20030004 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030103

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 10, 2003
DWQ# 03-0004
Mecklenburg County
Ms. Mary C. Murray
City of Charlotte Storm Water Services
600 East Fourth Street, 14th Floor
Charlotte, NC, 28202
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Ms. Murray:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to ditch 0.04 acre of wetlands, stabilize 1,674 linear feet of
perennial streams, install gabions along 146 linear feet of perennial streams, and fill 149 linear feet of intermittent streams in order to
implement the Meadowdale-Carousel Capital Improvements Project in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, as described in your application
received by the Division of Water Quality on January 3, 2003. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this fill is
covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3376, 3353 and 3362, which can be downloaded from our web site at
htto:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 3,13 and 39 when issued by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. You should send an
application to the Division of Land Resources for their review of your project under dam safety rules as well as erosion and sediment
control. Also this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you must
notify us in writing. and you may be required to send us a new application fora new. certification. If the property is.sold, the new.owner.
must be given a copy'.of'the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland
fills for this project (now orrfn the future) exceed one acre; compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506
(h). For this approval to be'valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and the additional conditions' listed
below:
1. Equipment used in the streams shall be in good working order and be free of oil leaks and drips. Equipment shall be checked
daily for leaks and drips;
2. You are required to return the attached Certification of Completion form to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401
Certification has been completed.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60.days
of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition which conforms to Chapter 1508 of the North Carolina
General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any
questions, please telephone Samar Bou-Ghazale in our Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699 or Cyndi Karoly in Raleigh at 919-
733-1786.
AW K/cbk
Attachments
in a el ,
limek, P. .
cc: Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mooresville DWQ Regional Office
Central Files
File Copy
Benjamin Leatherland, 2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100, Charlotte, NC, 28220 030004
N
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Samar Bou-ghazale
Rex Gleason
Facility Name Meadowdale- Carousel Capital Improvements County Mecklenburg
Project Number 03 0004 County2
Recvd From APP Region Mooresville
Received Date 113103 Recvd By Region
Project Type reduce stream bank erosion & replacement of Two
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland' Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. ME
-' ? O ti' OO N F_ 11-137-9-t ?F- 30,434. ? 1,929.00 F_ F-
39 F F7 -@N ?F_-_-F_ 30,834. 0.04 F- F- F-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
i
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: *issue p Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Longitude (ddmmss)
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Meadowdale- Carousel Capital Improvements County Mecklenburg
Project Number 03 0004 Regional Contact: Samar Bou-ghazale
Date: 2/7/2003
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
LAW
RESOURCES CREATING SOLUTIONS JAN 3 1,,,
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. _-
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100 Date: December 30,20A w a t't30'100 _3 Phhse 11
Charlotte NC, 28220 Project Name: Meadowdale-Carousel CIPP
[phone] FAX [phone] Attention: Mr. John Dorney
Re: NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39: Pre-Construction Notification
TO: Mr. John Dorney
N.C. Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
WE ARE SENDING YOU ®Attached ?Under separate cover via the following items:
?Plans ?Samples ?Specifications ?Copy of letter ?Change order ®Other
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
7 12/30/02 1 Pre-Construction Notification for Nationwide Permit Nos. 3, 13, and 39
1 12/30/02 2 $475 check for DWQ review fee (check number 1566)

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
® For approval ? Approved as submitted ? Resubmit copies for approval r
? For your use ? Approved as noted ? Submit copies for distribution
? As requested ? Returned for corrections ? Return corrected prints
® For review and comment
REMARKS:
Hi John,
We hope you had a happy holiday season. Enclosed, please find seven copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) for the Charlotte
Storm Water Services (CSWS) Meadowdale-Carousel Capital Inrovements Project (CIP). Please contact Ms. Marv C. Murray at (704)
336-4588, if you have any questions. We look forward to hearing from you. Thanks, and have a great day!
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Benjamin L. Leatherland, P.W.S.
Project Environmental Scientist
Copy to: USACE, Mr. Steve Chapin
File
Michael A. Iagnocco, P.W.S.
Principal Environmental Scientist
BY WITH PERMISSION
_ F'_' North Carolina °
Wildlife Resources Commission I'
Charles R. Ful.lwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Chapin, Permit Coordinator
Asheville Office, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinatorsi/
Habitat Conservation Program ?. ?/
DATE: January 30, 2003
W F
X1
FEB - 5 2003 :
F
SUBJECT: Review of 404 Permit, DWQ No. 030004 (401 Certification), City of Charlotte
Stormwater Services (CSWS), Meadowdale-Carousel Capital Improvements Project,
Mecklenburg County
CSWS is requesting a letter of concurrence from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) to obtain a 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and a 401
Certification from the NC Division of Water Quality. The NCWRC has reviewed information provided by
the applicant, and field biologists on our staff are familiar with habitat values of the project area. These
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1.977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et.
seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d),
The proposed project is indicated to impact < 0.04 acres of wetlands due to tail-ditching. In
addition, the project proposes to impact a total of 1,929 linear feet of perennial streams in the Campbell
Creek subbasin. Impacts will occur due to new pipe installation, pipe maintenance and pipe upsizing.
Stream stabilization will also require 146 linear feet of gabions. Fish and crayfish are present in portions of
these streams. Bioengineering techniques are indicated.
Based on our review of the documents submitted, we will not object to the stream stabilization or
the associated piping. We are concerned about the tail-ditching to drain wetlands. Research and wager
quality data indicates that vegetated buffers and wetlands provide important biological and water quality
functions. In addition, buffers with vegetation such as herbs, shrubs and trees remove nutrients and other
pollutants, improve overall water quality and provide habitat for aquatic and terrestrial wildlife.
Providing that the stabilization activities are accomplished using best management practices to
reduce off site impacts and that state-of.--the-art bioengineering methods are used, we will not object to the
stream stabilization activities. However, the associated wetlands should not be tail-ditched. Instead, we
recommend that these wetlands be allowed to naturalize to provide Stormwater management, improve water
quality and provide urban wildlife habitat. Protective conservation easements should be required.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions
regarding these comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453.
Cc: Cyndi Karoly, DWQ
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service C enter * Raleigh, N(; 27699-17) J.
Telephone: [phone] ext. 281 & Fax: [phone]
Triage Check List
Date: o? 0 0 Project Name: c t.
DWQ#: to 3
County: / ?I 6
To: ? ARO Mike Parker
? FRO Ken Averitte
P-P MRO Mike Parker
RRO Steve Mitchell
From.
? WaRO 4)eber-ah1 49p". f ? -Ce . J
? WiRO -Jeame Nye.ile 2,-f 4
? WSRO ewaaX y_ e
Telephone : (919)
The file attached is being forwarded to your for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neese, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern
Comments:

r (.. t_?_
IWLAW
RESOURCES CREATING SO UT O NS
December 30, 2002
Mr. Steve Chapin
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers JAN
Regulatory Field Office 3 2nd
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 WAR ?N SGROl1P
'tea Ty ECT101V
--mod....
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification for Nationwide Permit Nos. 3, 13, and 39
City of Charlotte Storm Water Services
Meadowdale-Carousel Capital Improvements Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
Dear Mr. Chapin:
On behalf of the City of Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS), enclosed please find a completed Pre-
Construction Notification (PCN) Joint Form (Attachment A), along with figures and details (Attachment
B) for Nationwide Permit (NWT) No. 3, NWP No. 13, and NWP No. 39, for the above-referenced storm-
water improvements project. CSWS has retained Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.
(LAW) to provide permitting services for this project. This submittal is the product of a cooperative
effort between CSWS, Armstrong Glen, P.C. (AG), and LAW. The project area is located east of
Campbell Creek, north of Idlewild Road, west of East W.T. Harris Boulevard, and south of Albemarle
Road, in Charlotte, North Carolina (see Attachment B, Figures 1 and 2). The proposed project will
include approximately 1,674 linear feet (If) of streambank sloping/seeding, 149 if of new storm pipe
installation, and maintenance activities (40 bank feet [bf] of gabion replacing a timber wall, 106 bf of
gabion replacing riprap, and pipe system replacements).
CSWS, in conjunction with LAW, is submitting this PCN for authorization under NWP No. 13 - Bank
Stabilization and NWP No. 39 - Residential, Commercial, and Institutional Developments. Since the
proposed project will result in over 500 if of streambank stabilization activities, this PCN is being
provided in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) NWP No. 13 requirements.
Notification is also being made for the proposed storm pipe installation, and resultant loss of open waters
(intermittent stream) below the ordinary high water mark, in accordance with NWP No. 39 guidelines. In
addition, notification is being provided to request written verification for culvert replacement and
maintenance activities under NWP No. 3.
LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.
2801 Yorkinort Road, Suite 100 a Charlotte, NC 28208
704-357-8600 a Fax: [phone]
Serving the Charlotte area for over 50 years
Meadowdale-Carousel C1P - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705.
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
Background
December 30, 2002
The Meadowdale-Carousel storm-water improvements project is a City of Charlotte Capital
Improvements Project (CIP). The : 'City's CIP program addresses large, complex, costly, and
interconnected drainage problems. These drainage and conveyance problems may include structural
flooding, streambank erosion, infrastructure failure, and/or code compliance issues. Occasionally, many
storm-water drainage problems are evident in a single geographical area. These individual problems may
then be grouped together, so that CSWS can resolve them as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible.
CIPs require extensive planning,. detailed design, easement acquisition, and construction, and take
approximately two to three years to complete, from planning through construction.
For the Meadowdale-Carousel CIP, CSWS has proposed storm-water improvement measures along two
unnamed tributaries to Campbell Creek (a tributary to McAlpine Creek). Tributary 1 is a second-order
stream that flows southward until converging with Campbell Creek, near the Idlebrook Drive roadway
crossing (see Attachment B, Figure 3). Tributary 2 is a first-order stream that generally flows westward,
and is located between Easthaven Drive and Dawnwood Drive. Tributary 2 is situated between a
downstream pipe system (approximately 320 feet long) which discharges to Tributary 1, and an upstream
pipe system (approximately 880 feet long) which drains a wetland area. Stream flow is generally
conveyed southward through the predominately residential watershed (project area) located east of
Campbell Creek and northwest of the East W.T. Harris Boulevard/Idlewild Road intersection.
The proposed project will involve the following activities:
Along Tributary 1:
1) Approximately 1,6741f of streambank stabilization utilizing bank sloping and seeding; and
2) Culvert replacement and maintenance activities at two locations, including the installation of 146 bf
of gabion (106 bf of gabion to replace existing riprap and 40 bf of gabion to replace an existing
timber retaining wall).
Along Tributary 2•
1) Approximately 1491f of channel piping.
Tributary 1 is a perennial stream with low sinuosity, moderate to severe incision, and poor to moderate
in-stream habitat structure. Many channel reaches associated with Tributary 1 lack significant bedform
characteristics, and are currently experiencing significant streambank erosion. Historic development in
the watershed, previous channel modifications, and the removal and trimming/mowing of adjacent
riparian vegetation have likely contributed to the degradation and impairment of this channel. Tributary
2 is an intermittent, aquatically-important channel that has been previously piped upstream and
downstream. Approximately 149 if of Tributary 2 is currently not piped; the majority of the un-piped
section is riprap-lined, with a 201f pre-cast masonry outfall structure at the upstream end.
The Tributary 1 watershed (including the Tributary 2 watershed) is approximately 300 acres (0.5 square
mile) in extent. Surrounding land use is primarily single-family residential, and institutional (two
schools to the north). During project implementation, the City may acquire temporary construction
easements from local property owners for access to the subject streams. Temporary impacts to personal
property will be repaired and restored. Armstrong Glen, P.C., in cooperation with CSWS, is serving as
the lead designer of the proposed storm-water improvements project. The proposed project is scheduled
2
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39 December 30, 2002
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
for construction in March 2003, following approval from the USACE and the North Carolina Department
of Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
' CSWS has proposed the Meadowdale-Carousel CIP improvements to reduce streambank erosion and
downstream sedimentation, and to reduce flooding of streets and structures. The existing drainage and
conveyance system is currently experiencing streambank erosion problems and is undersized to
effectively convey current urban storm-water discharges, resulting in the flooding of streets, homes,
' structures, and other property. To address these problems, CSWS has proposed storm-water
improvements at various locations within the project area, along with replacement of two existing
culverts.
Project Purpose and Need
The Charlotte Storm Water Program, the first of its kind in North Carolina, was implemented in January
1993. Since the program's inception, CSWS has been committed to providing Charlotte communities
with a quality storm drainage system by monitoring and managing functional storm water systems that
' provide for public safety. Operation of this CSWS program has revealed the magnitude of drainage
system needs in Charlotte. In November 1995, CSWS along with City staff and City Council developed
a comprehensive strategy for the storm water program. Among the strategies adopted was a strategy to
I address stream channels that experience bank erosion. CSWS has begun a 15-year program to restore
degraded channels by re-establishing vegetation on stream banks and/or by maintaining and upholding
the bank with a protective cover.
To protect public safety and property, and to enhance the natural and beneficial functions of waterways
and their associated riparian corridors, CSWS has an obligation to the neighborhoods of Charlotte to
' maintain and improve area storm water drainage and conveyance systems. In keeping with their
commitment to Charlotte neighborhoods, CSWS has proposed improvements to the storm drainage
system within the Meadowdale - Carousel neighborhood. These storm water improvements will be
implemented at various locations within the approximate 300-acre project area watershed, which contains
approximately 4,150 if of jurisdictional stream channels. Several residences and personal properties
within the project area are within 75 feet of the top of the channel bank. The need for the project is
based on the severity of flooding and streambank erosion along the stream channel within the
neighborhood. The localized flooding and eroding streambanks are causing a threat to property owners,
jeopardizing public safety, and degrading the quality of the waterway.
' To address erosion problems and flooding, as well as to enhance the natural benefits of the waterway,
CSWS has proposed storm drainage improvements along 1,969 if of jurisdictional stream (see
Attachment B, Figure 4). The improvements include streambank sloping and seeding along perennial
' stream channels where bank erosion is severe and/or is threatening private property (approximately 1,674
If), and the placement of new storm pipe (approximately 149 If) within an intermittent, aquatically-
important stream. In addition, minor maintenance activities, such as culvert and pipe system
replacements, and the placement of supplemental riprap on existing culvert outlet aprons will be
conducted. Approximately 146 bf of gabion installation associated with culvert replacement (e.g.,
immediately upstream of culvert replacement locations) will also be performed. Without the proposed
improvements, erosion and pollution will continue to be a problem. Left in its current state, eroding
streambanks and flooding conditions will: a) affect public safety, causing damage to personal properties
and potentially damaging private infrastructure (including buildings and roadways), and b) will
perpetuate the continued degradation of the stream environment and riparian habitat. The proposed
4 3
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39 December 30, 2002
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
project will help satisfy CSWS's goal of maintaining and improving area storm water drainage systems in
the interest of the communities, wildlife, and natural resources. Completion of this project will result in
positive, long-term benefits to: storm water conveyance, streambank stability, adjacent properties, and
habitat resources (both aquatic and terrestrial). Short-term adverse impacts during construction should be
offset by long-term benefits to the watershed.
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
The project area includes approximately 4,150 if of unnamed stream channels that are tributaries of
Campbell Creek. The primary subject stream targeted for storm drainage improvements, identified as
Tributary 1 (see Attachment B, Figure 3), is a perennial, second-order stream which flows southwesterly
through the project area watershed until converging with Campbell Creek (DWQ Stream Index Number
11-137-9-1) (see Attachment B, Figure 1). Campbell Creek is located in the McAlpine Creek sub-basin,
within the lower Catawba River Basin, Sub-basin 3-08-34. The McAlpine Creek confluence is located
approximately two miles downstream of the southern portion of the project area.
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map does not identify the unnamed tributaries of Campbell
Creek as a classified system, and does not depict any other jurisdictional waters of the U.S. or wetlands
within the project area. Campbell Creek, located within 600 feet of the southern-most portion of the
project area, flows south to its confluence with McAlpine Creek. The NWI map indicates that Campbell
Creek is a riverine system (R2UBH). Campbell Creek is further described as a permanently flooded,
lower perennial stream with an unconsolidated bottom (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1991).
Jurisdictional areas within the proposed project area include an approximate 4,000 if perennial stream
(Tributary 1), an approximate 149 if intermittent, aquatically-important stream (Tributary 2), and 0.04-
acre of emergent, linear wetlands (see Attachment B, Figure 3). An additional intermittent, aquatically-
important stream is located in the northeastern portion of the project area, but no work is proposed along
this channel. Project activities will largely be conducted within the bed and bank along 1,969 if of
jurisdictional stream channels.
The primary subject stream (Tributary 1) flows south to its confluence with Campbell Creek. Tributary 1
is a perennial channel with an average width of 15 - 20 feet (measured from top of bank to top of bank)
and a channel bottom typically 6 - 10 feet wide with a substrate composed of gravel, cobble, boulders,
and areas of exposed bedrock and/or sapprolite (i.e., weathered bedrock). Bank heights range from 3 to 8
feet. Water depth ranges from less than six inches at riffles to 2.5 feet at pools. Minor excavation within
the channel improvement areas will be necessary near proposed culverts and gabions. The depths and
widths of the channel will largely remain unchanged. Vegetation associated with the primary subject
stream largely consists of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), with areas co-dominated by one or more of
the following: green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), box-elder (A. negundo), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), English ivy (Hedera helix),
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), smartweed (Polygonum sp.), Nepal microstegium (Eulalia
viminea), false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica), Asiatic dayflower (Commelina communis), giant cane
(Arundinaria gigantea), and bamboo (Bambusa sp.).
LAW scientists completed stream assessments in the study area utilizing the USACE's Intermittent
Channel Evaluation Form and DWQ's Stream Classification Form on January 18, 19, 2001. The purpose
of the stream assessments was to distinguish between non jurisdictional ephemeral streams, and
jurisdictional intermittent and perennial streams. Jurisdictional intermittent streams were further
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39 December 30, 2002
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
categorized as "aquatically important" and "aquatically unimportant" in accordance with USACE
methodology. Those streams categorized as perennial would be considered important by the USACE and
meet DWQ's definition of perennial, i.e., confirmed presence of fish, crayfish, or shellfish, or a positive
7Q10/30Q2 flow. Waters of the U.S. fall under the jurisdiction of the USACE pursuant to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act. Jurisdictional areas were confined to the bed and bank of the channels, with the
exception of a linear wetland (described below), which apparently resulted from the accumulation of
sediments, and subsequent vegetation, within a storm channel.
The entire length of Tributary 1 within the project area, as well as the stream located between Dawnwood
Drive and Easthaven Drive (Tributary 2), were characterized as aquatically-important streams, based on
observations made in January 2001. Subsequently, on September 19, 2002, LAW scientists conducted
biological sampling within Tributary 1, utilizing a D-shaped dip net, for purposes of determining the
presence of fish, crayfish, and shellfish. Crayfish were noted in Tributary 1 throughout the project area,
and fish were observed in a number of pools during the September 19, 2002 field review. Therefore, this
stream is classified as a perennial stream, in accordance with the current DWQ definition. While flowing
water was noted in Tributary 2 during the January 2001 field review, no flowing water or pools of water,
and no crayfish, fish or shellfish were observed during a subsequent September 23, 2002 field review.
Therefore, Tributary 2 is classified as an intermittent stream.
Possible wetland.areas in the study area were evaluated using the Routine On-Site Determination method
as described in the 1987 "Corps of Engineers Wetlands. Delineation Manual" (Environmental Laboratory,
1987). This technique uses a multi-parameter approach, which requires positive evidence of the
following three criteria: hydrophytic vegetation, wetland hydrology, and hydric soils. Field
reconnaissance conducted by LAW in January 2001 identified one linear wetland within the proposed
project limits, approximately 0.04-acre in size, located between Cloverdale Avenue and Twin Oaks
Place. Observations indicate that this wetland area may have developed as a result of sediment
accumulation in a storm channel. The wetland is currently vegetated with a combination of black willow
(Salix nigra), climbing hempweed (Mikania scandens), sedge (Cyperus sp.), arrow-leaf tear-thumb
(Polygonum sagittatum), and soft rush (Juncus effusus).
Jurisdictional areas are identified on Figure 3, Approximate Waters of the U.S. and Wetlands Boundary
Map (Attachment B). Sample Stream Assessment Forms and Routine Wetland Determination Data
Forms are included in Attachment C. Photographs of stream segments and the linear wetland located
within the project area are included in Attachment D. A jurisdictional determination request is being
forwarded to the USACE by CSWS as a component of this NWP application (Attachment E). The
USACE conducted a site visit and verified field determinations on May 24, 2001.
Alternatives/Minimization
Several alternatives were considered for the proposed streambank stabilization and pipe installation
activities associated with the Meadowdale-Carousel C1P. To determine appropriate methods for
addressing the existing storm drainage inadequacies that are contributing to streambank erosion and
flooding, the project area and existing storm drainage system were evaluated by CSWS, in cooperation
with AG. These efforts focused on Tributary 1 of Campbell Creek and its tributaries, in order to
determine appropriate measures for streambank erosion control and flood minimization. Among the
options considered were a "no-action alternative," Rosgen Priority I, II, III, and IV restoration, soil
bioengineering (with and without rock toe protection), riprap stabilization, gabion installation, storm
piping, natural-bottom culverts, and urban debris removal from the subject streams.
5
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39 December 30, 2002
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
The project area poses a number of challenges along many stream reaches, including steep vertical banks
and other urban constraints, including the close proximity of residences and private property along the
targeted stream reaches. After considering these project area constraints, it was determined that impacts
to Tributary 1 will be unavoidable, in order to accomplish the necessary improvements.
To minimize potential impacts associated with the proposed drainage and conveyance improvements,
however, "soft" streambank stabilization measures are planned along most stream reaches. "Hard"
stabilization measures, consisting of riprap toe protection, were initially proposed along approximately
420 if of Tributary 1, in areas that are undergoing significant bank erosion. However, in order to
minimize impacts to waters of the U.S., "hard stabilization has been removed from the planned
stabilization activities, in order to limit disturbance of aquatic and terrestrial habitats.
Within the context of "soft" measures, streambank stabilization, stream enhancement, and stream
restoration measures were further considered for the proposed project. Streambank stabilization efforts
would reduce channel degradation and erosion, and would minimize downstream sedimentation. Stream
enhancement and/or restoration measures would serve to reduce channel degradation, and would provide
additional habitat/water quality improvements, but were determined to be unfeasible, due to the close
proximity of nearby structures and buried utilities, the need for additional property acquisition, and the
potential for increased flooding.
Two culvert replacements are proposed along perennial Tributary 1, at Idlebrook Drive and Helmdale
Avenue. Culvert extensions were initially considered at these locations due to the eroded conditions of
stream banks immediately upstream and/or downstream of the existing culverts. In order to minimize
impacts to the streambed, culvert extensions were dropped from the project plan, and, in one instance (at
Helmdale Avenue), the culvert replacement will result in daylighting 2 if of currently enclosed channel.
To further minimize potential impacts to the streambed and aquatic habitat, a natural-bottom culvert will
replace the existing conventional culvert at Idlebrook Drive, and the proposed replacement culvert invert
at Helmdale Avenue will be buried beneath the existing streambed. The culvert replacements are
necessary in order to address flooding problems and to protect public safety. Existing culverts are
currently undersized.
A no-action alternative was also considered. This alternative would allow continued degradation of
existing streams and streambanks in the project area, threatening public property and impairing
downstream surface waters. Considering the severity of channel instability throughout the targeted
reaches and the ongoing threat to property and public safety, the no-action alternative was subsequently
eliminated from further consideration.
Recommended Alternative
After consideration of these alternatives and issues, it was determined that the recommended alternative
for the Meadowdale-Carousel C1P would involve a combination of streambank stabilization through
sloping/seeding efforts, limited use of new pipe, and culvert replacement and maintenance activities,
including the installation of gabions at culvert inlets and outlets -(Attachment B). Stabilization efforts
will incorporate streambank re-contouring to 1.5:1 slopes, installation of permanent erosion control
matting, and seeding of all disturbed areas with a riparian seed mix. Rock toe protection has been
removed from project plans since calculations performed by AG and CSWS indicate that shear stresses
should not exceed the stabilizing capabilities of the sloped/seeded banks. New storm pipe installation
will occur along an intermittent channel that has been previously piped upstream and downstream, and
6
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39 December 30, 2002
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
' which currently provides marginal aquatic habitat resources. Limited gabion installation immediately
upstream of the Idlebrook Drive culvert replacement will be implemented. Extensive streambank sloping
and seeding along perennial channels, rather than hard armoring or piping, should minimize overall
project impacts, while also reducing streambank erosion and downstream sedimentation.
' Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
' The proposed Meadowdale-Carousel CIP will result in unavoidable impacts to waters of the U.S. as a
result of streambank stabilization measures, gabion installation, and storm piping activities. Impacts to
existing channels will occur along approximately 1,780 if of the approximately 4,000 if of perennial
' channel that comprises Tributary 1 within the project area. The project will also include 1491f of storm
pipe installation along Tributary 2 (between Dawnwood Drive and Easthaven Drive), an intermittent,
aquatically-important, first-order Campbell Creek tributary. These unavoidable impacts will be
' necessary for stabilization of eroding streambanks and flood hazard reduction. See Attachment B for
figures and details regarding storm-water improvement measures.
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
Pro posed` Jurisdictional Stream Impacts
Total Perennial Stream Impacts (If): 1,780
Total Intermittent Aquatically-Important Stream Im acts Of): 149
Total Jurisdictional Stream Tm acts Of)- 1,929

