20080058 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_2015_20150414

Unnamed Tributary to Crab Creek
Stream and Wetland Restoration
NCEEP Project Number: 857
Monitoring Contract Number: 004495
Monitoring Year 5
2014 Report
Submitted to
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
January 2015
r�i
LE QS Lem
nf
Iancement
PROGRAM
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699

Monitoring Firm
Jr
EQUINOX
balance through properpfanning
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Phone: 828 - 253 -6856
Project Contact: Hunter Terrell
Email: hunter @equinoxenvironmental.com

Unnamed Tributary to Crab Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
2014 Monitoring Report (MY 5)
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary / Project Abstract
Page 1
2.0 Methodology Page 3
3.0 References Page 4

Appendices
Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1.
Vicinity Map and Directions
Table la.
Project Components
Table lb.
Component Summations
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.
Project Contacts
Table 4.
Project Attributes
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photo Station Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Table 9a. Random Circular Vegetation Plot Stem Counts
Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Cross - Sections with Annual Overlays and Photos
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
Containment Parameter Distributions)
Table 1 la. Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross - Sections)
Table 1 lb. Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E. Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Monthly Precipitation Data Compared to 30th and 70th Percentiles for
Alleghany County, NC
Precipitation and Water Level Plots
Table 13. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
in

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The goals and objectives stated in the Unnamed Tributary to Crab Creek Restoration Plan
(NCEEP 2007) are as follows:
Project Goals:
• Reduce bank sediment export and nutrient inputs to the receiving watershed of Crab
Creek, a Class C Trout Water;
• Enhance and preserve riparian buffers of a headwater trout stream;
• Enhance aquatic and terrestrial habitat along an intact stream corridor;
• Improve wetland functions by connecting and expanding the following wetland
communities: Swamp Forest -Bog Complex, Southern Appalachian Bog, and Montane
Alluvial Forest and;
• Improve and expand Southern Appalachian Bog wetland habitat for the Bog Turtle
Clemmys muhlenburgii.
Project Objectives:
• Restore 4,026 linear feet of stream channel with appropriate pattern, profile, and
dimension to support a gravel transport system;
• Re- establish the natural stream features (bed heterogeneity) to restore aquatic habitat;
• Improve aquatic organism passage and habitat corridor continuity by replacing the
culvert; and
• Convert existing croplands into Swamp Forest -Bog Complex and Southern Appalachian
Bog communities.
Project Performance:
Vegetation data were collected during August 2014. Based on the planted totals for plots within
the 30 foot buffer surrounding the restored channel, 6 of the 9 vegetation plots fell short of the
260 stems per acre criterion for monitoring year 5. The planted mean was 243 stems per acre
with a range of 121 to 566. However, the inclusion of natural recruits results in a mean of
approximately 700 stems per acre with a range of 243 to 1700. A different methodology was
used to sample the Southern Appalachian Bog wetland features surrounding the mainstem and
lower portion of the tributary due to the early successional planting plan associated with this
community type (See sheet 15 of the planting plan in the approved mitigation plan). In keeping
with an early successional reference for this community type, the planting plan consisted of a
low density shrub assemblage with various sedges and rush species making for an herbaceous
dominated system. These bog systems are characterized by a mosaic of patchy shrub
assemblages and meadows. Therefore the woody density of this community type is lower than
those of typical mitigation (50 stems per acre - see sheet 15 of the planting plan and section 7.4
in the approved mitigation plan for zones D and F). Random circular plots were sampled during
monitoring years two and five within the five year monitoring period. In these bog areas the
woody stem density ranged from 61to 627 stems per acre (with a mean of 323 stems per acre) in
year 5 and is accompanied by a dense herbaceous layer. Therefore the bog features on the site
possess the distribution of strata and densities that meet or exceed those targeted in the planting
plan. Due in large part to the project elevations resulting in shorter growing seasons, the size of
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland 1 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

the woody stems are generally smaller than that observed at many sites after 5 years of
monitoring.
There are also approximately 20 isolated patches of high threat invasive plants that are
distributed throughout the project area. Four percent of the easement acreage is comprised of
these invasive plants. The one percent increase in invasive coverage is due to two new areas
added during MY5. One of these areas is associated with the powerline right -of -way at the
downstream end of the easement. The dominant species is multiflora rose Rosa multiflora; other
species present include oriental bittersweet Celastrus orbiculatus, privet Ligustrum sp., and
Japanese honeysuckle Lonicera japonica. There also are two areas with low stem densities that
are associated with the streambank erosion areas as noted below.
All cross sections have remained stable through MY5. All cross sections show no signs of
erosion or deterioration. Stream reach geomorphological data indicates the stream channels have
remained very stable since construction. Stream channel problems observed during MY5 were
minimal and consisted of seven small problems areas, 2 areas of aggradation and 5 areas of
degradation, throughout all assessed reaches. Particle -size distributions remain stable, with no
significant trends towards coarser or finer materials. This indicates that the channel is
transporting sediment as designed.
Data from the eight groundwater monitoring stations indicated that all stations, with the
exception of MW -1, met the soil saturation criterion of groundwater being within 12 inches of
the soil surfaces for at least five percent of the hydroperiod during the MY5 growing season.
The on -site rain gauge documented above normal precipitation during May -July. During normal
rainfall years all groundwater gauges are expected to meet the minimum criteria. One bankfull
event was documented during a November 2014 field visit (Table 12). This is the fifth
documented bankfull event since construction was completed, meeting the criterion of two
bankfull events since completion of construction.
In October 2013, wetland boundary delineations were performed to confirm the boundary of
wetland features on the project site. A total of 21.8 acres of wetland were delineated within the
project site. This included 10.9 acres of restoration, 3.1 acres of enhancement, 0.1 acres of
creation, and 7.7 acres of preservation. The total acreage showed a 5.1 acre increase in total
wetland area compared to the original baseline delineation of 16.7 acres, resulting from a 2.9
acre and a 2.2 acre increase in restoration and preservation acreage, respectively. The increase in
wetland acreage increased primarily as a result of including wetlands within the beltwidth of the
stream that were excluded during the initial delineation. Two areas within Wetlands 1 and 2 that
were included in the original wetland delineation failed to meet all three indicators for wetland
jurisdiction. The failing area in Wetland 2 was located in the restoration area around Monitoring
Well 1, which has failed to meet the hydrologic success criteria three out of four monitoring
years. Additionally, this area failed to meet the hydric soil indicator. The failing area in
Wetland 3, consisting of both restoration and creation, failed to meet the hydric soil indicator;
which, was due to a large deposit of sand burying hydric soil. The origin of the sand layer is
likely from the adjacent agricultural field. These areas have been excluded from the wetland
acreages included in Table 1 a and 1 b.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland 2 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

During a May field visit, mountain redbelly dace (Phoxinus oreas) were observed spawning over
creek chub beds along the mainstem within the restoration area. Mountain redbelly dace are
important indicators of stream health because they thrive in soft, unpolluted, clear water. The
evidence of this spawning taking place illustrates the success of the UT -Crab Creek project in
providing aquatic habitat and enhancing overall water quality within the watershed. Follow the
link below to watch a video of mountain redbelly dace (http: / /portal.nedenr.ora /web /eep /eep-
news /- /blogs /video -of- redbelly- dace- spawning-at-eep- project-
site?_33 redirect=%2Fweb%2Feep%2Feep-news).
Summary information and data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and
supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and
restoration plan documents available on NCEEP's website. All raw data supporting tables and
figures in the appendices are available from NCEEP upon request.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland 3 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

2.0 Methodology
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in MY4 replicate those employed during the
previous monitoring years and are based on standard guidance and procedures documents
(Rosgen 1996; USACE 2003).
Vegetation plot monitoring data were collected following the standard CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, Level II, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008).
Wetland hydrology was considered established if groundwater monitoring data indicated
saturated soils within 12 inches of the soil surface for 5% of the Hydro period. Due to the
Alleghany County data set being based on a site with elevations approximately 1,000 feet
different from the project site, the growing season for the site was based on the Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS) data set for Ashe County (MRCS 2009). During October 2013, a
wetland boundary delineation was performed to confirm the presence of wetland features on the
project site. The delineation utilized the Level II Routine Wetland Determination method as
defined in the 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual and the 2010 USACE Interim
Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern
Mountains and Piedmont Region.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland 4 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

3.0 References
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.2. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Department of Biology.
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program). 2007. UT to Crab Creek
Restoration Site. Alleghany County, North Carolina. Restoration Plan. Raleigh.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). Undated. Climate Analysis for Wetlands by
County. http: / /www.wcc.nres.usda.gov /climate /wetlands.html; accessed November 2012.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books. Pagosa Springs,
Colorado.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources - Division of Water Quality. Wilmington District.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland 5 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

,_ i `.• 6 /r �� Yr /ice f v
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) and is - - . i' �";;= ''�, r (� I t /' / i� • i i
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered;
by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may require �'� , ` ' ` _ / •'fr r++
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and therefor 14
't
personnel of state andf federal agencies or their designees /contractors +�
access b the general public is not permitted. Access b authorized h, .
1;
- involved m the development, oversight and stewardship of the �I i
restoration site 7s permitted within the terms and timeframes of their ztry
defined roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by any person /� 'r, -w': ' t _ • I lh r � 1', "� f� r � 'u- ,� .r
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and activities requires ✓_^' l 1j �� I ` RI. ' �� Garr, yy� J�` 11� 7
prior coordination with NCEEP. ' ( n f/ r S r / t. - I lira Spdn¢ Q - -
t I
�' � r ��� � �t41 I •, � � � ,, •, -. r Il� f �ert � �I �� 1 .. "' 4 . ,.� ,- ,. -
X43 ! ��l° �I 9-`/
_
ass
r r _�
L 3 I t l ✓ l `� Savannah C'' __
-�
y r E`t3monds N-
r
-,p-h. Gem
— „
18 I
Eunice
l
=J
-
�t
270.3
T{
UT to Crab Creek Stream
C) — & Wetland Restoration Site
M
Y' l
p C ;•cek _
( Iy X" t9 E k f
t
r +
wyme oioyd
smNh county c unry
ca,nry Carron
conny
Grayson Patrick
County UT to Crab Creek Stream County
&Wetland Restoration Site
Allghany
Ashe County
County Surry Stokes
County County
Wilkes
County
Yadkin County Forsyth County
Directions: From Raleigh, proceed west on I -40 towards
Winston Salem. Take Exit 193 B (NC- 8N/US -52N) towards
Mount Airy. Proceed on US -52N to I -74W towards Wytheville,
VA. Take Exit 5 (I -77S) and proceed to Exit 100 (Mount
Airy/Galax/NC -89). Turn left and proceed west on NC -89.
Turn left at NC -18 and go approximately 6 miles to the project
site. The site is located on the north side of NC -18.
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map - r `r
UT to Crab Creek Stream & EQUINOX &0gs'stem
E NVIR )NMENTAL Wetland Restoration Site • ° ° ° ° °• ° ° °° emen
PROGRAM
Project No. 857 N
0 1,250 2,500 5,000
Feet
Alleghany County, North Carolina
7.5 Minute Series Cumberland Knob
Quadrangle

