19054 HD Supply EMP Final 20171004

1
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the
North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a project manager for the program.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments to their project manager prior to any site earthmoving or other
development related activities. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it must be completed,
reviewed by the program, and signed by all signers at the bottom. Consult your project
manager if you have questions.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Date: 10/2/2017

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: HD Supply

Brownfields Project Number: 19054-15-060

Brownfields Property Address: 1414 and 1422 South Tryon Street, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County

Brownfields Property Area (acres): approximately 3.5 acres

Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Not Applicable.

Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Not Applicable.

COMMUNICATIONS

Prospective Developer (PD): BMPI – ST1414 LLC
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone]…..Mobile:
Email: [e-mail]
Primary PD Contact: Matt Lucarelli
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile:
Email:
Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC (Attn: Nathan O’Leary)
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] …..Mobile:
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Carolyn Minnich
Office: [phone]
2
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
Email: [e-mail]

Other DENR Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste): No Applicable.

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM

Advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept minimum
notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:
On-site assessment or remedial activities: Within 10 days ☒
Construction or grading start: Within 10 days ☒
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: Within 48 hours ☒
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood, or soil erosion control
measures in area of contamination, venting of explosive environments):
Within 48 hours ☒
Installation of mitigation systems: Within 10 days ☒
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement
redevelopment activities: (as applicable): Within 30 days ☒

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☒ Residential ☐ Recreational ☐ Institutional ☐ Commercial ☒ Office ☒Retail ☐ Industrial
☒ Other specify: parking garage

2) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (attach conceptual or detailed plans as available):
a) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
b) Do plans include removal of building foundation slab(s) or pavement:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
c) Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement and other structures:
Redevelopment plans include demolition of the multi-use building (7,700-square ft) and
warehouse building (36,000 square ft) located at 1414 and 1422 South Tryon Street. The PD will
redevelop the subject site with two office buildings, a parking garage, and a multi-family
apartment residential strcture around three sides of the parking garage. The PD will be
constructing the buildings at one time. A copy of the current constructions plans for
redevelopment of the Brownfields property are included in Appendix A.

3
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
3) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement?
☒ Residential ☒ Non-residential or Industrial/Commercial

Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields
Agreement for comparison purposes.

4) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Phase I start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
10/9/2017
The Project Redevelopment schedule is currently being revised at the time of submission of this EMP.
The current schedule indicates that site prep and demolition activities will begin on October 9, 2017.
Construction is anticipated to complete in the first quarter of 2019. The construction schedule is
provided in Appendix A.

b) If applicable, Phase 2 start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each
phase): Not Applicable

c) Additional phases planned? If yes, specify activities if known:
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Not in the foreseeable future ☐Decision pending
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 10/1/2019

CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Contaminated Media (attach tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with
sample locations):
Part 1. Soil: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected

PART 1. SOIL – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list specific compounds): As noted in H&H’s Phase II
Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report dated July 10, 2015, both petroleum-related
compounds and chlorinated solvent compounds were detected in collected samples. 1,3,5-
4
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
trimethylbenzene and naphthalene were detected at concentrations above the Residential
Preliminary Soil Remediation Goal (PSRG) in SB-4, located in the northern portion of the former dry
cleaning area in the south central portion of the site. Additionally, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene was
detected above the Industrial and Residential PSRG in SB-4. Tetrachloroethene (PCE), 4-
isopropyltoluene, naphthalene, isopropylbenzene, n-butylbenzene, n-propylbenzene, sec-
butylbenzene, tert-butylbenzene, and trichloroethene (TCE) were detected at concentrations above
Protection of Groundwater PSRGs in the soil samples collected from SB-2 though SB-4 from the 0 to
2 ft below ground surface (bgs) interval. PCE was detected at a concentration above the Protection
of Groundwater PSRG in the soil sample collected SB-5 from a depth of 6 to 8 ft below ground
surface. A low concentration of 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene was detected in the sample adjacent to a
former heating oil UST, but at a concentration below the PSRGs. As such, there is no indication of
significant impacts associated with the former UST at the site. As noted in H&H’s Brownfields
Assessment Report dated June 19, 2017, H&H advanced five soil borings to evaluate the vertical and
horizontal extent of impacted soil associated with the former dry cleaner observed during Phase II
activites. Although low levels of VOCs were detected in several soil samples, none of the compound
concentrations exceeded Residential or Industrial/Commercial PSRGs. Compounds that were
detected include n-butylbenzene, sec-butylbenzene, tert-butylbenzene, chloroform, ethylbenzene,
isopropylbenzene, 4-isopropyltoluene, naphthalene, n-propylbenzene, PCE, TCE, 1,2,4-
trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, and xylenes. Among the compounds detected, 4-
isopropyltoluene, naphthalene, PCE, TCE, and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene were detected above the
Protection of Groundwater PSRGs. A grading plan is included in Appendix A and a Site Map with soil
sample locations is provided as Figure 2. Soil sample data from previous reports are summarized in
Table 1.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): Petroleum-related compounds were detected
above Residential and Industrial/Commercial PSRGs in a soil sample labeled SB-4 collected at 0-2 ft
bgs in the south central portion of the site. H&H further evaluated the horizontal and vertical extent
of impacts near SB-4 during Brownfield assessment activites. Detected compound concentrations
in soil samples collected from borings advanced during the Brownfields assessment activities were
below Residential PSRGs. As such, the extent of impacted soil appears to be limited to a small area
near SB-4 from ground surface to a depth of approximaltey 4 ft bgs.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
Approximately 153,000 square feet will be graded to level the Site and to implement positive
drainage flow across the Site into the proposed stormwater drainage system. Grading activities will
be conducted in accordance with a grading plan using grading equipment (i.e. backhoes, front end
loaders, bull dozers etc.) and the Site development contractor will implement best management
practices (i.e. implementation of silt fencing, berming, and covering stockpiled soil with plastic) to
manage soil on-site during redevelopment activities and mitigate the spread of soils onto adjacent
properties. Construction plans are included in Appendix A.
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): Grading activities will include excavations of up to 4 ft bgs in
portions of the Site along Winnifred Street and Winona Street to remove existing light poles and
storm drainage pipes. Approximately 4,000 square ft will be excavated to a depth of up to 4 ft for
installation of a storm water run-off basin in the western corner of the Site. Construction of building
footers, foundations and utility installations may require additional excavations of up to 3 to 5 ft
bgs. Construction plans are included in Appendix A.
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): Currently, it is
estimated that up to approximately 4,000 cubic yards of soil may be cut and removed from the site
during grading activities. Construction plans are included in Appendix A.
5
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
Based on the depth of-impacted soil identified in the area of SB-4 location and the determined
horizontal and vertical extent of contamination determined during Brownfield Assessment activities,
an approximately 190 cubic yards of impacted soil present in the vicinity of the proposed southern
office building. Grading activities proposed for this portion of the subject Site include surface
grubbing and light grading activities in areas where 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene,
and naphthalene have been detected above the Residential PSRGs in shallow soil. Soil in this area
will be marked clearly and with minimal excavation, portions of the impacted soil will be relocated
beneath the proposed southern office building so that the soil can be capped with an impervious
surface. H&H does not anticipate encountering or excavating other contaminated soils during Site
redevelopment except through an unexpected occurrence (i.e., discovery of an orphan UST).
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
Disposal of impacted soils at off-site locations is not anticipated at this time. Soil in the “Potential
Area of Soil Contamination” that will be disturbed during grading will be placed with in the
“Potential Area of Soil Contamination” and will be covered with impervious surfaces. If soil
disturbed in the “Potential Area of Soil Contamination” is moved outside that area, the location will
be documented, and the plat revised and re-recorded upon DEQ Brownfields review and approval.
If off-site impacted soil disposal is warranted, then it will be conducted in accordance with the
procedures identified below.
IMPORTED FILL SOIL

