20031076 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030827

?OF WATF9o Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
O North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
November 10, 2003
WAIVER of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. O.A. Keller, III
P.O. Box 130
Sandford, NC 27331
Dear Mr. Keller:
O.A. Keller, III
Madison Park
Lee County
DWQ # 03-1076
Your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification to impact 1126 feet of stream , which included
133 feet of culverts and 993 feet of stream restoration at the tract known as Madison Park in Lee County, was
received in the Central Office on August 27, 2003. According to our rules [15A NCAC 2H .0507 (A)], if final
action is not taken within 60 days, the Certification is waived unless DWQ has objected in writing to your
application. Therefore, DWQ has waived the requirement for a 401 Water Quality Certification for your plans
to impact waters as described August 27, 2003 application materials.
A Notice of Violation (NOV), issued by the Raleigh Regional Office, was issued to this site. In your
efforts to abate the violations, impact/restoration efforts must correspond to those proposed in your August 27,
2003 application materials. If you cannot adhere to the items detailed in your application, this waiver is no
longer valid and a 401 Water Quality Certification will be required.
If you have any questions, please telephone Danny Smith at 919-733-1786 or Debbie Edwards at our
Raleigh Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
C John R. Dorney
Cc: Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Pat Shillington, P.E. and Robin Little 3008 Anderson Drive, Suite 102, Raleigh NC 27609
??
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http:/th2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Madison Park, Phase I Residential Condo
Project Number 03 1076
Recvd From APP
Received mate 8/27/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type residential condominium development
Certificates
Permit Wetland Wetlan
Type Type Impac?
14 Stream 7-Y@)
iw?nnnu?ww?wwww?
39 Y B'
r- O _70
Mitigation
MitigatiopType
r
Is Wetland Rating Sheet
Have Project
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y
Provided by Region: Latitude
Stream
t
l
Comments:
This application NEEDS W h
Only possible problem noted
notification of stream crossing
reduce the amount of impacts
The stream relocation and res

County Lee
County2
Region Raleigh
Stream Impacts (ft.)
Acres Feet
Req. Req.
7F 0.01 1,126.00 F--- I -

,re info? 0 Y 0 N
,plicant? 0 Y 0 N
Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
nmss) 791786
sq. ft. (?.) for their after the fact
needed in stream crossings to
r

cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Debbie Edwards
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Ken Schuster
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Madison Park, Phase I Residential Condo
Project Number 03 1076
Recvd From APP
Received Date 8/27/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type residential condominium development
County Lee
County2
Region Raleigh
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
F 14 Stream OY OO N F__27-57-(17) ? NSW 30,406. r'-0.01- 1,126.00 F-?
39 r 10 Y N r Ir F-F-30,406..
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? pQ Y O N Did you request more Info? Q Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue 0 Issue/fond p Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 355260
Longitude (ddmmss) 791786
Comments:
Th_ __is application NFFDS to he reviewed by Danny Smith.
Only possible problem noted is the amount of Ri121ap requested... 800 sq. ft. (?) for their after the fact
notification of stream crossings. Need to reduce the amount of rip rap needed in stream crossings to
reduce the amount of impacts.
The stream relocation and restoration needs to he reviewed by Todd and Danny,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Tardy Projects as of October 1, 2003
County DWQ# Project Regional Office CO staff CO Received
Date Drop Dead
Date
Beaufort 03-1045 tat3) n ree < WaRO Cyndi Karoly 8/21/03 10/19/03
Lee 03-1076 Madison Park Phase I RRO Cyndi Karoly 8/27/03 10/25/03
Wake 03-1077 Bachelor Branch Greenway RRO Cyndi Karoly 8/27/03 10/25/03
Wake 03-1077 RRO Cyndi Karoly 8/25/03 10/23/03
Variance Requests: None
Beaufort 03-1037 WaRO Bob Zarzecki 8/21/03 10/19/03
i
Triage Check List
04'?
Date: " 2 9' v3 Project Name:
DwQ#: D3 -- 10 -
County: Lee--,
To: ? ARO Mike Parker ? WaRO Tom Steffens
? FRO Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
? MRO Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
RRO Steve Mitchell
From: Telephone : (919)
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
?-Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
0-Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
Check drawings for accuracy
0-Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments:
TO
40-
o jer .
? t
August 19, 2003
Mr. Todd Tugwell
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Y I
VET14w)lmi GROUP
Ah!'? '? 'Uila
AXERQUALITYSECTION
Subject: Post-Construction Notification for Culvert Installations Associated with Two
Road Crossings and Stream Restoration Plan at Madison Park Residential Development,
Keller Group LLC, Sanford, Lee County.
Dear Mr. Tugwell:
By copy of this letter, I respectfully submit a post-construction notification application
package for the subject property, on behalf of Mr. O. A. Keller, the property owner. The
enclosed PCN application addresses the construction of two new access roads for
Madison Park Residential Condominium Development and associated road crossings of
an unnamed tributary to Little Buffalo Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin. The subject
property is located on the west side of SR 1420, approximately 0.3 miles south of US 1
Business, south of Exit 70 on US 1. I have requested authorization under Nationwide
Permit # 39, and the corresponding Water Quality Certification # 3402. The permit
drawings and site evaluation forms are also included.
The road crossings do not appear to have impacted any wetlands, although I have
delineated approximately 0.02 acres of isolated and possibly man-made wetlands
adjacent to a berm and in an area of soil disturbance west of the culvert installation.
The culvert installations are labeled as "Culvert System 1 and 2" respectively. The
combined culvert installations resulted in approximately 133 feet of fill within a perennial
headwater stream channel. Culvert System 1 is located on the southern end of the subject
property, and consists of four 36-inch diameter corrugated metal pipes, approximately 64
feet in length. Culvert System 2 is located on the northern end of the subject property,
and consists of two 36-inch and two 40-inch diameter corrugated metal pipes,
approximately 69 feet in length. Concrete toe walls were installed on both inlets, and
approximately 800 square feet of riprap was placed on or near the stream banks for
stabilization.
The culverts have been surveyed and their relative elevations are shown on the attached
permit drawings. The inlets of Culvert System 2 are currently perched, but will be
realigned with the streambed by the stream restoration project. The completed stream
restoration will result in the pipes being buried to a depth equal to 20% of their diameter.
Construction debris was observed in one of the pipes and will be removed. Two of the
7 r
pipes in Culvert System 1 are installed at a slightly lower elevation, which corresponds to
the stream bed elevation.
I have also enclosed a stream restoration, planting and monitoring plan for the subject site
for your review and approval. Comments received from you and from Danny Smith of
DWQ on July 24, 2003 have also been included in these documents. If you have any
questions or need any additional information, I will be glad to provide further
information. You can contact me at [phone].
Respectfully yours,
/TiI l
Robin 1M. Little
Cc: Danny Smith, DWQ
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14 or 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. O. A. Keller III
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 130
Sanford, NC 27331
Telephone Number: 919-770-1570 Fax Number: 919-775-1043
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. Pat Shillington, P.E.
Company Affiliation: Engineering and Environmental Sciences Company
Mailing Address: 3008 Anderson Drive, Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 2709
Telephone Number: 919-781-7798 Fax Number: 919- 781-7796
E-mail Address: E2S(d,mindspring.com
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Madison Park, Phase One, Residential Condominium Development
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Lee Nearest Town: Sanford
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): US 1 south to intersection with
US 15/501/87, take exit to US 15/501 southeast to first left onto Amos Bridges Road. Follow
for 0.3 miles to right onto private access road (Post Oak Drive). Subject site is to the right
before subject stream crossing.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35.5260°N, 79.1786°W, UTM 17 665145E
3932707N, Colon Quad
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the coordinates for each
crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Tract 1 = 14..6 ac., Tract 2 = 4.105 ac.
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Little Buffalo Creek DWQ 17-42
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site is currently cleared and grubbed, and the
surrounding land use is primarily mixed use residential and commercial.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Post
construction authorization is requested for the installation of a new access road and four new
60 foot long, 36 -40 inch diameter concrete pipes with concrete toewall and riprap on an
unnamed tributary to Little Buffalo Creek. Preconstruction authorization is requested to
restore stream channel that was relocated and to perform streambank stabilization activities
under Nov issued on April 14, 2003.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the work is to comply with
regulatory requirements associated with resolution of NOV. The purpose of the construction
of the access road and road crossing structure was to provide access for residential
condominium development.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
NA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
NA
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 7 of 12
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Road fill in uplands and
placement of road crossing structure over perennial stream. Eight 36-40 inch diameter
Corrugated metal pipes, 64-69 feet in length, with concrete toewall and riprap were installed
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
NA NA 0 No 0 NA

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.rema.pov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.018 acres
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma linear feet) Before Impact leasespecify)
A Culverts 133 UT to Little Buffalo 4 feet Perennial
Creek
B Stream 993 UT to Little Buffalo 4 feet Perennial
relocation Creek
C riprap 800 sq. ft. UT to Little Buffalo NA NA
Creek
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 1126 If, (>1200 if to be
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Page 8 of 12
Open Water Impact Area of
Name Wat Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact )
(if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on ma) (acres) bay, ocean, etc.

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
1 A
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Access reauired by local buildiniz ordinances. Access blocked by small stream parallel to
Amos Bridges Road. Impacts minimized by use of standard specification construction, toewalls
and minimal riprap. Stream relocated to provide better drainage from exisitng culverts to new
culverts. Stream was not indicated on county topographic maps.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
Page 9 of 12
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htmi.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NA
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Page 10 of 12
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
" Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular tram near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Page 11 of 12
Stormwater controls in compliance with DLR impervious acreage estimated to be > 60% in
residential development.
X1I. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Public sewer, non-discharge
X1II. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (I 5A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ® No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ® No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-do%km schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA
4;?

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
flX
CONTROL
Ex5 -
SSMH CORNER
_ N_WW 6•NE3.16 _
8 gELN,
JS 3 EP 809
,SOT / .fir
0
017-'SITE
"o
Jy
G 7
S
m
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
EAST
SSMH
?O
Zf
Q
0?
rA??
Q
EX bT
SSHM
ER E19 t2FE
[ab
0 4

B
(//?. ne?R I
9
EW
y 320
EPK B SSMH
COMA, Ay
CORNER vP ,
? 315
POST OAK DRIVE (3o, R1W. MWATE) ' Bs
---------------
316
'W 305 dd
50C=? ?j
-e'
EW7
Bu•tsaw ? -----------
200.n7
? ??tr

} N
? RECREATION
AREA
JEW
5; 3 eE 3. ,- - is
01 _ i
BLDG TWO
BEDROOM
; UNNTS
F]OS'1M?3
5N• - 15,
8 H1.7P - L -
d - - --
POOL -- - -
Bumoll
Two
S`
R
OM
UN
"D ONE
rP.C14.0 - - BECROJM-
uNre
_ 2RS23a _
+ - - -- 2R+SP1
o4?1 - - = - -

BIDD P1:
TWO 9LDGM9
FJTJRE
- B TWO _
- OONSTAUC
)DN URaNITS
=
B -
BEDROOM
_ rFL+31B1 = _
E 247a1254
rFL-=6
24L-031.5

FURJRE
??- RRURE TN.
OOM
BED ._
- B
..
- CONSTRUCTION -
' - OCNBIRUCTON- _
UNaB TY1C WO
RECREATION
I I-FL•319 5 BEDROOM _
,
AREA

-- 2SL-3275 UNITS
rN723.5 '
23 = 2"PL432.e =
W

EIF
- _ _ BILL IN _- _ _-
FMJRE
RnJRE d - RTJRE 1WC
CONSAJCTOI CCNS'AJTd1 = CONSTRJOTION- S BEDROOM
- ONE
C= lMTT -.
0-_ _ r mB5 .A,m _
41

tl -- - _ =; "2'E _ BLDG PS --
- - 01
WALNUT (RAVE - -
=
UNITS
- - - rR•s273 -
29:1-4345 -

FUTURE RLTLRE FUTURE SLDG A: -
-
E
_ CONSTRUC'NM OONff ? OCNTMX TICN __ RTF?E
pNSTRUCTCN RMiE _
CONSfRU:nON _
TWO
BEDROOM _
UNITS -
2R-3A23 =
cAM sy nm1 -; Oak Bra Rd
p
EF
General Project Information
At the Madison Park Residential Condominium Development Project (formally Oaks II)
in Sanford, North Carolina a stream restoration project is proposed. The stream which
was degraded by timbering activities and subsequent ditching is approximately 1065 ft.
long. Improvements to the stream will include widening the channel width and flattening
the bank slope, addition of riffles and pools, and addition of directional flow vanes and
root wads. The length of the stream will also be increased to approximately 1229 lineal
feet. Total oxbow areaa created is.072 acreas. Stream "pattern, dimension, & profile"
will be constructed based on natural dimensional design principles and calculations for
urbanized watersheds.
Approximately 3 acres will be disturbed for the stream restoration project. Erosion
control will be provided by restricting flow through the down stream culverts. Also,
level spreaders will be added to the discharge points from the proposed pavement areas.
Oxbows will be excavated to improve TSS removal, flood storage and amphibian habitat.
The erosion control is an addendum to the existing erosion control permit for this site.
LEGEND
DENOTES WON PPE
IPF RCNPIPE FOUL
SIR BET PON PIPE
DENOTES'PK- NAY (CONTROL,
EPA M511143TM'NAIL
NT NOW OR FORMERLY CWNEC BY
DS DEFD BOOK
PO PAGE
PC PUT CABINET
SSMH SAMTARYSEWERMAHKKE
TBM TEMPORARYBENCHMARK
ALL PROPERTY CORNERS DwnNouiSNEL
BY IRON PIPES UR.ESS OT E RAISE NOTED
EIF
89.
A
F
I
Scale 1"=120'
NOTES:
1, NONORQOINTAL CONTROL FOUND WrTHIN
2.000 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY.
2. THERE ARE NO NON-CO FO1MlG
STRUC URES ON THIS BITE.
3. AREA CdiOREDBY COORDINATES.
A. REFERENCES: PLAT CAS9ET4 SIDE 177,
DEED BOCK 835 PAGE 778
PLAT CABINET 9 SLIDE 42-D
8. THE NBFLT PROPERTY IS NOTWOIlI A SPECIAL
FLOOD NAZA RD AREA AS DETERMINED BY REGIPLALD
BUIE OF THE CrrY OF WiFORD, NORTH CAROUNA,
AND REFIBRENCED BY MAP NO. 371 OW WS B.
6. TSM -Ri SPIKE IN MAPLE TREE HEAR APT. 155 HEN 335.61
RR SPIKE W BURR OAK HEAR REC CNTR ELEV.315.05
ALL DRIVES ANC PARKING ARE PRIVATE.
315
Culvert System No.1
Looking Down Stream Looking Up Stream
315
310 $ 3101,
0 o IrKa
4- n ++
CU
1 >
w - w
305-- 305

300
0 20 f? 20 40
Distance, ft.
zt?
S-W.:
Vrttid
Flaomht 1?fi0'
0
a+
m
w
30040 20 20 40
Distance, ft.
Culvert Svstem No_ 1
Culvert System No. 2
295 -
40 20 20 40
Distance, ft.
Looking Up Stream
T
310
I
I
? 305
c
0
CIO
CD
w 300
Longitudinal Cross-Section
Retming Wei
Co ele Slab sdc ---
v.e.L 1=m
Had-OW: 1129
29540 20 20 40
Distance, ft.
Culvert System No. 2
Plan View
Doemvaw n
Fill
Erril3aI
----- /
S"a
Rooawyraaeofway r
R'rot?YV WY __
Rip Rep Caaaete Slab Sale 1'20
` Note: Ppes are Cortugaltd M?
Llpahnm
Rp Rap
Longitudinal Cross-Section
Road
U{atrsan R^bI
Wag
I~-

