20010550 Ver 2_Application_20020821

~ ,, .,~,
.~+$
Site 2, sheet 4 of 9: During installation of the RCBC at this site, Spring Branch will be
diverted into an open diversion channel constructed to the west of the existing channel.
There will be two impervious dikes in Spring Branch at the inlet and outlet of the
diversion channel to redirect flow and prevent back flow. Within the construction
easement, 0.15 ac (6,534 square feet) and 0.10 ac (4,356 square feet) of mechanized
clearing impacts will occur to Zones 1 and 2, respectively, of the Neuse River Buffers.
Clearing is essential to allow access for construction equipment..
Site 3A, sheet Sbf~9: Within the construction easement, 0.06 ac (2,614 square feet) and
0.03 ac (1,307 square feet) of mechanized clearing impacts will occur to Zones 1 and 2,
respectively, of the Neuse River Buffers. Clearing is essential to allow access for
construction equipment. At Site 3A the buffers of the relocated channels of Dunn Creek
will be planted and will serve as buffer replacement for buffer impacts incurred at this
site.
Site 3B, sheet 5 of 9: Within the construction easement, 0.49 ac (21,344 square feet) and
0.20 ac (8,712 square feet) of mechanized clearing impacts will occur to Zones 1 and 2,
respectively, of the Neuse River Buffers. Clearing is essential to allow access for
construction equipment.
Site 4, sheet 6 of 9: During installation of the RCBC at this site, Smith Creek will be
diverted . into a short diversion channel west of Smith Creek, then into a 900 mm pipe
(construction phase 2), which will outfall into another diversion channel before it flows
back into the original channel. There will be two impervious dikes in Smith Creek at the
inlet and outlet of the diversion channel to redirect flow and prevent back flow. Within
the construction easement, 0.19 ac (8,276 square feet) and 0.13 ac (5,663 square feet) of
mechanized clearing impacts wil occur to Zones 1 and 2, respectively, of the Neuse River
Buffers. Clearing is essential to allow access for construction equipment. The addition of
these impacts is conservative estimate. Actual impacts may be considerably less.
Site 6, sheet 7 of 9: Within the construction easement, 0.06 ac (2,614 square feet) and
0.04 ac (1,742 square feet) of mechanized clearing impacts will occur to Zones 1 and 2,
respectively, of the Neuse River Buffers. Clearing is essential to allow access for
construction equipment. The addition of these impacts is conservative estimate. Actual
impacts may be considerably less
The NCDOT proposes to mitigate for these additional Neuse River Basin Buffer impacts,
utilizing the NC Wetlands Restoration Program in lieu fee program. Application has
been made for payment (see attached request letter). Since construction is underway
around Site 4, the NCDOT respectfully requests a permit modification condition stating
that payment will be made to the WRP within 3 months of modification issuance.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Elizabeth L.
Lusk at [phone], extension 335.
Respectfully,
~~.> '-
V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D., Manager,
Office of the Natural Environmental
Cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ
Mr. Ron Ferrell, WRP DOT Coordinator
Mr. Ron Ferrell, WRP DOT Coordinator
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Kathy Matthews, EPA
Mr. Garland Pardue, Ph.D. USFWS
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Burt Tasaico, P.E., Program Development
Mr. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Design Services
Mr. D.R. Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. David Harris, P.E., Roadside Environmental
Mr. J.G. Nance, P.E., Division 5 Engineer
Mr. Chris Murray, Division 5 Environmental Officer

~' a, ~.~ 0 .65 ~:
rLre~ti~ •tr 48~
p~ c_19-M. ~
/ m a~' ~.~ ~a~rh Ft~ ; C' I `~~
O~~ ~~o ~ ~ ~ ~J ~'
`~ ~' ~' '06 ~8 .~ 93 ~ '~ END PR ~
.~ o ~ ~
~, -~- 2 j ~ R-2~
~ .,~
Wake a ,~r ` .n -
I Elem ch •~
' ~~ / z~s~ ~ , ~ l I
•- _ ~ J ~ 2°
~- - ~ ~ ~ q e'~~S ~~ / 2053 `'' ~• ~:
I e 5~ ~'
~ aG ~SEOI, ~
~ f~
- - --~ A 2053
Fore tan le BE RQ'• ECT I '~"
' '~9
.,,~ ~ i
y \ a°' `'' ~'~ I Austin _ ,--- ;L
~. -
~~, ~' 2920
2049 1- ~ " ~ 2054
VICINITY
~.~~s
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIpFiWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~(0250~ Qt-2809C)
NC 98, WAGE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR X453
HEFT ~ OF ~ REVISED ~'
~~ 3vlV z

ITE 4
SITE 1
~'A
~Cdi
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAGE COUNTY
I ~ ~j ~ ~ ~ ~ PROJECT: 81~(0250~ Qt~S809C)
NC 98, WAGE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR ~~
SHEET Z OF q -
~/~I ~ Z
vwn• v~ n~ ~ ~ ~~wa.v ~ v.~w~..v ,
BEGIN F.A. PROJECT STP-98(D
BEGIN CONST.

a
SIDE 1~AID 2
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WA.S.E COUNTY
PROJECT:81~0250.1 Qt~YY809C)
NC 98, WA.S.E FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US LA
TO EAST OF SR ~~
SHEET 3 OF 9 REVISED ~~
~~3o/vz

~~
~ E
• • ~ sin~µiROe /E~
Lr~-ESE E~ • • • • ~ r ~• E ~ ~~/E

4~
,~
i

2~LLx1~

O
~~~~ ~~~~
~~~~
O
w
~`~
i ~`
~~ ~
L fR~M~
TIIIIM
lOm 2 m
SCALE
• • ~ a
~~~ ~~ ~ DENOTES MECHANIZED CLEARING
® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~0250~Q (R-2809C>
NC 98, WAKE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET 4 OF G REVISED 7 / 8 / 02

WE~ NE \
\ ~
1 T

j
\`!
1 THOMAS B. DAMERON ~

NANCY H
DAMEltON b

~ 1fADS
R00
.;\\ \ ~„
+ r
\
,
~
1~,
\
~ .
ROOTMIAOS ~

~
\
`,
~
~~ ~~~~ ~,,~ ~ 1
TOE PR07ECTION ~
. ~
~ 3 ~" - - E-PDE-
~ ~
~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 31t *` !4~ *` ~~" f
aus a ~uv ~ \
~E ~T ~.~.~ ~~ U~ as. e~ orra ~
\ ~ _ -~ ~ ~ eF~x i°~ ~ '--~
~ ~ *` ~-' 1
,-.

~ ~ ~
~~.
\
I
m . ~ ~ ~
~- \ ~ ~
~--~ ~
J `
-- -_ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~
-- --
--
• - - /-
_ -_ _ -- - -
~~ - /
~ ~ `°° ~°
~~ ~
/ ~ ~~~~
E-- -PDE-PD PDE-PDE-PDE-E
O ~ ~ ' - ~t ~e5soz THOMAS B. DAIERON h
F . -' ~ NANCY H. DAMERON
1 e 3 TOE PROTEC710N O
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
~ ~TJ I[~~.ALI~T ~~IE~V
~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
//J 1~ WAgE COUNTY
Ali { S S ~ s • «• ! ~ ~ DENOTES MECHANIZED CLEARING pROJECT: 81~0250~1 (R~2809C)
~'(`1 DENOTES TEMPORARY NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
/Om 0 2 m ® Fu.L IN SURFACE WATERS FROM WEST OF US lA
SCALE TO EAST OF SR 2053
[L113L111~J DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
SHEETS OF Q REVISED 7 / 8 / 02

~~~~0
~~
/eN
~ ~~~
.7 w 91w~ O TOE PROTE~TbN
~~ ~~~
TOE PROTECTION-~
a.Ass a RrItM -
NeooT sTa N0. eeaat
V TE~~ Y DI
R R ~u~RRORAR
O
lOm 2 m
SCALE

RAP ~ ~ a `+I..~
~ ~ ~;
~ ~ ~ ~ r,~„'' ~ ~'~
.. 1 ,~~/ti~V~`Z
(~.
r s s • DENOTES MECHANIZED CLEARING
•~~~*~~
® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
I~]~~1N ~~~~
~~~~
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~0250~ (R-2809C)
NC 98, WAKE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
HEFT ~ OF ~ REVISED
~ /ten/n ~
~~~-~~

~ ~"'1
r~ ara
THOWS B. DAIERON 6 ~\
NANCY H. DAAEItON ~ `
TRIBUTARY T0~ \_ _
DUNN GREEK "'~J~r
\ ~~~
\\ ~ 1~
/~y~ / \
=-~ ~ Aso ad~a.~ss
n ~ ~ •i e
rZirn
-~
D
V
V
N
0
r- -
-~- /~
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE
• a ~ ~
• ` • DENOTES MECHANIZED CLEARING
• s : s
® DENOTES PII.L III SURFACE WATERS
~~~~ ~~~~
~g~~ ~
o~ \ ANDREA L A6010N5.
\ \ JAAES A. UIC.~•„
\ ~1
-E~E-~E~_ E E
I
\ ~ \ O
-f-
\ r~ \ e+o~
`~ ~ Q
~ / i
--L ~ • ~'c-E-=•~ t-
E Pp !• • s •
L \Pp ~` \ HF~ DITCH
NCDOT STD~668 02 \ ~ P •~ c ~ c ~ \
1 '' n z \
THOMAS 8. DAIJERON ~ ~ m ; T ~~ N N
NANCY H. DAIE3tON ~ ~ ~ m m
N
Z N - n>
TOE PR07ECTION f+l ~
z
ro m
TRIBUTARY TO DUNN CREEK

IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS BUFFER IMPACTS

Site
No.
Station

(From/To)
Structure
Size
Fill In
Wetlands
(ha)
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
(ha)
Excavation
In Wetlands
(ha) Mechanized
Clearing
(Method III)
(ha)
Fill In SW
(Natural)
(ha)
Fill In SW
(Pond)
(ha)
Temp. Fill
In SW
(ha) Existing
Channel
Impacted
(m)
Relocated
Channel
(m)
Enclosed
Channel
(m)
Zone
1
(ha)
Zone
2
(ha) Mech
Clear
Zone 1
(ha) Mech
Clear
Zone 2
(ha)
1 62+95 -L- RT N/A 0.0037
2 66+40 -L- 2 @ 2.7m X 1.8m RCBC 0.0505 110 110 0.185 0.114 0.0606 0.0405
3A 74+76/74+73 0.003 30 27 0.05 0.017 0.0231 0.0127
Trib to Dunn Cr
38 74+20/76+20 2 @ 2.7m X 2.4m RCBC 0.0673 0.0057 172 62 78 0.235 0.159 0.1976 0.0821
Dunn Creek
4 84+60 -L- 2 2.4m X 2.4m RCBC 0.0275 90 65 0.13 0.068 0.0783 0.0533
5 85+20 -L- LT NIA 0.0161 0.0508 0.0037 0.0047 62 60 0.03 0.01
6 77+80 -L- 750 RCP 0.0054 87 71 0.124 0.076 0.0253 0.0161
7 g2+70/83+g0 900 RCP 0.1132 0.0083 138

TOTALS: 0.133 0.0508 0 0 0.1657 0 0.0104 689 149 324 0.754 0.444 0.3849 0.2047

N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1402504 (R-2809C)
SHEET ~ OF 9 REVISED 7/30/2002

ac

IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS BUFFER IMPACTS

Site
No.
Station

(FromlTo)
Structure
Size
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
In Wetlands
(ac) Mechanized
Clearing
(Method III)
(ac)
Fill In SW
(Natural)
(ac)
Fill In SW
(Pond)
(ac)
Temp. Fill
In SW
(ac) Existing
Channel
Impacted
(ft)
Relocated
Channel
(h)
Enclosed
Channel
(ft)
Zone
1
(ac)
Zone
2
(ac) Mech
Clear
Zone 1
(ac) Mech
Clear
Zone 2
(ac)
1 62+95 -L- RT N/A 0.01
2 66+40 -L- 2 @ 2.7m X 1.8m RCBC 0.13 360.80 360.80 0.46 0.28 0.15 0.10
3A 74+76/74+73 0.01 98.40 88.56 0.12 0.04 0.06 0.03
Trib to Dunn Cr
36 74+20/76+20 2 @ 2.7m X 2.4m RCBC 0.17 0.01 564.16 203.36 255.84 0.58 0.39 0.49 0.20
Dunn Creek
4 84+60 -L- 2 @ 2.4m X 2.4m RCBC 0.07 295.20 213.20 0.32 0.17 0.19 0.13
5 85+20 -L- LT NIA 0.04 0.13 0.01 0.01 203.36 196.80 0.07 0.02
6 77+80 -L- 750 RCP 0.01 285.36 232.88 0.31 0.19 0.06 0.04
7 g2+70/83+80 900 RCP 0.28 0.02 452.64

TOTALS: 0.33 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.03 2259.92 488.72 1062.72 1.87 1.10 0.95 0.51

N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1402504 (R-2809C)
SHEET q OF q REVISED 7/30/2002
Page 1

~~v
yd /` "+.
J
~Q au+.Rd.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
March 23, 2001
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 010 5 5 0 ~ 2
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suate 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 24615
Attention: Eric Alsmeyer
Regulatory Specialist
Dear Sir:
Subject: NC 98, Wake Forest Bypass from west of SR 1923 (Thompson Mill Road) to east of SR
2053 (Jones Dairy Road), Wake County, State Project No. 8.1402501, Federal Aid No.
STP-98(1), TIP R-2809.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)~proposes to construct a highway on
new location on the southern side of Wake Forest in Wake County. The proposed road will connect NC
98 from west of SR 1923 (Thompson Mill Road) to NC 98 east of SR 2053 (Jones Dairy Road), a
distance of approximately 4.8 miles (7.8 kilometers). The proposed project consists of constructing a four
lane, median divided facility on 150 feet (46 meters) of right-of--way. Initially, only two lanes will be
constructed.
For construction purposes, the NC 98 bypass has been broken down into three sections. Table 1
reflects the project breakdown, section termini, and project let dates. A map depicting the sections
associated with TIP No. R-2809 is attached. Accordingly, .the permit drawings for each section were
independently prepared. This application addresses the impacts from construction of all three Sections.
Section C has a let date of August 21, 2001.
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
C7 -1
r?rn
C m
rn z
C~ ---i
table I . Description of Proiect Sections for Construction Purooses
Section Let Date Project Termini
A June 2008 Existing NC 98, just west of SR 1923 (Thompson Mill Road) to US 1
B October 2003 US 1 to US lA (South Main Street)
C August 2001 US IA to east of SR 2053 (Jones Dairy Road) to tie into existing NC 98
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL AIJALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: l1M~W. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

NEPA DOCUMENTATION
An Environmental Assessment (EA) was approved by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) on October 25, 1995. The EA explains the purpose and need for the project, provides a
description of the project and characterizes the social, economic, and environmental effects of the project.
After the EA was approved and circulated, a Public Hearing on the location and design was held on
February 8, 1996. On September 30, 1996, the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was approved.
Copies of the EA and FONSI have been provided to the regulatory review agencies involved in the
approval process. Additional copies will be provided upon request.
Environmental Commitments
NCDOT has made several environmental commitments for the proposed project outlined in the
FONSI. The commitments pertaining to environmental permits required for this project include:
• Impacts to Waters of the U.S. will be in the form of surface water impacts at stream crossings and
minimal wetland impacts (less than 1 acre). It is anticipated that the stream impacts will meet the
criteria for Department of the Army Section 404 Individual Permit. Also, an Section 401 Water
Quality Individual Certification will be required from the N.C. Division of Water Quality.
• Using the N.C. Division of Highways Erosion and Sedimentation Control program, the Natural
Resources Conservation Service (previously Soil Conservation Service), and Wake County, in close
coordination with the NCDOT, has developed a plan which consists of rigorous requirements to
minimize erosion and sedimentation. NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of
Surface Waters and Sedimentation Control guidelines will be strictly enforced during the
construction stage of the project.
• Hazardous spill catch basins will be installed in accordance with the criteria set forth in Mr.
Dorney's (DWQ) May 22, 1995 memorandum. Specifically for streams classified as Outstanding
Resource Waters (ORWs) or WS-I and streams within 0.8 km (0.5 mile) of the critical areas in
streams classified as WS-Il, WS-III, or WS-IV. Final determination will be made during final
design.
• All applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be implemented and maintained throughout
construction of the proposed project.
Endangered Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered,
and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered
Species Act. As of February 26,2001, four federally protected species are listed for Wake County: red-
cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), dwarf wedge mussel
(Alasmidonta heterodon), and Michaux's sumac (Rhos michauxii). At the time the EA was written the
bald eagle was listed as Endangered for Wake County. Since that time the listing for the bald eagle has
been changed to Threatened and is being proposed for delisting
Biological Conclusions of No Effect are given for the bald eagle and red-cockaded woodpecker
because there are no suitable habitats for these species in the project area. A Biological Conclusion of
No Effect is also issued for the dwarf wedge mussel, since a November 30, 2000 survey by Logan
Williams and Elizabeth Lusk revealed no dwarf wedge mussels in the project area. However, there is
favorable habitat in the project area for Michaux's sumac. Therefore, a Biological Conclusion of
Unresolved is issued for this plant, pending a survey during the flowering period from April to June,
2001.
2

Cultural Resources
According to the December 27, 1995 letter from the N.C. Department of Cultural Resources, the
"project will have no effect on Crenshaw Hall because existing NC 98 will be moved further away from
the property, and no additional right of way or construction activity is required. The William Thompson
House is outside of the area of potential effect for the recommended alternative [Alternative lJ." A
concurrence form was signed that all parties agreed that the project would have no effect on the Purefoy-
Dunn Plantation (included in Appendix B of the FONSI).
Archaeological Site 31 WA175 was surveyed on August l9, 1994 by NCDOT staff
archaeologists. No archaeological evidence was recorded during the investigation. The investigation
concluded that the proposed project would not adversely impact prehistoric archaeological site
31 WA175. The State Historic Preservation (SHPO) concurs with these findings in a memorandum dated
July 20, 1994 (see the EA for further details).
JURISDICTIONAL STATUS
Construction of the proposed project will necessitate impacts to Waters of the United States.
Surface waters of Smith Creek, Richland Creek, Dunn Creek, and Spring Branch and several tributaries
thereof, as well as tributaries to Horse Creek, will be affected by the installation of culverts and pipes at
stream crossings, stream relocation, and temporary fill utilized in the construction of the bypass, as well
as improvements and relocations to existing roads. Jurisdictional stream determinations were conducted
on October 25 and November 1, 2000 and field verified by NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)
representative Steve Mitchell on November 8, 2000. Wetland delineations were conducted using the field
delineation method outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental
Laboratory, 1987). Sections A, B, and C were delineated on November 16, 2000 by NCDOT biologists
Elizabeth Lusk and Karen Lynch. USACE field representative Eric Alsmeyer conducted a field review of
all three sections on November 29, 2000. North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission field
representative David Cox and DWQ representative John Hennessy were not able to attend the field
review and therefore deferred verification to Mr. Alsmeyer.
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
The R-2809 project is in the Neuse River Basin, Hydrologic Unit 030020201, Richland Creek and
Smith Creek subbasins. Under the current design, there will be a total of 13 stream buffers impacted,
(subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules), 11 jurisdictional streams impacted, and 5 wetland sites impacted
throughout the entire R-2809 project.
Impacts to jurisdictional areas within the entire project consist of approximately 0.79 acres (0.32
ha) of permanent fill in wetlands, 0.03 acres (0.01 ha) of excavation in wetlands, 0.68 acres (0.27 ha) of
fill in surface water (stream), 3,176 feet (968 meters) of existing channel impacted. Buffer impacts total
3.94 acre (1.60 ha) in Zone 1 and 2.40 ac (0.97 ha) in Zone 2. Onsite relocation of streams total 872 feet
(266 meters), of which 384 feet (117 meters) will be naturalized allowing for onsite stream mitigation at a
1:1 ratio.
Sections A and B
Because Sections A and B are not due to be let for construction unti12008 and 2003, respectively,
they are still in preliminary design. The following table summarizes rough estimates of impacts to Waters
of the U.S. and stream buffers for these two Sections. Also, calculations are forthcoming for the exact
3

acreage of buffer restoration around the naturalized relocated channel in Section B. This mitigation
potential should be pursued further when final drawings are submitted for Section B. The preliminary
permit drawings for both Sections are attached to this permit application. The NCDOT understands that
application must be made for permit modifications when the designs are finalized.
Table 2. Preliminary Impacts to Waters of the US in Sections A and B
Fill in Existing Channel Impacts Buffer Impacts
Fill/Clearing Surface (ft) (ac)
Section in Wetlands Waters Naturalized
(ac) (ac) Impacts Relocated Zone 1 Zone 2
(Onsite Mitigation)
R-2809 A 0.01 0.01 62 0 0.21 0.25
R-2809 B 0.75 0.29 1,592 384 1.88 1.24
Totals 0.76 0.30 1,654 384 2.09 1.49
Wetland communities that are found within these two Sections are contained within maintained
easements. The small wetland at Site 2 in Section A (Sheet 4 of 7) is a natural seep draining into a
concrete roadside ditch. The installation and maintenance of a powerline right-of--way most likely created
the wetlands at Sites 3 and 4 (Sheets 6 and 8 of 18) in Section B.
There are a total of six jurisdictional stream crossings and eight jurisdictional buffers (all of the
jurisdictional streams and two streams that are stormwater channels), which will be impacted in these two
Sections. All streams are perennial, with the exception of an unnamed tributary (UT) to Richland Creek
at Site 2 in Section B (Sheet 5 of 8).
Section A
Site 1 (Sheet 4 of 7) -This UT to Horse Creek contains a silt, sand, and gravel substrate. Flow is
slow to moderate and water clarity is good. Stream banks are stable and sinuosity is moderate.
Site 3 (Sheet 5 of 7) -The UT to Richland Creek is a stormwater channel, not subject to stream
regulations. However, the buffers have been classified as being subject to the Neuse River Basin
Buffer Rules.
Section B
• Site l (Sheet 3 of 18) -The perennial UT to Richland Creek contains a substrate of silt and sand.
Water flow is good and water clarity is fair to good. Stream banks are eroding and stability is low.
There is very little sinuosity in this stream, which appears to have been straightened in the past.
• Site 2 (Sheet 5 of 18) -The intermittent UT to Richland Creek at contains a substrate of silt and sand.
Flow is slow to moderate and water clarity is fair to good.
• Sites 3 and 4 (Sheets 6 and 8 of 18) -Richland Creek at is a 40-foot wide perennial stream containing
a substrate of silt and sand. Water flow is moderate to fast and water clarity is moderate to good. At
the point of crossing, water is 2 to 4 feet deep. This stream has been channelized and deepened in the
past; sinuousity is low.
• Site 4 (Sheet 9 of 18) -The stormwater channel buffers at this site have been ruled to be subject to the
Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules.
4

• Site 5 (Sheetl0 of 18) -This perennial UT to Richland Creek is a narrow stream paralleling a sewer
line. The substrate is composed of silt and sand. There are occasional slabs of rock providing grade
control within the stream. Flow is slow to moderate and water clarity is good. Stream banks are
stable, but sinuosity is very low. This stream appears to have been straightened in the past, in order
to allow installation of the adjacent sewer line.
Section C
There are a total of six jurisdictional sites on this section. They are labeled Sites I through 5 (Site
3 is subdivided into Site 3A and Site 3B) in the attached permit application. Impacts for this Section are
detailed in Table 3. Buffer impacts were calculated for intermittent and perennial streams subject to the
Neuse Buffer Rules.
• Site 1 -This wetland is a very small (<O.OI ac)medium-quality wetland. Hydric indicators include
hydrophytic vegetation and low chroma soils.
• Site 2 - At this site Spring Branch will be enclosed underneath the new alignment with 2 RCBCs.
• Site 3A - A small UT to Dunn Creek will be redirected to Dunn Creek north of the cut/fill slope via a
3-foot lateral base channel.
• Site 3B - In order to minimize impacts to Dunn Creek ,the sinuosity will be reversed where the creek
intersects with the cut/fill slope. Although root wads will be placed in stream bank areas of high
velocity impact, it was not practical to conduct a comprehensive natural stream design on this short
section of relocated channel. The portion of Dunn Creek flowing underneath the new NC 98 will be
straightened and enclosed within 2 RCBCs.
• Site 4 -Where the new NC 98 intersects with Smith Creek, the creek will be enclosed within 2
RCBCs.
• Site 5 -This site contains a medium quality wetland in the floodplain of a UT to Smith Creek. Hydric
indicators include hydrophytic vegetation, low chroma soils, and a high water table (within 12 inches
of the surface). Both the wetland and the UT will be temporary filled as the temporary detour is
constructed. Water flow will be redirected into a lateral 2-foot base ditch to the north of the detour.
Following completion of amendments to existing NC 98, the detour will be lifted and the majority of
the wetland and stream will be restored.
5

Table 3. Impacts to Waters of the U.S. for Section C of R-2809
Channel distances Buffer Area (ac)
Fill in Fill in (feet) (Zone 1/Zone 2)
Site Station Type Wetlands Surface Naturalized Streams Naturalized Buffers

(ac) Waters
Impacts Relocated Requiring
Im acts
p Relocated Requiring
(ac) (On-site Offsite (On-site Offsite
Mitigation) Mitigation Mitigation) Mitigation

62+95 -L- Medium Quality
1 RT Wetland 0.01 - - _ _ _ _ _
2 66+40 -L- Spring Branch

2@9ftx6ftRCBC _ 0.12 361 0 361 0.46/0.28 0 0.46/0.28
74+46 to UT Dunn Creek
3A 74+73 -L- Redirected via lateral - 0.01 99 0 99 0.05/0.04 0 0.05/0.04
base ditch
3B 74+20 to
76+20-L- Dunn Creek
2@9ftx8ftRCBC _ 0.17 564 0 564 0.77/0.39 0 0.77/0.39
4 84+60-L- Smith Creek
2@9ftx8ftRCBC _ 0.07 295 0 295 0.41/0.17 0 0.41/0.17
Medium Quality
Wetland and
5 85+20-L LT UT Smith Creek 0.05 0.01 203 0 203 0.16/0.03 0 0.16/0.03
Redirected via lateral
base ditch
Totals 0.06 0.38 1,522 0 1,522 1.85/0.91 0 1.85/0.91

MITIGATION
The USACE adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a wetland
mitigation policy that embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of
this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of the Waters of the
United States. Mitigation of wetland and surface water impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include:
avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time, and compensating
for impacts (40 CFR § 1508.20). Executive Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands) and DOT Order
5660.1 A (Preservation of the Nations Wetlands), emphasize protection of the functions and values
provided by wetlands. These directives require that new construction in wetlands be avoided as much as
possible and that all practical measures are taken to minimize or mitigate impacts to wetlands.
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating reasonable and practicable design features to avoid
and minimize wetland impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of remaining wetland
impacts. Avoidance measures were taken during the planning and EA/FONSI phases; minimization
measures were incorporated as part of the project design.
Avoidance
All Waters of the U.S. not affected by the project will be protected from unnecessary
encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or storage of construction supplies will be allowed
in wetlands or near surface waters.
Minimization
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce the adverse
impacts. Minimization techniques were implemented as follows:
• Best Management Practices: Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control Best
Management Practices (BMP) for the protection of surface waters and wetlands.
• Bridging streams and wetlands: Where possible and feasible, streams have been bridged to minimize
permanent stream and buffer impacts. Richland Creek will be bridged in Section B.
• Slopes: In wetlands the side-slopes have been steepened to the extent possible
• Ditching: It is the policy of the. NCDOT to eliminate lateral ditching in wetlands as much as possible,
thus preserving the hydrology of adjacent wetlands.
• Rip Rap: The NCDOT Hydraulics Unit has reduced the amount of rip rap in all stretches of relocated
channel.
• Natural Stream Design: Where possible, relocated streams have been naturalized, utilizing natural
materials, such as natural fiber matting, live stakes, and native shrub plantings and improving channel
sinuosity. On Site 1 in Section B the "naturalized channel" creates a more favorable stream design
than currently exists on the streams being impacted.
Compensation
Mitigation is generally accomplished through a combination of methods designed to replace
wetland and stream functions and values lost as a result of construction of the project. Compensation
may take the form of mitigation banking, contributions to wetland trust funds, or replacing lost wetland
7

and stream functions and values on-site. Replacing lost functions and values may be accomplished
through creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar functions and values in constructed or
improved streams and wetlands. When practical, replacement wetland and stream standards are to
provide new wetlands and streams either preceding the losses or concurrently with the losses so that
wetlands and streams are functioning at all times during the construction process.
Richland Creek, Spring Branch, Dunn Creek, Smith Creek, and their tributaries flow through an
area of Wake County that is primarily agricultural: farmland and woodland. However, residential
development is encroaching southward from Wake Forest. The NCDOT concurs with DWQ's
requirement of 2:1 mitigation ratios for stream impacts. Compensatory mitigation will be required for
3,176 of permanent stream impacts thoughout Sections A, B, and C of the proposed project. The
following summarize impacts by type within each Section of the project and mitigation required.
Section A:
Compensatory mitigation will be required for Section A impacts to Waters of the US. From the
preliminary design, the NCDOT anticipates the following impacts:
• Stream impacts in Section A total 62 feet. At the required 2:1 ratio, offsite stream mitigation required
for this Section of the proposed project totals 124 feet.
• Stream buffer impacts in Section A total 0.21 acres in Zone 1 and 0.25 acres in Zone 2. At the
required 3:1 ratio for Zone 1 impacts and 1.5:1 for Zone 2 impacts, offsite buffer mitigation required
for the proposed project totals 1.0 acres.
• Wetland impacts in Section A total 0.01 acres. The NCDOT does not anticipate compensatory
mitigation for these minimal wetland impacts.
Section B:
Compensatory mitigation will be required for Section B impacts to Waters of the US. From the
preliminary design, the NCDOT anticipates the following impacts:
• Stream impacts in Section B total 1,592 feet. Onsite mitigation via a relocated and naturalized
channel totals 384 feet. At the required 2:1 ratio, offsite stream mitigation required for this Section of
the proposed project totals 2,416 feet.
• Stream buffer impacts in Section B total 1.88 acres in Zone 1 and 1.24 acres in Zone 2. At the
required 3:1 ratio for Zone 1 impacts and 1.5:1 for Zone 2 impacts, offsite buffer mitigation required
for the proposed project totals 7.5 acres.
• Wetland impacts in Section B total 0.75 acres: 0.72 acres of fill and 0.03 acres of excavation. The
NCDOT does not anticipate compensatory mitigation for these minimal wetland impacts.
Section C:
Compensatory mitigation will be required for Section C impacts to Waters of the US. The NCDOT
anticipates the following impacts:
• Stream impacts in Section C total 1,522 feet. At the required 2:1 ratio, offsite stream mitigation
required for the proposed project totals 3,044 feet.
• Stream buffer impacts in Section C total 1.85 acres in Zone 1 and 0.91 acres in Zone 2. At the
required 3:1 ratio for Zone 1 impacts and 1.5:1 for Zone 2 impacts, offsite buffer mitigation required
for the proposed project totals 6.9 acres.
• Wetland impacts in Section C total 0.06 acres. The NCDOT does not anticipate compensatory
mitigation for these minimal wetland impacts.
8

On-site Mitigation
Onsite mitigation will be conducted in Section B at Site 1. The existing channel of the UT to
Richland Creek, which will be impacted, has a Rosgen classification of BSc with a substrate composed of
sand, gravel, and cobbles. The 384-foot relocated channel is designed to have a BS classification.
Channel banks will be planted with native trees and shrubs. In addition, low water rock dams will be
placed in the channel and coir fiber mats will be placed along the outside of the channel bends. See
Natural Stream Design beginning on Sheet 12 of 16 in the attached Section B permit drawings. The
potential for onsite buffer mitigation at this Site will be investigated further as design plans are finalized.
Off-site Miti ation
For all three Sections, a total of 2,792 feet of stream loss impacts will require off-site
compensatory mitigation. At the required mitigation ratio of 2:1, offsite stream mitigation required totals
5,584 feet. The NCDOT intends to utilize the WRP to provide the balance of stream and buffer
mitigation required for all three sections of the proposed project. Because Sections A and B are not due
to be let until after the current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) expires in December 2001, the
NCDOT can only purchase mitigation credits for stream impacts in Section C. NCDOT proposes to pay
WRP $380,500 for stream impacts (at $125 per foot of stream mitigation requirements at a 2:1 ratio) and
$287,213 for stream buffer impacts (at $41,625 per acre of stream buffer impacts) for compensatory
mitigation in Section C before construction begins.
Mr. Ron Ferrell, DWQ Coordinator for WRP, intends to forward a letter of intent to accept
payment for impacts in Section C. The WRP will also committed to accepting payment for, developing,
and finalizing approved mitigation plans to cover the final impacts for Sections A and B before
construction begins on these Sections. Payment will be made to WRP for Section A and Section B
impacts at the rates established by the renewed MOU. The R'RP letter committing to these conditions
will be forwarded upon receipt to be incorporated into this application.
SUMMARY
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404 Individual Permit as
required for the above-described activities for the proposed TIP project R-2809, Sections A, B, and C.
The NCDOT understands that permit modifications will be required when designs are finalized for
Sections A and B. We anticipate an Individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification will apply to this
project, and are providing seven copies of the application to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. In addition, in compliance with Section
143-215.3D(e) of the North Carolina Administrative Action (NCAA) we have enclosed a check for
$475.00 to act as payment for processing the Section 401 Certification application.
Construction of Sections A, B, and C of the proposed TIP Project No.R-2809 will result in 0.79
acres of permanent fill in wetlands, 0.03 acres of excavation in wetlands, 0.68 acres of fill in surface
water (stream), 3,176 feet of existing channel impacted, and 872 feet of relocated channel. On-site
mitigation will be implemented through a 384-foot naturalized segment of relocated channel. The
remaining 2,792 feet of stream impacts will be mitigated for via the WRP program. Payment will be
made by the NCDOT at the current rate for stream and buffer impacts in Section C before construction
begins. For final stream and buffer impacts in Sections A and B, payment will be made at the new rate
established by the renewed MOU and mitigation plans will be approved before construction begins in
these Sections.
9

Thank you for you assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need any additional
information about this project, please contact Elizabeth L. Lusk at [phone], extension 335.
Sincerely,
. C~~. ~~~
William Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
WG/ell
Attachments
cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ (7 copies)
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Kathy Matthews, EPA
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Mr. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Design Services
Mr. D.R. Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Tim Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. J.G. Nance, P.E., Division 5 Engineer
Mr. Ron Ferrell, WRP DOT Coordinator
10

APPLICATION FOR
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
(33 CFR 32v~
OMB APPROVAL No. 0710-003
Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington
Headquarters Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204,
Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003),
Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be
submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10: 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require authorizing activities in, or
affecting, navigable waters of the United States, the discharge or fill material into waters of the United States, and the
transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this
form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If
information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must
be attached to this application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 7 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION
COMPLETED
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE
(an agent is not required)
N.C Department of Transportation William D. Gilmore, P. E. Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence
b. Business [phone]
10. AGENTS PHONE NOS. W/ AREA CODE
a. Residence
b. Business
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, , to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this
application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
DATE
ENG FORM 4345

NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Proposed NC 98 bypass south of Wake Forest in Wake County and the associated road
improvements to existing NC 98, SR 2053 (Jones Dairy Road), and US lA (South Main Street), US 1,
SR 2000 (Falls of the Neuse Road), and SR 1923 (Thompson Mill Road); TIP R-2809, Sections A, B,
and C, State Project No. 8.1402501, Federal Aid No. STP-98(1).
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOW (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Spring Branch, Dunn Creek, Smith Creek and unnamed tributaries to Dunn, Smith, and Horse
Creeks.
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Wake County NC
County State
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
See October 1995 Environmental Assessment (EA) and September 1996 Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI).
17. DIRECTIONS TO SITE
See October 1995 EA and permit drawings attached to this USACE permit application.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct a highway on
new location on the southern side of Wake Forest in Wake County. The proposed road will connect
NC 98 from west of SR 1923 (Thompson Mill Road) to NC 98 east of SR 2053 (Jones Dairy Road), a
distance of approximately 4.8 miles (7.8 kilometers). The proposed project consists of constructing a
four lane, median divided facility on 150 feet (46 meters) of right-of--way. Initially, only two lanes
will be constructed. Road improvements will also be made to roads being crossed by the new bypass
(listed in Item 12 of this form). The project has been divided into three sections: Section A from
west of SR 1923 to US 1, Section B from US 1 to US lA (South Main Street), and Section C from US
lA to east of SR 2053.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
Public highway facility for public safety and transportation. Detailed explanation of project purpose
and need included in October 1995 EA and September 1996 FONSI.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/ OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for discharge
Proposed highway on new location on the southern side of Wake Forest in Wake County, from
existing NC 98 from just west of SR 1923 to just east of SR 2053.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
See Section A, B, and C permit drawings attached to USACE application, dated March 23, 2001.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)"'
ENG FORM 4345

See Section A, B, and C permit drawings attached to USACE application, dated March 23, 2001.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No X
IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK.
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can
be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/ Denials Received from other Federal, State, or Local Agents for Work
Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE OF IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE DENIED
APPROVAL' NUMBER
' Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify
that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to
un rtake the work described herein or am acting as the agent duly authorized agent of the applicant.
~~ ~ ~•~~~ 3 23 2.0~ 1
SIGNATURE OF PLICANT AT SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it
may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or
agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or
disguises a material fact or makes any false, ficticious or fraudulent statements or respresentations or makes
any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry,
shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345

~ ~ ~~v
~ - .
~.~..~~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTZVIEENT' OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT 7R. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
1/4/01
STATE PROJECT: 8.1402501 (R-2809A)
COUNTY: Wake
DESCRIPTION: NC 98 Wake Forest Bypass from West of SR 1923 to West
of US 1.
MEMORANDUM TO: V. C. Bruton, Ph.D.
Asst. Manager, Project Development and Environmental
Analysis Branch
~~M~'.
FROM: ~o~ ' D. R. Henderson, P.E.
State Hydraulics Engineer
SUBJECT:
Permit Action
The hydraulic design phase for the above identified project has been completed. The
following are the environmental permit requirements as identified at this time by:
(A) Planning Document: Anticipates Section 404 Individual Permit and Section 401
Water Quality Certification.
(B) Hydrological and Hydraulic Design Studies: Impacts to Ja~risdictional Siciface
Yl'aters and Wetlands.
The following is the status of the permit drawings and application (when applicable).
Permit drawings m~e being provided to PD&EA.
cc: Mr. J. E. Alford, P.E .(Roadway Design) w/o att.
Mrs. D. N1. Barbour, P.E. (Highway Design Branch) w/o att.
Mr. R. Young (Scheduling Unit) w/o att.
Project file

198 ,1989 _ -
i
BEGIN ROJECT ~- ~~
~
R-2 09A I ,
% 195E
---/ ~
~
19
'
1 9 '
1977
1923 ~/
~. 1976\i
t
a,"~
r
19
' I wy~ Foy
98 j tOf. 3,9~
..,, rte,
Rd.
-----~ L/
I '°.
1 I A
,~
,- -
i~ ~~
~I
- ---~ ~ ~ BYPp55
r-
NG~~98 ~ ~ ~,~
l
/ 1967
~, ~~~~
A
,POAOSF ~ I
END PROJECT i/
R-2809A ;~
~~,
~~~5 ~,~
--rv
VICINITY MAP
~~~~~~~~
~~~~
N. C: DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~02501 (R-2809~il
NC 98 WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF SR 1923
TO WEST OF US 1
SHEET 1 OF 7 1 / 2 / Ol

