The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20081629 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2013_20140808M n RECEIVED Year 2 Annual Monitoring Document .IAN 2. 8 2013 NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENTPROGRAM UT to Haw River ( #747) Alamance County Data Collection Period: October 16, 2013 Submission Date: December 12, 2013 AUG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 Owner NCDENR r-�I Ecosystem Enhancement Program Lrl'OSyStCll1 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 EEP Project Manager: Perry Sugg Phone: (919) 707 -8937 Monitoring Firm � Mulkey Engineers and Consultants -#= ` M U L K E Y 6750 Tryon Road Cary, North Carolina 27518 Phone: (919) 851 -1912 Fax: (919) 851 -1918 Project Manager: Mark Mickley Phone: (919) 858 -1797 0, 3.0 References Lee, Michael Tl, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol Ll for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 2 (http //cvs bio unc edu /methods htm) NCDENR- Ecosystem Enhancement Program 2007 Final Restoration Plan, Unnamed Tributary to Uwhame River Stream Restoration Project, Randolph County, North Carolina NCDENR- Ecosystem Enhancement Program 2012 Baseline and Year 1 Annual Monitoring Document, UT to Uwhame River ( #747), Randolph County, North Carolina NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) 2012 Web Soil Survey — Randolph County Available at http //websoilsurvey nres usda gov /app/HomePage htm Schafale, M P, and A S Weakley 1990 Classification of'the natural communities of North Carolina, third approximation N C Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC USACE 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines USACOE, USEPA, NCWRC, NCDENR - DWQ Weakley, Alan S 2011 Flora of the Southern and Mid - Atlantic States University of North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, UNC Chapel Hill http //herbarium/ unc / edu/ F1oraArchives /WeakleyFlora_2011- May -nav pdf UT to Haw River EEP Project #747 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Mulkey, Inc December 2013 Page 14 Six at -grade stream crossings and one rock structure to stabilize an existing crossing were installed on project reaches at the Site during construction The conditions of these features were observed during the site visit in October 2013 All of these features are stable and functioning properly as depicted on the CCPV '- No crest gauges are installed at the Site as hydrology is not being evaluated for this project 1.5 Note Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on EEP's website All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request 2.0 Methodology The UT to Haw River project includes preservation and enhancement level Il restoration Since there were no changes made to dimension, pattern, of profile for any project reaches, no morphological characteristics were measured Instead, project -wide stream monitoring was accomplished using visual assessment as well as photo documentation Any areas showing evidence of aggradation, degradation, and/or bank erosion are identified and mapped on the CCPV Vegetation monitoring was conducted according to the CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4 0 (Lee, M T et al , 2008) Four 100 square meter vegetation monitoring plots were observed and data collected along the enhancement reaches on October 16, 2013 Two plots measure ten meters by ten meters, and two plots measure five meters by twenty meters The four corners of each plot are marked with one -half inch steel rebar Level 2 (planted and volunteer woody stems) data collection was performed in all plots Each planted woody stem location (x and y), height (cm), and live stem diameter (dbh) were recorded All planted stems were identified with pink flagging and silver tree tags indicating tree species Vegetation was identified using Weakley ( Weakley 2011) Photos were taken of each vegetation plot Plots lacking cover, or with low planted -stem density or vigor, are identified and mapped on the CCPV UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page 13 Watershed in the 2009 Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priority report The Haw River is the closest named stream to the Site At 1.3 Vegetation Stream Vegetation Success Criteria Vegetation monitoring will be considered successful for stream mitigation credit if at least 260 stems /acre (trees and shrubs), both, volunteer and planted, are surviving at the end of five years The interim measure of vegetative success for the site will be the survival of at least 320 3 -year old stems per acre at the end of year three of the monitoring period and 280 4 -year old stems per acre at the end of year four of the monitoring period (USACE et al 2003) Monitoring Results Overall stem counts were based on an average of the evaluated vegetation plots Based on the number of stems counted toward stream mitigation credit, average densities were measured at 324 planted stems per acre (excluding livestakes) surviving in Year 2 (2013) The dominant species identified at the Site were planted stems