S.
V., 1?
DvMS?teatn
Hab.t t 1+.M
Looking Down Stream
?r
ti.
-Z
-.?7 Iva'

?•_ •111 v, rrt I r1t. So Utl•L
I rrag. r 4: 'Ftornivater Clk..rrrt 0 11 It---t, in it I
Irru -?-r, 3: StorrrLw9f er ?:14veit Chif K tcp
T
E
''- ?r..A
+a
S '
Ail
4r- f
Jo -:"L--" W_
Iriii,? 1?: _,tC,t;?tr7 ?;?rxt i_ rt, 1?4? L;t

s q•=emu

E
4
If
I mige 6 : '_-R ?n.[ll,?,1teI C'1 f rtta Vryd
. f
fl
r 4? a nv
?p I ,rYit S, rtti I filet

.,ti.
°er? ? R _ 1 a? •fit eta 1 1_- ?r y"dn.' ` ?
13r, 6 s ..
° ,7 1 P
.. 1 L
Y Y-
q
Imai-r 10 - C&reit sires m Ir 1)tH-- sm iffi
I -?'1 11 _
Y•L eg e 9 - C I11veft I?T? exrL , qi 111l et
•
?A:-r ?4fL? a ? 'r •?
k7'
a 4
??_? ?#? -`? •` do ? '?+,'? ? •??? ,;_';
1 . k. .Fj_ '?4j? ati3 ' r 4
f.? ? - -'4 {? Y. ? ? • 1. ? w i Y ' °
.- r fib. '. - al" ,fit • c
y v ro
•eC ?? .., it ?y,,t .?y7,s s 9 Y a. y Y a ,+y,,??
eh_•
IrrUir, 11: Reef Sty ,ffr? Lo o Iri-L Eh- ve stewa

?'' , 'Y ?Al ('; sir `?r°'?, ? •
° • t 1L?P ?i t? ,u r i • ,? `:
"AA
"'? _?;r a °• e'y(ta x + '?'tiW '',,? ?
_e •?L?.t?t. ? :'?r•. i r'?Sa?Y P•w M1.?.r ? ?jY? ?L r • •.a
•?.. T~l? I ? 1 a y?? ?a f? yeti gr 1?r' .'r? 'i
Irna-Te I f*)- W ettat•A A m a, L[u kiL 7 YIDIII-eNI A
.-I Le
P ?w?'Ayo
In-La e

