20001591 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20001228

F W A TF
\0?0 9pG Michael F. Easley
Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
> Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
June 14, 2001
Mecklenburg County
DWQ Project # 00-1591
WAIVER of 401 Water Quality Certification
Gateway Homes, LLC
6407 Idlewild Road, Suite 1-113
Charlotte, NC, 28212
Dear Sirs:
Your revised application for a 401 Water Quality Certification was received in the Division of Water Quality's Central
Office on April 2, 2001, with the North Davidson Mixed Use Master Plan Wetland Impact Map dated March 5, 2001.
According to our rules [ 15A NCAC 2H .0507 (A)], if final action is not taken within 60 days, the Certification is waived unless
DWQ has objected in writing to your application. Therefore, DWQ has waived the requirement for a 401 Water Quality
Certification for your plans to impact 0.373 acre of wetlands and 250 linear feet of streams for development at the North
Davidson Road site as described in your application. This waiver replaces the one issued to you on June 5, 2001.
However, if additional impact occurs or your development plans change, this waiver is no longer valid and a 401 Water
Quality Certification will be required. Therefore, you still must submit acceptable plans for 1) an extended detention wetland
for stormwater treatment and 2) channel relocation.
If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-9646 or Pete Colwell at the DWQ
Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699.
Sincerely,
John R. Dorney
Cc: DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
Asheville Regulatory Field Office, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Chris Huysman, 720 S. Main Avenue, Newton, NC, 28658
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
!11/, 100 490C /..1.......\ !11/1'17.) -1 /f....\ .w..•/IL.11......-n1 ..... .... .... 1.........11 .....J../
State of North Carolina
? W A TF
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources o?o
9QG
Division of Water Quality cis

Michael F. Easley, Governor p -C
William G. Ross,Jr., Secretary
Kerr I Stevens Division of Water Quality
June 5, 2001
Mecklenburg County
Project # 001591
WAIVER of 401 Water Quality Certification
D
Gateway Um , LLC
6407 Idlewild Road, Ste 1-113
Charlotte, NC 282125
Dear Sirs
Your revised applicat(ays, r a 401 Water Quality Certification was received in the
Central Office on April 2, 200 cording to our rules [15A NCAC 2H .0507 (A)], if final
action is not taken within 60 the Certification is waived unless DWQ has objected
in writing to your application. Therefore, DWQ has waived the requirement for a 401
Water Quality Certification for your plains to impact 0.373 acres of wetlands or 275 feet
of streams for development at the North Davidson Road site as described in your
revised application.
However if additional impact occurs or your development plains change, this
waiver is no longer valid and a 401 Water Quality Certification will be required. Therefore
you still must submit acceptable plans for 1) an extended detention wetland for
stormwater treatment and 2) channel relocation.
If you have any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-9646 or
Pete Colwell at our Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Cc: Mooresville DWQ Regional Office
Asheville Field Office Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Todd St. John
Chris Huysman; Wetland & Natural Resource Consultants, 720 S Main Ave,
Newton, NC 28658
MEW
Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Wetlands/401 Unit [phone]
Fax: [phone]
2
DWQ Project No.: County:
Applicant:
Project Name:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate
to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1621.This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's
authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities,
due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction
was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting
materials.
Signature: Date:
Agent's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities,
due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction
was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting
materials.
Signature: Date:
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional
I, , as a duly registered Professional
(i.e., Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, ect.) in the State of North Carolina, having been
authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the
observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the
approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature Registration No. Date

Wetland and
Natural Resource
=? • Consultants, Inc.
?. ? J•i

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. Steve Chapin
151 Patton Avenue, Rm. 143
Asheville, North Carolina 288
I! L4 ??! I?
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Re: Supplemental Information
Section 404 Permit/ 401 Water Quality Certification Request
North Davidson Mixed Use Master Plan, Gateway Homes
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County North Carolina
Dear Mr. Chapin and Mr. Dorney:
Regrettably, no Corps action ID Number or DWQ project numbers have been forwarded
on any correspondence related to this site. Attached is some limited correspondence
that may provide links within your offices.
Supplemental information that you both had requested took more time to compile than
we had anticipated; we trust the attached information will satisfactorily complete the
application to justify Gateway Homes request for authorization. We feel that it is
appropriate for your offices to issue the requested permits because the attachments
hereto complete a reasonable avoidance and minimization review in accordance with the
Clean Water Act.
The purpose of this package is to provide requested supplemental information for the
North Davidson Mixed Use Master Plan that is proposed by Gateway Homes. The
application is dated December 15, 2000 and was placed on hold by both agencies
pending the submittal of supplemental information. We trust that you have maintained
copies of the application and can refer to the document as needed; additional copies are
available upon request.
Attached hereto as supplemental information are the following:
1. Narrative justification from the applicant
2. Limited comparative proformas developed by the applicant
3. Fair Housing Act discussion
4. Detailed site development plan
5. Response to Cultural Resources Comments
6. Response to Wildlife Resources Commission Comments
7. Mitigation and Conceptual Relocation Plan.
These items are compiled with the understanding that they will functionally fulfill the
submittal requirements for the Corps and DWQ.
828-3121,9207 Chris 720 South Main Ave,
828-312-9205 Jennifer Newton, NC 28658
828-312-9206 Tamp -- 828-465-3050 Fax
Revised and attached are the following:
1. Narrative of Nationwide 14 and revised PCN
2. Narrative of Nationwide 39 and revised PCN.
Revisions were required to more precisely define impacts to wetlands and because of
channel importance determinations made by the Army Corps of Engineers. The Corps
has reduced the linear feet of channels that we presented as requiring mitigation.
The following information, presented in the original application has not significantly
changed.
1. Supporting information, photos and resource maps
2. Minimization and Avoidance Narratives
3. Mitigation Narratives
The applicant has yet to complete the storm water management plan and final channel
mitigation plan because of the uncertainty of the projects approval. The applicant fully
expects a conditional approval of the plan pending the satisfactory completion of an
extended wetland detention facility and a channel relocation plan. Initial estimates for
design of these elements are $70,000; therefore, without some understanding of the
Corps and DWQ position we cannot proceed with this work. Within the original
application for fill, Gateway Homes offered mitigation through the Wetland Restoration
Program and additionally proposed to mitigate storm water impacts through the
establishment of extended detention wetlands.
In conclusion, your offices must issue a permit once an applicant has 1) provided
justification for a proposed impact, has 2) demonstrated avoidance and minimization to
the extent practicable as to not frustrate the equitable development of such site and has
3) offered to mitigate for anticipated impacts to the effected environment. Under item
3, consideration must be given to A) direct demonstrable adverse impacts to the
environment and B) indirect cumulative adverse impact resulting from the development
of the site. As such, contribution to the State WRP will compensate for losses attributed
to piping and storm water facilities will mitigate for indirect impacts resulting from the
development of the site.
Please call with questions.
C regards,
Chris Huysman
Cc: Pete Colwell
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED: # 39
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION i i l •- t j `'
1. Owners Name: Gateway Homes, LLC
Contact: Dave Ransenbur
t
2. Mailing Address: Gatewav Homes, LLC
6407 Idlewild Road Suite 1.113
Charlotte, North Carolina 28212
subdivision name: North Davidson Residential Site
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address above): North
Davidson Street, Mecklenburg County Charlotte North Carolina
3. Telephone number (home):
(work): [phone]
4. Agent: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
720 South Main Ave.
Newton, North Carolina 28658
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
5. Location of work:
County: Mecklenburg
Nearest town or city: Charlotte
Specific location: From Hwy 49/29 take East 3611 Street south Turn left onto North Davidson
Street, Site is located on right side iust Pist Herrin Avenue See Attached Location Man
6. Impacted or nearest stream / river: Unnamed Tributary to Little Sugar Creek
River Basin: Catawba
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high
quality waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-1
or WS-2)? Yes E] No ® If yes, explain:
7b. Is the project is located within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental
Concern (EAC)? Yes ? No
7c. If the project is located within a coastal county, what is the land use plan designation (LUP): N/A
8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? Yes ? No ® If
yes, provide Acton I.D. number of previous permit and any additional information (include photocopy of 401
Certification):
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
Yes ? No ® If yes, describe anticipated work:
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land: 10.59 ac.
9b. Estimated total acres of wetlands located on project site: 0.82 acres of vegetated wetlands 0.07 acres of
channels ac.
10a. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project:
Filling: 0.373 ac
Flooding: ac
Drainage: ac
Excavation: ae
Other: ac
Total acres to be impacted: 0.373 ac
10b. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated, provide distance both before and
after relocation):
Length before: 275 if Length after: fill if
Width before: 2 ft Width after: fill ft
(based on normal high water contours)
Average depth before: 0.12 to 0.5 ft Average depth before: i e ft
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from:
Open channel relocation ® Placement of pipe in channel
Channel elevation ? Construction of a dam/flooding
Other:
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, what is the size of the watershed draining to the pond? Extended
Detention Wetland Basin to he utilized ac
What is the expected pond surface area? Calculations and Plans to be submitted upon conditi2n.11
authorization construction activities ac
12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical equipment to be used (attach plans: 8
''h" x 11" drawings only): Site development and infrastructure for a proposed residential development
Typical equipment will be utilized for road crossinns
13. Purpose of proposed work: Access to residential development, Building pads for stnuctures
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. (include any measures taken
to minimize wetland impacts): For site development to be economically feasible. Toa access structures of
both sides of property.
15. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regardig the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project. Date contacted: see attached
letter
16. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (State) land? Yes ? No
(if no, go to 18)
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursant to the requirements of the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act?
Yes ? No El
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina Department of Administration State
Clearinghouse? Yes ? No ?
If answer to 16b. is yes, then submit appropriate documentation from the State Clearinghouse to Division of
Environmental Management regarding compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
17. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity involves discharge of
excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on the property (for Nationwide
Permit numbers 14, 18, 21, 26, 29, and 38). All streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property must
be shown on the map. Map scales should be 1 inch equals 50 feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or their
equivalent.
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
c. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the stormwater management plan if required.
e. What is the land use of surrounding property? Urban Residential / Industrial
£ If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? Existine Sanitary Sewer
g. Signed and dated by agent authorization letter, if applicable.
Note: wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1) Issuance of a section 404 Corps of Engineers permit, and
2) Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental Management (Water Quality)
Certification.
Owner's / Agent's signature
3 • ? ? ? c2.'-1
Date
Supplemental Information
Attachment 1., Narrative justification from the applicant:
The letter from Mr. Dave Ransenburg, details that affordable housing is needed in the
Charlotte region. The site, when developed for residential use requires the proposed
wetland impacts so that it can be equitable because:
1. Density defrays land prices which are higher than in rural settings
2. Fair Housing Act requirements require ground access units with flat entrances
3. Infrastructure costs are fixed for the site; therefore reduction of units do not
change this costs.
Attachment 2., Limited comparative proformas developed by the applicant:
The proforma developed by Mr. Ransenburg and referenced in his justification,
demonstrates that impacts are required to maintain the equitable development of the
site. The proforma considers mitigation and storm water management under the
development costs. Note that the site will require storm water facilities regardless of the
impacts being approved. As such, channel mitigation, anticipated at $70,000 is not
much in terms of overall profit.
Attachment 3., Fair Housing Act discussion:
The letter from Watts Leaf Architects, P.A., explains some of the Fair Housing Act
requirements for the site. The architect has developed a plan that complies with the
intent of the cited regulations.
Attachment 4., Detailed site development plan:
Attached is a site plan that depicts impacts. Impacts from this map are reflected in the
attached PCN's.
Attachment 5., Cultural Resources Comments:
According to our calendar, this department did not respond within their allocated time
period. Respectfully, we expect that their comments be waived.
Attachment 6., Wildlife Resources Commission Comments:
The commission comments are incorporated to the extent practicable; however, since
there role is non-regulatory we request only minimal consideration of their comments.
To the extent practicable:
1. The site will be stabilized with the recommended seed mixes to the extent that it
is economically similar to fescue and available.
2. Native tree species will be planted along the relocated stream. The channel will
be relocated using bio-engineering concepts and practices. The relocation will be
submitted for review.
3. We do not conceptually oppose the idea of a park, however, the highly degraded
site is encircled by industrial and residential uses; no quality wildlife corridor
exists in either direction.
Attachment 7., Mitigation and Conceptual Relocation:
Concepts are outlined in the attached plan; they include meanders and stabilization.
Additionally, estimated costs are included.