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table la. Project Components
UT Crab Creek Stream &Wetland / Project No. 857
Project
Riparian Wetland
(Ac)'
Non -
Riparian
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
Footage
BMP
Creditable
Riverine
Non- Riverine
Component or
Existing
Restoration
Approach
or
Stationing
Footage or
Ratio
Credits
BMP Elements
Comment
Reach ID
Feet /Acres
Level
Acreage'
Acre age 2
Enhancement I
0
Enhancement II
100 +00 - 101 +71
Creation
0.08
Stream channel stabilized with in-
103+00- 104 +35
7.89
R
P3
1,775
1,775
1.0
1,775
stream structures, including step pools
105 +34 -112+29
0.0
0.0
and riffle grade control.
113+51-116+88
1 20.98
0
0
0
0
Existing culvert and
120 +26 - 124 +65
UT I
2,313 If
crossing removed.
101 +71 - 103 +00
104 +35 - 105 +34
Included revegetation and stream bank
E
EII
496
496
2.5
198
stabilization.
112 +29 - 113 +51
116 +88 - 118 +34
Existing culvert and
crossing replaced
Stream channel stabilized with m-
UTCC-US
2,086 If
R
P2
2,485
10 +00 - 34 +85
2,423
1.0
2,423
stream structures, including step pools
with open bottom
and riffle grade control.
arch culvert.
UTCC -DS
2,1721f
P
2,172
34 +85 -56 +57
2,067
5.0
413
M ontane Alluvial
Ditch filled and existing fill, debris, and
Forest
3.00
E
3.01
2.90
2
1.45
culvert drain removed. Existing seep
Enhancement
M ontane Alluvial
heads developed and additional
hardwood trees planted to restore and
Forest
0.90
R
0.83
0.82
I
O.g2
enhance M ontane Alluvial Forest.
Restoration
Southern
Preservation m Appalachian
Appalachaan Bog
2.70
P
2.23
2.17
5
0.43
Bog Community.
og ornm
(Preservation)
Southem
Appalachaan Bog
0.00
C
0.08
0.08
3
0.03
Overfill cropland soil removed,
(Creation)
groundwater springs exposed, and bog
create species planted to restore and
create Southern Appalachian Bog
Southern,
Appalachaan Bog
6.70
R
9.57
9.29
1
9.29
Community hydrology.
(Restoration)
Swamp Forest Bog
Preservation of Swamp Fort -Bog
Complex
5.81
P
5.81
5.72
5
1.14
(Preservation)
Comp lex along UTCC -DS reach.
= Non - Applicable
'Acreaw undated based on MY4 wetland boundary delineation
2 Creditable amounts account for removal of any crossings and 50% asset reduction for utility crossovers
Table lb. Component Summations
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
Restoration
Level
Stream
(10
Riparian Wetland
(Ac)'
Non -
Riparian
(Ac)
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
Riverine
Non- Riverine
Restoration
4,198
10.1
Enhancement
2.9
Enhancement I
0
Enhancement II
496
Creation
0.08
Preservation
2,172
7.89
HQ Preservation
0
0
0.0
0.0
Totals 6,866
1 20.98
0
0
0
0
= Non - Applicable
IAcrea2e undated based on MY4 wetland boundary delineation
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland A -2
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Land Acquisition
N/A
May 2006
Environmental Resource Technical Report
2006
May 2007
Restoration Plan
2007
Dec 2007
Permit Date
N/A
A H 2008
Final Desi - Construction Plans
N/A
Aug 2008
Construction
N/A
A ri12010
Teworary S &E mix applied
N/A
2009-2010
Permanent seed mix a lied
N/A
A H 2010
Planting
N/A
A H 2010
Initial Wetland Monitoring Gauges & Rain Gauge Installed
N/A
A ri12010
Morphological Data Collection
June 2010
N/A
Mitigation Plan / As -built Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline
June 2010
Feb 2011
Year 1 Monitoring
March 2011
Oct 2011
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct 2011
Dec 2011
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov 2012
Jan 2013
Year 4 Monitoring
Nov 2013
Jan 2014
Year 5 Monitoring
Nov 2014
Nov 2014
N/A - Item does not apply.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland A -3
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 3. Project Contacts
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
Designer
KCI Associates of North Carolina
Landmark Center II, Suite 220 4601 Svc Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Primary Project Design POC
Aril Davis 919 783 -9214
Construction Contractor
Carolina Environmental Contracting Inc.
P.O. Box 1905
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Construction Contractor POC
Stephen James (336) 320 -3849
Planting Contractor
Carolina Environmental Contracting Inc.
P.O. Box 1905
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Planting Contractor POC
Stephen James 336 320 -3849
Seeding Contractor
Carolina Environmental Contracting Inc.
P.O. Box 1905
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Seeding Contractor POC
Stephen James 336) 320 -3849
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resources
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Mellow Marsh Farm
(919) 742 -1200
Monitoring Performers (YO) - 2009
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Win Taylor 828 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Win Taylor 828 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Win Taylor 828 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Yl) - 2010
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Win Taylor (828 ) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Win Taylor 828 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Win Taylor 828 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2011
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Win Taylor 828 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Win Taylor 828 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y3)- 2012
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell 828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell 828 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y4)- 2013
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell 828) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell (828 ) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y5)- 2014
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell 828 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell (828) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell 828 253 -6856
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland A -4
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 4. Project Attributes
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
Project County
Alle han
Ph sio ra hic Region
Blue Ridge
Ecore ion
New River Plateau
River Basin
Little River
USGS I UC
05050001030020
NCDW Sub -Basin
05 -07 -03
Within Extent ofEEP Watershed Plan
Little River and Laurel Branch Local Watershed Plans
WRC Class
Cold
% of Project Easement Fenced or Demarcated
1000/0
Beaver Activity Observed During Design Phase
No
Restoration Component Attributes
UTl
UTCC -US
UTCC -DS
Drainage Areas .mi.
0.53
1.65
2.64
Stream Order
First
Second
Second
Restored Length feet
1,775
2,485
N/A
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial
Watershed Type
Rural
Watershed LULC Distribution
Forest /Wetland
Pasture /Managed Herbaceous
Other
53%
45%
2%
Watershed Impervious Cover
-
-
-
NCDW AU /IndexNumber
10 -9 -12
10 -9 -12
10 -9 -12
NCDWQ Classification
C; Tr
C; Tr
C; Tr
303d Listed
No
No
No
Upstream of 303d Listed Segment
No
No
No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total Acreage of Easement
47.8
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
9.0
10.6
19.7
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
3.3
10.6
1.5
Ros en Classification of Pre- Existin
64 /C4
CA
FA
Ros en Classification of As -Built
Cb /C
C
N/A
Valley Type
-
-
-
Valley Sloe
0.025
0.010
-
Valley Side Slope Range
-
-
-
Valley Toe Slope Range
-
Cowardin Classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
Trout Waters Designation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Species of Concern, Endangered, Etc.
Bog Turtle, American Speedwell, and Canadian Burnet
Dominant Soil Series and Characteristics
Series
Depth
Clay%
K
T
Nikwas i
-
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland A -5
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Legend
— • -
Easement Boundary
- --
Stream Alignment
Power Line ROW
®
Roads
Longitudinal Profile Begin /End
Cross Sections
Structures
Control Points
•
Crest Gauges
•
Rain Gauge
Photo Points
Wetlands
® Creation
Enhancement
Restoration
Preservation
® Expansion- Enhancements
® Expansion- Preservation
Expansion- Restoration
® MY4- Not Meeting Wetland Criteria
Community Types
Montane Alluvial Forest
Southern Appalachian Bog
Swamp Forest -Bog Complex
Prepared for
_r_14
E aamement
PROGRAM
C
Year 5 Conditions
Beaver Dam
Vegetation Plots
0 Criteria Met - MY5
Criteria Not Met - MY5
O Circular Vegetation Plot- MY5
Wetland Gauges
0 Criteria Met - MY5
Criteria Not Met - MY5
Bank /Bed Conditions
Scoured / Eroding
RI
4 �1 • '
R !
i
�F Vk
Sheet 2
'r
1 y j
r
f
•' fi3A —
18
Project: UT to Crab Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
Year 5 Monitoring
Alleghany County, North Carolina
Sheet 1 of 4
Date
November 2014
� =rr
i
Notes: 1) Base Map from CAD file "Crab—base—final" Provided by KCI Associates of NC P.A.
2) NC OneMap 2010 Aerial Photo
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
Project Number
NCEEP # 857
N
W E
S
Prepared by
�NFro
EQUINOX
Mass Wasting
Vegetation Problem Areas
Easement Encroachment
Low Stem Densities
®
Invasives - Dense
Invasives - Present
RI
4 �1 • '
R !
i
�F Vk
Sheet 2
'r
1 y j
r
f
•' fi3A —
18
Project: UT to Crab Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
Year 5 Monitoring
Alleghany County, North Carolina
Sheet 1 of 4
Date
November 2014
� =rr
i
Notes: 1) Base Map from CAD file "Crab—base—final" Provided by KCI Associates of NC P.A.
2) NC OneMap 2010 Aerial Photo
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
Project Number
NCEEP # 857
N
W E
S
Prepared by
�NFro
EQUINOX

Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
R
Year 5 Conditions
Legend
Beaver Dam
— • - Easement Boundary
Aq '
I
Vegetation Plots
- - -- Stream Alignment
- `
■ Criteria Met - MY5
Power Line ROW
Criteria Not Met - MY5
Roads
�`O\
• Circular Vegetation Plot- MY5
Longitudinal Profile Begin /End
I
Wetland Gauges
Cross Sections
Criteria Met -MY5
N. Structures
i
Criteria Not Met - MY5
/.\ Control Points
<`
I
Bank /Bed Conditions
® Crest Gauges
e
Q Scoured / Eroding
• Rain Gauge
Photo Points
�
— Mass Wasting
Vegetation Problem Areas
Easement Encroachment
Wetlands
Creation
®Enhancement
T z I
Low Stem Densities
Restoration
UT1 - Upper
'
`
Invasives -Dense
�' Invasives - Present
� Preservation
® Expansion- Enhancements
Longitudinal Profile Reach
,_
® Expansion- Preservation
s ;{�
Expansion- Restoration
MY4- Not Meeting Wetland Criteria
Community Types
[�s
Montane Alluvial Forest
js
Southern Appalachian Bog
Swamp Forest -Bog Complex
3
N
}
p
,
W E
1 1
i 111
NC • neMap
Prepared for
Project: UT to Crab Creek stream and Wetland
Year 5 Monitoring
Restoration
Notes: 1) Base Map from CAD file "Crab base final' Provided by KCI Associates of NC P.A.
2) NC OneMap 2010 Aerial Photo
Prepared by
1,
Alleghany County, North Carolina
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
Sheet 2 of 4
En °�ement
EQUINOX
Date
Project Number
a
PROGRAM
November 2014
NCEEP # 857

Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
' `a,,� ' s�•������ �� • � '-� x
Year 5 Conditions
Legend
Beaver Dam
— • - Easement Boundary
,E c K 4a'
:.
t`.
Vegetation Plots
- - -- Stream Alignment
r. .''P�'
+ e
■ Criteria Met - MY5
Criteria Not Met MY5
Power Line ROW
r'
-
® Roads
"�' i
• Circular Vegetation Plot- MY5
Longitudinal Profile Begin /End
°
r
UT1 - Lower +,
Wetland Gauges
Cross Sections
Longitudinal Profile Reach —
0 Criteria Met - MY5
Criteria Not Met - MY5
Structures
Control Points
f .z
Bank /Bed Conditions
Crest Gauges
Scoured / Eroding
® Rain Gauge
Photo Points
y . .
- -� Mass Wasting
Wetlands
— `
- �. . .. .
_ _ _ _
• - • •
Vegetation Problem Areas
® Creation
•
Easement Encroachment
Enhancement
•
9
r ::
. .
Low Stem Densities
Invasives -Dense
Restoration
�7zz Preservation
-8
fi
.' . :. ........................
Invasives - Present
® Expansion - Enhancements
:::.Wetland #2 ::
® Expansion- Preservation
-
/rff rte} f
-
Expansion - Restoration
_ _ 1
• • • .�
•�'1 ^, ��_
®MY4- Not Meeting Wetland Criteria
R • f .. ..jr� -.
' 1 • •.� < -.
... .... .. . . • . • . ��` �`` '
r •!..
Community Types
Montane Alluvial Forest
+ .
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::Wetland .......Wet
. ..... ..... ....... land #2 _ .I
• •
. :.. :: ... lum5 : ,r
• �tirc -s: :
i
f r 3'
Southern Appalachian Bog
Swamp Forest -Bog Complex
50 �..,
Wetland #2 �. r' ..: }`^ _ 1 f : { ;r.
/ ! :�uT / Wetland #2 .,
o- .�
�' •
� �,,� �
�� �
Longitudinal Profile'Reach
1 ,+
N
W E
r
,,
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board
Prepared for
Project: UT to Crab Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
Year 5 Monitoring
Alleghany County, North Carolina
Notes: 1) Base Map from CAD file "Crab—base—final" Provided by KCI Associates of NC P.A.
2) NC OneMap 2010 Aerial Photo
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
Prepared by
y
Sheet 3 of 4
Ea °�eme L
`J /\
U E I N O X
Date
Project Number
PROGRAM
November 2014
NCEEP # 857
`

Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Legend
Year 5 Conditions
- --
4
- • - Easement Boundary
Beaver Dam
- - -- Stream Alignment
Vegetation Plots
Power Line ROW
Criteria Met - MY5
Roads
❑ Criteria Not Met - MY5
Longitudinal Profile Begin /End
0 Circular Vegetation Plot- MY5
Cross Sections
Wetland Gauges
f**• Structures
0 Criteria Met - MY5
A, Control Points
Criteria Not Met - MY5 "A
• Crest Gauges
Bank /Bed Conditions �..
• Rain Gauge
-� Scoured / Eroding
Photo Points
4'
- - - Mass Wasting
Wetlands
® Creation
Vegetation Problem Areas
-
Enhancement
Easement Encroachment
•�
Restoration
Low Stem Densities
❑ Preservation
Invasives -Dense
l
:''i
® Expansion- Enhancements
Invasives - Present
'
::l
s
416
» „� =:aj0 !
® Expansion - Preservation
_
p:
« ,
;
0 Expansion- Restoration
,�,-� ,_
i
• {K Wit" ttte
® MY4- Not Meeting Wetland Criteria
/
Community Types
Montane Alluvial Forest
. ;, .. ..:
, -;� _ ,�..
::::::::.::::::::::::::::
, ^.--.—
, / •'
—• —•— —•— ��
• �. / : : .
'•
Southern Appalachian Bog
♦��ea
.......................
......
... .............
#2
�•�������J ...
,� ..............
::::We tl an d
Swamp Forest -Bog Complex +�����������
♦01♦�� �.:
R•�����������•� '' , Wetland #2 :
...............
:: ✓ .. a`'
1.
x>
Wetland #3 n,x $ .. ,
Wetland 42�
\
f
f
I `�
• Wetland #2 18
' WE
p ®sue
Prepared for
Project:
UT to Crab Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
Year 5 Monitoring
Alleghany County, North Carolina
Notes: 1) Base Map from CAD file "Crab—base—final" Provided by KCI Associates of NC P.A.
2) NC OneMap2010 Aerial Photo
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
Prepared by
y
Sheet 4 of 4
-
E a°r�eme L
EQUINOX
Date
Project Number
PROGRAM
November 2014
NCEEP # 857

