20071551 Ver 3_401 Application_20131113

T14, -i
WM;t 01- ISS I V3 'LL4
Wetland and Natural Resources
Consultants, Inc.
Agent Authorization
;�P,
The undersigned, a representative of the current landowner of the property identified
below, hereby authorize Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants to assist with the
collection, preparation, and submittal of information necessary for the processing of
Jurisdictional and /or Permit Verification requests and their associated Water Quality
Certification as regulated under the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act.
Federal and State agents are authorized to be on said property when accompanied by
Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants staff.
Property Owner / Applicant: REDUS C/O Wells Fargo - Commercial Owned Real Estate
Contact Name: Pat Greathouse
Street Address / PO Box: 301 S. College Street, Fourth Floor
City, State, Zip Code: Charlotte, NC 28202
Phone / Fax Number:
Project Name: Christenbury Four Comers
Property Street Address: Derita Road and Concord Mills Blvd.
NCDWQ #07 -1551 USACE SAW-2007-2970-313
County and Tax PIN:
Owner / Applicant Signature:
Date: "
�� V 2'v 101,E
Sparta Office
170Dew Drop Rd, Sparta, NC 28675

�oF WArF9 G
v
o <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
FZ Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number: 3890
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
[]Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Christenbury Four Comers USACE SAW 2007 - 2970 -313: NCDWQ #07 -1551
2b. County:
Cabarrus
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Concord
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
REDUS Commercial Owned Real Estate
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
REDUS Commercial Owned Real Estate, ATTN Pat Greathouse
3d. Street address:
301 South College Street, Fourth Floor
3e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
REDUS Commercial Owned Real Estate, ATTN Pat Greathouse
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
301 South College Street, Fourth Floor
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Christopher Huysman
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants
5c. Street address:
170 Dew Drop Rd
5d. City, state, zip:
Sparta, NC 28675
5e. Telephone no.:
336 / 406 -0906
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Chds.Huysman @wetland- consultants.com
Page 2 of 12

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Cabarrus County 4589378441
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): - if you can't get
Latitude: 35.3771 Longitude: 80.7339
these, just include a very good vicinity map
1c. Property size:
90.4 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water, (stream, river, etc.) to
UT of Clarke Creek/Rocky River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin: Broad River map is available at
Yadkin
http: / /h2o.enr.state.nc.us /admin /maps/
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Highly disturbed agricultural land. NC DW R staff (Alan Johnson) visited the site on October 4, 2013 and commented that
mitigation requirement from the prior authorization was sufficient for the project.
The project was permitted in 2007 but impacts were not completed prior to the expiration. The required stormwater
management pond is functional and the required mitigation obligation has been satisfied for the entire site.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
No wetlands
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Estimated length 1,600 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Development of building pads, parking lots, stormwater management facilities for a large planned commercial
development. Two of the four comers have been completely developed and the stormwater management facilities are
installed and functional. The remaining two parcels are east of Derita Road. The anticipated land use remains the same.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project is a large commercial development including anchor stores and outparcels.' Heavy construction
equipment will be utilized. Site is subject to a strictly enforced local erosion control ordinance.
The two parcels located west of Derita Road have been completed. The undeveloped parcels contain the stormwater
management facility and are undisturbed.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes [:1 No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Johnson and Lund
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Rindner
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
See USACE SAW AID 2007 - 2970 -313 and NCDWQ # 07 -1551
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If then; are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
NWP #39
UT of Clarke
Creek
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
® DWQ
g'
300'
S2 ®P ❑ T
same
same
❑ PER
® INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
4'
336'
S3 ®P ❑ T
same
same
❑ PER
® INT
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
3'
403'
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
1,039'
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 12

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (P), or
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
❑P [IT
02 ❑P [IT
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then
you MUST fill out Section D
of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse
❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
61 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P [IT
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 12

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Permanent impacts to important intermittent streams are limited to 300 linear feet. The remaining stream impacts are to
unimportant intermittent streams based on USACE and NCDENR. The proposed impacts to streams are required to
develop flat pads for commercial development, parking, roads, pedestrian areas, and related engineering and design
requirements on this commercially zoned property at a major intersection of two thoroughfares. Impacts to Clarke Creek
tributary have been avoided.
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Significant buffers along Clarke Creek are provided in accordance with local ordinances. Compliance with buffer and
stormwater requirements are greatly enhanced by local planning and engineering department oversight tied to site plan
approvals. In addition, the proposed scope of the development was significantly reduced to allow for the development of
required stormwater management facilities and to allow the RSOD buffers.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: See attached reciept
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
E] Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
Max 70 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Since the project is commercial, impervious is expected to greatly exceed 20% impervious. However, Concord has
adopted Phase II NPDES Stormwater Requirements, plus detention of the 10 year and 24 hour storm predevelopment
rates. The stormwater management plan will be subject to review and approval by the City of Concord.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Concord
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state- implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Concord has adopted Phase II NPDES Stormwater Requirements, plus detention of the 10 year and 24 hour storm
predevelopment rates. The stormwater management plan will be subject to review and approval by the City of Concord. In
addition, perennial streams such as Clarke Creek are subject to RSOD buffer requirements as depicted on the plan.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal facilities
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program Website (NHP Map Viewer)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
F[:l Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
None
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Mecklenburg County GIS
Chris Huysman
November 14, 2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12

