The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20081268 Ver 3_Tull Wooten III Baseline Monitoring Report_20210723AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT TULL WOOTEN III MITIGATION SITE LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA USACE Action ID: SAW-2017-00847 I DWR Project # 2008-1268v4 NEU-CON STREAM AND WETLAND UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK Provided by: fires Bank Sponsor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC, An entity of Resource Environmental Solutions 3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27612 919-209-1055 July 2021 fires July 23, 2021 Kyle Barnes U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Division 69 Darlington Ave Wilmington, NC 28403 Subject: NeuCon UMBI Tull Wooten III (SAW-2017-00847) As -Built Baseline Report Submittal Mr. Barnes: 360o Glenwood Avenue, Suite ioo Raleigh, NC 27612 Corporate Headquarters 6575 West Loop South, Suite 300 Bellaire, TX 77401 Main: 718.520.5400 On behalf of EBX Neuse I, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), I am pleased to submit the NeuCon UMBI Tull Wooten III As -Built Baseline Report. Construction and planting for this project were completed in March 2021 and invasives treatment was completed in July 2021. The site was built to design and guidelines with only minor adjustments. RES set up cross sections, vegetation plots, and stream monitoring devices in March 2021. Monitoring data of the vegetation indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. The average stem height in the plots was 1.5 feet. Per the approved mitigation plan and as referenced in the as -built report, RES is requesting to perform supplemental planting and livestaking on TW1 and TW4 to fulfill the adaptive crediting strategy in the upcoming dormant season of winter 2021/spring 2022. The livestaking would include shade tolerant species (buttonbush and silky dogwood) and occur every four feet along the bottom of both banks on both reaches. The supplemental planting would be performed in areas of low stem density/heavy invasive treatment and include shade tolerant species such as flowering dogwood, eastern redbud, persimmon, blackgum, sugarberry, and laurel oak. The additional work would take place during this upcoming dormant season and would change the credit ratios for TW1 and TW4 from 10:1 to 5:1. Upon approval of this as -built report and the adaptive crediting strategy, RES is requesting a 15% stream credit release based on the approved mitigation plan. This is a total as -built release of 531 SMUs. All wetland credits for this bank are preservation and were released in the initial Task 1 release. Please see the enclosed credit release timeline and updated credit ledgers. Thank you for all of your time and consideration and we look forward to continuing to work with you all as this Project progresses. Please contact me if you have any questions or require any additional information. Thank you, Katie Webber, Project Manager kwebber@res.us 1 (984) 275-3483 res.us Table of Contents 1.0 Project Summary..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location and Description.............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives.................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Success Criteria............................................................................................................. 2 Stream Restoration Success Criteria................................................................................................ 2 VegetationSuccess Criteria............................................................................................................. 3 AdaptiveCrediting Strategy............................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Project Components.................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 Stream and Wetland Design/Approach..................................................................................... 4 1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions...................................................................................... 5 1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance(MYO)................................................................................. 5 Vegetation........................................................................................................................................ 5 StreamGeomorphology................................................................................................................... 