Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRocky Mount Villas BPA-OCRBrownfields Property Application North Carolina Brownfields Program www .ncbrownfields.org I. PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPER (PD) INFORMATION {USE TAB KEY TO GET TO NEXT DATA ENTRY LINE-DO NOT USE THE RETURN KEY} A. PD information: Entity name Rocky Mount Mill, LLC Principal Officer Michael J Goodmon, Sr. Representative Evan Covington Chavez Mailing Address P.O. Box611 Durham, NC 27702 E-mail address echavez@cbc-raleigh.com Phone No. 919-433-1568 Fax No. 919-433-4278 Website None B. PD contact oerson information fi.e .. individual who will serve as the NCBP's point of contact if different than above/: Name Company Mailing Address E-Mail Address Phone No. Fax No. Cheryl Moody Atlantic Shores Environmental Services, Ltd. 154 Backhoe Road Lelnd, NC 28451 cmoody@atlanticshoresenv.com 910-371-5980 910-371-6652 C. Information regarding all parent companies. subsidiaries or other affiliates of PD (attach separate sheetfsl if necessarvl: (Use for LLCs) Member-managed or manager-managed? Answer: Site entity: Rocky Mount Mill LLC -Manager Managed, Afiliates: Rocky Mount Dam, LLC -Manager Managed 4 Rocky Mount Willage, LLC -Manager Managed Parent Company: Capitol Broadcasting Company is sole member and sole Managed If manager-managed, provide name of manager and percent of ownership: Name Ownership(%} Mailing Address E-Mail Address Phone No. Fax No. Capitol Broadcasting Co. 100 See below For all LLCs, list all members of the LLC and provide their percent of ownership: Name Ownership(%} Mailing Address E-Mall Address Phone No. Fax No. Name Ownership(%} Mailing Address E-Mail Address Phone No. Fax No. Name ownership(%} Mailing Address Capitol Broadcasting Co. 100 2619 Western Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27606 webmaster@cbc-raleigh.com 919-890-6000 919-890-6095 NA 5 E-Mail Address Phone No. Fax No. Managers of manager-managed LLCs are required to execute all brownfield documents for the LLC; as to member-managed LLCs, state name of member who will sign these documents. Michael Goodmon List all parent companies, subsidiaries and other affiliates: Site entity: Rocky Mount Mill LLC -Manager Managed, Afiliates: Rocky Mount Dam, LLC -Manager Managed Rocky Mount Willage, LLC -Manager Managed Parent Company: Capitol Broadcasting Company is sole member and sole Managed (Use for Partnerships) Check one: 0General Partnership OLimited Partnership List all partners and percent of ownership: Name Ownership(%) Mailing Address E-Mail Address Phone No. Fax No. NA Is this person a general or limited partner? Name Ownership(%) Mailing Address NA 6 E-Mail Address Phone No. Fax No. Is this person a general or limited partner? List all parent companies, subsidiaries and other affiliates: (Use for corporations other than LLCs) (If information is the same as shown in 1.A., please indicate "same as 1.A. "below.) Name Mailing Address E-Mail Address Phone No. Fax No. NA List all parent companies, subsidiaries and other affiliates: (Use for individuals) (If individual is the same as shown in 1.A., -please indicate "same as 1.A." above.) Name NA Mailing Address E-Mail Address Phone No. Fax No. D. Does PD have or can it obtain the financial means to fully implement a brownfields 7 agreement and assure the safe reuse of the property? (Attach supporting documentation such as letters of credit, financial statements, etc.) Answer Yes Explanation The project will be financially backed by Capitol Broadcasting Company. E. Does PD have or can it obtain the managerial means to fully implement a brownflelds agreement and assure the safe use of the property? Answer Yes Explanation The project will be managed in house with guidance from the law firm of Moore & VanAllen and environmental consultant, Atlantic Shores Environmental Services, Ltd., each of whom have experience In management of Brownfield activity F. Does PD have or can it obtain the technical means to fully implement a brownfields agreement and assure the safe use of the property? Answer Yes Explanation The law firm Moore & VanAllen PLLC and the environmental consulting firm Atlantic Shores Environmental Services , Ltd. have been retained to aid in the technical implemetation of the brownfield agreement, each of whom have experience in the technical implementation of Brownfield agreements. G. Does PD commit that it will comply (and has complied, if PD has had a prior project in the NCBP) with all applicable procedural requirements of the NCBP, including prompt payment of all statutorily required fees? Answer Yes (List all NCBP project name(s) and NCBP project ID numbers where PD or any parent company, subsidiary and other affiliate of PD has been a party to.) ATC North Residential, LLC-Brownfields Project No. 17032-13-032-Parent Company- Capitol Broadcasting Co. H. Does PD currently own the property? Answer No If yes, when did PD purchase the property and from whom? (Provide name, address, telephone number and email address of the contact person for the current 8 property owner.) If no, provide the name, address, telephone number