f� - ���� ✓V', �'� �.� �i =���a p�� s"�r'� �r� l !� tai. �'� iti.✓ r /i,
• ,?t� .�� e�. \� 4� i \\ •���,�``` %.v-' " ,I - S�! � ' �U t —:��' ...: j � 1, �� ' ; `\` •' /fr
el
(�;_i/rA `\ jai _ _ , , i Ate• ! 'f' V( �� %
"rte,
,"-n "4( �j -� '��Y '��i• '���',���u, ��; {A � �[J� �, I �,� l� I�
lr �> -`::1 � \t \, { � �" 11•`,1 � /f�A Oti, ,+ i I J�� � „1; �'`� , j � '- ��.•�� ��'\ � , �� 1 � r .\
i rrt r � J'' Jae' �` r� •�A- � "*'^ .- • � � ° ' � ° �V' �� ''�'� C? j
, Christenbury Comers ,' 1
4 ,4 i \• J,
Cabarrus County, NC
Derita Rd.
Clarke Creek -�-
�/ %�`' •` a ; �', : , l` 5Y';% %� c. }� Index # 13 -17 -4
C
Classification
o ss� \
Class Date 07/01/73
�w N 35.3771:
, �' '; _ :�� �� , _�� • � \,, }'' �� v �� < � �' }, ii' � 339 "•�,-
90.4 ac
�� � I `:Y�' a— � lLi_! � � ��� - � �,ltri i :'Ci�J 'L .4 �y� _ _'^' ` � \` ' , l� ��`•,�� �•� t � J" --..J�
''; �_ Jy .ate• -�,' 1 ��,� �� `} �V ( ` /lf' / • (� f�....•.
'tl � � � �, fir.. -�� �f ) \�, y. �''`��1 `.�- —��Js) �,� j� mil _ ;� C�" �ti\ 1� � , t '�i'r ✓� �� �t� ��,.�
! • . v �� .r,,`�+.a✓ ll • t �'V r �':A �t ��.r; �� �I(�� C\� �.: 1 (r'r { I,'
i"X ay \\
' ` ' : ('1\ -. _ � '� .�- �- •,�,.E�,�, .. `�� =...� \-�`.� -111 �1 �:,"i \:��._.1. I.�C�� ...., �,, • ;�,,/ � �`. . -, \ \\ ``�.Esa \`
r 46) /.'�'� ,l. � iijL. ...., v��•�l�j�i`:� l�,t ��c�^� "���`'i�l�li����S�i�� �� ��.. I ,� \�i�t �� ',���" �1{ ..^'V`�'
(2 (r ;<
� �, • as •�. �,. � ..�� ��, �, � • �. i �i 1�\ ��`' >/; ,, ,�� c � - • �" - t .
Cent ' i•) _ �� �� -.._� /'(� ,y� f,..��,,'�G {�,�, i i ti , +`i `c b 1 ti i 4� -s- .,VA
X, � , ','mac' �, 1 \ 1 v, `{! ,;.1y " -'1 ,' ol� ''f,� . -.'`^� r /�"v` � � �• ,�11, I

Soil Map — Cabarrus County, North Carolina, and Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
3
v
8
� 35° 22'50"N
�i
8
N
N
8
M
8
a
R,
K
v
0
0
v
rn
M
1400 524500 524600 524700 524800 524900 525000
3
N
N1
V
11/7/2013
Page 1 of 4
35° 22'14'N

Soil Map— Cabanus County, North Carolina, and Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
C Area of Interest (AOI)
Solis
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
®
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
()
Blowout
®
Borrow Pit
d
Clay Spot
(`t
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
-_
Gravelly Spot
Background
Landfill
Aerial Photography
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
t
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
0
Perennial Water
V
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
�.�
Sandy Spot
4�
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
1@
Spoil Area
Water Features
Stony Spot
Streams and Canals
Very Stony Spot
}4{
Wet Spot
d
Other
•0
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
}4{
Rails
�y
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Mayor Roads
-_
Local Roads
Background
®
Aerial Photography
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http : /twebsoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal -area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA -NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 12, Sep 11, 2012
Soil Survey Area: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 12, Jul 6, 2012
Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey area.
These survey areas may have been mapped at different scales, with
a different land use in mind, at different times, or at different levels
of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil properties, and
interpretations that do not completely agree across soil survey area
boundaries.
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 11, 2011 —Mar 2,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
11 /7/2013
Page 2 of 4

Soil Map- CabaRvs County, North Carolina, and Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Cabarrus County, North Carolina (NCO25)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of A01
ChA
Chewacla sandy loam, 0 to 2
17.4
5.4%
EnD
percent slopes, frequently
24.0
7.5%
IrB
flooded
0.1
0.0%
COB
Coronaca clay loam, 2 to 8
0.7
0.2%
MO
percent slopes
12.5
3.9%
CuB2
Cullen clay loam, 2 to 8 percent
19.1
5.9%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
slopes, moderately eroded
21.9%
Totals for Area of Interest
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent
X6.9
8.4%
slopes
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15
74.1
23.0%
percent slopes
IdB
Iredell loam, 2 to 6 percent
0.9
0.3%
slopes
MeB
Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8
52.0
16.1%
percent slopes
MeD
Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15
26.2
8.1%
percent slopes
PoB
Poindexter loam, 2 to 8 percent
10.6
3.3%
slopes
POD
Poindexter loam, 8 to 15
3.1
1.0%
percent slopes
PoF
Poindexter loam, 15 to 45
17.8
5.5%
percent slopes
W
Water
2.7
0.8%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
251.61
78.1%
Totals for Area of Interest
322.4
100.0%
Mecklenburg County, North Carotins (NC119)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in A01
Percent of A01
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
6.5
2.0%
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
24.0
7.5%
IrB
Iredell fine sandy loam, 1 to 8
percent slopes
0.1
0.0%
MeB
Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2
to 8 percent slopes
15.1
4.7%
MO
Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
12.5
3.9%
WkD
Wilkes loam, 8 to 15 percent
slopes
12.5
3.9%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area
70.7
21.9%
Totals for Area of Interest
322.4
100.0%
usDA Natural Resources -Web Soil Survey 11/7/2013
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4

