20070998 Ver 1_401 Application_20070607

Baker Engineering NY, Inc.
1447 S. Tryon Street
Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
PAYMENT 704-334-4454
June 1, 2007 RECEIVED FAX [phone]
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC DENR
Division of Water Quality, Wetlands Unit 0 7- 0 9 9 8
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification/401 Certification Package
Little Sugar Creek CPCC Reach- Stream Enhancement Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Please find enclosed seven copies of our PCN package for the subject project. We have included the
following supporting data:
• PCN form,
• Vicinity, USGS, and site maps,
• existing conditions and design summary,
• photo log, and
• 11" x 17" copy of the 30% plan set.
The goals of the project are to
• improve water quality and channel stability in 490 linear feet of Little Sugar Creek,
• stabilize the creek banks with native vegetation,
• install in-stream boulder structures to improve habitat and provide grade control, and
• excavate a floodplain bench where constraints allow.
This same information has been submitted to the Asheville Regulatory Field Office of the US Army
Corps of Engineers. If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
~ ~~~
James A. Buck
Vice President p ~ ~ ~ ~ V
I ~1
Enclosure JUN 6 2007
Cc: Ms. Crystal Taylor
Mecklenburg County Storm Water Services ®r:N;~ - WATER ~uwur~-
WETLANDS ayD STORMWAIER BRANCH

0 7- 0 9 9 8
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing PAYMENT
RECEIVED
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information p ~ ~ ~ ~~~ D
1. Owner/Applicant Information JIJN 6 2007
Name: Crystal Taylor
Mailing Address: Mecklenburg County Storm Water Services ~EwR -WATER 4UALITY
. ?1TER~hi
700 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: (704 336-7342 Fax Number:~704) 336-3846
E-mail Address: Crvstal.Ta for ,mecklenbur cg ount n~c.gov
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Emily Reinicker, P.E., CFM
Company Affiliation: Baker En ineerin~ NY, Inc.
Mailing Address: 1447 South Tryon Street
Suite 200
Charlotte NC 28203
Telephone Number: (704) 334 - 4454 Fax Number:~704) 334 - 4492
E-mail Address:_ ereinicker(a~mbakercorp.com
Updated 1 L/1/2005
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Little Sugar Creek Greenway -CPCC Reach - 7th Street to Elizabeth
Avenue
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 08013108, 08013109, 08013110, 08013111
4. Location
County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): North of the Cit~of
Charlotte: I-77 South, Take the Wilkinson Blvd/I-277 E/ John Belk Frwy/ US-74 E/ West
Blvd exit 9, Merge onto I-277 N / US-74 E via exit 9B Take the Kenilworth Ave / NC-16 S /
Third St./ Fourth St. exit 2-A, Turn right on 3rd Street Turn left onto Kings Drive proceed to
intersection of Kin>s Drive and 7th Street. Creek is adjacent to existing CPCC parking lot•
See Vicinitv Map and Site Maw
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.220506° °N 80.830331°W -Upstream Point
35.219050°°N 80.831011°W -Downstream Point
6. Property size (acres): Project area is 1.66 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Little Sugar Creek
8. River Basin: Catawba
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/ma~s/.)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 8

9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The project site is located just south of uptown Charlotte, in
a highly urban settin>?. CPCC is planning an adjacent culinary campus and er enway. The
existing_parking lot will be removed as part of this initiative. The e~,r ater project will
decrease overall impervious area.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Removal
of portions of the riprap armoring the stream banks, invasive species control, rg ading and
planting bank slopes with native riparian species excavation of floodplain bench where
space allows, excavation of riffle and pool bedform features and installation of in-stream
boulder structures. A trackhoe will be used for in-stream work.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The primar~~oal for the project is to improve
bank and channel stability, improve water quality and reclaim the natural and beneficial
functions of the floodplain and stream channel.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A. Future plans for stream enhancement work are bein dg eveloped on other sections of Little
Sugar Creek, but construction document packages are being developed for these reaches under
separate contracts.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 8

accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: adin~plantin~ to improve
stability of 490 LF of channel.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure anti flnndinu.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
(es/no (linear feet)

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage. multiply leneth X width. then divide by 43.560.
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on map) Before Im act (linear feet) (acres)
Little Sugar Creek Enhancement Perennial 50' 490 0.56

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 490 0.56
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill. excavation_ dredgin~_ flcuding_ drainaue hnikhearlc etr.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on map)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 8

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.56
Wetland Impact (acres):
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.56
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 490
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The nroiect constitutes a_positive impact, enhancing stream function and habitat by imvrovin>?
bed features in the stream. Construction practices will follow guidelines from the NC Erosion
and Sediment Control Planning and Desi~ Manuel.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
u~ted t tniaoos
Page 5 of 8

USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
httn://h2o. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at htt~//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 8

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 1 SA NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 8

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The proposed design will reduce the impervious area by approximately 0.005 acres through the
removal of an existing structure in the project area and its replacement with ve etg_ ation.
Additional impervious area will be reduced adjacent to the project area in the future through the
proposed construction of the Little Sugar Creek Greenway.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This is a stream restoration project that will not increase development in the area.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Age ` is Signature `Date
(Agent's signature is va id only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Updated 11 / 1 /2005
Page 8 of 8

LITTLE SUGAR CREEK: CPCC REACH
7`'' Street to Elizabeth Avenue
Prepared For
Prepared t3y
;e
1447 S. Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28203
0 7- 0 9 9 8
PAYMENT
RECEIVED
June 1, 2007
STREAM ENHANCEMENT
SUPPORTING DATA
PCN 401/404 CERTIFICATION PACKAGE

