20010550 Ver 1_Complete File_20070829

,.. 0 0550
j?@Iqfl W?k-e
SEP 0 4 !??# 200) CX,o
m
tel 1 1
O J l tNFT(gNDS R 1A%"
'Cli
AN? ALITy
1
PROGRAM
August 29, 2007
Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, '"suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
R-2809A, NC 98 (Wake Forest Bypass) from West of SR 1923
(Thompson Mill Road) to US 1, Wake County; Neuse River Basin
(Cataloging Unit 03020201); Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) will provide the stream and nonriparian wetland mitigation and the buffer
mitigation for the unavoidable impact associated with the above referenced project. As
indicated in the NCDOT's mitigation request dated August 29, 2007, stream and
nonriparian wetland mitigation from EEP is required for approximately 95 feet of warm
stream impacts and 0.01 acre nonriparian wetland impact.
Also, this project will impact buffers located in CU 03020201 of the Neuse River
Basin. The total buffer impacts are 7,556 square feet in Zone 1 and 4,198 square feet in
Zone 2 with a total buffer mitigation requirement of 28,965 square feet. If the buffer
impacts or the amount of mitigation required from EEP increases or decreases for this
project, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation
acceptance letter will be required. All buffer mitigation requests and approvals are
administrated through the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund (Fund 2982).
The NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that the appropriate compensation for
the buffer mitigation will be provided in the agreed upon method of fund transfer. Upon
receipt of the NCDWQ's Buffer Authorization Certification, EEP will transfer funds
from Fund 2984 (Tri-Party MOA Account) into Fund 2982 and commit to provide the
appropriate buffer mitigation to offset the impacts associated with this project.
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 21699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
Stream and nonriparian wetland mitigation associated with this project will be
provided in accordance with Section X of the Amendment No. 2 to the Memorandum of
Agreement between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the N.
C. Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers fully executed
on March 8, 2007 (Tri-Party MOA). EEP commits to implement sufficient stream
mitigation up to 190 stream credits and 0.02 nonriparian wetland credits to offset the
impacts associated with this project by the end of the MOA year in which this project is
permitted. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation
acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be
required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
Willi D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., NCDOT-PDEA
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
Ms. Kelly Williams, EEP ILF Coordinator
File: R-2809A
..,,
Y
COS?St+?I? ?.?
PROGRAM
August 29, 2007
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
R-2809A, NC 98 (Wake Forest Bypass) from West of SR 1923
(Thompson Mill Road) to US 1, Wake County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) will provide the compensatory stream and nonriparian wetland mitigation
and buffer mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you
on August 29, 2007, the impacts are located in CU 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin in
the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Warm Stream: 95 feet
Nonriparian Wetland: 0.01 acre
Buffer Zone 1: 7,556 square feet
Buffer Zone 2: 4,198 square feet
If the buffer impacts or the amount of mitigation required for this project increases, then
this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance
letter will be required.
All buffer mitigation requests and approvals are administrated through the
Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund. The NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that
appropriate compensation for the buffer mitigation will be provided in the agreed upon
method of fund transfer. Upon receipt of the NCDWQ's Buffer Authorization
Certification, EEP will transfer funds from Tri-Party MOA Fund into the Riparian
Restoration Buffer Fund. Upon completion of transfer payment, NCDOT will have
completed its riparian buffer mitigation responsibility for TIP R-2809A. Subsequently,
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 21699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
EEP will conduct a review of current MOA mitigation projects in the river basin to
determine if available buffer mitigation credits exist. If there are buffer mitigation credits
available, then the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund will purchase the appropriate
amount of buffer mitigation credits from Tri-Party MOA Fund.
During the review of this request, it was noted that this project was not included
in the 2007 Impact Projection Database; however, EEP will provide the requested stream
and nonriparian wetland mitigation. Depending on the availability and projected need of
stream and nonriparian wetland mitigation in this cataloging unit, additional stream
mitigation may be required that was not included in the biennial budget submitted to
NCDOT on April 2, 2007 (revised April 16, 2007).
EEP commits to implementing sufficient compensatory stream and nonriparian
wetland mitigation to offset the impacts associated with this project by the'end of the
MOA Year in which this project is permitted, in accordance with Section X of the
Amendment No. 2 to the Memorandum of Agreement between the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina Department of
Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, fully executed on March 8, 2007.
If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter
will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
E,
William . Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer, USACE - Raleigh
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality,
Ms. Kelly Williams, EEP ILF Coordinator
File: R-2809A

Wetlands/401 Unit
.? r
DRAFT MINUTES OF INTERAGENCY 4C MEETING
MEETING FOR PROJECT -2810 CUMBERLAND COUNTY
ti HELD ON 8/22/08
Team Members: Andrew Nottingham NCDOT Hydraulics (Present)
Richard Spencer USACE (Present)
Gary Jordan USFWS (Absent)
Travis Wilson NCWRC (Absent)
Rob Ridings NCDWQ (Present)
Kathy Matthews EPA (Present)
Donnie Brew FHWA (Present)
Roger Thomas NCDOT Roadway (Present)
Tyler Stanton for Elizabeth Lusk NEU (Present)
Charles Cox for Undrea Major PDEA (Present)
Tracey Pittman Division 6 (Present)
Participants:
John Frye NCDOT Structures
Amy Billings NCDOT Hydraulics
Phil Harris NCDOT-PDEA/NEU
Mark Staley NCDOT-REU
Lee Puckett NCDOT-Bridge Construction
Jim Rerko NCDOT-DIV 6 DEO
DOT began the meeting at 2:00 P.M. with an overview of the project. Since the last 4B
meeting held on 6/15/07, there have been several changes and adjustments to the project,
especially the bridges.
Hydraulics reviewed the Stormwater Management Plan included with the permit
package.
Hydraulics discussed Site 1 on sheet 4 of the plans. The existing 42" RCP shown at Sta
21+70 -L- (Rt) (Unnamed Tributary 3) will be extended by approximately 96 LF. On
this plan sheet, there is also an outlet from the storm drain system to a grass swale to the
northwest to obtain treatment before discharging into the channel. USACE would like
the work to be done (ex. Extending existing 42" RCP) indicated clearly on the plan sheet
as well as the length of the extension. They would also like a scale on each plan sheet.
USACE indicated that this was standard practice as indicated in their permit application
instructions. Hydraulics said this could be done. Hydraulics noted that the scale was
shown on the permit drawing title sheet, the type and size of pipe was labeled on the
wetland permit impact summary sheet and the pipe size and extension was labeled on the
permit drawings.
Hydraulics explained that the small wetland area shown on Sheet 4 was actually included
on Site 2. USACE wanted to have more stars added to the shaded area of mechanized

clearing. Sheet 4 also needs the level for "Wetland Boundary" shown on the plans. The
easement indicated on the right side of sheet 4 may be removed. At one time in the past,
the storm drain system did outlet in this area, however, the wetland boundary has been
revised and now the system is draining into the upland area between the wetlands. (See
sheet 5)
Hydraulics moved to Site 2 on sheet 5 of the plans and gave a brief history of this
location. The design used to be 2 bridges at this location. Now the 2 bridges have been
squeezed together to form one very wide bridge. The original design was cored slab with
top down construction. However, since it is now 84' wide, cored slab is no longer
feasible. Due to flooding issues at this location, the grade had to be raised. The current
design is a 36" pre-stressed concrete girder bridge. This bridge is in a detailed Flood
Insurance Study and the design is required to have no rise in the 100-year flood.
Therefore, the bridge opening had to be made longer (230'). Since it is now a concrete
girder, top down construction is no longer feasible.
A temporary work bridge will be used during construction and hand clearing will be done
under the bridge. There are still 3 overflow pipes at 66" each and they are spaced further
apart than the original design (as requested by USAGE). There are no deck drains except
on the last span on the right side of the bridge. These deck drains have rip rap underneath
the bridge to prevent erosion. Impacts to the wetlands due to this rip rap need to be
shown. Catch basins will be picking up deck drainage from either side of the bridge.
Hydraulics reviewed the "Wetland Restoration" area indicated on the permit drawings
under the proposed bridge. USACE questioned the height of the bridge over this area.
Hydraulics indicated it was approximately 6'. USACE indicated that there would not be
adequate sunlight for vegetation and vegetation is one of the 3 parameters required for
wetland restoration. The wetland restoration area would also require monitoring and the.
area was considered too small to waste time and money on monitoring. DWQ also
considered the area to not be cost effective. NEU agreed that the area was too small to
spend resources on monitoring.
Division 6 noted that they have had scour problems with interior bents located near the
stream banks when H piles are used and it would be better to use pipe piles. USACE
questioned a need to armor the piles in the active channel. Structure Design responded
that we do not armor piles with DOT bridge design. If we prefer pipe piles, Structure
Design suggested Hydraulics and Structures talk to the Geotech Unit and tell them that
pipe piles are the preferred alternative rather than H piles.
At Site 2, USACE asked about the rip rap at the outlet of the three 66" RCPs shown on
sheet 5. USACE was concerned about a channel developing beyond the outlet of the
pipes. Hydraulics indicated that hydraulics warrant the use of rip rap. USACE wanted
the rip rap kept to a minimum. Hydraulics indicated that what was shown on the plans
were the minimum dimensions required for rip rap at the outlet of 66" RCPs. USACE
requested that the rip rap be assessed as impacts and added to the total impacts at that
site.