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported? It is not currently anticipated that
fill soil will be needed at the Site.
3) If yes, what is the depth of fill soil to be used at the property? It is not currently anticipated that
fill soil will be needed at the Site.
If a range of depths, please list the range.

4) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide plan to analyze fill soil to
demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards and can be considered clean for use at the
Brownfields property (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, lead,
selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated
according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver, thallium, and
zinc)
☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Click here to enter text.
☐ Known borrow material (DESCRIBE SOURCE AND ATTACH SAMPLING PROFILE):
The PD will use reputable landscaping firms and does not intend to collect samples of landscaping
materials prior to placement at the Site. DEQ will be notified of the volume of landscaping material
6
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
needed and the proposed source of the material prior to placement in proposed landscaping areas. If
import structural fill is needed for future redevelopment of the Site, the Prospective Developer will
source the fill from an approved quarrey. The following import quarries have been pre-approved by
DEQ and will not require additional sampling:
Martin Marietta Charlotte Quarry at 4551 Beatties Ford Road, Charlotte, NC 28216
Vulcan Materials Company at 10526 Old Nations Ford Road, Charlotte, NC 28273
If import material is to be brought to the site from a source other than those listed above, a sampling
plan including a summary of the historical use of the fill source property and sample analysis will be
provided to DEQ for review and approval based upon the estimated quantity of import fill to be
obtained from the fill source. The fill soil will not be transported to the subject Site until the sampling
plan is approved by DEQ. The soil sample(s) will likley be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals
plus hexavalent chromium. Fill soil will be considered suitable for use at the Site if it does not contain
compound concentrations above DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs or site-specific background levels for
metals.

MANAGING ONSITE SOIL

1) If soil in known or suspected areas of contamination is anticipated to be excavated from the
Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields Property,or otherwise disturbed during site
grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates
areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only preliminary data
available).

2) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the
North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35? ☐ Yes ☒ No

If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes generating the
waste( include pertinent analytical results as needed). Click here to enter text.

If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the North Carolina
Contained-In Policy? ☐ Yes ☐ No

NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE
CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED-IN POLICY THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR
HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

3) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?:
☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).

☐ Ignitability
☐ Corrosivity
☐ Reactivity
☐ Toxicity
☐ TCLP results
7
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous
constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard)

If no, explain rationale: Analytical results of the soil sample collected form SB-6 (which coincided with
the sample from SB-4 collected in 2015) did not indicate the presence of VOCs in the TCLP leachate at
concentrations above laboratory reporting limits.

NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL MAY NOT
BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR HAZARDOUS WASTE
SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

4) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs 10/1/2016
☐ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs Click here to enter a date.
☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level, or acceptable concentrations determined via
calculated cumulative risk. Enter details of methods used for determination/explanation:
Not Applicable

5) Check the following action(s) to be taken during excavation and management of said soils:

☒ Manage fugitive dust from site:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: Significant areas of contaminated soil are not
expected to be encountered or disturbed during future Site redevelopment activities based upon
previous soil sampling data and field screening soil samples during previous assessment activities. The
grading contractor will take into account conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and moisture
content of soil during soil grading and stockpiling activities to minimize dust generation. Contractors will
implement dust control measures as needed based on Site and atmospheric conditions (i.e. by
controlled water application, hydro-seeding, and/or mulch, stone, or plastic cover). Potentially
impacted soil will be managed as described below.

☒ Field Screening:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: During soil disturbance at the Site, the
workers or contractors will observe soils for evidence of potential significantly impacted soil that may
not be suitable to leave in place in exposed areas at the Site. Evidence of potentially impacted soil
includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns
(i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during Site work, the contractor will
contact the project environmental engineer to observe the suspect condition. If the project
environmental engineer confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be
implemented. In addition, the environmental engineer will contact the DEQ Brownfields project
manager within 48-hours to advise that person of the condition.