-i- sTa to+oo.ooo
BEGIN PROJECT 8.1402501
SITE 1 AND 2
THQYP5~7W -Y3-
Y/11 RD 1923
° RQ -
TO~= ~ BYP,~
c~50M `~` ~ ~`'
~ ~;
F ~~ ~
~~ ~ ~~
~(3~y
~~r
~~
~~~
~~
ISriNC Fa./" ~~'
OF THE
NEUSE RD 1
~ ti
<W j
i'
Q
'~
SITE 3
WAKE UNKW CHI/Riq/ RD
SR /929
~~
~~~y ~ 9g ~o .N-~
y-~•~qQ y~ ~~~,y RO'
• RElLCATED FA11S
AF THE NEUSE RQ
-L- STA. 32 + 40.000
END PROJECT 8.1402501
0
Q
z
l;
J
3~~6
~~~~
era i
~ Y~ ~ ~•
~~
ASS
TO- gU--r~~
~~
2
• ~ W
J ~
FO
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
JL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PROJECT: 8102501 tat-2809A)
NC 98 WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF SR 1923
TO WEST OF US 1
SHEET 2 OF ~] 1 / 2 / 01

LEGEND
~i~lLB~~ WETLAND BOUNDARY
L
~~ WETLAND
L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® OENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
tPONO)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
•. ;••• DENOTES MECHANIZED
• • • • CLEARING
-~- ~- FLOW DIRECTION
TB
-1-TOP OF BANK
---WE --- EDGE OF WATER
- ~ -- PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- -E - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-~ PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG - -NATURAL GROUND
- --e~- - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
---EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
--~ ---- WATER SURFACE
LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
~~~ COIR FIBER ROLLS
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
~-.-~
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE

''
DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
VANE
RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~02501 (R-2809A)-
NC 98 WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF SR 1923
TO WEST OF US 1
SHEET 3 OF 7 1 / 2 / Ol

,~ ~
,»
UNNAA "D TRIBUTARY ' /
TO

n
__
r
Z
m
N
--a
D
O
I
r
-i
Z
N
HC SE CREEK \ / LEVEL SPREADER
~ ~~ \ ~ ~ LINO R/~'
\ F` \ ~` `~\~ ~~
`~~~`~ -~~K100

~_ _~ ry~MLD ~_ _~
CLASS B RPRAP
\\
\\
N.C. DEPT. TRANSPORTATION \\
lOm D 2 m
SCALE
~\
.~
. ~ 1 '
~~'
~' \
.~ ~~
~~ -~
~~ -~

n
r
Z
m
V1
D
...~
O
0
0
r
V1
a0
Q
Z
IE~I,ALN VIEW
SITE 1 ANA ~
® DENOTES FII,L IN WETLANDS
DENOTBS FII,L IN
SURFACE WATERS
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHIVAYS
WASE COUNT Y
PROJECT:81~102501 (It-2809A)
NC 98 WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF SR 1923
TO WEST OF US 1
EET 9- OF 7 1 / 2 / Ol
DAVD E. ~ COLLEOI SARTOHE

------_
ANVL NVESTIENTS LLC I
IwAKEFELD) ~ I LYtN M. BRANDON
I
~\
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY ~
To RICHUND cREEK ~ ., e ~~ ~ ?o,~,?\ 1~ o.fwn e~sE I
-i
n
_r
Z
rn
N
D
~.
ao
0
i
N
I
NORTH Nu.s rzo~TT>Es
/~
ii
r
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
TO RICHLAND CREEK
lOm 0 ` 2 m
SCALE
NANNE B. BRANDON
I

n
__
r
Z
rn
Vf
D
ao
0
N
I
ANVL NVESTMENTS LLC
(IIAKEFI~LD1

~~~~
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~02501 (R-2809A)
NC 98 WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF SR 1923
TO WEST OF US 1
SHEETS OF ~] 1 / 2 / Ol

PARCEL IE~]E$®]~1E]Eg~°~ ®~N]E][$~
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
1 DAVID E. AND COLLEEN SARTORE 7201 HAYEBURY CT.
WAgE FOREST, NC 27587
ANVII, INVESTMENTS LLC
2
(WAgEFIELD) NOT AVAII.ABLE
3 LYNN M. BRANDON RT. 3 BOX 285
WAgE FOREST, NC 27587
~ NANNIE B. BRANDON 13028 FALLS OF THE NUESE RD.
WAgE FOREST, NC 27587
5 NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES '(22~ SIX FORgS RD.
RALEIGH, NC 27609-5716
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~02501 (R-2809A>
NC 98 WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF SR 1923
TO WEST OF US 1
SHEET ~ OF `1 1 / 2 / Ol

n ". SaATF u~
y ~~.
~ ~_ ~ ~
.~+~, ~.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
c;ovt.Rn~oR
March 1, 2001
STATE PROJECT: 8.1402501 (R-2809B)
F. A. PROJECT: STP-98(1)
COUNTY: Wake
DESCRIPTION: NC 98 (Wake Forest Bypass) from US 1 to US 1 A
MEMORANDUM TO: Dr. V. Charles Bruton, PhD
Project Development and Environment Analysis Branch
AT°I'N: Elizabeth Lusk
FROM: Anne Hunt
Hydraulics Unit
SUBJECT:
Enclosed is the permit drawing showing the requested revisions for the above mentioned
project.
Revised Individual Permit
a if
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Please advise if any additional information is needed.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HYDRAULICS UNIT
1590 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1590
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
CENTURY CENTER COMPLEX
BUILDING B
1020 BIRCH RIDGE IJRIVE
RALEIGH NC

:y ~
~,.^~-,-
_~--
1929
/ ~
124 \\
~~
C
9~
BEGIN PROJECT
~\ R-2809B
I
~~ \ I ~
\ '
SITE ~~~
SITE 1-~`~
`_~
SITE 3
i
i
I
II
1
I I~

f o~%
r ~ ^~ttE FOREST GTY l11/?S,l ~T
- ~..
:~
.~' ~-,
~, I ~ y•
~:~. I
I ~'` WAKE
i ~ ~ ~ FOREST /
SITE ~ ~ I I ---L.
/,• rn I /~
~~~~ ~ ~-- ~ ~J
\G'~~' ti
Y ~/•'
BYPASS ~
~~~
f~ ~ :~= NC q i ---
r~ SITE 5 I~ ~ orestville
-z -~: ;~
J
r -CITY LYATS ~/
I
~ IN
i ~ ~ -~ I:
~/ 1 ~ I
~~ l ~ I ~
~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~\
/~ i ~ -~ ~
~~ ~ \
^oke Forest
Roleevllle YICGb
Sch.
,~.
~~
'~ .
END PROJECT
R-28096
~~ \ ~ ~ /
~ \ \ Z44 ~.
I /
l I ~
/ I ~.
I / i ~~ i ~ .
1 I I
I i
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
SCALE
.5 0 1 KM
PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-2809B)
NC 98 WAK~EQ~ FOREST BYPASS
SHEET ~ OF~iL 2/8/01

LEGEND
--•WLB--- - WETLAND BOUNDARY
X X X LIVE STAKES
y)LB'--~ X X
~
~ ~ ~` \~
\~
~ WETLAND ~ BOULDER
-- WLB,
DENOTES FILL IN --- COIR FIBER ROLLS
~~~!LLl~LI WETLAND

~~,~%
~1~///~~~
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER ~ ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER

~ DENOTES FILL IN
~ ~~~~ SURFACE WATER PROPOSED BRIDGE
(POND)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY PROPOSED BO

FILL IN WETLAND X CULVERT
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND PROPOSED P
IPE CULVERT
DENOTES TEMPORARY (DASHED LINES DENOTE
FILL IN SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
~~ DENOTES MECHANIZED
• ' • • CLEARING
E- E- FLOW DIRECTION
TB
~- TOP OF BANK
- -~WE•-~~- EDGE OF WATER
-- ~-- PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
-- F-- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-~ PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
-- NG- --NATURAL GROUND
-- PL - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP.ORAINAGE
EASEMENT
- POE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
- - ~ - -• - WATER SURFACE
SINGLE TREE
-`~`L``~'-`~-`~~`~`L WOODS LINE
^ DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
VANE
RIP RAP
~~
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
N.C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-2809B)
NC-98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
SHEET ~ OF ~~ 2/8/01

U.T. TO
RICHLAND I ~ m 6 ;
CREEK ~ m I yl ~ ;/~
6P Y
FF .~_ •
_Q ~/ ' i / ~~ •/ ~0
i •~
'~ i ~ d ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~C
~ p ( ~ r i `i' --
~ I I o o'~ i // I ~* I
U.T, TO ~, ' //
RICHLAND I '~ d ~ I~ N i~ f~li ~~
-~. CREEK \ ',~,I 1 i'. ~I it 1 ~ ~n~ 9 ~
~~~ ~, !/ /
~', ' ~~ ~ ~ ~``% 5 '~ ~ '~`
NATURAL STREAM DESIGN ~ ^ ~~
~~` SEE DETAIL SHEET 1'1 QFl8 ~ ~'~ ~ ~~~~" .~,~' I
~ ANO SUMMARY SHEET ~1'! OF ~~ I ~~ ~~: ~ ~d
~ ~ +~ ~ ~ ~ 1
~ \ y1 ~~\ ~
~ ~" `'' --
~ ~ . `m i S
~ PROP. _ _ ~ ~ I~ f \~
~_~ RIPARIAN n, } •, `•~ `~~ ~ ~ ~+
BUFFER ,,, ~ _~~ 1 ~~~ I } 1
\ N ~ 1,
H i' ~
O r ' W \
j / j S ~_._~ /.
_ ~ F~~ _ SILL
"' ~
O II ~" /" i ~ -'
~;
!~ /
II ~.j ~ ~ ~ S ,/ ~~~
II 2 GI / ~ /~" ~i
t: . ~.."
5 ~ ~ ~ " ~ / / i" '~1C 98 WAKE FOREST
%' ~ ~l 3 -~ o o ~ '~' i~ ~/ ~ I , ~~ BYPASS wESTB0UN0 3 3 00 '-
.==sew=tea-_.~ ~~ ~ ~ ' f
~~ -_ s . _
~ -~ i~ i~ S " " ' - i NC 98 WAKE FOREST -_- -RPBB-
~ ~? BYPASS EASTBOUND ~r
~ Z
~. ~ r ~. 12 GI
~~ ~ ~ f j
~! ~ ---'
~~. 1_ r _ _ .. ~ X15
\ r ~~ l~ S W A F / ----C--
~ i ., ~; r I
'~ E
` \ ~ _• i ~ i F ~TDE
\ ~ " ~ I TDE \
CFA ~ ~ TDE~` \
~ S
.~ /~ ~ .,'
~ ~ ~ m.
i;' i DE ~ m ;"ate
~ ~-~ ,~ N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
~ i DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~% I~IL~N V~]EW
U.T. TO
RICHLANO~~ :~ ~1f~~ ~ WAKE COUNTY
CREEK ~ 1 1L
' DENOTES MECHANIZED •,•••,•,• PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-2809B)
10 0 20 CLEARING • • NC 98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
DENOTES FILL IN S S
SURFACE WATERS SHEET 3 OF 1~ 2/8/01

PROFILE GRADE LINE +1.3749%
90
\~\ 32+75 -L- PVT
~ i
~ i
85 ~
\\~~\ D. A. = 1 . 53 km2 / ~
~ ~ \ AVG. DAILY FLOW= 0.029 m'/s / ~
~ ~
~~ /
~\ /~
80 NATURAL GROUND
~, ~o,o° ~OsO ~
`~ _ ~
75 ORDINARY HIGHWATER ~~ ~ i ~
ELEV.= 74.64
-~
600mm CONC. SILL PROPOSED CHANNEL
PROPOSED 2 @ 2.1m x 1.8m RCBC INVERT ELEV. 73.708
70
+40 +60 +80 32 +00 +20 +40 +so +BO 33 +00 +20 +40
l~Ig®lFI lL]E
~I7["]E ~
5 0 10
HORIZONTAL SCALE
90
85
80
75
2.5 0 5
VERTICAL SCALE

' ~ u.r. To
, RICHLAND _ I I m
CREEK ~ ~ m: I ~I `;/~
~` 1 _ ~ ..
OVFf~~ / ~ _ / /
a ~ ~
:.--
/ I
\~ I ~ W ~( ~ Q y I t;
1 I ~ ~
U.T. TO ~! ~° N ~i N ;~ ~ ~'~i I~ ~ I '
RICHLAND ` Ili vl a ~ ` I ~ I ~ ~ I ' ~-
CREEK
- _._ _ ~ , I I ~ ~ Ii , it /~ I I ~ ^~!
ii
~ / I I i,
i `,,~ Y •q1 ~ i
''I ~'VA ~ ~^ I ~ ~~ I I I Q
~ •1A ~~ ~ ~ ~ I I Qi
~~ i% +~ ~ I
i , \\ ,I / ~ /I I i X
' , ~ ~ '/
NATURAL STREAM DESIGN ,+ '. ~ ~ ~ f i
` ` SEE DETAIL SHEET __ OF _ ~~ ~ ~` ~
AND SUMMARY SHEET __ OF __ , - ti \\~ ' ~ , `\1 •~.~~ ~i
.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
I o ' \\, a m; . 1
\" /
~ PROP. ~. ~ ~ ~i~ !., A i I I ,
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ t -~
~~ BUFFEIRN ~, ~ _•~ 1 { I ~ \ i l I j -
.~ i ~ i Q
~ ~
i / ~ / ~_ -_
/, % /"
.- f~ ~ CONC. i ~ ~ ~~ / / ~ ~~~ ~I
' ~~ ~_~_~ ' SILL ~ ,, / ~ --
_ ~ II - -- _, ~i i ,~0 r
- - ~ ~~ f ~,~~ - ' -~, -; - _
II ~ ~; ,~. ~ ~%
2 cl
'15 ~ ~ / ~ / i% ~ '~1C 98 WAKE FOREST _
'.
~ 3 + OO // /~• // r ~ f ~ BYPASS WESTBOUND 33 ~~ t,
_~~n~~~as~vJ j- /, /
i/ / %~ NC 98 WAKE FOREST
•---------- ,p / / .~ a i BYPASS EASTBOUND
~\ r /2 GI / -- `1I
~~. h ~.~- .:- '- i~ X15
~ i. ~ I E
~ ~ ~ !I , i ~ ~ F TDE
~ ~ ~', I I ' 1 I ~ ~ TDE \
~I I ~i I TDE- \
.: ~F~I \
- i f I O -
•I /~ 1 v` ti
,~l / I
<I ! I
~,~ ~ of ,;m :~a
i ~ : ~ 4.- N.C. DEPT. OF TRANS
/ ~T ~I' DIVISION OF HII
!!1:l1~~~1V ~~~ 1'~
u.T. To WAKE COUP
RICHLAND-~! ~ ~~~~ 6~
CREEK i I
I DENOTES MECHANIZED :~:~:.:.: PROJECT: 8.102501
10 0 20 CLEARING NC 98 WAKE FORE
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATERS S S SHEET 5 OF ~
-- -RQPBB-
Z
----C--
6~0
I
~/
I ;c•
j '<
I
`1
'` ~
~ f
0

~\~ ti ~/~ 1@ ~'~ \ ' '/l~ -- \~\ O EXCAVATION IN WETLAND ~pE_~TpE - _ _ _ -
,~
' ~ • ~
^;>a ~ ~
o~ \
., . >~
F _
r .-,.A _ _
_ _ _ ~~~~
.,
..~.°-..
:r• ~. -
_. __ _
_.._.. r
' ~ \ \ ~ \ \ ~ O + OO SOUT BOUND \
-- _ -- _
. _ 19+00
,.:~\~\\
., -YI- `\
T - _ '` \ ~ ~ \~ OO \ NORTH80UND _ ~ ~ T
__ r OC
_, _ \
i ~ .. ,~ ~ ~
~..
;: :„ ~. ,
2
,. , O
\.\ \ ~ ~ \ \ qf~.\ ~` ~, .
l~]LA N ~V I lE W
~I7["lE ~
~~ ~ ~~
DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING •`. `. `. `.
DENOTES FILL IN S S
SURFACE WATERS

r ~
10 0 20
NC 98 WAKE FOREST
BYPASS EASTBOUND
N
J
W
Z_
J
U
F
Q
PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-2809B)
NC 98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLANDS F F
SHEET ~ OF ~ 2/8/01
~T q , 1G~ N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
~~~lr V I1L%W DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~I7ClE 4
WAKE COUNTY

