20030599 Ver 2_Monitoring Report_20140930

BOWLIN -PEAK CREEK MITIGATION SITE
EEP ID 92606
USACE ACTION ID 200702632
DWQ 401 # 030599
2014 CLOSEOUT REPORT
STREAM PROJECT
Coordinates 81 17 58.47 W 36 23 17.77 N
Milestone
Date (Month -Year)
Project Setting & Classifications
Project Instituted
March 2000
County
Ashe
Restoration Plan
December 2002
General Location
West Jefferson
Final Design — Construction Plans
December 2002
Basin
New
NCDWQ 401 Certification (initial)
May 2003
Physiographic Region
Mountain (Blue Ridge Pr.)
Interagency Transfer
May 2006
Ecoregion
New River Plateau
NCDWQ 401 Certification (final)
August 2007
USGS Hydro Unit
05050001020050
USACE 404 Permit(final)
August 2007
NCDWQ Sub -basin
05 -07 -01
Construction Completed
December 2007
Wetland Classification
NA
As Built Survey
February 2008
Thermal Regime
Cold
Monitoring Year 1
September 2008
Trout Water
Yes
Monitoring Year 2
June 2009
Project Performers
Monitoring Year 3
June 2010
Beaver Dam Removal
April 2011
Source Agency
DOT
Live Stakes Installed
April
Transferred
EEP (2006)
Fence repair at stream ford crossing
May 2011
Designer
NCWRC
Monitoring Year 4
June 2011
Monitoring Firm(s)
NCWRC
Bank reshaping / live staking
April 2012
Channel Remediation
NCWRC
Beaver Dam Removal
May 2012
Plant Remediation
NCWRC
Monitoring Year 5
June 2012
Property Interest Holder
EEP
Containerized planting of bare areas
April 2014
LOI
No
Live Staking
April 2014
Long Term Steward
State of North Carolina
Fence repair & natural debris cleanup
April 2014
Boundary signage updated
August 2014
Close Out Submittal
September 2014
Note - Invasives spraying occurred annually
MY throw MY5

Project Setting & Background:
Setting - Peak Creek, located in the Blue Ridge Province of the Appalachian Mountains, is a tributary to
the South Fork New River in Ashe County, North Carolina. The watershed upstream of the project site
has an area of approximately 4.4 square miles. The project is 4.1 miles southwest of Laurel Springs, 12.2
miles southeast of Jefferson, and 30.8 miles northwest of Wilkesboro. Land uses within the watershed
consist mostly of rural farms containing pastures and forested wood lots. The less steep valley floors are
used to raise crops and graze livestock. While a significant portion of the watershed remains in second
growth forest, some Christmas tree farms have been developed.
Project Condition and Need- Historic dredging of the stream channel, gravel mining, and poor riparian
zone management on the Bowlin -Peak Creek site resulted in stream bank instability at numerous
locations, adverse water quality impacts through increased sedimentation, and degraded aquatic habitat.
Stream work intended to address project goals included installing root wads, rock cross vanes, and rock
vanes to increase fish habitat diversity, stabilizing, resloping, and revegetating eroding stream banks to
make the banks more resistant to erosion and flooding, and eradicating invasive exotic plant species. In
addition to the stream work, agricultural best management practices were implemented with assistance
from The New River (Ashe County) Soil and Water Conservation District. An existing stream ford was
improved, the easement was fenced to exclude livestock, and an alternative watering system for livestock
was installed. The site was monitored for five years following EEP and USACE monitoring guidelines.
Mitigation and Permitting Background - The Peak Creek - Bowlin site was presented to the US 421
mitigation review team as a potential mitigation site in 2000; in 2002 the landowners agreed to the
proposed conservation easement boundary. The pre- construction notification and the Peak Creek site
mitigation plan were submitted to the USACE and NCDWQ in May 2003. The plan was approved by
NCDWQ (Certification number 030599) in May 2003. No comments were received from the USAGE;
therefore it was assumed that the project was approved under the general permit conditions. While the
conservation easement survey was completed on April 2003, final closing was delayed until fall 2006 due
to problems obtaining valid appraisals. The NCDWQ permit was reissued in August 2006. In attempting
to renew the USACE permit, it was determined that the original permit had expired, negating the
NCDWQ August 2006 permit and requiring new permits to be obtained. In 2006, responsibility for this
site was transferred from NCDOT to the EEP. Under a new memorandum of agreement and interagency
contract, EEP tasked the NCWRC to complete this project. New permits were then obtained.for Section
404 (Action ID No. 200702632; 11 Aug 2007) and Section 401 (Project number 030599; 20 Aug 2007).
It is important to note the easement widths for parts of this project are smaller than currently required by
mitigation guidelines because this project originated using policies from 1999, and the easement survey
was developed and produced by April 2003. Additionally, 1,003 if of the project's 2,710 if stream is
protected and fenced with a conservation easement on only one side of the stream bank (no credit being
sought for this section).
Project Goals and Objectives:
The project goals as originally stated were to improve aquatic habitat and riparian area vegetation and to
reestablish channel stability. The objectives of the Bowlin -Peak Creek enhancement project were as
follows:
• Increase fish habitat diversity by installing root wads, rock cross vanes, and rock vanes;
• Stabilize, slope and vegetate eroding stream banks to make the banks more resistant to erosion
and flooding;
• Eradicate invasive exotic species such as multiflora rose;
• Construct a stable stream crossing at the existing ford location;
• Exclude livestock from the riparian zone by installing exclusionary fencing and providing an
alternate drinking water source;
• Plant native trees, shrubs, and ground cover on all disturbed banks and along the channel to
provide long -term bank stability, stream shading, and cover and food for wildlife; and
• Provide long -term protection of the stream and riparian corridor by the purchase of a permanent
conservation easement.

