20071011 Ver 1_Application_20070611

•N•
•~~: BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
:W Ej
308ll W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 - Raleibh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone (919 j 541-9977 -Fax [phone]
~~~ ~ 7 ~ ~ Q
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Mr. Ronnie Smith Date: June 4, 2007
US Army Corps of Engineers Project #:
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
60082
RE: Clinton Planned Unit
Development
We are sending the following items attached to this transmittal:
Co ies Date Descri tion
1 6/4/07 PCN A lication
Remarks:
~c~~o
JJN 1 ~ 200i
[;H
Signed: Jennifer Burdette c: Ian McMillan - NCDWQ ~ ~ZAi eI
Howell Edwards -Edwards Ent. of Dunn

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing 0 7- 1 0 1 1
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information D ~ ~~~ V ~`~ j
:~
1. Owner/Applicant Information JUN ~ ~ ~~~~
Name: Edwards Enterprises of Dunn LLC
l)r=Ni2 - T
Mailing Address: Contact: Howell Edwards __ ,,,~, 4ses fb'JEt ernc~t,ANATER gRANC
P O BOX 2121
Dunn. North Carolina 28335
Telephone Number: 910/237-1853 Fax Number: 910/567-4686
E-mail Address: NA
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jennifer A. Burdette
Company Affiliation: Burdette Land Consulting, Inc.
Mailing Address: 308D W Millbrook Road. Suite 200
Raleigh North Carolina 27609
Telephone Number: 919/841-9977 Fax Number: 919/841-9909
E-mail Address: JBurdetteBLCC bellsouth.net
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Clinton Planned Unit Development
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 2405981379
4. Location
County: Sampson Nearest Town: Clinton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The site is located on the
southeast side of Pugh Road (SR 1751) approximately 300 feet southwest of Pugh Road's
intersection with NC Highway 403 in Clinton, Sampson County, North Carolina. Fi ug re 1
depicts the location of the~roperty on the US Geological Survey (USGS) Clinton, NC 7.5-
minute quadran lg e topographic map.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.0076977 °N 78.3015929 °W
6. Property size (acres)
10
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Beaverdam Branch
8. River Basin: Cape Fear
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site consists primarily of an agricultural field with
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 9

mature and successional forest alon dg raina~ys. Agricultural and commercial are the
,general land uses in the vicinity of the project.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project involves construction of retirement community condominiums of which, a portion of
the entrance impacts a wetland area. Heav~quipment typical of road and sanitary sewer
construction will be used to complete the project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to provide
retirement community condominiums for Clinton and the surrounding area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Burdette Land Consulting, Inc. (BLC) conducted a delineation of the
surface waters and wetlands present within the impact area of the proposed project on February
15 2007. Upland and wetland data forms and Figure 2 are attached in support of the wetland
delineation. Fi u~provides the location of the site on the applicable Sampson Count
Survey map. BLC's wetland delineation has not yet been verified by the USACE. Please
contact us as soon as possible if a field meeting is necessary to verify the wetland delineation.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Future permit requests are not anticipated for this project.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 9

Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed access road for
the development crosses a nonr~arian wetland resulting in 0.013 acre of wetland impact.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
cenarately list impacts dne to tenth structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no) (linear feet)
1 fill forested no 400 0.013

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.013
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 3
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
mast he inclnderl Tn calculate acreat~e_ multiply length X width. then divide by 43560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
NA

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation. dredQin~_ fleedin~_ draina~e_ bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)

NA

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 9

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.013
O en Water Im act (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.013
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The applicant retained BLC to
delineate surface waters and wetlands on the property to avoid and minimize impacts to these
features to the maximum extent possible. Much of the property containing wetlands and
modified stream channels was dedicated to open space. However, the wetland area encroaches
into the only area that provides access from the high ground on the property to Pugh Road.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 9

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlandslstrmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant minimized wetland impacts that were unavoidable to the maximum extent
practicable. The proposed site plan dedicates approximately 46°Io of the property to open
space to avoid impacts to wetlands and modified stream channels. BLC believes that the
applicant's project modifications to avoid all but a very minor and unavoidable impact (0.013
acre) to the wetland and dedicated open space provide sufficient mitigation for the project.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9

website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): NA
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within l5A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 9

Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 NA 3 (2 for Catawba) NA
2 NA 1.5 NA
Total NA Na
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of [he near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. NA
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss Stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level. Currently the site does not contain any impervious acreage. Enoch Engineers have
estimated that the site would contain 2.28 acres of impervious area upon completion of the project. This
acreage includes 0 46 acre for streets and 1.82 acres for buildings and driveways. The open space left
adjacent to wetlands and modified channels on and adjacent to the property is anticipated to protect
surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater >;enerated from the retirement community will be disposed of through the municipal
sanitary sewer system.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: This
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 9

project represents a single and complete project with no infrastructure proposed beyond what is
necessary to develop the~roiect itself.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

~ A~icant/ gent's Signature )bath
(Agent's signature is va id only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

Updated 11/1/2005
Page 9 of 9

f ,~~y ~~
c ~~ ,;/ ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ t~ } Ceram d ~i' f 1--~,~ }. `;i ~: . ~J
` { .