Pro cased Activity Impact Length
Linear Fcet i M
Stream Clas.,'tic dot Nationwide
Permit NWP
Streambank Stabilization:
Streambank slo in /seedin 1,674 Perennial NWP 13
New Storm Pipe Installation. 149 Intermittent A uaticall -Im rtant NWP 39
Total: 1,823

Pro osed Acti it , Impact Length*
B3 Ink Feet (M-)
Stream Classiri ation Nationwide
P -rmit NWP
Gabion Installation:
Timber retainin wall replacement) 40 Perennial NWP 3
Gabion Installation:
Ri ra replacement) 106 Perennial NWP 3
Total: 146
* Gabion installation on opposite streambanks totals 106 linear feet (may also be expressed as 146 bank feet of gabion).
Bank Stabilization Activities - Nationwide Permit No. 13
Completion of the proposed storm drainage system improvements project will result in potential impacts
to approximately 1,674 if (measured along centerline of the stream) of jurisdictional stream channel
resulting from streambank stabilization measures. The streambank stabilization is proposed to be
accomplished utilizing sloping/seeding methods (see Attachment B, Figure 8). Impacts to jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. associated with the proposed streambank stabilization are addressed in NWP No. 13 -
Bank Stabilization, designated for implementation of erosion prevention measures along stream channels.
The proposed streambank stabilization measures are necessary to protect adjacent property and to
improve both aquatic habitat and water quality. Left in their current state, the channel's eroding
streambanks will affect public safety and will perpetuate the continued degradation of the stream
environment and riparian habitat.
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39 December 30, 2002
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705 '
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase Il
New Pine Placement - Nationwide Permit No. 39
New storm pipe will be installed at one location in the project area, between Dawnwood Drive and
Easthaven Drive (Tributary 2) (see Attachment B, Figure 7). Impacts to an approximate 149 if
intermittent, aquatically-important stream at this location will result from the placement of fill material in '
the existing stream, and routing the stream flow through a new 149 If, 48-inch diameter reinforced
concrete pipe (RCP). Impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. associated with the proposed storm
pipe installation are addressed in NWP No. 39 Residential, Commercial, and Institutional
Developments, including attendant features. The 149 if of channel to be piped is isolated from adjacent
open surface waters by piped channel upstream and downstream. The proposed storm piping efforts have
been designed to reduce private property flooding and eliminate downstream sedimentation from '
collapsing streambanks.
Maintenance Activities- Nationwide Permit No. 3 '
This project will also involve maintenance activities such as culvert and pipe system replacements, and
the placement of supplemental riprap to existing culvert outlet aprons, at separate locations on area '
stream channels, in order to address flooding problems and to protect public safety (see Attachment B,
Figure 4). A total of 146 bf of gabion and various culvert/pipe system replacements will occur on area
streams. The installation of gabion is associated with the replacement of the culvert at Idlebrook Drive;
106 bf of gabion will replace existing riprap and 40 bf of gabion will replace an existing retaining wall
immediately upstream of the culvert (see Attachment B, Figure 6). The proposed culvert and pipe system
replacement/maintenance activities are necessary to improve hydraulic conditions and drainage beneath
several roads in the project area, which become flooded and eventually result in flooding of yards and
structures. The culvert replacement/maintenance projects have been designed to achieve current City of
Charlotte design standards for conveyance of the 25-year storm event. Pipe system replacement efforts
have been designed to reduce home flooding and to meet design standards for conveyance of the 10-year
storm event. Proposed supplemental riprap aprons at pipe outfalls are designed to be the minimum size
required for energy dissipation, and to satisfy current erosion and sedimentation control design standards.
Three culvert/pipe replacement efforts will be implemented under the NWP No. 3 - Maintenance
guidelines (Attachment B). At Idlebrook Drive, an existing reinforced concrete box culvert(RCBC) will '
be replaced by a concrete arch (natural-bottom). At Helmdale Avenue, an arched metal pipe culvert will
be replaced by a partially-buried dual RCBC. Upstream of Helmdale Avenue, an existing pipe system
will be replaced by a larger-diameter pipe system of equivalent length.
Larger-diameter replacement culverts/pipes have been designed to closely replicate existing pipe length,
in order to increase conveyance capacity without increasing stream length impacts. Culvert inlets and
outlets will be buried below the existing streambed, or closely matched to existing streambed gradients.
To further minimize project impacts, the existing Idlebrook Drive culvert will be replaced by a natural-
bottom concrete arch.
Tail-Ditching
In an effort to improve hydraulic conditions and reduce yard and house flooding, tail-ditching of a linear
wetland is proposed between Cloverdale Avenue and Twin Oaks Place. The proposed tail-ditching effort
will involve the physical removal of accumulated sediment from the 0.04-acre wetland area
(approximately 300 feet long and six feet wide), and redefinition of the historic storm channel. '
8 op
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP -PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39 December 30, 2002
' CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
Observations indicate that this wetland area has developed as a result of sediment accumulation in the
storm channel. Culverts currently exist both upstream and downstream of the wetland area. Impacts will
result from the physical removal of accumulated sediment, and associated vegetation. Excavation
equipment (e.g., track hoe, backhoe, etc.) will operate from the top of the bank (i.e., from the upland
area), rather than within the wetland area, in order to minimize potential impacts. Excavated sediment
will be deposited in an upland area and will be handled in accordance will applicable regulations and
agency guidelines. The proposed tail-ditching activity will likely result in incidental fallback only, and it
is CSWS's understanding that this type of discharge is not subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
It is anticipated that this activity will be performed under the guidelines of 40 CFR Part 232, as issued in
the January 17, 2001 Federal Register (volume 66, number 11).
The proposed project efforts will help satisfy CSWS's goal of maintaining and improving area storm-
water systems for the benefit of the community, local wildlife, and natural resources. The completion of
these efforts should result in only minimal impacts to surface waters.
Regulatory Implications
1 The project designs comply with conditions of the Section 401 General Certification for projects eligible
for NWP No. 3, NWP No. 13, and NWP No. 39, effective March 18, 2002. Since over 500 if of
streambank will be stabilized, Pre-Construction Notification to the USACE and DWQ is required for
compliance with NWP No. 13 conditions.
PCN to the USACE is also required under NWP No. 39 conditions, since jurisdictional stream channel
below the ordinary high water mark will be impacted as a result of new pipe installation. The proposed
project will comply with general and regional conditions associated with these nationwide permits.
' PCN to the USACE is not. required for the culvert replacement and maintenance activities. However,
CSWS requests written verification that the proposed culvert replacement and maintenance activities are
' permissible under NWP No. 3 and comply with the general and regional conditions of NWP No.3.
Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices, which equal or exceed those outlined in the most
recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" will
be utilized to prevent exceedances of the water quality turbidity standards. Additionally, project
sediment and erosion control measures placed in waters of the state will be removed and the natural
grade restored after the Division of Land Resources or delegated local program has released the project.
Per NWP guidelines, additional site-specific conditions may be added to the proposed project in order to
ensure compliance with applicable water quality standards. General and regional conditions for NWP
No. 13 and NWP No. 39 will be met by the CSWS designs and communicated to CSWS's contractors.
Activities affecting jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will not begin prior to receipt of the requisite Section
404 permit and corresponding Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC). Impacts to jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. will adhere to DWQ General Certification (GC) conditions.
9
1
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39 December 30, 2002
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705 '
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
Conceptual Compensatory Mitigation
Completion of the proposed storm-water improvements will result in 1,780 if of impacts to perennial
stream channels. The proposed project is anticipated to be self-mitigating, since streambank sloping and '
seeding should reduce erosion and subsequent downstream sedimentation (non-point source pollution),
and gabion installation will involve direct replacement of existing hard structures. Streambank sloping
and seeding should help improve aquatic and riparian ecosystem health, should help reduce downstream
substrate embeddedness, and should enhance long-term riparian habitat integrity.
Cultural Resources and Protected Species
On January 31, 2002, a letter was sent to the N.C. Department of Cultural Resources (NCDCR) `
requesting comments on the proposed project. A response letter from the NCDCR dated February 22,
2002 indicates that NCDCR is aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project
(Attachment F). Since the proposed storm-water improvement measures will be implemented largely
within the bed and bank of the existing stream channels, it is not anticipated that cultural resources will
be affected by this project. '
Correspondence, dated January 31, 2002, was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) to request information regarding documented populations of federally-listed, state-listed, or '
candidate endangered species, threatened species, or critical habitat, within the proposed project area. A
letter from the NCNHP, dated February 4, 2002, noted that there is no record of rare species, significant
natural communities, or priority natural areas as the site, nor within a mile of the site (Attachment G). '
A search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database provided information
concerning the potential occurrence of threatened and/or endangered species within Mecklenburg '
County, North Carolina (NCNHP, 2001). This database indicates that there are seven federally and/or
state threatened or endangered species which may occur in Mecklenburg County, namely the bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), Georgia aster (Aster
georgianus), tall larkspur (Delphinium exaltatum), smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), ,
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii).
The potential presence of freshwater mussels, particularly the Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona
decorata), was also considered during project planning efforts. Occurrences of the Carolina heelsplitter
have not been documented in the portion of the Catawba River Basin containing the project area
(USFWS, 1996). The nearest known population is located in Goose Creek (Union County),
approximately 18 miles southeast of the project area. Additionally, previous urban storm-water
discharges have likely eliminated from the project area any preferred Carolina heelsplitter habitat,
including mud, muddy sand, or muddy gravel substrate. The urban, residential land use within the
project area also does not likely provide suitable foraging, nesting, or roosting habitat for the bald eagle.
Michaux's sumac has been likely extirpated from Mecklenburg County (USFWS, 1993). As the project
will largely be confined to the bed and bank of the stream, the likelihood of the channel stabilization and
flood control project impacting non-aquatic protected species is remote.
Correspondence dated January 31, 2002 was also forwarded to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) to determine the presence of federally-listed endangered or threatened species, candidates
proposed for listing as endangered or threatened species, or critical habitat in the proposed project permit
area. A letter dated February 12, 2002 was received from the USFWS, with comments regarding the '
10 1
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3,13, and 39 December 30, 2002
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
proposed project (Attachment H). The UFWS assigned Log No. 4-2-02-154 to the proposed project. The
USFWS concluded that the proposed project will have "no effect" on federally listed species, and that
requirements under Section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act have been fulfilled. In response to
additional USFWS comments in this correspondence: 1) CSWS has pursued impact avoidance and
minimization during final design efforts (including removal of 65 bf of originally-proposed gabion), 2)
CSWS has removed the originally-proposed streambank stabilization rock toe protection, and will utilize
a "softer" streambank stabilization solution comprised of streambank sloping and seeding, and 3) CSWS
will encourage future protection and management of the existing 35-foot vegetated Surface Water
Improvement and Management (SWIM) buffer upstream of Idlebrook Drive and the 50-foot SWIM
buffer downstream of Idlebrook Drive by the Mecklenburg County Department of Environmental
Protection (MCDEP).
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act Documentation
Since the proposed Meadowdale-Carousel CIP project will impact less than 500 if of perennial stream
channel with hard structure, DWQ does not require environmental documentation pursuant to the North
Carolina State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).
Closing
Your prompt decision in .this matter and corresponding processing of this permit will be greatly
appreciated. Seven copies of this letter and attachments, including detail drawings from the CIP have
been forwarded to DWQ for notification purposes. Please do not hesitate to call Mary C. Murray at 704-
336-4588, if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
CHARLOTTE STORM WATER
qy) Um
Mary C. M , P.W.S. ichael A. Iagnocco, '
U
Charlotte Storm Water Services Law Engineering and vironmental Services, Inc.
Permitting and Mitigation Administrator Principal Environmental Scientist
' MCM/MAUBLL/AHK
Enclosures: Attachment A -
Attachment B -
Attachment C -
Attachment D -
' Attachment E -
Attachment F -
Attachment G -
Attachment H -
cc:
Joint Form - Nationwide Permit Nos. 3, 13, and 39
Figures and Details
Stream Assessment and Wetland Determination Forms
Photographs
USACE Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
NCDCR Correspondence
NCNHP Correspondence
USFWS Correspondence
Mr. John Domey, NCDENR DWQ
11
r tI
1? 1 l
Q
0 \NA
OF QG
1
r
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
r
For Section 404, and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
http://www.saw.usace.gM.mil/wetlands/Penn app.htm.
' The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/regtour.htm, or contact one of the field
offices listed at the end of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for
each county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and
regulation of wetlands and waters of the U.S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
r Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
r Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for some General Certifications is not required,
provided that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet
should contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
r Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is also required for projects' occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on the last page of this application).
Page 1 of 16
CAMA Coordination - If the project occurs in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on
the last page of this application) the applicant should also contact the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM) at [phone]. DCM will determine whether or not the project involves a
designated Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead permitting agency.
In such cases, DCM will require a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Permit and will coordinate
the 404/401 Permits.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office (addresses are listed at the end of this
application). Upon receipt of an application, the USACE will determine if the application is complete as
soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant
to address information needs for all USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as
information required for State authorizations, certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the
information requested on this form will result in a complete application for any of the USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the minimum amount of information that must be
provided for a complete PCN for each USACE Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 65 Fed.Reg. 12893
(March 9, 2000), available at http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/nwpfinalFedReg_pdf.
Processing times vary by permit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete.
Please contact the appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at http://h2o.ehnr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/fees.html. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
Page 2 of 16
Office Use Only: Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3.13, and 39
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Marv C. Murray, P.W.S., Permitting and Mitigation Administrator
Mailing Address:- -City of Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS)
600 East Fourth Street 14th floor
Charlotte, NC
28202
' Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
' 2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
' Company Affiliation: N/A
Mailing Address: N/A
i
Telephone Number: N/A Fax Number: N/A
E-mail Address: N/A
Page 3 of 16
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Meadowdale-Carousel Capital Improvements Project (CIP)
2. T.I.P. Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Multiple properties and property
identification numbers (residential properties)
4. Location
County: Mecklenburg Nearest Town: Charlotte
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Easthaven (existing subdivision)
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From interstate 85: 1) Take exit 45
(East W.T. Harris Boulevard) and proceed south-southeast for 10.1 miles on East W.T. Harris
Boulevard, 2) Turn right on Idlewild Road and proceed west for 0.3 mile, 3) Turn right on
Idlebrook Drive and proceed north. The proposed streambank stabilization efforts (NWP 13)
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): The center of the project area is
located at 35 degrees, 11 minutes, 24 seconds N. / 80 degrees, 44 minutes, 02 seconds W.
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: Land
use in the project area is approximately 95% residential, with limited commercial land use to
the southeast near the East W.T. Harris Boulevard/Idlewild Road intersection and
institutional land use (i.e., school) near the northern portion of the project area.
7. Property size (acres): WA
Page 4 of 16
Drive/west of Cloverdale Avenue/south of Easthaven.
i
IV.