Vicinity Map
r*u~• raw.e .¢ . tC A O~swn
soh R~ ~ti ~ F~ 9a0tt
dr f aJ ~ O _ a:
~~ U n
po• 4'R~sr ~~i a~ ,` , e~~ y'e'a ~~ ~` dQ, e~~Q Fj )ask°On~ •Gt;tea}Pve ~ e
~..~ 5 ~~i[ch `~~e. C o\~. ~~~ Qa yam`' e~` ~S ~ ~ "~ E
r
f +
~ ~ ~G ca~a yd~ Y'h3, ca y0~ ~ .~~ ; µ;Exx
~°~ ~~' 6~ ` ~~J s( 00.6 j,'f.~ r~?~ Sfaclicirrl ~ -~ ~ ~. y
~~ ay ~^ h~ SAy A hR r'G. ~"" b~ ~Yrc7 ~ ~-y^ 9:
viq ~~ S' ~ ~~1 ~L ~J A y ~• p9 S`v Q
~ a ~ F v~ ~` n~ vi d0 a Q~ r-
y ~7 ~q O (~~ ~ ~@~~ @~l
'~ ~~'i t* c. eye ~ .. ~ - Q S ffsf ~,~' t`'~wr F~f'`', S}
r,~ ~JP J ~ ~ t9 `S r~ ~ F of
ski d~ rw-4~ ri` c "ter ~~ .s~ ~
.fib' 4;~,':, ~~~~V `~wc ~Y 6 ~q ~;a xir;tiY ~5 ~ r.
~ fFro qL O~ ~ ~ 9kF j'R Cnltryc tr '~a
vS `V'ro'e ~~ VEhr ~ '~t St `°~
~p r '~'f on q t'r! ~> a~ ~ tiT
~.t ~A ;,, ¢^ Cafes ~ d~ ~ Rrcx~syE«riv1 ~
y~`~ a,~... d ~ FA ~:~^ a y ,Er' ~z ~ NaafrfJaf G'i
w rv s ~ ~ u ~' ~~ rr r '-`F
`tea - 'p ° ~ `y t •c •~° 'hr.
S~ y. ~ c• ~
G aL a2 +~'~'rry Orr wr h r~ Qr~`f y~~e p ~ ~ ~S/f ~, '6~*4F
fi%~F ,~3`~~- _.r E3rrktfey Fevr yd. ` a~ C ~ y~.o ~ ijry q~w /
~~ ~~rr rcreta uror "a; <? 4~ s ~ 'yn o~
v~ Sa Fye S~"4- Park ~ ~'qi aGa c7w ~ ~~ ~ O` '~P
G. ,r.~~4~ ~~"~i '~ 4~. ~ Fa~~ $at~„r Sf ~ ~~,ep~ ~lfrdrs
-f0 ~`. ~~!o ~ J'u O~W [7afVnr.uSh ~t q ~ ~f'P
?,r °zy ~ ~t°F Sr"c/ ~~ ~" ~SeVt~t ~ HiFrpGSJ
c~'~i 4 ~~E ~~~ raf rarr St ,~rfw ~' ti v: rtrrta y e Ct ~ CoJ `pyre
d~v vy Q-`~ ~~~Jf e~ ~ ~yc omley fYd u ,t S o`°~x.
q~ mv- air ,c~ y^ crr„arras .. 1v1ur~VS~n Ln .e ~ a0
~.. ~ Sf yy `c '~ N g;igehdt Rrt
^daynaSta lhvc ~ ~~ 'hip Carrtcr ~ O ~ Clanll+ook t,n
e q ~ 9y ,~ o G7 P RS ~' ~~
;A ti, Q~le`I `1c
ro ~ e ~ 5 Ed9Nhill Rr~ ^ 4
7 W e e, ~' m ~ a ~ Benton e` o,F~P ~q ~-
~~y;a ~ `oww~ ~Ua eta ~ a~ r ~ ,r ~y4 Altnndate kue o•
Or `° ~r~ ~ ~ ~ Conr~onpr g C~~~~ Coady., FI ~~StPiej-
a
d~'rmUre r v hlnpidala ~rvi C7 R
T. inn:. n.6 ~.,n~ ~m~* r.,... `fi't ~' ~. X2006 N74VTEF
Directions:
North of the City of Charlotte: From I-77 South, take the Wilkinson Blvd/I-277 E/John
Belk Frwy/ US-74 E/ West Blvd exit 9.
Merge onto I-277 N / US-74 E via exit 9B.
Take the Kenilworth Ave / NC-16 S /Third St./ Fourth St. exit 2-A.
Take the 3rd Street ramp and turn right onto 3rd Street.
Turn left onto Kings Drive.
Continue to intersection of Kings Drive and 7th Street. There is an existing CPCC
parking lot adjacent to the creek.
The CPCC Reach site is bounded by I-277 to the north and west, Kings Drive to the
south, and 7`h Street to the east.

,~
Qr ~ y, o-
~e~ i ~~. if ~ ff i ~' fr ~•.•
V I t, ~ r t~ Q ~p 5 ~ ~ i~ sir ~ '~' ~ , ~ ~r°`t' ~~121~..~ t ~- ~~ % h` V ~ 1
~~` .per i' } or ~ ~'4"{-'~'~p~,'~ ~ ~ ~r ~ ~,fr ~~''..,'~. ~~-.c-: ~~-,~J ti~.~ ~~ i '~f.
%R t ~ ~'~~ ~ 117-y~ ~ : f~ ~ ~tf ~~•.~!~ l y'/1`j ~ ° j~ ~,~' ~ . ~ ~i~. ~y "`;.~ ~r ~~y ~~
.tom. I rly tii, 1~ ~' f ~ „~/''~ \ ~ i „~. ~ ~i'`C ~„~'~) ~`?~-. `s~.~p~•
~1 ~ ~ ' ~ys~ ~a1 ~ ~ -"'' '~ a 'r
..~
..
_ q ~ r,
~` u ~ ~Itti, r~7'~ t0. - _ ~`,*z} ill`" y . ra, f r~ }'r~: ti ~ "';5 y~rti
~. ~ ~ ~~ ~'~ r ~,'^J. ~- ~ ~ ,..~ ate' '~.- ~~- y~~~ ? ~ ~~ ,:
r, ~ t~ ' ~ ~ ~~` , • ~ rte- '-"--' "~., ~ , - ., ~ ~ '' •f . ~ ~`.
f ~ ~ ~~ N f "'Y~- 4 i t'' ~ ~ -.•. '"
,
Legend Vicinity Map t
Little Sugar Creek
Project Area Streams 7th St to Elizabeth Ave
1447 S. Tryon Street. Suite 200 0 o.z5 0.5 /~, Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte, NC 2A203 Miles /~ Mecklenburg County, NC

r
SIL
x
J ;
;,
40
Mono
x
lip
ell
2
2
fi
a a
M
6
m :
Legend Site Plan
Little Sugar Creek
Project Area Streams Parcels 7th St to Elizabeth Ave
1447 S. Tryon Street, Suite 200 0 50 100 Stream Restoration Project
Charlotte; NC 28203 Feet l� Mecklenburg County, NC

Little Sugar Creek CPCC Reach
7th Street to Elizabeth Avenue
Existing Conditions and Design Summary
Baker Engineering is developing construction documents for a stream enhancement project on
Little Sugar Creek from 7"' Street to Elizabeth Avenue in Charlotte, NC. This memorandum
summarizes our watershed assessment of Little Sugar Creek to the downstream end of the
project at the Elizabeth Avenue culvert under Kings Drive.
Watershed Delineation
The project area is located in central Mecklenburg County just southwest of downtown Charlotte
in the Catawba River Basin. The drainage area of Upper Little Sugar Creek (from the headwaters
to the project) is approximately 9.6 square miles. The headwaters of the creek are located in the
northeast quadrant of Charlotte, south of I-85 and east of I-77. After flowing through the project
site, Little Sugar Creek continues south through Mecklenburg County to join Sugar Creek which
continues to the Catawba River east of Rock Hill, SC.
Land Use
The Little Sugar Creek watershed is located in a highly developed urban setting; approximately
80% of the land in the watershed has been developed. Approximately 43% of the land surface is
impervious. The land uses within the watershed include residential (47%), industrial (25%),
commercial (19%), woods (7%), and institutional (2%).
Geology
The city of Charlotte lies in the Charlotte Belt, which is a geologic zone comprised of
predominantly metavolcanic and plutonic rock types. The geology of the project area is Devonian
and Ordovician age granodiorite rock. The granodiorite is medium-grained, massive to weakly
foliated, and is comprised mainly of plagioclase and quartz (Goldsmith, 1984).
Bedrock knick points were observed in the project reach. These knick points indicate the
presence of shallow bedrock and also indicate that bedrock is preventing the creek bed from
further incision or downcutting.
Soils
The soils found within the floodplain of the project site consist of Urban soils. Urban soils describe
areas where the original soils have been cut, filled, graded, or paved to the extent that a soil type
can no longer be recognized. The existing site's banks are stabilized with riprap and a large
portion of the floodplain serves as a parking lot.
Hydrology
The Upper Little Sugar Creek watershed is an urban watershed with a very high percentage of
impervious cover. The development and impervious cover has impaired the natural hydrologic
function of this watershed. The increase in development and impervious surface allows more
rainfall to run off the land and directly into the creek. In less developed watersheds, a greater
percentage of the rainfall is able to be absorbed by the ground and so less rainfall Hans off into the
creek. Urban watersheds such as Little Sugar Creek will see higher quantities of rainfall enter the
creek at a faster rate. Urban systems are often described as "flashy' since the stage and flow of
the creek quickly increase in response to a storm; after the storm, the peak flow can quickly pass
and the stage quickly recedes.