~) ~1 ~ n r' ~? 1 l!
r '" ~ _
,~
., ~; ~I , ~ is S
~,
_ _ \' t
s ~, ~ ,:
t
~,,s _. ~, l
1 ; . ~~~ '
,_
. .
- , ~ _ ,~,
~- ,
~!
'~ ru ~ .,- , ~ rw 'L, -
i ~;i~ I
,!~ ~ - ,
~~~ ~, ,;,
~.
'.
- ;
• - - i. -...e... _ _ ~ .- ~ s, I
. y
~ 1. .~f sue; /j1 ~. _.__.._. _ _.__..__. ~ :,,/ 1 ..~~t'"'"-~_.. ~ ~ ;~~ '~ { ',.-..
~ ~
~F
+% ~
~ ~ ~~~ ~~
i
1 ~ ~ .. ~ y ~ -,~ ~ ,~
s~ ~:.• ~ jam' ~ ~ j 'irsc,G .~ % ~~ j~,v % r~ ; ~,
.-
~' ~ ! f -
., r. - ,.
f ` i -
,, 1
Y~I
-.
N _
I ~
' .
S
))
-'
f
. ~.
tf,$ l - .. ,_ ~ ~ \ --~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
! ~k
~. YY ~' /J 755 l.. „~~ _~,_ '-1 / _ ; .,....__... ,~. ~~ `~ ' _~ -- ,,
~ + . , _} `-
__ ,~
T
~.
~ ~~ ~ ~ f , ; 1 2 ~ f ~ ~ ~__,.~ - ~ .
I ~`
~ r ~,~, -
• 11
,.
~.
4 s ,~ 1
;~~ C~ ~
:° _ "~ ,
.,t ., N i
~.
4
,__
``,-r^-~
~~ ~ '
. ,r- t .. `J .,~`~,.. ~~, Theater , `.
i
-., - - .~ -
~M ~~ ~ t
~ _ ~
~,,.F. _~ ~~~~.iJii ~
PI _ ~
GRAPHIC SCALE USGS LOCATION MAP N
~'~ = zooo~ CLINTON PUD PROJECT
zooo~ o zooo~
EDWARD'S ENTERPRISES OF DUNN, LLC
CLINTON, SAMPSON COUNTY, NC
~~~•N~~~' DATE: 02/15/07 USGS 7.5' TOPO QUAD:
~' CLINTON
w e'3 BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB
308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 CHK'D BY: JAB
Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60082
s FIGURE #: 1

GRAPHIC SCALE SAIO!1PSON COUN I,Y SOIL SURVEY MAP N
1° = 2000" CL1N7 ON PUD PROJP,CT
20(10' 0 2000'
EDWARD'S ENTERPRISES OF DUNN, LLC
CLINTON, SAlVIPSON COUNTY, NC
~.
•''•N•''• DATE: 02-15-07 SHEET(S):
IN E I v URn~rrTl~ LAND CONSULTING, INS. PRAWN BY: TMI3 CHK'p F3Y: JAL3
308-D W Millbrook Road, Suite 2,00 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
S Telephone (9l9) 841-9977- Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60082 ~; IGURE #. 2

?I I 1
i
~ ~0
~ ~ c~ •
~ ~;
JE ~ ~
r
,~
7
!6
3~
NE
-~-
~.~ y -.
~,.
~-~`
~s
LEGEND
^~ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ~ JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNELS /DITCH
--------------- NON-JURISDICTIONAL DITCH
~__~...~._._-____. ___...,. JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND BOUNDARY ~s NOTES:
I 1.) THE DESIGNATION AND LIMITS OF THESE FEATURES MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE US
WETLAND IMPACT --_-W ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
>..p
2.) THE LOCATIONS OF THESE FEATURES ARE APPROXIMATE AND DEPICTED HERETO
~. FACILITATE SURVEYING. THIS MAP DOES NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY OF
NE AREA NOT EVALUATED -°' JURISDICTIONAL /ISOLATED WATERS OF THE US.
