20031241 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030108

WgTF Michael F. Easley, tiovemor
O R William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
`OCR pG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
? Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
y Division of Water Quality
O Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
December 1, 2003
DWQ# 03-1241
Mecklenburg County
Mr. Jarrod J. Karl
City of Charlotte
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC, 28202
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Karl:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to conduct bank stabilization and maintenance on
1,609 linear feet of perennial streams associated with the Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project in
Mecklenburg County, as described in your application received by the Division of Water Quality on October 8, 2003. After
reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3376
and 3399 which can be downloaded from our web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us. This Certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit Numbers 3 and 13 when issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should get any
other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. You should send an application to the Division
of Land Resources for their review of your project under dam safety rules as well as erosion and sediment control. Also this
approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us in writing and you may be required to send us a new application for a new certification. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and the additional conditions listed below:
1. Equipment used in the streams shall be in good working order and be free of oil leaks and drips. Equipment
shall be checked daily for leaks and drips;
2. You are required to return the attached Certification, of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in
the 401 Certification has been completed;
3
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper
design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect
surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must be
such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow
sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the
project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in accordance with the
requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (htlp:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands)
Customer Service #: 1-877-623-6748
Mr. Jarrod. J. Karl
Page 2 of 2
4. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the
impacts depicted in the Pre-construction Notice Application. All construction activities, including the design,
installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be
performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
5. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent practicable.
If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed
and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the
project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone Mike Parker in our Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh
at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AW K/cbk
Attachments
cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mooresville DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
Gregory Antemann, 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230, Charlotte, NC, 28217
031241
MRO Tracking and Tardy Notice DWQ Project No. 03-1241
Subject: MRO Tracking and Tardy Notice DWQ Project No. 03-1241
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 12:13:12 -0500
From: Michael Parker <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR - Mooresville Regional Office
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Cyndi,
This project got "stuck" together with another project when it came here to this Office so I didn't get it until
roughly 2 weeks after it arrived in the MRO. I have been on extended leave for most of November, and I
will be gone (after today) for most of the rest of December. I will not be able to get anything out on this
project before the statuatory date of December 6th. I just wanted to give you a heads up so we (DWQ)
wouldn't get a chance to review it before it goes statuatory. I guess this is one of the delimmas I face when
I'm gone for such a long period of time in the fall/winter.
Just so you will know, I have looked at the channels to be stabilized, and I have no problem with what they
have proposed, therefore, I see no reason why we shouldn't issue the 401.
Michael
Cyndi Karoly wrote:
Hi Alan, Mike and Samar
Below is this week's 401 Tracking Notice for the Mooresville Regional
Office. The Central Office has not received your recommendations for
these projects as of December 1, 2003. If you have not received any
application, please let me know and I will fax it to you. Please take
note of the date received in the Central Office and the 60-day clock
projection. If we do not have your comments by two weeks before the
clock expires, we may have to prepare the 401 without incorporating your
comments, in order to avoid waiving the 401. Two weeks from today, the
application will be forwarded to the appropriate Central Office staff
member (me while Todd is on Paternity Leave) if we do not have Regional
Office comments by then. The CO staff will then consult you if time
allows and make a recommendation on the 401 to John Dorney.
TRACKING:
401 Certifications:
DWQ No. Project County Permit Type Received Expires
03-1313 Ganassi Racing Facility, Cabarrus Co., NW39 10/24/03 12/22/03
Please use the staff recommendation sheet in Filemaker Pro, and then
notify me that the report has been filed. My e-mail address is
[e-mail] or you can call me at 919-733-9721.
There is one tardy project for MRO this week listed on the attachment.
1 of 2 12/1/03 2:23 PM
Tardy Projects as of December 1, 2003
County DWQ# Project Regional Office CO staff CO Received
Date Drop Dead
Date
Dare 03-1267 Richard B. Mercer WaRO Cyndi Karoly 10/13/03 12/11/03
Caldwell 03-1276 Dr. J. D. Robinette ARO Dave Penrose 10/14/03 12/12/03
N 1 M 03-1241 Historic North Charlotte
Neighborhood Improvement MRO Cyndi Karoly 10/8103 12/63
Granville 02-1368 Saddle Ridge Subdivision RRO Cyndi Karoly 10/10/03 12/8/03
Variance Requests: None
F' W ATF Michael F. Easley, Governor
0 9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
`OCR QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Street Address: 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
J? -
Fax To: 0 ?? SU
Company:
Number of pages including cover sheet:
Notes or special instructions:
Fax #:
Date:/ / // 00
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http:/Wo.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
0 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0
('hatlcs R. l"ullwood, F.xccntiVe Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Chapin, Permit Coordinator WETLANDS / 401 GROUP
Asheville Office, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
OCT 2 3 2003
John Dorney, DWQ 401 Certifications
NC Department of Environment & Natural Resources
WATER cAi~Ae.rr)sEcTiaN
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: October 15, 2003
SUBJECT: Review of an application by City of Charlotte, Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood
Improvement Project, UTs Little Sugar Creek, DWQ No. 031241, Mecklenburg County
The City of Charlotte is requesting a letter of concurrence from the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC) to obtain a 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The
NCWRC has reviewed information provided by the applicant, and field biologists on our staff are familiar
with habitat values of the project area. These comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the
Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401,
as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The project is proposed to reduce erosion, improve channel dimension and upgrade storm drainage
infrastructure. Approximately 1,352 linear feet of stream enhancement will be provided. Floodplain
benching restoration and other bioengineering activities will be provided. Concrete channels will be
removed from streams and natural stream conditions restored. Unavoidable impacts will be from culvert
maintenance and riprap placement for stabilization.
Based on the information provided by the applicant and our knowledge of the project area, we do
not believe this project will cause negative effects to waters. Therefore, we do not object to the project as
proposed. We recommend that culverts 48" or larger should be buried approximately a foot into the
streambed. Culverts less than 48 inches in diameter should be buried to a depth equal to or greater than
20% their size to allow for aquatic life passage. These measurements must be based on natural thalweg
depths. Additionally, any riprap placement should provide a thalweg in jurisdictional channels for aquatic
life passage during low flow conditions.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions
regarding these comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453.
Mailing; Address: DIvIsIon of Inland fisheries • 1 721 %1111 tirr?ice Center • RaIci;;li, NC 2 7699-1 72 1
Tclephone: [phone]cst. 281 • tax: [phone]
Cherloffe-Mecklenburg
STORM
WATER
Services
October 7, 2003
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to a Nationwide
Permit Nos. 3 and 13
The City of Charlotte
Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Domey:
The City of Charlotte is submitting a Pre-Construction Notification pursuant to
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 for the Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood
Improvement Project in Charlotte, North Carolina. The project is located between
Matheson Avenue and E. Sugar Creek Road and, is bound by The Plaza Road to the
southeast and the CSX Railroad to the northwest. The stream channel enhancement
portion of the project is located to the north of Charles Avenue between North
Davidson Street and North McDowell Street. The purpose of this project is to
improve existing storm water infrastructure and control stream bank erosion and
flooding within the residential area. Channel enhancement activities will result in
unavoidable impacts to an unnamed perennial tributary of Little Sugar Creek. We
are sending you seven copies of this submittal in accordance with the notification
requirements for NWP Nos. 3 and 13, effective March 18, 2002.
If you have any questions concerning this project, don't hesitate to contact me at
[e-mail] or [phone]. Thank you for your attention to this
matter.
Sincerely,
NNETLANDS1401 Mp
O C T - 8 2003
Jarrod J. Karl
Wetland Scientist
NATERQUALITY SECTION
To report drainage problems: 336-RAIN
Printed on recycled paper.
i
Carolina Wetland Services
kV124',
Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13
Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2003-0423
October 7, 2003
Prepared For:
The City of Charlotte
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
[phone]
Prepared By:
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
[phone]

NETLM1401 GW
OCT - S 2003
NATER URSEC}M
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 • Charlotte, NC 28217 • [phone] Office • [phone] Fax
www.carolinawetlandservices.com
' Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project October 7, 2003
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No. 2003-0423
' Table of Contents
' Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1
Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 2
Current Land Use ............................................................................................................................... 2
Jurisdictional Delineation .................................................................................................................. 2
Agency Correspondence ........................................................................................................................ 4
Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................................. 4
Protected Species ............................................................................................................................... 4
'
Purpose and Need for the Project .......................................................................................................... 5
Avoidance and Minimization ................................................................................................................ 5
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters ............................................................................................ 6
' Nationwide Permit No. 13 ..................................................... . 6
Nationwide Permit No. 3 ................................................................................................................... 7
Compensatory Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 7
List of Attachments
' Attachment A - Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Attachment A - Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey
Attachment A - Figures 3a and 3b. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Maps
' Attachment B - Request for Jurisdictional Determination Form
Attachment C - Pre-Construction Notification Application - Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13
Attachment D - Routine On-Site Data Form
Attachment E - NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms
'
Attachment F - USACE Intermittent Channel Evaluation Forms
Attachment G - Representative Photographs
Attachment H - Agency Correspondence
'
Attachment I - Proposed Impacts (Plan Sheet Nos. C 1-C4)
List of Tables
Table 1. Summary of On-Site Jurisdictional Stream Channels ............................................................. 3
' Table 2. Shear Stress Calculation Summary ......................................................................................... 5
Table 3. Allowable Shear Stress ............................................................................................................ 6
Table 4. Summary of Proposed Impacts ................................................................................................ 7
i
' Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project October 7, 2003
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No. 2003-0423
Executive Summary
' The Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project (NIP) is located in Charlotte,
North Carolina. This project proposes to construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage, and
' waterline improvements within a residential neighborhood. The Historic North Charlotte NIP is
located between Matheson Avenue and E. Sugar Creek Road and is bound by The Plaza Road to the
southeast and the CSX Railroad to the northwest (Attachment A - Figures 1 and 2). The stream
channel enhancement portion of the project is located to the north of Charles Avenue between North
Davidson Street and North McDowell Street. Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) has been
contracted by The City of Charlotte to provide permitting services for this project.
' The results of the on-site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are four
jurisdictional stream channels (Streams A-D) and one non jurisdictional channel (Channel A) located
within the project limits (Attachment A - Figures 3a and 3b). The City of Charlotte is requesting
' written verification of the jurisdictional determination of the on-site jurisdictional features
(Attachment B). On behalf of The City of Charlotte, CWS is submitting a Pre-Construction
Notification application with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition
' No. 13, and pursuant to Nationwide Permit (NWP) Nos. 3 and 13 and Water Quality Certification
No. 3353 (Attachment C). The City of Charlotte believes that this project is self-mitigating given the
water quality improvements that will result from construction of the project.