8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): U.T. to Campbell Creek (tributary of
McAlpine Creek)
9. River Basin: Catawba
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.dnr.state.nc.us/admin/mai)s/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: CSWS has proposed the Meadowdale-Carousel
CIP improvements to reduce streambank erosion and downstream sedimentation, and to
reduce flooding of streets and structures. The existing drainage and conveyance system is
currently experiencing streambank erosion problems and is undersized to effectively convey
current urban storm-water discharges, resulting in the flooding of streets, homes, structures,
and other property. To address these problems, CSWS has proposed storm-water
improvements at various locations within the project area, along with replacement of two
existing culverts.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Track hoes, back hoes,
bulldozers, dumptrucks, and hand tools
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Primarily single-family residential land
use in the vicinity of the project area.
Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No prior permits or jurisdictional determinations have been requested or obtained.
Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application:
No future project plans are known at this time.
Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
Page 5 of 16
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
Site 4 Tail-ditching < 0.04 no 600 Emergent

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.eov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: approx. 0.04 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: Up to 0.04 acre of wetland impact may result from
Page 6 of 16
under the guidelines of 40 CFR Part 232, as issued in the January 17, 2001 Federal Register
(volume 66, number 11).
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please seci )
Site 1 Stabilization 1,674 Tributary 1 5-8 feet Perennial
Site 2 Maintenance 40 bf Tributary 1 5-8 feet Perennial
Site 2 Maintenance 106 bf Tributary 1 5-8 feet Perennial
Site 3 Storm Pipe 149 Tributary 2 2-3 feet Intermittent

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.); excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tot)ozone.com,
www.mgpguest.com, etc.). 1 q / 9
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: IM "t°9 ( linear feet (1,674 If
of streambank stabilization + 106 If of gabion [146 bank feetl + 149 if of storm pipe). See
Attachment B. Figures 4, 6, and 7.
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of +ho T T O
CTA
of ; c)-
rea of
npact
icres)
(if Name applicable) Wat) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, .estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
N/A N/A N/A

pacts. impacts include, but are not limited to: rill, excavation, dredging,
r--rased, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
-- - mciuu6c1 above m the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Page 7 of 16
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
VII.
Size of watershed draining to pond: WA Expected pond surface area: WA
Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Several alternatives were considered for the proposed streambank stabilization and pipe
installation activities associated with the Meadowdale-Carousel CIP. To determine appropriate
The project area poses a number of challenges along many stream reaches, including steep
Within the context of "soft" measures, streambank stabilization, stream enhancement, and stream
restoration measures were further considered for the proposed project. Streambank stabilization
Two culvert replacements are proposed along perennial Tributary 1. at Idlebrook Drive and
Helmdale Avenue. Culvert extensions were initially considered at these locations due to the
eroded conditions of stream banks immediately upstream andfor downstream of the existing
culverts. In order to minimize impacts to the streambed, culvert extensions were dropped from
the project plan, and, in one instance (at Helmdale Avenue), the culvert replacement will result in
Page 8 of 16
control and flood minimization. Among the options considered were a "no-action alternative,"
Rosgen Priority I. II, III, and IV restoration, soil bioengineering (with and without rock toe
protection), riprap stabilization, gabion installation, storm piping, natural-bottom culverts, and
urban debris removal from the subiect streams.
To minimize potential impacts associated with the proposed drainage and conveyance
been removed from the planned stabilization activities, in order to limit disturbance of aquatic and
terrestrial habitats.
determined to be unfeasible, due to the close proximity of nearby structures and buried utilities,
the need for additional property acquisition, and the potential for increased flooding.
streambed and aquatic habitat, a natural-bottom culvert will replace the existing conventional
culvert at Idlebrook Drive, and the proposed replacement culvert invert at Helmdale Avenue will be
buried beneath the existing streambed. The culvert replacements are necessary in order to
address flooding problems and to protect public safety. Existing culverts are currently
undersized.
the targeted reaches and the ongoing threat to property and public safety, the no-action
alternative was subsequently eliminated from further consideration.
Recommended Alternative
capabilities of the sloped/seeded banks. New storm pipe installation will occur along an
sloping and seeding along perennial channels, rather than hard armoring or piping, should
minimize overall project impacts, while also reducing streambank erosion and downstream
sedimentation.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
The proposed Meadowdale-Carousel CIP will result in unavoidable impacts to waters of the U.S.
as a result of streambank stabilization measures, gabion installation, and storm piping activities.
Impacts to existing channels will occur along approximately 1,780 If of the approximately 4,000 If
of perennial channel that comprises Tributary 1 within the project area. The project will also
include 149 If of storm pipe installation along Tributary 2 (between Dawnwood Drive and
Easthaven Drive), an intermittent, aquatically important, first-order Campbell Creek tributary.
These unavoidable impacts will be necessary for stabilization of eroding streambanks and flood
hazard reduction. See Attachment B for figures and details regarding storm-water improvement
measures.
Bank Stabilization Activities - Nationwide Permit No. 13
Page 9 of 16
(Attachment B). Stabilization efforts will incorporate streambank re-contouring to 1.5:1 slopes.
prevention measures along stream channels. The proposed streambank stabilization measures
New Pipe Placement - Nationwide Permit No. 39
Maintenance Activities- Nationwide Permit No. 3 '
Larger-diameter replacement culverts/pipes have been designed to closely replicate existing pipe
length, in order to increase conveyance capacity without increasing stream length impacts.
Culvert inlets and outlets will be buried below the existing streambed, or closely matched to
existing streambed gradients. To further minimize project impacts, the existing Idlebrook Drive
culvert will be replaced by a natural-bottom concrete arch.
Tail-Ditching
In an effort to improve hydraulic conditions and reduce yard and house flooding, tail-ditching of a
Page 10 of 16

proposed storm pipe installation are addressed in NWP No. 39 - Residential, Commercial, and
Institutional Developments, including attendant features. The 149 If of channel to be piped is
isolated from adjacent open surface waters by piped channel upstream and downstream. The
proposed storm piping efforts have been designed to reduce private property flooding and
eliminate downstream sedimentation from collapsing streambanks.
This project will also involve maintenance activities such as culvert and pipe system
replacements, and the placement of supplemental riprap to existing culvert outlet aprons, at
existing pipe system will be replaced by a larger-diameter pipe system of equivalent length.
minimize potential impacts. Excavated sediment will be deposited in an upland area and will be
i
ill Page II of 16

this activity will be performed under the -guidelines of 40 CFR Part 232, as issued in the January
17, 2001 Federal Register (volume 66, number 11).
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htti)://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Completion of the proposed storm-water improvements will result in 1,820 If of impacts to
perennial stream channels. The proposed project is anticipated to be self-mitigating, since
Page 12 of 16
embeddedness, and should enhance long-term riparian habitat stability.
' 2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
' you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
' will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/M=/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
' the following information:
' Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
' Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): WA
' IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
' land?
Yes ® No ?
' If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
' coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
' If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
' X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
' It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
' and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
' applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
' (Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify Mecklenburg County
Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) buffers will be temporarily impacted by the
' proposed project. The proposed project will incorporate vegetative stabilization of disturbed
' Page 13 of 16
areas. Storm-water management projects in Charlotte are exempt from SWIM buffer mitigation
requirements. )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* (s uImpct are feet) Multiplier Mitiga icon
1 0 3 0
2 0 1.5 0
Total 0 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
No increase in existing impervious area should result from the proposed project.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
Page 14 of 16
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
I Applicant/.
(Agent's si
0,-mw
s Signature
e is valid only if an
Z/3/
letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
I

Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell Union
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk Watauga
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan Yancey
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham Wilson
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes Yadkin
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones Pitt
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir Tyrrell
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin Washington
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico Wayne
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans *Croatan National Forest Only
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
Page 15 of 16
US Fish and Wildlife Service / National Marine Fisheries Service
US Fish and Wildlife Service US Fish and Wildlife Service National Marine Fisheries Service
Raleigh Field Office Asheville Field Office Habitat Conservation Division
Post Office Box 33726 160 Zillicoa Street Pivers Island
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Asheville, NC 28801 Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone] Telephone: [phone]
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
1638 Mail Service Center Bertie Craven Hyde Pender
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 Brunswick Currituck New Hanover Perquimans
Telephone: [phone] Camden Dare Onslow Tyrrell
Fax: [phone] Carteret Gates Pamlico Washington
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator Alleghany Caldwell Watauga
3855 Idlewild Road Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Kernersville, NC 27284-9180 Avery Stokes
Telephone: (336) 769=9453 Burke Surry
Mountain Region Coordinator Buncombe Henderson Polk
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Waynesville, NC 28786 Clay Macon Swain
Telephone: [phone] Graham Madison Transylvania
Fax: [phone] Haywood McDowell Yancey
Page 16 of 16
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39 December 30, 2002
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
Attachment B
FIGURES AND DETAILS
(CSWS, LAW, and Armstrong Glen, P.C., 2002)
"f f Meadowdale-Carousel CIP -
Campbell Creek + ?1 - Project Area
I ';t n .marle Road r•. ?r,
Watershed T t 77
• \ .? ^o ._?, 1 :{' : L
L..? lift
'Z L- T ' -

41
1

AL X
Source: lJSGS. 7.5-Minute Series TonoEranhic Ouadransle of Mint Hill. NC, dated 1993 (Mavtech, 1997)
EXPLANATION
L , Approximate Project Area
Stream Channel
y
W *-7
1t ?.
•
? r A
Mecklenburg County
Vicinity Map
NOT TO SCALE Prepared: l?4? 12 30/02-
Checked: MAri 12131 nz
G:/projects/30141 Natural Resources.'Jobs/2000/0369-City SWS/l I Meado?idale F:_ere : tae L,canon pp:
City of Charlotte
Storm Water Services \ Site Location
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP LAW RESOURCES CREATING SOLI,-'ONS
Charlotte, North Carolina Project 30100-0-0369 Figure 1

CuB Alexanders-
St
P
o,
-a e6'2 ore.
urAlbema o w
`? - - He8
Ur . APB _

oo re
M B2
He8

6
y e CuB
E
z
Dab
z

CeB2 CeD? A; B DeD2 \

d

n TeB2 ^
_ y
j MO

c r
HeB p0 1 ?
CUB ?6??
iii CFB?
o J {` Mks _ h

MO EnB
?gAkB =n8
?m E
°
z eB2
En8 _
U u6
le ild-? ??B2 Mee
? MeB
Mew FG F?@ l?
Hu6 CeB2
HeB
c ?o
CUB
...Hu6 ;E MkB i ?o2
.5
-. -`Hu;3 -.{'.. En6 HeR
\
o _
GuB CuB Apg Ce

) I CeD2
Mp
v
B2 Ce62 CeD2
?0. 0 ?J aF
n CeD2 MD
Q 2
CPD2 ties ApD A D EnB
Ha
1 p
?
C
82
Ca
to
i\ \o-
CeB2 Q
e
Ylkd
2 HeB Cub
CeB2
HeB
uB G¢
ng
- E-
aF
CeD2
Mp Ce62

E t?
L
_

North Carolina Vicinity Map
EXPLANATION
-
Approximate Pro
ject Area .-

He6 Soil Map Unit -

Mecklenburg County
Vicinity Map
NOT TO SCALE Prepared:
--
Checked: Li 41
G:/projects/30141 Natural Resources/Jobs/2000/0369-Cit}S\\ S 11 Meadoudale Figure Soils.ppt
'
City of Charlotte
Storm Water Services

Meadowdale-Carousel CIP LAW
Soil Survey Map
"R.EATING SOLUTIONS
?y /? Pro? -r3g?1 Figure 2
i
Leeend:
•
•?,?0** Project Study Area Boundary
00-? Perennial Stream Channel (Jurisdictional)
J Intermittent, Aquatically-Important Stream (Jurisdictional)
=^ Ephemeral Channel (Non-Jurisdictional)
N Jurisdictional Wetland Area (Jurisdictional)
• Wetland Data Point (DP) Location
0 Stream Assessment (SA) Location
Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. and wetlands were approximated
in the field by LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW).
Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S and wetland boundaries
were verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on May 24, 2001.
Use of this map is intended for preliminary planning purposes only.
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies as waters and
wetlands all areas of waters and wetlands regulated pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, as determined by the undersigned on this
date. Unless there is a change in the law, or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five
years from this date. This determination was made utilizing the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetland Determination Manual."
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Representative
Title and Date
NOT TO SCALE
G:/projects/30141 Natural Resources/Jobs/2000/0369-City SWSIII MeadowdalelFigure 3-Waters of US.ppt
Created BLL 12/27/02
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP Revised
Revised
Charlotte, North Carolina Revised
Revised
Checked CAM 12/30/02
- ?09
a
° .0t?aclp? ooodbooa?aba
'1'b ? O? ?? apOpo?aaoQ?goaoc5 Q
Da o ?, .
o °
C3 C;W C C3 IM O C1 Intermittent, D
? '0 0" ' na Aquatically-Important D
Q `I] 0 D D. Stream (SA-2)
Q Q ?a o C7 °° D p
47 11 ??' 00 Q o
0
o.?o 9 a 17
a (3. Tributary 1
° o Q Q. o Q 0 Perennial Stream (SA-3)
243 0
b .4©°0?o p o 00 0o Q B
000 ? Q .
0 p a p
Qo?Q p o 0 0?0 o n Q? a
40
CD ogo d o
e ??? , 4o a o .° o o D oa ' a 0
0 0 4o a s r, o a Q
ZIP
odo ?oqo 0 ° d d
o ° _V QQ d o
°90 o`SsQ dd Meadowdale-Carousel CIP p
b+ 0
4 ° pQ9 a0 0 ?q4 Project Area D
0
QQd °a?'.o°°aoo fl o ? QQ ?
O P p po p 0 •
o •,?I
og oooQ o o P a a?
Li 1=3
Q
i ° .
CZ10 Q° a0
1
Ephemeral Channel (SA-1) `t f k„, 0
r i r ? ? w L/
o
i o Q
Upland (DP-1) Q
o? .
°
Tributary 2 Q?t P?p
Intermittent, Aquatically- ^ , Q Q
Important Stream (SA-4)
b o ?.. a a° ? P °?400? aka
a p
0 Wetland (DP-2) QO
Q° ? b ? oo Q C3
0 0 0? ? C??
0 4.; o Qo 0 d Qd
?•o a 0 ? ?4a°'? 9 0 "?
O
?Q O
d o O O P O! b d o Q O• a,? O °fl O ?a0
Q,2 CZ9
?C3 p o0R • Q? ?p 4 l?r Obo p
00 QO ?p .ado ?QQ 0 : 0 4Q ??
p0 4
?d (I'o ap0
Source: Mecklenburg County Demographic Employment and Land Development (DELD) Information System, and LAW survey data (2001-2002)
Charlotte-Mecklenburg
LAW STORM
CATER
RESOURCES CREATING SOLUTIONS, = Services
Approximate Waters of
the U.S. and Wetlands
Boundary Map
Figure 3
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP -
n?• 1 ,
Cam bell Creek - Project Area
p Tmarle Road
..
Watershed r N ?' rr. Y
;,;. 4 w
?p^ == Site 1 ,

I ?
Site 3

Site 4
- i
Y
f 4 1 ?,

Site 2

%
47 .rv
is
{ v
Source: USGS. 7.5-Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle of Mint Hill, NC, dated 1993 (Maptech, 1997).
EXPLANATION
L _ 1 Approximate Project Area
Stream Channel
Streambank Stabilization
North Carolina Vicinity Map
O Culvert Maintenance _
j
Pipe Installation

® Tail-ditching Mecklenburg County
Vicinity Map
NOT TO SCALE Prepared: 1213010-2-
Checked: AA A-( 12/31 ?02
G:/projects/30141 Natural Re-ources Jobs I I Nleadowdale/Figure 4 Project ActMties.ppt
City of Charlotte
Storm Water Services LAW Proposed Project
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP Activities
Charlotte, North Carolina RESOURCES CREATING SOLUTIONS
Project 30100-0-0369 Figure 4

''
'b ,J
F
.
r
. ?+h tr P? r r j 1Vleadowdale-Carousel
J
- I I f i . - .-
tl.
P
A
y Project
rea
CI
merle R_ oad a

? ''11
..?
11
...:
T
il
di
hi
tc
ng
a
-
., Location
T
-
r

??- • ' 1VI 6
5 f

"t Ac
Source: USGS 7.5-Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle of Mint Hill, NC, dated 1993 (Maptech, 1997).
EXPLANATION
SY? N
i , Approximate Project Area ?-
L

Stream Channel
Q Tail-ditching Location North Carolina Vicinity Map a^
(Physical reconfiguration of
stream channel through the
removal of accumulated
sediment)

-i
Mecklenburg County
Vicinity Map
Prepared: ?L ?z/3o/oz
NOT TO SCALE
Checked: Nl/QY'1 12(3t/G'
G:/projects/30141 Natural Resource :res . i', S%1 "S I1 Nleadowdale/Figure 5 Tailditching.ppt
City of Charlotte
Storm Water Services

1Vleadowdale-Carousel CIP
J,J
j AW
Proposed Tail-ditching
RESOURCES CREATING SOLUTIONS
Charlotte, North Carolina
Project 30100-0-0369 Figure 5

Y3?S

09. LL

`
s '§ % \ S \
{ \ ` A ? -
°
\
F g
J?

a 0 -0 ^
m ?