5 StreamHydrology............................................................................................................................ 6 AdaptiveCrediting........................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 Methods.................................................................................................................................................. 6 3.0 References............................................................................................................................................... 6 Appendix A: Background Tables Table 1. Project Mitigation Components Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3. Project Contacts Table Table 4. Project Background Information Table Figure 1. Site Location Map Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View Vegetation Plot Photos Monitoring Device Photos Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data Table 5. Planted Species Summary Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorpholo2y Data Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table Cross Section Overlay Plots Appendix E: As -Built & Record Drawings 1.0 Proiect Summary L I Project Location and Description The Tull Wooten III Mitigation Site (Project) is located within Lenoir County, less than two miles east of Kinston. The Project lies within the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina Department of Water Resources (NCDWR) sub -basin 03-04-05 and United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14-digit hydrologic unit code (RUC) 03020202060040. The Project is being designed to help meet compensatory mitigation requirements for stream impacts in the HUC 03020202. The Project restores 2,912 linear feet (LF), enhances 2,911 LF, preserves 208 LF of existing stream, preserves 42.45 acres of intact wetlands, and provides water quality benefit for the 136-acre project drainage area. This mitigation plan was approved in accordance with the Neu -Con Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument Modification with the addition of Tull Wooten III Mitigation Site (SAW-2017-00847). This site is co -located with a DWR Riparian Buffer Bank of the same name (Tull Wooten III). The width of the riparian restoration and enhancement areas where buffer credits are generated begins at the most landward limit of the top of bank and extend landward to a distance of at least 50 feet perpendicular to the streams, and again from 151-200 feet from the top of bank. There is no overlapping buffer crediting areas with stream or wetland crediting areas from 51-150 feet. The Project is upstream of the Neuse River and is comprised of four unnamed tributaries that drain to a wetland slough directly upstream of the Neuse River. The stream and wetland mitigation components are summarized in Table 1. The Project abuts two closed out bank sites, Tull Wooten I and Tull Wooten IL The Tull Wooten I project is comprised of approximately 145 acres of wetland preservation and was closed out in September of 2005. The Tull Wooten II project is comprised of approximately 42 acres of wetland preservation and was closed out in March of 2010. The Project is accessible from Tower Hill Road. Coordinates for the Project are as follows: 35.255000 N,-77.544000 W. The streams where restoration was performed had been significantly impacted by agricultural practices, and two reaches lack riparian buffer entirely. Improvements to the Project help meet the river basin needs expressed in the 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) as well as ecological improvements to riparian corridor within the easement. 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project's maximum functional uplift using the Stream Functions Pyramid Framework, specific, attainable goals and objectives will be realized by the Project. These goals clearly address the degraded water quality and nutrient input from farming that were identified as major watershed stressors in the 2010 Neuse River RBRP. The Project addresses outlined RBRP Goals 2, 3, and CU specific goal 2. The Project goals are: • Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non -erosive manner in a stable channel • Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbanks flows and connection to the active floodplain • Improve instream habitat • Restore, enhance, and preserve native wetland and floodplain vegetation • Preserve wetlands • Indirectly support the goals of the 2010 Neuse RBRP to improve water quality and to reduce sediment and nutrient loads Tull Wooten III 1 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site July 2021 The Project objectives to address the goals are: • Designed and reconstructed stream