and e-mail address of the contact person for the current property owner Current Owner: RM Properties of Rocky Mount P08ox448 Elizabeth City NC 27907 Phone Number unknown I. If PD does not currently own the property, does PD have the property under contract to purchase? Answer Yes If yes, provide date of contract. Auction closing scheduled for April 17, 2014 If no, when does the PD intend to purchase the property {e.g., after the project is determined to be eligible for participation in the NCBP, after PD receives a draft BFA, after the conclusion of the brownfields process}? Note: the Act requires the PD to demonstrate that it intends to either buy or sell the property. J. Describe all activities that have taken place on the property since PD or PD's parents, subsidiaries and/or other affiliates, and/or lessees or sublessees of PD, took ownership of or operated at the property {e.g., industrial, manufacturing or commercial activities, etc.}. (Include a list of all regulated substances as defined at NCGS § 130A-310.31(b){11) that have been used, stored on, or otherwise present at the property while those activities were conducted, and explain how they were used.) The PD or PD's Parents have not and do not own or operate at the site. 11. SITE INFORMATION A. Information regarding the proposed brownfields propertv: Proposed project name Rocky Mount Villas acreage 12.47 street address{ es) 450 North Ridge Street city Rocky Mount County Nash zip 27804 9 tax ID(s) or PIN(s) 385014344078 past use(s) Based on the Sanborn map coverage, the site was undeveloped land prior to the construction of portions of the current miff complex in 1941, with the exception of the presence of the railroad spur some time prior to 1917. However, City Directories suggest that a textile mill was present on the site since at least 1930. The current facility was originally operated as the Sidney Blumenthal & Co. Inc. Car 0-Mount Division. Some time between 1949 and 1954 the operations of the mill expanded onto the western adjoining property. Some time between 1964 and 1969 the site was purchased and operated by Burlington Industries. Materials used at the site reportedly included dyes, caustic material, oils, and possibly chlorinated solvents. Burlington Industries ceased production on the site in January 1981 but continued to operate a warehouse on the site until the some time into the 1990's. The warehouse appears to have been vacant or used as dry good storage by a transport company since that time. current use(s) The site is currently vacant cause{s)/source(s) of contamination: known Impacts have not been dcumented at the site. suspected The following potetial sources have been identfied on the property: > A large area on the southeastern portion of the site appears to have formerly staged above ground tanks. The size, contents and purpose of these presumed tanks have not been determined. > A concrete block containment area was observed on the eastern portion of the site, east of the former water softener building. The containment has the remnants of the base of a large above ground storage table foundation. However the tank was not present. Based on the aerial photograph review, this tank was removed from the site some time after 2010. This tank is believed to be the No. 2 fuel oil storage tank identified in the B&G 2002 ESA report. > An approximate 750-gallon above ground tank was observed within an alcove, behind three transformers on the southern side of the main warehouse building. The actual volume, contents and purpose of this tank have not been determined. This tank does not have containment. > An approximate 750-galfon above ground tank located in a sub-grade concrete vault was observed south of the main warehouse building. A curbed concrete pad was observed adjacent to this tank. The actual volume, contents and purpose of this tank or the adjacent concrete pad have not been determined. This tank does not have containment. > An approximate 1,000-gallon above ground tank was observed within the warehouse building, on the second ftoor mezzanine. The purpose of this tank is not known. However it is located in the vicinity of what appears to have formerly been the dying operations. > Two approximate 500-gallon above ground tanks were observed within the warehouse building, on the second floor. The purpose of these tanks is not known. However they are located in the vicinity of what appears to have formerly been the dying operations. > An approximate 1000-galfon above ground tank is located north of the warehouse building, within a small diked area. This tank is believed to be the tank identified as a diesel tank in the B&G 2002 ESA report. 