MAPO WEST
•:; : 400 m
Al I 1200 ft
.f
I I
If
t f
f
I~Qnftrd
I
l M Atlpv�riC
y � r
, F
_A#,
tiry
LA
All CIO
_ ,v
0 200 7 UMI CiUaost Inc. \ �' 0' ► 2tad N1AVTEQ

G
G=O.
10
Fl
ti
4 4P
j
35.37710N, 80.7339OW (WGS84/NAD83)
USGS Kannapolls Quad
611X
N
WA
wom".
-,, 7-k
CHRISTENBURY
APPROXIMATE SITE
LOCATION

a a _ a
rL
n ,{.64..ry i bbl y f
t ' )
p r f f
x�J .
t C'
yP
Vr
E7, �.
l., ..^ .. +. � '.yj % •'',.h �5.� }fit;
5
J �.

w• TOP
a Wr-. w taa
em
h 'T _ _ y •. w Z Sin 5.
mp
� n,. :.•t� � wag.° F . ' '*� � � �, i 4�' ,.. ` �r�q �; ; °'� �. � ��x•,a
�.4w-ns r k7 i. , . t��E � S {�'y< c4). '.. %• t�- d� °- � ;"g4. ° � � %S ��.}t .w' ,,.. •,, 'zq.+q S" eye" '� '�;�r �I�,,,, � � b
r �
�q�we a'xp "y°'s y yJ
5. �'• is
i�
° � A � •? � S1" t' YA�I�° 4 �'�° Y p 'i..r�
oval
7""
.+'Fa.
rA
't:.a+.Y.. "E`s'��• ` � 9k Kq� }���i�� � � _. Px °n.Y x� ��� ... '�' � i �� �,#
_ k 1• x "� Ptd .� y c F ..
to
-i qg£ - ^¢•' 1' A°A,�¢ %i$' ., i (.A 48 •i 8 1 Fa 4 a'
'� T. Z "*K�' *'4 �� y �y �d77•• l���c�H� �k �kr,'Ea i y{�+<fi�. �FT�y'4�[' .. _ �,'-� ` i i
z?" %°.'s
h: 'S. }•�< !'�e�aJ�' ?��. <' a J ° e,.., <�Fh' ��xuk t ►! �� ,'(Y.... "�7y'l' '�
n .K. «� ��� i ,Yt'• r y,# tit• '�` p � � � ^tom

I'� PRROXIMATE MAP - WATERS OF THE US t
,
,-.*FOR SURVEY AND STUDY PURPOSES ONLY �
SUBJECT TO U.SJLC.E. VERIFICATION
8
"A ": LOCATE C-L & j '
WIDTH OF PER. y
STREAM
Ll. - 8: PER. STRM
El - ].2: PER. STRM
Fl - 6: INT. STRM
Jl - 19: WETLAND
Rl - 7: PER. STRM
DI
f �rr
t�
l5 t = �-. .• yr - y5 . .t �_ �r t "A- LOCATE C•L &
j Nl(v) - 9: WETLAND SLOUGH _ tj �j WIDTH OF PER.
I rdor or �} ? 1 ti STREAM
K16 - 29: INT. STREAM
I wNik N.,
END. SECTION
A e r
`•,�'_. °- ".,,�� —` r �- - �'_�``.l rr Sri �� s 1 rr _.t' � M1 _ 5/K1-16
r `fr INT. STREAM
r' r
`� ' _ �jt � -`' �' •a' 1,�. ve
`GRADE1�1
—jf_ ` STORM WATER
CONVEYANCE/EPH. DRAINAGE
X746,
CHRISTENSURY
r INT. STREAM El
\ G
WETLAND AND STREAM
,,�a �, DELINEATION
J Ql - 24: PER. STRM ` ,. 12x4-06
(revised 1.15.07 per surveyor
_i5�ft`��,,�y ' �� coordination)
S/27/07 USACE
WATER CONVEYANCE -- '`-° .�ti`., , . � ,�.� ,f ' ' 6/27/07 NCDENR
1

CHRISTENBURY 4- CORNERS UNDISTURBED
EXISTING CONDITIONS RSOO Bu�ER
CESI PROJECT NO. 061111.035
DATE: 08 -30 -07
ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - � •' "'� l l t � �
! f PLAMNERS NSPE PE'NC ACM NSPS , Y ice' t_ • 't t' \. %r_
NCSS ASHE ASCE :-
,c
i PA Eft 20
` > COIICOItD. NC 2E025-OZ66 S � ���„�r�,t�Y —y�,� i � r•�^1 � t, !
PMEVT9EAVICES pnC \ -?
/'�� /r�.�:s 3� =.i \\
/ C,✓ rt• ,.� \
Q CIS 2007 \
PORTANT)NTERMITTENT STREAM
% �' _ Yl� ,'�~_ t t ,' 1 `390' MAXIMUM STURBED !t
UNIMPORTANT \
INTERMg7NT STREAM
Y ti
� { r M 1 —K 16
6.07' DISTVRBEIQ
UNIMOORTANT r r r� t�•, + /, T
INTERMITTENT STREAM,
101 -010 ' ,{ ,t J �—� —'�:� tr;t / 'z t l V
160.78' DISTURBED ,� ,,: • ,`'� _ — ;` 4.` 4 e c (��' , `. `�, ` , i
UNIMPbRTANT
INTERMITTENT STREAM--'
_� A
242.37' DI$TURBIE#1 so.7RES ` —�-
�` (OICtUlA 4 ARIA IN O)9(Ir t ,
of OERffA,RD)
,4' CLOG # ... ,„ a.�,��`� � !t i _ , -.• !' le•+ :.z- _ ,' _ _' y ~ � � - `\� ' �4 r�` ~ .''�
TOTAL J�i,. ^.
ID
vl
GIMP ANT''�r •t i r t` , +1 J $E CORNER
1 TRACT
PERENNIAL STREAM �� ! r rN
01 -021 `�INCIAJOI ARFA
NO DISTURBANCE DES.
'15p'�"' ti t,A�, �l,} �, %' \ \\ - GRAPHIC SCALE
-4W o No 400
IN FEET
IL v � � I I inch = 400 it

