20050785_Individual_20050505 (2)

M?Fp
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTN.: Mr. Bill Biddlecome
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
RECEIVED
MAY 05 2'005
UGULATORY BRAWN
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Ift,
May 3, 2005
Subject: Application for an Individual Section 404 and 401 permit for Improvements to US 17.
Improvements to US 17 From South of SR 1127 (Possum Track Road) to North of SR 1418
(Roberson Road). Beaufort County. State Project No. 8.T150601. Federal Aid Project MAF-
75-3 (26). WBS 34440.1.1. TIP No. R-2510. USACE Action ID 199301143.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Division of Highways, in consultation with
the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) proposes to improve US 17 in Beaufort County, 0.5 mile
south of SR 1127 (Possum Track Road) near Hackney to 0.2 mile north of SR 1418 (Roberson Road) near
Old Ford. The proposed project is approximately 15 miles in length.
Summary of Impacts to Waters -of the U.S.: Proposed impacts to jurisdictional areas of R-2510 consist of
a total of 11.92 acres of permanent wetland impacts (8.74 acres of riverine, 3.23 acres of non-riverine),
0.15 acre of fill in surface waters, and 4,244.4 linear feet of stream channels. Table 1 summarizes the
jurisdictional impacts associated with the R-2510 project by Sections A, B, and C. Wetland impacts have
been reduced by bridging the wetland associated with the Tar-Pamlico River.
• Proposed impacts to jurisdictional areas of Section R-2510A consist of 4.38 acres of wetlands, 0.06
acre of surface water impacts, and 478.0 linear feet of stream channel impacts. Wetland impacts are
further broken down into 1.34 acres of riverine and 3.04 acres of non riverine.
• Estimated impacts associated with preliminary design of section R -2510B consist of 6.09 acres of
wetland impacts, 0.38 acre of surface water impacts, and 2,417.3 linear feet of stream channel
impacts. The riverine and non-riverine wetland impacts include 5.70 acres and 0.39 acre, respectively.
• Estimated impacts associated with the preliminary design of section R -2510C consist of 1.49 acres of
riverine wetland impacts, 0.33 acre of surface water impacts, and 1,349.1 linear feet of stream
channel impacts.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE; WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SoLrrHWLmNGToN STREET
RALEIGH NC

(?
'Val,lo 1 Cnmmarv of Tnricdictinual Impacts
Section vM r Permanent Wetland
Impacts (ac)*
Riverine/non-riverine Existing Channel
Impacts (ft) Surface Water (ac)
R-2510A 1.34/3.04 478.0 0.06
-
R-2510B 5.70/0.39 2,417.3 0.38
R-2510C 1.49/0 1,349.1 0.33
TOTAL 8.53/3.43 4,244.4 0.77
*includes fill, excavation, and mechanized clearing
Purpose and Need: The purpose of this project is to increase traffic capacity and safety by widening US
17 from the existing two-lane facility to a four-lane roadway and to route traffic around the major urban
centers in the project area. Currently, traffic is heavy and the level of service (LOS) for the majority of
US 17 within the project area range between D and E; accident rates for both the urban and rural
segments are currently above the statewide accident rates for similar types of roadways; the posted speed
limit (35 mph) within Chocowinity and Washington inhibits the flow of regional traffic. In addition, US
17 is designated as part of the North Carolina Intrastate System and is a Strategic Highway Network
(STRAHNET) route.
Typical Section: A description for each typical section for the entire project is as follows:
From 0.5 mile south of SR 1127 (Possum Track Road) to SR 1149 (Price Road) [length = 4.2 miles] -
Widen existing roadway to a four-lane divided expressway facility with a 46-foot median and partial
control of access.
From SR 1149 (Price Road) to south of existing US 17 north of SR 1142 (Bragaw Lane) [length = 1.8
miles] - Four-lane freeway on new location with a 46-foot median and full control of access. An
interchange is provided at NC 33 near SR 1142 (Bragaw Lane) east of Chocowinity.
From south of existing US 17 north of SR 1142 (Bragaw Lane) to north of the Tar River [length = 2.8
miles] - Four-lane freeway bridge on new location with a 10-foot median divided by a barrier and full
control of access. The bridge will span existing US 17, the Norfolk Southern Railway, SR 1165 (Sand
Hole Road), the Tar River, Kennedy Creek, and the wetlands adjacent to the Tar/Pamlico River.