STREAM RESTORATION PLAN
Madison Park, The Oaks Phase II
Lee County, North Carolina
Prepared by
Engineering and Environmental Sciences Co.
and
Soil Systems, Inc.
August 19, 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................... 4
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................ 5
2.1 Site Description and Physiography.......... 5
2.2 Site History and Land Use ..................... 5
2.3 Geology ............................................. 5
2.4 Water Resources .................................. 5
2.4.1 Surface Hydrology .............. 5
2.4.2 Ground Water ................... 6
2.4.3 Water Quality ................... 6
2.5 Soils ................................................... 6
2.6 Vegetation .......................................... 7
2.7 Wildlife ................................................ 7
2.8 Protected Species .................................... 7
2.9 Wetlands ............................................... 7
3.0 STREAM RESTORATION PLAN ..................... 8
3.1 Natural Channel Design Calculations............ 8
3.2 Structural Restoration Plan ........................ 10
3.3 Implementation Plan ................................. 11
3.4 Riparian Zone Replanting Plan .................... 12
3.5 Long-term Protection Plan .......................... 13
4.0 MONITORING PLAN ...................................... 13
4.1 Stream Stability ................................... 13
4.2 Vegetative Establishment ......................... 13
4.3 Contingency Plan .................................. 14
5.0 DISPENSATION OF PROPERTY ...................... 14
6.0 PERMITTING ................................................ 14
7.0 SUMMARY ................................................... 14
8.0 REFERENCES ............................................... 14
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 DWQ Notice of Violation April 7, 2003 and USACE
Notification Letter, March 19, 2003
FIGURE 2 Site Location Map - USGS Topo - Colon Quad
FIGURE 3 1966 Aerial Photograph
FIGURE 4 1972 Aerial Photograph
FIGURE 5 1983 Aerial Photograph
FIGURE 6 1999 Aerial Photograph
FIGURE 7 FEMA Flood Insurance Map
FIGURE 8 USDA Soil Survey - Lee County, Sheet 2
FIGURE 9 USFWS Federally Listed Species for Lee County
FIGURE 10 Wetland Data Forms
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 Hydraulic Geometry Relationships between Reference and
Subject Sites
TABLE 2 Design Specifications
TABLE 3 Implementation Schedule
TABLE 4 Planting Species List for Streambank and Riparian Zones
APPENDIX
SHEET 1 General Project Information
SHEET 2 Restoration Plan
SHEET 3 Stream Profile
SHEET 4 Stream and Culvert Details
SHEET 5 Typical Bioengineering and Erosion Control Details
SHEET 6 Planting and Monitoring Plan
SHEET 1 Survey Map by Denver McCullough
2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this document is to provide information relevant to the resolution of a
recent enforcement action by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR),
Division of Water Quality (DWQ), and Division of Land Resources (DLR). The location
of the violation is in Lee County, North Carolina, north of Sanford, approximately 0.2
miles southeast of the intersection of US 1 and US 151501. A compliance inspection to
the subject site on March 4, 2003 revealed an unauthorized stream relocation and the
unauthorized installation of road crossing structures on the subject property. On April
14, 2003, the property owner, Mr. O. A. Keller, and president of The Keller Group, LLC,
received a Notice of Violation dated April 7, 2003 from the DWQ. On March 19, 2003
the USACE sent a notice of violation to Mr. Keller. (See Figure l.) Based on those
letters and discussions with Mr. Danny Smith (DWQ) and Mr. Todd Tugwell (USACE-
Raleigh Regulatory Office) and Mr. Keller, the following information will be presented
in this document:
? A description of existing conditions on the subject site, including wetland
boundaries;
? A stream restoration plan to restore stream functions and stability;
? A planting plan to restore mixed hardwood headwater forest within the
riparian zone;
? A monitoring plan to comply with regulations;
? Success criteria and contingency plan;
? And long-term protection options.
On April 3 and 4, 2003, Mr. Pat Shillington, P.E. of Engineering and Environmental
Sciences Company and Ms. Robin M. Little of Soil Systems Inc. conducted a site
evaluation to delineate jurisdictional wetlands and to identify the original stream channel
location. Telephone correspondence between Mr. Shillington, Ms. Little and DWQ
continued through May and June, while the subject site was surveyed for elevations and
the approximate original stream channel location. A site review was conducted on July
24, 2003 with the DWQ and USACE representatives involved, in order to review the
proposed conceptual stream restoration plan, wetland delineation and the post-
construction notification for the culvert installations on both ends of the subject site.
This document includes a stream restoration plan, planting plan, implementation and
monitoring plan for the subject site, as well as pre- and post-construction notification
under USACE Nationwide Permit 39 or 14, and under the corresponding DWQ Water
Quality Certifications #3402 and 3353. Exhibits B and C show the stream restoration
plan and the planting plan, respectively.
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION AND PHYSIOGRAPHY
The subject property is located to the west of SR 1420, approximately 0.3 miles south of
US 1 Business, south of Exit 70 on US 1. The subject site consists of approximately
4.105 acres (Tract 2) adjacent to approximately 14.60 acres (Tract 1) of a residential
condominium development called Madison Park. The Oaks II of Sanford, LLC, of which
Mr. O. A. Keller is the responsible party, owns the subject site. The stream relocation in
question is located near the boundary between the two tracts, and the culvert installations
are located on the north and south of the subject tract, to provide road crossings over the
subject stream channel for Post Oak Drive and Oak Branch Road. The subject site is
adjacent to and east of Amos Bridges Road, and south of Post Oak Drive. (See Sheet 1.)
The subject site is located in the headwaters of an unnamed tributary to Little Buffalo
Creek. The site is located at the edge of the Triassic Basin within the Piedmont
physiographic province.
2.2 SITE HISTORY AND LAND USE
The site is currently partially cleared of woody vegetation, and was wooded with mature
mixed hardwoods prior to 2001. Aerial photographs from 1966 and 1972 show the site to
be heavily wooded, and apparently clear cut prior to 1983. (See Figures 3, 4, and 5.) In
1999, the site again appears to have revegetated and to be fully wooded with mature
forest. (See Figure 6.) In 1966, the ponds upstream and immediately downstream of the
subject site are evident on the aerial photograph, but Amos Bridges Road is not visible.
In 1983, Amos Bridges Road is visible, as is the construction of the loop interchange at
the intersection of US 1 and US 15/501/87. By 2000, the upstream pond was filled due to
commercial development. In 2001, the subject site was cleared, and the access road to
Madison Park, Post Oak Drive, was built over the subject stream. The culverts were
installed and the stream was relocated to improve alignment between the existing culverts
immediately upstream of the subject site, and the newly installed culverts.
2.3 GEOLOGY
According to the 1985 North Carolina Geologic Survey map, the site is located near the
edge of the Chatham Group of the Triassic Basin, mapped as the Pekin Formation, which
predominantly consists of conglomerate, sandstone and mudstones. On-site investigation
revealed shale and mudstone underlying the site. Depth to bedrock is estimated to be
greater than five feet from the surface.
2.4 WATER RESOURCES
2.4.1 Surface Water Hydrology
The surface water on the site flows to the northeast, originating from a previously ponded
intermittent headwater channel and more recently added ephemeral stormwater inputs
from residential, commercial and highway developments within the immediate
watershed. The stream channel on the site then flows into two large ponds before
entering Little Buffalo Creek to the north of the site. FEMA Floodplain maps show Little
Buffalo Creek to be within the 100-year floodplain, while the subject stream is not. (See
Figure 7.) Adjacent to the site are recently constructed and proposed future construction
area of residential condominiums. (See Sheet 1.)
2.4.2 Ground Water
The ground water table was observed to range from 2 to over 6 feet below the ground
surface, with areas of perched superficial water table observed due to soil compaction.
2.4.3 Water Quality
The subject site is found within the 03030003 Cataloging Unit of the Cape Fear River
basin (USGS 1974). The stream channel on the site flows to Little Buffalo Creek, which
in turn flows north into the Deep River. Little Buffalo Creek is listed as 17-42 by DWQ
and has a best use classification of "C". Class "C" uses are aquatic life propagation and
survival, fishing, wildlife and secondary recreation. Deep River has a WS-IV
classification near Moncure (DWQ ID No. 17-(43.5)) according to the Basinwide
Information and Monitoring System ((BIMS) and a water supply intake upstream of the
outlet of Little Buffalo Creek. "WS" or water supply classifications are assigned to
watersheds based on land use characteristics of the area. There are five WS classes, I
through V. Each water supply classification has a set of management strategies
designated to protect the water supply. There is a large pond and beaver impoundment
downstream of the subject site that should prevent any sedimentation impacts from
construction activities on the site to Deep River.
In 1996, the Water Quality Section of DWQ identified Little Buffalo Creek as not
supporting its uses in the Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan.
However, Little Buffalo Creek was not shown as impaired in the draft Plan published in
2000. In the Basinwide Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Plan for the Cape Fear River
Basin, published in 1997 by the NC Wetland Restoration Program (NCWRP), the DEM
Sub-basin 07 (where the subject site is located) is not shown as a Priority Subbasin in
terms of identified water quality issues that could be resolved by wetland or riparian zone
restoration.
2.5 SOILS
According to the USDA NRCS Soil Survey for Lee County (1989), the subject site is
mapped as containing Mayodan, Creedmoor and Chewacla soil series. (See Figure 8.)
The Mayodan series is described as a well drained soil and Creedmoor series consists of
moderately well drained and somewhat poorly drained soils in Piedmont uplands, both of
which formed from fine textured residuum weathered from Triassic parent material.
Chewacla series consists of somewhat poorly drained soils on floodplains formed in
recent alluvium, with slopes less than 2 percent. Soils investigations on the subject site
confirmed these mapping units, with a small area of hydric soil in a disturbed and
compacted area observed in the northeast corner of the site.
2.6 VEGETATION
The subject site had been effectively cleared and grubbed prior to the site investigation,
with very few woody tree or shrub species remaining. Typically, the site would contain
mixed pine and hardwood forest, with loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), Sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), Yellow Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), Southern Red Oak
(Quercus falcata), White Oak (Quercus alba) and Hickory (Carya tomentosa) dominating
the overstory in the upland landscape positions and areas mapped as Mayodan soil series.
Water Oak (Quercus nigra), Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), American Sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis), Yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), Southern Red Oak
(Quercus falcata), Willow Oak (Quercus phellos), and Eastern Cottonwood (Populus
deltoides) would dominate the overstory in the riparian zone or areas mapped as
Creedmoor and Chewacla. Understory species would also include sourwood
(Oxydendron arboreum), black cherry (Prunus serotina), ironwood (Carpinus
caroliniana), dogwood (Comus florida), or American holly (Illex opaca). Common
shrubs would be horsesugar (Symplocus tinctoria), Virginia Willow (Itea virginica), wax
myrtle (Myrica cerifera) or saplings of canopy trees. Early successional species would
also be common in areas of disturbance, such as blackberry (Rubus spp.), greenbrier
(Smilax rotundifolia), red maple (Acer rubra) and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).
The riparian zone could also support tag alder (Alnus serrulata), river birch (Betula nigra)
and black willow (Salix nigra).
2.7 WILDLIFE
The mixed hardwood forest and riparian forest surrounding the subject site and stream
channel could be expected to support many wildlife species, but only unidentified species
of frog tadpoles (Bufo americanus?) and an eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina) were
observed during site investigations.
2.8 PROTECTED SPECIES
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists several animal and plant species as
endangered in Lee County. The Cape Fear Shiner and the Red-cockaded woodpecker are
listed as federally endangered aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates respectively, and
Harperella is listed as federally endangered plant species. The full listing of all federally
listed species is shown in Figure 9. The subject site had been cleared and grubbed at the
time of the site investigation and no habitat or indicative plant communities were
observed for any listed species.
2.9 WETLANDS
The subject site was evaluated on April 3 and 4, 2003 by a licensed soil scientist and
trained wetland delineator for jurisdictional wetlands per the USACE 1987 Wetland
Delineation Manual and NCDENR DWQ guidelines. A small area of isolated wetlands
was identified to have hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and sufficient hydrology to be
considered jurisdictional. It is located on the north end of the site to the west of the
relocated stream channel berm, and is approximately 760 square feet (or 0.02 acres) in
size. (See Sheet 1 for mapped area location.) The wetland area is located adjacent to a
man-made berm, where surface hydrology collected but had no outlet, and where soils
had been disturbed and compacted. While this small area did meet jurisdictional criteria,
it is likely that it was created by the site disturbance and had formed in the two years
since the initial construction of the unauthorized stream relocation. Herbaceous wetland
vegetation (Juncus spp.) dominated the wetland area vegetation and the hydric soil
indicators were marginal in places. (See Figure 10 for Wetland Data Forms.) It is
currently acting as a sediment trap for the surrounding areas of cleared vegetation, but
does not appear to offer significant wetland functions. Further soil investigations on the
remainder of the site did not reveal any other areas of hydric soils, or subsequently, any
jurisdictional wetland areas. The stream restoration plan will result in a net gain of
wetland area, and a net improvement in wetland functional and values.
3.0 STREAM RESTORATION PLAN
In general, the goal of a stream restoration project is to construct a stream channel with
stable pattern, dimension and profile that will successfully transport and/or deposit
sediment load in the subject stream. Successful establishment of riparian vegetation
plays an integral part in streambank stabilization and wildlife habitat enhancement.
The goal of this stream restoration plan is to reconstruct a stable stream channel in the
original location, and to restore stream functions in terms of water quality benefits and
habitat to the greatest extent possible. However, it is important to note that the large
amount of ephemeral (stormwater) inputs to this stream channel had previously impacted
the original stream channel, and will continue to pose a challenge to successful
restoration. See Sheet 2 for a plan view of restoration stream channel dimensions and
pattern and Sheet 3 and 5 for longitudinal profile and typical cross-sections.
3.1 Natural Channel Design Calculations
The subject site is located in a rapidly urbanizing watershed, with total impervious
surface estimated to currently exceed 20 % over the total land surface. Future
development is also anticipated, both in the immediate vicinity of the site and in the
drainage area to the site. The current literature for bankful hydraulic geometry
relationships for rural and urban Piedmont streams emphasizes the uncertainty of
successful stream restoration in watersheds with high impervious surface and thus, high
stormwater inputs. Hydraulic geometry statistical relationships were applied from the
Stream Restoration, A Natural Channel Design Handbook (Stream Restoration Institute,
NCSU, NCDENR, 2002) to the greatest extent possible. Calculations were also used
from the Stream Mitigation Guidelines Handbook (USACE, DWQ, NRCS, and NCWRC,
May 2003) to estimate surface water flows and width depth ratios for the subject site.
Limited reference reach data was available for the subject site, due to the lack of similar
reference stream settings with small, urbanized drainage areas and significant levels of
disturbance to the stream channel vicinity. Several reference sites with similar drainage
areas were identified in the literature, but they are located in Wake County, which does
not have soils or geology of the Triassic Basin, unlike the subject site. The reference sites
are provided to show a range of design criteria for similar variables to the subject site.
The drainage area for the subject stream channel is measured to be approximately 135
acres (0.21 square miles or 0.5463 square kilometers). While this is a relatively small
drainage area, the calculated surface water flows for a two-year rainfall storm event are
estimated to be 115.7 cubic feet per second. The remaining stream segment was
significantly incised with vertical stream banks and a high entrenchment ratio (ER) which
is calculated to be 12, but may potentially be obscured by site grading). Previous onsite
grading and increased impervious surface and highway construction in the drainage area
may have obscured the topography to the point that the flood prone width and
Entrenchment ratio measurements are exaggerated on the subject site.
The slope of the subject site ground surface is calculated to be approximately 0.7%, based
on the site elevation survey prepared in May 2003. The sinuosity of the remaining stream
channel is currently 1.076, based on a stream length of 1068 feet and a valley length of
993 feet. The remaining stream channel was surveyed from existing, undisturbed
remnants and interpretation of soil boring investigations. Mean bankfull depth (D bkf) is
calculated to be 2.33 feet, as a function of the calculated bankfull Width (W bkf) of 14.6
feet. The remnant stream channel was observed to be only 2 feet deep, with no bankf ill
indicators within the channel. It is therefore suggested that the subject stream was
overtopping its' banks during the two year flood events, and was actively downcutting or
incising due to increased impervious surface in the watershed.
The following table (Table 1) compares hydraulic geometry relationships of various
reference sites used in the cited paper to those of the subject site. The listed reference
sites are classified as "E" type streams, according to Rosgen classification and the papers
from which they are cited. Conversions from Metric to English units have been made
and calculations based on Rosgen methods are included for various ratios and
relationships. These relationships have been used to design the pattern, dimension and
profile of the restored stream channel, to the greatest extent possible.
A disclaimer must be made on the use of the hydraulic geometry relationships. It is
important to understand that the use of these calculations does not guarantee the success
of the proposed stream restoration. Many factors can conspire to prevent success.
Extremely high flow rainfall events, particularly in the early stages of the restoration
project, as well as large increases in impervious surface within the watershed can result in
prolonged channel instability that is not directly related to the proposed design or
calculations. A contingency plan is discussed in Section 4.3, which outlines possible
contingency actions in the event of catastrophic failure. While every effort has been
made in ensure success in this design, it is a natural part of stream equilibrium dynamics
to respond to changes within the immediate watershed and to high stormwater inputs.
TABLE 1. Hydraulic Geometry Relationships between Reference and Subject Sites
DATA Bushy Br Marsh Crk Yates Mill Subject site
DA (sq.mi.) 0.2 0.21
DA (sq.km.) 0.5 0.5 0.53 0.55
A bkf (sq.ft.) 14 39.8 9.7 22 - 34
W/D ratio 7.6 7.1 5.8 6.3-9.7
W bkf (ft.) 9.8 16.4 7.5 14.6
D bkf (ft.) 1.3 2.3 1.3 1.5-2.3
Q bkf (cfs) 105.9 247.2 30 115.7
V bkf (f/s) 7.6 6.2 3.1 5.3
D max (ft.) NA NA 1.7 3.1
