IDX On-Site Assess Rpt Appendix A-C (July 1998) (Segment 2)-OCR

*241HSSF2021 *
11111111111111111111111111
DocumentlD NONCD0001814 ·
Site Name HAMILTON BEACH/PROCTOR SILEX
. oocumentType Site Assessment Rpt (SAR)
RptSegment 2
Doc Date
DocRcvd
Box
Access level
Division
Section
Program
DocCat
7/1/1998
2/20/2007
SF2021
PUBLIC
WASTE MANAGEMENT
SUPERFUND
IHS (IHS)
FACILITY
•
•
•
APPENDIX A
FIELD PROCEDURES
•
•
APPENDIX A
FIELD PROCEDURES
This appendix briefly describes the field procedures used in conducting the on-site
assessment. The procedures pertain to cone penetrometer and direct-push probing, well
installation, sample collection and handling, field measurements, equipment decontamination, and
waste management.
A.1 Surface Water Samplin1:
Water samples were collected from selected points in the drainage ditch to assess
the surface water quality. At each location, sampling team members wore new, disposable nitrile
gloves. Grab samples were collected at each of five sampling locations beginning with the
downstream location and proceeding upstream. Samples were collected from the middle part of
the channel by partially dipping the mouth of the sampling bottle or vial below the water surface
with the container pointed upstream .
The sample for purgeable aromatic (VOC) analysis was collected first in each case.
Three clean, labeled, 40-mL glass VOA vials were completely filled and sealed without headspace
using Teflon-lined septum caps. Each vial contained sufficient hydrochloric acid to lower the
sample pH to less than 2. Immediately upon sample collection, tpe vials were placed into an
insulated cooler containing wet ice for storage.
The sample for SVOC analysis was collected next. One clean, labeled, 1-L amber
glass bottle was filled and sealed with a Teflon-lined cap. Immediately upon sample collection,
the bottle was placed into an insulated cooler containing wet ice for storage.
The sample for metals analysis was collected last. One clean, labeled, 500-mL
plastic bottle was filled and sealed with a plastic cap. The bottle contained nitric acid to lower the
sample pH. Immediately upon sample collection, the bottle was placed into an insulated cooler
• containing wet ice for storage.
c:lhamilton\appndx_a.wpd (7/10/98) la
650138.0501 A-1
Procedures used to manage samples after collection are described in Section A.11 .
A.2 Soil Borina: and Samplina:
'·
Soil borings were advanced to collect samples for laboratory analysis and to
characterize the subsurface geology. Borings were advanced using cone penetrometer techniques
(CPT) and direct push technology (DPT). Several shallow borings were advanced using a hand
auger. Each method is described below. Following completion of probing and sampling, each
boring was abandoned by grouting as described in Section A 13. Management of investigation-
derived waste (IDW) is discussed in Section A.14.
A.2.1 Cone Penetrometer Techniques
Soil and geologic conditions were assessed using a cone penetrometer equipped
with a fuel fluorescence detector to profile the soil stratigraphy and to screen for TPH distribution
•
in the soil. The cone penetrometer was used to develop detailed geologic logs for interpreting the •
stratigraphy of the underlying deposits and for identifying the occurrence of potential confining
beds, in particular. The cone penetrometer is a combination of geotechnical and environmental
sensors that was hydraulically pushed into the ground. Data were collect~d in-situ and
transmitted electronically to an on-board computer for analysis and display. The cone
penetrometer probe measured point resistance, sleeve friction, and pore water pressure. From
this data, the computer determined a range of soil parameters based on established correlations.
Soil type was identified from the ratio of sleeve friction to point resistance, and soil strength is
related to point resistance. Similarly, water table depth was estimated by correlating the
instrument depth with the measured hydraulic head, and measurement of excess pore pressure
generated by the penetration process identified low permeability layers. Use of a cone
penetrometer equipped with a fuel fluorescence detector simultaneously measured TPH
concentrations in the soil as the tool was advanced into the ground. Although not intended for
production soil sampling, the cone penetrometer tools were used in conjunction with a discrete
interval soil sampler to collect a limited number of depth-specific soil samples. The addendum to
this appendix describes these cone penetrometer techniques in greater detail.