From north of the Tar River to existing US 17 north of SR 1404 (Whispering Pines Road) [length = 1
mile] - Four-lane freeway on new location with a 46-foot median and full control of access. An
interchange is provided at US 264 west of SR 1404 (Whispering Pines Road). An at-grade intersection is
provided at existing US 17 north of SR 1404. A grade separation is provided at 15'h Street.
From north of SR 1404 (Whispering Pines Road) to 0.2 mile north of SR 1418 (Roberson Road) [length =
5.2 miles] - Widen the existing roadway to a four-lane divided expressway facility with a 46-foot median
and partial control of access.
Summay of Utility Im_pacts: It will be necessary to relocate several utilities because of road widening
activities. There are three utilities located on the west side of US 17 that are in the project's footprint: a
water main, a gas main, and underground telephone cables. NCDOT will relocate these and use
directional bore so as not to impact environmentally sensitive areas. Progress Energy has power lines on
both sides of US 17. NCDOT plans to relocate the lines to the east side of US 17.
Summ of Miti ag tion: Throughout the NEPA and design process this project has been designed to
avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas. Specific strategies are detailed elsewhere in this
2
document. Highlights include widening NC 17 along the existing roadway in some areas, using 3:1
slopes within wetland limits, and bridging the wetlands associated with the Tar-Pamlico River.
NCDOT has proposed to restore approximately 7,000.0 feet of stream utilizing natural stream design and
approximately 14.1 acres of buffer reforestation (Sections A, B, & Q. Currently, feasibility studies are
being conducted for all five sites and final designs are incomplete. When the designs are completed and
the sites are approved, NCDOT proposes to use some or all of these sites as a portion of the required
mitigation for R-2510. The remaining permanent impacts to wetlands and existing stream channels will
come from the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP).
Summary of Tar-Pamlico Buffer Impacts and Miti ag tion: The total Tar-Pamlico River riparian buffer
impacts associated with R-2510 consist of 7.77 acres (338,576.8 sgft) in Zone 1 with 6.82 acres
(297,044.5 sgft) mitigable and 4.86 acres (211,636.1 sgft) in Zone 2 with 4.24 acres (184,797.0 sgft)
mitigable.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Construction of this project will be divided into three sections as detailed in Table 2. Permit drawings for
all three sections are included in this application. The attached permit drawings are complete in detailing
all proposed impacts occurring within section R-2510A, which is at 100 percent design completion.
However, permit drawings for sections R-2510B and R-2510C detail the current best preliminary
alignment and maximum potential impacts. Design for these latter sections is at 30 percent. The impacts
associated with sections R-2510B and R-2510C are expected to decrease once final design is completed.
Final permit drawings for R-2510B and R-2510C will be provided under separate cover in the form of a
permit modification request. NCDOT understands that no construction will occur on Sections B and C
until final design and resulting impacts have been approved by all regulatory agencies.
Table 2. Project Sections and Scheduling
Section Project Limits Scheduled Let
Date
R-2510A South of SR 1127 to South of SR 1149 March 2007
R-2510B South of SR 1149 to South of 1536 December 2005 DB
rR-157107C South of SR 1536 to North of NC 171 June 2007 (est.)
DB - " Design Build" - Final design, right-of-way acquisition, permit acquisition, and
construction will be produced by a private engineering firm.
NEPA DOCUMENT STATUS
Improvements to US 17 were first recommended in the US 17 Corridor Study in 1982. The project was
first added to the Transportation Improvement Program (T.I.P.) in November 1989 and the environmental
study began in 1992. A Purpose and Need Statement documenting the need for the project and potential
benefits was completed in January 1999. A Preliminary Build Alternatives Analysis was completed in
February 1999 which evaluated ten (10) preliminary build alternatives. An eleventh Preliminary Build
Alternative was evaluated in November 1999. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) which
assessed three Build Alternatives (Alternatives B, C and I-G) was completed and signed in June 2002.
The project went on public notice on October 3, 2002 (USACE Action ID 199301143). The Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was completed and signed in August 2005. Copies of the project
documents have been provided to regulatory review agencies involved in the approval process.
Additional copies will be provided upon request.
This project was developed through the NEPA/404 Merger process. All concurrence points have been
reached for the A section of this project. The B and C sections have both reached 4A. A Design Build
Private Engineering Firm will conduct the 4B and 4C concurrence meetings for the B section. It is
unknown as of the date of this permit application if the C section will be administered through the Design
Build process.