I

I

I
Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project October 7, 2003
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No. 2003-0423
Existing Conditions
The Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project (NIP) is located in Charlotte,
North Carolina. This project proposes to construct curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage, and
waterline improvements within a residential neighborhood. The Historic North Charlotte NIP is
located between Matheson Avenue and E. Sugar Creek Road and is bound by The Plaza Road to the
southeast and the CSX Railroad to the northwest (Attachment A - Figures 1 and 2). The stream
channel enhancement portion of the project is located to the north of Charles Avenue between North
Davidson Street and North McDowell Street. Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) has been
contracted by The City of Charlotte to provide permitting services for this project.
Current Land Use
The project area is mainly comprised of single-family residences with maintained lawns and small
wooded areas. Dominant canopy vegetation within the project area includes black walnut
(Juglans nigra), red mulberry (Mons rubra), American elm (Ulmus americana), sugarberry
(Celtis laevigata), and silver maple (Ater saccharinum). Dominant understory vegetation consists of
Chinese privet (Ligustnm sinense), glossy privet (Ligustnm lucidum), silky dogwood
(Corpus amomum), common blackberry (Rubus argutus), catbriar (Smilax rotundifolia), poison ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), ground ivy
(Glechoma hederacea), and false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica). According to the Soil Survey of
Mecklenburg County' (Attachment A - Figure 2), soils within the project area largely consist of Cecil
sandy clay loam (CeD2) soils. Cecil soils are well drained and have a moderate water capacity.
Jurisdictional Delineation
On July 17, 2003, CWS's Isaac Hinson and Tyler Burgess investigated on-site jurisdictional waters of
the U.S.2 using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) - Routine On-Site Determination Method.
This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.' No wetland
areas were identified within the project limits. A Routine On-Site Data Form representative of
on-site non jurisdictional upland areas has been included as Attachment D. Jurisdictional waters of the
U.S. were classified according to recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ)4 and
USACE guidance. NCDWQ Stream Classification and USACE Intermittent Channel Evaluation Forms
representative of Streams A-D and Channel A have been included as Attachments E and F.
USDA, 1980. Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Z "Jurisdictional waters of the U.S." includes essentially all surface waters such as: all navigable waters and their tributaries, all interstate
waters and their tributaries, all wetlands adjacent to these waters, and all impoundments of these waters.
i Environmental Laboratory, 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1999. Stream Classification Method. Version 2.0.
2
Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project October 7, 2003
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No. 2003-0423
The results of the on-site field investigation indicate that there are four jurisdictional stream channels
(Streams A-D) and one non jurisdictional channel (Channel A) located within the project limits
(Attachment A - Figures 3a and 3b). On-Site stream channels are unnamed tributaries to Little Sugar
Creek, which is part of the Catawba River basin (HU# 030501035) and is classified as "Class C" waters
by the NCDWQ. On-Site jurisdictional stream channels are summarized in Table 1. The City of
Charlotte is requesting written verification of the jurisdictional determination of these on-site
jurisdictional features (Attachment B).
Table 1. Summarv of On-Site Jurisdictional Stream Channels
Jurisdictional
Area Classification Approximate
Len th 1
Stream A Perennial 1,727 if
Stream B Unimportant Intermittent 15 if
Stream C Unimportant Intermittent 10 if
Stream D Unimportant Intermittent 294 if
Total 2,0461f
Stream A is a Perennial unnamed tributary to Little Sugar Creek and generally flows west across the
project area for approximately 1,727 linear feet (Attachment A - Figures 3a and 3b). This portion of
Stream A exhibits a ten-foot average ordinary high water width, stream substrate consisting of coarse
sand to boulders, and a strong presence of wrack material (Attachments E and F - SCP 1). Stream A
scored 38 out of a possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form. Photographs of
Stream A have been included as Attachment G - Photographs A and B.
Streams B and C are Unimportant Intermittent channels located in the western portion of the site.
Stream B flows for approximately 15 linear feet and Stream C flows for approximately 10 linear feet
to their confluence with Stream A (Attachment A - Figure 3b). Both streams exhibit channel
substrate consisting of coarse sand, a one to two-foot average ordinary high water width, and the
presence of wrack material. A stream classification point representative of both channels was taken
within Stream B (Attachments E and F - SCP3). Stream B scored 12.5 out of a possible 71 points on
the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form. Photographs of Streams B and C are included as
Attachment G - Photographs C and D, respectively.
Stream D is located in the eastern portion of the site (Attachment A - Figure 3a). Stream D is
approximately 294 linear feet in length and drains into Stream A. This stream channel was evaluated
to be Unimportant Intermittent and exhibits a continuous cement lined bed and lower bank and a one
3

Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project October 7, 2003
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No. 2003-0423
to two-foot average ordinary high water width (Attachments E and F - SCP4). Unimportant
Intermittent Stream D scored 15.5 out of a possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification
Form. A photograph of Stream D is included as Attachment G - Photograph E.
Channel A is a non-jurisdictional channel that flows north across the project area for approximately
113 linear feet to Perennial Stream A (Attachment A - Figure 3b). Channel A is rip-rap lined, and
lacks sinuosity, hydric soils, and a bankfull bench (Attachments E and F - SCP2). No flow was
observed in Channel A at the time of the field investigation. Channel A scored 11.25 out of a
possible 71 points on the NCDWQ Stream Classification Form. A photograph has been included as
Attachment G - Photograph F.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on July 18, 2003, to
determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that
would be affected by the project. In correspondence dated September 12, 2003, SHPO requested that
additional project information be provided so that they can accurately determine the effect the project
may have on historic properties or cultural resources (Attachment H). CWS is currently in the
process of providing SHPO with a detailed description of project activities, a complete set of the
construction plans, and detailed maps illustrating the specific location of each activity.
Protected Species
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on July 18, 2003
to determine the presence of any federally-listed or candidate endangered or threatened species or
critical habitat located within the project area. In correspondence dated July 21, 2003, NCNHP
indicated that there is "no record of rare species, significant natural communities, or priority natural
areas at the site nor within a mile of the site" (Attachment H).
"HU4" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey. 1974.
4
Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project October 7, 2003
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No. 2003-0423
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of the Historic North Charlotte NIP is to improve existing storm water infrastructure
and control stream bank erosion and flooding within the referenced residential areas. Activities will
include the installation of curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage, and waterline improvements
throughout the project area. Other activities will include bank redefinition and the construction of
floodplain benches to improve channel dimension, and installation of hard and soft stabilization
along an unnamed tributary to Little Sugar Creek (Perennial Stream A).
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. Soft stabilization and bioengineering techniques will be used in lieu of hard stabilization
(i.e. rip-rap) where possible (Attachment I). In general, the project design has limited the placement
of rip-rap along the channel banks to those areas where stream velocity and sheer stress are too high
to be treated with soft-stabilization techniques. Sheer stress calculations and thresholds are
summarized in Tables 2 and 3. The project design has limited the placement of rip-rap below the
stream bed (average ordinary high water width) and upper portions of the channel bank to those areas
directly adjacent to proposed culvert replacements and a proposed pipe outfall. All rip rap placed in
the stream bed is necessary to protect the installed structures by dissipating energy and reducing
erosion. The proposed rip-rap will adhere to Standard 20.23 of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Land
Development Standards Manual.
Table 2. Shear Stress Calculation Summarv
Location: Stream A
Station Shear Velocity Prop. Stabilization Material
4+38 2.23 (10 yr) 2.6 fps Rip rap apron
4+38 3.51 (100 yr) 2.04 fps Rip rap apron
5+09 5.11 (10 yr) 3.35 fps Rip rap protection - right bank
5+09 8.90 (100 yr) 2.02 fps Rip rap protection - right bank
12+50 1.37 (10 yr) 8.38 fps Rip rap apron
12+50 1.76 (100 yr) 9.49 fps Rip rap apron
13+36 8.50 (10 yr) 3.22 fps Rip rap protection - left bank
13+36 13.55 (100 yr) 2.29 fps Rip rap protection - left bank
17+17 1.81 (10 yr) 5.39 fps Rip rap apron
17+17 2.37 (100 yr) 6.52 fps Rip rap apron
5
I
I

