HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0001422_LVSuttonSARP_Rev0_AppendixE_20161201Appendix E
Aquifer Pumping Test Memo
50 South Belcher Rd
Suite 116
Clearwater, Florida 33765
813-792-4820
www.geosyntec.com
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: 19 May 2015
To: Matt Gozdor
Geosyntec Consultants
From: Michael Callahan and Matthew Wissler, P.G.
Geosyntec Consultants
RE: DRAFT Summary of Duke Sutton Aquifer Performance Test
At the request of Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (DEP), Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec)
provided multidisciplinary environmental and geotechnical services for developing design plans
for Onsite Landfill and CCR Basin Final Closure at the L.V. Sutton site (Sutton). As part of
these multidisciplinary environmental and geotechnical services, a hydrogeologic
characterization was conducted within the 1971 Ash Basin. This characterization consisted of a
46-hour constant-rate pumping test and the associated background and recovery monitoring, as
well as, additional slug tests within the 1971 Ash Basin. The methods and results are provided in
the following sections.
Methods
Four observation wells (PT-1, PT-2, PT-3, and PT-4) were used to monitor the response in the
surficial aquifer during the pumping test within the 1971 Ash Basin (Figure 1). Observation
wells were constructed of two inch diameter schedule 40 poly-vinyl chloride (PVC), additional
well construction details and boring logs can be found in Appendix A. Observation wells PT-1
and PT-2 were located approximately 5 and 11 ft south of the pumping well EW-1, and
observation wells PT-3 and PT-4 were located approximately 4 and 10 ft east of pumping well
EW-1. Observation wells PT-1 and PT-2 were both screened at a depth of 25 to 40 ft below
ground surface (bgs), corresponding to the upper sand unit of the surficial aquifer. Observation
wells PT-3 and PT-4 were both screened at a depth of 59 to 69 ft bgs, corresponding to the lower
sand unit of the surficial aquifer. The observation wells and the pumping well were outfitted with
stand-alone pressure transducers (In -Situ, Level Troll 700 Data Loggers®). Additionally, water-
DRAFT Summary of Duke Sutton Aquifer Performance Test
19 May 2015
Page 2 of 4
level measurements were collected manually to evaluate data set integrity. Water quality
parameters including field parameters (pH, conductivity, oxidation-reduction potential [ORP],
dissolved oxygen, and temperature) were also monitored during the test. Monitoring wells MW-
1A and PZ-105, located to the east (MW-1A) and southwest (PZ-105) of pumping well EW-1,
were used as background monitoring wells during the pumping test (Figure 1). The reasoning
for the background well selection was to determine potential background effects from the canal
(PZ-105) and to the higher ground elevations to the east of the testing area (MW-1A).
The pumping test period lasted a total of approximately 10 days including background
monitoring, the constant-rate test, and recovery. The background portion of the test started at
1500 13 March 2015 and ended with the initiation of the extraction phase of the constant-rate test
at 1900 18 March 2015. The extraction phase of the constant-rate test lasted until 1630 20 March
2015. Recovery was monitored in the observation wells until 1400 23 March 2015. Water level
data from pumping and recovery phases for the observation wells was analyzed in
HydroSOLVE’s (V 4.50) AQTESOLV using the Moench (1997) and Neuman (1974) methods.
In addition to the constant-rate pumping test, slug tests were conducted to estimate the in-situ
saturated hydraulic conductivity within the 1971 Ash Basin. Pneumatic slug tests were performed
on the four observation wells (PT-1, PT-2, PT-3, and PT-4) and one of the background
monitoring wells (MW-1B) (Figure 1). Several trials were conducted at each of the wells and the
results of the slug tests were analyzed in HydroSOLVE’s (V 4.50) AQTESOLV using the
Hvorslev (1951) and Bouwer-Rice (1976) methods. Since the water table elevation was
consistently above the top of the well screen elevation during the duration of these tests, the
Hvorslev (1951) method was considered to be a suitable analysis in addition to the Bouwer-Rice
(1976) method (Batu, 1998).
Results
A summary of the pumping test results are included as Table 1. Manual water levels measured
during the pumping test are summarized and presented in Table 2. In most instances, manual
water levels correlated with water level measured from the pressure transducers. However,
inadequate clearance due to pump drop pipe and electrical leads within the well casing at EW-1
prevented accurate manual water level measurements from being conducted at the pumping well.
The data collected from manual measurements and from pressure transducers at each well were
inspected to identify any data drift which may have occurred during the pumping test. Review of
the data indicated the data drift was less than 0.1 feet and therefore was considered adequate for
analysis without drift correction (Appendix B). The results of the water quality monitoring are
DRAFT Summary of Duke Sutton Aquifer Performance Test
19 May 2015
Page 3 of 4
presented as Table 3. Little change was documented among the water quality parameters. Small
increases in conductivity, pH, and temperature were recorded near the end of the pumping test.
Curve matches were developed using both professional judgment and automatic matching
techniques. Numerical solver results are provided in Appendix C. Water level data was
analyzed from both the pumping phase and recovery phase of the pumping test. In general,
hydraulic conductivity values derived from the pumping phase were lower than values derived
from the recovery phase. The geometric mean of hydraulic conductivity for the pumping phase
data was 266.5 feet per day (ft/day), compared to 431 ft/day for the recovery phase data. The
overall geometric mean of the hydraulic conductivity was 339.2 ft/day and ranged from 220.2 to
613.8 ft/day. Transmissivity values ranged from 1.06 x 104 to 2.95 x 104 feet squared per day
(ft2/day).
A summary of the slug-test results are included as Table 4 and numeric solver results are
included in Appendix D. The geometric mean hydraulic conductivity was 67.9 feet per day
(ft/day). Hydraulic conductivity values ranged from 22.5 to 189.6 ft/day. As is typically when
comparing hydraulic conductivities between slug-test and pumping test data, an order of
magnitude difference between the two values was observed (Butler and Healey, 1998). Typically,
hydraulic conductivities derived from slug tests are lower and less representative than the larger
scale and longer duration pumping tests. Slug tests usually have much smaller volumes of water
being displaced and reflect the hydraulic conductivity of a small volume of the ground near the
well (Schwartz and Zhang, 2003).
DRAFT Summary of Duke Sutton Aquifer Performance Test
19 May 2015
Page 4 of 4
References
Batu, V. 1998. Aquifer Hydraulics: A Comprehensive Guide to Hydrogeologic Data Analysis.
New York: Wiley.
Bouwer, H. and R.C. Rice, 1976. A Slug Test Method for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity
of Unconfined Aquifers with Completely or Partially Penetrating Wells. Water Resources
Research. 12(3): 423-428.
Butler, J.J. and J.M. Healey, 1998. Relationship Between Pumping-Test and Slug-Test
Parameters: Scale Effect or Artifact? Ground Water. 36(2): 305-313.
Hvorslev, M.J., 1951. Time Lag and Soil Permeability in Groundwater Observations. U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Bulletin 36, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 50p.
Moench, A.F., 1997. Flow to a Well of Finite Diameter in a Homogeneous, Anisotropic Water
Table Aquifer. Water Resources Research. 33(6): 1397-1407.
Neuman, S.P., 1974. Effect of Partial Penetration on Flow in Unconfined Aquifers Considering
Delayed Gravity Response. Water Resources Research. 10(2): 303-312.
Schwartz, F.W. and H. Zhang, 2003. Fundamentals of Ground Water. New York: John Wiley
and Sons, Inc.