Existing Stream Condition
Much of Little Sugar Creek has been altered to accommodate development. The creek has
historically been dredged and maintained as a flood control channel. Most of the banks have
been armored to prevent erosion from high flow velocities. The project reach of Little Sugar Creek
has been listed on the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's (NCDWQ) 303(d) list since 2000.
Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires states to develop a list of waters not
meeting water quality standards or which have impaired uses. The NCDWQ 303(d) list includes
violations of impaired biological integrity and high fecal coliforrn concentrations for the creek.
Bankfull Verification
The bankfull stage along the Little Sugar Creek CPCC Reach was identified in the field, and work
on the Midtown Reach and the Kings Drive Reach downstream of the project assisted with
bankfull identification. The indicators were a break in slope on a narrow depositional feature and a
high scour line. Vegetation trends were used as additional validation for this stage selection.
These indicators are consistent with other North Carolina urban Piedmont streams. Bankfull data
for the project reach was compared with the North Carolina Piedmont regional curve. The
project's cross-sectional areas plot close to the urban regional curve data, indicating that bankfull
stage was adequately selected within acceptable limits.
In order to identify bankfull discharge along the downstream Kings Drive Reach, the current
Mecklenburg County HEGRAS model was used. A range of discharges was run through the
model to identify a range which correlated with the field-identified bankfull stage. The bankfull
discharge ranged from 900 to 1,100 cubic feet per second (cfs) according to the model. These
values are consistent with other North Carolina Piedmont urban streams. The bankfull discharge
was further verified by astage-discharge rating curve developed at a USGS gage (02146409)
near Medical Center Drive approximately 6,600 LF downstream from the CPCC Reach on Little
Sugar Creek. The observed bankfull depth (bankfull height -water surface elevation) in the Kings
Drive Reach was approximately 5.8 to 6.3 feet. This stage on the rating curve shows a discharge
of 950 to 1,150 cfs. This identified discharge is near to the previously identified range and
therefore within the acceptable limits.
Two other reaches of Little Sugar Creek have had stream enhancement work performed. The Liz
Hair Reach (Morehead Street to East Boulevard) and Westfield Road Reach (Princeton Street to
Brandywine Road) are both located downstream of the Kings Drive Reach. A geomorphic survey
has been conducted on both of these reaches. The Liz Hair Reach was a Rosgen Priority 4
enhancement project which did not change channel geometry. The Westfield Reach bankfull
area plots near to the North Carolina Piedmont urban curve. The Kings Drive Reach data are
consistent with the other Little Sugar Creek reaches, thus further verifying that the bankfull stage
was selected within acceptable limits.
Reference Reach and Design Parameter Selection
Two reference reaches were identified off the project site and are located in the Piedmont of North
Carolina. These same reaches were used for the Westfield Road Reach natural channel design.
Campbell Creek is located in Charlotte, NC, and has asemi-urban drainage area of 6.1 square
miles. Silas Creek is located in Winston-Salem, NC, and has a watershed that is suburban with a
high percentage of forest. The Silas Creek reach drains 3.3 square miles. Both of these sites plot
close to the rural regression curve for bankfull cross sectional area, thus indicating the Piedmont
regional curve is applicable to these streams which are being used as reference reaches. The
fact that these streams' bankfull characteristics plot near to the rural curve rather than the urban
curve may indicate that urbanization has not had much of an effect on the geomorphic functions of
these streams.
Baker Engineering Page 2
LSC CPCC Reach Summary June 1, 2007

Campbell Creek classifies as a Rosgen E4 type stream, while Silas Creek classifies as a Rosgen
B4c type. Silas Creek is more entrenched with an entrenchment ratio (ER) of 1.3 than Campbell
Creek's ER at 3.5. Silas Creek has a higher width to depth ratio at 15.1, while Campbell Creek is
approximately 9.7. The grain size distribution of the reference reaches is comparable to that of
Little Sugar Creek design reach. The design reach has a lower d~ grain size, which can be
attributed to a more urbanized watershed than the reference reaches. The average water surface
slope of the design reach is 0.3% and is also comparable with the reference reaches which are
between 0.7% to 0.8%.
The Little Sugar Creek CPCC Reach stream enhancement project will consist of Rosgen Priority 3
and 4 enhancement. Floodplain benches will be excavated in a few short, isolated locations. The
stream alignment will not be adjusted due to restrictions from infrastructure and utilities. This
reach currently classifies between a Rosgen B4 and G4. An absolute Rosgen stream
classification of urban streams such as Little Sugar Creek is difficult due to historical channel
modification and the limited ability of the channel to freely adjust to its channel-forming agents
because of utility and infrastructure constraints.
Sediment Sampling
Baker Engineering collected sediment samples in stable riffles downstream of the project reach
using pavement-subpavement and modified Wolman 100-count sampling techniques. Most riffles
contain a large percentage of embedded riprap sized particles that appear to have sloughed into
the channel from past bank stabilization efforts. The embedded nature and algal growth on these
larger particles indicate that they are not likely mobile during bankfull events. For our pavement-
subpavement sample, we selected a location that appeared to be most representative of the
mobile portion of the riffles. We conducted a wetted perimeter zigzag pebble count at a riffle to
characterize the pavement materials.
Sediment Analysis
We checked sediment transport competency of the existing channel reaches using the
methodology developed by Rosgen and Jessup (Jessup, personal communication, 2002). This
methodology is based on dimensionless critical shear stress that is determined from ratios of
pavement to subpavement particle sizes. From the dimensionless critical shear stress estimates,
critical depth and water surface slope can be estimated and used to check a design. We also
used a boundary shear stress calculation and a modified version of Shield's curve to estimate the
largest particle size that can be moved in the channel. Our stream enhancement work will not
change the slope of the reach or the bankfull cross-section of the creek. We investigated whether
the stream can be expected to aggrade or degrade over time given its existing slope and cross-
sectiongeomorphic characteristics.
Our calculations indicate that the existing average stream slope of 0.0028 feet per foot is near to
the critical slope of 0.0022 to 0.0025 feet per foot needed to transport the median bed material. A
reach average slope was calculated for the creek from 7"' Street to 3`~ Street. The local slope for
portions of the project reach is much steeper. The actual bankfull depth of 4.4 to 4.6 feet is more
than the critical depth of 3.7 to 4.0 feet. These results indicate that degradation could be a risk
along the project reach. Proposed in-stream boulder structures will provide grade control as
safety measures against degradation. The shallow bedrock observed upstream and downstream
of the project site will also prevent degradation.
Aggradation is not expected to be a problem because of these calculation results and because not
much coarse sediment is being supplied to the system. The supply of coarse sediment in the size
Baker Engineering Page 3
LSC CPCC Reach Summary June 1, 2007

range greater than about 90 mm is very limited in a developed, urban watershed such as Little
Sugar Creek. Furthermore, the existing channel appears to be moving its sediment load
adequately as evidenced by the lack ofmid-channel bars, and the design section does not
represent an extensive variation from the existing condition.
Referring to the modified Shield's curve, the largest movable particle size for the channel is 150 to
200 millimeters (mm), which indicates that the 43 mm to 63 mm maximum-size particle collected
during the subpavement sampling will likely be mobile during bankfull events. This movement will
prevent aggradation.
Baker Engineering Page 4
LSC CPCC Reach Summary June 1, 2007