I
I
I
1

I
I
I

Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project October 7, 2003
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No. 2003-0423
Table 3. Allowable Shear Stress
Method Allowable Shear Stress
Rock Toe 18" - 24") 6 lb/sq. ft.'
Grade Control Structures 41b/s . ft.'
12" Coir Fiber Roll 3 lb/sq. ft.'
Natural Fiber (Coconut) Matting 2.25 lb/sq. ft.'
All other portions of channel requiring stabilization due to erosion will utilize root wad structures
and bioengineering techniques. Root wad structures will be installed where redefinition of the banks
has eliminated deep rooted vegetation (Attachment I - Sheet No. C4, Detail RW 1). These structures
will reduce erosion by diverting flowing water away from the bank towards the center of the channel.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will also be used to minimize disturbance to downstream
waters. In order to further reduce erosion and sedimentation of Stream A, erosion control matting,
riparian seeding, and/or live stakes will be installed to stabilize the channel bank. Streams B-D will
be avoided during construction of the project.
Proposed Impacts to jurisdictional Waters
Nationwide Permit No. 13
Stream bank enhancement activities will be conducted in accordance with the general conditions of
Nationwide Permit No. 13 and Water Quality Certification No. 3353. Proposed activities are intended
to enhance Perennial Stream A by reducing erosion, improving channel dimension, upgrading the
existing storm drainage infrastructure (i.e., pipe and culvert replacement) to meet The City of
Charlotte's storm drainage capacity standards. Proposed improvements include enhancing
approximately 2,728 bank feet (1,352 right bank and 1,376 left bank)' of Perennial Stream A
(Attachment I - Sheet Nos. C 1-C3). Small floodplain benches will be cut along sides of the channel
and the banks will be redefined to a more natural slope where necessary. Live stakes, coir matting, and
riparian seeds will be installed throughout the entire project area. These activities total approximately
1,431 linear feet10 of temporary impacts to Perennial Stream A. Table 4 provides a summary of the
proposed activities. In addition to stabilization, existing concrete bed and bank along sections of
Stream A (See Attachment G - Photograph B) will be broken up and removed from the entire reach
between Yadkin Avenue and North Myers Street to return the channel to its natural condition.
' 6 NCDENR, 1995. Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual, Table 8.05g, p. 8.05.13.
Letter from Rolanka International, Inc. (manufacturer).
" North American Green, manufacturer of C 125 and C 125BN (coconut fiber matting), design data.
9 Bank position is determined facing downstream.
10 Linear feet = bank feet x ''/z.
' 6

i
1
Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project October 7, 2003
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No. 2003-0423
Nationwide Permit No. 3
Culvert replacement activities will be conducted in accordance with the general conditions of
Nationwide Permit No. 3 and Water Quality Certification No. 3376. Additional unavoidable impacts to
Perennial Stream A will result from culvert replacements at Yadkin Avenue and North Myers Street
(with associated rip rap), the replacement of a stormwater outfall at the end of North Alexander Street
(with associated rip rap), and the placement of additional rip rap protection at the North McDowell
Street crossing (Attachment I - Sheet Nos. C 1-C3). The culverts at Yadkin Avenue (66-inch RCP) and
North Myers Street (54-inch RCP) will be upgraded by leaving the existing culvert to maintain channel
flow characteristics and installing an elevated floodplain culvert (66-inch RCP at Yadkin Avenue and
42-inch RCP at North Myers Street) to accommodate high flow events. This culvert configuration will
maintain proper hydrology and water depth while providing flood control during storm events. The rip
rap aprons at these stream crossings will also be upgraded to satisfy City of Charlotte standards. These
impacts will total approximately 178 linear feet. A summary of proposed activities has been provided
as Table 4.
Table 4. Summarv of Proposed Impacts
Jurisdictional
Activity" t Quantity
lf- linear feet
Attachment I
Permit
Area bf - bank feet Sheet No.
Bank enhancement with bioengineering 2,728 bf C1-C3 NWP No. 13
Root wad enhancement - Yadkin Ave 56 bf C1 NWP No. 13
Rip-rap apron replacement - 24 if C1 NWP No. 3
Yadkin Ave
Rip-rap replacement - Yadkin Ave 30 bf C1 NWP No. 3
Rip-rap replacement - N. Alexander St 24 bf C2 NWP No. 3

Perennial
Stream A Root wad enhancement - Stream D 34 bf C2 NWT No. 13
Rip-rap apron - Stream D 22 if C2 NWP No. 13
Pipe Extension - N. Myers St. 14 if C3 NWP No. 3
Rip-rap apron replacement - 22 if C3 NWP No. 3
N. Myers St
Rip-rap replacement - N. Myers St 32 bf C3 NWP No. 3
Rip-rap apron replacement - 32 if C3 NWP No. 3
N. McDowell St
with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 13, and pursuant to
On behalf of The City of Charlotte, CWS is submitting a Pre-Construction Notification application
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 and Water Quality Certification No. 3353 (Attachment Q.
Bioengineering includes installation of coir matting, riparian seeding, and live stakes.
7
' Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project October 7, 2003
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 Project No. 2003-0423

Compensatory Mitigation

Construction of this project is intended to enhance channel dimension, profile, and in-stream habitat.
The proposed channel enhancement should reduce sedimentation, thereby improving the quality of
downstream waters. The City of Charlotte believes that this project is self-mitigating given the water
quality improvements that will result from construction of the project.

L

1

I
I

pr T-{
E e' -

rn8 / V -W cnn Cub /
m
/ MeB f Ur Mk8
/ Feg c'
Cub {0Pe
WUD Cub
Cee?
N J
CHARLOTTE Mo
EnH ? -'
(county sg4t) Mo I?
Ce0 Mk6 Ce82 CUB
Ct'82 Cub Lit ? EnB VOR Mo
CVB Ce82 EnD h' -
n8 rd=??: En6 + 1i? NeB
in
nna
G f (0)
U? r,S,. Ur M I) M
+'? GCB }
«_ .. 0462 CtS$x, ,r..
r w p? ''?Aµ CUH
it
e ,r
F
C
MD
qle -
ea+'-,gyp- CUD fi
CUB - H UB- Y
Ur - -- [1CT >/? ITE Hub ` '. a. r..•, >. _ {..\:.;
e? s vt:-: -
2 Cud
j
Ur Par j
S1
Cub CUD l/
CUB CUB
V . Ur t
, j j CeD2
CuD r t CUD ( Ce82
( l`
\1 Cue Hue j
j I MkB yee Ur
I CUB CeB 2
ill i
j \t CeD2
?n
Approximate Scale l" = 2000'
Reference: NRCS Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, Sheet Nos. 4 and 7, dated 1980.
Carolina Wetland Services Figure 2. NRCS Soil Survey
I I 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230 Historic North Charlotte
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217 Neighborhood Improvement Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2003-0423
PREPARED BY DATE CHECKED BY TE.
DA
o-?1z?31o3 ?c?a ?- r-3-0?
? I? I III' i
35- of-S.W.-I. er
Perennial
Stream A
DP1
SCP4
1 ? ;,\ r f
Unimportant Intermittent
Stream D

LEGEND
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM REACH
....... NON-JURISDICTIONAL STREAM REACH
STREAM BUFFER
-\ - PROPERTY LINE
•DP1 DATA POINT
*SCP1 STREAM CLASSIFICATION POINT
PHOTO LOCATION AND DIRECTION

Car olina Wetland Services
500 0 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
Reference: OIS layme provided by Mecklenburg County LAW Uee and
Envimnme nW Servim, dated 2002.
Fig ure 3a. Approximate Juriadlctional
N Boundary Field Map
Historic North Charlotte
Neighborhood Improvement Project

"
' Charlotte, North Carolina
2003-0423
CWS Project No
SCALE: I
= 100 .
100 0 100 Foot PRVARED
X311 BY DATE CFiCCAKM DATE

??3
10-6-03 61.4 10• 7

XA.
Unimportant Inte
Stream B
y0
u
.. //`1 / ',
Non-Jurisdictional
Channel A
?a
i
LEGEND
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM REACH
....... NON-JURISDICTIONAL STREAM REACH
STREAM BUFFER
-\---?? II PROPERTY LINE
•DP1 DATA POINT
*SCP1 STREAM CLASSIFICATION POINT
PHOTO LOCATION AND DIRECTION
?
J1/ -- 1'
Unimportant Intei
Stream C
Perennial
Stream A
r
?I
IW 6
Oy
G
N.
4
35-Foot .LM. er
yt_

t`? 1
Carolina Wetland Se rvices
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 2 8217
Rehnwe: OIS lay= Mvided by Mecklenh" Coun ty land Use and
Envi? Services, dated 2002.
Figure 3b. Approximate JurWd lctlonal
N Boundary Field Map
Historic North Charlotte
Neighborhood Improvement Pr oject
Charlotte, North Carolina
SCALE. I"= 100' CWS Project No. 2003-042 3
100 O 100 Fog PREPARED BY
r=N DATE
10-?-03 C10MM
,?t,A DATE
(o•7,A3

Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1 I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
I2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested:
Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13
I3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
I4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
' II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
' Name: The City of Charlotte, Contact: Mr. Jarrod J. Karl
Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte North Carolina 28202
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
' E-mail Address: jkarl(a,ci.charlotte.nc.us
2. Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
' attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Gregory C. Antemann, PWS
Company Affiliation: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
' Mailing Address: 5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte North Carolina 28217
I Telephone Number: 704-527-1177 Fax Number: 704-527-1133
' E-mail Address: greegg_(&carolinawetlandservices.com
Page 1 of 7
III. Project Information
1. Name of project: Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project
' 2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
' 3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A - multiple properties
4. Location
' County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From downtown Charlotte, travel
' northeast on N. Davidson Street to Charles Street. Turn right on Charles Street and the
project area is located behind the houses on the north side of Charles Street, from N.
Davidson Street to N. McDowell Street.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): N350 14' 36" - W800 48' 28"
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for
' each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: The
existing project area is comprised mostly of single-family residences with maintained lawns.
7. Property size (acres): N/A
' 8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Little Sugar Creek
t 9. River Basin: Catawba River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
' 10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the Historic North Charlotte NIP
is to improve existing storm water infrastructure and control stream bank erosion and
flooding within the referenced residential areas. Activities will include the installation of
' curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage, and waterline improvements throughout the
project area. Other activities will include bank redefinition and the construction of floodplain
benches to improve channel dimension, and installation of hard and soft stabilization along
' an unnamed tributary to Little Sugar Creek (Perennial Stream A).
I11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: A trackhoe and typical
construction equipment will be used for this project.
I12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential, commercial, and industrial
land usages surround the project.
Page 2 of 7
IV.