Revised Information
Narrative of Nationwide 14 Impacts
Impacts associated with Road Crossing 1, Card Street, will be 135 linear feet. This
channel is important by both DWQ and Corps standards. The crossing is as near
perpendicular as possible and will require impacts associated with rip-rap energy
dissipaters. Channel impacts will be associated with fill.
Nationwide Permit 14 has been applied in consideration of Corps recommendations.
Channels lost under 14: 135 feet
Mitigation for loss: 135 feet
Narrative of Nationwide 39 Impacts
Impacts associated with a road crossing located at the southeast corner of the property
have been removed from the request because the channel will now be spanned.
Channel relocation and fill will not occur upstream of the existing pipe located at
Academy Street. This channel will be contained between keystone walls.
Impacts to wetlands located south of Card Street will be to 14,199 square feet (0.325
acres). Within this area 275 linear feet of important mitigatable channel will be lost to
piping under Nationwide 39. The original application requested impacts under
Nationwide 3 to relocate the pipe located under Academy Street; this relocation allow for
the impacts as depicted. These impacts will allow for the development of up to 12 four
story units and their supporting infrastructure.
Impacts to the wetland located between Card and Warp Streets are the minimal that will
allow the site to comply with the Fair Housing Act. This compliance is due to the flat
topography located in this portion of the site. Minimal grading will allow for access to be
granted in the most cost efficient manner. Impacts to the wetland that will be enhanced
for storm water retention, will account for an additional 785 square feet (0.018 acres).
This area will be replaced within the storm water facility and will be planted with native
wetland tree species. These impacts will allow for the placement of up to 4 four story
units and their supporting infrastructure.
Impacts associated with the Warp Street Crossing will be completed under Nationwide
Permit 39 as directed by the Corps. This crossing will require that and additional 870
square feet (0.020 acres) of wetland be impacted. This crossing will result in the loss of
70 linear feet of channels that support crayfish but that are not important to the Corps.
Impacts between Warp and North Davidson Street will total 714 square feet (0.016
acres). These impacts will cause the loss of 465 linear feet of channels that the Corps
finds not important. DWQ will find these same channels to be important due to the
presence of crayfish. Additionally in this area, 225 linear feet of channel will be relocated
to and existing property line.
Wetlands lost under 39: 0.373 acres
Channels lost (DWQ): 535 feet
Channels lost (DWQ COQ: 275 feet
Channel Mitigation: 810 feet
Gateway Homes, LLC
1819 Sardis Road North Suite 330
Charlotte, NC 28270
February 16, 2001
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Dear John:
Currently, Charlotte is in an affordable housing crisis. The city officials pound home on a
daily basis the lack of affordable housing. This issue has taken a prominent position in city
planning efforts to make affordable housing a reality. Their desire for affordable housing
close to the city core is evident by the changing of zoning, transportation and building
codes. By denser affordable housing near the city core many infrastructure and
environmental stresses are reduced quickly. The need to go to the suburban markets to
buy less expensive housing is curtailed. The monies required to extend roadway, sewer,
storm water and water systems are greatly reduced by utilizing existing systems.
Our project accomplishes the goals set forth by the city but does it in an area that needs
revitalization. By introducing new homeownership in run down areas only spurs more
urban redevelopment. This will further utilize existing services and curtail more suburban
sprawl. The end result is more efficient use of utilities and a great reduction in
environmental impacts suburban sprawl imposes.
We can only realize these goals by doing two things, providing an affordable unit and
building it affordably. Our housing prices need to compete with suburban housing prices.
Our homes also need to be reasonably priced due to the fact the area around the project is
in need of revilalization. This means that the project can only support a certain price
point. In addition, we need the 4 units east of the wetland area to satisfy ADA
requirements and provide disabled homeowners a place to buy. By reducing the number
of units, each one of the remaining units will go up geometrically since many of our costs
are fixed. Our land price is higher than it would be in the suburbs since we had to purchase
I-2, (heavy industrial land usually is 2 to 3 times the cost of suburban multifamily land).
Infrastructure costs do not reduce in proportion with the number of units built. Therefor,
the remaining units will have to absorb the costs. Any reduction in the number of units
will make this project unfeasible and will cause us to develop it for an industrial user. An
industrial user will not solve the affordable housing problem. An industrial user will not
stop the environmental impact 220 homes will make on 150 acres of suburban land. An
industrial user will not curtail the need of tax monies to extend infrastructure. By adding
these homes in the suburbs the stream basins would be adversly affected.
Please review the enclosed projected proformas as they relate to the current condition and
the reduced unit number based upon CDOT realignment of Davidson. The final proforma
combines the CDOT reduction with the 12 units you propose to cut based upon your
requirements. Please notice how the feasibility is reduced as units are removed.
In conclusion, if we have to reduce the number of units, we cannot go forward with this
plan. We feel that it would be ashamed to shift the burden to build these 220 homes from
this 10.5 acre site to 150 acres in the suburbs.
Sincerely,
David Ransenberg
Gateway Homes, LLC
'O cn

CD Q-1?.*C7? DCO?
0 CL
c 6<
9
M
(J)

L co
(D R
C?p N ro 3 ?
0
f0
? G
tJ rD
C3 p
O o
a 0
0 0
o a
t0 ? iD
C3 0 W
.P .P o
CD M C3
4 O O
000
0 °0 0
4A in
NQN WC 03
oOp 0 0
s°O°°?'
00000
ooooao
000040
N
iA w - 40
N! O
n p 44P ' {/? {A w (C??ss G
4 Ca -4--40 -I?+'triN ACStnR_.
o Q co G P pO o (Q 0?? p o pq O pp 0 u
4 4 p?7 a dp .. 4 C 4
b C3
8 8 4000 r naoooo
?q
C
9:
ta
fV
O
O
Q
c7
O
O
a Grp
*4 {{ ?(pp N CO
Q co-4.a Q Al"S7NQ C, t"
-? 4N CA 1aaOCACz000
N O O O Q Q O p 0 0
Cf C7 O0 000 C2 C7O?
Ca 0 Q Q oOC.?OC7O
O QQp .ppppp4
C5 OGC]rC7CC?GOQ
Q OC,30 0C7pO4CD
0
?M
0
G
N_ N
N
0
0
"s
t7 (D
Q.
Q
C
7•
r?-1-
A
O Z
Q 0
Q
R? C/) '
CD`
C
CO
C6
£d Wd8 .:£0 S©0Z 9S 'qaj 21783:7 ? VOZ : 'ON 3NOHd 3T1 `33WOH Ua : W0a-?
FROM : D&D HCMES,LLC
W A T L 3E: A F
Fobrunry 19, 2001
Davo Ransenburg
T= Gateway Homos
$treat
city, state zip
kkkkkk iY
FHONE NO. : 704°446947 Feb. 19 2001 03:0 PM P1
Pi It (:' 7H I T F C 'T S P A

Re: Davidson Condominiums
Fair housing unit
Dear Dave:
I have done some more research into the application of the Fair Housing Act toward the
dwelling unihs in your development. As I have explained, the Fair housing Act excludes
townhomes 33 "covered units" as they aro multilevel and do not hove an elevator. The
Act does state that if you have single level units above parking then the ground floor is
raised to that' second level and you must provide an arces?bla entranca (ramps or
elevator). We will have that condition.
Fortunately we are planning to have some ground level single story plans. Thurso will
assure that we are providing equal accommodation and will therefore not be rcquirod to
have the ahvator access. The Fair housing Act is not clear 33 to the required number of
such Plana. I feel that we satisfy the intent by having, at minimum, two dwefling units. If
spaco permits more units would be preferred.

U"AKLl!aU . JATT8, AIA
President 11
Attachmcnt pogo 4 rmM 24CFR Ch,I
"eupp. To Notice of Fair hou3inlg Accaasibillty Wdallnos: Q S A cbcut fete Guido4nes'
101 NORTH
Akocr+rELLsr
SURE 112
CHALOTTl:. NC
PM 704 376. TZ09
FX 704,376-511 !' ` ?'
E
;i
r
1
N ! I i 0 ?1 _
I I -?" ? s, r y? 1 I ?=
Io I 111111111 -,
I I ? 1 , •lj
r"
I 1 I
j y ? O I r i
? y?11a, ? ? ? . L "j a o
6C?Zt? I -All ?? c!
O
1
?1

E? NORTH DAVIDSON
MIXED N
WETLAND IMPACT MAP 4
??'?' _.: GNA ncsrcv A?rst?res. 1„?.
s?.•r ? a
• rwrr.••e•or.w?
i.r
dd STATED j
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
February 12, 2001
Jennifer Robertson
Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
720 Main Avenue
Newton, NC 28658
Re: Develop site for residential subdivision/access, North
Davidson Road, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County,
ER 01-8456
Dear Ms. Robertson:
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
We have received notification of a nationwide permit for the above project and would like to
comment.
We have conducted a search of our maps and files and have located the following property of
historical or architectural importance within the general area of the project.
Adjacent to North Charlotte Historic District, a property listed in the National Register of
Historic Places
Therefore, we need additional information to complete our review. Please send us architectural
drawings of the proposed subdivision so that we may determine its effect on this historic
property.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section
106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, Environmental Review Coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
avid Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:s
cc: John Rogers, Charlotte Historic District Commission
Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
Administration 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4617 [phone] •733-8653
Restoration 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone].715-4801
Survey & Planning 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4618 (919) 7334763 •715-4801
Y
1
b,
fit. =
t ?
J '.
i?a?
I°?TortCarohna Wildlife Resources Comml*ssion
Cl, arles R. Fullwood, E.-.Ccutlvc Director
TO: John Dorney, DWQ
401 Certification Program
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: January 26, 2001
SUBJECT: Review of 404/401. Application by Gateway Homes, North Davidson
Road Site, Mecklenburg County
The applicant is requesting a letter of concurrence from the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) to obtain a 404 Permit and 401 Certification.
These continents are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of
1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401,
as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The application package is somewhat confusing. Impacts from the development
appear to be the reduction of 2116.5 linear feet to 520 linear feet and a reduction of 0.83
acres of wetlands to 0.42 acres. It also appears that the remaining portion of stream will
be a consolidation of existing waters into a bioengineered stream while the remaining
wetland will be utilized in some fashion for stormwater management. The Wetland
Restoration Program (WRP) will be requested to accept a $54,125 payment for site
impacts.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) continues to be
concerned about the fragmentation and loss of forested areas or woodlands as
development occurs in areas near the City of Charlotte and in or near Mecklenburg
County. We appreciate the efforts to protect water quality by providing stormwater
detention and treatment. However, the NCWRC does not encourage the utilization of
existing waters or wetlands for water quality treatment facilities. As the area is currently
forested habitat that appears to reduce pollutants and remove trash from downstream
areas, we recommend that the consultant and Charlotte Stormwater Services discuss the
benefits of the site for stream and wetland restoration instead of development. The area
might be utilized as a park and wetland/stream restoration site. This area could provide a
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fishcries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Ralelgli, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] ext. 241 • Fax: [phone]
Gateway Domes 401 2 01/26/01
small "wildlife refuge" in the urban area. Environmental enhancement activities should
be beneficial.
If a certification is issued, we recommend the utilization of bioengineering design
techniques for the new stream segment. Any required wet detention facilities should
include vegetated littoral shelves for aquatic edge habitat. In an effort to restore avian
and terrestrial habitats as well as enhance aquatic/detritus habitats in a detention facility,
we recommend that the applicant provide for the restoration of tree and shrub species
similar to those currently found on the site. Species such as wild cherry, hickory and oak
may be preferred due to structural concerns. These trees and shrubs should be planted.
around and on the upper third of the detention structure, excluding the dam. They should
provide habitat benefits that could offset those functions lost by development, partially
restore aquatic habitats, reduce exposure of the water surface to surilight thereby
minimizing thermal pollution, provide essential summer and winter habitats as well as
provide an aesthetically pleasing green space which should enhance property values.
Additionally, instead of using the typical fescue or grasses, the upper interior and
exterior of the structure should be planted with the following mix:
Spring/Summer Mixture, May 1 - Sept. 15 FallAVinter Mixture, Sept. 15 - April 30
Browntop millet 20 lbs/a Rye grain 120 lbs/a
Korean lespedeza* 20 lbs/a Korean lespedeza* 201bs/a
Shrub lespedeza 1 lb/a Shrub lespedeza 1 lb/a
Switchgrass 10 lb/a Partridge pea 10 Ib/a
* On slopes less than 3:1 use Korean lespedeza
On slopes greater than 3:1 use Crown Vetch
Add one of the following to the above mixture
Crown Vetch 5 Ibs/acre
Ladino Clover 5 lbs/acre
Alfalfa 5 lbs/acre
Note: Mowing should be limited to early spring and should only occur as needed to prevent tree
growth on the dam or other areas. Mowing on a 2-3 year schedule should suffice. Lime and
fertilize as recommended by Natural Resources Conservation Service standards when planted.
Trees and shrubs (1 year bare root seedlings) should be planted randomly at a
minimal rate of 100 trees per acre on the top and upper portions of the structure and at a
minimal rate of 150 per acre around the normal water elevation and littoral shelf area.
The following list of tree species may assist in providing habitat benefits:
Loblolly Pine* Red Cedar Black Gum American Holly
Dogwood Hickory Sumac White Oak Willow Oak
Red Maple** Oak Viburnum Green Asti Ironwood
Black Cherry Persimmon Water Oak Spice Bush Willow (sp)
Swamp Chestnut Silky Dogwood
Other species may be utilized depending on site requirements and availability. Pines* should not
exceed 15% of the reforestation. No more than 20% of the tree species will be of a single species.
An 80% success rate is acceptable over five years. Large or fast growing trees like Sycamore and
Maple** may not be appropriate around detention facilities.
Gateway Homes 401
01 /26/01
Native species are preferred for these activities. The above recommendation
should be considered for the multiple benefits that they can provide to the community and
to the environment. Initial costs should not be prohibitive and the long-term costs should
be reduced, as constant mowing would not be necessary in the naturalized areas. Thank
you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions
regarding these comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453.
Cc: Steve Chapin, USACOE
Pete Colwell, DWQ-MRO
Attachment 7 ,Mitigation and Conceptual Relocation Plan:
Maximum development efficiency will be achieved by relocating the impacted channel to
follow property lines. Specifically, from the outfall of the storm water facility to North
Davidson Street, the channel will be re-directed into a bio-engineered channel for 475
linear feet. We proposed that the open channel will offset impacts for the relocation of
the 225 linear feet of channel relocated between Warp street and North Davidson
Street. Additionally, this channel can offset some of the site impacts. We propose to
offset the total impacts on the site by the 250 linear feet of relocation.
The final channel relocation plan will include the design and planting recommendations
for the channel. Also, it is understood that the final amount of mitigation will be based
on the completeness of the plan and its compliance with generally accepted design
standards.
Conceptually, the channel would meander within the proposed 35' to 45' belt width.
The channel would be designed with a small floodplain the entire width of the belt area.
The channel will be stabilized with native plant species and natural structures to the
extent practicable. Meanders will be incorporated to reduce velocities and the floodplain
will account for additional water storage. From the floodplain, the side slopes will be
either vertical and achieved through keystone walls or will be 2:1 side slopes stabilized
with native shrubs and trees.
Geometrically the channel will exhibit B characteristics (Rosgen). Final design will be
constrained by the limited belt width and will be further limed by the
Mitigation and enhancement of existing wetlands
1. NC WRP mitigation 560 linear feet, cost
2. Onsite relocation 475 linear feet, cost
3. Plantings within the wetland, cost
4. Extended detention wetland, cost
Total
for the proposed impacts is costly:
$70,000
$60,000
$20,000
$50,000
$200,000

1-
I
I
I
I
'\ ?? _ ,,.? d"`? ?P?^? T ? ? 'rte z t •} '.,'?.
al E,_2

??' 'gym'- is r? 1

C
I
1 1
.. %'
_ _ f ET?'A I I
\- I I I 731.
1 72 75
505 72.00 \ zs \
\ I I
( I
715 504 \ I \ \ I \
cHZOZ 903 1 \ 1 I I 731.00 \
1 \ I II
H2 3 CH2 2A
H2O4 '
205 \ 1 1 \
CH2O6 731:0
I 1
72 .00 72 ` 5
07 719.7
CH404
-?--
4-0
r,,=
\720
'71 .50 \
na ?
23. 5
S 76°21'22"E
57.05'
S 15°08'40"E
47.06'
i {
\ \ \°,
r i
?t9
P:l
? ? 1 1
20
10
?Z8 O,
19
\ Nc9 GAS LINE
-A 7

.