10 > Two concrete block containment areas are located adjacent to the north side of the warehouse building. Based on the B&G 2002 ESA report, it is believed that these diked arrears formerly housed a used oil above ground tank and a Freon above ground tank. > An approximate 5,000-gallon above ground tank is located west of the warehouse building. The tank is located in a concrete block containment. Based on the B&G 2002 ESA report. This tank reportedly contained varsol. > What appear to be concrete bases for former above ground tanks were observed southeast of the power plant. > A brick containment was observed adjacent to the east wall of the power plant. What appeared to be a fill and vent pipe were observed in this containment. ASE does not have additional information regarding this potential tank. > Four brick vault type structures were observed east of the powerhouse building . According to B&G 2002 ESA, these vaults are three abandoned 20,000-gallon and one 10,000-gallon former No. 6 fuel oil underground tanks. The report indicates that the three 20,000-gallon tanks were filled with •used water softener" and the 10,000-gallon tank was empty in 2002. At least two of these tanks appear to currently be open and filled with water > A concrete block containment area was observed on the northeastern portion of the site, north of the powerhouse building. The containment has the remnants of two large above ground storage tank foundations. However the tanks are not currently present. Based on the aerial photograph review, these tanks were removed from the site some time after 2010. This tank is believed to be the No. 6 fuel oil storage tanks identified in the B&G 2002 ESA report. > A large transformer is located within the building, on the second floor mezzanine within the warehouse building. The unit is labeled as containing PCBs and is registered with the EPA under record ID 739. > An additional transformer is located off of the northwestern side of the warehouse building. This unit is heavily overgrown with vegetation and labeling as not visible. However, base don the B&G 2002 ESA report, this unit contains PCBs. Photograph No. ??) > Three relatively old transformers are located south of the warehouse building in a small out cove. It appears that portions of the transformers have either been vandalized or salvaged. It is not known if these units contain PCBs. > Three relatively old transformers are located west of the powerhouse building. It is not known if these units contain PCBs. > One hydraulic freight elevator is located within the warehouse building. According to the B&G 2002 ESA report, this elevator has an oil filled cylinder that extends approximately 20 feet below grade. It is not known if this hydraulic oil contains PCBs. > Sanborn maps illustrate a former cistern and former incinerator located west of the powerhouse building. The purpose of the cistern is not known.The Standard Environmental > Site history includes dyeing, bleaching and processing of textiles and testing of products (laboratory). Oils and solvents were also used on the property. It is not known if hsitoric septic systems or leaky subgrade piping exists on the property. > The site address was identified on the RCRA database under two entities: DoeSpun Inc., 750 North Pine Street -Currently classified as a non-generator. In 1995 this facility was a conditionally exempt small quantity generator (waste code 0001 ). Violations were not noted in the database. It is not known if this generator operated on the western adjoining property and/or the subject site. However, the G&B 2002 ESA did identify waste storage from this facility on the western portion of the subject site. Rocky Mount Weaving (facility name Burlington Industries), 750 North Pine Street -Currently classified a conditionally exempt small quantity generator (waste code F001 ). Violations were not noted in the database. 11 B. Regulatory Agency Involvement: List the site names and all Identifying numbers (ID No.) previously or currently assigned by any federal, state or local environmental regulatory agencies for the property. The ID No's may Include CERCLIS numbers, RCRA generator numbers for past and present operations, UST database, Division of Water Qualitv's incident management database, and/or Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch inventory numbers. (In many instances, the PD will need to actively seek out this information by reading environmental site assessment reports, reviewing government files, contacting government officials, and through the use of government databases, many of which may be available over the internet.) Agency Name/JD No: RCRA Generator -NRC000000901 -DoeSpun lnc.750 North Pine Street. DoeSpun Inc., 750 North Pine Street-Currently classified as a non-generator. In 1995 this facility was a conditionally exempt small quantity generator (waste code D001 ). Violations were not noted in the database. ft is not known if this generator operated on the western adjoining property and/or the subject site. However, the G&B 2002 ESA did identify waste storage from this facility on the western portion of the subject site. Agency Name/ID No: RCRA Generator -NCD981025323 -Rocky Mount Weaving, 750 North Pine Street. Rocky Mount Weaving (facility name Burlington Industries), 750 North Pine Street -Currently classified a conditionally exempt small quantity generator (waste code FOO 1 ). Violations were not noted in the database. Agency Name/ID No: Agency Name/ID No: Agency Name/JD No: C. In what way(s) is the propertv abandoned. idled. or