channels sized to convey bankfull flows that maintain a stable dimension, profile, and planform based on modeling, watershed conditions, and reference reach conditions • Added in -stream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and enhanced streams; • Installed habitat features such as brush toes, constructed riffles, woody materials, and pools of varying depths to restored and enhanced streams • Reduced bank height ratios and increase entrenchment ratios to reference reach conditions • Increased forested riparian buffers to at least 50 feet on both sides of the channel along the Project reaches with a hardwood riparian plant community • Treated exotic invasive species • Established a permanent conservation easement on the Project that will perpetually protect streams, wetlands, and their associated buffers 1.3 Project Success Criteria The success criteria for the Project follows the 2016 USACE Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update, the Tull Wooten III Final Mitigation Plan, and subsequent agency guidance. Cross section and vegetation plot monitoring takes place in Years 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Stream hydrology, wetland hydrology, and visual monitoring takes place annually. Specific success criteria components are presented below. Stream Restoration Success Criteria Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull events have been documented in separate years. Stream restoration reaches will be monitored to document intermittent or seasonal surface flow. This will be accomplished through direct observation and the use of stream gauge transducers with data loggers (flow gauge). Reaches must demonstrate a minimum of 30 consecutive days of flow. Two flow gauges were installed: one on TW2-A and one on TW3. There should be little change in as -built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -cutting or erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be above 2.2 within restored riffle cross sections. Channel stability should be demonstrated through a minimum of four bankfull events documented in the seven-year monitoring period. Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images should not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation. Cross section, vegetation plot, stage recorder, and flow gauge locations will be used as permanent digital image stations. Tull Wooten III 2 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site July 2021 Vegetation Success Criteria Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the Project follow IRT Guidance. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project is the survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 trees per acre with an average height of six feet at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success criteria is 210 trees per acre with an average height of eight feet at the end of Year 7. Volunteer trees are counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports, but are not included in the success criteria of total planted stems until they are present in the plot for greater than two seasons. Moreover, any single species can only account for up to 50 percent of the required number of stems within any vegetation plot. Any stems from a species in excess of 50 percent will be shown in the monitoring table but will not be used to demonstrate success. Invasive species presence should not exceed more than five percent of the project area and will be treated through the monitoring period to remain below this threshold. RES will develop a species -specific treatment plan should invasive species presence exceed five percent of the project area. Adaptive Crediting Strategy Additional work may be required along TW1 and TW4 during the monitoring period to further provide ecological uplift and establishing desired plant communities following invasive species treatment. Additional work may include live staking, supplemental planting, or bank grading. The table below outlines the adaptive crediting strategy, where proposed ratios will be directly related to the activities performed on the project reach. These strategies can be implemented on one or both reaches and will not be required to be the same set of activities. Ratio 5:1 Activities Live staking along channel banks AND Supplemental planting post invasive species treatment Supplemental planting post invasive species treatment 8:1 OR Live staking along channel banks Tull Wooten III 3 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site July 2021 1.4 Project Components Through stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation, the Project presents 