~/~ ~~4Q- // ti0 / ~ tO /~ ~~ Ott`
r' 0~ , ~'" ~ / ~ a I
~ ~ /
s J U.T. TO ~ // wv ~ ~ /•/ TYPE 'A' BASIN /' /
~ RICHLAND G i ~ ~ i
CREEK // ,/ iO / ~ ~1 /, ,//~i
Wig` / ,;~ Q~~ /~ _ ,... _ _ /' .' W
~ ~' _ o
l \e~~ pO lo~ti/// :~~~G`Z~'/ ~ . / o~i ,''' ~ \ ~ ~ ~PD6~ f E~
obo / 'j ~ ~'i'~ \ ~~`~ Q Q \ ~- ~~
~ ~ F v~ ~
+ •9~~ ~ i ~ •~'ob:. O um Q m 2GI
~ °4 ~ Se °~ ° b: ~" o w
1r'1 •o.°.•.g o.°0,.~ \ \ A •.~' '~~ / 0 / •~~t d, t8d~° ~~°b° ' 2GI `O ~ 2GI
Q , .
N E°•' o/ NC 98 WAKE FOREST ~ ~ 41 + 0
o ~J ~ ~ A ~ •°B °i'''O'°~b:°° f" BYPASS WESTBOUND
~ d t d t o ~ o
Z ~~
~ ~ ob v obo• 3 .° 600
•' ~
_ /. ~ ;r: / ,. ,° t,y~ ePXad~i° 3T5 3T5 7 3T ~--
CB NC 98 WAKE FOREST ,,,
V ~,` / d i °b"o y'~• CB-~ CB-- -~ CB -~ CB BYPASS EASTBOUND
~ t°~dpt // m 2GI
.•b.o
080' ' 4iO.° 2GI ^ w
i .: % ' ,~~ ' ; ' 2GI C, ~ =_ E---__ E-- C--
~/ ~ r" -~
'~ E
,~ ,~~' ti JQ ~' j :. .i t dot
,,~' o. :°O.
/ ~ Q i;~/" ~~ ----
.'rte ~c~jri ~"
~~ ~,.;,
.:
I~IL~N VIEW
~I7[°lE 4
~~ ~ ~0
DENOTES MECHANIZED ••• •••
CLEARING • • • • • •
DENOTES FILL IN S S
SURFACE WATERS

]~ILt~N ~gIEW
~~~~ 4
~~ 0 Z~
DENOTES MECHANIZED •••••••••
CLEARING
DENOTES FILL IN S S
SURFACE WATERS
_ __
__ a;,,
^;:,,
~` `,

o l r ~ , ~1l o ~~ /
ri a ~ ~ '
~~,' ~ ~ '
\', \ \ `) I
~ t I
CREEK ;,~ ~~~ ~ /
\ t ~ \, ' ~ /
c. _ E QOE J i '. p /
_ I F E-1~
F- ~ ~ ~' j, ''f, ~-PD
~ ~ - _ _ ~ / E_PDE-
,. ,I ~, _ -
f y~ ~ ~ ~.:
__
~~ r. ~ -~~
1 'mot I T //'~~ '.~ ~ F~
375 O V ~ 375 ~ ^ ~, ~ ,
,.
,~ ~, ;.
,. ..
., I
,..
~_..~.._
400 CSP W~
..2 ELBOWS ~..--f _.., ~.` 1 `~ 1 ~ /
_~ ~, `i
o ~ ~ ~ ~ -f,
. E~-~f` / i E~"~ E--`~ E s " ~ 'E E__--- E-~'~~ E
-- \ \
i /
U.T. RICHLAND
., ., p ~l `~ ~ CREEK ~ ` /
- -
,,.. ,. -,
.~ O s \~' m ~ I,
1. I I i ~ 1' /'-
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
~~~jr ~~~W DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~~~
~~ 0 20
DENOTES MECHANIZED •
CLEARING ••••••••
DENOTES FILL IN S S
SURFACE WATERS

Project No. 8.1402501 (R-28096)
Property Owner List
For
Each Wetland Site
Site Station Parcel Name Address
N0. N0. DB and Pg
-L- 31+97 Rt. to N C D 0 T p,0. Box 25201
O/ DB 6392 Pg 113 Raleigh, N.C. 27611
-L- 32+49 Lt. BM 1990 Pg 1192
Norma E. Adkins &
-L- 31+90 Lt. to Heba G. Adkins 1522 Deerberry Lane
-L- 32+17 Lt O DB 6352 Pg 489 Wake Forest, N.C. 27587-8207
. DB 1990 Pg 1192
to
-L- 32+16 Lt Town Of Wake Forest 401 E. Elm St.
. O3 DB 4831 Pg 319 Wake Forest, N.C. 27587-9166
1 -L- 32+50 Lt. BM 1990 Pg 1192
-L- 31+g6 Rt
to North Hills Properties 4224 Six Forks Rd.
. O4 DB 3021 Pg 304 Raleigh, N.C. 27609-5716
-L- 32+36 Rt. BM 1994 Pg 1621

to
-L- 32+45 Rt William N. Jones &
5604 Castlebrook Dr.
. O Betty K. Jones N.C. 27604
Raleigh
-Y2- 11+29 Lt. DB 2445 Pg 191 ,
Beatrice B. Jones &
-Y2- 11+18 Lt
to Madeline C. Ray .
. O DB 5948 Pg 544 Not Available
-Y2- 11+38 Lt. DB 1962 Pg 227
to
-Y2- 10+50 Lt Town Of Wake Forest 401 E. Elm St.
. O ~ 4831 Pg 319 Wake Forest, N.C. 27587-9166
-Y2- 10+89 Lt. BM 1990 Pg 1192

2

-Y2- 10+42 Lt
to William N. Jones 8~
5604 Castlebrook Dr.
. O Betty K. Jones Raleigh, N.C. 27604
-Y2- 10+84 Lt. DB 2445 Pg 191
-Y1- 16+88 Lt. to O N C D O T P.O. Box 25201
-RPB- 10+51 Rt. Raleigh, N.C. 27611
KF US-1, LLC c/o Drucker & Falk
3 -L- 36+65 Rt. to O8 DB 6184 Pg 801 7200 Stonehenge Dr.
-RPC- 10+07 Rt. BM 1994 Pg 881 Raleigh, N.C. 27613
-RPB- 10+21 Lt
to Park Associates, Ltd. 4224 Six Forks Rd.
. O DB 6333 Pg 7 Raleigh, N.C. 27609-5716
-RPB- 10+38 Lt. BM 1994 Pg 1621
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-2809B)
NC-98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
SHEET ~ OF 8/ 31 / 00

Project No. 8.1402501 (R-2809B)
Property Owner List
For
Each Wetland Site
Site Station Parcel Name Address
N0. N0. DB and Pg
-L- 37+14 Rt. to Jones Heirs
/0 DB 2785 Pg 941 Not Available
-L- 39+59 Lt. BM 1962 Pg 227
4

-Y3- 10+81 Rt. to Jones Heirs
/0 DB 2785 Pg 941 Not Available
-Y3- 10+84 Rt. BM 1962 Pg 227

-L-
47+09
Lt. to Mary Forbes
335 Forbes Rd
5
-L-
47+70
Rt. // DB 1107 Pg 15
BM 1935 Pg 12 .
Wake Forest, N.C. 27587
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-2809B)
NC-98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
SHEET 12
~~
/
OF
00
8 / Yl

IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SU RFACE WATER IMPACTS BUFFER IMPACTS

Site
No.
Station

From/To
Structure
Size
Fill In
Wetlands
ha
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
ha
Excavation
In Wetlands
ha
Isolated
Wetland
ha Mechanized
Clearing
(Method III)
ha
Fill In SW
(Natural)
ha
Fill In SW
(Pond)
ha
Temp. Fill
In SW
ha Existing
Channel
Impacted
m
Relocated
Channel
m
Enclosed
Channel
m
Zone
1
ha
Zone
2
ha Mechanized
Clearing
(Method III)
ha

1 -L- 31+96 RT /
-Y2- 11.38 LT
2 ~ 2.1 x 1.8 RCBC
-
-
0.075
240.8
117.0
101.9
0.404
0.263
0.026

2 -Y2- 10.42 LT/
-YZ-to.e9LT
-
0.004
-
40.3
-
0.023
0.018
0.015

3 -Y 1. 16.68 LT /
~RPB- 11.01 LT
4 ®3.2 x 3.2 RCBC
0.024
0.012
0.019
67.8
26.8
0.063
0.034
0.042

4 -L- 37.74 LT /
L- 36.34 LT
0.268

-V3- 10+84 RT I
v3- 11.81 RT ~ -
• ,0:>f 5 -~
62.6
0.140
0.076
0.030

-L- 38+92 LT /
-L- 39+59 LT
BRIDGE
0.003
0.034
0.031

5 -L- 47+09 LT /
-L- 47.70 RT
1 ~ 3.0 x 1.8 RCBC
0.015
73.7
65.2
0.128
0.079
0.028

PROJECT TOTALS: 0.292 0.000 0.012 0.000 0.000 0.118 0.000 0.000 485.4 117.0 193.9 0.761 0.504 0.172
Note: Mechanized Clearing impacts within the Buffer are broken down by Zone on Sheet 13A of 18.

R-2809B
Riparian Buffer Impacts
2/ 13/01
Wetland Im acts Mechanized Clearin
Site No. Zone 1
(ha) Zone 2
(ha) Zone 1
(ha) Zone 2
(ha)
1 - - 0.017 0.009

2 - - 0.008 0.007

3 - - 0.034 0.008

4 - - 0.031 0.030

5 - - 0.020 0.008

Totals 0.000 0.000 0.110 0.062
R-28098
Sheet 13A of 18
2/13/01

NCDOT Project I.D. R-2809B
Wake County, NC
NC 98 (Wake Forest Bypass) from West of US 1 to West of US lA (South Main Street)
Prepared by: TranSite Consulting Engineers, Inc.
1300 Paddock Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
NATURAL STREAM DESIGN
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO RICHLAND CREEK
Left of -Y2-Project Station 11+25
Shcct ~ of ~U

The construction of NC 98 (Wake Forest Bypass) from West of US 1 to West of US lA
(South Main Street) will require that a portion of an unnamed tributary to Richland Creek
be relocated left of -Y2-. The proposed channel will be 117 meters in length starting left
of -Y2-Station 10+40 at the inlet of the proposed 2 @ 2.Im x 1.8m RCBC and continue
upstream to left -Y2- Station 11+25. The proposed channel is designed according to
"natural channel" design principles proposed by Dave Rosgen.
This unnamed tributary to Richland Creek drains 85 hectares in northern Wake County.
Existing and future land uses within the drainage basin are low to medium density
residential with commercial along the major roadways.
There is no hydraulic data available on this stream. Discharges were estimated using
procedures outlined in USGS Water-Resources Report 96-4084, Estimation of Flood-
Frequency Characteristics of Small Urban Watersheds in North Carolina.
EXISTING CH,4NNEL
A 65 meter section of the existing channel was surveyed in detail and used as a reference
stream. This section of stream was chosen because it will be the portion lost due to the
construction of -Y2-. Analysis of the existing channel led to a classification of BSc. This
portion of the channel was found to have flowing water and shallow pools with a bed
composed of sand, gravel and cobbles.
Sheet I~ of ~~

PROPOSED CHANNEL
The relocated channel is designed to have a BS classification. The design data for the
existing, reference and proposed channels is shown on the attached design data table.
The natural tie upstream and the proposed RCBC invert downstream set the channel
gradient. The sinuosity of the proposed channel is lower than the reference stream
because of a longer meandering length. The proposed channel has a lower entrenchment
ratio than the existing channel due to a reduced flood prone width and greater bankful
width. The proposed channel width /depth ratio is greater due to increased bankful
width.
Proposed channel stabilization is shown on the attached detail sheet. It is anticipated that
the channel banks will be planted with native trees and shrubs above bankful depth. In
addition, low water rock dams will be placed in the channel and coir fiber mat will be
placed along the outside of the channel bends. The channel bottom will match the
characteristics of the existing channel.
Shcet ~ ~~f

N A~ vl[[° ~I If$ ~ ]L ~'ICIE$ IE A~ ~I[ ~ ~~~ ~ N 'l[[°~ lf~ ~~~ l[.~
LOW STAGE CHECK DAM
1 Not tD SGOIe 1
F r
_ Bonk
RiD ROD
lOP Y[E Cenrer O.Jm mOe
RID ROD- ODO Ve N.S.I.
0.6~j. _NOrmOl Srreom
usr. JD.Jm le Vel
Srreom BsG •J/Jj Cr oke Sro~nef I
rIIIV laa
rlpiT RE1Y YE•
Elor-~ LonO avls o1
Ellrer EoDrl[ srP'o POr OYpI
Srreom Beovel N 1l0•
N/I~ 1N
DOSS SEOTON
TYPICAL FLOOD PLAIN SECTION
( Not to Scale 1
Flood Plain
J../ ~\
VAR, ypR, Natural
Noturol Ground
Ground q,6
SEE CHANNEL DETAILS
CHANNEL DETAIL
PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION
1NOr rD Scoe I
BANaEULI OEPTN
E O.loln ~ fboe PI In
V R. 'r O.Am 'LA VAR.
62'RE--~-!
1TPICAL SE[TION I BE1eEEN Bfr-0S
PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION
o BEND IAAEANDER)
1 Nar ro Scole I
L pE DEEPEN CHANNEL
PO NT BELOe GRADE POWT
O.Sm Ai BEND
B1NaEUlI DEPTH
I.Om
fbo0 PIOIn E[I0pB0[[0 NOin
VAR. O.Am ,LT f1T A.
R
~m
E OOiER lOL 0.)m DI \ANCHOq ROCItS
IPIkmE 0.6 DTI. BEL Orr LAVER ir_ _ 68 - 91kp
I TPIEAL SEC iION 2 •1 BENDS
NOTES:
MINBER OE ROOTeA05 NSLAILEO 10 BE OE TERNINED ON SIiE
NUNBER OE l0e STALE CNE[a OANS TO BE DE iERNWED ON SI/E
LADS TO BE SPACED Aa DIANE iER OE 8001 BASE
EER LOG ANCHOR ROCK TO BE PLACED ON iNE DO.NSLREAN ENO
:ACN EOOIER LOG SO THAT II IS LEANING ALAWii 1Nf LOL ON
SIDE Ae1T fRON iNE CNANNEI.
V BACaE RL NL OVER AND AROl1W EOOiER LOGS. R00 L.Ap IOLS
ANCHOR ROCaS EIRNLY SECURE AlL CONPONENIS WCLUOWL
T5, [ONNECiIONS AND LAPS.
ITNGS SNOUlO BE PLACED ABOVE BINSEULI DEPiN
pT
~~~ILs~~ I~IL~N ~~1Li 9'W

ITEM E%ISTING
STREAM REI:ERENCE
STREAM I'R©P~SEI~
REI.®CATI®N
STREAM NAME UNNAMED UNNAMED UNNAMED
DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 85 ho 85 ho 85 ha
CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 1.66% 1.66% 1.91%
BANKFUL WIDTH (Wbkf) 3.1 m 3.1 m 3.7 m
MEAN DEPTH (dbk{) 0.4 m 0.4 m 0.4 m
BANKFUL X-SECTION ARE 1.04 m2 1.04 m2 1.16 m2
WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO
r 7.75 7.75 9.25
Maximum DEPTH (d mbkf) 0.6 m 0.6 m 0.4 m
IDTH FLOOD-PRONE AREA
f e 6.6 m 6.6 m 6.2 m
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO 2.13 2.13 1.68
CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 3 mm 3 mm 3 mm
SINUOSITY (K) 1.17 1.17 1.06
MEANDERS:
AVG. LENGTH 27.5 m 27.5 m 34 m
AVG. AMPLITUDE 7.5 m 7.5 m 8.0 m
AVG. RADIUS 9.0 m 9.0 m 8.0 m
DISCHARGES:
O BANKFULL 1.34 cros 1.34 cros 1.59 cros
02 5.80 cros 5.80 cros 5.80 cros
OIO 12.80 cros 12.80 cros 12.80 cros
VELOCITY:
V BANKFULL 1.29 m/s 1.29 m/s 1.37 m/s
V2 1.56 m/s 1.56 m/s 1.45 m/s
VIO 2.09 m/s 2.09 m/s 1.68 m/s
CLASSIFICATION B5c B5c B5
S'][''~~ ~l~l[ ID~SCI3I1~'I'I~N
ANA
~C1L~5SI~ICA'l[[°I®N ~~'I°r~

L
~°~ ~ , PO¢ 5/948 ~
`~, ~ ~ ~,r~ ' /
/ ,
-~;~ ~ ~'~~ ~.~ ~ ~,,.,:- - ~ ~ END PR % /, /
wake ~o~-est ~ ~ ~ ~ R-2~
Elem;! Sch: •• ~
~~ - ' ~ v !~
~ ~ ~~ / ~
1 ~ •~
_-----1 i~ ~ ~~ q8 os~o~ - -- ~ ~ ~ ~~
`Q~oe ~ ~
- - - --~ 3r~ ~ ~,~,
J ~;~ •
,Forestville ~ . ~ ~~
~~ BEGIN PROJECT
- ~~
R-2809C _
::\
~ ~~;.
,~ ___~
__ ,,
~~~~~~~~
~~~~
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~(0250~ (R-2809C)
NC 98, WAKE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 20,53
SHEET ~ OF ~ ~/~, 10 / 9 / UO

r

a
z
7 ``
SITE 2
'~ ~
c~

SITE 1
To
~~ Ark \
U
T~~~~S~
SSX RN!!~b
~ :-.
,
V'VM~ ~ ,o;
/ .~~~~,'
~~ -\~~ ` ~
~
~i _. _
r ~. ~ _
~
~
Q l nrr ~^s .++ri west 70 RALFI
GI{
/ /
J
O
O I I
- - TA. 7+0 .000

BEGIN STATE PROJECT 8.1402504 / I
BEGIN F.A. PROJECT STP-98(D
BEGIN CONST.
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~1 ~
~°
~ ~ ~
~ WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1~(0250~[ (R-2809C)
NC 98, WAKE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US 1A
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ OF ~ 10/9/00

-L- STA. 88+20.000
END STATE PROJECT 8.1402504
END F.A. PROJECT STP-98(D
END CONST.
SITE S
~/
~ i
~~ a
0
~`~~
a eK
L~
so cam. -no-
SI/. 11 . TD.000
a~'
~Sr
.•
~ ~cY ~4, eo cam. 1 ~.
~ u..o ooa ~
,~O
SITE ~
.cc cam.
,q~ .~(~ STA b r X0.000
.~ ~~Dr
~r~~
Fo
to
~` .~
p~~
T
~~~~ ~~~
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WARE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.110250~( (R-2809C)
NC 98, WARE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEE"I' 3 OF ~ ~ 10 / 9 / 00
SITE 3

/Y~
h4gTCHI.II~E SITE

- R
u~ a~ e~ orta LADY CONSTRt)CT10H C0.
~~
¢DE PDE-Pnc __~
SKP S1fICEG000 ~
~T/LL, ~.AIOS. LLC

~~~~
IOm 0 2 m
SCALE
DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WA%E COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~0250~ (R-28090)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ OF I ~ 10 / 9 / 00
-- atz~TM w Haor~c

/ / ' \ ~g I THOMAS & DA-ERON A I I 120' TONN OF HAKE FOREST
NANCY H. DAlAFRON I I I ~~ EASElQ1T O
~p,r
T ~
\ \ ` ~ ~ /
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /
\~ ~t ~ ~ //
~ ~
a s
''F 1 \ CE-~ a
~ ~ ~
\ ~ \ \~ \ ~ a
\ 2 ~ LTA x 1.l~ RCBC p y ~
- - - -fi-~ ~ ~" 1W
E E E E E~~\ E--_E~_E--E ~\ \\ ~ m
_~E ~ PDEy
~~ ~ \ ~~
~ ~.
~,~ '~~
O \\ ~ ~ ~
~ \ \ ~ ~'~
1 ~l ~ ~ ~ 1Li VV r-awAS e. oAMEROr~ s \ ~ N. C. ]
NANCY H. DA-ERON \ D,
~~~~
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE
® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATBRS

1 , ~~`` ~~~ j6_\
~ ~;
~~
'~~ \ ~ ~~,
~F` \ \ '.~~` ~ \
~ E~E\f ~~ SrtE 3A~~, ~ E
~ ~ E
TFpMAS 8. DAA~RON ~
NANCY H.OAIERON
as. e~ orta ~ _ ~ , ~ s~
_pOE~ -PDE-PDE-~DE~P~E~Q~
,~~ PDE ~ ~ .~ ~ e~ ~~___ -----
~- -
_~~~~
-- . ~' i ~
J ~ ~
- ~-~L--
r t
)E / ~ ,~DE~
~ ~ ~- '~ 1
/' ~ .
_ /
~/
/ ~
_~~ i
--
~ - ~~ SiTE 3B
/ / / -,~•
/ / ._ ~ 8
P~ E E E E ` ~- _ ___G
E ~ /
~~ ~ ~ DE PDE-PDE-PDE-PDE-PDE-POE-PD E
----~ ~~POE . -~ ~ E~E~_E_~E~~~
_ ~ . -- ~ TFIOIJAS & DAMF7tON A
`, 'POE_-P0~ / ~ NANCY H.OA1EttON
,pOE. / ~ O
/ AT !~ TL'DT AL` TD A i~TCDADT A TTA'
~~~~ ~~ ~1J3.. ~~
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE ® DENOTF.3 FILL IN SURFACE WATERS

J I
AH~ER L. AW/ONS.
JEAHETTE F. AMAONS 8
JAMES A. LUCAS. JR.
O
lOm 0 2 m
~~~ SCALE
~~~
'I -
TORN OF MAKE FOREST O
i
` /P h
i*f_ ~
E /
`E~E E E E
I hi
/e
/ MARY BOLUS F~
~ /b
I I'
\ 1
.\ ~ \
/ /
// /
E_
~~~1 r ~~ ~~ i 1i"
~~~~
® DBNOTBS FILL LEI SURFACB WATERS
h f

PERMANENT ~~ ~
IMPACTS ~ ~ ,~ ~~ .,
J
0
~o
Op
FQ-
N
W
Z
J
~--

F. AIAIOKS~~
,~µES A. LlJCAS.
,E E_E E~ a~ /
~ ~~-_ O
N
--_
N
W
_Z~.1
.E E E E E U
a ~ etH+ ~ ~
~TM "~ ~' s
]f~]LAN ~IIE W
~I7C]E 5
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~0250~ Qt-28090)
/ uu~r soon ~ ~ .•- - - / 1~ ~
uT~ o~. e~ ma / ~ Jdf~ER ZEE 2 ~ ~ ,i'~ ~ '
Q ~~ `E E .~E J /E BUFFER ZONE I ~ 10N~ ~ /~ ~/
0
i' -
~~
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE
® DBNOTES FII.L IN
3URFACB WATBRS
® DBNOTE9 P[LL IN WBTLANDB
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
VISED 1/5/01

TEMPORARY
IMPACTS

~~
~~~
wnnm ro orr { o¢r- a ~,
~ soon ~ ~ ~df~ER ZONE 2 ~ ~ ,i'~~ ~ '
\ ~ - '~,,,
"- ~ i / BUFFER ZONE I _:~""" NE ~ / /2
i~_~ /
][~ILA1N
DSNOTSS TS)~ORARY
FII,L IN 3URFACS WATBR9
® DSNOTS9 'I'BB'II'ORARY
FII,L IN WSTLAND3

IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS BUFFER IMPACTS

Site
No.
Station

(From7To
Structure
Size
Fill In
Wetlands
ha
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
ha
Excavation
In Wetlands
ha Mechanized
Clearing
(Method 111)
ha
Fill In SW
(Natural)
ha
Fill In SW
(Pond)
ha
Temp. Fili
In SW
ha Existing
Channel
Impaled
m
Relocated
Channel
m
Enclosed
Channel
m
Zone
1
ha
Zone
2
ha
1 62+95 -L- RT N/A 0.0037
2
3A 66+40 -L-
74+46(74+73
Trib. Dunn Cr. 2 ~ 2.7m X 1.8m RCBC 0.0505
0.0030 110
30
27 110
0 0.185
0.021 0.114
0.017
3B 74+20176+20
Dunn Creek 2 2.7m X 2.4m RCBC 0.0673 172 62 78 0.313 0.159
4
5 84+60 -L-
85+20 -L- LT 2 2.4m X 2.4m RCBC
N/A
0 0224
0.045 0.0275
0.0041
0.0044 90
62
60 72 0.168
0.063 0.068
0.01

TOTALS: 0.0261 0.045 0 0 0.1524 0 0.0044 464 149 260 0.75 0.368
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1402504 (R-2809C)
SHEET ~~ OF ~ /Z Revised 01/05/2001

LEGEND
~iJLB WETLAND BOUNDARY
L
~~ WETLAND
~-~-4J L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
• DENOTES MECHANIZED
• • •• • • • CLEARING
SINGLE TREE
-~- -~- FLOW DIRECTION
TB
~- TOP OF BANK
---WE --- EDGE OF WATER
- ~ - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- ~ - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
---~- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG- -NATURAL GROUND
- -P~-- - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
---------- - WATER SURFACE
DISSIPATOR BASIN
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
W AgE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1~0250~ <R-2809C)
NC 98, WASE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ( ~ OF ~ 2 10 / 9 / 00

LIVE STAKES
BOULDER

COIR FIBER ROLLS
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
7~
WOODS LINE
^ DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
VANE
RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY

r
If~1E$®I~IEIE$~`"~' ®~I~TIEIE$~
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO. NAMES
ADDRESSES
CADY CONSTRUCTION CO
ELIZABETH H. HOLDING
THOMAS DAMERON
NANCY DAMERON
TOWN OF WAKE FOREST
MARY BOLUS HEIRS
ANDREW L. AMMONS
JEANETTE AMMONS
JAMES LUCAS, JR.
7020 SIX FORKS RD
RALEIGH NC 27615
12630 WAKE UNION CHURCH RD
WAKE FOREST NC 27588
414 SCOTLAND ST
RALEIGH, NC 27609
401 E. ELM ST
WAKE FOREST NC 27587
C/0 ELIZABETH B. NASSIF
115 E. ELM ST
WAKE FOREST NC 27587
7412 CHAPEL HILL RD
RALEIGH NC 27607

~ ~~
or,.
~ E .~5~ Scr
n ~° ~nM~.
~~ ~
~~ ~~@~~ n
"~ ~ r~tlz~ ur sy~,il ~~~.a
C TATS OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOb'ERNOR
August 7, 2001
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120 i'~ '
Raleigh, North Carolina 24615
Attention: Eric Alsmeyer
Regulatory Specialist
Dear Sir:
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Subject: Amendment to Individual Permit application for NC 98, Wake Forest Bypass from west
of SR 1923 (Thompson Mill Road) to east of SR 2053 (lodes Dairy Road), Wake
County, State Project No. 8.1402501, Federal Aid No. STP-98(1), TIP R-2809.
Reference: I) Individual Permit Application, dated March 23, 2001, COE Action ID. 199601836.
2) WRP Mitigation Commitment letter, dated May 23, 2001 to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
(cc. Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ)
Per our conversation, please find attached the amended permit drawings for Section C of the
abovementioned project. These drawings include an additional tributary to Dunn Creek at Site 6 east of
the proposed NC 98 crossing of Dunn Creek, as well as an additional wetland at Site 7 between Jones
Dairy Road (SR 2053) and existing NC 98. Additional impacts are 285 feet (87 meters) and 0.29 acres
(0.12 ha), respectively. This letter describes these additional sites and impacts resulting from construction
of the proposed project. It also serves to update previously unresolved protected species issues, as well as
the mitigation strategy for the proposed project.
In light of the above additions, as well as a May 16, 2001 request from the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) for design changes, the Let Date for R-2809 Section C has been extended from August
until November 2001.
Jurisdictional Status of Additional Wetland and Stream
The additional wetland in Section C was delineated on May 15, 2001 by NCDOT biologist
Elizabeth Lusk. USACE field representative Eric Alsmeyer conducted a field review of this wetland on
June 14, 2001. Stream classification of the additional Dunn Creek tributary was conducted on June 19,
2001 by NCDOT biologists Elizabeth Lusk and Hal Bain and verified by Mr. Alsmeyer. This
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC. US `RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

jurisdictional tributary requires mitigation, and is subject to the Neuse River Buffer Rules, appearing on
the soils map.
Impacts to Waters of the U.S.
The R-2809 project is in the Neuse River Basin, Hydrologic Unit 030020201, Richland Creek and
Smith Creek subbasins. With these two additional impact sites, there will be a total of 14 stream buffers
impacted (subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules), 12 jurisdictional streams impacted, and 6 wetland sites
impacted throughout the entire R-2809 project.
Impacts to jurisdictional areas within the entire project consist of approximately 1.07 acres (0.43
ha) of permanent fill in wetlands, 0.03 acres (0.01 ha) of excavation in wetlands, 0.69 acres (0.28 ha) of
fill in surface water (stream), and 3,461 feet (1,055 meters) of existing channel impacted. Buffer impacts
total 3.96 acre (1.60 ha) in Zone 1 and 2.59 ac (1.05 ha) in Zone 2. Onsite relocation of streams total 872
feet (266 meters), of which 384 feet (117 meters) will be naturalized allowing for onsite stream mitigation
at a 1:1 ratio. Table 1 summarizes revised total impacts for R-2809 by Section. As mentioned in the
original permit application, project design in Sections A and B are preliminary, therefore impacts may
vary slightly when designs are finalized.
Table 1. Total impacts to Waters of the U.S. for Sections A, B, and C of R-2809 (revised)
Existing Channel Impacts Buffer Impacts
Fill/Clear•ing Fill itt (~) (ac)
Section- in Wetlands Surface Naturalized