c:\hamilton\appndx _a. wpd (7/10/98) la
650138.0501 A-2
•
• A.2.2 Direct Push Technology
A truck-mounted Geoprobe was used to collect soil samples for laboratory
analysis from the source area and several background locations. The Geoprobe was positioned
over the selected sampling point and a decontaminated closed piston sampler was advanced to the·
prescribed depth using hydraulically-applied static force and a percussion hammer. A new, clear,
polymer liner was sealed within the sampler by the closed piston tip which locks into the cutting
shoe. At the desired depth, the piston was unlocked allowing it to retract into the sample tube
and the sampler was driven through the prescribed sampling interval. The sampling tools were
then retrieved and the soil sample was handled as described in Section A.2.4.
A.2.3 Hand Auger
A clean, steel hand auger assembly consisting of a detachable handle, extension
rod, and auger bucket was used to collect soil sal!lples for laboratory analysi~ at several sampling
• locations. At each sampling location, the hand auger was advanced to the top of the desired
sampling interval and then retrieved. The auger bucket was then replaced with a clean bucket and
reinserted into the open auger hole. The hand auger was advanced farther until the auger bucket
was full, and then retrieved. Soil from the top and bottom of the sample was removed from the
bucket using a clean spoon and discarded. The remaining soil was then collected and handled as
described in Section A.2.4.
•
A.2.4 Soil Sample Collection
Upon retrieval at the surface, the soil sampler was opened, exposing the soil in the
split spoon and allowing the polymer liner to be removed from the closed piston sampler. The
sample was then prepared immediately by an engineer or scientist wearing new, disposable nitrile
gloves. Soil in the polymer liner was then exposed by splitting the liner with a clean, knife blade
and a lithologic description of the soil sample was noted and recorded. The soil sample was then
prepared for laboratory analysis as follows. The sample for purgeable TPH and VOC analyses
c:lhamilton\appndx_a.wpd (7/10/98) la
650138.0501 A-3
was transferred directly from the bottom of the sampler into a clean, labeled 4-oz. sample jar
that was filled completely and sealed with a Teflon-lined cap. The sample for the remaining
analytes was then placed in a cle~m, disposable pan where it was thoroughly mixed before being
transferred into a clean, labeled 9-oz. jar and sealed with a Teflon-lined cap. Upon sealing, each
sample was immediately placed into an insulated cooler containing wet ice for storage.
Procedures used to manage samples after collection are described in Section A.9.
A.3 Groundwater Screenin&
Groundwater screening was performed using direct push technology to collect
discrete water samples for immediate analysis ofVOCs by field gas chromatograph/mass
spectrometer (GC/MS). Selected VOCs, typical of the petroleum and solvent constituents that
were previously detected in the groundwater, were used as indicators of chemical distribution.
Screening samples were collected from cone penetrometer stratigraphy profiling locations and
from several other locations indicated by the screening results. Two to three. vertically separated
•
samples were collected at each location. Replicate samples to confirm the screening results were •
collected at three locations and submitted for laboratory analysis.
A truck-mounted Geoprobe was used to collect groundwater samples for on-site
analysis. The Geoprobe was positioned over the selected sampling point and a decontaminated
screen point sampler was advanced to the prescribed depth using hydraulically-applied static force
and a percussion hammer. When the sampler reached the desired depth, the wire-wound screen
was exposed to permit formation water to enter the sampling assembly. A clean Tubing Check-
Valve System was fully inserted into the assembly by the sampling team and quickly oscillated up
and down to remove groundwater from the sampler. The water sample was transferred directly
from the tubing into three 40-mL VOA vials. The vials were completely filled and sealed without
headspace using Teflon-lined septum caps. The vials were submitted immediately to the field
laboratory for on-site analysis. Replicate samples collected for laboratory analysis were also
transferred into three 40-mL VOA vials, preserved with hydrochloric acid, and placed into an
insulated cooler containing wet ice for storage. Procedures used to manage the samples after
collection are described in Section A. I I.
c:\hamilton\appndx_a.wpd (7/10/98) la
650138.0501 A-4
•
• When sample collection was completed at a particular depth interval, the sampler
assembly was removed from the probe hole. Another decontaminated screen point sampler
assembly was then inserted into the probe hole and advanced to the next desired depth interval.