D max/Dbkf NA NA 1.3 1.3
W fpa (ft.) NA NA 128 175
ER NA NA 17.1 12
Imp. Sfc. (%) 20 25 15 25
S pool (%) NA NA 0-0.014 0-0.014
S avg (%) 0.65
S pool/S avg NA NA 0 -2 0.02
D pool max NA NA 1.9-3.1 5.06
Dpoolmx/Dbkf NA NA 1.5-2.4 2.18
A pool NA NA 12 -22 73.8
A pool/Abkf NA NA 1.3-2.4 2.17-3.35
W pool NA NA 8-9.5 14.6
W pool/Wbkf NA NA 1.1 - 1.3 1.0
Lpool NA NA 7.4-3.5 7.4-3.5
L pool/Wbkf NA NA 1.0-4.7 1.0-4.7
Pool spacing NA NA 11 -53 11 -53
Pool sp/Wbkf NA NA 1.4-7 1.4-7
9
3.2 Structural Restoration Plan
Based on reference site information and calculations, the stream restoration design is
shown on Sheet 2 in the Appendix. Under direct supervision of the design engineer, the
reconstructed stream channel will be excavated according to design specifications,
reinforced with strategic placement of root wads, rock and timber cross vanes and
vegetation prior to reintroducing stream flow from the man-made ditch. An
Implementation Schedule is detailed in the following section. Streambank and riparian
zone vegetation will be planted within 50 feet from the top of the stream banks. DWQ
has stipulated that 2:1 slopes on the streambank are to be maintained.
The proposed stream alignment will be surveyed and flagged over the existing stream
channel with the appropriate bankfull width, pool width and within the appropriate range
of values for meander wavelength, radius of curvature and belt width. Dimensions may
be adjusted in the field to account for topographic variations, remnant stream channel,
and existing vegetation. The proposed thalweg along the new stream channel will be
flagged, with stations in order to locate the position for each riffle, run, pool and glide
along the thalweg, with pools located on the outside of the meander bends. The
longitudinal profile will then be plotted and flagged according to the design
specifications. Typical cross-sections for riffles, pools, steps and glides as well as grade
control structures, streambank stabilization, and other design features will be used to
guide construction. Detailed design drawings will be developed for each stabilization
structure, showing plan, profile and section views. Material specifications will be
developed prior to construction.
Based on geometric relationships developed by the Stream Restoration Institute at NCSU,
the following specifications have been derived for "C" and "E" type streams in the
Piedmont of North Carolina, as a function of Bankfull width and Bankfull depth.
TABLE 2. Design Specifications
Design Specification Calculated Value (feet)
Meander Belt Width 18.6
Radius of Curvature 29.3
Riffle to Pool Spacing 20.3
Pool to Pool Spacing 45
Maximum Pool Depth 5.1
Maximum Riffle Depth 3.4
Bankfull Mean Depth 2.3
10
3.3 Implementation Plan
The proposed implementation schedule is outlined as follows:
TABLE 3. Implementation Schedule
Dates Action
August 2003 Submit and review plans
August 2003 Order grass, shrubs and trees
September 2003 Begin excavation, install structural devices
October 2003 Complete excavation, establish grass cover
November 2003 Plant trees and shrubs
March 2004 Construct plug/regrade ditch, establish cover
April 2004 Reroute water into restored channel
April 2004 Site review by agencies
August 2005 Monitoring review
August 2006 Monitoring review
August 2007 Final Monitoring review
3.4 Riparian Zone Planting Plan
A planting plan is proposed to re-establish appropriate plant communities within the
riparian zone of the reconstructed stream channel. The Guidelines for Riparian Buffer
Restoration (DENR, DWQ, NCWRP, January 2001) were utilized in developing this
plan. The plan consists of the acquisition of available seedlings, implementation of
proposed soil surface improvements (mowing, plowing, scarifying soil surface) and
planting selected species in designated areas on the subject site.
The requirement by the DWQ that at least two native tree species be planted at a density
sufficient to provide 320 trees per acre at maturity will be met by planting approximately
436 trees per acre on 10' by 10' spacing. The targeted planting area is the riparian zone
located fifty feet from top of the newly constructed stream bank outwards. The
streambank and inner riparian zone (30 feet) will be planted with hydrophytic vegetation,
while the outer zone (20 feet) will be planted with mixed mesic pine and hardwood
species. Planting of tree and shrub seedlings should occur when trees are dormant, in
winter or early spring.
Table 4 identifies the separate planting areas, and the relative location the of seedlings to
be planted, by species. The listed species are identified based on soil types and landscape
position, as well as their potential for successful re-establishment. Typically, tree species
such as sweet gum, red maple and loblolly pine will naturally re-colonize a disturbed site
from rootstock and seed. Mast-producing species are preferred for their wildlife habitat
value and are therefore included in the planting list. Shrubs and herbaceous plants will
also re-colonize naturally over time. Other species may be substituted as necessary.
Table 4. Planting Species List for Streambank and Riparian Zones
Species Streambank Inner Riparian Zone Outer Riparian Zone
American Sycamore x x
Green Ash x x
Tulip Poplar x x
Southern Red Oak x
White Oak x
Water Oak x
River Birch x
Dogwood x
Forsythia x
Willow x
Soil samples will be collected prior to planting to determine the appropriate types and
amounts of fertilizer necessary for successful plant growth. A wetland grass seed mixture
(no fescue) will be used to provide grass cover on exposed soil areas prior to planting tree
seedlings. Thirty pounds of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) and 35 pounds of Winter
Rye (Secale cereale) per acre will be used for vegetative stabilization, along with a one-
time application of 500 pounds of NPK fertilizer and 400 pounds of Lime per acre, to be
applied as necessary.
Bare-root seedlings of selected tree species will be planted in a random planting on an
10-foot by 10-foot grid. Flagging or spray paint may be used to mark tree seedlings by
species, in order to facilitate vegetative monitoring. Tree shelters may be necessary to
minimize predation by herbivores. Invasive plant species will be controlled by use of
appropriate herbicides, if necessary. Sheet 6 indicates the relative planting zones and
stream cross-section and vegetation monitoring transects.
3.5 Long-term Protection Plan
Protection of the subject site from future encroachment by construction and vehicular
traffic will be ensured by placement of signs and a recreational trail adjacent, to but
located outside of, the planted riparian zone.
4.0 MONITORING PLAN
The USACE and the DWQ will measure stream restoration and revegetative success over
a three-year period, beginning in April 2004. Three monitoring reports will be submitted
to the USACE and DWQ in August of each year, in order to allow assessment in the
growing season and replanting within the dormant winter or spring months.
12
4.1 Stream Stability
The success criteria for the restoration of stream geomorphology on the subject site will
be based upon the establishment of stable dimension, pattern and profile of the stream
channel. Permanent cross-sections will be established and surveyed or located with GPS
(one cross-section per 20 bankfull widths, or 1200 /14.6 x 20 = 4 cross-sections.) in order
to document Width to Depth Ratio, Entrenchment Ratio, Bank Height Ratio and Bankfull
Depth at each cross-section. A plan view of the project site will be included to show
sinuosity, Meander width ratio, and Radius of Curvature for the first year of monitoring
only. The longitudinal profile will be included in the monitoring report to show average,
Pool and Riffle slopes, and Pool to Pool Spacing. Pebble counts may be required, with
an expected increase in pebble size in riffles, and decreased size in the pools, and with
sampling based on the percentage of pools and riffles. Photo reference points will be
provided at each cross-section to show stream banks and channel, and at each structural
feature (rock/cross vanes, root wads, etc...).
4.2 Vegetative Establishment
Vegetative monitoring plots will be established within each planting zone (streambank,
inner and outer riparian zones) and success will be measured as survival of at least two
tree species with at least a density of 320 stems per acre. Vegetation monitoring plot
locations may correspond to stream monitoring cross-section locations.
4.3 Contingency Plan
In the event of catastrophic failure of the proposed stream restoration, every effort will be
made to repair and reconstruct the stream channel in order to maintain stability and
minimize erosion and sedimentation impacts. If stability has not been achieved in three
years, redesign may be necessary to obtain success. If stream channel failure occurs due
to extremely high rainfall and stormwater events, a revised plan may be developed to
accommodate stormwater flows appropriately.
5.0 DISPENSATION OF PROPERTY
The property will remain under the ownership of The Keller Group LLC and will be
managed by the future owners with the intent of protecting the stream restoration site
from damage by construction, vehicular traffic or other uses. It will be included in the
development plan of the Madison Park Residential Condominium Development as a
recreational area, with a walking trail and appropriate signage.
6.0 PERMITTING
13
According to the July 24, 2003 field review meeting with DWQ and the USACE,
authorization of the proposed stream restoration and streambank stabilization activities
will be covered by the post-construction notification for the culvert installation on the
subject site. Post-construction notification is included under USACE Nationwide Permit
# 39 and DWQ WQC # 3402 for the after-the fact authorization of the culvert installation
for the road crossing associated with the construction of the private access road to
Madison Park condominiums.
7.0 SUMMARY
It is the intention of Keller Group LLC to comply with the regulatory requirements by the
USACE and DWQ regarding the subject site. This document outlines the proposed
stream restoration, planting and monitoring plans required under state and federal
regulations. In order to comply with regulatory requirements, Mr. Keller has contracted
with Mr. Pat Shillington, P.E. of Engineering and Environmental Sciences Company and
Ms. Robin Little of Soil Systems to implement this plan and monitor success.
8.0 REFERENCES
Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams, Harman, W. A.,
et. al., Stream Restoration Institute, North Carolina State University.
Basinwide Wetlands and Riparian Restoration Plan for the Cape Fear River Basin,
published in 1997 by the NC Wetland Restoration Program (NCWRP)
Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan, October 1996, prepared by
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of
Water Quality.
Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third Approximation,
1990, Schafale, M. P. and Weakly, A. S., North Carolina Heritage Program, North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Parks and
Recreation.
Draft Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Management Plan, February 2000,
prepared by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Water Quality.
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration, January 2001, North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality.
Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for Urban Streams throughout the Piedmont of North
Carolina, Doll, B., et. al, North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute and North Carolina
Sea Grant.
14
Internal Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, Version 3.0, April 2001,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Quality and Division of Land Resources.
Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003, prepared by the United States Army Corps of
Engineers, Wilmington District, Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission and North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality.
Stream Restoration, A Natural Channel Design Handbook, prepared by the North
Carolina Stream Restoration Institute and North Carolina Sea Grant.
15
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200320558 County: Lee
NOTIFICATION OF UNAUTHORIZED ACTIVITY / PERMIT NONCOMPLIANCE
Responsible Authorized
PartyMr. Carter Keller Agent Mr. Patrick Shillington
The Keller Grout). LLC Enetneerina & Environmental Science Co
Address Post Office Box 130 Address 3008 Anderson Drive. Suite 102
Sanford NC 27330 Raleieh NC 27609
Telephone Number 919-776-4641 Telephone Number 919-266-7469
Size and Location of Propertv (witerbodv Hiahway name/number, torn etc.).: The project is
located south of Amos Bridges Road, east of Hawkins Avenue (US 15/501) in Sanford, Lee County,
North Carolina. The site is adjacent to an unnamed tributary of Buffalo Creek, above headwaters, in the
Cape Fear River Basin.
Description of Unauthorized Activity / Permit Noncompliance: Relocation of approximately 1,200
linear feet of stream channel, installation of 90 linear feet of culvert (Oak Branch Drive) and placement of
approximately 30 linear feet of riprap with stream channel.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
X Unauthorized Activity River and Harbor Act, Section 10 (33 USC 403)
Noncompliance with Permit X Clean Water Act, Section 301 (33 USC 1311)
Unless you have a Department of the Army Permit for the above described activity, it is a violation of federal law
as specified above. You have aQrccd to do no further \\ork in %%atcrs or %%ctlands \\ithout the required Department
of the Armv Permit. Anv further unauthorized work in waters or \\ctlands %%ill be considered an intentional
violation of federal law. If you do no further work in waters and \vetlands, and perform the remedial action
requested below, the Corps of Engineers will take no further action in this matter. If you continue to
work in waters and wetlands without the required authorization, and'or fail to perform the requested
remedial action, the Corps will take further administrative action, and may request the U.S. Attomey to
file suit against you. If you need further information about the Corps of Engineers regulator,- program,
please contact Todd Tuewell at telephone number (919) 876 - 8441 extension 16
Remedial Action Requested: All wetlands and remaining portions of original stream channel located on
site shall be identified. A channel restoration plan utilizing natural channel design \\hich sho\\s proposed
activities (including relocation and design of channel, stabilization measures, plantings, etc.) shall be
submitted to this office for approval within 90 day of the date of this notification. The existimz diversion
ditch shall be stabilized with riprap check dams or other measures immediately to prevent further erosion
while channel restoration is under design and construction.
Your signature ackno\yledges receipt of this notification. Return a signed copy of this notification to
the Raleigh Regulatory Field Office in the enclosed pre-addressed envelope.
Property Owner / Responsible Party Signature
Regulaton• Project Manager Signature I
Date March 19, 2003
NYETLAND DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPT OF THIS FORA.
CF: Danny Smith, D\VQ, Wetlands/401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
FIGURE I
e WA IFq
C
>
o -c
Mi&ael F. Easley: Covens
WAtllarn G. Rcss Jr., Secretary
Nonh Carcllna 06Partrraw of End mrAnt and Natural Pewurcws
Alan IN K:Imak, P.E. Dtroctor
Division of Waist Quailry
April 7, 2003
The Keller Group, L.L.C.
301 Oal< Branch Lane
Sanford, NC 27330
ATTN: 0. A. Kellcr, III
- ]3)
t
Dear Mr. Keller:
FAX o,?E -?0 PGS y .
CO. TAXI 7 V I - 7 1'Co
?RCM AVERY Fx.n
Subject: Notice of Violation
Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
The Oaks Apartments-Phase II
Stream Standards
401 Water Quality Certification Conditions
Lee County
On, \Ma: ch 4, 2003,1oc Albisten of the Regional office and Danny Smith of the Ccntral
Office of the Division of Water Quat.ity inspected the tract known as The Oaks Apartments
Phase 11 in Le: County.
During the site visits, the investigators took photographs, meas:trcmcnts, and made
observations of the respective stream impacts along Class C Waters in the Cape Fear River
Bnsin. The inspection revealed that the constriction activities had resulted in approximately 800
linear fcct of stream channel impacts. 700 feet of unnamed trihutary to Littlo Buffalo Crcck had
been diverted in to a ling ditch. This ditch ccrtained a series of rip-rap check dams and flowed
back into the original channel just upstream from an approximate 72 foot culvcrtcd road
crossing.
The original stream ehanael had been relocated and the now diverted by backfill into a
linear ditch. The original stream right of way had been clca: cut and the s:rearnbcd back-filied.
However. a few relic stream segments remained, such that !hc investigators could distinguish a
well defined stream channel, stream barks and strcam channel sinuosity. In addition to the
rclocatcd stream impacts, the investigators noted a road crossing, wherc approximately 72 feet of
sire:ull impacts had occurred from the installation of a road crossing containing three (3)
culverts. Also, inspectors noted sediment was bciag conveyed to waters, short circuiting
sediment controls, and wns depositing sediment into the rclocatcd channel and down stream
helo%v the road crossing.
As a result of the above-mentioned inspections and a DWQ file review the below listed
viointions and NPDES storniwater permit information arc noted: 1) failure to secure a 401 Water
Quality Certification, 2) Removal of best usage and 3) General Stormwater Permit NCG010000.
Rabfh Re,7lonal CMce 162E Vital Sarvtea Contar phone [phone] CO Cwlome• 9er&e
Water Cue6ty SAC606 Raleigh, NC 27e59.162E facs;mile (919) 571.471E 1 •ECO.62347745
1 r 7 ?i ? J
r- t.?. FIGURE 1
c'+J. ;v1-4 ?la"? Hpr. 14 odds 1d: G>=+`1 P4
Oaks . Pace 2 of 4
April 7, 2003
itrm 1 401 V4.ater Otl? Ct tification
A DWQ site visit and file review confirmed that approximately 800 linear feet of stream
had been impacted by fill and grubbing (relocation) and that approximately 72 feet of stream had
been impacted from a road crossing prior to the proper securing of a Nationwide Permit from the
US Army Corps of Engineers. A file review indicates that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COB) has not authorized use of a Nation Wide Permit for these activities or has notification
been provided to the Corps of Engineers for these activities. The review confirmed that no Pre-
constntction Notification had been received by the Division of Water Quality for this project and
no 401 Water Quality Certification has been issued, nor are these activities covered by n Gcncral
401 Water Quality Certification. A 401 Water Quality Certification is required for the above-
mcntioned impacts pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0500.
A DWQ site visit and file review confirmed that approximately 800 linear feet of stream
impacts occurred to an unnamed tributary to Little Buffalo Creel:. Specifically, the impacts
include the relocation of a stream channel, the hack fill of the stream, and an additional
approximate 72 feet of road crossing impacts. There impacts to waters also represent a removal
of best usage, a stream standard violation. Specifically, 15A NCAC 2B .0211 (2) states that the
preclusion of best usage, %%hich include aquatic life propagation, biological integrity, wildlife,
ar.d secondory recrcat:on, and agricultu-e represent a water quality standard violation.
Item ?.:eneral Stormnater Permit NMIM04
Upon the approval of the Sedirner,ta:ion and Erosion Control Plan, issued by the
DMsion of Land Resources on September 28, 2000 and October 29, 2002, an NPDES Gencral
stormwatcr permit (N00010000). administered by DWQ is issued. This General Pc-nit alimv's
stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing activities us stipulated by eor.diticcs in the
permit.
S; ccif:c findinzs during the inspection were as follows:
Part I Section A. states that the Approved Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan is
considered A requirement or condition of this permlL Deviation from the approved plan,
or npproved amendment to the plan, shall constitute n violAtioo of this permit, except as,
rioted iit the permit. Some of the required sediment control devices have not been installed as
per the approved crosier. and sediment control plan.
Part I. Section B.I. requires that nil erosion nod sediment control facilities be inspected by
or under the direction of the permittee at least once every seven calendnr dad's, and wllhin
24 hours after nny storm event of greeter than 0.5 inches of rain per 24 hour period. A
rnin gauge shrill also be mnintalned on the site and a record of the rainfall amounts and
dates shall be kept by the permittee. These records could not. be produced during the
inspection, and the rain gauge was not on the site.
Part 1. Section B.2. requires that once land disturbance has begun onsite, stormwater
discharges shall be inspected by observation for stormwater discharge characteristics nt a