Hydraulics moved on to Site 3 (Buckhead Creek). This location consists of a bridge
being replaced bya bridge. There are no surface water impacts at this location. Storm
drainage system drainage was taken against the grade to provide treatment from a grass
swale in the north west area of the bridge. This prevented direct discharge into the
stream. USACE was concerned about the existing piles under the existing bridge. They
are timber piles. NCDOT asked USACE how they would like them to be removed. If
they are cut, they would like them cut 1 foot below the bed. Another option is to vibrate
them and pull them out. USACE did not want the timber piles to remain in place. These
2 options should be indicated in the permit application.
Hydraulics moved on to Site 4. At this location, an existing 24" RCP is being replaced
by an 8'x6' RCBC. Project U-620 (Hope Mills Bypass) (upstream of this project) has
rerouted drainage through an old channel. This is part of the mitigation on the U-620
project. USACE requested that NCDOT show how the wetlands connect to Buckhead
Creek. The quad map (a portion included with the permit package) does show how this
channel is connected to Buckhead Creek.
Hydraulics moved on to Site 5. This location has a 30" RCP being removed and replaced
with dual 30" RCPs. USACE would like the length of pipe shown on the plan sheet.
Hydraulics moved on to Site 6 at the railroad crossing. There is a stream on either side of
the tracks. Photos of the stream shown on the U-620 project were distributed. NEU
would like USACE to look at this location to determine if it is a Jurisdictional. stream.
NCDOT indicated that a crossing would be required to set the girders of the bridge.
USACE indicated that the railroad would be a bigger hurdle in permitting than the
USACE at this location. The group questioned what was done on the Hope Mills Bypass
project downstream of this location. At that location, they were able to set up on one side
of the tracks where there was no stream. USACE would prefer using mats. At this
location there are banks on both sides of the tracks. This location has a bridge length of
208' with concrete slope protection. Structure Design commented that the slopes could
be pulled back a little to avoid the stream. The natural slopes are close to 2:1 at this
location. Structure Design commented that they should be able to pick a location where a
crane can place girders and back out as they place them. Therefore, only one corner of
one side of the tracks will be impacted. The total impact will probably be 1/4 of what is
shown on the plans. The west side of the tracks is the flattest side. NCDOT will
coordinate to determine what type of construction access will be required at this location.
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 3:00 p.m.
Certificate of Completion
DWQ Project No.:
Oq?- 07 +-f County: _1?, l ? v,
Applicant: G T
Project Name: 5 W 1 0 ? 1 ?i? P-d
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: 0 ?65
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621. Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1621. This form maybe
returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer.. It is not
necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
?d?je , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction, such that the construction was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials..
Signature: lu& Zuk- !W? Date: "? z d
Agent's Certification
I nA?Sor \r ? %.? , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the constriction was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: ..,, Date: e-27-0-7
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional
1 , as a duly registered Professional (i.e.,
Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to
observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state that,
to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that
the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
r 5 No., Date:
Signature: Re st7ratt''o
'•ii 9 f , v+
6? F :W , C
2007
DENIR - V`dATER QUALITY
` r-TLAND 3.?ND SI oR4, YATER WICH
Ij3j?y M?
h e? s b
V
?? ayes
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR
August 28, 2007
WBS Element: 33073.3.1 (B-3453)
Contract No. C201794
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
F . A. Number: BRSTP-301 (116)
Counties: Edgecombe/Halifax
Description: Bridges over Fishing Creek and Overflow and Approaches on US 301
MEMORANDUM TO: Ellis C. Powell, Jr., PE
State Construction Engineer
FROM: Wendi O. Johnson, P
Division Construction Engineer
SUBJECT: Approved Preconstruction Conference Minutes
We are transmitting an approved copy of the minutes covering the Preconstruction Conference for
the above project, which was held on June 27, 2007. The minutes were approved by the
Contractor, Sanford Contractors, Inc., as recorded.
Attachment
c: Ron Lucas (FHWA)
Gary Jordan (US Fish & Wildlife)
William Wescott (US Army Corps of Engineers)
Rob Ridings (NCDENR, Division of Water Quality)
Brian Wrenn (NCDENR, Division of Water Quality)
John Holley (NCDENR, Land Quality Section)
Travis Wilson (NCWRC)
David Cox (NCWRC)
Ron Sechler (National Marine Fisheries)
Lee Wall (Dominion Power)
Bert Boswell (Embarq) ;
Nate Harris (Adelphia) *
Bobby Davis (Town of Enfield) g?
SFp 1 ??.
0
?IjgNpSNip ?,: i j
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Ellis C. Powell, Jr., PE
August 28, 2007
Page 2
ec: Cecil Jones, PE
Donald Pearson, EI, CPESC
Robert Simpson
Andy Brown, PE
Bobby Lewis, PE
Mike Robinson, PE
Warren Walker, PE
Andy Pridgen
Ron Hancock, PE
Lloyd Johnston, Jr.
Eddie Bunn, PE
Keith Honeycutt, PE, PLS
Charles W. Brown, PE, PLS
Kevin Lacy, PE
Victor Barbour, PE
Don G. Lee
Chris Kreider, PE
Barry Whitaker
Jimmy Marler
Jamie Guerrero
Haywood Daughtry, PE
Doug Allison
David R. Henderson, PE
Queen Crittendon
Greg Dixon
Ronnie Keeter, PE
Wade Harper
Franz Enders, PE
Kenny Baines
PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND PERMIT MEETING
WBS Element: 33073.3.1 (B-3453)
Federal Aid No .: BRSTP-301 (16)
Contract No.: C201794
Counties: Edgecombe/Halifax
Description: Bridges over Fishing Creek and Overflow and Approaches on US 301
The Preconstruction Conference for the above project was held in the Wilson Division Office Conference
Room on June 27, 2007 with the following persons in attendance:
NAME REPRESENTING
Andy Pridgen NCDOT - QA Lab
Walter Spivey NCDOT - Roadside Environmental
Kenny Baines NCDOT - Materials and Tests
Lee Perry NCDOT - Nashville Construction
Steve Joyner NCDOT - Asst. Resident Engineer
Ernie Nichols NCDOT - Construction
Rick Poythress NCDOT - Location & Surveys
Bert Boswell Embarq
Chad Coggins NCDOT - DES
Lloyd Johnston NCDOT - Division Right of Way
Eddie Bunn NCDOT - Resident Engineer
Randall Gattis Sanford Contractors, Inc.
Chris Brown Sanford Contractors, Inc.
Kenny Brady Sanford Contractors, Inc.
Mark Perkins Sanford Contractors, Inc.
Shannon Douglas Barnhill Contracting Co.
Greg Dixon NCDOT - Office of Civil Rights
W en(li Jul- nn U 151 -son, Divi ion unugulccl, presiueu over uuc wiucicu?c. -.sue aancu c`vciyvii a pry ?? iu w
introduce themselves and their company affiliation.
Kenny Brady will act as Project Superintendent for the Contractor.
Lee Perry will act as Project Inspector and Traffic Control Coordinator for the Division of Highways.
The Contractor advised they plan to begin work August 5, 2007, putting up signs. He should give the
Resident Engineer 30 days notice if this date should change.
The Contractor submitted his progress schedule. He was advised that it would be checked, and he would
be advised if satisfactory. By copy of these minutes, we are advising the Contractor that his progress
schedule has been checked and is approved as submitted.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 2
RIGHT OF WAY
Lloyd Johnston covered this portion of the contract.
All of the right of way necessary for this project has been acquired. Copies of the Right of Way
Agreements were given to the Resident Engineer. These agreements cover all of the right of way and
easements necessary for this project that were acquired by negotiation.
There are no 200 Series Items on this project.
There is no known asbestos contamination, underground storage tanks, or any known soil contamination
within the right of way of the project.
The Contractor is advised not to exceed the right of way or easement areas during construction without
written permission from the property owner.
LOCATION AND SURVEYS
Rick Poythress advised that this was in-house surveying. The right of way was staked by Division One in
the early part of 2004 and verified in the spring of 2006. Several monuments were not staked because of
the wet conditions at the time.
UTILITY CONFLICTS
Halifax EMC - All conflicts have been cleared.
Embarq - All conflicts have been cleared.
Adelphia - All conflicts have been cleared.
Town of Enfield - There is a waste water outfall at toe of fill, but this should not be in conflict. There is
also a sampling station on the south side and a U SUS station, but these should not be in conflict.
ASPHALT PAVEMENTS
Andy Pridgen, Division QA Supervisor, asked the Contractor if he had any questions of the Special
Provisions outlined on pages 49 thru 69.
Mr. Pridgen advised that the Special Provisions in this contract are dated 05/17/05 (Rev. 04/18/06).
Contractor stated that he would be willing to convert to the Specifications dated 7/18/06 (Rev. 9/19/06).
The Contractor will be allowed to run 20% rap.
The Contractor advised that Barnhill Contracting would perform paving on this project. A certified QMS
Roadway Contractor's Representative will be required to be on the project during paving.
' Density testing may be required for wedging (depending on the depth).
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 3
In the last sentence of the third paragraph of Subarticle 609-5 (D) 1, insert the wording "and wedging as
shown in the HMA/QMS Manual" (page 10-28) after the wording "temporary pavements".
The Contractor shall repair any damage caused by hauling equipment across structures at no additional cost
to the Department.
Contractor's attention was called to Item 11, Removal of Existing Asphalt Pavement, and Item 29,
Incidental Milling (refer to Section 1012-1 of the Specifications).
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
It is the policy of the North Carolina Department of Transportation that Disadvantaged Business
Enterprises (DBEs) as defined in 49CFR Part 26 shall have the opportunity to participate in the
performance of contracts financed in whole or in part by federal funds in order to create a level playing field
on which DBEs can compete fairly.
The Contractor, subcontractor and sub-recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national
origin or sex in the performance of this contract. The Contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of
49CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of federally assisted contracts. Failure by the Contractor to
carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this
contract or such other remedy, as the Department deems necessary.
The Contractor is also encouraged to give every opportunity to allow DBE participation in Supplemental
Agreements.
The Contractor's EEO Officer and Minority Liaison Officer is Brent Sloane.
The Contractor shall exercise all necessary and reasonable steps to insure that Disadvantaged Business
Enterprises participate in at least 7% of the contract. The contract was awarded with 7.04% participation.
The Resident Engineer furnished the Contractor with required posters for his bulletin board. The Contractor's
EEO Policy Statement is to be posted on the project's bulletin board, which should be weatherproof, along
with the following posters:
1. Davis-Bacon Minimum Prevailing Wage Rate Schedule
2. Wage-Rate Information - F/A Project, Form PR-1495
3. Notice Relating to False Statements, Form PR-1022
4. EEO Poster - Discrimination is Prohibited
The Contractor is urged.to document, in writing, all actions taken in complying with Equal Opportunity of
Employment Provisions, Training Provision, and Minority Business Enterprise Provision. This includes
applicant referrals, meetings with employees, on-site inspections, wage evaluations, etc.
All subcontractors and suppliers are responsible for meeting the same requirements as the prime contractor,
and it is the prime contractor's responsibility to oversee that both are in compliance.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 4
All alleged discriminatory violations should be brought to the attention of the Resident Engineer.
The State and/or FHWA will conduct a Contract Compliance Review sometime during the life of this contract.
Therefore, fair employment practice should be maintained at all times.
Reporting Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Participation - When payments are made to Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise firms, including material suppliers, contractors at all levels shall provide the Engineer with
an accounting of said payments. This accounting shall be furnished to the Engineer for any given month by the
end of the following month.
The Contractor shall report the accounting of payments through the Department's DBE Payment Tracking
System, which is a web based application. The System can be accessed through the following web link:
lilt s:/iapps.d0t.state.nc.us/Vendor/Pa?iuc;ntTrackiiig .
The Contractor shall also provide the Engineer an affidavit attesting the accuracy of the information submitted
in the Payment Tracking System. This, too, shall be submitted for any given month by the end of the following
month.
Retainage and Prompt Payment - The Department will not deduct and hold any retainage from the Prime
Contractor on this project. Contractor at all levels, prime, subcontractor, or second tier contractor, shall
within seven calendar days of receipt of monies resulting from work performed on the project or services
rendered, pay subcontractors, second tier subcontractors, or material suppliers, as appropriate. The Contractor
may withhold up to 3% retainage if any subcontractor does not obtain a payment and performance bond for
their portion of the work.
Submission of Records -Federal Aid Projects - This project is not located on the National Highway
System; therefore, federal form FHWA-47 is not required. Payrolls will be required for this project.
PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
GENERAL
Ms. Johnson reminded everyone that the meeting was being held from the proposal, which is based on the
2002 Specifications, and we must have an executed contract before work begins.
As far as pay items are concerned, we must adhere to the 2002 Specifications.
Contract Time and Liquidated Damages - The date of availability for this contract is July 2, 2007.
The completion date for this contract is August 1, 2009.
The liquidated damages for this contract are $800.00 per calendar day.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 5
Intermediate Contract Time Number 1 and Liquidated Damages - The Contractor shall not narrow or close a
lane of traffic on all roads, detain and/or alter the traffic flow on or during holiday weekends, special events or
any other time when traffic is unusually heavy, including the following:
HOLIDAY AND HOLIDAY WEEKEND LANE CLOSURE RESTRICTIONS
I . For an unexpected occurrence that creates unusually high traffic volumes, as directed by the Engineer.
2. For New Year's Day, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. on December 31'A and 8:00 a.m. on January 2°d
If New Year's Day is on a Friday, Saturday, Sunday or Monday, then until 8:00 a.m. the following
Tuesday.
3. For Easter, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. on Thursday and 8:00 a.m. on Monday.
4. For Memorial Day, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. on Friday and 8:00 a.m. on Tuesday.
5. For Independence Day, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. the day before Independence Day and
8:00 a.m. the day after Independence Day. If Independence Day is on a Friday, Saturday, Sunday or
Monday, then between the hours of 4:00 p.m. the Thursday before Independence Day and 8:00 a.m. the
Tuesday after Independence Day.
6. For Labor Day, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. on Friday and 8:00 a. in. on Tuesday.
7. For Thanksgiving Day, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday and 8:00 a.m. on Monday.
8. For Christmas, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the week of Christmas Day and
8:00 a.m. the following Tuesday after the week of Christmas Day.
Holidays and holiday weekends shall include New Year's, Easter, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor
Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas. The Contractor shall schedule his work so that lane closures are not
required during these periods, unless otherwise directed by the Engineer.
The time of availability for this intermediate contract work shall be the time the Contractor begins to install all
traffic control devices for lane closures, according to the time restrictions listed herein.
The completion time for this intermediate contract work shall be the time the Contractor is required to
complete the removal of all traffic control devices for lane closures according to the time restrictions stated
herein and place traffic in a two-lane, two-way pattern.
The liquidated damages for this Intermediate Contract time are $500.00 per hour.
Intermediate Contract Time Number 2 and Liquidated Damages - The Contractor shall complete the required
work of installing, maintaining and removing the traffic control devices for road closures and restoring traffic
to a two-lane, two-way traffic pattern. The Contractor shall not close US 301 Monday thru Sunday from
6:00 a.m. to midnight.
The maximum allowable time for the road closure is 30 minutes for US 301. The Contractor shall re-open the
travel lanes: to traffic until the existing traffic queue is depleted.
The time of availability for this Intermediate Contract Time will be the time the Contractor begins to install
traffic control devices required for the road closures according to the time restrictions stated herein.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 6
The completion time for this Intermediate Contract Time will be the time the Contractor is required to
complete the removal of traffic control devices required for the road closures, according to the time restrictions
stated herein, and restore traffic to a two-lane, two-way traffic pattern.
The liquidated damages are $500.00 per 30-minute time period.
Construction Moratorium - An in-water work moratorium will be in effect from March 1 to June 30 of any
year.
Training Requirements - The number of trainees to be trained on this project shall be one.
Safety Vests - All Contractor's personnel, all subcontractors and their personnel, and any material suppliers
and their personnel shall wear a reflective vest or outer garment conforming to the requirements of
MUTCD at all times while on the project.
Erosion & Sediment Control/Storm Water Certification - Contractor shall provide a Certified Supervisor,
Certified Foreman and Certified Installer on this project. Contractor will notify the Engineer of changes in
certified personnel over the life of the contract within two days of change. The Certified Supervisor on this
project will be Kenny Brady, and the Certified Foreman will be Robert Carter.
Procedure for Monitoring Borrow Pit Discharge - Water discharge from borrow pit sites shall not cause
surface waters to exceed 50 NTUs in streams not designated as trout waters and 10 NTUs in streams, lakes
or reservoirs designated as trout waters. For lakes and reservoirs not designated as trout waters, the
turbidity shall not exceed 25 NTUs. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural background
conditions, the existing turbidity level shall not be increased.
During the Environmental Assessment required by Article 230-4 of the Standard Specifications, the
Contractor shall define the point at which the discharge enters the State's surface waters and the
appropriate sampling locations. The discharge shall be closely monitored when water from the dewatering
activities is introduced into jurisdictional wetlands. No activities shall occur in wetlands that adversely
affect the functioning of a wetland. Visible sedimentation will be considered an indication of possible
adverse impacts on wetland use.
Contractor advised that they would be using a commercial pit for borrow and waste.
The Project Inspector will furnish the Contractor with a weekly erosion control list.
Notes to Contractor
1. Aerate and dry any unclassified excavation material containing moisture content in excess of what is
required to achieve embankment stability and specified density.
2. Undercut using drag line or other approved methods to prevent disturbance of the underlying soils.
Do not operate heavy equipment directly on the base of the box cut.
3. Fabric for soil stabilization should be used at the discretion of the Engineer to assist in bridging
poor quality soils if soft yielding conditions exist at the time of construction. The fabric should
typically be placed on natural ground from the toe of existing US 301 fill to the toe of the proposed
embankment.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 7
PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
ROADWAY
Clearing and Grubbing - Perform clearing on this project to the limits established by Method III shown on
Standard No. 200.03 of the Roadway Standards.
Roadway Excavation - Revise the 2002 Standard Specifications as follows:
Page 2-8, delete Article 225-2 and replace with the following:
Erosion Control Requirements
Install erosion control measures as required by the plans prior to any kind of land-disturbing activity.
1. Unless otherwise required by the plans, conduct operations in such a manner that cut and fill
slopes are completely graded to final slopes in a continuous operation and permanently
seeded and mulched, in accordance with the requirements of the Specifications.
2. Should the Contractor fail to comply with the requirements specified in No. 1 above within
the time frames established by the Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act, the Contractor
shall perform temporary seeding and mulching on any exposed areas at his own expense.
3. When the Contractor fails or neglects to coordinate grading with the permanent seeding and
mulching operation, the Engineer may suspend the Contractor's grading operation in
accordance with the provisions of Article 108-7 of the Standard Specifications until the
work is coordinated in a manner acceptable to the Engineer. Failure to perform the directed
work may result in the Engineer having the work performed in accordance with Article
105-16 of the Standard Specifications.
Shoulder and Fill Slope Material - Required shoulder and slope construction for this project shall be
performed in accordance with the requirements of Sections 560 and 235 of the Standard Specifications
except as follows:
Construct the top 6" (150mm) of shoulder and fili slopes with soils capable of supporting vegetation.
Provide soil with P.I. greater than 6 and less than 25 and with a pH ranging from 5.5 to 6.8. Remove
stones and other foreign material 2" (50mm) or larger in diameter. All soil is subject to testing and
acceptance or rejection by the Engineer.
Material shall be obtained from within the project limits or an approved borrow source.
Restrictions on Construction of Embankment - The Contractor shall construct the embankments to the
finished, graded, roadway section for a minimum distance of 100 feet from the listed end bents, and shall
not begin any work on the bridge end bents until the three-month waiting period has elapsed or until
notified by the Engineer that the settlement rate has stabilized and work on the end bents may proceed for
the Fishing Creek Overflow Bridge.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 8
Embankment Monitoring- The Contractor shall conduct operations in such a manner that the gauges are
not damaged. Compact fill around the gauge pipes and plates to the same density as the surrounding
material. No additional payment will be made for compaction of fill around and over the settlement gauges
or for interference with the Contractor's operations resulting from settlement gauge installations.
Rock Embankment - Contractor will construct the rock embankments in accordance with Sections 230 and
235 of the Standard Specifications, the detail shown on the plans and the following provisions:
Use Class II Rip Rap, Class VI Select Material and Filter Fabric to construct the rock
embankments detailed on the plans and at locations shown on the plans or directed by
the Engineer.
Density requirements will not apply to rock embankments, but construct the formation
of rock embankments as outlined above.
Filter Fabric shall have a minimum overlap of 18 inches.
Flowable Fill - Contractor shall provide and install flowable fill material in accordance with Article 340-2
of the Standard Specifications. The Contractor shall discharge flowable fill material directly from the truck
into the space to be filled, or by other approved methods. The mix may be placed full depth or in lifts as
site conditions dictate. The Contractor shall provide a method to plug the ends of the existing pipe in order
to contain the flowable fill. The flowable fill will be used at the north end of the project to fill temporary
pipes.
Aggregate Base Course - Base course that is in place on Novemberl5 shall have been covered with a
subsequent layer of pavement structure or with a sand seal. Base course that has been placed between
November 16 and March 15 inclusive shall be covered within seven calendar days with a subsequent layer
of pavement structure or with a sand seal.
EROSION CONTROL
Environmentally Sensitive Areas - This project is located in an Environmentally Sensitive Area. This
designation requires special procedures to be used for clearing and grubbing, temporary stream crossings
and grading operations within the Environmentally Sensitive Areas identified on the plans and as designated
by the Engineer. This also requires special procedures to be used for seeding and mulching and stage
seeding within the project.
The Environmentally Sensitive Area shall be defined as a 50-foot buffer zone on both sides of the stream or
depression, measured from top of stream bank or center of depression.
Clearing and Grubbing - In areas identified as Environmentally Sensitive Areas, the Contractor may
perform clearing operations but not grubbing operations until immediately prior to beginning grading
operations as described in Article 200-1 of the Standard Specifications. Only clearing operations (not
grubbing) shall be allowed in this buffer zone until immediately prior to beginning grading operations.
Erosion control devices shall be installed immediately following the clearing operation.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 9
Grading - Once grading operations begin in identified Environmentally Sensitive Areas, work shall
progress in a continuous manner until complete. All construction within these areas shall progress in a
continuous manner such that each phase is complete and areas are permanently stabilized prior to beginning
of next phase. Failure on the part of the Contractor to complete any phase of construction in a continuous
manner in Environmentally Sensitive Areas will be just cause for the Engineer to direct the suspension of
work in accordance with Article 108-7 of the Standard Specifications.
Minimize Removal of Vegetation - The Contractor shall minimize removal of vegetation at stream banks
and disturbed areas within the project limits as directed. Only remove what is absolutely necessary.
Waste and Borrow Sources - No additional payment will be made for erosion control devices or permanent
seeding and mulching in any commercial borrow or waste pit. All erosion and sediment control practices
that may be required on a commercial borrow or waste site will be done at the Contractor's expense.
Safety Fence - The Safety Fence shall be installed prior to any land disturbing activities.
Special Stilling Basins - Ms. Johnson advised that we need to add baffles to the basins on this project. There
is no pay item for this. Roadside Environmental will do a plan revision to add these to the contract.
Eddie Bunn advised the Contractor that he needed for him to submit his plan for removal of the old bridge
as soon as possible. The Contractor advised that the deck would be removed by sawing and lifting. The
piers would be removed using a steel encasement and wire sawing, and lifting the piers out in sections. A
meeting will be scheduled on site with William Wescott to discuss the bridge removal.
STRUCTURES
Drilled Piers -The Contractor advised that McKinney would do drilled piers. Any changes should be sent
to the Resident Engineer as soon as possible. A meeting will be held prior to beginning of work on the
drilled piers.
Submittal of Working Drawings - Submit working drawings in accordance with Article 105-2 of the Standard
upeciil dUV?-is arld the MgUirertiGilLb of i111s Jpeciai Pluvi?iuiL I cC subliuiiUIS thai are not specifically noted in
this Special Provision directly to the Resident Engineer. Anything that differs from the permit drawings should
be submitted for approval as soon as possible.
Crane Safety - Prime contractors, sub-contractors and fully-operated rental companies shall comply with the
current Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (OSHA). Changes in personnel or
equipment must be reported to the Engineer prior to continuing with crane operations.
PERMITS
Mrs. Johnson advised that the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDENR have issued a permit for this
project.
The Resident Engineer will furnish the Contractor with a set of legible drawings.
The Contractor shall comply with all applicable permit conditions during construction of this project.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 10
Agents of the permitting authority will periodically inspect the project for adherence to the permits.
Should the Contractor propose to utilize construction methods (such as temporary structures or fill in waters
and/or wetlands for haul roads, work platforms, cofferdams, etc.) not specifically identified in the permit
(individual, general or nationwide) authorizing the project, it shall be the Contractor's responsibility to
coordinate with the Engineer to determine what, if any, additional permit action is required.
The Contractor shall also be responsible for initiating the request for the authorization of such construction
method by the permitting agency. The request shall be submitted through the Engineer. The Contractor shall
not utilize the construction method until it is approved by the permitting agency. The request normally takes
approximately 60 days to process; however, no extensions of time or additional compensation will be granted
for delays resulting from the Contractor's request for approval of construction methods not specifically
identified in the permit.
Where construction moratoriums are contained in a permit condition which restricts the Contractor's activities
to certain times of the year, those moratoriums will apply only to the portions of the work taking place in the
waters or wetlands, provided that activities outside those areas are done in such a manner as to not affect the
waters or wetlands.
Construction will be conducted in such a manner as to prevent a significant increase in turbidity outside the
area of construction or construction-related discharge.
No live or fresh concrete shall come into contact with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened.
During construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U. S. or
protected riparian buffers.
All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials.
Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface
waters if prohibited.
The Contractor was reminded not to work outside the footprint of the permit.
The Resident and Contractor will meet on the job site prior to beginning work.
Three months prior (September 2008) to the expiration of the permit (permit expires 12/31/08), a review will
be done to determine if an extension is needed.
Everybody should be familiar with the conditions of the permit.
Eddie Bunn will forward a set of construction plans to DWQ.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page I 1
The Resident Engineer and the Contractor will hold monthly construction meetings.
There were no further questions and/or comments and the meeting was adjourned.
SANFORD CONTRACTORS, INC.
AVyVST 21, 200 ----- Asst Vitg
a
DATE APPROVED NAME AND TITLE
y
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTWNT OF TRANSPORTA nON
o?
SEp V?
SSA*1)
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
August 28, 2007
WBS Element: 33073.3.1 (B-3453)
Contract No. C201794
F. A. Number: BRSTP-301 (16)
Counties: Edgecombe/Halifax
Description: Bridges over Fishing Creek and Overflow and Approaches on US 301
MEMORANDUM TO: Ellis C. Powell, Jr., PE
State Construction Engineer
FROM: Wendi O. Johnson, P
Division Construction Engineer
SUBJECT: Approved Preconstruction Conference Minutes
We are transmitting an approved copy of the minutes covering the Preconstruction Conference for
the above project, which was held on June 27, 2007. The minutes were approved by the
Contractor, Sanford Contractors, Inc., as recorded.
Attachment
c: Ron Lucas (FHWA)
Gary Jordan (US Fish & Wildlife)
William Wescott (US Army Corps of Engineers)
Rob Ridings (NCDENR, Division of Water Quality)
Brian Wrenn (NCDENR, Division of Water Quality)
John Holley (NCDENR, Land Quality Section)
Travis Wilson (NCWRC)
David Cox (NCWRC)
Ron Sechler (National Marine Fisheries)
Lee Wall (Dominion Power)
Bert Boswell (Embarq)
Nate Hams (Adelphia)
Bobby Davis (Town of Enfield)
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Ellis C. Powell, Jr., PE
August 28, 2007
Page 2
ec: Cecil Jones, PE
Donald Pearson, EI, CPESC
Robert Simpson
Andy Brown, PE
Bobby Lewis, PE
Mike Robinson, PE
Warren Walker, PE
Andy Pridgen
Ron Hancock, PE
Lloyd Johnston, Jr.
Eddie Bunn, PE
Keith Honeycutt, PE, PLS
Charles W. Brown, PE, PLS
Kevin Lacy, PE
Victor Barbour, PE
Don G. Lee
Chris Kreider, PE
Barry Whitaker
Jimmy Marler
Jamie Guerrero
Haywood Daughtry, PE
Doug Allison
David R. Henderson, PE
Queen Crittendon
Greg Dixon
Ronnie Keeter, PE
Wade Harper
Franz Enders, PE
Kenny Baines
PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND PERMIT MEETING
WBS Element: 33073.3.1 (B-3453)
Federal Aid No. : BRSTP-301 (lb)
Contract No.: C201794
Counties: Edgecombe/Halifax
Description: Bridges over Fishing Creek and Overflow and Approaches on US 301
The Preconstruction Conference for the above project was held in the Wilson Division Office Conference
Room on June 27, 2007 with the following persons in attendance:
NAME REPRESENTING
Andy Pridgen NCDOT - QA Lab
Walter Spivey NCDOT - Roadside Environmental
Kenny Baines NCDOT - Materials and Tests
Lee Perry NCDOT - Nashville Construction
Steve Joyner NCDOT - Asst. Resident Engineer
Ernie Nichols NCDOT - Construction
Rick Poythress NCDOT - Location & Surveys
Bert Boswell Embarq
Chad Coggins NCDOT - DES
Lloyd Johnston NCDOT - Division Right of Way
Eddie Bunn NCDOT - Resident Engineer
Randall Gattis Sanford Contractors, Inc.
Chris Brown Sanford Contractors, Inc.
Kenny Brady Sanford Contractors, Inc.
Mark Perkins Sanford Contractors, Inc.
Shannon Douglas Barnhill Contracting Co.
Greg Dixon NCDOT - Office of Civil Rights
-wenul JohiisoI1, Division wdl- llstiuctlotl ErlginvulI InVbIded VVCI the VViuviviwC. ShG aJkcd cvcIYV11%> prv$%.iai tv
introduce themselves and their company affiliation.
Kenny Brady willact as Project Superintendent for the Contractor.
Lee Perry will act as Project Inspector and Traffic Control Coordinator for the Division of Highways.
The Contractor advised they plan to begin work August 5, 2007, putting up signs. He should give the
Resident Engineer 30 days notice if this date should change.
The Contractor submitted his progress schedule. He was advised that it would be checked, and he would
be advised if satisfactory. By copy of these minutes, we are advising the Contractor that his progress
schedule has been checked and is approved as submitted.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 2
RIGHT OF WAY
Lloyd Johnston covered this portion of the contract.
All of the right of way necessary for this project has been acquired. Copies of the Right of Way
Agreements were given to the Resident Engineer. These agreements cover all of the right of way and
easements necessary for this project that were acquired by negotiation.
There are no 200 Series Items on this project.
There is no known asbestos contamination, underground storage tanks, or any known soil contamination
within the right of way of the project.
The Contractor is advised not to exceed the right of way or easement areas during construction without
written pennission from the property owner.
LOCATION AND SURVEYS
Rick Poythress advised that this was in-house surveying. The right of way was staked by Division One in
the early part of 2004 and verified in the spring of 2006. Several monuments were not staked because of
the wet conditions at the time.
UTILITY CONFLICTS
Halifax EMC - All conflicts have been cleared.
Embarq - All conflicts have been cleared.
Adelphia - All conflicts have been cleared.
Town of Enfield - There is a waste water outfall at toe of fill, but this should not be in conflict. There is
also a sampling station on the south side and a U SUS station, but these should not be in conflict.
ASPHALT PAVEMENTS
Andy Pridgen, Division QA Supervisor, asked the Contractor if he had any questions of the Special
Provisions outlined on pages 49 thru 69.
Mr. Pridgen advised that the Special Provisions in this contract are dated 05/17/05 (Rev. 04/18/06).
Contractor stated that he would be willing to convert to the Specifications dated 7/18/06 (Rev. 9/19/06).
The Contractor will be allowed to run 20% rap.
The Contractor advised that Barnhill Contracting would perform paving on this project. A certified QMS
Roadway Contractor's Representative will be required to be on the project during paving.
Density testing may be required for wedging (depending on the depth).
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 3
In the last sentence of the third paragraph of Subarticle 609-5 (D) 1, insert the wording "and wedging as
shown in the HMA/QMS Manual" (page 10-28) after the wording "temporary pavements".
The Contractor shall repair any damage caused by hauling equipment across structures at no additional cost
to the Department.
Contractor's attention was called to Item 11, Removal of Existing Asphalt Pavement, and Item 29,
Incidental Milling (refer to Section 1012-1 of the Specifications).
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
It is the policy of the North Carolina Department of Transportation that Disadvantaged Business
Enterprises (DBEs) as defined in 49CFR Part 26 shall have the opportunity to participate in the
performance of contracts financed in whole or in part by federal funds in order to create a level playing field
on which DBEs can compete fairly.
The Contractor, subcontractor and sub-recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national
origin or sex in the performance of this contract. The Contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of
49CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of federally assisted contracts. Failure by the Contractor to
carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this
contract or such other remedy, as the Department deems necessary.
The Contractor is also encouraged to give every opportunity to allow DBE participation in Supplemental
Agreements.
The Contractor's EEO Officer and Minority Liaison Officer is Brent Sloane.
The Contractor shall exercise all necessary and reasonable steps to insure that Disadvantaged Business
Enterprises participate in at least 7% of the contract. The contract was awarded with 7.04% participation.
The Resident Engineer furnished the Contractor with required posters for his bulletin board. The Contractor's
EEO Policy Statement is to be posted on the project's bulletin board, which should be weatherproof, along
with the following posters:
1. Davis-Bacon Minimum Prevailing Wage Rate Schedule
2. Wage-Rate Information - F/A Project, Form PR-1495
3. Notice Relating to False Statements, Form PR-1022
4. EEO Poster - Discrimination is Prohibited
The Contractor is urged to document, in writing, all actions taken in complying with Equal Opportunity of
Employment Provisions, Training Provision, and Minority Business Enterprise Provision. This includes
applicant referrals, meetings with employees, on-site inspections, wage evaluations, etc.
All subcontractors and suppliers are responsible for meeting the same requirements as the prime contractor,
and it is the prime contractor's responsibility to oversee that both are in compliance.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 4
All alleged discriminatory violations should be brought to the attention of the Resident Engineer.
The State and/or FHWA will conduct a Contract Compliance Review sometime during the life of this contract.
Therefore, fair employment practice should be maintained at all times.
Reporting Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Participation - When payments are made to Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise firms, including material suppliers, contractors at all levels shall provide the Engineer with
an accounting of said payments. This accounting shall be furnished to the Engineer for any given month by the
end of the following month.
The Contractor shall report the accounting of payments through the Department's DBE Payment Tracking
System, which is a web based application. The System can be accessed through the following web link:
https:;iapps.dot. state.ns:.ns/Vendor/PaNinentTracking, .
The Contractor shall also provide the Engineer an affidavit attesting the accuracy of the information submitted
in the Payment Tracking System. This, too, shall be submitted for any given month by the end of the following
month.
Retainage and Prompt Payment - The Department will not deduct and hold any retainage from the Prime
Contractor on this project. Contractor at all levels, prime, subcontractor, or second tier contractor, shall
within seven calendar days of receipt of monies resulting from work performed on the project or services
rendered, pay subcontractors, second tier subcontractors, or material suppliers, as appropriate. The Contractor
may withhold up to 3% retainage if any subcontractor does not obtain a payment and performance bond for
their portion of the work.
Submission of Records - Federal Aid Projects - This project is not located on the National Highway
System; therefore, federal form FHWA-47 is not required. Payrolls will be required for this project.
PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
GENERAL
Ms. Johnson reminded everyone that the meeting was being held from the proposal, which is based on the
2002 Specifications, and we must have an executed contract before work begins.
As far as pay items are concerned, we must adhere to the 2002 Specifications.
Contract Time and Liquidated Damages - The date of availability for this contract is July 2, 2007.
The completion date for this contract is August 1, 2009.
The liquidated damages for this contract are $800.00 per calendar day.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 5
Intermediate Contract Time Number 1 and Liquidated Damages - The Contractor shall not narrow or close a
lane of traffic on all roads, detain and/or alter the traffic flow on or during holiday weekends, special events or
any other time when traffic is unusually heavy, including the following:
HOLIDAY AND HOLIDAY WEEKEND LANE CLOSURE RESTRICTIONS
1. For an unexpected occurrence that creates unusually high traffic volumes, as directed by the Engineer.
2. For New Year's Day, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. on December 31? and 8:00 a.m. on January 2"d
If New Year's Day is on a Friday, Saturday, Sunday or Monday, then until 8:00 a.m. the following
Tuesday.
3. For Easter, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. on Thursday and 8:00 a.m. on Monday.
4. For Memorial Day, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. on Friday and 8:00 a.m. on Tuesday.
5. For Independence Day, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. the day before Independence Day and
8:00 a.m. the day after Independence Day. If Independence Day is on a Friday, Saturday, Sunday or
Monday, then between the hours of 4:00 p.m. the Thursday before Independence Day and 8:00 a.m. the
Tuesday after Independence Day.
6. For Labor Day, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. on Friday and 8:00 a. m. on Tuesday.
7. For Thanksgiving Day, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday and 8:00 a.m. on Monday.
8. For Christmas, between the hours of 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the week of Christmas Day and
8:00 a.m. the following Tuesday aver the week of Christmas Day.
Holidays and holiday weekends shall include New Year's, Easter, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor
Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas. The Contractor shall schedule his work so that lane closures are not
required during these periods, unless otherwise directed by the Engineer.
The time of availability for this intermediate contract work shall be the time the Contractor begins to install all
traffic control devices for lane closures, according to the time restrictions listed herein.
The completion time for this intermediate contract work shall be the time the Contractor is required to
complete the removal of all traffic control devices for lane closures according to the time restrictions stated
herein and place traffic in a two-lane, two-way pattern.
The liquidated damages for this Intermediate Contract time are $500.00 per hour.
Intermediate Contract Time Number 2 and Liquidated Damages - The Contractor shall complete the required
work of installing, maintaining and removing the traffic control devices for road closures and restoring traffic
to a two-lane, two-way traffic pattern. The Contractor shall not close US 301 Monday thru Sunday from
6:00 a.m. to midnight.
The maximum allowable time for the road closure is 30 minutes for US 301. The Contractor shall re-open the
travel lanes to traffic until the existing traffic queue is depleted.
The time of availability for this Intermediate Contract Time will be the time the Contractor begins to install
traffic control devices required for the road closures according to the time restrictions stated herein.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 6
The completion time for this Intermediate Contract Time will be the time the Contractor is required to
complete the removal of traffic control devices required for the road closures, according to the time restrictions
stated herein, and restore traffic to a two-lane, two-way traffic pattern.
The liquidated damages are $500.00 per 30-minute time period.
Construction Moratorium - An in-water work moratorium will be in effect from March 1 to June 30 of any
year.
Training Requirements - The number of trainees to be trained on this project shall be one.
Safety Vests - All Contractor's personnel, all subcontractors and their personnel, and any material suppliers
and their personnel shall wear a reflective vest or outer garment conforming to the requirements of
MUTCD at all times while on the project.
Erosion & Sediment Control Storm Water Certification - Contractor shall provide a Certified Supervisor,
Certified Foreman and Certified Installer on this project. Contractor will notify the Engineer, of changes in
certified personnel over the life of the contract within two days of change. The Certified Supervisor on this
project will be Kenny Brady, and the Certified Foreman will be Robert Carter.
Procedure for Monitoring Borrow Pit Discharge - Water discharge from borrow pit sites shall not cause
surface waters to exceed 50 NTUs in streams not designated as trout waters and 10 NTUs in streams, lakes
or reservoirs designated as trout waters. For lakes and reservoirs not designated as trout waters, the
turbidity shall not exceed 25 NTUs. If the turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural background
conditions, the existing turbidity level shall not be increased.
During the Environmental Assessment required by Article 230-4 of the Standard Specifications, the
Contractor shall define the point at which the discharge enters the State's surface waters and the
appropriate sampling locations. The discharge shall be closely monitored when water from the dewatering
activities is introduced into jurisdictional wetlands. No activities shall occur in wetlands that adversely
affect the functioning of a wetland. Visible sedimentation will be considered an indication of possible
adverse impacts on wetland use.
Contractor advised that they would be using a commercial pit for borrow and waste.
The Project Inspector will furnish the Contractor with a weekly erosion control list.
Notes to Contractor -
1. Aerate and dry any unclassified excavation material containing moisture content in excess of what is
required to achieve embankment stability and specified density.
2. Undercut using drag line or other approved methods to prevent disturbance of the underlying soils.
Do not operate heavy equipment directly on the base of the box cut.
3. Fabric for soil stabilization should be used at the discretion of the Engineer to assist in bridging
poor qualitysoils if soft yielding conditions exist at the time of construction. The fabric should
typically be placed on natural ground from the toe of existing US 301 fill to the toe of the proposed
embankment.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 7
PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
ROADWAY
Clearing and Grubbing - Perform clearing on this project to the limits established by Method III shown on
Standard No. 200.03 of the Roadway Standards.
Roadway Excavation - Revise the 2002 Standard Specifications as follows:
Page 2-8, delete Article 225-2 and replace with the following:
Erosion Control Requirements
Install erosion control measures as required by the plans prior to any kind of land-disturbing activity.
1. Unless otherwise required by the plans, conduct operations in such a manner that cut and fill
slopes are completely graded to final slopes in a continuous operation and permanently
seeded and mulched, in accordance with the requirements of the Specifications.
2. Should the Contractor fail to comply with the requirements specified in No. 1 above within
the time frames established by the Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act, the Contractor
shall perform temporary seeding and mulching on any exposed areas at his own expense.
3. When the Contractor fails or neglects to coordinate grading with the permanent seeding and
mulching operation, the Engineer may suspend the Contractor's grading operation in
accordance with the provisions of Article 108-7 of the Standard Specifications until the
work is coordinated in a manner acceptable to the Engineer. Failure to perform the directed
work may result in the Engineer having the work performed in accordance with Article
105-16 of the Standard Specifications.
Shoulder and Fill Slope Material - Required shoulder and slope construction for this project shall be
performed in accordance with the requirements of Sections 560 and 235 of the Standard Specifications
except as follows:
Construct the top 6" (150mm) of shoulder and fiii slopes with soils capable of supporting vegetation.
Provide soil with P.I. greater than 6 and less than 25 and with a pH ranging from 5.5 to 6.8. Remove
stones and other foreign material 2" (50mm) or larger in diameter. All soil is subject to testing and
acceptance or rejection by the Engineer.
Material shall be obtained from within the project limits or an approved borrow source.
Restrictions on Construction of Embankment - The Contractor shall construct the embankments to the
finished, graded, roadway section for a minimum distance of 100 feet from the listed end bents, and shall
not begin any work on the bridge end bents until the three-month waiting period has elapsed or until
notified by the Engineer that the settlement rate has stabilized and work on the end bents may proceed for
the Fishing Creek Overflow Bridge.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 8
Embankment Monitoring - The Contractor shall conduct operations in such a manner that the gauges are
not damaged. Compact fill around the gauge pipes and plates to the same density as the surrounding
material. No additional payment will be made for compaction of fill around and over the settlement gauges
or for interference with the Contractor's operations resulting from settlement gauge installations.
Rock Embankment - Contractor will construct the rock embankments in accordance with Sections 230 and
235 of the Standard Specifications, the detail shown on the plans and the following provisions:
Use Class H Rip Rap, Class VI Select Material and Filter Fabric to construct the rock
embankments detailed on the plans and at locations shown on the plans or directed by
the Engineer.
Density requirements will not apply to rock embankments, but construct the formation
of rock embankments as outlined above.
Filter Fabric shall have a minimum overlap of 18 inches.
Flowable Fill - Contractor shall provide and install flowable fill material in accordance with Article 340-2
of the Standard Specifications. The Contractor shall discharge flowable fill material directly from the truck
into the space to be filled, or by other approved methods. The mix may be placed full depth or in lifts as
site conditions dictate. The Contractor shall provide a method to plug the ends of the existing pipe in order
to contain the flowable fill. The flowable fill will be used at the north end of the project to fill temporary
pipes.
Aggregate Base Course - Base course that is in place on November 15 shall have been covered with a
subsequent layer of pavement structure or with a sand seal. Base course that has been placed between
November 16 and March 15 inclusive shall be covered within seven calendar days with a subsequent layer
of pavement structure or with a sand seal.
EROSION CONTROL
Environmentally Sensitive Areas - This project is located in an Environmentally Sensitive Area. *1 his
designation requires special procedures to be used for clearing and grubbing, temporary stream crossings
and grading operations within the Environmentally Sensitive Areas identified on the plans and as designated
by the Engineer. This also requires special procedures to be used for seeding and mulching and stage
seeding within the project.
The Environmentally Sensitive Area shall be defined as a 50-foot buffer zone on both sides of the stream or
depression, measured from top of stream bank or center of depression.
Clearing and Grubbing - In areas identified as Environmentally Sensitive Areas, the Contractor may
perform clearing operations but not grubbing operations until immediately prior to beginning grading
operations as described in Article 200-1 of the Standard Specifications. Only clearing operations (not
grubbing) shall be allowed in this buffer zone until immediately prior to beginning grading operations.
Erosion control devices shall be installed immediately following the clearing operation.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 9
Grading - Once grading operations begin in identified Environmentally Sensitive Areas, work shall
progress in a continuous manner until complete. All construction within these areas shall progress in a
continuous manner such that each phase is complete and areas are permanently stabilized prior to beginning
of next phase. Failure on the part of the Contractor to complete any phase of construction in a continuous
manner in Environmentally Sensitive Areas will be just cause for the Engineer to direct the suspension of
work in accordance with Article 108-7 of the Standard Specifications.
Minimize Removal of Vegetation - The Contractor shall minimize removal of vegetation at stream banks
and disturbed areas within the project limits as directed. Only remove what is absolutely necessary.
Waste and Borrow Sources - No additional payment will be made for erosion control devices or permanent
seeding and mulching in any commercial borrow or waste pit. All erosion and sediment control practices
that may be required on a commercial borrow or waste site will be done at the Contractor's expense.
Safety Fence - The Safety Fence shall be installed prior to any land disturbing activities.
Special Stilling Basins - Ms. Johnson advised that we need to add baffles to the basins on this project.. There
is no pay item for this. Roadside Environmental will do a plan revision to add these to the contract. -
Eddie Bunn advised the Contractor that he needed for him to submit his plan for removal of the old bridge
as soon as possible. The Contractor advised that the deck would be removed by sawing and lifting. The
piers would be removed using a steel encasement and wire sawing, and lifting the piers out in sections. A
meeting will be scheduled on site with William Wescott to discuss the bridge removal.
STRUCTURES
Drilled Piers - The Contractor advised that McKinney would do drilled piers. Any changes should be sent
to the Resident Engineer as soon as possible. A meeting will be held prior to beginning of work on the
drilled piers. -
Submittal of Working Drawings - Submit working drawings in accordance with Article 105-2 of the Standard
Sp2c'
iLl cations aria t is requirenieilts of ti115 al)VUial Piovisiuii. Md-ke subiiuiials inat are not specincauy noted in
this Special Provision directly to the Resident Engineer. Anything that differs from the permit drawings should
be submitted for approval as soon as possible.
Crane Safety - Prime contractors, sub-contractors and fully-operated rental companies shall comply with the
current Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (OSHA). Changes in personnel or
equipment must be reported to the Engineer prior to continuing with crane operations.
PERMITS
Mrs. Johnson advised that the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDENR have issued a permit for this
project.
The Resident Engineer will furnish the Contractor with a set of legible drawings.
The Contractor shall comply with all applicable permit conditions during construction of this project.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 10
Agents of the permitting authority will periodically inspect the project for adherence to the permits.
Should the Contractor propose to utilize construction methods (such as temporary structures or fill in waters
and/or wetlands for haul roads, work platforms, cofferdams, etc.) not specifically identified in the permit
(individual, general or nationwide) authorizing the project, it shall be the Contractor's responsibility to
coordinate with the Engineer to determine what, if any, additional permit action is required.
The Contractor shall also be responsible for initiating the request for the authorization of such construction
method by the permitting agency. The request shall be submitted through the Engineer. The Contractor shall
not utilize the construction method until it is approved by the permitting agency. The request normally takes
approximately 60 days to process; however, no extensions of time or additional compensation will be granted
for delays resulting from the Contractor's request for approval of construction methods not specifically
identified in the permit.
Where construction moratoriums are contained in a permit condition which restricts the Contractor's activities
to certain times of the year, those moratoriums will apply only to the portions of the work taking place in the
waters or wetlands, provided that activities outside those areas are done in such a manner as to not affect the
waters or wetlands.
Construction will be conducted in such a manner as to prevent a significant increase in turbidity outside the
area of construction or construction-related discharge.
No live or fresh concrete shall come into contact with waters of the state until the concrete has hardened.
During construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U. S. or
protected riparian buffers.
All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials.
Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface
waters if prohibited.
The Contractor was reminded not to work outside the footprint of the permit.
The Resident and Contractor will meet on the job site prior to beginning work.
Three months prior (September 2008) to the expiration of the permit (permit expires 12/31/08), a review will
be done to determine if an extension is needed.
Everybody should be familiar with the conditions of the permit.
Eddie Bunn will forward a set of construction plans to DWQ.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3453
Page 1 I
The Resident Engineer and the Contractor will hold monthly construction meetings.
There were no further questions and/or comments and the meeting was adjourned.
SANFORD CONTRACTORS, INC.
Puyust z1, 2otY? --1- F?sST i e ?z ? 1.ci
DATE APPROVED NAME AND TITLE
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Project Review Form
Project Number: 08-0068 County: Watauga
Due Date: 09/24/2007
Date Received: 08/28/2007
Project Description: Proposal to resurface the pavement & replace guardrail along a NC 194 between Avery County
& SR 1112 (Broadstone Rd) in Watauga County & to widen section of NC 194. TIP No. R-2710
This Project is being reviewed as indicated below:
Regional Office Regional Office Area In-House Review
Asheville ? Air Soil & Water . Marine Fisheries
Fayetteville Water
? Coastal Management
Mooresville Aquifer Protection Wildlife Water Resources
Raleigh Environmental Health
, Land Quality Engineer y/ Wildlife - DOT Solid Waste Mgmt
Washington
Forest Resources Radiation Protection
Wilmington
Land Resources Other
? Winston-Salem Parks & Recreation
- Water Quality
? Water Quality - DOT
Air Quality
Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
No objection to project as proposed. No Comment
Insufficient information to complete review Other (specify or attach comments)
If you have any questions, please contact:
Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator at [e-mail]
.SFP 0 4 2007
WETLgNDSNk . Wt7-Ek Ct UALITy
ANp 5`rrj7MWATE BRANCH
NC 194 IMPROVEMENTS
From the Avery County Line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road)
Valle Crucis Watauga County
WBS Element 34499. 1.1
Federal Project No. STP-194(4)
State Project No. 8.1721001
TIP PROJECT R-2710
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
And
FINAL SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
submitted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)
And 23 CFR 771.135
APPROVED:
/? /Q k7 ?s _-
Date Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
.? 1
`? / i..? ydc?s'?
f Date ?-?ohn F. Sullivan III, Division Admini trator
Federal Highway Administration

NC 194 IMPROVEMENTS

i From the Avery County Line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road)
Valle Crucis Watauga County
WBS Element 34499.1.1
Federal Project No. STP-194(4)
' State Project No. 8.1721001
TIP PROJECT R-2710

' FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
And
' FINAL SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION
July 2007
J

Documentation Prepared in Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch By:
p anie Ca 1 CAR
Project Plann ng Engineer ?•```??.??
??+.• SEAL :
' - - 25 fc?u
Robert Andrew Jo er, P.E. --0- s
F ?.
Project Engineer ??`•'•. M ?;.•
.,?.Al, •..eGtNE. ? ??
ILI
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
NC 194 EWROVEMENTS
From"the Avery County Line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road)
Watauga County Valle Crucis
WBS Element 34499.1.1
Federal Project No. STP-194(4)
State Project No..8.1721001
TIP PROJECT R-2710
GeoEnvironmental Section
• NO UST (Underground Storage Tank) facilities were found within the vicinity of the
proposed project and no landfills or dumpsites-occur within the project limits.
However, an extensive corridor subsurface investigation will be performed prior to
right of way purchase. '
This is a standard project commitment.
Division 11 Desipan
• NCDOT will install "rust-look" guardrail throughout the entire .project length-
* NCDOT will replant disturbed lawn in front of the Carendar Barn property with grass
on a 21 slope.
Right of Way Branch
t • The NC Geodetic Survey will be contacted prior to construction, due to the presence
of three Geodetic Markers within the vicinity of the project.
' This is a standard project commitment.
Division 11 Design/ Right of Way Branch/PDEA
• NCDOT will replace any trees, bushes, plantings, or fences that are a part of the Valle
Crucis Historic District, the Valle Crucis' Episcopal Mission and the Carender Barn,
that acre impacted by the subject project unless otherwise requested by the property
owner. NCDOT will coordinate the replacement of these-items with the appropriate
property owner. and the State Historic Preservation Officer prior to the completion of
the final environmental document for the project. NCDOT will avoid displacing the
mature oak tree in the vicinity of the Valle, Crucis Episcopal Mission property as well
j as use appropriate measures to protect the tree during construction.
?. T.I.P. Project R-2710 Page of 2
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSn Greensheet ;
July 2007 -
i ,
NCDOT will avoid impacts to the cemetery located near theValle Crucis Episcopal
Mission, along NC 194 just north of SR 1134 (Dutch Creek Road):
Division 11 i
• No clearing and grubbing will occur within 25 feet of Craborchard Creek, Dutch
Creek, or the Watauga River from October 15th to April 15thdue to the presence of .
trout. North Carolina regulations entitled "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds.
' shall be implemented during the design and construction` of this project, as applicable.
A letter of notification, with reference to impacts to trout water habitat, will be
provided to the U.S Army Corps of Engineers - Asheville Regulatory Field Office and
the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) office prior to construction of the
project.:. -
• All teas of major improvement along the project will be .designed with a lane width of
10 feet. Other proj ect areas will be designed with lane widths of 9, feet where possible`
and where shoulder width is available.
• Construction activities will be phased around yearly local activities that include the
Blood, Sweat and Gears Bike Race every third Saturday in June,' and the Valley
County Fair and Wooley Worm Festival every third Saturday in October.
Structure' Design
• The proposed project is located in the Tennessee Valley Authority's '(TVA) Land
Management District. A permit pursuant to Section '26a of the TVA Act is, required
for all construction or development involving streams or floodplains in the Tennessee
River drainage basin.
J
1
T.I.P. Project R-2710 Page 2 of 2
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Greensheet
July 2007

1

1 1

I

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1. TYPE OF ACTION ....................................................................................................1
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION ............................................................1
III. SUMMARY OF BENEFICIAL AND ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS .......................................................................................................................... 2
IV. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS ................................................................... 4
A.. CIRCULATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................... 4
B. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................. 4
C. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING AND FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING ................... 4
V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................... 6
A. LANE WIDTHS ............................................................................................................. 6
B. STRUCTURE #1 ........................................................................................................... 6
C. RIGHT OF WAY .......................................................................................................... 6
VI. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT .................................... 6
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
APPENDIX
Appendix A - Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment
Appendix B - Public Hearing Notice and Handout
Appendix C - Final Section 4(f) Evaluation for Impacts to the Valle Crucis Historic
District

1

NC 194 IMPROVEMENTS
From the Avery County Line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road)
Valle Crucis Watauga County
WBS Element 34499.1.1
Federal Project No. STP-194(4)
State Project No. 8.1721001
TIP PROJECT R-2710

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Prepared by the Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
' in Consultation with
the Federal Highway Administration
' I. TYPE OF ACTION
This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) administrative action, Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
The FHWA has determined this project will not have any significant impact on
the human and natural environment. This FONSI is based on the Environmental
Assessment dated November 2, 2005, which has been independently evaluated by the
FHWA and determined to adequately and accurately discuss the environmental issues and
impacts of the proposed project. The Environmental Assessment provides sufficient
evidence and analysis for determining that an Environmental Impact Statement is not
required. The FHWA takes full responsibility for the accuracy, scope, and content of the
Environmental Assessment.
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
r resurface the pavement and replace guardrail along a section of NC 194 between the
Avery County Line and SR 1112 (Broadstone Road) in Watauga County. Additionally,
NCDOT proposes minor curve/ intersection realignment and shoulder widening along
four sections of NC 194 within the project limits. The length of the proposed project is
approximately 5.5 miles. Approximately 60 feet of right of way will be required along
the four sections of the roadway where additional shoulder width and curve realignment
is proposed.
' NCDOT includes this project in the Federally-approved 2006 - 2012
Transportation Improvement Program. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in
fiscal year 2007, and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2009.

