20030747 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030618

O? WAT?9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r
_q Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
.? Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
July 14, 2003
City of Wilson
Attn: Kent Montgomery
PO Box 10
Wilson, NC
DWQ Project No. 03-0747
County: Wilson
Page 1 of 2
Subject Property: J. Burt Gillette Athletic Complex & Toisnot Park, Corbett Ave, Wilson, NC
S&EC, Inc. Project No. 02-7402
Toisnot Swamp [03-04-07, 27-86-11-(1), WS-IV (water supply) NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE per the Neuse River Buffer
Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Montgomery:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill within or
otherwise impact 145 feet of streams and 7,000 square feet (ft2) of protected riparian buffers for the purpose of
constructing a road and to impact 26,100 square feet (ft) of protected riparian buffers for the purpose of installing a
sewer system within an existing, cleared utility easement at the subject property, as described within your application
dated June 18, 2003. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by the N.C.
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3402 (GC3402). The Certification(s)
allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 39 when issued by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This letter shall
also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B
.0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before
you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and water
supply regulations. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project,
you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If
total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. Sewer System
No trees or woody vegetation shall be removed from the protected riparian buffers associated with the installation of
the sewer system, unless otherwise approved by the DWQ. In addition, the project shall comply with 15A NCAC 2H
.0219(i)(2)(G) and all other State, Federal and local sewer system regulations.
2. Diffuse Flow
An additional condition is that all stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the
protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within 15A
NCAC 2B.0233(5).
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Page 2 of 2
3. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the
401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
4. Water Quality Certification(s)
The proposed project must comply with all of the conditions of General Water Quality Certification(s) (GC) 3402.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in criminal and/or
civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the
Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or
CAMA permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or stream impacts),
you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for
a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the
Neuse riparian buffer protection rule as described within 15A NCAC 213 .0233. If you have any questions, please
telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726.
Sincerely,
0an mek, P.E.,
, Director
Attachments: Certificate of Completion
GC 3402
Cc: Sean Clark, S&EC, Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614
USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
DWQ # 03-0747
Date: July 14, 2003
bz
It
imap://bob.zarzecki%40dwq.denr.ncmail.net@nplex l mcmail.net:143/
Subject: Re: 030747J.BurtGilletteAthleticComplex&ToisnotPark
From: Steve Mitchell <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 08:22:44 -0400
To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
2 agree. Seems to me that the minimization requirement is met by allowing
the impact within the existing cleared easement even if it is Zone 1.
Regarding the road crossing, if it is under threshold, let'er rip.
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
Steve & Debbie:
Below is some additional information for your review. I just spoke with
Sean Clark about this project. Scaling off the plan, I came up with 148
feet within the shaded area for the road crossing. The crossing is of a
modified stream / roadside ditch along the existing road. Sean said
that the impacts will be less than the shaded area and won't exceed 145
feet. The proposed sewer has two options. The preferred by the
applicant is to place it in the existing cleared sewer easement within
Zone I. The 2nd is to places it within zone 2, but this would result in
more trees cut down that would not be if the preferred option is chosen.
I haven't been to the site but I told Sean that I would prefer it
within Zone I with no trees cut:. in Zone 2.
- Bob
1 of 1 7/7/03 816 AM
r'
mailbox:///CI/W INNT/Profi les/bob_zarzecki/Appl ication%20Data/Mo...
Subject: Re: 030747J.BurtGilletteAthleticComplex&ToisnotPark
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 10:10:04 -0400
To: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
CC: Steve Mitchell <[e-mail]>, "Debbie Edwards (RRO)"
<[e-mail]>, Sean Clark <[e-mail]>
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
Steve & Debbie:
Below is some additional information for your review. I just spoke with Sean Clark about this
project. Scaling off the plan, I came up with 148 feet within the shaded area for the road crossing.
The crossing is of a modified stream / roadside ditch along the existing road. Sean said that the
impacts will be less than the shaded area and won't exceed 145 feet. The proposed sewer has two
options. The preferred by the applicant is to place it in the existing cleared sewer easement within
Zone 1. The 2nd is to place it within Zone 2, but this would result in more trees cut down that would
not be if the preferred option is chosen. I haven't been to the site but I told Sean that I would prefer it
within Zone 1 with no trees cut in Zone 2. Correction, that's within the existing easement and no
additional trees cut.