Little Sugar Creek CPCC Reach- 7`h Street to Elizabeth Avenue Baker Engineering
Photo Log
Photo 1-Looking upstream toward culvert outlet Photo 2-Looking downstream from utility
(wisteria area) near upstream extent. Utility crossing area midreach.
crossin rotected b abions.
._ ~ k
,-- ~ ,.~.. ,rte,
Photo 3-Looking upstream from midreach. Photo 4- Looking at right bank midreach,
Numerous overhead utilities. ad~acent to Duke Power substation.
,. .
~s-
` ' S)
,~~.: - :a
/,~~'
Photo 5- Downstream project extent at Elizabeth
Avenue culvert under Kings Drive.
L:\Projects\111089\Documents\Perm its\401404\PhotoLog_CPCC.doc

LITTLE SUGAR CREEK - CPCC REACH
7TH STREET TO KINGS DRIVE
STREAM ENHANCEMENT
60~ PLANS
LEGEND
-=
I ~.~
12
I II
I
II
I
. I
II
II
,I
II
;I
II
it
I
~~
. I
II
II
II
it i
~I
1,
~:~
~II ~
~ ~~ r ' a
m ~
c . ~ 1
i
~~ ~ ~~
~i r ~~= ~ - -__= KENDS DRI VF ~ : ~ I
III I 11 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ - --__ `'•
III ~ ~ -- _-
u ~l I _ i a - ~~' - = --
II.. ~ .
w C
w ;; (~-
~ ii q
II I
(n u . Ir
II .
I ,
I ~I
f~ n ~ i
II
f-
ll r~
II ;
II •:.
Q n l ..
l LI I
I I '.
~~
~\
__ ~_:_. ~ ~~lr ,a~~ ~ ~'
~: 1~ I
,I ',~
~= _=-~ ~-
p I R.
~ ~ I {1 --1~-~-~ ~ 't
~ LB J
I
II~ ~
II

rl
I, r
~I r~. . ::~I
I~~.
ni ~
l~i}
- ff
-
~~~ 1i
N _ ~\ _~

I
~
u ,~ ~ ~~
u r
l~ h ~ Y! ~ ~~ ~ " ~ ~ i
~ ~~r ; ~ ~ ' ~~ ~`,~
~`
t l I o d I' 1 ,f
~ "• f A d I'. ~ ~" ~',
+~ ~ t°~ Irl ~, !,• ~ ~
,,
.. 1 ~ •'\~ ~1 ,~ i ~•
~~ ~ ~ ~~ ' ~ ~ ' -_ . _:I~
': I

~r
~~ ~ _'el`
~~~y ; n
i • ~y c~ ~ --- ..._.
~ ~ / ~ ~ `~ ~\~ 60' 0 6D' 120'
~' ~~ ~
/• \`
~ • j ~ ~~ ~ SCALE (FT)
12+00
STREAM ALIGNMENT
- - - - - PROPERTY LINE /RIGHT-OF-WAY
- - -sao- - -EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
- - - -EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR (2-F~NTERVALS)
s.w PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
s3z PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
ss EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
- sr - sr sr - EXISTING STORM SEWER
o~E EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
PROPOSED DOUBLE DROP
CROSS VANE STRUCTURE D1
PROPOSED CROSS e1
VANE STRUCTURE D1
PROPOSED 1
r RIFFLE SILL D2
SHEET LIST
T1 TITLE SHEET
Pt SITE PLAN
P2 PROFILE
Li-L2 PLANTING PLANS
X1 TYPICAL SECTIONS
D1-D4 DETAILS
SUN ~ ~~~~
jpg rVVO 8TOIN~A R BRAS
47-4998
BE~OfiE YOU DIOI
cn~.t. i-eoo-asz-aeee
rr.c. ot~-cnu. c.Err~
ma n~ uvln
PREPARED FOR:
Charbtte-Mecklenburg
STt1RM
WATER
Services