☒ Soil Sample Collection:
8
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.); If no, explain rationale:
A soil sampling plan will be submitted under separate cover. Additional soil samples will be collected at
the site to profile soil prior to soil being disturbed and transported off-site. If significant soil impact is
encountered during grading and/or installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far
as needed to allow grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only as far as needed to
allow alternate corrective measures described below. Suspect significantly impacted soil excavated
during grading and/or utility line installation or removal may be stockpiled and covered in a secure area
to allow construction to progress. Suspect impacted soil will be underlain by and covered with minimum
10-mil plastic sheeting. At least one representative sample of the soil will be collected for analysis of
total VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium. If the results of analysis of the sample
indicate that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then the
soil will also be analyzed by the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) for those compounds
that could exceed the toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria. Impacted soil will be handled in
the manner described below based upon the laboratory analyses:
i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are attributable to
sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are below Unrestricted Use PSRGs or are consistent with
Site-specific background levels, then the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on-Site fill or as off-site
fill. The proposed location(s) for off-site placement of soil (other than a permitted facility) along with
the receiving facility’s written approval for acceptance of the soil will be provided to DEQ for approval
prior to taking the soil off-site. Subtitle D Landfills are pre-approved and do not require DEQ
confirmation. If soil is to be transported to an unlined landfill such as a Land Clearing and Inert Debris
(LCID) or Construciton and Demolition (C&D) landfills, approval will be pursued with DEQ prior to
moving soil to these facilities.
ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed the DEQ IHSB Industrial PSRGs
(other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with Site-
specific background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria,
then the soil may be used on-Site in area of the proposed commercial use building. Impacts to soil will
be pre-defined. If soil in area of Potentially Impacted Soil are moved, the grading contractor will
coordinate with the on-site surveyor to document soil placement location(s) for incorporation onto the
plat.
iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the DEQ IHSB Industrial PSRGs (other
than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with background
levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with
DEQ’s written approval, may be used on-Site as fill below an impervious surface, or at least 2 ft of
compacted clean soil. If the impacted soil with concentrations above Industrial/Commercial PSRGs is
moved to an on-Site location, its location and depth will be documented, covered with a geotextile
fabric so that its location can be identified if encountered in the future, and its location will be provided
to DEQ in an updated survey plat.
iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a landfill provided that the soil
is accepted at the disposal facility. If soil is transported to a permitted facility, the permitted facility’s
written approval to dispose of soil from the Site will be included with the final EMP report. In the
unlikely event that the sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then
the soil must be transported off-site to a permitted disposal facility that can accept or treat hazardous
waste.
☒ Stockpile impacted soil in accordance with NCDENR IHSB protocol in the current version of
the “Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup”, and providing erosion control, prohibiting
9
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing
contaminated runoff. Explain any variances:

☒ Analyze potentially impacted soil for the following chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,
lead, selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Other Constituent(s) & Analytical Method(s):
If suspected contaminated soil is identified during Site redevelopment activities, soil will be sampled and
analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals. VOC and SVOC concentrations will be compared to
Residential PSRGs. Metal concentrations will be compared to Residential PSRGs and other published
sources subject to DEQ Brownfields prior written approval.

☒ Proposed Measures to Obtain Pre-Approval for Reuse of Impacted Soil within the
Brownfields Property Boundary
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☐ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on
site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☐ Use geotextile to mark depth of fill material (provide description of material)
☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☐
Describe cap or fill: Disturbed areas that are impacted wil be covered with an
impervious surface upon completeion of site work activities. Impacted soil will be placed
beneath the slab of the proposed south office building. A location diagram is provided in Figure
2. (provide location diagram)
☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-
recorded if actions are Post-Recordation).
☐ Other: Note that impacted soil is that exceeds Residential PSRGs

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or permanent
hardscape): [if not checked provide rationale for not needing]
Provide diagram of soil sampling locations, number of samples, and denote Chemical
Analytical Program with check boxes below (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,
lead, selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)
10
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Pesticides
☐ PCBs
☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Disturbed areas of known soil impacts
will be covered with impervious surfaces upon completion of site work activites. Sample locations
collected after final grade will be detailed in the Soil Sampling Plan under separate cover.
OFFSITE TRANSPORT & DISPOSITION OF EXCAVATED SOIL
NOTE: Unless soil will be transported offsite for disposal in a permitted facility under applicable
regulations, no contaminated or potentially contaminated soil may leave the site without approval
from the brownfields program. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields agreement,
endangering liability protections and making said action subject to enforcement. Justifications
provided below must be approved by the Program in writing prior to completing transport activities.
☒ Transport and dispose of impacted soil offsite (documentation of final disposition must be sent to
Brownfields Project Manager)
☒ Landfill – analytical program determined by landfill
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility Off-site disposal of impacted soils is not anticipated
at this time; however, if grading specifications are not met, off-site disposal options will be
considered.
☐ Use as Beneficial Fill Offsite – provide justification:
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill at another Suitable Brownfields Site – (Note: a determination that a
site is a “Suitable Brownfields” site will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same
or similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil as beneficial soil will not
increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at that site, and that notarized
documentation of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the receiving site is
provided to Brownfields. Provide justification: A soil sampling plan will be be submitted under
separate cover. The sampling plan will detail additional soil samples to be collected and analysis of
those samples. Results will be provided to DEQ for approval to move soil to another Brownfields
property or other facility.

MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from
which it was excavated.

☒ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or
degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? Result: Yes □ No □
If no, include rationale here. Click here to enter text.
If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials

11
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil and/or vapors are encountered in utility
trenches during redevelopment activities, the trench will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening
of the vapors will be performed to protect workers. If results indicate further action is warranted in
response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans)
will be implemented. In the event that utility trenches need repair or to be relocated after initial
construction, the last out first in principle will remain in effect. If potential vapors in utility trenches
become a concern, H&H will provide a plan to DEQ for the instllation of a barrier or other method to
mitigate the vapor migration concern.

PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below and attach figure showing
distribution of groundwater contaminants at site

What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? During groundwater assessment
activities conducted at the site in 2015, depth to groundwater was measured to be approximately 22
feet below ground surface (bgs).

Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☒onsite ☐ offsite ☐ both ☐ or unknown
sources? Describe source(s): The locations of previous groundwater samples are shown on Figure 2. A
summary of previous groundwater data are provided on Table 2.
During H&H’s June 2015 Phase II assessment, results of analysis of a groundwater sample collected from
TMW-3 installed in the former dry cleaning area in the central portion of the site indicated
concentrations of PCE, TCE, and naphthalene above the North Carolina groundwater standards. In
addition, the groundwater sample collected from TMW-1 installed on the eastern portion of the site
indicated the presence of PCE at a concentration above the groundwater standard. No compounds
were detected in the sample collected from TMW-2 in the northwestern portion of the site.

What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property? The Site is located
topographically on a hill. Groundwater at the Site is expected to mimic topographic gradient and flow
towards the southeast, south, southwest, west, and northwest.

Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, describe these activities: Encountering groundwater during future redevelopment of the Site is
not anticipated at this time.

In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if
no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of
groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary
sewer, or sampling procedures): Although not anticipated at this time, appropriate worker safety
measures will be undertaken if groundwater gathers in an open excavation within an area determined
to be impacted during construction activities. If less than or equal to approximately 1 foot of
groundwater water accumulates across an open excavation, the water may be allowed to evaporate or
it may be tested and disposed off-site (if impacted) or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not
impacted above DEQ surface water standards). If greater than approximately 1 foot of water
accumulates across an open excavation, the water will be tested and disposed off-site (if impacted), or
tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards).
12
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

PART 3. SURFACE WATER – Please fill out the information below.
Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.

Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No

Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No

In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities, or
clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events (e.g.
flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted during
construction activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken. If less than or equal to
approximately 1 foot of surface water accumulates across an open excavation, the water may be
allowed to evaporate or it may be tested and disposed off-site (if impacted) or tested and discharged to
the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards). If greater than approximately 1
foot of water accumulates across an open excavation, the water will be tested and disposed off-site (if
impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water
standards) in accordance with applicable State and local ordinances and regulations.

PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.
Is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No

Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No

If yes, attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): Not Applicable.

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.
Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following
vapor intrusion screening levels in the following media:

IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
13
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

Attach a map showing the location of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening levels.

If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated? 15 ft below ground surface

Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown

In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities (trenches,
manways, basements or other subsurface work, list activities for management of such contact:
In the unlikely event contaminated soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment activities,
the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed. If results
indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will
be implemented. If impacts inconsistent with those previously documented at the Site are identified,
the Brownfields Project Manger will be notified.

PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR -please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.

Are sub-slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing
the location of these exceedances.

At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐ 0-6 inches ☒ Other, If other
describe: No sub-slab vapor samples have been collected at the Site. However, sub-slab are assumed to
be present in the vicinity of the former dry-cleaner.

Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact: In the event soil vapors are encountered during future
redevelopment activities, worker breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated photoionization
detector. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of
industrial fans) will be implemented. Soil gas data collected during the Brownfields assessment activities
is summarized on Table 3.

14
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below .

Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

If yes, attach a map showing the location where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.

If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will not
be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated indoor air
during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact: In the event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues
(i.e. unusual odors) during future redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate
safety screening of the indoor air will be performed. If warranted, safety screening procedures will
include periodically screening indoor air for volatile organic vapors with a calibrated photoionization
detector when workers present in the lower level of the current or future site buildings identify
potential indoor air issues. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering
controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. Current site buildings will be demolished
as part of the site redevelopment activities. As detailed below, a vapor mitigation system will be
installed below the proposed southernmost office building to address the potential vapor intrusion
concern at that building.

PART 8 – Vapor Mitigation System – Please fill out the information below .

Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

If yes, provide the date the plan was submitted to the Brownfields Program.
Vapor Mitigation options are currently being discussed with the PD and environmental
professional. A Vapor Mitigation Plan will be submitted under separate cover at a later date.
Attach the plan.

Has the vapor mitigation plan been approved by the NC Brownfields Program?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
Has the vapor mitigation plan been signed and sealed by a North Carolina professional engineer?
☐ Yes ☒ No