(ac) Waters
Impacts
Relocated
Zone 1 Zone 2
(ac} (Onsite Mitigation}
R-2809 A 0.01 0.01 62 0 0.21 0.25
R-2809 B 0.75 0.29 1,592 384 1.88 1.24
R-2809 C 0.34 0.39 1,807 0 1.87 1.10
Totals 1.10 0.69 3,461 384 3.96 2.59
Table 2 tabulates all impacts in Section C by impact and Waters of the U.S. type. Descriptions of
previously reviewed impact sites are detailed in the original permit application. The following
information details the two additional sites:
Site 6 -This unnamed tributary to Dunn Creek originates from a spring in the side of a steep slope
southeast of the alignment. The channel is deeply incised, varying between 1 foot and 8 feet deep.
Water depth is 6 to 10 inches and channel width at water surface is approximately 1 foot. Channel
substrate consists of silty sand and channel sinuosity is moderate. There is evidence that a small
floodplain is forming within the deepest sections of the channel via bank sloughing and siltation. In
order to maintain flow after the new NC 98 is constructed, a 750 reinforced concrete pipe will be
installed. Details are available on Sheet 11 of 14 in the attached permit drawings.
Site 7 -The wetland at this site is the result of several hillside seeps originating just east of Jones
Dairy Road. Hydric indicators include low chroma soils (lOYR 2/1 muck in the wettest portion)
drainage patterns, water within 12 inches of the ground surface, and hydrophytic vegetation. The
boundaries of the wetland are determined primarily by a steep topography. This area will be
contained within the fill slope for the proposed NC 98. Water will be directed into lateral ditches on
either side of the new NC 98. Details are depicted on Sheet 12 of 14 of the attached permit drawings.
2

Table 2. Impacts to Waters of the U.S. for Section C of R-2809 (revised)
Channel distances Buffer Area (ac)
Fitl in (feet) (Zone 1/Zone 2}
Fill i
n Surface Naturalized Streams Naturalized Buffers
Site Station Type Wetlands Waters Relocated Requiring Relocated Requiring
(ac) (ac) Impacts (On-site Offsite Impacts {On-site Offsite
Mitigation) Mitigation Mitigation) Mitigation

1 62+95 -L- Medium Quality
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
RT Wetland
2 66+40 -L- Spring Branch _ 0.12 361 0 361 0.46/0.28 0 0.46/0.28
2@9ftx6ftRCBC
UT Dunn Creek
3A 74+46 to Redirected via lateral - 0.01 99 0 99 0.05/0.04 0 0.05/0.04
74+73 -L- base ditch
3B 74+20 to Dunn Creek _ 0.17 564 0 564 0.77/0.39 0 0.77/0.39
76+20-L- 2@9ftx8ftRCBC
4 84+60-L- Smith Creek _ 0.07 295 0 295 0.41/0.17 0 0.41/0.17
, 2@9ftx8ftRCBC
Medium Quality
Wetland and
5 85+20 -L LT UT Smith Creek 0.05 0.01 203 0 203 0.16/0.03 0 0.16/0.03
Redirected via lateral
base ditch
6 77+80 -L- UT Dunn Creek _ 0.01 285 0 285 0.31 /0.19 0 0.31 /0.19
750 RCP

7 82+70 to Medium Quality
0.29
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
83+80 -L- Wetland
Totals* 0.34 0.39 1,807 0 1,807 1.87/1.10 0 1.87/1.10
*Note: Rounding differences may cause totals to diner slightty.

Endangered Species
In the original permit application a Biological Conclusion of Unresolved was given for Michaux'
sumac (Rhus michauxii) pending a plant by plant survey. Section C of the subject project was surveyed
on June 22, 2001 by NCDOT biologists Logan Williams and Elizabeth Lusk. No plants were found,
resulting in a Biological Conclusion of No Effect.
Compensation Required
The NCDOT concurs with DWQ's requirement of l:l onsite mitigation and 2:1 offsite mitigation
ratios for stream impacts. Wetland mitigation will be conducted at the 2:1 ratio required by the USACE.
Compensatory mitigation will be required for 3,461 of permanent stream impacts and 1.1 acres of non-
riverine wetland impacts throughout Sections A, B, and C of the proposed project. The following
summarizes total impacts by type within each Section of the project and mitigation required.
Sections A and B:
Impact summaries for these two Sections are detailed in the original permit application.
Section C:
Compensatory mitigation will be required for Section C impacts to Waters of the US. With the
addition of the aforementioned impacts, the NCDOT anticipates the following total impacts:
Stream impacts in Section C total 1,807 feet. At the required 2:1 ratio, offsite stream mitigation
required for the proposed project totals 3,614 feet.
Stream buffer impacts in Section C total 1.87 acres in Zone 1 and 1.10 acres in Zone 2. At the
required 3:1 ratio for Zone 1 impacts and 1.5:1 for Zone 2 impacts, offsite buffer mitigation required
for the proposed project totals 7.3 acres.
Wetland impacts in Section C total 0.34 acres. At the required 2:1 ratio, offsite wetland mitigation
required totals 0.7 acres.
Mitigation
On-site Miti a~ tion
As proposed in the original permit application, 384 feet of on-site stream mitigation will be
conducted in Section B at Site 1. The potential for onsite buffer mitigation at this Site will be investigated
further as design plans are finalized.
Off-site Miti ag tion
For all three Sections, a total of 3,077 feet of stream loss impacts, 1.1 acres of non-riverine
wetland impacts, and 3.96/2.59 acres of Zonel/Zone2 buffer impacts will require off-site compensatory
mitigation. At the required mitigation ratio of 2:1, offsite stream and wetland mitigation required totals
6,154 feet and 2.2 acres, respectively. At the 3:1/1.5:1 ratio for Buffer Zone 1/Zone 2, buffer mitigation
required totals 11.88 acres for Zone 1 and 3.89 acres for Zone 2.
In a May 23, 2001 letter from Mr. Ron Ferrell, WRP Program Manager, the WRP committed to
providing the NCDOT mitigation for 0.12 acres of wetland impacts, 3,721 feet of stream impacts, and
5.11 acres and 3.06 acres of Zone 1 and 2 buffer impacts. The NCDOT proposes to revise the WRP
request to include the additional impacts not covered by the May 23, 2001 commitment letter. NCDOT
4

proposes to pay WRP $8,160 for non-riverine wetland impacts (at $12,000 per acre of wetland mitigation
required at a 2:1 ratio), $451,750 for stream impacts (at $125 per foot of stream mitigation requirements
at a 2:1 ratio), and $302,198 for stream buffer impacts (at $41,625 per acre of stream buffer mitigation
required) for compensatory mitigation in Section C before construction begins.
SUMMARY
Amendment is hereby made to the original application for a Department of the Army Section 404
Individual Permit as required for the above-described activities for the proposed TIP project R-2809,
Sections A, B, and C. The NCDOT understands that permit modifications will be required when designs
are finalized for Sections A and B. We anticipate an Individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification
will apply to this project, and are providing seven copies of the application to the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. In addition, in compliance
with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the North Carolina Administrative Action (NCAA) a check for $475.00
was enclosed with the original application package to act as payment for processing the Section 401
Certification application.
Construction of Sections A, B, and C of the proposed TIP Project No.R-2809 will result in 1.07
acres of permanent fill in wetlands, 0.03 acres of excavation in wetlands, 0.69 acres of fill in surface
water (stream), 3,461 feet of existing channel impacted, and 872 feet of relocated channel. On-site
mitigation will be implemented through a 384-foot naturalized segment of relocated channel. The
remaining 3,077 feet of stream impacts will be mitigated for via the WRP program. Payment will be
made by the NCDOT at the current rate for stream and buffer impacts in Section C before construction
begins. For final stream and buffer impacts in Sections A and B, payment will be made at the new rate
established by the renewed MOU and mitigation plans will be approved before construction begins in
these Sections.
Thank you for you assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need any additional
information about this project, please contact Elizabeth L. Lusk at [phone], extension 335.
Sincerely,
1/ ~ ~~
William Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
WG/ell
Attachments
cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ (7 copies)
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Kathy Matthews, EPA
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Mr. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Design Services
Mr. D.R. Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Tim Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. J.G. Nance, P.E., Division 5 Engineer
Mr. Ron Ferrell, WRP DOT Coordinator

ems" '
0~'
,,
I wE
11` //
~i L)
A
__ =1~
.- -- _.
\Fore~tvi`le
f \ 1 -/
~,~
c~9~.., s
c,~ h
!h !~~ 3

--~-~~
~~5~
-.
~ ~ ~ ~~~5
r1G 9a SEOI ~`~
I `P0.pYG /dF
-L i
-- / \~
BE - RO'~ ECT !~
R-28 9C~~
\~
.\
~ ~L
I \
r `8~''
/ ,-'~ END PR /
~ ,~' R-2~ /
~ ` I
i !~ v - - ~
~l ~~_C
X053 `si ~~;.
2.oa 1
11.
.1
,l
Austin _.----_ ~
2054
~(~~~ _;
~~- ~ ~ - -
~~~~~~~~
~f~~~
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~(0250~ QZ-2809C)
NC 98, WAKE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET OF ~~' REVISED 7/ 11 / Ol

ITE 2
SITE 1

N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1Le 1~ 11 ~ ~ ~ I PROJECTA81 0250~QZ-2809C)
NC 98, WAGE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ OF ~4 REVISED 7/ 11/ Ol
BEGIN F.A. PROJECT STP-98(D
BEGIN CONST.

a
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
I PROJF,CT:81~0250~TQt-28090)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET 3' OF iy REVISED 7/ll/

LEGEND
-4~L6~ WETLAND BOUNDARY
L
~~ WETLAND
~-~4JL
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
®DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
• • • • DENOTES MECHANIZED
• • •• • • • CLEARING
• ~•- FLOW DIRECTION
Tom- TOP OF BANK
---WE --- EDGE OF WATER
- ~ - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- ~ - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
--~-- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG- -NATURAL GROUND
- -P~- - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
--------- -- WATER SURFACE
LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
--- COIR FIBER ROLLS
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
]~
f-..y
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
^ DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
VANE
RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1402504 (R~2809C)
NC 98, WAGE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET 9' OF ~9' REVISED 7/llI

,~ / ~~1
utau~ ns e~ ara I
car oa+s~raucnoN co.
s~ sw~cooo s
~o.uu--\ I caarr~ ~~ws. uc
DE~ PDE-pDE-pD
I
I
E
DE-PDE
-_ F~
neo ass ~- - m w E E
i ~niao e - ~ ~ -
E
--_
.
~sr~na~
J I
~
~
n

t
N r
Z
m
~ D
W ~ 0`
J
=
P
O
~" ..J~ I
r
-f---

PDE`P _P
-PDE-PDE-P E-PDE-PDE-PD
.._..
uteu~ ac. e~ ara
.iause~
lOm 0 2 m
~ SCALE
t~5000 11L~TT ~s 0~. iq. K1+Oz
f7000 (/5~,8D7
F3.RABETH K HOIDNG
® DENOTES FILL IN WBTLANDS
]~]L~N ~VI~~V
~I7C]E ~

\- ` ~ ~ \ ~g I THOMAS 8. DAIERON • I I 120' TOIIN OF SAKE FOREST
' ~, ~ A ~ ~`\ ~,i I ~ NMICY FL DAIERON i I I ~~ ~~i O
I ~ ~ ,, ~ i I TOE rnorFrnw
~ \ 1 ~
\ \ \ ~ ~ ~ cua ~ aswr ~E
NCOOT STD. M0. Kt.02
~ ~ ~_
_ ~
\ ~~°°~
1 ~` ~ ~ ~i
~_ ~
,~
\ 2 ~ LTA x t2~ KaC
--- -f- _
~~ ~_ _
_ E E E--E~~_ E__ -~~
~ E~-E~_E- E--~E ~
~ \
-----r=
\ ~
\ ~
~' _
~ ~~~~~
O ~ \\ \\
\ O
I~IL~1N ~~]EV~
~~~~
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE
\ \
~ ~
rHOUAS s.oA1ERON s ~
NANCY H. DA1EItON
~,
W
<t/
\ ~ `- a,~s ~ mur
rmoT sTatn.~aa¢
~~ ~~
® DENCYPE9 FII.L IN SURFACE WATERS
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~(0250~ Qt-28090)
NC 98, WAGE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~D OF ~4' REVISED 7 / 18 / Ol

wE
~ E
~ ~
THOMAS B. DAIETiON A
NANCY K DAIEItON
ROOTrIAC
TOE PROTECTION
crass a ~rlur 1 \~ ~ ~ reu
~E Kxor sra wu ~w„a¢ \ r~
~~~. I

r
~ O
/
/
/ / /
--
---
pOE~o
,o~~\ I Ei OE'PO
_p0 ~

_ ~ _--- -='P~
a~ ~ oral ~ ~~
~ ~pOE~ -PDE-PDE-~DE~P6E--i~~
_POE~ POEM ~ - ~ ~ ~ slr~~r -_ -----
-- -~~ -
/ ~ _~~~~
/ i--- ~m ~' \ \
~--~'G - -
/ - T J- -- - -_ - -
/ / m
~ r R00T11ADS
E-PDE ~.'BE~ DFr~PDE~
/ ,a
--'~ 1
r' a
_ /
~/
i
~/

DE ~P E-PDE-PDE-PD PDE-PDE-PDE-E E E E E~E~ .~ _ _ -C~ ~ ~ -
~E~POE _ ~' E~e~E~~E~E~
~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ sto.Ia~iaot THOMAS B. DAItEERROl1 a
NANCY H. DAIEItON
TOE PROTECTION
~ I~]L~N ~I]E~
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE
O
® DENOTES TEB~ORARY
FII.L IN 9URFACE WATERS
® DENOTE3 FII.L IId SURFACE WATERS
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WASE COUNTY
PROJECT':8.1~0250~ (R-28090)
NC 98, WASE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET 7 OF ~~' REVISED 7 / 18 /

TOE PROTECTION-~ `~
~s a R>~ ~
-xooT sTO. Ia. eceoz
At~ORER L ALUOItS,
JEANETTE F. ALYONS JA
.TALES A+ LUCAS..R.
O
i
/~ /~
/ /
IOm 0 2 m
SCALE ® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
TORN OF RA!(E FOREST O
CLASS 'I' RPRAP ~ ~
/Q ~/
E ~
`E`f ~E / E E E E~
I h~
/e
/ VARY BOL1lS HERS
m l ~---TOE PROTECTION
]~]LALN ~IIE~
~~~~
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT:81~(0250~1 Qt-2809C)
NC 98, WAKE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ OF fig' REVISED 7 / 18 / Ol

PERMANENT ~
IMPACTS ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~"
Boutt ~ / ~ ,~ - - / Ij I
rroE ~orECno-r ~ ~ r~ , ~ ~~ER ZEE 2 ~ ~ ,~'•" f '
~ ~,,"
Q ~~ E ~ J ~ BUFFER ZONE I ~"'"~ E \ ~ /~,
-E -.-,LEE ~ ~ ~ ' E"" °"~~ /~ ti~
J
0
~o
ao

W
Z
J
U
H
2~
E ~ . ~ ~' -ems
Jii -- ~~
_ _ _ / --- -
i ~~~ ~ ~ ~
i ~
~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ . __ ~
i
X11 L A11~~
,~IETTE F. AWOKS k
JA1E5 A. ~-~'S''~'
_ - E ESE E--~ Q\ i
~ ~
-'---- o
(V
.}
~O
OD
FQ-
h
W
._- Z
J
-E E E E E V
a~£ -~ eu~+ a sr
~un+ ~ ~ 2
][~ILA~N ~I]E~
ass •i• r~~a
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE
TIE 5
® DBNOTB3 FII,L IN
9URFACB WATBRS
® DBNOTES FILL IN WBTLANDS
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIQHWAYS
WASE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.10250.1 (R-2809C)
NC 98, WAS.E FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US 1A
TO EAST OF SR 2053
OF ~~ REVISED 7/18/01

TEMPORARY
IMPACTS
~~
CLASS B RPRAP /
NCOOT STD. 868
~ TEtrr, goo cSP
1 ~e 1 ~ _~E~
.E .
= E~
---~7`~
J
1 ,
/_ ~ t~
Q
1~
T
00
H
N
W
_Z
J
V
QS"'

TEAPORARY LATERAL O.6m BASE DITCH
STA. I+25 fDAYLK~IT) TO 13*2T { DET- LT
~ ~~ER ZONE 2 ~ ~ ,~',~ ~ I
_E E~- ~ BUFFER ZONE I ~:;~"' NE \~ ti~
" ~ /~~~
~ ~
r ~ ~
// ~ --
/ ~ ~`
/ / T
` P/L~
~~~ ~~ ~~
~~- _--~ I
-- . O
N
'~
~O
~~ ~
~~~
~ ~~
-_
cLASS -r RPRAP
/ --- N
W
Z
J
.~ ~ E_.--E E E E E V
~E ctAr+~E H. BUtl1 ~ F-
RUTH H. BLltl
Q
1~]LA~N ~VIIE W
~~~~
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
/ PROJECT:81~0250~ (R-28090)
/Om D / n$rro~$s ~1'~O~Y NC 98, WASE FOREST BYPASS
2 m FII.L >ar 9vRFAC$ WATERS FROM WEST OF US lA
SCALE ® DENOTES TSbIPORARY TO EAST OF SR 2053
FII.L IN WETLANDS
SHEET JO OF J4 REVISED 7/18/01
~M L AWO~S.
,~TT£ F. ANIONS ~
JAIES A. UICAS• ~
--F- =E F
_E~E

. i.,w
s%«aoa~
~ ~'
TAL RIGI
TNOws e. DAlE3tON a ~'
NANCY H. DAlAERON ~ pE
~~REEICTO~~__ rr
\ ~ ~~t
~~ y~~l ,
' ~ ~~~
n~ d s

\
F` ~ \ .lEAlETTE F. AWOflS A
'~~
~\ JAIES A. UlCAS. JL

-~E-~_E_
~~
E'_~E--
~~`~--- -_ E E

_ I
~

O
mot'
~
. RfM CO
V
V
-F I I
O
_--~ ar / /
.~ _ _
E PD ~ _
E

-~- l5'9 ~pr7 0
~P \ d DITCN
~
\
~~~g g p
NCDOT STDp868.02 \
\ ~ 1 c I
TNOw-s a
DA1E7tON e ~ ~ ~ -~
1 a
.
NANCY K uAIERON
~ ' ~ ~ g
~
m
TOE PROTECTION N
~ ~
N - - ro
TRBUTARY TO DUNN CREEK
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE ® DENOTES FII.L IN SURFACE WATERS
~I,~N ~VI~W
~I~]E ~
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WASE COUNTY
PROJECT:81~0250~ (R-28090)
NC 98, WASE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ ~ OF ~~{' REVISED 7/11/01

~~T~~ ~ ~ ,R.~ ~r
i
J

~]LA1N ~YIEW
~I7C]E ~
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~0250~ (R-2809C)
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE
® DENOTES PII.L IN WETi.ANDB
NC 98, WAGE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
:ET ~ /2 OF ~~' REVISED 7 / ll / Ol

IMPACT SUMMARY
WET LAND IMPACTS SU

Mechanized RFACE WATER IMP ACTS BUFFER IMPACTS

Site
No.

1
Station

From/To
62+95 -L- RT
Structure
Size

N/A
Fill In
Wetlands
ha
0.0037
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
ha
Excavation
In Wetlands
ha
Clearing
(Method III)
ha
Fill In SW
(Natural)
ha
Fill In SW
(Pond)
ha
Temp. Fill
In SW
ha Existing
Channel
Impacted
m
Relocated
Channel
m
Enclosed
Channel
m
Zone
1
ha
Zone
2
ha
2 66+40 -L- 2 2.7m X 1.8m RCBC 0
050

3A
74+46/74+73 .
5
0 110 110 0.185 0.114

Trib. Dunn Cr. .0030 30 27 0 0.050 0.017
3B 74+20/76+20 2 2.7rn X 2.4m RCBC 0
0673

Dunn Creek . 0.0057 172 62 78 0.235 0.159
4 84+60 -L- 2 2.4m X 2.4m RCBC 0
0

5
85+20 -L- LT
N/A
0
0161
0
0508 .
275 90 65 0.130 0.068

6
77+80 -L•
750 RCP . . 0.0037
0
0 0.0047 62 60 0.030 0.010

7
82+70/83+80 L
900 RCP
0.1164 .
054 87 71 0.124 0.076

TOTALS: 0.1362 0.0508 0 0 0.1574 0 0.0104 551 149 324 0.754 0.444
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1402504 (R-2809C)
ET ~ 3 OF ~ 4 Revised 7/18/2001

~~®~~~~~ ®wN~~~
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO.
NAMES ADDRESSES
CADY CONSTRUCTION CO 7020 SIX FORKS RD
RALEIGH NC 27615
ELIZABETH H. HOLDING 12630 WAKE UNION CHURCH RD
WAKE FOREST NC 27588
THOMAS DAMERON 414 SCOTLAND ST
NANCY DAMERON RALEIGH, NC 27609
TOWN OF WAKE FOREST 401 E. ELM ST
WAKE FOREST NC 27587
MARY BOLUS HEIRS C/0 ELIZABETH B. NASSIF
115 E. ELM ST
WAKE FOREST NC 27587
ANDREW L. AMMONS 7412 CHAPEL HILL RD
JEANETTE AMMONS RALEIGH NC 27607
JAMES LUCAS, JR.
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIQHWAYS
WAGE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~02501 Qt-28090)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2453
SHEET ~ 9' OF ~ y- REVISED 7 / ll / Ol

o~~~ w A r~qp~
~_ ~
4 ~
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
REVISED
May 23, 2001
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Subject: Wetland, Stream and Buffer Mitigation NC 98, Wake Forest Bypass
from west of SR 1923 (Thompson Mill Road) to east of SR 2053
(Jones Dairy Road), State Project No. 8.1402501, Federal Aid No.
STP-98(1), TIP R-2809
Wake County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina
Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is willing to accept payment from the
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) for wetland, stream and
buffer impacts associated with the subject project in accordance with the
Memorandum of Understanding between the NCWRP and the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers. Based on information supplied by the NCDOT in a letter dated
February 2, 2001 the estimated impacts associated with this project are 3,721
linear feet of streams, 0.12 acres of non-riparian wetlands and 8.17 acres of
riparian buffer.
R-2809 Stream and Buffer Impacts
Wetland impacts Stream Impacts Buffer Impacts (ac)
Site No.
requiring offsite
miti ation (ac) requiring offsite
mitigation (ft)
Zone 1
Zone' 2
Section A 62 0.21 0.24
Section B 2 138 3.05 1.91
Section C 0.12 1 521 1.85 0.91
Total 0.12 3 721 5.11 3.06
Note: Stream impacts for Sections A and B are based upon preliminazy drawings and may
decrease as the final permit drawings aze prepazed.
The NCWRP will utilize the local watershed planning process to develop a
comprehensive compensatory mitigation package for R-2809. The Local
Watershed Plan for the Upper Neuse River Basin (the upper portion of
Cataloging Unit 03020201) was initiated during 2000 in conjunction with the
.+~-~11
~VCDENti
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 1619 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Wetlands Restoration Prcgram [phone] Fax: [phone]
1 800 623-7748

Upper Neuse River Basin Association (UNRBA). Utilizing a stakeholder
process consisting of representatives of all local governments within the Upper Neuse,
the UNRBA has identified the protection of the eight water supply watersheds within
the Upper Neuse as the highest priority. Specifically the UNRBA has identified the
water quality of Lake Michie, Lake Butner and Lake Rodgers as the highest concern
due to violations of the Cholorphyll A water quality standard.
The NCWRP will focus the search for stream restoration opportunities within
the immediate watersheds of water supply watersheds within the Upper Neuse. The
search will be conducted primarily within the following 14 digit hydrologic units:
03020201010010,03020201010020,03020201010030,03020201010040,
03020201010050,03020201040010, 03020201060010,and 03020201050010. The
search will identify a comprehensive package of projects that will include stream and
buffer restoration projects as well as other strategies to reduce nutrient loading and
sedimentation in these water supply reservoirs. A comprehensive package of potential
projects will be developed and submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACOE) for review and approval. The NCWRP will implement those projects that
have been determined by the USACOE to meet the compensatory mitigation
requirements of R-2809. The following table outlines the time line for the
identification and implementation of projects.
Schedule
Draft Upper Neuse River Water Quality Management Plan 7/01
Identification of Projects 7/01- 6/02
Submission of Projects to USACOE 7/02
Approval of Projects by USACOE 8/02
Site Acquisition and Design 9/02 - 8/03
Implementation of projects 1/03 - 8/04
Although the local watershed planning process will be utilized to the maximum
extent practical for all impacts associated with R-2809 the NCWRP will implement the
compensatory mitigation for Section C in accordance with the requirements of the
Memorandum of Understanding. Projects to compensate for the impacts associated
with Section C will be instituted within 12 months of receipt of payment by NCDOT.
Compensatory mitigation for the remaining sections of R-2809 will be identified and
implemented in accordance with the above schedule.
If you have any questions or need additional information I can be reached at
919-733-5219.
Sincerely,
onald E. Ferrell
Program Manager
cc: John Hennessy
Elizabeth L. Lusk, NCDOT

~/
l~ ~
~,
/^ ~ . ' ~~
/^ ~r `
v~
~t
CJ ~`~'
~~-
C
,,\~~
~~l
~~
~~
n .+=~6
~Q a;,M~„os
d lOss~

~ ~ o ~s r~ e'#' ~ ~'~^'"
~,,,~~ ; ~- ~i tt
LYNDO TIPPETT F ~ ~~~
SECRETARY / h~TV
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 24615
Attention: Eric Alsmeyer
Regulatory Specialist
Dear Sir:
October 3, 2001
~~ ~~w
On
>7
Subject: Amendment to Individual Permit application for NC 98, Wake Forest Bypass from west
of SR 1923 (Thompson Mill Road) to east of SR 2053 (Jones Dairy Road), Wake
County, State Project No. 8.1402501, Federal Aid No. STP-98(1), TIP R-2809.
Reference: 1) Individual Permit Application, dated March 23, 2001, COE Action ID. 199601836.
2) DWQ Request for design clarification, dated May 16, 2001
3) WRP Mitigation Commitment letter, dated May 23, 2001 to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
(cc. Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ)
Per our conversation, please find attached the amended permit drawings for Sections B and C of
the abovementioned project. Revised Section B drawings and summary sheet exclude 206 feet of stream
impacts at Site 4 which were mistakenly calculated as jurisdictional. Revised Section C drawings include
an additional tributary to Dunn Creek at Site 6 east of the proposed NC 98 crossing of Dunn Creek, as
well as an additional wetland/stream complex at Site 7 between Jones Dairy Road (SR 2053) and existing
NC 98. Additional wetland, stream, and buffer impacts are 0.28 acres (0.11 ha), 738 feet (225 meters),
and 0.5 acres (0.2 ha), respectively. These revised Section C drawings also address questions from DWQ
in their May 23, 2001 correspondence (see attached correspondence with comments noted directly
thereon).
This letter describes these amendments and impacts resulting from construction of the proposed
project. It also serves to update previously unresolved protected species issues, as well as the mitigation
strategy for the proposed project. This correspondence replaces the previous amendment submitted on
July 30, 2001. In light of the above additions, the Let Date for R-2809 Section C has been extended from
August until December 2001.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
154$MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC. US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