Logical Termini: R-2510 is in compliance with 23 CFR Part 771.111(f) which lists the FHWA
characteristics of the independent utility of a project:
(1) The project connects logical termini and is of sufficient length to address environmental
matters on a broad scope;
(2) The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure, even if no additional transportation
improvements are made in the area; and
(3) The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable
transportation improvements.
RESOURCE STATUS
Wetland and Stream Delineations:
Wetland delineations were conducted using the criteria specified in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual. Wetlands and streams were delineated between December 1999 and February 2000.
Mr. Mike Bell of the USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office verified the delineations in the field on
February 28, 2000. The wetland verification will be updated prior to the permitting of this project.
Stream classification, delineations, and buffer sites were field verified by Mr. Mike Bell and Mr. Mike
Thomas [NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)] in March and April 2004.
The attached permit application package consists of drawings depicting jurisdictional impacts. As
previously mentioned, the construction of R -2510A will involve 4.38 acres of permanent wetland
impacts, 0.06 acres of fill within surface waters, 2.14 acres (93,492.8 square feet) of Tar Pamlico Buffer
impacts, and 478.0 linear feet of impacts to jurisdictional streams. Impacts associated with section R-
2510B consist of 6.09 acre of wetland impacts, 0.38 acre of surface water impacts, 7.03 acres (306,112.1
square feet) of Tar-Pamlico Buffer impacts (allowable and mitigable), and 2,417.3 linear feet of stream
channel impacts. Impacts associated with section R-2510C consist of 1.49 acre of wetland impacts, 0.33
acre of surface water impacts, 3.17 acres (138,295.6 square feet) of Tar-Pamlico Buffer impacts
(allowable and mitigable), and 1,349.1 linear feet of stream channel impacts. All impacts for sections B
and C of this project are preliminary estimates. These impacts are projected to decrease with further
avoidance and minimization efforts. However, it should be noted that the proposed mitigation is based on
the maximum potential jurisdictional impacts.
R-2510A: Characterization of Jurisdictional Sites:
Wetlands
This section will have 4.38 acres of proposed permanent wetland impacts and 0.06 acres of surface water
impacts (Table 3). The major wetland type (approximately 70%) associated with section R-251 OA can be
characterized as palustnne forested, mixed broad-leaved deciduous and flooded (PF06F, Cowardin, et
al.). This wetland classification specifically refers to the tidal bottomland hardwood and cypress-gum
communities associated with the Tar River floodplain and Old Ford Swamp.
4
Wetlands associated with streams can be characterized as Coastal Plain bottomland hardwood wetlands
(Schafale and Weakley, 1990) (riverine wetlands). Hydrology for this system is provided by overbank
flooding of the associated stream. Dominant canopy vegetation includes bald cypress (Taxodium
distichum), blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), yellow poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Acer rubrum), water oak (Quercus nigra),
and river birch (Betula nigra). Understory and herbaceous species include saplings of canopy species,
ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), redbay (Persea borbonia), privet (Ligustrum sinense), doghobble
(Leucothoe axillaris), giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea), chain
fern (Woodwardia virginiana), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), and rush (Juncos sp.). Riverine wetlands
within section R-2510A occur in association with tributaries to Chocowinity Creek (Sites 3, 6, 12, 13, 14,
15, & 17; permit drawing sheets 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, 17, 20, & 21).
Hydrology for depressional wetlands (non-riverine) is provided by rainfall, surface water run-off and
groundwater discharge. These systems are found on the broad flat interstream areas. Dominant canopy
vegetation includes loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), water oak (Quercus nigra), and red maple (Acer rubrum).
Understory and herbaceous species include saplings of canopy species, giant cane (Arundinaria
gigantea), chain fern (Woodwardia virginiana), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), and rush (Juncos sp.).