ID
3 ?
4

?
WETLAND FILL AREAS
.f
PLUNGE POOL
LOCATIONS
?
?

40X
r ??cH4o CH6 _
? \ N
/ \ \ \728. 0 \ \
0 N e? \
7 \ 40 \ \ \ \
'?71 .50
718 \ \
23. 5 \
1
607\ CH606
I \ 1 \ \ ?
131, ,
3. 5 1
1 WSJ \
O
l< 73
1 ?N CH6 0 1 723.25
g c,j ^ ti F 731/
??? ( f » 728
\ \ kt401
05°40'53"W \ \
40.11'
\
0
(,ni \
11 10 -
N \ -
001
i ? 000 \ i
o ? 1 ? ?2-
Asa ???
70
1 19
\ \ ?? GAS LINE
7
\ N? S 47°31'48"E
\\ ` 60.32
18
\ \ RETAINING WALL
\ 76.50 \ - TYPICAL /
\ \ \ 7 .50
?\ \ 726.50 \ \ \
W1400 1 ' \ \ \ \ \ r (`
X00\ \
a •?U , \ \ ?O 32 \
T7 \ 002 \ \
X31.00 I I 7 1.0
1
? '7 1
f
6 ?
1

©Copyright
The use of these drawings
without written permission
from the architect/engin-
eer Is prohibited. Violators
will be subject to legal
action.
z
Q n
-? U Q
J
n
LL J
oWo ?.
U) Q Q
>Qw
Qua
ZWIM 0
o z
o
oo;
zwo w
X
L;j
F
U
W
O w
0_ 2
n cn
Project No.
47806
I ?

?05*40`53",W--:-
40.11" ,
I
I
11
1
I 1
I 1
1
1
10 --
1 \ -
0
90
o .
1 -7-2
1
i
12

\\ ` 726.50
3 " \
?( L
V&400
3?. 5
\
?7 \ 0021
X31.00 \ \
7 1.0
2 EA
73
ON
zz.
83044'30?'?--;?__
W 485-71 740
Ql J4 --
L-1 ji
f
` J.. r
16
,

2ZP
? 1
,
1
1
Q
-? U
n J
LL J
z V
oW?
o
°- cn Q
?Qw
Q?<
_ /wn m
?vJ0
rho
O
w
z°'
w
0
x
U
w
O
a
a
U
Q
0
_.z
w
W
I-
W
w
7-
V)
Pro'ect No.
47806
Checked by M vS
Drawn by MVS
Date Drawn 03.05.01
Revisions
Sheet
?1RO Comments
Subject: NIRO Comments
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 15:20:02 -0500
From: Peter Colwell <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR - Mooresville Regional Office
To: John Dorney <[e-mail]>, cyndi karoly <[e-mail]>
CC: Robert Ridings <[e-mail]>
You should find the MRO comments for the following on filemaker:
Sedley Road; 001502; Mecklenberg
James Farm; 000299; Iredell
Villages of Wesley Chapel; 010049; Union
Gateway Homes; 001591; is a mess. Steve Chapin has requested a new
application and more detail. MRO is sending out a letter also declaring
the application incomplete and on hold until the revised application is
received.
What's all this about moving?
Have a good weekend.
Pete
Pete Colwell - [e-mail]
9oTITLE%
North Carolina Dept. of Environment & Natural Resourc s
Div. of Water Quality
919 N. Main St.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ph: 704.663.1699 Fax: [phone]

Pete Colwell <[e-mail]> '%TITLEc7c
NC DENR - Mooresville
Div. of Water Quality
? -L Uf
101,1 1/26/01 4:10 PN1
00/ 6 el/
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Dircctor
TO: John Dorney, DWQ
401 Certification Program
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: January 26, 2001
SUBJECT: Review of 404/401 Application by Gateway Homes, North Davidson
Road Site, Mecklenburg County
The applicant is requesting a letter of concurrence from the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) to obtain a 404 Permit and 401 Certification.
These comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of
1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401,
as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The application package is somewhat confusing. Impacts from the development
appear to be the reduction of 2116.5 linear feet to 520 linear feet and a reduction of 0.83
acres of wetlands to 0.42 acres. It also appears that the remaining portion of stream will
be a consolidation of existing waters into a bioengineered stream while the remaining
wetland will be utilized in some fashion for stormwater management. The Wetland
Restoration Program (WRP) will be requested to accept a $54,125 payment for site
impacts.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) continues to be
concerned about the fragmentation and loss of forested areas or woodlands as
development occurs in areas near the City of Charlotte and in or near Mecklenburg
County. We appreciate the efforts to protect water quality by providing stormwater
detention and treatment. However, the NCWRC does not encourage the utilization of
existing waters or wetlands for water quality treatment facilities. As the area is currently
forested habitat that appears to reduce pollutants and remove trash from downstream
areas, we recommend that the consultant and Charlotte Stormwater Services discuss the
benefits of the site for stream and wetland restoration instead of development. The area
might be utilized as a park and wetland/stream restoration site. This area could provide a
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Servicc Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone. [phone] cxt. 28 1 • Fax: [phone]
Gateway Homes 401 2 01/26/01
small "wildlife refuge" in the urban area. Environmental enhancement activities should
be beneficial.
If a certification is issued, we recommend the utilization of bioengineering design
techniques for the new stream segment. Any required wet detention facilities should
include vegetated littoral shelves for aquatic edge habitat. In an effort to restore avian
and terrestrial habitats as well as enhance aquatic/detritus habitats in a detention facility,
we recommend that the applicant provide for the restoration of tree and shrub species
similar to those currently found on the site. Species such as wild cherry, hickory and oak
may be preferred due to structural concerns. These trees and shrubs should be planted
around and on the upper third of the detention structure, excluding the dam. They should
provide habitat benefits that could offset those functions lost by development, partially
restore aquatic habitats, reduce exposure of the water surface to sunlight thereby
minimizing thermal pollution, provide essential summer and winter habitats as well as
provide an aesthetically pleasing green space which should enhance property values.
Additionally, instead of using the typical fescue or grasses, the upper interior and
exterior of the structure should be planted with the following mix:
Spring/Summer Mixture, May 1 - Sept. 15 Fall/Winter Mixture, Sept. 15 - April 30
Browntop millet 20 lbs/a Rye grain 120 lbs/a
Korean lespedeza* 20 lbs/a Korean lespedeza* 20 lbs/a
Shrub lespedeza 1 lb/a Shrub lespedeza 1 lb/a
Switchgrass 10 lb/a Partridge pea 10 lb/a
* On slopes less than 3:1 use Korean lespedeza
On slopes greater than 3:1 use Crown Vetch
Add one of the following to the above mixture
Crown Vetch 5 lbs/acre
Ladino Clover 5 lbs/acre
Alfalfa 5 lbs/acre
Note: Mowing should be limited to early spring and should only occur as needed to prevent tree
growth on the dam or other areas. Mowing on a 2-3 year schedule should suffice. Lime and
fertilize as recommended by Natural Resources Conservation Service standards when planted.
Trees and shrubs (1 year bare root seedlings) should be planted randomly at a
minimal rate of 100 trees per acre on the top and upper portions of the structure and at a
minimal rate of 150 per acre around the normal water elevation and littoral shelf area.
The following list of tree species may assist in providing habitat benefits:
Loblolly Pine* Red Cedar Black Gum American Holly
Dogwood Hickory Sumac White Oak Willow Oak
Red Maple** Oak Viburnum Green Ash Ironwood
Black Cherry Persimmon Water Oak Spice Bush Willow (sp)
Swamp Chestnut Silky Dogwood
Other species may be utilized depending on site requirements and availability. Pines* should not
exceed 15% of the reforestation. No more than 20% of the tree species will be of a single species.
An 80% success rate is acceptable over five years. Large or fast growing trees like Sycamore and
Maple** may not be appropriate around detention facilities.
Gateway Homes 401
01/26/01
Native species are preferred for these activities. The above recommendation
should be considered for the multiple benefits that they can provide to the community and
to the environment. Initial costs should not be prohibitive and the long-term costs should
be reduced, as constant mowing would not be necessary in the naturalized areas. Thank
you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions
regarding these comments, please contact me at 336/769-9453.
Cc: Steve Chapin, USACOE
Pete Colwell, DWQ-MRO

Wetland and

Natural Resource
-• Inc.
Consultants
,

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers"'
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. Steve Chapin
151 Patton Avenue, Rm. 143
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
i'.il

December 15, 2000
WNR, Project # GH-1000
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Attn: Mr. John Dorney
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Re: Section 404 Permit / 401 Water Quality Certification Request
Gateway Homes, North Davidson Road Site
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County North Carolina
Dear Mr. Chapin and Mr. Dorney:
On the behalf of Gateway Homes, we request authorization for proposed impacts to
jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. for their proposed North Davidson Road development site
located within the city limits of Charlotte, North Carolina. The attached USGS Topo Quad
and Mecklenburg County Soil Survey depict the location of the site. In its current state the
site contains some 2116.5 linear feet of urban channels and 0.83 acres (36,167 square feet)
of wetlands. The applicant has avoided and minimized impacts to the greatest extent
practicable to allow for the equitable development of the site in consideration of housing
demands and mitigating adverse impacts to the environment.
The development is an urban in-fill project that will accommodate some 230 dwelling units
on a site comprised of less than 11 acres. The site will result in 7 acres of impervious area
and 3.59 acres of open space. Of particular note, with respect to issues germane to this
permit, a storm water wetland has been proposed to assimilate pollutants from the
development site. In its final developed state the property will contain a 0.42 acre wetland
and 520 linear feet of bio-engineered channel.
Existing Conditions:
The on-site channel is assessed to be a low quality urban channel with high peaks in its
hydrograph resulting from the 50 plus acre urban watershed. This channel becomes braided
once it enters the site. The entire watershed upstream of the site is heavily developed and
the channel up-stream of the site was historically piped for some undetermined distance.
Currently the channel flows from a perched 48-inch pipe into an unstable channel reach.
Severe down-cutting and bank failure are evident along the entire reach. Vertical banks
828."312."9207 Chris 720 South Main Ave.
828-312,19205 Jennifer Newton, NC 28658
828"312"9206 Tamp 828'4653050 Fax
n D
rn
<:Z r-n
r-n z
=-) --i
indicate that the stable natural morphology of the channel has been lost and that the
channel is contributing excess bed-load (sediment) to down stream reaches. The upper
reaches of the floodplain, though present, do not appear to function on a regular basis; the
channel is deeply entrenched and the floodplain contains no regulated wetlands. Trash,
including household and automotive debris, is also present along the entire reach. Even
considering all the items listed above, fish and crayfish inhabit the entire channel. No
ephemeroptera or plecoptera were observed; however, tricoptera were present.
Moderate quality wetlands exist on the site downstream of the above-described reach of
channel. Their quality is based upon pollutant removal and flood storage. Significant
amounts of sediment have historically been deposited in the wetland from the degrading
channel described above. Additionally, the wetland is a reservoir for trash. Woody species
dominate the wetland and three invasive species are present. Primary tree cover is by black
willow, ash, and red maple. Alder dominates the sub canopy. The invasive species
becoming more prevalent within the area are Chinese privet, Japanese honeysuckle, and
Kudzu.
Downstream of the existing wetlands, the channel looses structure and becomes two distinct
low-grade channels and one storm water feature. These two channels are extremely
degraded with no substrate but still support fish and crayfish. De-nude channel banks are
believed to contribute excess sediment to receiving waters.
Immediately downstream of the project this same channel is confined between the fill slopes
of North Davidson Road and the existing Rail Road (250 linear feet) before discharging into
Little Sugar Creek. It is not certain what the pattern or profile of the stream was prior to its
placement between the fill slopes. Incidentally, the railroad may be converted into a light
rail connection between Charlotte and points north.
The attached wetland survey map depicts the locations of wetlands and channels.
Avoidance and Minimization Analysis:
During the extensive alternatives analysis, open relocation of the entire channel was
assessed to be inappropriate because it would require extensive cuts of up to 15 feet deep
and 50 feet wide along the border of the property. The relocation would then place the
channel in a valley that was not consistent with the expected channel morphology.
Relocation that would require up to a 20-foot riparian buffer on either side of the relocated
channel would equate to the loss of up to 3 acres of developable land. Accordingly, the
relocation was re-assessed for a shorter length so that it is consistent with cost and design
constraints.
Keystone walls were considered as a tool to reduce fills but were abandoned when it was
determined that to comply with zoning and development needs channel impacts would be
reduced by only 100 linear feet and compromise up to 5 four story units. The open segment
would then be the only segment open to light within the upper limits of the project.
Additionally, any open area within the channel would essentially become a scour-pool and
would likely not be stable. Ecologically and hydrologically this solution was determined to be
not acceptable because it would result in a scour pool inhabited by few organisms.
Functionally a channel confined by keystone walls is the same as a pipe with regard to

r? :+irv•.
storage. The latter, however, will contribute less sediment and will be inhabited by fewer
organisms. Keystone walls have been incorporated to the degree that they provide for
suitable development zones.
Minimization of impacts to less than 0.33 acres of wetlands and 150 linear feet of channels is
not practicable. Therefore, the locations of proposed impacts were selected so as to comply
with design considerations and to mitigate for their adverse impacts. The largest wetland on
the site is the most valuable intact portion of the regulated landscape. As such, impacts to
this area are minimized to the greatest extent practicable. Up stream of the wetland the
channel is inhabited by fish but is contaminated by auto debris and tar, as such impacts to
this area are not considered to be significant. Downstream of the wetland the channel
looses definition and becomes a source of sediment to receiving waters. Fortunately,
topography is such that the channel can be consolidated into one channel that would run in
the buffer between the subject property and the neighboring property.
Development plans call for impacts to the upstream portion of the channel that is degraded
and that cannot be relocated due to topographical restraints; wetlands adjacent to this
channel will also be impacted. Impacts are located upstream of the existing wetland in the
top of the drainage where the stream discharges from an unknown length of pipe.
Downstream of the wetland the existing channel will be "restored" to natural morphology
within buffers after treatment by a storm water wetland. This portion of enhanced channel
will have an increase in centerline flow from about 1 to 2 feet to 4 to 5 feet, which will
greatly help decrease sediment loads to Litde Sugar Creek.
Included with this permit are two early site plan maps that were abandoned once Wetland
and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. were retained to do the wetland delineation and
permit application. Channel and vegetated wetland impacts have been significantly
decreased from both of those earlier site plans.
Proposed Development:
Site development requires piping impacts to 567 linear feet of channel and 0.396 acres of
wetlands will be filled (this liner footage includes the 100 linear feet of repair and retrofitting
of existing pipe under Nationwide Permit 3). One hundred and forty-five linear feet of
channel will be impacted under Nationwide Permit 14 for the construction of public access
roads and three hundred and twenty-two linear feet of channel will be impacted under
Nationwide Permit 39 for the construction of building pads. Nationwide Permit 3 will be used
to retrofit an existing pipe for one hundred linear feet. Finally, 631.5 linear feet are
requested under Nationwide Permit 39 for the purpose of relocating a stream.
The current site development plan calls for the construction of 230 dwelling units on a 10.5
acres site. Zoning regulations dictate that impervious area cannot exceed 70% or 7.4 acres.
Economics mandate that impacts be committed as illustrated and de facto limits the ability to
minimize project impacts. Land cost, demand and location are the engines that promote
urban in-fill. This infill site will place up to 230 residences within easy walling distance to a
future light rail transportation route and within a few miles of the downtown metropolitan
area of Charlotte.
The attached site plan depicts the proposed site development.