What are the components of the vapor intrusion mitigation system?
☐ Sub-slab depressurization system
☐ Sub-membrane depressurization system
☐ Block-wall depressurization system
☐ Drain tile depressurization system
☒ Passive mitigation methods
Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Data
HD Supply Brownfields Site
1414 and 1422 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. BCP-064
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-064 1414 and 1422 S. Tryon\brownfields\BF Assessment\Tables\Tables.xlsm
5/19/2017
Table 1
Hart & Hickman, PC
Former Heating
Oil UST
Former Boiler
Room
SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-6 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 SB-8
Duplicate SB-9 SB-10 SB-5
6-8 0-2 0-2 0-2 0-2 20-22 6-7 10-11 10-11 0-2 10-11 6-8
Residential Industrial 6/12/2015 6/12/2015 6/12/2015 6/12/2015 2/23/2017 2/23/2017 2/23/2017 2/23/2017 2/23/2017 2/23/2017 2/24/2017 6/12/2015
(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)
n-Butylbenzene 110 110 <0.0051 <0.34 0.88 35 NA 0.69 <0.0026 0.020 0.66 <0.0021 <0.0028 <0.25
sec-Butylbenzene 150 150 <0.0051 <0.34 0.59 42 NA 0.52 <0.0026 0.0041 0.18 <0.0021 <0.0028 <0.25
tert-Butylbenzene NS NS <0.0051 <0.34 <0.31 20 NA 0.24 <0.0026 <0.0026 0.044 <0.0021 <0.0028 <0.25
Chloroform 1.40 0.34 <0.0051 <0.34 <0.31 <0.27 NA <0.16 0.0012 J <0.0052 <0.13 <0.0041 <0.0057 <0.25
Ethylbenzene 25.0 8.1 <0.0051 <0.34 <0.31 <0.27 NA <0.080 <0.0026 0.004 0.43 <0.0021 <0.0028 <0.25
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)270 2,000 <0.0051 <0.34 <0.31 4.8 NA 0.083 <0.0026 0.0028 0.21 <0.0021 <0.0028 <0.25
4-Isopropyltoluene NS NS <0.0051 0.52 0.74 63 NA 0.79 <0.0026 0.0044 0.24 <0.0021 <0.0028 <0.25
Naphthalene 3.8 17 <0.010 <0.68 0.67 12 NA 0.39 <0.0052 0.029 2.3 0.0011 <0.0057 <0.51
n-Propylbenzene 260 260 <0.0051 <0.34 <0.31 13 NA 0.36 <0.0026 0.0080 0.70 <0.0021 <0.0028 <0.25
Tetrachloroethylene 16 78 <0.0051 1.7 <0.31 14 NA 0.51 0.067 <0.0026 <0.067 0.0019 <0.0028 1.5
Trichloroethylene 0.82 3.8 <0.0051 <0.34 <0.31 0.73 NA 0.030 J 0.0093 <0.0026 <0.067 <0.0021 <0.0028 <0.25
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 12 48 0.013 4.4 4.6 300 NA 6.2 <0.0026 0.063 7 <0.0021 <0.0028 1.8
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 160 2,400 <0.0051 3.5 0.81 230 NA 3.6 <0.0026 0.040 2.8 <0.0021 <0.0028 4.1
Total Xylenes 120 260 <0.0151 <1.02 <0.93 4.3 NA 0.100 J <0.0026 0.0076 0.811 <0.0041 <0.0057 <0.76
SVOCs (8270C)Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 38 160 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.78
TPH GRO/DRO (8015)----BRL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Notes:
Blue highlighting indicates samples collected in February 2017
Only those compounds detected in at least one sample shown above
Bold and Underline indicates concentration exceeds the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch Residential PSRG
Bold and Underline with yellow hightlighting indicates concentration exceeds the Residential and Industrial PSRG
Method number follows parameter in parenthesis
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons, GRO = gasoline range organics, DRO = diesel range organics
NA = not analyzed; NS = Not Specified
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
VOCs (8260B)
Location DEQ Inactive
Hazardous Sites
Branch (IHSB)
Preliminary Soil
Remediation Goals
(PSRGs)
Former Dry Cleaner
Sample ID
Depth (ft bgs)
Sample Date
Units
Table 2
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
HD Suppl Brownfields Site
1414 and 1422 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. BCP-064
Location Eastern Site Norhwest Site Former Dry Cleaner
Sample ID TMW-1 TMW-2 TMW-3
Sample Date 6/12/2015 6/12/2015 6/12/2015
Units µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
VOCs (8260B)
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.5 <0.5 55 400
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.5 <0.5 38 400
4-Isopropyltoluene <0.5 <0.5 4.8 25*
Acetone <5.0 <5.0 3 6,000
Chloroform 1.1 <0.5 1.2 70
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene <0.5 <0.5 1 70
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)<0.5 <0.5 1.2 70
Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 6.6 6
n-Butylbenzene <1.0 <1.0 3.4 70
n-Propylbenzene <0.5 <0.5 3.4 70
Total Xylenes <1.5 <1.5 4.7 500
sec-Butylbenzene <0.5 <0.5 4.6 70
tert-Butylbenzene <0.5 <0.5 2.1 70
Tetrachloroethylene 1.6 <0.5 140 0.7
Trichloroethylene <0.5 <0.5 29 3
SVOCs (8270)BRL BRL BRL --
Notes:
1) North Carolina Administrative Code 15A 2L Groundwater Standard
* Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration (IMAC)
Only those compounds detected in at least one sample shown above
Bold indicates concentration exceeds NCAC 15A 2L Groundwater Standard
Method number follows parameter in parenthesis
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds
BRL = below reporting limit, -- = not applicable
µg/L = micrograms per liter
NCAC 2L
Groundwater
Standard(1)
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-064 1414 and 1422 S. Tryon\Phase II\Tables\data
9/29/2017
Table 2
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3
Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Results
HD Supply Brownfields Site
1414 and 1422 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. BCP-064
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-064 1414 and 1422 S. Tryon\brownfields\BF Assessment\Tables\Tables2.xlsm
5/19/2017
Table 1
Hart & Hickman, PC
Location
Sample ID SG-1 SG-2 SG-6 SG-7 SG-3 SG-4 SG-4
Duplicate SG-5
Depth (ft bgs)15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
Sample Date 2/24/2017 2/24/2017 2/24/2017 2/24/2017 2/24/2017 2/24/2017 2/24/2017 2/24/2017 Residential Non-Residential
Units (µg/m3)(µg/m3)(µg/m3)(µg/m3)(µg/m3)(µg/m3)(µg/m3)(µg/m3)(µg/m3)(µg/m3)
VOCs by TO-15 (µg/m3)
Acetone 11 J 14 J 18 J <19 8.3 J 9.1 J 9.3 J 37 216,000 2,720,000
Benzene 9.9 1.0 8.0 14 7.9 2.9 2.7 20 120 1,570
1,3-Butadiene 13 <0.44 8.3 8.9 55 <0.44 <0.44 27 13.9 175
2-Butanone 2.7 J 3.8 J 3.3 J 2.0 J 3.7 J 1.8 J 1.9 J 4.1 J 34,800 438,000
Carbon Disulfide 7.9 2.1 J 9.8 11 7.0 2.1 J 1.9 J 3.2 J 4,870 61,300
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.33 J <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 <1.3 4.15 2,040
Chloroethane <0.53 <0.53 <0.53 8.3 <0.53 <0.53 <0.53 3.4 69,500 876,000
Chloroform 0.25 J 1.3 0.57 J <0.98 1.8 3.4 3.2 6.9 40.7 533
Chloromethane 2.1 <0.83 0.46 J 31 0.77 J <0.83 <0.83 14 626 7,880
Cyclohexane 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.3 16 3.1 3.0 <0.69 41,700 526,000
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 11 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 NS NS
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.8 140 4.4 1.9 72 2.7 2.5 7.9 695 8,760
1,2-Dichloropropane <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 1.1 27.8 350
Ethanol <15 <15 8.4 J <15 <15 <15 <15 <15 NS NS
Ethyl Acetate 1.2 0.75 2.0 <0.72 9.0 <0.72 <0.72 <0.72 487 6,130
Ethylbenzene 36 61 110 64 56 17 17 72 374 4,910
4-Ethyltoluene 0.77 J 6.4 24 3.1 22 16 16 1.6 NS NS
Heptane 18 19 26 22 120 16 16 4.7 NS NS
Hexane 24 J 11 J 19 J 25 J 57 9.3 J 9.1 J 9.1 J 487 61,300
Isopropanol 6.1 J 0.86 J 1.8 J <20 3.3 J <20 <20 <20 1,390 17,500
Methylene Chloride <6.9 <6.9 <6.9 <6.9 1.2 J <6.9 <6.9 1.0 J 4,170 52,600
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 1.6 <0.82 0.74 J <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 <0.82 0.69 J 20,900 263,000
Naphthalene 7.2 <1.0 5.2 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 20.9 263
Propene 73 36 59 64 330 16 15 120 20,900 263,000
Styrene 1.7 0.51 J 0.90 1.8 1.1 0.29 J 0.27 J 2.9 6,950 87,600
Tetrachloroethene 64 22 330 9.8 180 13 9.5 390 278 3,500
Toluene 35 3.8 51 18 67 18 18 9.9 34,800 438,000
Trichloroethene <1.1 <1.1 0.37 J <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 0.41 J 13.9 175
Trichlorofluoromethane 6.2 15 37 12 9.4 2.1 J 1.8 J 4.3 J NS NS
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-
trifluoroethane 0.92 J 0.46 J 0.52 J 0.61 J 0.55 J 0.46 J 0.49 J 0.46 J 209,000 2,630,000
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.4 20 83 14 62 65 63 3.9 48.7 613
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.79 J 10 34 8.5 32 28 27 2.1 NS NS
Vinyl Chloride 0.39 J <0.51 <0.51 2.2 <0.51 <0.51 <0.51 1.1 55.9 2,790
m&p-Xylene 150 320 350 260 170 48 47 270 695 8,760
o-Xylene 44 120 130 86 39 10 10 93 695 8,760
Notes:
Only those compounds detected in at least one sample shown above
Bold indicates concentration exceeds the Division of Waste Management
Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Concentration
Laboratory analytical method number provided after parameter
VOCs = volatile organic compounds
NS = Not Specified; ft bgs = feet below ground surface
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Proposed Northern Office BuildingProposed Apartments DEQ Division of Waste
Management Vapor Intrusion
Screening Concentrations
SITE LOCATION MAP
HD SUPPLY BROWNFIELDS SITE
1414 AND 1422 SOUTH TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE NO:
05/12/2015 0
1BCP-064
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
N
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f)
CHARLOTTE EAST, NORTH CAROLINA 1991
SITE
SG-1
SG-2
SG-3 SG-4
SG-5
SG-6
SG-7
SB-7
SB-1
SB-5
SB-3
SB-2
SB-4/TMW-3
TMW-1
TMW-2
SB-6
SB-8
SB-10
SB-9
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PROPOSED HD SUPPY SOUTH
END
SOIL BORING LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL/
SOIL BORING LOCATION
SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
AREA OF POTENTIAL SOIL CONTAMINATION
REVISION NO. 0DATE: 9-26-17
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF FORMER DRYCLEANER
B
L
A
N
D

