19991307 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20090609

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: (A -q- 09
Date of Report: J (I Rq
Date of Field Review: Q- c1- o q
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site: near the intersection of Park Road and Tyvola Road
1. Office Review Information:
Project Number: 19991307
Project Name: Tyvola Park
County(ies): Mecklenburg
Basin & subbasin: Catawba
Nearest Stream: UT of Briar Creek
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: C
Mitigator Type: Private
DOT Status: non-DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 2 acres
Stream:
Buffer:
Nutr. Offset:
Event Date
1/21/1997
1/1/1999
2/3/2000

Approved mitigation plan available? Q No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site: "Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, repairs, etc.
- During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
- On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit.
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved
19991307-1 2 acres Wetland Creation
Evaluator's Name(s): [-Vi o
Report for Monitoring Year: % Evaluator's Name(s): {Ili Ati,I \-
Protect History
[Event
401 Issued
Report Receipt: Application
401 Issued
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
-r - - -
MITIGATION SUCCESS: ?
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
C)uA Ok plQn i Wi
c,pp.4, \b i?-?- ,rte- bOX) .? !A-c_ Loci
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2

Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 2 acres Wetland Creation Component ID: 19991307-1
Description: 1acre of wetlands & 1acre of surface waters (pond)
Location within project: (ui . 0J_L. ,: 1 r?ri C ?V.
III. Success Criteria Evaluation: Y"
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria: Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
sat/inun for at least 12.5% of GS during average climatic Inundated
onditio, ns; 5-12.5% of GS for upper landscape areas
to
a Saturated in upper 12 inches
oriinng
report indicates success Yes No
Monit Drift lines
?k Observational field data agrees? Yes No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches, excessive water, etc.):

SOILS - Approved Success Criteria: rr %c?- ht' I I CV\Ck,`'
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? Yes No
List indicators of hydric soils:
List any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria:
at least 320stms/ac survival; a minimum of 75% cover after 5
n yrs required for herb cover
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No
Average TPA for entire site (per report):
Observational field data agrees? Yes No
based on community composition? Yes No
based on TPA and/or % cover? Yes No
Vegetation planted on site? Yes No
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes No
Dominant Plant Species
Species Story TPA/'1o cover
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
I
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
na Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
- During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
- Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
- Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2