
o

I
i

w

J LL
w
Q

w
cn
I
a0
UI
O
H
_m
0
N
U)
z
a
!
c U
'
o I T
m M
v O
N O
m C 00
_
v
E O 00
O
p
C 0 T

00
o R N

O
fn z
o ? ? y

a {
I
a
J
U

Z

L
a I

I
(n
?
m ?U

>' z
N
,
LLI 0-
o

3 a?

co
LL
Li. y J
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
GeoTechnologies, Inc.
Job Number: Job Name: Rockwell Pastures
sample I.D. UT-1 Pavement
Sieve Analysis 200 Wash
Dry Weight of Total Sample 10458.01 grams
SIEVE WEIGHT PERCENT PERCENT
SIZE RETAINED RETAINED PASSING
3+ 9069.32 86.7% 13.3%
2.5 9923.59 94.9% 5.1%
2.0 9923.59 94.9% 5.1%
11 /2 10183.91 97.4% 2.6%
1.0 10431.01 99.7% 0.3%
3/4 10433.56 99.8% 0.23%
1 /2 10433.56 99.8% 0.23%
3/8 10433.56 99.8% 0.23%
#4 10443.28 99.9% 0.14%
#10 10449.44 99.9% 0.08%
#20 10452.99 100.0% 0.05%
#40 10454.83 100.0% 0.03%
#60 10455.94 100.0% 0.02%
#100 10456.65 100.0% 0.01%
#200 10457.31 100.0% 0.007%
ROCK 1 = 7352.3 grams
Length x Width x Thickness = 6.445 x 5.665 x 6.945 in.
ROCK 2 = 1717.02 grams
Length x Width x Thickness = 4.695 x 3.892 x 3.755 in.
•
•
•
• O
• U
N
N o
- N o
• O
N
- U7 0
L
(a o
- V
• U
i o
- ..81£
- 24
i „blE
i
• N

I I

? I

i

I I
I

I

I
I
I

i
I i

- _? _
I i I I
°

G
i O O O O O O O O O O O?
O Ol co h (D W) R m ry
- 146iaM A8 Jauid 3u03Jad
D
7
V
!A
d
.r
N
E
_N
N
v7
c
cu
0
I
1
uJ
N
I
J i
U
N
w
z
LL
?
w
N
U)
H
_J
W
Z_
LL
Z
Q'
N
I?
w
2I
W
U)
Q
10
U
Z_
t
J
w
Q
C)
w
I?
0
U
O
-
m
N •
w
N
U)
Z
Q
I
Q
U
L
I
ti M
?I p
?j O
m 0p
U O 00
0 C r
C N 00
0 N
u m 0
z
a - -
a
J
J
(3
m
Z
L (n
Q C)
o ?U
?
w, O
z? v 3 ai
zm? "
U C
0 Q
r?
V
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
GeoTechnologies, Inc.
Job Number: Job Name: Rockwell Pastures
sample I.D. UT-1 Upper Sub Pavement
Sieve Analysis 200 Wash
Dry Weight of Total Sample 2677.32 grams
SIEVE WEIGHT PERCENT PERCENT
SIZE RETAINED RETAINED PASSING
3.0 0.00 0.0% 100.0%
2.5 0.00 0.0% 100.0%
2.0 282.96 10.6% 89.4%
11/2 357.78 13.4% 86.6%
1.0 949.60 35.5% 64.5%
3/4 1031.45 38.5% 61.5%
1/2 1249.20 46.7% 53.3%
3/8 1323.10 49.4% 50.6%
#4 1670.61 62.4% 37.6%
#10 2124.02 79.3% 20.7%
#20 2454.48 91.7% 8.3%
#40 2539.58 94.9% 5.1%
#60 2563.21 95.7% 4.3%
#100 2575.66 96.2% 3.8%
#200 2587.30 96.6% 3.4%
c
N
N c
N
c
N
U7 c
u
70
c
RS c
V7 ?

v
„ar£
24
N
N

i
i i

i

ICI

f N

o m W r- io- in a M r N v-
WIOM 49 Jau'J luaaJad

w
N
N
Q
J
U
r
0
U)
_z
LL
i
V)
w
N
I J
N
? N
N
z_
LL
N
_N
R z
C7 (n
D
w
w
Er
Q
0
U
w
z
U-
J
w
Q
0! ,
C7
w
N
R
Q
0
I
O
D
N?_m
LL. ?
U -
0
W ?
N
U)
Z
Q
v /
i
I I
Q
U
o c
- ? r
E co
A - 00
U O co
o` r O`
a f/1 00
o N
N ?
.. Q.
? O
Z-
0 a
J i
a
J
Li
? I
z
L (n
a ?
o ?U
V) Z
W a. o
z° ^v^`` 3 aTi
c W u ?
U
_ p 6 M
m a x v7
w
•
M
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
--
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Appendix 9
Soil Water and Environment Group (SWE) Soil Analysis and
Evaluation for Rockwell Site Wetland and Stream Mitigation Project
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.