Table 3. Jurisdictional Impacts within R -2510A

Site
Station Fill in
Wetland

(ac) Excavation
in Wetlands

(ac) Mechanized
Clearing
( Method IM
ac Surface
Water
Impacts
ac Existing
Channel
Impacted
ft
1 29+50 Rt 0.08 0.04 0.01
2 33+50 Rt 0.02 0.02
3 57+50 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 113
4 63+50 to 67+00 Rt 0.30 0.33 0.14
5 85+00 to 90+20 Lt 0.03 0.09 0.07
6 86+10 to 93+60 Rt 1.05 0.16
7 103+15 to 105+20 Lt 0.15 0.01
8 107+20 to 110+20 Rt 0.25 0.01 0.06
9 117+15 to 120+50 Lt 0.12 0.09 0.03
10 132+00 to 134+60 Rt 0.42 0.17 0.07
11 136+90 to 138+20 Lt 0.04 0.01
12 155+20 Rt 0.02 0.01 88
13 162+35 0.01 52
14 185+82 0.01 122
15 223+50 to 225+30 0.18 0.02 0.08 0.02 103
16 230+40 to 234+00 Rt 0.20 0.05
17 241+30 to 241+65 Rt 0.01 0.01 0.01
TOTAL 2.82 0.83 0.73 0.06 478
Streams
Within section R-2510A five stream channels are traversed: Horse Branch, White Branch and associated
canals, and an unnamed tributary to Maple Branch. Jurisdictional stream information is presented in
Table 4. Horse Branch is approximately 4 feet in width and maintains a moderate flow for the majority of
the year. White Branch and its associated canals are approximately 4 feet in width and maintain a
moderate flow year round. The unnamed tributary to Maple Branch is approximately 6 feet in width and
maintains a moderate flow for the majority of the year. Each channel can be characterized as having
adequate aquatic habitat and associated faunal assemblages. R-2510A will impact a total of 478 linear
feet of stream channel to the previously listed streams.
Table 4. Jurisdictional Stream Information on R-2510A
Station
DWQ
Required
Site Number Stream Index DWQ Status Impact Mitigation
(From/ Name No. Rating (ft) 2:1 (ft)
To
3 57+50 Horse 29-6-2- C NSW I 113 113(1:1)
Branch 1-6-2
12 155+20 Rt White 29-6-2- C NSW P 88 176
Branch 1-6-2
13 162+35 White 29-6-2- C NSW P 52 104
Branch 1-6-2
14 185+82 White 29-6-2- C NSW P 122 244
Branch 1-6-2
223+50/ Ut to Maple 29-6-2- C SW
15 1 225+30 Branch 1-7 NSW P 103 206
TOTAL 478 843
R-251 0B and R-2510C: Characterization of Jurisdictional Sites:
Wetlands
Proposed impacts to jurisdictional areas within Sections B and C have been calculated, but are
preliminary at this time. These values are the result of minimization and avoidance measures and
represent the maximum possible impacts foreseen at this time. Table 5 shows the estimated, site by site,
impacts for R-25 I OB and R-2510C.
Wetland delineations were completed for the entire project, as stated previously. Wetlands occurring
within Sections B and C are characterized in a similar manner as those in Section A. These systems
exhibit the same position within the landscape, hydrologic sources and vegetative species. Riverine
wetlands are present in Section B and are associated with tributaries to Chocowinity Creek and the Tar-
Pamlico River (Sites 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, & 9; permit drawing sheets 4, 6, 7, 12-23, 25, 26, & 32). Riverine
wetlands are present in Section C and are associated with tributaries to Cherry Run and Old Ford Swamp
(Sites IA, 1B, 1C, 3, & 4; permit drawing sheets 7, 11, & 18).
At the present time, due to the sequencing of the project, Sections B & C permit drawings detailing the
exact nature and location of jurisdictional impacts are preliminary (approximately 30 percent design).
NCDOT will continue to explore every avenue to reduce these projected impacts. Proposed changes will
be coordinated with the relevant natural resource agencies.