of persimmon (Dtospyros virgintana) and white oak (Quercus alba) Three of the four individual vegetation plots met success criteria by greater than ten percent when counting planted stems alone Plot 4 did not meet ,success criteria based on planted stems alone, nor when including appropriate naturally recruited stems Numerous small stems of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) are located inside the easement boundary along Tnb C2 north of Tnb C2 -c The locations of these populations are mapped on the Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) map (Figure 2) Additionally, sporadic stems of multiflora rose (Rosa multtflora) are located along Tnb C2 south of the pond, however, these stems are isolated and very small in size Invasive /exotic vegetatation is not currently compromising the vegetative success of the site 1.4 Stream Stability The UT to Haw River project includes preservation and enhancement level H restoration Since there were no changes made to dimension, pattern, or profile for any project reaches, morphological characteristics will not be, measured Instead, thorough visual assessments and established photo points will focus on documenting evidence of aggradation, degradation, and bank erosion Year 2 monitoring surveys along UT to Haw River project occurred in October 2013 Thirty photo point locations were reviewed and subsequent photographs taken during data collection at the Site These photographs serve as documentation of the Year 2 stream condition as well as reference photos for future monitoring years Based on available data and visual comparison between Year 2 and Year 1, no new areas of channel instability were identified during the October 2013 site visit UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page 12 1.0 Executive Summary The following report summarizes the vegetation establishment and stream stability for Year 2 monitoring for the UT to Haw River Stream Enhancement Project (Site) in Alamance County, North Carolina. 1.1 Goals and Objectives Goals • Improve the overall water quality by reducing the input of sediment and nutrients into the aquatic system. • Restore the richness and diversity of the plant species within the riparian zone and upland buffers. • Improve the overall wildlife habitat across the entire conservation easement. Objectives • Stabilize excessively eroded stream banks through bioengineering techniques and appropriate vegetation planting. • Eliminate livestock access to project reaches and associated riparian buffers through the installation of cattle exclusion fencing. • Effectively treat and eliminate approximately 4.2 acres of invasive plant species and replace with appropriate native plant material. • Implement a specific planting plan that addresses immediate planting needs for 0.45 acres of stream bank, 1.06 acres of riparian buffer, 3.14 acres of upland buffer, and provides for supplemental planting of all vegetative zones based on site specific needs identified during project construction. • Protect the completed enhancement activities at the Site through 39.4 acres of perpetual conservation easement. • Implement a site specific farm management plan that compliments enhancement activities by providing alternative water sources, additional fencing, and at -grade permanent stream crossings. 1.2 Project Background The Site consists of 13 unnamed tributaries to the Haw River located approximately 2.8 miles southeast of the Town of Ossipee and 3.1 miles northwest of the City of Burlington (Figure 1). The site is within the area bounded by Gerringer Mill Road (SR 1530) to the north, Burch Bridge Road (SR 1530) to the east, and the Haw River to the south and west (Figure 1). The enhancement project is located entirely on two private parcels owned by Ms. Jane Iseley (Parcel ID Nos. 118481 and 118526). The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) purchased 39.4 acres and established four perpetual conservation easement areas to protect stream enhancement activities. The Site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin Cataloging Unit 03030002 and local watershed unit 03030002030010 (14 -digit HUC). EEP identified this HUC as a Targeted Local UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................... ............:.................1 1.1 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................ ............................... 1 1.2 Project Background .......................................................................... ............................... I 1.3 Vegetation ......................................................................................... ............................... 2 1.4 Stream Stability ................................................................................. ............................... 2 1.5 Note ......................................................................................_............. ............................... 3 2.0 Methodology ........ ..............................3 3.0 References .......................................................................... ..............................4 APPENDICES Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3 Project Contacts Table Table 4 Project Attribute Table Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Photo Point Photographs Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data Table 7 Vegetation Plot Attributes and Criteria Attainment Table 8 CVS Vegetation Metadata Table Table,9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means) Vegetation Plot Photographs UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page I i Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3 Project Contacts Table Table 4 Project Attribute Table IF Gerrin Road - - ger Mill l rCL i \\ Preservation Reach Access %� �r j►I Or I • iii I • !. Enhancement Reach � Access � '0 � ;• �„l' '_ �•,� • �; - � '/ � 663 6s ~< Legend �`,ti �� •f `Irr f�/ 1 � ,, - i j, Conservation Easement Project Streams �; �� -�' ^ r r. `_•J�^� -�.� l �� ; : `� `fit Directions to the Project: The project site is located directly adjacent to the Haw River approximately 2.8 miles southeast of the Town of Ossipee and 3.1 miles northwest of the City of Burlington in Alamance County. The approximate center of the project site is located at 36.141589 N Latitude and 79.475549 W Longitude. The site is bounded by Gerringer Mill Road (SR 1530) to the north, Burch Bridge Road (SR 1593) to the east, and the Haw River to the west and south. Access to the conservation easement during all phases of the project will be maintained through the landowner's gated entrances to the Site. These entrances are located at the end of Terry Smith Trail and on Burch Bridge Road approximately 0.75 mile south of Gerringer Mill Road. NC subject proles sne n m enPr o ram E P) and us sne a me fEborands Enhancement Pot. PROJECT VICINITY MAP FIGURE y land liner easement. but Is bordered by land error by a ne dea conservation but by recorded e 1 inch = 1.000 loot m p. Acceacon any s the site may require traversing areas near or U T TO HAW RIVER along Iha easemMl boundary and therefore access by he general pudic g easement e t boundary not perndied. Access by authorized personnel of state and federal involved development. STREAM ENHANCEMENT PROJECT 1 agennes or thou designees'cornractors m the v ,ghl and stewardship of the nyilwat— vie is petted ..Mel die GRAPHIC SCALE j',('0!S 1tCttl } EEP PROJECT #747 I erms and dmeframes of then defined roles. Any intended site ws,taeon or 0 500 1,000 acuvily by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles and Feel ALAMANCE COUNTY, NC a, mesrequrespnorcoadinaeonwithEER Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables Project Components Project Component -or- Reach ID Station ng /Location Existing Footage %Acreage Approach (PI, PII etc) Restoration -or- Restoration Equivalent Restoration Footage or Acreage Mitigation Ratio Main West 0+00-17+68 1768' N/A P 1720' 51 Trib W1 0+00-1+49 149' N/A P 128' 51 Main Center 0+00-41+02 4102' N/A E2 3952 5' 2 5 1 Trib C1 0+00-8+25 825' N/A E2 792' 2 5 1 Trib C2 0+00-20+50 2050' N/A E2 1971 5' 2 5 1 Trib C2 -a 0+00-2+71 271' N/A E2 221' 2 5 1 Tnb'C2 -b 0 +00r- 2 +39 239' N/A E2 239' 2 5 1 Trib C2 -c 0+00-0+98 98' N/A E2 97 5' 2 5 1 Southeast Trib 0 +00�- 5 +16 516' N/A E2 349' 25 1 Main East 0+00-21+64 2164' N/A E2 2163 5' 2 5 1 Trib E1 0+00-1+21 121' N/A E2 121' 2 5 1 _ Trib E2 0+00-2+91 291' N/A E2 290 5' -251 Tnb E3 0+00-4+47 447' N/A E2 400' 2 5 1 Component Summation ` Restoration Level Stream (linear feet) Riparian Wetland Non - riparian Wetland Buffer Upland (acres) (acres) (square feet) (acres) Riverine I Non- Rivenne Enhancement Enhancement I Enhancement I Creation Preservation High Quality 0,5975 18480 I BMP Elements Element Location Purpose /Function I Notes BR = Bioretention Cell, SF = Sand "Filter, SW = Stormwater Wetland, WOP = Wet Detention Pond, DDP = Dry Detention Pond, FS = Filter Strip, S = Grassed Swale, LS = Level Spreader, NI = Natural Infiltration Area, FB = Forested Buffer UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc EEP Project, #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page A -2 Appendix A Protect Vicinity Map and Background Tables Table 2. Project,Activity and Reporting History UT to Haw River Stream Enhancement Project ( #747) Activity or Deliverable Data Collection Complete Completion or Delivery Environmental Resources Technical Report Oct -07 Nov -07 Permanent Conservation Easement Executed & Recorded N/A Mar -08 Restoration Plan N/A Aug-08 Final Desl n — Construction Plans N/A Mar -11 Construction_ N/A Dec -11 Planting N/A Dec -11 Baseline/Year 1 Monitoring Aug-1 2 Dec -12 Year 2 Spring Site Assessment Aril -1'3 May-1 3 Year 2 Monitoring Oct -13 Dec -13 UT to'Haw River EEP Protect #747 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Mulkey, Inc December 2013 Page A -3 Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables Table 3. Project Contacts Table UT to Flaw River Stream Enhancement 'Pro'ect #747 Designer Mulkey Engineers and Consultants, Inc 6750 Tryon Road Cary, NC 27518 Primary project design POC Tom Barrett, (91'9) 858 -1817 Construction