- ° Soil, Water, & Environment Group, LLC

- Research Building 1, Centennial Campus
1001 Capability Drive, Suite 312 + Raleigh, NC 27606
- Ph# [phone] • Fax# [phone] • http://www.sivegrp.com
Soil, Water, & Environment
Group
-
March 15, 2007
Mr. Todd St. John
- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
. PO Box 33068
Raleigh, NC 27636-3068

• Re: Soil Analysis and Evaluation for the Rockwell Wetland and Stream Restoration
Mitigation Project Site EEP Proposal

Dear Mr. St. John,
The following is a description of the data set included with this correspondence related to
the Stanly County (Rockwell) Wetland Restoration Site:
Soils Descriptions
On March 9th, 2007, SWE Group personnel investigated the Rockwell Stream and
- Wetland EEP Mitigation Project Site to confirm NRCS soil survey mapping data, record
- detailed soil descriptions for selected areas representing different landscape positions
across the site, and to determine the extent of hydric soils for the purpose of wetland
restoration site criteria. A series of hand augerings were accomplished across selected
- areas of the proposed wetland restoration site at maximum depths of approximately 18-24
- in. Detailed soil descriptions including depth of horizon, color, texture, structure, and
consistence were recorded and a sketch of the area was created entitled Rockwell Site
(enclosed).
•
The site specific soil descriptions included in this report are most similar to Chewacla
loam and Oakboro silt loam type series soils as described by the Stanly County Soil
Survey (NRCS, unpublished) with some variations in texture, color, and redoximorphic
• features. However, some descriptions are most similar to Wehadkee loam series soil
- described in other county surveys. These soils are somewhat poorly drained and
frequently flooded from riverine systems and toeslope drainage. Subsoil consists of
loamy and silty clay textured soils. These soils are found on nearly level flood plains
along creeks and drainageways. Permeability is moderate for these soil series. The
. subsoil is characterized by a clay or silty clay that restricts water movement between 3
and 33 inches below the soil surface. Seasonally high water tables are found below the
soil surface between .5 and 1.5 feet for the Chewacla and Wehadkee and 1 to 2 feet for
the Oakboro series soil.

Overall, the areas investigated have hydric soil characteristics and hydric soils that are suitable
for wetland restoration. Strong redoximorphic features are present indicating seasonally high
water tables and frequent inundation from toeslope subsurface drainage and surface runoff from
field ditches. These features include relic and present oxidized root channels, depleted matrices,
and chroma 2 colors in the upper soil profile. Currently the fields investigated are in row crops
(corn and soybeans) and have hydric vegetation volunteering among other herbaceaous
vegetation. In addition, wrack lines were observed from recent overland surface runoff.
For areas where relic redoximorphic features occur greater than 12 in. due to site disturbance
from farming, minor grading of less than or equal to 6 in. (USACE Guidance) in these areas
would most likely result in a change to more hydric conditions and an elevated water table
similar to adjacent soil areas. From observations, these areas in question most likely were
crowned to maximize row crop acreage, resulting in a cap of soil to increase runoff and drainage.
Let me know if you have any questions concerning the enclosed soil data and discussion. We
look forward to continuing to work with you on this project.
Sincerely,
Scott J. Frederick, El, NCLSS
Environmental Scientist
t Soil, Water, & Euvironmcnt
Group
/ gip SOIL SC,
10
1236
NOM 0
Research Building I, Centennial Campus
1001 Capability Dr., Suite 312
Raleigh, NC 27606
Ph [phone]
Fax[phone]
Cell [phone]
sjfrederlck6sweerp.com
www.swegM.com
I / ? 1
1 C,?1K2C_ ?Cacs > 1
......rte..,., .,.
1 SCOTT J. FREDERICK
(ERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL
`p SOIL SCIENTIST i
?0
es46
Encl: soils data
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
i
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
> x

N
' 91 v
o
? o

A A A
P A A N
e' O
N

N
3
O (n O 0

N
O N O N m ?

m

3 3 3 ?
a a a d
mm
N N N

p1 (»l
o a a 0
H C
n
C
N
C C ?
Q O' C
O'
O'
F O'
F O'
F N
J M J ?' J -" 3

?
m m m
J J J y
N N N .y. C
N
n
lu
m C
I

N
O O
N
d N
O m
Cl O IO
j N
C O
7
d d d y

a j

X N S
N
?
O

pOj _
N
N
C ?
f0
N ?
N
X
a
N
a

0
O
J
m

0
n
m ? o
C 0
O 0
4.

N O ? J
N

m w
?" to
v
o
w -

? J N
d w m
N
Q
^_ Z
W
O
i
C
(D
y
O
d
(D

O
O
J
ca
O
m
N
O
v
m
d
N
A

DRAFT
Restoration Plan
Rockwell Pastures Site
Stanly County, North Carolina
Appendix 10
Hydrologic Gauge Data Summary, Groundwater and Rainfall
Information
•
• K rnley-Horn
? and Associates, Inc.
•
Appendix 10. Hydrologic Gauge Data Summary, Groundwater and
Rainfall Information.
Wells have recently been installed to monitor groundwater at the wetland restoration
areas along UT6 as well as the hydrologic reference wetland adjacent to UTL Data will
be gathered in fall 2008 and will be used in conjunction with soils analysis data and
general conductivity data to evaluate water table elevations.
Gauge data, groundwater, and rainfall information will be recorded and analyzed prior to
final design and construction of the wetland site.