- Bob
1 of 1 7/3/03 10:10 AM
Triage Check List tt?l
Date: June a0, .xO3
Project Name: J Kurt Litette AWehin- Corn Iplex d loi3rI&_ Park
DWQ#: 03 O?yF-
County: U I son
To: ? ARO
? FRO
? MRO
9 RRO
Mike Parker ? WaRO
Ken Averitte ? WiRO
Alan Johnson ? WSRO
Steve Mitchell
Tom Steffens
Noelle Lutheran
Cyndi Karoly (Central Office)
From: Zarry Ced-on d D"nv Smi'd, Telephone : (919) -733-/X86
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
! So
® Stream length impacted l yr Olt
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
® Buffer Rules Neuse Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman) calk wl8A Za.zeck,, A e- %s
? Pond fill re{erenced %n Ae cover lelkr"
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments: ftW )?AcJ 6v-zfe,L JAA >lfti,4 effnA cL 2 oAttc
oil & Environmental Consultants, PA
110 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
, /"vV.SendC.com
Transmittal
Z,JZ r l9. S fl-dip -
X 4 , ME 17407
-V
We Transmit to you Herewith:
? Drawings
? Specifications
? Brochures or photos
? Correspondence
? As per your request
ell
File:
? For your information and files
For comment or approval
? Returned for correction, resubmit
? Approved as noted
Under Separate Cover:
? By mail
? By courier
? By express
No. Copies Document No. Date Description

? 6
A rL 3

t4c- 4k yvf ?. G...1.' /.e/
? J L-Q L rt-r-e- G

Remarks:
If enclosures are not as listed as above, kindly notify us at once.
By. ? 14.-
Charlotte Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C
Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Greensboro Office:
3817-E Lawndale Drive
Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hickory Office:
622 Coon Mountain Lane
Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone [phone]
Fax: [phone]
To: ,Jd??? 12. x,, Project #: Date: li A, V10
WIL OF Project Name: ,/J(- ((?'"

JUN p
FILE COPY
CT ?/'? June 18, 2003
w, r.o rr e fi J "E ??' HIj p.?"A
A i.4
US Anny Corps of Engineers NCDENR-DWQ
Attn: Ms. Amanda Jones ? n -,Attn: Mr. John Dorney
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd., Ste. 120 '12321 Crabtree Blvd
Raleigh, NC 27615 Parkview Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Nationwide Permit 39, Nationwide Pen-nit 12, and Buffer Compliance
J. Burt Gillette Athletic Complex & Toisnot Park
Wilson, Wilson County, North Carolina
S&EC Project #: 02-7402
Dear Ms. Jones and Mr. Dorney:
On behalf of the Town of Wilson (applicant), we hereby request authorization from the
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to use Nationwide Permit 39 for proposed
permanent impacts to a perennial stream resulting from a road crossing and Nationwide
Permit 12 for proposed temporary impacts to a wetland resulting from a sewer line. In
addition, we request written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NC-DWQ) that the project complies with the Neuse Buffer Rules and the 401
Water Quality Certifications associated with NWP 39 and NWP 12. A Pre-construction
Notification Application (PCN) is attached, as well as an agent authorization form.
The site is located in Wilson, North Carolina and is cast of Corbett Avenue (SR 1326),
and west of London Church Road (SR 1327), beginning approximately 3,000 feet south
of the intersection of Corbett Avenue and London Church Road County. Please refer to
the attached map (Figure 1) for the project's location on a USGS topographic quadrangle.
S&EC performed a wetland and Neuse Buffer evaluation of the site in December 2002.
Because S&EC believes features B and C are subject to the buffers within the athletic
complex boundaries, S&EC has not requested that NC-DWQ conduct a site visit to make
a buffer verification. No jurisdictional determination and no previous permits have been
obtained for this site.
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office: Hickory 011e:
236 Lcl'hillip Court, Suite C 3817-F Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455 Taylorsville, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phonc [phone]
F.-- r70a) 7?ll_u.tttf, Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleich, North Carolina 27614 • Phonc: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
June 18, 2003
S&EC Project V: 02-7402
Page 2 of 3
The purpose of this project is to construct a public use athletic complex and park that will
facilitate recreation activities for area residents. Past impacts include 0.09 acre, of lot rill,
which will be used to facilitate the construction of soccer fields (see attached plan).