0 ..: ?, y '-? - --- - • - npr. 414 40C.) 10.04-0 P2
April 7, 2003 . page 3 Of 4
frequency prescribed in Section B.I. of the permit. If any visible sedimentation is lenvIng
the disturbed limits of the site, corrective action shrill be immediately tnken to control tltc
discharge of xedintents outside the disturbed limits. These records could not be produced
during the inspection.
Part I Section C.2. requires the permitter to provide the necessary operation and
maintenance to ensure the stormwater controls operate at optimum efficiency. The
temporary sediment and erosion control facilities were not maintained as required in the plan.
Part If. Section II. 2. requires the permittee to take all reasonable steps to minimize or
prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of
adversely nffecting the environment.
Section E.3.nf the General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activities requires the
permittee to notify the Division orally within 24 hours of first knowledge of noncompliance,
and to submit a written report within 3 days of same. This Office was not notified by phone
or by mail of any non-compliance on the site.
Please provide this Office a copy of all weekly inspections and inspections subsequent to
rain event greater than 0.5 inches ar.d rain gauge data. Also, please provide inspection
information that was recorded with respect to measures taken to clean up sediment that has left
the disturbed limits of the site. Failure to provide these decumcnts or lack of decumcntation wil!
constitute additicnal violations.
T} is OtTice requires that violations, as detailed above, he oba;cd immediately. Also
please rote, these violations and any future violations are subject to civil penalty assessment of
up to 525,000.00 per day for each violation,. This Officc requests shat you respond to this l:ttcr,
in -,-'ring, within 20 days of receipt of this Noticc. Your response should address the following
items:
• Please provide a innp that details the number of feet of stream channe! impacts (lerg(h_of
stieealii that was Civertcd aid length of stream impacts associated v: ith the road crossing).
Please explain why you diet not secure authorization (a 401 Water Quality Certification er a
404 Permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers) fcr this activity?
• You should plan to restorc the stream and riparian areas. This will require you to develop a
restoration plan for the streams and riparian Zone (stre; inside areas). It is required that you
contact the Raleigh Regional Office of the Divisier. of Lznd Reseurccs at [phone],
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at [phone]. These contacts arc necessary' to
ensure that your restoration efforts arc in compliance with Land Resources slid Section 404
of the Clean Water Act requirements. Also, you will need to secure an appropriate "aftcr-
the-fact" authorization for the road crossing Fom the US Army Corps of Engineers and .
properly secure a 401 Water Quality Certification. In your response you should explain your
current efforts with respect to these issues.
---? `HK K.J. : x13775164 - Apr. 14 23x3 I2:;35M , ?3
Oaks Page 4 of 4 °
April 7, 2003
A Restoration Plan for the relocated stream and riparian zone impacts should be submi:ted to
both Raleigh Regional Office and to Mr. Danny Smith of the 401/Wetlands Unit - Central
Office (2321 Crabtree Blvd., Parkview Building, Raleigh, NC 27604-2260) for our review.
This plan should include the following:
a.) Stream Restoration Plan: This plan must include your proposal for the physical
restoration of the stream to original dimensions, pattern, and profile. This plan must also
include a final Planting Plan and Physical Stream Monitoring plan. The Restoration plan
should include: 1) a layout of the restored stream in the original pathway, with measures
to he used to provide or create no less than a 2:1 slope on both banks, at original bed
elevation; 2) measures that will be used to recreate a stable stream bank and riparian
zone, including a planting scheme (see below); 3) detailed maps ofthc stream and
wetland restoration locations and a proposal for preventing future impacts to these
resources; and 4) a three year monitoring schedule to ensure the above listed restoration
efforts are succesvftrl.
b.) Riparian cone planting: A planting plat must he developed and implemented in crdcr
to ensure that at leant rw•o native tree species be planted at a density sufficient to provide
320 trees per acre at maturity. This density is usually achieved by planting
approximately 436 trees-act on a 10 x 10 ft. grid or 681 trees.'acre on a 8 x 8 ft, grid.
Please sec the attached Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration (Janua.--• 2001) for
nsvistance in developing your plan. This plan must include the types of native wccdy
vegetation sclcctcd, methodology of plant, and site map indicating the location of the
r:plattting efforts.
-Nve ask you to give your immediate attention to this matter and that yeu address each
item rota in the above-mentioned request. This Ofticc is pl,-mning to scr.d a rccomrr.crdation for
enforcement to the D:rcctor of I -,c Dtvisior of `,ti'atc- Quality regarding thcsc issues and any
future.'contintied violations that may be encountered. Your response to this correspor.dcncc will
be cer.sidered in this process. If you have questions eonccming this matter, or if this of:icc c2-r,
be of assistance, please contact Joe Albister. a: (919) 5 71-47CO or Danny Smith a: (919) 733-
9116.
Sincerely,
Ken Schuster
WQ Regional Supervisor
cc: RRO - Water Quality - Joe Albiston
RRO- Division of Land Resources - Dcbbic Fuquay
US Arn;y Corps of Engineers- Amanda Joncs
Ccntral 401AVetlands Unit - Danny Smith
Central Filc
`-?I ?? ?!'l?.l/?I ' \?, 1` ?`\ 'l(?l?j-?j?\\!Vllr??•})t ,%y, j`///n?
'> 11. (ll ? '?-? ??ys-? ? ( ??..t ,, \ \ j .J\`?1( 11 i ._? 1.?. ?) 1•)t I tµ1??• ? ?---"" !' r/
? `?'l1?\? ,?,?,\ ??.??' ?,`? l/ is?° `? ?,^,? Jl , \t , `._ ? 1 ?/ tF v? r /? (,!l?l_-??v'{, o ?•. ?` / ti; ;?!' i/ " I; ,
C\?1 • - -rte .?; '-,.ter ?,, •, ?? ? f \c ? \? rf ? ??--,?
'?`,`,'•??5...1t ???1 l? ?` .'•?? `?1 ? ? _\ ? \\ , J.. 1 ? ???% ? ? ? ? ..a Jtl ?l-?ti?C-/=\??? ?yya ?' I
\? - C?.. V? % \?7 J^?• .` ?; '??t ?`? ••? i ??? ?` "?1' /?Jl ? 1 ` ?1 I, ? i?lt ? +5 , i Jr / ?__. .--?? ?` `?
;.? -`•C; ?L ?? ? ? A tic;;' , • ?/ ,i-?,? ? ?,
,?,\?\?? V f?`? -??? f 1, )1 • •?• - _?1 • `?aJ 1 {t ` ?` 1 { h f ? f, t \ ,? ? \ 74?' ?` D. V'????•? ,??- Z'...?
101
, ?.? CC i JI r
.? C-?ji? ?,?^,??., j ? ?? p,?//1'?..,??? r ' `r `:J`' ?--J 1 ?' y i .? ??:_?'? ?•-?? t??' `t J-, ?V >(??? C' ? `'?.J ,
C\?; 1--?„ ???, ? c- I ?? ?!, ? ?.j` t ? ? ?':... .-•M,,c?.,?; i ? / r? _,t'; ,? J - tii. \-\_.1,?,? ??J \11\?/
lJ "'
owaa ? )• i' S> ._ yy. 11 ,? ,?nl?, ?r /./?%i?`
11111 ?jl ?• J ?,.. `?`. ll r ? : 1 1 •?+SC.? p ? ??`? J I) ? ,?,? \ ? `?'?J ? ' , i
_?%==t- .mil 1,,; ? .ll_? ? (??`? ,.r ? ? \. 1 :? ?: --''?,?,a'q,J` •?L-,fl ?!, +.f\ ?1 : _
, ?` ?_. i?°`-?:\? ? \\? -?lr.\ \ "-?` ^?/i? ? j _ ?c1' j 1 t ? •a??p iii4i•' _?? ' ?J :l ?l r?M?,L?• ? •-' ,
?C!It ??'`?C?c1y?JT
t.`?j"?sc`?h? / ?• .\? t5f=cL\j-? \I 11 ?- r'`11H V '?:,tx;lt? ',?'-%\\\?
'il 11 ?? \ L/-3 ?+?'y •1 ? (l??'1 •? f?l, ?.?l..T . ? ?` ' ? 1F?/?? ?-? ?v , ,ter f4 ?`Ri •.? : ?+.' i?`mr1' ??,,?>\ ?` ?`: f- 1,
•' t, ??. ? t???yJ` ??-=r?,? ? ? `?-?. ?? ? _?-"? ?r???f-- ^ ?t ?t.` `?` ? ;??J?\°??C?ctl?'??Z\?---"1-; ?\ ?-.V ?,-_?
' ` r•'?-''?? ??h???`.,? Tea-? ;?iit ? ['.Y?/? ?-\ ? :;;'' / . ? ?' -\?. /, J ??? t ? ??` \? ?" i` Cl?,?,.-?:
,fi 4 ,:-
l ???i' ? r_ / ; ; , • (\???,Jrr 1\}!l lN? 1 x r ,!J\:u`\r
? ?? ? ,c-ss?..??Y'3'.?.,,??-v? J y 4/,?c'?f ? 'J?% 1,? '\ `? ? f,,-\=-Z J ?/ r(f ????y ?G-.?\i ?i >`•??
"'?i?=
tp-
?ol
/ti?rl(?"
? \• (_? ? .- ?? ????-? , ?' 1 ?-' c, ,? /-J'?.?J >??r: rte' ?i? ?, ?••' ? ?,r
1`
? u7• ?'-, ,?? '1 ?? 1.
Sir
I -'? ? / •/A J .. ie-^? ? ., t '-' i ,?, '? 1 `l J•? 1. ..._ _. , ' /..??.- .-:?%-ar^?Fl,.;_`?I\l??-':?`, r
FIGURE .2 USGS 1:249000 Topo Quad Map: Colon Quad
S

f' lv
?t
Scale F'= 1,350' (approx.) x
ENGINEERING d ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCE COMPANY
~ 9008 ANDERSON DR., SUITE 102
`RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
J [phone]
1972 SCS Aerial Photograph 71
ao3
The Keller Group Property
Oaks Apartments Phase
Amos Bridoes Road
¢
sanfol-CI, NC 4
?2
J

,;71

Y_:7n

r
;Ir
,t'
k7 r
/l l I?
l?
Scale V = 1,350''
/ .? :
ENGINEERING 3 ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCE COMPANY
3008 ANDERSON DR., SUITE 102
' `RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
j J [phone]
1983 SCS Acrial Photograph 7
s The Keller Group Propert ° m
Oaks Apartments Phase lyI
' Amos Brihes Road 5
' fs Sanford NC
C7S
,....._ . ..?I
?2C

Site
. J
I
N t,
CO
S
Not to Scale
i; .