CHRISTENBURY 4--CORNERS
OVERALL SITE PLAN
CESI PROJECT NO., 061111,035 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT RMP
DATE: 08-30-07 tOR NE & NW OORNERS
ENGINEERS — SURVEYORS
PLANNERS NSPE PENC ACSM NSPS
NCSS ASHE ASCE
45 SPRN ff.
FBI PA am m
IC 28Ul-M
VICES F PROPOSED RETAINING WAI1L
0 CM 2W
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMP�
I
I
UNIMPORTANT
INTERMITTENT STREAM
01-010
UNIMPORTANT
INTERMIT
INTERMITTENT STREAM
% . ,p I'l -pi 6
PERENP41AL STREAM JL�N
01-021
NO DISTURBANCE
PROPOSED
74#
4 s?
Y
ti CGS
403.15 LF. OF
UNIMPORTANT STREAM IMPACT
PROPOSO REY*IKG WALL
v13
~A lc-
41
UNDISTURBED
\\RSOD BUFFER
UM 300' OF IMPACT
ALO &CENTERUNE
N,
IMPORTANT li4TEhqMNT STREAM
j'i'l; K 2 9
U 'MP
NI ORTANT
INTERmuft, STREAM
Ml-K16
�TOWAWATER MANAGEMENT BMP
F& SE CORNER
GRAPHIC SCALE
wo 0 200 400
IN FEET
1 inch = 400 ft,

Nw
CHRISTENBURY �' ' ` 2�
CORNER
�C PROJE :Y. A_
•�` jr �1INDI
B
,RSOD bU
WALL
SNIP
INTIf$k1T
�•"' (fl \ \� \� " �'�¢F p pJ 1`� _•rte `` -�'� � jt / / y Q \e �.`�'".'` �* �
� c >
300 OME
C LINE
y 't
���„ y �` �\ • 1 r ff / UN
zk ISO
ISO
1

CHRISTENBURY 47 ,CORNERS
NW do NE CORHJERS BMP PLA
CESI PROJECT 0. 061111.0
DATE: 08 -3/0-07
=ice ENGINEERS — SURVEYORS` — V` !
/ PLANNERS NSPE PENC?GSM*SPS(
NCSS ASHE ASCE , •Z`�' , ;v , .`
0 spw sr. w
# PA. soot see
aolcal% me sets
Bevel PALM SERVICES '0 s, ` r ; f„ X
Via° r .c %"
/ o c® no
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMF(
UNDISTURBED
.RSOD BUFFER
SWM NOTE: \
' THIS OMP 5 DESIGNED TO CONTROL \
STORMWATER RUNOFF (QUALITY & \
a / \ QUAMiTY) FROM FULLY DEVELOPED
! GR HIC SCALE -
�
f d 120 0 w 120
FEET )
f
PROP ED R NO 1 inch 120 ft

CHRI RY 4 -COR \ \
%CO E SITE PUaj
I 0. 061
DATE ' � 1� •! � � /' � a \ \ \� ,� ta" _ swl+ NOTEi ,
�• /% / �/' , t DUAL" MID QUAM1fY � R \
K , �.oF r EIVCIN — SU iNIS Sm WILL BE "W OR
cbgf.? ESPS \ t
NO STREAM OR WEnAA IMP
PROPOSED ON THIS PARCEL
Q5 S�j
I -c C�5
� Q i. /..""Y , -� � ti`s .� � � ` • -ti ` �� � `` - �l -•/
GRAPHIC CALE
TAIL :. � ,.A1Sb o 78 150
rosoc �
^ /1 L
_ ~------- __LEV
RD
MILLS BpULEVAD -- — '' ( h ,� 150, it.

GHRIT Y 4 -ERNE ' ° Qom. -x--�
COR`�IR , PLAN = --
C R61JECT m owl- . ��T��� � �r
SQ
f j ` PLAN -N
Nc
#' r1vr SBRVICES \ n _ CONCORD MILLS BOULEV 6
Tp4FCE
4 AC
000 AIL �4�'T� f '/ / i NO STREAM OR WETLAND 1MMR44CT5
PROPOSED ON THIS PARCM
,yam r
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMP \
GRAPHIC SCALE
—10 O 60 120
IN FEET
\ ED RETAINING WALL ` ,
/ �^ i inch = 120 it.