CY)

\\\ \ \?? ? \ \ \'?`? ?? laic d

g"
a

r t e
G p Re F Esb?
el i?
IIIS/

Q Al
Ht 3
ae L / '
/S '0 I Oil,
IN

? . t-
w

y0 ?` T :q
y
T9
C .. .. "Ix.? -` ?-
1
g
v1
O
W
$
?I
a g
3 it C LU

4?e s v
eFaggh .-. ??= i Eaap ^?,p
5 ? y? L' yK \? ?
?y,
AR
1 ^ # a ` - ?- ni xooae 3

r

??/? aN V ?- ?Ls I °' c4 O V O
21
l
? a
Y
b
v
?
O
?y'? / i
B x SyA ?
t
?° ¢ ?O

e a °= ?e? '. $
•
ens - O
?
0
a W
r
v
o?? I
zti I
Nay; ,-.
N2ry$ ??? ?
TOW 'O-' ?W
qFU ? w
N
° as m .goy v:.s
?^o ? I
z o u, I I o
l
W?Z I
x
C? N? N y C O
OU
HFpn? ?? 3 03i
°
z W !+,1 j VNf O
2 .`f]Y32 0
2 -°
G ?3 °o
K9 KB K9
AL9 NO
\ H?9
O I w -
1 oz
00 KY
QQ e I`1
i? a?oo
Nagy 2
I °
I ?^ o
vpai? I / i ! ?.^?.10
;G It 10
IWO2S r? ?~? EW?n
w p? / 7 l'T O W •`
1 m .G!-G??/?II
n_lim?z` G I K ? ?/d LLLL
W • Y??O,v?? ? ? S 2 Jp
Nzv ym? h i v ?? ? nsz? `v?W C
ZW m I
?j <U°? pNp Y<Z<Z°Z
• I V(J?U2w aSJO ?
un
ry??
Nib
o ?
z
gym`
? coo`
m?
NQ I o
u, 3
Nampo
`? 0Q0
`?mWV I
?Qv

K
b ? C g Soh
=) ? °i O ? o vii
I O b ? 4
J '? °o?? wHOo
I ? W
rrrrh1 r T,--
'Ntr,
`) o m o W
r 2 yo
or?
LLLLLL ?lL iOr
(+
? R Nam W wdY?
??m° NZ 2?- OC NZ>>2
I ? Co$'? O??W VCIU °?VfW 6
Wd
Z- <V F >p O
t
w? tG Ob9
LLoN no eA
W? nn Imp ?
u
Y ° 0 9
o zoz
Nz??W?pzo?z.
' C. Zix ZJ?Z
HZhN /x?xf2?
K N V I W Z v m v
J ?T
n4LSN0.7 '
o (?
zm?
-.8.
©UW ?Z

yq?Wa
m
'OL h
V!?_
-l1'^?T o
2
0
?V oNo
U
UV W ? .°m
?3W
U
O
N
D
m n+
N
N ?
? Y
Q U
d U
ti
a?
C
m
IL a
3 cy
c
a?
Z C
N
z
O
J
O
cn
Z
Q
LL,
Vn
w
a ? UU
o ?
p
N
w
.C- 0!
C
I
en
?
N
d
U V
c+ '? a
o ?"r
O
o
N
L

r
?
_
_

o y

y O

U

o C? t
G U o

W
J ?
? y a?
=Q Z
ti
?

U z
.I
.nO

?+
O
V] y, O t6
F" v V y
O
n O
?, c7 A
V
GRASS AT ALL DISTURBED AREAS
INSTALL PERMANENT EROSION
CONTROL MATTING FULL LENGTH
TOP TO BOTTOM
VARIABLE
EXISTING GROUND GRASS AT ALL
TYPICAL EROSION MA J DISTURBED AREAS.
AT TOP OF BANK
VARIABLE EXCAVATE
1.5 '
1
INSTALL PERMANENT E
nl
CONTROL MATTING FU
TOP TO BOTTOM
d
GRASS AT ALL EXISTING GROUND
_
DISTURBED AREAS.
i
i
12' MINIMUM TYPICAL EROSION MAT
BURY DEPTH AT TOP OF BANK
/ CAVATE
1.5
I ///=/A'.
VARIABLE
BOT. WIDTH
4 TYPICAL SECTION FOR CHANNEL SLOPING
RIGHT BANK, LEFT BANK, RIGHT AND LEFT BANK
Source: Armstrong Glen, P.C. and City of Charlotte Storm Water Services (dated 2002).
NOT TO SCALE a
Prepared: OW IA/301-,
13:/projects/30141 Natural Resources/Jobs/2000/0369-City SWS/11 Meadowdale/Pigure Ii_Streambank Stabilization.ppt Checked: MA'[ 17-/v To Z
City of Charlotte Storm Water Services
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP LAW Streambank Stabilization
Charlotte, North Carolina RESOURCES CREATING SOLUTIONS Proiect 30100-0-0369 Figure 8
Cover sheet

General Motu »».»»«. ».? -..

Schedule of Structures and WaterlSeaer Permib . »» . » ..».J
Traffic Control Plan «..._..» 413
Plan Une "A" 14-19
Plan & Profile Line "B" 21
Plan & Profile Line "C" ____ _____22-25
Plan & Profile Line "E" ___26-27
Plan & Profile Line "F" a
Erosion Control Plans 943
Plan and Profile For Idlebrook Drive Culvert ...» ... _.» . 44
Plan and Profile For Belmdale Avenue Culvert.. _..^? .».. 45
Helmdale AvenueSan.Sewer ReloationPlan 46
IdlebrookDrive San. Sewer Relocation Phu x.47
Dawnwood Drive San. Sewer Relocation Plan 49
Easthaven Avenue San. Sewer Relocation Plan ..» » _»_»» «A9

Erosion Control Details ---- ----- %61

Typical Sections _.« »:62.53
Idlebroolr Drive Calvert Details 54
Helmdale Avenue Culvert Details
Catcb Basin Details »-...56

Details -59

v
` f Vi lE.
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
Construction Plans of Proposed
Meadowdale/Carousel Capital Improvement Project
Project No. 671-98-705
Project Features:
This project consists of Storm
Drainage, Grading, Curb and Cutler,
Sidewalk, Streambank Stabilization
4-k and Sanitary Sewer Relocation.
October 22, 2NL
4®

b
/
8e TION am"
APPROX SCALP 1"-- 350'
ra
r-i
it
z
it
a?
/
Contract Administration
r 20 4A 60- - Sm
Plan view rmWnterComUnMianMaoagor
20 40 60 Storm Water Project Manager
Harz. prorne......».. w.->• Landscape Management
a J 12 Design
Vert. Profile »»_._M. ?- -?+•?
NewpropertyL•ibe.....».---^--- - - - - ';
Property Line or Existing RPW Line - - - - - '
Existing Structures ---------------
RalboadTroeks .». __ ++-++-H4+

Proposed Edge of-Pavement {
Fence
j
SlopeStakeLine »»».»«,»»- -u-u--»c- .
r
Construction Easement- »• -"--e-s- '
1
PCrmm,ent Easement _...».....»»••• a
1
,._......»....».-?^...--^-••-»
Cos Llne: -o-n-o-
Waterline »» ^ ».» »»»»»..M »»»» -n-w-w-

y M'--'- 0

_.»» ....--
ExisfibgSanitary Sewer
Es<sling-UndergniandTolewmmuniendons -T-T-T-

Existing Underground Electric ....». »
-nE-ur--ur- +i
Existing Storm Drainage -
Proposed Storm ' Drainage »_..-. .

Water Meter aTl
11 d
f
Water Valve

-.... _
Gas Valve cv

-- ---- -« --°°
Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole
??

..
Existing Storm Drain Manhole
-----^--.-- ---^
G

°? X
Proposal Storm Drain Maahalo « ».m^- » ^ ^» ».^-^^•. ^- .-. ^

Fsisl'ugTelephone Macimk..-»-^^»•»« ?
l
»...?^^-
V
4
Proposed Telephone Manho n
le
s
Existing Electric Manhole .....»^.•..
ProposedEkxtricManhole Q
Existing Catch Darin
» ?«»» _»:»»». ---
-- r^- . ---^ -^•I
Proposed Catch Basin .. » .»- «» -»• ^«» «»^ ^- --». ^» ^ ^^ ??
Existing Light perk. » »..^». »- -» ». . -. -^.^ • •». -'
Proposed Fight Pole . « .. » ^ : ^ . »^w ...» . ..• ....^ ^»
Existing Utility Pole ^...»^»^.^•^»•»^» ^-» w -» •»^»^ .•.»^^» ^^ U
Proposed Utility Pole . » ».. ^» -»^ » ^ ?^^»»»» ^ ^ .» -• r
Iron Pin « _.:..• . «.. « _wM.^ _ ^^ . , ».«w« « « --0
Existing Fire Hydrant _ . »^ .^-^»^^^»^^»^» ^ -, •- »• 6' a
Proposed Fire Hydrant

lolet ««_ ----»»-.-»»-•^--??
Existing Yard
r
Proposed Yard Ink4 »_».» :. » »»^ ^ w ^» ^^»»^^ ?»^ ^^,.® f

Tree Removal .. »» » ^ -»-» -^-» •-^» ^---^-^^» - . --^ ^ /?

. .....__.........._»
Accessible Ramp
_....» x
Guy Wire ..» .. _» ... » ..»».-?
Tree Protection

« . » - --
Proposed Hand Rail
•-,------^-^°
Stabilization Matting
Grass Planting Strip _ _ ...._ « . ??
Proposed Curb & Gutter, Cone Drive _ __»« »
Asphalt Widening --- »-^---•--»-

Proposed Sidewalk V
i Proposed Rip Rap Ditch. »
Asphalt Driveway ._.._.. _ ....«__»»•.-----
°°°°l°? $

Pavement Removal z
J? 9
Easement Numbers

Drainage Structure N'uuxber _-------- A8
Bid Set Nor
W"
NTS .a
/N6m1V?n ' \G" j / // 7 ?rr r rr
??.,,?,1! 1 PR6ROSEU PIPfi 51s ,y?/
/ \ \ .. N ? / . adi Ne.G. w COI,LNL (NCNOT 1 iz) `' 1 \ OwMm BBVAE ?''`, '' T?-rrr l t
l Poo 34 W2) 1 } 6 COIINO 1pEp., r ?/? & F 270 AND DISPOSE
REE. AND W= +? r O111cBElE WRIS?NJ V 1 ? ? i/ 0 VFA11F.27Y 0 IF - cur15N z' 71 r A 4
INN t
100 tF OF CHA
/ 1 q.y ?1 E10GSM1 w ` v ?.4 d
FPt Exp1 NFN6N W / A
o \ \ / ly
RELAY 14 W. 'FnnF '' E•1481.198711
/ poWER POLE sEWEB /FJ ?L ( \ r r 1 a + ?. 1 r A
RBDFPTE N-5481 OVERLAY
M1I 6x \ \ ??11c TO 9E
VCT CU
7 E(( ?.' 1 aryl / V?
Ob OF La1c11Na k I \r J`.\ A \? \..: .Zp1 rrf...: w? 1. 7 siD. 10.49) J 1` t(r1r I / ??}?vl/-(t? ?? v/,
I GRADE I 1F
BANK AT },5:1 SIDE 6iAPE. xxx: l I M?4 s \ ss r / Q '' } •` ?'l? 1 / ?`°' 1 ?^
<?y wsrru PElwwExr EROSbM I ` \ a ?' f33-211-D6
0.F camas NvDNC ON 14 of \ mro . 'tS
= DISTURBED AR $. AND yy
MDEOx S ,? `? >V \ , +* 1F eCory Fisher f ` 1 wra ,'`? \ _
I - v \ \ 2'-6• 12RB 187AND Gt;1ERK ? wf. Denise f
a \ '\Q > (NCDDI sm. 0.1x01) 6435 ldlebrook Dr. 1 4 ` i ?A , .
433-2f1-04 0
108Q1-084.
\ I , \ a z 18F"1BY OF ASPIIALT r? Cr 1? 1 E' Lucille Brooks /' / t0,
\. - . o - 7 a• (? } }? 1 1 ` 6424 kflebreok-Or Cg
i c s '', _ \? _ ti WR \ !r r } + Y 1 ?' - .8 0894
A t' W C0NstRUGT _Yrif i \ 1 s al
_. ? A ? A a t \ (6YID 0.284.) V L ?, i i .l.
„.?? ceyt _ s i ?A s ob ' \ rrr E 1 +x611 Ounkhom Ilrononglit ,.
sMW1 1E>107ON, & wf. Sommay V.
N AID s,? r0. d p \ \ 1 y Set
1 6429 ldlebrook Dr.
? B RARE T i ; FW4 \ }?? J r f 5146-0?fll- r /
' REgovE At DISTVR 7b S. - \
OP gy1M UNK
ANO UASTAIL 52 4' ?• "?'?7`:F ,1 l /
IAiN ....64.1E AND N$fAjl WALTL
FASEMENt
?. tu• \ ?. .?¢S fl? 10."
l
?4r SHMNG
' REMOVE MID DISPOSE •' 90 \ M PPE. pEN CYW ?1l • _ 1 \ v `1
ASPHALT ORNEY'Ar. REIAGTE \ /11 W - s ` ` "r` \ AT pa50NC / \ T/ /.% r"
GARAGE. lul
O1w6WAY 10 50DIH SUE Q?FpUSE CAMI?f b P{IhN15H AND ALL y *n"^k' 1 Y.Y . `? 1 1 p / -- ,0
\ \ ?OE (SOS-516 ( 52 1E OF 1 S n CNF • _ / CONSTRUCT 106
CA" W
\ \ p / 1 WlMA6. 1 ° n, ll Ol c... _ \?\ \ • i , '&• % HEIGHT. SSEE BEET 53. R=am
\ \ 3'. ww4 ',A\ 15 11 t . t!v 12 1 _ \\?\ \\ REMWE .
' 18 44 f?U6 FSEH E / 1: 0 „ WTI Pr J?
_rr
-662-- ?6510Jdlels?oak fk `1 t . 1?° 1 \ , c? ?j? / / /
DURING
--JfJ\J'0\ \ 1? ?SdeOBC
"J^
' \ .. ! ... '1,V TT. TR1GfQ. TIE to \\ \ COST. Pam
REMOVE AND 04SPOSE OF
55 LF OF FE 4 FT
\ \ m `` - .r EEf 153. r } (?, { 1 }?? h _ \ \
Om UNWK
a TI>AE1 m p / ///
CONSTRUCT 106 S.Y. 1 t
- I 9 'l AWtl 11 Gpil130111 \? P ' .p" j \ /
OF N w 6•. r
E
AND REPLACE
of-
4 SY OF 4' CONCRETE A 1i e 1 s .. D6PO5E I ''1 w !f 1)
' siBEwpLx \ )CONSTRUCT TYPE 1 119 ! l ht IUQOM A .. ! e _ / ` 133-225-07 /
} VN6TpEN0A1 DROP 96, OW l A I TnNNR (?i t - - = r Daniel W. Obert /
• . } CURB DRnfwA1• ( ° I? sw w ti : 124 Sr OF 6t ! A l WALL l
I ut F?Ao X NORETE DRIVEWAY. , I, 1 1 y ERIsr. WOODEN E I J J P13' 7618 Meadowdale tn.
} AN p 1 } STD. 10.25x) I fox;. array y: 4 ..? RETAINING 1 W
P I \L° m I z K : 9 V 1? TO R r 4 E \ 5491-0667
m w /
I C o /
} }}IITT \ p s Re u?yes (ewD l l 133- T1 1-08
tARS ?(
1? \ I SyO, Ia2sA) J Kenneth L Avery
6501 klWrook Dc p mx // ? oP1 SIX
AA } I \ - / 8200 0939 o / w-mi /
PROTECT IXSRNG /
1LV x CPOWER 6 AND
y I t>y p4. r
WMIR
EXISTING BA" OF p ! (?- } :. t - 'S X
BLVATIONS w TYPE
RES1Er1rw DRDP1 GWE 35 LF OF CHANNEL
PUCE 11{• COMPACTED CURB DRIVMY (CMU) I I l , \ - 1 1 BFI AT 1.5:1 561E SLOPE
' Balimmous s1a 10.25A) I 1 I\ n? '-
T INSTAL PERAIWEMr EROSION
11400k55
1 CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE. I DMING RACK OF CURD I I h} }}I
CONTROL. OSEEED AND 133-211-14 DISTU TYPE ?-2. (cam TRANSITION
I I I? 1 MUCH olsltpmED AREAS. Idlewild ARP Church \ .
CONSTRUCT (CUD sin. 10.19) CONSTRUCT CURB TRANS" I } no V V Trustees
(CMU) STD. 10.19) CIA} }}I 65J7 ldlew17d Rd.
UMTT OF ' I N 52%024r `??1 1 I 6358-0059 .13 1 133-211-08
E.1,481,21ZO
Fred Curtis Hoke
+ BASQJNE BEND POINTS
f 651J ldlebrook Dr. ^} 0
7704-0353 I 11
' STATION NORTHING EASTING
L??1?11??11 0+00.00 528047545 1480921.798
? 04.32.05 528055.474 14809528
k??? 0+50.67 -5?8.665.jl& 55
1 9
It 0 H73 88 528 077.808 1480 88 420
1+22.07
+51.39 528.126.019 148104885
\? _?`kl}LiV?lll 1
2+18.34 528152.923 1481110.120
2,07.20 528174.113 1481186.085
J 34.44.94 528182.503 1481233.083
4'N17.39 528 174.121 1 481 305.042
' 44.54.27 528192.434 1481337.061
5+79.14 528,299.605 1,481,401.138
•
gum
STRUCTURE Na NCDOT 910. NO. CMIA 510. NO, NORTHING EASTNO INVERT N INVERT OUT POINT DESCA6'TION
Al N/A N/A IS A15292 1,481,110.12 N/A N/A Q CULVERT ENDWNL 0 OUTSIDE FACE
A2 N/A N/A 528,17171 1,481,194.66 N/A N/A £ CULVERT HEADWALL 0 OUTSIDE FACE
A3 N/A N/A 52AI6895 1,481.IOU3 N/A N/A TIE 24• RCP TO ENDWALL

AS N/A N/A 52%174.51 6461,227.48 N/A N/A FACE OF GABO Wµ1, b END
AE N/A N/A 524.,792:32 14662p9116 NIA N/A FACE OF OA5911 WAU.
A7 N/A N/A 524.194:58 148iW4.56 N/A N/A PACE OF GO" WALL
AS N/A N/A 5!8;18&75 1,481,2854.1 N/A N/A FACE OF GABION *ALL 0 END

0.v
110
^`I1
891
V `.\
01
20, 0 20' 41
SCALE. 1 = 20'
No UAW., W
.Arrllstr0719 Gkn, T.C. ( CHARLOTTE- .
9741-F Southern Pine Boulevard
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
P.O. Box 7328
Charlotte, NC 28241
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]-D6-705 .:. MEADOWDALE / CAROUSEL
AM M tAF N8
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
e
ei
eAeA CAN
M,
PLAN
.? LINE "A'"

? 14 58
At9MDM IMFMRM b
WM`if! Al GQF74A M AIIAdm By DAE
I?
W
Cl)
W
co
m
E
I
E-
1224
M
rn
W
z
a
U