Project Success Criteria'':
Measurement
Performance Standard
Success Criteria Met
1.Photo Reference Sites
No significant aggradation,
Yes (as determined following
(longitudinal photos, lateral
degradation or erosion
interagency transfer)
photos)
Const.
Mit.
2.Channel Stability(Cross- sections,
Minimal evidence of instability
Yes
longitudinal profiles, pebble
(down- cutting, deposition,
Units
counts)
erosion, decrease in particle size)
App.
3.Vegetative Cover (Shading,
Water and air temperature should
Yes (shading only; temperatures
Water temperature, Temperature
decrease, and shading should
not taken)
stability)
increase over time
4.Plant Survival (Survival Plots,
>75% coverage in photo plots
Yes
Stake Counts, Tree Counts )
z
>80% survival of stakes, 4/11L
WMU
Peak Creek
>80% survival of bare rooted
trees
Overall Success Met (Yes/No): Yes
'Source: Stream Bank Stabilization and Habitat Enhancement Plan, NCWRC, December 2002.
?Overall success or failure will be based on success in 3 of the 4 criteria.
3Significance or subjective determinations of success will be determined by a simple majority or consensus decision of the Mitigation Review Team.
Asset Table and Component Summation
Project
Pre-
Non - riparian
Total
Wetland
As-
Creditable
LF or AC
(WMU)
Mitigation
Component/
Const.
Mit.
Watershed
Built
Component
Difference
Mitigation
Units
Segment
(lf/ac)
App.
Acreage
(lf/ac)
(lf/ac)
(reason)
Ratio
(SMU/
WMU
Peak Creek
Reach 1
1707
E -I
2816
1773
1773
-
1.5 to 1
1182
Peak Creek
One sided
Reach 2
1003
E -1
-
1003
0
easement
1.5 to 1
0
TOTALS
Stream Mitigation Units
Riparian
Non - riparian
Total
Wetland
(SMU)
Wetland Units
Wetland Units
(WMU)
1182
0
0
0

PROJECT MAPS
-73
Ile* Ir
Legend
New river basin hydrology
Conservation Easement
lk �9
K
Project Assets
Peak Creek - Bowli n Site
Ashe County
EEP ID 92606
r - 74),--7"I?VIPM7,w9
nmmmmE����
Feet
0 85
170 340

Monlb.ftg Pin Locations -Peak Creek
Was Saclions Fsalere latlIdNosc 1DIB Lmgitu (M oac Degrees Lena Pm --(IQ Ckc 1Dep LorpiluderyV decimal oe­s
lepi 14n PaaN Croak 36.'i859186165 812%SY342d]
st bM ips PMIa 06.3686tW520 01.2>at20tRde MPaek Greek 0.5 0130td6et6,'i0
xs -1 repi 3B.]N89@➢38 81.2W99121n E V Pidn 18a[aeeire axim�oa�aas la eryVl Decimal asaiaes
ss- 21epiR 88.aan281368 81.288fi9 a. ya1 eri2in %3afil' 9]8899 81.iB9Nk12806 - ' 1' .. ' ._ _.
xs2 MiR PWI 38.36]x8805]8 81.2N5]d318] ya2 ariAn 38.38]53Rt130 81.29a] /69a -
2 PIR 38.36]300d5M 81895 ?E10M vPS erlBin *.B.�p8181512 8t.3Sp94iA9G6 " � ° �
xs31 iR 36.36]�]8W] 61.2820555@ Photo Polms 6aalaCalW oecimal0.®eas Lo�lWarwawimal oagna., ea0rm / - � C
3 aM IR Pwl 3i38]Ye29YvG 81.2888908392 pp ]6.9n832820M et:29B990?8d29 290°
S repipa 38.38149)9928 B1 ]�591aA19 PA -2 ?53855�2E2 St 201R55]1d9 Zx0'. 915° _��
xaJ lap ips 36.3C�JJOJ835 01,2'Ad9Yin3 PP3 8,_+86€68.#319 8T:3:R9900T850 ail°
xSJ bM IR 18111¢ %.06011,2B3i1 01,21�det6C9t 114 W307 FW1299A 8F,28682550820 8 %° r -
aJreplR 36- 388]9[e� BI 29931'Ai]9 PPS 9a.38]d]090'1fll ex.]084
:e -s lepiR ae.z®e4rs11a al,xmAa9as9 PP.s x,3s]dmasat et,z�ndanae9 ta• _. ... X5-4 MS -1
xs9 akrlR Pmt 39386aet30n Y041 ]i PP -] M.38806T3fIT20 89.2BB06droe30 320' XS -2?
81 Yfa2
s SrepiR 363889Hfi'M1JS.i 61 Sa11501P19 PPA Ti�83' 0 St 30923]5]0 �9° -..
s6lapip 8.3W9839(45 61.3WCW3.RS PP5 8.3880ZFA3Ca 85.30W34l1?90 31 D°
xs�6 bM IR FSIRa 8.6W�4819118 01,2898)38Sde RP.tO 7Q.51803125`.�990 eF.28f99T.Cd83a 20' - .. c Y
do mPlps ae.aa9a]a -t9s] a1 a�e.ea2ax PP n sa.3e9a13�m as zesaaee•ss9 xo• z/ • � _..'.�� .� , �
xa ]IapiR zs.eeolzwdae e1,3m4asaaz PP -tz 3c,3avzslowea s3,6w4e3onlw za9° - �Z � -��
xa7WIFs 3fi.3801404ns 81.3005544830 PP -13 Y2901150]550 8t.3fA89]04420 330' _ - b ° // _
a Wi 8.3901NB048 01.39a596166d PP�9d 36.3901?06]]90 04.30198]19 0 30° -
BencMlml[ Iarhu�lNj axime aaPrees l.manlnelwl D3c'mW CYgreas PP -15 8.368i32W810 01.3012538W00 a)'. er.
%:OaW8e- 81,ZWleaa]a1
PROBLEM AREA
IDENTVFIE
11�
' Stream Crossin .3
_ Legend
r Thalweg (MY5) ® Veg. Problem Area
Thalweg (AS- BUILT) Stream Problem Area
Edge of Water Photo Paint
- - -- Bankfull �i PP- Location
Terrace Crest
- - - - - Minor Tributary or Ditch Rock J -Hook
Permanent Cross Section
Conservation Easement Boundary Log/Rock Weir
-o-o- Fence Line Log Vane
Watering System Line or Digger Log
Y Waterer
- - Rock Vane
Veg. Plot
Wetiund Area Root Wad
&&system 120 0 120 240 364 ^ Crest Gauge
' Scale: 1 a = 120'
Rebar Pin Set p� Rack Sill
NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION Bowlin - Peak Creek Stream Enhancement Project SURVEYED BY: JCF, MDF DATE 04112 SHEET
WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT GROUP "she County EEP Project Number 92606 DRAWN BY: JCF JDATE 01/13
REVISION:
DATE'
PO BOX 387 33527154 FAX E MY5 Overall Plan View OF 4
ELKIN, NORTH CAROLINA 28627 3366 .527.1548 8 FAX CAD FILE D' BQWIin MY5 Plan
Monitoring Locations and Features