Sampling proceeded at.progressively lower depth intervals as described previously until all
samples at a particular location had been collected. Following the c9mpletion of sampling, the
probe hole was immediately abandoned by grouting as described in Section A.13.
A.4 Well Installation
Four well pairs, each consisting of a shallow well and a deeper well, were installed
at locations selected based on the results of the groundwater sc~eening. Each well was installed
by a truck-mounted DPT rig. The DPT rig was positioned over the selected well site and
decontamin~ted probe rods were advanced to the prescribed depth using hydraulically-applied
static force and a percussion hammer. When the rods reached the desired depth, an assembly of
half-inch I.D., flush-threaded, Schedule 80, PVC casing and .010-inch factory-slotted, prepacked
• screen was inserted. The screens are prepacked with 20/40 grade silica sand and the outer
component of the screen is stainless steel wire mesh. All casing and screen was new and received
from the manufacturer sealed in protective plastic packaging. Nine feet of well screen were
installed in each of the deeper wells and six feet of well screen were used ip. each of the shallow
monitoring wells. A filter pack consisting of clean, filter sand was emplaced into the annulus
above each prepacked well screen. The filter pack ~xtended from the top of the prepacked screen
to at least one foot above the top of the screen. A seal of bentonite pellets at least one foot thick
was emplaced above the filter pack and, for the shallow wells, hydrated with potable water. The·
remaining annulus in all wells was then filled with neat cement. Each well was completed above
grade within a lockable steel casing surrounded by a cement apron. Well heads were fitted with
slip caps and the outer casings were secured with keyed-alike locks to preclude unauthorized
access. Following installation, all wells were developed as described below .
•
c:\hamilton\appndx _a. wpd (7 /10/98) la
650138.0501 A-5
A.5 Well Development
All monitoring wells were developed by overpumping. Development was
continued until the water was· free of sediment or until no additional improvement in quality was
apparent. Development water was contained and managed as discussed in Section A.14.
A.6 Surveyin~
All probing locations, surface water sampling points, and monitoring wells were
surveyed using a Total Station Surveying Instrument to establish horizontal and vertical control.
Positions of the probing locations and the wells were established relative to permanent site
features. All locations were surveyed to the nearest 0.1 foot. At each monitoring well, the
vertical elevation, referenced to mean sea level, was surveyed to the nearest 0.01 foot. The
elevation was established at the measuring point marked on the edge of each uncapped PVC well
casmg.
A.7 Water-level Measurement
The water-level in a well was measured before collecting a groundwater sample to
determine the volume of water to be purged. A round of synoptic water-level measurements was
also performed in selected wells to interpret groundwater flow directions and to estimate
hydraulic gradients at the site. Water levels were measured according to the following procedure.
The depth to water in each monitoring well was measured with a clean electric water-level
indicator. The measuring point marked on the top of each PVC well casing served as the
reference point. To minimize errors, the measurement was repeated until two consecutive
readings agreed within 0. 01 foot. Results were recorded in the field notebook. For consistency
between the wells, one observer using a single water-level indicator measured the depth to water
during the synoptic water-level measurements. The water-level indicator was then
decontaminated as described in Section A.12 prior to moving to another well.
c:\hamilton\appndx_a.wpd(7/10/98) la
650138.0501 A-6
•
•
•
for volatilization. The remaining samples at the well were collected using the peristaltic pump .
At monitoring wells purged using a bailer, all samples were collected also using the bailer. The
bailer was slowly lowered and retrieved to minimize aerating the sample. The sample was gently
transferred from the bailer directly to the VOA vials. The SVOC and metal samples were then
collected directly into their respective containers through the peristaltic pump tubing.
The sample for VOC analysis was collected first in three clean, labeled, 40-mL
glass VOA vials that were completely filled and sealed without headspace using Teflon-lined
septum caps. Each vial contained hydrochloric acid to lower the sample pH. Immediately upon
sample collection, the vials were placed into an insulated cooler containing wet ice for storage.
The sample for SVOC analysis was collected in one clean, labeled, 1-L amber glass
bottle that was filled and sealed with a Teflon-lined cap. Immediately upon sample collection, the
bottle was placed into an insulated cooler containing wet ice for storage.