S
T
R
E
E
T
WINNIF
RED ST
REET
W
I
N
O
N
A

S
T
R
E
E
T
FORMER BOILER ROOM
FORMER HEATING OIL UST
JOB NO. BCP-064 FIGURE NO. 3
HD SUPPLY BROWNFIELDS SITE
1414 AND 1422 SOUTH TRYON STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
S. T
RYO
N STREET
PROPOSED NORTHERN
OFFICE BUILDING
PROPOSED SOUTHERN
OFFICE BUILDING
PROPOSED
COURTYARDPROP
OS
ED
PARKI
N
G
GA
RA
GE
PRO
POSE
D
APARTMENT
S
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
UNDERGROUND
STRUCTURE
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-064 1414 and 1422 S. Tryon\brownfields\BF Assessment\Figures\Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 3, 9/26/2017 2:10:41 PM, zbarlow
Appendix A
Construction Plans

Level 1-P10' - 0"Level 2-P324' - 0"Level 338' - 0"Level 452' - 0"Level 566' - 0"Level 680' - 0"Level 794' - 0"Level 8108' - 0"Low Roof122' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"24' - 0"122' - 0"ALUMINUMCURTAIN WALLSYSTEMALUMINUMCURTAIN WALLSYSTEMALUMINUMCURTAIN WALLSYSTEMLevel 1-P10' - 0"Level 2-P324' - 0"Level 338' - 0"Level 452' - 0"Level 566' - 0"Level 680' - 0"Level 794' - 0"Level 8108' - 0"Low Roof122' - 0"24' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"12' - 0"134' - 0"17' - 2"6' - 10"ALL DESIGNS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS DEPICTED ON THIS SHEET ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE R B A GROUP, INC. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OR REPRODUCTION IS SUBJECT TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. POSSESSION IN ANY FORM CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF THESE CONDITIONS. COPYRIGHT 2017122-B W. BLAND ST.CHARLOTTE, NC 28203704.344.90983/13/2017 12:07:33 PMA200EXTERIOR BUILDINGELEVATIONSPROJECT NUMBER: 15-1732ISSUE DATE: 03/10/2017CONCEPTUAL PRICINGTHE RAILYARD1414 S Tryon Street 3/32" = 1'-0"A2001S TRYON STREET ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A2002WEST BLAND STREET ELEVATIONNo. Description Date
Level 1-P10' - 0"Level 2-P324' - 0"Level 338' - 0"Level 452' - 0"Level 566' - 0"Level 680' - 0"Level 794' - 0"Level 8108' - 0"Low Roof122' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"14' - 0"24' - 0"CANOPY SUPPORTBRICK PILASTERDECORATIVE METALRAILINGALUMINUM STOREFRONTWINDOWPREFINISHED METALCOPINGBRICK VENEERWALL SYSTEMALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEMALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEMALUMINUMSTOREFRONT WINDOWALUMINUMSTOREFRONT WINDOWALUMINUM CURTAINWALL SYSTEMALUMINUMSTOREFRONTBRICK PILASTERALUMINUM FASCIAALL DESIGNS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS DEPICTED ON THIS SHEET ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE R B A GROUP, INC. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OR REPRODUCTION IS SUBJECT TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. POSSESSION IN ANY FORM CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF THESE CONDITIONS. COPYRIGHT 2017122-B W. BLAND ST.CHARLOTTE, NC 28203704.344.90983/13/2017 12:07:50 PMA201EXTERIOR BUILDINGELEVATIONSPROJECT NUMBER: 15-1732ISSUE DATE: 03/10/2017CONCEPTUAL PRICINGTHE RAILYARD1414 S Tryon StreetA2011COURTYARD ELEVATIONNo. Description Date
A 333 WEST TRADE ST.R C H I T E C T U R E SUITE 200CHARLOTTE, NC 28202T 704.927.9900w w w. a x i o m a r c h i t e c t u r e . c o mA-1706AUGUST 1, 2017A5.0WINNIFREDSTREET ELEVATIONWINNIFRED STREET AND WINONA STREETCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINATHE RAIL YARD AT SOUTHENDNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1/16" = 1'-0"A5.01Winnifred Street Elevation
Appendix B
Construction Schedule
The RailyardActIDDescriptionOrigDurEarlyStartEarlyFinishJUL2017AUG2018SEP2019OCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNDesign3140Complete SD drawings14d25JUL17 11AUG173200Prepare site plans submission6d25JUL17 01AUG173210Site drawing review / revisions50d02AUG17 11OCT173150Prepare 60% drawings34d14AUG17 29SEP173170Prepare SD budget17d14AUG17 06SEP173160Prepare final documents100d02OCT17 22FEB183180Prepare 60% budget17d02OCT17 24OCT173190Foundation permit review30d02OCT17 10NOV173270Obtain foundation / structural permit013NOV173280Obtain building permit022FEB18Procurement3220Prepare foundation GMP17d14AUG17 06SEP173230Prepare precast GMP17d14AUG17 06SEP173240Prepare steel GMP12d14AUG17 29AUG173250Prepare elevator GMP17d14AUG17 06SEP173260Prepare concrete GMP17d14AUG17 06SEP173350Prepare demo GMP12d14AUG17 29AUG173390Prepare site GMP17d14AUG17 06SEP173320Approve / release steel subcontractor5d30AUG17 06SEP173360Approve / release demo contractor5d30AUG17 06SEP173300Approve / release foundation subcontractor5d07SEP17 13SEP173310Approve / release precast subcontractor5d07SEP17 13SEP173330Approve / release elevator subcontractor5d07SEP17 13SEP173340Approve / release concrete subcontractor5d07SEP17 13SEP173370Obtain demolition permit20d07SEP17 04OCT173410Approve / release site contractor5d07SEP17 13SEP173420Prepare steel shop drawings20d07SEP17 04OCT173470Prepare rebar shop drawings20d07SEP17 04OCT173510Prepare elevator submittals30d07SEP17 18OCT173450Prepare deep foundations submittal20d14SEP17 11OCT173500Lead time for precast130d14SEP17 20MAR183530Prepare curtainwall GMP17d02OCT17 24OCT173430Review steel shop drawings10d05OCT17 18OCT173480Review rebar shop drawings10d05OCT17 18OCT173460Review deep foundations submittal10d12OCT17 25OCT173440Fabricate and deliver steel40d19OCT17 15DEC173490Fabricate and deliver rebar20d19OCT17 15NOV173520Review elevator submittals10d19OCT17 01NOV173540Approve / release curtainwall subcontractor5d25OCT17 31OCT173550Prepare curtainwall shop drawings30d01NOV17 14DEC173560Review curtainwall shop drawings10d15DEC17 29DEC173570Fabricate and deliver curtainwall75d02JAN18 16APR18Office Tower One1010Mobilize028SEP171020Set-up erosion controls / obtain demo permission5d28SEP17 04OCT171040Raze buildings / site demolition25d05OCT17 08NOV171050Rough grading / site utilities25d02NOV17 08DEC171080Install deep foundations OT One30d27NOV17 09JAN181120Erect steel OT One / erect crane55d03JAN18 20MAR181130Slabs on metal deck OT One35d28FEB18 17APR181140Rough-in underslab utilities OT One15d07MAR18 27MAR181150Form and place slab on grade OT One15d28MAR18 17APR181280Install exterior framing / sheathing OT One40d04APR18 31MAY18Complete SD drawingsPrepare