Please note that this impact was recently made under a Non-reporting Nationwide Pen-nit
39 during the grading of some adjacent areas. This area had been used as the "fairway"
of a Frisbee golf course, which subjected the area to considerable foot traffic and
essentially eliminated the presence of herbaceous vegetation. Proposed impacts will
result from construction of a road crossing to access the site and installation of a force
main to provide sewer service to the site (see impact maps).
The proposed road crossing will result in permanent impacts to 145 linear feet of
perennial stream channel and 7,000 square feet (0.16 acre) of Neuse Buffer. Two options
are possible for the location of the proposed force main: 1) the main could be installed in
Zone 1 of feature A, within an existing, regularly maintained utility easement along the
grassed right-of-way of Corbett Avenue (see Fig. 3); or 2) the main could be installed
outside of Zone 2, but within a mature, bottomland hardwood forest (see Fig. 4). At the
request of Mr. Bob Zarzecki, of NC-DWQ, we are providing descriptions of the two
options for the location of the proposed sewer line. The two options are described below.
Option 1
Under this option, the force main will be installed in an exiting grassed utility casement,
within the road right-of-way of Corbett Avenue, resulting in 26,100 square feet of impact
to Zone 1 of the buffer of feature "A" (see Fig. 3). It is important to note that this area is
currently vegetated by fescue and does not contain jurisdictional wetlands; thus, the
installation of the main would not result in the removal of any woody vegetation or
impact any wetlands. It should also be mentioned that feature "A" is a perennial stream
that was channelized in the distant past and now more closely resembles a straight
roadside ditch.
Option 2
Under this option, the force main will be installed outside of both Zones 1 and 2 of the
Neuse Buffer. However, a mature bottomland hardwood forest is located immediately
beyond the utility easement and right-of-way of Corbett Avenue (see Fig. 4). Locating
the main outside of the Neuse Buffer would result in the clearing of approximately
24,884 square feet of forested land to install the main and establish a maintenance
corridor. This location will also result in temporary impacts to 0.009 acre of bottomland
hardwood wetland.
S&EC believes option 1 is the best choice for the location of the proposed force
main, as it will ultimately result in the least amount of disturbance to existing
riparian vegetation and wetland areas. If NC-DWQ decides that locating the main in
Zone I is the more preferable of the two alternatives S&EC does not believe that
mitigation should be required for the resulting impacts because the proposed sewer
.June I ?,, 2003
S&FC I'loAcct 11: 0'-7402
Page ? o f I
casement is currently an existing regularly maintained powerline easement. However, if
NC-DWQ determine, n-.tigation is necessary, the applicant proposes payment into tltc
NC-WRP. Because the Buffer impacts associated with the proposed road crossing
impact less than 1/3 acre and 150 linear feet of riparian buffer, S&EC believes buffos
mitigation for this impact should not be required.
The USACE's current policy requires applicants to avoid and minimize wetland and
stream channel impacts to the maximum extent practicable and may require
compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable losses of waters of the US when impacts
exceed the thresholds for notification (0.10 acre) or if a discharge causes the loss of any
open waters. Because the proposed road crossing is aligned perpendicularly with the
channel, and because the only other permanent impact associated with the project
consists of 0.09 acre of wetland previously impacted under a Non-reporting Nationwide
39, S&EC believes mitigation should not be required by the USAGE for this project.
NC-DWQ's current policy requires mitigation for perennial stream impacts greater then
150 linear feet per project and wetland impacts greater than 1 acre per project. Because
the proposed project impacts are below these thresholds, S&EC believes that neither
stream nor wetland mitigation should be required by NC-DWQ.