TIP Project R-2710 proposes to widen shoulders of several curves and to relocate ,
an existing curve to a new location section in the vicinity of Dutch Creek Road along
NC 194 from the Avery County line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road). In addition,
guardrail will be added and pavement will be resurfaced throughout the entire project
length. The proposed curve relocation is located at the existing intersection of SR 1134
(Dutch Creek Road) and NC 194. This intersection occurs at the midpoint of a sharp
horizontal curve along NC 194. The intersection is at a severe angle, creating poor sight
distance due to a combination of the horizontal curvature of NC 194 and the skewed '
intersection angle. The proposed improvements include shifting the alignment of NC
194 south approximately 130 feet of its existing location. This will accommodate the
proposed curve relocation and reduce the severity of the existing curve along NC 194, ,
alleviating the poor sight distance.
The draft 2007-2013 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) has allocated '
$7,852,000 for the proposed project including $252,000 for right of way acquisition,
$7,600,000 for construction, and $270,000 for prior years spending. The total estimated
cost for the proposed improvements is $7,392,000.00, which includes $192,000 for right '
of way acquisition and $7,200,000.00 for construction.
III. SUMMARY OF BENEFICIAL AND ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS
This section of NC 194 is characterized by poor pavement, inadequate shoulder '
widths, and poor sight distances at existing curves within the project limits. The
proposed improvements will improve the level of safety along NC 194 from the Avery '
County line to SR 1112(Broadstone Road).
It is anticipated that no jurisdictional wetlands and a total of 425 feet of surface
waters will be impacted by the project. No relocatees are expected due to the proposed
improvements to NC 194. Two (2) architecturally historic sites are anticipated to be
impacted by the proposed improvements. Approximately 0.26 acres of right of way
impacts to the Valle Crucis Historic District (including the Valle Crucis Episcopal
Mission) and 0.06 acres of right of way impacts to the Carender Barn property will result
from the proposed project. The Carender Barn and the Carender Farm are not located r
together. The Carender Barn is labeled in Figure 2 (sheet 1) of the Environmental
Assessment, the Carender Farm is located outside the area of proposed improvements '
and, therefore, is not labeled in Figure 2 as no impacts to the Farm are anticipated as a
result of this project. The State Historic Preservation Office has concurred that the
proposed impacts to the Carender Barn and the Lee Carender Farm will result in "no
adverse effect", while the proposed impacts to the Valle Crucis Historic District
(including the Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission) will result in an "adverse effect".
NCDOT has committed to coordinate with the respective property owners for the '
replanting of trees, shrubs, or bushes along the road frontage of these properties as well as

1

t
avoiding a mature oak tree in the vicinity of the Dutch Creek Road intersection with NC
194. No impacts are anticipated to any archaeologically significant sites.
Federally protected species were identified within Watauga county and a
biological conclusion determined in order to satisfy section 7(a)(2) of the ESA for the
following: Roan Mountain bluet, Heller's blazing star and Spreading avens, Carolina
northern flying squirrel, Virginia big-eared bat. It was determined that the project would
have "No Effect". A biological conclusion for the Bog turtle is not required. Therefore,
concurrence from US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for the species described above is
not required.
No adverse noise or air quality impacts are anticipated as a result of the project.

t

No UST (Underground Storage Tank) facilities were found within the vicinity of
the proposed project and no landfills or dumpsites occur within the project limits.
However, an extensive corridor subsurface investigation will be performed prior to right of
way purchase.
Summary of Impacts - R-2710
Resource Impacts
Wetlands 0 acres
Streams 425 linear ft (3 streams)
Buffers 0
Relocations 0
Haz-mat Sites 0 UST Sites
Noise Receptors 0
Prime Agricultural Lands 0
Terrestrial Forests <1 acre
Endangered Species 0

Section 106 Properties 3 - Lee Carender Barn- No Adverse
Effect, Lee Carender Farm, No
Effect, Valle Crucis Historic District-
Adverse Effect
Section 4(f) Properties 3
Churches / Schools No Impact
EJ Communities No
Air Quality No
Critical Water Supplies No

1
IV
COORDINATION AND COMMENTS
.
A. Circulation of the Environmental Assessment
The Environmental Assessment was approved by the NC Division of Highways and
the FHWA on November 2, 2005. The approved Environmental Assessment was
circulated to the following federal, state and local agencies for review and comments. An ,
asterisk (*) indicates a written response was received from the agency. Copies of the
correspondence received are included in the Appendix A of this document.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ,
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service*
Soil Conservation Service
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency*
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S. Forest Service '
N.C. Department of Administration
N.C. Department of Cultural Resources
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Federal Emergency Management Administration
Land of the Sky Regional Council
Tennessee Valley Authority
Watauga County
B. Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment
U.S. Department of Agriculture-NRCS
Comment: The Natural Resources Conservation Service has no comment at this time.
,
Response: Comment Noted.
U.S Envirionmental Protection Agency
Comment: EPA has no environmental concerns for the proposed project.
Response: Comment Noted.
C. Comments Received During and Following the Public Hearing
Following the circulation of the Environmental Assessment, a public hearing was ,
held at the Valle Crucis Conference Center on April 25, 2006. Copies of the public
hearing notice and a copy of the handout presented at the public hearing are included in
Appendix B of this report. Approximately 55 citizens attended the public hearing.
Substantive comments received during the public hearing are addressed below: '

t
Ll

Ll
r?

I

1

1
TIP Project No. R-2710
FIGURES

s

1 Comment: One citizen was concerned with potential impacts to wildflowers currently
growing on the banks of the Valley Mountain section of NC 194.
Response: Environmental impacts will be minimized as much as possible throughout
the project limits.
Comment: Several citizens made the following comments:
-a layer of tar and gravel should be placed on the new asphalt surface for
added traction during inclement weather
-guardrail should also be placed at various points that have steep slopes.
falling away from the roadway
-a wet weather spring on the north side of NC 194 near the Barrows
property and Avery County line causes runoff over the roadway and an
excess of three to four feet of mud in which trucks regularly get stuck.
-flood area may be caused by a drain blockage where highway 194 meets
Clark's Creek
-a roadway near the Valle Crucis Elementary School needs to be raised
due to flooding
-the roadway should be wider in the area where NC 194 meets Rominger
Curve near the Demyen property
-the curve between site 4 and the "Dugger S Curve" is not wide enough for
truck travel
' Response: The use of tar and gravel would not make a significant amount of
difference and maintenance issues may arise because of costs to replace
the tar and gravel. Flooding issues were improved with the recent bridge
1 improvement near Valle Crucis elementary school, other flooding issues
are outside the scope of this project but may be addressed in future
projects.
Comment: Several comments were made regarding the safe passage of emergency
personnel throughout the entire project, especially in the area of the
"Dugger S Curve" where many trucks become stuck. Other comments
1 pertained to the size of the existing shoulder width compared to the size
and volume of oversize vehicles that travel NC 194, as well as the many
bicyclists using NC 194.
Response: The major improvement areas along the project will be designed with a
lane width of 10 feet. Other project areas will be designed with lane widths
of 9 feet where possible and where shoulder width is available. Guardrail
will be implemented throughout the length of the project.
Comment: Several citizens expressed the need to schedule construction activities
around local events that include the Blood, Sweat and Gears Bike Race
every third Saturday in June, and the Valley County Fair and Wooley
Worm Festival every third Saturday in October.
' Response: A note has been made in the Project Commitments of this document
regarding the need to phase construction activities in association with
these two festivals.

V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
A. Lane Widths
A request was made at the Public Hearing to add wider lanes where
possible throughout the length of the project. NCDOT determined that all
areas of major improvement along the project will be designed with a lane
width of 10 feet. Other project areas will be designed with lane widths of 9
feet where possible and where shoulder width is available.
B. Structure #1
Part II, C of the EA document describes three major stream .
crossings found in the vicinity of the proposed project. Since the EA was
completed, new recommendations concerning replacement of the existing
culvert at Structure #1 have been made. It is now recommended that
Structure #1, a 6-foot by 4-foot single barrel box culvert, be retained.
Appropriate measures to further stabilize the outlet may be developed
during the final design phase of the project.
C. Right of Way
The EA states that approximately 40 feet of right of way will be
required along the four sections of the roadway where additional shoulder
width and curve realignment is proposed. The required ROW in these
locations is approximately 60 feet.
VI. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon a study of the proposed project documented in the Environmental
Assessment and upon comments received from federal, state and local agencies and the
public, it is the finding of the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the
Federal Highway Administration that this project will not have a significant adverse
impact upon the human or natural environment. The project is not controversial from an
environmental standpoint. No significant impacts to natural, ecological, cultural, or
scenic resources are expected. The proposed project is consistent with local plans and
will not disrupt any communities. In view of the above evaluation, it has been
determined a Finding of No Significant Impact is applicable for this project. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Impact Statement nor further environmental analysis will be
required.
6
U
w _
Q
jui

J w
1
O
i
1
\
1
1
r;
i
I?
i '
I
LOW Crab
orctaro %
1/10
04
e b
o ?
e ?
t?-,
A?
d `V

O v
1 J'

Ra
Hach .
1

J

0

1 U
W

J
O O
CL
!m ull
C7
W.t.uj. Carl,
¦yrrrrr?r rr.
// Awl Cx /

P" d

?
Uri
O
®
?
Z M Its
® 'd
tto /O
L

® a? 4) o r?

a 4 E-4
®L? ?
? ? ? ?
? 1 ?1 O v?

? r • ry
r "

°
• V
.."
a
??f' • GttA?4
N
- +
F-
a

?10 ??
r
rrrrr ?
4)
U
0
0
z

M.
= = m = w m r r = w m = = m m m m m
r r m m! s= r m w = m m m m r m m=
t
t
t
TIP Project No. R-2710
APPENDIX A
Comments Received from Agencies In Response to Circulation of
Environmental Assessment
1
1
1
1
unncen azazes uepartmens oz sagracumzure
6,v N RCS
Natural Resources Conservation Service
4405 Bland Road, Suite 205
Raleigh, NC 27609
Dr. Gregory 1. Thorpe, PhD
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NC Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548

Michael J. Hinton sz1
Phone: [phone] %? ,• rFax: [phone] ' 4 ?!' '?•? {;aU
E-mail: mike.hinton@ri??{?°d GovY3 c?
"?;.:,+.?
December 23, 2005
RE: Federal Environmental Assessment for NC 194 Improvements, From the Avery Co
Line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Rd) Valle Crucis, Watauga Co, Federal Project No. STP-
194(4), State Project No. 8.1721001, WBS Element 34499.1.1, TIP Project No. R-2710
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed highway
improvement subject above. The Natural Resources Conservation Service has no
comment at this time.
Sincerely,
Michael J. Hinton
Planning Specialist
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people
conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment.
M Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer -
.-,

Subject: Federal EA for R-2710, NC 194 Improvements, Valle Crucis, Watauga County
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:11:02 -0500'
From: [e-mail] (Chris Militscher)
To: [e-mail], [e-mail],
CC: [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail]
Stephanie/Teresa: EPA has completed its review of the above referenced
document which includes a draft and programmatic section 4(f) evaluation
for 3 properties. This is a non-Merger improvements project of
approximately 5.5 miles in length. The summary of impacts table on page iv
is very comprehensive. Impacts from the proposed project to
jurisdictional streams and wetlands is minimum 0 acres wetlands/42.5 linear
feet including 3 streams. Per page 40 of the EA, EPA would request
compensatory mitigation for stream impacts to Craborchard Creek,
Craborchard UT-A, Dutch Creek-and Dutch Creek UT-C as per meeting the
criteria under 40 CFR 1508.20. There are some Section 106/4f property
issues and EPA notes the environmental commitments contained in the Green
sheets, including the trout moratorium 'no construction work' within 25
feet of the 3 streams from Oct. 15 to April 15. EPA has no environmental
concerns for the proposed project. Please provide a copy of the FONSI when
it becomes available. Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Christopher A. Militscher, REM, CHMM
USEPA Raleigh Office
919-856-4206

11

1

?f i , 3/20/2006 3:29 P?

1
t
TIP Project No. R-2710
APPENDIX B
Public Hearing Notice and Handout

C?

1

1

1

t
NOTICE OF A DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING
FOR THE NC 194 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
FROM THE AVERY COUNTY LINE TO SR 1112 (BROADSTONE ROAD)
WBS No. 34499.1.1 R-2710 Watauga County
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will hold an informal
Design Public Hearing on April 25, 2006 between the hours of 4:30 p.m. and 7:30
p.m. in the Johnson Hall at the Valle Crucls Conference Center.
Department of Transportation representatives will be available in an
informal setting to answer questions and receive comments relative to the
proposed project. The opportunity to submit written comments or questions also
will be provided. Interested citizens may attend at any time during the above
mentioned hours.
This project calls for transportation improvements to NC 194 from the
Avery County line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road). The project proposes to level
existing asphalt (removal of worn or deteriorated pavement), resurface
pavement, widen and realign curves at certain locations, widen and reconstruct
road shoulders, construct retaining walls at certain locations and install guardrail.
. A map setting forth the design of the project and a copy of the
environmental document - Environmental Assessment - are available for public
review at the Watauga County Manager's Office, 814 West King Street, Boone
28607 and at the NCDOT District Engineer's Office, 1829 Jefferson Highway
NC 194 North, Boone, 28607.
Anyone desiring additional information may contact Kimberly D. Hinton,
1 Human Environment Unit at 1583 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1583,
phone [phone], or email khinton(cr)-dot.state. nc.us. Additional material may
be submitted for a period of 15 business days from the date of the hearing.

11

NCDOT will provide auxiliary aids and services under the Americans with
Disabilities Act for disabled persons who wish to participate in this hearing.
Anyone requiring special services should contact Ms. Hinton as early as possible
so that arrangements can be.made.

resat pORI1) C,1{04
CAROLINA DEPAR'T'MENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NORTH '
.
x •
O
?rN`or mrTse
NC 1 94 IMPROVEMENTS
From the Avery County line to Broadstone Road (SR 1112)
1
WBS dumber 34499.1.
TIP PROJECT R-2710
Federal Aid No. STP-194(4)

Watauga County ,

Design Public Hearing

Johnson Hall
Valle Crucis Conference Center
146 Skiles Way
Banner Elk, 28604

4:30 -- 7.38 p.m.
(No presentation tonight) r

April 25, 2006 ,

t
t
t
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
NC 19.41m-provements
TIP R-2710
Watagua County
•r
Packet Contents:
• Project overview
• Public Involvement Process
• Project Funding
Public Hearing Format
• Right of Way Procedures
Project Team Contact Information
• Project Map
Comment Sheet
??.j??,)?J, • ? ?131ii:111 ?'.1?`.'Ii"f?,iiii!:?11' ?";?il I:???.'t `l:t:? .``:•:" .-'t' ?.c';:fC':" ?l:?((-•:1;, ..?" _ rir?_ 1?
NC 194 improvements TIP R,2710
Project Overview
The proposed project would widen shoulders and straighten out curves along 5.5 miles of
NC 194 from the Avery County line to Broadstone Road (SR 1.112). These improvements
are proposed in order to address safety along NC 194. Numerous accidents that occur along
NC 194 are caused by cars running off the road due to the narrow shoulders and inadequate
pavement widths.
NCDOT proposes to widen and realign shoulder curves, add guardrail, construct retaining
walls and resurface road on the length of the project. A new curve would be constructed
near Dutch Creek Road on NC 194 from the Avery County line to Broadstone Road (SR
1112). Improvements also include shifting the alignment of NC 194 south about 130 feet of
its existing location in order to accommodate the curve relocation and improve the sight
distance at the intersection.
Project Funding
NC 194, a Federal-Aid Highway Project, will be constructed under the State-Federal Aid
Highway Program. Financing of this project is 80% federal funds and 20% state funds. The
Board of Transportation is responsible for the selection and scheduling of the project
location, design and maintenance cost of the project once construction is completed.
In order to ensure that each Federal Aid Highway Project meets federal standards and
guidelines, the Federal Highway Administration is responsible for the review and approval of
the location and design of the project The preliminary cost and schedule estimates for
widening NC 194 are:
Right of Way Acquisition $203,000 Schedule: November 2006
Construction $7100,000 September 2008
' Total Cost $7,303,000

Public Involvement Process
NCDOT's Public Involvement Program provides interested citizens the opportunity to gain
information about the project and to participate in the planning process. Tonight's public
hearing is an important step in the department's transportation development process.
By participating-in this process, you will have the opportunity to provide input regarding the
NC 194 improvement project. Everyone is encouraged to participate by expressing his or
her individual opinion. Please note that the project team considers all opinions equally.

i?

1
Public Hearing 3
April 25, 2006

NC 194 Improvements
it
1

1
Public Hearing Format
TIP R 2710
Tonight's meeting is a continuation of the department's efforts to gather information
regarding NC 194 improvements. This is an occasion for the project team to meet you and
answer any questions that you may have. It is also an opportunity for you to meet the team
members and obtain additional information about the project.
MAP REVIEW
Maps of the NC 194 project are available and will help guide you regarding the
project boundaries and sections of the road that will be improved.
When looking at the maps you will note there is a legend in the bottom left corner.
Below are some of the items on the map to which you may want ,. ,
to pay particular attention. ' t
• BrQym = existing buildings, i.e. residents and businesses
LEGEND:
?
• Dark en _ -- existing right of way ? RVILDINGS
e EXISTING RIGNT Of WAY
• Ugh green - proposed right of way ?
-
,T PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
IC ALL EASEMENTS
y...? y
• Steel, existing roadway
? EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY
• Crangc = existing roadway that will be resurfaced °
,
27 EXISTING ROADWAY
EXISTING ROADWAY TO BE REMOVED
M
RF
CED
• Yellow = proposed roadway A
EXISTING ROADWAY TO RE RESU
PROPOSED ROADWAY

-
,proposed structures, i.e. a bridge
• $gd

PR POSED STVTTERUCTURES, "LAND. SIDEWALK,
ANC GR
CURB
PUBLIC HEARING
The public hearing is from 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. and is an occasion for you to meet one

' on one with project team members. Please note that there will be no
eetin
t th
i
g.
e m
on a
presentat
COMMENTS
Please take a moment to complete the comment sheet, which is page 7 of
this information packet. Written comments are considered by the project team
and will be accepted until Ma 6. You may give your comment sheet to a
Project team member, drop it in the comment box, located at the sign in table, or
mail it.to the Senior Public Hearing Officer, Kimberly Hinton,
Once the comment period closes the project team will meet again with NCDOT and federal
agency staff who play a role in the project development. In addition to public comment, the
project team will also considers safety, cost, traffic service, and social impacts when making
decisions regarding the,next phase of the project.
If an issue merits further consideration, additional assessments and studies may be
conducted. Board of Transportation Members and/or the Secretary of Transportation may
be consulted, if necessary. If you wish to receive a copy of the post hearing meeting
minutes, please indicate so on the comment sheet.
Public Hearing
April 25, 2006
4
All?

NC 194 Improvements 11F K L!1U
Right of Way Procedures
Right of way will be required for this project, but no homes or businesses will be
affected by the project. However, for your information NCDOT's standard right of way
procedures are outlined below.
As part of the right of way acquisition process NCDOT must:
• Treat all property owners and tenants impartially without regard to race, color,
religion, sex or national origin;
• Fully explain an owner's legal rights;
• Pay just compensation in exchange for property rights;
• Furnish relocation advisory assistance, in accordance with federal and state
regulations; and
• Initiate legal action should a settlement not be reached.
Right of way agents are trained to explain plans and advise you how a proposed highway
project will affect your property. On the initial visit the right of way agent must get
important information to make certain the property has been properly evaluated for fair
market value. The agent will also collect information regarding the property history,
accuracy of the property lines and buildings as shown on the plans and property areas.
Project Team Contact Information
If you have any question or would like to send comments regarding NC 194, please contact:
e

1

fl

Kimberly Hinton
Senior Public Hearing Officer
N.C. Department of Transportation
Human Environment Unit '
1583 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1583
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: khinton ,,dat.state.nc.us
T
1
1
i .
Public Hearing 5 ?,,,i '
April 25, 2006

NC 194 Improvements

Public Hearing
April 25, 2006
l
Project Map
6
TIP R 2710
-0 ?-- f - /
NC 194 Improvements
Submit by May 16, 2006
Name:
Comment Sheet
TIP R 2710
Address:
Public Hearing 7
April 25, 2006
1

t

TIP Project No. R-2710
APPENDIX C
Final 4(f) Evaluation for Impacts to the Valle Crucis Historic District

1

n
?I

1

1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NC 194 IMPROVEMENTS
From the Avery County Line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road)
Valle Crucis Watauga County
WBS Element 34499. 1.1
Federal Project No. STP-194(4)
State Project No. 8.1721001
TIP PROJECT R-2710
FINAL SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION
FOR, THE VALLE CRUCIS HISTORIC DISTRICT,
(INCLUDING THE VALLE CRUCIS EPISCOPAL NUSSION)
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
submitted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)
And 23 CFR 771.135, Section 4(f)
a1
/
;!111
ti
Date
j? o?
Date
T-P`
4i'- "Of
al?y.
X Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Cohn F. Sullivan, III, Division Admini ati
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ....................................................... 1
B. DESCRIPTION OF SECTION 4(f) RESOURCE ....................................................... 1
C. IMPACTS TO SECTION 4(f) PROPERTY ................................................................ 2
D. AVOIDANCE ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................... 2
E. MEASURES TO MINIMIZE HARM .............................. 2
...........................................
F. MITIGATION MEASURES .................. ........... 3.
G. COORDINATION ....................................................................................................... 3
fl
IIF

'
NC 194 IMPROVEMENTS
From the Avery County Line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road)
Valle Crucis Watauga County
WBS Element 34499.1.1

' Federal Project No. STP-194(4)
State Project No. 8.1721001
TIP PROJECT R-2710

A. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to resurface
the pavement and replace guardrail along a section of NC 194 between the Avery County
Line and SR 1112 (Broadstone Road) in Watauga County. Additionally, along four sections
of NC 194 within the project limits NCDOT proposes minor curve and intersection
realignment and wider shoulders. The proposed curve realignment near Dutch Creek Road
will be constructed partially within the boundary of the Valle Crucis Historic District
adjacent to NC 194. The total project length is 5.5 miles. The project vicinity is shown in
Figure 1. The proposed improvements are shown in Figure 2 of the Environmental
Assessment (EA). `
B. DESCRIPTION OF SECTION 4(f) RESOURCES
Eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places falls under criteria A for
agriculture, commerce, education, religion, and social history as well as C for architecture.
The Valle Crucis Historic District (including the existing Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission) is
designated eligible under both criteria A and C.
Located amidst the Watauga River Valley of western Watauga county, the earliest
recorded settlement in the community of Valle Crucis dates back to the 1770s. Fertile
farmland, wooded hillsides,. creeks and a river all led to settlement in this area in the late 18`h
century by the Baird, Mast, and Shull families. However, it was not until Bishop Levi
Silliman Ives established an Episcopal Mission in the 1840s called Valle Crucis (which
means "valley of the cross" in Latin, and which Ives named after a Cistercian monastery in
Wales) that the entire area became known as Valle Crucis. In 1845, The Valle Crucis Post
Office was established at the mission, as well as day schools at other sites in the valley. In the
late 19th century many frame farm houses were built, and by the 1920s, almost half of the
' valley families began to open their large houses to travelers and summer visitors. The
Episcopal Mission also hosted summer programs and conferences. Over time the area
became a desirable location for seasonal homes and tourism, a trend that continues presently.
' Valle Crucis, today maintains much of the same character as the rural mountain
community of the early 20 century. The community remains rural and agrarian with open
fields and wooded hillsides stretching back from the roadsides. Contemporary commercial
and residential buildings are intermingled with historic structures from each period of
development. Unlike other rural communities in Watauga County, Valle Crucis became a
social, commercial and educational center for the surrounding area, largely due to the
presence of the Episcopal Mission. The community also benefited from the abundant natural
resources and scenic beauty of the Upper and Lower valleys, as well as the strong presence in
1
t
he
leadership of the early valley families. The natural landscape, which has complemented
development of Valle Crucis over the two- hundred-year history of the community, exists
today as an integral part of the built environment. The buildings contained within the Valle

Crucis Historic District represent every stage of the community's development, and many '
historic structures continue to serve their original functions.

C. IMPACTS TO SECTION 4(f) PROPERTY
The boundaries of the Valle Crucis Historic District extend roughly from the Watauga '
River in the north (including the Mast Farm (NR, 1972) at the eastern edge and the David F.
Baird Farm on the western edge) and along NC 194 in the Upper Valley and Valle Crucis
Episcopal Mission (NR, 1993) whose 426-acre property forms the southern limits. This section '
of the Valle Crucis Historic District is primarily a grassy, sparsely wooded area. The proposed
relocation of a curved portion of NC 194 will occur away from the Valle Crucis Episcopal
Mission. The project will require the acquisition of approximately 60 ft of right of way and

temporary construction easements along a distance of 450 feet within the Valle Crucis Historic '
District as well as displacing one contributing historic structure. The structure, a garage/shed
built circa 1950, is a two-bay, frame structure with a shed roof located towards the east side of
NC 194 alongside an unpaved farm road. NCDOT, the State Historic Preservation Office
(HPO) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) have agreed that the proposed
project will have an "Adverse Effect" on the Valle Crucis Historic District (See Appendix A of
the Environmental Assessment). The project results in a use under Section 4(f) of the U.S. '
Department of Transportation Act.
D. AVOIDANCE ALTERNATIVES '
Northern and Southern avoidance alternative designs on new location, which would
avoid impacts to this historic resource were considered infeasible. The northern alternate
consists of providing a new location facility to the north of existing NC 194. The southern
avoidance alternative consists of providing a new location facility to the south of existing NC
194. A Northern or Southern avoidance alternative on new location would require the purchase
of approximately 29-55 additional acres of ROW causing impacts to the adjacent Northern
'
Hardwoods Forest and Craborchard Creek in order to circumvent the Valle Crucis Historic
district. In addition, this type of avoidance alternative would not satisfy the purpose and need
for this project due to its inability to meet the required safety standards for the existing roadway. '
The proposed relocation of the existing curve is necessary in order to provide a safer design, as
the proposed improvements will bring the curve up to design standard for sight distance.
Northern and Southern new location avoidance alternatives were dropped from further '
consideration.
E. MEASURES TO MINIMIZE HARM
The curve realignment section (see NCDOT proposed design plans, site 6, sheets 16-
17) is shown to be shifted to the south (away from the main complex of buildings at Valle
Crucis Episcopal Mission) of the present roadway centerline. This design is intended to
reduce impacts to the historic property, the historic district, as well as to a mature oak tree in
the vicinity of the NC 194 curve realignment.