Jurisdictional Status
Section A
Descriptions in the original permit application are still valid.
Section B
During the November 9, 2000 verification, USACE field representative Eric Alsmeyer verified that the
Richland Creek UT at Site 4 is non jurisdictional. However, permit drawings for Section B (dated
February 8, 2001), which were submitted with the original permit application, included stream impacts
for this stream. Confusion may have resulted from the fact that this UT is not a jurisdictional stream, but
is subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules.
Section C
The additional wetland in Section C was delineated on May 15, 2001 by NCDOT biologist Elizabeth
Lusk. Mr. Alsmeyer conducted a field review of this wetland on June 14, 2001. Stream classifications of
the Smith Creek UT originating in this wetland, as well as the additional Dunn Creek UT were conducted
on June 19, 2001 by NCDOT biologists Elizabeth Lusk and Hal Bain and verified by Mr. Alsmeyer.
Although these tributaries are jurisdictional, they do not require mitigation. The Dunn Creek UT is also
subject to the Neuse River Buffer Rules, since it appears on the Wake County soil survey. However,
because the Smith Creek UT does not appear on either the soil survey or the topographic quadrangle map,
it is not subject to the Buffer Rules.
Impacts to Waters of the U.S.
The R-2809 project is in the Neuse River Basin, Hydrologic Unit 030020201, Richland Creek and
Smith Creek subbasins. With these two additional impact sites, there will be a total of 6 wetland sites, 12
jurisdictional streams, and 14 stream buffers (subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules) impacted throughout the
entire R-2809 project.
Impacts to jurisdictional areas (all not requiring mitigation) within the entire project consist of
approximately 1.06 acres (0.43 ha) of permanent fill in wetlands, 0.03 acres (0.01 ha) of excavation in
wetlands, 0.70 acres (0.28 ha) of fill in surface water (stream), and 3,708 feet (1,130 meters) of existing
channel impacted. Buffer impacts total 3.96 acre (1.60 ha) in Zone 1 and 2'..59 ac (1.05 ha) in Zone 2.
Onsite_ relocation of streams total 872 feet (266 meters), of which 384 feet (117 meters) will be
naturalized allowing for onsite stream mitigation at a I:1 ratio. Table 1 summarizes revised total impacts
for R-2809 by Section. As mentioned in the original permit application, project design in Sections A and
B are preliminary, therefore impacts may vary slightly when designs are finalized.
Table 1. Total impacts to Waters of the U.S. for Sections A, B, and C of R-2809 (2"d revision)
Fill in Existing Channel Impacts Buffer Impacts
FiWClearing Surface (ft) (ac)
Section in Wetlands Waters Naturalized
(ac) (ac) Impacts Relocated Zone l Zone 2
(Unsite Mitigation)
R-2809 A 0.01 0.01 62 0 0.21 0.25
R-2809 B 0.75 0.28 1,386

R-2809 C 0.33 0.41 2,260 384 1.88 1.25
~.
0 -~~ -}~~0
Totals 1.09 0.70 3,708 384 3.96,
:..~-
r,~~,;
2 .:
..
~
r,; ~
.~~ ~ .. ~ . , .
,_ ___ _ ,
4 ,t'~~/' ,,,~j ~

Table 2 tabulates all impacts in Section C by impact and Waters of the U.S. type. Descriptions of
previously reviewed impact sites are detailed in the original permit application. The following
information details the two additional sites: ~ [~, ~~.~
• Site 6
This intermittent unnamed tributary to Dunn Creek originates from a spring in the side of a steep
slope southeast of the alignment. The channel is deeply incised, varying between 1 foot and 8 feet
deep. Water depth is 6 to 10 inches and channel width at water surface is approximately 1 foot.
Channel substrate consists of silty sand and channel sinuosity is moderate. There is evidence that a
small floodplain is forming within the deepest sections of the channel via bank sloughing and
siltation. In order to maintain flow after the new NC 98 is constructed, a 750 reinforced concrete pipe
will be installed. Details are available on Sheet 11 of 15 in the attached permit drawings.
Site 7
The wetland at this site is the result of several hillside seeps originating just east of Jones Dairy
Road. Hydric indicators include low chroma soils (IOYR 2/1 muck in the wettest portion) drainage
patterns, water within 12 inches of the ground surface, and hydrophytic vegetation. The boundaries
of the wetland are determined primarily by steep topography. This area will be contained within the
fill slope for the proposed NC 98. Water will be directed into lateral ditches on either side of the new
NC 98. Details are depicted on Sheet 12 of I S of the attached permit drawings.
A small intermittent UT to Smiths Creek originates and forms in the wetland at Site 7. Within the
majority of the wetland the stream is very unorganized with difficult to define channels. The poorly
defined channels anastomose into one defined channel near the southeastern corner of the wetland
and flow southeasterly into Smiths Creek. This UT is similar to the UT at Site 6, except not as deeply
incised. There is ample vegetation (rush and jewelweed) within the channel. Bed substrate is mucky
sand. During the site visit, flow was moderate to slow.
Per DWQ's inquiry, additional water quality information for Site 4 in Section C is as follows:
Where the new NC 98 intersects with Smith Creek, the creek will be enclosed within 2 RCBCs.
According to NCDENR's Basinwide Information Management System (last updated September 20,
2001), this section of Smith Creek [27-23-(2)] has a DEM Rating of C NSW from the dam at the
reservoir south to the Neuse River. North from the dam to the Franklin-Wake County line, the DEM
rating for Smith Creek is WS-II HQW NSW CA.
Endangered Species
In the original permit application a Biological Conclusion of Unresolved was given for Michaux'
sumac (Rhus michauxii) pending a plant by plant survey. NCDOT biologists Logan Williams and
Elizabeth Lusk surveyed Sections C and B of the subject project on June 22, 2001 and August 9, 2001,
respectively. No plants were found, resulting in a Biological Conclusion of No Effect for Sections B
and C. Section A should be surveyed no sooner than 2006 because of the 2008 Let Date.
3

Table 2. Impacts to Waters of the U.S. for Section C of R-2809 (2"d revision)
Channel distances Buffer Area (ac) ~
Fill in (feet) (Zone 1/Zone 2)
Fifl i
n Surface Naturalized Streams Naturalized 'Buffers
Site.: .. Station Type Wetlands Waters Relocated Requiring Relocated Requiring ,
(ac) (ac) Impacts (On-site Offsite Impacts. (On-site Offsite
Mitigation) Mitigation Mitigation) Mitigation

1 62+95 -L- Medium Quality
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
RT Wetland
2 66+40 -L- Spring Branch _ 0.12 361 0 361 0.46/0.28 0 0.46/0.28
2@9ftx6ftRCBC
UT Dunn Creek
3A 74+46 to Redirected via lateral - 0.01 99 0 99 0.12/0.04 0 0.05/0.04
74+73 -L base ditch
3B 74+20 to Dunn Creek _ 0.17 564 0 564 0.58/0.39 0 0.77/0.39
76+20-L- 2@9ftx8ftRCBC
4 84+60 -L- Smith Creek _ 0.07 295 0 295 0.32/0.17 0 0.41/0.17
2@9ftx8ftRCBC
Medium Quality
Wetland and
5 85+20 -L LT UT Smith Creek 0.04 0.01 203 0 203 0.07/0.02 0 0.16/0.03
Redirected via lateral
base ditch
6 77+80 -L- UT Dunn Creek _ 0.01 285 0 0 0.31/0.19 0 0.31/0.19
750 RCP
Medium Quality
7 82+70 to Wetland and 0.28 0.02 453 0 0 -- -- --
83+80 -L- UT Smiths Creek
900 RCP
Totals* 0.33 0.41 2,260 0 1,522 1.87/1.10 0 2.16/1.10
*Note: Kounding ditterences may cause totals to diner slightly.

Compensation Required
The NCDOT concurs with DWQ's requirement of 1:1 onsite mitigation and 2:1 offsite mitigation
ratios for stream impacts. Wetland mitigation will be conducted at the 2:1 ratio required by the USACE.
In Sections A, B, and C, compensatory mitigation will be required for 2,970 of permanent stream impacts,
1. I acres of non-riverine wetland impacts, and buffer impacts of 3.96 acre (1.60 ha) in Zone 1 and 2.60 ac
(1.05 ha) in Zone 2. The following summarizes total impacts by type within each Section of the project
and mitigation required.
Sections A:
Impact summaries for these Section A are detailed in the original permit application.
Section B:
Compensatory mitigation will be required for Section B impacts to Waters of the US. With the
exclusion of the aforementioned stream impacts, the NCDOT anticipates total impacts to be as follows:
• Wetland impacts total 0.75 acres. At the required 2:1 ratio, offsite wetland mitigation required totals
1.5 acres.
• Stream impacts total 1,386 feet. Onsite mitigation totals 384 feet. At the required 2:1 offsite stream
mitigation required totals 2,004 feet.
• Stream buffer impacts total 1.88 acres in Zone 1 and 1.25 acres in Zone 2. At the required 3:1 ratio for
Zone 1 impacts and 1.5:1 ~or Zone 2 impacts, .offsite buffer mitigation required for the proposed
project totals 7.5 acres.
~.,
,,
Section C:
Compensatory mitigation will be required for Section C impacts to Waters of the US. With the
addition of the aforementioned impacts, the NCDOT anticipates total impacts requiring mitigation to be
as follows:
Wetland impacts total 0.33 acres. At the required 2:1 ratio, offsite wetland mitigation required totals
0.7 acres.
Stream impacts total 1,522 feet. At the required 2:1 ratio, offsite stream mitigation required for the
proposed project totals 3,044 feet.
Stream buffer impacts total 1.87 acres in Zone 1 and 1.10 acres in Zone 2. At the required 3:1 ratio
for Zone 1 impacts and 1.5:1 for Zone 2 impacts, offsite buffer mitigation required for the proposed
project totals 7.3 acres.
Mitigation
On-site Mitigation
As proposed in the original permit application, 384 feet of on-site stream mitigation will be
conducted in Section B at Site 1. The potential for onsite buffer mitigation at this Site will be investigated
further as design plans are finalized.
Off-site Miti ag tion
For all three Sections, a total of 1.1 acres of non-riverine wetland impacts, 2,586 feet of stream
loss impacts, and 3.96/2.59 acres of Zonel/Zone2 buffer impacts will require off-site compensatory
mitigation. At the required mitigation ratio of 2:1, offsite wetland and stream mitigation required totals
2.2 acres and 5,172 feet, respectively. At the 3:1/1.5:1 ratio for Buffer Zone 1/Zone 2, buffer mitigation
required totals 11.9 acres for Zone 1 and 3.9 acres for Zone 2.
6

In a May 23, 2001 letter from Mr. Ron Ferrell, WRP Program Manager, the WRP committed to
providing the NCDOT mitigation for 0.12 acres of wetland impacts (Section C only), 3,721 feet of stream
impacts, and 5.11 acres and 3.06 acres of Zone 1 and 2 buffer impacts. On August 7, 2001, the NCDOT
submitted a revised request to WRP to include the additional wetland impacts not covered by the May 23,
2001 commitment letter. NCDOT proposes to pay WRP the following for compensatory mitigation in
Section C before construction begins:
• $8,400 for non-riverine wetland impacts (at $12,000 per acre of wetland mitigation required at a 2:1
ratio),
• $380,500 for stream impacts (at $125 per foot of stream mitigation requirements at a 2:1 ratio), and
• $303,863 for stream buffer impacts (at $41,625 per acre of stream buffer mitigation required) for.
SUMMARY
Amendment is hereby made to the original application for a Department of the Army Section 404
Individual Permit as required for the above-described activities for the proposed TIP project R-2809,
Sections A, B, and C. The NCDOT understands that permit modiftcations will be required when designs
are finalized for Sections A and B. We anticipate an Individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification
will apply to this project, and are providing seven copies of the application to the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. In addition, in compliance
with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the North Carolina Administrative Action (NCAA) a check for $475.00
was enclosed with the original application package to act as payment for processing the Section 401
Certification application.
Construction of Sections A, B, and C of the proposed TIP Project No.R-2809 will result in 1.06
acres of permanent fill in wetlands, 0.03 acres of excavation in wetlands, 0.70 acres of fill in surface
water (stream), 3,708 feet of existing channel impacted (2,970 feet requiring mitigation), and 872 feet of
relocated channel. On-site mitigation will be implemented through a 384-foot naturalized segment of
relocated channel. The remaining 2,586 feet of stream impacts will be mitigated for via the WRP
program. Payment will be made by the NCDOT at the current rate for stream and buffer impacts in
Section C before construction begins. For frnal stream and buffer impacts in Sections A and B, payment
will be made at the new rate established by the renewed MOU and mitigation plans will be approved
before construction begins in these Sections.
Thank you for you assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need any additional
information about this project, please contact Elizabeth L. Lusk at [phone], extension 335. If
further clarification is need regarding the proposed design, please contact Galen Cail, Hydraulics
Engineer at 919-250-4100.
Sincerely,
~/. G ~ ~~
William Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
WG/ell
Attachments
cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ (7 copies)
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
7

Ms. Kathy Matthews, EPA
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Mr. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Design Services
Mr. D.R. Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Tim Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Byron Moore, P.E., Roadside Environmental
Mr. J.G. Nance, P.E., Division 5 Engineer
Mr. Ron Ferrell, WRP DOT Coordinator
8

.~
\;
/ ~
_~4 \\
i ~
C
98
BEGIN PROJECT
~\ R-28096
1
~ ~~
~~ ~ j
~ '
SITE ~~_
I
~I
~ .J

i'~ ~ao~
i~
m
~ o~%
WAKE FOREST GTr UMTS, ?,
~,.
.•~
'` ~~ ~ ~
t ~.
~~c'~.' ti
~~.. I
-• i
~~ I
`~
V .\ I
_% I
~~ ;: ~ I
SITE ~ ~ j
,..
~..
,..
,1_
J ,-- f~ NC 9
SITE 1 ~ -'.~ SITE 5
\ P
\./
BYPASS ~
----~
_ _i
j Forestville
`~~y/

SITE 3 --~ ~~~ ~
i ~
J
~ ~ ~ /
~ ~ ~ r - ~-rriwis .i
ry~ ~~ I
/ IN
1 I lA
!<\ ~
i ~ ~ IW
1 ~
/i ~~ 1~-~~\ I
l
o WAKE /
~ FOREST
~~ /
~---
~ i
~ ~~
END PROJECT
R-28096
~ ~~
~~ ~ ~ i
i
~\` ~~ ~.
~ I r
~ I
1 / ~ 1r ~
~ ~ ~J~ ~~ , ~ ~ ~~~\ 1 ~ I
i
1
Raka Foreat
Roiesvbb Ylddle
Sen.
SCALE
.5 0 ~ ~(i~
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-R809B)
NC' 98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
~ ~i le~(i5tcl 3/Z ~/DI
SHEET I OF ~ 2/8/01
\ ~-
98 >I
Ndc~ for~at
Ebm. Sch.

LEGEND
--•WLB---- WETLAND BOUNDARY
~ y11.8 - `
:~ ~ ~` `; WETLAND
~- WLB'
DENOTES F]LL IN
WETLAND
V11L_LL~1 DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
e?~~~?Tf~j DENOTES FILL IN
/~L1~~'~ SURFACE WATER
(POND)
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
~~ DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
E- ~ FLOW DIRECTION
TB
~_ TOP OF BANK
- WE- - EDGE OF WATER
-- ~.-- PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
-- F-- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
~- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
-- NG--• NATURAL GROUND
- - PL - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB-- EX[ST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
- - ~ ~~-• - - WATER SURFACE
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1~OY501 (R-2809B)
NC-98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
SHEET ~ pF ~ V Y / 8 / Ol
XXXXX
LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
- - - COIR FIBER ROLLS
O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
~~
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
SINGLE TREE
-~"~~-`r"L-`~-~'L WOODS LINE
^ DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
VANE
RIP RAP
~•~
RIP RAP ENERGY
OISSIPATOR BASIN

U.T. TO ~
1
I
RICHLAND 11
CREEK ; m j m 6
I ,/F
FF %-
_ /~

.I a ; .
i
U.T. TO ~ ~ •,I r °I °
! ~ „ i
-- RICHLANO ~
CREEK ~
~I ~ ~ . a
'~ ~ i '
i ~~

~ ' O
~ i ~ :~~ ; , j ~ ~
S
'
~ O ~
'
NATURAL STREAM DESIGN
~` SEE DETAIL SHEET !~ QF 18
~
~
~~
~ ~ ~
~
~ '
\
y T
'
~ ANO SUMMARY SHEET ~~} OF l~, ~
.
. ?'
~~
~~
/ j

~~ ~
~ \\ ___ ~
1 `
`
l
\ d
~
t~ ~
\
~~ ` S --

/
PROP.
RIPARIAN a 'r'- _~ ~'
~ I ' ` ~~ ~ I '
BUFFER
I ~ \
~ ,;
2
O ' ~ ~ ~ ~
N •.
~
AY
' N
~
~ 1~ , ,
~ Q
/
I S : ----~
~
I
F~ / ~
0 60m
~ 1 ~, ~0

~F-~- _ CONC.
SILL _
__
__
. -~ 111 -" -- -
-- OII /
%-,~-- 0
'` .

6~0
-9
'f1
0
i /
-i i ~ I'
II 2 GI ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
,'t, ~ j
~.~g ;~ ~ ' ~ j i i , 'NC 98 WAKE FOREST -_
~~' ~ 3 -~- 00 ~ ~~ ~~ ,/~ ~ ' BYPASS WESTBOUND 33 00 f
;j"%ra I _~_ t
.>=n=a=ate==J - ~
J~ /
NC 98 WAKE FOREST
\\\ i' ~~ i~ ~ ~I i BYPASS EASTBOUND
~ y\'I ~I I- -- ------ -'~-I}~}~ - --
r~;_L__ -- - - - - ,,5
I I
I, I S W A F ~
~ ~ I;,. I, 1 E
~\ ,~! 1 I
~ i =; I t I F ~TDE~
~ ~ I I E TpE \
~ ~F~ ~ TDE~- \ \
I r I F O
. I r I ~ ,.
;I ~ I
~I ~ I m, _
W I : I ~ ~ ~'
I ; I ~ ti ~O
,'~~~I~ILAN V~]EW
U.T. TO I
RICHLANO~~ ~~~~
CREEK j I
1 DENOTES MECHANIZED '~~'
~O Q 20 CLEARING
DENOTES FILL IN S S
SURFACE WATERS
-- -RPBB-
- o-T-
Z
-----c--

PROFILE GRADE LINE
+1.37497
90
90

~ 32+75 -L- PVT
\
~
~ i
~
85
\~
2 ~
~
~~ D. A. = 1.53 km i
~ i
~ ~ AVG. DAILY FLOW= 0.029 m'/s / ~
\
~ ~
' ~ /
~ ~ /
80 NATURAL GROUND
~
~
\ /

~~ ~O,o° ~Qso ~
~ _ i
~
75 ORDINARY ~
HIGHWATER ~~ i ~
~
ELEV.= 74.64
_~
PROPOSED C
HANNEL
600mm CONC. SILL
PROPOSED 2 @ 2.1m x 1.8m RCBC INVERT ELEV. 73.708
i
+ao +so +ao 32 fOC~ +20 +ao +so +ao 33 +00 +20 +ao

~~'~~i ~ N.C. DEPT.OF TRANSI
DIVISION OF HIG
5 0 10
WAKE COUN'
HORIZONTAL SCALE

2
5 0
5 PROJECT: 8.102501 I
. NC 98 WAKE FORES
I VERTICAL SCALE
A ~ n
85
75
7

U.T. TO ~
RICHLANO - I I 'm
CREEK ' m I ~I ~
./
~ 3 ~ ~ y-_
I F I a N ~i ,/ I ~/ t I
~ a i l W ~ rl
u.T. To ~ N ~ o i V I '
RICHLANO I I ',, I ~. a ~ I ~ ~i ;'~ ~ I i ~!
_ CREEK ~~ ~ ~ ~~:
\ ! t i
~ I `. ~
I \\ ~ i :- ~~ '~ I C I ' Q
i ~ ~ ~~ r
I ` ra ~,',, ~ I
\\ ~ I
I I X
NATURAL STREAM DESIGN 1+ '. ~~ ~, ~ ~ 11
~ I ~ ,~
SEE DETAIL SHEET __ OF __ f` _ "• ~ ~ .~j j
ANO SUAAAIARY SHEET __ OF __ I' \\.;.~ ~ \ / ! I I
I ~ ~ t VV '~~ ~ ~r I
~ ~ \~
1 I
\~ ( ~\` ~'--- ~ ~,~~ Vii. i /
__ " ~, i i
~ PROP. ~• '\~ ~ I ~..\ ; /
~~ RIPARIAN n, • •~ i __
.~ BUFFER i ~ ~-'• ~ ~ '~ I I I '
;tY Y~ i ~ I ~ i
. ~ ~ ~ ~ Q
~ i
/---_--
/ ~• %.
~ 0 60m i f ~ ~ ~ / ~ , / 's
.- f~ CONC. ` ~ " / r ~ ('~ j
/ /,`0
F-r _~ SILL / ~ ; - -- ` !III
/, .:
II z cl , , ~,
___ s --_--^-------f-~-~---
~,~/ // / ~
i- i
-~"' 3 + 00 %~ %
~~~~=~s-=;~ sa is / ~ '..
~:
,. ~
,'NC 98 WAKE FOREST
BYPASS WESTBOUND
i
.,
0
:Oo
l
I
~`~
\'F
•~
33 00 f
_~_ .~'_
~ NC 98 WAKE FOREST _
•- ---------~' ~f_ /' / ~ ;i i BYPASS EASTBOUND
\ _ ~~
~ i " 12 GI`/ ~ - -
<` 1 / ~ /
~1 ~1 !~ ---- - ---
Ih~~ -~-t ~I'- ` - i X15
\ II 1. ~ 1' I I I' W Q F
~ 1 ! . E_
` ~ ~ \ ~. ~ ~~ ~ j ! ~ F TDE
~'~D 1 i 1 '! ~ F -TDE \
CIF 1 +~ j TDE \
rl f l \ ,F O .c
•1 I s ~ ! ti
`±1 r i
1 ~ 1 m: -
/ 'm
- i` I i T~F r.:~~~o`` ~ N.C. DEPT. OF T.
~ , DIVISION C
,~~ l~]L~N V~]EW
U.T. TO 1 WAKE
CREEK ND-~/ I ~Y~~
' I DENOTES MECHANIZED ~ PROJECT: 8.1~
10 0 20 CLEARING NC 98 WAKE
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATERS S S SHEET 5 OF ~$
-+- -RPBB-
- o-r-
Z

' \ \ ~~ le \~~ <T;j ~. /~~-~ ~- \\' O EXCAVATION IN WETLAND TDE~~ _.-
<~ \ -. \.., TDE- ~ _ _
~ \ ;,~,
',~ ~y~,o ~ `.%~ ~ \ \ Hfff~` TDE__
,o _.
. ~~ Fr .o ~ TD~-
., - -
B,\
• - '_" ~`
.,
\ °
7 ..: ,°
\ \_
,.
.• ~ - -
'~ \ S - ~"F~\----F-- -
_. _ \
_ ---
~ \ \ \ \ ~, ~ O + OO SOUTHBOUND \ \
\~~~ _ _ _. 19+00
_ __
9ra - _ ~ ~ \
. - \\\\~~
~~
us t
~, ~ ~ ~ _: - _ ~ ~ \ \ \~ OO \ NORTHBOUND _ , ~ 1 -~- ~n
,._:: -
_ .. ~ - -
_. _._
;..:. - ..
T
~-
_ '
t ` \ x
4 ~: - \ r\
\\ 8 \ \ \~Fr\N Fj\~F~ ~ ~ r~ ~ cz~~'\ \ GgyO ~ \ `-..~ ~ ~ _r as
\1 \\ \ • \ Ta'= ~ \\ :n\
1~lLA~N ~V~IEW
~~~~ ~
10 0 20
DENOTES MECHANIZED ~ ~ ~•
CLEARING ~ • •
DENOTES FILL IN S S
SURFACE WATERS

MATCHLINE -RPDD- STA. 10+60 MATCHLINE -Y3- STA. 10+70
.~ •' • I . _F~ ~
ti `
\\"':. ~„°:a 1r.~ RICHLAND I D .-~•,,`~ ~
~ ~~'~ ' CREEK /O ° I ~ A~F
~ ~~
'F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
__
_ .i 900
~F----a-F-~~_
-F~~ HW r"
O ~~_F ~ I O ~
~ A rn
\ ~ ~ / P 3\ ~
~* fl
~Rpoo. \ 2CI 375 2GI 375 C ~/ F F ~ 2 G '
.o.
~~~ y i t;/ft.e~ibe~
~ NC 98 WAKE FOREST 7 ~~ J~' f ° a •ob°•~o.R~'o'F
f BYPASS WESTBOUND 3 / -~ oo t ~ ~ ~i• ~ F : •o yq:e° Dib°p~
o~~°~;d~t ae~ ~ ¢pu
-L- f • o:
~~ NC 9B WAKE FOREST '? \ ~ } ,.~' / ~ _ ~ta °b ° °~ o..?"~ `
~~ -~ BYPASS EASTBOUND -'~ \\ i` F F d•t `tE°''bo Ou~P°'e
~.\ ;1 ~ ~ ~ °~ept d~t adY
.-~ -~ ~ • o' op~o 00 .o
. .
. ._
IO /"~ ' 1 ~ ~~_\ CREEK OO \ \ ~+:' bo P°. l E _ ~ G
~1 0
F - - -~~/• - - - . F- -~ P - . t °b°••oao 'o o %•b.° t :o~r e~i b° • ~{ 'l0"~/,j'~ Y~~ .,
F~
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATU
~~~lr ~~~ rr DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~~~
10 0 20
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLANDS /F /F
J

% 0J4 / ~`, / / / / ~~ ` I
~~ ~ ~ ~
I ~/, \v / ti / r /~
/ -
~/ U.T, TO ~ / / v/ ~ ~.C ~•~ TYPE 'A' BASIN /'/ /
~ RICHLAND // /GQi / 1`J /' ~
CREEK / /O / ~ F'J /• /' /
/
00 ~ ~ s. ~' ° a: ~ W m zGl
• °. A
a •«o~..p,g~~ \ A ,~m, '/l~ ~ e / .P"~' ~ ~adD° ~•obo~: zcl °~ zcl
N ~d`9ibo~ / ~ •• d4~ b~ o.•' ~ NC 98 WAKE FOREST ~
o.°~~ ~, q -•}r / • • Y~~o~?adp~ae~~'° f 40 -}- oo BYPASS WESTBOUND
J x
taJ / ~ .r,i /. Q•:• ~,yo• ~ a~zd .° „~, °o CB 375
? - 600 ~_
_ ~ y ••/ F_. 1 / , ~ibd~d~S~ad~~ob'~•, 375 375 7 37 CB NC 98 W KA E FOREST ~ ~ ~
V (,` / •dP~ ob' •o {~• CB -~ CB i -~ CB C6 ASTBOUNO
1- / f / ~ •o;oo t,dpt~ h BYPASS E
/ !/ /.'/ • Ml~•o f,d •ddk'ia~ • / ~~ m 2GI
1~b. ~
ti
obo •.a,o ..~; 2G1 ~ W
i
/, yR °° ~ C' Ems- E--- E----__
~ /, ~ Q. /..r" i Sao a E
1 ~ 'ti 0J Fj/ t ~~O°b'oob
eQPP i i ~ ~~~ ~ ~ryt d~ •o o:•°~• °
~ 2 ii.
~' j<.,
I~]LA~ N ~ ~ ]E W
~~~~ 4
~~ ~ 20
DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
DENOTES FILL IN S S
SURFACE WATERS
~~

T
~ \ F I 1
~ \\ XD \ • / A~ ~~
'' U 1 T O \\ /y .Is ~ /.
04
2iGlI ~ \ '
\ / %
~~ V G`~ ~ wr.c.,>
`4
t I r l 1 ~
I ~ .\ oy ~ ~ \ '•, \ oA
4i ~ 'OA
\ N ~ \ I + \ AQ R/A
I 7 II ~\\ ~ ~`~~ ~ 1 1 \\ ~ z~~I~Qtie
~ O ~I . \ I I ~ ~ ~ G~~F
I ; ~ \ \
o U.T. TO
~ L~ \ TB ~~~ \ '\' ~ RICHLAND CREEK
~ ` ~
I e ` \ ~ s * ' `\\
I ~ ~ ~\ • # ~ EX1S T. RiP Ri
asa m I ~ ~ \ 4
/ ~ U.T. TO \ ~0 R \ \ ~"
~ ~ ~ CREEK ND \\ ~ \\ \ \ \ ~ ~ _ \\ 9
___.-_ _- _ _ O
Y
,.
q, .' I \
~~'>< ' \ ~ P \ ~ i
\\ '/ ~ \
l~ATCHLINE -RPL~L- 5T ~. 10+60 MATCHLINE -Y3- STA. 10+70
??~~• ~~y N.C. DEPT. OF 'T'RANSPORTATION
~~~~ ~~1Li V`Y DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~~~
WAKE COUNTY
DENOTES MECHANIZED ~ , • , • ~ ~ r ~ PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-2809B)
70 0 20 CLEARING ~ NC 98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
I
SHEET 9 OF ~a 3~27/0l

`\
~r U.T. TO ; I `; ~
~;` ~ y
~, r
r~ r
RICHLAND
•..
CREEK ~~ ~ ,
~~ , I
~

E ~ , ~~~
~
~.•~-----C--_ E~_E pDE I' I

• pEt~ pq I
E--._~
P

~ ~
f. E I
PDE
~ ,
` y - -
' -PpE
`
c
~ ~ ~ _
~'~
S -

/47 + OQ ~
1 ~ ~
`` `,% >:~ '• '-
~ 375 375 ~.
.
~
:_

:
~;t
,~ ~
f ~•
;..
,.,....
.
~.:

..~ t
400 CSP W~
2 ELBOWS i"~- "-•._..- t

::
- --- ~ ~ ~.