Sincerely,
Sean Clark
Environmental Scientist
Attachments
Pre-construction (PCN) notification form
Agent Authorization Form
Site Location Map-USGS (Figure I)
Site Location Map Soil Survey (Figure 2)
Option I Map (Figure 3)
Option 2 Map (Figure 4)
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(It any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Cheek all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Pen-nit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Utility Location Option 1:
NWP 39• Utility Location Option 2• NWP 12 and NWP 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
11. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: City of Wily
Mailing Address: PO Box 10
Wilson. NC
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: _ Sean Clark _
Company Affiliation:- Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Ralei 4h, NC 27614 _
"Telephone Number:_(919)846-5900 _ Fax Number:- 919 846-9467
Fax Number:
Page 1 o1'9
E-mail Address: SClark(ci)SandEC.com
111. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-1nch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: J. Burt Gillette Atheletic Complex & Toisnot Park
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Deed book 1723, Page 701, Wilson County
4. Location
County: Wilson Nearest Town: Wilson
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The site is located in Wilson,
North Carolina and is east of Corbett Avenue (SR 1326), and west of London Church Road
(SR 1327), beginning approximately 3,000 feet south of the intersection of Corbett Avenue
and London Church Road County. Please refer to the attached map (Figure 1 for the
project's location on a USGS topographic quadrangle.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 035° 45'5.31" N; 077° 54'8.18" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): +/-
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Toisnot Swamp
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://l12o.cnr.state.tic.us/adiiiiii/iiiaps /.)
Page 2 49
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:- Botlomland portions of the site are currently forested.
Upland tortions ol, the site are in-both forest and agricultural fields. Surrounding land uses
include residential developments and agriculture.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project consists of a public recreational facility. The project will involve the
construction of athletic fields and a parking area and the installation of a -utility line.
Conventional heavy equipment typical of such projects will be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of this project is to provide atl
athletic complex and park for public use by residents of the Town of Wilson.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or pennits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date pennits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued pen-nits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC performed a wetland and Ncuse Buffer evaluation of the site in December 2002. Because
S&EC believes features B and C are subject to the buffers within the athletic complex
boundaries, S&EC has not requested that NC-DWQ conduct a site visit to make a buffer
verification No jurisdictional determination and no previous permits have been obtained for this
site Please note that 0.09 acre of wetland was impacted in the recent past using a Non-reporting
Nationwide Permit 39 (see impact maps
V. Future Project Plans
Arc any future pen-nit requests anticipated for this project'? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None known at this time. _
V1. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section V11 below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accotnpatlying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and dchncatlotl fornns should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 3 oF9
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section Vlll below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The proposed impacts consist
of a road crossing of stream channel subject to the Neuse Buffers. If option 2 is
chosen for the utility line location (see cover letter), then temporary impact to a wetland area
will be required for installation of the line.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Option 1 Utility Location:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on map) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
N/A --
Option 2 Utility Location:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wctland***
(indicate on map) (acres) (yes/no) (linear feet)
2 Excavation 0.009 No 70 LF Bottomland Hardwood
acre Forest Wetland
* List cacti impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps arc available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USAGE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 4.88 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: No proposed impacts under Option 1 Utility
Location; 0.009 acre of temporary impact under Option 2 Utility Location. Please note 0.09
acre of wetland were previously impacted under a Non-reporting Nationwide Permit 39.
3. Individually list all intennittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number "Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent'?
(indicate on map) (linear feet) Before Impact (please specify)
I Fill (Culver,
Dissipator) 145 LF UT to 'foisnot Swamp 3' Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but arc not litnited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and Flooding), relocation (include linear feet bctirrc and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Page 4 of 9
** stream names can be found on USGS topographic Illaps. II a stream has no panic, list as ll f (unname(I tllbnlalV) to file nearest
down.st mnn named sprain into which it Ilo\vs, USGS maps arc aivailahle through the USiS at I-800-158-9610, or online at
www.usgs.gov. several intcrilet sites also allow direct download and printing ol, USGS maps (e.g., www.topozonc.aom,
wNvw.1lwp(lucst.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 145 LF
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact - Area of ---- -- Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
(indicate on map) (acres) applicable) bay, ocean, etc.