1
L
1
0

1
n
I I
1
The NCDOT will minimize fill sections and right-of-way within the historic district as
much as possible. Additionally, the NCDOT will implement adequate erosion control
measures.
F. MITIGATION MEASURES
Several features will be incorporated into the design of the project to help minimize the
impact and mitigate the effect of the proposed project on the Valle Crucis Historic District and
Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission. These commitments are as follows:
Prior to the construction of the project, NCDOT shall record, at the curve realignment
section (see Figure 2, site 4 of the Environmental Assessment), the existing conditions of
both the historic landscape and historic architectural features associated with the Valle Crucis
Episcopal Mission and the Valle Crucis Historic District in accordance with a Historic
Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan. This recordation shall include the 1950s
contributing shed/garage structure that is planned to be demolished. The written and
photographic documentation will be deposited with the NC Division of Archives and
History/HPO to be made part of the permanent statewide survey and iconographic collection.
The NCDOT is continuing to coordinate with the Valle Crucis Historic District, and the
Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission representatives, regarding the type of guardrail that will be used
to replace the existing guardrail along the property. The existing guardrail consists of
deteriorated wooden stakes with strands of barbed wire connecting them all along NC 194.
Valle Crucis Historic District representatives including representatives of the Valle Crucis
Historic Mission property have expressed concern over the aesthetics of conventional guardrail,
should it be used to replace the existing wooden stakes in the proximity of the historic district
property. Since the wooden stakes that were used originally are not considered safe by current
design standards, the historic community would like NCDOT to use something other than the
standard shiny metal guardrail when it replaces the existing guardrail.
NCDOT has committed to coordinate with the respective property owners for the replanting of
' trees, shrubs, or bushes along the road frontage of these properties as well as avoiding a mature
oak tree (using protective tree measures during construction), located on the east side of NC
194, north of the intersection with SR 1134 (Dutch Creek Road).
1

1

G. COORDINATION
NCDOT coordinated with the Valle Crucis Community and a Valle Crucis Episcopal
Mission representative regarding the project.
On February 18, 2002 NCDOT met in the Episcopal Chapel, with representatives from
the Valley Crucis Historic District to discuss plans for safety improvements to NC 194.
Resurfacing NC 194, improving shoulders in four locations and relocating a curve to the south
of NC 194, and away from the Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission, were presented as potential
improvements to the group. The Valle Crucis Historic District representatives opposed
widening lane widths throughout the entire length of the project.
On April 23, 2002, a workshop was held at the Valle Crucis Elementary School. At this
meeting, the Valle Crucis Historic District representatives and the Valle Crucis Episcopal
Mission representative voiced additional comments. Representatives from the Valle Crucis
Episcopal Mission and the Valle Crucis Historic District indicated that while they did not
approve of lane- widening throughout the project length, they did not object to relocating the
1
1
curve to the south side of NC 194 within the historic district. Other requests from the '
community, included preserving a mature tree located in the vicinity of the proposed curve
realignment, replacing guardrail with anodized guardrail, and adding shoulder- work and other '
safety measures while preserving the historic and scenic nature of the area.
On September 30, 2003 NCDOT met with the State Historic Preservation Office
(HPO) to discuss project impacts to the Valle Crucis Historic District property. The Valle '
Crucis Historic District and the Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission are listed on the National
Register of Historic Places. The HPO noted that the right of way that would be acquired as
well as the garage/shed structure that would be displaced on the Valle Crucis Historic District '
side of NC 194, are considered character-defining elements of the property.
The HPO concurred with NCDOT that the proposed project would have an "Adverse '
Effect" on the Valle Crucis Historic District and the Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission property
(see Appendix A of the Environmental Assessment).
Based on these findings, NCDOT representatives proposed the following with regard to
improvements to NC 194: '
- DOT will construct the curve relocation segment away from the Valle Crucis
Episcopal Mission, requiring the relocation of the shed/garage structure.
- DOT will use anodized guardrail in the historic district.
- DOT will add shoulders only in specific curves along NC 194.
- DOT will resurface and add guardrail throughout the entire length of the project '
for safety purposes.
- DOT will protect a mature oak tree located within the historic district in order to
preserve the historic and scenic nature of the area.
NCDOT will continue to coordinate with representatives from the Valle Crucis Historic '
District and the Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission concerning impacts to historic resources.
Following the above public involvement opportunities, NCDOT summarized public concerns
in a Citizens newsletter (see appendix E of the Environmental Assessment). '

1

1

1
1

L
1

1

1
1
1
1
1

1

i
1

1

1
NC 194 IMPROVEMENTS
From the Avery County Line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road)
Valle Crucis Watauga County
WBS Element 34499.1.1
Federal Project No. STP-194(4)
State Project No. 8.1721001
TIP PROJECT R-2710
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
And
FINAL SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
submitted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)
And 23 CFR 771.135

i
' APPROVED:
ii
410107 f
' Date f-Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Manager
L Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
' Date ^t" -,John F. Sullivan III, Division Admini trator
Federal Highway Administration

11
u

NC 194 IMPROVEMENTS
From the Avery County Line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road)
Valle Crucis Watauga County
WBS Element 34499.1.1
1 Federal Project No. STP-194(4)
State Project No. 8.1721001
TIP PROJECT R-2710

0
' FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
And
' FINAL SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION

0

July 2007
' Documentation Prepared in Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch BY:
Avff - b
p anie Ca 1 CA20 ?N ?
Project Plann ng Engineer 4F:••'S
/f ? ? 2 .• OF ??1rL;
. q? 'A` •
SEAL •
24925 ?0:_
Robert Andrew Jo er P.E. = s u';
•
Project Engineer ••. N ?•??`Z
:. GtN
MORE `
7 41

'.i-.aM6vv.aJv..ML V1111T1i i.1viL1 \ i AX
NC 194 IMPROVEMENTS
From the Avery County Line to SR 1112 `(Broadstone Road)
Watauga, County Valle Cmcis
WBS Element 34499. 1.1
Federal Project No. STP-194(4) '
State Project No. 8.1721001
TIP PROJECT R-2710

GeoEnvironmental Section
' NO UST (Underground StorAge Tank) facilities were found within the vicinity of the
proposed project and no landfills or<durnpsites occur within the project limits.
However, an extensive corridor subsurface investigation will be performed prior to
' right of way purchase.
This is a standard project commitment.
Division 11 Design
• NCDOT will install "rust-look" guardrail throughout the entire project length.
• NCDOT willreplant disturbed lawn in front of the Carendar.Barnproperty with grass
on a 2:1 slope.
Right of Way Branch
The IBC Geodetic Survey will be contacted prior to construction, due to the presence.
of three Geodetic Markers within the vicinity of the project:
This is a standard project commitment.
Division 11 DesismMeht of Way Branch/PDEA
• NCDOT will replace any trees, bushes, plantings, or fences that are a part of the Valle
Crucis Historic District, the Valle Crucis Episcopal Missiori`and the Carender Barn
that are impacted by the subject project unless otherwise requested by the property
owner. NCDOT will. coordinate the replacement of these items with the appropriate '-
property owner: and-the State Historic Preservation Officer prior to the completion of
the final environmental document for the project. NCDOT will avoid displacing the
'mature oak tree in the vicinity of the Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission property as"well
as use appropriate measures to protect the tree during construction.
' el
f 2'
P
o
ag
T.I.P. Project R-2710
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSn Greensheet.
July 2007

{' ,?'

';'
,.
??

_ '} ?!,
,?
?
:
? ;

.,
'
'`
?
_
.7
?'
Is

1:
.?

Its
?.F
,.,?
..

• NCDOT will avoid impacts to the cemetery located near the Valle Crucis Episcopal
Mission, along NC' 194 just north of SR 1134 (Dutch Creek Road).

Division 11
• No clearing and grubbing will occur within 25 feet of Craborchard Creek, Dutch
Creek, or the Watauga River from October 15th to April 156',due.to the presence of
trout. North Carolina regulations entitled Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds
shall be implemented, during the design, and construction ofthis project, as applicable.
A letter of notification, with reference to impacts to trout water habitat, will be

i provided to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Asheville Regulatory Field Office and
the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) office prior to construction of the
project.
' • All areas of major improvement along the project will be designed with a lane width of
10 feet. Other project areas will be designed with lane widths of 9 feet where possible
and where shoulder width is available.
• Construction activities will be phased around yearly local activities that include the
Blood, Sweat and Gears Bike Race every third Saturday in June, and the Valley
County Fair and Wooley Worm Festival'every third Saturday in October.
' Structure Design

• The proposed project is located in the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) Land
Management District. A permit pursuant to Section 26a of the TVA Act is. required
for all construction or development involving streams or floodplains in the Tennessee
River drainage basin.

T.I.P. Project R-2710 Page 2 of 2
Finding ofNo Significant Impact (FONSn Greensheet
' July 2007 -

r

??.
?;

?"
{

?r

?''
s

?N
?''

i
.. '`,

..
I.

'
TABLE OF CONTENTS
' PAGE
1. TYPE OF ACTION .................................................................................................... 1
1 II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION ............................................................ 1
III. SUMMARY OF BENEFICIAL AND ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL
' IMPACTS .......................................................................................................................... 2
IV. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS ................................................................... 4
' A.. CIRCULATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................... 4
B. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................. 4
C. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING AND FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING ................... 4
' V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................... 6
A. LANE WIDTHS ............................................................................................................. 6
' B. STRucTuRE #1 ........................................................................................................... 6
C. RIGHT OF WAY .......................................................................................................... 6
BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ....................................
VI 6
.
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map

APPENDIX
Appendix A - Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment
Appendix B - Public Hearing Notice and Handout
Appendix C - Final Section 4(f) Evaluation for Impacts to the Valle Crucis Historic
District

1

' NC 194 IMPROVEMENTS
From the Avery County Line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road)
i Valle Crucis Watauga County
WBS Element 34499.1.1
Federal Project No. STP-194(4)
State Project No. 8.1721001
TIP PROJECT R-2710
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
' Prepared by the Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
in Consultation with
the Federal Highway Administration
' I. TYPE OF ACTION
This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) administrative action, Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
The FHWA has determined this project will not have any significant impact on
the human and natural environment. This FONSI is based on the Environmental
Assessment dated November 2, 2005, which has been independently evaluated by the
FHWA and determined to adequately and accurately discuss the environmental issues and
impacts of the proposed project. The Environmental Assessment provides sufficient
evidence and analysis for determining that an Environmental Impact Statement is not
required. The FHWA takes full responsibility for the accuracy, scope, and content of the
Environmental Assessment.
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
resurface the pavement and replace guardrail along a section of NC 194 between the
Avery County Line and SR 1112 (Broadstone Road) in Watauga County. Additionally,
NCDOT proposes minor curve/ intersection realignment and shoulder widening along
' four sections of NC 194 within the project limits. The length of the proposed project is
approximately 5.5 miles. Approximately 60 feet of right of way will be required along
the four sections of the roadway where additional shoulder width and curve realignment
is proposed.
NCDOT includes this project in the Federally-approved 2006 - 2012
Transportation Improvement Program. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in
fiscal year 2007, and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2009.

TIP Project R-2710 proposes to widen shoulders of several curves and to relocate
an existing curve to a new location section in the vicinity of Dutch Creek Road along
NC 194 from the Avery County line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road). In addition,
guardrail will be added and pavement will be resurfaced throughout the entire project
length. The proposed curve relocation is located at the existing intersection of SR 1134
(Dutch Creek Road) and NC 194. This intersection occurs at the midpoint of a sharp
horizontal curve along NC 194. The intersection is at a severe angle, creating poor sight
distance due to a combination of the horizontal curvature of NC 194 and the skewed
intersection angle. The proposed improvements include shifting the alignment of NC
194 south approximately 130 feet of its existing location. This will accommodate the
proposed curve relocation and reduce the severity of the existing curve along NC 194,
alleviating the poor sight distance.
The draft 2007-2013 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) has allocated
$7,852,000 for the proposed project including $252,000 for right of way acquisition,
$7,600,000 for construction, and $270,000 for prior years spending. The total estimated
cost for the proposed improvements is $7,392,000.00, which includes $192,000 for right
of way acquisition and $7,200,000.00 for construction.
III. SUMMARY OF BENEFICIAL AND ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS
This section of NC 194 is characterized by poor pavement, inadequate shoulder
widths, and poor sight distances at existing curves within the project limits. The
proposed improvements will improve the level of safety along NC 194 from the Avery
County line to SR 1112(Broadstone Road).
It is anticipated that no jurisdictional wetlands and a total of 425 feet of surface
waters will be impacted by the project. No relocatees are expected due to the proposed
improvements to NC 194. Two (2) architecturally historic sites are anticipated to be
impacted by the proposed improvements. Approximately 0.26 acres of right of way
impacts to the Valle Crucis Historic District (including the Valle Crucis Episcopal
Mission) and 0.06 acres of right of way impacts to the Carender Barn property will result
from the proposed project. The Carender Barn and the Carender Farm are not located
together. The Carender Barn is labeled in Figure 2 (sheet 1) of the Environmental
Assessment, the Carender Farm is located outside the area of proposed improvements
and, therefore, is not labeled in Figure 2 as no impacts to the Farm are anticipated as a
result of this project. The State Historic Preservation Office has concurred that the
proposed impacts to the Carender Barn and the Lee Carender Farm will result in "no
adverse effect", while the proposed impacts to the Valle Crucis Historic District
(including the Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission) will result in an "adverse effect".
NCDOT has committed to coordinate with the respective property owners for the
replanting of trees, shrubs, or bushes along the road frontage of these properties as well as
2
l

?J

1

L

avoiding a mature oak tree, in the vicinity of the Dutch Creek Road intersection with NC
194. No impacts are anticipated to any archaeologically significant sites.
Federally protected species were identified within Watauga county and a
biological conclusion determined in order to satisfy section 7(a)(2) of the ESA for the
following: Roan Mountain bluet, Heller's blazing star and Spreading avens, Carolina
northern flying squirrel, Virginia big-eared bat. It was determined that the project would
have "No Effect". A biological conclusion for the Bog turtle is not required. Therefore,
concurrence from US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for the species described above is
not required.
No adverse noise or air quality impacts are anticipated as a result of the project.

Ll

u
No UST (Underground Storage Tank) facilities were found within the vicinity of
the proposed project and no landfills or dumpsites occur within the project limits.
However, an extensive corridor subsurface investigation will be performed prior to right of
way purchase.
Summary of Impacts - R-2710
Resource Impacts
Wetlands 0 acres
Streams 425 linear ft (3 streams)
Buffers 0
Relocations 0
Haz-mat Sites 0 UST Sites
Noise Receptors 0
Prime Agricultural Lands 0
Terrestrial Forests <1 acre
Endangered Species 0

Section 106 Properties 3 - Lee Carender Barn- No Adverse
Effect, Lee Carender Farm, No
Effect, Valle Crucis Historic District-
Adverse Effect
Section 4(f) Properties 3
Churches / Schools No Impact
EJ Communities No
Air Quality No
Critical Water Supplies No

IV. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS
A. Circulation of the Environmental Assessment
The Environmental Assessment was approved by the NC Division of Highways and
the FHWA on November 2, 2005. The approved Environmental Assessment was
circulated to the following federal, state and local agencies for review and comments. An ,
asterisk (*) indicates a written response was received from the agency. Copies of the
correspondence received are included in the Appendix A of this document.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ,
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service*
Soil Conservation Service
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency*
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S. Forest Service ,
N.C. Department of Administration
N.C. Department of Cultural Resources
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Federal Emergency Management Administration
Land of the Sky Regional Council
Tennessee Valley Authority
Watauga County ,
B. Comments Received on the Environmental Assessment
U.S. Department of Agriculture-NRCS 1
Comment: The Natural Resources Conservation Service has no comment at this time.
Response: Comment Noted.
U.S Envirionmental Protection Agency '
Comment: EPA has no environmental concerns for the proposed project.
Response: Comment Noted.
C. Comments Received During and Following the Public Hearing ,
Following the circulation of the Environmental Assessment, a public hearing was
held at the Valle Crucis Conference Center on April 25, 2006. Copies of the public
hearing notice and a copy of the handout presented at the public hearing are included in
Appendix B of this report. Approximately 55 citizens attended the public hearing.
Substantive comments received during the public hearing are addressed below: '

Comment: One citizen was concerned with potential impacts to wildflowers currently
growing on the banks of the Valley Mountain section of NC 194.
Response: Environmental impacts will be minimized as much as possible throughout
the project limits.
Comment: Several citizens made the following comments:
-a layer of tar and gravel should be placed on the new asphalt surface for
added traction during inclement weather
-guardrail should also be placed at various points that have steep slopes
falling away from the roadway
-a wet weather spring.on the north side of NC 194 near the Barrows
property and Avery County line causes runoff over the roadway and an
excess of three to four feet of mud in which trucks regularly get stuck.
-flood area may be caused by a drain blockage where highway 194 meets
Clark's Creek
-a roadway near the Valle Crucis Elementary School needs to be raised
due to flooding
-the roadway should be wider in the area where NC 194 meets Rominger
Curve near the Demyen property
-the curve between site 4 and the "Dugger S Curve" is not wide enough for
truck travel
Response: The use of tar and gravel would not make a significant amount of
difference and maintenance issues may arise because of costs to replace
the tar and gravel. Flooding issues were improved with the recent bridge
improvement near Valle Crucis elementary school, other flooding issues
are outside the scope of this project but may be addressed in future
projects.
Comment: Several comments were made regarding the safe passage of emergency
personnel throughout the entire project, especially in the area of the
"Dugger S Curve" where many trucks become stuck. Other comments
pertained to the size of the existing shoulder width compared to the size
and volume of oversize vehicles that travel NC 194, as well as the many
bicyclists using NC 194.
Response: The major improvement areas along the project will be designed with a
lane width of 10 feet. Other project areas will be designed with lane widths
of 9 feet where possible and where shoulder width is available. Guardrail
will be implemented throughout the length of the project.
Comment: Several citizens expressed the need to schedule construction activities
around local events that include the Blood, Sweat and Gears Bike Race
every third Saturday in June, and the Valley County Fair and Wooley
Worm Festival every third Saturday in October.
I Response: A note has been made in the Project Commitments of this document
regarding the need to phase construction activities in association with
these two festivals.
71
L

V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
A. Lane Widths '
A request was made at the Public Hearing to add wider lanes where t
possible throughout the length of the project. NCDOT determined that all
areas of major improvement along the project will be designed with a lane
width of 10 feet. Other project areas will be designed with lane widths of 9
feet where possible and where shoulder width is available.
B. Structure.#1 ,
Part H, C of the EA document describes three major stream
crossings found in the vicinity of the proposed project. Since the EA was
completed, new recommendations concerning replacement of the existing
culvert at Structure #1 have been made. It is now recommended that
Structure #1, a 6-foot by 4-foot single barrel box culvert, be retained.
Appropriate measures to further stabilize the outlet may be developed '
during the final design phase of the project.
C. Right of Way '
The EA states that approximately 40 feet of right of way will be
required along the four sections of the roadway where additional shoulder
width and curve realignment is proposed. The required ROW in these '
locations is approximately 60 feet.
VI. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT !
Based upon a study of the proposed project documented in the Environmental
Assessment and upon comments received from federal, state and local agencies and the
public, it is the finding of the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the
Federal Highway Administration that this project will not have a significant adverse
impact upon the human or natural environment. The project is not controversial from an
environmental standpoint. No significant impacts to natural, ecological, cultural, or
scenic resources are expected. The proposed project is consistent with local plans and
will not disrupt any communities. In view of the above evaluation, it has been
determined a Finding of No Significant Impact is applicable for this project. Therefore, ,
neither an Environmental Impact Statement nor further environmental analysis will be
required.

n

1

[ - I

TIP Project No. R-2710
FIGURES

1

s= = m m m = m m == = r r m m m m
or•••
•*1 0?

0
et,
0
0

A
7.rtd,
? O O ? O
K ?
M n -1.
0
.°? -a I
?CD (7
c
1
i
Llunn:) AA*, V
11an*3 •fngV,u
z o'j O
L
/
1
• apeH
:
1
1
1
1
SOP 1
i
i
gy 1
3 ?
L
r
v o
o '
A y ,.
ell- rr . '
?0 1
O
4"ON "'00
',ON vv0
R? 0 0-4
'p R, cts cow
-Zi
CD ?° CD ®®
A ? U7
Fr. lb e =
Oq
C o Z Z
Q•? ? o
Ahl
%toe ?
W1 ?
I
I
1
1
.? j
1
1
1
i
s4 ?
i
_,_?
?,. ..?
1 amp psj3 ,

•?• 0
Rq?• m -
t.
m m m m m m m = m A m r m m m = i s

TIP Project No. R-2710
APPENDIX A
Comments Received from Agencies In Response to Circulation of
I Environmental Assessment

1

11

unmea states uepartment or sagncuiture
O
K S
V 1 V 12 CrJJ
Natural Resources Conservation Service Michael J. Hinton tst
4405 Bland Road, Suite 205 Phone: [phone] %t; ?
a r3 }
Raleigh, NC 27809 Fax: [phone] ??
f?.
Email: mike.hinton@ri .?ft3ov , : - ,

December 23, 2005

1
ii
1
Dr. Gregory I Thorpe, PhD
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NC Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
RE: Federal Environmental Assessment for NC 194 Improvements, From the Avery Co
Line to SR 111.2 (Broadstone Rd) Valle Crucis, Watauga Co, Federal Project No. STP-
194(4), State Project No. 8.1721001, WBS Element 34499.1.1, TIP Project No. R-2710
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed highway
improvement subject above. The Natural Resources Conservation Service has no
comment at this time.
Sincerely,

Michael J. Hinton
Planning Specialist

The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help people
conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment.
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Subject: Federal EA for R-2710, NC 194 Improvements, Valle Crucis, Watauga County '
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:11:021-0500'
From: [e-mail] (Chris Militscher)
To: [e-mail], [e-mail], i
CC: [e-mail],gov, john.t.thomas@sa,,v02.usace.army.mil,
[e-mail]
Stephanie/Teresa: EPA has completed its review of the above referenced
document which includes a draft and programmatic Section 4{f} evaluation
for 3 properties. This is a non-Merger improvements project of
approximately 5.5 miles in length. The summary of impacts table on page iv
is very comprehensive. Impacts from the proposed project to
jurisdictional streams and wetlands is minimum 0 acres wetlands/425 linear

feet including 3 streams. Per page 40 of the EA, EPA would request ,
compensatory mitigation for stream impacts to Craborchard Creek,
Craborchard UT-A, Dutch Creek-and Dutch Creek UT-C as per meeting the
criteria under 40 CFR 1508.20. There are some Section 106/4f property
issues and EPA notes the environmental commitments contained in the Green
sheets, including the trout moratorium 'no construction work, within 25
feet of the 3 streams from Oct. 15 to April 15. EPA has no environmental
concerns for the proposed project. Please provide a copy of the FONSI when
it becomes available. Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Christopher A. Militscher, REM, CHMM
USEPA Raleigh Office

919-856-4206 ,

1

Ll

of 1
1 3/2012006 3:29 P?
.. e?

?-1

1

L'
TIP Project No. R-2710
APPENDIX B
Public Hearing Notice and Handout
u

LJ
L

NOTICE OF A DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING
FOR THE NC 194 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
FROM THE AVERY COUNTY LINE TO SR 1112 (BROADSTONE ROAD)
WBS No. 34499.1.1 R-2710 Watauga County
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will hold an Informal
Design Public Hearing on April 25, 2006 between the hours of 4:30 p.m. and 7:30
p.m. in the Johnson Hall at the Valle Crucis Conference Center.
Department of Transportation representatives will be available in an
informal setting to answer questions and receive comments relative to the
proposed project. The opportunity to submit written comments or questions also
Will be provided. Interested citizens may attend at anytime during the above
mentioned hours.
This project calls for transportation improvements to NC 194 from the
Avery County line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road). The project proposes to level
existing asphalt (removal of worn or deteriorated pavement), resurface
pavement, widen and realign curves at certain locations, widen and reconstruct
road shoulders, construct retaining walls at certain locations and install guardrail.
. A map setting forth the design of the project and a copy of the
environmental document - Environmental Assessment - are available for public
review at the Watauga County Manager's Office, 814 West King Street, Boone
28607 and at the NCDOT District Engineer's Office, 1829 Jefferson Highway
NC 194 North, Boone, 28607.
Anyone desiring additional information may contact Kimberly D. Hinton,
Human Environment Unit at 1583 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1583,
phone [phone], or email khinton a.dot.state.nc.us. Additional material may
be submitted for a period of 15 business days from the date of the hearing.

I)
L _J

1

NCDOT will provide auxiliary aids and services under the Americans with
Disabilities Act for disabled persons who wish to participate in this hearing.
Anyone requiring special services should contact Ms. Hinton as early as possible
so that arrangements can be.made.
1
NORTH. CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION '
NC 194 IMPROVEMENTS
From the Avery County line to Broadstone Road (SR 1112) '
WBS Number 34499.1,1 '
TIP PROJECT R-2710
Federal Aid No. STP-194(4)
Watauga Counter
1
1
Design Public Hearing
Johnson Hall
Valle Crucis Conference Center
.146 Skiles Wad '
Banner Elk, 28604
4:30 -- 7:30 p.m.
(No presentation tonight)
April 25, 2006 ,
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NC 194 Improvements
TIP R-2710
Watagua County
•r
Packet Contents:
• Project overview
Public Involvement Process
Project Funding
• Public Hearing Format
Right of Way Procedures
• Project Team Contact Information
• Project Map
• Comment Sheet
??-1??.: J • J JI.II+i:tf) J'.1? :"fs?!?iiii!:?ll' ?- :li! J;r? .l ?1:. J .. .'C' (.c'::fC':"
NC 194 improvements TIP R 27101
Project Overview
The proposed project would widen shoulders and straighten out curves along 5.5 miles of
NC 194 from the Avery County line to Broadstone Road (SR 1.112). These improvements
are proposed in order to address safety along NC 194. Numerous accidents that occur along
NC 194 are caused by cars running. off the road due to the narrow shoulders and inadequate
pavement widths.
NCDOT proposes to widen and realign shoulder curves, add guardrail, construct retaining
walls and resurface road on the length of the project. A new curve would be constructed
near Dutch Creek Road on NC 194 from the Avery County line to Broadstone Road (SR
1112). Improvements also include shifting the alignment of NC 194 south about 130 feet of
its existing location in order to accommodate the curve relocation and improve the sight:
distance at the intersection.
Project Funding
NC 194, a Federal-Aid Highway Project, will be constructed under the State-Federal Aid
Highway Program. Financing of this project is 80% federal funds and 20% state funds. The
Board of Transportation is responsible for the selection and scheduling of the project
location, design and maintenance cost of the project once construction is completed.
In order to ensure that each Federal Aid Highway Project meets federal standards and
guidelines, the Federal Highway Administration is responsible for the review and approval of
the location and design of the project. The preliminary cost and schedule estimates for
widening NC 194 are:
Right of Way Acquisition $203,000 Schedule: November 2006
Construction 57,100.000 September 2008
Total Cost $7,303,000
Public Involvement Process
NCDOT"s Public Involvement Program provides interested citizens the opportunity to gain
information about the project and to participate in the planning process. Tonight's public
hearing is an important step in the department's transportation development process.
By participating-in this process, you will have the opportunity to provide input regarding the
NC 194 improvement project. Everyone is encouraged to participate by expressing his or
her individual opinion. Please note that the project team considers all opinions equally.
Public Hearing 3 ?
April 25, 2006

J

1

n
1
NC 194 Improvements
i

in
Lam'

Public Hearing Format
TIP R 2714
Tonight's meeting is a continuation of the department's efforts to gather information
regarding NC 194 improvements. This is an occasion for the project team to meet you and
answer any questions that you may have. It is also an opportunity for you to meet the team
members and obtain additional information about the project.
MAP REVIEW
M., ?i Maps of the NC 194 project are available and will help guide you regarding the
3 project boundaries and sections of the road that will be improved.
When looking at the maps you will note there is a legend in the bottom left corner.
Below are some of the items on the map to which you may want
to pay particular attention.
• BrQn = existing buildings, i.e. residents and businesses LEGEND:
• Dark en = existing right of way BUILDINGS
EXISTING 110µT OF WAY
' • Light green - proposed right of wap c

^"

WAY
HRIGHT TS OF
ALI PROPOSED EASEMENTS
%
• ee existing roadway
- EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT
RAILROAC UGNT Of WAY
• QIan P = existing roadway that will be resurfaced ;7
ZM Z EXISTING ROADWAY
3 EXISTINO ROADWAY TO SE REMOVED
' • _ Wo
Ye^llow -proposed roadway n EXISTING ROADWAY TO RE RESURFACED
PROPOSED ROADWAY

-
- proposed structures, i.e. a bridge CU
POSED STRUCTURES, ISLAND, SIOEWAL[,
RS ANO GUTTER
PUBLIC HEARING
The public hearing is from 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. and is an occasion for you to meet one
' on one with project team members. Please note that there will be no
presentation at the meeting.
COMMENTS
t Please take a moment to complete the comment sheet, which is page 7 of
this information packet. Written comments are considered by the project team
' and will be accepted until May 6. You may give your comment sheet to a
:project team member, drop it in the comment box, located at the sign in table, or
mail it.to the Senior Public Hearing Officer, Kimberly Hinton,
Once the comment period closes the project team will meet again with NCDOT and federal
agency staff who play a role in the project development. In addition to public comment; the
project team will also considers safety, cost, traffic service, and social impacts when making
decisions regarding the.next phase of the project.
' If an issue merits further consideration, additional assessments and studies may be
conducted. Board of Transportation Members and/or the Secretary of Transportation may
be consulted, if necessary. If you wish to receive a copy of the post hearing meeting
' minutes, please indicate so on the comment sheet.
Public Hearing 4 1r+r?
April 25, 2006
NC 194 Improvements
Right of Way Procedures
Right of way will be required for this project, but no homes or businesses will be
affected by the project. However, for your information NCDOT's standard right of way
procedures are outlined below.
As part of the right of way acquisition process NCDOT must:
• Treat all property owners and tenants impartially without regard to race, color,
religion, sex or national origin;
• Fully explain an owner's legal rights;
• Pay just compensation in exchange for property rights;
• Furnish relocation advisory assistance, in accordance with federal and state
regulations; and
• Initiate legal action should a settlement not be reached.
Right of way agents are trained to explain plans and advise you how a• proposed highway
project will affect your property. On the initial visit the right of way agent must get
important information to make certain the property has been properly evaluated for fair
market value. The agent will also collect information regarding. the property history,
accuracy of the property lines and buildings as shown on the plans and property areas.
Project Team Contact Information
If you have any question or would like to send comments regarding NC 194, please contact
11F K /-/IU
1

h
1

7-1
?J
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Kimberly Hinton
Senior Public Hearing Officer
N.C. Department of Transportation
Human Environment Unit
1583 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1583
Phone: [phone]
Fax [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Public Hearing
April 25, 2006
5
JAI?
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
i
1
1
NC 194 Improvements

Public Hearing
April 25, 2006
1
Project Map
6
TIP R 2710
-0 ?-- - /
NC 194 Improvements
Submit by May 16, 2006
Name:
Connnent. Sheet
TIP R 2711
Address:
Public Hearing 7 is
April 25, 2006

[1

' TIP Project No. R-2710
APPENDIX C
Final 4(f) Evaluation for Impacts to the Valle Crucis Historic District

U

1
7

1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NC 194 IMPROVEMENTS
From the Avery County Line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road)
Valle Crucis Watauga County
WBS Element 34499. 1.1
Federal Project No. STP-194(4)
State Project No. 8.1721001
TIP PROJECT R-2710
FINAL SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION
FOR, THE VALLE CRUCIS HISTORIC DISTRICT,
(INCLUDING THE VALLE CRUCIS EPISCOPAL MISSION)
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADNIMSTRATION
AND
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
submitted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)
And 23 CFR 771.135, Section 4(f)
Date
kk?
Date
9?7
T
?`?'rar
c,?Q
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
?hn F. Sullivan, III, Division Admini rat
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
N
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ....................................................... 1
B. DESCRIPTION OF SECTION 4(f) RESOURCE ....................................................... 1
C. IMPACTS TO SECTION 4(f) PROPERTY ................................................................ 2
D. AVOIDANCE ALTERNATIVES .................................. 2
.............................................
.......................................
E. MEASURES TO MINIMIZE HARM .................................. 2
F. MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................ I
G. COORDINATION ....................................................................................................... 3

L7,

1

NC 194 IMPROVEMENTS
From the Avery County Line to SR 1112 (Broadstone Road)
Valle Crucis Watauga County
WBS Element 34499. 1.1
Federal Project No. STP-194(4)
State Project No. 8.1721001
TIP PROJECT R-2710
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to resurface
the pavement and replace guardrail along a section of NC 194 between the Avery County
Line and SR 1112 (Broadstone Road) in Watauga County. Additionally, along four sections
of NC 194 within the project limits NCDOT proposes minor curve and intersection
realignment and wider shoulders. The proposed curve realignment near Dutch Creek Road
will be constructed partially within the boundary of the Valle Crucis Historic District
adjacent to NC 194. The total project length is 5.5 miles. The project vicinity is shown in
Figure 1. The proposed improvements are shown in Figure 2 of the Environmental
Assessment (EA).

