20040935 Ver 1_Complete File_20070831

DAVIS-MARTIN-POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING
6415 Old Plank Road, High Point, NC 27265
[phone] • Fax [phone] • www.dmp-inc.com
; 40 3
May 31, 2004
Re: Primax Properties, LLC
NC Hwy 109 / US Hwy 64 Area
Sewer System Improvements
DMP Job No. E-3492 (BF)
Ms. Andrea Wade WETLANDS /401 GROUP
Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120 JUN 0 9 2004
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Dear Ms. Wade: WATER QUALITY SECTION
In regards to the above referenced project, we are enclosing one (1) copy of the following:
• Executed Pre-Construction Notification form
• Project location map (derived from USGS map)
• Excerpts of applicable construction plan sheets
• Routine Wetland Determination forms
The proposed project will provide for public sewer service to the area of the NC Highway 109 / US
Highway 64 intersection. The project will include gravity sewer, forcemain and a wastewater pumping
station.
By copy of this letter, we are also transmitting a courtesy copy of the above information to Mr. John
Dorney, Division of Water Quality, for his review.
We trust this information is complete. and will allow you to complete your review and issue approval at
an early date. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact our
office.
Sincerely,
DAVIS-MARTIN-POWELL & ASSOC., INC.
q9-
Ben Palmer, PE
c: Mr. John Dorney, DWQ (enc)
Mr. Rob Neill, Primax Properties (enc)
File (enc)
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ NX40935
(If any particular item is not appucaoie to uns project, piease enter "Not i ppucame or NtA°.)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Primax Properties, L.L.C. c/o Mr. Rob Neill, Jr.
Mailing Address: 1115 East Morehead Street
Charlotte North Carolina 28204-2857
Telephone Number: 704-344-8200 Fax Number: 704-344-8288
E-mail Address: robneill(alnrimaxproperties.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: NC Hwy 109 / US Hwy 64 Area Sewer System Improvements
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Davidson Nearest Town: Thomasville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):
Project area is located at US Hwy 64 / NC Hwy 109 intersection and north along NC Hwy_
109 (toward Thomasville
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres):
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake):Brier Creek
8. River Basin: Yadkin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing land use varies - residential areas, unimproved
Road right-of-ways (Highway 109) and wooded areas
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavation for installation of gravity sewer and sewer forcemains by means of
track-mounted and rubber-tired excavators and loaders. Stream crossings will be stabilized
immediately upon crossing, and disturbed wetlands returned to original pre-construction
contours after installation of pipelines
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:
Construction/installation of gravity sewers, a wastewater pumping station and forcemain for
to provide sewer service to the Hwy 64/109 intersection
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
Page 7 of 12
Excavation of wetlands and streams necessary for pipeline installation. Impacts listed will be the
maximum permissible under the construction contract. All crossings to be stabilized/returned to
pre-construction grades immediately after construction.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
WA Excavation 0.011 No 500' f Herbaceous Wetland

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htti)://www.fema.go .
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.011 acres
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
leasespecify)
1 Excavation 10 Brier Creek 15 Perennial
2 Excavation 10 UT to Brier Creek 10 Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usas.eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tMozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 20 L.F.
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Page 8 of 12
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres)
(if Name applicable) Wate) Type of Waterbody ,
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: * Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Proposed construction corridor has been reviewed and adiusted in order to minimize impacts,
within en ngieering and cost constraints. Required stream crossings are proposed to be made as
near perpendicular as possible alignments have been shifted where possible to minimize wetland
impacts and where topogrghy, meanders and existing develpment permit
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/3ym/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify V
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* (s uare feet) Multiplier Mitig ton
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater collected and transported by the proposed project will be treated at the City of
Thomasville's Hamby Creek WWTP
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
5'
Applicant/Agent's S' ature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
DRAWING NAME: P: \P ROJECT\E3492\dwg\E3492- TOPO.dw - 8x11 May 18, 2004 - 1:46pm

- r
' -
? 11 ?
?