`I •1Jsd ? ~ J i -''"° '".~ }~ ~ r ~ ~ - , -- Hi :z-.zi ~ - ~ r~, ^'~°~~ 0~111089ENc
., ,., -~` "~ /.,__ YM301S ~s~c ! S ~~~ PROJECT ENpNEER
1 ~/ ` -. ~- s ~ STA 14+35 TO 14+90
`1 ~ I ~ ~3{j ~ '" .,. d~ - - .....19 ~ ~`~ K'~' ~ ~ EMOV~RIPRAP ON LEFT~~' ~!
11 + /~~ i `.~. I :i' ~',/ ~:~ ....... .... <~~,a ~ ~ - ~ i~ P.NONr~~~'`~~ BANK. MATS SEED AND PLANT " Q~ EGR
- -,
~_.._ - ~.;~ ~,. .. is ;- A6013109 `~ 3 m -~~ ~ ~~~~ Q ~ PPROVED BY
,t ' I ` I , ~. Medlenburq cwnty - / ,~ ---~ ~+ _`'`"~-~. z, N0-th Ki ~ ~'
/ .' 1 D BOON,-OR PACE Nor AwILABLE '" `~--_ - ~ - z c~i~aAN n9s Dry'y ~"~`+ ASE
-~
d ~'1 I ~ ,I-.1 Ci of ChMdlte Propct No. S1J-67-1J2 / ~ R°- \ ~S 0 ~~~z Q Px~°
p
\ ~ 1 \ ~ ,
` ^ 1 ~ I I ~ / l ~ .. ~ / ~~ _ ~ iZi-~ZZ ~(~`V~r1 GS/09 /~7
' ~ 1 ~ '~ _~
(,, + ~ tl I ' 1 ~~ ~ 06013110 / y
/ ~ ~~ Central P'edmonl Community Cdlege ! rS. ~~~ Sr _Y /
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --. I I: I ~ i DEED BOOK OR PACE NOT AVAIUBLE .y ~ ~~. / "~s~"~"s, r.'•`
~~ 1: ~, 1 City of Chadolte Prajed No. fi1J-67-IJ2 sheet 14 A f5 of 21 / . .
~~~. ~ ~~ ~~ I ~:' III:; ~ 1
,p \ 1 ~ ~ t COMMUNITY ENCROACHMENT / d' /
J , ~~~~~/ $; ~~ ~~ FLOOOWAY ~ STA 12+75 TO 14+35 j~ s ~ .~
~ _- ~ GRADE 20~ <MOE BENCH , ~'; S / " a -
S /
.~ > I ~''~' 1 ON FT N TIE IN ~ ~j ~ ~y
\ ~ . ~ ! / 1 LE BA K. TO
\ `~ -' ~ ,~ EXISTING GRADE AT Y.1 SLOPE ~s ~ ~
5
i
1 _.: ~ I ~ S fS ~ R r
i ( •`I FEMA FLOODWAY ~ 1 ~~ ' gS '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ruu eu tse.~a
y„~ I ~ ,- ' :' - r ELEV=666.60
- 1 ,w
r
/ i
~~/ ~ d4' I ~ EXISTING BWLgNO ~ SS ~ / o%e~s
~ ~ ~ ~ TO BE DEMOUSHEO ~ 5~ ~ j/ /
;- ~~
y ,,
__~A~L~ _- 1 C. ttt}1 ` ~ r ~,, ~ ~ (eY OTHERS) ^~
I OktllE_ .~ a ~ ` UTURE PLAZA ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
w i
-- ~ ~ / j (BY OTHERS) ~ ~'" 1 ~ / i
../ /
'~ '~ °. ~~ / ~~NN +~ / ~~ / ~ ~~~
1 ~ ~~~~I / ~ e ,~ / ~~` i ,,,' ',~% '~~ vY/
`k_
~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ STA 12+30 TO 1 w ~ U ~~/,! i / ~ ~_ ~ / 6x d0'
11 ~~ e1 ,o
~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ STA 12+75 NO GRADING ~ ~~~ ` - ./ ~
u ~' I i" PROTECT SEWER SIPHON _ ~ a~ / ~-~ ~~ ~ ~
1 ~ ~ ~~ ~~~;U, b~ti~
' "St Rca •,,, 1 1" / ~TA 11+60 TO 11+00 w ~ - o.~ ~
I / /
/ ~, 1 S7^„_ Ib 1 --, NO GRADING ON LEFT ,/ /~. _ - / i-"'~ ~.. ~ 'y ~~
' I . `13- R 1 BANK. PROTECT UTURE CREENWAY t/' ~ 1 / ~~'~ ,~ ~-y i/, /
U , ~ ', Sj C~1 ~ / TRANSMISSION TOWER /~A (BY OTHERS) 1 /.~ - , , ~ ~ St~v~ ~ ~ % _ _
Al
9 1 / /I ,~ / '" Au
/` _- .f '
~,~q1 -
:-. ~ / /
' ~ .. ~~
i- ~~/~ /
~ n
' ~'.
~ ~ ZL c"`, ~s1~ ~ ~. _ ---=~ ~^_',-./;; 1 sY ri , ~/ ~~' // INSTALL TEMPORARY
- ..
i
I ~ ~ / -
/ ~~ •~>:.` :-.>- _ i / // ROCK CHECK DAMS
I ~ \ STA 1D+ TO T1+l1Q AND fftsf - ~./`° / `3e00 t ~~/ ' ' / ,
~ / 12+OOT012+JOREMQVE ;; ~ fs _ /rte ;'g ~ /' /./ ~~/
I ~ A°a ON LEFT ~f~NN91 '~ '. ~s~ '~ ~ , ~1/ _. ~ m ~6~, i/ ~
O O ~~ RI RA
a/ SEED AND PLANT ~~~
I
_- p ~ - ,. -. / ~ t i /i , - TA 12+20 TO 14+9D
~~O ~ .~ .. ~"~ ~ :{;. _ ~ _ . ~ / ~ ~" i' ~ •9' I y ~ REMOVE INVASIVE SPECIES
`.:, ` / ~ 2`, _ - _.. ~;, .~ - --- ~ vV -- l 1 ~ _ _ ~~~7 ' ~ AND JOINT PLANT ON
.' / ~-.-
_ .-
/ ~ _ ~ ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ - HT BANN
_ . ~M;^'" /- ~~:,/ ~ ~ ~ __ ~ .,¢i ~ ~ II UTURE FIFTH STREET R
. -_-'y-- .___. ___ .: ~ ~-~~ ~ '~ ~ K"~ II CONNEC110N (BY OTHERS)
_..-
~ / II
~... ,~O
# _
/~!J --- __- - -:-""''`_`._ ~`,r__ L_, ~ _~p~ - ~- ~ EXISTING
\ ~
_..- -
,' ~ I
1. ._.- ,,
- ~ r ~ ~' r '....... , III DUNE POWER
~ •~ ~,, ...~ 1 ~ 1!I~ .._ - _ - ~' / !- /'~ / SUBSTATION
-.
..
-ir ~ .
_=
I
II
~ ~~
-..
I ~ _ \
II
I - %' / //
---- ~~ I I
f ~ II
- - UE II Duke6PoJi1wl Co.
/ ~ / ,~ / - r``
FF II DEED BOOK OR PACE NOT AVAILABLE
4~l~ D ~ -- ____ j ~ ~ A~' jj PROPERTY ADDRESS NOi AVAIU&E
I _. ~ ~ / ~ A ~ ~ P
I +. ~ ~ II
~ ~ /. D / 5A s II
~ ~ ~ V 6 ~ ~ A• ~ ~ i I I
ay~~ I FEMA FLOODWAY COMMUNITY ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~\ ~ q~C(y / ~ / / I I
yY
ENCROACHMENT ~ ....: ~ ~ ." ... -, ' ~ ~V/
~~ a. ~~ ..
-` ~ ,,, _, ~ '~ ., ... - ,' STA 11+40 TO 12+PO ~ e • • ;~ + - I I
.. . _. ~ a=a~$~s ~~4, ' ... " ' _ .... ~ / ~ GRADE RIGHT BANK TO ~` ` rn, ~ ~~; I I
_ _ ~ E ' 3 / •1 ~ ~ ;~ I I BEFORE YOU [)101
-~-.... _ ~ ~_ __---._ ._ a=~°o _ _ ~~~ ~.. .. ~,. _„ ~ -.. 642 AT 5.1 SLOP .. 11
_ _ CALL 1-800-E32-4946
_ ~ + ~ v r ~ ~ ~ I I NC. OPE-CALL CENTER
_ FEMA FLOOOPLAINZt / - ~~ ~~ _ \ i~ ' ~ I I Ft'8 TF~E ~~
Ott ~~ S ~ ~° • I I
~ a
~ ~ FUNRE FLOODPLAIN ~4it f~Q~~ ~~ ~a- ~' ~~ ~ ~`^ I I
E%iS
~ / i ~ ~ ~ ~ y 20' 0 20' 40'
\ _ _ .. / \ pia ~+~ ~ s ~ I I
~ / 4 \ ~ + 1111111 ---_----- 7~~
0 a __
~~\ ~`,.~, ~ii / '.+~>, ~\ ~ ---- --------- ii tl ~~ SCALE (FT)
~/ ~ - '~ ~~, ~ ~. ~ • '1 '~~~~ ~. -~~;, o ~ LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
_. - o ~ ~ ~ I
1~
-,-r..... _ ~
e ~ DE
_
/ \ ll ~ ~ _
- - _ _
,-
.~ \, ,
~~~~ - - ' ~ ~~ o _ , ~ ~ l~\ ~ - >z = _-_ _-__ ---- _ ~ ~ - , PLAN SHEET
~_
~. ~ ~ ~ ~~
L'~\Propcts\070s.70~0uigi\PLAN9~plorsnebAp NaY 04 7007 ~~ _ ~~ _ -

o ~ .__
-~_,, ..T
i
o
+ ~
U
O
__
~
o ,
~ a ',
a i ~ ~.
z _
i _
N W I
i
S m '. '. '.. '. '.
a ......... .__._ ,.__.
I. '; ',.
i
:_
i
nn ".L,_, alb
~ d If
± ~ 'il
a o
~ i w
m
n
Nq
a
~~
N
a3
BEFORE YOU DKY
CALL1-800-832-4949
N.C. ONE-CALL CENTSi
IT'S TiE LAWI
2' 2' 4'
20' 0 20' 40'
SCALE (FT)
May