USGS 24K N
r� Peak Creek Bowlin Site A
e�e � Ashe County ✓I1V
EEP ID 92606
' -
ME a WaD `° ., - ".. \ WaD
r 1^p
aF w aF ME
`
r. F vial vvai ,{ _ LTD
CtE".
Ind \IYaE: �' EvE _ EvE :
, Fn WaF
-�TsD WaE
Ev - ME a
TsD„ `` 28'� �E \\T34�`
gs Bare Site -Ut Peak Creek {927oaD Wa
LM
J i '.WaE - _ FnDW%jt
�WaE
WF
�WaE
C T3C5 EvE .
•
T "
1��-'
_
WE\
CID - EF _ WE CaF
f, -
-
EvE fir.. 44
CfE
_-
fi`.
`..
WaE.
i '.%� r _FnD
WIE x i WaD
Tsi7 13fYaF
WaE�'
Peak Creek
Bowlin
r rr
ME
_
� WaE
J
Legend
a �a f �. " Tsa r r
r
N
© IMS._IC_C- servalion_Easemenis
2. '• TSD
I} �� E WaE Fn❑ WaE
Ts� Tusquitee Loam Sto 15?u slopes
TI'D
To Toxa roam
— Tag,+ ME TSD
r "..•' ....�
Soils
Peak Creek Bowlin Site
Ashe County
EEP ID 92606
_
FTI
A:�dd: ial Plan[nq
2�1 Ell
Sheet
dditpnal lan � - �
WWI 1/4
­­M EL= n9. YiSPkm k!+a
' ...`� R r5 — _— _YmF•q '.{fT—f lu,_utiui�Ani
r , \ snit ya
w2 �°4A Y W
Yid /'~ WcEYrtnp T»�dm Llim � �aR9�Y �^Y
NDRTH CAR01 INA4' itM IFF RF SCkRC,FS 1011111SLIV NI Remediation Actions N -Y - - SHEET
P AT. RShF6 NHAN E6IFNT GRt7LIF Peak Creek Bowli n Site j
Ashe County EEP ID92608 n111I +«�Y +.� +Y�wa�, a_ d

Cross - section 1, Riffle
Bowfin -Peak Creek/Project N—I er:92606
999
998
997
m
b
996
995
p
m
m I
994
993
992
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Distance (feet)
_My0.091 -08 _Myl, 10 Sep 08 _NffZ20May O9
+M13, 12 Apr 10 —My4 14 Apr l l —MyS, 09Apr 12
■ Ban6fun Elecati� 4 Waar S�face ;7 Cm ss- section End Pin
Cross-section 3, Pool
Bma6n -Peak Creek/Praject Number: 92606
996
995
994
Jy
992
991
C
990
w
989
988
987
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Distance (feet)
_MY0, 09 fan 08 —MYt IOSep08 +IV1Y220May09
—MY3, 12AFe10 — MY414Aprll —MY5, 9Apx 12
■ ♦ Water Su-face : Cross-se fta End Pin
Cross Sections
Cross-sectiaa 2, Pool
Bowfin -Peak CreeklProject Nuxaber:92606
997
996
995
994
993
m 992
C 991
D
990
.a
989
988
987
0
l0
20 30 40
50 60
Mt.— (feet)
—MY"0, 091-08
—Illy 1: 10 Sep 08
—NffZ 20 May09
—MY 3_ 12 Apr 10
_Nry4, 14 AkF l l
—MY5, 9 Apr12
CROSS SECTIONS
■ Ha ilfu Eleca4on
♦ Water Surface
7 Cxoss- section EndPn
Crass - section 4. Riffle
Bowfin -Peak CreeklProject Number: 92606
994
993
992
„ 991
R
m 990
c
989
w
988
987
986
0
10
_MYO, 091an 09.
_MY3, 12 Apr 10
■ Baxrifi'uIl Eleva4cm
20
30 40
Distance (feet)
—Nfy 1.10 sep OR
—MY4, 14 Apr 11
A Water Sra£ace
50 60
_MY 2 20 May 09
—MY5, 9 Apr 12
C Cxoss- sectienEnd Pin
70

Cross - section 5, Pool
Bosnia -Peak CreekT,.ject Numb-:92606
999
989
988
987
a 986
`m
m 985
.p
984
a
.:
983
w
982
981
980
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Distant. (feet)
_MY 0. 09 J_ 08. t11ly1. 105ep 08 _MY 2, 20 May 09
—MS'3. 12.Ats 10 — ,4IY4, 14 Apr 11 —MYS, 9.4p, 12
■ Barffull Elecatian 1 Water Sixfw, H Cross-sectian End Ptin
Cmss-secti.n 7, Riffle
Boryrlia -Peak Creek/Proje t Number: 92606
984
983
982
2;
981
980
'A
a
979
978
977
10 20
0
—MYO. 091an08
— MY3.12 Ag 2010,
■ Bmldull ElevatLm
30 40 50
Distance (feet)
—MY 1, 10 Sep 08
_ n1) 4, 14 Apr 11
Water Sum ce.
60 79
—MY 1 20 May 09
—MY 5, 9 Apr 12
H Craes-section End Pin
80
988
987
986
985
m 984
C
p 983
0
w 982
981
980
0
Cross -section li, Riffle
Bolvliu -Peak CreeklProject Number:92606
IO 20 30 40 50 6C 70 86
Distance (feet)
— IYty0, 09 J_ 09 —MY I, IO SeP08 AMY 120 May 09
—MY37 I2.k7 10 — rfy4, 14 Apr 11 —MY5,9 Apr 12
■ 13 nIZ.UElec-atian ♦ Water 8-f.- Crass - section End Pin