6,031 LF of stream, generating 3,269.800 base Warm Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) (Table 1). By incorporating wider buffers, the total adjusted SMUs for the Project amount to 3,562.885 SMUs Additionally, the Project presents 42.45 acres of wetland preservation, generating 4.245 Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs) (Table 1). Stream Mitigation Mitigation Approach Linear Feet Ratio Base Warm SMU Restoration Enhancement I Enhancement III Preservation 2,912 81 2,830 208 1:1 1.5:1 10:1 10:1 2,912.000 54.000 283.000 20.800 Total 6,031 3,269.800 Non -Standard Buffer Width Adjustment 293.085 Total Adjusted SMUs 3,562.885 Wetland Mitigation Mitigation Approach Area Ratio WNW Preservation 42.45 10:1 4.245 1.5 Stream and Wetland Design/Approach TWl - Enhancement activities included establishing a conservation easement that is protected in perpetuity and treating invasive species during the monitoring period. TW2-A - Restoration activities included constructing a new channel within the natural valley with appropriate dimensions and pattern, grading out a floodplain bench and backfilling the abandoned channel. In -stream structures such as log sills, rock sills, constructed wood riffles, brush toes, step pools, and log vanes were installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat was further improved through buffer plantings, treating invasive species, and increasing the buffer to at least 150 feet. Buffer activities improve riparian areas that filter runoff from adjacent cropland, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel. TW2-13 — Enhancement activities included the placement of several instream habitat structures to improve flow regime diversity through the creation of pools. TW2-C - Preservation activities included establishing a conservation easement that is protected in perpetuity and treating invasive species during the monitoring period. TW3 - Restoration activities included constructing a new channel within the natural valley with appropriate dimensions and pattern and backfilling the abandoned channel. In -stream structures such as log sills, rock sills, brush toes, constructed wood riffles, and log vanes were installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat was further improved through buffer plantings, treating invasive species, and increasing the buffer to at least 150 feet. Buffer activities improved riparian areas that filter runoff from adjacent cropland, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel. TW4 - Enhancement activities included improving habitat by increasing the riparian buffer to at least 150 feet from the reach, treating invasive species during the monitoring period, and establishing a conservation easement that is protected in perpetuity. Tull Wooten III 4 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site July 2021 Wetlands - 42.25 acres of wetland are being pursued for wetland preservation credit (Wetland E and Wetland F), due to their quality and connectivity to the closed out Tull Wooten I and Tull Wooten II conservation easements. The entirety of WE and WF are not being pursued for wetland preservation since some areas adjacent to the project streams are being utilized for non-standard buffer width SMU adjustments. Wetland preservation activities include the establishment of a permanent conservation easement, initial treatment of invasive species, and treatment of invasive species throughout the monitoring period. 1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions Stream construction and planting was completed in March 2021. The Tull Wooten III Site was overall built to design plans and guidelines. The only minor change made was the addition of an engineered sediment pack at the top of TW3, above the ephemeral/intermittent call. The record drawings are included in Appendix E. An initial invasive species treatment was conducted across the entire site in July 2021. The only planting plan change was the replacing black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) and yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) with buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis). This change was based on bare root availability. Minor monitoring device location changes were made during as -built installation; however, the quantities remained as proposed in the Final Mitigation Plan. 1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MYO) The Tull Wooten III baseline monitoring activities were performed at the end of March 2021. All baseline monitoring data is present below and in the appendices. The Project is on track to meeting vegetation, stream, and wetland interim success criteria. Vegetation Setup and monitoring of nine fixed vegetation plots and two random vegetation plots was completed after planting and stream construction on March 30, 2021. Vegetation data are in Appendix C, associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot locations are in Appendix B. MYO monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 567 to 1,295 planted stems per acre with a mean of 1,012 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of seven species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming years. The average stem height in the plots was 1.5 feet. Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is generally becoming well established throughout the project. Upland areas that were not disturbed/seeded during construction will be seeded during the upcoming dormant season. Stream Geomorphology A total of 10 cross sections were installed and geomorphology data collection for MYO was conducted on March 30, 2021. Summary tables and cross section plots are in Appendix D. Overall the baseline cross sections and profile relatively match the proposed design. The as -built conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for the restoration reach. Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation. Tull Wooten III 5 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site July 2021 Stream Hydrology One stage recorder and two flow gauges were installed on March 31, 2021 and will document bankfull events and flow days, respectively. Stream hydrology data will be included in the Monitoring Year 1 Report in this section and in the appendices. The gauge locations can be found on Figure 2 and photos are in Appendix B. Adaptive Crediting Pending approval, RES plans to livestake and supplemental plant along TW 1 and TW4 during the upcoming dormant season. The livestaking would include shade tolerant species (buttonbush and silky dogwood) and occur every four feet along the bottom of both banks. The supplemental planting would be performed in areas of low stem density/heavy invasive treatment and include all shade tolerant species such as flowering dogwood, eastern redbud, persimmon, blackgum, sugarberry, and laurel oak. 2.0 Methods Stream cross section monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three-dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section data were collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data were collected at eight cross -sections. Survey data were imported into CAD, ArcGIS®, and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. The stage recorders include an automatic pressure transducer placed in PVC casing in a pool. The elevation of the bed and top of bank at each stage recorder are used to detect bankfull events. The flow gauge was also installed in a pool and records flow conditions at an hourly interval. Water level data from the flow gauge is corrected using the height of the downstream riffle to detect stream flow events. Vegetation success is being monitored at nine fixed monitoring plots and two random monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data are processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year. The random plot is to be collected in locations where there are no permanent vegetation plots. Random plot will most likely be collected in the form of 100 square meter belt transects with variable dimensions. Tree species and height will be recorded for each planted stem and the transects will be mapped and new locations will be monitored in subsequent years. 3.0 References Griffith, G.E., J.M.Omemik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H.McNab, D.R.Lenat, T.F.MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelburne. (2002). Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina, (color Poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,500,000). Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2 Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274 Tull Wooten III 6 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site July 2021 Resource Environmental Solutions (2020). Tull Wooten III Final Mitigation Plan. Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC. USACE. (2016). Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update. NC: Interagency Review Team (IRT). Tull Wooten III 7 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Mitigation Site July 2021 Appendix A Background Tables 2 / / / / \ \ \E \\ \ \� { EE _ E 3/ _ 2 _ 2 _ 2 \/ _ 2/ / J § o o SSG) 3)( R R %\ R A\ § *§ ] $3@ \o< ® 0 co )) � )�§))e( § S 00 g/ 8a %% &} � k \ ) \ \ 000 \ ) k ) ) - - 9 % % % % g % g g �o �o 0 0 ' < _ Ea a--- a a a a )> j a a a a a j ƒ 0 E E E E E E E E � §G - \( r r g( CC)e 2 g g * moo° 07 ' & 0< LL G ° ) / 2 - § g 7 0 o e R - & m§- ) j) ) - - E $ $ $ < c g / / / / \I ƒ7 }) . . . . . . )2 ƒ k - \ ƒ { ) 3 E_ ko m ou § § § \ ) # E \ / G ° ^ g co / ^ ^ ^ m oo �c:EEEEE )\ I) F° < k § 3 } } } w \ ƒ § Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Tull Wooten III Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 4 months Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 4 months Number of reporting Years : 0 Activity or Deliverable Data Collection Complete Completion or Delivery Restoration Plan NA Apr-20 Final Design — Construction Plans NA Nov-20 Stream Construction NA Mar-21 Site Planting NA Mar-21 As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline) Mar-21 Jul-21 Year 1 Monitoring Year 2 Monitoring Year 3 Monitoring Year 4 Monitoring Year 5 Monitoring Year 6 Monitoring Year 7 Monitoring = The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline Table 3. Project Contacts Table Tull Wooten III Designer RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612 Primary project design POC Frasier Mullen, PE Construction Contractor Carolina Environmental Contracting Inc. (RES) / PO Box 1905 Mount Airy, NC 27030 Construction contractor POC James Poe Survey Contractor Matrix East, PLLC / 906 N. Queen St., Suite A, Kinston, NC 28501 Survey contractor POC Chris Paderick, PLS Planting Contractor Shenandoah Habitats Planting contractor POC David Coleman Monitoring Performers RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612 Monitoring POC JRyan Medric (919) 741-6268 / \ m 9 \ — \ & J \ § \ j Cl) _ — - = Lc?E 0 3 @ ® & = w r a)\ ® _ $_ 9 § f } \ Cl) » / _ / ) ° / k \LO _ Cl)0 / k ) / N a m ) 2 % — — \ ■ k — } / E i = ] ) 2 \ — _ _ 2 / 2 / § \ k \ — \ \ \ } 7 / � ) ( — \ \ \ \ ( # \ : a) - \ }LU / \ » < < \ \ _ } - § _ ) / d J 0 / } ) j t t — ? 7 2 7 J 2 — ® J 7 / J z \ / / / / } ƒ j \ 0 / / I I / \ eytown m 00 Afaskett Rd slate r'� 4P ry a c a re 6 u I Troman Ave N 4 a'�— 3 Peso Beechy m 'e _ o z O E .nAve.- _ � I w ' iz _ Alm;,IV �5t c Ea561d Tower Hill Rd Georgetown hrfal� ge Cir a D K pve N m � e o O O 0 y OP syc� "r oPrvSt G y swell St y ,ion spar arts Holk—y P.,k F np Ling C Bnght St CakmU`, !smond St _ O 11 ills $t N N C - r = Lincoln s, N 'willow St C 3 u z Tull Wooten II Tull Wooten I Greenville Legends New B Conservation Easement Tull Wooten I & II Tull Wooten III Hi Service Area - 03020202 Project Hydrologic Unit - 03020202060040 I JackSOF35.255,-77.544 " Figure 1 - Site Location Date: 5/6/2020 w e Tull Wooten III Drawn by: MDE res 49W0 ,,000 s 2 000 Mitigation Project Checked by: KAW Feet Lenoir County, North Carolina finch=2,000 feet Appendix B Visual Assessment Data !77�; Nt. ��( 7WHO Tull Wooten III MYO Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Vegetation Plot 1 Vegetation Plot 3 Vegetation Plot 5 Vegetation Plot 2 Vegetation Plot 4 Vegetation Plot 6 I � t si�nrwk �•� �~.: •l�. L•.rlL 'Si7�i7411�sii i�� d N O w Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data Table 5. Planted Species Summary Common Name Scientific Name Mit Plan % As -Built % Total Stems Planted Water Oak Quercus nigra 15 24 2,900 Willow Oak Quercus phellos 15 23 2,700 Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 15 19 2,250 River Birch Betula nigra 15 12 11500 Persimmon Diospyros vir iniana 10 11 1,250 Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 0 6 750 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 5 650 Yellow Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 10 0 0 Blackgum Nyssa sylvatica 15 0 0 Total 12,000 Planted Area 12.78 As -built Planted Stems/Acre 939 Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Plot # Planted Stems/Acre Volunteer Stems/Acre Total Stems/Acre Success Criteria Met? Ave rage Planted Stem Height (ft) 1 1295 0 1295 Yes 1.5 2 567 0 567 Yes 1.6 3 1052 0 1052 Yes 1.4 4 971 0 971 Yes 1.7 5 1012 0 1012 Yes 1.6 6 971 0 971 Yes 1.2 7 971 0 971 Yes 1.6 8 1133 0 1133 Yes 1.2 9 1133 0 1133 Yes 1.4 R1 850 0 850 Yes 1.5 R2 728 0 728 Yes 1.6 Project Avg 1012 0 1012 Yes 1.5 .� a 0 C. t c C. t c 0 F c 0 0 U E Appendix D Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data 1. 0 Solo N lo I i o 0 ; 7o - mO m- oo o o N o 6A o N 'A o N w o o . . m- . . . . . . . . . . §§:§` . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . §'§�/ (\:::::::: :; w, Nm No o � o I o N �/\o 'o & N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2\{ ):::::::: . . . . . . . . . . - - - Awo o o o - - - - - - - - - 1w o o N o o -2 . - o o ,� I I i o \}� o o o o 2 w x m �. o E 8 A -5 h3 -wa -w ma 'm 2 m w - o o o �6 2 .0 m- m h3 m 1. w 2 o oa w 0 0 ?