VI.
Prior Project History
Previous projects within the on-site stream channels include bed stabilization in the form of a
concrete flume. The dates and circumstances of these activities are unknown.
Future Project Plans
There are no future project plans for this area.
Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
1. Wetland Impacts

Wetland Impact
Type of
Area of Impact Located within
100-year
-ye
r
Distance to

Site Number
Impact*
(acres)
Flood
*
plaia
Nearest Stream ***
Type of Wetland
(indicate on map) (linear feet)
N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hqp://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (If- linear feet)
(bf - bank feet) Before Impact (please specify)
NWP No. 13
Stream A Bank enhancement 2,728 bf UT to Little Sugar 10' Perennial
with bioengineering Creek
Stream A Root wad enhancement 56 bf UT to Little Sugar 10' Perennial
- Yadkin Av Creek
Stream A Root wad enhancement 34 bf UT to Little Sugar 10' Perennial
- Stream D _ Creek
Stream A Rip-rap apron 22 If UT to Little Sugar 10' Perennial
Creek
Page 3 of 7

I

I

I

Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on map) (If- linear feet)
(bf- bank feet) Before Impact (please specify)
NWP No. 3
Stream A Rip-rap replacement - 24 If UT to Little Sugar 10' Perennial
Yadkin Av apron Creek
Stream A Rip-rap replacement- 30 bf UT to Little Sugar 10' Perennial
Yadkin Av Creek
Stream A Rip-rap replacement 24 bf UT to Little Sugar 10' Perennial
- N. Alexander St Creek
Stream A Pipe extension - 14 if UT to Little Sugar 10' Perennial
N. Myers St Creek
Stream A Rip-rap replacement 22 If UT to Little Sugar 10' Perennial
- N. Myers St apron Creek
Stream A Rip-rap replacement 32 bf UT to Little Sugar 10' Perennial
- N. Myers St Creek

Stream A Rip-rap replacement
32 if UT to Little Sugar
10'
Perennial
- McDowell St apron Creek
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site:
NWP No. 13 - 1,431 If• NWP No. 3 - 178 if
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S. N/A
Open Water Impact Area of
Name
Wat Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact )
(if
applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on ma (acres) bay, ocean, etc.
N/A
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A
Expected pond surface area: N/A
Page 4 of 7
1
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
' Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent
practicable. Soft stabilization and bioengineering techniques will be used in lieu of hard
' stabilization (i.e. rip-rap) where possible (Attachment I). In general, the project design has
limited the placement of rip-rap along the channel banks to those areas where stream velocity
' and sheer stress are too high to be treated with soft-stabilization techniques. Sheer stress
calculations and thresholds are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. The project design has limited the
placement of rip-rap below the stream bed (average ordinary high water width) and upper
' portions of the channel bank to those areas directly adjacent to proposed culvert replacements
and a proposed pipe outfall. All rip rap placed in the stream bed is necessary to protect the
installed structures by dissipating energy and reducing erosion. The proposed rip-rap will adhere
' to Standard 20.23 of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Land Development Standards Manual. All
other portions of channel requiring stabilization due to erosion will utilize root wad structures
and bioen metering techniques. Root wad structures will be installed where redefinition of the
' banks has eliminated deep rooted vegetation (Attachment I - Sheet No. C4, Detail RW 1). These
structures will reduce erosion by diverting owing water away from the bank towards the center
of the channel. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will also be used to minimize
disturbance to downstream waters. In order to further reduce erosion and sedimentation of
' Stream A, erosion control matting, riparian seeding, and/or live stakes will be installed to
stabilize the channel bank. Streams B-D will be avoided during construction of the project.
VIII. Mitigation
Construction of this project is intended to enhance channel dimension, profile, and in-stream
habitat. The proposed channel enhancement should reduce sedimentation, thereby improving the
quality of downstream waters. The City of Charlotte believes that this project is self-mitigating
' given the water quality improvements that will result from construction of the project.
' 1. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
' reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
t process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wG2/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
' Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A

Page 5 of 7
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
' Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify: 35-foot SWIM Buffers )?
' Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
' mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers. N/A
' Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
' 2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
' additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
' of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0260.
' Buffer mitigation is not required. Enhancement activities will result in replacement of the
riparian buffer within the project limits.
' Page 6 of 7
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
' Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
' Sources of nearby impervious cover include roads, driveways, and rooftops. This project will
not cause an increase in the impervious coverage of the project area.
' XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
' wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
' Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
' construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
' Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Construction is scheduled to begin immediately following rceipt of the appropriate permits.

I
I
I
1

?6 ( 7/e)_)
Applicant's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 7 of 7
Date:
Triage Check List
lq, S-{a '? c llvJ - fi-, C ?'a
w O 102) Project Name: /ye 'V-3 l ? c?V e_-)
DwQ#: d r l ?V l
County:
To: ? ARO Mike Parker
FRO
? Ken Averitte
?,/
L`'l MRO Alan Johnson
? RRO Steve Mitchell
From: C A
? WaRO Tom Steffens
? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Telephone : (919)
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
ET'?Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: T) O?'t"? U-
G- _. K' L, or l d -t-4

'e P'-- "'/"
Win/ e?J-f??Jl? 1????? CJ11 Vl?? v Ptjf ??

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
I
I

I
DATE: October 7, 2003
COUNTY Mecklenburg County. North Carolina TOTAL ACREAGE OF TRACT N/A
PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project
PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT (name, address and phone):
The City of Charlotte
POC: Mr. Jarrod J. Karl at [phone]
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-2844
NAME OF CONSULTANT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER (if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
POC: Gregory C. Antemann, PWS at [phone]
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, North Carolina 28217
STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes

( X) Project in planning stages
(Type of project: Neighborhood Improvement Project )
No specific development planned at present
( ) Project already completed
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted - forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the following first two items must be sent.
(X) USGS Site Location Map (Attachment A - Figure 1)
(X) NRCS Soil Survey (Attachment A - Figure 2)
(X) Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Maps (Attachment A - Figures 3a and 3b)
(X) Pre-Construction Notification Application - Nationwide Permit Nos. 3 and 13 (Attachment C)
(X) Routine On-Site Data Form (Attachment D)
(X) NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms (Attachment E)
(X) USACE Intermittent Channel Evaluation Forms (Attachment F)
(X) Representative Photographs (Attachment G)
(X) Agency Correspondence (Attachment H)
(X) Proposed Impacts (Attachment -I - Plan Sheet Nos. C 1-C4)
ignature of Property Owner or
Authorized Agent
Mr. Jarrod J. Karl
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Historic North Charlotte N.I.P. Date: 07/17/03
Applicant/Owner: City of Charlotte County: Mecklenburg
Investigator(s): Tyler Burgess and Isaac Hinson State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: DPI
If needed, explain on reverse.
VFGFTOTInN
Dominant Plant Species
1. Morus rubra Stratum
tree Indicator
FAC Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9. Microste ium vimineum herb FAC+
2. Juglans nigra tree FACU 10.
3. Acersaccharinum tree FACW 11.
4. Ligustrum sinense shrub FAC 12.
5. Lonicerajaponica vine FAC- 13.
6. Vitis rotundifolia vine 14.
7. Toxicodendron radicans vine FAC 15.
8. Glechoma hederacea herb FACU 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
63%
Remarks:
More than 50% of dominant ve etation is FAC or wetter.
HYDROLnGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
X No Recorded Data Available Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_ Inundated
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: _ Sediment Deposits (on leaves)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) _ Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" (in.) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hvdrolop-y indicators are absent.
Routine On-Site Data Form Pagel of 2 10/7/2003
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Cecil sandy clay loam, 8-15% slo pes Drainage Class well drained
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): thermic T is Ha ludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descri tion:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 B 2.5Y 3/2 N/A N/A sandy clay loam
_ Histosol _ Concretions
Hlstlc Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List (Inclusions)
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
H dric soil indicators are absent.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (Circle)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Is this Samolina Point Within a Wetland? Yes No
Approved by HQUSACE 2/92
Routine On-Site Data Form Page 2 of 2 10/7/2003
' NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP1 - Perennial Stream A
Project Name: Historic N. Charlotte N.I.P. River Basin: Catawba River County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): Tyler Burgess and Isaac Hinson
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Little Sugar Creek Signature(s): ?n &C4
' Date: 7/17/03 USGS QUAD: Charlotte East, NC Longitude: W80° 48' 30" Latitude: N35' 14' 37
Location/Directions: From downtown Charlotte, travel northeast on N. Davidson Street to Charles Street. Turn right on Charles Street and the stream
to be restored is located behind the houses on the north side of Charles Street, from N. Davidson Street to McDowell Street.
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgementof the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be used"
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geomorpholoizv Absent Weak Mod rate Stron
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 0 I 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed _
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strone
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? 0 I 2
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS., 3
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way?
0
0.5 1 I
iJ
'
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
IL Hvdroloev 3
Absent
Weak Moderate
Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed?
1.5
in 0.5
0
2) Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 0,5 in 15
'
3 A Wrack in Present? 0 5 I 1.
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE' I(Ditch Indicated In 09 Above Skin 0
This Step And #5 Below*) 0.5 I 1.
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry
' Conditions Or In Growing Seas n ? 0 0.5 1 1.
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes= L No=O_
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 8
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= 38 (IjGreater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
(*NOTE: If Bed & -Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score= 0*1
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Man And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 Nom
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 14
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 7
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(*NOTE: IjTotal Absence OJAII Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0.5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Presents)
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS. 3
' NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP2 - Non-jurisdictional Channel A
Project Name: Historic N. Charlotte N.I.P. River Basin: Catawba River County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): Tyler Burgess and Isaac Hinson
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Little Sugar Creek Signature(s):
Date: 7/17/03 USGS QUAD: Charlotte East. NC Longitude: W80' 41'10" Latitude: N35° 14' 37"
Location/Directions: From downtown Charlotte, travel northeast on N. Davidson Street to Charles Street. Turn right on Charles Street and the stream
to be restored is located behind the houses on the north side of Charles Street from N Davidson Street to McDowell Street
*PLEASE NOTE: tfevaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream-this rating system should not be wed*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Geornorpholo2y A bunt Weak Moderate Str n
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
' 11. Hvdroloev Absent Weak Moderate Strone
1) Is There A Groundwater
Flow/Discharge Present? ® I 2 3
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 0
ill. Rininav Absent Weak Mnderate Strone
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Stream bed? 3 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 1 0
3 I Peri h t n Present? 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 1 1.5
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 2
11. Hvdroloav Absent Weak Moderate Strone
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 Hrs. Since M 0.5 1 1.5
Last Known Rain? (*NOTE: IfDilch Indicated In 9 Above Skin This Step And #5 Below*
' 5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0.5 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growin Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes= 1.5 No=
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1.5
1 *Are Fish Present? 5 Y 1 V o 1.5
V
2 Are Amphibians Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3 Are A uaticTurtle Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4 Are Cra fi h Present? 0.5 1 1.5
5 Are Mac en h Present? 0.5 1 1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidiziniz Bacteria/Fungus Present? 0.5 1 1.5
7 1 Filamentous AI ae Present? 0.5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
' (* NOTE: If Total Absence Of All Plants In Streambed 2 1®7 0.5 0 0
As Noled Above Skip This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 0.75
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)-- 11.25 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
(*NOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0*)
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Map And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 NA
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3

NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP3 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream B
Project Name: Historic N. Charlotte N.I.P. River Basin: Catawba River County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): Tyler Burgess and Isaac Hinson
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Little Sugar Creek Signature(s): &?CA
Date: 7/17/03 USGS QUAD: Charlotte East, NC Longitude: W80° 48' 30" Latitude: N35` 14' 37"
' Location/Directions: From downtown Charlotte, travel northeast on N. Davidson Street to Charles Street. Turn right on Charles Street and the stream
to be restored is located behind the houses on the north side of Charles Street from N. Davidson Street to McDowell Street
*PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modifred natural stream-this rating system should not he used*
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
1. Gcomorpholoi!y Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Seauence? 1 2 3
' 2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
Different From u din Terrain 1 2 3
Are Natural Levees Present? 1 2 3
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 1 2 3

I
5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
I IIHydrology n_ - ^ Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
r,3
I
I
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS. I
111_n.1- Absent Wcalc Mr.derato Ctrnea
I Are Fibrous Roots Present In Stream bed? 3 1 0
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 1 0
3 Is Peri h t n Pre ent9 1 2 3
4) Are Bivalves Present? 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS. 4
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
3) Does Topography Indicate A
' SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 0.5
11. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
1 Are Fish Present? 0.5 11•,
2 A Amphibians Present? 0. 1 I.
3 A A ticTurtles Present" 0.5 1 I.
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0.5 1 1.5
5 Are Macr benth Present? 0 1 1.
6 Are Iron xi izin Bacteria/Fun us Present? 0.5 1 1.
7 Is Filamentous Aloe Present? 0.5 1 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
' (* NOTE. If Total Absence OJAII Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0 0
As Noled Al ove Skin This Step UNLESS SAV Present*).
SECONDARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 0.5
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)-- 11.5 a Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
(*NOTE: UBed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score =0*)
10) Is A 2nd Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Tono Mao And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 NO=R
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1
Last Known Rain? *NOTE: 1 Di ch Indicated In #9 Above Ski This Ste And # Below*)
5) is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing eas n ?
61 Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=1. No=O
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 4.5
I
' NCDWO Stream Classification Form SCP4 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream D
Project Name: Historic N. Charlotte N.I.P. River Basin: Catawba River County: Mecklenburg Evaluator(s): Tyler Burgess and Isaac Hinson
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: Little Sugar Creek Signature(s): J a GCA
' Date: 7/17/03 USGS QUAD: Charlotte East. NC Longitude: W80° 48' 30" Latitude: N35° 14' 37"
Location/Directions: From downtown Charlotte, travel northeast on N. Davidson Street to Charles Street. Tura right on Charles Street and the stream
to be restored is located _behind _ the houses on the north side of Charles Street, from N. Davidson Street to McDowell Street.
I 'PLEASE NOTE: If evaluator and landowner agree that the feature is a man-made ditch, then use of this form is not necessary. Also, if in the best professional judgement of the evaluator, the
feature is a man-made ditch and not a modified natural stream--this rating system should not be used-
Primary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
I
1. Geomorphology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Riffle-Pool Sequence? ® 1 2 3
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed
' 5) Is There An Active (Or Relic)
Floodylain Present?

I
11. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) Is There A Groundwater
' PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICA TOR POINTS: 2
III Biology

1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? _ IrIVUClAIC JIrVUY
2 l 0
2 Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 2 1 0

3 Is Peri h ton Present? _
1 2 3
4 Are Bivalve Present? 1 2 3
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS. 6
I
Secondary Field Indicators: (Circle One Number Per Line)
' 3) Does Topography Indicate A
Natural Drainage Way? 0 0.5 15
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 1.5
II. Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
' 1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaflitter
Present In Streambed? 1.5 1 0® 0
2 Is Sediment On Plants Or Debris Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3 Are Wrack Lines Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4) Is Water In Channel And >48 His. Since 0 0.5 Ql 1.5
Last Known Rain? ('NOTE: I(Ditch Indicated hi #9 Above Skio This Steo And #5 Below')
' 5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry 0 0© 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)o Yes=1.5 No?
' SECONDARY HYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: 2
III Biology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 Are Fish Present? 0.5 1 1.5
2 Are Amphibians Present? 0.5 1 1.5
3 Are A aticTurtles Present? 0.5 1 1.5
4 Are Crayfish Present? 0.5 l 1.5
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0.5 1 1.5
6 Are Iron Oxidizing BacterWFun s Present? 0.5 l 1.5
7 Is Filamentous Algae Present? 0.5 1 1.5
8) Are Welland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(* NOTE: If Total Absence QJ All Plants In Streambed 2 1 0.75 0.5 0 0
As Noted Above Skip This Steo UNLESS SA V Present*).
SECONDAR Y BIOLOGY INDICA TOR POINTS: 0
TOTAL POINTS (Primary + Secondary)= 15.5 (If Greater Than Or Equal To 19 Points The Stream Is At Least Intermittent)
MOTE: If Bed & Bank Caused By Ditching And WITHOUT Sinuosity Then Score=0'I
10) Is A 2°a Order Or Greater Channel (As Indicated
On Topo Mao And/Or In Field) Present? Yes=3 No f§
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: 3
MM
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
SCP1 - Perennial Stream A
ACTION ID: APPLICANT NAME: City of Charlotte DATE: 7/17/03
' PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.): stabilization, and structure maintenance
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN: UT to Little Sugar Creek/Catawba River basin COUNTY/CITY: Mecklenburg/Charlotte
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS: 85 degrees and sunny: no rain within 48 hours
P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
X Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present Crayfish
X Benthic Macro Invertebrates Aquatic worms
X Amphibians Present/Breeding Salamanders
X Algae And/Or Fungus water quality function) Green algae
X Wildlife Channel Use i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
X Federally Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
X Riffle/Pool Structure
X Stable Streambanks Several areas exhibit erosion

X Channel Substrate
i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, coarse sand)
Coarse sand to boulders

X
Riparian Canopy Present (SP =/> 50% closure) Juglans nigra, Celtis laevigata, Morus rubra,
Acer saccharinum, Li strum sinense
X Undercut Banks/ In-stream Habitat Structure
X Flow In Channel Ten-foot average ordinary hi water width