Contractor River Works, Inc 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200 Cary„ NC 27518 Construction contractor POC William Pederson, -919 459 -9001 Survey Contractor Level Cross Surveying, PLLC 668 March County Lane Randleman, NC 27317 Survey contractor POC IJena Bundy, 336 495 -1713 Planting /Seeding Contractor River Works, Inc 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200 Cary, NC 27518 Planting /Seeding contractor POC 'William Pederson, (919) 459 -9001 Seed .Mix Sources Green Resources, (336) 855 -6363 Nursery Stock Suppliers Mellow Marsh Farms, Inc, (919) 742 -1200 Cure Nursery, (919) 542 -6186 Foggy Mountain Nursery, LLC', (336) 384 -5323 Monitoring Performers Mulkey Engineers and Consultants, Inc 6750 Tryon Road Cary, NC 27518 1 Stream/Vegetation Monitoring POC Mark Mickley, (919) 858 -1797 UT to Haw River EEP Project #747 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Mulkey, Inc December 2013 Page A -4 a) M H C O m Y U (0 m C� N a m G C U_ U a) O a Q x v c a p co U? C O Q Y a Q) N ° U > U 3 a) rn = a o CL z a c Q 7) w z M p <a O O N M H N C a J Q O N W L V5 O (6 @ J j W r N N O ~ N Q 0 N 0 oo 0 n ° o M o �'' Z `O Z O Z Q Z oob co N Q Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Q Q 'O Z O 00 CO Cp CD �� Z Z Z Z W L D '- N a U 00 O) V N � H Cl)) p C N t° N M O a U> O M M W ° Q N O -ac ~ O �— C c r c O 0 V 0 �' c M c M� Z O Z O Z Q Z O O N O Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q Z O Z U> TO J Q O O `- N cN7 O l° v N >� > a: L U CD to a) O M V d F- U co W O a Y N N N O N C CD N H W r M C co N a) M W co N E V C U N N 0 m L L� CO M `e ° C U O co to v M Wd C H F U N co O a) 7 o 0 0 0 e c �, Z O O Q co n O N Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 N r U) .G U v to ao to V i Z Z Z N N M Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z cn Y M N G) Q (A a O N N O N O ~ C aC) E 3 O p U M O\ L n n 2 d m p m g a E s v �rn na pp co mCD 0 (D U C ca a) M O O H° C O E c6 u) CN � o ° C E E -O (D O r n p O yi 7 O Z O M V E t° as n n CO y Q a O U M° m O O to g O a N O M O Lr) C`a O M N U M N M F- U LL >_ > In w C° 7E E N ° M M In -2 a) CL d °) N— N A Cl) O L. U ~ c c 0 0 c c Z O O Q O Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q p Z Q to O co � Cl) .- . i Z Z Z O p p Z z z z z Z z Z Z E V' CD C) ° N o n g N ° N a) to N n co n M to a `p co M O IL m C C O C O C y- ," U p C, C .p U N L U U �p a) 'O N C a) .U-. 6 O Y U O 'p U o C O (� .'O C t°n C `a) C a) C 0 C —_� 7 a) a) 0 o C O 4C O Z_ N a) C Y F d° 7 a) N m U O @° a U E N N ° �w a) C U y p W m= �� " a' E N P E E m N_O u) 0 M M iU U� i0 C } N w N U U a @ L E w E C 3 > C N a) a) x Q �, N CV N N a) U U W a) ° j(E C Ca a) N ° J a N a) Ca t6 N `) N to p0 L C N U i N a) y C Q y l6 M U ° 2 a) >m � a) a) CNa U y a f° 5 2 (a m E O U C N D° a) Q p C C>3 N C y r w° 2 a) i0 cn C N N 'U p a L� N N C c0 ° C O a) Q> U N c L°° c `c � a) N t0 a a a- o� U) W � N� U -'° 0 N W c a E p Z M cl O Mo m r `° (a 'r N a) u) i o 3 D c v U U C7 W N C d y C Q Ca M N m co y U opi o V P ac) c U) r) c: U a) E ° O L U Z p O O N 0 ; CO C ° a) c a) 'o ~ E cu L (n Z �(D -o 2 O aZi p E c m~ N p p O C O z N O >O > y Q) N U ON a' a) @ c6 U N N :D ) > @ N L mN — o Fa— � m c3 l c � 0 p co U? C O Q Y a Q) N ° U > U 3 a) rn = a o CL z a c Q 7) w z APPENDIX E Visual Assesment Data Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment Photographic Log Photo Point Photographs _ o a m 0 a Z C -Z m a `U) O O O 65 ui i m U w E N � o U) c _ c ( o m Z C: LV 2 2 a) ° O N in Z a°i m U a> +-' `a m 0 w ., U o C7 j w —O (A 0 O O c L U ° �o O W a� a N— N M v a E Q d +-+ o o a J N N O N 'N 'N O N O N N N = N > C c� c0 N a O N .� Z o is - o x x U = 0 0 0 0 O O (D (D Q m a U U d d W W N Z, N N N N Q @ 3 - c N c=o U U Q cn W E >oa o� z W cm w LL I - �• �• ' / �'�' W l %C� a, z W ti / z =� z W U - U c~n w O� W Q w� w > Q POE Z) At oil We Word C) 0 L LU 4 o �1 o U) EE a 0 RNNI.:_ _ • . O o � W d d 1 , � LL- cn .. • • • - .. • . • - • • . , • CIO 0 r ' ' • r r w CD • 1 1 • - o I -j- '1" _tL,,•'� �``'' i.�•V 'F� it i _. _ •_.'_ ^� -� 1 � / T ,I f f y Y � ,�•1 }- �. { +Jc'?" • -\ ., rx 1 ��'� Y 1 ,'� „(-(G,rJ gi[�'3JA► r 1�` a - 'F • ' � � .. ✓-1�•• [��•��' �' - _ 1 _ ! r ' :1 , ± #tom �� _ +` � ,f '�` . iQ: ui —40 ILI 41 uj ztn t �'_ -.fig.• b., �. ` V-7 r ',.• - _, ; �!•,. _ jai 1%,•- !z3f'!c� -��. t tip' , c� �xi\` p*RFNs.. h • "� iI LU �✓�� ,�. . 'Z rte..; > . _ _ ice' ,1�'�.%.. t . F .1 "�.t. -' 4. ,�. � ._ I4 '�, 1,'.� k�� \ \ \µ. ^�`'� �j.��.- W_Z -/. •!� -' \\ . `. - °- ' • . ,rat, ��"'iii "'- .y' � i�r' � �' �� • � l� \ � _Id /.T# tx• �! ,% F -�;5 = - �t � �s �, t � � � i _� _ � * O �. 111'1 �V;' i� ` ��'4• ��:. - �a�' ► �r_,y- y_- -F �A f �•�' � �,'t' ' ' -7 � \'�S •'" \`•r -LAC •!'If jr 'A. � - CD � �Ll��h� y� \ / -� y *� ..' �F�' ii`{r�,�,� ,P- tom,• " - - ' � ui _ 010 -. 1C % -. �� jai- CD -� r. .4 • r/r }` rte; e � '�, �'�,�^ Y��Y,y;J(�'�..� _ y'`f r(- TYyy i, � !'�� .�y�., l�a�e;_ ` "•'�,.-/•�y��- a ��i !� 'i ,.� -i %.' �.1� t .�� _ I r � �.�P6� 'e}t�r -J �.� _�: Ar aY� - J a 2 :r nom, �/ -� f - 1 i �, •,��f+�i Yl,A4r . I 1� T•t. ', #1 3+.` e/fi'.� -3 1y� �`� - }��'� ��.'