* * * * * *
Attachments
TABLES
TABLE 1: Pumping Test Inputs and Results
EW-1
Well Diameter (in)4
Screen interval (ft bgs)23.7-48.7
Well Depth (ft bgs)48.7
Screen Length (ft) [AQTESOLV "L"]25
Confined or Unconfined Aquifer unconfined
Ground Surface Elevation (ft)NA
TOC Elevation (ft NGVD 29)GS + 3.12
Selected Well Configuration [1]Partial Penetrating
X Coordinates (relative to pumping well)(ft)0.00
Y Coordinates (relative to pumping well)(ft)0.00
Pre-test Depth-to-groundwater (ft)24.84
Pre-test water column height (ft) [AQTESOLV H]26.98
Water level above top of well screen [AQTESOLV d]1.98
Inside Radius of Well Casing (ft) [AQTESOLV r(c)]0.167
Radius of Well (ft) [AQTESOLV r(w)]0.333
Well Skin Radius (ft) [AQTESOLV r(sk)]0.333
Formation Saturated Thickness (ft) [AQTESOLV b]46.35
Vertical-to-Horizontal hydraulic conductivity anisotropy ratio
[AQTESOLV Kv/Kh]0.1
Test Phase (Pumping or Recovery)NA Pumping Recovery Pumping Recovery Pumping Recovery Pumping Recovery
Transmissivity (T) (ft2/day)NA 1.58E+04 2.18E+04 1.69E+04 1.69E+04 1.06E+04 1.46E+04 1.08E+04 1.92E+04
Storage (S) (unitless)NA 9.76E-07 2.73E-02 2.53E-06 4.21E-03 9.76E-07 6.43E-02 3.38E-06 0.006676
Specific Yield (Sy) (unitless)NA 0.002 0.000 0.001 0.010 0.271 2.766 0.044 0.1183
Calculated Hydraulic Conductivity (K) (ft/day)NA 341.3 470.2 363.9 365.2 220.2 304.3 226.1 401.8
Test Phase (Pumping or Recovery)NA Pumping Recovery Pumping Recovery Pumping Recovery Pumping Recovery
Transmissivity (T) (ft2/day)NA 1.17E+04 2.40E+04 1.50E+04 1.83E+04 1.06E+04 2.95E+04 1.09E+04 2.19E+04
Storage (S) (unitless)NA 3.85E-04 1.98E-02 1.95E-04 5.90E-03 2.34E-03 1.20E-04 3.55E-04 5.28E-05
Specific Yield (Sy) (unitless)NA 0.020 0.002 0.004 0.029 0.341 0.001 0.055 0.001
Calculated Hydraulic Conductivity (K) (ft/day)NA 253.0 517.3 323.5 395.2 220.0 613.8 228.2 457.9
Hydraulic Conductivity Summary ft/day
Moench (1997) Geomean:326.7
Neuman (1974) Geomean:352.1
Overall Geomean:339.2
Specific Yield Summary Unitless
Moench (1997) Geomean:0.02
Neuman (1974) Geomean:0.01
Overall Geomean:0.01
Note(s):
in = inches
ft = feet
BGS = below ground surface
TOC = top of casing
NGVD = National Geodetic Vertical Datum
GS = ground surface
ft2/day = feet squared per day
ft/day = feet per day
cm/sec = centimeters per second
0.1
PT-3 PT-4
47.95
37.81
0.083
0.250
0.250
47.81
NA
GS + 2.98 ft
Partial Penetrating
9.66
0.00
24.67
0.1
10
2
59.5-69.5
69.5
10
48.01
0.167
46.30
0.1
unconfined
48.17
38.01
0.083
0.250
unconfined
NA
GS + 2.96 ft
Partial Penetrating
3.97
0.00
24.6524.81
18.61
3.61
0.083
0.250
NA
GS + 3.12 ft
Partial Penetrating
0.00
-11.56
1.20E-01
24.73
19.19
4.09
0.083
0.167
0.167
46.32
0.1
cm/sec
1.15E-01
1.24E-01
Constant Rate Pumping Test Analysis
PT-1
2
25.8-40.8
40.8
PT-2
2
25.3-40.3
40.3
2
59.7-69.7
69.7
We
l
l
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Un
c
o
n
f
i
n
e
d
A
n
a
l
y
s
e
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
Ne
u
m
a
n
(
1
9
7
4
)
Mo
e
n
c
h
(
1
9
9
7
)
-5.31
15
unconfined
NA
GS + 3.02 ft
Partial Penetrating
0.00
0.167
15
unconfined
TABLE 2: Summary of the Manual Water Level Measurements Recorded During the APT
Date/Time EW-1 PT-1 PT-2 PT-3 PT-4 MW-1A MW-1B MW-18 PZ-105
3/18/2015 18:55 --24.47 24.59 24.40 24.40 --------
3/18/2015 19:05 --24.93 24.93 24.51 24.51 --------
3/18/2015 19:10 --24.97 24.96 24.52 24.53 --------
3/18/2015 19:15 --25.01 24.99 24.53 24.53 --------
3/18/2015 19:30 --25.01 24.97 24.53 24.53 --------
3/18/2015 19:45 --25.03 25.01 24.55 24.54 --------
3/18/2015 20:00 --25.05 25.02 24.56 24.55 10.03 10.12 10.60 --
3/18/2015 20:30 --25.06 25.05 24.58 24.58 --------
3/18/2015 21:08 --25.09 25.08 24.60 24.60 --------
3/18/2015 21:30 --25.11 25.10 24.60 24.60 --------
3/18/2015 22:00 --25.12 25.11 24.60 24.60 10.08 10.12 10.61 --
3/18/2015 23:00 --25.14 25.13 24.61 24.61 --------
3/19/2015 0:00 --25.15 25.13 24.64 24.63 10.07 10.13 10.61 --
3/19/2015 1:00 --25.17 25.16 24.64 24.64 --------
3/19/2015 2:00 --25.18 25.18 24.65 24.65 10.08 10.14 10.62 --
3/19/2015 3:00 --25.20 25.18 24.66 24.67 --------
3/19/2015 4:00 --25.22 25.19 24.67 24.68 10.09 10.15 10.63 --
3/19/2015 5:00 --25.22 25.21 24.67 24.69 --------
3/19/2015 6:00 --25.24 25.22 24.69 24.70 10.09 10.16 10.63 --
3/19/2015 7:00 --25.25 25.24 24.69 24.70 --------
3/19/2015 8:00 --25.26 25.23 24.72 24.71 10.10 10.16 10.63 --
3/19/2015 9:00 --25.27 25.25 24.72 24.72 --------
3/19/2015 10:00 --25.28 25.27 24.73 24.72 10.10 10.17 10.63 --
3/19/2015 11:00 --25.29 25.25 24.75 24.73 --------
3/19/2015 12:00 --25.29 25.26 24.73 24.73 --------
3/19/2015 13:00 --25.30 25.28 24.75 24.74 10.10 10.19 10.65 --
3/19/2015 14:00 --25.30 25.28 24.75 24.76 10.12 10.18 10.64 --
3/19/2015 15:00 --25.31 25.28 24.76 24.75 --------
3/19/2015 16:00 --25.31 25.29 24.76 24.75 10.12 10.19 10.65 --
3/19/2015 17:00 --25.32 25.30 24.77 24.77 --------
3/19/2015 18:00 --25.32 25.31 24.78 24.78 10.12 10.19 10.65 --
3/19/2015 19:00 --25.33 25.31 24.78 24.78 --------
3/19/2015 20:00 --25.34 25.32 24.78 24.78 10.18 10.20 10.65 --
3/19/2015 21:00 30.98 25.34 25.32 24.77 24.78 --------
3/19/2015 22:00 34.00 25.35 25.32 24.78 24.80 10.18 10.27 10.74 18.33
3/19/2015 23:00 33.12 25.35 25.33 24.78 24.81 --------
3/20/2015 0:00 31.90 25.35 25.33 24.79 24.81 10.08 10.17 10.63 18.18
3/20/2015 1:00 32.90 25.35 25.33 24.80 24.80 --------
3/20/2015 2:00 32.80 25.37 25.34 24.81 24.81 10.08 10.17 10.63 18.19
3/20/2015 3:00 29.60 25.36 25.32 24.79 24.80 --------
3/20/2015 4:00 32.20 25.38 25.37 24.81 24.82 10.09 10.17 10.63 18.20
3/20/2015 5:00 32.85 25.37 25.35 24.82 24.82 --------
3/20/2015 6:00 33.50 25.38 25.35 24.81 24.82 10.08 10.17 10.63 18.19
Start Pumping at 3/18/2015 19:00:25
DTW (ft BTOC)