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UTl - Upper
Assessed Length 1,832 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aegradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
17
17
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth? 1.6).
20
_'u
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
�10
0
100%
1. Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run).
20
20
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
19
95%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply frompoorgrowth
and/or scour and erosion.
4
117
97%
3
45
98%
Banks undercut /overhangingto the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
4
117
97%
3
45
98%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
15
15
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
15
15
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
15
15
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15 %.
15
15
100 ° /
Pool forming structures maintaining — M ax Pool Depth : Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio ? 1.6. Rootwads / logs providing some cover at
15
15
100°
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -2 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UTl - Lower
Assessed Len th 438 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aegradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
5
5
100°
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth? 1.6).
4
+
100°
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
4
4
100%
1. Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run).
4
4
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
4
4
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply frompoorgrowth
and/or scour and erosion.
2
33
96%
1
15
98%
Banks undercut /overhangingto the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
2
33
96%
0
0
96%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
5
5
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
5
5
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
5
5
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15 %.
5
100°
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio ? 1.6. Rootwads / logs providing some cover at
5
-
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -3 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UTCC - US
Assessed Length 2,485 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aegradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
17
17
100°
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth? 1.6).
15
15
100°
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
15
15
100%
1. Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run).
15
15
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
15
15
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply frompoorgrowth
and/or scour and erosion.
110
98%
2
25
98%
Banks undercut /overhangingto the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
1
21
100 %
1
21
100%
Totals
4
131
97%
3
46
98%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
7
7
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
7
7
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
7
-
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15 %.
exceed
7
100°
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. 7Hbitat 4. Habitat
ll Depth Ratio ? 1.6. Rootwads logs providing some cover at
7
�7
100°
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -4 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
Planted Acreage 15.4
% of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
N/A
0
0.00
0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3,
Stipple
2. Low Stem Density Areas
2
0.06
<1%
4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Black Dots White Background
Totals
2
0.06
0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
given the monitoring year.
N/A
0
0.00
°
0 /o
Cumulative Totals
2
0.06
0%
Easement Acreage 47.8
of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Foss Hatch
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present)
20
1.90
4%
Stipple
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Orange Dots White Background
7
0.47
°-
& ATV Trail
N/A - Item does not apply.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -5 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary 1 — Permanent Photo Station 1
Upstream
Unnamed Tributary 1 — Permanent Photo Station 2
Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -6 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary 1 — Permanent Photo Station 3
Upstream
Unnamed Tributary 1 — Permanent Photo Station 3
Downstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -7 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary 1 — Permanent Photo Station 4
Upstream
Unnamed Tributary 1 — Permanent Photo Station 5
Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -8 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary 1 — Permanent Photo Station 6
Upstream
—� -.
r
I
a/4
CC i r
Unnamed Tributary 1 Permanent Photo Station 7
Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -9 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 7
Upstream
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 7
Downstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -10 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
A
A.
r 4
Wetland Area 2 — Permanent Photo Station 8
North
Wetland Area 2 — Permanent Photo Station 8
Southwest
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -11
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Wetland Area 2 — Permanent Photo Station 9
North
Wetland Area 2 — Permanent Photo Station 9
West
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -12 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 10
Upstream
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station ll
Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -13 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 11
Downstream
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 12
Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -14 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
2 7k
��j
s �
t�
---7 6'
Unnamed Tributary Crab Creek Upper — Permanent Photo Station 13
Upstream
Wetland Area 2 — Permanent Photo Station 14
West
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -15 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
f � }
Wetland Area 2 — Permanent Photo Station 15
Southwest
Wetland Area 3 — Permanent Photo Station 16
South
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland B -16 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
UT Crab Creek / Project No. 857
Vegetation Plot
ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
No
33 %
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
No
5
No
6
No
7
Yes
8
No
9
No
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland C -1
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Vegetation Plot Data
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Monitoring Year 5 — Aug 28, 2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 5 — Aug 28, 2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland C -2 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Monitoring Year 5 — Aug 28, 2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Monitoring Year 5 — Aug 28, 2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland C -3 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Monitoring Year 5 — Aug 28, 2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
Monitoring Year 5 — Aug 28, 2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland C -4 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
Monitoring Year 5 — Aug 28, 2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8
Monitoring Year 5 — Aug 28, 2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland C -5 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 9
Monitoring Year 5 — Aug 28, 2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland C -6
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
UT Crab Creek - 857
Report Prepared By
Owen Carson
Date Prepared
8/29/2014 9:44
Database Name
Equinox- 2014- A- UTCrab- MY5.mdb
Database Location
Z: \ES \NRI &M \EEP Monitoring \UT Crab Creek \UTC -MY5- 2014 \Data \Veg
Computer Name
FIELDTECH3 -PC
File Size
13638 8864
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS
IN THIS DOCUMENT------- - - - --
M e tadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
project data.
Proj. Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This
excludes live stakes.
Proj. Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot;
dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Project Code
857
Project Name
UT -Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Restoration
Description
River Basin
New
Le ngth(ft)
Stream -to -Edge Width (ft)
Area (s q m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
19
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland C -7
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
Species
Current Plot Data (MY5 2014)
Annual Means
2
3
4
857 -01 -0001
857 -01 -0002
857 -01 -0003
857 -01 -0004
857 -01 -0005
857 -01 -0006
857 -01 -0007
1 857 -01 -0008
1 857 -01 -0009
MY5(2014)
MY4(2013)
MY3(2012)
MY2(2011)
1 MY1(2010)
MYO(2010)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
1
1
4
6
Total Stems
5
12
9
28
31
3
14
29
131
Stems Per Acre
101
243
182
567
627
61
283
587
4
3
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
1
1
4
7
7
7
8
8
8
2
2
2
2
2
35
4
4
22
1
1
18
3
3
3
4
4
4
32
32
103
35
35
119
35
35
133
32
32
89
21
21
50
11
11
11
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
1
1
1
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
6
6
Aronia prunifolia
1
1
Betula lenta var. lenta
Isweet birch
Tree
1
1
1
9
9
9
9
9
9
15
15
15
Betula nigra
Iriver birch
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
Carpinus caroliniana var. virginiana
Tree
1
4
4
8
15
151
151
25
25
25
Cornusamomum
siIkydogwood
Shrub
5
4
1
9
31
43
2
1
Ilexverticillata
common winterbern
Shrub
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
11
11
11
12
12
12
7
7
7
Lindera benzoin var. ben
northern spicebush
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
5
7
7
7
11
11
11
23
23
23
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
Physocarpus opulifolius
common ninebark
Shrub
2
2
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
Robinia pseudoacacia
black locust
Tree
1
Rosa palustris
swamp rose
Shrub
13
13
10
9
Salix nigra
blackwillow
Tree
2
2
3
1
Sambucuscanadensis
Common Elderberry
IShrub
5
5
4
7
2
2
Unknown
IShrub or Tree
5
5
5
Viburnum nudum
possumhaw
IShrub
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
8
8
8
8
8
Stem count
3
3
6
14
14
14
9
9
11
4
4722
3
3
42
5
5
23
7
7
24
3
3
8
6
6
6
54
54
156
61
61
190
66
66
232
73
73
143
84
84
117
100
100
100
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
9
9
9
9
9
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.22
0.22
0.22
0.22
0.22
0.22
Species count
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
5
2 2
4
2
2
2
2 2
2
1 1
2
2
2
2
7
7
12
7
7
10
8
8
14
7
7
12
7
7
10
8
8
8
Stems per ACRE
121.4
121.4
242.8
566.6
566.6
566.6
364.2
364.2
445.2
161.9
161.9
890.3
121.4
1700
202.3
202.3
930.8
283.3
971.2
121.4
323.7
242.8
242.8
242.8
242.8
242.8
701.5
274.3
854.3363
296.8
1043
328.2
328.2
643
377.7
377.7
526.1
44917
449.7
449.7
Exceeds requirements by 101/6
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10.1
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
et requirements by more than 10%
Table 9a. Random Circular Vegetation Plot Stem Counts
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland/Project No. 857
Species
Plot
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total
Stems
Alnus serrulata
3
9
5
22
23
4
7
73
Aronia arbutifolia
3
3
Cornus amomum
1
3
4
3
7
14
32
Pinus strobus
1
1
Pinus virginiana
6
6
Rosa palustris
2
3
5
10
Salix nigra
1
2
4
6
Total Stems
5
12
9
28
31
3
14
29
131
Stems Per Acre
101
243
182
567
627
61
283
587
Average Stem Density- 332 Stems Per Acre
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
C -8
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Upper
Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
Station 106 + 83.73
2609
2608
2607
2606
m
w
0 2605
- - - - --
- - - --
- - --
- - - - --
- - - --
_,,.
- - - - --
- -----
--
------
- - - - --
'L
W 2604
2603
2602
2601
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55
Station (feet)
—� As -built 6/22010 — MY1 3/1/2011 � MY2 10/17/2011 — MY3 5/2/2012 — MY4 5/1/2013 — MY5 4/16/2014 - - - B
Upstream
Downstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -1 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Unnamed Triburary 1 - Upper
Cross - Section 2 - Pool
Station 107 + 77.18
2607
2606
2605
2604
m
w_
A
,LO 2603
ca
m
W
2602
i
2601
2600
2599
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60
Station (feet)
�— As -built 6/2/2010 — MY1 3/1/2011 � MY2 10/17/2011 � MY3 5/2/2012 � MY4 5/1/2013 � MY5 4/16/2014 — — — B
Upstream
Downstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -2 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Upper
Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
Station 109 + 65.00
2602
2601
2600
2599
m
w_
2598
,LO
ca
m
W
2597
2596
2595
2594
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0+35 0 +40 0 +45
Station (feet)
As-bu0t 6/3/2010 --- MY1 3/1/2011 —MY2 10/17/2011 —MY3 5/2/2011 — MY4 5/1/2013 —MY5 4/16/2014 — — — - KI:t
Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No, 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -3
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Lower
Cross - Section 4 - Pool
Station 123 + 11.85
2575
2574
2573
2572
w
a
0
L
--
--
- --
--
- - --
- --
--
>'
_
- - --
-
- --
- - --
-- - -
- - --
- - --
- --
- - --
ca-
2571
W
2570
�i
2569
2568
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80
Station (feet)
As -built 6/3 /2010 — MYl 3/2/2011 — MY2 10/17/2011 —MY3 5/2/2012 — MY4 5/1/2013 —MY5 4/16/2014 — — — Bkt
Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No, 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -4
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Lower
Cross - Section 5 - Riffle
Station 123 + 54.60
2574
2573
2572
d
2571
w.
0
2570
a�
W
2569
2568
2567
0+00
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 0 +50 0+55 0 +60 0+65
Station (feet)
As -bunt 6/3/2010 - MYI 3/2/2011 - MY2 10/17/2011 - MY3 512/2012 - MY4 5/1/2013 - MY5 4/16/2014 - - - - Bk
Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No, 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -5
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Cross - Section 6 - Riffle