q T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PROJECT flEFERENCE N0. SHEEi ND.
. ..... ,_ ~ yk _ <
~~ ., , n ~ ~ - - ~0
/ 1 / / ~ ~ I .~ ABOI31O9 ..... ~~°''..: 1 ; ~ / q ~~ ~.... '- ~ ~ -~ ~ ~i~ cs ~ PROJECT NEER
~ +'', ~ , ~ ,, Meglllenhurq coeely ,'u / N -'"--.. } ~-, --_YB`~ Noah ~ EGR
Kin P
,J ~ ED 800K; OR PACE NOT AVAIUBLE ~ ~ ~ ', '' ~ ~ ~ ~z $ V
i c
9 5 c I ~ ~ 11 Ci of Chod6tle Prajed No. 51J-67-132 / ~ ~ R ~ ~ _ ~ ' ~ -~ S ~O ';a.~i 9 Drive Q S~ APPROVED BY
/ ' Z
f ' : <
~ ~ i
~ vs ~ ti
. I I ' f ~ ~ Pw~ ASE
. ~ r , , ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ s aza_
~~ ; ~ . ~ ~ , ~ ospl3np ~ ~ ~ /~ ~ ,. ~ ~~ g 05 09 07
. I,. ~ _ ,_. I '. ~' :. ~ ~ Cmlrol Piedmont Commun t Cdl a ,._.
`• %' 1 : ,,, i DEED BOOK ~ PACE NOT AVAILABmLE ,;' Q
;~~ ~ s l ~
I ~ Cilyu/ Charlotte Project No. 513-67-132 sheet 11 k 15 of 21 ;; ~ /
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,il ~~ ~ I ~~ '
' < ~ ~~-~ / ~ ~ COMMUNITY ENCROACHMENT ~ ~ ~/ Ys 0 ~ ~ ~ ~" ~~~
i~~ / ~ j `;~a FLOODWAY ~ ~,~ /~ // A, s~ - z~
~ ~ ~ ~ she
J ~!' Am
`._ ~ :~ II FEMA FLOODWAY ~ 1 ~ - ~ gt ~ ~ ~ - S ~ / Rub Bu L18.ia
yyy
. ,'J _ ~ I ~ ~ ` ~ ./ / ~ /.~Y.xro~ ELEV=646.60 ._
__.. /~ ~ ~ St °/
' / ~ U'~' ~ ._ - E%ISTINC BUILDING ~ ~ / - ~ °°~ !ns
_, _- ~ '6 ~ / TO BE DEMOUSNED 51 / ~ ~ /
~RAVt1 p t .~ ~ `~ (eY an~ERS) ^ i ~' ,%~ ~ ~ r~
DaluE ~~ --~R p~ i , ~ ~ / ~~ ti , E sra: ~
,. ~ w ~ ~ ~
„~
' ~~
',r` ~ 1
`.
'~ ~~ a ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~/
I ;~~ 1 - ''~~ ~ / ~ ~~ ~/ i ~/, ~ ~ .J
1 ~1 ~ ~ I l ij "~ Mar o ' / w ~~ ~ _ - X~ 0,
~ ~8 ~ ~ ~' I ~ ~ q / STA 10+DO TO 14+90 ~~ ~ `` ,~ ~ ~ J" ~
~ ' ~ SST 5 RCp ~ ~ F~ / .. ~ REMOVE INVASIVE SPECIES, ,K ~ j ~ _
~~ ~ S~ s '. ,~1 BOTN BANKS. ii / ~ri,y-n'~~~ ~ f`~~~
;~l ~u ~13, ' 4 ~'~ i(~ ~ ~ y~ ~ ,,"tik v /
~ ~
___
,,aa~~ 1 ,~~ ~~
~ ~ a ~~ `~`, /~ /
~. ~ - .d ~ / ~ ~~~,/ ~ iii
' ~ ~ ~ i y ~~ ~ ~ ------- ~ ~ - ,
-\
~I ~ / LZa~ ,a.~~,~~ -- ~ _ I ~ ~ /ii
`s
/ ~~~~ ~ i /
~~~? \ ~ /
y
.- ~
__
• ~- ~ - - ~++=~ v :' ~ , ~ - III
i - __ i
d ~ "fi
2 _ _ -
:~. __-'
ti -- ~~-~--' ~ 1~~~ Y
~- . _-
x ~ ~ °f ~~
a.."-`- t ,. -
a ...c_: _, ..
~a ~ _ - a _ - _ .. .~'~ _ _ _ ~ t .. ~ ' y ~a ~ ~~I~ E%ISTING
_ DUNE POWER
~ ~ ~ ~ >l _ ~ / / . ~ ~ ~ -1~ .'~ ~ I I suBSrAnoN
II
1T+ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ; s~ I I
/ ~~~" ' ` .
uE-~ II oeol3m
r II Duke Parrer Co.
/ / ~ ~
~, II GEED BOd( OR PACE NOi AVAILABLE
as / ~ ~ ~ ~ I I PROPERtt ADDRESS NOT AVAILABLE
"~~ ~ 111 ~~
I ~ ti n ~ II
I ~~...~a~ ~ 0~ ~ / GA A ~ '. II
~.,~~~ ~ '_ ~`'a '~ A i ~ II
~° , ^ ,i„ 60~ f ~ 1 I I
a< ~ FEMA FLOODWAY ~ ~O'~'r. ~~ V ~-. d~R ~ ~/,.~/" ° ~ - II
~ „`
~_~ / COMMUNITY ~ `.. / A ~ /
ENCROACHMENT ~ - ~ ~ ~ ,~~~ s~~ .~~ r II
y ~ ~ ROODWAY ,~~~~ ~ ~ ~ v
~~ ! ~a ,~~ ' ~ 0 < • ! I I
~/ 4444'_4 ~ *~._ ~ a / , °~. ` (} II
~ FEMA FLOODP AlNaaaa V ~ ~~` t7C _~~~~ ~ + ° s ~ ~ ~ ~ I I CALL 1-800-032-4649
~~(( \\ s LLJJ
~ ~~ .... ~ a/~(/a h Sly ° ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I N.C. ONE~ALL CENTER
\ ~ - NNRE FLODDPUIN / aaa eel ` ~~+ ° ' \`~~+ 1 ~ I I TT'8 T}'E L's'~
~ ~ / 4444 I , ~~.e ~ e! I I
~ ~ i aaa ~ II
o ~ a '°;
~,7 ,~
,. _. ,
~..
,~a p ,_ -.. , ~ _,.. _. ~ ~ ~ ~ '~, ~ ~ ~`~ \ ° :.' M - -~- - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~"vc~= _ ~ LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
a / \ all +~ ~ --- ._ _
~.. - _ _ __ _ `._ _ h
`~` , _ _ _~,. ~ _ _ ~ ~ a ~ . ~; °` -- -_ -, ~_ ~~-~~ PCC REACH
~~ ~v
_ fl _, ~ __
_ ~~ _ _
_ l
,. ~ ~ s _ _
_--_-- --
- -?`.e ~ , ;:., ~ ~ l PLANTING
PLAN
L•~Propch\0201.20~Delim\PI WC\dmdr.rs A.n un. M om~

Stream Bank Plants

Scientific Name
Common Name Mature
Height
Spacing
Installation Size
Alms serrolata Tag Alder 6'to 10' 4' OC BR, Tabling
Amnia arbutifolia Choke Cherry 6'to 10' 3' OC BR, Tubling
Callicarpa americana Beautybeny 4'to 6' 3' OC BR, Tubling
Ckfhra alnifolia Summersweet 6'to 10' 4' OC BR, Tubling
Comas amomum Silky Dogwood 6'to 10' 3' OC LS, BR, Tubling
Corylus amerrcana Hazelnut 6'to 10' 4' OC BR, Tubling
llex verficillata Winterberry Holly 6' to 10' 4' OC BR, Tubling
Physocarpus opulifoUbs Ninebark 6'to 10' 3' OC LS, BR, Tubling
Salttserecra Silky Willow 6'to 12' 3' OC LS, BR, Tubling
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 6'to 10' 3' OC LS, BR, Tubling
Viburnum denfatum Amowwood Vibumum 6'to 10' 3' OC BR, Tubling
.Joint Planting '

Sciantific Name
Common Name Mature
Height
Spacing
Installation Size
Corms amomum Silky Dogwood 6'to 10' 3' OC LS
Ph ocarpus opulitoGus Ninebark 6'to 10' 3' OC LS
Safrx serecia Silky Willow 6'to 12' 3' OC LS
Sambucus canadensrs Elderberry 6'to 10' 3' OC LS
Lame Trees

Scientific Name
Gommon Name Mature
Haight
Spacing
Installation Size
Betula nigra River Birch 60'to 80' As Shown 15 GAL min
Frawnus pennsylvanica Green Ash 60'to 80' As Shown B+B
Nyssa sylvat~a Black Gum 60'to 80' As Shown B+B
Platanusoccidentalis Sycamore 80' As Shown B+B
Herbaceous Seed

Scientfc Name Common Na
Agrastis alba Retltop
E~ymus virginicus Virginia Wild
Panicum clandestinum Deer Tongue
Panicum viruatum Switchgrass
amma grass

e Mature
Height °h5eed
Mix
2'to 3' 20%
ye 2'to3' 30%
2' to 3' 10%
3' to 6' 20°/a
i 2' to 3' 10%
2' to 3' 10% m
R
20' 0 20' 40'
SCALE (FT)
40y

EXISTING GRADE TOP OF BANK
TIE INTO EXISTING
GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE
INSTALL MATTING
AND BARE ROOTS
PER PLANTING PLAN
- - - - - - - -
~~L \
~~_ \~
EXCAVATE BANKFULL BENCH,
STA 12+75 TO 14+35
RIGHT BANK INSTALL
JOINT PLANTING STAKES
IN EXISTING BANKFULL
TOP OF BANK EXISTING GRADE
~~- ---~
BANKFULL ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
9 NORMAL
\ _ WATER SURFACE1
y~ A.o 1 ~
_ ~
~ / .
~~ /
BANK AREA ABOVE NORMAL
WATER SURFACE AND BELOW
BANKFULL: INSTALL MATTING
AND LIVE STAKES
TYPICAL SECTION 1
USE FROM STATION 12+75 TO 14+35
EXISTING GRADE TOP OF BANK
BANK AREA ABOVE
BANKFULL INSTALL MATTING
AND BARE ROOT PLANTS
PER PLANTING PLAN
~~~-
~ ,,fa
~ .... ~_ 1
TOP OF BANK EXISTING GRADE
~z
BANKFULL ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
~ NORMAL
BANK AREA ABOVE BANKFULL ~ WATER SURFACE1
SMOOTH CRADE ON BANK SLOPES. ~ 1
INSTALL MATTING, SEEDING, AND ~ ~
BARE ROOTS
BANK AREA ABOVE NORMAL
WATER SURFACE AND BELOW BANKFULL:
INSTALL MATTING AND LIVE STAKES
_ ~
~ / .
~~ /
. ~ ~ i
TYPICAL SECTION 2
USE FROM STATION 11+40 TO 12+20
BANK AREA ABOVE NORMAL
WATER SURFACE AND BELOW BANKFULL:
INSTALL MATTING AND LIVE STAKES
GRADE PER PLANS
EXCAVATE AT 5:1 SLOPE
STA 11+40 TO 12+20
5' 0 5' 10'
SCALE (FT)