TABLE 2: Summary of the Manual Water Level Measurements Recorded During the APT
Date/Time EW-1 PT-1 PT-2 PT-3 PT-4 MW-1A MW-1B MW-18 PZ-105
DTW (ft BTOC)
3/20/2015 7:00 33.65 25.38 25.37 24.82 24.82 --------
3/20/2015 8:00 33.95 25.38 25.36 24.84 24.82 10.09 10.17 10.63 18.20
3/20/2015 9:00 33.62 25.40 25.36 24.86 24.84 --------
3/20/2015 10:00 33.61 25.39 25.37 24.85 24.83 --------
3/20/2015 11:00 33.10 25.40 25.38 24.85 24.84 10.10 10.18 10.64 18.19
3/20/2015 12:00 33.15 25.40 25.38 24.85 24.83 --------
3/20/2015 13:00 34.20 25.40 25.38 24.85 24.83 10.11 10.18 10.64 18.19
3/20/2015 14:00 33.75 25.40 25.38 24.85 24.85 --------
3/20/2015 15:00 33.65 25.41 25.39 24.85 24.85 10.11 10.20 10.64 18.19
3/20/2015 16:00 34.30 25.41 25.39 24.84 24.83 --------
Note(s):
DTW = depth to water
ft = feet
BTOC = below top of casing
Stop Pumping at 3/20/2015 16:34:06
TABLE 3: Water Quality Parameters
Date/time pH Conductivity (µs/cm)ORP (mV)DO (mg/L)Temperature (°C)
3/18/2015 20:00 7.13 875 -347.0 2.14 21.5
3/18/2015 21:08 7.13 864 -338.0 2.47 21.3
3/18/2015 22:00 7.16 871 -205.7 3.06 21.2
3/18/2015 23:00 7.13 863 -212.3 3.30 21.3
3/19/2015 0:00 7.15 863 -197.0 3.20 21.2
3/19/2015 1:00 7.15 868 -188.0 3.30 21.4
3/19/2015 2:00 7.13 870 -183.0 3.50 21.6
3/19/2015 3:00 7.14 859 -187.9 2.76 21.4
3/19/2015 4:00 7.14 864 -184.0 3.10 21.3
3/19/2015 5:00 7.15 867 -183.1 3.18 21.3
3/19/2015 6:00 7.16 863 -184.0 2.58 20.9
3/19/2015 7:00 7.17 867 -180.8 3.08 21.1
3/19/2015 8:00 7.14 868 -183.0 2.96 21.6
3/19/2015 9:00 7.14 868 -174.0 2.41 21.2
3/19/2015 10:00 7.13 866 -168.0 2.70 21.5
3/19/2015 11:00 7.36 869 -185.0 3.73 21.5
3/19/2015 12:00 7.19 861 -140.0 3.16 21.8
3/19/2015 13:00 7.16 866 -131.0 2.67 21.8
3/19/2015 14:00 7.21 868 -124.0 2.96 21.4
3/19/2015 15:00 7.20 868 -119.0 3.00 21.5
3/19/2015 16:00 7.12 865 -121.0 3.28 21.6
3/19/2015 17:00 7.14 860 -128.0 3.44 21.6
3/19/2015 18:00 7.19 865 -115.0 3.13 21.3
3/19/2015 19:00 7.15 859 -111.0 3.25 21.1
3/19/2015 20:00 7.10 866 -114.0 2.83 21.3
3/19/2015 21:00 7.18 861 -114.6 3.08 20.6
3/19/2015 22:00 7.14 862 -130.1 2.61 20.1
3/19/2015 23:00 7.19 858 -139.5 3.90 20.2
3/20/2015 0:00 7.17 860 -141.1 3.22 20.9
3/20/2015 1:00 7.17 859 -147.4 2.75 21.1
3/20/2015 2:00 7.17 857 -153.5 3.58 21.1
3/20/2015 3:00 7.19 851 -162.2 3.34 21.1
3/20/2015 4:00 7.16 856 -145.0 3.61 21.4
3/20/2015 5:00 7.18 854 -183.8 3.42 21.3
3/20/2015 6:00 7.17 852 -153.7 3.25 21.4
3/20/2015 7:00 7.18 795 -158.0 3.36 21.6
3/20/2015 8:00 ----------
3/20/2015 9:00 7.19 851 -109.0 5.10 20.4
3/20/2015 10:00 7.22 981 -115.0 2.80 21.4
3/20/2015 11:00 ----------
3/20/2015 12:00 7.29 987 -134.0 3.28 21.5
3/20/2015 13:00 7.32 942 -131.0 3.10 21.9
3/20/2015 14:00 7.36 981 -160.0 3.14 22.0
3/20/2015 15:00 7.30 967 -182.0 2.70 22.2
3/20/2015 16:00 7.42 980 -189.0 3.29 22.3
Note(s):
µs/cm = microsiemens per centimeter
ORP = oxidation-reduction potential
mV = millivolts
DO = dissolved oxygen
mg/L = milligrams per liter
TABLE 4: Slug Testing Inputs and Results
Well Diameter (in)
Screen interval (ft bgs)
Well Depth (ft bgs)
Screen Length (ft) [AQTESOLV "L"]
Confined or Unconfined Aquifer
Ground Surface Elevation (ft)
TOC Elevation (ft NGVD 29)
Slug Test Trial #1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 4
Test Date
Pre-test Depth-to-groundwater (ft)10.25 10.25 10.25 24.73 24.73 24.73 24.73 24.81 24.81 24.81 24.81 24.81 24.65 24.65 24.65 24.67 24.67 24.67 24.67
Pre-test water column height (ft) [AQTESOLV H]17.75 17.75 17.75 19.29 19.29 19.29 19.29 18.61 18.61 18.61 18.61 18.61 48.01 48.01 48.01 47.81 47.81 47.81 47.81
Initial displacement (ft) [AQTESOLV H(0)]5.751 5.446 5.287 2.16 3.85 3.74 2.93 3.67 4.95 5.03 4.62 5.60 5.84 6.43 4.83 6.34 6.04 6.47 5.83
Water level above top of well screen [AQTESOLV d]12.75 12.75 12.75 4.09 4.09 4.09 4.09 3.61 3.61 3.61 3.61 3.61 38.01 38.01 38.01 37.81 37.81 37.81 37.81
Inside Radius of Well Casing (ft) [AQTESOLV r(c)]
Radius of Well (ft) [AQTESOLV r(w)]
Well Skin Radius (ft) [AQTESOLV r(sk)]
Formation Saturated Thickness (ft) [AQTESOLV b]61.75 61.75 61.75 46.32 46.32 46.32 46.32 46.30 46.30 46.30 46.30 46.30 46.35 46.35 46.35 46.36 46.36 46.36 46.36
Vertical-to-Horizontal hydraulic conductivity anisotropy ratio
[AQTESOLV Kv/Kh]
Hvorslev (1951)185.1 177.9 189.6 142.8 68.3 85.9 116.8 41.0 30.9 35.7 36.2 32.8 65.1 64.3 78.5 77.9 88.0 87.3 88.1
Bouwer-Rice (1976)149.8 188.0 153.4 104.3 49.8 62.7 85.3 29.8 22.5 26.0 26.3 23.9 55.4 54.8 66.8 66.4 74.9 74.3 75.0
(ft/day)(cm/sec)
Geomean of all analysis 67.9 2.40E-02
Note(s):
in = inches
ft = feet
BGS = below ground surface
TOC = top of casing
NGVD = National Geodetic Vertical Datum
GS = ground surface
ft/day = feet per day
cm/sec = centimeters per second
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
0.083 0.167 0.167 0.250
In
p
u
t
P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
3/25/2015 3/25/2015 3/25/2015 3/25/2015
0.083 0.167 0.167 0.250
0.083 0.083
0.250
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
unconfined unconfined
0.250
0.083 0.083
3/25/2015
NA
GS + 2.98 ft
0.083
10
27.0 41.0 40.3 69.7 69.5
5 15 15 10
2
22-27 25.8-40.8 25.3-40.3 59.7-69.7 59.5-69.5
We
l
l
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
2 2 2 2
NA NA NA
GS + 1 ft GS + 3.02 ft GS + 3.12 ft
NA
GS + 2.96 ft
unconfined unconfined unconfined
MW-1B PT-1 PT-2 PT-3 PT-4
FIGURES
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MW-1B
MW-18
PT-2
PT-1
PT-3 PT-4
3.97'
9.66'
5.31'
11.56'
EW-1
LIGHT-POLE GENERATOR
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE BASIN AND LANDFILL OUTLINE
APPROXIMATE COOLING POND OUTLINE
APPROXIMATE LAY OF LAND AREA (LOLA) OUTLINE
EXISTING MAJOR GROUND ELEVATION CONTOUR
GEOSYNTEC PUMP TEST LOCATION
EXISTING GEOSYNTEC PIEZOMETER
HISTORICAL MONITORING WELL
NOTES:
1. PT-1 AND PT-2 ARE LOCATED IN UPPER INTERVAL OF SAND UNIT.
2. PT-3 AND PT-4 ARE LOCATED IN LOWER INTERVAL OF SAND UNIT.
3. PZ-105 , MW-1A, MW-1B AND MW-18 ARE BACKGROUND MONITORING LOCATIONS.
N
COOLING
POND
1984
ASH BASIN
1984 ASH BASIN
(2006 INTERIOR CONTAINMENT AREA)
GREENFIELD
LANDFILL
AREA
1971
ASH BASIN
LOLA
CA
N
A
L
300'0
SCALE IN FEET
PROJECT NO:
FIGURE
L.V. SUTTON
PUMP TEST WITHIN 1971 BASIN
MAY 2015
1
PUMP TEST
LOCATION BLOWUP
APPROXIMATE
DISCHARGE
LINE TO DITCH
PZ-105
LEGEND
LIGHT-POLE GENERATOR
PUMPING WELL (EW-1)
OBSERVATION PIEZOMETER
FOR WELL PUMP TEST
PT-1
1
SCALE: 1"=5'
DETAIL
PUMP TEST CONFIGURATION-
N
1
-
5
APPENDIX A
Well Construction and Lithology Logs
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
1. Well Contractor Information:
Malcolm Coogan
Well Contractor Name
2540
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Mid -Atlantic Drilling Inc.
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable well permits (i.e. County, State,
Variance, Injection, etc)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
❑Agricultural
❑Municipal/Public
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Industrial/Commercial
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
❑Irrigation
Non -Water Supply Well:
OMonitoring
❑Recovery
Injection Well:
❑Aquifer Recharge
❑Groundwater Remediation
❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery
❑Salinity Barrier
❑Aquifer Test
❑Stormwater Drainage
❑Experimental Technology
❑Subsidence Control
❑Geothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Tracer
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return)
❑Other explain under #21 Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 03/12/2015 Well ID# PT-1
5a. Well Location:
Duke Energy Progress
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
801 Sutton Steam Plant Road, Wilmington, 28401
Physical Address, City, and Zip
New Hanover
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(ifwell field, one lat/long is sufficient)
34.29092 N 77.98623 W
6. Is (are) the we8(s): ❑Permanent or OTemporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or BNo
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under *21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
8. Number of wells constructed: 1
For multiple a jection or non -water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can
submit one form.
9. Total well depth below land surface: 40.8 (ft )
For multiple wells list all depths if d8erent (example- 3@200' and 2@100')
10. Static water level below top of casing: 24.69 (fL)
If water level is above casing, use "+"
11. Borehole diameter: 4 (in.)
12. Well construction method: Mud Rotary
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
For Internal Use ONLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION
ft.
ft.
ft
ft
15.OUTER CASING for multi -cased wells OR LINER if a licable
FROM
I TO
DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft.
t
fL
in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING eothermal
closed-10010)
FROM
TO
I DIAMETER I
THICKNESS
I MATERIAL
-3.1 fL
25.8 fL
2 i"' I
SCH40
PVC
ft
ft.
in.
17. SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOT SIZE
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
25.8 ft-
40.8 It-
2 r"'
0.01
SCH40
PVC
ft
ft.
in.
19. GROUT
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METMOD & AMOUNT
0 ft.
18 fL
CEM-Bentonil
Slurry through Tremie pipes
ft.
ft.
ft.
fL
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK if i licable
FROM
TO
MATERL4L
EMPLACEMENT MErMOD
22 fL
40.8 fL
#2 Sand
Pour
fL
ft.
20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets ifnecessary)
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION color, hardness, soil/mck type, grain aiz etc.
0 fL
14 fL
Ash
14 fL
40.8 fL
Tan/Gray Fine to Medium SAND
ft
ft.
fL
ft.
fL
ft
ft
fL
fL
fL
21. REMARKS
Bentonite seal from 18 to 22 feet
22. Certification:
3/30/2015
/46&fC.itifird W 11-Contra or Date
By signing this form, 1 hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Iniection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to the address in
24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 276"-1636
13a. Yield (gP m) Method of test: 24c. For Water Supply & Iniection Wells:
Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount: well construction to the county health department of the county where
constructed.
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources Revised August 2013
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
1. Well Contractor Information:
William M. Wiggins
Well Contractor Name
3470-A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Mid -Atlantic Drilling Inc.
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable well permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, Injection, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
❑Agricultural
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
❑Industrial/Commercial
Non -Water Supply Well:
❑Aquifer Recharge
❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery
❑Aquifer Test
❑Experimental Technology
❑Geothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Geothennal (Heating/Cooling
❑Municipal/Public
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
❑Groundwater Remediation
❑Salinity Barrier
❑Stormwater Drainage
❑Subsidence Control
❑Tracer
❑Other (explain under 421
4. Date Wells) Completed: 03/11/2015`,lell ID# PT-2
5a. Well Location:
Duke Energy Progress
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
801 Sutton Steam Plant Road, Wilmington, 28401
Physical Address, City, and Zip
New Hanover
County
Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lab9ong is sufficient)
34.29090 N 77.98624 W
6. Is (are) the well(s): ❑Permanent or ❑Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or 0No
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under 921 remarks section or on the back of this form.
8. Number of wells constructed: 1
For multiple injection or non -water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can
submit one form.
9. Total well depth below land surface: 40.3 (ft)
For multiple wells list all depths ifdierent (erample- 3@200' and 2@1001
10. Static water level below top of casing: 24.79 (ft.)
If water level is above casing, use "+"
It. Borehole diameter: 4 (in.)
12. Well construction method: Mud Rotary
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
For Internal Use ONLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION
ft
ft.
ft
ft-
15. OUTER CASING for
mRlti�ase� wells OR LINER if a livable
FROM
TO
DIAMETER THICKNESS
MATFRiAt.
ft.
I ft
in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING eothermal
closed -loon)
FROM
TO
DIAMETER I
THICKNESS
I MATERIAL
-3.1 ft
25.3 ft
2 in
SCH40
PVC
ft.
ft.
in.
17.SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOT SIZE
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
25.3 ft
40.3 ft
2 in.
0.01
SCH40
PVC
ft
ft
in.
18. GROUT
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft
15 ft
CEM-Bentonil
Slurry through Tremie pipes
ft
ft
ft.
ft
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK if 81310liC2ble
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
22 ft
40.3 f"
#2 Sand
Pour
ft
ft
20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM
TO
DESCRDMON color, hardness, soiVmck type, grain sae, etc
0 &
14 ft
Ash
14 ft
40.3 ft
Tan/Gray Fine to Medium SAND
ft
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft
ft.
ft
ft
ft
ft
21. REMARKS
Bentonite seal from 15 to 22 feet
22. Certification:
Tn C?Dfj70 3/30/2015
Signa of ert fled Well Contractor I V Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance
with I5A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Infection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to the address in
24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1636
13a. Yield m 24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells:
(gP ) Method of test: Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount: well construction to the county health department of the county where
constructed.
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources Revised August 2013
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
For Internal Use ONLY:
1. Well Contractor Information:
William M. Wiggins
Well Contractor Name
3470-A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Mid -Atlantic Drilling Inc.
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable well permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, Injection, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Suppl}
❑Agricultural
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
❑Industrial/Commercial
Non -Water Supply Well:
❑Aquifer Recharge
❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery
❑Aquifer Test
❑Experimental Technology
❑Geothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Geothermal (Heatine/Coolin¢
❑Municipal/Public
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
❑Groundwater Remediation
❑Salinity Barrier
❑Stormwater Drainage
❑Subsidence Control
❑Tracer
❑Other (explain under #21 Remarks
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 03/9/2015 Well ID# PT-3
5a. Well Location:
Duke Energy Progress
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
801 Sutton Steam Plant Road, Wilmington, 28401
Physical Address, City, and Zip
New Hanover
County
Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one latAong is sufficient)
34.29092 N 77.98621 W
6. Is (are) the well(s): ❑Permanent or QTemporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or allo
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under fi21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
8. Number of wells constructed: 1
For multiple injection or non -water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can
submit one form.
9. Total well depth below land surface: 69.7 (ft.)
For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- 3@200' and 2@1001)
10. Static water level below top of casing: 24.60 (ft,)
If water level is above casing, use "+"
11. Borehole diameter: 6 (in.)
12. Well construction method: Mud Rotary
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
14. WATER ZONES
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION
ft.
ft.
ft
ft.