_
N/A
* I,isl each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., danl/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A EApectcd pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
intbrtnation related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The applicant requested a wetland delineation prior to site plan development in order to avoid
wetlands and waters to the maximum extent practicable. The applicant is planning to construct a
road crossing of a perennial stream channel that separates Corbett Avenue from the property in
order to access the site. The proposed crossing will be aligned perpendicular to the channel in
order to minimize impact. The applicant would prefer utility location option 1 which is
described in detail in the attached cover letter. Under this option, a utility line required for the
development of the site would be installed within an existing grassed utility casement and road
right-of-way, in lone I of the NcuSe Buffers, rather than being located outside the Buffers,-in a
mature bottomland hardwood forest and wetland area. Because the proposed mad crossing-is
aligned perendicular to the channel, and because the applicant has devised an alternative
Pagc 5 of()
location for the proposed sewer line that will minimize impact to existing lJorest and wetlands,
S&EC believes the client has minimized project impacts to the maximum extent practicable. _
VI11. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in detennining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stringidc.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A - Because the proposed road crossing is aligned perpendicularly with the channel, and
because the only other permanent impact associated with the project consists of 0.09 acre of
wetland previously impacted under a Non-reporting Nationwide 39, S&EC believes
mitigation should not be required by the USACE for this project. However, if tile USACE
detennines mitigation is necessary for this project, the applicant proposes payinent into the
NC Wetlands Restoration Program.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
Page 6 of'9
N(VI01, check the NCWRP website at htlR://h2o.cnr.state nc.us/wrp/indcx.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount Ofstrcam mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A_
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):-
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
N/A
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land'?
Yes ? No ® The project is below the stream and wetland impact
thresholds that trigger DWQ review under the SEPA.
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)'?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? if so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the protect impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neese), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please Identify_
Yes ® No ? if you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buftcr
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
nlullipliers.
Pao*c 7 of")
Option I Utility Location
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier

- Required
Mitigation
1 -- 26,100 SF 3 -- _N/A ----
2 0 SF 1.5
- ------------- N/A
----
--
Total 26,100 SF N/A
Option 2 Utility Location
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 0 SF 3 N/A
2 0 SF 1.5 N/A
Total 0 SF N/A
Road Crossing
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 4200 SF 3 N/A
2 2800 SF 1.5 N/A
Total 7000 SF N/A
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
S&EC believes option 1 is the best choice for the location of the proposed force main, as it
will ultimately result in the least amount of disturbance to existing riparian vegetation and
wetland areas. If NC-DWQ decides that locating the main in Zone 1 is the more preferable of
the two alternatives S&EC does not believe that mitigation should be required for the resulting
impacts. However, if NC-DWQ detennines mitigation is necessary, the applicant proposes
payment into the NC-WRP. Because the Buffer impacts associated with the proposed road
crossing impact less than 1 /3 acre and 150 linear feet of riparian buffer, S&EC believes buffer
mitigation for this impact should not be required.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The imnervious surface cover for the site is expected to be below 30%. Silt fencing and
temporary sediment basins will be used for sediment and erosion control during construction. --
Page 8 019
Xll. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitarv Sewer
X111. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
X1V. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. Tlowever, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
'T'hreatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature ' Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Pagc 9 of '9
Jun 18 03 11:34a rrh 252-291-5900 P.2
Soil & Environmental Consultants, rn
11010 Roven Ridec Road - Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • phone [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.sampr com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
1 To-13'. -Filla rt In The CutTe nt Len owner
Name: ---
Address: p O ?Ok /& .1e-S6^1 A/C
Phone: ---
-_ TI y2 ( GSL? l ?Ti1_- kGC??c ?dir fGL-r?
Project Name/ Description:
Date: 6 G •- ,?-h3 -- - - -
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington NC 28402
Attn: --
Field Office: //
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
1, the current property owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon rT t day information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The / of
TUr?L 20 0 3
'this notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to vask"ag the site.
L:;7 Z:L zff_?t L4 ,-?,4L
Print Property Owner's Name
Property Owner's Signature/
cc: Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
cc: Mr. Sean Clark
Sod 6c Environmental Consultants, PA
L7lar6t. f3ff ce:: Gttrntlx ( O m_ Hickory Office,
216 LePhlllip Court. Suite C 3817-N Lawndale Drive 622 Coon Mountain Lane
Concord, NC 28025 Ccnrnehoro, NC 27455 7)tylonvil1c, NC 28681
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Phone [phone]
Far [phone] Fax: [phone] Fav [phone]
it
N
SCALE: 1- = 2000'
WIN.qTR A n
PROJECT #: 7402 FIGURE 1 - USGS QUAD.