~•.•N.•~~ SURFACE WATERS & WETLANDS IMPACT MAP DATE: OS-29-07
'~ SCALE: I"=100'
': BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. CLINTONPUDPROJECT DRAWN BY:TMB
w E 308-D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 EDWARD'S ENTERPRISES OF DUNN, LLC c~cD BY: JAB
Telephone [phone]-Fax [phone] CLINT~N, SAMPSON COUN'T'Y, NC PROJECT#:611082
S
FIGUJZI #: 3

WETLAND IMPACT `'
567 SF ~Q~~~
0.013 AC
~ b

ii~
~\
OGZ
n

GRAPHIC SCALE SURFACE WATERS & WETLANDS IIVIPACT MAP N
1" = 40"
ao' o ao' CLINTON PUD PROJECT
EDWARD'S ENTERPRISES OF DUNK, LLC
CLINTON, SAMPSON COUNTY, NC
N'' DATE: 06.04-07 CHK'D BY: JAB
'w E~i BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC. DRAWN BY: TMB
308-D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200-Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 INSET A
Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone] PROJECT #: 60082
S
42'-24" RCP
W/FES -

~v ,
i 1~~1 ~ ,

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: Clinton Planned Unit Development Date: 2/15/07
Applicant /Owner: Edwards Enterprises of Dunn, LLC County: Sampson
Investigator: Jennifer Burdette - Burdette Land Consulting, Inc. State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? ves X No Community ID:hwd forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? ves No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? ves No X Plot ID: UP@Flg_#106
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 9.
2. Betula nigra FACW 10.
3. Magnolia virginiana FACW+ 11.
4. Acer rubrum Sap/Shr FAC 12.
5. Betula nigra FACW 13.
6. Arundinaria gigantea Herb FACW 14.
7. Smilax rotundif lia Vine FAC 15.
8. LoniceraLponica FAC- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 88
Remarks: More than 50% of the dominant species are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- indicating that the
hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: NA (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >16 (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >16 (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of only one secondary indicator and absence of primary indicators at this location
confirms [hat the wetland hydrology criterion is not met.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Lynchburg sandy loam Drainage Class: somewhat poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aeric Paleaquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Descriation:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-4 A lOYR 3/2 NA NA loam
4-16 E lOYR 3/1 NA NA loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime x Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions x Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of low chroma colors confirms the presence of hydric soils.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: This location does not meet the criteria for a jurisdictional wetland based on the absence of wetland
hydrology.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: Clinton Planned Unit Development Date: 2/15/07
Applicant /Owner: Edwards Enterprises of Dunn, LLC County: Samson
Investigator: Jennifer Burdette -Burdette Land Consulting, Inc. State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? ves X No Community ID:hwd forest
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? ves No X Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? ves No X Plot ID: WL@Flg #106
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Suecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Saecies Stratum Indicator
1. Betula nigra Tree FACW 9. Lonicera iaponica Vine FAC-
2. Acer rubrum FAC 10. Smilax rotundifolia FAC
3. Liguidambar s raciflua FAC+ 11.
4. Magnolia virginiana FACW+ 12.
5. Magnolia virQiniana Sap/Shr FACW+ 13.
6. Ilex opaea FAC- 14.
7. Arundinaria Aipantea Herb FACW 15.
8. Lonicera iayonica FAC- 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 80
Remarks: More than 50% of the dominant species are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC- indicating that the
hydrophytic vegetation criterion is met.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other x Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
X No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 3-4 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of primary and secondary indicators at this location confirms that the wetland hydrology
criterion is met.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Lynchburg sandy loam Drainage Class: somewhat ~oorl~drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aeric Paleaquults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 A lOYR 2/1 NA NA loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: The presence of low chroma colors confirms the presence of hydric soils.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: This location meets the criteria for a jurisdictional wetland based on the presence of hydrophytic
vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils.

N•
.w E'.y BURDETTE LAND CONSULTING, INC.
308D W Millbrook Road, Suite 200 -Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Telephone [phone] -Fax [phone]
S
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
US Army Corps of Engineers North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Central Office
69 Darlington Avenue Mail Service Center 1650
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Raleigh,-North Carolina 276Gy - _ ~°
To Whom It May Concern:
By signing below, the current property owner gives representatives of Burdette Land
Consulting, Inc. permission to act as their authorized agent for jurisdictional and isolated waters
and riparian buffer determinations, delineation, and permitting for the subject project. This
authorization includes permission to enter the site to conduct site meetings with US Army Corps
of Engineers and NC Division of Water Quality personnel, as necessary.
Project Name: Clinton PUD Project
BLC Project #: 60082
Current Property Owner or Easement Holder:
Name: FAN ~ e JS .EN i ~2 t~~ ~~E S 6 F ~ ~-.~ ~ L L ~ ,
(include contact person if a corporation, partnership, or government) f~• ~ ~~ ~ ~~~/ ~4~'t~ S
Mailing Address: ~ ~ • '3 ° X z ~ z ~
Telephone: Sia - 23 7- / $s3
~~~~1 ~.1•e. 28.;3
Fax: S'io - s-G ~ = y6 g ~
Cjjo -SS/- 87°3
Si a r ,
/-{Q,-r ELL ~ _ F~ ~.4C)S ~ . - ~ _<~+~t t3~~
Print Name (include title, if appropriate)
2 ? F~~3 d ~
Date