site plans submissionSite drawing review / revisionsPrepare 60% drawingsPrepare SD budgetPrepare final documentsPrepare 60% budgetFoundation permit reviewObtain foundation / structural permitObtain building permitPrepare foundation GMPPrepare precast GMPPrepare steel GMPPrepare elevator GMPPrepare concrete GMPPrepare demo GMPPrepare site GMPApprove / release steel subcontractorApprove / release demo contractorApprove / release foundation subcontractorApprove / release precast subcontractorApprove / release elevator subcontractorApprove / release concrete subcontractorObtain demolition permitApprove / release site contractorPrepare steel shop drawingsPrepare rebar shop drawingsPrepare elevator submittalsPrepare deep foundations submittalLead time for precastPrepare curtainwall GMPReview steel shop drawingsReview rebar shop drawingsReview deep foundations submittalFabricate and deliver steelFabricate and deliver rebarReview elevator submittalsApprove / release curtainwall subcontractorPrepare curtainwall shop drawingsReview curtainwall shop drawingsFabricate and deliver curtainwallMobilizeSet-up erosion controls / obtain demo permissionRaze buildings / site demolitionRough grading / site utilitiesInstall deep foundations OT OneErect steel OT One / erect craneSlabs on metal deck OT OneRough-in underslab utilities OT OneForm and place slab on grade OT OneInstall exterior framing / sheathing OT OneStart date 25JUL17Finish date 11FEB19Data date 25JUL17Run date 15AUG17Page number 1A© Primavera Systems, Inc.Beacon PartnersEarly barProgress barCritical barSummary barStart milestone pointFinish milestone point
The RailyardActIDDescriptionOrigDurEarlyStartEarlyFinishJUL2017AUG2018SEP2019OCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUNJULAUGSEPOCTNOVDECJANFEBMARAPRMAYJUN1170Dry-in roof OT One20d11APR18 09MAY181160Erect storefront / curtainwall facade OT One90d18APR18 24AUG181180Fireproofing OT One20d10MAY18 07JUN181190Erect shaft walls OT One20d01JUN18 28JUN181200Overhead rough-in OT One30d15JUN18 27JUL181300Erect brick and metal panel facade OT One60d16JUL18 08OCT181210Frame, rough-in and close partitions OT One50d23JUL18 01OCT181230Set units / switchgear OT One25d30JUL18 31AUG181240Obtain permanent power OT One15d04SEP18 24SEP181250Frame, MEP drops, close ceilings OT One30d18SEP18 29OCT181290Install elevators OT One40d25SEP18 19NOV181220Finishes OT One30d23OCT18 05DEC181310Start tenant upfit001NOV18 *1320Tenant upfit60d01NOV18 30JAN191260Obtain final inspections OT One10d06DEC18 19DEC181270OT One substantially complete019DEC18Office Tower Two / Connector2010Install deep foundations OT Two30d03JAN18 13FEB182020Erect steel OT Two55d07FEB18 25APR182030Slabs on metal deck OT Two35d04APR18 23MAY182040Rough-in underslab utilities OT Two15d11APR18 02MAY182050Form and place slab on grade OT Two15d03MAY18 23MAY182180Install exterior framing / sheathing OT Two40d10MAY18 06JUL182070Dry-in roof OT Two20d17MAY18 14JUN182080Fireproofing OT Two20d15JUN18 13JUL182060Erect storefront / curtainwall facade OT Two90d22JUN18 29OCT182090Erect shaft walls OT Two20d09JUL18 03AUG182100Overhead rough-in OT Two30d23JUL18 31AUG182110Frame, rough-in and close partitions OT Two50d04SEP18 12NOV182130Set units / switchgear OT Two25d04SEP18 08OCT182200Erect brick and metal panel facade OT Two60d18SEP18 12DEC182140Obtain permanent power OT Two15d16OCT18 05NOV182150Frame, MEP drops, close ceilings OT Two30d30OCT18 12DEC182190Install elevators OT Two40d06NOV18 07JAN191520Install paving, hardscapes and landscapes40d13NOV18 14JAN192120Finishes OT Two25d06DEC18 14JAN192160Obtain final inspections OT Two10d11JAN19 24JAN191500Create and execute final punch list20d15JAN19 11FEB192170OT Two substantially complete024JAN191510Project complete011FEB19Parking Deck Construction3010Rough grading Parking Deck10d07MAR18 20MAR183015Install deep foundations Parking Deck20d21MAR18 17APR183040Erect shaft walls Parking Deck25d11APR18 16MAY183030Erect precast structure Parking Deck55d17MAY18 03AUG183070Overhead MEP rough-in Parking Deck40d30JUL18 24SEP183050Rough-in underslab utilities Parking Deck15d06AUG18 24AUG183060Form and place slabs / ramps on grade25d27AUG18 01OCT183090Install lights & life safety Parking Deck30d25SEP18 05NOV183100Install elevators Parking Deck40d25SEP18 19NOV183130Erect P1 walls Parking Deck20d02OCT18 29OCT183080Install finishes / Rooftop Garden Parking Deck30d23OCT18 05DEC183110Obtain final inspections Parking Deck10d06DEC18 19DEC183120Parking Deck substantially complete019DEC18Dry-in roof OT OneErect storefront / curtainwall facade OT OneFireproofing OT OneErect shaft walls OT OneOverhead rough-in OT OneErect brick and metal panel facade OT OneFrame, rough-in and close partitions OT OneSet units / switchgear OT OneObtain permanent power OT OneFrame, MEP drops, close ceilings OT OneInstall elevators OT OneFinishes OT OneStart tenant upfitTenant upfitObtain final inspections OT OneOT One substantially completeInstall deep foundations OT TwoErect steel OT TwoSlabs on metal deck OT TwoRough-in underslab utilities OT TwoForm and place slab on grade OT TwoInstall exterior framing / sheathing OT TwoDry-in roof OT TwoFireproofing OT TwoErect storefront / curtainwall facade OT TwoErect shaft walls OT TwoOverhead rough-in OT TwoFrame, rough-in and close partitions OT TwoSet units / switchgear OT TwoErect brick and metal panel facade OT TwoObtain permanent power OT TwoFrame, MEP drops, close ceilings OT TwoInstall elevators OT TwoInstall paving, hardscapes and landscapesFinishes OT TwoObtain final inspections OT TwoCreate and execute final punch listOT Two substantially completeProject completeRough grading Parking DeckInstall deep foundations Parking DeckErect shaft walls Parking DeckErect precast structure Parking DeckOverhead MEP rough-in Parking DeckRough-in underslab utilities Parking DeckForm and place slabs / ramps on gradeInstall lights & life safety Parking DeckInstall elevators Parking DeckErect P1 walls Parking DeckInstall finishes / Rooftop Garden Parking DeckObtain final inspections Parking DeckParking Deck substantially completeStart date 25JUL17Finish date 11FEB19Data date 25JUL17Run date 15AUG17Page number 2A© Primavera Systems, Inc.Beacon PartnersEarly barProgress barCritical barSummary barStart milestone pointFinish milestone point