15.OUTER CASING for malti cased wells OR LINER if a ticable
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
ft
ft
in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING eothermal closed-loo
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS
I MATERIAL
-3 ft'
59.7 ft.
2 in.
SCH40
PVC
ft
ft
in.
17. SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOT SIZE
THICKNESS
MATERIAL
59.7 ft
69.7 ft'
2 in.
0.01
SCH40
PVC
ft
ft.
in.
]8. GROUT
FROM
I TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft.
53 fL
CEM-Bentonil
Slurry through Tremie pipes
ft
ft
ft
ft
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK if a licable
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
58 fL
69.7 ff•
#2 Sand
Pour
ft
ft.
20. DRILLING
LOG attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM
TO
DESCRIPTION color, hardness soil/rock in size, etc)
0 ft
13.7 ft.
Ash
13.7 fL
69.7 fL
Tan/Gray Fine to Medium SAND
ft
ft
&
ft.
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft.
21. REMARKS
Bentonite seal from 53 to 58 feet
22. Certification:
nAi.&,wi m /t/, - 3/30/2015
Signature of Certified Well Contractor 04 Date
By signing this form. I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Uuit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Iniection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to the address in
24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
13a. Yield (gp m) Method of test: 24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells:
Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount: well construction to the county health department of the county where
constructed.
Form GW-I North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources Revised August 2013
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
1. Well Contractor Information:
William M. Wiggins
Well Contractor Name
3470-A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Mid -Atlantic Drilling Inc.
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable well permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, Injection, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
❑Agricultural
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
❑ Industrial/Commerciat
Non -Water Supply
❑Aquifer Recharge
❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery
❑Aquifer Test
❑Experimental Technology
❑Geothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Geothermal (Heatine/Coolin¢
❑Municipal/Public
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
❑Groundwater Remediation
❑Salinity Barrier
❑Stormwater Drainage
❑Subsidence Control
❑Tracer
❑Other (explain under #21 1
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 03/11/2015 Weil ID# PT-4
5a. Well Location:
Duke Energy Progress
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (ifapplicable)
801 Sutton Steam Plant Road, Wilmington, 28401
Physical Address, City, and Zip
New Hanover
County
Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees
(ifwell field, one IaUlong is sufficient)
34.29092 N 77.98620
6. Is (are) the well(s): ❑Permanent or ❑Temporary
W
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or ElNo
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under r21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
8. Number of wells constructed: 1
For multiple injection or non -water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can
submit one form.
9. Total well depth below land surface: 69.5 (ft.)
For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- 3@200' and 2@1001
10. Static water level below top of casing: 24.62 (ft.)
If water level is above casing, use "_
I1. Borehole diameter: 6 (in.)
Mud Rot
For Internal Use ONLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO I DESCRIPTION
ft. ft.
ft. ft
15. OUTER CASING for multi cased wells OR LINER if a ticable
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING eothermal closed -too
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
-3 ft 59.5 ft 2 in.SCH40 PVC
ft ft in.
17. SCREEN
FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATERIAL
59.5 ft 69.5 ft 2 in. 0.01 SCH40 PVC
ft ft in.
19. GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METMOD & AMOUNT
0 ft 52 ft- CEM-Bentonil Slurry through Tremie pipes
ft ft
ft ft
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK if a ticable
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METMOD
57 ft 69.5 ft #2 Sand Pour
ft ft
20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM TO DESCRIPTION color, hardness, soil/mck type, zrain sae, etc.
0 ft 13.7 ft- Ash
13.7 ft 69.5 ft Tan/Gray Fine to Medium SAND
ft ft.
ft ft.
ft ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft
21. REMARKS
Bentonite seal from 52 to 57 feet
22. Certification:
9,kb 2L " eW&2o&Xm 3/30/2015
Signature of Certified Well Contractor# V Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Infection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to the address in
24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
12. Well construction method: ary construction to the following:
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1636
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: 24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells:
Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount: well construction to the county health department of the county where
constructed.
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources Revised August 2013
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
For Internal Use ONLY:
1. Well Contractor Information:
Malcolm Coogan
Well Contractor Name
2540
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Mid -Atlantic Drilling Inc.
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:
List all applicable wellpermits (i.e. County, State, Variance, Injection, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
❑Agricultural
❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
❑ IndustriaVCommerc ial
Non -Water Supply Well:
(OMonitoring
❑Aquifer Recharge
❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery
❑Aquifer Test
❑Experimental Technology
❑Geothermal (Closed Loop)
❑Municipal/Public
❑Residential Water Supply (single)
❑Residential Water Supply (shared)
❑Groundwater Remediation
❑Salinity Barrier
❑Stonnwater Drainage
❑Subsidence Control
[]Tracer
❑Other (explain trader #21
4. Date Well(s) Completed: 03/13/2015 Well ID# EW-1
5a. Well Location:
Duke Energy Progress
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
801 Sutton Steam Plant Road, Wilmington, 28401
Physical Address, City, and Zip
New Hanover
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(ifwell field, one lat/long is sufficient)
34.29093 N 77.98624 W
6. Is (are) the well(s): ❑Permanent or ❑Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or ElNo
If this is a repair, fell out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under 421 remarks section or on the back of this form.
8. Number of wells constructed: 1
For multiple injection or non -water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can
submit one form.
9. Total well depth below land surface: 48.7 00
For multiple wells list all depths i(diffenent (example- 3@200' and 2@1001
10. Static water level below top of casing: 24.8 (ft.)
Ifwater level is above casing, use "+"
11. Borehole diameter: 8 (in.)
12. Well construction method: Mud Rotary
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
14. WATER ZONES
FROM
TO
I DESCRIPTION
ft
ft
ft
ft
15. OUTER CASING for
multi -cased wells OR
LINER if a tieable
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft
ft
in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING eothermal closed-looul
FROM
TO
DIAMETER T
THICKNESS
I MATERIAL
-3.2 ft
23.7 ft
4 in.
SCH40
PVC
ft
ft
in.
17. SCREEN
FROM
TO
DIAMETER
SLOT SIZE
THICKNESS
MATF'.Riei
23.7 ft
48.7 ft
4 1D
0.01
SCH40
PVC
ft.
ft
in.
18. GROUT
FROM
TO
MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft'
15 ft
CEM-Bentonil
Slurry through Tremie pipes
ft
ft
ft
ft
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK
if applicable
FROM
TO
I MATERIAL
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
18.8 ft
48.7 ft
#2 Sand
Pour
ft
ft
20. DRILLING
LOG attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM
TO
DESCREMON color, hardness, soittmck in sae, ete.
0 ft
14 ft
Ash
14 ft
48.7 ft
Tan/Gray Fine to Medium SAND
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft.
ft
ft
ft
ft.
21. REMARKS
Bentonite seal from 15 to 18.8 feet
22. Certification:
��/" - //�"_ " 3/30/2015
Si tti a 46.1 Well Cont < ctor Date
8y signing this form, I hereby ceritfy, that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance
with 15.4 NCAC 02C .0100 or 1 SA NC,4C 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
copy of this record has been provided io the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Iniection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to the address in
24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1636
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: 24c. For Water Supply & Iniection Wells:
Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount: well construction to the county health department of the county where
consWcted.
Form GW-I North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources Revised August 2013
tlOF-TH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT Of NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUtliTY DEvaOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL.MANAGEMENT -GAOt.NlWATef SSCTIOH
P.O.SOX 27887 -AALElGH,H.c.27S11.PHONe (911l)733-6083
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
FOR OFFICE USE ONlV
Quad.No.~erlalNo.
Lat.long.
Minor Basin _
Basin Code _
Header Ent.GW-1 Ent._
DRILLING CONTRACTOR cz;p;e fl\.;,12...'/4-<;d'\'1'(.
DRILLER -REGISTRATION NUMBER 4:<:1=c..STATE WELL CONSTRUCTIONPERMITNUMBER:___
To 'I,'2.
1.WELL LOCATION:(Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town:\J.)\\V'{)\'D670f\
L.\}.SUrrQl,A By:',,-r
cRoad,Community,or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2 OWNER (w&()\.\J'\',~VOuJE!?P.L0.\-'''':'".I
ADORESS --------r;:;=~:':"i';=:_=_:;-::-,:------(Street or Aoute No,)
County:\~\".,)
Depth
From
Q
W\P>.'.(\O,\\\;:Q
ORILLING LOG
eFOrmatlOn Description=rp'~O\L
-----I.