�'ift'-_'� -� - - _+�_ ^ I�1_,1(. w� �r ♦s�% n'Y..JJJ��+:/� '7�h .� • Y. `^ • '� itjl�r r1 % - a{ _•� t!•'.\ 40 r.F. in!� It CD • u , • 2 c .. • .. • • , • ' • LLJ LU . • < E • . , , • • • oa Ln c) • • + ' ' • • t * 1 C• ' • t 1 • O a- ' ui Z 17 uj LJJ AN Jh 'L' � _' _ a � �:_ t � � ,�� ,,,. •.i a - � yyt4i '� �y,'�rti'4� r- 't�-•�Y•� � ✓�->r "� \ \� �� t'• { .} � • -� _ - •. !yh�xl� �•_ �' �� d''��qq •� ��''��vve �j Z, Y is �� ,C_ T \ \\ \� ' �.� } ti_a"'\' AM -,1'. ��., _' •- �''.Cr.i'?i ��-t { -ti .�ea4K �i�'�rJ }-a. ii r r9. �°i - I � L - Est¢ , ti�i - ,. �, • - # �r�jG.+�'v,��i i �!, _ ��.s _ - _ sue'..- -y` '.\ � �i _ _� . - �• � _- . r � � 1 � � `+.. -�'t�� •SX�� \� —. , �• -t�� .tit,:. ' t -, �� s ! • s ='S�„ I Y, f ti• 4* �`1-' ^ - f. "" ins+ '�' - _- p' •� j /1( ' /J •� , dp jr t � t � c x:'49' #�"!r .� /� � � .� � � • ��• Y - - -. ` _� 1 � •� r �'�_ A...n Z. '/% ice./ / J// %: '`� • ��. � ry!* :1 � —'`� ' ` i+� t.� • ~ 7FK+t_- , 'ice , • s _ Its ir/v Ar 1 1 1 cn 1 ' .. 1 , • ' • • co • • ON a • 1 • • • ■ • . 1 . I • • . • • • , ■ ' • 0 ca 1 • ■ cu w • • , • 1 I ; 1 1 • ,4 o ■ si � � ui — •s��ti_ * �S: r� - � �a �•r- r�1�1r� �`, L .r•� ,! 1�. 1 �M _ �i,�•�.��r Yr T,t, f s�J� I All. '+.�. � �1�yy S_x4�'''-� ��-y`� `�� . F'�,� cA� i' �: _ .• /.�4'�..7y.+�y `�i� l"�J•..•r • p /`:V/ 'Y � . } � is r•��y.� z �' L,r-!I -� 1 1 ; ;„ \ ��• f � LU •� - - % to . Lu 4K- if ,,� Q�• - �■� 1 \ i !. �/ i•y� • +r �- "�`�. � In �F • i /� t'- - . M' 1, '� a-� %•' A. It 'fin ; �. ,� — t , '�" : ;+4 1 _ 1+ „ � .� - `4� _ • _ S .,..fir � ir •� � ��,.,, �Td \ 1 �, 11 y if .yam � . �} i �'.".� "'� ..[x 'fit lv� f�„d _ ; '�,,, .�i•+,jR"K. - � � , ,► 1' L .1 _!'L'_ 'J: a° s .•�� ' , � wit ''��• � Jw � 'r �c�� '+ ►'tee •' �- �, ^.' ,- i �. ^r r�r�. 4�.r•ri rr.. '• `�` ,f,:� 1. t{( !. /. _ ? 1z1' .� , }�k�'� '.Z- •�`,o,..'�'•'1t• -1, _ ym �► Abp. .% _ i " i� + : 4 ti yllry t fir ZWA X1 •fx. /y is ' �� ' ..f,� ,,t,y- ,.".ya. f, i ,,$G'+',d. �. yi�,� .�ar'Y•'` \.y, t �r�"� ■ lift O E w w c N LL o c a) (n w m c U _0 E .� � E Z O �' m Q Q a (- O U O = a O r C (.► d c� N Z O c: W c� LV J a� _7 cn w a. Va -0 (D (U N N N a O n C (n (n 0) �° O t c c c N N Cl) v Z O V N N o o L a E O c6 Q O V O E N c a L �+ L '- Q w M cn U �, o c O U o M U a N ° c c c x x U = O O O O n. w w N ., N N N N Pe, r f a �11 } C °' O > w > c c cg M O w. .� .� U U t E m a +?� Q cn �• 1 :mot �� _ .) A- > a� >aa v) =o E T w Yg N C T T 0 3: 0 10 O �aa 3 w 0 a 3`n c 3> Z -.o m o �D y -o�-o -o m M w C a�a:ccE CD -r- > v t c o m x _�a.O co m w° z _5 m N V (6 CL m} 3 c m o N o c CL c ca H 2 0 E a-5 cO la 5 m 0-0 rn 3 0 n w @ N > @ w O1 H d C n, d !1 7 w L6 2 W �o m.a)� o ac) o °ate o a 0 w w V 0) O m o E o@ cS O o c o Z Q OO a o > w o a» C .k s Th4 l ._ a. L.3 } m I) LU O z CO C IL W w D qcr (' N LL U W `W � / Z W Q W U � Z �. Z Z = z I— D O ww O U 0 QO W O cr 0- z U U)w 2i H [)�w J Z W Q w > _ � Q U = O D a� O LL 0 v w O i C:) W N U II = O d O U Q N O O O (D- li O LL ± r. LLJ w w w - �• 1 :mot �� _ .) A- 14 ' el•..1 Ra. �_�Sarlt _.�'._ �1P- S.�i `ai�l"1�, - b.. .r. ✓�.i 'aMr.'��.. CJs. C .k s Th4 l ._ a. L.3 } m I) LU O z CO C IL W w D qcr (' N LL U W `W � / Z W Q W U � Z �. Z Z = z I— D O ww O U 0 QO W O cr 0- z U U)w 2i H [)�w J Z W Q w > _ � Q U = O D a� O LL 0 v w O i C:) W N U II = O d O U Q N O O O (D- li O LL ± r. LLJ w w w m X v a) CL a Q U Cl) co C p m N y Y 4,7 m a m a E U a) V N Xk N U } N C O ag a E w 2 d C y C c d f0 m o ° w o Cc. w O E y o 0 G L O Q O N iN� O N \° d 2 e Q O \° W 0 y y 0 d o no ici o c v o 0 a r 0 o O y O y M 0 G 0 E O O Ot O a g N O O a O a Z Z c 0 of c 1- > a i m m m > d v m m ti v - E o � E o' z� 0 `'� z� v a o w� E o )0 v D a d d£ G a a O ., _C O t a) m a) m a U m C O t d w N M ,y - y t0 00 Z VH O O N C) H m a) m U t ` V C W 0 E E V N ai co } m 0OQ (ttQ ca co O T d cn d 0 > coo umi U) ' O m E co E ° � E It E a' io m y w @ N U) O y O N N O U) O m m y (D 21 m a) o a a) m w n n m a) C r a) L +m+ N m m m m U a) C C m O O U d m y T a) N N ° N cu d 00 T m O O m E W cc (D o — m — m N d a f/1 a) E a) N O cn O 3 U a) n Q j N@ N T m 'O j, O v O _ `-� as N C �•°- N � U w � U o w c w c E a) E N y C E aj 3� o y p n a m a) ? L_ 3 4) " E > 0 3 c " 0 0 L c IM c w d a�i 0 E a? m E a) O) w O m co L 0 M > to G > m Q w M D Q Q �' as Lii N � N p > ° .E 00 7 O 0 m d a) M @ ° U) a) a) c ° O E to m V a) C N p 3 o d r t 3 c o E ;E o 0 5 Q) 8 a) 0 0 N L V N c6 ` tC V a) p 0 U c0 V w d c W ° 3 ° E °' @ v c H m E a Q c E E Q O m °) 0 C O d N E m u m o a (a N m 3 m E m �' N ,� d N O m {Cp QM m J ty/1 Oi C Lu F°- f°- c W a > ro as �� U Cl) co C p m N y Y 4,7 m a m a E U a) V N Xk N U } N C O ag a E w 2 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 1; Looking Upstream on Main West As- Built/Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -7 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 1; Looking Downstream on Main West As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -8 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 2; Looking Upstream on Main West As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -9 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 