•
The sample for metals analysis was collected in one clean, labeled, 500-mL plastic •
bottle that was completely filled and sealed using a plastic cap. The bottle contained nitric acid to
lower the sample pH. Immediately upon sample collection, the bottle was placed into an insulated
cooler containing wet ice for storage.
After the last laboratory sample was collected at a well, a sample aliquot was
collected and measured for pH, temperature, and specific conductance. A Hanna Instruments
· Model HI 9023 pH meter was used to measure the sample pH and a YSI Model 33 S-C-T Meter
was used to measure sample temperature and specific conductance. Both instruments were
calibrated prior to each day's use according to the manufacturer's instructions. The sample was
located in a shaded area during measurement and the results were recorded as soon as the
readings had stabilized to ensure accurate and representative values.
Sampling activities conducted at all wells were documented in the field notebook.
Data recorded included the sampling team, sample identification information, purging and
collection methods, and the results of field measurements.
c:\hamiltonlappndx _a. wpd (7 /13/98) la
650138.0501 A-8
•
• A.10 Field Quality Control (QC) Samples
Three types of Quality Control (QC) samples were prepared and submitted to the
analytical laboratory with the·field samples. The QC samples, which were used to verify that all
sampling and analytical techniques were performed properly, included trip blanks (TB), equipment
blanks (EB), and matrix spikes/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSD).
A.10.1 Trip Blank
A trip blank is a VOC sample vial filled in the laboratory with organic fre~ water,
transported to the site, handled like a sample, and returned to the laboratory for analysis. Trip
blanks were not opened in the field. The trip blank for soil samples is the same as for water
samples.
One trip blank accompanied every cooler of soil and water s~ples sent to the
• . laboratory for the analysis of VOCs. This blank was analyzed for VOCs only.
•
A.10.2 Equipment Blank
An equipment blank is organic free water that is poured into or pumped through a
sampling device, transferred to a sample bottle, and transported to a laboratory for analysis.
Equipment blanks were prepared for the closed piston sampler used to collect soil
samples and for the bailer, tubing, and foot-valve pump used to collect the groundwater samples.
The blanks were analyzed for all laboratory analyses requested for the field samples. Equipment
blanks were collected at a rate of 5% of all field samples.
A.10.3 Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicates
Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSD) samples were used to evaluate the
effects of the chemical matrix of water and soil samples on the analytical process. MS/MSD
c:\hamilton\appndx_a.wpd (7/10/98) la
650138.0501 A-9
samples were collected in the same way as field samples. In the laboratory, known amounts of
select target analytes were added. Measurements from these spiked samples were compared to
data from the unspiked samples to evaluate the precision and accuracy of the analytical process.
MS/MSD samples will be collected at a rate of 5% of all field samples.
A.11 Sample Documentation. Packa1in1. and Shippin1
The following procedures were used to manage the field samples and QC samples
following collection. All samples were classified as environmental samples for shipping purposes.
A.11.1 Sample Custody and Documentation
Once collected, all samples remained in the possession of the sampling team or
were locked in a vehicle at all times prior to transfer of custody for shipment to the laboratory.
Prior to packaging, each sample's unique identification number was entered on the chain of
•
custody record along with the names of the samplers, type of sample, time of collection, number •
of containers, requested analyses, and any sample preservation used. A separate chain of custody
accompanied each sample shipping container.
. A.11.2 Sample Packaging
The following procedure was followed in preparing each sample shipping
container. A medium-sized, insulated cooler was selected and its drain plug was sealed with duct
tape on both the interior and exterior sides of the cooler. The cooler was lined with a large plastic
bag and a layer ofvermiculate was added to the bottom of the cooler. Each sample container was
placed in an appropriately sized polyethylene freezer bag and sealed. Several layers of sample
bottles were then placed in the cooler with fresh ice, double bagged in gallon-size polyethylene
freezer bags, added on top of and below each layer. The plastic bag lining the cooler was then
secured with duct tape and the signed chain of custody was inserted into a plastic freezer bag and
affixed to the interior side of the cooler lid. The cooler lid was taped shut and secured with two
c:\hamilton\appndx_a.wpd (7/10/98) la
650138.0501 A-10
•
• signed custody tapes. Appropriate shipping labels were then affixed to the top and sides of the
cooler.