I
' Ir
I
.-4

els
RM1
ZONE X

E
PRNA T
o p
q9? 4
301
.? 307
303
`A =05
306
- Y
COURSE LANE 07
-.u
JL15
ENGINEERING d ENVIRONMENTAL
2 ^ SCIENCE COMPANY
3008 ANDERSON DR., SUITE 102
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROUNA 27609
[phone]
Lee County Flood Insurance Map
The Keller Group Property V.1643
Oaks Apartments Phase II „KIND
Amos Bridges Road
Sanford. NC 7

0.9 uuql 151E530
• ?3 IanaZ
' 01 .ca)uM 421H Xlleuoseas
rvl?
Elaen?ac?? y?
loowpaalz)
gib W
vapo N ajw `83InI
awuk! IloS 1o9 SS IIoS /
=fi?„- `ma`y ,?'•. .i- Bi+H-A[j $iW
4 V,
Updated: 02/24/2003
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
LEE COUNTY
Critical Habitat Designation:
Cape Fear shiner, Notropis mekistocholas - Approximately 0.5 river mile of Bear Creek, from Chatham
County Road 2156 Bridge downstream to the Rocky River, then downstream in the Rocky River
(approximately 4.2 river miles) to the Deep River, then downstream in the Deep River (approximately
2.6 river miles) to a point 0.3 river mile below the Moncure, North Carolina, U.S. Geological Survey
Gaging Station. Constituent elements include clean streams with gravel, cobble, and boulder substrates
with pools, riffles, shallow runs and slackwater areas with large rock outcrops and side channels and
pools with water of good quality with relatively low silt loads.
Common Name
Vertebrates
"Carolina" redhorse
Robust redhorse
Cape Fear shiner
Red-cockaded woodpecker
Vascular Plants
Bog spicebush
Buttercup phacelia
Georgia indigo-bush
I-larperella
Sandhills bog lily
KEY:
on,
r c
Scientific Name Status
Moxostoma sp. FSC
Moxostoma robustum FSC
Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
Picoides borealis Endangered
Lindera subcoriacea FSC
Phacelia covillei FSC
Amorpha georgiana var. georgiana FSC
Ptilimnium nudosum Endangered
Lilium iridollae FSC
FIGURE 9 7/17103 2:52 F
? },,`t-?`. +"•el.ysr •;.a• <r?. -' "_•?'C?.' * ?5.1`Ik::?}?''?.{` .;i'.o7? ?t`...f,_..,+`.?.,i? ?
0
Status Definition
Endangered - A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
Threatened - A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all
or a significant portion of its range."
Proposed - A taxon proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened.
C1 - A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient
information to support listing.
FSC - A Federal species of concern--a species that may or may not be listed in the future
(formerly C2 candidate species or species under consideration for listing for which
there is insufficient information to support listing).
T(S/A) - Threatened due to similarity of appearance (e.g., American alligator )--a species that
is threatened due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for
its protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and are
not subject to Section 7 consultation.
EXP - A taxon that is listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential).
Experimental, nonessential endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as
threatened on public land, for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for
listing on private land.
Species with 1 , 2, 3, or 4 asterisks behind them indicate historic, obscure, or incidental records.
*Historic record - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
**Obscure record - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant record - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
* «" Historic record - obscure and incidental record.
For additional information regarding this Web page, contact Mark Cantrell, in Asheville, NC, at
mark _a [e-mail]
Visit the North Carolina ES Homenaee
Visit the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Home Page
Keywords= (same keywords listed above - used for search tools)

2 oft 7/17103 2:52 P.
•, ,: ,., ,. ',?' ?? f?.s-' m 1?:iry ?' ? .i?, tom- .. ?.•t'????f+i
. FIGURE 10

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: _ EGI-LER P&0fg jLTy - IMAb ISo N Pk Date: Agri 1312603
Applicant/Owner: K(A ( 11.C.. County:
Irnestigator: EC-
State: N C.,
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Transact ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Ye No Plot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
^ stratum k1gIrmor DpminwtPtant Spades Stratum hEkator
1. L= fir US Ll 9

2. .
10
33
11
4.
5.
a. _
7. iZ
13
14 _
Is
16
Percent o(Donnnanl Spaces Vial are OBL, FACW or FAC ?
(eadud FACA O Y _
RemsAx
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Descnbe in Remarks): Wetland Ridrokogy Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or ride Gauge Primary I dcau n:
_ Aerial Plntograpts V ixaslatad
_ Other _ Sabrated In Upper 12 Inches
tkb Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sedinerd 0eg03 is
Field Observations: _ Drainage Patterns In W stands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. (In.) 'It-1 O?ddlzed Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Freo Water in PA: (In.) Local Sol Survey Data
FAG-bbutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (E)qlain In Remarks)
Remarks:
Appendbt B Stank and Example Data Forms
FIGURE 10
tl?,?'? ;.S-, • . x`s? ?-,.^k'? ?'N'-.?4aG'o!f "? f ?i. A '?:kti ?. ??.L.:.:? .. ? a ? ..yl ?r t?:.hf t?'??: ??
I AA {
JVIVJ V V 1
Map Una Nam. n 1?,& ?u6 or 5 P
(Ssnes and Phase): l• - Drainage Clan:

Taxnomy (Subgroup): Aqy it- 14jv Field ObserYations
I k d u I-V Confirm Mapped Type? NO
profile Dexrlotion:
Depth Matrix Color
nsel Motstl
(M
t
l H
Mottle Cobra Mottle Abundance/ Texdre, Concretions.
(Munsal Molsll «Cantrast strutlure. etc.
u
Ow
or
7nn
C -_ 4` 15 0- 5VE 5B 6J-4- l o a m
-Y Q 5 3 /cD'f, 09 5A 51 1+ 0 m
.5 a Y 5"91 ?? ORc': 5?'rr Srt?
?0-14 Q.Sjc; 17- OQC 15%
"ric Sol Indicators:
_ Hstosol
HsW Epipedon _ Concrretlona
_ Hgh Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soda
_ Suffxlic Odor
Apulc Moisture Regim _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Sods
_ Listed on Local Hydnc_Soda last
-
_ Reducing Conditions
_ Gleyed or LowChrorm Cobra _ Listed on wbonal Hldric Sods List
_ Other (EW in In Ranarln)
Remarks: .?
3
'
F,3 _..l clews ho} rro ?.? (fl'
C rr -? 0./
tat wam nG•TeOlllklAT1/1/J
Ffrdrophylic Vegetation Presort? No (Circle) (Cimse)
Wetland Hrdmbgy Present?
ljdrfe Sots Present? Yea Is this Sampfing Pont W din a W dstland? Yes
Remarks: /? ?-
Poor V dra(h9? SOr I, 1 St I- UJ"h2d w1 Qa-
3OQS VI v f vyw- F 3 -1
Sow l? p-}- ?,-? 1 o w 221 n
. - ?.. I.J/11 do src IAGI
B3
z;. .';? l.n r*rt'?,.i. ti'x?Fka,?, y.. ,?,c? fr "vr"7x`%?r ..•t, C-?,tr.
' "T" T
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
F e: K ?' ?? IM D I S O N Date: 4 3 ??0 3
wner. County: ?r: ?? ('r a State:
l Circumstances exist on the site? yes, Community ID:
significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Transect ID:
a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
ed, explain on reverse.
VEGETATION
Sralum
U.fl
- lkSLl.? ?-
2.
4.
S.
e. -
Dominant CI•M Cww?Sef - Stratum Indicat9f
9.
10.--
11
12-
1 3.
14 -
16. --
Percent of Domnanl SPews e+al are OBL, FACw or FAC
fecttene FACA _
Remits:
HYDROLOGY.
Recorded Data (DascrDe in Remarks): Welland Hyd $My lndic?:
_
Lake, or ride Gauge
Stream Primary lndcators.
.
_
Aerial photographs
- ]?L bur "I
?
Saturated In Upper 12 Inches
Other
W Recorded Data Available - Water Marks
Drift Lines
_ Sed'ment Deposis
_ Drainage Patterns In Wetlands
Field Observations: ecendary Ind'catnrs (2 or more required):
?
(In•) Oxidtzed Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Depth of Surface Water. _ _ W alarStained Leaves

Depth to Fred Walor In P0.:
(In') Local Sol Survey Data
FAC-Abtlral Test
o - (In)
Other (E)Vlaln In Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soo:
Remarks:
vsw=?
Appendlx B Blank and Example Data Focros
r
Y •
?}}? r
a.l --7
?7VIW
Map the Name 1 -
(Series and Phase): Ok (?- ` ' U? p!? Fran g Ob3oriationse
Tamnomy (Subgroup): VLn Od Confrm Mapped Type? No
Pmfbl Desaiotlorr
Depth matrix color mottle Cobra Monte /lbundancal Texture, Conaetbns
finches Hart= (Mun.al Moist) (Munsal Motett $Im/Cantest Structure- etc.
O-4 7x5 5?- 1FS'1K SzL-
?_ ??(25 3• Y ?
q-IZ K?Y? I rn_. ?6rcL
a.sY s 14
hWnc Sod Indicators: concretions
Fiat F ipodon _ Hgh Organic Content In Surface Lryer in Sandy Sails
_ Sutfidic Odor _ Organic StreakkV in Sandy Sods
_ Npulc Moisture Regime - Listed on Local 1•1ydrlc Sails List
_ Reducng Cand4lons _ Listed an Pmonal "Anc Sots LEO
_ Gleyed or LowCtuy- Colors _Other (Expwn in Renrrb)
Remarks: ?QS ^+ ` 1 • ?ytQ? F -
1.1 aun n cTCOIIUJATWAKI
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? l No (Circb) (Circb)
Welland Hydrology Prise wit?
Hydric Sob Present? Yes b this Sampfng Pohl W thin a W elland? Yea
Remar>ls:
Ci? VO ncdQ d - re G?
-- A . IYI1 ICArr uui

B3
- .,... -I ? , crl?:ii?• x'7 !.;v _ - s »Da,Ay??i ?011_?'N R.. '„i ; '.. r, , t'v _ i •.?'. J
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: KLt k- C Date: 14 3 2-C6
Applicant/Owner: County.
Investigator: State: L
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID:
If needed, explain on reverse.) I
VCP=TeTlnu
lbmnant Ptarof S222 Stratum SQL Dominant Plant Soacia Stratum _ t+dKator
, 9. -
_
2 10
3.
11.
a. 12.
5.
6 17.
14
7.

6. '15
_
16.

Percery of Domnanl Spaces Inat are OBL, FACW or FAC O O
(amck4rdg FAG). -
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wedand Rydmbgy kdcators:
_ SUsam, Lake. or redo Gauge --Primary Incicators:
_ Aatie! Photographs Inundated
_ Other _ Saturated In Lbper 12 fiches
_ W Recorded Date Avaiebie Water Mark
_ Drft Linea
_ Sedrnerd DaposIs
Field Observations: _ Dranege Pvawm In Wetlands
Secondary tndicalom (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water. 2 (in.) Oxidtzed Rect Charnels in Loper 12 inches
Ni Water-Staked Leaves
Depth to Free Water in PA: (in.) _ Local Sol Swey Data
_ FAC-NoutniTest
Depth to Saturated Sol: _(_(n.) _ Other (E)#irt in Remarks)
Remarks:

(.1 _ 1
Mao that ?b u CJ??.t. tl Drainage Ctaa:
(Series and Phase): Field Observations
Taxonomy (SubgroupVM C111. Confirm Mapped Type? tb
profile Descriotlom
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colas Mottle Abundance/ Teldurs, Concretions,
(jpchasL Horimn (Munawa Moistl_ (Munsel Moist) Slml'antrast Structures etc
p b I M a" 0 5_ 10%cY S L.
tydnc Sod Indicators:
_ "allow _ Concretion
HeUe Epipedon _ Hgh OrgarNc Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Salo
_ Sulfdc Odor _ Organic Streaking In Sandy Solt
_ Aquic Molature Regime _ Listed on Local Nydric Sob List
Reducing Condition _ Listed on Nataxlal t•ydnc Sob List
_ Gleyed or LowCwomw Colors _ Other (Fipteh in Ranertcs)
Remarks:.
5 nw? rm-z* 12 3
e?e??rrnaalal ATIA\I
Oj
•\GI G/V?? vAnl?
FIdrophytic Vegetation Pros*rtT No (Circle) (Circle)
Wed" Hydrology Prosenl4 n
Fyeric Solt Present? Y. W • Is this Sampfr+g Point W ihn a Wetland? Yes
Remarks:
A......e.11... L.Y111CAr r "7
Appwi& B• Blanc and Example Data Forms

AN

B3

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)

ProjecUSite: Date: ci / 3 / 2 003
AppricanUOwner, L-Y County: l-?E
Investigator: State, r -
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Community ID:
Is the site signiftcardly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? te o Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Plot ID: 1,11
If needed, explain on reverse.
•2ncT AT1A?1
W -j
Dorrywnt t Indkator Donftanl Plamt Specie! Stratum Indicator
1.17 L1 9. -
2. 10
3. 11 _
4. 12 _

s.
.
13
e. 14.