---.----- I I F=9 / I I II II 1 f' 7 I i I 9484-0098 I I I /rrr-fib srr I
rrrrrr
q?????4>rrrr / } II II I (/ Yi a' I I r/.?,M I I ?' 1 I I I r/
?3r? I d' I 6/ / I \ I I I I I Ir-I' 1 I I .rnE.sSau
L 1? ri it Y/TrT / , / 1 ! ' ?I eya I I b' I Y/ 1 I +I ?/ vE.60.14
1 I I
FM-693.03 4 r/
r r l 4' wE-69442 I I
NF-16f 'J I LJY, '1 ?'f II`I /4 / I I V, / / , / / / / / IA I it ?LLL4IJJJJ.11I ,1(,? I II L[111
M.M.10 , IRI / l', I \ } I I \ ?•/ , / / / / / / / , / I I IL/.JJ1111.L1,/ ,? W, - ll L_____
L_ C_
111.<LLL4I / I I p' 1 y I IL- _j
I` I' ! ---
,///,,,,,,, ?L..?LLLLLlJJJJ $LLLLLLL/J? II{..? I ?, ,'? IIv I ` Y, '? I II I` r? I
:LL-L LhLJJJJ,JIJ \. \ \ \ ? I?7 •??_••• I ?/,//'///// i I? II I I IUUU
p L_J LL/JJJ I \ Il1J
rnm
Y,
ux mo 1
iE 1 p
999,11 \689., . ,
-_ _ r -- --• I '? (I N "2!699.4{
E. 14916W21 I ... _.. - "•- `7?1?
_ x x-
--
? J r. I I - 00.50
GIN M
lj? onL.-- 1 4 uz•w1sr Om1.5111.19 \ - Ml. M . I'n / fig. -
ux. - i + n1 ` sAVryn SE?99 F NDn_ \ --• - - - \ },,x.Ir????-? I I / rai mx /' an. wu ytAmw s vt cAS6uun... -
`ax ?a`E _?iss
ss ss -.. s9 ss TI 7 - - / - -- tE
0 I > 59 \ j ..
?. =-e66- -• _.: i,
v3yE/R-ss-•- `- ._""Tw'C ` ONE - °N6 ?aa oHF a??? ° 7 '-- SS
SS 55 55
-rfirol 1 -1 OIK ?? _- sue-- - _ -- -??'? •_ _- -;A; "3Ba^
?: .. - •4?.= - - bas 6eT
- -- - •- - _-_- - - -- i - - 691
__ - :._ - - - - c T xe OE ? a 9usm.t '91-
'SLOPE. -' '„ ' -
SNx;
II ? I I
o -
?I' II' i I
l ? ,' i2 1 I ,
I 1 .l
p n (i ' 1 '' y aw+uel- ,
S -ANB'NULCIi gI518RBEO ARFiIS. _
'f / / /l R1RR1/ I I \ ''...? \, - 11ut'OE} NS1xuCt?lw e / s¢ suxr 53, I
L*K
5 ?"' Yh `` i j/ 7`I / I t 111 • e e ec-?e e x e--'?e?"' - - J -?
S? I I 133-225-07 M-689.24 /?iutyl r ° I w S? +eQeA ?II? 1'I 99?oe auN1+ t 9 to 1.51 ?(r? n4v,E'N+9 REPLACE Ioue ' A - x ?- '-? -?
Daniel W. Obert t I 'r ? I I sID6 SLOPE. INf7 PER OF CmN LJWFFNCE yi
a I T / EA06gN canna Rcw?..Ern Ln+'? 1 mxm _/ - - Li3-201-16
/ & wt. Rebeccb A. / I OW r / I I 1 t REICRE OF nRrWc SEED must- x_ ? -
7618 Meodowdole Lone l can I I ?+ /r ARE(S. J Malcolm 3 ?tonto?
\ I / 5491-0667 I I / 1 \ EE a1 Er w rrr j - /- - &--w/-ono C.
?J//// A 1 I 1 Y un . ' / ^ ` 4¢25 Dbwnr+rAOd Dr
mmnrc vm k/L'/J I / j I ?? ' '\? ??_y/J - - ...' ,_ _ ,? • i-- -- = - .? .. 5794cQ884?. //
J it I t 1aa-2a1-1s - i -I - - _ - ^ - 14 I Bruce Beltom p?? ?Lx I ! -
! .. 1-?''
_ I 440 wnwood Or. "-- un w-22
Parr r h a w utt / i --1 u &m ( 8 I I ?/ \ 7T-0576 I V% x I i - = i - - -
arcnva T - ; ?UJJ .?--
It ,& wr. Juanita-H"
I - -- 44JJ1)bwnwood Dr.- f - \
1 -- ' 3799-0798 133201=15
?• -777J?/ / / I /' I tt t l \ - ' ' ' von C. SprrrlJs - - -
/4 I x 4419 flwnwood Or. - i-
/ 9096-089$ - `
l_ J11W >rrrrrr ?A I Trr'?? pry
?? I I
f7""I4`Yrrrlr- }I-?
- - Ili
i?/r,//,//,/' I ? FFE.NST wE.705.27
?i// /1 I Iq I? / l
..e.et LL' ..? { I i i "ME 701.e2 11 '-J I_ .._.._.• .Yi ,a ?Iji
i I 1 (,
--' , ° I I E III I I / / 1 A
TMMkUTE
nN
40
20' 0 20'440'
- SCALE: 1' = 20'
Armstrong Glen, P.C.
9741-F Southern Pine Boulevard
P.O. Box 7326
Charlotte, NC 28241
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
TI '.Vrk-
!- BASELINE BEND POINTS
STRn0N NORINING EASTING
8175.21 528,552.107 1,481,555,736
9+22.43 528593,667
- 1,481,578.151
949520 528656.401 IA61,6'I5.006
12+5%.53- 526,887.96-2 1,481,737.271
d
N
W
fA
Ep
CID
.,1
m
94
I
.a
W
w
fn
W
x
U
(Crn CHARLOTTE. I
'ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
MEADOWDALE / CAROUSEL
+nO en nK w
-i6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Kara a11as a.1
PLAN
- m
low LINE "A°
APPROVED RY DATE
I 133-202-05
Vershella J. Solis 1 Y 1 1 V,' I r T 7
1 1 1 I 4' 1? ?' b I
133-2A 06 5939 Idlebzook Dr 1 1 4 ` 1? J '<j l 1 r rh /
8647-0121 1 II 11 l J'r r'1<1 1 ?r /??.? [?
Sheri W. Gf fSn I 1 a Lf 1° i
945 /dlebrook Dr. 1 / I 1 ( Z
8796-0706 ` 77E.709.68 11 11 1 T>? lr?'`^\ I 712
I 1 t./ fs 1 1 II { i Y - - to .._ - -
q Y /??' I 1 I ! w - __.710
rrE.709e9 , Y
;` ?; ,)` L?? /,._- / -- / / ?•!- - \ _.708- ?.. •-• ._. .
I ! - -
S, , A 709 FMI 707 -. n,
._ r
r rr/a 1 r i '? 1j
gq6?ytIyEI?AFR?•POIE/ --
?(r, r J? N I i tot --Iµ 7%
?? 1 ` / S rRI1N EASEM ?0w NNI
ROM AM
1 il 1 1 i / _.r- -•? OF CHAIN Ulf( "FEN 1031F
A 1,2e:.4 , ?,
AND RESET
(Tj r AND 71; MEN EASEMENT % too-
TON n B F.
\ cm? LW
OwiE dJ / PROPERTY d R7KF
703 YI t ? ??..
i ?r r ? ? // 7aAn0Arox ??

_ 733-2TO02- J \ 1\
\
Keanjtth G'Vlnson ^• 1 1
\
& wh Meh p17
"
= 1
1
5913Jdk
0 Dr.
476`0,974 Ps
'7 \ \
\
3

iatr?E OHa11NE1 541111 70 Ta
six
\\
33
-0(
02
i
2
\
n
SIAPE7 N$TAO. PERNAW EROSION .
Dan6a Eum1m Tb 0W`-OF
? .? Salem Bopt
st Chu
?h
5901 kWMbroak 0.

.
...,.
ENNN. s® MMM
• o
MEAS
SEE D
1
,- 4500- 053\ '
.
Q
8 9/57.
"v o
SET
-/two m
• L`A !' -mot \ EXISTING DOG PEN .(
\-1 n Q? `sec
4r\ \ ••.. •`\ I ` , TO REMAIN. r?r7. l1J(J' fSQ
W REMOVE aYm?L ?? - 1 "/ ` Won 00[ ONB °• 'i I \ , 000 119 Y ?) Cr? [rjJx XQQ' - \
y. IXIST. OF PERIW7E . E 6g9 j.-_-- -'-s-'n\?? I acom'0 1 Sim O "? `
I a -' If TO LorAtIDN / } / • 7 ' / - i . i _ i ? "i / i__ ??.- ._. _ _ \ \ {*? ? __
APPROVED BY ,69?'!'107 S??'P' W
OWN Ls1 ?? / • toi E-.? -"77-10
Qfe - / Eric doasga-
_- -P
>' a / -, -- ? ?'& wf Corletto Moore
i • /
(A f a. . _ t . , tro -!_..._ , ?. \\ \ , \ cD ctwN 5833 ldtebroak Or. / W
?yf
9!? axx / /tt" y -wrt ti _ ?/ 4 r f• t ?* 4 \ \ 5t9b,%-0627 I g
71. \ 51
19 k
707
r OHE -' 011E ac OIIE -_ Q
ONE I _ - -- -
/ •; / / i / .,; + E DHg4vK 70 nq.rot.m
C,2 WOE _
5 //??? 704 \
44 / / /,"f '{? tUi/ /?1•+??/?. \ \\ \//? /!- '11
/ 5Em oxs ?rr /\ \\0 4 / /?i \\ \\ / / ,a ?u* '?t-
?
x pEwu?em wEa9 wa 4 / /? d ` _ _\ _ 1? \\ \ \ _ uxE'a' i'7
.?/ ,./ s•+0 I .. / 17 \\ ??// / -? \ \\ 'o, \ \?,•'.- _99 _?_--? _ 7aav.._ -iat?``_Zat.` __ _--";''_/'?'. / -
LWE
17? REl10YE ANO REMME REPIACE OOIF/ \,\\\ ?? 133-102-10
t DE EXISTING DISPOSE
TIMBER r OF ++ EE11x 1 I f/ / ?f Rick D. Burleyson
e -99 --_'-
WALL rt REraMNG l G / & wf. Catherine 0=
HOUSE 8?1_6_
\ ( FFE-709.09 ?.b 4721 Downwood Dr.
W _ - tmr o? \??q I ?(, i 5261-0543
{ r? x l f 1 N? V /A os PROPOSES Tit EQIWM-., o.x u•
N 1 0j / r 4 • y" ?? ?1 ?/ /G/,4 ?i 4 ,?`, ??/ / sra, 29+3M2 ENE A" ss
% SAO _ SS
Y i cw¢ 7 sPU wa iii /? A C/ / i ® /i d4 / 45' i/ a SEA O+ODaO NEE H
- —EXISTING RIPRAP
(71 1 T, EtE.70x57 ,1a11e \\ 4, /' 1 GrG` 133-202-19 ,?% / / 70 REMAIN - " W
W Y nNm9 1 ">r / / \ Rachel Davis ?j?
, ?? o""nM` \\ 4717843-00wood 96 Dr. /4
%' STOW N9o //? tag l- tm k0t- - - - VI
?
713-
f,3 \ /i0/Q?? Sean P.
3 Sullivan
U I , r`A & wf. Melissa T Z
N o ? 4726 Downwood Dr.
'A ??``iy 133-202-18 9131-0306 /
Anthony E. lannone c,
r ) & wf. Stephanie L. H
EFE-707.47 4701 Downwood Dr.
7847-0871
7jL1/j11! //11.370.038
17 4.92
<1? 133-201-17 E-6459609?P// 0 / BASELINE BEND POINTS
Stephen M. Tensi ?« , j
& wf Ruth A. STATION NORTHING FASTING
4645 Downwood Dr. / 26+57.56 530104.313 1,482,425.668
6103-0180 0180 27+75.86 530204.806 1482488.094
28+70971 530 247.358 1,482,572.858
29+21.90 530, 5$.630 1482622.790
\ 294.62.61 530275101 1 .4132,660.018
530366.299 1 482,7fi4.497
/?? 3S 31 +02.61
/eg/ ?j, / 31+51.90 530410.746 1482,789.552
.% SS
fi
gnu6ti

20' 0 20' 40'
SCALE. 7" = 20'

.Armstrong Glen, P.C CHARLOTTE
Southenn Pine Boulevard
9741-P ENGINEERING 16EPAMUM
P O.
Box 9326
.
Chanotte, NC 28241
"
Phone: [phone]
PON: 704-529-0493 671-98-7n5 oR9n+ MEADOWDALE CAROUSEL
.ql 110. fRE M0.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

NFCOID O•GN OA[
PLAN
LINE "A"
sCWt
AM JA WHA s[tt
? ET OF
58
REM" %MVEN9 9Y pm-Am NY ago" 9Y APPRoM 9Y D,11E
RT 697]7 I 1
, /1 LI I I ?' , , / 1s1L?J/JJ I I Y/ / /`Q I 4Y'---- _ I I V7i 6119 Idlebroak Dr. I l -
I (/ /1 r/ I 4'/ yyL f I L? J 1 1 lJ -201=D4 I/ 3021-0438
(/ / / / I , / , , / I / / , JJ' JJJJJ? I I I ?? \ I"? I \I N 1J _
?trTc'.uJJ i LILLLL/-/-/J.l/?-f1? ??? \I I I Y^ \ I I"???`?? Chodes'& 9le Jr, ? ' ..?
a 73 I 1 1an , uvawE?a9E?olSDUaLS AT /
-INS
I I l \ _ , L-J 6117 ldlebrookr Dr. \14WaRa w1nAc
ERD, / 3J-101 02
I I\\ I I 1 \ 'y J, 11\ 9182-0186 Y/ 10P OF eMpE To i9v >x Joseph Aged G7o /
1 bT,rr'I' L---?J I \ " 1JJ-1171'-45 a aw ur w6? J Bw4PAPRON / 611 J_ldlebYOOk Dr.
-.? -
-s 1/ Martha Smallwood" $ a ?. LLB L 404J-054,1. '
_¢ZOj Idlebrook Or. 1 -
\ Y Rwfifi I (P s 041, U71 I I _. f -
70
GROPE CHANNEL WK TO
\ _.. I r, , ,/? \ S :-r7 '•-y ?\ ? 1? \•? \ \ \ '' S? (1;+ ...-698 ' \ \ OVE INSIANIRUI • • ?? - ?? 1 % / - -_ / ; / ;
IDE m o ? /
? elm
7, I
14TIBlG FULL HEIGHT OF \ • „- "? l
p - \ 1 :. `' \ 1J OF I smEAM B" SEED AND uMCH -- 6 - y j 30 sr oe / /
) Y? } \ ,(" / \ __ -i •" ` ONSIM/CIION 6 / G E Dan RBED R • / % I r n dm 19P PM
Ac, yn.? 7 .....i \ \\.. ` C,1,? J \. V 24' THICK. SEE SHIES 6S! q/ TECT EXISW
-
` V yip fJ" \ ?,.,v?)?V`" _ \ O rJ_.. 1 I ww uw mix - D W ..-• $ BOMFA POKE _AND ?i
\ T?? ) x X-, \ x 696 1 I ti x ! • - . _ 6 i E1MOS OF on M1AES' j. I
wB 697 \c7v
out PN NYISTJP .__ -_
aur•wm ? ?'l,P • ? - ?• c? C) s9a--^
\? \ rte.- •?.ti ., . _ • •- B? / '. .•. . ? / /,
I 4, P
W. J?7,• P 691 II ?n / v7T P - - \ - \ 1 _ '_ '._ -- _ _ -?' - _
65 , ss.\ -.•- ss E 1 ?a ?- g as - ORE W
y?'?}' I \ 1 ND WOW RECLINED SS -=mss _•- s _ a - B ss $ - ss.? te7- ss
d N aBy"Rm \ - - - -!u? SS_-- SS SMS w
- j./ / -•-c?? _. 6sz' _..- ONE
a ?- ss ` - _ =_oNE -.r aY
ORE =- _ _ ° - - _ \? 693.-
Y>?n€xE•e=--o"c axE
6 ^ cvl::?'__ = m _ °_.= eN
6B7 - _ -• - __ - _
-".N--'-
?' _-_ -'eL?_? c_ __ - -?`? ?" ---6A_6-_ -'ONE
tiv
T T T / T c
- T _ T
-- a-- CAt AD iQLANNQB W
?
-4
02, T T T Tom' T T T 1E POM401 --tS 1 SIDE sIDPB• I ALL
-7 'T ER0. N
H ?T -` T r ' - / ?P T / aoEE By oTN % - < !rota F
,r?, L Q d BANK. 'SEED AND N
x Lc,T _ I. ,nT , g6sTu BFY1 ABED.
$FE 5MEf( 5J. ? rf?
.?•+/ ? F. _ J
E* I \ _ Metro Coston Jr. ! F
& wf. Juanita L.
4511 DawAFwo(2,d Dr. _
1JJ-201-19 5706-0754 - 1
03
Mark ;Sullivo
W & wZeame M D
11020 ovell --
\ to j?\ I 111-201-10 W
W J / - 1-17^ r ] ' 4501 Downwood Dr.
U7 \ 7820-0604 Eric Qruckheimer / 1JJ-201-2J W
i- - ?. ?• _ /lliam?hG Ne ?t/ - - I / o h
!? 4509 Downwgod Dr. _....-_ -- - - a - Nel ),to F. Stmter
_ \ \ - &?af.-SteQa Elafse \I 7596-0842 4527 ?ownwop /Or
44J1 DawnW00d'Dr, 1JJ-101-1& - -
- - -- 82, _0;69
/ Jamestf Graves
T?J 68'9'7c D3'14, -Gmt f. Mae-P.' -- - ---- -- - .? ( - - - -'-
_4.432 Downwood Dr. - -- __ -' ^,
7079-0:744- 1J3-201-11 ,' 77/
/1 I
U \ rr- 1 1 _ James C. Tuck /?' % , rr E
H \ 11 rT - / 1 - & wf. Mechede R. / l
?? I I 1827880958 - ??-1- r ??
1. I rmrmr-"-i wv-i>o77771 >vT?' r/ 4 Y,
'err - I ` - ,•
/' ?• ? CL1_' I ?--?.7'91TL ?-_? /:'? /7 I ?/ / / / , / 4 •3
tEl] / J 1 /
j - \ 1 l
' rTE.OTx

I \\
P7 < r/??y?
I
r/
///,TTTT/T\.?1
J
j
)J 7,7.705.04
1 (,
L?'
q
y
?? I
f r
i
PTE-Pa.99
M-705
60
/ Y I I r

PFE•705]7 .
I
r/ al
I I - ,
r/
/1-? I
Y,
,
?.
/
,
A \ r, al ri r, I
? r, ,I
1 ., _ ,70
A
A
BASELINE BEND POINTS
STATION NORTHING EASTING
13+90:88 526 997.429 1481.815.678
14+91.40 529 084.654 1,481,865.627
16+77.76 529 242.658 1481964.461
17+76.83 529 330.138 1 482 010:950
T8+39.14 529 382.281 111482045. 067
9+12.33 529445.673 1482081.658
A G./Jl_Ltt LLL/?J1i LLA \- ?? i ?-? '•
\ \\ 1 I r-
it I - -
79
1 .Bt
\ - -- --- --... _ __ _ ?- ew "-- 6w 6'W -6w - ?Y - _ ?-- D pOD DRM,
_-_- ss -
is ? SS
-7- 6,01
5, 6o, R/V
V.
uU??
.Armstrong Cfe7t, P.C. CHARLOTTE
9741-F Southern Pine Boulevard
P.O. Box 7326 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Charlotte, NC 28241
0345
Ph
704-529 -
.. ,... ...... .
one:
-
Fox: 704-529-0493 671-98-705 1 98004
MEADOWDALE
CAROUSEL
JOB i6A ME NO. /
` OAPITAL IMPROVENENT PROJE'
10/22/02
1ECAp.om DATE .
PLAN
'•'2d
"
"
SCALE LINE
A