Zip CodaStateCityorTown
3.DATE DRILl.ED I '2 -It.:et'J.USE OF WELL _
4.TOTAL DEPTH '2:7'CUTTiNGS COLLECTED 0 Yes 0 No
5.DOES WELL REPLACE eXISTING WELL?0 Yes Q:g NoI
6.STATIC WATER LEVEL:(Q FT.(J abo",TOP OF CASING.
I I ca below
TOP OF CASING IS FT.ABOVe !..AND SURFACE.
1.VIELD (gpm):b I \f~METHOD OF TEST _
.I
8.WATER ZONES (d~Plh):-----9-1------~------
If additional space Is needed use back of form.
w~il I 6
LOCAnON SKETCH
(Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads.
or other map reference points)
MElt."od
Amount _.J,rt+JJ.r:r~l1;.l..!1oc;:._
Wall Thickness
MaterialDepthIDiameterorW.I~tlFt.
To ZZ Ft.Zlf ~f'\JC
To Ft.,
To Fl ..
Depth I tJ~3terial
From _'.10<0:...-_To ''5 Ft.c..'etrP'..J\f/uwe _
From To'Ft.,_
From_O~_
From _
From _
11.GROUT;
9.CHLORINATION:Type _
10.CASING:
12.SCREEN:
Depth Diamltter Slot Size Material
From "J."'2...I To '27'Ft._Z,:.:<-J'_in.,QOJO In.S:,I-f 40
From To Fl.in.in._
MaterialSize
From To Ft.in.in._
13.GRAVEL PACK:*",
Depth
From To Ft._
From __-:--_To Ft.....,•
14.AE MA AKS;...::7"---1.'\\~~~;}L..l.l\Yu.~~~;U:'PsN:mq.bt......lf:;J'-\.J.o\.:.\JmllOrll.Lfj~-..::::1'o.Io!-.J,;,l!..O::llottt~·N'SL.U:.;u.E,,---.p~-lio.!:ii!¢l:1l!C·-J.li1Cb::-TI...1..U.lIce"~sc.~g.::.lt~o6O..!.:~_
r DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THiS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH IS NCAC 2C.WELL CONSTRUCTION
STAN:)ARDS •.~ND THAT A COpy OF THIS RECORD HAS,8~EN PROVIDED TO THE WELt.OWNER.
:",_,~:~.-
::.'.1.t:".h.':.,...1
SIO;·J"TURE OF CC~JT:::J.CTC'Fl OR ;GE'iT
:..'..~
Start using drilling mud at
begining of boring
Trace organic wood was
observed at 4.9 ft bgs
1-2-1
1-1-1
5-6-7
4-3-5
5-7-7
8-7-10
0.9
1.5
1.1
0.9
1.0
0.9
SILT (ML) (Ash); gray; wet; very loose
SILT (ML) (Ash); gray; wet; very loose
Top 0.5': SILTY SAND (SM) (Ash and Surficial
Aquifer); gray; wet; medium dense
Bottom 0.6': fine to medium grained SAND (SP)
(Surficial Aquifer); brown and gray; wet; medium
dense
Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
gray and tan; wet; loose
Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
tan and brown; wet; loose
Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
gray and tan; wet; medium dense
Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
gray and tan; wet; medium dense
Grout
Bentonite
seal
(Continued Next Page)
Well
Construction
BORING LOG
GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNICAL INFORMATION
BORING DATE:3/11/2015
PROJECT NAME:L.V. Sutton Final Closure Plan
PROJECT NO:GC5770
SITE LOCATION:Wilmington, North Carolina
GEOSYNTEC REPRESENTATIVE:Mustafa Erten
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Mid-Atlantic Drilling
DRILLER NAME:William Wiggins
BOREHOLE DIA:4"
RIG TYPE:CME 45C Track Rig (Serial # 273964)
SAMPLING METHOD:SPT with Split Spoon
DRILLING METHOD:Mud Rotary
NORTHING:198428 (Hand-held GPS)
EASTING:2306217 (Hand-held GPS)
BOREHOLE ID:PT-2 (within the 1971 Basin)
GROUND ELEVATION:33 ft (NAVD88) (Approximate)
All depths referenced to ground surface.
Total Depth: 40.3 ft bgs
Page 1 of 2
Geosyntec Consultants
1300 South Mint Street #410
Charlotte, NC 28203
El
e
v
.
(f
t
,
NA
V
D
8
8
)
30
25
20
15
10
5
De
p
t
h
(f
t
)
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
CommentsN-Value
10 20 30 400 50
SP
T
Bl
o
w
s
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
(
f
t
)
Pa
t
t
e
r
n
Lithologic Description
gravel was observed at 38.5
ft bgs
10-15-18
6-6-7
1.1
0.8
Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
gray and tan; wet; dense
Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
gray and tan; wet; medium dense
End of Boring at 40.3 feet bgs.
Filter
Pack
(Sand)
Screen
Well
Construction
BORING LOG
GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNICAL INFORMATION
BORING DATE:3/11/2015
PROJECT NAME:L.V. Sutton Final Closure Plan
PROJECT NO:GC5770
SITE LOCATION:Wilmington, North Carolina
GEOSYNTEC REPRESENTATIVE:Mustafa Erten
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Mid-Atlantic Drilling
DRILLER NAME:William Wiggins
BOREHOLE DIA:4"
RIG TYPE:CME 45C Track Rig (Serial # 273964)
SAMPLING METHOD:SPT with Split Spoon
DRILLING METHOD:Mud Rotary
NORTHING:198428 (Hand-held GPS)
EASTING:2306217 (Hand-held GPS)
BOREHOLE ID:PT-2 (within the 1971 Basin)
GROUND ELEVATION:33 ft (NAVD88) (Approximate)
All depths referenced to ground surface.
Total Depth: 40.3 ft bgs
Page 2 of 2
Geosyntec Consultants
1300 South Mint Street #410
Charlotte, NC 28203
El
e
v
.
(f
t
,
NA
V
D
8
8
)
0
-5
De
p
t
h
(f
t
)
-35
-40
CommentsN-Value
10 20 30 400 50
SP
T
Bl
o
w
s
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
(
f
t
)
Pa
t
t
e
r
n
Lithologic Description
Started using drilling mud
2-1-2
2-1-1
4-6-6
3-3-5
7-8-8
10-9-9
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
SILT (ML) (Ash); some gravel; black; wet; very loose
SILT (ML) (Ash); black to gray; wet; very loose
Top 0.2': SILT (ML) (Ash); gray; wet; medium dense
Bottom 0.8': fine to medium grained SAND (SP)
(Surficial Aquifer); black to tan; wet; medium dense
Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
tan; wet; loose
Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
tan; wet; medium dense
Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
tan; wet; medium dense
Grout
(Continued Next Page)
Well
Construction
BORING LOG
GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNICAL INFORMATION
BORING DATE:3/9/2015
PROJECT NAME:L.V. Sutton Final Closure Plan
PROJECT NO:GC5770
SITE LOCATION:Wilmington, North Carolina
GEOSYNTEC REPRESENTATIVE:Michael Martin
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Mid-Atlantic Drilling
DRILLER NAME:William Wiggins
BOREHOLE DIA:6"
RIG TYPE:CME 45C Track Rig (Serial # 273964)
SAMPLING METHOD:SPT with Split Spoon
DRILLING METHOD:Mud Rotary
NORTHING:198435 (Hand-held GPS)
EASTING:2306226 (Hand-held GPS)
BOREHOLE ID:PT-3 (within the 1971 Basin)
GROUND ELEVATION:33 ft (NAVD88) (Approximate)
All depths referenced to ground surface.
Total Depth: 70 ft bgs
Page 1 of 3
Geosyntec Consultants
1300 South Mint Street #410
Charlotte, NC 28203
El
e
v
.