Percent of Domnant S0000s that are 08L, FACW or FAC 1(?
(exckoding FAC-1. ----"' -?--- -------

Remanu:
n 1 airw a.vv ? -
_ Recorded Data (0exnbe in Remarks): Wedand Hydrology Indicators:
- Stream. Lake, or ride Gauge
t+dcators:
Wrimary
- Aerial Photographs ?L Inundated
Saturated In Upper 12 Inches
Other
No Recorded Data Available _ Wider Muks
DrA Lnea
_ Sediment Deposls
Field Observatioro: _ Draroge Patterns in Wetlands
secondary kxfcators (2 or more requied):
Depth of Surface Water- 2 (in.) O&Itzed Rod Channels In Upper 12 Inches
_ WalerStahed Leaves
Depth to Froo Water in PA: (In.) _ Local Soi Survey Data
FAC-Noedral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: C_(in.) - Other (Explain In Remarks)
Remarks:
B2
Appendix B Blank and Example Data Forms
,ww

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): ?? Drainage Class:
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): -Aci Lt _.Ic- T-y o I7 /? Confrm Mapped Type? No
Profile Deseriotlon:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture. Concretions,
(jnchesL Forlorn (Munse! Moistl (Munsel Molstl ShWContrast ?D rf,na. etc.
Su 75%f
2-4 lob 5 9 5 4 7_ A 6 7tr- 5T
0 4 r 10 DYtr-
_4-B w RLyI L C{? c_ J.r3 I
-1 ?oY e Szc L
f"nc SOt Indicators:
WOW _ Concretions
Histic Epipedon _ Hgh Organic Content In Surface Layer in Sandy Soda
_ Sutfxdic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soft
_ Apulc Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Sob List
` Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Sob List
y Gleyed or LowChroms Cobh _ Other (Fjvlain in Remarks)
Ramer:
VUL-ri nun nCT=V UINATlnN
W-?
(Circle) (Cide)
F4yCro0yx Vegetation Present? &No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Fydric Soib Present? b thisSampfng PoiI W thin a W dW*d7 Yes No
I Remarks:
rnaj? Q-x Q a to-y?Nrd be'y- m

Appendix 8 Blank and Example Data Forms ' % 133
f' t,?M*r bif. y K
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
wner: `^/ County: ?E
FWrmal : i ?-? Date: L413103
r: State: C-
_
Circumstances exist on the site? Yes W Community ID:
significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes ND Transect ID:
a potential Problem Area? Yes W Plot ID: ed, a lain on reverse.
YCVGIMIIV I?
DommaM Pant , Imirror pon4nant Plant Specie Stratum Micalor
1 9.
2 10
3. 11
a. 12.
5. 13.
6. 11
T. 15
6. 16 -
Percent of Dominant Speoes that are 08L. FACW or FAC
???
--
- - - -----
(alctue FAC•1. -

Rtlrrurts:
MTUKVLVVT•
Recorded Data (Descrbs in Remarks): Weiland Hydrology Indicators:
_
- SUeam, Lake. or ride Gauge Primary Indicators:
Inundated
Aerial Photographs
_ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Other
W Recorded Data Available Water klarks
_ DrR Linea
_ Sediment DeposLs
Field Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in W chards
Secondary Indicators (2 or more requiod):
Z (h
) Oxkdtzed Rod Charnels in Upper 12 inches
Depth o (Surface Water. . _ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in PC ('n.) _ Local Sol Sway Data
FAC-Nn" Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (In.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
B2
t
Append'oc B Blank and Example Data Forms

SAILS 0, _;-

Map Unit Name
(Serles and Phase):
l/V ??r??! /(?(/1 t a c?? Drainage Class:

Taxonomy (Subgroup): G /u / n L Field Confirm Observations
A0 u- I- ( Gt-l??/" T Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Qmfile Descrlotlom
Depth
Gnchesl Hortmn
Matrix Color Mottle Colors Willie Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(Munsel Moist) (Munsel Moisil 51mlContrast Structure. etc.
Q-3 _ 1?
1 5'( e'514 Llp SS L
-
7 140 1 A
-u ?,l( lQ l'Y2 1? ?o t t Ssc
\-I4} _-g ?AYTxdZ.
41
0-18 Wig? wYSUI \
a•S?? q vc2 ?•6YQ5 ?(?o%tr
Hydnc Sol Indicators:
_ Fletosol
_ Wic Epipedon _ Concretions
_ Hgh Organic Content In Surface Layer In Sandy Sob
Sutfxdic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Sob
Apuic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
\- Reducing Conditions Listed on National t'ydrlc Sods List
_ Glayed or LowChroma Colors ^ Other (Fiplain In Remarks)
RemaAS:
F?11 m?- suI-?ac?.,hyd??c
wFTi aNn nFTFRIuiNATION
Hydrophytic Vogotalion Present? Y No (Ctrclo) (Circlo)
Wodard Hydrology Present7 w
Hydric Sob Present? s No is this Samp&V Point Whin a WWard? Y)No
1 Remarks:

Append x B Blank and Example Data Forms
?t
«t ; x
--5
B3
Planting Schedule;
A. Grass Revegation in Riparian Zone NETTING DETAILS
1. Spread topsoil over disturbed areas and leave surface reasonably smooth and uniform. 1P_.1Rh d. 1fTV.P~ ° d'
2. Scarify surface to prepare a seedbed four to six inches deep. Use such equipment as
tilling, discing, tracing, or the teeth on a front-end loader. ogon=knd
3. Mix lime and fertilizer with the soil during seedbed preparation. rs , EXIST. SSMH
4. Seed on freshly prepared seedbed.
5. Mulch all seeded areas immediately. EPIC EIP
6. Inspect seeded areas and make repairs within the planting season. If vegetation is over 60°/, CONTROL ~ CORNER
damaged, repeat steps 2 through 5. EXIST.
SSMH 2
7. Seeding Schedule N28'02'36'w63.16' ~ye?r' ~ W h
(TIE LINE)
Switch Grass 30 lbs/acre L 3 R 89°02'18" E193.13' EIP S 88°45'34' E 500.67" EXIST.
Rye (Grain) 35lbs/acre = `mod ~r_ Ala sas°o2'1a'Eiss.13! SSMH
10.10-10 Fertilizer 500 lbslacre wed - 'EIP - - _
Lime 400lbs/acre Loma ps4=hvmgmdrnx1ppue EPN 320 Mulch 40001bs/acre NETTING INSTALATION SPECIFICATIONS CONTRO / EXIST. SSMH
u CORNER'.,
1. Start the laying of net from the top of the upstream and of the channel and unroll it downgrade. , j /
Note 1: Fertilizer and lime application rates may deviate from above if soils are analyzed for Do NOT stretch the netting. i~G r ~~i rt ESMT W~W0
0 tlnlUm rates. 2. Bury the upslope and and staple the net every 12" across the top end, every 3 feet around the edges I ar g p and across the net w that the straw is held closely against the sod. Do NOT stretch the netting when stapling. 315/ B. Grass Revegation outside of Piparian Zone p/
3 -R-- ~ S24*15'4T'W i 100' j / POST OAK DRIVE (30' R/W _ PRIVATE} n~ 208.62'
EIP L Prepair seed bed as disseussed in (A) above 8. Netting strips should be joined together along the sides with a S' ovedap and stapled together.
2. Seeding Schedule
Apply: Agricultural limestone - 2 tons/acre 4 with the previoueN '"aid uPP ppernoll. Turn underp8"" of the 18" ov da p s anwith d stapPle eve ry s 12" across the end18^ 310 P Fertilizer -10.10.10 analysis ® 900 lbslacre Al 310 C~
r r ,7a 305
superphosphate - 500 lbs/acre of 20% analysis / , ? za•w
mulch - 2 tons 80 bales) Straw/acre soo• .w --t1~ ~ ~ I
/ t _
SEEDING SCHEDULE wos~` RECREATION `Scale. 1n-60'
AREA
Date Type Rate`' /SILsa N
Aug 15 - Nov I Tall Fescue 120 lbs/AC Riparian Planting Detail with Netting
Nove I - Mar I Tall Fesue 120 lbs/ACj
&Abruzzi Rye 251bs/AC 146
Mar 1- Apr 15 Tall Fescue 120 lbs/AC - - BLDG TWO
Apr 15 -Jun 30 Hulled Bermudegaee 12 IbsIAC EXIST. BEDROOM J
June 15 - Aug 15 Tall Fescue and 60 lbs/AC - - SSMH ESI .u UNITS --POOL-- MAINT S 4°4701 E 1"FL=315.2
i " Brown Top Millet 351bslAC I 3.FW ,.r' r Exus1 BLDG 281FL=324.5 L
+ Sorghum - Sudan Hybrids 30 lbs/AC s SSMH i r * ~ i 23- -
" 1.70' f~ oP 1 x - -C - - POOL
SLOPES (3 TO I AND 2 TO l v~ g '~NmW r r cb V/ ~V L- - -
'x ~ BLDG #11 / TWO
Mar 1-Jun 1 Serioea lespede2a (scarified) SO 1bs AC BLDG 2
and 140 EON SpM',.L^I P`FL 3R M
Mar I -Apr 15 Add tall fescue 60 lbs/AC / 2" FL=323.3 rFL=318.1
Mar 1- Jun 30 or add weeping lovegrass 5 lbs/AC 2'FL 327 4 ~ .
Mar 1- Jun 30 or add hulled bermudagrass 6 lbs/AC II _E_
Jun 1- Sep I 'tall fescue 60 lbs/AC brown top millet
35 lbs/AC J y Tr 141
• sorghum - Sudan hybrids 30 lbs/AC m BLDG 10 LEGEND
Sep I -Mar 1 Sericea lespedeza L7 BLDG #3 TWO FUTURE IIF 'BEDROOM'. lr", -1 TWO
r (unhulled - unscarified) 70lbs/AC 0 a r; CONSTRUCTION,, UNITS" BEDROOM
and tall fescue 50 lbs/AC - PTFL=316.1 t UNITS 2"FL=325.4 2'FL--322.
Nov 1- Mar 1 add abruzzi rye 25 lbs/AC
Riparian Zone
Consult conservation engineer or (MRCS) soil conservation service for additional Q~ I ~y
information concerning other alteratiives for vegetation of denuded areas. hry VY
The above rate combinations are those which do well under local conditions;
other seeding rate combinations are possible. ~o4~' FUTURE FUTURE TRUCTIONS- CON TRUCTION'rr L232 r1 BLDG _ TWO
I a - BLDG #9 CONS rrII TWO
" Temporary -reseed according to optimum season for desired permanent RECREATION ik 4J r- BEDROOM P .CREATION _ -L UNITS 1
vegetation. Do not allow, temprary cover to grow over 12" in height before AREA Zone 1 rl AREA ~~---1 ? ~ ~ - I ~ ~ ~ . } PFL-023.5 ~
mowing otherwise fescue may be shaded out ~zp'y~ 93 2"FL=~332.8
C. Tree Planting o~I ',A J j ~Ae er ~Ir / ~ - QUALItYSECI°)N
1. Plant sapling trees per the suppliers recommendations. Q BLDG #8 J
2. Tree shelters may be necessary to minimize preciatation by herbivores. FUTURE "UTURE FUTURE d - FUTURE TWO L
3. The trees shall be planted on 10-ft centers with each row of trees staggered with ° CONSTRUCTION I CONSTRUCTION STRUCTION - ! BEDROOM I~ ONE z CONSTRUCTION ; I UNITS C Zone 2
i the next row of trees. i SSMH F - - 0 i~ PFL=320.5„ BUNK SpM_
4. Tree planting schedule. ^ i ~C (.5 2NFL=329.6- J i^ri~1
Riparian Zone: '
Green Ash, River Birch, (Dogwood, Forsythia, Willow) live staking 1__TT 7
SOO°31'OB'E DG #8~
Zonal:
American Sycamore, Green Ash, Tulip Poplar, Water Oak ti OVE BEDROOM WALNUT C - - TWO - UNITS
ti
~L, 2"FL=336.8
Zone 2: 1 ~ _LLL_ I - r PfL=327.3 ~_:1 1. ~ I ,III ~ ~ I ~
American Sycamore, Tulip Poplar, Southern Red Oak White Oak I F -L
Note 1: At least two to three species of trees will be used for each zone. The actual species
FUTURE of trees used will depend on availability at time of ordering. EIP , s W01'2e" E; CONSTRUCrIOfJ cc FUTURE ~ FUTURE ~ I CONSTRUCTIONS FUTURE ~ > BLDG #7
228.94' i LL u TIO CONSTRUCTION FUTURE < L EIP ' CONSTRUCTION ; TWO CONSTRUCTION BUM SOM
PFL=333.0 L) 2"FL=342.3 $
~e s~ -
EIP 1 II~~J, II a m
Tree Planting Spacing for Zone 1 & 2 EIP
~J
I
Ah A
9' 10 Coe
10
h ~10
ee L°L gg ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL DATE:
2 C SCIENCE COMPANY 8/14/03
101 ! it J 3008 Anderson Drive DRAWN. Raleigh, NC 27609 [phone] BRS
10' /
Planting & Monitoring Plan REVISED:
1F"~~~u~Z Madison ark
pZ~l~-
1 q4 Amos Bridges Road SCALE:
Sanford NC See Drawing
15472 '
o=, The Keller Group Sheet No.
P. O. Box 130 6
Sanford, NC 27331 of:

` \
~S LEGEND o~ '~v
~ ~0~ ~ DENO"TES IRON PIPE
~ IP IRON PIPE \ 36..
0 \
~~t' ~ DENOTES "PK" NAIL (CONTROL.) IP SI ~E \ \ \.Y
SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ~ W~I11 ~r.~.,,...._
PC 9 SL 42- D -
J' ~ TAL PIPE 24" CMP ~ ~ CMP CORRUGATED ME ~a ~ INV=311.08 ~ \ \.,FOG,
INV INVERT (PIPE) 18" CMP ~ \ qSp ~F 1~ ~ gSpyF
~ 1NV=310.71 ~ ~ ~ \ ~FIj r ~,ICT
S 18" CMP A. x2 INV=310.60-'"~ \ CQ~,\
~ S S ~ ~ OF'
1 ~ A \ qSp\ ~ A I 373 N,q ~
VICINITY MAP ti ~ ~r T
N.T.S. , v'~ 3~• 1 ~ \ SSMH
~ ~
Ala NO iES:
1) BENCHMARK -RAILROAD SPIKE. IN MAPLE TREE NEAR ~ w \ ~
= 335.61 a N APARTMENT X185. ELEVATION ~
2 WETLANDS SHOWN PER US ARMY CORPS ~ ~ ~ \
) ~ ~ N \ CONTACT: PAT 5HILLINGTON (919}781-•7798 f as ~ ~ \ \
\
\ ~
36" CMP ~ 371 7.50' - 7.50' - ~ '
INV=308.54 r ~,p N~ \
36" CMP ~ INV=308.65 ~ ' ~ ~ 26 \
LINE TAQLE 36" CMP 2 y3, ~
LINE LENGTH BEARING INV~308.62---------r... ~ ~ / ~ ,y i~ SSMH
L1 17.70' N32'58'50"E 36" CMP 3 _ _ ~,J` ~ J-.- tip/ . t2 50.18' N66'41'27 E INV=308.70 x..._____09 ~ ~ ~
1.3 20,33' N65'49'17"E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
7T 3 L4 17.02' N8 23 _
5 56.05' S52'16'30"W \ ` ~ _ " "30 ~ ~ ~ L ~ , - ' 9 ~ ~ \ ~ ~
L6 37.68' N81'51'07°W , ~ ,
~ • ~
~ ~ ti~
~ , ~ ~ OLD DITCH ` ~ ~ SSME{
~
' THAT THIS COPY OF THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~
1HIS CERTIFIES ~ , ~ BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER \ ~ S~~, _
NED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS ~ ~6 ~ ACT AS DETERMI OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS 36'w`~. \3~ ~ - ~ ~ \
THERE IS A CHANGE IN 7HE LAW N 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR \ ~ \ X33 ~ TERMINATION OF SECTtO ~ ~ DE \ \ ~ ~
A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. TFIIS \~V ~8S' ~ ~ \ ~
DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS ~ WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL. ~ \ \
~ , ~ RI( NAIL s'.
\ ~ y ~ .307_ NAME _ \ - - - 4.105 ACRES S.~MII _.307 _ _ 9 '"5`~:~~ , ~C~77
~ AV - - y ~ ~ ~ P~_ , <'ao ~~~,1
TITLE _ ~r-- ~ \ I IP V ~ ~L. ~ ~
DATE - ~ ~
~ L ~ ` T
AID # _ - ~ ~ ~ AV ~ A N~ ` ` ~ 4
NEW DI~C1~1._ A\ • 0~ `6 3 ~ ` ~ . ~ ~ A 8 F
~y ~ x.33, ~ " ~ ~ _ V
\V~ SL;~. ~ ~ L ~V ll~
\ ~
~ ~ ~
~9 ~ \ s~, ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~.~oe,
jr
DENVER LEE McCULLOUGH, PLS L-4182 ~;~,fi' ti• ~~d ~ ~o ~ e~
~ c,, ~ ~ ~ ~ A
l ~N IP ~ Cv
» ~~1~`S. .Aw ~ ~ A~
1 14.60 ACRES - ~ ~ ~ ~ -v ~ ~
~6` ~ v ~
t"'w i11G~,~5,4 ~ ~ A C~' ~ ~ o ~ ~ \ ,~p0 ~ ~ b, ~n
~~~M1CA~M,.1 ~"n~, i \ ~
S2~ ~ ~
~ ~ 3 „ \ ~9> ~ w
~ •5 ~ \ s \
~ V ~
~ 4'Ev ~u ~SM1~1
~ ~ ~ `~0 A\ \
\ ~ \ k
s \ \
\ - ~ - -_.1 ,i iW~~2
~A IP ~ iP
-Wr:TLAN(JS AREA
V ~U \ W--1 -
WE3-4~ ~ ~A WQ-3
\ ~ 5
\
u' ~ ~ WH..1
5oz s w
1h'B 1 ~
~ s \ u
~`V ~~303~-- -RIP-RAf'
~ ~ ~ c~ AREA
3~,, ~ ~ ~ CONCRETE
~ NEADWAI_L
.r \ ~ ~ ~,56" CMP
~ INV=:501.69
~ " iNV- 301.,~~
-..r-~---.- 40' CME
INV=301.33 t ~~`.r__ P 4C CM
INV-=301.28
RIP_ RAP- ~ \ AREA `CONCRETE
(OF:WALI
GRAPHIC SCALE
~0 0 20 ~o so Aso A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 1!
AND WETLANDS L0CA710N FOH
e niTrw pci nreTin~i er p i c a~s~~
( IN FEET ) VI I VI I I\4LV VI\ IIVI\ /1l I .v. 1 vR.
i inch = 40 It
MADISON PARK 404 HOPE MILLS RD, SUHT 4A FAYETTL-VILLE, NC 25304
TOWNSHIP: WEST SANFORD COUNT Y: CUMBERLAND PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
STATE NORTH CAROLINA DAIS. 05/06/2003 ;IJI~VEYIU UY: DENVER McCULLOUGH DRAWING
SCALE 1 =40, DRAWN BY: MICHELLE LEE Ill _E NAMI::
PROPERTY OF: THE OAKS II OF SANFORD, 1_1_C CI<CI~ h "C - KE:LLERWET CF( CIU"UBEl 7EJVMcCUllOUGFand

i

Level Spreader
Cross Section
NTS
Material
Typical Rock Vane Details stapled in
IC al R NTS ootwad ross ectlon place ~ _ t Variable ?
( ) Yp ~ _ i?
T Plan Vlew j_ 1
- A - fiber Glass ~ _ 1
- - - - 1+~tting
Stucture spans 112 to 213 of stream width. Build up rootwad to
Bankfull bench with sod Level lip
mats andlor transplants of spreader - - Buned
8anktull _ 6» min
L
V A5 `p°g r Level S reader S p chedule
X10" a`amate
I
Note: Pers ective Vi De th Entrance Width p ew P Length
Rocks i n Note: Orient rot wads upstream so that the stream vane flow meals the root wad al a 90-degree angle to deflect the water away from the bank. NTS No. A, ft B, ft C, ft
are not spaced and 1 0,6 16 20
rocks should be 2 0.5 10 10
fit tad Indlvlduall " ~ 3 0.5 10 10
Y to avoid gaps. Header Vegetated 4 0.5 10 10
Diversion
- rock should be offset Flow
upstream of the footer rock. 20-30
Scour be , Heath the footer - Transition Stabilized
rock can cause fall ure. Slo e to O grade P
Use 250 Ib rocks with smaller v . ~ _
rocks to fill voids.
Stable ~ ~
undisturbed
outlef
T ical Pool Cross-Section 1
Yp
NTS
14.6' Notes
, 1. The matting should be a minimum of 4 ft wide extendin 6 inches over the
g lip and buried 6 inches deep in a vertical trench on the lowered e. The
~ , g upper edge should butt against smoothly cut sod and be secure) held in
` 1~ Y place with closely spaced heavy duty wire staples at least 12 inches Ion .
Profile ~ ~ 9 2. Ensure that the spreader lip is level for uniform spreadin of storm runoff,
3.1 to 5.1 g 3. Construct the level spreader on undisturbed soil (not on fill ,
Bankfull Stage ~ 4. Construct a 20-ft transistion section from the diversion channel to blend
` , smoothly to the width with depth of the spreader.
` Note: Cut stream bank slo es in benches nches 5. Disperse runoff from the spreader across a properly stabilized slo a not
for better establishment of ve getatlon _ ~ , in o P to exceed 10 /o. Make sure the slope is sufficiently smooth to kee flow from
Flow-~ ~ Y , cone n r P e t atmg.
6. Immediately after its construction, appropriately seed and mulch the entire
Scow Hole Channel Bed ~ disturbed area of the spreader.
Channel Subpavement -
Upstream End of
Culvert
1 2 Pipe Dia,
114 inch thick Grate
with filter fatric
T ical Riffle Cross-Section Yp
Cross-Section NTS
Note: Tack welled metal Conaete grate to culvert,
--Slope and vegetate banks
1 --Bankfull bench 4.
Stone Filter Inlet Projection (NTS)
2 - _ _ _ 2 _ 1 _ ~ ,
1.3'to2.3' 1,~__
- ~ ,
,
Bed Elevation
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL DATE,
SCIENCE COMPANY 8114103 3008 Anderson Drive DRAWN;
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone] ERS
Bioen ineerin and T ical Erosion Details xEV?sED. g 9 YP
iviaaison rarK
Amo SCALE: s Badges Road x. Sanford N NTs
l
The Keller Group Sheet No.
P. 0. Box 130
Sanford NC 27331 of:

+ 75. i n7 tat o + .8 m o. + se u ve .6 86 11 tation
79 4 + tation 10. tation
stream iew View Downstream
_ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _
_ _ - _ _ _ - ~Y 9,aae
10 3 / 10 1 1
310 310 _ _ - 1 + _ - - 1 1 1 1
_ _ _ _ 1 1 _ .__.316.24_-- 1 1
_ 1~/ rode _ 1 1 1 1
1 /
1 , 1 1 1
1 , + -r - , 1 Propose Stream
+ _I.._. - - _ 1 1 - _ _ _
1 I _ 1 1'.___ - - _ - _ - 1 - -
- r 1 I 1 ~ 1 _ _ 1°/;-glad _ - _ _ -
Propose Stream - _ I . 1 _ m ¦ 05 _ _ ~ 3
I 05 /grade 1 1 y~ 305 1 ~ - _ _ ~ - 1.... _ - 1 , ,
_ 1 ; ; h I 1 h oxgwl I __1 _ _i _ _ _ _ _T_. _ - 1 1 - - - -
- I , 1 1 1 1 1 I h I -1 - _ - ~ I 1 1._ _ - - I 1 ~ - ~
_ 1 i._ _ 1 ~ 0 _ - I 1 I O 1 1 -1 a 1 1___. _ _ - - ~ ~ 0 _ _ - ~
- i 1 ~ ~ 1 1 O 1 I 11 _ 1 1
¦ 1 I 1 1 ~ - _ _ - 1 I _ _ - 3ae7 ~ oe64___ _ _ --30B:E2 8,86
> Propos d Stream _ 03.31 0 A\ ~ ._..808. _ ...308.05
j 1 - n1 _ _ _ _ - _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ W _ 1 W _ _ _ W _ - _ _W _ 3 Zri
_ - Propos Stream ~ ~Y W -
_ _ _ W _
300 W 3 00 _ 00 _ _ o _ 30 ~ ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ W - W
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _

_ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ -
_ _ _ _ _ - -
_ _ _ _
295 295 295 295 _
20 4 160 120 100 80 60 40 20 20 20 40 60 80 60 40 20 0 140 100 80 60 40 20 40 60 80 40 20 40 _ _ - 20 20 _ _ .
nce la s I nce a s nce - ia s
nce la ~ Note. Cross-sections are left
to right looking upstream
Scale:
Horizontal: 1" = 30' nce is s ance Is
Vertical: 1" = 2.5'
Existing Ground Surface
proposed Ground Surface
O ¦ m se ve u n View Pla
~A.,
m View Downstrea em o. ~A~
View U stream p v s ue 308.54
View Plan ~~~~5 308.65 Downstream
` Downstream 0a~~ 08.62
_ _ 0. m e s _ u ve Pt°x~ ~ PP ~ 308.7
300 _ 300 15.
- a .z~zss
- _ Road Road Re ~ • rain
mg W all
_ _ Fill
oe _ ~ - , Embankment Fill
- ~ Slope Embankment ~ ` ~`irr,
2~' _ _ _ _ v\s 3 _ Retain n Wad G e~ Slope
_ 308..4_. _ G 61 316.65 -
_ _ _ - t3 ~
. _ 3oa.so e~ ~ ~ 309 ~\J
_ G 309 ,0~ g0 309.43
° _ eon
h ^ - 5y5 _ ~ 0
_ - .~c Roadway F ~,o R Roadway Right of way 17.3 Oad
0 e 5 e yR.
Retaining Wall _ _ ~ ~ght, _ _ ~ c-7 ~ off.
soz,oe ~ _ _ _ - c < wa < < ~ Y
30 301.28.. Sot. C ncreteApro ~ _ 30 _ 1'~- _ _ ~ 3 3 m m ~
30 .28 1.33 ~ I - W _ _ _ ' ~ ~ ; Scale 1"=10 31724
Rip Rap _ _ Concrete Slab Note: Pi es are Corru ated Meta _ _ W p 9 W 300.42 rru ated Metal w w rn 9 rn
o. 9 Upstream ~ 300.43
299.53 1
_ Upstream
_ _ _ _ . _ _ \\~;~t~ Rip Rap
F~ ~ _ _ goo
Fill I
Embankment
_ _ Sto e Scaled"=10 p
308.03
_ _ _ 307.77
3 8.05
308.31 Note: Pipes are Corrugated Metal
Upstream
nce . ~a
nce la
- GINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL DATE:
- ction I ross e dina roSS ection EN I udina Lon it 8114!03
Lon itu SCIENCE COMPANY 3008 Anderson Drive pgA~;
Raleigh, NC 27609
Road 919 781-7798 ERS c ~
Retaining Wall Road _ _ _ Retaining xEVtsED:
Downstream pstream wall Stream and Culverts Details
Madison Park
- Omnc Rrirlnac Rnarl scALE:
/ \IIIVV VI INMVV 1 VNn V Sanford NC See Drawings
Concrete Slab Scale Vertical:1"=10' scale: Sheet No.
Horizontal: 1"= 10' Vertical: 1"= 10' Downstream The Keller Group 4
Honzontal:l" 10' PO Box 130
Sanford NC 27331 of-. 16

_ _ _
_ _
C Ivert Syste
310 2

Head all
_ (Re fining Wall _ _ r_ - - - 1 _ _ 1
_ _ _ _ -1 ! _ 1
I 1 _ _ 1 I
- I I
~ 305 _ - _ r---1 I 1 _ - _ _ _ I I 1 1 1 1 ~ 1
I 1 1 1 1 1__ _ _ - I _ _ _ - I
C _ _ r - ` -1 1 1 t _I 1 1 I 1 1 1 _ 1 _ _ -I I
O sca +oa l 1 I 1 ~ 1 1_ ~ 1 _ 1 1
Endo Stream _ ~ ' _ 1 ~ _ ~ 1 1 ~ 1
` - J ! J
- J
W 1 ~ 1 ~ i I 1 f ~ ~ 4__.. ~
3OO ~ - . J - J --l _ _ _
_ _ _
_
_ _

295 0+00 1+00 2+pp 3+00_ _ 4+00
+ + 7+00 + 6 00 8 00 5 00
STATION NUMBER
o Crete Wal
_ _ _ . . .
sta Sta 12+29 -
d es 1 ` ` ' _1 i _ datS~e m _ 3 _ _ ~ n_ 1 est rats _o o _ Honzon to . 1 30 cl. ae
C_
310 _ _ _ V i ~ - ert ca . 1 2.5
Existing Ground Surface - _ _ 3Q8~8q _ _ ;
- - ~
- - 1 Culvert S stem
- - - - - - - - Proposed Ground Surface a~ I _ _Na1
~ ~
ai:;.
I _ ,
~ _ 1 I } 1 ~ 1 I _
305 ~ _ ~f ~ _i ~ -i
- _
_ _ _ _ _ -
~ _ _ _ _
^ _ _
c _ _ - _ _ _
o
_ _
cv
~ 300 _
_ _ _ _
w -
_ _
295 _
8+40 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+ STATION NUMBER 12+00 + 13 00
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL DATE:
8!14103 SCIENCE COMPANY
3008 Anderson llrive DRAwN;
Raleigh, NC 27609 9 _ ERS (91 ) 781 7798
Stream Profile REVISE°:
Madison Park
Amos Bridges Road SCALE
Sanford NC see drawing
rl~
Sheet No. The Keller Group
3 PO Box 130
Sanford NC 27331 of: 6-
I

Culvert System No. 2
Pro e t e uence c a
~ ~ ~o q h c M Up 3 ~ uF M~ U~ a
' 'nand install rotective fencin around existin wetland. 1. Install culvert restnctio s p g g ~0~ ~ 2 ~ ~
2. Be in excavation & restoration of stream. The u stream rotion of the restoration 9 p p Z 2 ~ 3 -308.86 ~ti
should not be closer than 40-ft. of the existin ditch. The downstream ortion of 306 _ s 305 304,63 1.69 ~ M
g p 303.81 303.71 ~ 6 w,- 303,80 \ ~ ''30.'~g2 3.. ~u ~ St ~On 2ao90.8~\ ~ 30~.32~ ~ ='3g15a- ~ ~ ~
the restoration should discharge to existing ditch, (AugustlSeptember) 3 ~ ~ j~303.88 302.43'' 9b Q~~~ ~ w
3. Vegetate disturbed riparian zone with switch grasslwinter rye mixture and revegetate O ~ , ~ 299.2 •x{:33
M ~ / ~3Ei35EY ~ M ~ ''300.8 .13 '~3Q2.24 Proposed Oxbow 0 , ~
er he on final erosion control Ian for the site. Se tember/October remaining areas asp t g p ( p ) 303 0 ~j , 301 03-.: ? ~ 302.26 _ 307.97 4s ~ 30 . 305.90 P Ol ~ p001 304.69
ock filed and reve etated. 4. Soils excavated for stream shall be st p g
5. Plant sapplings. (November/December) g 3 Install P 01 02-9 300.35,,3p,~~ r~~
303.7,x,---- +oo U riUlVert zs ~
6. Construct remaining portions of upstream and downstream sections. (March/April) 904,2 " 1.36 Q~ 3 Restrictions . ~ ~ ~ 3.16 ~J, . , ~ l
7. Reve etate areas as necessa . 9 ry ~ ' :302~.~44 001
8. U on com letion of buildin construction install levels readers at the channelized ' ,,'301 . ,
p p 9 p P ,~oaso o~ , Initial construct of stream
ormwater dischar a from the arkin lots. st g p g 304 ~.~0"~:91 • 6 ~ ~ r `~t~' should dischar a to
~aoA~92 3oz ,,'e ~ 9 + ~03~4 L existing ditch.
Note; i' \ .303 p4 2s ' 00 ? 30177~~
~ ' r'- 1303.42 Proposed Oxbow x~9 305, r__ ~ ~
1. Schedule is dependent on weather conditions. Q ~ , r ~x0~ 3rs j 05.
2.Oxbows shall be approximately 2ft deep , ~j~a i ~ 4+ ~ ''d~8° ao
3. Select fill is defined as "C:L" or "SC"soil types as defined by ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~~\5 : ~ ,;ass
za eQQ Rid ~ ; ,j o bow .Prop sedOx i j M \lQ~\
' ' ' e shall the Urnfied Soil Classification System. The SC soil typ - - ,
have at least 35% assin the No, 200 sieve. oxb°~ p 9 p5ed ~bo~ 08.31,,E 3 70 ta(~ ~*383.95,,~ ss
° -Q~°c 4. Compact select fill to 95 of Standard Proctor ~ 3 ,'3oa~s~'' o~ t ~e .'soa.o7
308.11 Q~ ~ 0 ~ ~ , ~ Level S reader No. 4 ~a p
Maximum D Densi ASTM D-698 ry tY f ) zo , ~301,9~ ss
P°°\ v~ 9z k M C
~P 5Q - ~ q~ k e ' Nr
P p 304'.05 co ~ ,fs~s Level Spreader No. 3 G
~ ~5? , ' 00 ,i 304.33 ~ Q k A
\i •~OP 72.5 ~,r 8:45 Q~ , ' 6' ~ 0
~P tia~ n' 305.29 ~,i ~Q ~J i , ~a ' ~o~ y~t14.94 -1r
P ti ~ ' eo I O r~ .3oes3 Q ~ 3 . 9k'~
,f3o4.9, ~ Level S reader No. 2 k
0 0 ~ ~ ' ,
ao 7s ~C
Q" 3ozs1.~' i , 305.12
."'3D1i19 ~ 00\ ~ ~ ~ ~ 20 Q i i
i Riff 3ofis2 ~ `3 ' + ~ a n a Q
OA23 O ,f305.49 ~l
0 ~ 307.47 ~ ~ Q '3 . yam.. 3071 i ~ ~ _ 1~ r
~ 307 - e 0 F
~8i , ,i 1. g iii 0 R ~ o
r '~0 6 POOi .OD J za ~ 306.62 S o N T ~r
~ ~ ,1305.69 1 / F S C, "0 3
ll j ,406.12 1 4 .p
f r ' -3~ r I ao f? f / ~ , ~ 306.28
~
0+'°0 ~ Proposed OxGow f~ i S? 6
Q g`~, i ,>308.85 i •
~ ,i •86 f ,i -306 ~ 0~ ,308.83 / F
~ 0 ~ 34.36 Sot Elevations Exlstln U P ( 9) c r o ~
N R s F r
i 1 t3 31 0~ ~ ,i' 9 R M ~ s, c
~ ~ ~ ~ 82 ~ goo ~ 1 1 I~ i ~ 1 t ,i '~05~'9 3 ~ r ~ 308 0 To o ra hlc Llnes Exlstln p 9 p t 9) N
r 1 ~ ~ "307.06 ~
I r ~ , f 1 '\5 I' 120
f r ~0 1 f a ~ , ,~2 i'
~ f 7 ~Q , i~ Pro ert Line p Y
Q' r 40 G d ,i~ f 0\ ~~0 ,~OS.95 i' ~ iaa
Q ~ i Q ~ ~ 3 V a ,'307. s T e o~ ~
R . Q ss s F .BQ9S i ~ , , 1 A roxlmate Llmlts of ~ ~ ~ i pp
I i i V stream or ditch to P
' ~ i i r / t 49 ~ , ~ / o - 0 of Bank 0
~ ~ a ~ ~ ,V 5 4s ~ ~ m ~0. 00 I I 00 Q°g ~ ~ N
Q ~ ~ Q 3059 ' Level S reader No.1 Pro osed Stream To of Bank p p
I ~ 308.03 p i ~ F v c T o v
i f I I p~ N R S F r
/ ~ . 0a CL I ~ Sti R Root Wad v ~ C ;f . . '
~ 8.24 , ~ 2a r 0
3~ 1 I 308,74 ~~p~ , ~ , .04(2 N
I 309. ~ `a5 Rock Vane v
~a
a o` ; ~ to
r' r . . p Pro osed Artificial Oxbows p
I 7 l~ 9D1` 3 1+ ~ ~ o6,tr 2a
~ 1 1 10.05 , ~ ~308,64\OQ ~ I I ~ _~-~i t05
I ~ ~ ~2a 1 F
~ ~ ra . U , Select Fill Area c r o ~
f ~ ~ ~ '~0 I O f , !'~~\a t I I I .C N R S F - T
~ ,309.25 i 2' Initial stream construction shout + ?Da1 ~ ;3oges o~ R c
~ of~z . f3a9.a2~ be no closer than 40-ft. of the , 1D ~ T 0 N
existin ditch. . o Note; Ditch plug shall be at least
R 9 ' oc 'Vane: M 315.90 f w , 150 linear feet.
3 ~ ~ti ~ ~ , %24'108..»113.43 ~J (D , I , i
, 310.05 cn 1 310.12 a ~ ~ `+311.04 + ~ 309.97 i 817.48,_310.71 311 310.'1'S``.,~ ^20 j_ O9. ~ ~3
? 310~(~0.09 309.87 '311.08 309.98T X31 A2 Qf309.28 Scale 1 -30
~G~ 3~O 3DB~J4~ [ 0 `L°gr~~~~. ~ ~311,'~f"`-.... 1163 309.21 308.40 0 rr a zc
~~,~qo 318.11 ~ ? 311.45 ~ V1 ~ ' ROCi( Vane /
3oa. 1 0 ~ ' T ~ N F
. S - r f R 310,'hl~? ?y'10.93 , ~ v
309 09 85 C ? ~ 3
? ? i ~ I ? ? ~ ~ 77 0 ~ ~ 'Y
310.88 ~r3Q9, ~ ? 0~ ~
3D8.95 ~ 87 .309.52 t, .78~~ F 311.06 308.55 ~ ~r DATE:
308.12 o R ? 311,92 N ENGINEERING ~ ENVIRONMENTAL 8!14/03
11.50 S ? 309.17 308, SCIENCE COMPANY
R / ~ 3008 Anderson llrive DRAWN;
310.70 ~ 0 1 o ~ 0 y308.84 ~ , Raleigh, NC 27609 ERS [phone]
/ ~ .309,01 I
, /x31202 REVISED~~ Restoration Plan
r l.. X11.03 r C F 0 T N Madison Park
~ _309.41
312.98 308 54 1! I .308,85308.90 h'U O-lo, Amos grid e5 Koad SCALE:
1 308.82 f/312.53 317 45~ 308.701 See Drawing Sanfor NC
N ~
Culvert System No. 1 ' 317.02 --''314.e4 The Keller Group Sheet No.
P. 0. Box 130
Sanford NC 27331
off, of:

EPK
E~„S7 CONTROL ~u
SSMH, CORNER ~ w° 5~ ~ 2
°a N 28°02'36" W 83.16' {TIE L'iNE} ~y ~ ~~P W
~ 2~ , 5P~ ~ ~
a EIP S 89`02'18" E193.13' EIP EXIST. ~'Q ~w _ S 88°45'34" E 500.6T SSMH EXIST.
~ t c SSMH
EIP ¦ ¦ rs enera ro ec n orma ion
~ 320 EXIT - _ _ ° EPK ~ ° SSMH
Q' CONTROt~}. W ! CORNER a''
V~ G C ert Syst 2
fo ~ At the Madison Park Residential Condominium Develo ment Pro ect formal) Oaks II p 1 Y
~2~ 315 ~ m _ S24°15'47"W ~ 0 POST 0 ~ ~ a~ ~ W 100 m Sanford North Carolina a s ream r r i n t esto at o ro ect is ro osed. The stream which
~ AK DRIVE (30 RNV - P a~ g~ ~ 2oa.62 a~ Ui N P RIVATE) ~ , ~ EIP _ _ g ctt 2~ a °a~ R F p 1 p p
- - as on '4dunnq,~inu•uniui~~~~ ? was de raded b timberin activities and subse uent ditchin is a roximatel 1065 ft. 9 Y 9 q g pp Y
0 .u Q
31.0 J ; ~ Q6 • ~ Ion . Im rovements to the stream will include widenin the channel width and flattenin 9 p 9 9
Z ss 3~, •o ~ 3oy 0 m the bank slo a addition of riffles and ools and addition of directional flow vanes and
G N z zd„~ 305 p•~3", 3~ R p, p ,
~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ root wads. The len th of the stream will also be increased to a r xim I 1 I'n o ate 229 i eal 9 pp Y
m ti~ •o ~~1 ~ ~ Kati
J~ •0 wel~aNO~snR ~ iswa ~S RECREATION f et. T I X w r r e ota o bo a eaa c Bated is 072 acreas. Stream attern dimension & rofile p p AREA
~,P • a, p• VICINITY MAP ~ N5P ~ 'EIP m ''•p• ' 0 o will be constructed based on natural dimensional deli n rinci les and calculations for
N.T.S. •o• 3 ~ s _ 9 p p
_ _ m ° urbanized watersheds.
m - _
d•. BLDG #1
/ S. ••o TWO A roximatel 3 acres will be disturbed for the stream restoration ro'ect. Erosion pp Y p 1
EXIST. •Q • • aSMH • BEDROOM - UNITS control will be rovided b restrictin flow thro h h d
•O POOL ESM'T MAINT S14°4T01"E ~.ESM'T u t e own stream culverts. Also, p Y 9 9 S14°4T01"E 1"`fL=315.2
EXIST. BLDG SSMH ••0 ~ •Q ~ x _ 231.70' 2S'FL=324.5 levels readers will be added to the dischar a oints from h r 231.70' p t e o osed avement areas.
~ •p " 9p pp p -
~ •0• POOL _ Oxbows will be excavated to im rove TSS removal flood stora a and am hibian habitat. p g p
~ * x • ~ ~ y _ BLDG #11 Th r s' n r . e e o io cont of is an addendum to the existm erosion control ermit for this site.
p' ati •0 ti° ~ ' x x - x - TWO 9 p BLDG #2
~F 2 0• BEDROOM •p UNITS - ONE
' _ BEDROOM ~ ' UNITS
• - 0• 2"~L=323.3 ` ~ i ~ 1~'FL=318.1
D 2"~L=327.4
_ • 0• ~
• , ~ ,I'
~ 0 V - BLDG#10 _ i
M~ ~ 0 TWO I$'~ f$ BLDG #3
~ ` ••0 •p I FUTURE ' BEDROOM N ~ • _ _ _ _ CONSTRUCTION. TWO
Qi 0 UNITS ~ ~ ry ^ - 1 FL-316.1 - BEDROOM _ uNlrs LEGEND NOTES:
'Z ~ g EI J 2"'~L=325.4 Op ~ ••p 16iFL=322.6 DENOTES IRON PIPE 1. NO HORIZONTAL CONTROL FOUND WITHIN
• • ~ • r i - 2"~L=331.9 2,000 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. IPF IRON PIPE FOUND 2. THERE ARE NO NONCONFORMING
O SIP SET IRON PIPE STRUCTURES ON THIS SITE.
0 DENOTES "PK" NAIL (CONTROL) 3. AREA COMPUTED BY COORDINATES.
• _ Op• - EPK EXISTING "PK" NAIL 4. REFERENCES: PLAT CABINET 4 SLIDE 177, i ' ~ DEED BOOK 635 PAGE 73 &
rr^^ ••0 ••P - _ BLDG #9 ~ u ~ N1F NOW OR FORMERLY OWNED BY PLAT CABINET 9 SLIDE 42-D. i i _
vJ • p•• ~ r~ 0•• FUTURE _ FUTURE BEDROOM •J• ~ 0 56' CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION,;- UNITS DB DEED 600K 5. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN A SPECIAL BLDG #4 PG PAGE FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS DETERMINED BY REGINALD
• • V • • ,oQ` •0 I r TWO ' BEDROOM PC PLAT CABINET BUIE OF THE CITY OF SANFORD, NORTH CAROLINA,
•C •0 RECREATION ~ - ~ FL=31ss O • • _ _ - 2'~L=327.8 UNITS SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE AND REFERENCED BY MAP N0.371 056 006 B.
~ ~ ~ 0 AREA Q p'FL=323.5 TBM TEMPORARY BENCHMARK 6. TBM - RR SPIKE IN MAPLE TREE NEAR APT. 185 ELEV=335.61
"V f~j v • 2"~L=332.8 RR SPIKE IN BURR OAK NEAR REC CNTR ELEV=315.08 - ALL PROPERTY CORNERS DISTINGUISHED 7. ALL DRIVES AND PARKING ARE PRIVATE.
Q Q' _ - rr^^ 0 QZ _ W - BY IRON PIPES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
vJ ~ • - • ~ ~ _ Q ~ V
O 0 Q • a 0 EIP. O - Q BLDG #S J
~ ~ 0 0• FUTURE a TWO a0 oc FUTURE CONSTRUCTION FUTURE BEDROOM - BLDG #5
Q- ~ . CONSTRUCTION Z CONSTRUCTION: • ~ • ~ UNITS • • • ONE - - BEDROOM
EXIST. •0 ~ Q 151FL=320.5 UNITS _ ¦
SSMH p• 0 P• _ _ 2"'~L=329.8 1~'FL=325.1 2"~L=334.4
aF _ Q w~ ~o .
_ ~ 0
~~i` r.
~ ~ S00°31'06"E _ - ¦
m~ : _ BLDG#6 ee ie
~ ° _ - i TWO BEDROOM
• ti WALNUT COVE UNITS ¦ ¦
o• 19iFL=327.3 enera ro ec n orma ion
• 2"~L=336.6
- _ - _ - s • _ - s _ _ ¦
• - - e ora ion an
_ - - - i 1• _ _I
• EIP ~ FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE ' ' BLDG #7 '
S 89`1'28" E EiP CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FUTURE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION - ream ro i e ' TWO EIP
2~ 94' _ - - CONSTRUCTION BEDROOM
~ ."'Cp ¦ ~ co 0 ~ o, 0 _ ' UNITS ¦
N w • F ' 15TFL=333.0 ~ o re m n uv a s e s e i as 2 ~L-342.3 a o
- ~w
i 1 Ui
EIP " ~ • W is ioen ineerin n r i n i a os o e a s m
4 :EIP ~ ~ ~
i ~ s i an in n oni orin an
r • • • •
i r • ,y a ~ ~ ~u~nnnq.u • • •
~ ~ 1~ 3to
~ sOF
m 9 0 n
0
m 0u r o a a~ m
a3 EM ad vu fm rot
_ Z ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL DATE:
Culvert System 1 8114143 SCIENCE COMPANY
yak ~ Bran 3008 Anderson Drive DRAwN:
a v ~ nh Rd U~ Raleigh, NC 27609 [phone] BRS
lmp+~ MZ II ~p ~ Z U~ Z
~Z General Project Information WISED:
Madison Park
a _ w.. - - w- - ~
AMOS tsn0ges Koaa SCALE:
See Drawing t. Sanford NC
Scale V= 60'
The Keller Group Sheet No.
PO Box 130
Sanford, NC 27331 of.