1 CROSS VANE
D1 NTS
B'~
~i o~
i J ii
A ~
' ~ ~A -
/. ,\
_~~
I
~' I
~'~
i ~'
\ / I
NO GAPS
BETWEEN
BOULDERS
POOL TO BE
EXCAVATED PER
PROFILE
CLASS I STONE
CLASS A~
STONE
ON-SITE CHANNEL A n
ALLUVIUM k
TYPE 2 FILTER
FABRIC
(NON-WOVEN)
TOP OF BANK HEADER
~ ,,,, _ `CHANNEL BED B ROCK SLOPE SILL ROCKS TO
1 ~ „ / B' 3/4 OF BANKFULL HEIGHT
-.
rc ~~ ~x
,. _ . ,:
~~ ~~~ ~ .._ FLOW G _ _ O
STREAM BED ;'~;~_-_-" -- "----"
ELEVATION FOOTER TYPE 2 FILTER
' MINIMUM CLASS A S 0 E ROCK FABRIC (NON-WOVEN)
OULDER, 4'X3'X2' MIN. CLASS 1 STONE
SECTION A - A' PROFILE VIEW B-B'
STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS
L (ft) 56
S (ft) 6 TO 8
F de) 20
W (ft) 14
G % 7.5
2 DOUBLE DROP CROSS VANE
D1 NTS
A
B'~

~ ,,
>~ m
,' -' , ~
- ~ -; ~ o

'
1 1
11

~' <~

~
I l
)
~,.
'~ ,
A

I 1<
~~
~ / -~
~
' ~ i ~
~ -1: .
~''
Y NO GAPS
a BETWEEN
m BOULDERS
0
w
0

POOL TO BE
EXCAVATED P ER
PROFILE
=,
CLASS I STONE
CLASS A
STONE
ON-SITE CHANNEL_
ALLUVIUM
TYPE 2 FILTER
FABRIC
(NON-WOVEN)
~~. ~ ~;
rt jYl.
(Y:~ -
MINIMUM
OULDER, 4'X3'X2' MIN.
SECTION A - A'
STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS
L (ft) 56
S (ft 6 TO 8
F (deg) 20
W (ft) 14
G % 7.5
TYPE 2 FILTER
FABRIC (NON-WOVEN)
CROSS VANE STRUCTURE NOTES
1. BOULDERS MUST BE AT LEAST 4' X 3' X 2'.
2. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM THE MIDDLE OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND
EXTEND DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK, AND THEN UPSTREAM
FOR A MINIMUM OF SIX FEET.
3. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS. FILL SHALL BE PLACED
ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF VANE ARM, BETWEEN THE ARM AND STREAM BANK.
4. STARTING AT BANKFULL, FOOTER ROCKS SHALL BE PLACED FIRST AND THEN HEADER ROCKS.
5. STRUCTURE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
6. AN EXTRA BOULDER MAY BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT, PER
ENGINEER'S DIRECTION.
7. CLASS i RIP RAP SHALL 8E USED TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF BOULDERS. CLASS A
RIP RAP SHALL BE USED TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF STONE CLASS 1.
8. AFTER ALL STONE HAS BEEN PLACED, THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE
FILLED WITH ON-SITE ALLUVIUM TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCK.
-~ 1~--~
CHANNEL BED
CROSS VANE STRUCTURE NOTES
1. BOULDERS MUST BE AT LEAST 4' X 3' X 2'.
2. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM THE MIDDLE OF THE HEADER ROCKS AND
EXTEND DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER ROCK, AND THEN UPSTREAM
FOR A MINIMUM OF SIX FEET.
3. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS. FILL SHALL BE PLACED
ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF VANE ARM, BETWEEN THE ARM AND STREAM BANK.
4. STARTING AT BANKFULL, FOOTER ROCKS SHALL BE PLACED FIRST AND THEN HEADER ROCKS.
5. STRUCTURE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
6. AN EXTRA BOULDER MAY BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT, PER
ENGINEER'S DIRECTION.
7. CLASS 1 RIP RAP SHALL BE USED TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF BOULDERS. CLASS A
RIP RAP SHALL BE USED TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF STONE CLASS 1.
8. AFTER ALL STONE HAS BEEN PLACED, THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE
FILLED WITH ON-SITE ALLUVIUM TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER ROCK.
TOP OF BANK
8
FLOW
~T
STREAM BED ~'.~
ELEVATION
CLASS ASTONE
CLASS i STONE
ROCK
B'
G-
~7_----" ----i `FOOTER `-
ROCK
PROFILE VIEW B-B'
_ 7 . , , ~. .~~r
A ~ ~ V „~ t, a, ~~ `y~~~v A

~I',
B'
Y
Z
a
m
0
a
O
Y
z
a
m
0
w
O
H
PLAN VIEW
7 IFFLE SILL
D2 ~
B' TOE OF
EROSION CONTROL MATTING' ~'
B'
CENTER BOULDER SHALL BE PLACED ~
2" TO 4" BELOW ADJACENT BOULDERS. SECTION B'-B
PLACE 3" STONE MIXTURE OVER BOULDER
SILL TO ACHIEVE THALWEG ELEVATION.
STONE MIXTURE SHALL BE UNIFORM
THICKNESS WITH THALWEG IN CENTER
OF CHANNEL.
TOP OF
BANK
TOE OF B
BANK
_~ ~ EROSION CONTROL MATTING
50'
SEE PLAN
FLOW
~ 57 STONE
B~
A A
A~
J `s 4
f
q l
l h31~4 . „ .: ~..7~C'