Station 11 + 47.00
2575
2574
2573
2572
w
d
0
C
0
2571
W
2570
2569
2568
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75
Station (feet)
As -built 6/32010 - MYl 3/2/2011 - MY2 10/17/2011 - MY3 5/2/2012 - MY4 5/1/2013 - MY5 4/16/2014 - -- Bk
Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No, 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Cross - Section 7 - Pool
Station 12 + 02.03
2575
2574
2573
2572
m
w
2571
C
O
F
SLI
> 2570
FTa
/F
2569
2568
2567
2566
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75
Station (feet)
�— As -bu0t 6/3/2010 — MY 1 3/2/2011 —W210/17/2011 — MY3 5/2/2012 —W45/1/2013 — MY5 4/16/2014 ----B
Lcu vcMwiiuuiL! uaIin
Upstream
Downstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -7 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
Station 17 + 49.02
2570
2569
2568
2567
m
u
C
2566
m
- - --
- --
- --
- - --
- --
-
-- - -
- - --
- --
- --
- --
--
-'-
-----------
_d
W 2565
2564
s
2563
2562
0+00
0 +05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80 0 +85
Station (feet)
As -bait 6/3/2010 -W13/2/2011 - MY2 10/18/2011 - MY3 5/3/2012 .--._ MY4 512/2013 -W54/17/2014 ---'B
Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No, 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -8
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Cross - Section 9 - Pool
Station 32 + 30.85
2558
2557
2556
2555
d
w
2554
-
- --
---
- - --
-----------------
_.
7
W
2553
2552
2551
2550
0+00
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80 0 +85 0+90
Station (feet)
—°— As -built 6/4/2010 — MY1 3/3/2011 — MY2 10/18/2011 — MY3 5/3/2012 — MY4 5/2/2013 — MY5 4/17/2014 - - - - Bkt
Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No, 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -9
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
Station 33 + 08.78
2558
2557
2556
2555
m
w
0 2554
L
_m
W
2553
2552
2551
2550
0+00
0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0 +70 0 +75 0 +80
Station (feet)
As -built 6/4/2010 - MY13/3/2011 - MY2 10/18/2011 - MY3 53/2012 - MY4 5/2/2013 - MY5 4/17/2014 - - - Bk
Lett Descending BanK
A01;
7'.7t
s= _
7' ,may
JS
Upstream
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -10
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
2610
2608
2606
2604
2602
a
w
0 2600
e�
W
2598
2596
2594
2592
2.590
10
.Sx
SO
Stream Survey Data
UT to Crab Creek - Upper
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 105 +63 - 110 +63
10
6x
.SO
10
�x
.SO
Station (feet)
10
`px
.SO
10
9
.SO
TW- As- Built6 /2/2010 TW- MY13/1/2011 - TW- MY2- 10/17/2011 - TW- MY3- 5/2/2012 - TW- MY4- 5/1/13 - TW MY5 4 /16/14 • Bkf - -------- WS <` Structures-MYO
II
Ox
SO
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -2 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
- - - - -- -- - - - - -- -
- -------------
Average Bankfull Slope
XS1 - R
•'--- - - - - -,
XS2 - P
--- -
•
•
XS3 - R
10
6x
.SO
10
�x
.SO
Station (feet)
10
`px
.SO
10
9
.SO
TW- As- Built6 /2/2010 TW- MY13/1/2011 - TW- MY2- 10/17/2011 - TW- MY3- 5/2/2012 - TW- MY4- 5/1/13 - TW MY5 4 /16/14 • Bkf - -------- WS <` Structures-MYO
II
Ox
SO
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -2 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
2577
2576
2575
2574
2573
2572
a�
w, 2571
a
0
2570
W
2569
2568
2567
2566
2565
2564
12
OX
00
Stream Survey Data
UT to Crab Creek- Lower
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 120 +36 - 124 +33
I�OXS
J��xOO
J�
✓��JO I���SO
l��JO
l��XSO
����OO ���xso
/XSO
O
Station (feet)
-----------
Average Bankfu11S1
pe
C Structures -MYO
TW -As -Built 6/3/2010
TW -MYI 3/2/2011
• TW -MY2 10/17/2011
-----------------------
-
• Bkf WS
VV
- ---- - - - - --
- - - - --
•
•
•
XS5 - R
I�OXS
J��xOO
J�
✓��JO I���SO
l��JO
l��XSO
����OO ���xso
/XSO
O
Station (feet)
C Structures -MYO
TW -As -Built 6/3/2010
TW -MYI 3/2/2011
• TW -MY2 10/17/2011
TW- MY3- 5/2/2012 TW -MY4- 5/1/2013
TW MY5 4/13/14
• Bkf WS
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -3 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
LO /It
2573
2572
2571
2570
2569
2568
2567
2566
2565
2564
,1 2563
a
w 2562
0 2561
2560
W 2559
2558
2557
2.556
25.55
2554
2553
2552
2551
2550
2549
2548
Stream Survey Data
UT to Crab Creek- Upstream
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 10 +02 - 34 +57
! °x Ij J� I� l� IS 16. 1) lip ly 2° 11 1� 2�x 2yX 1sX 2�pX 29x .��x .��x
00 'b° 'O° 'b° 'b° 'O° 'b° 'o° 'o° 'b° 'b° 'o° 'bo 00 0° oo 'b° 'b° 190 00 "o° o° 1919 "o° "oo 'b°
Station (feet)
—� TW -As -Built 6/4/2011 TW -MY1 3/3/2011 TW -MY2- 10/18/2011 TW -MY3- 5/3/2012 — TW -MY4- 5/2/2013 TW MY5 4/17/14 • Bkf --------- WS Structures -MYO
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -4 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
•-
XS6 - R
XS7 -P
r
rN A
......
'
Aver
ge Ban
full Slof
e
XS8 - R
----
Wi
- - - -•- .
•
Ing
XS9 - P
XS10 - R
! °x Ij J� I� l� IS 16. 1) lip ly 2° 11 1� 2�x 2yX 1sX 2�pX 29x .��x .��x
00 'b° 'O° 'b° 'b° 'O° 'b° 'o° 'o° 'b° 'b° 'o° 'bo 00 0° oo 'b° 'b° 190 00 "o° o° 1919 "o° "oo 'b°
Station (feet)
—� TW -As -Built 6/4/2011 TW -MY1 3/3/2011 TW -MY2- 10/18/2011 TW -MY3- 5/3/2012 — TW -MY4- 5/2/2013 TW MY5 4/17/14 • Bkf --------- WS Structures -MYO
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -4 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UT1 - Upper - Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Monitoring Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
7
7%
7%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
7%
fine sand
0.25
7
7%
13%
medium sand
0.50
19
18%
31%
coarse sand
1.00
7
7%
37%
very coarse sand
2.00
7
7%
44%
very fine gravel
4.0
0
0%
44%
fine gravel
5.7
3
3%
47%
fine gravel
8.0
2
2%
49%
Gravel
medium gravel
11.3
5
5%
53%
medium gravel
16.0
7
7%
60%
coarse gravel
22.3
1
1%
61%
coarse gravel
32
8
7%
68%
very coarse gravel
45
8
7%
76%
very coarse gravel
64
11
10%
86%
Cobble
small cobble
90
9
8%
94%
medium cobble
128
3
3%
97%
large cobble
180
2
2%
99%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
99%
small boulder
362
1
1%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
107
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
8.8
D84
60
D95
97
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -5 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -6
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Upper
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 1 -Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
r
70% F
L
d
C
W
60%
d
50% L
d
P.
40% >
30
y
U
20
10%
O
0%
O O
N V
b
d
f-0
Particle Size (mm)
F—MY1 —MY2 10/18 /2011 —MY3 6/6/2012 --#--W45/2/2013 -f-MYS 4/17/2014
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Upper
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
20
-
y
b
15%
C
u
10% n
5%
0%
d
Qa
Particle Size (mm)
■MY13 /1/2011 ■W210 /18/2011 ■MY36/6/2012 ■MY45/212013
■MY54/17/2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -6
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UT1 - Upper - Cross - Section 2 - Pool
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Monitoring Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
22
21%
21%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
4
4%
24%
fine sand
0.25
0
0%
24%
medium sand
0.50
9
8%
33%
coarse sand
1.00
2
2%
35%
very coarse sand
2.00
7
7%
41%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
1
1%
42%
fine gravel
5.7
2
2%
44%
fine gravel
8.0
4
4%
48%
medium gravel
11.3
6
6%
53%
medium gravel
16.0
8
7%
61%
coarse gravel
22.3
2
2%
63%
coarse gravel
32
9
8%
71%
very coarse gravel
45
8
7%
79%
very coarse gravel
64
6
6%
84%
Cobble
small cobble
90
3
3%
87%
medium cobble
128
10
9%
96%
large cobble
180
3
3%
99%
very large cobble
256
1
1%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
107
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
9.1
D84
64
D95
120
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -7 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -8
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Upper
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 2 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
C
F
70%
L
d
C
60%
y'
C
u
50% L
d
P.
40%
30%
1
�
20
0%
O
CO
Particle Size (mm)
F—MY1 —MY2 10/18 /2011 —MY3 6/6/2012 --#--MY4 5/2/2013
-411,-MY5 4/17/2014
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Upper
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 2 - Pool
20%
-
b
15%
C
d
u
s.
n
10%
5%
O
N N rl rl N M 7 �O 01 N 00 �A D
ti N 7
O� u
0%
d
Qa
Particle Size (mm)
■MY13 /1/2011 ■W210 /18/2011 ■MY36/6/2012 ■MY45/212013 ■MY54/17/2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -8
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UT1 - Upper - Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Monitoring Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
18
17%
17%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
10
10%
27%
fine sand
0.25
3
3%
30%
medium sand
0.50
1
1%
30%
coarse sand
1.00
2
2%
32%
very coarse sand
2.00
9
9%
41%
very fine gravel
4.0
1
1%
42%
fine gravel
5.7
1
1%
43%
fine gravel
8.0
4
4%
47%
Gravel
medium gravel
11.3
2
2%
49%
medium gravel
16.0
5
5%
53%
coarse gravel
22.3
2
2%
55%
coarse gravel
32
10
10%
65%
very coarse gravel
45
9
9%
73%
very coarse gravel
64
8
8%
81%
Cobble
small cobble
90
8
8%
89%
medium cobble
128
10
10%
98%
large cobble
180
2
2%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
12
D84
73
D95
110
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -9 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -10
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Upper
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
c
c
.c
70%
—
sF.
as
c
W
60%
d
50% L
P.
40% >
c
30
c
U
20%
if
10%
0%
O
O
N V
b
d
CG
Particle Size (mm)
F—MY13/l/2011 —MY2 10/18 /2011 —MY3 6/6/2012 --#--MY4 5/2/2013 -0-MY5 4/17/2014
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Upper
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
20
c
b
15%
C
Q
10"/. �-
5%
b 00 �O N N kn 7 O OD O �D
O N N rl rl N M 7 �O CT N 00 M
N N 7 00 �D
�O
4
0%
as
Qa
Particle Size (mm)
■MY13 /1/2011 ■W210 /18/2011 ■MY36/6/2012 ■MY45/212013
■MY54/17/2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -10
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTI - Lower - Cross - Section 4 - Pool
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Monitoring Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
10
9%
9%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
9%
fine sand
0.25
9
8%
17%
medium sand
0.50
25
22%
39%
coarse sand
1.00
1
1%
40%
very coarse sand
2.00
7
6%
46%
very fine gravel
4.0
3
3%
49%
fine gravel
5.7
2
2%
51%
fine gravel
8.0
4
4%
54%
Gravel
medium gravel
11.3
9
8%
63%
medium gravel
16.0
7
6%
69%
coarse gravel
22.3
15
13%
82%
coarse gravel
32
5
4%
87%
very coarse gravel
45
4
4%
90%
very coarse gravel
64
2
2%
92%
Cobble
small cobble
90
4
4%
96%
medium cobble
128
4
4%
99%
large cobble
180
1
1%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
112
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
4.9
D84
26
D95
86
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -11 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -12
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Lower
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 4 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
a
r
70%
y,
d
C
W
60%
d
50% L
d
P.
40% >
30
y
U
20%
10%
O
0%
d
f-0
Particle Size (mm)
F—MY1
—MY2 10/18 /2011 —MY3 6/6/2012 —*--MY4 5/2/2013
-f-MYS 4/17/2014
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Lower
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 4 - Pool
20%
b
15%
C
Q
�-
loo/.
5%
N lf1 n Vi '-I N R
�O 00 rl b N N � 7 00 O �D N
N 7 O b.ti
0%
d
Qa
Particle Size (mm)
■MY13 /2/2011 ■MY210 /18/2011 ■MY36/6/2012 ■MY45/212013 ■MY54/17/2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -12
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTl - Lower - Cross - Section 5 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Monitoring Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
4
4%
4%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
4%
fine sand
0.25
9
9%
12%
medium sand
0.50
21
20%
32%
coarse sand
1.00
0
0%
32%
very coarse sand
2.00
8
8%
40%
very fine gravel
4.0
0
0%
40%
fine gravel
5.7
0
0%
40%
fine gravel
8.0
1
1%
41%
Gravel
medium gravel
11.3
5
5%
46%
medium gravel
16.0
8
8%
53%
coarse gravel
22.3
4
4%
57%
coarse gravel
32
6
6%
63%
very coarse gravel
45
3
3%
66%
very coarse gravel
64
12
11%
77%
Cobble
small cobble
90
11
10%
88%
medium cobble
128
5
5%
92%
large cobble
180
8
8%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
105
105%
100%
Summary Data
D50
14
D84
80
D95
140
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -13 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -14
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Lower
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
c
70%
r
sF.
d
c
W
60%
50%
d
L
d
P.
40%
>
—
c
30
20%
c
U
10%
O
0%
O
O
N V
b
d
f-0
Particle Size (mm)
—MY13/2/2011 —MY2 10/18 /2011 —MY3 6/6/2012 —*--MY4 5/2/2013 -0-MY5 4/17/2014
Unnamed Tributary 1 - Lower
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
7
20%
b
15%
C
u
n
10%
5%
N lf1 n Vi .--
O N N
N 7 �O 00 rl N N V7 7 O 00 O
rl rl N M 7 �O 01 N 00 kn �A
N N 7 O (71
7 N O� ti 7
0%
d
Qa
Particle Size (mm)
■MY13 /2/2011 ■MY210 /18/2011 ■MY36/6/2012 ■MY45/212013
■MY54/17/2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -14
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTCC - Upstream - Cross - Section 6 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Monitoring Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
0
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
0.25
0
0%
0%
medium sand
0.50
0
0%
0%
coarse sand
1.00
0
0%
0%
very coarse sand
2.00
9
8%
8%
very fine gravel
4.0
2
2%
10%
fine gravel
5.7
5
5%
15%
fine gravel
8.0
3
3%
17%
Gravel
medium gravel
11.3
6
6%
23%
medium gravel
16.0
5
5%
28%
coarse gravel
22.3
12
11%
39%
coarse gravel
32
15
14%
52%
very coarse gravel
45
17
16%
68%
very coarse gravel
64
10
9%
77%
Cobble
small cobble
90
13
12%
89%
medium cobble
128
7
6%
95%
large cobble
180
2
2%
97%
very large cobble
256
3
3%
100%
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
109
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
30
D84
78
D95
130
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -15 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -16
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
r
70%
�I
y,
d
C
W
60%
d
50% L
d
P.
40% >
-
—
30
y
U
20
10%
0%
O O
N V
b
d
f-0
Particle Size (mm)
—MY13/2/2011
—MY2 10/18 /2011 —MY3 6/6/2012 --#--MY4 5/2/2013
— ,-MYS 4/17/2014
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