>,
9�
--- _ _ ONCORI) MILLS bOUiI►RD
RVEVO
PEW N4. J
,•lam :� ^°' ' �
4` 1 I
_ f
_ c
672 r
i
SWM i 1 \ NOTES
THS
TMs eMP s DfSKiNED To cormtoL
` STORMWAM RUNOFF (QUAM &
FRO
QU M FULLY DEVELOPED
CD
Ica
_ _ SCALE
' -- _ _ — - GRAPH
- —too 0
_ - - -_ — —
IN FEET )
== 1 inch = 100 M

STOR ME CHRISTENBURY 4C-CORNERS
_
: P v `
SW CORNER SITt PLAN
CESI PROJECT NO, 061111.035
DATE: 08 -30 -07
ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS
PLANNr�g NSPE PENC AGSM NSfSS \ �\ -• _ 1,
NCSS ASNE ASCE
Z: PAS ON
I �.; j. ,+
t` ra�vrssxvccs PN011B gee -ego• l
O as mot
UNIMPORTANT i '`"o' //� i/ \` , ;\ `\` `r l ' / �j ; a`' I J {✓ ` �rj'+ �' '
INTERMITTENT STREAM
UNDISTURBED
RSOD BUFFER
.PERENNIAL SW.EAM
NO DISTURBANCE + �. -
PROPOSED , �v 1- `
UNIMPORTANT
INTERMITTENT STREAM �` ` / -200
01 -010 \ %
OF
\ s°
403.15' OF IMPACT TO / �i %�'` `(`IN"1'e) 26-6 �'�TA /•
UNIMPORTANT INTERMITTENT STREAM 2� !'tti'° ^�

CHRISTENBURY 4- CORNERS
SW CORNER BMP PLAN
CESI PROJECT NO. 061111.035
DATE: 08 -30 -07
ENGINEERS — SURVEYORS —
PLANNERS NSPE PENC•ACSMAINSPS
NCSS ASHE ASCE
CESI � .
IAND MVBLOPI V [ sE+xvccEs °nab �7ot°` 74 7i�
o cm 2007 4y
SWM NOTE'
TNIS BMP IS DESIGNED TO 2% CONTROL
SfORMWATER RUNOFF (QUALITY &
ODUFROM FULLY DEVELOPED
RM
STnRMWATER MANAGEMENT BMP
Ad
�J
m W-.61m
' o
\ DI ��Ea\ a O
RkOD R
\
vfi
In
}
66
V.
i

CHRISTENBURY 4-CORNERS
OVERALL STREAM IMPACT SUMMARY
CESI PROJECT NO, 061111,035
DATE: 08-30-07
ENGINEERS — SURVEYORS —
PLANNERS NSPE PENC AGSM NSPS
NOSS ASHE ASCE
45 SP� St.
P A 299
CESI No now-4m
LAM Di VEwpmv,-r sEitvicEs MM, =5"
0 mm
STREAM IMPACTS SUMMARY
SITE J-PERENNIAL
STREAM
IMPACTS (FT )j
JIMPORTANT INTERMITTENTIUNIM13ORTANT
STREAM IMPACTS (FT)
INTERMITTENT
STREAM IMPACTS (FT)
TOTAL
(FT)
SE NE
0
0
0
0
0 403.15
403.15
TOTAL
0 M"AX.

• • M1 - 5 & K1 - 16
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 11 -28 -U6 Project: PAKAUISE - CHKIS I LNHUK Latitude: 35.311 N
Evaluator: I UUU WAKKtN Site: Longitude: tl X339 V
TOW Points. 19 MECKtNtiUR(A CAUAKKU Other USE'S KANNANU1.15 UUAI
Stmanr is at feast irdenrutterd County: a 9. (quad Name.:
d 2 19 orperenniad if a 30
A. Geomo o subtotal = 12 1
Absent
Wean
Moderate
2
Stronq
1e.. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
2
16. Leaflitter
3
2. Sinuosity
0
1
17. Sedanent on plants or debris
2
1 0.5
3
3. In- channel structure: rtffle -pool sequence
0
1
0.5
2
1.5
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorb
0
1
26. biacaobenthos (*tom dwersity acrd abundance)
2
101
3
5. Activefrelic tioodplain
rol
1.5
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
101
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
0.5
2
3
B. Recent alluvial deposits
FAC - O.S. FACW = 0.75. OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0. Other 4 0
14
1
2
3
9a Nahuallevees
101
1
2
3
10. iHmWcuts
0
1
2
3
11. Grade controls
0
1
1.5
12. Natural valley or drain a
0
0.5
1
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS Wrap or other doctunenied
evidence.
No = 0
r
Yes = 3
--
'Man-nude dt*m are not raped. see discussions m manual
R I.4iaMlwiw♦ ra. - 3 %
14. Grosmdwater flow/discharge
0
1
1
2
3
15. Water In channel and > 48 hrs since rein. or
Water in channel - or r season
0
1
2
3
16. Leaflitter
1.5
1
IIA
0
17. Sedanent on plants or debris
0
1 0.5
L 1
1.5
16. Omenle debris lines or piles (Wrack bnes )
0
0.5
1
1.5
19. Hydnc sods (redoximorphic feetures) present?
No = 0
Yes = 1.5
t^ Rin4s7u Noti total = 4 1
Fibrous mats in channel
3
2
1
0
21D. Rooted plants in channel
3
2
0
22. Crayfth
0
Im
1
1.5
23. Bivalves
1
2
3
24. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. AnnAblens
0
0.5
1.5
26. biacaobenthos (*tom dwersity acrd abundance)
101
0.5
1
1.5
27. Filamentous at
0
101-
1
2
3
26. h'on oxidbIng becteriaMu s.
0
0.5
1
1.5
29 P. Wetland plants in strewrlbed
FAC - O.S. FACW = 0.75. OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0. Other 4 0
Rom 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland plants Item 20 focuses on fie presence of aQuaft or wenand crams.
Sketch
Notes- (use back scle of this form for additional notes.)