B~
PLAN VIEW
2 TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK DAMS
DZ NTS
SPILLWAY CREST 3
# 57
,; ~ " , ~~, STONE
CLASS I RIPRAP ,?~~..~` ' \y?• (6" THICK)
{ ~ ~ ;;~~ 3' aFLOW
~~"~~ !( ~C~, ,
f 10'-~
SECTION B-B
W (SPILLWAY)
~",.~ MIN 2/3 STREAM WIDTH ,%'"
~tTl~r~ ~,- ~ .
s _; ~~ ~.
~:i
~~CLASS I RIPRAP
SECTION A-A
10'
_._ _ _.... 1p,
1 i ^ \,'
WORK AREA
_., ,,, _.
x n.
,._ _.~
~ : -.
.--
0
_.
w ,
~~
INSTALL AND MAINTAIN
THREE CHECK DAMS
`~~~ DOWNSTREAM OF
PROJECT
PLAN NEW
,.,..\
CONTRACTOR TO
REMOVE
SEDIMENTS WHEN
ACCUMULATION
REACHES 12"
~ a
i"s., ~~
CLASS I RIPRAP ~
10 ~ 10
ELEVATION POINT PER
PROFILE (TYP)
HEAD OF
RIFFLE 12" NOMINAL THICKNESS
FILTER FABRIC EQUAL PARTS CLASS
A, B, AND I STONE
RzFFLE INVERT OF CROSS VANE
ems.
6' MINIMUM - ~ ~ ~ ~~'
BURY BOULDER
3" BELOW
STONE pROFILE A-A'

~ TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
D3 Ts
BERM
~~
FILTER FABRIC FOR
DRAINAGE UNDER RIPRAP
~`-
,-
~~" 2
a ~ ';'`~i
~~~r
12" MIN
PROFILE VIEW
3 ROSION CONTROL MATTING
D3 NTs
PLACE COIR FIBER MATTING IN 6 INCH DEEP
TRENCH, STAKE, BACKFILL, ANO COMPACT
ITOP OF BANK /BANKFULL
IPRAP CLASS A / B I

2 TORM WATER OUTLET PROTECTION
D 3 "n
fr=-~
BERM ~` ~
~.~..`~
2
~ / ~'x.
~ '~ ~ MIN.
t,
~" ~- ~?~ '~- ~ ~ a
r ~- ~ ~
_ ~ ; y i ._ ~ ~ s.,~..y
f
L ~ ~~ ~~ ~~
B , ,>~~~{ ,,~. f
~ - , ~~--~ ~ , ~ , ,r
~,~ Y~~ ,~ ~t~~,
__ -<.,
i= z ~ ~ ~ i K
a
t~ , .. r
n ~ ~ ~,
W
PLAN VIEW
PLACE COIR FIBER MATTING IN 6 INCH DEEP
TRENCH, STAKE, BACKFILL, AND COMPACT
OF CHANNEL
ENCH
P OF BANK
12' TO 20'
_i=~
L~
PLAN VIEW
AKES
COIR FIBER MATTING
TO BE EXTENDED TO
NORMAL WATER
SURFACE
NOTES:
1. ON SLOPES ABOVE BANKFULL ELEVATIONS,
MATTING SHOULD BE INSTALLED ON TOP OF
SOIL TREATMENT MATRIX IF EXISTING
MATERIAL IS UNSUITABLE FOR VEGETATION.
2. BANKS SHOULD BE SEEDED PRIOR TO
PLACEMENT OF MATTING.
3. PLACE COIR FIBER MATTING ACCORDING
TO MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS.
4. MATTING STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED
IN A DIAMOND SHAPE PATTERN.
W
RIVER COBBLE
_~ - c
LAYER OF FILTER FABRIC
SECTION B-B'
ID L (FT) W (FT) T (FT) STONE
EXISTING 18" 6.0 4.5 1.5 CLASS A
EXISTING 24" 10.0 6.0 2.0 CLASS 8
EXISTING 36" 12.0 9.0 2.0 CLASS B
EXISTING 40" 15.0 10.5 2.0 CLASS B
EXISTING 48" 15.0 12.0 2.0 CLASS B
TYPICAL MATTING STAKE
CROSS SECTION VIEW

~ ANK TREATMENT 2 STRUCTURE ELEVATION TABLE
D4 ~ D4
FOR BAREROOT PLANTING SURFACES AT DR ABOVE
BANKFULL ELEVATION
TOP 6" OF BANK MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED AND
REPLACED WITH SOIL TREATMENT MATRIX IF EXISTING
MATERIAL IS UNSUITABLE FOR VEGETATION GROWTH
EXISTING
GRADE
BANKFULL
ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
- __.. _. ~
STATION STRUCTURE ELEVATION
ii+58 DOUBLE DROP CROSS VANE 633.D0
11+68 DOUBLE DROP CROSS VANE 632.50
12+35 RIFFLE SILL 632.10
12+60 RIFFLE SILL 632.00
12+70 RIFFLE SILL 631.50
13+54 RIFFLE SILL 631.21
14+D4 CROSS VANE 630.67
4 TUBLING AND CONTAINER PLANTING
D4 "rs
.5 ALIVE STAKING
TOE OF
TOP OF 3 ~
BANK
3'
nd Mrs
TOP OF
BANK
~-3' BETWEEN STAKES
TOE OF BANK
~// 1.._. - .._...
CROSS-SECTION VIEW
PLAN VIEW
~.
BUDS FACING
UPWARD
LIVE CUTTING ~~ 2' TO 3'
MINIMUM 1/2° DNS ~~ 1~LENGTH
`,
ANGLE CUT 30 ',
TO 45 DEGRE€~',
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
TOP OF
BANK
', STAKES SHALL BE
', PLANTED FROM TOP
OF BANK TO TOE OF
~ ' BANK
0!.
NOTES
1. STAKES SHALL BE CUT AND INSTALLED ON THE SAME DAY.
2. STAKES THAT HAVE BEEN SPLIT SHALL BE REJECTED AND NOT USED FOR
CONSTRUCTION.
3. STAKES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH BUDS POINTING UPWARD.
4. STAKES SHALL BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO BANK.
5. STAKES SHALL BE 1/2 TO 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER AND 2 TO 3 FT LONG.
6. STAKES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 1/5 OF STAKE REMAINING ABOVE GROUND.
7. 80% OF STAKE SHALL BE BELOW GROUND.

CROSS-SECTION VIEW
BANKFULL ELEVATION
NOTES
1. SHRUBS AND TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AT LOCATIONS
AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
2. SPACE SHALL BE ALLOWED BETWEEN PLANTINGS,
DEPENDING ON SIZE OF PLANTS, AS DETAILED ON PLANTING PLANS.
SOIL SHALL BE LOOSENED PRIOR TO PLANTING.
.L BE PLACED IN HOLES DEEP AND WIDE ENOUGH TO
ROOTS TO SPREAD OUT AND DOWN WITHOUT J-ROOTING.
. BE KEPT MOIST BY MEANS OF WET CANVAS, BURLAP,
IHILE DISTRIBUTING OR WAITING TO PLANT.
.L BE HEELED-IN TO MOIST SOIL OR SAWDUST IF NOT
CANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT PROJECT SITE.