1

1

B. DESCRIPTION OF SECTION 4(f) RESOURCES
Eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places falls under criteria A for
agriculture, commerce, education, religion, and social history as well as C for architecture.
The Valle Crucis Historic District (including the existing Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission) is
designated eligible under both criteria A and C.
Located amidst the Watauga River Valley of western Watauga county, the earliest
recorded settlement in the community of Valle Crucis dates back to the 1770s. Fertile
farmland, wooded hillsides, creeks and a river all led to settlement in this area in the late 18th
century by the Baird, Mast, and Shull families. However, it was not until Bishop Levi
Silliman Ives established an Episcopal Mission in the 1840s called Valle Crucis (which
means "valley of the cross" in Latin, and which Ives named after a Cistercian monastery in
Wales) that the entire area became known as Valle Crucis. In 1845, The Valle Crucis Post
Office was established at the mission, as well as day schools at other sites in the valley. In the
late 19th century many frame farm houses were built, and by the 1920s, almost half of the
valley families began to open their large houses to travelers and summer visitors. The
Episcopal Mission also hosted summer programs and conferences. Over time the area
became a desirable location for seasonal homes and tourism, a trend that continues presently.
Valle Crucis, today maintains much of the same character as the rural mountain
community of the early 20th century. The community remains rural and agrarian with open
fields and wooded hillsides stretching back from the roadsides. Contemporary commercial
and residential buildings are intermingled with historic structures from each period of
development. Unlike other rural communities in Watauga County, Valle Crucis became a
social, commercial and educational center for the surrounding area, largely due to the
presence of the Episcopal Mission. The community also benefited from the abundant natural
resources and scenic beauty of the Upper and Lower valleys, as well as the strong presence in

t

leadership of the early valley families. The natural landscape, which has complemented the
development of Valle Crucis over the two- hundred-year history of the community, exists
today as an integral part of the built environment. The buildings contained within the Valle
Crucis Historic District represent every stage of the community's development, and many
historic structures continue to serve their original functions.

C. IMPACTS TO SECTION 4(_f) PROPERTY
The boundaries of the Valle Crucis Historic District extend roughly from the Watauga ,
River in the north (including the Mast Farm (NR, 1972) at the eastern edge and the David F.
Baird Farm on the western edge) and along NC 194 in the Upper Valley and Valle Crucis
Episcopal Mission (NR, 1993) whose 426-acre property forms the southern limits. This section '
of the Valle Crucis Historic District is primarily a grassy, sparsely wooded area. The proposed
relocation of a curved portion of NC 194 will occur away from the Valle Crucis Episcopal
Mission. The project will require the acquisition of approximately 60 ft of right of way, and

temporary construction easements along a distance of 450 feet within the Valle Crucis Historic '
District as well as displacing one contributing historic structure. The structure, a garage/shed
built circa 1950, is a two-bay, frame structure with a shed roof located towards the east side of
NC 194 alongside an unpaved farm road. NCDOT, the State Historic Preservation Office '
(HPO) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) have agreed that the proposed
project will have an "Adverse Effect' 'on the Valle Crucis Historic District (See Appendix A of
the Environmental Assessment). The project results in a use under Section 4(f) of the U.S. '
Department of Transportation Act.
D. AVOIDANCE ALTERNATIVES ,
Northern and Southern avoidance alternative designs on new location, which would
avoid impacts to this historic resource were considered infeasible. The northern alternate

consists of providing a new location facility to the north of existing NC 194. The southern '
avoidance alternative consists of providing a new location facility to the south of existing NC
194. A Northern or Southern avoidance alternative on new location would require the purchase
of approximately 29-55 additional acres of ROW causing impacts to the adjacent Northern
'
Hardwoods Forest and Craborchard Creek in order to circumvent the Valle Crucis Historic
district. In addition, this type of avoidance alternative would not satisfy the purpose and need
for this project due to its inability to meet the required safety standards for the existing roadway.

The proposed relocation of the existing curve is necessary in order to provide a safer design, as ,
the proposed improvements will bring the curve up to design standard for sight distance.
Northern and Southern new location avoidance alternatives were dropped from further
consideration. ,
E. MEASURES TO MINIMIZE HARM '
The curve realignment section (see NCDOT proposed design plans, site 6, sheets 16-
17) is shown to be shifted to the south (away from the main complex of buildings at Valle
Crucis Episcopal Mission) of the present roadway centerline. This design is intended to
reduce impacts to the historic property, the historic district, as well as to a mature oak tree in '
the vicinity of the NC 194 curve realignment.
I,

1
J

1

7

The NCDOT will minimize fill sections and right-of-way within the historic district as
much as possible. Additionally, the NCDOT will implement adequate erosion control
measures.
F. MITIGATION MEASURES
Several features will be incorporated into the design of the project to help minimize the
impact and mitigate the effect of the proposed project on the Valle Crucis Historic District and
Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission. These commitments are as follows:
Prior to the construction of the project, NCDOT shall record, at the curve realignment
section (see Figure 2, site 4 of the Environmental Assessment), the existing conditions of
both the historic landscape and historic architectural features associated with the Valle Crucis
Episcopal Mission and the Valle Crucis Historic District in accordance with a Historic
Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan. This recordation shall include the 1950s
contributing shed/garage structure that is planned to be demolished. The written and
photographic documentation will be deposited with the NC Division of Archives and
History/HPO to be made part of the permanent statewide survey and iconographic collection.
The NCDOT is continuing to coordinate with the Valle Crucis Historic District, and the
Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission representatives, regarding the type of guardrail that will be used
to replace the existing guardrail along the property. The existing guardrail consists of
deteriorated wooden stakes with strands of barbed wire connecting them all along NC 194.
Valle Crucis Historic District representatives including representatives of the Valle Crucis
Historic Mission property have expressed concern over the aesthetics of conventional guardrail,
should it be used to replace the existing wooden stakes in the proximity of the historic district
property. Since the wooden stakes that were used originally are not considered safe by current
design standards, the historic community would like NCDOT to use something other than the
standard shiny metal guardrail when it replaces the existing guardrail.
NCDOT has committed to coordinate with the respective property owners for the replanting of
trees, shrubs, or bushes along the road frontage of these properties as well as avoiding a mature
oak tree (using protective tree measures during construction), located on the east side of NC
194, north of the intersection with SR 1134 (Dutch Creek Road).
F7

G. COORDINATION
NCDOT coordinated with the Valle Crucis Community and a Valle Crucis Episcopal
Mission representative regarding the project.
On February 18, 2002 NCDOT met in the Episcopal Chapel, with representatives from
the Valley Crucis Historic District to discuss plans for safety improvements to NC 194.
Resurfacing NC 194, improving shoulders in four locations and relocating a curve to the south
of NC 194, and away from the Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission, were presented as potential
improvements to the group. The Valle Crucis Historic District representatives opposed
widening lane widths throughout the entire length of the project.
On April 23, 2002, a workshop was held at the Valle Crucis Elementary School. At this
meeting, the Valle Crucis Historic District representatives and the Valle Crucis Episcopal
Mission representative voiced additional comments. Representatives from the Valle Crucis
Episcopal Mission and the Valle Crucis Historic District indicated that while they did not
approve of lane- widening throughout the project length, they did not object to relocating the
3

curve to the south side of NC 194 within the historic district. Other requests from the
community, included preserving a mature tree located in the vicinity of the proposed curve
realignment, replacing guardrail with anodized guardrail, and adding shoulder- work and other
safety measures while preserving the historic and scenic nature of the area.
On September 30, 2003 NCDOT met with the State Historic Preservation Office
(HPO) to discuss project impacts to the Valle Crucis Historic District property. The Valle '
Crucis Historic District and the Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission are listed on the National
Register of Historic Places. The HPO noted that the right of way that would be acquired as
well as the garage/shed structure that would be displaced on the Valle Crucis Historic District
side of NC 194, are considered character-defining elements of the property.
The HPO concurred with NCDOT that the proposed project would have an "Adverse ,
Effect" on the Valle Crucis Historic District and the Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission property
(see Appendix A of the Environmental Assessment).
Based on these findings, NCDOT representatives proposed the following with regard to
improvements to NC 194: '
DOT will construct the curve relocation segment away from the Valle Crucis
Episcopal Mission, requiring the relocation of the shed/garage structure. '
DOT will use anodized guardrail in the historic district.
- DOT will add shoulders only in specific curves along NC 194.
DOT will resurface and add guardrail throughout the entire length of the project
for safety purposes. '
- DOT will protect a mature oak tree located within the historic district in order to
preserve the historic and scenic nature of the area.
NCDOT will continue to coordinate with representatives from the Valle Crucis Historic ,
District and the Valle Crucis Episcopal Mission concerning impacts to historic resources.
Following the above public involvement opportunities, NCDOT summarized public concerns
in a Citizens newsletter (see appendix E of the Environmental Assessment).

1

11

1

1

1

1
1

r
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ryFr Sc?° 2
Asheville Field Office
?NVS N?. y
160 Zillicoa Street qNn ''ar ?0 v'
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 cr `k ;
September 21, 2007 cR??grFRy?
Mr. Phil S. Harris, III, PE
Manager, Natural Environment Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598
Dear Mr. Harris:
Subject: Endangered Species Concurrence for Replacing Bridge No. 221 over West Fork
Twelvemile Creek on SR 1315 in Union County, North Carolina, TIP Project
No. B-4650
As requested by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), we have reviewed
the natural resources information and the biological conclusion for federally protected species for
the subject project. We provide the following comments in accordance with the provisions of
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
The NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge No. 221 over West Fork Twelvemile Creek in Union
County with a new bridge on the current alignment. The alignment of the road will be shifted
slightly to improve the approaches to the bridge. An off-site detour on existing roads will be
used to reroute traffic during construction.
Although Twelvemile Creek has no current records for the federally endangered Carolina
heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), historic records indicate the heelsplitter was found in the
Twelvemile Creek drainage. Freshwater mussel surveys of Twelvemile Creek conducted in
2006 found three species of native freshwater mussels in the project vicinity but no live Carolina
heelsplitters or shells. Of the native mussels found at this site, the eastern creekshell (Villosa
delumbis) and the Carolina creekshell (Villosa vaughaniana) are federal species of concern, and
the eastern elliptio (Elliptio complanata), while more common, was found in fairly large
numbers. The presence of a diverse native mussel fauna indicates that although Twelvemile
Creek is degraded, this reach has maintained suitable habitat and adequate water quality for these
sensitive species. We strongly recommend that the NCDOT require Design Standards for
Sensitive Watersheds for this project area and request that the native freshwater mussels in the
project footprint be relocated to a suitable site out of the area of direct impacts.
Given the negative survey data, the limited scope of the project, and the current project
description, we can concur with your conclusion that this project is "not likely to adversely
affect" the Carolina heelsplitter. We believe the requirements under section 7(c) of the Act are
fulfilled for this species. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered
if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or
critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in
a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is
determined that may be affected by the identified action.
If you have questions about these comments please contact Ms. Marella Buncick of our staff at
828/258-3939, Ext. 237. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference
our Log Number 4-2-05-351.
Sincerely,
Brian P. Cole
Field Supervisor
cc:
Ms. Marla J. Chambers, Western NCDOT Permit Coordinator, North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission, 12275 Swift Road, Oakboro, NC 28129
Mr. Brian Wrenn, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Central Office, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Steve Lund, Asheville Regulatory Field Office, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 151 Patton
Avenue, Room 208, Asheville, NC 28801-5006
?? r
o ?
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
August 14, 2007
MEMORANDUM
To: Colin Mellor, NCDOT, Project Development and Environmental Analysis
Through: John Hennessy, Supervisor, NC Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting Unv+
From: David Wainwright, NC Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting Unit 01
Subject: Comments on the proposed Wilmington Bypass ICE in New Hanover and Brunswick Counties,
Federal Aid Project No. STPNHF-17(1), State Project No. 8.U250901, TIP R-2633 A/B.
The DWQ was recently requested by the NCDOT to comment on the aforementioned project with regards
to the Indirect and Cumulative Impacts (ICE) document. More specifically, the DWQ was asked if any
concerns existed surrounding the anticipated development associated with proposed interchanges and
adjacent areas of the project.
There are five proposed interchanges associated with this project - US 421, Cedar Hill Road, Mt. Misery
Road, US 74/US 76, and US 17. The ICE indicates the following:
• US 421 is the current terminus of I-140 and is a presently a mix of commercial, industrial, and
forested/wetlands uses. This interchange is targeted as a top priority for water and sewer
expansion. Additionally, the area is targeted for further industrial development.
• If the project is constructed, Cedar Hill Road area development is expected to change over to
commercial and industrial development, perhaps with some residential areas further out.
• Currently, the Mt. Misery Road interchange area is a mix of forested/wetland areas and low-
density residential. However, if the project is constructed, areas are expected to shift more
towards commercial and industrial uses, primarily to the south.
• The US 74/US 76 area is presently a mix of commercial, industrial, and forested/wetlands uses.
Future land use, if the project is constructed, is expected to include a substantial expansion of
industrial development with and moderate commercial development. The industrial uses will
accelerate due to the existing Leland Industrial Park.
• The terminus of the project, at US 17, will likely spur commercial and residential development,
which will replace existing forested areas. Much of this development will most likely be due to
the development of Brunswick Forest.
It is understood that much of this development will occur even if the project is not built. However, it is
stated in many places that the project will not only accelerate development in most of these interchange
areas, but development types will most likely shift as a result as well. It appears that much of these areas
will be developed for industrial and/or commercial uses. Some areas, such as those in the US 741US 76
will be aggressively developed for industrial uses. Shifts in land uses and development in a project area
such as this should be expected. This is primarily due to the Port of Wilmington's recent efforts to
expand and upgrade, access to rail service, as well as the access to major arterial roads such as interstates.
Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Nye Carolin
wrld#
Waters within the project area drain into the Cape Fear River. According to the DWQ's 2006 303(d) list
(the most recent), there are segments of several waters either in, near, or downstream of the project area
listed, which include:
Waterbod Name Class Assessment Number Impairment(s)
Cape Fear River C Sw 18-(63)a Biol. Integrity; Fish Advisory
Cape Fear River SC 18-(71)a Low DO; Low H
Brunswick River SC 18-77 Low DO; Low H
Town Creek (Rattlesnake Branch) C Sw 18-81 Fish Advisory
Smith Creek C Sw 18-74-63 Biological Integrity
While there are several reasons why these waters are listed, all can be exacerbated by run-off from
development. Impervious areas associated with development create more run-off. The DWQ is
especially concerned with the amount of projected industrial development that will occur with this
project. Nearly all interchange areas and nearby lands appear as though they will be zoned for industrial
and commercial uses. These two land uses typically have the largest amounts of impervious areas. This
is primarily due to the size of building footprints and the required parking areas. Additionally, industry
often will disproportionately add contaminants to run-off via materials and activities associated. with the
business.
Additional run-off from increased impervious areas may lead to entrenchment and decreased bank
stability. This may increase turbidity and siltation in streams, which will affect the biological integrity.
Additional nutrient inputs may increase algal growth and lead to lower dissolved oxygen. Industrial
activities could potentially be a source of metals; development, especially residential, may lead to an
increase in coliforms.
According to the Cape Fear River Basinwide Assessment Report (DWQ, 2004), many streams within or
near the study area already have poor water quality. Smith Creek near I-40 was rated as "severe." Burnt
Mill Creek has very poor habitat and water quality and has consistently rated "poor." Hewlett Creek has a
"moderate" rating, while Analysis of Greenfield Lake determined it to be eutrophic during summer
months. Not all streams in the project area have been assessed. Some other streams that have been
assessed have better water quality than the ones discussed here; however, they too may be affected in the
future by the rate of anticipated development.
The DWQ is concerned about the added impervious areas and associated contaminates in run-off from the
projected commercial and industrial activity. We fear that not only will additional pollutant loading
impact the 303(d) listed waters above, but other surface waters in the general area as well. It is possible
that the amount of projected development in the area, while not quantified directly in the document, will
make it difficult to implement required reductions in pollutant loading to listed waters as determined by
future TMDLs. These activities may also lead to more waters being listed on the 303(d) list as well.
Due to the increased impervious areas, potential pollutants, and the increased run-off associated with
development in the project area, the DWQ encourages the appropriate stormwater controls be
implemented. By doing so, potential pollutants to surface waters will be reduced.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact David Wainwright at [phone].
cc: Jennifer Frye, US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Chris Militscher, Environmental Protection Agency
Travis Wilson, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Gary Jordan, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Steve Sollod, Division of Coastal Management
File Copy
O?O" N NA
r?RQG
r
August 14, 2007
MEMORANDUM
To: Ms. Chrys Baggett, Director, State Clearinghouse
Through: John Hennessy, Supervisor, NC Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting Unit
From: David Wainwright, NC Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting Unit
Subject: Scoping comments on proposed improvements to Village Road in Leland from (SR 1435) to
Lanvale Road (SR 1438) in Brunswick County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-1472(5), WBS
No. 36594.1.1, TIP R-4063.
This is in reference to your correspondence dated July 19, 2007 in which you requested comments for the
referenced project. Preliminary analysis of the project reveals the potential for multiple impacts to
perennial streams and jurisdictional wetlands in the project area. More specifically, impacts to:
Stream Name River Basin Stream
Classifications Stream Index
Number
UT to Sturgeon Creek Cape Fear C;Sw 18-77-1
Sturgeon Creek Cape Fear C;Sw 18-77-1
UT to Mill Creek Cape Fear C;Sw 18-77-1-1
Further investigations at a higher resolution should be undertaken to verify the presence of other streams
and/or jurisdictional wetlands in the area. In the event that any jurisdictional areas are identified, the
Division of Water Quality requests that NCDOT consider the following environmental issues for the
proposed project:
General Project Comments:
1. The environmental document should provide, a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed
impacts to wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. If mitigation is necessary as
required by 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h), it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized)
mitigation plan with the environmental documentation. Appropriate mitigation plans will be
required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification.
2. Environmental assessment alternatives should consider design criteria that reduce the impacts to
streams and wetlands from storm water runoff. These alternatives should include road designs
that allow for treatment of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed
in the most recent version of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices, such as grassed
swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes; retention basins, etc.
NorthCarolin
Transportation Permitting Unit ?llhlCllt'?lf
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetiands
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
n.. ?,.,...? n.....,.+,...,ti.in u?.,.,.,u.... n..f4- Cmnl-- - rnO/- D.-[m AM OO% D-+ ('--- D-r
3. After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality
Certification, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the
avoidance and minimization of impacts to wetlands (and streams) to the maximum extent
practical. In accordance with the.Environmental Management Commission's Rules {15A NCAC
2H.0506(h)}, mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 1 acre to wetlands. In the
event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate
lost functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be available for use as
wetland mitigation.
4. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules {I 5A NCAC
2H.0506(h)}, mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single
perennial stream. In the event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan should be designed
to replace appropriate lost functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may
be available for use as stream mitigation.
5. DWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project.
NC DOT should address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to the
aquatic environments and any mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.
6. If a bridge is being replaced with a hydraulic conveyance other than another bridge, DWQ
believes the use of a Nationwide Permit may be required. Please contact the US Army Corp of
Engineers to determine the required permit(s).
7. If the old bridge is removed, no discharge of bridge material into surface waters is allowed unless
otherwise authorized by the US ACOE. Strict adherence to the Corps of Engineers guidelines for
bridge demolition will be a condition of the 401 Water Quality Certification.
8. Bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream when possible.
9. Whenever possible, the DWQ prefers spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not
require work within the stream or grubbing of the streambanks and do not require stream channel
realignment. The horizontal and vertical clearances provided by bridges allow for human and
wildlife passage beneath the structure, do not block fish passage and do not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
10. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater should be directed
across the bridge and pre-treated through site-appropriate means (grassed swales, pre-formed
scour holes, vegetated buffers, etc.) before entering the stream. Please refer to the most current
version of NC DWQ Stormwater Best Management Practices.
11. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area should be maintained to prevent direct
contact between curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured
concrete should not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and
possible aquatic life and fish kills.
12. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction
contours and elevations. Disturbed areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and

appropriate native woody species should be planted. When using temporary structures the area
should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or
other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact allows the area to re-
vegetate naturally and minimizes soil disturbance.
13. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands shall be below the
elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and
20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low
flow passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures
including temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result
in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and down stream
of the above structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being
maintained if requested in writing by DWQ. If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock
or other limiting features encountered during construction, please contact the NC DWQ for
guidance on how to proceed and to determine whether or not a permit modification will be
required.
14. If multiple pipes or barrels are required, they should be designed to mimic natural stream cross
section as closely. as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation and/or sills where
appropriate. Widening the stream channel should be avoided. Stream channel widening at the
inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity causing sediment deposition
that requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage.
15. If foundation test borings are necessary; it should be noted in the document. Geotechnical work
is approved under General 401 Certification Number 3424/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey
Activities.
16. Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to protect water resources must be implemented
and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina Sediment and
Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual and the most recent version of NCS000250.
17. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area unless otherwise
approved by NC DWQ. Approved BMP measures from the most current version of NCDOT
Construction and Maintenance Activities manual such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and
other diversion structures should be used to prevent excavation in flowing water.
18. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands and streams.
19. Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Impacts to wetlands
in borrow/waste areas could precipitate compensatory mitigation.
20. While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, NC Coastal Region Evaluation of
Wetland Significance (NC-CREWS) maps and soil survey maps are useful tools, their inherent
inaccuracies require that qualified personnel perform onsite wetland delineations prior to permit
approval.
21. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in order to
minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams.
This equipment should be inspected daily and maintained to prevent contamination of surface
waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
22. In most cases, the DWQ prefers the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
and restored to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted
with native tree species. Tall fescue should not be used in riparian areas.
23. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner
that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly
designed, sized and installed.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact David Wainwright at [phone].
cc: Jennifer Frye, US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Clarence Coleman, Federal Highway Administration
Chris Militscher, Environmental Protection Agency
Travis Wilson, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Gary Jordan, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Steve Sollod, Division of Coastal Management
Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy

W ATF9
QG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
August 10, 2007
MEMORANDUM
To: Mark Pierce, NCDOT
Through: John Hennessy, Supervisor, NC Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting Uni #
From: David Wainwright, NC Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting Unit
Subject: DWQ LEDPA decision for NC 43, Sections E and F, in Sampson and Duplin Counties, Federal
Aid Project No. F-8-2(17), State Project No. 8.T280802, TIP R-2303.
In reference to the project stated above, the DWQ was unwilling to select a Least Environmental
Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) at the May 24, 2007 Concurrence Point 3 meeting. All other
team members, with exception of the DWQ,. were able to concur with what is commonly referred to as the
Southern Alternative.
The DWQ feels that questions and concerns regarding the Northern Alternatives have been sufficiently
addressed, and can concur with the Southern Alternative. Below is a brief summary of information
obtained by the DWQ regarding these issues.
The DWQ was unable to concur based on what we felt was a lack of relevant information. The DWQ
submitted an issue brief, dated May 31, 2007, stating that it would require further information in order to
make an informed decision. As stated in the brief, primary concerns included:
• With respect to Section FIA, it was unclear what effects the road would have on the Allen
Canning Company. Section F1A did not appear to affect the company, as it avoided their existing
property.
• It was unclear as to the full extent of impacts to the Coharie Native American community. The
Northern Alternatives would have affected the community, but to what extent was unclear to the
DWQ. Additionally, there is a cemetery in the community, which would have been affected by
this alternative as well.
• The DWQ was concerned about impacts to a stream along Section E3. Based on experience and
information provided by NCDOT, the stream appeared to be perennial, not intermittent as
reported in the meeting packet.
• Constructability issues of the road over the existing railroad tracks. This was due to what
appeared to be an extreme skew of the proposed overpass over the tracks on section FIA.
On August 10, 2007, staff from the DWQ, the NCDOT, Parsons Transportation Group, and the Mid-
Carolina Rural Planning Organization, met onsite with representatives of the Allen Canning Company,
Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] Internet: httr):Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
NorthCarolin
Aatura!!y
n.. C--l AnC- Cmn1-- rA0% D-1-11100% D-f rnnc -r D.-
Coharie Mills, and the Coharie Native American community. The purpose of the meetings was to clarify
the above issues. Based on discussions from the meetings, the DWQ found that:
There appear to be no direct impacts to the Allen Canning Company or Coharie Farms as a result
of selecting section F IA. However, there will be some secondary effects. Currently, there are
approximately 100 trucks visiting the Allen Canning Company during peak production times.
The facility has plans to expand to 24-hour operations in the near future. This will, in turn, add
even more truck traffic to the area. Coharie Farms has moved its primary operations to existing
NC 24 directly adjacent to the Allen Canning Company. Coharie Farms currently has
approximately 60 trucks visiting the facility on a daily basis. They are expecting to double
capacity in the next five years, which would result in approximately 120 trucks per day.
Additionally, there was mention of another existing facility on NC 24, in the general vicinity of
Allen Canning and Coharie Farms, which has an estimated 100 trucks visiting the facility per day.
Therefore, within the next five years of so, there will be several hundred trucks using a very short
length of NC 24 or the new road (if a Northern Alternative is constructed).
The issue is between anticipated truck traffic and road design. Since the road is limited access
and of expressway design, no traffic signals are anticipated on the new roadway, and is a "super-
street" design. Approximately 33 percent of trucks leaving Allen Canning, and approximately 75
percent of trucks leaving Coharie Farms travel west, and would have to turn left. Current
proposed design of a Northern Alternative calls for a right turn exit from both facilities via a
single access point, followed by a U-turn at a bulb-out. There was great concern from both
facilities with this design, which are primarily safety related. The DWQ agrees that, due to the
anticipated amount of truck traffic, that great safety issues would exist at this intersection. The
issue is further exacerbated by potential line-of-sight in the west, which has a curve associated
with it. Line of sight east would potentially be limited by a grade over existing railroad tracks.
The team had the opportunity to meet with Pastor Randy Simmons of the Holly Grove Holiness
Church. Pastor Simmons met with the team on behalf of the Coharie Native American
Community. The community felt they were impacted with the construction of the Faircloth
Freeway, and felt very strongly about not being impacted by another road project, which would
severely affect community cohesion. The community is relatively small, and lies primarily along
Tram Road and Indian Town Road south of US 421, and is smaller than what was initially
thought by NCDOT. An interchange associated with the Northern Alternatives would be placed
in the general area of the community. Pastor Simmons was kind enough to ride along and show
the team the community first hand.
After the meeting, it appeared that the primary impacts to the community would be the loss of
access to US 421, which would need to be removed to allow for access ramps to the new
roadway. It was discovered that there is currently no legal access to the cemetery (current access
is via a dead end road, followed by a dirt road marked with "private - no trespassing" signs).
However, the church was planning to buy the property behind the church, which would allow
legal access. This parcel may be affected by the interchange, still leaving the community without
access.
The team also visited a stream that would be potentially impacted by section E3. The NCDOT
consultant had previously visited the area, and determined the stream was intermittent. During
the CP3 meeting, DWQ staff was told that a 66-inch culvert would be installed under the roadway
at this location. Furthermore, according to maps presented at the meeting, there appeared to be a
large wetland area associated with the system. These two issues were of concern to the DWQ,
and they wanted to verify and confirm the calls that had previously been made on behalf of
NCDOT.
Upon reaching the site, it was made known that the 66-inch culvert was not going to be installed
to handle flow associated with this stream, rather to handle stormwater associated with the
roadway. Additionally, it was brought to the DWQ's attention that a dam exited upstream of the
sample location. The DWQ agrees that the stream is intermittent.
Constructability of the railroad overpasses associated with section F IA was not addressed directly
by NCDOT. However, as a result of the meetings with Allen Canning Company and Coharie
Farms representatives, it became apparent that grades associated with the railroad overpasses
would most likely have other issues. If section FIC were constructed, the grade would be directly
in front of Allen Canning Company's current truck access. This would create a hardship with
them, as truck and employee access would need to be moved to the other end of the facility, in
which space to do so would become an issue. If section F I A were constructed, the overpass
would create further safety issues with truck traffic, as this would most likely limit visibility to
the east.
In closing, the DWQ feels that questions and concerns raised at the CP3 meeting and stated in. the
associated Issue Brief have been answered sufficiently enough to choose a LEDPA. Based on
information presented by the NCDOT at concurrence meetings, combined information obtained from the
meetings with Allen Canning Company, Coharie Farms, and Pastor Simmons, along with the site visit to
the wetland and stream area in question, the DWQ feels it can concur with the Southern Alternative
(E3/F4/F5) as their preferred LEDPA.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact David Wainwright at (919)
715-3415.
cc: Jennifer Frye, US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Ron Lucas, Federal Highway Administration
Chris Militscher, Environmental Protection Agency
Travis Wilson, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Gary Jordan, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy

United States Department of the Interior
o?
CH 3 Asheville
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: Review of the Environmental Assessment for a New Interchange at SR 3468
(Weddington Road) and I-485 (Charlotte Outer Loop) in Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina, TIP Project No. R-021 IEC, State Project No. 8.U670124, Federal Aid Project
No. NHF-117-1(54)
As requested by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), we have reviewed
the environmental assessment (EA) provided for the subject project. The following comments
are provided in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C.
661-667e), and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531-1543).
The NCDOT proposes to construct an interchange for I-485 (Charlotte Outer Loop) at SR 3468
(Weddington Road). The alternative recommended in the EA is to build a half-clover
interchange and widen Weddington Road to a five-lane curb-and-gutter roadway with left turn
lanes at ramp and loop intersections. The bridge over I-485 will be widened to the east, and a
sidewalk will be included on the west side.
Impacts to Listed Species
In our December 2006 comments on this project, we stated our concerns that the project may
have adverse effects on the headwaters of Sixmile Creek. Sixmile Creek is occupied by the
federally endangered Carolina heelsplitter mussel (Lasmigona decorata) downstream of the
project. In our review of the EA, we noted that the water resources described as being directly
impacted by the project area are tributaries to Fourmile Creek. We were unable to find a map
displaying the watershed boundaries of Sixmile and Fourmile Creek or a summary impact table
in the document. Therefore, we remain concerned that this project could directly impact the
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Zillicfla Field Office Street 4&6
?V
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
kF ?Fiy
goo
August 23 D
, 2007
cos ?RQO ?
'?Yq?R
headwaters of Sixmile Creek. In addition, there are multiple references to a Growth Impact
Study Area (GISA), but there is no map or physical description of the study area boundaries.
Table 28 lists only South Fork Crooked Creek in the GISA. South Fork Crooked Creek is east of
the Twelvemile Creek watershed and east of US 74, several miles from the project area.
However, Fourmile Creek is directly impacted by the project, and Sixmile and West Fork
Twelvemile Creeks are nearby, to the south. At a minimum, these streams should have been
considered in an analysis of growth impacts for this project.
According to the EA, it is likely that the project will increase the rate and influence the location
of development in the area. The potential for induced residential growth is high on the east side
of Weddington and McKee Roads. Although the EA discusses the potential for induced growth,
there is no analysis of the effects of that growth on the resources in the area. Additionally, there
is no discussion about measures to offset any impacts, such as zoning, ordinances, access control,
or comprehensive planning, including protective conservation measures. We believe that a more
thorough analysis of indirect and cumulative effects needs to be conducted to determine the
extent and magnitude of impacts from this project.
General Comments
The following statements appear on pages 35 and 42 of the EA, respectively: "This project is
consistent with the Local Land Use plans," and "The Matthews Land Use Plan states that the
Matthews Town Board objects to the Weddington Road interchange." The statement on page 42
is under the heading entitled "Conflict with local plan." There is no discussion about why the
local community objects to the interchange or how it impacts their land-use and zoning plans.
In SectionC--Land Use and Planning--there are references to Figures 3 and 4. Neither of these
figures was included in our copy of the EA. In particular, statements made in reference to
Figure 3 would be much clearer if the figure were available.
Given the analysis of traffic and congestion improvement, we question the basic need for the
project. The analysis in the EA demonstrates very similar. Levels of Service (LOS) between the
"build" and "no-build" scenarios; and, strikingly, where a difference is demonstrated, the LOS
will be worse if the project is built. The document also indicates that, with or without the
project, I-485 will operate at an unacceptable LOS by the design year 2025. In order for all
freeway segments, ramps, and weave sections to operate at LOS D or better in the design year,
I-485 will need to be widened to eight lanes, and a ramp on the NC 16 interchange would need to
be widened. There is no discussion regarding planning for any of these future improvements,
and we were not entirely clear about whether the proposed interchange itself would need to be
upgraded if these future improvements are deemed necessary.
We are still concerned about potential impacts associated with the project to the important
headwater area of Sixmile Creek, the Carolina heelsplitter, and all other streams that drain the
project area and vicinity. The project vicinity has experienced tremendous growth, and a new
interchange is likely to induce further growth. We reiterate our recommendation that the
NCDOT proactively address induced growth and its related impacts by implementing techniques
such as access control and working with the local governments to help develop and adopt
protective zoning and comprehensive planning. Comprehensive planning for this area should
include a conservation strategy for the Carolina heelsplitter to help offset impacts to the
long-term survival and recovery of the species.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments at this early stage of project planning. If
you have questions about these comments, please contact Ms. Marella Buncick of our staff at
828/258-3939, Ext. 237. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference
our Log Number 4-2-07-080.
Sincerely,
Brian P. Cole
Field Supervisor
cc:
Ms. Marla J. Chambers, Western NCDOT Permit Coordinator, North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission, 12275 Swift Road, Oakboro, NC 28129
Mr. Brian Wrenn, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Central Office, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd., Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Steve Lund, Asheville Regulatory Field Office, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 151 Patton
Avenue, Room 208, Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Mr. Chris Militscher, c/o Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Terry Sanford Federal Courthouse, 310 New Bern Avenue, Room 206,
Raleigh, NC 27601
O?O0 WA T ?9QG
Uj
O '<
August 31, 2007
MEMORANDUM
To: Jennifer Harris, North Carolina Turnpike Authority
P
From: David Wainwright, NC Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting Unit
Through: John Hennessy, Supervisor, NC Division of Water Quality, Transportation Permitting U t>.
Subject: Comments and concerns regarding the Mid-Currituck Bridge project, TIP R-2576
As part of the Section 6002 process for the proposed Mid-Currituck Bridge, team members have been
encouraged by the NCTA to submit any comments, questions, or concerns regarding the project. The
DWQ has, concerns and questions regarding various aspects of the proposed project. Many of these
comments and concerns have come about as a result of discussions from past meetings, document review,
and the field visit performed in July 2007. Included below are current comments, questions, and concerns
of the DWQ.
1. With respect to the July 10, 2007 field visit:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
At the northern bridge-landing site (alternatives C1, C2, and C5) in Corolla (NC 12),
there were discussions among the resource agencies about possibly shifting the corridor
to the south enough to reduce wetland impacts. NCTA was able to implement this shift.
This resulted in avoiding all of the coastal wetlands, although the non-coastal wetland
impacts increased slightly (0.09acres). Efforts resulted in an overall reduction of wetland
impacts by 1.21 acres. Of the two Corolla bridge-landings, this site now has the least
amount of wetland impacts. Currently, if a bridge alternative is selected as the LEDPA,
this is the DWQ's preferred Corolla alternative.
The team also visited the alternative corridor sites on the mainland near Aydlett. There
are three potential corridors in this area; all three cross Maple Swamp. One of the
alternatives crosses through the swamp to the north of Aydlett Road; the other two cross
to the south. The team was able to view habitat present at only one of the corridors (C3
and C4). Although the team was unable to view the actual. habitat that existed at the other
two corridors, they were able to see habitat expected to be similar to the other two
corridors (C5/C6, and C1/C2). Habitat viewed on the north side ofAydlett Road was
very good with respect to habitat quality, and appeared to be undisturbed. The habitat
viewed on the south side of Aydlett Road was exceptional. As with the north side, it also
appeared to be undisturbed.
Perhaps the most striking feature of the south side was the Loblolly Bay trees. The trees
were mature at approximately 65 to 70 feet tall and about three feet in diameter; and were
rather numerous. According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS), the
No iCarolin
Transportation Permitting Unit Aawrally
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: httr)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
most northern extent of the loblolly bay is Tyrell County in North Carolina, which is a
little south of the project area. Due to the ecological significance and rarity of the area,
the DWQ would like to discuss opportunities to preserve this area with the NCTA.
Because of the unique and rare habitat associated with this area, and since there is a
corridor that avoids this area, the DWQ feels it will be difficult to issue a permit for the
southern alternatives (C3/ C4, and C5/C6). The DWQ prefers the northern alternative if a
bridge is selected as part of the LEDPA.
The DWQ is also concerned about habitat fragmentation in Maple Swamp with the
proposed corridors. For the most part, Maple Swamp is still largely intact, with relatively
little fragmentation. The DWQ feels that, in addition to the reasons stated previously,
corridors associated with alternatives C3/C4 and C5/C6 will further fragment the area.
The northern corridor (alternatives C 1/C2) will also fragment the area further; however
the corridor is in proximity to the existing power lines, and would appear to a little less of
a disturbance. Ideally, the DWQ would encourage the NCTA to route the corridor along,
or in very close proximity, to an existing road which would further minimize
fragmentation. Based on what has been provided to the DWQ thus far, the DWQ's
preferred alternative, should the LEDPA involve bridge construction, would be the
northern most alternative. The DWQ strongly encourages the NCTA to continue working
in a manner that will further reduce impacts to Maple Swamp.
The DWQ is still concerned about the impacts to wetland and forested areas to the west
of US 158 where the interchanges are currently placed. The DWQ understands the need
to keep traffic on US 158 moving. However, we would like to see the NCTA minimize
impact to this area as well. There has been some discussion between team members
regarding the use of a traffic light at this location. The DWQ encourages the NCTA to
investigate this further.
2. Concerns from recent meetings:
The DWQ is concerned about potential impacts to SAV. SAV beds are an important
component of the biological function and integrity of the sound. A map reflecting recent
survey efforts was made available to team members. It is understood by DWQ, per
meeting discussions, that an attempt will be made in August to verify the results of this
survey. Nonetheless, the map shows all corridors crossing SAV beds. This is most
prominent on the eastern side of Currituck Sound. Alternative C6 appears to impact the
largest number` of SAV beds (five), and consequently also appears to impact the largest
area of SAV. Alternatives C1, C3, and C5 appear to impact the least, and only cross one
SAV bed. As with other natural resources, the DWQ seeks to protect SAV beds by
reducing impacts to them. The DWQ will withhold further comment on SAV until the
results of the survey have been verified.
• During the June 20, 2007 meeting, there was a proposal for another alternative - MCB4.
This alternative was essentially alternative MCB3 with an additional northbound lane
added to US 158 between NC 12 and the Wright Memorial Bridge. This alternative was
discussed further during the July 18, 2007 meeting. The NCTA has stated that alternative

MCB4 will meet the 21.4-hour hurricane evacuation time that was met by all other
alternatives.
According to Table I in Handout 4 (May 23, 2007), MCB3 (or MCB4) would not add
additional lanes to NC 12 in neither Dare nor Currituck Counties, with exception of a two
to four mile stretch south of the Mid-Currituck Bridge landing in Currituck County. All
other alternatives involve adding at least one to lane to NC 12 in Dare County, and two
lanes in Currituck County. All alternatives, with exception of MCB3, were able to meet a
projected hurricane evacuation time of 21.4 hours. Alternative MCB3 was only able to
meet an evacuation time of 26.2 hours. It appears as though improvements to NC 12 in
Currituck and Dare Counties are necessary for the 21.4 hour evacuation time to be met. It
is unclear to the DWQ how the 21.4 hour evacuation time can be met with MCB4. if
improvements are not made to NC 12. Has the MCB4 scenario been modeled to show
what the actual anticipated hurricane evacuation time would be?
3. Concerns from other items:
With respect to the Proposed Mid-Currituck Bridge Preliminary Traffic and Revenue
Study, Final Report, it appears as though a Thursday and a Saturday in August were used
as the peak-season travel sample dates and a Thursday and a Saturday in September for
the off-season travel study dates. The DWQ questions why September was chosen as the
off-season travel month. According to Figure 2-4 it looks as though January or February
would have been a better choice for the off-season travel analysis.
Additionally, with respect to the travel study location (near the intersection of NC 12 and
US 158 at Chicahauk Trail), it is stated that this location was chosen because "a station at
this location was expected to intercept the largest number of potential Mid-Currituck
Bridge users." The location is approximately one mile north of where traffic coming off
of the Wright Memorial Bridge would turn north onto NC 12. It is unclear to the DWQ
why it is expected that this location would contain the largest number of anticipated Mid-
Currituck Bridge users. It would seem that the closer to the Mid-Currituck Bridge one
gets, the greater the chance of reaching the largest number of potential users. This
location is close enough to the Wright Memorial Bridge, which is the free alternative
route, which many users may opt to use the free alternative instead of paying to cross the
tolled bridge. To get to the sample point, it would probably be quicker at most times than
using the Mid-Currituck Bridge, as speed limits on US 158 are higher than those on NC
12 and traffic traveling on NC 12 would be less prone to slowing down as vehicles make
turns on and off of NC 12. Therefore, it would seem that a point closer to Corolla would
have been a better choice for the traffic survey study, as traffic closer to Corolla would
have a higher probability of using the Mid-Currituck Bridge.
Table 6 of Handout 5 presents a breakdown of displacements associated with the project.
With respect to the relocations associated with the bridge, ramps, and access roadways,
the number of displacements is averaged. The DWQ would like to see the actual number
of displacements associated with each of the potential routes (C 1, C2, C3, etc.). Ideally,
the number would be further broken down by the number of displacements in Aydlett and
Corolla.
r , 1 1,
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The NCTA is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water
Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality
standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please contact David Wainwright at [phone].
Cerdfficate of Completion
DWQ Project No.:
Applicant: '
Project Name:.

.County:
• T;',- I
S-00 T-
vLU E ?
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: M!1 r" y
Upon campletion of all work approved.withiii the 40I Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return.this certificate to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North
Carolina Division of Water Qua -V,,1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.. This form may be
returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not
necessary to send certificates from all•of these.
Applicant's Certi, ficadon
hereby state't*, to the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such tkat the construction was observed to be built
within substantial compli ance and intent of the 4.01 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the.
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting mateiia*t
5igna
Date:
Agent Ce fieation
hereby state that, fo the best of my abilities, due care and
diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that. the construction, was observed to be built
within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules; the
approved plans and specifications; and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
If this project was designed by a Certified .Professional
I, as a duly registered Professional i.e„
En$ineer,
Landscape Arctuteet, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, }laving been authorized to
observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the coustiuction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state that,
to the.best_of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that
the constmetion was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Watery ality
Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signatuue: '
0 Lq
Registration No.:.,________ Date:
or- J53
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4 RALEIGH OFFICE
TERRY SANFROD FEDERAL COURTHOUSE
310 NEW BERN AVENUE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27601
Date: September 11, 2007
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Manager, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
SUBJECT: EPA Review Comments of the Federal Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) for R-2710, NC 194 Improvements, Watauga County
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 (EPA) has reviewed the
subject document and is commenting in accordance with Section 309 of the Clean Air
Act and Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) are proposing to provide various roadway improvements to NC
194 from the Avery County line to SR 1112 in Valle Crucis, Watauga County for an
approximate distance of 5.5 miles.
EPA provided e-mail comments on the Federal EA for this proposed project on
12/16/05. EPA had no specific environmental concerns following our review of the EA.
The FONSI indicates several revisions to the proposed project following the
issuance of the EA and after conducting a public hearing, including a slight increase in
lane width where possible, the retention of Structure #1, and the additional right-of-way
requirements (from 40 to 60 feet). These changes do not alter EPA's overall assessment
of the proposed project.
EPA notes the project environmental commitments (`Green sheets') that include
avoidance and minimization measures for historic properties, trout water habitat and
significant local activities. EPA requests that NCDOT and FHWA also consider
appropriate measures to avoid the spread of invasive plant species while implementing
Green sheet commitment #5 for vegetation replacement around historic properties. Please
include Ms. Kathy Matthews, of EPA's Wetland Section on any future hydraulic and
permit review meetings. Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Sincerely,
Christopher A. Militscher, REM, CHMM
Merger Team Respresentative
NEPA Program Office
For: Heinz J. Mueller, Chief
EPA Region 4 NEPA Program Office
cc: Clarence Coleman, FHWA
John Hennessy, NCDWQ
Scott McClendon, USACE

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTIVMNT OF TRANSPORTAM
September 11, 2007
Stormwater Section
N.C. Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Attention: Mr. Scott Vinson
SFP?4 -
l
?r?N??;?? Ups
DSgNQ c o?Mh!97???
? 8
N ` c
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Subject: Stormwater Permit Request for the Widening of US 17 in Bridgeton. US 17 Widening in Bridgeton.
Craven County. State Project No. 8.1171601. Federal Aid Project STPNHF 17(24). TIP No. R-3403A.
$420.00 Debit WBS 34538.1.1.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen US 17 in Craven County, North Carolina.
Craven County falls under the jurisdiction of the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). The NCDOT is applying for a
CAMA Major Development Permit, a Clean Water Act (CWA) §404 Department of the Army Permit, and a North
Carolina CWA §401 Water Quality Certification.
A Stormwater Application Form, the Project Scope Narrative, the project plans, Culvert Survey Reports, and the
authority to debit $505.00 for the permit application fee are included with this request. Please review this project for
authorization by your division.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Please contact Mr. Galen Cail, P.E. at [phone] if you have any
questions or concerns with the stormwater design. If you have any questions concerning this project, please feel free to
contact Mr. Chris Underwood at [phone].
SSiince"' ,
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
CC:
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. William Wescott, USACE, Washington
Mr. David Wainwright, NCDWQ
Mr. Steve Sollod, NCDCM
Mr. Wade Kirby, Planning Engineer
R-3403A
RAILING ADDRESS:
IC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
'ROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
;ALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE. WWW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received Fee Paid Permit Number
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECT
This form may be photocopied for use as an original.
DWO Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes this application form, a supplement form for each BMP
proposed (see Section V), design calculations, and plans and specifications showing all road and BMP details.
1. PROJECT INFORMATION
NCDOT Project Number: 34538.1.1 R-3403A County: Craven
Project Name: US 17
Project Location: US 17 from Mills Street to North of SR 1433 (Antioch Road)
Contact Person: Phone: Fax:
Receiving Stream Name: Trib. to Neuse River River Basin: Neuse River Class:
Proposed linear feet of project: 15200 feet
Proposed Structural BMP and Road Station (attach a list of station and BMP type if more room is needed):
Type of proposed project: (check all that apply):
? New 19Widening ?2 lane* 094 lane*
?Curb and Gutter ?Bridge Replacement
?Other (Describe)
*2 lane and 4 lane imply that roadside ditches are used unless Curb and Gutter is also checked.
IL REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided below to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. Supporting documentation shall, at a minimum, consist of a brief narrative description
including (1) the scope of the project, (2) how the items below are met, (3) how the proposed best management practices
minimize water quality impacts, and (4) any significant constraints and/or justification for not meeting a, b, c and d to the
maximum extent practicable.
Designer's Initials
?4iM&Ia. The amount of impervious surface has been minimized as much as possible.
n b. The runoff from the impervious areas has been diverted away from surface waters as much as possible.
l c. Best Management Practices are employed which minimize water quality impacts.
?d. Vegetated roadside ditches are 3:1 slope or flatter.
Fnrm RWTT-112. Rev 04.00 Paize 1 of 2

III. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
I acknowledge and agree by my initials below that the North Carolina Department of Transportation is responsible for the
implementation of the four maintenance items listed. I agree to notify DWQ of any operational problems with the BMP's
that would impact water quality or prior to making any changes to the system or responsible party.
Maintenance Engineer's Initials
?a. BMP's shall be inspected and maintained in good working order.
b. Eroded areas shall be repaired and reseeded as needed.
c. Stonnwater collection systems, including piping, inlets, and outlets, shall be maintained to insure proper
functioning.
Maintenance Engineer's Name: -.)V k^ Q yuse- ) PE
Title: Drd+Sr'or, N1ainienanGe r-
IV. APPLICATION CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name) of Branch,
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and that the
project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans and that the proposed project complies with the
requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .1000.
Title: PO?If "/V? Eny?Ydn,???pKta?/ Sapp/VJsC-0-
Address: A o
V. SUPPLEMENT FORMS
Date: q-11-07
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for each BMP
specified for this project. Contact the Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone] for the status and
availability of these forms.
Form SW-102
Form SWU-103
Form SWU-104
Form SWU-105
Form SWU-106
Form SWU-107
Form SWU-108
Form SW-109
Form SWU-110
Wet Detention Basin Supplement,
Infiltration Basin Supplement
Low Density Supplement
Curb Outlet System Supplement
Off-Site System Supplement
Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Neuse River Basin Supplement
Innovative Best Management Practice Supplement
Extended Dry Detention Basin Supplement
Fonn SWU-112 Rev 04.00 Page 2 of 2

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Project: 34538.1.1
TIP: R-3403A
County: Craven
5/29/07
Hydraulics Project Engineers: W. Henry Wells, Jr., PE and William M. Hines, Jr., P.E.
(Sungate Design Group); W. Galen Cail, P.E. (NCDOT
Hydraulics Unit)
ROADWAY DESCRIPTION
The project involves the widening of US 17, located in Bridgeton, Craven County, from
Mills Street to north of SR 1433 (Antioch Road). The overall length of the project is
approximately 2.88 miles. The existing roadway is a predominately 28-foot wide
roadway with two 12-foot wide lanes and 2-foot paved shoulders. With Project R-3403A,
it is proposed to widen US 17 to a four-lane, shoulder section roadway with a narrow
grass median. Concrete curbing is proposed along both sides of the roadway between -L-
Station 18+50 and 63+50 (0.85 miles). Curb cuts along the concrete curbing will allow
the stormwater to flow into the roadside ditches. The project crosses three streams, one
Tributary to the Neuse River and two Tributaries to Mills Branch. The project drainage
system consists of cross pipes, grated inlets and associated pipe systems, and side and
lateral ditches and swales.
ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTION
The project is located in the Neuse River Basin. The project crosses three streams, one
Tributary to the Neuse River and two Tributaries to Mill Creek, one of which is crossed
twice. There are six wetland sites that will be impacted by the proposed project. Wetland
impacts have been kept to a minimum as much as practicable.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND MAJOR STRUCTURES
The primary goal of Best Management Practices (BMPs) is to prevent degradation of the
states surface waters as a result of the location, construction and operation of the highway
system. BMPs are activities, practices and procedures taken to prevent or reduce
stormwater pollution. The BMPs and measures that will be used on this project to reduce
stormwater impacts are grassed swales, raised drive-pipes in ditch lines, and a preformed
scour hole. On the four stream crossings, there are two box culverts and two large pipes.
The two large pipes will be buried 1-foot; however, the box culverts, currently in a
perched condition, cannot be buried.
A 7
R-340A Stormwater Management Plan 5/29/07
GRASSED SWALES AND RAISED DRIVE-PIPES
Grassed swales are proposed along the majority of the project. These ditches will
have a maximum 3:1 side slope and a 0.0 to 0.3 % grade. In addition, the grassed
swales along the side of the roadway will be used for stormwater storage and
encourage infiltration by raising the drive-pipes 3-inches above the ditch line.
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE (SITE 1)
A preformed scour hole has been located left of Station 67+10 -L- Left. Unable to
use preformed scour holes in other locations due to topography.
BOX CULVERT - STA 66+11 -L- (SITE 1)
The existing 6'x 6' RCBC will be retained and extended. The outlet extension
will be buried about 1-foot; however, the inlet extension will not, due to the
existing inlet being perched. The stream is a tributary to the Neuse River.
BOX CULVERT - STA 109+36 -L- (SITE 3)
The existing 2 @ 6' x 5' RCBC will be retained and extended. The extensions
will not be buried due to the existing inlet and outlet being perched. The stream is
a tributary to Mills Branch.
72-INCH PIPE - STA 155+47 -L- (SITE 7)
The existing 4'x 5' RCBC will be extended with a 72-inch RCP that will be
buried 1-foot. The stream is a tributary to Mills Branch.
72-INCH PIPE - STA 13+46 -L- (SITE 8)
The existing 42-inch CMP will be replaced with a 72-inch RCP that will be buried
1-foot. The stream is a tributary to Mills Branch.
DITCHING IN BUFFER ZONES AND WETLANDS
BUFFERS
Ditching through all of the Sites with Buffer Zones is required due to topography and the
inability to daylight the roadway ditches prior to the Buffer. The median storm system is
piped directly to the stream at Sites 1, 3, and 7. All median inlets and roadway ditches
that drain directly to the streams meet both of the following requirements: 100 feet of
grassed swale per 1.0 acres of drainage and the 2-Year velocity is less than 2 feet per
second.
WETLANDS
Ditching through Site 4 and 5 is required due to topography. The 2-Year velocity is less
than 2 feet per second in each grassed swale.
2
Al
A.
kUG- 00 1300
Uw \Fr?JRD2232?brdy-tsh.dgn
CONTRACT: R-3403A
o n o
w o

O w
0
0

o

o
0

o vi

o y y

?
N

N ?
y o

O

n * ~ Raj
?? b b
'aR < -? °
v?.Ni v
? rn
II II II II II II 2.,' b y
I _ rn
z
?
r •
rn
O
W
Z
O
T
'O
'O

1
N
Op
O ?
rn z
r ?
rn o
? o
O
z
s
rn

? W O

N 'J
o 0

a
0 m

F V
0
M

H?

y
5;
z
8
a
J
Z
J ?o
1>0
o?
11 ?D3N
N 4J
xx ? m
A P Q 4 W.? m m
r z ??
Q O
® z m m
4
m
1
-L LT- STa167415179 -

L
W
?? O
?
? y
O
cCi?

^^
Nye
V
Iz.
O
C? AV 7
M

MJ H
w
n
C
?

4
v?
ro
g
Q
g?.
?r
x?
x
n
0
I?
V941
.a
8
I ?
u
WMIONs
8/17/99
"'P o
o ?? N?a ?s z
r?
Q)

O?
O
j
t

t> p O
It II i II II
O
? ? ? (?li ?
71
} ? ?
'
(
,1 6
Cbl
O
?N JANE 6. B!
DB en
r ?
?yrot> I
II 11 11 U II ? S sGC?
?^
?
•{
? aQ V ' ?
a
? + n
C

•? uY
- - 7105
.BrteY
MAI UHLINL SFA. 20+00.00
?M.r0.BY?OGs
3.`C?1G15N
t' =' • I I K U
: •6S'B61 .6t'bl
USN
Li
n c ? l
? M.o6.65.056 .00'OOM,
q
`. ?C I I U

$$$
...A 15
I RRR?
I oppm
1 eX
g y 6' CONC CURB
i
I
{I c C) $t?? ? +
1 ? Z? ?J DO
m
BNnO 3N03.9 ?`??nr?,,
y gN a lAK3 -a i:,1 T
ON07.9C s $?
.15 A3 16 "In p
of
SEE SHEET NO.5
va .
od
so
a?
a?
a
fZ ?• t?•
??}} to
m c?'ii ZS Imp
3 o a p?Sy
o n
a ?
G
a
IL
a
N
€mm
s
?
u` ...? N
Oi L ?? S
n
G ?
;i
a
9
O

O
r
rn
m
i
m
b
S t'biy ? K ?
z o
IV
Zp
z SY to -1
0
A.
.don
R/W REVISION: NAME CHANGE AND DB CHANGE ON PARCEL NO. 13. DYP 9-28-05
R/W REVISION: MOVE PARCEL 15 LABEL TO PARCEL OWNED BY ROBERT YALDEN, ADD PROPERTY LINE. DYP 9-28-05
MATCHLINE STA. 20+00.00 SEE SHEET NO.4
:0 -il`Op*-v
II tI M 11 U
$, i
nQN 0
(? Q fo I ?
N
Q "i •A ?-
b

h
p O ?]
W 9 ?{pqt
A
?, M.??t-zoss
88
pO
}n ? F 1 ?' a f? J
LF „
#,6662555 0 rA 7 am
y
0. .
P S'91
soup
46
iiat
y
MUSE I IH3 XL :
1 ?
I
I tzizorgs
.trsoz
Ail
- - - - - Arsoz M.zz,s Iss -
0N00 Roil
N
d
R
BUZZ , f?(v
? N
a
l0 ?`
N
!III.

N
R
y, ? I
(
1
MATCHLINE STA. 34-f00.00
zu
a q ?
^ ??"OtOS? m0
I ? ? 0000p }°L ??mi
I ?
i pW 3 $=r
O
?h O G
2' 24' e
i
I m ?r v
I 1a ' p -+ ?.rl
?aa u ?
} Rm
D
r'1 MUSE 91H0.21 or'
m m?N
01 R
7! m?.. ? ? ? M.S2 ZY.KS R
1 16 R y +. tl .66.66 11
_ o gg
6i 6 tiJ M.51, 5 a IdW? A fl
m
rn, ,n, !ce `eG' cWD
a r• W Ll of M.YL/'Z.OSS OPgW? ?.f am
.I m I s 1??1
yl
10,
I w
16
0
C-o
' 1 z9' 6 ? .20'001 i6
- ?i. W R ?A c•, Y• ? g?
_ X055 - _ lot
9 70
J.51 ' w '661 R?1110.6Y 2.05 ,y[yl 1
L (? x W0.09
y gy UO
SdM45 7NQ7-2 Q C
? ? f143U1 0 `?1 ? ? G?1
$ I ox
0_
1 PIN? 31
Hm ? r ? m
1 ? ? ro
<. b I
m ? -
1
1 .E '61? '30'611 ?'IHa.o
N
3.60.SOAN MUSE N k .1
Zr161
( .?6'961 GS M55f i 10.21
i 6 .5 15
? 66.96 i '6 ,96'66
N 81 3
P- _ Oroo1 o
0 %JR
_ O=ff s C'{j?? ? 3.60?50.15N „? F„+
?? ¢ p
°z O m ,19'I3
R .15'121
F-1
A.Ij T ,A, Q 3.60. 1!
3
All
' -r 'lp 1 r ll-^
P OM .66 _ cl ^ r t?^I
1
fit
a m I 'd
•m a a Cli
A90 0
n f7 m o y U Ir
T 241
02 iros a °'
? ? .06'102 M.10.11.6YS
~ z
SEE SHEET N0.6
8/17
r
F
f
r
f

0
I R/W REVISIONLNANE CHANGE ON PARCEL NO.30.OVP 9-26-05
d9_pshO6.dgn
MATCHUNE STA.34f00.00
RL) 0 °a 0 0 t
p 0 0 0 '4
0
8
?e
a
X
a ^v
m
o
to aiss
G !tt
H
rL
lip -21
?G ? ? aR?cNn ?
?? _ .Yi'91J ui
1h
y
Is
? ? m

OI
I

1 1 a
a ° N 12
n © y} u g
a
h6 R s
N
-jig
}M ? s
????? gym= 1? ?
?,a r - -? Ct?f11yy
S ? - U
u
i
1

+ r

s y ?n
?; 11 II III II L m

a m
}
?
Q.
p
?? X
44

d-.ms's; I ? 1
t>

II I II O
N
q

V
I I ?_?fN
II ?L
1
[
U
b F .ot t" -'? 3.6 eds6 fn

N l7

IZ
ti1ATCj,L/NE 5,r :: i
A. V-00
.00

Rms10Ns
SEE SHEET NO.5
y 1 56'IOL N.10,L16b5 -? 1
? 1? r1 IL ?
609 ?l
ril
iws 1 X14°, O J ~ ? fn? C'' mm
?w c? o= co n?- yE2rn
35 V. tt?° a ? i ear
Of-aOT N.LO,u.6bs a r2p ? o ?
171r1
w
M.L0 LL6Y5
AROSE i IHO.ZL
FRO
01 ? a l_ a G c n 6
1
,y o'r y
5i or
N? u M65E°9 9HO. L G
tj Fl,
N/6 Ism 9
x ?? g JAI
k tpplLfl?F
?1 3Q1 $
3NOO.OE
.Z6' M.80.lL6YS p N
- _E 4S'TDE m c.21
'0 IC I S
0. M.YY.10.1S5 p
K }a 1 1 b0'B61 Ao
II 5 ? ? 0? A
i? s nd,w x a:'
?a 1
N
t'= NN lso2
J59 ,6I 1S 3Nld M ;
N N
can ryA p u n p ° cn
1 v? l 4S? / I R?? 5 - bo0(i1??A I
/ O N 1 1 1
vain ?iG ? / ? ? Q 1 1 1 t QTY gg_
m +u+
U'l
I
SEE SH?r
sr
n?
?z
L7'n SO
O
r
1
N
z
O
W
Z
O
Agn
/99
tl•
r N
r c k $mm :b -I r, O> 0
NO 6 r a'-- e?y II II II II n Y
SAP" I 'T I ? 1 ? ?
1Nc ^?N l tih? ? ? ? r ` 1 *wz
Y`I s
s ,? , W a t
rL t/• Cbx N 1 NI (J.J ' \ 11 V l+l 7: r ? r y • ?F 1
4 '?c
r T
n w
141
I i__
.r ol.-. ?F? j'j \ '•? ?'' rLtr G7 /?..?NA9 ?. IY
r o
a N r \ c1 O + ge•cH? ?-? Q
, n n N
tICC} ? '? r
\ to 49
m
lL'BIZ 3.90.6f.b8N?
no C:3
IN • ///} (may
W 1 0? 9 ?41 6
Y14 P ?V a ?? (? O t
?? f1•' /?/ f`. ?•?y .69 3.ZO,OZ.LBN
??I>R?l t? 'j5 07\pp
IF- o Q OlJ
04
S " -? r o r ?/ ? w (1
o o / z a ,u• • '? r1 yT
Il
cl ? / / ' T p ? tS K
a +
74 arc
46
r.
000
0 'o M1
./ i 4z a - - • OL94/. 5869 p o°
% d? . I rri. 1 w I I 81 I_y $A $+ on
I !? /' ?, I I rode ` I `1
0oq ,pV II a • ©'' (? / T + ?7• 55 ti r p D
o I
J _?A ?1 v
cii
1 f,? I s ©C) 0O,v?'j i \ I i n ^8 \ kS8612 J2 'F N
_ •V y •(>,
D'LI ?i ? bV•? ? ?0 °z r Z. "1 166.16• ? ???N
?. 43 H I ?y ? © b ? ?O%- ? ? ? ? o ? ? ? I `?2! ?v rte.; •ti
I I _© Q k /
DrL (4
It- Rog
f N J
c ???? 'I I ? ? ? ??R-•?? W ??v ? ? * -?1'???To?O ? ? (W,z ? (?tivCni
3?66 I i '/, r S N a ?? ZG bI 'Y
2440
j app$ ?I r gay i - So- i a ?(T??
' i AI a I 02 02 S6p?•9P6
S { I 1 r _..._? ?t 11 I a \
zs,6b. N / ? r O ? r
? ?00'00124•W09'_ ? i / 4 ? t>,l, I
a
a ?
I ? fir( j• N E? _
MATCHLINE STA.59f00.00 SEE SHEET NO.8
ye ? V Z
O
Q
97` 1? I
?f a o. X
\4 A
?y?y I
\ LX
?`\sai `? off..
J,
II II ?? pY?
RYIN ?p
?a

MATCHONE STA 59+00.00
\ II
11
\ ?Ss
-AIL
b? ? \
72'CHL6ISBW S'fi91. "
1>L q
b
mm - ?
00 I\ / p I

r
Caoaro?
i , O ? HTR
8
o n
:a 1i
/oy 74
"I
1'Sb9,'
'? 1e67a, .. I
r
o
Op 4. 1
a O O
? o ? 1 7ros? -
LLq
I?
??A0
FF -<
N -n
+ -
7f 06
of-
Z;OfA
Ys
gin
4`r
h94?
0-p \
m SOIL
w?
0
N
$?s
MAr 72+0? 00
AC NUNE STAr
SEE SHEET NO.7
\111
Q?
? O
nrn
8gr-
? =4
- 3? rn
r r S? o a ? 7n'riD
gr
SA ?^ evw
B
?iy t?.
11 w n
x
`? T?
7 1-.-
1 1 1
OV? L°
y?2 ?C?t
?IO
/ o
' bp 65
I ?©
1 la I
1 i
I
I
I
xz
of

i
6
B?l ? ??•• ? W191,
- - ' 4
\I b
I ?r
m
• L t
I ? 1
In m _ `
la o
?I I e$
lzMY
' I
\ r
? NN
IT pl
O r ? ?.
` Y
N
p oo:pql
9
X
. f:3 l X
..•na .