Cross Section Data Summary
Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross - section)
SowEin -Peals CreeklProject Nnmher: 92606
Cross Section 1 at Station 3+56 ( Riffie)
Cross S ectian 2 at Station 6+39 (Pool)
Cross Section 3 at Station 7 +62 (Pool)
Cross See:tioo 4 at Station 10+43 (R.iffie)
Di-i- and Substrate
_TYc
TYl
TY2
7Y3
?.'Tim.
.TY=
'.7Y6
'`Y_
'TY2
13
Y-
-Y�
-Y`
kTl1
TY2
'1 -'+
_1_
NTY=
_1:
:�rTY
_12
'TY3
_11Y-1
NMI
Based on fixed baseline bank full
elevation
Bankfixll W[ dth(ft)
34.9
33.4
i.2 .
35:6
34.2
23.5
15.7
15.4
IS.S
1S.S
i9.6
18.6
14.9
212
19.3
1 9.9
22.4
25.5
25.4
25.8
25.5
23.5
24.4
Floodproae Width (ft)
483
57..1
57.9
55.8
47.7
49.0
159.7
159.7
159.7
159.7
159.7
159.7
218.4
218.4
218.4
215..4
215..4
218.4
121.7
1132
124.4
113.8
1039
126.2
Bankfull Crosssectional A- (ft-)
353
39.5
40.6
43.1
33.9
33.5
32.4
33.5
33 7
36..7
52.2
52.6
48.5
50.7
52..8
55.8
54.6
62.6
48.5
46.9
48.0
44.4
42.8
44.2
Bankf.11 Mean Depth (ft)
10
12
12
12
10
13
1.7
1_9
1_S
20
27
29
24
24
2.7
29
2.4
2.7
1.9
1.5.
19
17
1.3
1.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.5
27
2.7
2 9.
24
2.5
13
32
36
3.7
5 7
53
39
4.1
4.1
40
39
42
2.9
2.7
2 :7
2.9
2:5
2.9
Bank -fLiH Width' Depth Rado
34.6
1 28.3
28.7
1 28.4
34.5
1 16.4
10.8
1 10.1
10.5
9.6
7.0
6.2
8.1
S.S
7.1
7.0
9.2
S_7
137
138
13.9
14.6
14.0
13.4
Bankfull Entreneh..,e.rt Ratio
1.4
1.7
1.7'
1.7
1.4
2.1
8.6
9.7
8.5
SS
8.4
S.9
11.0
10.3
11.3
11.1
9.9
9.4
4.7
4.5
4.8
4.5
4.3
5.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
2.1
2.6
2..0
1.9
2.:6
2.2
i.9
1.9
1.8
1.-?
1. _
1.5
1.2
1 1
i.1
1.1
1 1
_ _
_
' '
1.2.
1.1
1.2
Based on curr- Odevelopiug baulfull
feature
111-1 MMINIMN"�'
Bankdull Width (ft)
2.3.2.
31.1
35.3
27.9
2'•.5
29.4
Floodproae Width (ft)
166.8
1859
176.6
1 -3A
156.0
193.7
Bank-full Cress- sectional Area (ft'')
55.0
60.6
59.3
57.4
50 -S
553
Bank -full Mean Depth (ft)
2.0
2.0
1.1
1.9
19
1.9
Bankfull ".•iax Depth (ft)
3.0
32
30.:8
32
2.8
32
Bank-full Width'Depth Ratio
14.5
139
1 21.0
1 15.6
149
1 15.6
Bank-full Entrenchment Ratio
59
6.0
5.0
6.0
5_S
63
Bank -full Bank Heigh[ Ratio
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross- s.xtionaS ?.rea behs eea gad pins (ft")
141.4
1469
1489
151.5
1430
150.0
113.3
115.5
116.0
118._0
134.5
130.6
153.3
163.3
162.7
1 165.3
163.0
169..7
79.9
7S-3
78.2
792
767
81.7
D30
38.5
399
57.7
32_S
242
374
49.3
35.0
74.1
40.0
31.1
32.0
20.7
19.3
9.9
1 27.3
4S.S
43.7
34.5
36.0
374
39.7
40.0
31..1
Cross
Section
5 at
Station 14
+80 (Pool)
Cross
Section
6 at
Station 16+80
(Riffle)
Cross
Section
7 at
Statism 20+97
(Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
MYO
My 1.
14•lY_'-
'_ TY3
7NSY4
I'M
"_t•fY6
_lfYl
\•fig.
IAY3
'_'.4Y4
MYS
A•fY0
1.•fYl
MY-1
11.fY3
iklY4
h'fY5
Based an filed baseline b -kfi.11
elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
26.4
�" 5
21.i
26.9
2.1.1
20.4
21.4
2.5.9
27.0
269
29.2
2.5.3
20.6
� 6
26.8
29.7
20.7
26.7
Floodproae Width (ft)
1719
171.9
171.9
171.9
171.9
171.9
86.7
33.0
39.3
94.5
120.3
103.0
70.0
;0.0
70.0
70.0
Bankiull Crass- ss:.ticmal Area (ft')
45.3
45.1
493
49.6
49.9
43.0
332
34.8
36.1
39.0
42.1
36.7
40 8
41.4
44.6
41.5
-43.2
472
Batik-full Mean Depth (ft)
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.1
1.3
1.4
1..3
1.5
1.4
1.3
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.1
23
Bank -full Max Depth (ft)
4.8
4.7
4.6
4.4
4.7
42
27
2.7
2.7
2.7
3.0
29
2.7
2.5
2.8
2.6
2.9 -.
2.8
Banbfull'4b'idtb.Depth Ratio
5.6
S.S
9.1
3.5
9.0
9.7
19.6
192
20.2
18.6
203
21.9
10.4
102
9.7
10.4
9.7
9..1
Bankfull Ent-chment Ratio
SA
8.4
9_1
9.2
8.1
8.4
3.4
3.4
3.3
3.5
41
3_9
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
Bankfull Bank Hzht Ratio
1.1
1 1.0
1.1
1 1.0
1.4
1 1.1
1.3
1 1.4
1 13
1.3
1 1.2
1.3
1 1.9
2.0
1 1.3
1.9
1 1.9
1.7'
Based on cnrrent)developing banlcioll
feature
Bank-full Width (ft)
36.3
39.6
33.5
41.6
46.4
37.9
Floodproae ■Vidth (ft)
119.7
121.0
1203
1203 .
1203
119.8
Bank -full Crass- sectional- Ax -(ft")
60.4
69.2
652
663
652
63.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1. S
1.7
1.6
1.6
17
Bankfull \.Iax Depth (ft)
3.5
3.7
35
3.5
3.7
37
Bankfull Width Depth I7:atio
22_5
22_7
22.5
26.0
2.4.9
22.6
Bankfull Entrcluurt patio
33
3.1
3.1
2.9
3.0
32
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross - .sectional ?area betneea gad pies (ff�)
124.0
122.5
127.6
12.5
125.0
1 169
1225
31.1
1203 .
30.3
176A
42.4
177.5
60.0
178.7
50.9
1799
31.1
1752
52.9
172.0
4.9
1 141 _d
1 42.4
1 102.6
1 34.4
1 102.0
1 48.8
101.0
36.4
102.4
46.9
101.3
56.9
D50
67.1
54.5