K1b - 29
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 11- Zt3 -OG Project: NAKAUISh- CHKISItNHUK Latitude: -35.3t/ N
EValuator: 1 UUU WAKKtN Site: Longitude: 8U-1-339 V`
Total Points: Other USUS KANNAPULIS QUA!
S6eam is of feast bdw..rff m 1S County: MEC:KLNBUKU& C;ABAKKU e.g. Quad Name:
Wk 19 or perennial if z 30
A. Geomo olo subtotal = 14
Absent
Weak
Moderate
3
Strom
1. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
2
18. Leafider
3
2 Sinuosity
0
1
0
2
0
3
3. in- channel structure: rift-pool sequence
0
1
0
2
w
3
4. Sod texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
26. Macrobe the malt d*wsvty and abundance)
2
101
3
5_ Activefreiic floodplain
1.5
t
2
3
6- Depositional bars or benches
0
3
1
0
2
3
7_ Braided channel
0
FAC a 0.5. FACW - 0.75: OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2 0. Other A 0
i
2
3
B. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
9 a Natural levees
0
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
11. Grade controls
0
134
1
1.5
12. Natural vakW or drainageway
0
0.5
1
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or MRCS neap or other documented
evidence.
M_o=_01
Yes = 3
- Man -made cOtdves are not rated: see Osoussions m menus+
Q L&A..J.. 1 /.5
14. Groundwater floWdisellaW
3
2
2
3
15. Water to channel and r 48 hre since rein. or
Water In channel -- dry or arowho season
0
1
1
2
3
18. Leafider
1.5
1.5
0.5
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
18. Ownle debris lines or pMs (Wrack hnes)
0
0.5
w
1.5
18. c sods (redoxiinorphic features) present?
No 0
Yes - 1.5
r pi#%L-ww fQ62 h&AfM1 = 6.5 1
Fibrous roots in channel
3
2
1
0
21 . Rooted pWft in dwnel
3
1
0
22. Cmyfth
0
0.5
1.5
23, Bivalves
01
1
2
3
24. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
25, Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
26. Macrobe the malt d*wsvty and abundance)
101
0.5
1
1.5
27. Fdamentma a
Lai
1
2
3
28. Iron oxidizing becteriaMu e
0
0.5
1
1.5
29 D. Wetland PWO in streembed
FAC a 0.5. FACW - 0.75: OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2 0. Other A 0
Rims 2D and 21 fma on 0w oresenoe or upland oUr+ts Rem 29 mouses on tyre presence or aquaoo or weaana crarrm
Sketch
No*w lust back sift Offs form for additooW nates.p

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
PmjecUSite: PARADISE - CHRISTENBURY
D : 11,27-06
ApplicanUOwner
County: NIECK/CABARRUS
InVestigator TODD WARREN & NICK NELSON
State: No
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ✓ Yes No
Community ID: UPLAND
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No ✓
Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No ✓
Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
SHRUB
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
Dominant Plant Spg ft Stratum Indicator
1 Lrgoidambarsbra fta
TREE
FAO+
g
2. Plaafaaas oaddentaBs
TREE
FACW-
10
3 Rona maffillam
SHRUB
UPL
11
4.Vsmoafaaa* MHB
HERB
FACU-
12
5.
Depth to Free Water In Pit: N/A (in.)
Local Soil Survey Data
13
6.
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.)
Other (Explain In Remarks)
14.
7.
15.
8.
16
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC -).
Z4 OR 50%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
4' Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream. Lake, or Tide Gauge
Primary Indicators:
✓ Aerial Photographs
Inundated
Other
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ No Recorded Data Available
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations:
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (In.)
Oxidized Root Channels In Upper 12-
Water- Stained leaves
Depth to Free Water In Pit: N/A (in.)
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC - Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.)
Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Me6. Mecldenburg fine sandy loam - 2 to 8 % slopes Drainage Class: well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Confirm Mapped Type? ,(Yes No
Profile Desubtlon:
Depth Matrix Color
Motile Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist)
(Munseli_ Moist)
Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-5 A 10YR6 /4
N/A
N/A SANDY LOAM
5.15 B 10YR 6/8
N/A
N/A LOAMY CLAY
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon
_
_
High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor
_
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime
_
Listed on Local HydrIc Soils List
_ Reducing Condition
_
Listed on National Hydrdc Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low -Chrome Colors
_
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophy is Vegetation Present? ( Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Solis Present? Yes
Remarks:
No (Circle) I (Circle)
No �/
No,/ Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No V

WA
r Q
� • r
O `C
Ms. Angel Mendex
Paradise Development Group, Inc.
3265 Meridian Parkway, Ste. 100
Weston, FL 33026
Subject: Four Corners, Christenbury Development
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Ms. Mendex:
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
October 18, 2007
DWQ# 07 -1551
Cabarrus County
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact
1039 linear feet (If) of unnamed stream (463 If, perennial) to Clarke Creek in order to construct the
Christenbury Development in Cabarrus County, as described in your application received by the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) on September 13 2007 and subsequent information received on October 10, 2007. After
reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water Quality General
Certification Number 3631, which can be viewed on our web site at
http: / /h2o.enr. state .nc.us /ncwetiands /recicert.html). The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide
Permit Number 39 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should
get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those required by
(but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non - Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specked in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described
in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send
us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the
Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
In addition to the requirements of the certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
1. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact
areas has commenced.
2. Culverts placed in streams/wetlands shall be installed "in the dry". Immediately upon completion of the
installation, water flow shall be returned to its natural course. Existing stream dimensions (including the
cross section dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained (or restored via constructed
benches) above and below locations of each culvert. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched,
the appropriate stream grade shall be re- established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the
pipes shall be removed and re- installed correctly.
3. All wetlands, streams, surface waters, and riparian buffers located on the project site where impacts are
not allowed shall be clearly marked (example- orange fabric fencing) prior to any land disturbing activities.
1wroc; J Ir
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Intemet nwatecqulaity.org FAX [phone]. 623 -6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Reoided/10% Post Consumer Paper