AM JJA
VMA s¢r
1 C
1
RENBO9 SURVEYED BY PREPARED BY OeaaD BY APPROVED BY DATE 1 V

20'
SCALE I" = 20'
ExsnNo, BACK OF CURB
NATIONS try
r _ I
L _.
Q I 1s+98Da
AE1,1(NE Mal OKPOSE OF
® oesr. rro.
PROPOSED
aER PT'1PUSW ROTC.
133-2-01-01 K GttN &0.414
•, -Dr
Sr,
Randy Ray Rff;ii
?& mf For ne Osborne STA 0+1619
6101 Idlebrook -Or (E)TIE PROPOSED 46'
P
4742-0036 RCP 70
DIUL 8'xe' RIM
- 697 AN. Ollr .693.07
i-- \ A0.0CAlE B'
SEE Sf W48
GRADE gqIIANNEL BA MNK ro t,kTt
S SLOPS IN TALI- ANEN
FlROSa CONTROL MATING SEED
I \-D MUL04 C1SWj SM AREAS MATCH LIM SE 6 T 20
W ) SEE ENEET 57. Lt "B"
STS. 0+61.6 B?. I L i
rn
WWR W'_31
\\ rATA e
SEF
+ C f-CTIQN\ 9 IS
_\ ' ` • T. 1
dE \
S9 E 0 - -
l_I cl
P .•
REMOVE AM1 -. d
OF 6 01MN K
r CAN rAt / E-
TIE
m '? STL65.
e
JE- i BMNr'a• rSrA 0+0660 FWE
S.9. FURN 110 !F
-694 _TY
CONSTRUCT!
UIL
+?,4 ema d
P RFaOCA1E 6' 7. p I
695 he / SENFIC SEE SHT 46, i
'W / OSTA 14.48 . I
SEE
j
EYar.
W P P ?? J 4
?u//V ME F795TNG 24µ' 01P TO WN.
'y / r our M NNdE 6x6• RCBG/ 0 HEY. BD
r-I x
_Y.,?--.?••- x HT 175 700.75
I•rl ?? N• 529,466,1 1
W \ 96 - / i \ ?E,. 1.462192
EU.I \ 6 PROPOSED 12 SY OF
75PS I ---
REBDMAL DROP CURB OPoMY -
1 I rff?
"/,697/ l' '?'1??-f7TTTT I
REWOve OF
OR $Y QFY CRF?IE
1 rTE-7o15e 12 EWI
REMOVE DISPOSE OF
253 EF gAJ,'DaSL 7-0' r?
/ ? VALLEY' .?
QNER. , .
ZZZZ?
133-201-24
Charlotte Greenwald
4535 Downwood Dr.
V 4415-0903 PROPOSED 253 LF OF 2'-6'
CURB ME) GUTTER
/ (NCOOT 64801)
1 / SSE DETAIL 1/52 701 b
I i? A
PROPOSED 10 LF OF
_ CURB TRANSITION
1 y I (000 SAD. 10.19
- 4
x.5-29.395 n
--EL4B227250 -
7 _ _-1?. /SM?I ®7
yw -- aW 6.W 6* UNITS OF 0 SS
1
& wf Minnie i
16011 Idlebrook Dr. 1 NNrY 4An9 _ I 70g _
IOVE AND DISPOSE
ar Is OF Hr RCP. J I I I 6 9?- W L AAOM
E1051W BACK _----? I /
OF CURB
ElEVAt10115 01TNCAL) ??! ? / 1 r _ - I PmwEr r-• Y-- I I i , ' ' 'x,l
°"` J I I 1 1 I Y'
g I / "- 1 I I Y, awa - 704 N ? 970?s7° %
-PLUG MA ABANDON --- ?• `'• -"? I ,0.o,t I ?xIL . 4 •-- 7a -- •' •'? r; '?.4 ®E- 1, e7,27aR9 II W
48 IF OF 42' CP. ?705 , _. I ._ ..... -- rrr,K,'.,I I I I r+, ,'F-- .
__ • ., ? ?, L----? 7N -- ? _ -? _- ? J I ,..L7R1 _L_.K?Va«<,? I •--7p3` \ __ _ II _ .-- --- --- --
-TMSO sour _.- _.. 'RBMOSE.yWD REPLACE 451E
1 2a+t5w -- ?' ?l I I a aAx LERK EFNCE
` / t?78O4.10Ai 06POSE OF 703'.. ?'- PROPOSED 1E EQUALITY PROPOSED ' - 1 I CONSTRUCITIQN -ACCESS.. •. I : I I % U)
--- _ -J pP pG BMfK CATCH BASNj ~ .._ AlEI RF$ErU7llltr STA. 29+1821 LINE •A' aw uK rin[ 1 7021- -- __. / >4+? \ `•" RFAIQ6E ANO - .
CONC OVER PROPOSED ACBC. I L ON-APPR04E? BY -'EO STS. 0+00.00 LINE 'C'__ 1 I \, ""III q$PtiSE OF Eb5E
OPER I
Y PROPOSED tan OF I 1 CIMNNEL BANK ro i.kt SIDE SLOPE ` -- \ III RETA N9IC
OWNER. co
°N"E RELOCATE POMR
•--'7-- 71 POLE BY 01NER6- I - REMM AND 111516ACE 1,721E ` - GLASS I RIPRAP.IR9GY_... DAriI?NC.OANe'w,ol -.=
/ I INSIDE EASEMENT OF WOODEN-!" RAK 1B' THICK PLUSH VATH
H-!,R AREAS. SEE DUAL 2/67. g Ir PC W Or x
• ??
CHANNEL. TTOM AM
I I PTrr:r 117- / y •I I.k1BMWWSE SEE -1
t, Jt' I+
J A v NL? I ' - EET,? I LIMITS OF CONSIROLTbN .• " - +
O.YY, , OAVU ' I / / SET E7A§r?aNJ1V I / .. , _, ,_ ,-•-. I arwp
I'>o2?1 LOCA APPROVE'DABSELIENr ro Cl STS. a+lzoz (INt• c j 1 1 /? I 6,e .?,C am 7ro - kb
+r ,I / PR N OWNER _ .., PflOP03A CONC. y -?? _??•-j?/" "` FUHM
H
- 4 • 6 •_' 6 _ ?'?..-_, ONE 7 _ _ N -, ''s is I (n
'1p.p : SS.n _-• ` "- 699.._ M' MN 1 4 T ?-- O -•? OHE
-0.r. 9Br Nsn - •,' -? .. ANL 198[ E r OE - % p s Yom! - _ -_
E-E -9
IlE A
_ r
x
- =692_ - _ / M
E? .i E?.?-?? pP91? W
F GLU#?BPI.. W9FAEL';PER?W.'ENF wia awns Ii6?!µ. ' 7 i --- T / avlN f ?/?h'q\ .1.? ?-'? ((j
:. 7?"--- FCOryR(pLU N4T. 4UEN1 T fFArF E E?+LE 0?,•.-?_ _CT •?, 1?^DRR
7. E ..- E N uxc E . W ? ' 690' • '? LIW1S aF N ,n, ,l>u ? ? ?
B ?.v •? 0 UIS }F CONSIR?IC?ON IC
AND 146 LF
-FOR 7:ft REPAR AT 10 . A t0+2E.48 x\ \? f d'IA1 .1111K FENCE
6ETA9. 6 *ALL PROP03ALL SEE EE CON0R0E 55, WING I \ \
w4T ? SIEtT
Off AND. " l9f E10ST 42" C
2" MP
50 YF OF ItL FURNISH AND NSg1L
9GaO52` IPE CULVERT
R13E0PPE C.IILYEeB RE ' u LL « a8 RCP
fUAlA511 AND 94STA11 / HORIZONTAL ELLIPTICAL RCP
LFOF DUAL BX C
sEi; s+EEr?4.?, 6
?- Y, rxsE
_? rr FIE.maafi,f 1
roc axe Y, x'r---
x? C2 A POSED DROP
Y , , , JJCwc aNC I ?esAI SEE DUAIL
I?PROPOSETI 22 SY OF TYPE I ?JJJ \ 70P ELEV.
J RES1DENilAL QROP CURB
ORIEWAY. (GILD STD. 10.250.) I\ 3FURNISH
4 LF ANO
,1?.TTTTl.,Ir >] HORIZONTAL
REMOVE AND I
22 5Y OF CONCRETE OF DRIVEWAY. Y FR-70]3a x,(
REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF r, rFEaoo3a ;4 N 133-202-13
260 LF OF 2'-o EXIST. r' 4 p Chades R. Porker
VALLEY CU R• 14 L Y 4613 Downwood Dr,
1 -r 6035-0789
--F- PROPOSED 250 LF OF 2'-6' 9 /I
(NCOOT?B45mjl ©
Y, 133-201-12
L FJOSING BOO ELEVATION Y Roy A Bennett Jr.
& wf. Shirley A.
-55 SY OF ASPHALT PATCH 4601 Downwood Dr.
SEE SHIFT 52 7594-0674
NE P
TS OF PA VT
PATCH.
V0. .m 0.w PROPOSED 10 LF OF CURB
wN, N - solo TRAHSTION (GILD SID. 10.19)
A1NOM -
®®PN r0. r9.a
9
x=529,4808 YAl1 E7H ?Ps+n'.1)
E.1,4B232a4B
_ SS 69 66 50 /
SS SS ' RW ?
STRUCTURE NO. NCDOT STD. NO. CMLD SR0. NO. NOIRTHNG EASING INWRT N INMRT OUT PONT DESCRIPTION LINE
AS N/A N/A 529,501.74 1,462,11861 N/A 689.00 V. CONCRETE YANG WALL 0 OUTSIDE FACE LINE *A!
A10 N/A N/A 529.644.39 _ 1,482742.39 659,50 N/A It CONCRETE YANG WALL O OUTSIDE FARE IRE 'A'
-All 840.03 N/A 529,511.95 1.46271865 N/A N/A FRAME, GRATE AND HOOD ON BRICK CHIMMU LINE 'A'
A12 E-03 N/A 529;37.62 1,48213279 N/A N/A FRAME, 0617E AND HOOD ON BRICK CHIMNEY LINE 'A'
81 N/A N/A 529,499:57 1.452.117.18 N/A 89307 TIE TO NEW BOX CULVERT LINE 'B'
Cl N/A N/A 529.?02'42 1,48224925 - 69¢00 4 WTSOE FARE OF 1111INGWALL LINE
C2 N/A N/A 529;991,44 1.462270.0 69(;.22 69212 H P DROOP RAFT LIE v

OF?ppp / awy I' P
/ % / s?_ • OF •? • .699 / \ rn
CORC. QONSIRUCR01??`? J!?__,I f "fETUCE 170 /IF
• m9, EV Brx I'IT_y"31' I? - - ' v°, OF LINK nWM
ew: .
rP ram .n,
Nr. of 1201 I ) / /- Tr -Ay6
4 1v/ I I 5E p INST I 1.J(\ ??? Ky
rA+?+
/ OkE?ANB iI Mi . AAAND 1LYN' la URB Dom' wn , 1 / i __-??>< - v
?. t LADE 195 V I
IN. OF a LINK I I SEE DETAIL
Z/Ra?L4 { Lour jI j E
FENCE.
n N eru6 rr ,
LINE SEE sHT ?q I % - r« (???? 711 i 4
OVIOLM 1
DROP NIM EXISTING STA. 0+70.00 BAS ? I ) --i
PROPOSED
56 ?,? '1 I /' 41 1 Y
coNsnucTION
s Autaz f nE-2o s0 'A nE-706.59
?I I Y
REMOVE 291F . 1'33-202-15 •? ??I I I
9arAU EXIST 42'RCP. © Danold Phi/er •At6o,4 ?I I
38'x6O' 4629 Downwood Dr. - 'A
RCP
e 133-202-14 8392-0026
Joan E. Falls YJJ?JJ? ?Q ??J
4621 Downwood Dr
5508-0983 133-202-16
907E LIP OF GUTTER EI VATKNV OF I Annette g Slocum
PROPOSED 2'-6' CURB AND
GUTTER IS TO MATCH UP OF
GUTTER OF EXISTING 2'-0'
VALLEY GUTTER.
4637 Downwood Dr.
5950-0863
SS s9
-^ SS , SS ?- SS - ss ? 55
SEAL 1 n\
n
16691 1-2i
!? F4CINE? tie: A,V
20' 0 20' 40'
SCALE. I' = 20'
BASEUNE BEND POINTS
STATION NORTHING FASTING
19+12.33 529 445.673 1,482 081.658
19+79.14 529 501.439 1,482,118.446
20+26.32 529 542.664 1482141.376
23+16.70 529 792.977 1,482,288.576
23+65.52 529 838 720 1482 305.625
24+38.18 529 901.273 1482 342.593
Armstrong Cj[M P.C.
9741-F Southern Pine Boulevard
P.O. Box 7326
Charlotte. NC 28241
Phone: [phone] ?
CHARLOTTE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

-'
Fax: [phone] e,1
x5 a E
D
W
KeNO.
Va NO.
"o
nE xa
M
A
O
DALE./ CAROUSEL
la CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
RECORD ors BATE

1 PLAN
w
M
WALE UNE
A
.,

M
? -- OF
58
REl15bN SIPI -Vw BY PRT M
10 BY 0(0aD I
Y• AMr'ED BY DAZE 1 -17-1

I I! Il f ? i' I I I '?tr? I r r 7 I
?fj
I / ! t I !
I+ 1 / P', /I N1? YO
%11'1 1 I 1 % / / l// 11 ? / ! ' r / \ r ? J ? y5 a N N e7
' f I r (l ???
?, I! I I I't?Y ? ?ll I ? \ ? 1 ???{ / ! i ? t • l \ I ' a
0
Ili ,!?? /! /1 I ! r r r z C," v r
z o?aa
l/ ?, !' ' 1 I W z ?MMM
1 ' ? 1? ?n in N
! /1/I ?' ill \ I ! 1 / I I \ 1Np. N rM?I N
1
j! I I 1 lli/Il I( \ 11 ' r I \ 6p OI M NN
I I ( l/ijC ? S '? I i M MMM
1 l i f ! /
? I ? , l / Y 117r?llt ,0? ?f! 1' \? I ' t I c \
); ! / ? i ; Idly
V I l l i//? r 1?1t it jl / I 1 ?• I N 12
j ' 1 / 11??• ' r ?h? ? I \ j i I OV
!Ij) Sffi
!rI l 1
Ilia ,
S;Ii;Wa
111 {
i i
g ' 1{?
8
qss T .6 ; i I X/ ,
w?? p
8! (-Sre a ? I i !
\Z W { \
® r 1 ! I I
I
i
1 1 '? I ! I 1
I, -lfi
1 1
`? I f { lic II(7E ?,
1?1i1 \ ? E
I
I ' ?? ?y Ill??l ?
^b UP
W V \ \ \ / x,11, .. •,
5 ': 3
pN 8qj ? I \ '?N?; ? ,
f m??1ti
a
a ` goy 1 1
a tie
708 u p \
A 111
°i
?I
V W a 3

?
-x X ?Q

3
.
LL,
g W

a p
..? .
U ?
m
m e

CRT. a N p°I a
ppN ?N
I.a
NnZO'n
macgiiil°>.
o ?.
z
rNr , y PI.II?MO?fS? NN
VIDA
. ?U6w O n w
N
L
I
r
rz ?
i ! JI ?y
I
! q
C O

1 N
?NVe
?
R
4
R,
c, Q

v

, It
1 I
1 \
\{ \?^? ?{1 ? ?% III `\111,`\\3? q\?lc\?F \ ,?ra'y
I
mNa 1 ?' CJU
c-
pQOO
I ? I
GpM
Z
"1

I 1
SA-2
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL '5
m ` n 1
-Irlbm-61 -b
' EVALUATION FORM
CTION ID APPLICANT NAME CI Ig F C-fA Ww&4.&N? DATE 1 qN Q?
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) D i
ATERBODY/RIVER BASIN T^i -h-6 in& COUNTY/CITY 1 o 6u rxt Chj&J*,NC
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS yfrc - ?ln An In i0 Darr yg ?YS
P SP NP Observation
I FishtShelifish/Crustaccans Present
Benthic Macro Invertebrates
Y Amphibians Present/Breeding
X Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
- _
x Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces. shells, others)
Federally Protected Species (Discontinue)
V i Riffle/Pool Structure
Stable Streambanks
Channel Substrate
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, course sand)
Riparian Canopy Present (SP=h50% closure)
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
Flow In Channel
Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue)
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June thru Sept.)
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
'
- ?( Wrack Material or Drift Lines
- Vr Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel
Comments or Description

IV
t important To Domestic Water Supply? Y / )
Approx. Drainage Area:<(Macre$
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map. Y
Determination:
Perennial Channel (stop) Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR Initials
? ?
? intermittent Channel (proceed) (] Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (no id) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
Ditch Through Upland (no id)
t Evaluator's Signature: C4 (if other than C.O.E. project Manager)
14
P = Present SP = Strongly Present NP = Not Present
SAI
NCDWQ Stream Classification Forth
41rt" I 8byAm 41?.J -k1
proj,aName:? ?WdIL Ri.Basin:?wba co„n? M IMbHTj Evalusror ryt'y elpel?1Q
DWQ Project Numbw.. Nearest Named Stream:6-f)c)I cr• Latitude-W11-7 23" S' ??• ? ??^^'
:u?lle???
Date: )8Tu>tuq 2ooi USGSQUAD:'N' WC 64d Longitude:&' Ll .7' A' Lowh
ysse Abo, ljlw the
*PLEASE NOTE: If eea)aawr and tondonneragm that atujmaere b a a a"Aff e &c'4 tltrn "N ojrhbjonn b sat M.
bar projestlonal?gganenl ojdYe erabrator, drejasr e b a n?oeanode dhdY and nar o nndiJiad naarn(ab?m?n--dib rodig syAan tAarYsef be
awe
Primary Field Indicators: jcwkomNwmbwpwue)
c a&04
2) is The USDA Texture In Streambed irw _
S) Is Tbere An Active (Or
9) is A Continuous Bad & Bank Present? 0 1 (Z) 3
I'NOTE NBed d Bank Caned By MthbwAnd W WOVT S6wad Aw Some-O')
10) Is A 2 Order Or Greats Channel (As htdipted
On Togo May And/Or In Field) Present? Yes-3 Na
PRIMARYGEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POEM
II. Hvdreloev Absent Weak Moderate Strong
?
1) Is These A Groundwater
Ftnwmsc arve Present? _0 1 , " 3
PRIMARY.
PR I MA R Y B IO L O G Y I ND I C 4 T OR
S?econdarv Field Indicators: wideow w.dw PwLw
II_ . Hvdrolo¢v Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) is This Year's (Or Last's) I.eaBitter _ /^r
4) is Wader In Channel And >48 Hn. Sinn 0 V r r.?
Last Known Rain? k.&ord /9 /J Be)
7 t j is There wader In channel During Dry -0 1 1 s
P'n ) editions Or In Growing 9MO n)??
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDIClTOR
Ctimey my -
Abw-t
TI)TAL PoIWS (pHmarn +Secondmv)= 17 fIf Greater Than Or &mat To 19 Pobres The Strrnn Is U Least Intern We
Natural Drainage Way? 0
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYINDICITOR POINTS:
8) Are wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW MoanY FAG MOMY FA(."U MO MY Url.
('MM rTodAbwwQrARPbat6rswmW 2 1 .75 .s 0 0
AsNoudAbow Skb 7Jdr Sty UNLMSAVPnuaa*.
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL
EVALUATION FORM
ACTION ID APPLICANT NAMFlry t1? r!hir]n]?fSwter!y' Goy DATE 1? nuarti 1b01
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) w rta _m1)riu *1t 6,<Ox MA&AkL le a"
ATERBODY/RIVER BASIN 1 r'b 4ajaw?olxlj CrLck 6X:6PJh2 COUNTY/CITY GCkI?VI [1 T&Ybrltr
RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS N Y w
' P SP NP Observation
Fsh/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present

ates
enthic Macro Invertebr
mphibians Present/Breeding
lgac And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
ildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
ederally Protected Species (Discontinue)
Riffie/Pool Structure
0 cki
Comments or Description
Stable Streambanks
Channel Substrate
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, course sand)
Riparian Canopy Present (SP-h50% closure)
' - Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
Flow In Channel
_ Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue)
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
_ (June thru Sept)
t _ Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru Sept.)
Adjacent Floodplam Present
Wrack material or Drift Lines
Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel
we??O re?alte,??orfi?v? s? bAns? ?
?^bb1Z,
xer&j vlwidu+ 64S
i 1S
' important To Domestic Water Supply? Y & ?D l?s
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map. Y /(f?) Approx. Drainage Area: Determination:
Perennial Channel (stop) Important Channel: d _LF PROJECT MGR Initials
'
LF
Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel:
El Ephemeral Channel (no id) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
' Ditch Through Upland (no jd)
Evaluator's Signature:
If other than C.O.E. project Manager)
P = Present SP = Strongly Present NP = Not Present