6
ti
Table 5. Estimated Jurisdictional Impacts on R-2510B and R-2510C

Site Station

From/To Fill in
Wetland
(ac)* Excavation
in Wetlands
(ac) Mechanized
Clearing (ac)
(Method III) Surface
Water
Impacts ac
R -2510B
1 -L-228+25 0.09 0.01 0.01
2 -BY9-30+40 0.02 0.01 0.01
3 -L-250+50 0.43 0.04 0.76
4 -L-270+00 3.03 0.15
5 -L-315+25 0.12 0.01
6 -L-324+50-476+60 0.22 0.07
7 -L-495+00499+50 1.55 0.13
8 -L-508+00 0.04
9 -L-515+50 0.13 0.02 0.051
10 -L-525+50 0.22
TOTAL R -2510B 5.83 0.02 0.24 1.03

Site Station

From/To Fill in
Wetland
ac * Excavation
in Wetlands
ac Mechanized
Clearing (ac)
(Method HI) Surface
Water
him acts ac
R-2510 C
IA -L-582+75-585+75 LT/RT 0.02 0.03
1B -L-590+70-592+70 RT 0.07 0.02
I c -Y26-15+30-16+75 RT 0.06 0.02
2 -L-634+10-634+85 RT 0.01
3 -L-648+50-650+15 LT/RT 0.09 0.03 0.02
4 -L-743+50-761+90 LT/RT 1.04 0.11 0.29
5A -L-786+20-788+05 LT/RT 0.01
5B -L-792+40-794+15 LT/RT 0.01
5C -Y31-13+15-14+60 LT/RT 0.01
TOTAL R-2510C 1.15 0.13 0.21 0.35
Streams
Jurisdictional stream information for sections R-25 I OD and R-2514C is presented in Table 6. There are
11 stream channels that may be impacted by construction activity on Sections B and C. The unnamed
tributaries to Maple Branch are approximately 6 feet in width and maintain a moderate flow for the
majority of the year. Maple Branch is approximately 6 feet in width and maintains a moderate flow for
the majority of the year. The unnamed tributaries to Cherry Run are approximately 4 feet in width and
maintain a moderate flow for the majority of the year. Cherry Run is approximately 15 feet in width and
maintains a moderate flow for the majority of the year. Old Ford swamp is approximately 15 feet in
width and maintains a moderate flow for the majority of the year. The unnamed tributaries to Latham
Creek are approximately 5 feet in width and maintain a moderate flow for the majority of the year. A
total of 3763.4 linear feet of stream channels may be impacted and will require mitigation in these latter
two Sections. Please note, these are rough estimates and will likely decrease.
7
Table 6. Estimated Jurisdictional Stream Information. Sections R-2510B and R-2510C
Station
Stream
DWQ
DWQ
Impact Required
Site Number Structure Name Index No. Rating Status (ft) Mitigation
(From/To) 2.1 ft
R -2510B

Roadway Ut to
Sw
1 -L-228+25 Maple 29-6-2-1-7 NSW P 121.6 243.2
Branch
-BY9- Roadway Ut to C Sw
2 30+40 Fill Maple 29-6-2-1-7 NSW P 72.7 143.4
Branch
4 -L-270+00 Roadway Maple 29-6-2-1-7 C Sw P 826
1 1652
2
Fill Branch NSW . .
-L-495+00- Roadway Ut to C Sw
7 499+50 Fill Cherry 28-103-17 NSW I 1,118 1,118(1:1)
R
10 -L-525+50 Roadway Cherry 28-103-17 C Sw P 278.9 557.8
Fill Run NSW
TOTAL R-2510B 2,417.3 3,714.6
Station
Stream
DWQ
DWQ
Impact Required
Site Number Structure Name Index No. Rating Status (ft) Mitigation
rom/To 2:1 ft
R-2410C

2 -L-634+10- Roadway Ut to
Cherry
28-103-17 C Sw
P
113.8
227.6
634+85 RT Fill NSW
-L-648+50- Roadwa
Roadway Ut to C Sw
3 650+15 Fill Cherry 28-103-17 NSW P 159.3 318.6
LT/RT Run
-L-743+50- Roadway Old Ford 28-103- C Sw
4 761+90 Fill Swamp 14-1 NSW P 841.6 1683.2
LT/RT
-L-786+20-
dway Ut to
03-
Sw
5A 788+05 F? Latham 14-2 NSW P 107.5 215.0
LT/RT Creek
-L-792+40-
Roadway Ut to
28-103-

S
5B 794+15
Fill Latham 14-2 NSW
w P 72.5 145
LT/RT Creek
-Y31-
0

SC 13+15- Roadway Latham
? 28-103- C Sw P
54
4
108
8
14+60 Fill Creek 14-2 NSW . .
LT/RT
TOTAL R-2510C 1,349.1 2,698.2
PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed Endangered
(PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
lists seven federally protected species for Beaufort County as of the January 29, 2003 listing (Table 7).
In a letter dated, December 7, 2001, the USFWS concurs that the project will have "No Effect" for the
red-cockaded woodpecker, bald eagle, and rough-leaved loosestrife and that the project "May Affect, Not
Likely to Adversely Affect" (MANLTAA) sensitive joint vetch. The USFWS Concurrence letter is
included as an attachment.
NCDOT will resurvey areas of potential habitat in the entire construction corridor for sensitive joint vetch
during the 2005 flowering season as requested by the USFWS.
Table 7. Federally Protected Species
Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status Determination
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis E No Effect
K 's ridle sea turtle Le idoche s kem ii E No Effect
Manatee Trichechus manatus E No Effect
Rough-leaved loosestrife L simachia as erulae olia E No Effect
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucoce halus T No Effect
Sensitive-joint vetch Aesch omen vir 'nica T MANLTAA
Red wolf Canis rujits EXP No Effect
"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant
portion of its range).