2; Looking Downstream on Main West As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -10 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 3; Looking Upstream Main West As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -11 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 3; Looking Downstream Along Main West As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -12 Appendix B PHOTO POINT visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 4; Looking Upstream Along Main West As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -13 Appendix B PHOTO POINT visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 4; Looking Downstream Along Main West As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -14 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 5; Looking Downstream Along Main Center As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -15 Appendix B PHOTO POINT visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 6; Looking Across Trib C1 Crossing As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Year 5 Monitoring: Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -16 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 6; Looking Downstream Along Trib C 1 As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -17 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 7; Looking Upstream Along Trib C1 As- Built/Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 2 Monitoring: November 2009 Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -18 Appendix B PHOTO POINT visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 7; Looking Downstream Along Trib C1 As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -19 Appendix B PHOTO POINT visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 8; Looking Upstream Along Main Center As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -20 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 8; Looking Downstream Along Main Center As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -21 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 9; Looking Upstream Along Main Center As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: UT to Haw River EEP Project #747 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: Mulkey, Inc. December 2013 Page B -22 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 9; Looking Downstream Along Main Center As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -23 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 10; Looking Upstream Along Main Center (across planted area) As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -24 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 10; Looking Downstream Along Main Center As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: UT to Haw River EEP Project #747 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: Mulkey, Inc. December 2013 Page B -25 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 11; Looking Upstream Along Main Center at Crossing As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Year 5 Monitoring: Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -26 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 11; Looking Downstream Along Main Center As- Built/Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -27 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 12; Looking Downstream Along C2 -b As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -28 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 13; Looking Downstream Along C2 As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -29 Appendix B PHOTO POINT visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 14; Looking Downstream Along C2 -a As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -30 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 15; Looking Upstream Along Fence on Trib C2 at Pond As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -31 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 16; Looking Upstream Along Trib C2 As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -32 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 16; Looking Downstream Along Trib C2 As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -33 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 17; Looking Upstream Along Trib C2 at Step Pool As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -34 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 17; Looking Downstream Along Trib C2 As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -35 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 18; Looking Upstream Along Trib C2 As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Year 5 Monitoring: Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -36 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 18; Looking Downstream Along Trib C2 As- Built /Year I Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -37 Appendix B PHOTO POINT visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 18; Looking Upstream Along Trib C2 -c As- Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -38 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Visual Assessment Data Photo Point 19; Looking Downstream Along Main Center - Invasive Management As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -39 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 19; Looking Upstream Along Trib C2 - Invasive Management As- Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -40 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 20; Looking Upstream Along Main Center As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: UT to Haw River EEP Project #747 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: Mulkey, Inc. December 2013 Page B -41 �:: "!".