BURT GILLETTE Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
PROJECT MGR.: SC ATHLETIC PARK
- -- - - -- HERRING & SUTTON, P.A. 11010 Raven Ridge Rd. Raleigh, 27614
[phone] - [phone] 67
DATE: NOV. 2002 Wilson County, NC Web Page: www.SandEC.com
i =
1+

® 1
I
N
SCALE: 1* '= 1320'
PROJECT #: 7402 FIGURE 2 - SOIL SURVEY
BURT GILLETTE
PROJECT MGR.: SC ATHLETIC PARK
HERRING & SUTTON, P.A.
DATE: NOV. 2002
Wilson County, NC
it & Environmental c:onsuttani
11010 Raven Ridge Rd. -- Raleigh, NC 2761
[phone] - [phone]
Web Page: www.SandEC.com
! ? II
- _ t ~ I ~ , ~ ~ ~ , x
r 1 I ~ ~
i ~l I /
Q• 1 i ~ ~
p ~ % p p o ~ I i ~ g ~ ip
S 2 1 ~ ~ .~s i ~
l ~ ~ s ~ ~ J ~ , , , j ~ ,
1 /
~ o~ poi ~ 3.;~. J S I ' s SITE
1 ~ ~ a p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o. J ~ ~
~ s W ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ' N~ 1 ~ \ ~ ppp' p ~ ~'3 w ~ ~
- \ 1 8 9 , BGp 0 ~@ ~ ~ ~ .43 ; . I 1
I 48 0 RCP ` p o r /
w 2 krr ~ \ ~ ~
~ r ~ ~ g~ ~ gyp. a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (
IMPACT 1 ~ ~ ~ ,o~,~ a ,n ~ L r., _
r ~ gQ`~ ~ 145 LF CHANNEL ~ 9~ o _ s ~ / ~ ~ ~ _l _ Vicinity Yep
, ,0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti - P 1 ne 1 BU PEER 4200 S , , Zo . ~ ~ ~ m`~ ~ ~ ~ 2 '36~''E - Not to 9ceie ~ s ss~ _
Zone 2 BL FFER - 2800 SF ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 500.00 i
1 ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~
• ~ ` 1 i A ~ ,'t v _ ~
~ l - ~ ?S ~ 1 ~ / \ \
~ o • _ ~ ~ W i' ~ ? ~ ~ Q ~ / ~ ~
a A ,v L_ ~ - te~--
1 ~ ~ , ~ ~ - m et ~i 1 ~ ~ r tia \ ~ ~
_ ~ ~
~d ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ • _ ;
..l ~ ~ ~tizD ' b' i 9 ' 119 ~~e ~ /
~ ~ 11 / 111 A ~ ~ \ ~
~ .p ~ ~ ~ I ~ ) ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ f ~ \ ~ ~
~ ( / 1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ ^1l
~ ~,p• x~ k ~ ti6 ~ , ~ IN7P ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED r \ / ~ _ / ~
Y ~ 1~~ ~ I r ~ v~ 1 \ ~ ,5000ER A 1 ~ - ~ V ~ ~ o ~~1 ~ FlELD ~
.II' ~ ~ 1 \ / ~
GO ~ , ' ~ I ~ ~ 6 N ~ R ; ~ ~ o ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
O~ '1 I ~ P oPOSEO i ti ~ .