( ? •1?
on-
. ?_'i
.a as `,.*
\`./--= -?
,?
l i - '- r

f?
-J
tif
?)w
?

°-

1??' V.
% ''
• 6
1
(
ti fr
S
J5
`, 0

790 If:

?= WA
gill tiv?l?e = -
tat+oft ; ?: \a ? ?? 1 ?t 1 i (' ?•'Tcl
J i` -? 'l?' r J, \\ \ s?? \ ') 1' ao°1?'l`E'3 ` •?%_\?,\r?
-.7101

?
?
D !
,
- 7 .?
LEGEND
PROPOSED FORCEMAIN
??
? ? (1 ?' '' 'y`\ - ??\\ ? ?\ ?? ?''J PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER
,_ PROPOSED PUMP STATION

USGS QUAD
"
'
=2000
FAIRGROVE, 1987 SCALE: I
DAVIS-MARTIN-POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC PRIMAX PROPERTIES / CITY OF THOMASVILLE
ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - SURVEYING

6415 OLD PLANK ROAD
d
NC HWY 109 & US HWY 64 AREA
HIGH POINT, NC 27265
mp SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
[phone] FAX [phone] PROJECT LOCATION MAP
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Sanitary Sewer Easement (Thomasville) E-3492 Project No: Date: May 14, 2004
ApplI ant/Owner: Davis-Martin-Powell & Assoc. County: Davidson
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-9435 State: NC
Plot ID: DP-1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes VNo Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Field Location: Adjacent to Stream
If needed, ex lain on the reverse side
?rL fl T A Tlrf%TZ
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Festuca s p.
Fescue sp. Herb FACU

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 0%
(excluding FAC- FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks: The dominant vegetation is not hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other

® No Recorded Data

Field Observations

Depth of Surface Water: NA

Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12"

Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" Wetla
Pri

ec nd Hydrology Indicators
mary Indicators
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
ondary Indicators
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators are not present.
(Wetform) Pagel of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Sanitary Sewer Easement (Thomasville) E-3492 Project No: Date: May 14, 2004
Applicant/Owner: Davis-Martin-Powell & Assoc. County: Davidson
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-9435 State: NC
Plot ID: DP-1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Goldston very channery
Class: Well
i
G
E D
b
l
M
S
dric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
d H
M
nage
ra
o
n
ym
:
silt loam
ap appe
y
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Dystrochrepts Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ®Yes ? No
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
inches Horizon unsell Moist unsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture Concretions Structure etc.
0-12 2.5 Y 6/3 2.5 Y 5/4 30% Loam

Hydric S oil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
11 Gle ed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicators are not present.
WETLAND
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? HYes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? UYes 2SI
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No No
Hydric Soils Present? ?Yes ® No
Remarks: The three wetland criteria are not present. The sampling point is not located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Sanitary Sewer Easement (Thomasville) E-3492 Project No: Date: May 14, 2004
Applicant/Owner: Davis-Martin-Powell & Assoc. County: Davidson
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-9435 State: NC
Plot ID: DP-2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location: Inside Wetaand (Below
If needed, ex lain on the reverse side Pond)
XrV 9-V rr A TTl1N
? a:ivaJ a n a av .
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common)
Stratum
Indicator
Plant Species (Latin/Common)
Stratum
Indicator
Eulalia viminea
Microste 'um ne al Herb FAC+
Onoclea sensibilis
Sensitive Fern Herb FACW
Sambucus canadensis
Common elder Tree/Sap FACW-