-
20%
r
�
I
.y
15%
C
u
10% �-
5%
N lf1 n Vi .-- N 7
�O 00 rl � N N V7 7 O 00 O �D N
N 7 O b1i
0%
d
Qa
Particle Size (mm)
■MY13 /2/2011 ■MY210 /18/2011 ■MY36/6/2012 ■MY45/212013 ■MY54/17/2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -16
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTCC - Upstream - Cross - Section 7 - Pool
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Monitoring Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
38
35%
35%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
6
6%
40%
fine sand
0.25
7
6%
47%
medium sand
0.50
1
1%
48%
coarse sand
1.00
13
12%
60%
very coarse sand
2.00
3
3%
62%
very fine gravel
4.0
0
0%
62%
fine gravel
5.7
3
3%
65%
fine gravel
8.0
2
2%
67%
Gravel
medium gravel
11.3
0
0%
67%
medium gravel
16.0
1
1%
68%
coarse gravel
22.3
1
1%
69%
coarse gravel
32
0
0%
69%
very coarse gravel
45
4
4%
72%
very coarse gravel
64
4
4%
76%
Cobble
small cobble
90
13
12%
88%
medium cobble
128
4
4%
92%
large cobble
180
7
6%
98%
very large cobble
256
2
2%
100%
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
109
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
80
D95
150
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -17 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -18
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 7 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
a
.c
70% F-
L
d
C
W
60%
d
50% L
P.
40% >
—
30
y
U
20%
-
10%
N
O
4
Vi V VI ti N R
N C
D 00 O N N M R O x O �
.� .�-i N M R �C 0\ N W M b
�
N R W
N R
0%
� Y
O
O'
d
f-0
Particle Size (mm)
F—MY13/2/2011
—MY2 10/17/2011 —MY3 6/6/2012 --#--MY4 5/2/2013
-0-MY5 4/17/2014
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 7 - Pool
I E
20%
b
15%
C
u
s.
10% n
5%
N lf1 n Vi '-I N R
�O 00 rl b N N V7 7 O 00 O �D N
N 7 O
b1i
0%
d
Qa
Particle Size (mm)
■MY13 /2/2011 ■MY210 /18/2011 ■MY36/6/2012 ■MY45/212013 ■MY54/17/2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -18
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTCC - Upstream - Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Monitoring Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
5
5%
5%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
5%
fine sand
0.25
3
3%
8%
medium sand
0.50
4
4%
11%
coarse sand
1.00
0
0%
11%
very coarse sand
2.00
2
2%
13%
very fine gravel
4.0
0
0%
13%
fine gravel
5.7
0
0%
13%
fine gravel
8.0
0
0%
13%
Gravel
medium gravel
11.3
0
0%
13%
medium gravel
16.0
1
1%
14%
coarse gravel
22.3
2
2%
16%
coarse gravel
32
9
8%
25%
very coarse gravel
45
10
9%
34%
very coarse gravel
64
17
16%
50%
Cobble
small cobble
90
23
22%
72%
medium cobble
128
16
15%
87%
large cobble
180
11
10%
97%
very large cobble
256
3
3%
100%
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
106
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
64
D84
120
D95
170
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -19 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -20
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
.c
70%
�I
y,
d
C
W
60%
d
50% L
d
P.
40% >
30
y
U
20%
10%
O
N W M b
�
N Q O
0%
O
O'
O
N V
b
d
f-0
Particle Size (mm)
F—MY1 —MY2 10/18 /2011 —MY3 6/6/2012 --#--MY4 5/2/2013
— ,-MYS 4/17/2014
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
20
y
b
15%
C
u
10 M. �-
5%
i
0%
d
Qa
Particle Size (mm)
■MY13 /2/2011 ■MY210 /18/2011 ■MY36/6/2012 ■MY45/212013 ■MY54/17/2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -20
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTCC - Upstream - Cross - Section 9 - Pool
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Monitoring Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
6
5%
5%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
5%
fine sand
0.25
14
13%
18%
medium sand
0.50
6
5%
23%
coarse sand
1.00
0
0%
23%
very coarse sand
2.00
9
8%
31%
very fine gravel
4.0
2
2%
33%
fine gravel
5.7
0
0%
33%
fine gravel
8.0
0
0%
33%
Gravel
medium gravel
11.3
3
3%
36%
medium gravel
16.0
8
7%
43%
coarse gravel
22.3
11
10%
53%
coarse gravel
32
9
8%
61%
very coarse gravel
45
10
9%
70%
very coarse gravel
64
16
14%
84%
Cobble
small cobble
90
10
9%
93%
medium cobble
128
6
5%
98%
large cobble
180
1
1%
99%
very large cobble
256
1
1%
100%
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
112
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
20
D84
64
D95
100
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -21 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -22
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 9 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
a
r
70%
y,
as
C
W
60%
d
50% L
P.
40% >
30
y
U
20%
10%
0%
d
CG
Particle Size (mm)
— MY13/3/2011
—MY2 10/18 /2011 —MY3 6/6/2012 --#--MY4 5/2/2013
-0-MY5 4/17/2014
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 9 - Pool
20
y
b
15%
C
Q
loo/. �-
5%
N lf1 V1 Vi .-- N R
O N N
�O 00 rl �O N N V7 7 O OD O �O N
rl rl N M 7 �O O\ N 00 M �O
N 7 00 �O
0%
O O
� N 7
,d
as
Qa
Particle Size (mm)
■MY13 /3/2011 ■MY210 /18/2011 ■MY36/6/2012 ■MY45/212013 ■MY54/17/2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -22
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
UTCC - Upstream - Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
Pebble Count Summary
D50
Monitoring Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
13
12%
12%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
12%
fine sand
0.25
4
4%
16%
medium sand
0.50
11
10%
27%
coarse sand
1.00
3
3%
30%
very coarse sand
2.00
4
4%
33%
very fine gravel
4.0
0
0%
33%
fine gravel
5.7
0
0%
33%
fine gravel
8.0
0
0%
33%
Gravel
medium gravel
11.3
0
0%
33%
medium gravel
16.0
3
3%
36%
coarse gravel
22.3
3
3%
39%
coarse gravel
32
11
10%
50%
very coarse gravel
45
17
16%
66%
very coarse gravel
64
7
7%
72%
Cobble
small cobble
90
14
13%
86%
medium cobble
128
10
10%
95%
large cobble
180
5
5%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0
0%
100%
TOTALS
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
32
D84
86
D95
130
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -23 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -24
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
UT Crab Creek- Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 10 -Riffle
100%
—
90%
80%
a
r
70% F
L
d
C
W
60%
d
50% L
d
P.
40% >
30
y
U
20%
10%
O
N W M
�
b N Q O
0%
O
O'
O
N V
b
d
f-0
Particle Size (mm)
F—MY1
—MY2 10/18 /2011 —MY3 6/6/2012 --#--MY4 5/2/2013 -0-MY5 4/17/2014
UT Crab Creek - Upstream
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 10 - Riffle
20%
r
-
b
15%
C
u
10% n
5%
N lf1 n Vi .-- N 7
D 00 rl � N N V7 7 O 00 O �D
N N 7 OD b1i
0%
d
Qa
Particle Size (mm)
■MY13 /3/2011 ■MY210 /18/2011 ■MY36/6/2012 ■MY45/212013
■MY54/17/2014
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -24
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
* The design cross - section criteria were developed using an analytical design approach. Pattern and profile data derived from stable enhancement reaches from the existing UT 1 data.
Non - Applicable.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -25 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UTl - Upper 500 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre- Fxisting Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design*
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.9
13.5
13.6
15.8
2.51
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
13.1
-
14.8
15.3
15.3
15.7
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
18.2
N/A
N/A
>55
N/A
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
22
-
33
>100
>100
>100
>100
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.90
1.20
1.20
1.50
0.23
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
1.10
-
1.30
1.50
1.50
1.60
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.20
1.80
1.80
2.40
0.51
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.00
2.40
2.50
2.50
2.50
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
14.0
14.1
15.1
15.0
15.9
0.72
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
14.8
20.3
22.2
22.2
24.0
N/A
2
Width/Depth Ratio
6.5
12.2
11.7
16.7
4.12
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
12.0
9.2
10.7
10.7
12.2
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.2
3.4
3.3
>5.6
1.561
5
1 N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
1
1 1.7
1
1 >6.4
1 >6.6
>6.6
>6.7
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.6
1 1.7
2.4
0.54
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
I N/A
I N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
N/A
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
5.8
28.7
22.6
68.2
23.42
7
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.023
0.057
0.014
0.03
0.014
0.03
0.014
0.023
0.022
0.033
0.007
7
Pool Length (ft)
7.0
13.0
14
47
14.0
47.0
3.5
8.6
8.1
19.8
4.44
13
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.9
2.1
2.1
2.2
0.13
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
1.0
-
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
N/A
1
Pool Spacing (ft)
60.0
-
-
65.0
-
-
54
126
54.0
-
126.0
6.8
38.9
34.0
113.1
30.33
12
Pattern
Channel Belt Width ft
21.0
58.0
32
58
32.0
58.0
26.8
37.4
40.1
44.4
7.06
6
Radius of Curvature (ft)
11.0
37.0
20
37
20.0
37.0
28.7
34.7
32.4
51.3
8.35
6
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
0.7
3.7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.5
2.8
1.9
2.3
2.1
3.3
N/A
N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)
90.0
191.0
90.0
-
-
191.0
-
-
90.0
191.0
117.9
135.5
130.7
162.6
20.10
4
Meander Width Ratio
1.3
5.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.4
4.4
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.7
N/A
2
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb /ft2
N/A
2.08
Max Part Size (nun) Mobilized at Bankfull
N/A
262
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m2
N/A
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G4 /C4
N/A
134c/C4
Cb
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
-
3.9-4.7
N/A
4.5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
62
59-71
N/A
66
Valley Length (ft)
-
N/A
-
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,730
N/A
1,621
500
Sinuosity
1.19
N/A
1.14
1.14
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0210
N/A
0.0210
0.0238
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
-
N/A
-
0.0251
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
N/A
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
Biological or Other
N/A
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
* The design cross - section criteria were developed using an analytical design approach. Pattern and profile data derived from stable enhancement reaches from the existing UT 1 data.
Non - Applicable.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -25 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
* The design cross - section criteria were developed using an analytical design approach. Pattern and profile data derived from stable enhancement reaches from the existing UT 1 data.
Non - Applicable.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -26 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UT1 - Lower 397 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design*
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.9
13.5
13.6
15.8
2.51
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
13.1
-
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
N/A
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
18.2
N/A
N/A
>55
N/A
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
22.0
-
33.0
>100
>100
>100
>100
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.90
1.20
1.20
1.50
0.23
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
1.1
-
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
N/E
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.20
1.80
1.80
2.40
0.51
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.0
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
N/
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
14.0
14.1
15.1
15.0
15.9
0.72
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
14.8
17.6
17.6
17.6
17.6
N/
Width/Depth Ratio
6.5
12.2
11.7
16.7
4.12
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
12.0
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
N/Entrenchment
Ratio
1.2
3.4
3.3
>5.6
1.56
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.7
>8.7
>8.7
>8.7
>8.7
N/Bank
Height Ratio
1.0
1.6
1.7
2.4
0.54
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
21.0
37.6
40.2
52.6
15.19
5
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.023
0.057
0.014
0.030
0.014
0.030
0.020
0.026
0.027
0.033
0.005
5
Pool Length (ft)
7.0
13.0
14.0
47.0
14.0
47.0
11.8
17.4
17.4
27.1
6.24
5
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.9
2.1
2.1
2.2
0.13
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
1.0
-
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
N/A
1
Pool Spacing (ft)
60.0
-
-
65.0
-
-
54.0
126.0
54.0
-
126.0
45.0
71.3
73.4
93.6
121.55
4
Pattern
Channel Belt Width ft
21.0
58.0
32
58
32.0
58.0
57.2
62.9
64.2
66.2
3.9
4
Radius of Curvature (ft)
11.0
37.0
20
37
20.0
37.0
31.2
36.6
37.8
39.7
3.8
4
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
0.7
3.7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.5
2.8
2.71
3.18
3.28
3.45
N/A
N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)
90.0
191.0
90.0
-
-
191.0
-
-
90.0
191.0
142.0
196.0
202.0
244.0
N/A
3
Meander Width Ratio
1.3
5.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.4
4.4
5.58
5.58
5.58
5.58
N/A
I
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb /ft2
N/A
1.36
Max Pan Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
N/A
191
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m2
N/A
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G4 /C4
N/A
B4c /C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
-
3.9-4.7
N/A
4.5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
62
59-71
N/A
66
Valley Length (ft)
-
N/A
-
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,730
N/A
1,621
397
Sinuosity
1.19
N/A
1.14
1.15
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0210
N/A
0.0210
0.0156
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
-
N/A
-
0.0174
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
N/A
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
Biological or Other
N/A
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
* The design cross - section criteria were developed using an analytical design approach. Pattern and profile data derived from stable enhancement reaches from the existing UT 1 data.
Non - Applicable.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -26 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