A.11.3 Sample Shipment
The packaged samples were delivered to a commercial overnight carrier for
shipment to the laboratory on a priority basis. A copy of each air bill was retained to document
the shipment.
A.12 Equipment Decontamination
All non-dedicated, non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated
between each use. A plastic-lined decontamination pad was constructed in the rear of the facility
and served as a central decontamination area. All large equipment was decontaminated in this
area. Most small equipment (i.e., instrument probes, sampling spoons, etc.) ~as decontaminated
• at each work site; however, all wash and rinse water were containerized and transported to the
central decontamination area for temporary storage pending proper disposal.
•
A.12.1 Large Equipment
Large equipment included all downhole probing tools that came into contact with
soil during test probing, soil sampling, and well installation. After each use, the equipment was
transported to the central decontamination area for further cleaning using a high-pressure steam
wash from the site's potable water supply. Soil samplers were also scrubbed in a phosphate-free
soap and water solution followed by rinsing liberally in potable water. Finally, the
decontaminated equipment was allowed to air dry.
A.12.2 Small Equipment
Small equipment was decontamin~ted by washing in a phosphate-free soap and
water solution. The equipment was then rinsed in deionized water and allowed to air dry.
c:\hamilton\appndx _a. wpd (7 /10/98) la
650138.0501 A-11
A.13 Borehole Abandonment
All test borings not completed as monitoring wells were immediately abandoned by
grouting using neat cement. The prepared grout mix was added to the borehole using the gravity
fill without tremie method until undiluted grout flowed ~o the surface. A small amount of
additional grout was placed at the land surface to offset potential shrinkage or settlement.
A.14 Manaa:ement oflnyestieation-Deriyed Waste
Investigation-derived waste (IDW) was primarily water generated from well
development, well purging, and equipment decontamination. This IDW was contained in 55-
gallon, DOT-approved, steel drums. Upon filling, each drum was sealed and labeled as to point
of origination, date of accumulation, and contents. The drums were staged on-site within the
fenced portion of the facility pending proper disposal.
c:\hamilton\appndx_a.wpd (7/13/98) la
650138.0501 A-12
•
•
•
•
•
•
CONEPENETROMETERSURVEY
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This document describes the fundions of the cone penetrometer and discusses the
technology employed by Handex for geotechnical testing and hydrocarbon fluorescence
detection. In addition the document details manu~I and automated field procedures, data
collection/interpretation and soil classification. ·
2.0 DATA ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS METHODS
.1 Introduction
This section contains a discussion of the cone penetration test procedure including the
methods used to measure tip stress, sleeve stress and pore pressure. A discussion of the
fuel fluorescence module used in conjundion with the CPT is included. Calibration
methods used during the project for each of the CPT sensors is also discussed~ · This
section is concluded with a description of soil sample collection procedures and methods
for installing temporary monitoring wells using the CPT .
.2 Cone Penetration Testing
The cone penetrometer consists of an instrumented probe which is forced into the ground
using a hydraulic load frame mounted in a box truck with the weight of the truck providing
the necessary push mass. · The probe has a conical tip and a fridion sleeve which
independently measure vertical resistance beneath the tip and fridional resistance on the
side of the probe. A schematic view of the CPT penetrometer probe is shown in Figure 2.1
-Schematic of Cone Penetrometer/Fuel Fluorescence Detector ProbeFigure 2.1 -
Schematic of Cone Penetrometer/Fuel Fluorescence Detector ProbeFigure 2.1 -Schematic
of Cone Penetrometer/Fuel Fluorescence Detedor Probe. A pore pressure gauge in "the
cone is used to measure the pore water pressure as the probe is pushed into the ground
(CPTU). In addition, an FFD module, shown in Figure 2.1, is utilized to measure
fluorescence intensity with depth, which allows rapid delineation of residual hydrocarbons
as the tool is advanced .
~HANDEX® -
. 1 Piez~ne Penetration Test Procedure
The penetrometer equipment is mounted inside a 14 ft box truck body. Ballast in the form
of metal weights are installed in the truck frame to achieve an overall push capability of
24,000 lbs. The truck is also equipped with a pair of hydraulic earth anchors which provide
an additional 20,000 lbs of push capacity when deployed. Penetration force is supplied by
a pair of large hydraulic cylinders bolted to the truck frame.