°T" denotes Threatened ( a species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable
future throughout all or a significant portion of its range).
"EX?" denotes Experimental (a species that is treated as threatened on public lands and proposed for
listing on private land).
CULTURAL RESOURCES
The potential of the US 17 Improvements to impact cultural resources was evaluated in accordance with
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. Potential effects were
determined using Criteria for Effect and Adverse Effect (36 CFR 800.9) developed by the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation. Concurrence on the eligibility of each property with respect to
inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places and the final determination of effects were made by
the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Copies of all SHPO correspondence and concurrence
forms are found in Appendix B of the DEIS.
FEMA COMPLIANCE
The project has been coordinated with appropriate state and local officials and the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) to assure compliance with FEMA, state, and local floodway regulations.
MITIGATION OPTIONS
The Corps of Engineers had adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a wetland
mitigation policy that embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of
this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of the Waters of the
United States. Mitigation of wetland and surface water impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include:
avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time and compensating
9

for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Executive Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands) and Department of
Transportation Order 56601A (Preservation of the Nations Wetlands), emphasize protection of the
functions and values provided by wetlands. These directives require that new construction in wetlands be
avoided as much as possible and that all practicable measures are taken to minimi a or mitigate impacts
to wetlands.
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and
minimize wetland impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all remaining wetland impacts.
Avoidance measures were taken during the planning and documentation phases; minimization measures
were incorporated as part of the project design.
AVOIDANCE: Delineated, field verified and surveyed per GPS methodology all jurisdictional features
(wetlands, streams, riparian buffers) within the study corridor for the selected alternative. The study
corridor was approximately 1,000 feet in width along new location and 500-feet in width along upgrading
existing. Using these surveyed features, preliminary designs were adjusted to avoid and/or m;nim;tee
impacts to jurisdictional areas. All wetland areas not affected by the project will be protected from
unnecessary encroachment. In direct consultation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and the
State Historic Preservation Office, decisions were made to shift the alignment of widening the existing
roadway to minimize wetland impacts where possible. Individual avoidance items are as follows:
• Bridged stream (S 46) south of SR 1001 (Cherry Run Road).
• Shifted alignment westward to utilize existing roadbed and crossing over Old Ford Swamp.
• No staging of construction equipment or storage of construction supplies will be allowed in wetlands
or near surface waters.
• In-stream Moratorium: NCDOT has committed to avoiding in-stream activities during the spring
migration period of anadromous fish (February 15 through June 15) per the request of the NC
Wildlife Resource Commission and USFWS.
• Removed an interchange from design of existing US 17 and Alternative B south of Chocowinity;
avoided relocation of several residences and reduced impacts to natural systems.
• Revised interchange with NC 33 to avoid relocations of local physicians office and pharmacy.
• Shifted Alternative B east at same interchange to avoid relocations on Jones Circle and Bragaw Lane.
• Closed Grimes Road at historic Rhem Family House to avoid impacts.
• Removed an interchange from design at existing US 17 and Alternative B north of City of
Washington; avoided relocation of several residences, reduced impacts to adjacent natural systems
and avoided the historic Bishop Joseph A. Beebe House.
• Terminated right of way and control of access south of the historic Bishop Joseph A. Beebe House to
avoid impacts.
• Revised the design for Alternative B to avoid the relocation of Paradise Outreach Ministries located
on the east side of existing US 17 approximately north of SR 1509 (Springs Road).
• Shifted SR. 1409 (Wharton Station Road) north at historic Swanner-Cooper House property and
terminated right of way at eastern property line to avoid impacts.
10
.. I.
• Shifted NC 171 north and ended proposed construction at existing ditch at historic Woodmen of the
World Lodge to avoid impacts.
MINIMIZATION: Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce
the adverse impacts. Minimization techniques were implemented as follows:
• This permit application presents the maximum potential impacts currently associated with the
preliminary designs of Sections B and C. Avoidance and minimization measures are being
considered and evaluated for these sections; therefore, actual impacts should be less than those
reported in this document. Design for the latter sections will be coordinated with relevant natural
resource agencies.
• Slopes: It is NCDOT's policy to use 2:1 slopes in wetlands, where it is feasible. Oftentimes, as is the
case with this project, the soils will not support steeper than 3:1 slopes, or the steeper slopes would
require guardrails, which would require a wider footprint to back the guardrail away from traffic.