4. Mitigation must be provided for the proposed impacts as specified in the table below. We understand that
you wish to make a payment to the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to meet this mitigation
requirement. This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation
requirement. Until the EEP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR — Ecosystem
Enhancement Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. The EEP
should be contacted at (919) 733 -5205 if you have any questions concerning payment into a restoration
fund. You have 60 days from the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting purposes,
this Authorization Certificate authorizes payment to the EEP to meet the following compensatory mitigation
requirement:
5. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must be used where
practicable instead of nprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed
in the streambed, unless approved by the DWQ.
6. Storm water discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the potential
receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment accumulations, scouring or
erosion of the stream banks.
7. A final, written storm water management plan (including a signed and notarized Operation and
Maintenance Agreement) shall be submitted to the 401 Oversight and Express Permitting Unit (2321
Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250, Raleigh, NC, 27604 or local governing authority) within 60 days of the issuance
of the 401 Water Quality Certification. The storm water management plans shall be approved in writing by
this Office (or local governing authority with copy provided to DWQ) before the impacts specked in this
Certification occur per Condition No. 3631 in GC No. 4. You have the option of using the Express Review
Program for expedited approval of these plans. If you propose to use the Express Review Program,
remember to include the appropriate fee with the plan. The storm water management plan must include
construction plans, specifications, storm water BMP worksheets, and supporting calculations. The storm
water best management practices are required to be appropriate for the surface water classification and
designed to remove at least 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC DENR Storm water
Best Management Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire
project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality. Also, before any permanent
building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be constructed and
operational, and the storm water management plan (as approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The
structural storm water practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be
maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural storm water practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
8. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification application. All construction activities
associated with this project shall meet, and/or exceed, those requirements specified in the most recent
version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual and shall be conducted so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
9. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable,
they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within two months of the date the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
Compensatory Mitigation
Re uired
River and Sub -basin
Number
Stream
463 feet
Yadkin 3040105
Wetlands
acres
Waters
acres
5. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques must be used where
practicable instead of nprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed
in the streambed, unless approved by the DWQ.
6. Storm water discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the potential
receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment accumulations, scouring or
erosion of the stream banks.
7. A final, written storm water management plan (including a signed and notarized Operation and
Maintenance Agreement) shall be submitted to the 401 Oversight and Express Permitting Unit (2321
Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250, Raleigh, NC, 27604 or local governing authority) within 60 days of the issuance
of the 401 Water Quality Certification. The storm water management plans shall be approved in writing by
this Office (or local governing authority with copy provided to DWQ) before the impacts specked in this
Certification occur per Condition No. 3631 in GC No. 4. You have the option of using the Express Review
Program for expedited approval of these plans. If you propose to use the Express Review Program,
remember to include the appropriate fee with the plan. The storm water management plan must include
construction plans, specifications, storm water BMP worksheets, and supporting calculations. The storm
water best management practices are required to be appropriate for the surface water classification and
designed to remove at least 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC DENR Storm water
Best Management Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the entire
project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality. Also, before any permanent
building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office) shall be constructed and
operational, and the storm water management plan (as approved by this Office) shall be implemented. The
structural storm water practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be
maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural storm water practices shall be made without written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
8. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification application. All construction activities
associated with this project shall meet, and/or exceed, those requirements specified in the most recent
version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual and shall be conducted so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
9. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable,
they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within two months of the date the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.

10. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of
Completion" form to the 401NVetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality.
11. Continuing Compliance. The applicant (The Paradise Group, Inc.) shall conduct all activities in a manner
so as not to contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compliance with
section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If
DWQ determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a
designated or achieved use) or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are
necessary to assure compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions
appropriate to assure compliance with such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC
2H.0507(d). Before codifying the certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of
Engineers, provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public
hearing in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the
applicant in writing, shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any
permit issued pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404
Permit for the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704 -663-
1699 or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919 - 733 -9721.
Sincerely,
"00 / /3
for Coleen H. Sullins
Attachments: Certificate of Completion Form
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Ian McMillan, Wetlands Unit
Cabarrus County, Development Services
Central Files
File Copy
Len Rindner

07 -1551
NORTH CAROLINA - DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H.0500, Paradise Group, Inc. has permission as outlined below to
impact 1039 linear feet of stream in order to proceed with the improvements at the facility in Cabarrus
County, North Carolina. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with
the conditions listed in the attached certification. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE
ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT: ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
LOCATION:
COUNTY:
BASIN /SUBBASIN
Concord Mills Blvd. Concord
Cabarrus
Yadkin (03040105)
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to
compensate for the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of
wetlands as outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the
state.
Note: Linear foot requirements proposed to be mitigated through the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
must be rounded to the nearest foot and acreage requirements must be rounded to one - quarter acre
increments according to 15 2r .0503(b).
Impacts:
1039 linear feet of stream
Mitigation:
463 Linear feet of stream
Mitigation:
463 linear feet of perennial streams by EEP required for the 401 Water Quality Certification. In
correspondence dated May 23, 2007 the EEP indicated that up to 600 linear feet of stream mitigation
would be conducted by EEP if available within the cataloging unit. More may be required if mitigation is
required outside the unit.
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the
payment of a fee to the Ecosystem Enhancement Fund per NCAC 2R .0503. If you choose this option,
please sign this form and mail it to the Ecosystem Enhancement Fund at the address listed below. An
invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you upon receipt of this foram. PLEASE
NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE NOTIFICATION THAT
YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE EEP.
Signature Date,
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669 -1619