•. ,?''l??cjy

Permit Issues:
Permitting under a combination of Nationwide Permits 39 and 14 is consistent with Army
Corps released Draft Questions and Answers (Draft 04/28/2000) and with Nationwide Permit
General Condition 15 (Fed. Reg. Vol. 65,No. 47. pp. 12868 and 12896). Both the guidance
and the condition allow for the proposed impacts by 1) separating the project into two
distinct permits (public road and private development) and by 2) allowing impacts which are
not more than minimal when viewed in terms of cumulative impact acreage.
The channel is not assessed to be biologically important because it supports little biological
diversity. The diversity is limited by the sites extreme exposure to un-treated storm water
flows generated from the vastly impervious watershed. Non-point discharges from the
watershed have resulted in a degraded channel system. For reasons stated within this letter
we believe the channel is not subject to the 300 linear foot limitation under Nationwide
Permit 39. This assessment is consistent with regional guidance that allows for impacts to
exceed the 300 linear foot limitation under Nationwide 39.
tion•
Mitigation:
As a mitigative measure the site incorporates a storm water extended wetland detention
facility. The facility will be sized to treat all of the site-generated run-off. The total acreage
dedicated to detention facilities totals approximately 0.42 acres. Targeted pollutant removal
will be consistent with the published effectiveness of storm water wetlands. The presence of
exotic species will be controlled through periodic flooding. The Exotic Plant Guidelines
published by the North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation states that "Prolonged
flooding can kill plants that infest impoundments or other areas where water levels can be
controlled." Chinese privet, Japanese honeysuckle, and kudzu are all on the guidelines' high
priority list for highly invasive species. The storm water wetland will provide a functional lift
by detaining storm water and a value lift by flooding out the highly invasive species.
Mitigation credit for the open relocated segment of channel is requested at the location of
the bio-engineered natural channel. The developer requests that the 520.5 linear feet of
relocation be credited toward the 631.5 linear feet of relocated channel. Through this
exchange, some 520.5 linear feet of stable channel replaces 631.5 linear feet of highly
degraded channels and results in a net increase in wetland functions because the width of
the channel will be doubled from previous states.
Mitigation for channels impacted by this activity, and that are not compensated for through
the channel enhancement, are proposed through the NC Wetland Restoration Program (NC
WRP) at a 1:1 ratio because of the channels low quality. Early conversations with NC WRP
indicate that the program will accept the mitigation proposed. Payment into the NC WRP will
be for 433 linear feet and will result in a source of funding of $54,125 for restoration within
the adjacent areas. An evaluation of the channel down stream of the site identified suitable
reaches for mitigation but no landowners willing to participate in any mitigation.
Additionally, all land within the drainage basin and the adjacent basins falls within city limits
and the cost per acre is assessed to be too high when coupled with the lack of willing
participants, existing structures, high construction and utility cost and design costs. Onsite
channel mitigation is not possible and local offsite mitigation is not practicable.
~
V? rv

Authorized impacts will not more than minimally impact downstream water quality and
potential adverse impacts are ameliorated through storm water best management practices
and a contribution to the NC Wetland Restoration Program. Water quality, based on the
channels urban situation as described above, is not high quality and its loss will not likely
alter downstream water quality. Water entering the water ways after treatment within the
storm water treatment facility will be of higher quality and will be at a reduced rate therefore
compensating for the loss of subject channel. Those impacts not mitigated through the
storm water facilities will be satisfied through the NC WRP.
Channel impacts are to Corps important channels under Nationwide Permit 39. We believe
that the channel is biologically important but not physically important because it supports
only few organisms with little diversity and because it is down cut and contributing sediment
to down stream reaches. If permitted the loss of the channel will be traded for storm water
control, channel enhancement, and a contribution to the NC WRP.
All Things Considered:
Sprawling developments comprised of 230 dwelling units, each with a quarter acre lot,
minimally require 70 acres of land. (This acreage allows for roadways but does not consider
utility ROW or open space requirements; the acreage is conservative.) These subdivisions
typically achieve 20% imperviousness, or approximately 14 acres of solid surface. These
new subdivisions are the catalysts for new roads, stores and other support infrastructure.
Urban in-fill developments comprised of the same number of dwellings can achieve multiple
environmental dividends by moving the population more toward employment centers thereby
reducing linear infrastructure such as sewer and roadways. These projects are essentially
filling in the gaps that exist in the urban centers. These gaps do have ecological value but
they are compromised. This development recognizes the value of the wetland as a tool that
can be used for assimilating storm water and maintains a relatively low impervious area per
dwelling unit.
The issue needing consideration is that the infill projects reduce the secondary and
cumulative impacts from roadways that are built to these projects and from the ancillary
commercial development spawned from the sprawling developments
Please call with any questions or concerns that you may have.
Sincerely,
WNR Staff
Attachments:
Agent Authorization
Site Vicinity Maps (2)
Soil Survey
Wetland Table
Impact Data Table (2)
Nationwide Permit 3 Application (3)
Nationwide Permit 14 Application (3)

yr• ?. Yt •1t•.
Nationwide Permit 39 Application (3)
Full Size Site Plan Map
Site Plan Impact Map (4)
Illustrative Site Plan
Site Photographs (18)
Wetland Data Forms (4)
Abandoned Site Plan Maps (3)
Wetland Delineation Map
W
.?
/?
!

r"ROM : D&D <-vES,LLC NO',E No. 704G44te47 Nov. 20 2022 1a:2GAM P1
otlan&and
nalultanta, Inc,
FL??rju?'
a t cf t Q Army NC Dlv4lon of WaL-r Quality
Wllmin oistrI4 Corps of Englnczr9 Attn: John Dom?:y
Attnl Gr aync Wrlght, Chief Regulatory Divislon 4401 Rczdy Cry c Drlve
P.O. v4n 1'890 Raleigh, Nortfti Carollno 27614
Wilminptcn, North Carolina 28402.1890
I, the c?rrpnt landowner of the property Identlficd tklow, h rrby authorize Wetland end
Naturat Rpourq Conµ,ltants, Inc. to act on my behalf as my aunt during tto
proces In of pzrrmits to impacted Wetlands and Watarz of the U.S. that ore regulated
by the Clc5n Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act.
Federal and State agerts are authorized to b3 on sold property where accormpanfcd by
Wetland chd Natural Resource Consultants, Inc. staff.
Wctiano altd Naturol ieSqurcc Consultants, Inc. is autnorizcd to providd suppl mantal
inform lion needed for permit processing at the request of tha Corp or DWQ.
Property Own .-r of 11=4:r LA-1L
Address: (04171 T-- c) nL'
Ste; -e. I, I -S
Fhone Nuftar: H SS 44 - 'I's 4 Co -
Proparty Lwatlon: N6c Az) SLc -e-p-
wners ?tgna;ura:
o`-ta: „ IT lav -
907 Chls 720 Uovh MUn Mro.
826&
925' , 9 03 vomfof NvMon, NO 206M 920.112W4C6 Tamp 112a?bsrJOQO rot `
I i WX 4d' VU.VU' UN i i i i i i it i PPV-i4p144j1 YVI I I I I I I I I I YRUI 141 MY-Y4 M4 I I I I 1 I I I I YI 111 f=Y•Y`i r1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I

- r Ga ?p l f h !
lr ugortre -'K I
urying Groud
- ,
.

b
?.h ? ? { /rte-.?..- ? ? • ••''' - I, ? t° >? ?"-: 04

06

LI)
.. .???'?, fit, i- ?\
- ^1'? ?? ?` ?? :?\ •^-y`t11?
? ?. '..
?"•'i?'?'..,-.
.. ",
-
,
,,
(
:-770
P i f
?
-
•
t . i i14 it
1
?- • .
C7

o
- 01

•? `lit `.7T` ?. ??•..% 1 i•,p, ._ ? ? ?'`?? ? ?.?. ,/?`ti.J ?• / f ?

-
t -^?11' ? • /P ?? ?? ?rr?' ?V??7?/?}5 f ?yd?f 1a r.
+ ?7 1 /
?
`` ? ???%- f J` G
??
IN,
?'•
?
?
{r

•l.
?k{ r3?.'.` jl'4 • f IJ1 , ,"
Y?
ef` , f
'No 4
d9L
N
1 11 1 11 1 b8d° h$' 0,6d" W 1 1 11 1 1111 1080-14b'jd 00+ W1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 0W" 4r > 4 0 00" W 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 Ono' X37' 80.00" W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1
Name: CHARLOTTE EAST
Date: 12/11/100
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet
Location: 035° 14'52.7" N 080° 47'47.1" W
Caption: Gateway Homes, LLC
North Davidson Street
WNR, Inc. Job # GH-1000
I I I I I I I IkjpU-i40w•YN NV I I I I IVqU ra W-W My I I I I 1 -1- T' T"•Y" F• I I I 1 1 v?v T' Y"'T- r' I 1 II
. ..1'
?_? ?i rF ?? ? ,a;•L?i" ,_n.:t?:=-`T"YI°-E?f ?1
Z--
_ ry
I
w L; !
r•

L0 ell

Q- r
t' l"
.
]?'+
k
.98
f j t
rt al??
?
¦¦
i
.. ? ?"'f" ?
..t] t'^' a ti? -.,?
- ? ,, `
a A
_
il
Wr 1

6
_ ?R 'J'am j

je_
%
" r
`
'
'
?
O y
^ r ' ;
, ,i. _ x ..
`7
r r ' i t •.g'
? R_r-f- ?J^s?
?i ."? sR •. 1 1 e !"?
40
?y
?
?
`
,?, ,
: - 7 1r {-
??Esf-• ??T ri '
X14'.4 ?
. i •' mill. ?`- T'v:
'3 @ ''' 3e r' S .r
¢ w f i. k
t
?? i+.-E• } ?.
1
F'
f 'r
f fa
`{ ? li? s3 ? '? t
?
.
-
? .
?.^

O ? •.`
a
[4 J
tit ''?
.?•.??'?
?'''3
..r
!h r ?t ril - `? R? J3"'?'_ A .gyp k7'Y .. y-j..•
+ . °° ,...: p Fib '•.. 3 ...r:.y - - } "9
'
-
"
'
,
0. '
.ry y?,?.w _
r.. ? ?, _ ?'i"'
( ?7? C.:s - r' '
,[III •f
k
.s; t ktt c.J

? . ?. r ?? ? !
?
,
? ? y
?? •?
t? t
' ?
r?
I ? t
~ -.. it t ii ? !? ? . ?•s'.'-,j++• !t'( 1 i ,• • f'R 1 '? ? j
i .
a i? Y
!?f.
t
?
?
1
'k
°
i •
;
-
1
?
t
y
I ......
p
+
.? n ,,; i z
]
'1 t i} ?l
'}'F?Ir".', . F33,..5` 'c}L,f, - d'-P - ?
'jp.1t'?,. ( -?'7 ??..'_?!?'L,?" ?_ ? .- i ? 7t ? 1 Lam!! 'i ? kkd ? "ww,.,?.•
'?..
•e„ ..
•
'i""
, ? _
-
i -
s i-? B
?
?
1
t ` ?
1
- ? v
i
_ _
_
2
3,:; r 7. ? ?
a ?,
l ?
...t .? ??
;' -
'."^"'1~.?f"
td
?
"
: ".7
W '1 ? .i'-tea"` JT` 3
?,'
•
r
? ? ? M
"
?
?
?€
O ?
? ?
d
?
I
i
. ? ?
?ri
t 1
? I? ,,
1 1 i ry? , l
t