~
~PDE
P.bE-~-E--~
1
1, ~•"+ I F
`
C
~
c
~E-E= E ~
,, ~~E
~-E
~
/
-E ~ ,~
~` .. - -
,. .
~!~ ~ ~ ~' E
v ~, •~ E
U T RICHLAND ~' rr
CREEK -

,.,.1
,~ O
,
\
"~ ~ I

,
r
i ~
~~9 ~ ~
\
N
O~ 1 ~ ~
1 -
,

~~~lr ~~~ v~' N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~~~
l~~
DENOTES MECHANIZED ~•~•~•~••
CLEARING
DENOTES FILL IN $ S
SURFACE WATERS

Project No. 8.1402501 (R-28096)
Property Owner List
For
Each Wetland Site
Site Station Parcel Name Address
N0. N0. DB and Pg
-L- 31+g7 Rt
to N C D 0 T P.O. Box 25201
. O/ DB 6392 Pg 113 Raleigh, N.C. 27611
-L- 32+49 Lt. BM 1990 Pg 1192
Norma E. Adkins &
-L- 31+90 Lt. to Heba G. Adkins 1522 Deerberry Lane
-L- 32+17 Lt O DB 6352 Pg 489 Wake Forest, N.C. 27587-6207
. DB 1990 Pg 1192

-L- 32+16 Lt. to Town Of Wake Forest 401 E. Elm St.
O DB 4831 Pg 319 N.C. 27587-9166
Wake Forest
1 -L- 32+50 Lt. BM 1990 Pg 1192 ,
-L- 31+96 Rt
to North Hills Properties 4224 Six Forks Rd.
. O4 DB 3021 Pg 304 Raleigh, N.C. 27609-5716
-L- 32+36 Rt. BM 1994 Pg 1621

-L- 32+45 Rt
to William N. Jones &
5604 Castlebrook Dr.
. O Betty K. Jones N.C. 27604
Raleigh
-Y2- 11+29 Lt. DB 2445 Pg 191 ,
Beatrice B. Jones 8~
-Y2- 11+18 Lt. to Madeline C. Ray .
O DB 5948 Pg 544 Not Available
-Y2- 11+38 Lt. pg 1962 Pg 227
-Y2- 10+50 Lt
to Town Of Wake Forest 401 E. Elm St.
. O3 DB 4831 Pg 319 Wake Forest, N.C. 27587-9166
-Y2- 10+89 Lt. BM 1990 Pg 1192

2

-Y2- 10+42 Lt
to William N. Jones 8~
~ 5604 Castlebrook Dr.
. 5 Betty K. Jones N.C. 27604
Raleigh
-Y2- 10+84 Lt. DB 2445 Pg 191 ,
-Y1- 16+88 Lt. to O N C D O T P.O. Box 25201
-RPB- 10+51 Rt. Raleigh, N.C. 27611
KF US-1, LLC c/o Drucker & Falk
3 -L- 36+65 Rt. to O8 DB 6184 Pg 801 7200 Stonehenge Dr.
-RPC- 10+07 Rt. BM 1994 Pg 881 Raleigh, N.C. 27613
-RPB- 10+21 Lt. to Park Associates, Ltd. 4224 Six Forks Rd.
O DB 6333 Pg 7 Raleigh, N.C. 27609-5716
-RPB- 10+38 Lt. BM 1994 Pg 1621
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1(02501 (R-28096)
NC-98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
SHEET ~ ` OF 8/YI/00

Project No. 8.1402501 (R- 28096)
Property Owner List
For
Each Wetland Site
Site Station Parcel Name Address
N0. N0. DB and Pg
-L- 37+14 Rt. to
/0 Jones Heirs
DB 2785 Pg 941
Not Available
-L- 39+59 Lt. BM 1962 Pg 227

4
-Y3- 10+81 Rt. to
/0 Jones Heirs
DB 2785 Pg 941
Not Available
-Y3- 10+84 Rt. BM 1962 Pg 227
-L- 47+09 to
Lt Mary Forbes 335 Forbes Rd.
5 . // DB 1107 Pg 15 Wake Forest, N.C. 27587
-L- 47+70 Rt. BM 1935 Pg 12
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1102501 (R-2809B)
N C-98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
SHEET (2' OF ~~ 8/41/00

IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS BUFFER IMPACTS

Site
No.
Station

FrorNTo
Structure
Size
Fill In
Wetlands
ha
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
ha
Excavation
In Wetlands
ha
Isolated
Wetland
fha Mechanized
Clearing
(Method III)
ha
Fill In SW
(Natural)
ha
Fill In SW
(Pond)
ha
Temp. Fill
In SW
ha Existing
Channel
Impacted
m
Relocated
Channel
m
Enclosed
Channel
m
Zone
1
ha
Zone
2
ha Mechanized
Clearing
(Methoq III)
ha)

1 -L• 31.96 RT /
-V2- t1+38 T
2 ~ 2.1 x 1.8 RCBC
-
-
-
-
0.075
-
-
240.8
117.0
101.9
0.404
0.263
0.026

2 •Y2. 10+42 LT /
-vz- 10+69 LT
-
-
-
-
0.004
-
-
40.3
-
-
0.023
0.018
0.015

3 -V1- 16.98 LT /
-RPB- /++Oi LT
4 ~ 3.2 x 3.2 RCBC
0.024
-
0.012
-
-
0.019
-
-
67.8
-
26.8
0.063
0.034
0.042

4 -L- 37.74 Li /
-L- 38.33 LT
0.268
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

-Y3- 10.94 RT /
-v3- 11.81 RT
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.140
0.076
0.030

-L• 38.92 LT /
•L• 39.59 LT
BRIDGE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.003
0.034
0.031

5 -L- 47+09 LT /
L- 47. /o RT
i ~ 3.0 x 1.8 RCBC
-
-
-
-
0.015
-
-
73.7
-
65.2
0.128
0.079
0.028

PROJECT TOTALS: 0.292 0.000 0.012 0.000 0.000 0.113 0.000 0.000 422.6 117.0 193.9 0.761 0.504 0.172

R-2809B
Riparian Buffer Impacts
2/ 13/01
Wetland Im acts Mechanized Clearin
Site No. Zone 1
(ha) Zone 2
(ha) Zone 1
(ha) Zone 2
(ha)
1 - - 0.017 0.009

2 - - 0.008 0.007

3 - - 0.034 0.008

4 - - 0.031 0.030

5 - - 0.020 0.008

Totals 0.000 0.000 0.110 0.062
R-28096
Sheet 13A of 18
2/13/01

NCDOT Project I.D. R-2809B
Wake County, NC
NC 98 (Wake Forest Bypass) from West of US 1 to West of US lA (South Main Street)
Prepared by: TranSite Consulting Engineers, Inc.
1300 Paddock Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
NATURAL STREAM DESIGN
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO RICHLAND CREEK
Left of -Y2-Project Station 11+25
Shut ~ nl ~~

The construction of NC 98 (Wake Forest Bypass) from West of US t to West of US 1 A
(South Main Street) will require that a portion of an unnamed tributary to Richland Creek
be relocated left of -Y2-. The proposed channel will be 117 meters in length starting left
of -Y2-Station 10+40 at the inlet of the proposed 2 @ 2.1 m x 1.8m RCBC and continue
upstream to left -Y2- Station 11+25. The proposed channel is designed according to
"natural channel" design principles proposed by Dave Rosgen.
This unnamed tributary to Richland Creek drains 85 hectares in northern Wake County.
Existing and future land uses within the drainage basin are low to medium density
residential with commercial along the major roadways.
There is no hydraulic data available on this stream. Discharges were estimated using
procedures outlined in USGS Water-Resources Report 96-4084, Estimation of Flood-
Frequency Characteristics of Small Urban Watersheds in North Carolina.
EXISTING CHANNEL
A 65 meter section of the existing channel was surveyed in detail and used as a reference
stream. This section of stream was chosen because it will be the portion lost due to the
construction of -Y2-. Analysis of the existing channel led to a classification of BSc. This
portion of the channel was found to have flowing water and shallow pools with a bed
composed of sand, gravel and cobbles.
~~,~<< 15 ~,~~ Ib

PROPOSED CHANNEL
The relocated channel is designed to have a BS classification. The design data for the
existing, reference and proposed channels is shown on the attached design data table.
The natural tie upstream and the proposed RCBC invert downstream set the channel
gradient. The sinuosity of the proposed channel is lower than the reference stream
because of a longer meandering length. The proposed channel has a lower entrenchment
ratio than the existing channel due to a reduced flood prone width and greater bankful
width. The proposed channel width /depth ratio is greater due to increased backful
width.
Proposed channel stabilization is shown on the attached detail sheet. It is anticipated that
the channel banks will be planted with native trees and shrubs above bankful depth. In
addition, low water rock dams will be placed in the channel and coir fiber mat will be
placed along the outside of the channel bends. The channel bottom will match the
characteristics of the existing channel.
Shrct ~ ~,~' _~

N ~'l[° ~J IE~ ~ lL ~'I[~ IEg lE ~ NM[ ~ IE~ ~ ~ N 'I[°~ lE~ ~~C A ILA
LOW ;TnGE CHECK DAM
t no+ +o Scole I
_ Bona
.y NOD NOD
r. Iflu•
IQ- K• CPn+.r O.Sm mo.
NID Pop - ODOVP N.S.L.
y.6T f_ _IjprmDl S+rPOm
•x. O.Sm Lerel
S+~eam bra •/m CnOhP stones I
a /111 v01as
+u-STRE~Y YE^
fbv~- L+ ne O.IS O/
tlltPr fOM lc Dor OYPI
L(OV PI N y 0+0 }IOP
$lreOm BPO -
N/T~ 2N
(DCOSS SLC 11W
TYPICAL FLOOD PLAIN SECTION
t Not to Scole
Flood Plain
~~~ VAR. VAR. Ground
Natural
Cround 4.6
SEE CHANNEL DETAILS
CHANNEL DETAIL
PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION
(xD+ +a Scas 1
B.Wtf u(l DEPIN
f %Oln ~ fboO PI In
VAR-. r 0. m M1d R.
~a~--~-~
+r%CSL SEt7gn I BC7PECN BENDS
PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION
o RENO lA1EANDER)
1 n0+ +O ScDIP I
PRST OCEP(N CnsMKI
Gan BELOP GRSDE Pawl
O.Jm sl eCW
B.a NPf UlI o(Prx
om
fboo PIOIn fI0o0 Pbin
Y.R. O..m M1.) uli
y iR
foot[R Loc o.~m a m \.ncNOR Roas
IPIkmE 0.6 OIS. BELDP wvfRll EE 9'~O
1 +GICSL SCC 110n 2 st SEWS
NOTES:
M14BCR Of ROO1PSOS wS1.LLED f0 BC KtERUKD ON SItE
nuYBER o< LOP S1.LE CKCS DsNS 10 BE OE 1[awlnEO on 1~1[
Ps05 10 BC SG.CED .s as YE ICR OE 8001 B.SE
ER lOL ANCNOR ROCIt 70 BE PL.CED On IK OOPNS1RESU CnD
LCN f001ER LOL 10 1NS+ II IS LEsnwL sOsw51 iK LOC Jx
ilOE •P.+ fROU IK CnsnKL.
B.CSf ILLwL OVER sW sR0un0 COOICR LOLS, ROOF ssD LUCS
sNCWR ROCKS fIRYI+ SCCURE sLl COavGOKniS wCL UUwL
S, COnxE[710N5 sW OsP1.
iwLS SNOULD BE PLSCEO s80VE B.x.f ULL DEPiN
'Dl
5`l~ lE$1E ~ ~I 1~ IL A~ N ~" ][ lE'VS~

ITEM E%iSTING
STRE,~M REi: ERENCE
STREAM PR~DPOSED
REL®Cr'~TI~ON
STREAM NAME UNNAMED UNNAMED UNNAMED
DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 85 ho 85 ha 85 ha
CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 1.66% 1.66% 1.91%
BANKFUL WIDTH (Wbkf) 3.1 m 3.1 m 3.7 m
MEAN DEPTH (dbkf) 0.4 m 0.4 m 0.4 m
BANKFUL X-SECTION ARE
f 1.04 m2 1.04 m2 1.16 m2
WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO
kf 7.75 7.75 9.25
Maximum DEPTH (d mbkf) 0.6 m 0.6 m 0.4 m
IDTH FLOOD-PRONE AREA
f e 6.6 m 6.6 m 6.2 m
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO 2.13 2.13 1.68
CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 3 mm 3 mm 3 mm
SINUOSITY (K) 1.17 1.17 1.06
MEANDERS:
AVG. LENGTH 27.5 m 27.5 m 34 m
AVG. AMPLITUDE 7.5 m 7.5 ~~ 8.0 m
AVG. RADIUS 9.0 m 9.0 m 8.0 m
DISCHARGES:
0 BANKFULL 1.34 cros 1.34 cams 1.59 cros
02 5.80 cros 5.80 cams 5.80 cros
010 12.80 cros 12.80 cros 12.80 cros
VELOCITY:
V BANKFULL 1.29 m/s 1.29 m/s 1.37 m/s
V2 1.56 m/s 1.56 rri/s 1.45 m/s
VIO 2.09 m/s 2.09 m/s 1.68 m/s
CLASSIFICATION B5c B5c B5
S'1CI3E.~ld1[ D~SCI3I1~'I'I~N
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
.~N~
~CI.~SSII; IC~'I°I®N ®.~T:~
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-2809B)
NC-98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
SHEET ~ OF 1-`~
2/8/01

( ~ ~ T
/ :^ LI933.. ~ig f ~ h .65 ~'
S i 95a C,~' h a J
J.~.\n~T .r O .~ ~ `8
V~ ,_ ~; 0 6 ~ _ -~ 9~ l ` '~ END PR /
~ Wake q~e ~ ~~~ ~ \ / R 2 /
I Elem Bch •~ ~ ~~ ,~ - ,~ y
" ~s~ _!
~- \ e'~~5 / 2053 `~ °~ ;{:
- - -` ~ ~ 1 ~ ~_i: - ~ 2053
_ ,- _
Fore le BE - RO'~ ECT ~ ~'
I' ~ '~9
~~~ ~ R-28 9C~~ ' '
- ~ ~ W - ~"
9 ~ a ~ I Austin _,-----~ ~o
~ i~ 2920
2049 y~ ~ 2054
VICINdTY
1~R~~~
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WA%E COUNTY
PR0JECT:8.1~0250~ Qt-2809C)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ OF ~ S REVISED 7 / 11 / Ol

SITE 2
SITE 1
A
~Cf1
TIE 1~~111~ 1
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WASE COUNTY
PROJECT:81~I0250~ QZ~2809C)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET Z OF 1S REVISED 7/ ll/
BEGIN F.A. PROJECT STP-98(i)
BEGIN CONST.

a
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WA%E COUNTY
PROJF,CT: 81~0250~ Qt-2809C>
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET 3 OF ~ ~ REVISED 7 / ll / Ol

LEGEND
--WLB-- WETLAND BOUNDARY
L
~~ WETLAND
L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
®DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
• • • • DENOTES MECHANIZED
•• •• • • • CLEARING
~--- -~- FLOW DIRECTION
~- TOP OF BANK
---WE --- EDGE OF WATER
- ~ - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- -~ - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-'~-- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG- -NATURAL GROUND
- --P~- - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
---------- - WATER SURFACE
LIVE STAKES
O BOULDER
-~- - COIR FIBER ROLLS
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
~-.~
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
^ DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
VANE
RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIQHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1~0250~ (R-2809C)
NC 98, WAGE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US LA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET `~' OF ~~ R RVTRRn 7 / 11 i

uro~ oa. e~ ata
(A?499'J '
ura~n
CADY CONSTRUCTION CO.
~ouu.--\
1
I SKP S111CEGOOO ~
l CAPITAL LAlOS. LLC
DE~ pDE~ pDE-- pD
I
E
D ES ppE
1~
_
aeo ass ~- - m w E E
-'
~ E
.i ~npo ~
.aruUtw - -
a
J I
n
r
~ m
~ D
W ~ P
W
f
P
O
~ ~

TCE PRDTELiION
- --~- - -
_
PDE P _P
-PDE-PDE-P E-PDE- PDE-PD
u~ ns. e~ ara
.i axss s cur
+5000 iwoT sia w. ~avc
47A00 [/54.807
ELIV~BETII H. HoLDlIG
][~ILA~N ~g1E~V
~g~~ ~.
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~(025O~1 QZ-28O9C)
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE
® DENOTES FII,L IN WETLANDS
NC 98, WAGE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET Jr OF iS REVISSED 7/ll/Ol

~ ~ \
~/ , ~g I THOMAS 8. DAIEJtON !~ j I j 20' TONN OF HAKE FOREST

NANCY H
SEIItR EASDENT O
DAMEttON
' ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~
. i I i
/ ~ l
~
I I 6
I ~ ~ \ ~ \ i
raE raD,ecrai
E

~ ~ ~ /E_~
~ ~ aus a arn~w
~ wmor sm. ra woz E _
y s~, ~ i

_ ~
~
~

~ ~

~
\` ~ ~
~
~
~
~i
_yi
~ ~c r ~-` i

z-a
x ~ i

\ m --
~ \ \ \~ \
\ :. an:u.nmc
E E E E-~E - - --~_ ~ _ _~\ ~ ~
-~'--E~_E- ~- -
~ E~E_'-E~~E ~
~\\ \
O ~ \ \ '~,
n ~ ~ ~'~
\ ~ ~ '~,
\ O
1[~]LAN ~~lE~ \~\~
THOMAS s. oAM~xoN a ~
NANCY H. DAMERON
~~~~
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE
v p~ / ., .. ~v,r,
m oEy r : oozy
\ 0.ASSlf~11M ~~~~ ~~~1 Si,>~t~
~a.ASS Y ~
® DENOTE3 FII.L IN 3URFACE WATERS
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WA%E COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~0250~ Qt-28090)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~D OF ~SREVISED 7/18/01

wE~./ ` ~~
wE ~ ~ ~ 7HOuaS B. DaMERQ+r ~ ROOiwaDS
1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ `~,~r ~ \~ ~ NANCY N. DauERON RGO7wnD5 ~ /
g ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /
\ ~~o~~ \r4H.~ ` \\ ' 1 ~ TOE PROTECTION ~ ~ E-PDE ODE`- ~~PDEs
. ` ^ 0~/~ /
cuss e r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - -' ~ ~ / eI_
~f ucoor sro. No. esa.oz 1 ~ \\ \ tiTacu o.sm eaSE DITCN ~ - - `. ~ ~ ~ ~v~ y0ef 2 Q / / - " 1
~ ~ ~ ~ i~E~PDE~-PDE-PDE ~DF--'FDE--~~~ -
\ E\f \E `\ \ ~ ` ` \\ ' ~ V ~ ~ l --' ~ ~ ~ ~fER lOtf ~ - ' a
\ ~~_ ~ _ _ .
DE \ _
q/NN fF£ER ~
\~~ 1\ ~ ~ ___--- __ _1_
~ ~ ~FER 20NE ~ , /
~ ~
~ J \
- O ~./-.~/---,------------ - - - - -

~ / ~0 ti' ~ ~ ~

~ ~ c
~ ~ ~
~
~~
/ / / F -
/
0 0
- -
J /
/ p
~ ~ ---~---'
---~

~iQO~
QO ~ ~ /
~
~ OE~P6E-PDE- _
_- E E E-af~-~.__~---`
-PDE PDE-PDE-PD E E E_
E-
A '- - ~~ ~OE~PDE
E
O
~ _ - ~ . EIERGT DISSPATOR SPEau LNiFRLL v-WICN THDNA$ B. DA6IERO
~ CUSS ittP RAP N & E_E~~EJ-
~
PQE~ ~
~\
D~
~ t0E PROTECTgN •
NANCY H. DAUER ON
iP
~
/
/ 4~0 = 0 .V3 G
O
/ rhs
~~ A ~T ~C y~~~ V° = ~.sZ m/5
1C" 1~ 1~ ~Y S = o •y ~% N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ `'~0~°13
/ DIVISIOI~T OF HIGHWAYS
~-b•?a
s
y.o n, RAP P.aP Bu,.t., WARE COUNTY
Z ~ I ; B :I S~c~e Slots
s - °'~ ~~"
n=o.o~ PROJECT: 8.1~40250~d (R-2809C)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY

IOm O ZQ/p
FILL IN SURFACE WATERS NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
~
SCALE
®
DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET 7 OF ~S REVISED 9//01

TOE PROTECTIONS ~~
cuss e ~ _/
NCOOT STD. N0. E6d.02
MDREw L A-YONS,
.EMETTE F. AWONS a
_ JAIES A. LLCAS..~t.
Qb = o.oBYc~,S O
V, : 3.9 3 `~'s ~s
5 = '13 '/.
n =oozy
/V =o.So
1.5 m Quo ~ Bugt
z.5:/ ~ lsr ~ 5~dt S1,~
5=~~%
~, = o.o~
E~
in l r-70E PROTECTK)N
~`~ ~~
~~
~~
~~
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE ® DENOTBS FII,L IN SURFACE WATERS
TONN OF WAKE FOREST O
•~• RPRAP ~ / ~
~ ,QN
`f `E~-E / E E E
N~
/e
/ HART BOLLS HERS
l~]L~N ~~]E~
~~~~
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~0250~( Ot-2809C)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET 8 OF 1S REVISED 7 / 18 / Ol

PERMANENT ~~ ~
IMPACTS ~ ~ ,~ ~~

'~ ~ -~
:: ~ J ~- -
~~i ~ _
~ ---
~~ .. - -
]f~1LAlN
i
J
C1
fV
+'
~O
DO
N
W
_ _Z
J
-E E U
F-
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WA%E COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~(0250~1 (R-2809C)
® DENOTES FII.L IN
SURFACE WATERS
® DENOTES FII.L IN WETLANDS
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET g OF I ~ REVISED 7 / 18 / Ol
rroE ~orECnoN ~ ~ ~ ~~ER ZONE 2 ~ ~ ,~""" ~ 1
~"- /, ,
v ~ J / BUFFER ZONE I ~'~ NE \ / /ti
~;
/ '~_
,tea- ~ -

/Om
TEMPORARY
IMPACTS

TEMPORARY LATERAL 0.6m BASE DITCH p~ MARY BOLUS HEIRS
W/ CLASS B RIP RAP ~ ~
/ / / ,~
TEMP. ROCK SILT CHECK ~ B F ER ZONE 2 ~ ~
TYPE A STD.1633.01 / ~ ~ / /
/ / ~/-_
/ - J ~ BUFFER ZONE I : ~ ' ~ ~ / 1./
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLANDS

kLUS a xpaer
HL~Or sm. 968.02
\\ ~
7Al a7cx \
THOMAS B. DAIAERON ~ ~ \
NANCY H. DAUERON
TRIBUTARY TO~~,.
DUNN \ EK ~~
\ \
~ E~i~'~~
/6~~ i L
--~ 75p xCP~CIASS
n ~ .. uE e ~
V
V
- /59
Quo = o.Z4 ems
s=2G%
h = 0.021
0 ,23
3,F m RiP RoP Bast
Z:~' IZa S1dt `~oPns
5=0.3%
h=o~o'1
lOm 0 20m
SCALE
L_G.11_L_L.~J DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
~~~~ ~~~~
~~~~
-0 1 \ ANDREW L. ANMONS,
o~~ \\ \~ ~ AAIE$ A LUCA 5,3R.~
~\c~'~~E- E-~ _
~~\~ \ E E--E'_E E
~ \ \ ,78+00 ~
~ 375 C9 375
'. ~ \ \ ~ . 7
_ /
\
_ E \ ~-~
E--` -
~
~p0 I
\

PO f
•. ~-HEAD DITCH \
PREFORLED SCOUR HOLE `P \
n" w \ ~
c
\ I
„~ \
~
~ ~ ~ \
' ~
THOMAS s. DAUERON ~ 1 m ~ ~ ~
~ N N
NANCY N. DAfJERON A p
m m

TOE PROTECTI
ON O r1
m z
N m - N
TRIBUTAR Y TO DUNN CREEK

\ j ~
s ~~ i ~
\ ~ ,~' \~ /
~yh` ~ ~ \ ~
~ ~
\ ~~~
\~ \\~
~ ~
\~ i
.tA ` ~ SPRAIG BOX-
1 ~ ~ ~ ~~
u~ ~' ~ °rta I i I
I ~' r
~ ~ + o I .ui~wss e ~' 1
'~
1 ~,iq~S 1
~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ e ~NODOT STDpB .02 ' I '~~ 1
~55 g~ ~ ~ I -~ - 1
- \ T STD. 6 . ~ ~\ _~~'-~__~--~
~\ ~ ~
~ ~ ~n
F
1
_ `~
1~
i
-~_ ~-~~j 2~ ( .
~ ~~
'_ ~
~ ~
~•
_ o ~/- ~
~ i~ ara b c-u~ ~ _~-
/~t~TTE F. ~~~`
,~S A,111C1S.
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE
]~ILALN ~~IE~
~~~~ s
® DENOTES FII.L IN SURFACE WATERS
® DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS
J
N
''~t
H
N
W
.Z
J
2
U

N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WASE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~0250~ (R-28090)
NC 98, WASE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ Z OF 1 S REVISED 9/ 1~/ Ol

PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE WITH
LEVEL SPREADER APRON
(Not to 6c0191

Preformed
Scour Hole (PSH)
(Rip ROD In ba50
not anawn for
)reader tlOUlOera anOUla De
>proxfmately 0.6m x 0,6m x 0.6m
size with 0.3m between rocks.
3m of Permanent Soll
Reinforcement mattlnq IPSR>
around Derimeter of scour hole:
Shall be graded level.
Section A-A
P:M Or Ditch
wn.~ PSR
0.3 m Natural
~~ ~ m ~ II ~round-
F~- 3.Om
Liner; Class 1 Rip Rop Spreader Boulder
with Fliter Fabric Bcl'Sm-.~ 0.3m tuck Dury 0.3m
NOTE: 'B' denotes size of baslni NOTE: The Permanent SoIlRelnforcement
For example: I.Smx I.5m PSH, 8= I,5 mattlnq (PSR) shall be seeded with native
grasses at Installation,
ENERGY DISSIpATOR
NOT TO SCALE
6m DISSIPATOR POOL 2m~
PRON NEUSE BUFFER
~~ PROPOSED DITCH
?~ i 0.6m 9'
O.Am 0.6m
0.9m 0.6m
CLASS 1 RIPRAP
FILTER FABRIC
PROFILE
NOT TO SCALE
2: I
CLASS TRIP RAP ~
DISSIPATOR APRON
- PROPOSED DITCH POOL
2:1 OR FLATTER
FRONT DITCH SLOPE
PLaN vlEw
NOT TO SCALE
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~Q0250~ (R-2809C)
NC 98, WAKE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ 3 OF /`/'~ REVISED 9l/ Ol