• - '•,gip'.. . 1 -• . '�.I Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: Mulkey, Inc. December 2013 Page B -41 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 20; Looking Downstream Along Main Center As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -42 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 21; Looking Upstream Along Main Center As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -43 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 21; Looking Downstream Along Main Center As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. E E P Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -44 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 22; Looking Upstream Along Southeast Tributary As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -45 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 22; Looking Downstream Along Southeast Tributary As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Year 5 Monitoring: Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -46 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 23; Looking Upstream Along Southeast Tributary As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -47 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 23; Looking Downstream Along Southeast Tributary As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -48 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 24; Looking Upstream Along Main East As- Built/Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -49 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 24; Looking Across Main East at Upper Crossing As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -50 Appoidix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 24; Looking Downstream Along Main East As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: UT to Haw River EEP Project #747 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 t +L:: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: Mulkey, Inc. December 2013 Page B -51 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 25; Looking Upstream Along Trib E 1 As- Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -52 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 25; Looking Downstream Along Trib El As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -53 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 26; Looking Upstream Along Trib E2 As- Built/Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -54 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 26; Looking Downstream Along East 2 As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -55 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 27; Looking Upstream Along Main East As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Year 5 Monitoring: Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -56 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 27; Looking Downstream Along Main East As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 FALSE Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -57 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 28; Looking Upstream Along Trib E3 As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -58 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 28; Looking Across Trib E3 Crossing As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -59 Appendix B PHOTO POINT visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 28; Looking Downstream Along Trib E3 As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -60 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 29; Looking Upstream Along Main East As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -61 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 29; Looking Across Main East at Lower Crossing As- Built/Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year S Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -62 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 29; Looking Downstream Along Main East As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -63 Appendix B PHOTO POINT Visual Assessment Data PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 30; Looking Upstream Along Main East As- Built/Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -64 Appendix B PHOTO POINT PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point 30; Looking Across Main East As -Built /Year 1 Survey: August 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Visual