\
SEH E No.9
•a4 ?yy,S
_ ;??? Quo
\
I
I.. , ? 1 dy
1
x ?O
11 5 ,2g•W 217.37' %
I\ g?--I
?X.-??X 00
1
?$ n
1
rl y
15,11,
I 5 ? ilk ?
iX p '
. Blr ? 172.6bf. LJ r
N rn
??• X? qaA?? ? rn
RAIL
So1C - - - _ '?
t.99•zB'fi 172A1'
F.''\w
b o
b ?
8tri 7
z
y
n
Z
a o 0
?z
1
AUG
?N
M
rn??N
RW REVISON: REVISED THE ACCESS FOR PARCEL 52.THE TURN LANE.R/GHT OF WAY.AND EASEMENTS WERE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.OYP 12-21-06
MATCHLINE STA.72*00.00
.Y'L02 N.9? 5
Sal
MATCHLINE STA. 86+00.00
SEE SHEET N0.8
11111 «?ill Imo"
SEE SHEET N0.10
/a uuuuuC
/ x ?l,A ,p w y, `C
- „os U//--_--
a 'V
Iwo r
I
K9 (S3
sm /
175
as
13 M.
?•? A? Ft
DD O n'" 1 a
/sip
O .
!1?
1 k 1~L[ /,
a
??II gaf?Tl
57esszs•N r °
97.00. _ n _
I^yq}Ip Y Y
1v
V y +, ? O
6
n ? =< d rl r1 r? rl rl N
of m l I l l l l m 1A
G,',r ICI CI? A
0 x3y?v?°ia8 P
4 aoooyoooo?
.BI'LY£ M.99.6LL95
?? .OL'915i
.BLYO>i 80
CBS
IN
70
a
o ? s
f Crt
0'Bb '• _ __ __ .__ .26'290
A j
?:ia
85
?i
8
?z
?r
O
r
i
rr1?
I?
m
rn
w

V
111,0110
REVISIONS
MATCHUNE STA. 86+00.00 SEE SHEET NO.9
24' 12' 24'
II II ?! f ? ? ? m
II h II ? a ? I iI9A _"
?Q Q V {J}? b
Q v " $ ~ 2 ` ` ? O nr
SR IN F-1
? Lmp
1 I 1 °^ s
al 1 1 'O m °
1 1 I N° I ' 1 bG r
?? ?D j l C O1 i ? 1 ?$wy
tip° ri??, n I I w ?? l i 1 O; Y3 $ 1 1
???nnn ? q rrp IRA
?V ??? 1
us p ? BI ? I ??Niar ?W ?rD1
+ m
,By s?9? ' dAS I I -Y9 'p 4 o c
d' k ?{o - 4`rl r nmr
Nqx
? Z ??p4 \ \. 0 a ? ?,` 0 o m o
Val VI '? IV
P.
.! w ,-Ti w
'00, LN
I ??ry??e. *c' / a v?o ^C I? Y. 9 PI^r C Sri
_ ? \ y ? ? I fsno ©I \` ? O? ? ? 90 (96'8 ?PT?
q$! • 0 AD'BZI M.98A189S \
DIN
lIl _ _ _
p .o I 7ro - - 1 \ + 89
m I
? B
(C3 CC, c
?\ \ 9 01? 8 N 'cj C3
O -1
Z / S1 _
???' k s+? oo - I B!
9x 6y` +s. + r _ 8 1
Bp S> R I 1,
b' € 1 1
0`J? ?? ? A ?a I ?? br1 i m
! 1 In>o^
IHO,
059 ?'" ??9 ?? 15B _ D97105 ? r ql ? ?7 f?l
to.
4? ptv t \ to
BL-15 ? c 0 R. I Cc?
PINC 90+5(%79 -L- 94+3025 (45D7 RT)
- o - - °
cc?
ZW
.9 'I 1 M.I .10. Z
Q Ile Cl ?
r n
I 95
+ c!, `t
$ y I -)NO3
I W ?
Ric I I
?.
`°J o Q* I o pi 1'? n Dj 2 a
o`
I i?r? m
`? III
BL PINC 92+89.52
BY-9A PINC 8+16.93
(COMPUTED) ?S \I \( I o Q seal as waain7 4
'd I I ¦ry 1A.3
II IN
I w 1 >j II II II II U r
TIRE
v
? ? Ij b• ? W ?y cPp ^? o ? ? ? rn
?'i III ? 1 " N ? ? GI ___-.Bt•!5Z _ ,?% (n
I - a.vz.oa?9s m
®8 29' 30 9' b II ri oy? 0? cp
b 11'`? M? L5,Y0.B95 .tB'6B 4 ?• ; {n ?I? ? ? ? ° ? ? ?' ??7? ?
?TQi t 5? SF^i
1 s ? ? .b Gtb ? .rh Y9I
$ $ ? 3.60.86.89
° F mm o
??n ?i X101 rL L1
w? {e ?i mm
6 a c _
^ n
100 r
MATCHLINE STA. 100+00.00 SEE SHEET NO.II z o
\
Z

REVISIONS
RUN REVISION - CHANGED DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO JRD DRIVEWAY AND WIDENED DRIVEWAY TO 20 FT. - DYP 4-18-06
l.dgn
MATCHLINE STA. !00+00.00 SF_ F_ SHFFT Nn.10

BL-16 a
?v loo
\ \\
PINC 96+48.43 = w 9 \
-L- 1007`28.59 ( 625 RT) $
E Spar
9
I " s o
; I I
I ri
N
14 m
Sg4b61 .N 98 ° I I\ SI
q
?r B' O Yf

8
F d' a TH
~ 1 S + • ?
??a
I v
ICI ? 1 o I
!? \ o ?
m In ig
?I I
I I
\
a ?
1 l\p

\
1 Z I _I ? ?i ?

m
I Ln
u? I
v.
$ $ I tA I i A

I I I ? n a R
?
_=
Ir
r ---
-

Ttii?t
W
r I

n ?
?
v
a c ?yw
+
I a I ? ? m
0 mil

'

m

1 m
0
o/
Sal
ik 6-ji -
I
/
col 105
, 0
A
8'.Y? I I a
0
11
T s I
I I ?
, S
$
? "
,
00 1 M ? Y

BL-17
PINC 102+57.29 =

-L- 106+3612 (595 RT)
I

?c\ 9

. lsl02
m
r
m m

I-
' 9•
? ' I g
19?? I i ?.mi ?•? h

I? I
t 1
/ ' m ? $y
0Pa
I€ I SU o b 5

?nl I -1 K £ Q ?

I qq
A
I r
.+ a
m r v+

K P
O ? O

0 n
np
R a?
"

N
? r
g
6f
170.19'
LY M.tA.L5.L7 514.42. 7'W
5 7PY?f
{/.?
Z y,
OL
-
1'r< t g ??n
0 O Oil'
,A'
•F y

AaIIAA Z

1
° 110
0

G p

` , , . ? •l.I? ,?y; r
sc LSl
..
6P919
- LUZ - - a9

- I

I
- - -
. z4' a i I i C?
l
shot I I A
.65.6by N b
BL-18
PINC 108+66.92 a

-L- 112+44.46 (45
ma
I sad ? ' _ r -
- {
?$?- - -
'x'
0o I
1 ••
N _ I 6p /
i
1.
? 9
?• L
'
p5 -
®
/ N
5 Rii
? ' 11
O 2d' 12' ly a
' I A \ O
_
.LS'94
'?
°?'I fit 24
\ y
n ? II I
MATCHLINF STA. 114+nn_n n CFF ",PFFT Aln 19
8/17/99
?o
r
E 0
om n
;1n?
y y? ?per
O n-na
O S
v m o
1>f N '
C O ? "
•F y ti p
D y=
S?
OR
Q®
W
@ M yy
oo'poi
"
/L?4,r
eye
' od
G N
; m
g?yq?+ s
*?m r
?`ulul ;1<" ?rG
NCO e ? ?-DI-4
}} rr
m
o
n
a
a
d,Lll
A
i M4 t I

co? ?g
m
N
1

co
y?ry1 ? O
S ? g K ?j `a

id

Z
0
R/W REVISION - AGO PARCEL LADLE ON PARCEL Naar.OPP 9'2@'05
R/W REVISION - ADD PARCEL LADLE ON PARCEL NCL88.LVP 9-28-OS
R/W - AOD PARCEL LADLE ON PARCEL NO.89.01P 9-28-05
Rift REVISION - ADD PARCEL LABLE.NANE & LID CHANCE ON PARCEL MOM DYP 9-29-019
p MATCHLINE STA. 114+00.00
W ? ap?
I i
N ? 3,98•9LB9N ? ?•
m
,B6'Z51 ?` ? e I ?/
8 Q-
-_€zQ9 -
n r
9 ?D ?
A n
69'151__
,0['691 _ - M•CObL995 ?
\
a \t,
0 Q 1 \I
1
\I I
., ? _ ,z1•ca I
N.91,95.595 i2 HL \ I
C: D
©t I
I _ 1
$I I
0 011
©1 I
Y 0 of I
0 I I?
11?
1 1?
• ?SdC.09N ,1'991 I
OYOB 5537Y •5L /
???? N•05•CY / /
?CC.09N \ /
0 ??,05'L91 \ / /
d9 g105
T
CO•ZOL Q
,60.59E
?05,9Lf5S
?r
r
J
a
?k
MATCHLINE STA. 128+00.00
7roS T
1

a I Tll/,

it.
?q?
bag
Y it
REVISIONS
SEE SHEET NO.II
T
Ile
tzuo slil
Iz z W 11

1
P?
ll! ?
? N
?r
Ur K
. Itill 11 -1011w.,
I

?ll5
i1 h
?YCy'
X
0
stir-vC>
II II knlly' 11 II
'V a
y
ON d01 3n1B 6361 US
/20
/

I g
x1a? ?'
I
V LLi
??
?
I
1
??? II So

1! O
j1
I
I
I I
It
!I
I?
'
I
I

P
I t?
I
II
II
II
II

II
II

I I1
I1
I I
11
1
rl
11

?'
?
I I I I I I:
?
!1111;
24'
it
#, I
I
hl
I,
I
t
i
l
? tt
t I t? t
f 4\
t,
24' t
b I ,t
? 1" In t 1
SEE SHEET NO.13
/ oal\\tJ
\ \q 9
I
6A {?
O ,ty
7i' Pa
?P P
to
r -
I ?
/ lSg,U tr \ \ ? -
l \\
1_ \
1' ? 91 T 1 I P?
0
1'_Si
01 ???VCya v m
D
palai
\ LQ ?y K
/25
d
R
V?
8 '
r? rr m ?^
?? UQ
s

P
N c
o
x
/99
O
r
I
rn
m
rni
y
8
SM
s?
?z
?r
?z
CA
? O
Z? n
-?f I I?
g@
4u N
O
RMSIONS I
AW RevislOn - Revised Fencing and Easement area for Parcel 73A ELM 06-07-07 I
8/17/99
MATCHLINE STA. 128 +00.00 S E E S HEE T N 0.12
24' 30 24'
z
?
gg
1
I v I 11 0 ''
?' g
?.
11 P
V
?

t

l 11 Q3 ?
4
r
11 x0?
w
W 1
1

'?D
-
4
11 ?3a
??
I
s
w
Nrr
b
`C e
II? S
a^
I ? I I ? ? o
II a ? x

30 % i al /30
11
' 1
1 m
11 0
a'

i;
o
y
y m
O
?
C

I " w0
P

$
r r

T
°
?
Nj

p ? ? \
V

cc)
bv0 /
,l6?tiH / "IS3
O x ? O
a Y, .
m

/
1
10
I
?
I
pp
P$y 1

I
r
?y oD? gas ,
-4 Oi (j)

a gaA l?! tai

V 7

?

ry f
?o
$
2
aia 1 ?_? I /
+76.75
F-- ` y is // s

'
'
36 24' +SaLa I '
/
o
.

s
t

O

K

T
' I I I
_lf I I ?
!
I r
? ?I ? O V ?
N 1 1 (? ?
u u n n ncn r a t

?
?l bQ ? I I ? F Jat
-. / a

(7,
t!
I JII
1 I
' I
I I
I 1;
1
?J
y I ?
I I
R

MATCHLINE STA.142f00.00 SEE SHEET N0.14
}R o
?3 g4 O
?fC
N
N I ?

O O ?
JO ? q
u n ?' ?yy^ + '?
I
y 140
M
Z
?D 'II'oD-0
It 11 'I II 'I (n
4
VWm'?cD
'q r
I

SR AN 4 SM 1431
r

N ' F F ?
M
000
aa Apn
AuOa T
135
O
r
I

Rl

R?
rR
_
1 22
$ ? o
¢
i ?7 (?
?
y QQ

z01
y
Cod p
}i ? CN ?1
0
R/W REVISION - REVISED
if
8/17/99
I ? mmmm . ?
^iTk
' I
I
lit
o
o ?
O II
o?
n
I
I.
a I I I AITC ?IS OVER
4
r"?15
MATCHLINE STA. 142+00.00 SEE SHEET NO. l3
UrTl
' ? T N / / N \Ib \\? ? W r * ?g
f
\
C30
- W 1

4 Y
t?I
GNC n
T I
^? '
a P4' ham,
t ? \
a
;GATE- ATE
IT

I
r

°P-

A SIGN
: •
Tn 12 \

m \
V

I
a\

LT i P
o oy
0
? ?BSf
If
x ?
oFN
X ij ? x
I ? =,.fJg``?I
0
r
?`9'• Op
II II II' I It
lp?? 1
II 11 II: 9 V1
I
11 Ii ti II II Vl
vTrrta?
WWII uT?n
N$o4°
rn?
I
AREA FOR PARCEL 73A. ELM 8-16-07
sorb rq E ? ? * 5 e=-
/ ih a
ti
ti
rn
z

S
O
''11
?? 91 ipl •y?\ ? 9t W (?
m ?
Via` wr?t? QIF
? QF
I ?:i rt ? ??? 4w ?S?
iWi P{;i I
G' 145 qA? 3.6SA N ?? uo
°
O u
Seg oo,df /? T ?'?
?' b d QTQ
-04
\ ??\ as Ne'yy I •? €Ya? ??
\ om
IC3
1 1 ov.? Q
a\ \? a / / \ J' '? A
? I?/ / ? o y \SS ~
• \ \ I ? pvj, STaI.S N•0y ? ? ,.
\ I w I I 9
\ / f ? r r? H rL ? g
'R a.
I \ \ \ ? ? ? 3wpgAGl o00 ??
? ? F68SS t 'tn 17KK o
v? 3
1_// \ \\ //1 c $
st^ (C3 \ ? ? \
To.
V qi
a $ $ ?yO \\ ?7g f3 \ -
x ? ? ?i -? .gym
I
' X LS N f
I
I
I I 3 24'
t ep ? d •saaG ?' I

MATCHLINE STA. 156+00.00
lU I .zsa
IPPa¢ lit
r ?
?I I I
I
I l y I I 1 ??
X ?:J f I I 'e
I s
s
0
J.
s t«
Q?'I 4
i
aoG n

?? ?\\ \ ?-
'GV1-0.95
i„
H iU) yJ..
3 1 I o?l?U Ag ? ??
X \` z Ul
IT II II II
I ? I Ll \\ ? / / n IT
(I L4 N Z4
:I L
Iv o ? ? + I .q o
u ? `?' ? N? R6 ??W I O
'I' ? \ 6Ly0•GSN
? P5'I I ? W >c `A I i © Z ?•y9E
Illy \ a 'o a ?. y i aT?+b??fQ"? III1Z??
I?/? 1 II ? `? '?"5'3? ?i4" ?I
wW ??
• ? rwr, ? ? ??w ? ? b o
r
15
'Juss
~ it ? 4 I n a I
z
SEE SHEET NO. 15 °

T?

?=m
Y a *
apa
J ggg
°W
aoz ?
? < Q s
U
0
CG? m I? ?il?
.0 Al
-L - POT Sta. 160+00 =
-L RT - POT Sta. 160+00 (7' RTJ „
?1 m
it I
II
II
II ? ,
? II
BL-26
PINC 158+35.21=
-L RT- 162+1259 (1676 RT) E I I I
49e.0v Nfi8']2553.9 +? I 1 I
El ,
II
© I
m Ili II ?
ad ?, ?N S I sox
m I
I
Lip iO I I
12F © 11 A LJJ
A$ P" (C3
© QII
gg? I I "'
55 p G"
00 r ? - ?? ?4? ° a I I
?a 6 + ~ o? ? -? W I I m?.
88 +++ E _ ° I 1
$ G I I' I
Y4 m I I Z
t` 1 I: V
1.
D~ \\ .//
O m _// m l i
II r
0
-L LT- PT Sty. 167+51.79
-
0 n -L- POT Stu. 167+4928
\ O ~ -LRT- POT Sta.167+4928 BK
BL-
PINC
-L RT-
? ? III
MATCHLINE STA.156+00.00
-25
C 152+49.44 = Il?! 111
- 156+26.82 (4522 RT) I Q
I Cy?? 4 S-
24' a E f
I
I I OE
Iu
SEE SHEET NO. 14
TAE 'P
is 0
g?4
.? e
r?
J IL

L LT)
Q. ..k. 'ice
"V; y y ???,GdO
yf yQz Y
l
aY .j
86c) _ \\ ?/dpi
II : I I ? ? ( ? 1x
? ?? ? Z r r
IV mop ?!• ?? ?,? 3 n
cn espy yy c? _ g
CIO
r
c I x m. oo?r-
-
` s a
II f ? ? N ?? . rX_x? ` .
III *°g xx Al a
11 Lx is g g?
I ? Ni k c d
h
i?6 1 x?' ? r
F3 ? ?1 a >
g 1
25 1 r I .•\ CC, O I• o s>
> d 1' z y r d D v IA * m2-
ta o p
II ! .a
?n I ll If II If
01
?I
I I I 1 y1r.?e IB IN R W* v m v
4a
II x © x? ? 6 II II II II 11 N
>(
am 1 ?t':
$ i
is+
/ N 1 a
/
\ \56876'17'W yy
F-N--71
jjl -'x 1 1`0
s?'K
a , ?p ;J1
N
Z
33
?r 4
170 z Z
' v, I A
0
r
rN
1
N
N

0
JG-?OOT\1',40
yj\r34p3 rdy-tsh.dgn
IFiY AR AT RD2232b 09/08/99
1a`011iTR4CT.• R-3403A
r
12
O
o 09 ?
?tT vN°o
-4 V V
? II II II II 8 11
voo5 t"A
c
1
N
N
o?
m
O' 1 D
'O
ro n?
a
? 1 ??1 N ? ?? $ u q ?\lo ? w cn
rri rn 1 Z, c? C o - ?V ?m,. q i
!b r, cn rn / to m $
(Z' tD
a ~ Z C
rn nn ° ® 2 o
h p t?ii ^ t - Z o m o
N b` • • O ?. to
C ?
m rrI b
b "? y to
y
R7 g ^? V p-?
i ° d
w 10a
- t °
414
4
?IZD
? g
H ?
°o a wg,
0
a
y
m
-L LT- STA16745179 °
c
-L- STA. 167+4928 BK ?
-L RT- STA 167+4928 Mi
REMONS
kr3403e-rdy_psh04.dgn
r
1
y
q
O
e
n/U 15013 I - - - - •? 7
_ 10
I
?? lresr I
: EAST BRIDGE ST 17718ST
k ' I y
Mtl ISM
? ypp pp?'} 1
Op SyOP ?^ I e I
F??{1j ?1 1 G?
a I4?
o?R u¦737Q? rl
si '00,401 AO' CHL .00'001
y?ni I - _ 45'10 ,
.08' M40 92.06S
08 li 1 -. •' \ ? 'n? ^t?, I--
~ un 1$ 3? L
C? 1?1 I 3 I i .01-101 3?r1lfJ5N
r7j +
I
lira?
3 to ? ? I ? I 18?y' 13
1
-_I
i ?
.Or1M 'fib = .65'861
CAN
? '^ 3.H.YGOSN ? - -
° >n
\ H a _
x
.OP561 M.bZ.bG055 g - '- -M.Ob.Y5.OS5
a A-0-MOSS •00.004!x. 0
/ 8 cy N - a
^'00.001
o MAY
I co II N
y
gain m
o rn o15
RRR
Ra r ?N
N ?
?'yl•oDv p `o af3 I v
unou>o bh1 $ c? s s ?g
LLLb
L y 6' GONG GU08
15
i ...? Z6'fbl M.bZ.YC.055, 1 `
1
I JANE C.BASKERVILLE
n 00 sm - PG 355 o $ a
r Ma ° n 5? c a
ONO .51
?I r O -0 I u .s-MI Y . .1 SY u, zl Neasl s
p$a a No
D
II II II 0 II $ 3 N
I S
ro'-
SOtiCI
fit ?s
gig ?' II JNOJ m eQo izi ri BNOJ JNOJ.9 y 4 0
?F ism • 9 ONO .9f a lAX3 S
ONOO.9f 5? jp
- - - '? - - - W JS q3 JS S771H 0 9

MAI CHLINE STA. 20+00.00 SEE SHEET NO.5
? S t ?k
S N
o.
b jig
H N ,? Z
N
I
32
C
Q
So
r

tir?r
P

mtn?
? N
i
mp
aaa al -- own

+

n ?
G
T
i

w .>
° yrrn0

o r
D ?m
pr"1
a

0
I

0
Z

00
?cl
3 ti
i
?r
z
0
mrn
z
rn
m
s
ZI$
I 11,!
0
R/W REVISION: NAME CHANGE AND DB CHANGE ON PARCEL N0.13. DYP 9-28-05
R/W REVISION: MOVE PARCEL 15 LABEL TO PARCEL DINNED BY ROBERT YALDEN. ADD PROPERTY LINE. DYP 9-28-05
MATCHLINE STA. 20+00.00 SEE SHEET NO.4
20
02 2 m i0'OOZ l?.L?. 0.055 (? 1 1 1 1
Il It ?.A ???x
???Opv I
II II U U II $ r
h
i
opo?
O
n
§? ?uaiCn r ? ?
N ( I ? ? £
?2 ? ?
? I i m p
1 y
C
?
rr
24
'

1

I

•?
O? O ?
PP I III ? N P
_
I
I ?
¢
' y? O N
P'1 g?
•p I
1
I iIRQ i
A ? ? m I ? ? ? ? MBSf 9 lH0.21
III
I ?
I
I 0) ?W p 9
y s
I "1.07-05S
? $ ?
p
-
a°a
S
tA 'OVLOS ?i?" -? \ I I h
R ??
1i
F ?R+
1

lip
^' c
N

71

m 5

I µ.5i z16K5
I
a
m
O
{? In 1
I 1
1 bn p r © •66'66
(

bl I ?'
yn

aal I

4
V
5?

`i f

Its *
m yC

? ? $?

U1 ° ?

' Q G

a I I I

r ?
1 ! 1
_ I y[
M.b1.bZ.055 .9 OS N r •
1Fg a
I tS
$L M.bI.bZ.OSS

m F
?
ITV ? ? ? ?
{I ? 40'001
? ?Tl
1 ??
? 1C ? ? ? <

^
R
pp
p r `

T
7N h. 05S -
wut
SA, ^
a ._ ._ - O
(C?
A
p
#
80O
?Yp {{}} y
??
{{ § J.SI o
6'661 ,HJ.9b 7.09
VI0.09 $ 9
?o pi
CC +/ I
r
Y .i _ SdMIS ONCU-d Q
g+ F ( n Z iN?l o
Q

MBSC V IHJ.i1 l

? Ir .6 . a1
I €
I g 11 p -
I Q^
1 ( I 2i I M
°m
(1??
•[9'805-
M.QAGOSS (
l III N
N
'S ? $ I V
I^
C .CY90i 1 - - _ _ _

.91'SOZ M
ZZ
S I S ( !F R
.
. $ .

O ZY
o 161
? F ?
?
?g m ,?
O N
•a
?
b R I:
?
- c .
Q1
o
/
jQ P
11
o
SF
i?4 ?? ( •b6' M65£ q lHJ .21
961
,HJ Z!
- -
.99'61Z M.2 55'

'

y
O 96

a
'96 i 'a-,96,66
?
org

S

O
?

01'04
8
cp? ° $ •O
-
.
? 3.60.SO.ISN
~
?
?
?y
?
?
ff !!..?? ?O pe
V
n ?'
T
?
M ZS
W 17.
z=
°z C
F
'
Os
? zm .6050.1 N
O
15'IZ!
19
?pi
C?N fI/

o P A „

ro 4 ?? m .
,Z ? .
-?
'? ?l_1 C
M o
1-14
v ? ?• d
?
?
_ .?
N
z• .tYZ !
?, ?
1 crt 3.60. 01
m9° m

??_ ? ?
MIf0?C9?09S
q9 ? ?
? i0I 1?
1,P ?-
r-

? ? ~ I ?
?1 ?
p ?? ?
li b
OM .Bb I^ ti? tip"

n 1?< C ?rj
VJ Q I.?
7$+
fl x)•i, ?V"

y
1
?

I

2

0 FT

Ii

24'

I?I.1?
?
ab?

<?uO O
npgQ
moo 1
m?i 4w i° 9 ?4?
}.?(rj?.?Qj ly
I?,I?I "V
O ? O y?r u,
v .

,
v Lil
?1I
191y m
?,P
O III H 9
© I
IL
L
- m

IOZ M.LO.1I.6bS o
MATCHLINE STA. 34+00.00 SEE SHEET NO. &
8/17/99

%
:52m
C pl + crD
? ?sP
s
-
I? =
n ?
y
mo

? N
o nl .- n-4
o?y
c9i mcr

6
+1
y

Iq 9
°
II
G
M
Z
?O I

o
!
s
$o
em 1

m
w?
s? ?o
H
az Z?
zz S
Z Sol
Q
r
I
mZ
y
O,

Z
0
R/W REVIS/ON:NAAIE CHANGE ON PARCEL N0.30.DYP 9-28-05
0/17/99
MATCHLINE STA. 341-00.00
?aa I
a
2
a 1-,p a Itn
©a
a ?w $1
lit 4
m
s 1A4pn? tRppppp? x A?,? 1M 1M
M.60 0.195
Lll ??'
r
Q. rn
jwja
yy
?? .Yi'91! M.? , I
.Lf'SY_r?
gQ ?s•rn'j, b
I
J *? s?
O

p$p y ? ?Taa ? fi

r ?
?K?y?A?y !S
?r?r
Ohl

Co II II II II (/1
9
c? j
??Al
a
10 M
?
eZ.? ?? - ? tI

.K'95

? -I r 1>
II II II , II ? t`w ? I
9 $

f ` ??
c

MATCH?,UNE j(( I
£ S7 47,00.00
SEE SHEET NO.5
V 1 d6'I0S M.lOdl665 T 1
u a
V
1105 ? k ?i ? ? ?^
I c? e?
35
I AL'zffM.LO.11.665
?m IL_
I M99£ V 1140.21 4
P I
k = Ov ? a
m ?
ON00 N 1 ?' ? // - - ?
i` AM 1140. 1
W
AL rl AL ig

n N?
+
°j n
cz
pO
° ?
? a

y

1

N
v
€p
} 1 m
;sD
.
S
N

1

' m
?Q r al a -I

o ? ia
JTti v
W
p^
o

s? S
s'

C ?w
x
Q V ??

zs %E il.eo-- tI sis? YDE ON00 Of

it

l
p
a? ?' w I
f
I ie; N
N

I
?
!,I
?
rn
I

? al I
?? ?? I
?i$a a

I- r -I
- M.YY•I0.1S9 p Z
.i0'B61 U?
1 ? ? I Oi
O
?Y B
x ?
n
I
/ ? _ `b II II II II II
4Sl / hI ?m? ? S ? tbOVA??q I
l II •ta ? ?wbQQ1" '<
? r.
/
i
i
? I
V o? a c? a
SEESIY'E
tp

f
il
?
?
? ? SIT
?
(y
pp
// 4
NQO? ???