(f
t
,
NA
V
D
8
8
)
30
25
20
15
10
5
De
p
t
h
(f
t
)
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
CommentsN-Value
10 20 30 400 50
SP
T
Bl
o
w
s
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
(
f
t
)
Pa
t
t
e
r
n
Lithologic Description
Grout between 41' and 53'
bgs may contain cave-in
native soils (predominantly
sand)
10-18-20
6-5-5
5-4-5
4-3-4
3-1-2
2-1-1
1-2-1
2-3-5
6-5-5
1.0
0.7
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.9
0.5
0.9
Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
gray tan; wet; dense
Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
gray tan; wet; loose
Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
tan orange; wet; loose
Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer);
tan gray; wet; loose
Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Possible Surficial
Aquifer); tan gray; wet; very loose
Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Possible Surficial
Aquifer); tan gray; wet; very loose
Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Possible Surficial
Aquifer); tan gray; wet; very loose
Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Possible Surficial
Aquifer); orange brown; wet; loose
Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Possible Surficial
Aquifer); orange; wet; loose
Bentonite
seal
(Continued Next Page)
Well
Construction
BORING LOG
GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNICAL INFORMATION
BORING DATE:3/9/2015
PROJECT NAME:L.V. Sutton Final Closure Plan
PROJECT NO:GC5770
SITE LOCATION:Wilmington, North Carolina
GEOSYNTEC REPRESENTATIVE:Michael Martin
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Mid-Atlantic Drilling
DRILLER NAME:William Wiggins
BOREHOLE DIA:6"
RIG TYPE:CME 45C Track Rig (Serial # 273964)
SAMPLING METHOD:SPT with Split Spoon
DRILLING METHOD:Mud Rotary
NORTHING:198435 (Hand-held GPS)
EASTING:2306226 (Hand-held GPS)
BOREHOLE ID:PT-3 (within the 1971 Basin)
GROUND ELEVATION:33 ft (NAVD88) (Approximate)
All depths referenced to ground surface.
Total Depth: 70 ft bgs
Page 2 of 3
Geosyntec Consultants
1300 South Mint Street #410
Charlotte, NC 28203
El
e
v
.
(f
t
,
NA
V
D
8
8
)
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
De
p
t
h
(f
t
)
-35
-40
-45
-50
-55
-60
CommentsN-Value
10 20 30 400 50
SP
T
Bl
o
w
s
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
(
f
t
)
Pa
t
t
e
r
n
Lithologic Description
7-9-10
4-6-7
0.8
1.0
Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Possible Surficial
Aquifer); orange gray; wet; medium dense
SILTY SAND (SM) (Peedee Aquifer); gray; wet;
medium dense
End of Boring at 70.0 feet bgs.
Filter
Pack
(Sand)
Screen
Well
Construction
BORING LOG
GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNICAL INFORMATION
BORING DATE:3/9/2015
PROJECT NAME:L.V. Sutton Final Closure Plan
PROJECT NO:GC5770
SITE LOCATION:Wilmington, North Carolina
GEOSYNTEC REPRESENTATIVE:Michael Martin
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Mid-Atlantic Drilling
DRILLER NAME:William Wiggins
BOREHOLE DIA:6"
RIG TYPE:CME 45C Track Rig (Serial # 273964)
SAMPLING METHOD:SPT with Split Spoon
DRILLING METHOD:Mud Rotary
NORTHING:198435 (Hand-held GPS)
EASTING:2306226 (Hand-held GPS)
BOREHOLE ID:PT-3 (within the 1971 Basin)
GROUND ELEVATION:33 ft (NAVD88) (Approximate)
All depths referenced to ground surface.
Total Depth: 70 ft bgs
Page 3 of 3
Geosyntec Consultants
1300 South Mint Street #410
Charlotte, NC 28203
El
e
v
.
(f
t
,
NA
V
D
8
8
)
-30
-35
De
p
t
h
(f
t
)
-65
-70
CommentsN-Value
10 20 30 400 50
SP
T
Bl
o
w
s
Re
c
o
v
e
r
y
(
f
t
)
Pa
t
t
e
r
n
Lithologic Description
APPENDIX B
Pumping and Recovery Phase Plots
Pumping Starts Pumping Ends
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
3/18/15 12:00 3/19/15 0:00 3/19/15 12:00 3/20/15 0:00 3/20/15 12:00 3/21/15 0:00 3/21/15 12:00 3/22/15 0:00
De
p
t
h
t
o
W
a
t
e
r
(F
e
e
t
B
e
l
o
w
T
o
p
o
f
C
a
s
i
n
g
)
Date and Time
EW-1 Drawdown and Recovery Data
Pressure Transducer Water Level
Pumping Starts Pumping Ends
10.6
10.8
11
11.2
11.4
11.6
11.8
12
3/18/15 12:00 3/19/15 0:00 3/19/15 12:00 3/20/15 0:00 3/20/15 12:00 3/21/15 0:00 3/21/15 12:00 3/22/15 0:00
De
p
t
h
t
o
W
a
t
e
r
(F
e
e
t
B
e
l
o
w
T
o
p
o
f
C
a
s
i
n
g
)
Date and Time
PT-1 Drawdown and Recovery Data
Pressure Transducer Water Level Manual Water Levels
Pumping Starts Pumping Ends
12
12.2
12.4
12.6
12.8
13
13.2
3/18/15 12:00 3/19/15 0:00 3/19/15 12:00 3/20/15 0:00 3/20/15 12:00 3/21/15 0:00 3/21/15 12:00 3/22/15 0:00
De
p
t
h
t
o
W
a
t
e
r
(F
e
e
t
B
e
l
o
w
T
o
p
o
f
C
a
s
i
n
g
)
Date and Time
PT-2 Drawdown and Recovery Data
Pressure Transducer Water Level Manual Water Level
Pumping Starts Pumping Ends
10.4
10.6
10.8
11
11.2
11.4
3/18/15 12:00 3/19/15 0:00 3/19/15 12:00 3/20/15 0:00 3/20/15 12:00 3/21/15 0:00 3/21/15 12:00 3/22/15 0:00
De
p
t
h
t
o
W
a
t
e
r
(F
e
e
t
B
e
l
o
w
T
o
p
o
f
C
a
s
i
n
g
)
Date and Time
PT-3 Drawdown and Recovery Data
Pressure Transducer Water Level Manual Water Level
Pumping Starts Pumping Ends
10.8
10.9
11
11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
11.5
3/18/15 12:00 3/19/15 0:00 3/19/15 12:00 3/20/15 0:00 3/20/15 12:00 3/21/15 0:00 3/21/15 12:00 3/22/15 0:00
De
p
t
h
t
o
W
a
t
e
r
(F
e
e
t
B
e
l
o
w
T
o
p
o
f
C
a
s
i
n
g
)
Date and Time
PT-4 Drawdown and Recovery Data
Pressure Transducer Water Level Manual Water Level
APPENDIX C
Pumping Test Solver Files
0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-1_Moench.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 08:13:39
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.362
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-1 0 -5.31
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench
T = 1.581E+4 ft2/day S = 9.755E-7
Sy = 0.001981 ß = 0.004757
Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft
r(c) = 0.167 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1
0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: C:\Users\mcallahan\Desktop\PT-1_Neuman.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 16:45:22
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-1 0 -5.31
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman
T = 1.172E+4 ft2/day S = 0.0003849
Sy = 0.01971 ß = 0.005726
0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: C:\Users\mcallahan\Desktop\PT-2_Moench.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 16:41:41
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1062
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-2 0 -11.56
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench
T = 1.685E+4 ft2/day S = 2.526E-6
Sy = 0.001364 ß = 0.006607
Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft
r(c) = 0.04195 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1
0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: C:\Users\mcallahan\Desktop\PT-2_Neuman.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 16:44:52
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-2 0 -11.56
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman
T = 1.498E+4 ft2/day S = 0.000195
Sy = 0.003761 ß = 0.005899
0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-3_Moench.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 08:17:21
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 48.01 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 14.13
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-3 3.97 0
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench
T = 1.057E+4 ft2/day S = 9.755E-7
Sy = 0.2712 ß = 0.09659
Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft
r(c) = 0.167 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1
0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: C:\Users\mcallahan\Desktop\PT-3_Neuman.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 16:44:22
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 48.01 ft
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-3 3.97 0
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman
T = 1.056E+4 ft2/day S = 0.002338
Sy = 0.3414 ß = 0.1034
0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-4_Moench.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 08:19:26
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 47.81 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 2.532
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-4 9.66 0
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench
T = 1.081E+4 ft2/day S = 3.382E-6
Sy = 0.04415 ß = 0.1034
Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft
r(c) = 0.167 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1
0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: C:\Users\mcallahan\Desktop\PT-4_Neuman.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 16:43:54
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 47.81 ft
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-4 9.66 0
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman
T = 1.091E+4 ft2/day S = 0.0003545
Sy = 0.05504 ß = 0.1117
0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-1_Moench_Recovery.aqt
Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:32:37
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.0007609
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-1 0 -5.31
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench
T = 2.178E+4 ft2/day S = 0.02734
Sy = 0.0004314 ß = 1.0E-5
Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft
r(c) = 0.167 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1
0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-1_Neuman_Recovery.aqt
Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:35:09
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-1 0 -5.31
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman
T = 2.396E+4 ft2/day S = 0.01975
Sy = 0.002104 ß = 1.246E-5
1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-2_Moench_Recovery.aqt
Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:34:51
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.8042
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-2 0 -11.56
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench
T = 1.691E+4 ft2/day S = 0.004212
Sy = 0.009895 ß = 0.05002
Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft
r(c) = 0.04195 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1
1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-2_Neuman_Recovery.aqt
Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:34:39
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-2 0 -11.56
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman
T = 1.83E+4 ft2/day S = 0.005901
Sy = 0.02921 ß = 0.006396
1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-3_Moench_Recovery.aqt
Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:34:23
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 48.01 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 27.82
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-3 3.97 0
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench
T = 1.461E+4 ft2/day S = 0.06431
Sy = 2.766 ß = 0.1902
Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft
r(c) = 0.167 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1
1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-3_Neuman_Recovery.aqt
Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:34:02
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 48.01 ft
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-3 3.97 0
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman
T = 2.947E+4 ft2/day S = 0.0001201
Sy = 0.001 ß = 0.0001584
1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-4_Moench_Recovery.aqt
Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:33:46
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 47.81 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 1.314
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-4 9.66 0
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench
T = 1.921E+4 ft2/day S = 0.006676
Sy = 0.1183 ß = 0.05365
Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft
r(c) = 0.167 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1
1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-4_Neuman_Recovery.aqt
Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:33:15
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: EW-1
Test Date: 3/18/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 47.81 ft
WELL DATA
Pumping Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
EW-1 0 0
Observation Wells
Well Name X (ft)Y (ft)
PT-4 9.66 0
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman
T = 2.189E+4 ft2/day S = 5.282E-5
Sy = 0.001 ß = 0.0003159
APPENDIX D
Slug Test Solver Files
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\MW-1B_1_BR.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:12:48
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: MW-1B
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 61.75 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.751 ft Static Water Column Height: 17.75 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 17.75 ft Screen Length: 5. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.083 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 149.8 ft/day y0 = 6.163 ft
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\MW-1B_1_H.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:15:33
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: MW-1B
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 61.75 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.751 ft Static Water Column Height: 17.75 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 17.75 ft Screen Length: 5. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.083 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 185.1 ft/day y0 = 6.162 ft