Verification of Bankfull Events
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photograph
Number
05- Mar -2008
3,780 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
27- Aug -2008
3,590 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
08- Sep -2008
Unknown
2.95 ft on Crest gage
11- May -2009
Unknown
2.86 It on Crest gage
27- May -2009
3,240 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
17-Jan-2010
5,180 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
25- Jan -2010
4,650 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
22- Mar -2010
3,870 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
12- Apr -2010
Unknown
Rack line 0.2 ft above bankful bench elevation
BF 1
12- Apr -2010
Unknown
2.91 ft on Crest gage
1- Dec -2010
4070 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
3- Feb -2011
Unknown
Rack line above bankM bench
BF2, BF3
6- Mar -2011
3,730 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
7- Mar -2011
3,730 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
11- Apr -2011
Unknown
4.3 ft on Crest gage
14- Apr -2011
Unknown
Rack line 3.2 ft above stream channel bottom
16- Apr -2011
7,590 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
16- Apr -2011
Landowner indicated a 5 in. rain event occurred
17- Apr -2011
6,190 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage-
19-Apr-2011
Unknown
3.2 ft on Crest gage
26- May -2011
Unknown
3.2 ft on Crest gage
6- Sep -2011
3,140 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
7- Sep -2011
3,160 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
25- Sep -2011
2,950 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
29- Nov -2011
5,120 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
7- Dec -2011
2,840 CFS at S. Fork New River USGS gage
9- Apr -2012
Unknown
Rack line above bankfull bench
BF4

Cross - section 1
.,Now
1
50 100
—Pre- construction Apr -02
MY2 Thalweg May -09
MY5 Thalweg Apr -12
• MY5 Top of Bank Apr -12
1000
995
w 990
0
985
150 200 250 300
Channel Distance (feet)
—MYO Thalweg Jan -08
—MY3 Thalweg Apr -10
--*--MY5 Water Surface Apr -12
X Grade Control Structures
Cross - section 2 Cross - section 3
350 400 450 500
MY1 Thalweg Sep -08
—*--MY4 Thalweg May -11
MY5 Bankfull Apr -12
W 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000
Channel Distance (feet)
—Pre- construction Apr -02 —MYO Thalweg Jan-08 MY1 Thalweg Sep -08
MY2 Thalweg May -09 —MY3 Thalweg Apr -10 —*---MY4 Thalweg May -11
MY5 Thalweg Apr -12 --m--MY5 Water Surface Apr -12 ♦ MY5 Bankfull Apr -12
40 MY5 Top of Bank Apr -12 X Grade Control Structures
MEN,
No
=MR
on
W 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000
Channel Distance (feet)
—Pre- construction Apr -02 —MYO Thalweg Jan-08 MY1 Thalweg Sep -08
MY2 Thalweg May -09 —MY3 Thalweg Apr -10 —*---MY4 Thalweg May -11
MY5 Thalweg Apr -12 --m--MY5 Water Surface Apr -12 ♦ MY5 Bankfull Apr -12
40 MY5 Top of Bank Apr -12 X Grade Control Structures

995
990
985
0
0
W 980
990
985
w 980
0
975
Cross - section 4
Cross - section 5
1000 1050 1100
—Pre- construction Apr -02
— MY2 Thalweg May -09
MY5 Thalweg Apr -12
• MY5 Top of Bank Apr -12
W 1500 1550 1600
—Pre- construction Apr -02
MY2 Thalweg May -09
MY5 Thalweg Apr -12
• MY5 Top of Bank Apr -12
1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
Channel Distance (feet)
—MYO Thalweg Jan -08 MY1 Thalweg Sep -08
—MY3 Thalweg Apr -10 — *— MY4 Thalweg May -11
--m—MY5 Water Surface Apr -12 ♦ MY5 Bankfull Apr -12
X Grade Control Structures
Cross - section 6
•
1650 1700 1750 1800
Channel Distance (feet)
—MYO Thalweg Jan -08
—MY3 Thalweg Apr -10
--a— MY5 Water Surface Apr -12
X Grade Control Structures
►1
1850 1900 1950
MY1 Thalweg Sep -08
—a­MY4 Thalweg May -11
MY5 Bankfull Apr -12
2000
■
now,
*1 i
1000 1050 1100
—Pre- construction Apr -02
— MY2 Thalweg May -09
MY5 Thalweg Apr -12
• MY5 Top of Bank Apr -12
W 1500 1550 1600
—Pre- construction Apr -02
MY2 Thalweg May -09
MY5 Thalweg Apr -12
• MY5 Top of Bank Apr -12
1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500
Channel Distance (feet)
—MYO Thalweg Jan -08 MY1 Thalweg Sep -08
—MY3 Thalweg Apr -10 — *— MY4 Thalweg May -11
--m—MY5 Water Surface Apr -12 ♦ MY5 Bankfull Apr -12
X Grade Control Structures
Cross - section 6
•
1650 1700 1750 1800
Channel Distance (feet)
—MYO Thalweg Jan -08
—MY3 Thalweg Apr -10
--a— MY5 Water Surface Apr -12
X Grade Control Structures
►1
1850 1900 1950
MY1 Thalweg Sep -08
—a­MY4 Thalweg May -11
MY5 Bankfull Apr -12
2000

985
s.
980
a
c�
975
0
w 970
Cross - section 7
2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500
Channel Distance (feet)
—Pre- construction Apr -02 —MYO Thalweg Jan -08 —MY1 Thalweg Sep -08
MY2 Thalweg May -09 MY3 Thalweg Apr -10 —a---MY4 Thalweg Mayl l
MY5 Thalweg Apr -12 tMY5 Water Surface Apr -12 ♦ MY5 Bankfull Apr -12
• MY5 Top of Bank Apr -12 X Grade Control Structures
L.12
•
975
s.
970
0
0
w
965
W 2500 2550 2600 2650 2700 2750 2800 2850 2900 2950 3000
Channel Distance (feet)
—Pre- construction Apr -02 —MYO Thalweg Jan -08 MY1 Thalweg Sep -08
MY2 Thalweg May -09 —MY3 Thalweg Apr -10 —*--My4 Thalweg May -11
MY5 Thalweg Apr -12 —m--MY5 Water Surface Apr -12 ♦ MY5 Bankfull Apr -12
• MY5 Top of Bank Apr -12 X Grade Control Structures

Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Bowlin -Peak Creek
Plot Data (MY5)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
E92606- Elkin -VPl
E92606- Elkin -VP2
E92606- Elkin -VP3
MY5
MY4
MY3
MY2
MYl
MYO
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
4
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
4
1
1
3
Acer saccharum
sugar maple
Shrub Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub Tree
48
19
3
70
74
120
80
53
47
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
Calycan thus floridus
eastern sweetshrub
Shrub
1
1
2
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
2
3
1
3
3
6
3
7
3
4
1 3
31
31
31
4
4
Crataegus
hawthorn
Shrub Tree
38
38
43
55
59
4
14
Fraxinus pennsylvaniea
green ash
Tree
1
1
I
Ju lans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
11
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Lindera benzoin
northern spicebush
Shrub Tree
1
10
2
2
3
1
1
17
3
3
301
3
31
34
4
4
28
4
4
16
5
5
20
6
6
6
Physocar us o ulifblius
common ninebark
Shrub
2
29
38
13
2
80
2
41
2
24
2
62
2
31
3
10
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Shrub Tree
5
1 1
1 5
11
10
1
141
1 5
Prunus serotina var. serotina
black cherry
Shrub Tree
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
Rhododendron calendulaceum
flame azalea
Shrub
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
31
31
3
31
3
31
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Rhododendron catawbiense
Catawba rosebay
Shrub Tree
l
l
l
l
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Rhododendron maximum
great laurel
Shrub Tree
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
11
11
1
11
1
11
11
1
1
Robinia pseudoacacia
black locust
Tree
I
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub Tree
2
21
2
4
2
41
2
5
2
3
2
2
2
2
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub Tree
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
Sassafras albidum
sassafras
IShrub Tree
I
I
I
I
I
1
10
S iraea
s irea
Shrub
18
18
13
1 7
1 3
Tsugaearoliniana
Carolina hemlock
Tree
I
1
1
I
1
1
I
I
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Vaccinium
blueberry
Shrub Vine Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Stem count
size (areas)
size (ACRES)
Species count
StemsperACRE
3
9
121
15
16
79
9
9
88
27
34
289
27
34
258
28
351
274
29
37
270
32
41
153
35
45
126
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.07
0.07
1 0.07
0.07
1 0.07
3
61
12
11
12
171
51
51
HI
131
161
231
131
161
231
131
161
221
131
171
241
131
171
231
141
18
22
121.41
364.2
4897
6071
647.51
31971
364.21
364.21
35611
364.21
458.61
38981
364.21
458.61
34801
377.71
472.11
36961
391.21
499.11
36421
431.71
553.11
20641
472.11
6071
1700

EEP Conclusion and Recommendation
The Bowlin -Peak Creek site project goals were to improve aquatic habitat, riparian area vegetation, and
stream channel stability. This was accomplished by installing root wads, rock cross vanes, and rock
vanes to increase aquatic habitat diversity; stabilizing, resloping, and revegetating eroding stream banks
to make the banks more resistant to erosion and flooding; eradicating invasive exotic plant species; and
implementing a farm management plan to reduce stream impacts from livestock.
The visual assessment, geomorphic, and vegetative surveys indicate some minor stream channel
adjustments have occurred since construction. At MY5 the majority of features scored above 93% on
qualitative visual stability assessment. Beaver activity and multiple greater than bankfull storm events
during the winter of 2010 -2011 caused site specific channel adjustments. As expected, the stream channel
adjusted slightly since the as -built survey. The seven permanent stream channel cross - sections, four
riffles, and three pools indicated the site was relatively stable at MY5. Bankfull benches developed in 4
cross - sections. Only one, cross - section 2 was permanently impacted by an upstream beaver dam in MY4,
but remained stable in MY5. Beaver issues have been addressed periodically over the monitoring period,
and some of the vegetative loss and spotty bare areas are attributed to beaver. Such areas were container -
planted in April 2014. The vegetative criteria have been met, with an average of 364 planted stems per
acre and 3,898 total stems per acre, indicating adequate survival, strong recruitment, and overall healthy
vegetation. With only small isolated areas of channel bed material aggradation and channel bank
instability observed, the Peak Creek mitigation site is meeting all morphometric and riparian vegetation
success criteria for the five years of monitoring.
EEP recommends that the Site be closed generating 1182 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs).
Contingencies
None.

Site Photographs
Pre- and post - construction views of station 1 +75 to station 2 +48; Apr 2002 and March 2008.
Pre- and post - construction views of cross - section 1 at station 3 +56; Apr 2002 and Sep 2007.
Pre- and post - construction views of cross - section 3 at station 7 +62; Sep 2002 and Jan 2008.
Pre- and post - construction views of cross - section 5 at station 14 +80; Apr 2002 and Mar 2008.

Pre- and post - construction views of low water crossing at station 15 +25; Apr 2002 and Mar
2008.
Pre- and post - construction views at station 16 +25; Apr 2002 and Mar 2008.
Pre- and post - construction views of cross - section 6 at station 20 +90; Mar 2007 and Jan 2008.
Pre- and post - construction views of station 21 +50 to 22 +00; Mar 2007 and Mar 2008.