*Existing stream has been channelized and does not have a natural meander pattern with distinct pool and riffle features.
Non- Applicable.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -27 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UTCC -US (2,455 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.6
20.4
19.8
24.5
2.91
4
59.7
62.3
62.3
64.9
N/A
2
24.0
25.0
26.7
26.5
28.7
N/A
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
65
-
-
>80
-
4
200
248
248
296
N/A
2
-
54.0
>200
>200
>200
>200
N/A
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.40
1.65
1.70
1.80
0.17
4
3.30
3.35
3.35
3.40
N/A
2
1.4
1.40
1.53
1.50
1.70
N/A
3
Bankfull M ax Depth (ft)
2.40
2.78
2.75
3.20
0.33
4
5.00
5.40
5.40
5.80
N/A
2
2.3
2.40
2.50
2.50
2.60
N/A
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
39.0
30.8
33.1
33.7
34.2
1.57
4
198.0
208.0
208.0
218.0
N/A
2
34.2
37.0
40.5
42.1
42.4
N/A
3
Width/Depth Ratio
1 10.01
12.71
11.51
17.9
3.52
4
18.1
18.6
-
19.1
17.1
14.7
17.7
19.0
19.5
N/A
3
Entrenchment Ratio
3.1
>4.1
4
3.1
4.0
5.0
>7.5 >7.5
>7.5
>8.0
N/A
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.2
0.10
4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
N/A
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
14.9
60.5
64.9
100.0
22.55
19
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.020
0.042
0.015
0.029
0.027
0.048
0.012
5
0.014
0.045
0.006
0.013
0.012
0.021
0.005
19
Pool Length (ft)
29.0
51 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
21.0
105.0
10.4
41.1
39.0
79.2
21.76
19
Pool M ax Depth (ft)
3.0
3.1
3.1
3.3
NA
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.9
-
2.7
2.9
2.9
3.0
N/A
2
Pool Spacing (ft)
-
95.0
-
-
116.0
190.0
161.0
188.0
93.70
4
45.0
-
136.0
51.7
130.7
113.2
241.7
52.31
18
Pattern
Channel Belt Width ft)
13.0
-
43.0
-
500
-
-
N/A
1
75.0
211.0
54.7
101.7
102.5
132.8
23.59
15
Radius of Curvature (ft)
0.0*
51*
-
55.1
-
-
N/A
1
43.0
128.0
37.5
51.1
42.5
146.7
26.21
16
Re: Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
0.0*
2.9*
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
-
-
1.7
5.1
1.5
1.9
1.6
5.1
N/A
N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft)
*
*
51.3
159.0
61.6
540.0
213.0
5
20.0
228.0
204.4
238.7
234.4
314.2
32.62
15
Meander Width Ratio
0.5
2.4
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
N/A
-
3.0
8.4
3.6
3.9
3.9
4.1
N/A
3
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress Com etenc 1b/ft2
0.89
0.73
0.71
Max Part Size (nun) Mobilized at Bankfulll
1
130
125
1
118
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /mZ
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C3
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
-
3.3 -3.8
3.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
197
111-130
117
Valley Length (ft)
-
-
-
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,086
1,034
2,405
2,455
Sinuosity
1.04
1.20
1.20
1.21
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.0090
0.0088
0.0080
0.0080
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
-
-
-
0.0083
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
*Existing stream has been channelized and does not have a natural meander pattern with distinct pool and riffle features.
Non- Applicable.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -27 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 1Ob. Baseline Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
UT to Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UTl -U er 500 feet
Parameter
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Ri% /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
42
8
24
22
4
-
-
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
<1*
10*
59*
28*
3*
0*
3*
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
18
5
48
18
II
d16 / D35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /diP / di- (mm)
7.2*
22.2*
40.0*
103.0*
197.0*
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
144
512
-
-
-
Entrenchment Class
<1.5/1.5- 1.99/2 - 4.9/5.0- 9.9/ >10
-
-
-
-
-
Entrenchment Class
-
-
-
-
-
Incision Class
<1.2/1.2- 1.49/1.5- 1.99/>2.0
-
-
-
-
<1.5/1.5- 1.99/2- 4.9/5.0- 9.9/>10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
* Numbers reported are the mean percentages from the riffle surface pebble counts.
Non - Applicable.
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
UT to Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UTl -Lower 397 feet
Parameter
Pre - Testing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
47
9
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
<1*
10*
59*
28*
3*
0*
1*
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
18
5
48
18
II
dl6 / D35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / di° / di- mm
7.2*
22.2*
40.0*
103.0*
197.0*
11*
23*
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
144
512
-
-
-
Entrenchment Class
Entrenchment Class
<1.5/1.5- 1.99/2 - 4.9/5.0- 9.9/ >10
<1.5/1.5- 1.99/2- 4.9/5.0- 9.9/>10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Incision Class
Incision Class
<1.2/1.2- 1.49/1.5- 1.99/ >2.0
-
-
-
-
<1.2/1.2- 1.49/1.5- 1.99/ >2.0
-
-
-
-
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
* Numbers reported are the mean percentages from the riffle surface pebble counts.
Non - Applicable.
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
UT to Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UTCC -US (2,455 feet
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Parameter
Ri% /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
47
9
32
12
0
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B% /Be%
0*
1*
62*
36*
<1*
0*
0
18
5
48
18
II
d16/D35/d50/d84/d95 / dip /dep mm
11*
23*
44*
104*
150*
-
-
1.4
-
144
512
-
-
-
Entrenchment Class
<1.5/1.5- 1.99/2- 4.9/5.0- 9.9/>10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Incision Class
<1.2/1.2- 1.49/1.5- 1.99/ >2.0
- Information unavailable.
* Numbers reported are the mean percentages from the riffle surface pebble counts.
Non - Applicable.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -28 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table l la. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UT1 - Upper (500 Feet)
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
UT Crab Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UTl -Upper (500 feet)
Cross - Section 1
Riffle
Cross - Section 2
Pool
Cross - Section 3
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,605
2,605
2,605
2,605
2,605
2,605
2,603
2,603
2,603
2,603
2,603
2,603
2,598
2,598
2,598
2,598
2,598
2,598
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.7
15.9
15.3
16.0
17.3
18.4
18.4
18.0
17.6
18.0
17.9
17.9
14.8
14.7
14.9
15.0
15.0
15.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.7671
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.618
1.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.4
2.5
2.4
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.1
3.0831
2.9
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.698
2.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ 1
20.3
18.5
19.3
19.5
20.0
20.1
34.3
33.4
32.2
32.4
31.651
29.8
24.0
23.8
23.8
24.4
24.25
23.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.2
13.8
12.1
13.1
14.9
16.9
9.9
9.7
9.6
10.0
10.136
10.8
9.2
9.1
9.4
9.2
9.262
9.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>6.4
>6.3
>6.5
>6.3
>5.8
>5.4
>5.4
>5.5
>5.7
>5.5
>5.6
>5.6
>6.7
>6.8
>6.7
>6.7
>6.7
>6.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0649
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.096
1.1
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2) 20.3
19.0
19.4
19.6
20.0
20.1
34.3
33.6
32.2
32.4
32
29.8
24.3
24.1
24.2
24.6
24
1 23.9
d50 (mm) I N/A
17
4.6
6.6
19
8.8
N/A
11
1.7
1 6.4
4.9
9.1
N/A
23
12
19
26
12
N/A - Item does not apply.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland Final D -29 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table l la. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UT1 -Lower (397 feet)
Cross - Section 4
Pool
Cross - Section 5
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.7
14.3
14.7
14.7
14.4
14.2
11.5
12.2
12.3
11.8
11.7
12.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.3
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.42
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.5
2.72
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2
18.8
18.0
16.7
16.7
17.3
15.4
17.6
17.5
17.3
16.8
16.5
15.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.8
11.4
12.9
13.0
12.0
13.2
7.5
8.5
8.8
8.3
8.25
9.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>6.0
>7.0
>6.8
>6.8
1 >6.9
>7.0
>8.7
1 >8.2
>8.1
1 >8.5
>8.6
>8.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.02
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins ft2
18.9
18.0
16.7
16.7
17.3
15.4
21.1
21.5
21.6
21.1
16.5
15.8
d50 (mm)
N/A
8.4 1
4
2
0.4
4.9
N/A
0.91
2
1.3
0.06
14
N/A - Item does not apply.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -30
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 11a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Moprhology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UTCC -US (2,455 feet)
Cross - Section 6
Riffle
Cross - Section 7
Pool
Cross -Section 8
Riffle
Cross - Section 9
Pool
Cross - Secti on 10
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,571
2,566
2,566
2,566
2,566
2,566
2,566
2,554
2,554
2,554
2,554
2,554
2,554
2,554
2,554
2,554
2,554
2,554
2,544
Bankfull Width (ft)
25.0
24.7
27.2
25.1
24.3
23.7
27.7
27.8
27.8
27.6
27.4
27.6
28.7
27.9
28.0
27.9
27.5
27.7
23.5
23.8
23.0
23.1
23.7
22.9
26.5
27.2
26.4
27.8
27.3
26.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>2001
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.38
1.4
BankfullMax Depth (ft)
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.5
3.0
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.46
3.2
2.5
2.4
2.5
2.4
2.43
2.5
2.7
2.9
2.7
2.8
2.75
2.7
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.56
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
42.4
41.9
41.3
41.0
40.0
37.6
47.3
47.1
45.1
43.9
40.9
38.1
42.1
39.5
38.4
37.6
35.9
34.5
40.7
40.9
36.1
36.8
35.6
32.2
37.0
37.2
35.9
37.5
37.5
36.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.7
14.6
17.9
15.3
14.8
14.9
16.3
1 16.4
1 17.1
1 17.4
18.3
20.0
19.5
19.7
20.4
20.7
21.1
22.3
13.5
13.9
14.6
1 14.5
15.8
16.3
19.0
19.9
19.4
20.6
19.8
19.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>8.0
>8.1
>7.4
>8.0
>8.2
>8.4
>7.2
17.2
>7.2
>7.2
>7.3
1 >7.2
1 >7.0
1 >7.2
>7.1
>7.2
>7.3
>7.2
>8.5
>8.4
>8.7
>8.7
1 >8.4
1 >8.7
>7.5
>7.3
>7.6
>7.2
>7.3
>7.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.05
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.041
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.04
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins ft2
42.4
41.9
41.3
41.0
40.0
37.6
47.3
47.3
45.1
43.9
40.9
38.1
43.2
40.1
38.5
37.6
35.9
34.5
41.5
41.2
36.1
36.8
35.6
32.2
38.6
39.9
37.1
39.7
37.5
36.6
d50 nm
N/A
51
48
46
38
30
N/A
32
6
1 8.7
1 1.3
1 0.06
N/A
33
26
33
33
64
N/A
8.8
27
33
1 31
1 20
NA
24
IS
25
30
32
N/A - Item does not apply.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -31 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table Ilb. Monitoring D. Data Summary
UT Crab Cmek Stream & Wetland Project No. 857 - UT1-Upper (503 feet)
• ,
®����a
®
®��
®a
®��
®moo
®
®���a�
®���
®
®��
®�®
• .
®
®
®
®�
®�
®®
®tea
®
®
®
®�
®
®
®
®
®�
®
®
®®
®tea
®
®®
®tea
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = RifBe / Ro= R- / P =Pool / G= Glide / S= S[ep
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gavel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
"Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble conata.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -32 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table Ilb. Monitoring D. Data Stromnary
UT Crab Cmek Stream & Wetland Project No. 857 - UTI-Lower (396 feet)
tt
tt
1.
It
•
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri =RifB /Ro= R- /P= Pool /G= Glide /S =Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gavel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
"Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble courts.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -33 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table I I b. Monitoring D. Data Summary
UT Crab Creek Stream & Welland Proiject No. 857 - UTCC-US (2,465 feet)
• ,
�
®
®��o
®
®
®�
®o
®
®®
®moo
®
®
®��o
®�
®��
®
®
®���®
t, I
t l
t t :
t tt :
tt :
I ll:•
t tl:
I tt:
I tt .
I tt.
I tt
.,
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri =RifB /Ro= R- /P= Pool /G= Glide /S =Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gavel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
"Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble courts.
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland D -34 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification ofBankfull Events
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photo #
(if available)
4/2010
4/2010
Wrack lines
2/2/2011
12/2/2010
Crest gauge & wrack lines
4/10/2013
2/26/2013
Crest gauge & wrack lines
10/30/2013
Unknown
Wrack lines
11/5/2014
Unknown
Wrack lines
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -1
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix E
14.0
WWI
10.0
C
O 8.0
.Q
.� 6.0
L
IL
4.0
2.0
0.0
monunlly rrecipitation vata uomparea to su_.. ana ./u_.. rercentnes for Allegnany t_;ounty, ivy:
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
-2014 Rainfall 30th Percentile • • • • • • 70th Percentile
Hydrologic Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -2 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
UTC -1 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -3 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
5.0
Beginning of ;
Maximum# of Consecutive Days >12 ":
3
35.0
Growing Season
May 2
% ofHydroperiodDuringGrowing Season:
1.9%
30.0
4.5
;
25.0
4.0
;
20.0
15.0
=
.i
10.0
Ground Surface
;
)
:..
3.0
5.0
3
0.0
M
Required
i
2.5
Depth
-5.0
O
Q
.�
-10.0
(�
2.0
J 1
- 15.0
—
a
1.5
-20.0
a
End of
Growing Season
-25.0
0
Octobers
1.0
;
,
;
-30.0
-35.0
0.5
Rain Gauge Malfunction
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
r
r
r
r
r
r r r r
r
r r r r r r r
r
r
r
r r
r r
r
r r
C C
i
L L L L
R R
C G�
01
-2
01
C
Q
V V
0 >
d V
U V m
4)
a a
6 a
a
V
O
Z Z
0
D
LO
(D
N
N
M
N N
4 O O
ti
e
N
O N
N
L6 T
ti r
M
N
N
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -3 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015