? t 5 ?? ?! Via" ii ? 1 • + •
?i f k ?.i - 3 I .,pry .7•' f-

.?
A
?
•
'
i
?
X,
"„1?
. a J"
.? ?, ?_..
„£.. .
-
"t
l,r
?ytl '.r I
. a t e '
I I I I I I 1 1 060.1491o.ob" 1 v I I I I 10$0.11T ?0.6o" W I I I I 10$0' 4T 1?0.60- W I I I I 1 060' 4T P0.60" W t 1 1
Name: CHARLOTTE EAST Location: 035° 14'52.7" N 080° 47'47.1" W
Date: 12/11/100 Caption: Gateway Homes, LLC
Scale: 1 inch equals 500 feet North Davidson Street
WNR, Inc. Job # GH-1000
r-opyrlgnt (G) 1v97, Maptecn, Inc.
SHEET NUMBER 7
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NOR'T'H
I,) ? CeD2
?s1t e:' `fr 1j. Ur , L -: ,t r f=ti]++ + .' pl, v
v WE!
' r4 r t. rr?? 4'? r CL?lJ 44
L;? t?•r?rl. ?e •l'? '> "''?,a z^?s ?.....? rJ' ?` ?Y?
? ?? '`• y .? tf! ?_.; "St"` r ,a,_ €-":?:J ?: ? ?i•l 4`t.? ,? r r S? I.?`?!IJ
?i w r•s. ; 4. ? # }??? ! ?t- ..t "?'?•. r?_t. t •? `'}, rtla,.?-,?4? t. '??•.r? ' 1 'r .af ;'-
r a ?? r,=Ur. CuD
a. >?J ?? ?'A?t?rra •"? ta`4` ' 1 CeB2 "t, I
? ?''••f??• ,•t Z?, r Ya'"?," .?,????rG? t??`? , ?? ? ?jv r'-:'? TC,.j ?E',? ` 'C,I?,',,•'.!?•?C;
,il, -?a,w,? ?r+ Ia .•?a.f ,i??{ ?. Yrl•4. ? ` :4 ??1:. . n ?• r t`
r ,r, '•• aJ? a d . 1 ; a'i>-•s.•? t, •'^.,, r '> V t : -? I ?- ?, I -+n?" E
• ? .i w ,Si ?i. ' ? !: ! ?? ^ ? .a •1 y /'3,?? r ? _? , ? •C? t , ?<? t ? ? } t ? '? IE3 ?i:. +. ? ;•.
S, .? t..„B }'Mka?^rr S w .? ,1 t? s '?s?R t? `; ? ( ( stir y! ' ?'
rr. ? ) ?- t •• •f! arm hr 4 S:.
?Na tir '?insl T .d ?.. t ? ?--t 'i ref ..'' G? : / ? r.h K"- 17 rr,•
_ Z., r . pyl ?-?'' r - ( K'r •• ^-,,, s r-; r•' t yr is ( CU . M
S• U? yUB???? + Mk8
Ur .L Cub er ayd?,
err ?r tAC) t.. °<tt
or
F ,Jt e8' "w' YIauF3'? J ? .i
?.`} ?, Ur w. f CUD i .: ? ?., ? a•, '• rZ,
°b + ti HUB ' c t?: \ . t 3t SIN . HuB1 t
tie .+? •r "" (r? CUO f y7 ?K-'?l+r? `
?. ?:j rl: + '-r. ei,ir. 1 rr(o'•---'.+ ,?'q f,.? 1)G-?J a•?`??? ,.•r• Hu
t t _ ?E t • j! f is r1.;,.,G /- F?' S y •- C t
t' Cus i i' . r' ?• EnB 'L_r3?
l ? .. r n, ? ?, , ?. • ? ) CeDZ S t 6 (. 1 ? ? G`-rJ?' s L ? - s a.« f r
.? `.rj rc• fir: CeB2 ? ..ti: ? ? J • ?? t- •? ?
r. ?+ l u0 4 : r. t CUP t ? PaE 0 'v'lCeB2
P _ CeB2 t •i ?r 1 ,s. .
I' MkB t H"9 to Ur _ CUB I - a r ?ir.(? t' v
L t• a`* .. L r^ ` i, CeB2 r f d-?l? ,rr 'j llt 4 '"(
•j f L^ir .ra;?? .. yt ? ,? !C. J ,i ?.` - ,' ,•ti,CtIB2 ?(,_ e.J t1s f ? ?--- s.
_ rl: z a \ CeD2 .: t .l l..t [ '?, MO,'" L 14
` rtwl \ -
(, ( ?G R j 1' CUQ r% Lt""1 r.'`?9 \? O t'• `
IV.
r' a tipti j ti ,+,.N1C-„ Y M w ?I v
?: t l fr .. + ..'. ?. y '.? ••? 4 ny •r+' 't ^`? 4 ? l? t. ` t'/t?'M ? t ;; o ., r•? ?. ?. J
r? i •• r. t '.y rN t ((. ter r .tvt 9 CeB2 r •? l.CUB ` s. } rr tlp, i^car :.
..? :+1 f f. •.t /•. ?/C1 ? p ?? S 1 {?•YV \ 1r ?x { ?L? ) \ 1
I r V .t c r ('? ?ld M 1? /, [ 't' r f 1 + f \? '•l. ? t. {- /•` -
`• Y' r??" y Zr-j F: 4 ? ti?f I't t ><i YF j r . e?
!9a?t 4?? t7 ?`J'? rCl,l ?'• a., t', ?t t' t.p?t rr' r lp.
D - •.
t O l At r ti Itt r fir y .+" / S r t I,la, t
+'• ' ` t . yr t '
tt . t3 4v; X
'j. ,r. ?. 1r ,. e., I ?,?' { 'CUB. ? t + >.. !} ? ?" S. •'s tip C
?: 4 j •.y t -'?.• r i'I:( ~j, t:'r ? + ? ?? J,S :1?( y - e; r (- iY. kVl) a set ` 32s ? ?• , is ry , ?? ? ? ` •
W .,, Ui .1 ,,rr -•'•'! °t? ,rd fir` k?~''rF 7 ter..
`r y. .-.. a ?r ??`' t s? f+ ? d•' f Y,. fs
St a. t r?*1J, r ' TrA 5 CUB t: r+t I Cup (, r
;?a ? _•. r .,.-r d.. :J p.., t r ,a ri s..? t ?- - .• r` T L•:
?f t*?, j } r.M yZr 1 t. CUB ?li(. fX
,.} r .•` n ?_ :. t (t ft l .. M I nE.t r -• ; * rLL ` 'Ce13 < ? r •..
?Ije -'? 1 t,?+ t`.` - 4i t•,r - _ Tj ('{`, r ??'trl, . t jTt n•kn. 1. ?' Ist?? fT,'i r'
a4, CUB r1••' V. t` -:.Ny11 ,? j r 1?J7{i'•v: f Ur 'f f^=.. '?•"•I t rt'`',T Ur f :, tr S ... CUB
N? A? T? .t I _ V Y?. O.1 .i f?/r_F,.'(tT f;( ! wrfS.AX' P1`?t?ti ?.
t?l < < 4 • ? ? ?_ v r?s'r'.(, , .C ?.'' i ?- _?(9 f ? }t?l' ?• '.I .I{. /rJ aw ) i .;• + r
? ' 4 .,IRr ?-, ??? O. `' .?.`? ?'" c• v,-,',r- ? KKf r r.,,.
e '`^ '{•U a 2. ... , •Sr .r ?.r j Y•` ?./
Ur •nt !? a r e f Pn / CuDh? t% y .r ra ,?• .F /
Iy v >• r _ _ `tea : f_S tJ. s'F. + :_'C?+t '. -f ?. a f ris c=': 1,r . r {s%•?_
f ` J- • f k,i`?'• ?-•r?-? t d A__....,r.r ? r ys,?•y?, 1? t+y+ },. - ? f i 1 r 1 1
CUD •. rv? ?. ? I f~ 4. ...r r 1 ? 1 y ? s , fr + .r ?f
,,;•'.1 .?? A ( ?+ 1?• ?? i^'• ? J !. ar r (l v ?, YI 1` ?' ?i' 2 (` •?•- A..? 'l..
1 r .i?' si .I +•Sf? .
'.t -?•'• f; •._ 1 .rt e./'? yr.f,a r ,.r'-yI '•>• - '' 4-' ?r?ff
a.r _ - }-? -MS?4 ?. A .+???s .•?l`«:i..t ?•;'? / CuB_ `x.? ?; ?c?2 ,? .. :r'r?`?. ?
?.'Y ? Gi ¢C ?!'c ?? .r, ? { 1t?lr +', t;,,d •',? ' ,. . V ' r r , y k s F {tt'? f t'
++.?•.+ 7ds_ ?'+ 4IA`tS _t •. L+.- ?•?'?? ?`x r t;i",??,,:G°''• tUll .
??' ?4\, ti-___ _ r?t'?•' _ ,,r/\ r• ,.?. 111?iTr?.V` •;L'A?y?vvj%? .O'?y.CCB2Jt''r:f? /-ti !A0
Ur `yttI...lt'p. HQEI rtr;,rtir??...''? .ti• I v1 t:i t ' ;,? ri 1 r ha ,I} 1f_v:r? ;y-? '?.
s•.? r mil #??_' t- rrlw}? t.r-`, r '.?•' '?!?,/n 'T,', r ^ _ ';_.-. < !gip ! .? r1?Yiit"I?•- 1 'i -" r ?.,•
`r } k.. r`ya+ '_ ) ?.; f ' ?. ?_ r •• s _ MS.. •?•.?•"?.
Ur -
(yet t.?` {, r NYC 3 t•? O''. ,.' \ .. 2i ._ •.T ^21t-•- _ t 'i N
?y..?r ` i '•? ?t17 ???' r r. a :sp?`` x` 4r?r1.7;. f,,tr ?!"1 ,r4, .I: Vl
?? 4 y,,,. - ?j? ? s' t? a ( • t \ r r. .1 .? 1 t"/?+ G l+ Y ?? rr??? ? .'n?:- J^,?. r f f.. s•;
GATEWAY HOMES, CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WNR, Inc. Project # GH-1000
WETLAND TABLE
CHANNELS
CH 100/CH 300: 248.5 linear feet, perennial important, 2' centerline
CH 200: 174 linear feet, perennial important, 1' centerline
CH 400: 249 linear feet, perennial important, 2' centerline
CH 500: 217 linear feet, storm water feature
CH 600: 373 linear feet, perennial important, 2' centerline
CH 700: 1072 linear feet, perennial important, 1' centerline
CH 721A-721C: 100 linear feet, storm water feature
WETLANDS
WL 1000/5000: 0.489 acres of vegetated wetlands
WL 2000: 0.006 acres of vegetated wetlands
WL 3000: 0.004 acres of vegetated wetlands
WL 4000: 0.316 acres of vegetated wetlands
GATEWAY HOMES, CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, PJORTH CAROLIrJA
WNR, Inc. Project # GH-1000
IMPACT DATA TABLE
NATIONWIDE 3 IMPACTS
RETROFITTING: 100 linear feet of CH 700 (0.01 acres) of fill in perennial,
important channel, replacement of existing pipe
(No Mitigation Anticipated, Existing)
NATIONWIDE 14 IMPACTS
ROAD CROSSING 1: 50 linear feet of CH 700 (0.001 acres) of fill in perennial,
important channel, extension of Card Street
(No Mitigation Anticipated, Under Threshold)
25 linear feet of CH 600 (0.001 acres) of fill in perennial,
important channel, extension of Card Street
(No Mitigation Anticipated, Under Threshold)
0.05 acres of fill in vegetated wetlands, WL 1000/5000
(No Mitigation Anticipated, Under Threshold)
ROAD CROSSING 2: 40 linear feet of CH 400 (0.002 acres) of fill in perennial,
important channel, extension of Warp Street
(No Mitigation Anticipated, Under Threshold)
30 linear feet of CH 600 (0.001 acres) of fill in perennial,
important channel, extension of Warp Street
(No Mitigation Anticipated, Under Threshold)
0.02 acres of fill in vegetated wetlands, WL 1000/5000
(No Mitigation Anticipated, Under Threshold)
NATIONWIDE 39 IMPACTS
LOT FILL: 322 linear feet of CH 700 (0.01 acres) of fill in perennial,
important channel
(Mitigation Anticipated)
0.326 acres of fill in vegetated wetlands, WL 2000, 3000, 4000
(No Mitigation Anticipated, Under Threshold)
OPEN CHANNEL 248.5 linear feet of CH 100/300 (0.01 acres) of relocation in
RELOCATION: perennial, important channel
(Mitigation Anticipated)
174 linear feet of CH 200 (0.004 acres) of relocation in perennial,
important channel
(Mitigation Anticipated)
209 linear feet of CH 400 (0.01 acres) of relocation in perennial,
important channel
(Mitigation Anticipated)
MMGAIT.OM
WETLAND 0.42 acres in vegetated wetlands, WL 1000/5000
ENHANCEMENT:
OPEN CHANNEL 520.5 linear feet of CH 100/300, 200, 400 (0.05 acres - increase
ENHANCEMENT: centerline to 4 feet) of relocation and enhancement in perennial,
important channel
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED: # 3
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
1. Owners Name: Gateway Homes, LLC
Contact: Mr. Dave Ransenburg
2. Mailing Address: Gateway Homes, LLC
6407 Idlewild Road Suite 1.113
Charlotte North Carolina 28212
subdivision name: North Davidson Residential Site
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address above): North
Davidson Street, Mecklenburg Counly, North Carolina
3. Telephone number (home): (work): [phone]
4. Agent: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
720 South Main Ave.
Newton, North Carolina 28658
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
5. Location of work:
County: Mecklenburg
Nearest town or city: Charlotte
Specific location: From Hwy 49/29 take East 36t?' Street south, Turn left onto North Davidson
Street Site is located on right side just past Herrin Avenue See Attached Location Map,
6. Impacted or nearest stream / river: Little Sugar Creek
River Basin: Catawba River Basin
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high
quality waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-1
or WS-2)? Yes ? No ® If yes, explain: _
7b. Is the project is located within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (EAC)? Yes ? No
7c. If the project is located within a coastal county, what is the land use plan designation (WP):
8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? Yes ? No
® If yes, provide Acton I.D. number of previous permit and any additional information (include
photocopy of 401 Certification):
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
Yes ? No ® If yes, describe anticipated work:
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land: 10.59 ac.
9b. Estimated total acres of wetlands located on project site: 0.82 acres of vegetated wetlands. 0.07
acres of channels ac.
10a. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project:
Filling: 0.01 (channels) (under NW 3) ac Excavation: ac
Flooding: ac Other: ac
Drainage: ac Total acres to be impacted: 0.01 (under NW 3) ac
10b. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated, provide distance both
before and after relocation):
Length before: 100 If Length after: pipe If
Width before: 33 fl: Width after: pipe ft
(based on normal high water contours)
Average depth before: 0.12 to 0.25 ft Average depth before: pip?,R
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from:
Open channel relocation ? Placement of pipe in channel
Channel elevation ? Construction of a dam/Flooding ?
Other: (retrofitting of existing pipe)
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, include size of the watershed draining to the pond? ac
What is the expected pond surface area?
12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical equipment to be used
(attach plans: 8'/z" x 11" drawings only): Site development and infrastructure for a proposed
residential development Typical uipment will be utilized for road crossing
13. Purpose of proposed work: Maintenance of existing culvert. Access to residential development.
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. (include any
measures taken to minimize wetland impacts): For site development to be economically feasible. To
access structures on both sides of the prop.
15. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of
historic properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project. Date
contacted: To be completed by USACE as needed.
16. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (State) land? Yes ?
No ® (if no, go to 18)
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursant to the
requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act?
Yes ? No ?
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina Department of
Administration State Clearinghouse? Yes ? No ?
If answer to 16b. is yes, then submit appropriate documentation from the State Clearinghouse to
Division of Environmental Management regarding compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act.
17. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity involves discharge of
excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on the property (for
Nationwide Permit numbers 14, 18, 21, 26, 29, and 38). All streams (intermittent and
perennial) on the property must be shown on the map. Map scales should be 1 inch equals 50
feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or their equivalent.
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
c. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement
of the delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the stormwater management plan if required.
e. What is the land use of surrounding property? Urban/Residential/Industrial
f. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? Existing sanitary sewer
g. Signed and dated by agent authorization letter, if applicable.
Note: wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1) Issuance of a section 404 Corps of Engineers permit, and
2) Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental Management (Water
Quality) Certification.
Ow(( is / Agerkq signature
I a- ?O- c70
Date
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED: # 14
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
1. Owners Name: Gateway Homes, LLC
Contact: Mr. Dave Ransenburg
2. Mailing Address: Gateway Homes, LLC
6407 Idlewild Road Suite 1.113
Charlotte, North Carolina 28212
subdivision name: North Davidson Residential Site
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address above): North
Davidson Street Mecklenburg County, Charlotte, North Carolina
3. Telephone number (home): (work): [phone]
4. Agent: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
720 South Main Ave.
Newton, North Carolina 28658
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
5. Location of work:
County: Mecklenburg
Nearest town or city: Charlotte
Specific location: From Hwy 49/29 take East 36th Street south, Turn left onto North Davidson
Street Site is located on right side just past Herrin Avenue See Attached Location Mai.
6. Impacted or nearest stream / river: Little Sugar Creek
River Basin: Catawba River Basin
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high
quality waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-1
or WS-2)? Yes ? No ® If yes, explain:
7b. Is the project is located within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (EAC)? Yes ? No
7c. If the project is located within a coastal county, what is the land use plan designation (LUP):
8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? Yes ? No
® If yes, provide Acton I.D. number of previous permit and any additional information (include
photocopy of 401 Certification):
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
Yes ? No ® If yes, describe anticipated work:
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land: 10.5 ac.
9b. Estimated total acres of wetlands located on project site: 0.82 acres of vegetated wetlands, 0.07
acres of channels ac.
10a. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project:
Filling: 0.007 channels (145 linear feet) Excavation: ac
0.07 (vegetated wetlands) ac
Flooding: ac Other: ac
Drainage: ac Total acres to be impacted: 0.077 (under NW14) ac
10b. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated, provide distance both
before and after relocation):
Length before: 145 If Length after: pipe If
Width before: 22 Width after: ip pg
(based on normal high water contours)
Average depth before: 0.12 to 0.5 ft Average depth before: i e
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from:
Open channel relocation ? Placement of pipe in channel
Channel elevation ? Construction of a dam/flooding ?
Other:
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, include size of the watershed draining to the pond? n /a ac
What is the expected pond surface area? ac
12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical equipment to be used
(attach plans: 8 1/2" x 11" drawings only): Site development and infrastructure for a proposed
residential development Typical equipment will be utilized for road crossings
13. Purpose of proposed work: Access to residential development.
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. (include any
measures taken to minimize wetland impacts): For site development to be economically feasible. To
access structures of both sides of the prop.
15. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of
historic properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project. Date
contacted: To be completed by USACE as needed.
16. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (State) land? Yes ?
No ® (if no, go to 18)
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursant to the
requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act?
Yes ? No ?
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina Department of
Administration State Clearinghouse? Yes ? No ?
If answer to 16b. is yes, then submit appropriate documentation from the State Clearinghouse to
Division of Environmental Management regarding compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act.
17. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity involves discharge of
excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on the property (for
Nationwide Permit numbers 14, 18, 21, 26, 29, and 38). All streams (intermittent and
perennial) on the property must be shown on the map. Map scales should be 1 inch equals 50
feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or their equivalent.
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
c. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement
of the delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the stormwater management plan if required.
e. What is the land use of surrounding property? Urban/Residential/Industrial
f. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? Existing sanitary sewer
g. Signed and dated by agent authorization letter, if applicable.
Note: wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1) Issuance of a section 404 Corps of Engineers permit, and
2) Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental Management (Water
Quality) Certification.
Date
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED: # 39
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
1. Owners Name: Gateway Homes, LLC
Contact: Mr. Dave Ransenburo
2. Mailing Address: Gateway Homes, LLC
6407 Idlewild Road Suite 1.113
Charlotte North Carolina 28212
subdivision name: North Davidson Residential Site
Project location address, including subdivision name (if different from mailing address above): North Davidson Street, Mecklenburg County. Charlotte North Carolina
3. Telephone number (home): (work): [phone]
4. Agent: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
720 South Main Ave.
Newton, North Carolina 28658
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
5. Location of work:
County: Mecklenburg
Nearest town or city: Cha to
Specific location: From HM 49/29 take East 36th Street south, Turn left onto North Davidson
Street Site is located on right side just oast Herrin Avenue See Attached Location Man
6. Impacted or nearest stream / river: Little Sugar Creek
River Basin: Catawba River Basin
7a. Is project located near water classified as trout, tidal saltwater (SA), high
quality waters (HQW), outstanding resource waters (ORW), water supply (WS-1
or WS-2)? Yes ? No ® If yes, explain:
7b. Is the project is located within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (EAC)? Yes ? No
7c. If the project is located within a coastal county, what is the land use plan designation (LUP):
8a. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? Yes ? No
® If yes, provide Acton I.D. number of previous permit and any additional information (include
photocopy of 401 Certification):
8b. Are additional permit requests expected for this property in the future?
Yes ? No ® If yes, describe anticipated work:
9a. Estimated total number of acres in tract of land: 10.59 ac.
9b. Estimated total acres of wetlands located on project site: 0.82 acres of vegetated wetlands, 0.07
acres of channels ac.
10a. Number of acres of wetlands impacted by the proposed project:
Filling: 0.035 (channels)(953.5 linear feet)
0.326 vegetated wetlands) ac
Flooding: ac
Drainage: ac
Excavation: ac
Other: ac
Total acres to be impacted: 0.361 (under NW39) ac
lob. (1) Stream channel to be impacted by the proposed project (if relocated, provide distance both
before and after relocation):
Length before: 322(pipe). 631.5(relocate) If
Width before: see attached impact table ft
(based on normal high water contours)
Average depth before: 0.12 to 0.5 ft
Length after: i e 520 1
Width after: pipe. 3
Average depth before: pie. 0.12 to 0.5 ft
(2) Stream channel impacts will result from:
Open channel relocation ® Placement of pipe in channel
Channel elevation ? Construction of a dam/flooding ?
Other:
11. If construction of a pond is proposed, include size of the watershed draining to the pond? n /a ac
What is the expected pond surface area? ac
12. Description of proposed work including discussion of type of mechanical equipment to be used
(attach plans: 8 1/2" x 11" drawings only): Site development and infrastructure for a {proposed
residential development Typical equipment will be utilized for road crossings
13. Purpose of proposed work: Access to residential development. Building pads for structures.
14. State reasons why it is believed that this activity must be carried out in wetlands. (include any
measures taken to minimize wetland impacts): For site development to be economically feasible. To
access structures on both sides of the propg[ty.
15. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of
historic properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project. Date
contacted: To be completed by USACE as needed.
16. Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (State) land? Yes ?
No ® (if no, go to 18)
a. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursant to the
requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act?
Yes ? No ?
b. If yes, has the document been reviewed through the North Carolina Department of
Administration State Clearinghouse? Yes ? No ?
If answer to 16b. is yes, then submit appropriate documentation from the State Clearinghouse to
Division of Environmental Management regarding compliance with the North Carolina Environmental
Policy Act.
17. The following items should be included with this application if proposed activity involves discharge of
excavated or fill material into wetlands:
a. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, lakes and ponds on the property (for
Nationwide Permit numbers 14, 18, 21, 26, 29, and 38). All streams (intermittent and
perennial) on the property must be shown on the map. Map scales should be 1 inch equals 50
feet or 1 inch equals 100 feet or their equivalent.
b. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project.
c. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement
of the delineation line.
d. Attach a copy of the stormwater management plan if required.
e. What is the land use of surrounding property? Urban/Residential/Industrial
f. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? Existing sanitary sewer
g. Signed and dated by agent authorization letter, if applicable.
Note: wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to:
1) Issuance of a section 404 Corps of Engineers permit, and
2) Either the issuance or waiver of a 401 Division of Environmental Management (Water
Quality) Certification.
is-av-0
Date
Delineation Performed by: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
720 South Main Avenue
Newton, NC 28658
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
WETLAND DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Gateway Homes, LLC / North Davidson Street Date: 9/00
Applicant/Owner: CGR Development / Gina Razete County: Mecklenburg County
Investigator: Tamp Bandy and Jennifer Robertson State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed? No Transit ID: Wetland
(Atypical situation)
Is the area a potential problem area ? No Plot ID: Wetland
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
1. Juncus spp. grass FACW+ 9. -
2. Carex spp. grass FACW+ 10. _
3. Boehmeria cylindrica herb FACW+ 11. _
4. Impatiens capensis herb FACW 12. _
5. Solidago spp. herb FACW 13. -
6. Acer rubrum tree FAC 14. _
7. Comus amomum shrub FACW+ 15. _
8. S. canadensis shrub FACW- 16. _
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100 %
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
X_ Recorded Data (describe in remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
X Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: _0 to 1_ (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
X Oxidized Root Channels in
Depth to Free Water in Pit: _0 to 7_ (in.) Upper 12 Inches
X Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: _0 to 3_ (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
X FAC Neutral Test
Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetlands associated with unnamed tributaries to Little Sugar Creek
WLdata.frmGH-1000
Delineation Performed by: Wetland and Natural Resource Consultants, Inc.
720 South Main Avenue
Newton, NC 28658
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
WETLAND DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Gateway Homes, LLC / North Davidson Street Date: 9/00
Applicant/Owner: Gateway Homes, LLC County: Mecklenburg County
Investigator: Tamp Bandy and Jennifer Robertson State: North Carolina
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes Community ID: Channels
Is the site significantly disturbed? No
(Atypical situation) Transit ID: Channels
Is the area a potential problem area? No Plot ID: Channels
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): N/A
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
X_ Recorded Data (describe in remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs X Inundated
Other X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: _0 - 5_ (in.) Secondary Indicators: (2 or more required)
Oxidized Root Channels in
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) Local Soil Survey Data
FAC Neutral Test
Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: CH 100=2' centerline, CH 200=1' centerline, CH 300=1' centerline, CH 400=2' centerline, CH
500=1' centerline, CH 600=2' centerline, CH 700=1' centerline, All channels on site are unnamed tributaries
to Little Sugar Creek
WLdata.frmGH-1000
Project # GH-1000
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee fine sandy loam
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts
Drainage Class: poorly drained
Field Observations:
Confirm Mapped Type? Mecklenburg
County Soil Survey
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(ins.) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-8 Ap 10YR 5/2 fine sandy loam
8-17 Bg1 10YR 4/1 loam
17-24 B92 10YR 6/1 sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
_X_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_X_ Aquic Moisture Regime _X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List **
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Bottom of Tributaries to Little Sugar Creek
Wetland Determination
(yes or no)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? N/A
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Hydric Soils Present? YES
Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES
Remarks:
W Ldata.frm G H-1000
;y y ;r Map Scale
V - 40' r ak
\ - ` ? ? • ? i / \ ?.. i. ': Ail{ • c1
F ? t £ r
r i.. 'C t:r i< }t r ?l' ? •'? ? 1 ? r Y t .. ?_?'.
t- z
0. 2!-•
? +'•( f ..;Fi T j,- 44 /< ? ?.k -. 1 ` ?1: 7 i-• ? r _ t 4 . s
L J f? ji _ ,lyl ?I
t v _
;^ ?, 1 ,+ +'i r + ? 3»y of ? ++.- i F+'?yY T'-{?•?,t
•LSa.-
•f.
K
w ? i'Y h ? ?_ M` t J,- r :?„ l'. },. ?Sa' ,,. .S f ?}? R r?•' L`4 '}\ }?
-` - ,? ` °y k?!'Y ' Y,}`:? ??.• ? yr, \. ti -.5a a '? r,,
.?
? ?• ` .? _. f Y '.1 ? 'l ,r. <d. ly ?v 1 . J9 T . l a y ? Tj f°i'
? :L, Ir
- ?,. ?? Y ?t hyamy, I f -"•. - 1 ? J ? ty. ?. ?"?+ ? '
_ .. 1 ?.. 0 tt } r?i
r - - ?Sf? rh!-.: ?' ?Y?1??2? I'T•f sY? _ ,2 ti. .. i.'1? ?•.. fi4tl 4L{+'? lt-# a'?\' ? --Y a,t )i „ f. Y"'-`r
*?4 r? .4 t.( ..r ?n{1r ?1`!•r. -c?. + ,t. ,..Y?` ?L?,1?y;. '1 ,' ,'C `af *t. ,? ?t-s`'.- t..,#, ?{?r'i
' ? ? f t i• a ?... - ? +{`Y'1° 3TC ? F `?.^.x %sr' ? .?,\., -. ?? 1 ..' a ? `4 ,? f ?2 F. -i',
v!? 1' ?t ^^ r } 1• f ,t?t?. ' v-'.i - ,, ?yi Tt •,4
!r? ??+r? A j?? ?..-t C??'S l.?t? 5 ?•r~ ?? t ?? off Div Y 7-- i .`?J - sic '°? t , _'1? •? t ??- yy?
1.., yT. ? R ar?? rr Y? F >r- `'j 1 7,+. >~k ! - I.v,\.. ? ,?^ v:, (t} ?r?e
'' ,1 ? L I v•. tr +z r? s },tlri?..?er'! /`?`,?,t'?' _.?% ,??r .a ?y+? n ?r ?-}z??eyy A 'ate .SLR t.?,;
fr ', i 2::',' ?.? 'L :p`." ,`?c ! ?,1'I t '.' !'? -.fit. v ia; ?rti? _ r- f '?•.`'.?•'? ?}?? t??s{?.l
r• ? ?;.- • f?.? - d ?' - _+. r : . "".... T~ 3-2'+l ?,."'" t• ;? : ;1 R L ?!?'`SJ ?. '
• ?• t J:? y ;., - K t.F ?` .;nxJ r' y •ty+a"w _l Tti-
P r , J
,yam +ti . sy,-, try • ? ? _?y- ? ? ?+ Z? c c ? ? r' - - I.? ;Y •r
/''?`! t T1?.-? ?. _ -?.? :-e _F'?'!'Sr?:i?....`•'11?-..'!?'1 ''. .rd ?{t?.. - -RJ ?^?ts YP }'i'-psi -R 7y?4.-T
?o-
't. - ,, ?"''? t 1 r y?Y 9sJ Mtw,... i'i'V? ?', r ? ?t??A ? e ? +j? :. t* 4?y •,?'...•
r w mil; ti=r•r`% {tr'z s ? `? } 4? _? Si y? .r4y„'a ?, ff ?'w t f VV a ?{J?` ? r .r ?Y
?._ ?:$ 4.1?f 4L d. '? '?7 ?-x? ; f`r?'.'1i r{ +o.? rt? ?t ? H? IL cwf .R+? {}li F • ?.r R'
+'-' .?• t., rrr _ ?r_6..5. .. .._ .,_'t•t. ?/1??1t.?`?- 1? .F ?3 S`(:ta,? a? ? ?,A.1.\.,•? ?, -:+.
• / ' •; h ,? ii Y 39 L-,..w. ? ?, t: ,, ? •j .: ?t t ?'.g"r y 1..,?,,.,? ?,.1 ?: .. y
Lot Fill, Building Pad
} t 322 linear feet of
,? ? '•R L °st?: ?. '-,,,•.-1.3 ..-,L`-`_'`?"FCM1 +-.l ..Ll.•x / iJ??t?.=.
channel impact, CH 700 x^zb'
.J?r' +?. .: a f . y ff:t:. {s .' ! f.i(,•4 1?-?'?l??ryt?,rw....J ; -/.X ) ? ¢ ?-?.'i ?r+,,.,•?,??'r? ? ?l ?, ?ir`?r ?' '3? !a??f.?1L
Z s {.5•; , ?'+?Es ? ? , rr...r.r . -- 5 y ~ •? r . ? A T' ?,F t. d ? i'•Y . ,i.'!! t'7'
7. r(.+:r +F\?:rY?Y tE 1` rfJl '' .yr. , s? t r { ;?? i ?3 tii i .F' F !•'?"..Er`,
A s..t• ?,_? rr. } rr- 't} r..?y 's r•. }i j Zs t.ra^! ?-+L'i?.7.1'.
} : - t. R s i LL a , ?NJ 3 r't fr:i?.,?yr ?x = tt `w • ? SfR?
,? .?? ? t . ?, S s' 't ? 7y e a ? r}- i. iy ? 7 a.Y•- -Y f S'..? ? • 5 t{?' d i t' > rT ?} X
t ?'' "t 1 r r t r. y /";t + =4 tr a}.
) l? t 3 . ?,11I t 41 •? s, *- f ?.) -f4 G 1'= ?.a' i yt-.:*,? ?} r.
;?,RR?'4 ? r, a+?'. ?? ;'r'ti- 'ts ' ,? ?i, .?. ? } H' -: ?- ;. ? Y '•. a? n r' t3-. ++ct Lr't
K3 r ?r t -.? ? S'S, ? , f. ?,r ?c i..k ? i ? . ?•,' ? \ r t y fr ??s ? t J ? , a } 'i .,?? k): sf? . •.. N tier
as , ? ) F..-"S} Yh.,. ?rtt..ti}..?A? _?. •r ,?2:? r •-_ r ,?h +}.: V .lam, t _My. , i-. f,1?1 '-:r? ''c:V '? }
F
NW 39 ` . 04- q
Lot Fill, Building Pad
0.326 acres of vretland impact ,
' ,12 L?' a ?-? - Y
"" t + t
j NW 39 {'/[I? ??: F r t
Lot Fill, Building Pad
r
1 322 linear feet of
channel impact, CH 700 <} °}
7s ?! - Pipe Retrofit ' r;? a. ' • _`?
100 linear feet of
f .?.. channel impact, CH 700 R- `? ` xY
Y ? ? r ? .- t -•. f f ta. ,. ? iz, tJ?i, r L b ?K?
Map Scale
- 40'
_: - ` ?,?r.--,...ter--?"}' ???•-,., ;_ ?. ? ?; l
Q t? a'a ?, - ?? ar; - "z _ t-?•? rr •e ? ' -•i-,. `' -?.:-'..?r r .,??C ? r ;r? r '> > y` '? ?!t''??
r
r••?. 'tf- •°.?}'%?:? _ -, !.::.. rT7O .__.__ _ '? rrr"?:?'t?ra S'i'- ??r? S; .,r=`s.: s` y .