i J ~ ~ w r \ ~ ~e, ~
~ h ~ ° ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~
r ~ - ~ ' ~ C~ ROPOS~D ~ , ~ _ ~ \ '
I \ ~~e/ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ' ~
a ~ i ~ ~ y t~ ~ i _ , ~ \ ~ ~ ti-, ~ ~ ~ ~ z~ ~
1~ ~ / _w~~ ~"1
I ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ r - ~ ~ ~ 1 i ~ ~ \
~ , ~ 1 ~
C $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,1 ~ V~~ ~ - ~ , ~ \ . ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ r~ ~
~ L i~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ / p ~ I _ - - i 7 _
\ / ~ ~
. ~ ' - o ~ ~ l ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1 r
_ - 7 ~ l
~ ~ - ~ ~ n V ~ 1 A
~„m- i - I .ice ~ ~~.A \ ~ `1; ` ~ ~ \ ` V i
~ 476 SF ~ i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r
' ' ' 1 j / / I r ; ~
i ~1 ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ 1PET ND~S AREA OF MPACT _ I I ~ ~ I ~ r \ l ~
~ , ~ _ A ~~El~DY FILL . ~ ~ ~ (L 1 i i 1, ~
L , , ,l ~ ~ r \ 1 ~ 3,915 SF i ; ~ ~ ~ ~
1 ~
9 27,439 SF ~ / / ~ ~ ~ /
o ~ i ~ ~ ~ \ r ~ ! ~ ~ i ~ I
~ ~ ~ i • ~ ~
1 % % ~ 1 ~ ~ \ V. ~ I 1 ~ 1 i
1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 l/ ~ ~ i, \ ~
/ ~
~ J ~ ~ ~ ' ~
~ - ~ I
~ / ~ ~ 1_.____ 18~ i / ~
~ ~ ~ ~ i r ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ _
~ ~ 11g ~ ~1 ~ /
p i ~ ~ ~ ~ /I' / o~
y~~ i ~ ~
~ NE ~ ~ ~ ~ -
~ O~tf?JL ~ N ST1 ' " W yQ'if ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ' 24 ~ 0 214. ~
0 0 ~ o' N 43'43 04 W ~y ~~y \ \ , _
p 4,' 4y o ° 315.05' ` ~ qi~
. q,$__~ . ~y p ,
~ ~ ~
C o~ ~ o ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~
~ \ % p ~ ~ A ~ ~
i ~
i p p
~ ~ l ~ 4~ \ ~N
r. _ ~N h ~f
\ N ~ ~ ~ ~
~ Q_ ~ ~ N
"~b 8~ h e ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ /
~w ~ `7
~ _
/ ~ J ~
.s
~ ~
~
100 p 140 200 900.
~ . ~ ~ P:\03PROJ\9783\9783-Iddt\dwg\9783A-IMPACT.deg 05/30/2003 02:33:53 PM EDT
B Dete Yey 2009
° • •
Scale : Map No.
Herrin -oLiLLOA a r.h. & Toisnot Park- Pb
Engineers -Surveyors -Planners Phase one Impact Map 1- =100 03-L-V
OPTION 1-FIGURE 3 sheet xo. t of
2101-A Nash Street North, 11ilson, North Carolina 27896 [phone] Wilson, N.C. K*C* ~uM

1
~ I \ 1 ' ! 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~
1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ I
1 ~ I
~ '.J / p ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ / y ~
. / ~ \ , ,5 n J
1 _ J \ , _ _ ~ ~l .m ~
J ~ \ ~O 1 ' ~ p SITE
~ a J 1 ~ ~ ' - ~ ~ J r ~
r ~ .o S . / oop / ~ ~ I
i u 1 ~ oo~ ~ ~ ~ N I ~ p C ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~
48 ~ RCP - - ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
w 2 DES ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w~ ~~O ~ . d ~b ~

m~ ~ ~
x, ~ a~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ a 145 LF CHANNEL ` ~ o ~ ~a ' ~ ~ _ Vidnit~ Yap
Zone 1 BUFFER - 4200 SF ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ '3~ ~ Not to Scale
~ \ „ . _ _ Zone 2 BUFFER - 2800 SF ~ , m ` 1 ~ s
I, / ~ r ~ ~ ~ 500 ~
~ ti , yr' ~ \ _ P ~ ~ ~
1/ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ '?a ~ ~ ~
~ \ ~ , ; ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~za ~ ~ ~ .
h I ~ _ 12 ~ N ~ ~ " - m tin a
J! - I N bg \ ~ n ~ 1~e ~ ~ ~ ``~4? ~ -
~ ~ ;f 1 _ ~ ~ -
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 1A' ~ -118 ~ , - 1 1 ~ I ~ ~t1 1,1 ~ A.. - ~ l
~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ( °'o _ /
~ ~ r
g ~ , 1
Cpl ' C 11 ~ ~ r _ p~p.IS ~ Bpi ~ ~ s0 ~~1 r ( ~ ~ Ob .?j C / ~
7+ i ~ 11 10 5~'~ ~
i' ,Q ~ v1 ! ~ ` ( f ~ ~ /
i a ~ 1~ ~ \ ~ ~
~ ° ~~1 ~ ii ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ V~ ~ ~
W o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 / .