X Wetlands Adjacent to/Contiguous with Channel
(Discontinue)
X Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom (June thru Sept.)
X See s/Groundwater Discharge June thru Sept.)
X Adjacent Flood lain Present
X Wrack Material or Drift Lines
X H dro h tic Ve etation in/adjacent to channel Celtis laevi ata, Boehmeria c lindrica
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y / N
' Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y / N
Determination:
® Perennial Channel (stop) ® Important Channel: 1,727 LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
? Intermittent Channel (proceed) ? Unimportant Channel: LF
? Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportpit channel)
? Ditch Through Upland (no jd) Evaluator's Signature: --? %o
P--Present SP=Strongly Present NP=Not Present Isaac J. Hinson
Approx. Drainage Area: Approximately 50 Acres

IM

INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
SCP2 - Non-jurisdictional Channel A
ACTION ID: APPLICANT NAME: City of Charlotte DATE: 7/17/03
' PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.): stabilization, and structure maintenance
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN: UT to Little Sugar Creek/Catawba River basin COUNTY/CITY: Mecklenburg/Charlotte
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS: 85 degrees and sunny; no rain within 48 hours

P SP NP Observation Comments or Descri Lion
X Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present
X Benthic Macro Invertebrates
X Amphibians Present/Breeding
X Al ae And/Or Fun us water quality function
X Wildlife Channel Use i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
X Federally Protected Species Present Discontinue
X Riffle/Pool Structure
X Stable Streambanks Bed and banks lined with rira

X Channel Substrate
i.e. vel, cobble, rock, coarse sand)
X Riparian Canopy Present SP =/> 50% closure) Albizia 'ulibrissin, Acer saccharinum
X Undercut Banks/ In-stream Habitat Structure
X Flow In Channel 1 to 2-foot average ordinary hi water width

X Wetlands Adjacent to/Contiguous with Channel
Discontinue
X Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom June thru Sept.)
X See s/Groundwater Discharge June thru Sept.)
X Adjacent Flood lain Present
X Wrack Material or Drift Lines
X H dro h tic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y /0
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y /O
Determination:
Approx. Drainage Area: Approximately Acres
? Perennial Channel (stop) ? Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
? Intermittent Channel (proceed) ? Unimportant Channel: LF
? Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimpo tant channel)
® Ditch Through Upland (no jd) Evaluator's Signature:
P=Present SP=Strongly Present NP=Not Present Isaac J. Hinson
I
IM 91-, _.. IV, INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
' EVALUATION FORM SCP3 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream B
ACTION ID: APPLICANT NAME: City of Charlotte DATE: 7/17/03
' PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.): stabilization, and structure maintenance
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN: UT to Little Sugar Creek/Catawba River basin COUNTY/CITY: Mecklenburg/Charlotte
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS: 85 degrees and sunny: no rain within 48 hours

I

P SP NP Observation Comments or Description
X Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present
X Benthic Macro Invertebrates
• Amphibians Present/Breeding
X Algae And/Or Fungus water quality function
X Wildlife Channel Use i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
X Federally Protected Species Present Discontinue
X Riffle/Pool Structure
X Stable Streambanks

X Channel Substrate
i.e. vel, cobble, rock, coarse sand
Coarse sand
X Riparian Canopy Present SP =/> 50% closure Mons rubra, Ju lans ni a
X Undercut Banks/ In-stream Habitat Structure
X Flow In Channel 1 to 2-toot average ordinary hi water width

X Wetlands Adjacent to/Contiguous with Channel
Discontinue
X Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom June thru Sept.)
X Seeps/Ground ater Discharge June thru Sept.)
X Adjacent Flood lain Present
X Wrack Material or Drift Lines
X H dro h tic Vegetation -in/adjacent to channel Celtis laevi ata
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y / NO
' Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y /0 Approx. Drainage Area: Approximately 5 Acres
Determination:
? Perennial Channel (stop) ? Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) ® Unimportant Channel: 15 LF
? Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimpo t .channel)
? Ditch Through Upland (no jd) Evaluator's Signature: ILb.zi
P=Present SP=Strongly Present NP=Not Present Isaac J. Hinson

IM INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
' EVALUATION FORM SCP4 - Unimportant Intermittent Stream D
ACTION ID: APPLICANT NAME: City of Charlotte DATE: 7/17/03
' PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.): stabilization and structure maintenance
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN: UT to Little Sugar Creek/Catawba River basin COUNTY/CITY: Mecklenburg/Charlotte
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS: 85 degrees and sunny: no rain within 48 hours

P SP NP Observation Comments or Descri tion
X Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present
X Benthic Macro Invertebrates
• Amphibians Present/Breeding
X Algae And/Or Fungus water quality function
X Wildlife Channel Use i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
X Federal) Protected Species Present (Discontinue)
X Riffle/Pool Structure
X Stable Streambanks Bed and lower banks lined with cement

X Channel Substrate
i.e. aravel. cobble, rock, coarse sand
X Riparian Canopy Present SP =/> 50% closure Acer saccharinum, Ju fans ni a
X Undercut Banks/ In-stream Habitat Structure
X Flow In Channel l to 2-foot average ordinary hi water width

X Wetlands Adjacent to/Contiguous with Channel
(Discontinue)
X Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom June thru Sept.)
X See s/Groundwater Discharge June thru Sept.)
X Adjacent Flood lain Present
X Wrack Material or Drift Lines
X H dro h tic Vegetation-in/adjacent to channel
Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y /O
' Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y /ON Approx. Drainage Area: Approximately 5 Acres
Determination:
? Perennial Channel (stop) ? Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR. Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) ® Unimportant Channel: 294 LF
? Ephemeral Channel (no jd) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant. channel)
? Ditch Through Upland (no jd) Evaluator's Signature:
???_?
P=Present SP=Strongly Present NP=Not Present Isaac J. Hinson

i
i
i
1
1
1
1
Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project
Photograph A. View of Perennial Stream A
Photograph B. View of Perennial Stream A
i
i Yadkin Ave. and N. Myers St.
2,

?i
r
r

i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project
October 2, 2003 1
u?
i

Photograph D. View
Intermittent
C
I
Photograph C. View of Unimportant Intermittent Stream B
1,16
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Improvement Project
?l t
fy.
A a
iii
2,

Photograph E. View of Unimportant Intermittent Stream D

I
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
' State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Historical Resources
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
Office of Archives and History
' September 12, 2003
Gregory C. Antemann, P.W.S.
' Principal Biologist
Carolina Wetland Services
5000 Nations Crossing, Suite 230
' Charlotte, NC 28217
Re: North Davidson Neighborhood Improvements Project, Charlotte,
' Mecklenburg County, ER03-1964
Dear Mr. Antemann:
Thank you for your letter of July 18, 2003, concerning the above referenced undertaking. A
check of our maps and files indicates that the project is located within the North Carolina
' Charlotte National Register Historic District. To determine the effect the project may have on
the historic property we need additional information, including photographs of the project
area and a more detailed description of the planned construction activities. We will complete
' our review after receipt and review of the additional information.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
' Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with
Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
' Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the
above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at
919/733-4763. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above-
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
fDav!id Brook
John Rogers, Charlotte HPC
' www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone] • 733-8653
' RESTORATION 515 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 276994617 [phone] • 715-4801
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 276994617 [phone] • 715-4801

I

I
Ari',Av
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
July 21, 2003
I
I
Mr. Gregory C. Antemann
Carolina Wetland Services
5000 Nations Crossing Road, Suite 230
Charlotte, NC 28217
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Subject: Historic North Davidson Neighborhood Improvement Project; Charlotte, Mecklenburg
County; CWS Project No. 2003-0423
' Dear Mr. Antemann:
The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, or
' priority natural areas at the site nor within a mile of the site. Although our maps do not show
records of such natural heritage elements in the project area, it does not necessarily mean that
they are not present. It may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural
' Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys, particularly if the
project area contains suitable habitat for rare species, significant natural communities, or priority
natural areas.
' You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at
<www.ncsparks.net/nhp/search.html> for a listing of rare plants and animals and significant
' natural communities in the county and on the topographic quad map. Please do not hesitate to
contact me at 919-715-8687 if you have questions or need further information.
' Sincerely,
f Lam .
Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Zoologist
' Natural Heritage Program -
HEL/hel
' 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
' Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us/ENR
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper
lk?' 'I _ e[`?' _, rs\ !- l \ \ \ I I ~? mJ?mu Y75r FLOOR ELEV. 701.76'1 0&3-0 h
705
CRAwI SPACE
U%L GRAD 69180' . Opm P I
I _ ,Ngp 8 1 -FOR
S
e6PYF? 4=
ENTS ` HVAL ST µW1 ELEV. 69506- D2
7604 YbdR A V
_ I
-?
m
` ,l (w]-0© i6 OxC ]1m 99-175
fY
oeB-osfi u ml N. DPwAInr sr- 9T snwc caNlxAClDa ro REMOVE 1 RESEIIIIENCE
- AND EASEMENT
2725 Y?b A.
-FWSF FUXW £! 49150 .-'
I _ _ raE? o. e
12550-147
saE
PROP. ? - L
?: 1
9
EXS - AND REM VE U , VIM
.{ ` USE TYPE III BAAPoCAOE THEN 50.10 HATCIR6EN15 ING END'WAIL
WNC VA-LOW .REPTPICLL
VA-LOW O
_ -?' ?? - _ "7 xAVL ROAD Is NOT
SrAX@!c -?-. 5 `?:, 497! 05 ?
' LTYPICAL AT EACH HAUL ROAD BOTH SIDES SEE DETAIL i? 1'. pone Penfey?
SHEET C4
? EN RANC7 324 bf Channel redefinition N.CD.OT nt,? 63h W1 30 bf Rip W. PAID
?? -
ro v ro?S 400E DRAM 10 Rrin •....M .D REN q:Y 11C D>J T 1 >Q ? ,. rap • t' TRACTOR aunsM.xia4 with bloengin glneering TO ®_ pro
FROM ? OF BANK L TOP IfADwN1 F1EV.?69268 ' tion
CONS'MUCTION LL17 57R 3D.,,A BE FROM VA ND EA¢121YT'FrYP) E OF ELFV tc
11" SI , 30 ENIAANCE ff5 E ySEESDwG PIPES - D-t
_ R LI
_.PRaPas6n TDE
^ .CONSTRUCT10N I-LPFM P_PRPPQSED AD
-DEEP
i
dtNt( SLOPE dVu4 10F,
_
a
m9slRUC111N amAI+cL
CMLD SID. xinA
1 W
m
m
w•
4 OP -RIP DEEP
X.
.?. tr .? ? D ICS RAP
. , .. - .--
1 MY Roar X 1W CHECK DAN
---- ?? - eam A
I SM. 3Q, 0
Ili
- PD 0 - -