Assessment Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page B -65 APPENDIX C Vegetation Plot Data Table 6 Vegetation Plot Attributes and Criteria Attainment Table 7 CVS Vegetation Metadata Table Table 8 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means) Photographic Log Vegetation Plot-Photographs Appendix C Vegetation Plot,Data Table 6. Vegetation Plot Attributes and Criteria Attainment - MY2 (2013) UT to Haw River Stream Enhancement Project ( #747) Survival Community Planting Associated CVS Threshold Tract Plot ID Type Zone ID Reach ID Gauges(s) Method Level Met? Mean Mesic Mixed 1 3 Main Center NA CVS I &II Yes Hardwood 2 Mesic Mixed 3 Main Center NA CVS I &II Yes 100% Hardwood 3 Mesic Mixed 3 Main Center NA CVS I &II Yes Hardwood Mesic Mixed 4 3 Main East NA CVS I &II No 0% Hardwood UT to Haw River EEP Project #747 Monitoring Year 2 of'5 Mulkey, Inc December 2013 Page C -1 Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data Table,? CVS Vegetation Metadata Table - UT to Haw River,Stream Enhancement Project ( #747) MY2 (2013) Report Prepared By Brian Dustin Date Prepared 11/21/2012 13 02 Database name cvs- eep- entrytool -v2 3 1 mdb Database location G \Project \2012 \2012058 00\ENV\MONITORING\Monitoring Year 2 \CVS Computer name MMICKLEY -7 File size 161472768 DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------ - - - -_- M_etadata Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data Pro , planted Each project is listed with Its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year This excludes live stakes ,Prof, total stems Each project Is listed with Its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This Includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /,volunteer stems Plots List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc ) Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots Vigor by Spp Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems Impacted by each Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each species Damage by Plot Damage values tallied by type for each plot Planted Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded ALL Stems by Plot and spp A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot, dead and missing stems are excluded PROJECT SUMMARY------------------------------------- Project Code 747 Project Name UT to Haw River Description The Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Haw River Stream Enhancement Site (Site) is situated in the northwest corner of Alamance County, North Carolina Specifically, the Site Is located on multiple UTs to the Haw River approximately 2 8 miles southeast of the Tow River Basin Cape Fear Length ft Stream -to -edge ,width (ft) _ Area sq m 15742 Required Plots (calculated) 6 Sampled Plots 14 UT to Haw River E E P Project #747 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Mulkey, Inc December 2013 Page C -2 2 m O IL C_ O m a� V) a� X C_ a� a a Q O M C`7 �oU N N O) � N E d N O N 0 (D �- Y cc U) (D O J J 4) 2 2 t N In o L f- N ( w ~ O 5 } II ' o (v o E dam a. � II 11 .2 ° a E F- d H Z) w2 a o O r� a o r 0 N_ - N N M ti C c d o v � r N r N In N r r r co M r r m OH ,M a N Cl r T r ° y' iE d C"*,, coy r '�' r r N r �r M co 00 co V --IN I— N ch C s T r r N r r co r ° W O co M E r •- O Ra N r N "� r r r r r r N r r m LO Vi m co L _ > �t R (\� r r r lf) t} (V N N o r O rn a ° ° r ° co M -- N NT G1 N r O N _p ° M co -- s M r r r N N °° 3 C N N � r L O r O ... o a o EL V a CD N O V r N j Lo N dU*) Cfl N G1 T N °O r r O ,N d C cfl 3 CY) O U C a�,�E- �H�E- cn�'HF-- ��cncn d d 7 V o a c ca cn ~ E N Q. d N to NNN.4) E r H Cl) d Y c6 E - O 'a Z O L O O L c O r o O O� -a O E L to cc N cu O o C— m 3 E cm O Y O ,c (0 O` O 3 a C 3 a E m 3 c`uu' - C: v a) ,� � °? 3 °c Cd tam o = cn 0 (t 6- - (D -:-- 50<co E ig 3� n -5 -c cO o z <MIDI H co co U s; co N ` = c E U m co Cx N cu `�° m 0 m i a L m> CL coi n E OL E N N U L E U (0 Z3 z:3 � �'-.. x a o =-Z N 0 7 d C. O U i c0 N L O cn T LL 2 N CX JJ00CY o q) > >' NQUUU _ O M C`7 �oU N N O) � N E d N O N 0 (D Y cc U) (D J J 4) 2 2 t N In o L f- N ( w ~ O 5 } II ' o (v o E dam a. � II 11 .2 ° a E F- d H Z) w2 M A Appendix C VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS Vegetation Plot 1 As -Built Survey/Year 1 Monitoring: September 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Vegetation Plot Data Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page C -4 Appendix C VEGETATION PLOT Vegetation Plot Data PHOTOGRAPHS Vegetation Plot 2 As -Built Survey /Year 1 Monitoring: September 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page C -5 U Appendix C VEGETATION PLOT Vegetation Plot Data PHOTOGRAPHS Vegetation Plot 3 As -Built Survey /Year I Monitoring: September 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page C -6 Appendix C VEGETATION PLOT Vegetation Plot Data PHOTOGRAPHS Vegetation Plot 4 As -Built Survey /Year 1 Monitoring: September 2012 Year 3 Monitoring: Year 5 Monitoring: Year 2 Monitoring: October 2013 Year 4 Monitoring: UT to Haw River Mulkey, Inc. EEP Project #747 December 2013 Monitoring Year 2 of 5 Page C -7 i a