The Handex cone penetrometer uses a 15 an2 probe, which has a 1. 75 inch diameter, 600
conical tip, and a 1. 75 inch diameter by 6.50 inch long fridion sleeve. The penetrometer is
normally advanced vertically into the soil ·at a constant rate of 48 inches per minute,
although this rate is typically reduced when hard layers are encountered. The electronic
cone penetrometer test is conduded in accordance with ASTM 03441, 1986.
Inside the probe, two load cells independently measure the vertical resistance against the
conical tip and the side fridion along the sleeve. Each_ load cell is a cylinder of uniform
cross sedion inside the probe which is instrumented with four strain gages in a full-bridge
•
circuit. Forces are sensed by the load cells and the data is transmitted from the probe
assembly via a cable running through the push rods. The analog data is digitized,
recorded, and plotted by computer in the penetrometer truck. A set of data is normally
recorded each second, for a minimum resolution of about one data point every 0.8 in of •
cone advance. The depth of penetration is measured using a string potentiometer mounted
on one of the push cylinders.
As shown in Figure 2.1, the piezo-cone probe senses the pore pressure immediately
behind the tip. Currently, there is no accepted standard for the location of the sensing
element. Handex chose the sensing element located behind the tip as the filter is proteded
from the direct thrust of the penetrometer and the measured pore pressure can be used to
correct the tip resistance data (discussed below} as recammended by Robertson and
Campanella, 1988. The magnitude of the penetration pore pressure is a fundion of soil
compressibility and permeability. In freely draining soil layers, the measured pore
pressures will be very close to the hydrostatic pressure computed from the elevation of the
water table. VVhen low permeability soil layers are encountered, excess pore pressures
generated by the penetration process can not dissipate rapidly resulting in measured pore
pressures which are significantly higher than the hydrostatic pressures. Whenever the
penetrometer is stopped to add another section of push rod, or when a pore pressure
dissipation test is run, the excess pore pressure may begin to dissipate. When the
penetration is resumed, the pore pressure quickly rises to the level measured before the
penetrometer was stopped. This process causes some of the spikes that may appear in
the penetration pore pressure data.
•
~.HANDEX®
•
•
•
.2 Saturation of the Piezcx:one
As shown in Figure 2.1, penetration pore pressures are measured with a pressure
transducer located behind the tip in the lower end of the probe. Water pressures in the soil
are sensed through a 250 micron porous polyethylene filter that is 0.25 inch high and 0.202
inch thick. The pressure transducer is connected to the porous filter through a pressure
port as shown in Figure 2.1,; .. The pressure port and the filter are filled with a high viscosity
silicone oil.
In order for the pressure transducer to respond rapidly and correctly to changing pore
pressures upon penetration, the filter and pressure port must be saturated with oil upon
assembly of the probe. A vacuum pump is used to de-air the silicone oil before use and
also to saturate the porous filter with oil. The probe is assembled with the pressure
transducer .facing upwards and the chamber above the pressure transducer is filled with
de-aired oil. A previously saturated filter and cone tip is then threaded into place, excess
oil is ejected through the pressure port and filter, effectively forcing out trapped air ..
Saturation of the piezcx:one is verified with field calibrations performed before the probe is
inserted into the ground. The high viscosity of the silicone oil coupled with the small pore
space in the filter prevents the loss of saturation as the cone is pushed through dry soils.
Saturation of the cone can be verified with a calibration check at the completion of the
penetration.
.3 Fuel Fluorescence Detector
The fuel fluorescence detector provides a rapid method for in situ detection of
hydrocarbons. The FFD emits fluorescent light which excites hydrocarbon molecules
causing them to fluoresce. The FFD module mounts directly behind the piezo-cone and
·incorporates a down hole mercury bulb which projects ultraviolet light through a sapphire
window into the soil.
Hydrocarbons absorb the UV light and emit energy in the form of fluorescence which is
reflected back through the sapphire window and transmitted to the surface through a fiber
optic cable. A photo multiplier tube in the CPT truck converts the optical signal to an
electrical signal which is communicated to the acquisition computer. The data output is
presented as fluorescence intensity, expressed in volts M. as a function of depth below
ground surface. The intensity of the fluorescent signal is proportional to the concentration
of hydrocarbons in the soil.