Appendix E
U l U -L
ana water Levu riot
Hydrologic Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -4 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
15.0
Beginning of
Growing Season
;
Maximum #of Consecutive Days >12 ":
45
May 2
o
/o
of Hyd ro period During G rowi ng Season:
Q
28.7 /0
4
�
10.0
.5
Ground
Surface
5.0
4.0
1
.-.
3.5
;
Required
-5.0
4)
Depth
�I
3.0
-10.0
C
'r
End of
2.5
;
; Growing Season
-15.0
p
Q
;
; October5
.V
2.0
-20.0
p
i
-25.0
Q
1.5
-30.0
1.0
-35.0
0.5
Rain Gauge Malfunction
I
-40.0
0.0
IL
1 1111[
Ut
-45.0
1
1 . . I
I . I
1
i
1
T
r
r
T
T
T T T
r T
T
r T T r T r T
T
T
T T r r T
r
T
r3
t0
r6
a)
y
R
ciC Q.
I
O. f�6
I
R
� �
7 7 3 7 3
d
d
V V O O d
a)
N
>
LL
L
2 a
a
9
o o z z o
0
0
r
W)
O)
N
CO
N CO M
M r`
T
4 CO I�
M
O
4
00 N o O M
`
r
T
N
N
N
N
N
T N
N
N
M
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -4 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E
u i u -s rrecipitation ana water Level not
Hydrologic Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -5 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
10.0
Beginning
Growing Seas on
Maximum #of Consecutive Days >12 ":
157
May 2
%
ofHydro period DuringGrovang Season:
100%
4.5
Ground
Surface
5.0
4.0
,
,
3.5
Ily
Required
-5.0
=
Depth
L
.-.
-10.0
�
3.0
3
O
-15.0
2.5
End of
�
Growing Season
O
Q
October
-20.0
.�
2.0
O
i
-25.0
a
s
1.5
'
a
-30.0
Q
1.0
-35.0
0.5
;
Rain Gauge Malfunction
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
v
P
v
P
v
P T
P
P P P r
r
r
P P r r r r r
r
r
T P r r P
P
T
C
C
C M
W
M
0
i L i i
M M C Cg
:�
:;"
C C 01 LA
C.
Q
6
O 0 d
U
0)
V
41
u.
u.
2 2 Q Q
�
-?'2
O C? Z Z
0
O
D
LO
(D
N
t0
N 6 01 M
N
r
V 00 N P
O
V
O N 0 A M
N
ti
r
N
N
N
N
N
M
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -5 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E
U I L -4 rrecipitation ana water Level not
Hydrologic Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -6 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
i
10.0
Maximum#
of Consecutive Days >12 ":45
% of Hyd
roperiod During Growing Season :
28.7%
4.5
Ground
Surface
5.0
•�.
. • - -�
_
—
-♦
0.0
Beginning of
3.5
Growing Season
Required
-5.0
=_
.-.
May 2
Depth
L
-10.0
y
:..
3.0
Gauge Malfunction
3
�
O�
-15.0
=
+=�
2 5
End of
Growing Season
O
Q
October5
-20.0
.�
2.0
O
i
-25.0
a
s
1.5
'
a
-30.0
Q
1.0
-35.0
0.5
;
Rain Gauge Malfunction
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
v v
P P
v
P T
P
P P P r
r
r P
P r r r r r
r
r
T P r r T
P
T
C C
f6 M
C M
M 41
M
C
i L i i
R M C Cg
:�
:;" C
C
C
61
Q
d
0 O > d
v y
v d
J -7
-7 u-
u-
2 2 Q Q
� -?
-? 2
Q
V1
V1
O C? Z Z 0
O
D
P LO
C N
N
t0
N t0 01 M
N
r V
W N P
O
V
O N 0 T M
N
ti
r
r
N
N
N
r N
N
M
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -6 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E
u i u -5 rrecipitation ana water Level not
Hydrologic Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -7 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
10.0
Beginning of
Maximum# of Consecutive Days >12 ":
157
Growing Season
%
of Hyd roperiod During GroWng Season:
100%
4.5
Ground
Surface
May
5.0
0.0
4 .0
Required
-5.0
=
Depth
L
.-.
-10.0
3.0
3
O
;
-15.0
2.5
End of
;
Growing Season
O
Q
"V
;
; October5
-20.0
L-
2.0
O
i
-25.0
a
s
1.5
'
a
-30.0
Q
1.0
-35.0
0.5
Rain Gauge Malfunction
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
P
P
P T
P
P P P r
r
r
P P r r r r r
r
r
T P r r T
P T
C C
f6 M
C M
M W
M
C
i L i i
R M C Cg
:�
:;"
C C &
&
C
Q
0 O > d
v d
v y
J
-7
-7 u-
u-
2 2 Q Q
�
-? -? 2
Q
O C? Z Z 0
P
LO
C N
N
t0
N t0 01 M
N
r
V 0 N 0 O M ti
P M
O
e
O N 0 T M
N
IO - -
TD
r
N
N
N
r N
N
M
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -7 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E
u i u -6 rrecipitation ana water Level not
Hydrologic Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -8 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
10.0
Maximum # of Consecutive Days> 12":
31
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season :
19.7%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
\
0.0
4.0
3.5
Beginningof
Required
-5.0
=
.i
Growing Season
i
Depth
.-.
a
May 2
��
-10.0
3.0
3
c
O
-15.0
�
2.5
End of
�
Growing Season
O
Q
October5
-20.0
.�
2.0
O
i
-25.0
a�
�
s
1.5
'
a
-30.0
Q
1.0
-35.0
0.5
Rain Gauge Malfunction
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
v
P
v
P
v
P
T
P P P
P
r
r
r
P P r r r r r
r
r
T P r r P
P
T
C
f6
C
fC
C
R
M
W
M i L
0I M M
i
C.
i
C.
:�
:;"
C C C & &
= 7 z
-2
C.
d
Q
d
> > V
O O d
v
d
v
41
u
u- 2 2
Q
Q
-? -7 Q Q
O C? Z Z 0
O
D
LO
(D
N
t0 N 6
01
M
N
00 N 10 O IZ
P M
O
-4
O N Lh Im
N
r
N N
N
N
N
M
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -8 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
UTC -7 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
5.0
Beginning of Maximum# of Consecutive Days >12 ": 10 10.0
Growing Season ; %of Hydroperiod During GrowingSeason: 6.4%
May 2
4.5
* ♦ ` Ground Surface 5.0
4.0
0.0
3.5 Required -5.0
.-. Depth L
\ M
i \y
3.0 -10.0 3
'a
O -15.0 r-
2.5
;
O
-20.0
.O 2.0
O O
a '
-25.0 t
1.5
a
End of
-30.0
Growing Season
1.0 ; October 5
-35.0
0.5 Rain Gauge Malfunction -40.0
It0.0 -45.0
r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r
C C i L L L L 01 01 Q Q
a R a a g � r � r � Q �
V U 0 o > Q d
J ? ? u- u- 2 2 Q Q ' ? V1 V I? I? Z Z 0 O U D
LO M t0 N t0 01 M t V CO N t0 O O -4 O N Lh Im �
N N N N N r N N N V m
Cl)
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -9 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E
u i u -s rrecipitation ana water Levei not
Hydrologic Data
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -10 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
Beginning of
Growing Season
;
�
10.0
Maximum #of Consecutive Days >12 ": 34
Ma 2
y
;
o o
/ o ofHydroperiodDuringGrowingSeason :21.7/0
4.5
Ground
Surface
5.0
4.0
;
0.0
Required
-5'0
v
3.5
Depth
L
c
-10.0
m
f°
c
3.0
c
o
w
;
;Gauge Malfunction
o
>
-15.0
t9
•C
2.5
$
W
C.
L
IL
;
End of
-20.0
C
2.0
Growing Season
October s
-25.0
1.5
-30.0
1.0
-35.0
0.5
Rain Gauge Malfunction
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
r T
r T
T
T T r
T
r
T
r T r T r r T
r
T
r T T r T
r
T
M M O.
O.
!�4
3 j O 3 7 7 7
d
d
V 0 O O d
d
d
7
LL
LL
co
0 0 Z Z
O
r In
01 N
N
t0
N t0 07
M
N
ti
r
Op T M M f�
O
�F
O N lCf O
N
r
r
N
r N
N
r r N
r
N
r
r
co)
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -10 Equinox
Project No. 857 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Table 13. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
(Percentage)
Gauge ID
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
(2010)
(2011)
(2012)
(2013)
(2014)
No /6
No /6
No /4
Yes /9
No /3
UTC -1
3.8 Percent
3.8 Percent
2.5 Percent
5.7 Percent
1.9 Percent
Yes /70
Yes /30
Yes /39
Yes /148
Yes /45
LTC-2
44.6 Percent
19.1 Percent
24.8 Percent
94.3 Percent
28.7 Percent
Yes /35
Yes /33
Yes /143
Yes /74
Yes /157
UTC 3
22.3 Percent
21.0 Percent
91.1 Percent
47.1 Percent
100.0 Percent
Yes /52
Yes /61
Yes /55
Yes /157
Yes /45
LTC -4
33.1 Percent
38.9 Percent
35.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
28.7 Percent
Yes /157
Yes /155
Yes /157
Yes /157
Yes /157
UTC -5
100.0 Percent
98.7 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
Yes /22
Yes /38
Yes /45
Yes /132
Yes /31
UTC -6
14.0 Percent
24.2 Percent
28.7 Percent
84.1 Percent
19.7 Percent
Yes /15
Yes /8
No /6
Yes /68
Yes /10
UTC -7
9.6 Percent
5.1 Percent
3.8 Percent
43.3 Percent
6.4 Percent
Yes /37
Yes /58
Yes /48
Yes /45
Yes/ 34
UTC -8
23.6 Percent
36.9 Percent
30.6 Percent
28.7 Percent
21.7 Percent
Crowing season = 157 days
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland E -11
Project No. 857
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015