� m o w C) .. mw I _1 E . �O mm oa w 8 2 C) mw wm 10 h3 Im Im E' 1. o mw o ma E m .2 o E o E- o m oioT o o - S I - 1 A 1 16 117 o l .E 0 o o o I. oN I co o o IA IN I N N w I o N I w� oN �2 Im I w o . w o o N o 55 om N t. . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . 2E . . . . So m IN I N I I I wm No I o w 2E o . ol A o o N �CR NA . . . . . . . . . . C� E IoV N & & N (n 0 . . . . . . . . . .. C6 2\{ . . . . . . . . . . . . . o o u 0 o w - o - 3� w o o o o w 2 w x o E 2 , g T) w o o . w -5 -0 A wa E -w m' m 'm >w w> w- — 2 o w 0 m o — w 0 m -5 o �6 E 0. Im , h3 m w o -o oa > �Ei 0� 0 o m w C) Im mw E �O m- me w oa o o 2 0 E 1'a m wm Im E' -g mw p mE .6 .2 E o ol .2 E- ::=r; ]:::::::: :::;@ \ �� o o o o .E N A o 0 �2 o. 0 1' 71 IT . . . . . . I I . . . . . . § . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l:::::::: / o N lw0000,00N A NA — . . . . . . . . . . o Im V E oo mo oN oo -N C6 m 2 imi'lol TIT o I o IN o N o N w w, o 'o 1 N oo . . . . . . . x. . . m o oo if I I I I I I I I o o -2 . - o -o ,� i w w o. w, w m. lw o o o w 2 w xm � 2E o s � L oo . 0 w m -5 a 13 —w. -w cm) �w 2 mm o� w o 0 o �o 2 h3 m w o o is o o ?� m o , m w C) o mm o. o 8 2 C) h3 E' o o mm 6 .2 t 2E E E o 2 E- o ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 91110l119 ■11101911 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 811191119 BIBIBIIIB ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 BIIIIIIII 891191111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 A1110i191 ■11119111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 ■11111111 011111111 ■11111111 O N X x W Oo > I LD I c I N v � I O I � L ° I c y ILL o ' co I dI i co co I C O I O co U I 3 r— ^ N Y N N v C m L U N m in - ° a Q� N N I I I I ap I V I In C I o 04 O I O 04 r I I IH Cfl I I Cl) I I O LO LO LO LO LO LO (11) uOi;enal3 r O .ti O M O U O S. J O W cz `1j a w zcz o y� W z w M O w cz cz 4.1 o' U cz o�n .y a w cz cz cz cz 4r ,r O .y U U 0 U cz E E � k _ \ 00 \ - | a ) ® i § ] i \ t | % , e mco ) . 2 ! / S ) m e co § k i % /� i � G�o � o 7 . 5 � • _ m Ccu £ o k / % ƒ § a ( | / | I ® i � o dugegg \ / § / { � n / \ t $ \ � / / / ƒ \ \ \ § } Q / k § m 0 o� xx m w r m m LD V C N � d Q o I `o 0 co (o `o o O d I co co M O 0 co Y N � Ncu y O v m U N N i a I � a I p a ; C14 (N I � I I 00 U � Ids LD N O N I O r � I I I� I cY) I O LLO LO LO Ln LLO V V (11) uOl;enal3 r� O 0 a M O U U IX IX o In W 4.1 � W C (� w �Q �z 4 ..f �y r � N CL 0 W Oo 1 X L C O I > N N w O +, I m 0 co J N N i 1 co H ++ 1 co co m O O co o U O O 0 N i � � p N (N � m 0 o a L O O 04 N O 04 I }} IG II M I I 0 U) U) to U) c c U) (11) uOi;enal3 f� U U p� S. U C to O Mom, O S: ,MMY to E E g k D ! 2 0 # { $ cu 3 j § i % R Cl) � 2 | & q S I � ! k � o q I ! 0 co k \ u I I ] 2 2 ! \ � 2 . ! — � k 2 o ! \ I � ( k | ! / � � |! n I 0 J g ) g m m +qg \ / \ / { d � � \ \ t I ) / Q / / / /\ K\ ® z\ 9 E g / J ) § § « , # g 5 / m \ _ R m \ § m E E � k _ j \ - / � � \ � n < § � \ % � _ � eLL m / co 0 / $ \ / § S j o \ C / / \ � | � t � J % k 2 04 \ 04 � � � |k Cl) � � 0 «qg \ § / / a \ / \ \ / § / $ g g = 3 # & , Q } / _ Q } ) \ m § E E � k _ k ! | \ ( ! \ � � 2 2 � | \ j ` g \ _ 0 ® $ �(D : , mco . 2 I ` / a)! ` } g o m ! \ / 00 LL § ! S 7 ) | o , , 5 � | _ \ ( 2 | e m k J r < — \ | ` 7 � o 0 | / a ) ! , \ 2 |Cl) fit 0 « qg \ § / { d � � � / \ t $ ( / Q / / / z 9 g § d \ , } \ \ § , / Q j .( \ / ) / \ Q } ) \ m E E � k _ \ \ � \ S & § m % 0 - LL 0 / .0 / k u m � $ o /cu \ X. o jCN / m / o k � J % 2 0 � | � k� i Cl) � � 0 « qg \ / § / { \ � a \ % . / $ \ / / / ) § § « \ # & , Q \ / \ / / \ / ) § m E § k _ $ & LU \ � / \ \ / • � 2 � } & /CL / g \ 0 . ¥� m § ) / _ , & 2 / ] / / CL � � 2 � k 0 / a \ / _ § m � = e w o LO » o V u mg / 2 § 2 / k � � \ » $ § / u / § 2 \ \ 0 \ �D \ / 5 s j \ � _ 2 2 ] ■ � n E d N c O to d N Q O w Oo r x X I LO v N V Q � O I M o a I O I o LL y N Cl) � I Cl) I O a I o O I c I � Gi U m m N O Q Q U I N I I Oo I I I L ci LO � � N O � O I � rn I I 7 � I O I I m I I O LO LO LO LO LO LO LO (11) uOi;enal3 � o O O rH O M � c� rS.