NCDWO Stream Classification Fo
d le River Basin: Cad Wax( 'County: 4?dN(?' Evalator ?rr?Qe,`pe 1 Ke
Project Name:M&JA WGt l ( u ??4?
C-J wS
DWQ Project Number: Nearest Named Stream: (AYyfbeV &I.atitude:M 0 11•-) 12,'
Signature'?J?.t..,?/
/,
USGS QUAD: C Longitude: 80e tt 3,MLoodmobectiong
Date:185 Wr" '
Gnka bb! harkfi#C£?s JJ
*PLEASE NOTE: epekwor and landowner agree that the feature is a man-nu& Ack teen use gf&&fwm (r nor neommX Ah4 gf)w the
best profestlonal Judgement of the embWor. Are feaaue tr a ratan-mode Arch and nor a modified norard snmmn--Ok nadng system sborlrnor be
wee
Primary Field Indicators: pvkowmwberAwLbw)
CDbb1v 2) Is The USDA Texture In
K• n.Frorent From Summand
3) is There An Active (Or Relic) . , n, 3
9) Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Prawt? 0 i U 3
Noce: ed Bank Qwd aumn And WM0 Sbnwx
10) Is A 2 Order Or Greater el (As indicated /r1
ti r.,.... IA- A..wm. In t: oM Present? Yes-3 -- Q1Io?Ol
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOL0GYINDICATOR
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1) )s Thee A Groundwater /!1
Seeondary Field Indicators: tCwko-m-bsrp-f*w
3) Does Topography Indicate A
1
5
,
Natural Drainage WOW .
0
(12 1
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYRWICA TOR POINTS: D .
IL Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is This Year's (Or Last's) Led litox
t
2 Is Sediment On Plants Or
1
3 Are Wrack L' (A) 1.5
I S
4) is water in Channel And >48 Iles. Since 0
Ab
3) H Tbere Water In Channel Duridg Dry r9 ow Sib Ift Sky And r
.0 S 1 1 5
eye Abinne M In rimvrino Seaton)? ...
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Head)) Yes4I D Nom _
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYRWICATOR POINTS:
1 Are Fish Present? .5 . 1
2 Are Amphibians Present? 5 1 1.5
3 AguaticTintles Prew-uld -9 1.5
4) Am Crayfish 1
G L? i mnd{S b 14 Arc Macrobenthos Present? 1.5
l
1.5
reserit? s l
1 Are Iron oxidian
Is Filamentous AI 5
8) Are Wedand Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
r /s0M ¢Toad Abww ofA9 Plow AW So ras?led 2 1 .75 .5 0 0
AsNowdAbmr Sdp flits SAw tWLE5SSAVPmv04. '
SECONDARYBIOLOGYBWIC47VR POIN'T'S:
• T/17' A 7 DnT1VT(' t es? -22.5
f- Tw- Or Eoud To 19 Pohris 77ie SImm Is At Least Internswe
PRIMARYHYDROLOGYINDICAYUR POIIVW.-gL_
-SA -3
NT CHANNEL 5fiwhk ?9 mt? 3
INTERMITTENT
EVALUATION FORM (t, view bral 2 crW6
?CJJ
CTION ID APPLICANT NAMFr a'FU?uP1lJHP XWV94 DATE 18 Onup wl XO
CI
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.)
ATERBODY/RIVER BASINJ"ri,b Canlvbe)1 Cr>°e? / ?d?I?rJ COUNTY/CITY C Me
-W ii -
WEATHER CONDITIONS VI', R GV few Li R ky
' P SP NP
C
4>4

JC.

V?
¦ ,c
x
X
Observation
Fish/Shellfish/Crustaceans Present Comments or Description
Benthic Macro Invertebrates
Amphibians Present/Breeding
Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
Wildlife Channel Use (i.e. tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species (Discontinue)
Rifle/Pool Structure
Stable Streambanks
iMpot 1Y1 VVIVIri lm a tcm GMX+ (SP-40*4
a"
Channel Substrate
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, course sand)
Riparian Canopy Present (SP4>50% closure)
b
e
Undercut Banks/Instream Habitat Structure
?bbk
<AhI S
Flow In Channel
Wetlands Adjacent To/Contig. With Channel (Discontinue)
Persistent Pools/Saturated Bottom
(June thru Sept.)
Seeps/Groundwater Discharge (June thru Sept.) ,rp
/ r
d A- 54m t; ?"AN ?G
Tot
lM led, In TAvtLv4
Adjacent Floodplam Present

Wrack Material or Drift Lines

Hydrophytic Vegetation in/adjacent to channel
' Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y
Does Channel Appear On A Quad Or Soils Map? CY)/ N Approx. Drainage Area: «4?Yes
Determination:
0 Perennial Channel (stop) Important Channel: LF PROJECT MGR Initials
-0 Intermittent Channel (proceed) Unimportant Channel: LF
Ephemeral Channel (noid) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant channel)
' Ditch Through Upland (noid)
Evaluator's Signature: ?-?N ?'? u ' /'` ??"`' / ?Q""''
(if other than C.O.E. Project Manager)
' P = Present SP = Strongly Present NP = Not Present
NCDWQ Stream Classification
River Basin: lassification Form
Pro1 ject Name: ? r??a/?""?"' &JWL Ack"'e*J Evaluator: ) CleN;PL
??
DWQ Project Number Nearest Named Stream: f &1I Latitude: V' 11.4 ?7 Signature:
tt f L
Date: 1n a Ta*.UAr,/ Q601 USGS QUAD: d,01de'rft 6&4 Longitude: ?? I? + Locati q .
*PLEASE NOTE Iferatuator and landowner agree that the feature is a nnn-made d tc/4 then use ojtlds form is nor earn my. AkA #Iiw ike
bar pvfesslondJudgemuo of the evaluator, tie feature is a xim4nade dheh and not a n"JW namrd x0resnr-ahB rant system should not be
"ad*
Primary Field Indicators: xw&owm=bvpvvw)
a "W,
Is The USDA Texture In
5) Is There An

Secondary Field Indicators: xk*owNuwberPwLw)

SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGYRWIC 71OR
I

4) Is Water In Chanel And >48 Hrs. Simi 0 .5 1 U
,
Last Known Rain? mom imick h,draaaad N9 tr And A Betown
6) is Tbere Water In Channel During Dry •0 .5 1 1.5
Conditions Or In Growing Season)?
6) Are Hvdric Soils Present in Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes=1.5 Nom
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDIClTOR PORM.• . 5 '

Are Iron idian Bacteria/Fungus Present? .5 1 1.5
7) Is Filamentous Alan Presort? 0 I 1.5
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mosty OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly FACU Mostly UPL
(0NOyEirTolalAbwnmQfAUPIoarGSoraebrd 1 1 .75 .5 0 0
As Noted Above A& UNLW SAV Prvsve '
SECONDARYBIOL0GYINDIC47VR POINTS.
5
• TI)TA 1 PntN7:4 (Prlnrarv + Erns diavl -2 0 YGmarer Than Or Eonal To 19 Pobttr The Sbem Is At l cast rnterm!!te
II Hydrology Absent Weak Moderate Strom
1) Is There A Groundwater
low/Disch e Present? 0
PRIMARYHYDROLOGY RWICITOR POINTS:
1 1. Absent Weak Moderate Strome
1) is This Year's (Or Last's) Leaffitter _
' le w Jet Lc'- CA
INTERMITTENT CHANNEL CAA
' EVALUATION FORM
ACTION APPLICANT NAME ghat Ieil-t S1vrw? Wu r S y ??tS DATE-±/9 -3/0;-
PROPOSED CHANNEL WORK (i.e., culvert, relocation, etc.) i,,$ Dun tl X.
WATERBODY/RIVER BASIN yL,,-, reek f xjw'%) COUNT /CITY r , ,,burr 5o-r1o*
' RECENT WEATHER CONDITIONS C' l b . ?ti ' he -rc,' *4 `^'.??`° `r•c s' a c J' q?} ` ° ^ `?'?' ? oY, s

P SP NP Observation Comments or Description

x Fish/shellfah Cnataceans Present
- - Benthic Macro Invertebrates
Amphibians Ptesent/Breeding q /? ?2r S

^ Algae And/Or Fungus (water quality function)
- Wildlife Channel Use (Le. tracks, feces, shells, others)
Federally Protected Species (Discontinue)

L\ Ritne/Pool Structure r t ; cc,?St? h i tei
Stable Strambanlrs C - b 04 0,A S
Charnel substrate ?u
(i.e. gravel, cobble, rock, course sand) 'r' h C P wi- fi 0 a.r Ste- S "PSI 0 o ti

- _
f
- -
_
J
/? Riparian Canopy Present (SP-/>50% closure)
Undercut Banks/Instteam Habitat Structure
? Flow In Channel
Wetlands Adjacent To/Cwtig. With Channel (Discontinue)
- - Persistent Poois/Saturawd Bottom
(June thru Sept)
Seeps/Groumdwater Discharge (June thru Sept)
Adjacent Floodplain Present
J lc Material or Drift Lines
E
Vegetation inladjacent to channel
Hydrophytic p b

Important To Domestic Water Supply? Y Q
Does Channel A ear On A Quad Or Soils Map? Y /Q Approx. Drainage Area: C (04 o atf
PP
Determination:
Perennial Channel (stop) Important Channel: 4 1657- LF PROJECT MGR Initials
Intermittent Channel (proceed) ? Unimportant Channel: LF
? Ephemeral Channel (no id) (attach map indicating location of important/unimportant chwutet)
? Ditch Through Upland (no id)
Evaluator's Signature: Z!4-
(if other than C.O.E. project
P = Present SP = Strongly Present NP = Not Present `
sA - y
f 1
?CDWO Stream Classification Form
4
Fowa .Now ??'?tq ?° w 1d r,a?'bk A b l l 01-ec.k-, fivaiotor: jea r.cq
Ca rv ow-Q Projw Mrmmber N A I Neatest Named &.=
CXp
p(?
Date ?' 23 I e 2 us(?s QUAD 1
?Odo?°e? ?7-?• ?-w LPw'? ? a S'E'?w v E r? G n..P ?Q w 1? W O D ?? ?tJ e r "'?'? 0 '1? ?
*PLEASE NOTE lfey.hwwd.dbxdmmffw rdwAirferrnrb.ww.+ookdocl,trm w.frid8jarwirow
.eesv.rat.w..?(aarelar/Masi.wrrj.drawrwrdfMrer?rlr?.glMrfr.+ri.a.Fw.drdire?.r.r...d?w l?l<-(M des le•
awanrlsrarw?Mir r?rtk?gweasi.iYrswleauda
Primary Field lndicatorsl tco&*w#.*w 7aLt1

S
2) U The USDA Testme In Strambed
3) Is Tbere An Active (Or Rdk)
9) Is A Cook was Bed & Back Pn scsV 0 ? z [?
T, 4 A Order Or Greater Chaaod (As bsbated
On Tom Mao AnAtOr In Fidel) PM09 Yes-7 Nrd!0 )
PR I"YGEOMORPHOL06rRWIGTORPomx: L O
Ills There A

I
Pwmmr BIOLOGY INDicAroR POINTS:
Secondary Field Indicators: kcm*owm bwpwL w

1

"w
Sa?aVA Aw.
a) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Moody OBL Mosey Fjlatt'W Moody FAC Madly FACU Nearly VIOL
VJ
SEC'OMARYB/OLOGYINDIGIY)RPOMW ?• ??
a?
TOTAL POINTS (pr m "+secoedorr)-' 9 I)fG-ort- noor o.F"al To 12 Pein *VWa1..=LArLkkwst

PwmARY IYYDROwor'NO)CAMR POVM--
1 E(Y)NDARY GEomomwOLOGYINDICA70R POImR .-L
Conditions
G) Are Hvdrie Sow Presm In Sides O(Chanad (Orin Head W - Y L5? Ne•0
SECY)NDARYBYDROLOGYINDIG7nRPOIMM L- C )
i
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: C ors M Aei t Date: 18f4Y1Ua ;1601
pF "rkjk 8'?v1 Wo4w W -mg
Applicant/Owner:
' County: Alecklfabwa
21
A
Investigator: bAr<rin Nir%' State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes9 No[] Community ID:
Is the site sign;.Fcantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? YesE] No? I Transect ID:
Is the area a Problem Area? YesO Nc?g Plot ID:
I
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1
T G
- Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
s
. 1 Lgwi?'Idw 0, S-htr?aa _
r = . _ . _
2. 14??r rub nu w, _ T _ ?-? G 10' = =
3.
L
of qf {yN M c3 i I?PN rle _ '15
I
' _ FA< 11. - -
L
B
_
??a ke1ik _ WV
4. Rt?? - --? 12. - -
5. 4o?I L" la ;Dorn i _ WV _ FAC- 13.
6. - - 14.
7. 15.
8. 16. - -
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
FAC-)
l
di
/
l?
^ 7
u
ng
.
(exc - u
Remarks: ----- hq'??DrW!G V`e?? /c,
HYDROLOGY
'Dp-1
G K Cbe y N(64 F-JRecorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:

Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Inundated
QAerial Photographs
Other F]Saturated in Upper 12 inches
-
?Alo Recorded Data Available ]Water Marks
[
RDrift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands

W
i Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
ater. Iy (
n.)
Depth of Surface Oxidized Root Channels Upper 12 inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: N (in.) OWater-Stained Leaves
RLocal Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N (in.) ?FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: - - - - -
?n?i u?'drs
?drofdc
Nb 1?
?y
j
H:%CMCRAE1Wet"Detenninetbnfortn.doc
Sheet 1 of 2
8:12 AM 911200
?? vrr >?5 boy l s urv? vy- r KCG1?1fn6Hr?
Counh 077.
DATA FORM D P_ 6& Se q
mr4-*:L-
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Pay ;z
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): k)fncl 40Y6-
W 104M, o2 8 *
k rShA Drainage Class: - weA • %elld1atorJ

Field Observations
-
Taxonomy Subgroup:4iretic &jwrG R-P)udu.t Confirm Mapped Type? YesE] No[
]
Profile Description:
Depth Matra Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist)
- (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
/W
It! 31
5 m
SYR 518 M
1
d C1414
d > _ G 7S YR S )b S i Hsi 1o11 w4

Hydnc Soil Indicators.
[-?Histosol Concretions

r-l
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
?Aquic Moisture Regime
Reduang Conditions
? ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List

nGleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ----- NC kLiGir1 G 60I JS

I

WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yeses. N
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yesn N
Hydric Soils Present? Yes N
Remarks:
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
Yes No5?,

H:%CMCItAEl lmdDeerminenodorm.doc Sheet 2 of 2 8:12 AM 9/12100 1
i
t
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: a WS 1t'lEa"i tt Date: 18 -G X01
Applicant/Owner. Ci'}j of a4Arlc}(e 5lyrh wow SfYWC S County: maAcAby
Investigator: COCN(1-K( i(1' C241t / DArYln acihC State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes[). No[] Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes? No® Transect ID:
Is the area a Problem Area? Yes? NoN Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Plant Species Stratum Indicator
an
t
Domin Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
na
n
?
!is FWW + 10.
3- t+ V4 11.
4. V1G 1Acf 1kI u _ N- _ FUW + 12. = =
5. _ 13.
6. _ 14. - -
7. = - 15. - =
8. 16. _
_
t
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW, or FAC f t
e1
(excluding FAC-). y
oo
o
- - - - -
Remarks: = - - - - h? dVb?k?'hwC 1
tjTIDn ?Ye?Ytt'
HYDROLOGY
D P *a
an S-ti rsat -0-.3
[]Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
[]Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
[]Inundated
[]Aerial Photographs
[]Other ®Saturated in Upper 12 inches
ONo Recorded Data Available []Water Marks
[]Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: lDrainage Patterns in Wetlands

0 -1 Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
(in.)
Depth of Surface Water: []Oxidized Root Channels Upper 12 inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 3 (in,) []Water-Stained Leaves
[]Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil O (in.) ?FAC-Neutral Test
[]Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: S+aKd l vMft in (swe, p)are
H:%CMCRAE%WedandDetenninotblorm. doc
Sheet 1 of 2
8:12 AM 9/12100
*aM t4-- 5705 /Vlcc>rl t>~burj (41AW N W &ar"
DATA FORM La D PA
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Gn Mat
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)J
2
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): &to I- urea, l ^
ar-1 Lg@LP1W Q-9 tslcaes Drainage Class: - Li el) Jr&;,e d

Taxonomy Subgroup: 7krra cTVD Field Observations
'c Confirm Mapped Type? YesE] No[:]
Profile Description.
Depth Matra Color
inches Horizon (Munsell MoisU Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
O'8 A- 101125)3 CIot', a
I S _ AM MorfiLK_ 0 8d:61 clati )0,4"

Hydric Soil Indicators: Concretions
E]
n Histosol
Histic Epipedon
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Fj Sulfidic Odor [Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Q Aquic Moisture Regime ?Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Remarks: ----- !go 1)S bzMfr );,Ae
Cbrb*-w 6 -F 3) h H?pef B inc.kP? be?°'.?
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No0 Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes NoE] Yes ] No?
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No //`"'?-
Remarks: ----- 561 ?6rc?ff )it1e
H:ICMCRAE\wetiandDeterminationform.dx Sheet 2 of 2 8:12AM 9/12/00

I

I

Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
December 30, 2002
LAw -roiect sui uu-u-u-ioY, rnase 11
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
December 30, 2002
s ,
dye g.r-.I?,ti+ ;._ : ?, ?G?7 l ?'k '
'! err-. y i-r y. .-:7. •`r' - _ ' t w'?
Photograph 3: k iew of Tributary 1 approximately 150 feet downstream of Dawnwood
Drive, facing downstream. Left bank to be graded/sloped with riprap toe protection
(view of eroded bank obscured by vegetation).
XW ?
?'? ?ITt3_t-1f?.bc"_ C{0.rS Witw.,
j_
45,
;mod s>? ? •-t"?Y X ASS?fie -•?" ?'?? ? } `?'„ --
Photograph 4: View of Tributary 1 upstream of the Helmdale Avenue culvert, facing
downstream. Both banks to be graded/sloped.
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAWProject 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
December 30, 2002

f
?s
tai
L•?

T 0- I

?i
Aerial Sanitary
Sewer Pipe
Photograph 5: Helmdale Avenue culvert,,facing upstream (north). Arch pipe culvert to be
replaced with dual reinforced concrete box culvert. Note aerial sanitary sewer pipe, to be
relocated.
t} 1 1 4 " A4,? 'd r
LS.- jj
;? T? J ''?yAA J o o ?.
A AM
"a RAJ; ,11?j}j?1@a?§ iF i { a i$.?'S rY t , r? +IC .
.. 1 1 l 1 ta+ 3: S? ?y'
y r ? , i i 1 AW t T
j, o?$svF i, _
.4 X
71
3, -C
Y
Photograph 6: View of Eroded bank between Helmdale Avenue and Meadowdale
Lane, to be graded/sloped.
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
December 30, 2002
Photograph 8: View of vegetation growing on riprap-stabilized right bank (pictured on
left side of photograph) immediately upstream of Idlebrook Drive culvert.
Meadowdale- Carousel CIP - PCNfor NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
LAW Project 30100-0-0369, Phase 11
December 30, 2002

r ? r ?