Appendix A: Watershed Planning Summary
92606 — WRC Bowlin -Peak Creek
Watershed Characteristics Overview
The WRC Bowlin -Peak Creek project is located in eastern Ashe County, approximately 10 miles
east of Jefferson, in the New River Basin. It is located within HUC 05050001020050, the South
Fork New River and tributaries (including Peak Creek) watershed, which is listed as a Targeted
Local Watershed (TLW) in the 2009 New River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) plan.
Peak Creek flows into the South Fork New River approximately 5.2 miles (27,000 feet) north of
the project site. Neither Peak Creek nor the South Fork New River downstream of its confluence
are listed on the 2012 North Carolina 303(d) list of impaired waters. [The lower reach of Peak
Creek (2.9 miles from Ore Knob Branch to South Fork New River) had previously been listed as
impaired in 2010 due to poor benthic ratings, presumed to be the result of toxic /acid drainage
from the Ore Knob Mine.] The 57- square mile TLW is asset -rich, with 76 Natural Heritage
Element Occurrences (occurrences of rare plants and animals or unique natural communities),
22% HQW and ORW waters, four percent Significant Natural Heritage Areas (SNHA) and 8.3%
conserved lands (including New River State Park). Overall land use in the TLW is 30%
agricultural, 62% forested (including wetland areas), eight percent developed and 44% of
streams are non - forested. The watershed also includes 23 permitted animal operations (2009
RBRP).
Major problems noted within this TLW (2009 RBRP) include degraded (non- forest) riparian
buffers, agricultural stressors (pasture /grazing, row crops, Christmas tree farms, and livestock
access to streams), high nutrient and sediment loads, historic stream channelization and impaired
aquatic habitat.
Links to Watershed Goals and Objectives
The project involved stream and buffer restoration/enhancement along approximately 2,700
linear feet of Peak Creek, including over 4,600 feet of livestock exclusion fencing. The Bowlin
Site — Peak Creek Stream Bank Stabilization and Habitat Enhancement Plan (NC Wildlife
Resources Commission, 2002) addresses several project - specific stressors, including incised
stream channels (historically dredged /straightened), impacted riparian buffers, drained riparian
wetland areas, degraded in- stream habitat, unstable stream crossings /fords and several areas of
eroding stream banks. The project contributes to the following goals and objectives:
- Increasing fish habitat and in- stream habitat diversity by installing root wads, rock
cross weirs and rock vanes;
- Stabilizing (sloping, vegetating and installing structures) over 500 feet of eroding
stream banks;
- Constructing a stable stream crossing at one existing ford site;
- Excluding livestock from over 2,000 linear feet of stream (and riparian buffer)
through fencing and development of alternate water sources;
- Planting native trees, shrubs and herbaceous ground cover on all disturbed banks and
along the channel to provide long -term bank stability, stream shading and wildlife
habitat;

- Improving water quality in Peak Creek by reducing sediment and nutrient inputs,
through increased filtration/removal of these pollutants in the restored riparian buffer
and through stabilization of degraded channels and stream banks.
In combination with the additional watershed projects in the TLW (noted below), this project
should help improve water quality and aquatic habitat, including Natural Heritage Element
Occurrences, within Peak Creek and downstream waters.
Watershed Summary
There is one other EEP mitigation project within this HU: 92704 - UT to Peak Creek (Bare),
comprising 2,183 linear feet of stream restoration/enhancement. There is one agricultural BMP
site in the watershed (NC Soil and Water Conservation Division, 2014), a stream bank
stabilization project funded through the Community Conservation Assistance Program (CCAP).
A NC DWR 319 grant has been used to treat acid mine drainage from the Ore Knob Mine in the
watershed. There are also four projects funded by the NC Clean Water Management Program
(CWMTF) in the watershed, including three riparian buffer acquisition sites and one stream
enhancement project (on Potter Branch) completed by the National Committee for the New
River (NCNR) River Builder Program. This NCNR program assists private landowners with
stream bank stabilization and buffer enhancement /protection along eroding stream reaches.
W€iC Bowlin - Peak Creek
(New 05050001)
rA'i lh?" iil

APPENDIX B — Land Ownership and Protection
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project includes
the following parcel:
Grantor
County
Site Protection
Instrument
Deed Book &
Page Number
Acreage
protected
Harold B. Bowlin -Peak
Conservation
Creek
Ashe
353/1171
3.07
Easement
LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the NC DENR Stewardship
Program will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the
conservation easement are upheld.
PDF property documents including the recorded deeds and plats associated with this site are
located on the EEP portal at:
http: // portal. ncdenr.org /c /document_ library /get file ?p 1 id= 60409 &f6lderld = 11706724 &name=
DLFE- 6475 1.pdf

APPENDIX C
Jurisdictional Determinations and Permits
U.S. ,AIi11+IY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Copy
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action 1D. 240702632 County: Ashe
USES Quad: Laurel Springs
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner 1 Authorized Agent: Harold Bowlin
Address: 625 Harold Bowlin Road
Laurel Sprint's, NC 28644
Telephone No.. 336 - 992- 40411
Size and location of property (water 60dy, road namelnumber, town, etc.): The project site Is along freak Creek and
beeins w'lte re Peak Creek Church Road cusses the creek, continuing for 2,747 linear feet and is idenlifled as the
13o`vlin Stream Mitigsition Site. The prolect site is near Laurel Springs, Ashe Coring+, North Carolina. Peak Creek
is v tributary to the South fork of the New River.
Description of projects area and activity: This permit verifies impacts to Peak Creek associated with enhance.rnent
and restoration activities as described within the nerruit application for 2,747 linear feet of stream channel. The
applicant states that this is to satisfy the mitigation requirements associated with impacts from US 421. This
project had previously been permitted under Action ID 14970761.
Applicable Law: Section 404 (Clean Water ,Act, 33 USC: 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Slivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject tbt,
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order arWor appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked. or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -lay -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification You
should contact the NC Division of 'Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA.),
prior to beginning work you trust contact the N.C. Division ofCoastal Managcmcnt .
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the pernuttee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvalsfperrnits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Monte Matthews.
Permit Conditions: 1. All recommendations in the attached email from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission elated July 16, 2007, are hereby incorporated as special conditions of this permit.
2. All recommendations in the attached etnai I from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service dated August 24, 2007, are also
incorporates) as special conditions of this permit including a preconstruction survey and fencing of the nearby wetlands.
Corps Regulatory Official: Monte Matthews A � .E>� Date: August 11, 2007
Expiration Date of Verification: August 11, 2009
Page I of 2
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level ofsupport to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attachcd customer Satisfaction Survcy or visit httn;llvrww,saw.usace_ army- rniVWI TLhNDS/ind$x.hrml to
complete the survey online.
Copy Furnished:
Mark Fowikes
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
PCB Box 387
Elkin, NC 28621
poge2of2