\ V O � Chi Chi ct to W •F+ w W W w CG � o o N N N cz w 7�r c u C cz CZ 4� .fir cz � N cz cz cz 2 w 0 0 0 U 3 � O o lu U � N Appendix E As -Built & Record Drawings 8 �8 g W d Q'pN 23sa2u aiaa Todd 3w tvcf�f t�`m"Y _ _ a a a a a a rJ — J cn hW l❑ ZW z Dz3 w O w a Z W OO O � 0 Fr ui rr \z'JNOa�oz0a Tpp-�a8/ z woNmoJNOa�o0 �o-5Na8/� ' zw3N-�Cw9 rt4\p RNo3m_p w rpNNNU_°�q�I ONQ>w=omm kQY prmz�oum cj: —' UD QIN Q`Room- oo— �m $ h � " m � +"�'_N m � m nlne-sv :uo3 a3sa3d3u ZMl H0tl321 31L10N4NtlH0 VNIl021tl0 H1210N'AlNnOo LIION3l S9NIMtlN1 lling-SV 31IS III N3100M llnl a i 9' w ¢ 91 W YY�� wr :3wvry a a V\ d o :31t101ollld SN0ISIA3H �3roud o o= 0 0 > w � � w e 0 3° N�m bm 0 �o �o 0 8 0 8 f� o 0 0 0 o �.aamens�,nMo„d 11 ��M oo„va� �d3wN y � " :uo3 a3sa3d3u ZMl HOtl321 al-ON4NtlH0 lO21tl� H1210N'l.1Nf10� LIION3l jw a e g p €i: o ? y.,"',,,,, IF W v �wuue S9NIMtlNO lling-SV 311S III N3100M lln-L z d o :31t10101d :SNOISIA3H awtlry �o3roud 3 3 0 0 � w u� V EK i w I \ \ /g Nil yo,l bh, O O U< N e�u�.v..,/ _.s asnvs �a N�issa ev eesonesnw ��PoM n�/es(son.varaewR��eawrN iris H � w nlnasv :uo3 a3sa3d3u ZMl HOtl321 :31L1 ON4NtlH0 u 9 tlNIlO21tlO H1210N'l.1Nf10O LIION3l co U) ¢ W I.wu S9NIMtlN1 1ling-SV 311S III N3100M 11nI 3 3 V\ d o :31t101011 SN0ISIA3H awtlry �o3roud 0 0 o , Fyy N O O O O 6 w O 8 8 � tiOi w u� V EK w i O a 0 O w P m O 0 0 0 J�o 8 O O O 8 fd 0 O 8 O O U< N � " Bebo\l 111 uaLmMIm1E5Loo L\avafuVWaaatlle-'m y nlne-sv :uo3 a3sa3r3u ZMl HOtl321 31L1 ON4NtlH0 tlNIlO21tlO H1210N'l.1Nf100 LIION3l jw g _ vo ?_� s'a � � SONIMtlNO 11If19-SV 311S III N3100M llfll d 31t10101d SN0ISIA3H awtlry �o3roud 3 3 0 0 w u� V EK i w N e� J fi iiine a3sa3d3u313B ZMl H0tl321 :3lL1 ON4NtlH0 `g m- vo v e g n €i�. �o a p ": �i LID VNIlO21tl0 H1210N'l.-MOO LIION3l jw z a q �� ¢ � W � LL " �wuue S9NIMtlN1 lling-SV 31IS III N3100M 11nI d � o :31t10101d :SNOISIA3H awtlry �o3roud 3 3 0 0 ,g�tl J �Y tom/ e ll 8 �.aamens� "M— 111— / oo.va« mod" a %+ � $ = � n p'g LL As ¢'%° A I�. a nlne-sv :uo3 a3sa3�3u EMl HOtl321 :31L1 �JN4NtlH0 m. VNIl02JVO H1210N'l.-MOO LIION3l _.•I1 ¢ a € W "aOy- AQp LL " �wuue S9NIMtlN1 lling-SV 31IS III N3100M lln-L d o :31t10101d :SN0ISIA3H awtlry �o3roud 3 3 0 0 I I x S -- l I / I \ \ Olq \ I ' I 1 \ 1J w w u1 P 00 O O O O D �O 8 4 0 8 O O O 8 O 8 O O O e�uv+a%1-Ae a3ntl5 �TMP N%JI53a eti EEbo\leeMlll uaLmM Im1E5Loo L\%vafuV Wa%%tlle-3wdN 3lli fl � a rr rr 5n S`JN IMV2 G 02 0332 'H0303Stl3�3'd N3itla io�d 'sNoisin3e o S w w > N N N N N m N j J � N 9 N � S (nz � ——Nmv�n�o a v cn cn cn cn cn cn v Z_ rr J C y �-- �5�T�— Q N- I�n ? O J 10 o m co � w LdO z w oZ } y m Z 3 w 0� r Cc W W LLl W Z W [w, Lijz orr ., - .._.r �zr LU Ir �1,o �o N N z ?� _� zN zN 3 owo- � U a awzN E 3 o N o N 50. S o u � 0 o o O mwzu 'mw3� o omN� G oo i u',o i a oz Noow �oow a m5mo t F. m m „ „m _ m ,•, � S`JNIMVIGGIOO 2I eod a3sv3�3e M31n 311S-nV?:OAO Q 'A1Nnoc) - „'"" VNII JVO Hl?JON ?JION3P S°ONIMV?J(l MJ003?J 311S III N3100M llfll o a a o �aovuc �sNOISIn3e ewvN iodroed < o c...�r... g S`JNIMV2J002J03321 Ho3 a3 V—H ZMl H�V3?J VNIlO?J VO Hl?JON 'AlNf10o?JION3l ° �n s ode Viz,; F3 - e� P' S°JNIMV?JO 0?J0�3?J 311S III N3100M llfll® e _ - .............. „...,.„ ou '3wtlN 3 3 m m�31Va�a 101dvc 'SNOIS-II lO3rOHd o 0 0 0 0 8 o G - - o _ E o o _ - w w - �slsel6� �a , 3 11 i � m tO i �bs o 16� 0 o r a �,,, o g S`JNIMVIGG I003I eod a3sv3�3e ZMl HOV3l a v VNII JVO Hl?JON'AlNnoo?JION3P - �n m e� oON P' SONIMV?JO 0?J003?J 311S III N3100M -nn-L a a m m eiva io�d sNoisin3e awvN io3roed o y`V 0 0 o d d 0 o 8 o G - o - d d o o ¢N aye m ro o - fi S`JNIMV2G 020332 Hom—V—H ZMlHOV3l weHa VNII JVO Hl?JON'AlNnoo?JION3l env SONIMV?JO MJ003?J 31IS III N3100M llfll awvN io3roed o a a m eiva io�d SNoiSin3H w o 0 0 _ G "olo E I I 11 I_ — a � a� S`JNIMV2G 020332 eod—V—H ZMl HOV3?J 3�iu oNw�vea VN II JVO Hl?JON'AlNnooION3P ?J m � SONIMV?JO MJ003?J 31IS III N3100M -nn-L e ................ „...,.„ laou v a a m m eivaio1dc SNoiSI— awvNio3roed o 0 0 0 0 8 o G - - o _ E o _ - o 0 a m S`JNIMV2J002J03321 Hod a3 V—H ZMl H�V3?J Ln VNIl JVO Hl?JON'.l1Nnoo?JION3l ° S°JNIMV?JO 0?J003?J 311S III N31O0M llfll �aou v a a m m e\va \oldc sNOISI H awvN \o3roed a o o 0 0 Go Go �Z 0 o r W_ g S`JNIMV2J002J0�321 eom—V—H £Ml HOV3?J m 10 VNII JVO Hl?JON'AlNnoo ?JION3PO ¢ ° m m �s u .? `�' - SONIMV?JO MJ003?J 31IS III N3100M -nn-L e-....................�aovuc a a m meiva io�d SNoiSI— awvN io3roed o 6 y`V 0 0 3 0o 0 3 0 3 0 m G - 0 m - E o lolo _ - 0 ID#* 20081268 Version* 3 Select Reviewer:* Erin Davis Initial Review Completed Date 07/26/2021 Mitigation Project Submittal - 7/23/2021 Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No Type of Mitigation Project:* V Stream Pr Wetlands r- Buffer r- Nutrient Offset (Select all that apply) Project Contact Information Contact Name:* Katie Webber Project Information ................................................................................... ID#:* 20081268 Existing IDY Project Type: Project Name: County: r DIMS r Mitigation Bank Tull Wooten III Lenoir Document Information Email Address:* kwebber@res.us Version: *3 Existing Version Mitigation Document Type:* Mitigation As -Built Plans File Upload: Tull Wooten III Baseline Monitoring Report.pdf 18.64MB Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted... Signature Print Name:* Kathleen Webber Signature:*