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\MW-1B_2_BR.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:17:08
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: MW-1B
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 12.75 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.446 ft Static Water Column Height: 17.75 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 51.5 ft Screen Length: 5. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.083 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 188. ft/day y0 = 5.462 ft
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\MW-1B_2_H.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:18:52
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: MW-1B
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 61.75 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.446 ft Static Water Column Height: 17.75 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 17.75 ft Screen Length: 5. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.083 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 177.9 ft/day y0 = 5.462 ft
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\MW-1B_3_BR.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:20:41
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: MW-1B
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 61.75 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.287 ft Static Water Column Height: 17.75 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 17.75 ft Screen Length: 5. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.083 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 153.4 ft/day y0 = 5.447 ft
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\MW-1B_3_H.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:22:30
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: MW-1B
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 61.75 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.287 ft Static Water Column Height: 17.75 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 17.75 ft Screen Length: 5. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.083 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 189.6 ft/day y0 = 5.446 ft
0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_1_BR.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:24:02
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-1
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 2.16 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 104.3 ft/day y0 = 2.152 ft
0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_1_H.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:25:38
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-1
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 2.16 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 142.8 ft/day y0 = 2.151 ft
0. 20. 40. 60. 80. 100.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_2_BR.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:27:24
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-1
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 3.85 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 49.84 ft/day y0 = 3.486 ft
0. 20. 40. 60. 80. 100.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_2_H.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:28:42
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-1
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 3.85 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 68.27 ft/day y0 = 3.486 ft
0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_3_BR.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:30:06
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-1
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 3.74 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 62.73 ft/day y0 = 3.794 ft
0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_3_H.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:31:21
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-1
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 3.74 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 85.93 ft/day y0 = 3.794 ft
0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_4_BR.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:33:07
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-1
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 2.93 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 85.26 ft/day y0 = 2.93 ft
0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_4_H.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:34:09
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-1
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 2.93 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 116.8 ft/day y0 = 2.929 ft
0. 6. 12. 18. 24. 30.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_1_BR.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:35:31
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-2
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 3.67 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 29.81 ft/day y0 = 3.587 ft
0. 6. 12. 18. 24. 30.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_1_H.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:36:50
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-2
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 3.67 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 40.96 ft/day y0 = 3.587 ft
0. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50.
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_2_BR.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:38:07
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-2
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 4.95 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 22.47 ft/day y0 = 5.337 ft
0. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50.
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_2_H.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:40:31
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-2
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 4.95 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 30.88 ft/day y0 = 5.337 ft
0. 8. 16. 24. 32. 40.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_3_BR.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:43:33
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-2
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.03 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 25.97 ft/day y0 = 5.158 ft
0. 8. 16. 24. 32. 40.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_3_H.aqt
Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:45:00
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-2
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.03 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 35.7 ft/day y0 = 5.158 ft
0. 6. 12. 18. 24. 30.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_4_BR.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:40:10
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-2
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 4.62 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 26.34 ft/day y0 = 4.667 ft
0. 6. 12. 18. 24. 30.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_4_H.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:41:36
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-2
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 4.62 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 36.2 ft/day y0 = 4.666 ft
0. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_5_BR.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:42:54
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-2
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.6 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 23.88 ft/day y0 = 5.829 ft
0. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_5_H.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:44:00
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-2
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.6 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 32.82 ft/day y0 = 5.829 ft
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-3_1_BR.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:45:16
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-3
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.84 ft Static Water Column Height: 48.01 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 48.01 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 55.44 ft/day y0 = 5.846 ft
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-3_1_H.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:46:18
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-3
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.84 ft Static Water Column Height: 48.01 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 48.01 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 65.07 ft/day y0 = 5.846 ft
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-3_2_BR.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:47:21
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-3
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 6.43 ft Static Water Column Height: 48.01 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 48.01 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 54.75 ft/day y0 = 6.855 ft
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-3_2_H.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:48:18
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-3
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 6.43 ft Static Water Column Height: 48.01 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 48.01 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 64.26 ft/day y0 = 6.855 ft
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-3_3_BR.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:49:15
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-3
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 4.83 ft Static Water Column Height: 48.01 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 48.01 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 66.84 ft/day y0 = 5.101 ft
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.001
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-3_3_H.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:50:45
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-3
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 4.83 ft Static Water Column Height: 48.01 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 48.01 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 78.45 ft/day y0 = 5.101 ft
0. 1.4 2.8 4.2 5.6 7.
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_1_BR.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:52:13
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-4
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 6.34 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 66.36 ft/day y0 = 6.817 ft
0. 1.4 2.8 4.2 5.6 7.
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_1_H.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:53:08
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-4
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 6.34 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 77.92 ft/day y0 = 6.817 ft
0. 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6.
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_2_BR.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:54:03
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-4
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 6.04 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 74.94 ft/day y0 = 6.367 ft
0. 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6.
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_2_H.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:54:58
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-4
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 6.04 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 88. ft/day y0 = 6.367 ft
0. 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6.
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_3_BR.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:56:05
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-4
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 6.47 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 74.34 ft/day y0 = 6.849 ft
0. 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6.
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_3_H.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:57:00
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-4
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 6.47 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 87.3 ft/day y0 = 6.849 ft
0. 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6.
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_4_BR.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:58:00
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-4
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.83 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 75.03 ft/day y0 = 6.609 ft
0. 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6.
0.01
0.1
1.
10.
Time (sec)
Di
s
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
f
t
)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_4_H.aqt
Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:58:53
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Geosyntec
Client: Duke Sutton
Location: SC
Test Well: PT-4
Test Date: 3/25/2015
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (New Well)
Initial Displacement: 5.83 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev
K = 88.09 ft/day y0 = 6.608 ft