underused? The property consist of 12.47 acres of vacant industrial land and has over a 50 year history of active industrial use. The current site structures are in poor condition and it is unlikely that the current structures can be used productively. Underground and above ground storage tanks and PCB transformers are present and not currently being maintained. D. In what wav<sl is the actual or possible contamination at the prooertv a hindrance to development or redevelopment of the propertv (attach any supporting documentation such as letters from lending institutions/? Intrusive investigation of the site has not been conducted. The presence, degree and sources of the impacts to the property have not been determined. The cost associated with assessment and clean-up of these potential issues would likely be cost prohibitive to redevelopment of the property. E. In what wav<s} is the redevelopment of the property difficult or impossible without a brownfields agreement (attach any supporting documentation such as letters form lending institutions/? 12 For the same reasons discusssed in Section D F. What are the planned uselsl of the redeveloped brownfields property to which the PD will commit? Be as specific as specific as possible. A site plan has not been designed as of the date of this application. However, the prospective owner is planning on redeveloping the proeprty with approximately 70 single family homes, with a small area for a retail/restaurant/community center. The prospective owner would like to restore the existing power house building to be used for these purposes if possible. However, the remaining derelict structures will be removed from the site. G. Current tax value of brownfields property: $435,620 H. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: $Unknown at this time. I. List and describe the public benefits that will result from the property's redevelopment. Be as specific as possible. (Examples of public benems for brownfields projects include job creation, tax base increases, revitalization of blighted areas, preseNed green space, preserved historic places, Improving disadvantaged neighborhood quality-of-life related retail shopping opportunities, affordable housing, environmental cleanup activities or set asides that have community or environmental beneflf:s. Jn gauging public benefit, NCBP places great value upon letters of support from community groups and local government that describe anticipated improvements In quality of life for neighboring communities that the project will bring about. The jnclusion of such support letters with this application is recommended and encouraged.) • Eliminating potential health and safety hazards; • Eliminating eyesores; • Improving a disadvantaged neighborhood; • Creating new jobs for construction; Bringing new jobs into the community; • Bringing new investment into the community; • Increasing the productiVity of the land; Increasing property values and tax receipts by local and state governments Special Note: Please describe all environment-friendly technologies and designs PD plans to utilize in its redevelopment strategy. For example, environment friendly redevelopment plans could include: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Certification, green building materials; green landscaping techniques such as using drought resistant plants; energy efficient designs, materials, appliances, machinery, etc.; renewable sources of energy, and/or recycling/reuse of old building materials such as brick or wood. The prospective developer is considering implementation of certain energy efficient design features and environmentally sensitive materials usage practices in construction and operation of the project. but 'the precise nature of those features and practices will be determined in the design phase. 13 J. Who will own the brownfields property wben the Notice of Brownfields Property is filed with the register of deeds at the conclusion of the brownfields process? (If Information is the same as 1.A. above, please indicate.) Name Mailing Address E-Mail Address Phone No. Fax No. Rocky Mount Mill, LLC 318 Blackwell Street, Suite 150 Durham, NC 27701 mgoodmon@cbc-raleigh.com 919-433-1568 919-433-4278 Ill. OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION A. Brownfjelds Affidayit PD must provide its certification, in the form of a signed and notarized original of the unmodified model brownfields affidavit provided by NCBP, that it did not cause or contribute to contamination at the property and that it meets all other statutory eflgibility requirements. (Note: The form to use for this affidavit is attached to this application. It must be filled out signed notarized, and submitted with this application.) Is the reguired affidavit. as described above. included with this application? Answer Yes B. Proposed Brownfields Agreement Form: PD must provide the completed form Proposed Brownfields Agreement. (Note: The form to use for this document is attached to this application. It must be filled out, initialed, and attached on your submittal.) Is the reguired Proposed Brownfie!ds Agreement . as