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1402504 (R-2809C)
SHEET ~4 OF ~ ~ Revised 9/14/2001
IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS BUFFER IMPACTS

Site
No.
Station

From/To
Structure
Size
Fill In
Wetlands
ha
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
ha
Excavation
In Wetlands
ha Mechanized
Clearing
(Method III)
ha
Fill In SW
(Natural)
ha
Fill In SW
(Pond)
ha
Temp. Fill
In SW
ha Existing
Channel
Impacted
m
Relocated
Channel
m
Enclosed
Channel
m
Zone
1
ha
Zone
2
ha
1 62+95 -L- RT N/A 0.0037
2
3A 66+40 -L-
74+46/74+73
Trib. Dunn Cr. 2 2.7m X 1.8m RCBC 0.0505
0.0030 110
30
27 110
0 0.185
0.050 0.114
0.017
3B 74+20!76+20 L
Dunn Creek 2 2.7m X 2.4m RCBC 0.0673 0.0057 172 62 78 0.235 0.159
4
5
6
7 84+60 -L-
85+20 -L- LT
77+g0 -L-
82+70/83+80 L 2 2.4m X 2.4m RCBC
N/A
750 RCP
900 RCP
0.0161

0.1132
0.0508 0.0275
0.0037
0.0054
0.0083
0.0047 90
62
87
13g
60 65

71 0.130
0.030
0.124 0.068
0.010
0.076

TOTALS : 0.133 0.0508 0 0 0.1657 0 0.0104 689 149 324 0.754 0.444

]E~~$®~EI$~°Y ®~N1EI$~
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO.
NAMF-S ADDRESSES
CADY CONSTRUCTION CO 7020 SIX FORKS RD
RALEIGH NC 27615
ELIZABETH H. HOLDING 12630 WAKE UNION CHURCH R
WAKE FOREST NC 27588
THOMAS DAMERON 414 SCOTLAND ST
NANCY DAMERON RALEIGH, NC 27609
TOWN OF WAKE FOREST 401 E. ELM ST
WAKE FOREST NC 27587
MARY BOLUS HEIRS C/0 ELIZABETH B. NASSIF~
115 E. ELM ST
WAKE FOREST NC 27587
ANDREW L. AMMONS 7412 CHAPEL HILL RD
JEANETTE AMMONS RALEIGH NC 27607
JAMES LUCAS, JR.
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIQHWAYS
WASE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~02501. Qt-2809C>
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ s OF ~ s REVLSED 7 / 11 / Ol

' ~ r~~llU l iNBc b'F.HN~H Fax .[phone]
d
,~ Y.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 25 ' Ol 11 ~ 09 P. 02
~~
~~~~
~~'C~~~~
May 16, 2001
Mr. Bill Gilmore, P.E., Manager r~'~Y,•`~
Planning and Environmental Branch ~~ ~ 20~
North Carolina Department of Transportation ~ ~'
1548 Mai] Servicc Center ?~ ~ ~
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548 ~`'~'T Hf~¢ ~
~~'f'TFi'~L 0 Pl~tib' a
Rc: Pcrnut Application for proposed NC 98. Bypass of Wake Forest from west of SR 1923 (Th ~411~Yg~S
Mill Road). to oast of SR 2053 (Jones Dairy Road)'in Wa1ce County
DWQ No. 010550, TIP lYo. R=2809
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal: fora 441 Water Quality Certification for the
aforementioned project. Review of your. application icvciilod it lacking necessary information reyuired for
tusking an informed permit decision. The permit application yeas deficient in the following areas: .
Segment C
Site 2
01~ • Drawings do not show any tlow spreader device. at stormwater discharge outlets. L~~Z iL\P~~P S'~~ No . ~~,o~
Usp ~(q~PA(~ • No discussion or analysis presented that demtiiutratcs thcproposed sizing and design of the tlow ~~~' FLgP `_'~~~ p~ ~~`~
Je~oo-~ ~,n-r~~ spreaders. The information presented should indicaie the anticipated flow spreader design, exit y~',.?~T ~ S~
~~rr,~~1 vclocitics (to demonstrate non-erosive velocities), and the hydraulic design information.
«F ee'Mps') The legend for the drawings is ineomplefe, and do.csnot provide enough information to allow for full
~~ undcsstanding of what is proposed. Lq~.~... {Li~Q SAP ~ P.~PES
Site 3
• Review of the drawings t+nd table of proposed. impacts do not oppear to be con: intent. More
~e~tzl= specifically, the proposed Neuse-Buffer impacts presented in the table appear too low when cotupsred
to the drawings.
t~ Review Of the stormwater. design indicates that.a direcCdischarge into Zone 2 of the Neuse Riparian `~~~~ ~~C T~V~~
Buffers is proposed.. ~An ezplanatign as to the: necessity for the proposed discharge in required, The t2~? ~~~ ~~~~ ro
outlet, if possible, should be redesigned to discharge outside the Neuse Riparian Buffer at non-uosivc
velocities. The flow spreader design. should bs presented in the permit drawings and an analysis of the
design criteria and the exit velocities: should be presented. l ~ ~.~
~~ Drawings do not show any flow spreader devices at stormwater discharge outlets. t,AC'.e~ 9aP ~f ~T~~ rte'' ~'0 l
~ ~Fi; ~NE2Gy ~ • No discussion er analysis presented that demonstrates the proposed sizing and design of the flow
~iSSS P~Iroh spreaders. The information presented should indicate the anticipated flow spreader design, exit
(~~ romps , velocities (to demonstrate non-erosive velociues), and the hydraulic design information.
/~~~ • The legend for the drawings is incumplctc,-Nr~1 dots net pruvidt enough irfoxmauon to alleµ' for full
undcrstsnding of what is proposed. ~A~~L i'~1P t2+~f ~ ~~ ~.S
wet:nnds/~Oi Lai; 1621 Ivitia Servicc Cenl~r Raleigh. NorCn C2rolin:r 2 iGy9-1621
Te!errane 919-7'z-1.96 PAX 73?-9gj9
na Ecua; Oar-~iTL~ity At'l:~utivc A_tion p:nploycr Sl)R. tc_ycIcJlC~.c pp~t Waurnt: p~ptr

.~
iv~uu i ~ r ac pRhiv~n r dX ~ y l y- ASS-y (y4 Mdy 25 ' 01 1109 P. 03
.. -
Site 4
•
C~~C~ Review of the drawings and table of proposed impacts do not appear to be consistent. More
specifically, the proposed Meuse Buffer impacts presented in the table appear too low when compared
to the drawings.

OK • _
Drawings do not show any flow spreader devices at stormwater discharge outlets. ~'~~ 'Rlp ~'~ '~~~ N~'. ~''~'°i
u5cp ~P~h~~ No discussion or analysis presented that demonstrates the proposed sizing and design of the flow
NC'~T aa~1't_~
,R~GToN spreaders. 1'he information presented should indicate the anticipated flow sproadcr design, exit
velocities (to demonstrate non-
i
l
i
d
d
li
i
i
h
h
~ ve ve
eros
oc
t
es). an
t
e
rau
c des
y
gn information.
0~, • The legend for the drawings is incomplete, artd does no provhie enough information to allow for full
PI S
'
P ~~
understanding of what is proposed. ~-RK,3,
~
P-t
• The design as proposed placed n straight culvert in place of a stream meander. Based on review of the
proposed design the expected stream velocities through: this reach will increase dramatically.
Therefore, we request a by aulic analysis to dam nstrate that no destabilisation of the s eam wtl
occur. ~~~~~ b -t~ s,~ of ~k- ~x eu~--r ter. a ~ a~~ ~a,~ -t-~ a~a.. a,H ~~,ti
vim 0~~ ~ ~t_oG-*~t' 1}-r -~, vu~ts'r ~ ~.tP t~P ~s (~~ R'T ourT~--c -,o
Slte 3 ~~~`t t3R~S ,
L`~~~--
~ Review of the drawings and table of proposed.impacis do not appear to be consistent. More
if
ll
t spec
ica
y, the proposed Meuse Bu€fei impactspresentad in.thc table appear too low when-compared

p'~ • to the. drawings. ~ ~~ ~0 , ~~ t
Drawings do not show any flow spreader devices at stormwater discharge outlets. LR('~Z f~1P ~~p ~~ `
uS ~ psp ~,~~. • No disctusion or analysis presented that demonstrates the proposed Sizing and design of the flow
IN ~IiC H ZN
tVCT1
~
~
' spreaders. The information.presented should indicate the anticipated flow spreader design, exit
velociti
(
d
ve
c
`
~
,
_
=oN7u es
to
emonstrate non-erosi
velo
iues).
and the hydraulic design information.
;c L~ ~~ eNr L
~H~~i~ Q1 The legend for the drawings is incomplete,-and .does not prayide enough information to allow for full
-`s
P
'
'
srcr ~R'P ~r°l4pt
FLI
understanding of what is proposed. ~~~
L.
SE:E ~~~~ The design as proposed placed a Straight culvert in place of a su'eam meander. Based on review of the
~ SPc~t. proposed design the expected stream velocities through this reach will increase drarrkltically.
~~~ y"1~ ~ , Therefore, we request a hydraulic analysis to demonstrate that no destabilization of the stream will
occur.
Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCAC 2h :0507(x){S.)., we-wilChawe to place the permit applica4on on hold
until we are supplied the necessary information.. >uitficimore; until the information is received by the NC
Division of Water Quality, we request (by copy o€ this. letter) that the US Army Ccups of Engineers place
the permit application un hold.
Hopefully, we can work cogethcr to expedite. the processing cif your permit application. If you have any
questions or require additional information; please contact John I~ennessy at 919-733-5694.
Program
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Oftice
US Army Corps of Engineers
File Copy
C:~acdot~R-2309~;c[res~oadcncr~01 OSSOhld.doc

d ~~ u~
~ iA
ti
~~ Oww ~~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVER\OR
November 2, 2001
MEMO TO: John Hennessy, DWQ~~
FROM: Elizabeth L. Lusk, Natural Systems Unit ~1~1
Galen Cail, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
SUBJECT: R-2809, Wake Forest Bypass, Wake County, permit application
REFERENCE: Correspondence of October 16, 2001 from DWQ to NC DOT
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
The bulleted items in the abovementioned letter are addressed in the following memo. Also
attached is a duplicate set of permit drawings for Section C with comments or calculations noted
directly thereon. For clarity, I have numbered each item per Site in Section C.
Sections A&B
• As noted in the original permit application, (page 4 and page 9), "the NCDOT understands that
permit modifications will be required when designs are finalized for Sections A and B." A pre-
application meeting will be arranged prior to submitting these modifications.
Section C
Site 2 -Sheet 6 of 16
1. Information for outfalls (2) provided on this sheet.
2. Stormwater outfall at a preformed scour hole is proposed at the outfall at Station 66+42 -L- (Lt)
(see sheet 15 of 16).
3. Velocity calculated on the rip rap pad is 0.23 m/s (0.7 ft/s). This is for the 10-year storm
discharge. See attached rip rap pad detail (Sheet 13 of 16). Therefore, it was determined that a
preformed scour hole was not needed.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

Site 3 -Sheet 7 of 16
1. Information for outfalls (2) provided on this sheet.
2. Flow spreader devices for stormwater outfall is proposed to be a preformed scour hole (see
sheet 15 of 16) at the outfall at Station 74+40 -L- (Lt) and an energy dissipator for the outfall at
Station 74+80 -L- (Rt).
3. Velocity calculated on the rip rap pad is 0.28 m/s (0.9 ft/s). This is for the 10-year storm
discharge. See attached rip rap pad detail (Sheet 13 of 16). Therefore, it was determined that a
preformed scour hole was not needed.
4. The existing UT channel comes into Dunn Creek at a 90-degree angle. Therefore, the natural
conditions are replicated by the current design to tie the channel into Dunn Creek at a
perpendicular angle. In order to improve the site, some meanders have been provided.
5. In previous conversations, the NCDOT understood that the question refers to checking the
quantities for buffer impacts in Zone 1 and Zone 2. They were checked and they are correct.
Site 4 -Sheet 8 of 16
1. As indicated on this sheet a cross vane rock weir has been provided at the outlet (also, see sheet
14 of 16).
2. Velocity calculated on the rip rap pad is 0.18 m/s (0.6 ft/s). This is for the 10-year storm
discharge. See attached rip rap pad detail (Sheet 13 of 16). Therefore, it was determined that a
preformed scour hole was not needed.
3. See question #2.
6. In previous conversations, the NCDOT understood that the question refers to checking the
quantities for buffer impacts in Zone 1 and Zone 2. They were checked and they are correct.
Site 5 -Sheet 10 of 16
1. The buffer impact quantities on the summary table have been corrected (Sheet 16 of 16).
2. See question # 1.
We hope these changes and explanations are satisfactory. If not, please contact us immediately.
The current let date is December 21, 2001. Therefore, we look forward to your response as soon as
possible.
Cc: Eric Alsmeyer, COE
Hal Bain, Unit Head, PDEA
Charles Bruton, Asst. Branch Manager, PDEA
File: R-2809

1 State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
October 16, 2001
Mr. Bill Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
~~~
NCDENI3
~~C E 1 CFO
OCT 24 ~

Re: Permit Application for proposed NC 98 Bypass of Wake Forest from west of SR 1923 ( ~ANA~
Mill Road) to east of SR 2053 (Jones Dairy Road) in Wake County
DWQ No. 010550, TIP No. R-2809
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal fora 401 Water Quality Certification dated
March 23, 2001, and the addendum dated August 7, 2001, and the addendum dated October 3, 2001, for the
aforementioned project. Review of your application revealed it lacking necessary information required for
making an informed permit decision. The permit application was deficient in the following azeas:
Segments A&B
• As presently proposed the drawings for these segments do not represent final design. Therefore, the
401 Water Quality Certification will be conditioned to preclude any impacts until DOT obtains
modifications for these segments. At that time, the final design will be needed approval of the
requested 401 modification. The NCDWQ suggests that DOT arrange a preapplication meeting with
DWQ in the near future to address the final design for these two segments.
Section C
Site 2
(• The information about the stormwater discharge velocities is presented only for one discharge. Please
provide the appropriate information for both stormwater outfalls.
• The proposed rip rap pads will not provide the required diffuse flow. Please redesign the stormwater
outfall with an appropriate flow spreader device.
,3 • For the stotmwater outfall where discharge data is presented, the anticipated velocity is too high to
provide non-erosive velocities. Please reduce the discharge to less than 0.5 feet per second for the ten-
yeaz storm. In addition, the information provided is presented in metric units. Please provide future
information in English units.
Site 3
• The information about the stormwater discharge velocities is presented only for one discharge. Please
provide the appropriate information for both stormwater outfalls.
Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/109b post consumer paper

Z • The proposed rip rap pads will not provide the required diffuse flow. Please redesign the stormwater
outfall with an appropriate flow spreader device.
3 • For the stormwater outfall where discharge data is presented, the anticipated velocity is too high to
provide non-erosive velocities. Please reduce the dischazge to less than 0.5 feet per second for the ten-
yeaz storm. In addition, the information provided is presented in metric units. Please provide future
information in English units.
4 • The point of confluence of Dunn Creek with its tributary is being redesigned. The prpoposed
configwation of the redesigned confluence is a 90-degree angle. The angle of the relocated tributary
should be reconfigwed to more closely mimic the natwal conditions, and thus reduce the potential for
stream destabilization.
,)~ • In previous correspondences, DWQ indicated that the proposed drawings didn't appear to coincide
with the impacts presented in the table of impacts. No indication was given in the NCDOT
correspondence dated October 4, 2001 that the issue had been reviewed. Please provide a discussion
that indicates the issue was reviewed and what the analysis demonstrated.
Site 4

• As previously indicated, the proposed location of the new culvert occws in a section of stream with
significant sinuosity. Based on review of the proposed design the expected stream velocities through
this reach will increase dramatically. Therefore, the DWQ suggests DOT design and construct a
crossvane downstream of the proposed culvert.
Z • The proposed rip rap pads will not provide the required diffuse flow. Please redesign the stormwater
outfall with an appropriate flow spreader device.
3 • .For the stormwater outfall where discharge data is presented, the anticipated velocity is too high to
provide non-erosive velocities. Please reduce the dischazge to less than 0.5 feet per second for the ten-
yeaz storm. In addition, the information provided is presented in metric units. Please provide future
information in English units.
4. • In previous correspondences, DWQ indicated that the proposed drawings didn't appear to coincide
with the impacts presented in the table of impacts. No indication was given in the NCDOT
correspondence dated October 4, 2001 that the issue had been reviewed. Please provide a discussion
that indicates the issue was reviewed and what the analysis demonstrated.
Site 5
• The proposed drawings and tables indicate that the existing stream will be relocated dwing
construction and then replaced in its existing location after the new road is completed. Given the
design and construction constraints imposed by the existing development in the immediate area of the
proposed construction, the proposed plan is allowable at a conceptual level. However, the impacts
incurred to Neuse Buffers as a result of the project cannot be considered temporary in natwe. As such,
the table of impacts and proposed buffer mitigation presented in the application should be changed to
reflect this point. The impacts to the stream can be considered to be temporary. However, the
proposed construction phasing and final design needs to be approved as part of the 401 Water Quality
Certification.
Z • In previous correspondences, DWQ indicated that the proposed drawings didn't appear to coincide
with the impacts presented in the table of impacts. No indication was given in the NCDOT
correspondence dated October 4, 2001 that the issue had been reviewed. Please provide a discussion
that indicates the issue was reviewed and what the analysis demonstrated.

Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCAC 2h .0507(a)(5), we will have to place the permit application on hold
until we are supplied the necessary information. Furthermore, until the information is received by the NC
Division of Water Quality, we request (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of Engineers place
the permit application on hold.
Hopefully, we can work together to expedite the processing of your permit application. If you have any
questions or require additional information, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694.
Program
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
File Copy
C:~ncdotUt-2809~correspondence~OlO550h1d3.doc

Sincerely,

~-
C \ ism •.~ -s ~ 4
3 i~ C~; h
~t,o x ~ ~"
`~ ~os ~~8 .2 ~~ / '-END PR /
a ~ /
~, -~ ~ - ~ R-2~
I Wake e ~.,, -
~,~ :~
( Elem ch •~ o ~ ,s, 4, ,I ` I
~~ ^~ / `~ ~
~ v
I , ~ ~~ - _
,' •~ 2.oa
~- - ~ ` a e'~~S ~ 2053 `~ ,~~~ ~ {;
~G q SEOI"~~. 4
------ I ~°~ /off
- - -z~ ~ ~ ~ ~/ ~ 2053
Fore tan le BE ~ i
R~T . ~~"" .,9
~~~ '
~ ~ W R-28 9C'• ~- __ ~"" o
v ~ a '~ I Austin __-~- :L
~ i" 2920
2049 ~ ~ ' / ~~
VICINITY
Mr~II~S
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WA%E covNTY
PROJEG"T:81~0250~1 QZ~809C>
NC 98, WASE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR x(153
HEET ~ OF ~ 6 REVISED 7 / 11 / Ol

ITE Y
SITE 1
''A
~1
SI'Z'E 1~A~ 1
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:81~0250~ Qt~809C)
NC 98, WAg.E FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR ?A53
:ET Z OF 1~ REVISED 7/ 11/ Ol
BEGIN F.A. PROJECT STP-98(Dvv
BEGIN CONST.

a
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
_ WAS.E COUNTY
~j ~ ~ PROJECT: 81~0550~ Qt~2809C)
NC 98. WAGE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR ZOS3
ET 3 OF ~ 6 REVISED 7 / 11 /

LEGEND
--i,ILB-~ WETLAND BOUNDARY
/~L
~` WETLAND
L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
• • • • DENOTES MECHANIZED
• • •• • • • CLEARING
-~- -~- FLOW DIRECTION
TB
~.~ TOP OF BANK
---WE --- EDGE OF WATER
- ~ -- PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- ~ - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
--~-PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG- -NATURAL GROUND
- --e L-- - PROPERTY LINE
- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-POE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
----------- WATER SURFACE
DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
VANE
RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY
OISSIPATOR BASIN
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DNISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT: 81~0250~ (R-2809C)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EA5T OF SR 2053
SHEET 9' OF ~~ RRVi4RD 7/11/
LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
---•-- COIR FIBER ROLLS
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
~~
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
~°

u n ~
u~ aa. r-~ ma GD1f CGrISTAUCTION co. I
SKP SkICE(~000 A
~I~wu I CAPfTAL LAIOS. LLC

]~]LA~N ~V~]EW
~I7C~E 7l

t3'io00 mo ~s a~in. waa

~miD ~~0'~
uieu~ a~ ~ ora
N. C. DEFT. OF TRANSPORTATION
.i aass ~ ~
av.~eETM ~~~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
W AgE COUNTY
PROJECT:81.10250~ Qt-28090)

/Om 0 2 m NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS

SCALE ® DENOTES FII.L IN WBTLAN FROM WEST OF US lA
DB
TO EAST
OF SR 2053
`
SHEET S OF ~ V REVISED 7 / ll / Ol
DE PDE
PDE~pDE
I
DE-pDE

- ~_
E E
oeoa~ss A- - ~ w
r[two s -' a ~ -

E
.i
~arrt-nr
i
i
I
~
n
s
r
_
Z
m
F- >

W ~~ ~
P
O
r

~ ,~
--~--

P
4DE~
~P
-PDE-PDE-P E-PDE-POE-PO

\ , ~ ~ ~ THOUAS & DAAIERON E. C J C20' 70wN OF MAKE FOREST Q c D•/9 on-S
' ' ~ ~A ~ ~, \ 1 T8 I ~ NANCY H. OAUERON •~ ~ I ~ SErER EASEUEN7 Cg g v `
`C( ~ - y ~s 'Ys
~ ~ \ \ , ~ , r0¢ raoTecra« h = D •oZY
. ~ ~ \ ~ .~
\\ \\ \ \ \ ` ~ ~ rnEFaam scan xac E--~E~'~E 1~= 0.21 ~S
\ /
\ \ \ \ ~'~ \ \ ~ ~ /~ ~e- ._ - - GA,>. R;P 1?.r first,
JE--~E_"CE--~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ 2:/~ !L~/ S:clt 5/•~S
- \ ~\ ~
-_`~\.~~ ~ N=0.07
\ \ ~ ~ ~ ~= ~
' \ \ ~ - -'ty-- ~/ ~ Z

~ --~-- ~ ~'
-----\-- ~ Fq Fq
\ qY~r Z.q -0' -~
70~ y

T 700 q ~ ~ ~.._ -- -- --' ~ +
1 - ~~- ~ \
~ \ \ '$ $ ~

C
' \

\\ ~
\ t ! 2.im x Llm RCBC

\ m /

~/ ~

QTe'~'O~G~S
---
E E ----~-~ 1
E E--
- \
--~ L ~
E'-~E
~E'E'_-,E- -1 _. o .
~
n ~ 5 = 2'%
„: o
oZy
\
_E_~E_~E ~ `~
T E .
\ \
\ \ \ \ gCDOT $i0. •6•D2 ~' S A ~~
\
\
\ lrt
\\ 18 \\ \
\
\ ~
Lv ~ ~ ~ ~ THOUAS e. DAUERON a \ \ N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
NANCY H. OAMERON \ DI V
~~~~
IOm 0 2 m
SCALE
® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
ISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1402504 (R-2809C)
NC 98, WAKE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ OF I(p REVISED 10/Ol

Qi° = ~ 4 3~i 4MS
s=2Z°/,
h = O.OZy
V=o.iq "ys
~•4~, R~PRp ~
Z:li zo:1SSd..~
s~o•3%
n = o.o~
QTO =O.17uwS
T.f„ i ~
~P~~
~~
-~~"'~~
~ .PDE'POE~
wE
~.~1 ` \
~I` ~wE ~ ~~q ~
PREFORIED SCOUR M0.E
1~
P
a.ss a RrR.r
~~ RCDOT STq MD..
~~

i~p~E f- F'Ut- YUt- t"~uL-
~ ~ /J/ CIFJIOr pS5PAi0R J
iOE MtOtECttlR
taoss ruE Roa rot
~~~` lr V' ~1L:
lOm 0 2 m
SCALC
TNOY~S R_n~uronu .
-r~L r vim- ~ ~~ ..~ -- -
SPECYL UITEMU r-d/CM THOMAS 8. DAUERON 8
./ aASS iR1 RM NANCY H. DAeIERON
(~,=o•K3~n,s O
'~T V.=l.Sz"YS
~ 9 =b.'r%
~~ h= 0.013
0.2a ~S
`i•~ M RM tLr 6-sR.
® DENOTES TEMPORARY Z.~i t:I S:oleS/9
FILL IN SURFACE WATERS S ~ •3%
n= o •07
® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
1'
ROOTwADS
_E~E~E_~E~Er

_~
0
TONN OF t/AKE FOREST O
CLASS 'P RIPRAP ~
/QI~ /
E ~ i~
\ f`f i
1 j~E E E I
~~
I QI
' 1 ~ ~ NARY 901US HEIRS
~~ i--TOE PROTECTION
TOE PROTECTION-~ ~~/
CLASS IRPRAP J
NCOOi STO. N0. !68.02
ANOREN L. AMYONS,
JEANETTE F. Ar0rONS !~
JAi,ES A, LUCAS. JR,
Qa=o.oey u,.s O
Y,=3.93 "Vs
s : 43'/e
h ~ o •O2y
Z•S:l ~ !5:/ S:o~t 5le~S
s=o.3%
n ~ o•O'j
IOm 0 2 m
SCALE
~L~/
~/
-P J
\ Cg055 ruE xaU rErt
`~
/ /
/ ~
/ /
/ /
/ /
E--
~~~711r V' ~11 i ~'V
~~~~
® DENOTES F[LL IN SURFACE WATERS