1 =
f , t D?

MITIGATIOrA
t(? Channel Enhancement
S linear feet
520.
rjW 39
Channel Relocation
Open - -?. .. t• .-
631.5 channel imps i - `
N S : • d
NW 14
Road Crossing #1
25 linear feet of channel
1: ;V impact, CH 600
n - •, ., • -?... . T.:::..:.,? '?.?_' _ 1o- - t - ?ti M TIGATION y'
41 0
A, 1
?? 5
Wetland Enhancement
.10
1 ?. {
NW 14
Road Crossing #1
50 linear feet of channel
F
1 impact, CH 700 _ r . .
Map Scale NW 14 aws 1" = 40 No-no
Road Crossing #1 `
Cj-= 0.05 acres of wetland X,
impact, WL 1000/5000 t:
-.) ?? C .?" .-- r?n•,t? f - - r ?,.• * ?'t?a-•y 'Y.^i.T?i's" 4' r?_.' s xY..- Y'•'i,??-!t.".z: s ??+?.
1 ac
i??? .r iii" ???? ?• ? t 3' ? }?'? r?i'` '??s{ ?.G ???i?g ??'-? ?di.• L ?'>? afsy ? S4?i?t?4..P. Y r? ?,{?,j
Ma Scale •.. ,,`'tr¢ •? rr?;C,.?`?I
N-I
_N1,11- L
Av W-
•?i ; _ ? t `~ ? .?{ ?ir ?yyt }r try, ? •+- a?• '
.- 1
,
- • a
'_ ? , k ' ? & ?r? - ?„ ? } - ? sv" s., IWO
??? r. 1 - ?? •? - 1 ? t? ?. t, ht.?'?3 .1-x rti r L~?-yam? `fsy ? ? ;,? ti-. = r <. o r??^„- k
N X % 1 s
_ r
Channel Enhancement F Y
520.5 linear feet
t. t. 1
..y 7.?s??y.?. ? + ? •. ??,?? +.i ?l" i a +"Cy ?. .? ? - ? "?•. ? ? -<? ? ter ? r
A?#v?? ? t ? • • ? - ' aJ F
-. _* „ .• , '? qtr
O;lr
_a. •••i?j{, _ -i Vt?_-d ?,. ? .^ ` .`i'' TT:,na'ajC.Y ..J.? t.. `1 .. ,_ _ + .. •rpn? ?r"?4'? p `:{? %. Open Channel Relocation
NW 39
channel impact
1.5
63
let
#2
` r.,- `' • ` s. ' `•: Crossing Yt ,.
2 -i Road
40 linear feet of channel
impact, CH 400
t • iY . ;t r b-? r } 34' °' VON
NW 14 y .
:;,; Road Crossing #2 fit?
30 linear feet of channel r
y-': = x,, "` t { impact, CH 600
y •a 1
`?2,?'L7t''?' {?{? { t y, ';.+ - ? ate. \ ? -
NVJ 14
,: tht«?.?: is t '•? r - O
x = °4 y Road Crossing #2
0.02 acres of we tiand
See Full-Size Site Plan Map impact, WL 1000/5000
?, ? a ,r
• for Actual Road Placements '
Project # GH-1000
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wehadkee fine sandy loam Drainage Class: poorly drained
Field Observations:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fluvaquentic Confirm Mapped Type? Field Confirmed
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(ins.) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc.
0-9 Ap 10YR 4/3 loam
9-13 B1g 2.5Y 6/2 loam
13-32 B21g 5Y 6/1 sandy clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soil
_X_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
X_ Aquic Moisture Regime _X Listed on Local Hydric Soils List **
X_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_X_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (explain in remarks)
Remarks: Wetlands adjacent to channel
Wetland Determination
(yes or no)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Hydric Soils Present? YES
Is This Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES
Remarks:
WLdata.frmGH-1000
INAPSWt 19019 V1
11 N
I Ln J
1 '0
Q.
o11: .. ,
1 1 � M 4� rte:.:' �... •� (r((,� 11�' s.
Is
1 �
do ,
1 `6
II Z M"£9,0 L tM
1
0
1 .
ODII
1pt
of
"r
Lr_ / °O°
p.. { r
iA
1 � �
46
CVy
\ ^(D
' I , ..� _ 9g gyp`, " \ / J / � � �•, .
1 OclO g
NE—_ Z"
Ln
S co Z At..
th1EBLiN�.
I --' DNZZD
H
srn
oC)
N .
00
H
Z Z 07
j
1•{
W
i
m�
V�y�
N
2
_
W
I
w
0
00
H
Z Z 07
1•{
W
i
m�
-4O
2
pRoim
NORTH DAVIDSON
MIXED USE MASTER PLANT
DEVELOPED BY= GATEWAY HOMES, LLC
am nnL t
ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN
.'.. .�'.I 1C.'�u'�LL:: :•^ 'M3S..�'.l"" 4�.�.. .'.r '•:11%'.Li•• ... ....� _.19'. ,\' N4 �. �v. 4J t,�O,
1
I
GNA
s,.,a a .1.undulauw
H
y
1•{
W
i
_
I
O
I
GNA
s,.,a a .1.undulauw

r $ 9? ??
ooe
"i r ?? o l vJ. i
yr.
cv O rn
00
/ 1h
-k
?• Zi ti Y
8 ('. G
R
M- ..1
1

? t
/ ? •
? i
r
r. `

,
y A

I'
1

J
l?,r Yf .s a T ? Ja. ? y \ ? ? >
.i
10
?/ 1 7
d `'
t
A
1
.qtr t+1 ??
! t T» ? f 1

r
T
7

a r

f{

I •
J•
t:

?I

P,
u L?
T

/ 121\

• ?•, i ? f, ? 20101 ? \
f• ? C
1
-
?U •? rn\ ?.
i?l 10' a 20 751 48 -1-J

°
r
11
t

--
-
?, I
1

? I?
l
!
1 ?
{ r

N ,U 7'O???LS .?U

IIIIII
I
t
I i
I I.
I I '?
1 ?
L: 7-4

N
a I ` u l
m Q
r O•

-? cT.: ? '• fly . ?i
ur Z? ???
:j!
r \ /:

f- \
\ \ x1

uz 99
Vii - - Q
?IICI? o
19 s
¦
I _
. I
Photo 3: Tar and Industrial Debris in CH 700
Photo 4: Failing Banks Below Where CH 700 Enters Site Through 42" Pipe
Photo 5: Tar and Pollutants in CH 700
Photo 7: More Tar and Industrial Debris in CH 700
Photo 9: Grease Film Found Throughout CH 700
Photo 10: Grease Film Found Throughout CH 700
Photo 11: Tire and Other Automotive Debris in CH 700
Photo 12: Tire and Other Automotive Debris in CH 700
Photo 14: Presence of Failing, Unstable Banks Along Most of CH 700
Photo 13: Presence of Failing, Unstable Banks Along Most of CH 700
Photo 15: Presence of Failing, Unstable Banks Along Most of CH 700
Photo 16: More Automotive Debris in CH 700
Photo 17: Upstream Existing Culvert
Photo 18: Downstream Existing Culvert
Photo 19: Urban Trash Within CH 700 Near CH 720
Photo 20: Urban Trash Within CH 700 At CH 721
Photo 21: More Urban Trash Near CH 724
Photo 22: Fibrous Roots Within Storm Water Feature (CH 721A-CH 721C)
Photo 23: Presence of Invasive Species Within WL 1000/5000
Photo 24: Chinese Privet, Japanese Honeysuckle, and Kudzu Invading
IrAW
s ? • ? i
M
i `1r
n
` P ??
,
49-
f
Photo 26: More Industrial Pollution Downstream in CH 600
Photo 27: Storm Water Feature CH 500
Photo 28: Storm Water Feature CH 500
Photo 29: Reach of CH 200
Photo 30: Reach of CH 200, More Failing and Vertical Banks
Photo 32: Lack of Defined Substrate in CH 100
Photo 31: Lack of Defined Substrate in CH 100
Photo 33: Presence of Sediment Within CH 100
Photo 34: More Evidence of Sediment From Upstream Reaches Within CH 100
�� �^•� d ar r;rt� y. � N V y yw i.