Therefore, 3:1 slopes are being used where fill slopes intersect with wetlands.
• Best Management Practices: NCDOT has committed that Sediment and Erosion Control Guidelines
for BMPs for Protection of Surface Waters will be adhered to during construction to minimize
potential negative environmental impacts. (see FONSI) NCDOT's "Stream Crossing Guidelines for
Anadromous Fish Passage will be adhered to for this project.
• Sediment and Erosion Control Measures: NCDOT will stipulate that sediment and erosion control
measures not be placed in wetlands unless it is absolutely necessary to place silt fences on wetland
boundaries to contain erosion caused by the sheet flow of water. This commitment will be
incorporated into the construction contract awarded for the proposed project. "High Quality Waters
(HQW) Erosion Control Guidelines" will be adhered to throughout construction.
• Drainage:
Bridge Deck Drains - Deck drains on bridges will be directed away from open water and released
into Zone 2 of the riparian buffer.
Road Drainage - Road drainage will flow through grassed buffers before entering the streams.
• Clearing: Clearing Method III (clearing and grubbing of vegetation to 10 feet beyond the
construction limits) will be used.
• Revegetation: Within 15 days of construction completion, vegetation will be reestablished on exposed
areas with judicious use of pesticide and herbicide.
• Precautionary Guidelines for General Construction in Areas Which May Be Used by the West Indian
Manatee in North Carolina will be utilized for this project.
• Temporary Work Bridges: Temporary work bridges and barges will be used during construction of
the bridge over the Tar-Pamlico River, and adjoining wetlands, to minimise impacts to jurisdictional
waters and wetlands.
• In the area south of NC 33 and east of Chocowinity, the entire alignment was shifted westward to
minimize a parallel crossing through a large wetland (29) maintaining continuity of the natural
system. Designed a perpendicular crossing of the northern most finger of the same wetland.
• Reduced median width from 46 feet to 10 feet for approximately 500 feet prior to beginning of bridge
over Tar/Pamlico River.
11
• Extended Tar/Pamlico Bridge over all open water, adjacent riparian buffers and natural wetland
systems.
• Additional bridging of Chocowmity Creek at the NC 33 interchange was investigated. The design of
Ramp C was tightened and the culvert length was shortened to reduce impacts to Chocowinity Creek
and associated wetlands.
• Compressed interchange at US 264 to minimise community cohesion and relocation impacts to
Maryanna Mobile Estates. A second entrance was also provided into the community.
• Terminated proposed construction limits at existing ditch to maintain historic oak trees and minimize
impacts at historic J.C. Swanner House.
COMPENSATION: The primary emphasis of the mitigation is to reestablish a condition similar to that,
which would have existed if the project were not built. Mitigation is limited to reasonable expenditures
and practicable considerations related to highway operation. Mitigation is generally accomplished
through a combination of methods designed to replace wetland and stream functions and values lost as a
result of construction of the project. These methods consist of creation of new wetlands from uplands,
borrow pits, and other non-wetland areas; restoration of wetlands; enhancement of existing wetlands; and
relocation and restoration of streams. NCDOT requests to use EEP for the proposed impacts R-2510.
Additionally, NCDOT is currently investigating five on-site mitigation opportunities (one in section A,
three in section B, and one in section C) to use for R-2510. When these sites are designed and approved
for compensatory mitigation, NCDOT will send EEP a revised request letter exhibiting the modifications
to the original letter dated April 29, 2005.
FHWA STEP DOWN COMPLL4NCE: All compensatory mitigation must be in compliance with 23
CFR Part 777.9, "Mitigation of Impacts" that describes the actions that should be followed to qualify for
Federal-aid highway funding. This process is known as the FHWA "Step Down" procedures:
1. Consideration must be given to mitigation within the right-of-way and should include the
enhancement of existing wetlands and the creation of new wetlands in the highway median, borrow
pit areas, interchange areas and along the roadside.
2. Where mitigation within the right-of-way does not fully offset wetland losses, compensatory
mitigation may be conducted outside the right-of-way including enhancement, creation, and
preservation.
Compensatory Wetland Mitigation: There are 1.34 acres of proposed riverine wetlands and 3.04 acres
of proposed non-riverine wetlands impacted by the construction of R-251 OA. There are an estimated 7.19
acres of riverine wetlands and 0.39 acre of non riverine wetlands impacted by the construction of R-
2510B&C. NCDOT proposes to use EEP to mitigate for these impacts. A copy of the EEP acceptance
letter dated April 29, 2005 is attached to this application.