1

I
I

TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN - - 8 - A A
?CMID Sro M04 PoE?P - - - I 24 bf Chann w I redefinition D7 I
'? Ic POE, Dees 117]6-M'1 PDE
II I,. TEMPORARY ROC( CHECK DAY ?E---POE-,: P?-- PDE. A'w POE with lo_engmeenng \CDNSIRULT NEW HEADWALL
a1P sro. 3010 LT rENDE .. -_?? b
. ?• ?. , aaD sro. >o.a - it L KC?.T3Tu'7DB5ESFEPT
STANDARD REINFORCED CONCRETE
RESTORE CREEK CFN77B - fNDWALL FOR DOUBLE 66' RCP
_ apron
DISTURBANCE 'LME AS SHOWN Pte - 24 If Rip rap - 1 x•69766 HEADWALL NOTE: 197 bf Channel redefinition +n.?[c ws_. 7 -'FlEtD WAD UNITS. SEE, .w.? Dero4 II 9?T19
CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE TREES w?
SLOPE TREATMENT. AND WITHIN THE LIMITS _.. 11 1 11 MV IN ELEV.-6&3.32 BOM
FIIOTW.NBTAUNITS. D' tI - 9 1
'I
© ® l DETAIL sHmT C{ - (SIB OBIAK, 627 Cti s A. 1 'REMOVE AND CE
ONLY ALONG CHANNEL BANKS NN .I ?. MtAmY M. Fusco MIAmy K F nn' with MPf N. Derore fl bioengineering
OF THE HAUL ROAD. cWJ 0A
A 05 N
,
_ ?" }I 08J-073-01 083-073-02 0&-07J-03 ..FIrrH;,OPOn?'.h td - .an L-y R. 1 66RCP
Sh C Rai - 9 1
.. _ Ond 11011-117 Cs IN21-113 Ds 7904-62! MgdP Naa1 Verld 0 .. 2¢6.20 ..,PROP. HIN uL 1 .,a ,p
601 Oral- Av. 60.5 CAVks Ae 609 aimlm Av. QePP 12119-169 an STD. IMMA ELM
- 611 aaYes _
1 ' WS CAUles Ar. A. I I FBRJCNT OF EXIST,
I ? 11 A
1+50
w
w
1+00
w
w w
' 0+50
w
--I
O6 -a -m ?9 m w em
0+25
w
eIN
77-
em I e,e
o m
2+75
1.2
en ' $ w
.o -m a m
2+50
w
en °= em
2+00
eat
w
w
ue me
m o m
4+00
tP
20
3+50
tP
eR
L ,'E
-m $o m
3+25
PP
177,
w
715
w w
56 bf Root wad stabilization
C01IIRACTOR TO ADJI57 F7951. B' INSTALL 1L5 V OF
58 bf Channel redefinition C?UAA ?E ED PRUPOSNESTO STORM BY 86' TO Rte, w O.SDi
RM DRAINAGE
with bioengineering
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS
1. PLACE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES.
2. INSTALL NEW CULVERTS AND CULVERT EXTENSIONS AT STREET
CROSSINGS
3. CONSTRUCT HAUL ROAD AND PERFORM CLEARING OPERATIONS.
4. CONSTRUCT CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS COMMENCING AT THE
UPSTREAM END AND PROCEEDING DOWNSTREAM. ALL WORK WITHIN
ONE REACH OF CHANNEL SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE PROCEEDING
TO THE NEXT REACH. A REACH IS DEFINED AS THE LENGTH OF
CHANNEL BETWEEN CROSS STREETS
5. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, REMOVE AND OBLITERATE
HAUL ROADS. SEED AND MULCH DISTURBED AREAS.
4+25
Uu.K
w
2D 30 60
Rom Profile.._-_
ID 20 l0 ?
VerL Profile -"'.--:
5+25
w
5+00
I
I
I
.8
88 Iw
I
I

I
1

Li

TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN T
am•sm DD.G , ' ? . 1* C
'
8?gti0-
FPSf1RDd1 kEEV 999A/' L1A7-81<. 05 FIRST FLOOR ELEV 706.50' ?1..63A6
lS'[AWL 91/OE .19497 Dome Pam CRAWL•SPACE ELEV. G99.n' J SREET .
?•? 6 OR
1',R
W41dy Fa - Palm LOWEST 19A GRADE
09,7-074-DT, j HAM ROAD I -NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEWENTS
De 11742-250,. - . ' -- -....__ _ _-...... ._ _. _. .....
.
?.-...2904. Ynden Ax FROM TOP OF
"
\ RESTORE CREEK CENTER
UNE AS SHOWN,
283 bf Channel redefinition KBrya , - _
v
0p0`-074-05 \ Omit 9q9-098 ff N9.-MQIK Oq7-DT6-2tl - --FIRST fl
.Dons Pmtm 2819 N: 4aa04r St 'f SM OF STREAM pOq-EIEV..70462'
TLP with bioengineering , ._ -- RESMRE- giAW, SPACE ELfV 707.77 - -
Ntii'ar FnAmm Palm BANK ( 1RAC1ftt iD RF110VE CONTRACTOR R@IOV6R@IOV6 cm NLLWPIC N..V_dN St LOWEST ADJ. GRADE = 70291'
AND REP ACFFfNfE "I UNIT i1EY®. 70517 FEW
-AND RESET ,
ON _ i SOLID TCH
ALONG`E6SE91ENT fTT?
WILLOW STAK_'
FOR
BO
70R i0 $RFAK OP SHEET M]-076-19
G
CONTRACT MAIL 53 as PROPOSED TOP
_ 9' 9ff hE FNBRE REACH
. _... '? '.. .-? ? __ liETWE101-1L.YE?FRS"AND YAOItlM. ,r ?-% p \ % ?0?-IA. JNA+'ader 5t -
TEMPORARY ? ? OF BANK IYP
S
GRAIN
24 bf Rip rap protection -- -_ _ »_ 384 bf Channel redefinition
TEMPORARY SLOPE 3Q
-DRAW
=CWT bio _
-with engineering
"` --------- CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
e
--
t CMID
"- 570. 0011A
•
i
.., Stream p -
R -? 4
'01 ° OED...... - - ??-
CONSIRUC" ENTRAN --
CMLD SID 3IL11A
TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN
"CMLD. SM. *04
1'a -- ' " - -?_ -
_0_F BANK TYP
® - -. -
:rx-c--
- L19D 510. ?1N '
-074 382 bf Channel redefinition. dw,
s_b ffl d • NFA - -t'?yO - ISO
f OE
111,9 6. ineenng _
„Ax x
ROPOSED TOP
- with bioeng apron
YP UN?
rap °`?"K " UNIS19 9 ? 22 If Rip 34 bf Root wad stabilization \
Fl
' w RSi R ELEV. = 7G3.96. OE
CaITRERAC7OR m t®WP1E
FOOT WAD STA9U2ARDd, AND SET E TO HYAC LOWEST UNIT ADJ GRADE .DE = 699.93' 699.21 ,E 1?? ]?.
FIRST FSPAC EaEV.- 707N- O&j-O76 zr FIELD' ADJUST UN SEE., _ . ' MONO EASDAENT to l OF EIANK TO °TS:
-
' CRAW[ PALE EI']0010 - Srntf Brim'Poltdsa ...DETAIL BEET C4- 9LT,FENC£

GES Ap pADE_,GD2
- ' _
.. -
, . -' -
729Chm-A"
75 bf Ch
l
fi
iti
d p A CMLD STD. ?m
7
®

,
..
anne
re
n
e
n
o'
ith bi
i
i
C1 . LIMITS OF
OB7-
Actley DISTURBANCE
O
- w
oeng
ng
neer D. 11
]),-
2815 M. M1v4 SL•
v
0"-076-22
NOTE:
213 bf Channel redefinition `
-t 00D'? 0-OOD

717 Gom Ar. FIRST BOOR ELEV. - 717.AA•
CRAWL SPACE E - 71295'

LOWEST ADd GRADE - 71224 CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE TREES

ONLY ALONG CHANNEL BANKS RECFJYNG
SLOPE TREATMENT, AND MITHIN THE UMITS CLASS i RIP RAP BELOW

Bona' OF WILLOW with bioengineering -
STANINO
OF THE HAUL ROAD.