allS GuiMU3 OOL H:) :Z CV404d
OOL H3 ui aal JO wuasaad :Z 0404d
SHd"SOlOHd 31IS
000t-H9 # PDfad ':)uI IdNM
311OlbVH:)'S3WOH "M31V9
> » V
S 76 21 22 E E ~ 22 -
u~
1 5' 57.0 w
/ ~ Q o
U O ~~N W
- / ~ ~ _
_ - \ ° e f f) V~ ~ ~ ON
_ ' ~ S 15 08 ~ 15 08 40 E s~~ V! ~ N ~ Q SOU ~
_ ~ 47.06 r~ / 47.06 ov W Z
z
_ ~ ° L _ ~ ~ T N o ~ o~~ a~
g~ _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ N a _ A iA W 0 V/ N L L
_ T E _ 5 ~ ~ ~ . N 7t U
N _ / o-e ~ U Q F ~ L N
L 731. ~ ~ ~ ' n.
~ 72 75 I ~ Q v U 7 N
1 ~ / \ ~ n.~ f.. ~ C
i V O ~ ~ J
i i ~ . 72 .oo ~ ~ \ 505 ~ ~
I - i. I ~ ~ \ ~
I ~ ~
1 `x,.00 soo 71 ~ ~ \ 1 O Z o ~ , a ~ ~ > ~ _ 7
~ ~ 503 ~ 731.00 Q UI
1 ~ ~ ~ O CH2O2 I 1
0 1 \ ' I
~ ' ~ CH2 2A M 1 I W O 23 ~ -
-
' - 1 CH1 1~.7 I
l N - ~ 2D4
- CH1 CN / ~ o 1.
1 205 . 1 N cf+zos 731.0
~ 1 \ 1
72.5 I , \ I 7 .00 I 1
I -P 1 ~ ~ cf+ 1
Cp 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1
CN1W 1 \ 71x.7.. 1~ 1
CH,D4 - D \ \ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ I ~ ~ \ ~ \ ~ ~
I - 1 \1 N ~ ~
\ - \ \ -moo N 40T ~ N
~ ~ 731. ~a O, O,
~ \ ~ m ~ cry - \ \ - ~ ~ ~ 1 cry ~ ~
~ ~ \ 1 ~ ~ ~
~ i - 1 c 1 0,
n,. ~ aP 728.0 \ ~ N \ ~ 7 - ~ ~ ~ \ \
\ ~ ,D ~ ~ \ ~ ~ 1
~ ~ X91 .50 ~ ~ GAS LINE ~ ~
r~ ~ 718 ~ \ \ 1 1 ~ CH6 1 c9
1 ~ \ ? I WLt ~ W ~ w
\ 5 ~ I ~ 23. e ~
I \ 1 1N \ ~ • ~ / ~ N ~ S 47 31 48 E 1
I I _ / cllsoe ~ 1 ~ 1 \ ~1 ' BD7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 0.3 2 ~ ©Copyright 1 / The use of these drowin s
I \ ~ \ 9 ~ without written permission
`01 ~ ~ \ I ~ ~ 5 1 from the architect/engin- / - eer is proh(bited. Vlolotors
~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ will be subject to legal ~ action.
I ? o •1 RETAINING WALL - TYPICAL ~
~ % 1 I ~ ~ 76.50 i 1
I 1 \ - ~ ~ - ~ wu~13 3. 5
1 1 1 7 .50 ~ ~
- ~
_ ~ f~ ~O ~ 73 1 I C3ZN cHS D 723.25 ' ~ ~
- I I ° w 1 ~ S ~ z 1
I ~ ~ ti 731 ~ A ~ Q
~ I~ ~ ~ I ~ i i it ~ CL 1 ~ f ~ ~ J~
72 i \ ~ Q 1 ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~
I 1 ~ ~
i I - 726.5C Z 726.50 ~ w
I \ s ~ ~ ~
1 1' 728 - ~ ~ \ \ Wo ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 5 8 ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1 1 - Q ~ \
~ - ~ i 9 WL ~ ~ \ ~ C,L QW
- \ ~ ~ 3~,. 5 \ \ ~
a ~ \ Q ~ \ \ ~ -
\ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~
. - o ~ _ - 05 40 53 W I / i 1 / ~ W L m ~
40,11 , \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ ~ I ~
° v \ N ~ o Z \2 \ \ ~ w
I ~ \ ^ a I I \ ? n \ ~ , \ ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ o
O \ ~O] 9 1 ~ ~ I ? I l cAe \ ~ ~ _J l . ~ ~ W
I \ I I ~ > f-
w~ I I _ 72 3s oo ~ ~ ~ ~ _ w ~ \ / z \ 1 W W
~ ~ • ~ ~ 32 ~ , 1 ~ ~ i X - o \ ~
I I I ~ - 1, ~ \ \ ~ ~ w
N ~ 1 I I ~ ~ Cp ~ 1 I vn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~
I 00 1 \ DDz I , / 002 ~ \ U F-
I I ~ a O ~ W ~ ~ na~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ O w
I ~ ~2~0 31.00 ~ ~ O ~ 131.00 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 71.0 ~ t a
_ ~ ~ ~ 1 1-x80
~ 01 , ~ ~
~ ? _ N - - - ~ / 1
i 2 I I I 'ti- _ , 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~1~
~ . ~ - \ _ ~ ~
~ 3 \ _ \ ~ ~
~ ~ / _ - , ~j Checked by MVS
~~=i ~ ~ o~ ti ~ Drawn b MVS ~~j, ~^3s _ Y
_ _ i ` - - 1~` ~ _ ~ Date Drawn 03.05.0
_ ~ _ 'f ~ 700 4YCMP e ~
- - L _ _ Revisions r ~ i
N N - 44 ~ ~ 30 W W 7
48, 48 _ - t 40 5.7 _ _ 1
~ - - - o
~ _ _
_ _
o o: o_ - ~ _ _ _ _
o -
0 a _ _ Sheet

ivvrx 1 n inn UMM T cc, ZVU i d
U4
W 0 50' 100' 125' J V_
SCALE: 1" = 50' O
O Q U

IRS f S , ~ OS
N
IRS ,
,5e.•E 490.50 6.42
• on g v' J ~ ti a NORTH EAST DESC NORTH EAST DESC NORTH EAST DESC
p. ~ ~ 5350.3 5891.3 WL1000 5686.2 5640.7 CH100 4875.6 6613.1 CH700 42"CMP
~~y s 5312,1 5880.5 WL1001 5624.3 5663.1 CH101 4888,1 6576.3 CH701
IRS ~ 5284.0 5856.2 WL1002 5604.2 5670.8 CH102 4891.0 6555.4 CH702
5260.5 5869,9 WL1003 5555.1 5677.9 CH103 4921.8 6561.7 CH703
IRS N: 5678.3 5540.3 5680.8 CH104 CH300 4929.6 6538,3 CH704 21281 Square Feet 5526.2 5693.2 CH301 4952.6 6419,5 CH705
E: 5602.8 5503.6 5698.1 CH105 4982.4 6477.5 CH706
5484.4 5710.1 CH106 4996.8 6469.5 CH707
10.59 Acres 5478.4 5725.8 CH107 4991.0 6461.3 CH708
cHSOS 4989.3 6445.4 CH709 NORTH EAST DESC 497 Square Feet 4980.5 6428,4 CH710
5012.9 6263.5 VIL2000 4998.0 6402.2 CH711
~H p, 5006.1 6255,5 WL2001 5008,0 6356.6 CH712
,0~• H504 4990.3 6259.6 WL2002 5022.4 6365.9 CN713
4996,9 6271.5 WL2003 5035.5 6359.0 CH714
CH503 101 5013,2 6270.9 WL2004 NORTH EASt DESC 5040.6 6341.2 CH715
CH2o2 5615.9 5715,6 CH2O0 5024.0 6271.7 CH716 260 Square Feet 5590.9 5740.4 CH2O2 5023.7 6247.7 CH717
0 Z 5576.7 5748.5 CH2O2A 5042.7 6218.9 CH718
~ CH2O2A CH502 O CH2O3 5572.6 5729,5 CH2O3 5052.7 6189,3 CH719
5542.7 5742.7 CH2O4 5071.8 6155.3 CH720
5529.3 5745.8 CH2O5 5090.9 6131.1 CH721 NORTH EAST DESC 5522.4 5751.1 CH2O6 5111.2 6135.9 CH721A
~ cH1o3 `a f 5035.1 6203.5 WL3000 5131.0 6111,7 CH7218
N N CH104 CH300 CH2O4 174 Square Feet 5140,7 6065.1 cH721c
189 Square Feet 5109.9 6106.2 cH722
CH301 CH2O5 5113.4 6067,3 CH723
CH2O6 5132.1 6045.9 CH724 5130.6 6035.1 CH725
NORTH EAST DESC 5140,8 6023.1 CH726
CHt05 NORTH EAST DESC 5489.5 5737,0 CH400 5143.8 5993,7 CH727
CH403 CH501 5080,6 6187.8 WL4000 5494.8 5748.0 CH401 5156,3 5978.9 CH728
~y 1 5066.8 6209.3 WL4001 5491.2 5765.0 CH402 5178,9 5956.9 CH729
94 ~ ~ ~ 5018.5 6218.1 WL4002 5496.8 5783,0 CH403 5197,8 5932.2 CH730 5111,6 6200,3 W14003 5471.8 5787.6 CH404 5214.1 5912.5 CH731
cH1o7 5127,6 6192.8 WL4004 5460.0 5821.9 CH405 5238,5 5915.3 CH732
CH404 / 5152.3 6166.6 WL4005 5447.3 5844.5 CH406 5275,5 5888.6 CH733
N: 5456.4 ~ ~p5 RS / 5147,4 6136.6 WL4006 5436.6 5849.3 CH407 5302.6 5873.9 CH734
~ E: 5847.6 1/2" EIR ~ 5133.4 6110.5 WL4007 5427.3 5846.1 CH408 5145.0 6063.0 WL4008 5402.2 5869,9 CH409 1072 Square Feet
N: 5431.1 CH406 E: 564s.z 4 w 200.00 5142.0 6030.4 WL4009 5381.9 5890.1 CH409A
1" EIP S 92 cH4o7 ` 5136,3 5999.3 WL4010 5370.8 5872.3 CH4098
~ cH4oa ~ cH6oo 5108,0 6024.1 VIL4011
5077.1 6056.4 w~4o12 498 Square Feet
601 ~ N ~ 5059,7 6094.8 WL4013 p 5062.8 6116.2 WL4014
} (0 ''o 5052.5 6132.3 WL4015
a r CH4o9 ' ::::::t' 602 5042,9 6156.3 WL4016
Z ~ O • p CH6 pl 5057,9 6164.2 WL4017 NORTH EAST DESC
1 03 CH409k N J ~ ip 5473,8 5826) CH500
O 4099 H604 ~ i N,o 13750 Square Feet 5498.6 5844,3 CH501 5578,2 5794,7 CH502
f 5603.5 5777.3 CH503
J ~ r '::•iiiFi:iiii'rii•:ii:::.. J CH605 5614,3 5762,5 CH504
J ~ WL1000 : 5641.3 5745.1 CH505
CH606 NORTH EAST DESC s1as.6 5937.0 wl5ooo 217 Square Feet
5195.1 5919.7 WL5001
IRS S CH606A p IRS s 5218.9 5899.6 WL5002
A~' / 4 52 5.8 5889.8 WL5003 J~,
607 ~ v ~ N'U 001 ~ I
F / included in WL1000 s NORTH EAST oESc °'o
CH734 _ CH608 y 5428.4 5872.0 CH600 5416.3 5880.1 CH601
Kf M n 05.4 5915.» rugO2 5~ c,ti.. ~
- _ 1 5388.5 5940.3 CH603
0 5373.8 5949.7 CH604
5361.3 5974.5 CH605 5348.6 5982.1 CH606
5327.5 6002.6 CH606A
5318.7 5975.0 CH607
. -w1500 ;:a:':;:.:2 5299.1 6010.8 CH608
w 5263.0 6007.3 CH609 5230.8 5991.1 CH610
u CH610 m 5207.0 6000.6 CH611
f 82
J w ~ ....CH731:.:':.~ 746 Square Feet
~ ~ H 11 C6 m -
:;:::::730;; f` ~ fs WL5001 s
. ~::42~~I~~Sstii..,: A) ~A•
IRS ~S+
IRS 0.00 ~ F~ ~ ~
0'59 5 w a ~ g8 A~ , ~ ~
Ob CH728 ry p9 ~ ~0 s = uare ee
1
u yr s = uare ee
w1.4010 ,y, CH724 CH7216
~ = re ee = cres ua
r y,:.:::::.~ wl.4ooa a ;;::~s:::::::::: .
CH721A WL4U03
CH722... 1!41401 T ~ AREAS OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY BOUNDARY NOT INCLUDED

CH721
4000
4012..:.::::?.__::::..:..::.- WL4002 H720a::
'4L4001 ;:.:-:4014 ::::::.:5`.i::'
2 IRS
40 ~'1 ~ ~3 4015,;; 01) 719 ;:;;::.s::;:
4 1 . 14L 0 6 H718 ~~h c~
,1111111 I I1pl~~ ~ ``111 q~~~ W CH714 ~
N, f ~ 'F SID ~ N ~~OQ ~1
Q ~ . al ~s y~~s CH713 ~
i a, • ~ 1112000...;::.: WL2004 WL2004 H~12 t^
S ~ ~ _ WL2001 . i:y:~i:i:i: m ~ 0
%v ~ , WL2003 o°j n° a WL2003 H711 Z CH707 'rp DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE DRAWN CHECKED APPR VD
••'y0 SUfC~i••••• ~V`•` 2002 ~i ~ L2002
Wetlands Survey H710 CH706
/~h/ C.1111t 11111111 D HOMES D~
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG COUNTY
~ IRS NORTH CAROLINA
7os 40 20 0 40 80 120
t?
1~ ~~pa
G David W. Mitchom PLS 1527 NC
G~ MITCHAM & ASSOCIATES P.A. B. Bruce Nooe PE 23544 NC ~
PLS 3213 NC ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS SURVEYORS-PLANNERS
~0 Jeffrey C. Allen PLS 3810 NC
i ~ I PLS 20470 5C 5915 Hlah Polnt Road PO Box 7267 13532 Old Statesville Road
~ _IRS cT. Scott Borrow PE 22612 NC Greensboro, NC 27417 Huntersville, NC 28078
r ~6 PLS 4145 NC [phone] [phone]
[phone] FAX
CH700 42"C P [phone] FAX SURVEYED DRAWN CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO.
G GASLINE Norfolk & "-*44 '30 W qgg 71 JB JCA CT JCA 005644
Southern Railway SCALE DATE BOOK
Lic. No. 12/04/00
140' IRS DWG. NO. WETLANDS.DWG SHEET OF