Compensatory Stream Mitigation: There are 478 feet of proposed impacts to streams associated with
section A. There are an estimated 3,764.8 feet of impacts to streams associated with sections B&C.
NCDOT proposes to use EEP to mitigate for these impacts. The EEP acceptance letter was received on
April 29, 2005.
Tar-Pamlico Buffer Mitigation: NCDOT proposes to mitigate for the Tar Pamlico Buffer impacts by
using the EEP for the 8.79 acres of impacts. Total buffer impacts for R-2510 are 481,841.5 sq.ft. (11.06
acres). Due to the fact that the 2.27 acres of Tar-Pamlico buffer have already been accounted for by the
wetland impacts, NCDOT proposes to mitigate for the remaining 8.79 acres. The square footage for each
zone is summarized in Table 8.
12
Table R_ Summarv of Tar-Pamlico Buffer Impacts
Section Zone 1 s .ft. Zone 2 s .ft.
R-2510A final 53,505.3 30,424.8
-R-2510B(estimated) 102,571.9 69,936.5
R-2510C estimated 78,040.5 48,789.6
Total 234,117.7 149,150.9
On-site Mitigation: NCDOT is currently investigating five sites for onsite stream restoration for this
project. One is located in section A, three in section B, and one in section C. Based on preliminary
reports, these sites may provide NCDOT with the following mitigation credits (these amounts may
change during the planning and design process):
Section A
• Site 18 -Approximately 1,100 feet of stream restoration and an undetermined amount of buffer
reforestation credits.
Section B
• Site 13 - Approximately 760 feet of stream restoration and 2.3 acres of buffer reforestation. This site
is located on city-owned property and there is a possibility this site could be dropped.
• Site 12 - Approximately 1,740 feet of stream restoration and 4.0 acres of buffer reforestation.
• Site 8 - Approximately 2,000 feet of stream restoration and 4.6 acres of buffer reforestation.
Section C
• Site 6 - Approximately 1,400 feet of stream restoration and 3.2 acres of buffer reforestation.
When these sites are designed and approved for compensatory mitigation, NCDOT will send EEP a
revised request letter exhibiting the modifications to the original letter dated April 29, 2005.
Indirect and Cumulative Effects: The Qualitative Indirect and Cumulative Effects Assessment for R-
2510 has been completed. State and federal environmental regulations should help minimize any other
potential negative indirect impacts this project could have upon other notable features. Areas along the
Tar/Pamlico River and the southwestern extent of the Growth Impact Study Area (GISA) are unfavorable
for development. Furthermore, proposed access control along the alignment on new location should
temper some of the cumulative effects. Impacts to AECs and other notable features will more likely be the
result of direct impacts related to the construction of TIP R-2510, and less the result of indirect impacts
such as the potential future development of land. Additional copies of the assessment are available upon
request.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Individual 404 Permit as required for the above
described activities. We are also hereby requesting a 401 Major Water Quality Certification from the
NCDWQ. In compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAA we have enclosed a check for $475.00
to act as payment for processing the Section 401 permit application. We are providing seven copies of this
application to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, NCDWQ, for their
review.
A CAMA Major Development Permit application is being submitted under separate cover to the NC
Division of Coastal Management.
13
A stormwater management plan and one copy of permit drawings were submitted under separate cover to
the NC Division of Water Quality - Stormwater Management.
A Coast Guard permit application is being submitted to the Commander of the Fifth Coast Guard District
under separate cover.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Mr. Chris Underwood at (919) 715-
1451.
Sincerely,
11--
Gr'Grego .Thorpe,
Environmental Management Director
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Cc: W/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ (7 copies)
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Ms. Becky Fox, USEPA - Whittier, NC
Mr. Ronald Mikulak, USEPA - Atlanta, GA
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Michael Street, NCDMF
Mr. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
Mr. Bill Arrington, NCDCM
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Njoroge W. Wainaina, State Engineering Geologist, P.E., Geotechnical Unit
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer
Mr. Jay Johnson, DEO, Division 2
W/o attachment
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington (Cover Letter Only)
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Ms. Beth Harmon, EEP
Ms. Laurie P. Smith, CPA, NCDOT, Program Management
Mr. Brian Yamamoto, P.E., PDEA
Mr. Carl Goode, P.E., PDEA-OHE
14