T T? Q ^
u 1-3 G

M.1S.Bf.15S
z
8r
H y
az
A?
>3 ?
zz
Q
r
I
m
a
s p
O
z n
z
0
.dgn
8/17/99
?• g
6 I o o?n n ,l II I, u Y
X10• I - ?' ?^ol- lp NN
EE a'G r-• ? ? g?_
SN
SE? « ` ?& I ?Sa n W
Ln
?0 ?• X l \
T ?
r G '
?• ° / ? Ili
I / 1
L
bl #I ° "K' H ? \ ? ?I'I: ? ? O \ ?'r) .C I? •Z BLL •I;/T ? f!'1* I
n I
o? ?. o `»- ?rrF,?ip?p q$. Ff ? \ \? , ?• I ; ? ? ? '• a ,???10 /1? ?'?= p r lu I?
04
oR ,"\ \ s X I? F
G ? I s \ ? ) ? r \ R ?j CAI?UPY 'ES .
AWLA
? E " •r ss '?'' Q ^
° © pT
,11.812 3.90,8f.b8N?
YA no
Y (.1 ` OO • IA 1 07 0 CD 8
9.Z0,0Z.18N
4 u
D s 1V1 ? =i
I-atg T-
LI
n 8 ? e O! / ? L ? ul • p? N -b m
2 0
1 9 01 : a pgpdb ? , a•zs?" c r`e°,eaess ?? .
s2.? / 7 00 1 4
\ \ \. ?? g ov'1 ? r' ? `IIIJJJ ?04° , / , g , ' y+!? , ? ' - Q ? m?" ?oy??j.
\ ? O?v P0S4 ? ? t?? u : ?, $ i?'• 2.79.16• }
00 01
?ti t I eta ??* R ?? i frn
00
.% / SS ? a p `? ? 1 01.84' /r k SBO? °° y $
R. 88
1 w I A (` y7 Vii., 00 ?' y6sp1
4,?/ I ICI RIND:
lip
? I I ©?, ? ? ? air 55 ?D -If- op'_o
'G,oa?' I I ? ? ? k a• ? ?I?n ? II II II II 11 y
s m I ' k- X- --X 1?Vp1 fV O
o II?i \ I / R ', S S89$ E? V y d?aj
a I
E3 'G I n7 # p II II r
Rag. u 0 ? I
imp
f $ m `Y
24410 MI I G I I v1
Salle,
02 02
Ph- rL
I I+? G
m?
cai I
06 rn
i
I F ? ? z
u 8 o
MATCHLINE STA• 59+00.00 SEE SHEET NO.8
Z
p
i
MATCHUNE STA. 59+00.00 SEE SHEET N0.7
a \ ? N
.X 6-X I a COQ` 1 , .
\k? r Cq A ?` I " . S
dill
• .. k g ?.?s? 5 9.16.1 • ? ??O
aig.
60
-
PP-
an
° n I I 0/G 8 1 G1 .yi
X - X72CRL6150W - I, g S N
4?'OZ
t -0
19 5
4.71^ Z v 1
r%p?? /rte 1 r 4.62 s p° '" 5 5
A I I pp,? op a m
?? I •8 of n
Svc
9
rS OYs ?i ?^rr
ucs Q
W
$j?I o ¢
\ O ?X "1 ,fp• fZ I r up / WNY ?? ch ??
•r4' \ ? O 1^ M.fL1f.ZB X I li V4?1 ? m? S
1
p? N O a -1
\ \ G_ ``1 J ?r'h I s W 491W R 1 ) ` 11> r z
\ 10
OR 8
?f IjI
\\ Q \ a If 113 G
TA FA t.
J ' \ 02 '1279 o o
/
Hoar p zro / ts"
2 100'` NTR // I ?I I• N ?lii
} f 1c I I I 196.1
a? ? ? " I ? pry
$
si SR 02
02 I ? ?3
"`?l ? ?s I ? s I I ? ? ' ?} CC ?r
)I I 1w
®y?r4(' ?Sg4q l as Ih I / I I© ,r?.•J A? 1"
¢ b47p. I. 1 1 d. 1 I /!o Of 9 •. I I 4 ..rte iS?I??fi"+
_-_ . * R s I
all all
IN ? U1 C ' ~ ~ ? m _. ? ^? .• g.e ,?yZ,S
Q!q) K 102
Slit.
71
N I 100 0? o
lip Up ` (n 3.9 S . ,GZ'691 X
(.IW??+?Ot O I7105? I I?..` s 1
02
In ?' - I 03 N ? ?? ?I v y'
r LL _
r„ 2 Sad ? 01- _ .. L - •- '.. Y I 4I ? 5 ,26,N 217.37• ?.r-..._...,.?
3 1,-1 f :X w I "Li J -- S7
I ?- I
N Tag pall o F.- D ' f'd I I ?p ©y 171,99' I I I Eli
71 0. gr RR I I I d, f10 I Im} ©Q?o
to o °a $ G L' I I I R$4 III * t~
v,
A ; I Xa ? I ?? '? ? 'S ? ??• ? 51?? 4 ? m
?m q r'rl
GSA 3GIW' \? I ' rI 1. q. Ij `' In a RAILLL
# iT1 I 1l ?j 77 ZS _ _. - SOIL ------ ?I
99'28'E 172.41' .r`•\.,. W
/ s, t CV?' " r NO-9 b
GpRG , SEE H
SHEET s? oil
~
I ?' ? ? Z $ m
72+0Q•QO
z Z
HLiNE ST A• a? o 0
MATC
x y Oo
z
0
i

REVISIONS
RUN REVISON, REVISED THE ACCESS FOR PARCEL 5?-THE TURN LANE.R/GHT OF WAKAND EASEMENTS WERE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY, DYP !2-21-06
MATCHLINE STA.72f00.00
,II'LOE N.9f,bLB99
yN
P
1
SE_SHEET N0.8
• ? Yi' A. ul /

o
•-_ilos_-_ -- ---r

??Irop'?U
N 11 4 u n?
0p ?
N
y

awR
SR WZ
0
a
.91'Lbf N.99,6&195
O ~yrc °' r
1
47
4
O
C
A I

.26'590 ? ?
m

/ ?75
I as
1 ?
1'f061 80
-1
r .?
= A
II o
? $7? `I V*I a m
$r?
s? esw
pill
91.00• ? " _
o IRRO+J_
w i
o
? amllllllm?O
A?VVN41V? TF
A m?
Aga
.OL'9151

??mC9
c
R R
85
1

1-1 S Q
° Y O

0
MATCHLINE STA. 86+00.00 SEE SHEET N0.10
0
REVISIONS
MATCHUNE STA. 86+00.00 SEE SHEET NO.9
24' l2' 24
rz t> -_o
II II V U t1 O
Sol
I K \\ ? S N O m 0 NWT
4a
W $°j SR /bib ? r I k ' m_
ti y ? YI ? I I I I \ ? ? °^ O
O $? I? I I ? cAO
I R.+ I ? m m
p N ?
I 1 N ?.
Q??j 11/1 '01n SYI@`•
t I ~ _i • I , ? C ? w ? O?y
spy I I I Q zn,; 1p$ Q
N r
Ipl
U
+ G i 1 [24
INy
is ?l
ds 8 ?I my
g < Nq0
d'y J9? ?in ' sgss I I Y9 m °o "0D4
ok.y
04
y 1 0 !r+
I S. ??? \ 0? T a ? omm
'O ?.T\??• 8 \ ? I X47 T A N 11 kI\ {? AO'BLI . 0'0 LZ w '? JJ
9S b
I ??4. ?y. re` a7C K ?` /q p/ 1NC S>r
?'tv) I t' `? I e98?? 89*20p 0p
90
O \ \?k' ' p `] S ?II \ a Ao'0SI M9594995 QO
O o f0\ I )10 yea m - - _ \ \
gg a k7
?\ e+0? $ 4 £ N of g2w
\ \ ds y I t17 / /a. fill'. ? ? 0 0
?A 45 2 £7© ___/ O Y n r
? o 0
Ios - I I 7
?C \ o ' ba 'rn 1 a, al o
0? v?
¢ un
I
r ' c ??yy pA[ C
?O? ry mc`I . - - w - - 4 • C 1 7 $ $ O ?i 7?•1 wl A
a4H
lip (C3
BL-15 c s
k
PINC 90+50J9
= ?.
-L- 94fJ095 (45A7 RT) - ' - - c
9sn_ - o C3 ajo
? ?• z
+ 95 i
I I
I L
$ Noo 1 1 , i,7 a
I I W a t
? Ig ? ml ?? y
al a Xn DO
• I oopga . I t 2
J o I ,n? © i. m I a
-7 R
II a ??
BL PINC 92+49.52 = ` 5 i I I r N ,e„
BY-9A PINC 8+16.93
(COMPUTED)4
1 1 ? °l Q - - seal at/ wa3dm j -
i I Z y e'b"3x. q N tl l71k9 0
I ? ° ? ? ?yr.ppb ?
I I IN
• 1 I 0 A A II II II II 11 Q II
t $j? I
110
HC 1 I nro34 ? l71 •--?' M.bb.OZ.b95 Irmt?
?
l?os- 184 S.
G - 24' 40 4' ti 11 A o y + c?
_ J - ® ?ic
O
via ; w 7?i• ? A
M L5.b0.995 .[8'bB
o I
JBJ J.JJ. I I I Yi k3 b `$ nH L n
SSS^^^ ^r o
PIP
k7
/oo r
MATCHLINE STA.100+00.00 SEE SHEET NO.II x o
0
REVISIONS
TW REVISION - CHANGED DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO 3RD DRIVEWAY AND WIDENED DRIVEWAY TO 20 FT. - DYP 4-18-06
14
.dqn
MATCHLINE STA.100f00.00 SEE SHEET N0.10
a loo
\
PINC 96+48.43
-L- 100,12859 (1625 RT) $ ' s 1 I

N ? ? ? ?'
? A O I
?I? I t t
I ? ? ? m t¢
w
e4 ~
?s• •" 9e ? r?
I I
\ ¦
•
? s$1^
o
?
ss ?
?
9 ? ?` 1 e
e
F O
" I \\ I P ' ?? 1 ti
O

A -R

I

4
1
a
3
1

? `
?
V 13

a
x y 441 I q A¢no

? I

c?I ?I
I
I
,
I
\
I
I
m ? 1+700' K
? I ?s?? O
rn ?
rn l I V' I x
?• A ll I Q
A. ? R
- -

/ I
I
I
_ -_ _ $$$$L

5
I
I
5
?FlRP
1"
o
? • y
liviii
_
- ?I
rl L - - - r •
1 r a " g
p I , m 0

all

lop

©

I

/

I
105

oo I

w
ag? ? Q I I I = s

g 1,•?
I
I
I
? F
m i
"
•?
PI f?
TT
Tu
OC I
A I
I

/ ?, ?I
o
t1 rn N
o
y ? ? 1
m

BL _
72
PINC 102+57.29

-L- 106+36J2 (595 RT) \
I
\
07\

' rsLOa
rn
\ ` A P

I I
I '1ee1 u?
I I
1 I
? 9 s?? o $4
o "s '
v I? 50
E .
0 2i

s

1 p

x?A
€ .fj
?` ? r
$ am$
,6C 6?' b 770.49•
-
L ° p O °! m y 7P 1C .
`
S74
.L5•
4, W
y5 ?Z
m °
? ??
,
? ??M ?.y.
? pV? 1
Fy
M1O.lS•L ro ? n
8

?
V
(
yl /10
L5
N
? $ f e i m Nn
p © ©
r

.\ ) ,\ rI C-3
_
Y619
1
_ _ -.
.6
553-33V Of {•,') V 24' 3 ?p5 1 1

BL-18
pINC
I
- - -/ /
108+66.92 =
-L- 112,144.46 (4S
$ G R 1
$
?i
1
1 ~ i /
I
P
1 ?? _
°O
??

I v-

'
y ? N ?? 9w . \ 9?p55
I ,t0

s ?
?, iro
o ? q P4' !r a a
M.L590.eSS
o? 24 \ ti
?.?••
f .£5'551 * fit I 1 \
\

MAI L;HLINL SI A. 114f00.00 SEE SHEET NO. 12
r

O >m
Yj'N r
O am

0
v m v
V N
X00
a-
u

SO
'
s
°m

Z
? M 95
.oo'oa ?
5

?y
l
ZI\
1
rr?
r
?

a'vl w
?
ooh c ? -alm
Y 2r
E W
z 6
D
C S
O
a
71 i
mo
4 r`
ooa $2 b
m
?
Z

z
$ ?

7y 0

0

R/W REVISION - ADO PARCEL LABLE ON PARCEL NO87.DYP 9-2-05
A/W REVISION - ADD PARCEL LABLE ON PARCEL NO.8BdP 9-28-05
RIW - AL10 PARCEL LABLE ON PARCEL N681W 9-28-0
R/W REVISION - AOD PARCEL LABLE NAME b DO CHANGE ON PARCEL NO9O DIP 9-28-05
MATCHLINE STA. 114+00.00
fl-T 3,99.9L99N *0 B6Z9 . trrd
? t
? n
Y9'ZSI '
At'69 9wFObL999 °
\\
¢?c
1
a \ I
?aL to 1 I
M.91.99.L9972 HL \ I
I - I
I ?
?i l I
$ CD
° oI I
° I I?
I I?
I I?
• ?9.tF.09N ? '
1
OVOtl 5930V •9Z / /
_ •9t'96 •09•tY / /
UO R105
I3
$
Ci
a
,f0'LOL ?
O'99L
?Of,91.f95
N
P ?
i
- r 7roS - T
ms ??
I'
1

MATCHLINE STA.I28+00.00
REVISIONS
SEE SHEET NO. ll
o r" 0,91 \ f \ \
/ X001\\4`?
d ?• (O \\\. Una \ y?P,
0
y tII3Q ? \ ,1 \ ? y/9
tl? ? Ir P o cD
m ?
I2' 24' g
0
(C3 s9
?aa? I
/ ?9p \ It \\ ? ?
11 ' a 3
s " 1 {?
?tlitl ISO_ .??-
o9

F05
T y
.%3
n n " n ll
m(w W°
brnjm? Jt
R of
I
au dOl 201e 6aYI HS
c?? x
Q a * a
'EE
i /2a
log
-"'""--
,Y9'651 N f 120
AAA sT7?p .c ' .oo'9sc
tas
7 / o
II ?
II
!? I1
I
I I
?' Ile 8 n m to
I II ?? ?Q
II *? ??
I 11 ?x $? ??
11 oQ ??
I
I II ?a ?
II
II
? (I
I II
I I r; r
1 1 d ?' S% P w
A Fr K;
A• `i ? ? c x
H r ?1
I i ?`? C T Q?
? I I $ x x
I
Z ? ?I
II m
1
1
I 1 ??
1` ? z
'4' 30 24' ? \\I `? ?,
v
SEE SHEET N0. i3 z y
8/17/99

r
I
'TZ
l
Q
O
0

REVISIONS
RW Ravish. - Revised Fenolnp and Easement area for Parael73A ELM 08-07-07
8/17/99
MATCHLINE STA. 128400.00
N? $
P? F

cc)
? N

? Y O
?o Q YJ .

I
$S? I
r ;
?`IroD?
n u II a ° ? ??s
r ?
-4 Oi (I

g "I ,-
/
,
$$ A
S?
o
oil

?2 ? Q a

J
It 01 f

SA T/

?
ll ?
.
[> ? Ir
I / 1 4
C
11 II a II a v I ? a

x•

MATCHLINE STA. 142+00.00
SEE SHEET N0.12
24 1130?tjj 24' n
I ? I III
II
II
1 II
? bbb4 I I
? II
II
I ?° II
II
I ? II
1 II
30 ? 11
" rr
( 1 11
1 II
1 /,/lI
O
y
11117 ifi
a
i
1
I
I4
11
4
C ? I N
m 11(1 p
o I ??
I q
I
I ?o
I
o
+5000 ? ' ? /,

i
I
a?
jl•
Q A C
Uri W
N?w$
P 11 II
SEE SHEET N0.14
O
N
4

$
O? p V
m
€j3 n
S? ? w ?r?
°O
s
a
O
-4
+
g >
ORS

s ?
o?
a W
n ?
v
o
a
130
I m
?
p A
2!°
rn

?ga

m
mo S2

?y
wm

A
c?
135
a
rrop-o
II II It
II II N
o'
h
ti
? 555
a
SA SA 1431

O
I
rn
rn
140 rn
o=
w

m
I m
Z
A S

a" D
z
1-4
k?lo?
sy 4 \ 1
">y
1 r en
fZy7
F
Z

n
E p

R/W REVISION - REVISED FENCING AND EASEMENT AREA FOR PARCEL 73A. ELM 8-16-07
8/17/99
R
? y
r
? • oD
II II II' I II
• N
1a
MATCHLINE STA. 142+00.00 SEE SHEET NO. l3
4 ' ° I I
v /
O ?\ ?nfTl
lY fa D 1
?
o
~

n \
\ \
A
Y.N I n
O? W
o _
V ?
4 GN
D
? I

ISMT BUS OV CONC h
-V _j R
a

1
MT
5 $. S? f

P4'

?

\

\
T g
n O GATE+
AT

I
: 1 MTL fS OVER NC
\
SSS
u T n
a 1 x tl• , IGN T2' \
M !
L B &

a
85
IS BUS 0 0
_
B'HDPE m \
1 BST ` N

o
o° ? S
?
III I I '

o ? 1
+ssaB I

o ? ? aw h

x
x
Q?

b
°r \ g m
,' x ? ? `Txl ? ? a
I
I N I J E4' I
I ? ? d .sGOG ?' I
I
1 to -?
y'I H y
Il ll n, u
yroD?
II II II II II
II ,I n u
oy??oR°
X 4 VNq{•

I c I I
°I?
w, I a I
I o
,? b
I\ y i I I
\ s ??
'I
? 01

I
-p
,?\
y? A

E
'Z.
?Y
$oz rR ¢ I?'? 5 e=-
/ 0.
I•
rn
L

n
t?C 01 Xi /
88 ? .9t /A•
/? I ^ u
0•? T
gig
13? ? ??? a m
w a '•• a fop So ? ?- x??
?: '• X145 36iAr• N ?' i l ? ?r
v =+
1 y \"Vs °
0
\ ^g\ U? ?e ' oQ
p\ L o Agar
dol.
v
oe-
\ I ` 1a ? .SY81S M ? ` h
4
I\ IJN OM / / 110 i ? Si w ? l?r ?' p ? ??S
•
I \ \\ ? ' ' / ? ? ,? y06SASN o 0 0 ? ? w
t?5i o
nurl
k ?ro_?x X $3'? x \ \ eh?? 3? g S\?\y)) \? ? j??/ ? ,os z
p I i "1 \`5`0 /? N a
V IaF \ ? ???, SR Il!!
` I 1 ?gc?
y
1 c e \\ / -'?I'" p ?'` o D 'moo
IJA
N?o o 1 0 ??' g
u rq Q 4
m r
'4D ,b O
o", GO
A
1 ? $ wW w?
L V ? Imp '? ;yT 15 ?`" $
del `tbn °?i`rc? ?' gy z M W
22 sup z
7s Fs my m ? 1 a ?8i?3 ? ' / \Yr ? ? p
• s b? -L V yt twj x 1
T1
SUN 0
h ° cri 10 z
9
MATCHLINE STA. 156+00.00 SEE SHEET N0.15 Z
4
-AUG-
PINC 152+49.44 --
L- 156+26.82 (4522 RT)

? ?
C$p

a a ~ ..?
i I Ila
'-1
a v a
... II ?

0
°
ii

?s a - s

a+
88
?
?` A
R
pp
44
44
i
RTI

r
I
a
{;1
SEE SHEET N0.14
T
y TDE
-e Rig
? S?n
? ?Z' nCyCy
Mj 'F
g ?
I :Q
P
• O ? 1 V
? si
°Ja n S, $ w
N y $ I'4J,?O
NlH ^ \i
\ \ \
kn\+
n
?o a /a
s
4rm \ ? stir n
P
0 A.

Sg°
V I'
I I
I { ?
II ? I
• 11
1{
BL-26
PINC 158+35.21=
I I
-L RT- 162+1259 (1676 RT)
496.00' N6872'S9E I
I I
I I
I °I
II P
P I
EE1
© its P yA 1 Ir
P ''. e I I
11 d
11
° II
0 II 1
D -D 11 ?g
© 011
g I
3 II m'
rn I I 1
II
--I I I
° f..- a D ? { I I
< m II .
? ° II
i ? 1 I.^bI
Ilm lI I T,?
r
I
O
y
0
MATCHLINE STA. 156+00.00
?lil
r I
Isn
O
/
Q
-L LT- PT Sto.167+51.79 -
y -L- PDT Sta. 167+4928
-LRT- POT Sto.167+4928 BK,
? I I

I ?
m ? I
N
O
.' 9 9,r.-I.
?w1 NCR ?(//c?p
x°
II
T
I ?a ? a
I I? ?I g
a A
U III" ?N ?+
c? 1 p w s
h (
f? ?I
III ?
f hp
H1102 Moll ill
I /
1 I /
I sb..?/

?o
9
®. P1 i U 165
o 4
d ?ti?oD?
?'. ? ? 11 II II II II
174
w ?
-x-X r
_ © ?° ???oDv I
x P x? ° 11 n n n 11 v,
x
V ?.
N-1
r - \
176.05'
\ \56816'17'W
M -1x
?N1y yN?+'
IZ \ N
• ?" 170

~ ? r
? o
1
6 ' v
s
r
°
n
°
F
Y m?W

? D
4
i `
? tiry
o m ogn

W pumr
COE
r
O m q
I II

0
z
r
m
z
Ro
N
10
Z n m
z
a a
a

z Z

P
-L - POT Sta. 160400 =
-L RT - POT Sto.160+00 f
. r
Channel Mitigation Monitoring Sheets I, II, III, AND IV
Monitoring Data Record '- ? /7 -0- 2© ?
Project Title: Henderson Western Loop (U-2527) COE Action ID: 199708127
Stream Name: UT to Red Bud Creek DWQ Number: 031494
City, County and other Location Information: Henderson, Vance County
(Sta. 40+80 to 47+20)
Date Construction Completed:
Water was turned into stream on 6/13/05. Planting was completed on 3/10/06.
Monitoring Year: ( 2 ) of 5
Ecoregion: 8 digit HUC unit 03010102
USGS Quad Name and Coordinates:
Rosgen Classification: Proposed E4 Stream Type
Length of Project: 2,592' Urban or Rural: Urban Watershed Size:
Monitoring DATA collected by: M. Green and J. Young Date: 6/6/07
Applicant Information:
Name: NCDOT Roadside Environmental Unit
Address: 1425 Rock Quarry Road Raleigh, NC 27610
Telephone Number: [phone] Email address: mlgreenCaldot.state.ne.us
Consultant Information:
Name:
Address:
Telephone Number: Email address:
Project Status: Complete
Monitoring Level required by COE and DWQ (404 permit/ 401 Cert.): Level 1
Monitoring Level 1 requires completion ofSection 1, Section 2 and Section 3
Permit States: NCDOT shall perform the following components of Level I monitoring twice
each year for the 5 year monitoring period (summer and winter): Reference photos, plant
survival, and visual inspection of channel stability. If less than two bankfull events occur during
the first 5 years, NCDOT shall continue monitoring until the second bankfull event is
documented. The bankfull events must occur during separate monitoring years. In the event that
the required bankfull events do not occur during the 5 year monitoring period, the USACE, in
consultation with resource agencies, may determine that further monitoring is not required.
Section 1. PHOTO REFERENCE SITES
(Monitoring at all levels must complete this section)
Total number of reference photo locations at this site:
13 photo point locations, 2 photos at each
Dates reference photos have been taken at this site: 6/21/06,1/10/07, 6/6/07
Individual from whom additional photos can be obtained (name, address, phone):
Other Information relative to site photo reference:
If required to complete Level 3 monitoring only stop here; otherwise, complete section 2.
Section 3. CHANNEL STABILITY
Visual Inspection: The entire stream project as well as each in-stream structure and bank
stabilization/revetment structure must be evaluated and problems addressed.
Report on the visual inspection of channel stability. Physical measurements of channel
stability/morphology will not be required. Include a discussion of any deviations from as-built
and an evaluation of the significance of these deviations and whether they are indicative of a
stabilizing or destabilizing situation.
The stream is highly stabilized for the Year 2 summer evaluation. The minor bank erosion noted last year located at
approx. Sta. 40+90 is stabilized with heavy herbaceous vegetation and warrants no remedial action at this time. All
cross vanes are functioning properly except for a cross vane located at approx. Sta. 41+20. This cross vane has a
headcut and water pipine under the structure. NCDOT will continue to monitor this stream relocation.
6/6/07 Sta. 41+20 Station Station Station Station
Number Number Number Number
Structure Crossvane
Type
Is water Water is
piping piping under
through or the crossvane
around
structure?
Head "cut or Headcut
down cut
present?
Bank or scour
erosion
present?
Other
problems
noted?
NOTE: Attach separate narrative sheets to each monitoring report describing/discussing the overall
monitoring results. Include the identification of specific problem areas/channel failures, estimated cause
and proposed/required remedial action. This should include a brief discussion of any parameter that has
changed significantly from as-built.
UT Red Bud Creek
k4P ?
h' L elRI??M
`-
N''
1.a
it
y
s r ?U
nAh h
pstream)
r

Photo Point 42 (Upstream)

01
cf ' t 't

-gym _ gel, ?, s,VA'
4K `,? ? ?i ?a•, ? a F.

Photo Point #1 (Downstream)
Photo Point #3 (Upstream)
Year 2 Summer -.Tune 2007
Photo Point #2 (Downstream)
Photo Point #3 (Downstream)
UT Red Bud C
y_
?ca

-v
Photo Point 45 (Upstream)
k

reek
n7l

J? ?'(4 1 R- A r
Y't 1.6666.' ?Qw {'1_ l
Photo Point #4 (Downstream)
Photo Point #4 (Upstream)
AX VA
Photo Point #5 (Downstream)
Photo Point #6 (Upstream)
Year 2 Summer - June 2007
Photo Point #6 (Downstream)
UT Red Bud Creek

?'??• i ? h ti j+' ? `?7i

war 1; ?' ` /
i,)int 98 (Upstream)
y

,s

Year 2 Summer - June 2007
Photo Point #7 (Downstream)
Photo Point 47 (Upstream)
Photo Point #9 (Upstream)
Photo Point 48 (Downstream)
Photo Point 49 (Downstream)
UT Red Bud Creek

1 'I- i, a
? 7 ..?
Photo Point 410 (Upstream)
1??f• ?? Y. ? f :.?• .. 1.
t <' r i
A ?t7 fl i ? 4 1 i , 1+ J; •
Photo Poin-, 41 1 (Upstream)

y? ? :tf Zit „?
Photo Point #12 (Upstream)
Year 2 Summer - June 2007
Y?ti•
?.?4y1

Phc
: ",,ter :.__ _ ?•...
,to Point #I1 (Downstream)
Photo Point #12 (Downstream)
UT Red Bud Creek
t ,
...,y
a-

Year 2 Summer-.tune 2007
Photo Point #13 (Downstream)
Photo Point #13 (Upstream)
Cross Vane Located '4 Sta. 41+20
Surface Water Protection Section

TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE
?,JfO
J
T
L
FROM
Paul Rawls
ACTION
,Rfor Your Information ? Prepare Reply for my signature
? Note and Let's Discuss ? Take Appropriate Action
? Per Our Conversation ? Per Your Request
? For Your Approval ? For Your Comments (written)
? Investigate and Report ?
Please take action noted by:
Comments:
SON
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
April 9, 2007
Mr. Paul Rawls
Chief, Surface Water Protection Section
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Rawls:
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
This is to let you know that NCDOT forces will begin work on April 10, 2007 to carry out the
work that is listed in the attached addendum to the settlement agreement for R-210. Also, as
mentioned in the attached addendum, work will be completed by October 13, 2007.
State Highway Administrator Bill Rosser has delegated the authority to me to execute the
attached addendum to the R-210 settlement agreement for the Department. If you have any
questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Deborah M. Barbour, PE
Director of Preconstruction
DMB
cc w/attachment:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bill Rosser, PE
Steve Varnedoe, PE
Art McMillan, PE
Greg Thorpe, Ph.D.
Tim Johnson, PE
Dave Henderson, PE
Don Lee
Lisa Glover
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PRECONSTRUCTION SECTION
1541 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1541
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
1 Il pPR 2 5 2001
DENP, -WATER QUALITY
SURFACE WATER PROTECTICIv SECTION
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE OFFICE OF
COUNTY OF WAKE
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
. 05 EHR 0479
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Petitioner,
V.
ADDENDUM TO SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION
OF WATER QUALITY,
Respondent.
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Respondent, and
Petitioner, North Carolina Department of Transportation, hereby amend the Settlement
Agreement entered into on October 20, 2006, to add the following language to paragraph 6 of the
Agreement:
In the event a contract is not awarded as described in this paragraph, NCDOT
forces will construct the modified hazardous spill catchment basins and
modified hazardous spill catchment basins for use in a lateral ditch, eliminate
direct discharges of stormwater, and install the sandbag stockpiles. Work by
NCDOT will begin on or before April 16, 2007 and will be completed by
October 13, 2007. NCDOT will notify DWQ in writing within five (5) business
days of the beginning and completion of construction.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby agree to the preceding terms, as evidenced
by the signatures set forth below. This the Ql*"A day of April, 2007.
FOR THE DIVISION OF WATER FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
QUALITY OF TRANSPORTATION
Paul Rawls, Chief. W.F. Rosser, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Section State. Highway Administrator
AUG ; 0 2001
'?a••,.,®` ! WA i CR QJAL1TY SECTION
L_ A31; REiG;CNAL OFFICE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
PO BOX 3279, ASHEVILLE, NC 28802
August 9, 2007
Mr. David Baker
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Subject: Action ID. SAW-2007-1875-357
NC 63
State Project No. 13B.1057 (DWQ Minor Permit Fee $200)
Madison County, NC
Dear Mr. Baker:
NCDOT proposes to conduct on-site mitigation on Little Sandymush Creek immediately
upstream of the proposed pipe extension. We plan to conduct necessary stream
restoration and establish a 25' buffer on each side of the stream for a 30' section of Little
Sandymush Creek and approximately 20'section of an unnamed tributary that joins Little
Sandymush Creek near the proposed culvert inlet.
Prior to stream design, we would like confirmation that this activity would satisfy the
mitigation requirement for unavoidable impacts to 30 linear feet of cool water stream
(HCU 06010105). We would also like to know what permits must be obtained to do the
on-site mitigation. If you have any questions or information needs, please contact me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
P,7"0,9, R
oger D. BryaDivision 13 Environmental Officer
cc: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E.
Garry Moore, PLS
Mike Parker
STATE'OF NORTH CAROLINA SUBJECT =X.Y?NS'D") NC ro?
PROJECT
)EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 5--re?t?r? n??'-("a'?r'oiw s?f'i 1?'?GrOlira[?
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS COUNTY
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED BY `rA w DATE 5STATION
P. O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27611 CHECKED BY DATE - STR NO SHEET_ OF_
SO-O 1