• ,
U.S. ARMY CORPS. OF ENGINEERS
WHIVENGTON DISTRICT
�m
Action ID. SAW2007- 2970 -413 County: Cabarrns USGS Quad: Kanuauolis
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner J Authorized Agent: Paradise Development Group. Inc., Attn: Angel S. Mendez, Met:
Address: 3265 =diun Pou'kway. Suite 100
Westoa,,FL 33026
Telephone No.: 2i4- 2174980
Size and location ofpmperly (water body, road name/number, town, etc.); Approximate 90 -acre commercial
deeelaument site (Chrlstenb—n dot uersl at the Intersection_ of Concord MMs Boulevard and Derita Road adiacent
to Clarke Creek and unnamed UMMtarles we„ of Concord.
Description of projects area and activity: Pine and All 300 Iinear feet of important intermittent stream channel and
739 linear feet of unimnortont intermittent stream channel on two unnamed tributaries to Clarke Creek for
general site development. SPECIAL CONDITION: In order to comuensate for impracts to 300 linear feet of
of 300 linear feet ofwarm wafer stream channel In the Yadkin Itiver Basin, Cataloging Unit 03040105.
Construction within lurisdictiowd areas on the prope!U shall begin only after then ee has made hull
payment a to the NCFEP and provided copy of the payment documentation tv the Corps.
Applicable Law: X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Pemait Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 39
Yom work is authorized by, the above rethreneed permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop wmk order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will retrain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. 9 prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization, expires or is suspended, revolted, or is modified, such filet the
activity would no Ionger comply with the trams and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (Le., are
under construction) or are wider contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised an a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone] to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twcaty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Nbungement Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management .
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there arc any questions regardigg this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Steven Lund at telephone [phone].
Cotes Regulatory Official: Steven Lund Datm Januatry 7,,2008 Expiration Date of Verification :. January 7, 2010
.-� L4J -�(—:
The Wilmiagton District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisti3etion Survey or visit hnR://www.saw.usacei&MX.mil8a_TLA
MS/indmhtml to
complete the survey online.

Y I
Debermination of Jurisdiction:
❑ Based an preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area.
This prelim n o determnation is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program{ Admmaisttative Appeal Process
(Re%rence 33 CFR Part 331).
❑ There amWavigable Waters of ft United States within the above describedpreject area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this dtion may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Glean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, tins
detmuination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from. the date of this notiScation.
❑ Tbu jttdaftional am within the above.descnbed prof ext area have been identified under a previous action. Please refixence
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: Streams rtre intermittent MMs) flowing to Clarke Creek a nergUnial tributary to the
Roekv River-an aerenu, jal tribatary to t4 -le 'Yadldn River which is a aavlgable.vater.
+Agueals Information Mk information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations.)
Attached to this verification is on approved jurisdictional det mdnnatian. If you are not in agreement with tbat approved jurisdictional
determinadon, you can matte an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will fwd a Notification of Appeal Process
(NAP) fact dmt and request for appeal WA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA
farm to the following address-
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attu: Steven W. Lund, Project Manager
Asbevi'ite Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps trust determine that it Is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and drat it bas been received by the District Office within 60 days of the daft of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA Inn, it must be received at the above address by 11212008.
* "It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspoudence. **
Corps Regulatory Official: Steven Li=d
Date danuary 7.2008
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCId;'WMMAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, lF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Fmishe d: I& Leotard S. R.indner, Envirortmental Planning Consultant, 3714 Spokeshave Lane, Matthews, NC
28105

Angel Mendez
Paradise Development Group
3265 Meridian Parkway, Suite 100
Weston, FL 33026
Project:
County:
DWQ #:
USACE Action ID:
EEP No.:
Amount Paid:
Check Number:
HiPai Rm
PROGRAM
RECEIPT
June 17, 2008
Christenbury Four Corners
Cabarrus
07 -1551
S2007- 2970 -313
ILF- 2007 -5388
113,435.00
200009
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( NCEEP) has received a check as indicated above as payment for the
compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification/Section 404 /CAMA Permit(s) issued for the
above referenced project. This receipt serves as notification that your compensatory mitigation requirements associated with
the authorized activity as specified below have been satisfied. You must also comply with all other conditions of this
certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this activity.
The NCEEP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCEEP is responsible for the compensatory mitigation
requirements associated with the project permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit.
The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the NC Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the US Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998, as indicated below.
Yadkin
Stream Credits
Wetland Credits
Buffer II
03040105
(linear feet)
(acres)
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non-Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Yadkin
0
0
463
0
0
0
0
03040105
Please note that a payment made to the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is not reimbursable unless a request for
reimbursement is received within 12 months of the date of the receipt. Any such request must also be accompanied by letters
from the permitting agencies stating that the permit and/or authorization have been rescinded. If you have any questions or
need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at (919) 715 -1973.
Sincerely,
Vac&vk AW&enex f"
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands /401 Unit
Steve Chapin, USACE — Asheville, Thelma Hemmingway, USACE Wilmington
Alan Johnson, NCDWQ - Mooresville
Len Rindner, agent
File
R�,stalYir�... ... Pno" Ow Stag R
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 / 919 - 715 -0476 / www.nceep.net