described above. included with this application? Answer Yes C. Location Map: PD must provide a copy of the relevant portion of the 1 :24,000 scale U.S.G.S. topographic quadrangle map that shows the property clearly plotted, and that measures at least an 8 Y. by 11 inches. (Note: these maps can be purchased through the above link, or often through retail outdoor recreation stores that can print out the relevant map. Often environmental reports have location maps that use this type of map as the base for its location map.) ls the required location map included with this application? Answer Yes D. Survey Plat: PD must provide a preliminary survey plat of the brownfields property with the property boundaries clearly identified, and a metes and bounds legal description that 14 matches the property description on the plat At this stage of the brownfields process; one or more existing survey plats from a previous property conveyance will suffice. (Before the brownfields project enters the public comment phase of the brownfields process, the PD will be required to submit a final brownfie/ds survey plat which includes the information listed in the brownfields survev plat guidance.) Is the required preliminary survey olat included with this aoolication? Answer No. As of the date of this application, the Auction House is not providing additional access to the site until the proposed closing dateof April 17, 2014. E. Site Photographs: PD must provide at least one pre-redevelopment photograph of the property, in either hard copy or electronic format that shows existing facilities and structures. Please note that the NCBP prefers to have electronic photos instead of or in addition to hard copies. Electronic copies of photographs should be emailed to: Shlrley.Liggins@ncdenr.gov with a clear indication as to which Brownfields Application they apply to. Are photograohs of the propertv included with this application? Answer Yes fi<!ve electronic copies of the photographs been emailed to NCBP? Answer Yes F. Environmental ReportsiData: If it makes an affirmative eligibility determination, the NCBP will request that PD provide any and all existing environmental reports and data for the property on CD only. The brownfields process may be expedited 1f PD submits such reportsidata with this application. Are any environmental reports/data being submitted with this aonlication? Answer Yes If environmental reports/data are being submitted with this application. please provide the title. date and author of each Item being submitted: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 450 West Ridge Street, Rocky Mount NC. Dated March 24, 2014. Prepared by Atlantic Shores Environmental Services, Ltd. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 750 North Pine Street, Dated April 24, 2002, Prepared by Bensinger & Garrison Environmental, Inc. (B&G). IV. ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FORMS The following forms are to be filled out and submitted with the application including the Responsibility and Compliance Affidavit and the Proposed Brownflelds Agreement. 15 Submittal of the Affidavit requires signature and notarization, and the Proposed Brownfields Application requires an initial. 16 Preliminary Proposed Brownfields Agreement I. Property Facts a. Property Address( es): 450 West Ridge Street, Rocky Mount, NC b. Property Seller: RM Properties of Rocky Mount c. Property Buyer: Rocky Mount Mill, LLC d. Brief Property Usage History: Based on the Sanborn map coverage, the site was undeveloped land prior to the construction of portions of the current mill complex in 1941, with the exception of the presence of the railroad spur some time prior to 1917. However, City Directories suggest that a textile mill was present on the site since at least 1930. The current facility was originally operated as the Sidney Blumenthal & Co. Inc. Car 0-Mount Division. Some time between 1949 and 1954 the operations of the mill expanded onto the western adjoining property. Some time between 1964 and 1969 the site was purchased and operated by Burlington Industries. Materials used at the site reportedly included dyes, caustic material, oils, and possibly chlorinated solvents. Burlington Industries ceased production on the site in January l 981 but continued to operate a warehouse on the site until the some time into the I 990's. The warehouse appears to have been vacant or used as dry good storage by a transport company since that time. e. The planned reuse will potentially involve the following use classification(s) (check all that apply): 0 School/childcare/senior care 1:81 1:81 D D D D D D D Residential Commercial, retail (specify) Other commercial (specify) Office Light industrial Heavy industrial Recreational Open space Other (specify) II. Contaminant Information retail/restaurant a. The contaminant situation at the property is best described by the following (check all that apply): 0 Contaminants are from an on-property source(s) 0 Contaminants are from an off-property source(s) 0 Contaminants are from an unknown source(s) fgj Contaminants have not yet been documented on the property 18