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 100%
(excluding FAC- FAC Neutral:
Numeric Index:
Remarks: The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetla nd Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge Pri mary Indicators
Aerial Photographs Inundated
Other Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
® No Recorded Data Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Sec ondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water: NA Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 4" Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 1" Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2
. DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Sanitary Sewer Easement (Thomasville) E-3492 Project No: Date: May 14, 2004
Applicant/Owner: Davis-Martin-Powell & Assoc. County: Davidson
Investigators: ECS, Ltd. G-9435 State: NC
Plot ID: DP-2
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Goldston very channery
silt loam Map Symbol: GnE Drainage Class: Well Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ® No
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Dystrochrepts Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ?Yes ® No
Profile Description
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Color Mottle
inches Horizon unsell Moist unsell Moist Abundance/Contrast Texture Concretions, Structure etc.
04 2.5 Y 5/3 Loam
4-12" 2.5 Y 5/2 Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol ? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
® Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gle ed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Hydric soil indicators are present.
WL1LA )
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YeNo Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? 2SIYes LJ
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?Ye:HNo, No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes ? No
Remarks: The three wetland criteria are present. The sampling point is located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2
DRAWIN NAME: P \PROJECT\E.3492\dwg\E 3492--COE-EXHIBIT. dwg - 8xl May 31, 2004 - 11: i

WETLAND
AREA 4 WA

DA%2\

PROPOSED 8" / /
B
O
GRAVITY SEWER i <
O
_

?
I

/ - 11+00
12+00

MHI#2
20' UTILITY A
EASEMENT / SCALE:
PROP. ANTI P)P
1 =40
1
SEEP COLLAR \

MH #2
STA. 10+00
TOP 762.40
INV IN 751.55
760

305.64 LF DIP @ 0.507o
SCALE:
1"=40' H
750
1 "= 4' V
10+00 11+00 12+00
DAVIS-MARTIN-POWELL a ASSOCIATES, INC PRIMAX PROPERTIES, LLC
- ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - SURVEYING NC 109 / US 64 AREA SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
dmp 6415 ODD PLANK ROAD
HIGH POINT, NC 27265
PROPOSED WETLAND
IMPACT
[phone] FAX [phone] SITE WA
DRAWING NAME: P: \PROJECT\E 3492\dwg\E 3492-COE-EXHIBIT.dwg - 8x11 May 31, 2004 - 11: 05am
NC HIGHWAY 109

650= - PROPOSED
6" FORCEMAIN

52+00 v_ 53?C?0 \ 54+00 ?k

?s
- -R/W- R/W L_x

DP-I_
RIP-RAP SCALE:
CHANNEL 1 40'
STABILIZATION
650
RIP-RAP
CHANNEL
?-- STABILIZATION
LPROPOSED
6" FORCEMAIN
640
"
L
PROP. 6
DIP
FORCEMAIN
SCALE:
1 40' H
14' V
52+00 53+00 54+00
DAVIS-MARTIN-POWELL 5 ASSOCIATES, INC PRI MAX PROPERTIES, LLC
ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - SURVEYING NC 109 / US 64 AREA SEWER IMPROV EMENTS
6415 Oro PLANK ROAD
d
HIGH POINT, NC 27265
mp PROPOSED STREAM IMPACTS
[phone] FAX [phone] SITE I
DRAWING NAME: P: \PROJECT\E3492\dwg\E3492-COE-EXHIBIT dwg - 8x11 May 31, 2004 - 11 05am
NC H IGHWAY 109
PROPOSED
6" FORCEMAIN ?' I r

'655___ 1 I 1 .1 i

62+00 ??" / I
Il 1' , o
/ I
a'

63+Op ,
CD Qo

1
R/w
-
=
?
1
1
RIP-RAP 1
SCALE:
- I
CHANNEL 1 "=40'
_
STABILIZATION
RIP-RAP
CHANNEL
STABILIZATION

PROP SED
6" F RCEMAIN
650

L "
PROP 6 DIP
FORC MAIN SCALE:
1"=40' H
640
1"= 4' V
62+00 63+00 64+00
DAVIS-MARTIN-POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC PRIMAX PROPERTIES, LLC
ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - SURVEYING NC 109 / US 64 AREA SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
6415 OLD PLANK ROAD
d
HIGH POINT. NC 27265
mp PROPOSED STREAM IMPACTS
[phone] FAX [phone] SITE 2