20080396 Ver 2_Information Letter_20100923

w ?
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
September 23, 2010
Mr. J. B. Setzer, P.E.
Division 14 Engineer
N.C. Department of Transportation
253 Webster Road
Sylva, North Carolina 28779
Subject: Stormwater Inspection
US Highway 64
DWQ Project No. 08-0396
TIP No. A-001 I BB
Clay County
Dear Mr. Setzer:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
On September 8, 2010, 1 conducted a stormwater inspection for TIP Project No. A-001 I BB, US Highway 64
construction project in Clay County. The rainfall data and erosion control records appear to be maintained in
f-go'od order.
Continue to ensure that these records are maintained during the life of the project. Please refer to the attached
inspection report for additional comments and/or recommendations.
If you have questions, please call me at 828-296-4500.
Sincerely,
Michael R. Parker
Environmental Senior Specialist
Attachment
Icc: Trent Anderson, P.E.
Mark Davis, Division 14, DEO
Ed Ingle, Roadside Environmental
Transportation Permitting Unit
Mike Parker, Asheville Regional Office
A-001 I BB September 2010 Slorrnwater Inspection
Location: 2090 U.S. Hghway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service. 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.navaterquality.crg
An Equal Opponunily 1 Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Naturallil
FOrm A June 2005
Sjis Inspection form- Construct,'on StormvIater Permit NPDFS NCGO10000

Namz:
F
i S
e we Q? D %'7?f3
O R0:
DW ,;
eGU..
A;
I
pecte _
1. D`WOInspectiodate: (Al)IS[ r,.._43. J1J

Location:
2. County: (AL) '. + - S. Stream: (AS) yk.
3. Basin: (A3) #rW ASS43,d? 6. Class A6 ; ' n EL x
4. Location description: (A4)
(Topographical vicini ap of site is attached for case file/
7. Land disturbance due to construction/ development?OUT" /r+f11U.4 (A7) Ye r No
8. On-site representative available during ins ection? A8) Yes (' r N. Name(s) ?
Title(s a .s-
7
Employer(s)
t
9. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (Part I. Section A: No. 2.)
Is a copy of the approved plan on site and available for review? (A9) Y "' ! PIO Not
Inspected' i;
10. Rain Gauge ( Part I. Section B. No. 1.)
Is a rain gauge present on the site at the time of inspection? (A10) Y r No Not
Inspe cte
11. Rain Gauge Data ( Part I. Section B. No. 1.) _ ........ .... .... ..
Is rain gauge data measured and recorded? (At 1) Yo a $l No . 'st IN
eCted
Data from past 14 days:
Week 1 Date
Amount. s.:?:.. =%? A '__I
Week 2 Date:
Amount

12. Minimum Monitoring & Record Keeping (Part I Section B No. 3.)
Are inspection records of erosion & sedimentation control facilities complete &
Dales of documented
Week 1:
Week 2:
13. Sedimentation impacts to waters:
Typical range of sediment depth: (A13a) to?
Maximum depth of sediment: (A13b)
No C-: Not
Inspected'
14. Linear ft of stream im acts
(A14) i_a(_
15. Photo Documentation: Were photos taken? (A15) 3n Yes'':'}r-. rag ?:
Photos (1. impacted war.,-, 2. sedimentation depths, 3. sediment control measures, and 4. un-impacled upstream lvatar l
and sketch/map of where photos were taken are attached for case isle
15. Notes:
Project personnel not available during Dw0 site inspection
-4
1