PERMANENT ~{ ~
IMPACTS ~ ,~ ,~, ~ _~"
TOE ~to~crow ~ ~ ~ ~d~ER ZONE 2 ~ ~ . ~~~ ~ '
1~' E ~~E ~ / BUFFER ZONE I ~''oN~ ~ / ~'L
E , ~:
Q ~ fit/ - E-~je~~--~_~ _=- _~(y 1 ~,~pl~ /
/mot' ~.,. %"~ ~yFF~ /C~~
-E E-rLF. E ~"\
~~
~- -=~==% J i- -
~~~~ ~ ~
~ ~
i ~_•
DBNOTES FII.L IN
SURFACB WATERS

DBNOTE9 FII.L IN WBTLANDB

/ TEMPORARY LATERaL 0.6m BASE DITCH pp~~ MARY BOLUS HEIRS
/ W/ CLASS B R
o
P R

i I
AP
f i
~
V
i / /
~ _~/ i ~ ~ I
CLA55 B RIPRAP ! / TEMP. ROCK SILT CHECK / 8 F ER ZONE 2
/ / /
TYPE A STO
1633
01
}~ -E /
T
,
/
NCDO
.
.
STD. 868 QZ
TEMP. ROCK SEDIMENT f / ~ ~ / '- "- ; - /
DAM TYPE B ST0.1634.02 /
~ TEMP. 400 CSP / - J ~ BUFFER ZONE I _ - ~ON~ j /~'L/
E
(
\ /Q 1 E~J'-z-E =-~,E-- ~~R 1. / ,~-~/ ~
~-E _' E
E~E~
~
~
E
E E E~~ / \
/ ~
\
`~
~
'
f,~-----7 --
O
C

J /
o ~
~ _ ~oer-
.o - -
- -~ ~
~r.1 _-.~
c~ `~~= ~ ' - T~

_ ._ .~ _ - ~
--~
d _
__

W
.Z
~ ~ 85'~'~ -~-
~
~ ~

--
. . ~
-
u ; -_
d
__
_
~ , ~ `\ , ~ - -
AHOREw U. AMNIONS. ~ ~
AMIMON
TTE F
.
JEAIr~
_
AWES A. LUCAS.~• Z

~ _
3
_
~ ESE E E E E
_
W _a - - - ~E"~~E
~ CIA
~
E ~
a
- \
H. 81J-+~
RUTH
-f- E.~E~
PD E~
F
~ ~ ~ ~ A~ ~ y ~ ~ ~
l~l ~Y N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~'~~ ~j WAgE COUNTY
CLASS '1' RIPRAP
PROJECT:8.1~40250~Q (R-2809C)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY NC 98, wAgE FOREST BYPASS
~~II? 0 2 m FILL IN SURFACE WATERS FROM WEST OF US lA
SCALE ® DENOTES TEMPORARY TO EAST OF SR 2053
FLLL IN WETLANDS
ID
~~
SHEET
OF
D REVISED 9/01

~a.ss a xra.r
for spa ~seoz
\ ~
t.~ ara ~
THOMAS B.pAYERON d ~ \
NANCY H.DAMERON
TRIBUT\Y TO'~,~ O~
DUNN CREEK O
~ ~
\ E~6/ ~.
/6fC i ~
rso !A[[~~a.ss
~ ' v rElfd~ t ~
V
v
-BL- ~
s = Z G'~
* •+ o•O2I(
V= o.z3'~/s
r•~, ,z:~ s:d~ sarss
s=o•a%
n = 0.07
IOm 0 2 m
SCALE
® DENOTES FILL LN SURFACE WATERS
-O ~ \ ANOREM L. A-A//ONS,
~~\ ~ ~ JEANETTE F. AYYONS >~
\ \ JAI.IES A. LUCAS. JR.
\c~'~~E-`.E-~
~r~ ~ E- E--,_E_____E E
~'`~`~--~-----` _ I
J
~' ~ \ ~ , o
~ \ ~ I78fOO
a m srs d
~ ~ ~ ~ `_, z
P I ~ ~ 1 11 ~ ~Y ~ ~ V V
~_ ISO CS / / \ ~
\ ~ ~~~~
E ~
f ~~=E E
_~
~PD ~
pOf
~ -HEn,p DITCH ~
\
recsauEn start w~E a
~P ~ ~ C
I

TH0IAAS & pAYERON b~ 1 m I T~ N ^~
NANCY H.pAYERON z ~
N m m

TOE PROTECTION O N
~~., i - N
N `^ N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORT
TRIBUTARY TO DUNN CREEK 11iVTCTnN (1F FTi(3FIW A, 1

~,tapREM ~. AW10NS' SPRING 80x
~ANETTE F.AµuONS ~
...cc A.IUCAS. JR. ~J
1L`
~~~
an: 0.8o tA1$
~~-, R.p ~5c.
~ ~:~ ; zo:~s:dc sl.~s
S: o•~ye
n=0-o
°k -0.25"y
~\
F ~ _
J
1 ~.1
~«e.- , r
O
N
'~.
'•Y
OO
W
Z
J
gV
lOm 0 20m
SCALE
~~~~
® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1402504 (R~2809C)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~Z OF ICp REVISED 10/Ol

RIP RA+P OUTLET PROTECTION
PLAN VIEW
D
tm m) w
(m) L
(m) W
(m)

375 0.8 1.5 2.3
450 0.9 1.8 2.7

PROFILE VIEW
D
D
-,~
~T
T (m)o 0.3m CLASS B RIP
0.45m CLASS i RIP
RAP
RAP
W

E L

PLAN VIEW
e
2C1 °-JO
rya ~
1 ~ \
r ~ Pad ~
/•
bov/errs/ \
^@
CROSS VANE ROCK WEIR DETAIL
larger Douldv
usal to key 1~YO
stream Ronk
A
ocvv rocks
~~ ~~
mlNe donings
00
b~
.' ~•
O O .
^ ~
O ~.o /•
SECTION A-A
nolhe ~vant/nys
tProJeued hp of
5 ~ZO • vane wlnp
Typical
0.3 m mo~c.
ep bavldvs
•0 ~~~ m/n. ---- cL O
f001e/ rOCKS
SECTION 8-8
slream~ book
!o
O ;~
~'
O ~
.~
r O~~.O
~ Q ~~~~ ~ O
- Slreom Ch~nne!
NOTES Boulders should be native quarried rock
or locally shot rock, angular and oblong with
approximate dlmenslons ofi 1.2m x 0.9m x 0.6m and
weighing opproximgtely (4000 Ibs)
Note: Rocks should filt tightly with minimal spaces
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~0250~ <R-2809C)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF U5 lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET~OF I~p REV 10/Ol

PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE WITH
LEVEL SPREADER APRON
fNOt to scale)

Preformed
Scour Hole IPSN)
IRip RaD In bast
not shorn for
>reaaar Boulders should be
>praxtmately 0.6m x 0.6m x 0.6m
size rlth 0.3m betrsen rock e.
3m of Permonent Sotl
Reinforcement matting IPSRI
around Derimetar of scour hold:
ShaYDe graded level.
Section A-A
9
MN Y 81011
yrtir P$R
0.3 m Natural
?.. 6€ m T. II - -C'r-oun~
Fes-- 3.Om
Llner~Claes IRip Rap ~-g=LSm-~ Sprsoder Boulder
rich Filter Fabric 0.3m tuck bury OJm
NOTEa'B' denotes alas of Daalnl NOTES The Permanent SoilRelnforoemsnt
For example: I,Smx I,Sm PSN, B' I,5 matting fPSRI shay be seeded rich notlve
grasses at Instdbtlon,
ENERGY DISSIPATOR
NOT TO SCALE
l~ 6m DISSIPATOR POOL ~ 2m
`i ff PRON
PROPOSED DITCR
1 ,,
~~i 0.6m ~
O.Am TIf4~110.6m
0.9m ~ 0.6m
ClAS$ IRIPRAP
FILTER FABRIC
PROFILE
NOT TO SCALE
2: I
O OO O I .~
DISSIPATOR APRON
-- PROPOSED DITCH POOL
2:1 OR FLATTER
FRONT DITCH SLOPE
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
BUFFER
CLASS TRIP RAP 1

N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1402504 (R-2809C)
SHEET ~~ OF Imo/ Revised 10/25/01
IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPAC TS SURFACE WATER IMP ACTS BUFFER I MPACTS

Site
No.
Station

(From/To)
Structure
Size
Fill In
Wetlands
(ha)
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
(ha)
Excavation
In Wetlands
(ha) Mechanized
Clearing
(Method III)
(ha)
Fill In SW
(Natural)
(ha)
Fill In SW
(Pond)
(ha)
Temp. Fill
In SW
(ha) Existing
Channel
Impacted
(m)
Relocated
Channel
(m)
Enclosed
Channel
(m)
Zone
1
(ha)
Zone
2
(ha)
1 62+95 -L- RT N/A 0.0037
2 66+40 -L- 2 2.7m X 1.8m RCBC 0.0505 110 110 0.185 0.114
3A 74+46/74+73 L 0.0030 30 27 0 0.050 0.017
Trib. Dunn Cr.
38 74+20/76+20 L 2 2.7m X 2.4m RCBC 0.0673 0.0057 172 62 78 0.235 0.159
Dunn Creek
4 84+60 -L- 2 @ 2.4m X 2.4m RCBC 0.0275 90 65 0.130 0.068
5 85+20 -L- LT NIA 0.0161 0.0508 0.0037 0.0047 62 60 0.197 0.100
6 77+80 -L- 750 RCP 0.0054 87 71 0.124 0.076
7 82+70/83+80 L 900 RCP 0.1132 0.0083 138

TOTALS: 0.133 0.0508 0 0 0.1657 0 0.0104 689 149 324 0.921 0.534
~3

a,,. swF ~
M~
•~ Paa+~•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
November 30, 2001
MEMO TO: John Hennessy, DWQ
FROM: Elizabeth L. Lusk, Natural Systems Unit
Galen Cail, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
SUBJECT: R-2809, Wake Forest Bypass, Wake County, permit application
REFERENCE: DWQ November 28, 2001 request for revisions to November 2, 2001
permit drawings.
The following revisions have been made to the November 2, 2001 permit drawings for
Section C of the aforementioned project:
Site 2 -sheet 6 of 15
Class Brip-rap replaced with a preformed scour hole proposed at Station 67+04 -L-(Rt.)
Site 4 -Sheet 8 of 15
Class Brip-rap replaced with a preformed scour hole proposed at Station 84+65 -L-(Rt.)
We hope these revisions are satisfactory. If not, please contact us immediately. The current let
date is February 19, 2002. Therefore, we look forward to your response as soon as possible.
Cc: Eric Alsmeyer, COE
Hal Bain, Unit Head, PDEA
Charles Bruton, Asst. Branch Manager, PDEA
File: R-2809
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
ALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOTSTATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

,~a „ ~
M
j L1933 ~., .iy. O~ .65 ~;
C ~
~'" / K
S issa c,i y I
~ m Rd' r ~a~~h ~~ 3 %
' ~ 6 ~ 8 .2 9~ ~ '~~END PR /
o
I Wake a 21~ ;~ R 2~ ~
Elem ch •~ ~ "
I ~ J ~; I\ I
5 ~-' 2.08
`-~ ~ gae'~°S ~ 2053 `~ h~~ i;
NG o5E01, c` ~f} /
~~ 2053
Fore t~t`Ile BE RO'~ ECT ~ ~ -~~
<;,y L' ~
R-28 9C'~ -' ~ ~ ~9
'~ . Austin _---~ `L~
~ ~ 2049 ~L. ~ ?054
~~~~~~~~
1°.lL~~~
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WASE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~(0250~ Qt-2809C)
NC 98, WA%E FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~. OF ~S REVISED 7 / 11 / Ol

LEGEND
-~1~JL6~ WETLAND BOUNDARY
/~L
- ~ WETLAND
L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
®DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
• • • • DENOTES MECHANIZED
•• •• • ` • CLEARING
-~-- FLOW DIRECTION
~- TOP OF BANK
---WE --- EDGE OF WATER
- ~ _ PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- ~ - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
--~-- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG - -NATURAL GROUND
- -P~ - PROPERTY LINE
- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
---~EA3- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
----------~- - WATER SURFACE
N. ~'• n?~PT. +(!!P TRANSPORTATION
Dii~ISION OF HIGHWAY'S
WAGE COUNTY
PROJECT: 81~0250~ (R-2809CD
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET Z OF ~S REVISED 7/ ll/ 0
0
LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
-~~ COIR FIBER ROLLS
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
~~y
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSEO PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
^ DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
VANE
RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSiPATOR BASIN

~~~~ ~~~
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:81~0250~( Qt-2809C>
NC 98, WASE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET 3 OF I~REVISED 7/11/01
BEGIN f.A.PRQJE~: Sfr-:ii~l;
BEGIN CONST.

r
3
~~~~ ~~~
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:81~0250~ (R-2809C)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET q- OF ~ s REVISED 7 / ll / Ol

3p ~ ~~)
utnul oa. eASE atta CADY CONSTRUCTION CO.
SKP SNICEGOOO t
~ouu I CAPITAL LANDS. LLC
I

~]L~N ~VI]EW
~I7C~ ~

~s a~iio. eaoi
+.~5aQ0

~D0° ~~~
u,r~ ac. e~ orta
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
.i aass a ~
~M ~ ~~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WASE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~025O~ QZ-2809C)

lOm 0 2 m NC 98, WASE FOREST BYPASS

SCALE ® DENOTES FILL IN WBTLA.NDB FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET s OF ~~REVISED 7/ll/Ol
DE PDE-PDE_pDE I
DE~ppE
~
~
E E
- ~ aass ~ - ~ W
-
~

E
-
.i ~nuo e
a
~ar~n~
i
J
I
~
n

t
~ r
Z
m
D

W ~~ O`
P
O
r

~ ~ -~-
---~--
P
PDE 'P
-PDE-PDE-P E-PDE-PDE-PD

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ig I ~ TH aNCY H DA-.ERO & ~ I ~ SEwERwEASEUENTE FOREST i9 g (~jro '% (~. t q Ctiy,s

/ ~ ' E
4 ~ I
S
1 I ~ \ \ ~ I ~
TOE PROTECTIOF, $
c~
~ c
Z -~ / I (y - ~
`
\ \ s\ ~ \ E-
~ ~ --E S = 0 . ~ °~
~
~ \
~ PREFORfED SCOUR xOEE ES
~
~ h = O . I 0
\ ~\ ~ \
E
/
\
~E~CE-'~ \y\ ~ ~
~
\
E-E~ \

J \ 4Q0 CSe •T ELBWt
i
O \ \ \ - \ y ~ 1 - ~i i `
~ -- \-d~ \ ~-\
F Z
~
~
~ - -
- - -
- -\ - \
- ~ ~,~
F ~
\ F,9 ,r fq \ iYf 2-q 300 -~ -i
D
N

Q \ FL Fi
B \
-
~ - ~ -J

300 _
_ _
q
-~~ +
w ? - \ [s_
~ \

Z
J
- - -
\- - _
- _
\ \ ~+~ i
~

2 =

~
/

~
\ 2 Q 2.Tm x 48m RCBC ~ ~

m
\ ~v
y
/'
E E E E -
E-~E ~~-- \ \~
1
` `~ L ~
E~_E-_E
~ ~~ a
•~ /~ ?~
E~ (7f~D ~ V.Q•T: c-Vn5
\ ~E
\ E _~ \ ~ ~ \ ~ ~~ Bas~-
t 2 m -
, T

\ \ \ ~
\
~~~
` aREEOwm scouR RaE 5' = 0.3
\
~
~
\ \ \ '
\ n = 0.10

O .
\ \ \ \ \ ., CIASS _ pp~~ ~7
'Y RFRAP V ' V • O
5
\

7 I~
l l A ~ ~ ~~-qV ~~/y
~ ~ ll A ~Y V \ \
T
\ N. C. DEIDT. ®F TRANSF®I~TA°.
HOAIA$ B. DAMERON &
\
~I'jV ~~-'qV
~~
~ NANCY H. pAMERON DIVISI®N ®F HIGHWAYS
ll 11~ Q7 ®YT.` /-'B'11T TAT'I`V
lOm 0 20m
SCALE
DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS

Qua ` 0.A1D~'~3~/2O~C~"n~S
s=G ~3°t,
n=0,~o
~ =4.0$'3's
PD~~y ,
~P~~/- - _
`,
o~~ .PDE' D~
CLASS 8 RPRAP
`e NCOOT STO. H0.'~
~ /
~.~ ~ ga\
wE \ _I~ ~ wE \ °F \
PDt-rUt-rut-~
_ ~ ~ E,ERCY DKSPATOft J L~CLLL LATERAL v-pTCH TH01+1A$ B. DAUERON &
' w/ CLASS IRV RAP NANCY H. DAMERON
TOE PROTECigN
CROSS vuE ROCA DER O
6A m R-~p Bass..
q 2=11 i2:1 5ic~ S~~s
~=a.o$
V = x•24 ry'/
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
lOm 0 20m
SCALE

ROOTwADS
r`

~PDE~
i ~
~
~~
1
i
O
CL

/ W
~
i
`-`-E_~E~E_~E~E~

X
~ ` TOWN OF WAKE FOREST ~
o
~ J 1 CLASS 'I' RIPRAP /
--E-~_ g QI~ /
E I ~ /
\~~I ~ ~ ESE ~ //
~ ~ ~l `E j~E E E E E~
,, \ i
_ I /e I
~~ ~~ ` ~\ 1 / MARY BOLUS HEIR$
~Fxsr ~ ~ ~~~ ~. 1 /
\ ~w \ ~ ~X ~ ~b TOE PROTECTION
EXIST.2 @ 2.lin~ ~ ~
X 2.Im RCBC ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 2 @ 2.4m ~
` I ,~ 2~RCBC ~
~ ~
~fkisT ~
~ w
\ ~ GI FXisT \ \ \
I F~~ ~~ ~~
~- -_ ~ ~
;~
'~
400 CSP ~ I 20 \` ~~ \ ~
wiELBOw~ _ ~ m ~ ~
m c ~
\ c '^ ~
T _
A A
\F ~ ~ o i 1 i
~F ~ ~ ~ ^' I
N
TOE PROTECTION F\ a / / J
/G / /
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
ANDREW L. AMMONS, 1 0 ` ~ ~ - - '-
JEANETTE F. AMMONS & ~` E E
/(~!~ t~ JAMS A. LUCAS. JR. ~ \
`-~!O ~ O •!~ Ct l ~{'Y~ S \ \ CRO55 VAIE ROCII NER
`/• 8 wl R.y' ~ ALA O ~
ff \ ~ ~ ~
Z•~=) I ~5 ~ ~ SiCIC 5145 CLASS 'I' RIPRAP ~ , ley ,`
~= o.to / /
V=~•~Z mks ~ ~~ / i
lOm 0 20m
SCALE DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
~~~~ ~~~~
~~~~

/ TEMPORARY LATERAL 0.6m BASE DITCH pp~p MARY BOLUS HEIRS
P 01
/ W/ CLASS B RIP R
~
A
\ i
/
\ _
In / /
/ ~
/. I ~

TEMP
ROCK SEDIMENT CLASS BRIPRAP /
TEMP. ROCK SILT CHECK / B F ER ZONE 2
NCD07 STD. 86(72 TYPE A STD. 1633. / ~ ~
_ , ~ // ~ ~ ~
/ J
'
. \ /
/ /
DAM TYPE B STD.1634.02 / TEMP. 400 CSP / - J ~
BUFFER ZONE
`'
E
~ I ~
E ~ ~ 2~
' pN / F,
\ - ~-E J
E-~/-c-E~~=~_
/e 1
K`E' ' \~~~R ti / ,~p% /
E
~E / \ `~`"~~ /FF,~ /
ice
1 \ __ /
/
~\-~
_ -
-- ~

J ~7'`- -- ~ `LDET-

_
~~
\ ~ --_ _ --r~
~ - N
Z ~ ~ _
85f010 ___ ~
--
~ , '
V ~ --
__
ANDREW L. AMMONS.
AMMpNS &
TTE F LJJ
.
~pNE
JAMES A. WCAS. JR. ~ _
- Z
// ~ ESE E E E E
w w
--a -- -
-- -- - ~E_E ~ CIARENCE H. BONN &
- V
~,
a - -F--
ESE ~ RUTH H. BONN
'
PD E'
Q
F

~ ~ ~ ~ \~~ ~ y ~ ~ ~~y
1`~! ~Y ~'~Y N . C. DEPT. ®F TRANSF®RTA7
DIVISI®N ®F HIGHWAYS
~~~~ ~j WARE C®UNTY
CLASS 'I' RIPRAP
PR®JECT:8.1~0250~ (R-2809C
DENOTES TEMPORARY NC 98, WARE F®REST BYPA
/Om 0 20m FILL IN SURFACE WATERS FR®M WEST ®F US lA
SCALE ~ DENOTES TEMPORARY T® EAST ®F SR 2053
FILL IN WETLANDS
~
~~
SH EET
®F
REVISED 9

THOMAS B. DAMERON 8~
NANCY H. DAAIERON
r_
Z
rn
N
V
V
-4-
IV
O
i
r
-BL- ~
~~ = O,Zy t,bn5
C4.4 m ~i $oL.t
Z' ~ ~ 12 ~I rc~C S/sr,.e s
5 =0.3`0
h =©~~0
lOm 0 20m
SCALE
JCL-SS B RPRM
NC~OT ST0.868.02-
TH01~A5 & DAAIERON &
NANCY H.OAMERON
TOE PROTECTION
ANDREW L. ANMONS.
r ..rrrc r •uuAWC R
m m
N _
TRIBUTARY TO DUNN CREEK
DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
~~~~ ~~~~
~~~~

\
/ I $:r ~ yo /~ 13cat
\ 45p \ I
\ "" C \/ ~ © LATERAL 0.6m BASE gTCH I I ~
\ \ \- \ I I i RESERVOIR I ~ S 'V • 3 G~0
\ \ I IA~RAI 0.6m ~1SE gTCH GG
\ \ \ \ \ j © I r/ICLASS B RFJiAP I ~ ENERGY OISSP TOR YI = O . C Cr
\ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ CIJASS IB RIPRAP I I , ~` V =0'Z 5 '~5
\ \ \ \ Nf~DOT I STD. 86$.02 I RESENT.O,R ~ ~
\ \ ~ 02
\\ ~\ CLASS 8121PRAP -- ~\` *1'-~-_ ~ ~ ^' -
\ \ \NCDOT STD. 868:62 ~ ~ ~ - 4~ ~ $
ANOREw f. M-AA0~5• a' SPRING BOX \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 450 mm CON , mj 1 ¢>~
JEANETf A IUCAS.~•
,JAMES ~ ~
/ ~ ~ ~
f- ~ ~~ f- F ~ ~f_ ~
ti F
-" 83+Oi0
o ~
LATERAL 0.6n BASE gTCH y LATERAL y-gTCH ~~
r/ CLASS IRPRAP py
v~ C
T ~ ~~ ~ -
- ~ _ ~ ~ ~ Q~E E E E E E E E-
-t% 0~~
e ANOREw 1. AypA0N5.
~\ / ~ QQ~/ ~pNEiTE F. ANMONS ~+
-PDE, \ / JAMES A.I.UCAS.Jk.
PDE-'PDE- P
DE_.P~F' o~ ~ Jti5
~~~~ ~~~~
-BL- 164 jj(( ~~~
~~~1~
L! L~LLL~J DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
lOm 0 20m
SCALE ~!L~
DENOTES FILL LN WETLANDS
`1 ~ ~ i ,
1
\~~~ _ J
-r2- ror sTw 00
W
Z
J
~ - V
-.,. -T2- PoMC S1A.029Dd1

PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE WITH
LEVEL SPREADER APRON
INOt to scale)
L
Preformed
Scour Hole (PSH)
(Rip RaD In basil
not shown for
~nreader Boulders should be
:proximately 0.6m x 0.6m x 0.6m
size with 0.3m between rocks.
0.9m to 3m of Permanent Soil
Reinforcement matting IPSR)
to be prescribed around perimeter
ofi Scour hole csee plan .views);
Shall be graded level.
Section A-A
A~„~
Poe mrcn PSR
Ou Het
0.3 m Natural
0
2r 0.6 m Z ° ~ ~round-
oo~ooooo000o Varles
0.9m to 3.Om Spreader Boulder
Llner: Class IRIp RoD 8=1.5m~ bur 0.3m
with Filter Fabric 0.3m tUCk y
NOTE: 'B' denotes size of basin; NOTE: The Permanent Soil Reinforcement
For example: 1.5mx I.Sm PSH, B= I.5 matting IPSR) shall be Seeded with native
grasses at Installation.
ENERGY DISSIPATOR
NOT TO SCALE
Sm DISSIPATOR POOL 2m
'~ PRON
PROPOSED DITCH
2•y O.6m ~'\
0.6m 0.6m
0.9m ~ 0.6m I
CLASS I RIPRAP
FILTER FABRIC
PROFILE
NOT TO SCALE
2z I
O OOO I ..~
DISSIPATOR ppRON
PROPOSED DITCH POOL

2:1 OR FLATTER
FRONT DITCH SLOPE
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
BUFFER
CLASS IRIP RAP 1

CROSS VANE ROCK WEIR DETAIL
PLAN VIEW
^~ ~~ SECTION B-B
larger boulder r >/3 BanKfu// f/3 BanKfull l/3 BanKfull
20 °-30 ° used to key Tnto ~ Width Width Width
~,p ~ stream bank }
1
~1~ ~ ~
A A 00 °
poo weir crotch O;O
~~ °^ ° °
',D ~~ ~ ~~G e ^
~ ,,O ~ ~ __ ~ ~ ~~ '~~°
° ~r---'~ B ^ °
O ,^ ^ ° o ~
"~--fester rocks larger boulder ' ~' ^ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ° ' ^ ~ Stream Crbnne/
boulders used to key Into Footer rocKS
stream bank
~~ ~~
' ~ B notlve plantings
NOTE: Boulders should be native quarried rock
or locally shot rock, angular and oblong with
approximate dimensions of 1.2m x 0.9m x 0.6m and
S SECT/ON A-A weighing approximately (4000 Ibs)
~~i ~~ k ~~~UI native plantings
z[~. ~ Note: Rocks should tit tightly with minimal spaces
-4`Projected top of
5 ° 20 ° vane wing
typical
0.3 m max.
oranr~ tea boulders
° 9 . -'
o °O ~, °.~ o: a ° ~ X04 a~ o ~ o °' o. 6a
footer rocKs AT !'` TI~LDT ~/li.`

IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS BUFFER IMPACTS

Site
No.
Station

Fromlfo
Structure
Size
Fill In
Wetlands
ha
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
ha
Excavation
In Wetlands
ha Mechanized
Clearing
(Method III)
ha
Fill In SW
(Natural)
ha
Fill In SW
(Pond)
ha
Temp. Fill
In SW
ha Existing
Channel
Impacted
m
Relocated
Channel
m
Enclosed
Channel
m
Zone
1
ha
Zone
2
ha
1 62+95 -L- RT WA 0.0037
2 66+40 -L- 2 ~ 2.7m X 1.8m RCBC 0.0505 110 110 0.185 0.114
3A 74+46!74+73 0.0030 30 27 0 0.050 0.017
Trib. Dunn Cr.
3B 74+20!76+20 2 ~ 2.7m X 2.4m RCBC 0.0673 0.0057 172 62 78 0.235 0.159
Dunn Creek
4 84+60 -L- 2 ~ 2.4m X 2.4m RCBC 0.0275 90 65 0.130 0.068
5 85+20 -L- LT WA 0.0161 0.0508 0.0037 0.0047 62 60 0.197 0.100
6 77+80 -L- 750 RCP 0.0054 87 71 0.124 0.076
7 82+70/83+80 L 900 RCP 0.1132 0.0083 138

TOTALS : 0.133 0.0508 0 0 0.1657 0 0.0104 689 149 324 0.921 0.534

~I$®I~EI$TY ®WNEI$~
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
NAMES ADDRESSES
CADY CONSTRUCTION CO 7020 SIX FORKS RD
RALEIGH NC 27615
ELIZABETH H. HOLDING 12630 WAKE UNION CHURCH RD
WAKE FOREST NC 27588

THOMAS DAMERON 414 SCOTLAND ST
NANCY DAMERON RALEIGH, NC 27609
TOWN OF WAKE FOREST 401 E. ELM ST
WAKE FOREST NC 27587
MARY BOLUS HEIRS C/0 ELIZABETH B. NASSIF
115 E. ELM ST
WAKE FOREST NC 27587
ANDREW L. AMMONS 7412 CHAPEL HILL RD
JEANETTE AMMONS RALEIGH NC 27607
JAMES LUCAS, JR.
DIVISIOlY OF HIQHWAYS
WAGE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~02501 (R~2809C)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ ~ OF ~ ~ REVISED 7 / ll / Ol
PARCEL NO.

Z `, ~~ \,~ `\ \ \ 1
\~ \ ~ A~
x \ ~~ ~ .
~ ~ O
2GI V 375 't ~ \
tt `1 ~ \ R PARIAN
e I It I ~ >s ~` \ 1 woods BUFFER
woods : t woods ~ ~~~ ~~ _ ~~
t ~~
tt ~ \ `~Vl` ", ~ ~ \ \ e~2
I ~ ~. r
40 a0~~ \\
~ \\~ U.T. TO
LL i 90 \_ \ ~\ \ \ ~ \ RICHLAND CREEK
M I Sp \ \ `~\\
I~ ~ \\ ~
~; ~~ ~
,~; ~ ~ \ \ l0 ~ Zip \
_ ~ __
- '~~ ~ \i
w000s \ f
750 EXTENDED DRY ` ~ woods ~ _ Q~
DETENTION BASIN N
'~r' WOODS \ \ A \ L \
~~
MATCHLINE -RPDD- STA. 10+60 MATCHLINE -Y3- STA. 10+70
1C~ ~ ~ 1~ o~ ~ E ~ N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
l~l 0' DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~~E
', WAgE COUNTY
DENOTES MITIGABLE
IMPACTS ZONE I PROJRCT: 8.102501 (R-2809B)
14 0 20 DENOTES MITIGABLE ~ NC 98 WAgE FOREST BYPASS
BUFFEIa IMPACTS ZONE 2
SHEET ~ OF ~d 6/ 03