f PROP ~ / •4 0 i ~ ~ ~
l / ~ 1 ~1~ I fir. r , / / ~ ~ ~ i e`
f ? ~ z x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o I r~, FlEID ~ b / A/ / ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ .A ~ i ` »s
~ ~ ~ / `
O ~ / ~ _ ~ ~ i - ~ .~~.y ~ ~ - \
, ~ . N ` I
i ~ ..~1~ ~ ~ ~ L~t.r ~ l • A ~ ~ _ ~ \ . ' 1, / ~ 1
_ ~ 1 'vim ~ ~ ~ v
~ ~ ~ ~i~ Nom" i ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ / ~ ~ i ~ ~ it ` ^ / / ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~I
\ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 \ ,s ~
~ A ~ \ ~
\ r / / / , ( i ~ ~ - 1r ~ 113 / 1 I, ~
~ ` ~ \ \ ~J ' ~ \ \ ` /i ~ ~ ~ ry ~
° ~ ` \ / - Ito ~ ~ r ~ ti
o ti 1 ~ ~ l~ ,ub- _ ~i 1 ~ 1 s ~ ` ~ 1
11 q ,~y, ~ . ~ - - ..i-~. C6+- ~ • i , _ , ~ / 1?~ ~ \ i
_ ~ u k -'~V - bl i-~ X11 / ' ~ \ HELD 1 _ \ ~ i
~ ~ i 1' ~ ~ )
V ' 113~~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 1 ~ \ ~
~ / ~ ~ n U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ r•. _ \ _ i / ~ A ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ A \ i~
~ , ~ ; ~ i , A ~ , ~ 1 ~ V A ~ ~ ~
i ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ /
1 ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~
MPACT 2 ~ , fl'ETLANDS AREA GF I~~P~?CT ` ~ `.1
.009 ACRE WETLAN V ! / ~ \ ALREADY FILLED 1 ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ - A ~
j 1~ i i ~ ~ ~
o ~ ~ rcuvns ,use z i 31915 SF 27,39 sv , ~ r ~
o ~ / ~ ~
p ' ~ +e /JVr ~ ~ , ~
1 \ , ~ ~ ~ ~
~ i..` V f ~ ~ _
~ - - J ~ I
~..4 . 1/By7r1lYDS AREA--i _ I ' - _ ~ ' - _ 182,584 _ ~ / ~ ~ ~
1 -
~ ~i - i _ ~ _
~ ~ / ~ ' • ~
~
o ~ X4,1 ~ ~ yL~,n ~ ~ o~ \ ~ 1 \ ~ ~ otl
a~ ~ ~ 1~,~~- p E i~ ~ r"
~ - ~ 1
~F?~ ~N¢ N 5T1 ' 3" W ~ ~ ~ Z~ 0 214. ~ ~ - - ~
~ 1 M
` ~ c ~ N 43'43 4 W
1 ~ o ~ ~ J \ '1
/ ~ ° /J ~
~ ~ - ~ ~ / ~ V
I ° \ ~i ~ ~ ,
~S o 0 1
~ > ~
~ V ~ TOTAL FOODS REMO AL ~ 18?.5A4 SF / t ' in /r ~n
24,884 SF \ ~ ~ AN L
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n / ~ ~ /
~
~ ~ d l8 l ~ \ fi ,
/
1 ~
/ ~ - ~ \ / ~
~I~ J V s \ ~
1 \
~ ~ \ \
~ ~ \ \
~ ~

~ ~ ~ -
. 100 0 100 200 300
~ ~ :44 PM E . ~ P:\03PROJ\9783\9783-Iddt\dwg\9783A-IMPACT-CIEARING.dwg 05/30/2003 02:36
. ~ n» _ ,r__ e,nna
letc Complex °°t°Sc~e . Map No.
Herring-Sutton & Associates, P.A. J. Burt .Gillette Athleti Engineers -Surveyors -Planners & Toisnot Perk- Phi,
Phase One Impact Map i- a 100, 03-L-9783
2101-A Nash Street North, Wilson, North Carolina 27898 [phone] Wilson, N.C. OPTION 2 -FIGURE 4 sheet No. I of 1 J.C. UU,M
~7 voz