6+50
w
J
W
.a
6+00
IC
I
W
W
as
8+00
]m
I
7+50
j
I j
W -
°°° ?o -ID 4 m w
7+00
5+50
I 1
W

I

9+50
IC /
2.25'
_a
W -m a m w 6°?
9+00
/
§ SLOPQ
l
w -ID o m a
8+50
11+00
W S: W
10+50
\ la
W W
10+00
16 W
W \ ? W
W ID •n ID b W
ZO 40 60
Hon. Profile ii?
10 20 30
Vert PrDLle ._.....» -
12+00
I
-u m o m a
11+50
I
W
I
I

I

1
I

INSTALL 14 LF OF ,
--FIRST FLOOR ELEV 70377 54 RCP. 01.46% 083-076-04 OTE:
FIRST FLOOR ELEV. -'70789 N
CRAWL- SPACE ELEV 70078 % • M M (H '
TRACTO0. TO BREAK UP LOWEST ADy GRADE 7005y ; Mdo L L Mdarm (N/N) % CRAW DACE '/0220 Il
CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE TREES .'RACTO RTO BREA"WAC - HVac UNIT ELEV. 70076INSTALL n 6 OF Dme: mass-gar ? LLINEST AD.L GRADE RADE = 702,M'
ONLY ALONG CHANNEL BANKS RECEIVING ;
9' S12E THE 9116E REACH 4z Ra, a t./sx HV.AC UNIT Eire. = 705.09' SLOPE TREATMENT, AND WITHIN THE I1MIT5
`._ 19I5N SL ;
BETWEEN N. MEYERS AND YADMIN HA AD.
REMOVE AND rsEau? / ,-. - ?'. OF THE UL ROAD.
0ET-075=p3. dOPlT _
RaEe.t Emmet'Ltpmd '
... Dee2 9060-536 ` 54 RCP
-..-' PROPO¢D TOP 2911 N. My- CONSTRUCTION EH1RAwF?'
OF BANK 1YI` 'R CLWD SM. 30.11A', EMSO4G HEADWALL' =
., ms 077ZIs-
PROP. M-6"HAw71WL J! J NdEi?4e ON - --
A --?^ CmdFm ac _
Oee1^ 7?
-. " PROPOSED CLASS I RP RAF PAD ,'. B H Y! - jp R T9/P
Af ORARY ROPE DA/JN
REPLACE -W X 115-DEEP
TRACTOR TO R I2
- FENCE.
141f Pipe exte uom
n$lon ,. vmnr HAUL worn SOLID H CH REPRESENTS- O- ?, ? -CONTRACTOR To REMOVE -TIr trn SM. AM
S 100 O BANK -- ".Low NO TYPICAL FOR N. St
µCZ ALL CHANNEL WOW 804Ws SS-SEE1DETAi 6ND RESET FENCE 07
TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAM
cum SM 30.04 S BE FSTREAM
ROM THIS SHEET °` 361-bf Channel redefinition
?E? ,
n ENTRANCE
+_- - PROPOSED TOP NANO RESTORE -FOLLOW_ YafA L Cfid .h
u
ord roG
l 71A
euix rn AND MULCH with bloenglneering S0r1 N. M=S
\,
FIRST FLOOR'ELEV. - 705 72 ``.,.?
- r
?• LOW.,
AD1 CRADE _ ]0110
PROP0.5Ep'9N4 I RIP RAP PAD-. USE TYPE It BARRICADE NH
i
_ ??.. -181. 1 25-W ICWDEEP HAUL-ROAD IS NOT T BEING USED. _
? -:H-EACH NAUL ROAD
t _ _ Stre
am A
0122 if Rip rap apron --- --------, %,
?., < _- _ _ `ate
P RONTRACTOR WAMIUNE AS TO --ST NECESSARY l17$i.
-
CLEAR PROPOSED STORM DRNTONAGE 32 bf Rip rap D _ DE-?O
OSED r protection BANK (? 1 - -
PROP. 10-6 HANORNI . ;
A --._ TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAIN
TEMPORAAT ROD( CHECK OAM
"y' `• - 'P - . _. OTT 570. ]0.10 CHID SID. 70.01
336 bf Channel redefinition
o?CLASS IRPR?
_-'80CSTlR1 BANK DEPTH fY'18''BEER , 8? A ; 11
EMSTN?' ,gWALL CONSfRUCi IF WAU- A SEE DETAIL SHEET CL with bioengineering cu FENCE / '?•/ ?/
-% •? _ sruq;UA RENFOR[m CONCRETE z,.. _
HEADWALL FOR OO19E 54' RRP ?. CE MOE
(MODIFIED FOR A rW sr Ns) ® _ -- -- ?'
TOP HEAD FOR 42-&7005fi aa; ®.. D _ Rip rap apy
32 If ro
ap; " abr Dn-u - ReS-on o7 FIRST FLOOR ELEV. =nags rce
54' R INV. IN ELEV.=69102 Roy EYIe YuNa BWY 4- Of,- LOWEST ADL GRADE 706.94' O BANK
GONBIRU ivNEW HEADWALL . 42' RCP NV. N ELEV.=694.02 Mpd?-i -llF.. 083=a77-04 .. . SEE SHEET 10 FOR
N. . Lhmm A Dar-9n-p -_. - . Oee2 59H-986 Ysy.pmr HVAC UNIT ELEV. =70110 yJa B. Jrdm NE1p180RH000 YPRO'.flIENiS
STANDARD ROfLNCRETE. A Nmn FIRST FLOOR ELEV. 709.59' Dx.. 7279-1A
°"
'U , - .
OWML FOR DOUNE %• ARP Deal 8008-2t2 CRAW SPACE F1FV 704.52'.. N. Yrvs SI 2909 N. IkdJw1 SL D-& -t 0. 5755758-823
(M
A'42' .4y 9y /
(MOOPIED FOR /(4YN 52' RCP) 1900 N M)- St. LOWEST ADd GRADE- /04.40• _
NVAC UNIT ELEV. 707.4r - 29I5 N YCtb?Nl-9-
TOP ENDWA21 ElfXv699.80 ,
54' RCH: NY. IN ELEV- 1.90 -
42' RCP NV. N ELEV:.69z90 .-t ?•*,% 5? • / / /.. /./ ,
13+50
?E
14+50
14+00
1d
I
nR
-w -m 8o m a
15+50
it
em eee
E
-w -z o m w
15+00
OPE
T1P
W
16+50
e° -a -m o m b eu
16+00
AN -b -m - •0 m b ?
17+00
112
m
7w
88
HISTORIC
NORTH CHARLOTTE
NEIGHBORHOOD ]IMPROVEMENTS
CHANNEL BOROVEMENTS
BETWEEN McDOWELL ST.
AND DAVEDSON ST.
G- r STA.12+50 TO 17+27.55
zB w (B '
Hom Profile.__._ WOMPERT WOMPERT PAS Nc 16
RIARE'6EDBY qp RIMEI DEOLLDBY 'POND EY OAT6
10 20 30
Vert Pro61e 312-ao-cw r - m'
a _ sm. 8 K A 6 1 B TDPAn C3 C4
S
Ix'
? pw
x- ]C 1 Ntm .•,e, ccr ra•r mm ??
GOT nIs
NTAP EimNlMwd wort ="o.,
STAENLIZATION MAT 12' NN. • a?s°a ////--TO i0-tlm mly
AND WILLOW S
TAIUN
F? W}
dmmd NMkv p•r mvlflmtim-
•tmI. l• pr mmufvctume -Aanmh
DUSTING GN
COMPACTED F1
,RUNK DIAMETER IS T
EASTING CHANNEL
O
BE A MINIMUM OF 1 W BOTTOM
CUT PaN AT TRUNK END
OF TREE AND INSTALL BY
PUSHING INTO EMBANKJ,IENT
5EC ION VIEW
RW I - ROOT WAD IN5TALLATION
TREE5 NOT INDICATED TO BE REMOVED 5UALL BE
PROTECTF.D DURING CONSTRUCTION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH PIAN5 AND 5PECIPICATION5
MAINTAIN STNC
ECISDNG TREES IN EACAVATON AREAS
r0 REMOVED UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED
EXCAVATE /GRADE SLOPE
E)aSnNG CHANNEL BANK
INSTALL CLASS 1 RIP RAP
18' MAX, n9ONESS
INSTALL CLASS I RIP RAP
H
OW
p BASF FLtEw.
_ ?_ ?A1FR
FULL SANK STABILIZATION
N.T.S.
30' Lm atl'nq (Mmmt)
Sa PIw M•. d• la d WtT'aymt
NOTE
INSTALL LONG STRAW
MULCH BENEATH COIA MAT.
5ECTION
N.T.S.
Euet- trva
and regrtaLm
110' Hwl Nadd
ree by
xeAnq and
- - - ?TB- _ m IcTNg
Spore 2' ha zmtal ?•
and 2' -1- pm q?•
E tl T-
Geer CaRiNme ?- Flow
PUW VIEW 5PACING PATTERN
N.T.S.
LIVE STAKING
N.T.S.
fl1-EFON Y - ]d ?a
a ?
I yy? R, ?? ,??a =? p?R,TR C4 C4
.. .. :..5. 1»e..._.x ?,? .i?_......3... ...a 'd,--.. .-:v ...?,,,...#L?? '?°mss'?•.. L.L?r:-ins. .._, ... .x..57.. ?s