`
=
s
e°
?
L.< ? ?? ?
+-.
i
i
j
?-<'s ?4
?
O
' ' ? t?
??•'?r
: ?tiL ?
?' ti
?
? ??
"pp??
?
p N. 'i
i? •
? 4 ..''"ter
M fi

....
>
?
.}
_
Y G
`?
,?,
VY'
y P
[[CC?- ?
• •
? *?? < .? h? _? .i_ ?.. fem.,
fy
- fit' k taa

r + 7 ?
c a _ ?. .
e ``
? ,?•.` _

Photograph 9: Tributary 1 immediately upstream of Idlebrook Drive culvert, facing
upstream. Note gabions stabilizing the left bank (pictured on right side of photograph).
4- J,
F
i
•;? Sk ?
t ..r - - t,
Photograph 10: Idlebrook Drive culvert, facing upstream. Note - aerial sanitary sewer
Meadowdale-Carousel CIP - PCN for NWP Nos. 3, 13, and 39
CSWS Project No. 671-98-705
December 30, 2002

1,
9
4

?"5?? -rm.... . _ .._ Ayy6. :rh,J...-s w .! ? :?, Y•!?QY ? -Yt : ? _ ..'?s .
'c AA
lip
i're'-•'W .aT: = s . -h .if°? '' a.,s ?.!,f ,t.
r
?''-3+ l?? .? v?'! 2 4,???. > h #- ? r,? ? a ? c`o'o,, 'y'vg•• N ti
V.
Photograph 11: View of Tributary 2, a riprap lined, important intermittent stream to be
piped (facinti upstream).
t f ^r n R ?.e a k .,
41 _0_4
? ?,' •;.? ?x?3 ?''• _ r?'.?+ r ,s;`? ? Ott: ?
r 4 Y. } %q?4a6: F:.
r qr a ?;
taa ?•
rte- ,?? r •?
Photograph 12: View of linear wetland, to be tail-ditched.
O O O S C, o •. J
n n n L V
g jam' Nh
+
I o
£Z Z??Fi : Q S '.IIZTI HJ•LY?i \
C
r??7 dad I r otQ?os L. Q? ?g? e a .A 2 W
...7.. `?Nn d1s?.4 YG?? Oj+9 YJ,S st 9l F9 vi5 019' .''' 4 Q:Q Z Z
t 901 Xp3 " J
1??\?7?'( moW m
86, J,aaHS aas SI' j Ha;L g 3 0.
on on `- ------ II { m
o
b +
T> ,- ©N ',q N + ml
i
fry ?1 t _t 1./ / 'Se°.? ?i•"„ . ?? ??: ._.. --• - -- • - - - ... ? ? ao?
n
Y`,B ?Y?? }?'? ? ? a ?8 ?? 3e?m°•3?i .. ? ??? 1?? - .?" ?„u;n? Nt
MO_ -uwO
N I M4?.1 ?. ,? G=•md O. S? x'71 _94'•dd m0 nOpio
t`r: q ?aa ° s " 2 2 fi t9Bk4 Y15 6?1 f 1 -• ?L--uq: vy •3 $ mac>a?
!yy ? o?Wl 8 g ?ae 3e3' g 03AOW3a3a aLS •- -`na-c "?'"?ji2
? o--•?..•?• ? rn - v ZSI'i a ?? j
?-?.d ..rw^ o - • - 7J31N1 Oa0 03 . •: ;y '£400L-+ 0 AINI ?94'd0ad v
SOtl0a
ly.'p S-<•? r W.99+*- VLS II
q77 / c
NI NslNarti 09D3Nf1 ?? b lIaLSN00 A {
±? LOLL a8?
yy • S I N
?. t
a o ?
• L , .. S 94 I oa oV„ p
O3S 1 ao , P .w Oy o • n
• O N. a0
8 ?a m .-.. ^;9Z 669 0 Mll s4 •doa
.d •`•.? "•• r ^ a •,_
;o? ? ?? . T? U ?? ? ... ££T6+ "Yl LJ tr `? ??p? spyJ ?s'ya'= N' W
°/
aN?e i W N - rn? x, y
O
-:Y do 4 P g
a wwN?? Op D 5?;? • ,:a qm a3M35 NV 21
cry ?YimKf:<,3 •. I a•, N?'j $ :...: _.....__-I .. .. a .. ._ ._ ...w.?.?.: o
I 4$ t N a?,0 O t I •?a6Q O _O
2XC N ro$ o /'I m?: /` 777 ?-/ ?
f I ?. _ °9 i W I 7 I e a o e§R ?WA9 eti NN'A+
pto nn a01 - i I s iW,, cage. o nrii; e4 doa_
4} II???{{{,,, 3dAl BYiS 03S d0ad
L?.?LL. /tL LLLLG"?L?A _ ??? - G£[£+ tl15 8? i ?
GG1 2 I i 4 N
m
of 1 G111?CL?? r?-?` _ _ I M
m s
??yy,, N .. .. r
I Rxz I .: Pm " $2f + a • • ,.3? iri is O
U
i
o i 1 Qm^
I? ? I Oh3$
bbb fi9 H?. ?` 'G? .6'W? 5? B?E, OOH. :.. .... .... .. ._. ... ,r?_?.
IF•t 3 d H Ha " Yna Ti'
a a I 8'? as6 ? ? .€ ?.i f. ?( w :'ri ' • O Z
m
Nf/NipC 1i31[1Npp
1S- - - i.+
9i+i ?
_ - amp
•
??'•(??T?}[?tgypp ?? / /? t_ _ ? ? 6 I IiQ ..' ., .. O
Otla9 10 d N
0 3 0 NnoganS 3 i
dS SS -? SS ASS -•.?_ 55 y HIvx3• Da a7na pars •imq - AO A 7r 0'L A3'13 ,d0
Q GIB yQ - sx 13y I aoaesm ON _._....
S tO*d 0
s? "aR o
A ri`D 9-9 A-9 w t °ti- =? 1i ? t ?I
N
u
g??
NIStlB NDl ?fyR ....
I . I W 3e a n?( oRQ is , I? N.Y.•r 3?6
N e ?"d°n • I. N? 3: I?{{ am ulNs 6 3dk-LIWS mS oad L£zatz
r d } n m T = '?.y{ m. A z W eo ?t ty - 0'1Y11 4 ggqq??pp?? o
??•ni _ • p[ u i "?? ? I ' (iI ?F., nditi •+' t of 03AOi 38 Q3 80 'l.S ? t t+iryp ,: ` 4969 r l 1:.84 'il0ad N
I ?WN ? 6N: 6xW /f / O 4 yy I .? 1-II? J ? \V ? \?.. y ?. i
O ••Ir! I yW? -....44N
I .I I 0. 007rtJAlva.I. _ .. .. 1.a a'
m r ?` g Q 9B 101 A313 ltlOa Gg f? g
rr•rrrrrrrrrrrrrr>) _F,-b ? '
?• u .: ' M 6'??T :io 3dAt aS 035 do d •?B9 +/ V S
r/ i 8 W b cS e v ae tc 31vaO x3
'1 / I _ a s • 03ngw a e of ag lsl 1 e k h j 66 849 dOad
4°?' l8-. 69 1i1
?' x I' y Q'N m I I' y?7•'1' ' ?- O tJM
DroDL-? xs£ . •d0ad
?
l•L•_
x .

?
t•" ti• W

? u °' m K s _F
a ? NN ? p0 O O i3
33 m m m m A ?. n

Z ?pp
m Y?
Y n m
n A

Z N N ? Y
! v
) y
l y
II
? rQ 1I
!?
d r,?
I?
} rl
a I1
;?1

°z
ee
y

z

z

z

z

z

i

i ^
m

U V U V U V U rj

b r g
'El 2
0 TIs sr. i Lads aas aNn H3Z I 3 : i7
N
?? I tk?ko ., L 8
01 m M M OD M N m
Z V' n O M O A I? 00
rn
M .-
< n
a M
,a rn
lci N
ua a
i° lo
n
.`1
•d?m•+ to
M .Nm
C c4 ,4
V mN
V QNp
+1'

n
?t
z
N
R
m
m

p
ro
N

N
m
W 10 M
:; M nM
p p
h N n
MN n
Z 1 m 14 4p 4p N fb 10 4'I
W Z N
m N
u1 N
u'i m
ry' N N N
f,3j up u m ,A v1
g a
N n
N n
M ro
M .-
1
' m
Ol ,n
n
N q?
p
O O
t 01 41 47 0
+
+ i + + + + + +
N N M M "f •t m
}?.?.. p
at sus ?s x ,tv?i I 411 1 3, y e +
77
l i51 «j•
I 9£ L69. ? tla0 'X3 ? Otl ? ?? NI MN •IA a
d t 1(10 ANI Xi p
y? L
:..431N1dAi1O.. SOdQad z 1n0 ANi_dodsd
. tp N
!llVIf?ONyA 313 00 03SOd0 d38^' I O
1?•0,9?y
d ... (l,NM+dO' d0?6969 -'A3'13 - •: I -- - - NO 11?U ;d0ad 4
+ AOY13a' O1:1ZtlMOV3O LtM+O151X3 .1p l 1 //
338, ,
+ #9/?
>=?I?
N N If1 O 1A O t
,o W.
Z-? ad
.a NI
a??i?,oo 1 I I - - Z F.
I - - - - - WF? V W pAf
to
EZ m°. D 0N
MM MM M M M , I -
$ '.' CJa ?O ?W s
I---?mZoM mo, R"I I
Q
Z maimau4i•voi - ? _ W 'Q ?F
I a ,nonm?ean V
,[a N 1 7:
,
?i MMMaaa
.
XaHH
-m CL
14
8 \ ILL
LIM,
Ey 3u ,._ rR na
op Op
: pO O \ ?• 1 Ct ? Q ?p?+ ZLO c ..
AWN r • - ?•?? Cn'W' i - •d ?l oniCCF?h.
r ,
,
. •AO. see .. _ .. .;
Ed.
\, o
T
e£z? - M
Its
K \
_? ? ? ?- ? ?? ? ? ? i z ? .; TItlMpN3 G3SOd Y -.. ? od•a a nm ma :ct •n' .. ?
,l 09'a8+ t VLS; 0 'J ?'° 98.B1L - AN1 .,9f 'd0ad o ?
p
.P II
W .i
c
t? w!T i
10
7 C9 ?' „S q• _...
• £ I.u M I N011 a1 33slo?d _. ' ; { . ....... u4. .„w K.m,,,,...
"C ea Dvd
• Ba'4att t: 610 I ^' -0 LLL * 1 I d o
o• ,,. II- ? - ba"'fir ?? q}
F, N
• ? y I? !S 4, G1-G 1??? aY111 '.:i ??r'p F ?t:. N
C 3 c?
• ! r9i J Z - N
N
I ?
E?. I, ?. F{8
;Pp.
+ZI Y y .:i. n - I t g
$?z all
i
-?i ALL ALL M.L MLZ -- N.L
_ N31 03S 11 It d, g
A{
> .? nuoa meld aurxw as t? .
----
.r ?ino/?ryi .9?doad.-'.
n ?_, ?/ ffi SS ----SS t73NOk13Y 3]3 Ol 85 'SI3 I. al - 4' Ayr f BB. Z,IL : t1 iANI .9£ .10io
r to
dST)
ilk
q A/H U9 erg aovld aNMU.? e
V, 3`Id S AD 1? A £?z
ri5 a35 IU' - - uttc w No x -
e? ? 3- ?-? --- ---- fB +L IVlS l? ,` n fey. ii)AaaoAIG g
.N
o3norpa 3R of eo >b
M: $7H'E8 F+TT Slider:-.anrllC ±
RM, aS-v$ S910if+TT `?d'ILS N
-jl'3T
s sz Za9FIs Was qxn I40jvw q
POg^ _ . .. .... .. ....i , ... _ ... _ ..
1
i
.., ....
. ? 00`
I
I
at
N Y T11
4
..nj
h ?
b
is g

l 3 S
1
Vb_
`?? t/
ZZW

?._.a't YaS'.o 1

$pa?
/ v N
$ 13 ? g
I ti
7**•I
?N
d
b
m
of
?p
I?C_hC
I_
npr.
X14
i
c Nam
f?I1,y ?
2 2 W

Mpi M
44!! W yr
a 't GQd
Zo ?
W ' = M .N-
m
Wzjj n N
ti ^ ^
N N
N n
z
a;;
? &K
I Rb o
w?4b
R ?N
2
t?

31 t g
Il
/
G
V
•

> r s ?'
a
t
z
5
?l id ht
`
$^
?xoa
1
I I a ?4?
i o

' I p o
N ;
r
1- --
r
P
oiv
'
L
25 1
.
•I ( I °
t` ? ? ?a, o c
u
N-
J ^
. _ .. ... .... .. .....
1... ,
, . _ =
to
1 1 t
m+ d,
.,.. ' ; 49 3
NIStlB NO1 X. A3Z3 10'ON
HON18 03SOd011,
: ..L ....?
I . _ .L .. ..... ... ... _.. __._ .....: ....

6 ... :C
M
HOlVJ YSpO . e• u . nTO C 0N A =
ZO'Of+HI tl £ZO b t, 1 ts,LZL - NO W, dOa °fZ •d d.
.. . o+p
I
ti 3nN3Atl 3•NON3
'm
1vo ,Wl0-
- i I 9G9YY
N M It
?
l -- ZL
;i _ N

NIStlH HOW
IX3 y tPti[

Ito ?
N 0 '
Hs &l+Hl 15 Z
'J 3'
r '
H9- '
. F .
LZL ? NI ANI f
": ft
d0? d
} .

yy
S i

n
2 I.

CJ, ??I G o

r
+
n

z
h
Y?q ? V

v I

J

+.
UU"
? ?
l I c
y. N
I ? ^

_.
fw•
_ .....
c - •n3o aol
_. 1
?;????
1r
it
..........
-

m
oo!mso a; .:
ae uw ?w ..::

'ZL•88+p1 , ja^I
4Z.?
i
' doom m L(t
IANI dos y4Z 'a
Iild +
m
• b
. o
t
e
g

N
+
O
_

m

3
j s
3

Ys ? ?
4
W
W
W

N ? ? I
a
n
3

? GT uT `•3

E K z
Z z
Z

Z ym
y
6 y
O

o
8 z S
3 :S
'
z

REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
DATE: December 30, 2002
COUNTY Mecklenburg TOTAL ACREAGE OF TRACT(S) N/A - linear project
PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Meadowdale CIP
PROPERTY OWNER (name, address and phone):
City of Charlotte - Storm Water Services
600 E 4d' Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Attn: Ms. Mary C. Murray. P.W.S.
Permitting and Mitigation Coordinator
Phone: [phone]
NAME OF AGENT, ENGINEER, DEVELOPER, CONSULTANT (if applicable):
Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28208
Michael A. Iagnocco, P.W.S.
Project Manager
Phone: [phone]
STATUS OF PROJECT (check one):
( ) On-going site work for development purposes
( X ) Development in planning stages (Type of development: capital improvements project (CIP))
( ) No specific development planned at present
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED:
Check items submitted - forward as much information as is available. At a minimum, the following first two items must be
forwarded.
( X ) Accurate location map (from County map, USGS quad sheet, etc.)
( ) Survey plat of property in question
( ) Aerial photograph (from County Assessors office, or other source;
property boundaries shown on the photo would be most helpful)
( ) Topographic survey
( X) Conceptual site plan for overall development
( X) USACE Intermittent Channel Evaluation Forms/NCDWQ Stream Classification Forms
( X) SCS Soil Survey Sheet(s) (Mecklenburg County)
( X) Approximate Waters of the U.S. and Wetlands Boundary Map
( X ) USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Form
_W QAM 01w"
Signature Property Owner or
Authorizeig Agent
* LAW completed fieldwork and documentation for Charlotte Storm Water Services but will not be acting as agent.
I edvIs
' North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor
' Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
Office of Archives and History
February 22, 2002
' Michael I occo
LawGibb Group
t 2801 Yorkmont Road Suite 100
Charlotte NC 28208
Division of Historical Resources
David J. Olson, Director
' Re: City of Charlotte StorikWater Services, Meadowdale-Carousel CIP; CSWS #671-98-705,
LAW #30100-0-0369, Phase 11, Mecklenburg County, ER 02-8954
Dear Mr. Iagnocco:
I
I

I

Thank you for your letter of January 31, 2002, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic resources which
would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
ee.,? ??" -&
avid Brook
DB:kgc
Location Mailing Address
' Administration 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4617
Restoration 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4613
Survey & Planning 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4618
Telephone/Fax
[phone] •733-8653
[phone].715-4801
[phone].715-4801
??
?A
NCDENR
F1 eeei ve -? /?O /d2 $L-Z
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Parks and Recreation
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Dr. Philip K. McKnelly, Director
February 4, 2002
Mr. Benjamin L. Leatherland
Law Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Road
Charlotte, NC 2.8208
Subject: Meadowdale CIP Study Area, Mecklenburg County
Dear Mr. Leatherland::
The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, or
priority natural areas at the site nor within a mile of the site.
You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at
<www ncsnarks.netJnhp/search.html> for a listing of rare plants and animals and significant
natural communities in the county and on the topographic quad map. Please do not hesitate to
contact me at 919-715-8687 if you have questions or need further information.
' Sincerely,
Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Zoologist
Natural Heritage Program
' HEL/hel
1615 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1615
Phone: [phone] \ Fax: [phone] \ Internet: www.ncsparks.net
An P-al nnnnrtiinity \ Affirmative Action Emulover - 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
February 12, 2002
Mr. Benjamin L. Leatherland, E.P.I.
Project Environmental Scientist
LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28208
Dear Mr. Leatherland:
Subject: City of Charlotte Storm Water Services (CSWS), Meadowdale-Carousel CIP, Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (CSWS Project No. 671-98-705; LAW Project
No. 30100-0-0369, Phase 11)
We received your letter of January 31, 2002, in which you requested our comments on the
subject proposal. The following comments are provided in accordance with the provisions of the
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
According to your letter, the CSWS proposes to alter an unnamed tributary to Campbell Creek
(3,400 linear feet) that passes through a residential area (Easthaven) to reduce stream-bank
erosion.and flooding. The proposed project will include the stabilization of 1,500 bank feet (bf)
of stream bank, installation of 150 bf of gabion, piping of 110 linear feet of stream channel, and
grading of 0.04 acre of wetlands. The action will likely need to be permitted under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act.
We are pleased that the City of Charlotte is interested in attempting to stabilize the erosion
problems occurring in the Campbell Creek watershed. We do, however, have several concerns
regarding this project. First, the project is touted as a "channel improvement" project. Though
none of the specifics are provided, the prescriptions described do not "improve" the channel, they
merely alter it to move water as rapidly as possible downstream without any regard for the
stream's natural function and value. We also believe the problems that are to be corrected are
indicative of poor "up-front" planning for storm-water run-off problems in Charlotte's rapidly
growing metropolitan area. Additionally, if the corrective measures taken along the subject
unnamed tributary to Campbell Creek are not done correctly, the problems will only be
exacerbated in downstream portions of the watershed rendering any stream habitat improvements
inconsequential. Finally, no description was provided with regard to proposed mitigation for
wetland impacts and any stream relocation or piping. Even though the stream and wetland
systems in this area are presumably already degraded by storm-water run-off and/or impacts from
residential and commercial land uses, appropriate mitigation should be included. Impacts from
the proposed project should be considered when preparing a mitigation plan for this project.
When we review the permit for this project, we will evaluate the sequencing of impacts (avoid,
minimize, or mitigate, in accordance with Clean Water Act 404 guidelines) and the alternatives
considered, particularly with regard to the piping and wetland grading (presumably filling).
Additionally, we will stress the use of "soft' solutions; e.g., sloping of the stream banks, planting
of trees and shrubs, etc. (see the designs available at the CSWS home page), as alternatives to
gabions or other bank armoring. We also recommend a 50-foot vegetated buffer zone along the
stream bank in order to (1) protect the roots of bank-stabilizing riparian trees, (2) allow for
storm-water filtration and the deposition of eroded soil and pollutants, and (3) preserve a travel
corridor for wildlife.
Based on a review of our records for the area, we believe the project will have "no effect" on
federally listed species. In view of this, we believe the requirements under Section 7(c) of the
Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under Section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if:
(1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or
critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in
a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is
determined that may be affected by the identified action.
Please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Allen Ratzlaff of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 229, if you
have any questions regarding our comments. We have assigned our Log No. 4-2-02-154 to this
project. Please refer to it in all future correspondence directed to us concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
n
Brian P. Cole
State Supervisor
cc:
Mr. Bob Johnson, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office, 151 Patton
Avenue, Room 208, Asheville, NC 28801-5006