ti144iae -1 F "Rmk9iF- ri1V'P17ii
Sr 1 }13mnn MwAk.Sarowe
'.
DLIU. •,•F i- � r.� y ti LZa�i: vu yl � • rs cc�r rd P$axn I e��uyrrw
.. -.—
_ - Ldwr 41. lrl Era 174 rrnQ
V� • Eawv �' eur � gl
M. 2W
Affihg Cx
DWQ }fit 'wu.. 6 "
IL IA a5miciwd GIdh [ I.r ikt 2dM
AR'pia.O' AID 4401 'lei wrr i„lmmki� i ircrilllelmilvlt
Nir. bL+lork l.nwlk.c*
�N L'.AT 1
PO Bjl .
N - Mr ; . -
",icl F+rnr 0Uf ii aL IF 1ltlnl' a 116 ah IN l MmIlled condiliom pix form "he Row I m Sumem MriaWkin Fair
�-kdk e.n A61W C4101111V YAM & -k--r: Wd 14 )XILr On.LiMUJ UpplicWum &LeJ "41a-y 5. 2LID3, weed w%lrrc- Applictiof1 MOM
lr�jr Irsi }+�1 ftdchnliticroof Enhawin7cnr Lvvd I iA dw U.S. AmLy Co"ol'Fmiginerm'
A Ism lillitlislokv vti C.
After r ieMk "kW%C 6ilridlad tl°Itlr ibii iii 011 is ccti- t -dy Ciewr131 WAer Quality
CCF4iIfX*4 0q %P W OM� 111' i US— Ax-n,, Curps'af Ecigmeers NLa1iwwirse Permit Frmnker ..-' Iii
akka m )vu Et.puW rcamlre my 1I#ift cur I-al permits bv&am procrt— t w i L h y0a-r fb}.�I -°L 1
('bo ICI 11mmlini W1 Sifthmerm mof ErodiM ciumul, 'Nwc)-D,,Xhag6e and Wal1=r &�Iy k4 mvmhcll
TWm &Mj,;gv ml is 6 aW "cly fa,N L9Er. pmrpMa 1`d dakzbp 41e=.bedd m ANxLr arinl icaticin ' uld ylnur PTo5 40
Ch,in►m- 'r+M'rlwelrl11-41JV 11hil11„-,i&m:ofWalff QmAty ODL -iiisk m twmE wLLhmi, A nee,& 4ppitc;M14il. If aw 0 t- '
iY G qe- OPIZ I iW MUM k IA's & crap} Of" *k& k'sr –L-a--' ;,-C –: Fica-mwn, anll 14t 'tlereby t+egxuivibw
for raimpivinK 4 Iii rim 'Irc cc l*m If k" 4401MM &M AN 77 -,IW EW in chE RiNpri c41a4viiI 4imc
r . 4W 1+ 1r11J.1 1rl5lWr.••6 tO di t -RRIS (MUW W do dw if ) - -, s °�aaE,K4 IlIgUa6MI,rn M2, }-
°,ic E+ffyulmd 11-4 df-K-l-iKw in F 5 -% `4C- W 211 (Ai* h 1{ m d (i j. Fur iha+ rtpPrv� A 91D rsnLMim I ahld„ YEN mm4l
#dlltit llr Ibs comJklWob l k.W4 lilt Lbf ii arJred ccrlLir11 iki?� �r a�d»>i�- raWo�m lUrt+� bnrlav4
I , .�'Fnn mlalhli?IMM c� OW rmijo,:'t ilhe .4pp1oYau sLW c'rnpi1e5e M31 :rm= dw e?tick -.W ad
COrrllrlsli M Flans" lP MC4'f' PWQ xbM A] i w :?I ice 46 i C43116 .;r.40 h& Nw � PM01wilird
ne rickMi4m1bl* pAmy lihall complcw dw 4ugdxd Burr, a mwu a w ft 40VWrsLmrkh VAW ltd ills
)WI■IC111, br�'bl0f qu1i011y UfOft.Ixl P1CrjM PMe IM M2lel0M`'MOM rnP�� � Ili it
LQ (1w thViNiur, upwi praj"A wrUpItKIam
P*rilIwEnMI11r'k.erf WAR 41 111! MWAVAo,n3mi Fb. rl:ink, +,9"Akl" 6'�sT t+Ps
I., + WA MA# *B1.**Lq ''* 711r & *W s1l "W' :r, I A 7 a 14T, 4u,4 0*1
fir. Mark F4I+w)1uc
Aupst 20- M07
L)W 4134)5+9
Fade 2
If ;OLL d,a 661 V, XPt ally of ilLC rditiOrm of rh.,s ocrtihcaiion, � oti rna� ask f+ T an. adjudi€ btory tm;ah & You
mu!51 x, I w lhhi 6D dayr cal -lhe Male Thal _yrau receive this lcl eT. Tu ask l4r a heinn& send a written petitian,
whieb co,ifol ns to Chapter the Nmh Carohm -Omernl Statwes tc1 lh t: Other of Adminiscrativt
kann$sq 67L4 Mail Serwic t Caner, Rakli5lt, H.C. 7699 -6714. Tbis Ctx1ilieatiun and Us rundli[ulnnare final
and binding un]vm you ask for n tlinriing,
This lciter complctc. the mvicw of the Di vi rrvn of Water Quid ity milm S=hrm 401 of 11-c Clain Wgrcr Axt. ] f
u ha°of: are} qu .tiom, Pkmt- oomuwl SucHcltnCaa d al 3M-" 14964 or &I Silk .}Hcany,;woodij3Llcniail.ixi.
C.) 1 11 H. Sull,lm Di Pee Loo
.$ti efummi.
w: MonicMafth 's, USACE.lalcio Field Ofdlim
DArq Weilalldu;401 TracST=iadum Unit
1D1krQ'E' 5m;i.in Salern Reginnxl fltfio:
L W-Q (D:ntrbl Fibs

APPENDIX - D Debit Ledger
Mitigation Project Name WRC Bowlin -Peak Creek
EEP IMS ID 92606
River Basin NEW
Cataloging Unit 05050001
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 08/13/2014
E
E v
c
W
E m
d
c
W
E r.
` Z
S
`m g
.� `
m o
`m
w E
`m v
c
W
cm_
A Z
4
g
a m
o N
Z K
= o
a�
cc U
z
= E
a v
o s
Z c
W
-
a10�
o d
Z a`
R d
o
U
z
o
@ U
o
U
s
v
A s
o c
U W
z
Z
(6
oa
U
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
1,773.00
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
1,182.00
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): NCDOT TIP R -0529
1,773.00
EEP Debits feet and acres):
DWQ Permits
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
0.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
0.00
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 08/13/2014