Preliminary laboratory results indicate the FFD can detect hydrocarbon concentrations in
sand as low as 100 ppm. Site specific calibrations can be developed by. measuring
hydrocarbon concentrations with field or laboratory equipment and comparing the actual
results to the FFD signals obtained in situ. A range of concentrations can be developed for
-~HANDEX® ............
different FFD signal intensities allowing for rough quantification of hydrocarbon •
contamination at a site .
. 4 Data Acquisition
Electronic data acquisition equipment for the cone penetrometer consists of an IBM
compatible 586 computer with a graphics monitor and a rack of eight customized signal
conditioners. Analog signals are transmitted from the probe to the signal conditioners
where the CPT data is amplified and filtered at 1 Hz. The digital data are then read into
memory, plotted on a graphics monitor, and written to the internal hard disk for future
processing. Data displayed on saeen can be used to determine site layering as it is
encountered. This allows important decisions to be made instantaneously in the field.
Upon completion of the·test, the penetration and fluorescence data are plotted. Plots can
typically be available within ten minutes of completing the test. Floppy disks containing the
data are brought to Handex' New York Division for preparation of final report plots and
analysis.
.5 Field Calibrations
Many faders can effectively change the calibration faders used to convert the raw
instrument readouts, measured in volts, to units of force or pressure. As a quality control
measure, as well as a check for instrument damage, the load cells, the pressure
transducer, and the fuel fluorescence sensor are routinely calibrated in the field.
Calibrations are completed with the probe ready to insert into the ground such that any
fador affecting any component of the instrumentation system will be included and detected
during the calibration.
The tip and sleeve load cells are calibrated with the conical tip and friction sleeve in place
on the probe. For each calibration, the probe is placed in the push frame and loaded onto
a precision reference load cell. The reference load cell is periodically .calibrated in the
manufacturer's (ARA) laboratory against NIST traceable standards. To calibrate the pore
pressure transducer, the saturated probe is inserted into a pressure chamber with air
pressure supplied by an on board compressor. The reference transducer in the pressure
chamber is also periodically calibrated against an NIST traceable instrument in the
manufacturer's laboratory. Additionally, the string potentiometer, used to measure the
depth of penetration, is periodically checked against a tape measure.
Each instrument is calibrated using a specially written computer code that displays the
•
output from the reference device and the probe instrument in graphical form. During the
calibration procedure, the operator checks for linearity and repeatability in the instrument
output. In general, each probe instrument is calibrated at the beginning of each day of field
testing. Furthermore, the pressure transducer is recalibrated each time the porous filter is •
~HANDEX® ........ -
•
•
•
changed and the cone is resaturated. Calibrations are also performed to verify the
operation of any instrument if damage is suspected.
To calibrate the FFD module a black opaque cover is placed over the sapphire window
effectively blocking out all visible light. This is the equivalent of ~dvancing the sapphire
window through clean sediments. No fluorescence response would be measured. This
can also be achieved by baselining the FFD module in the guide tube. This method
has provided comparable :results to the black cover. Once the background signal. has
been established, the voltage output of the probe can· be zeroed with the coarse and
fine adjustments on the FFD control panel. The probe is now baselined and ready to
be inserted into the ground. The data acquisition system records the background
reading as zero. FFD output is measured in volts which is proportional to hydrocarbon
concentration.
As the sounding proceeds the sapphire window will leave the guide tube and be
exposed to ambient light beneath the truck. This will be observed as an FFD spike on
the computer monitor. As the window penetrates the ground the optical signal will drop
back to zero. The FFD signal should remain close to background as the probe is
advanced unless fluorescing compounds (hydrocarbons) are encountered. Baseline
drift in the FFD signal can occur as the probe is advanced into the ground. Common
causes for signal drift are : change in lithology , temperature change and equipment
vibration. Signal drift is normally small {+/-.25 V) and can be distinguished from
fluorescence emitted from hydrocarbons.
To develop a correlation between FFD signal and hydrocarbon concentration a number
of standards can be prepared of known fuel concentrations. The samples can then be
placed on the sapphire window and the corresponding FFD output in volts can be
recorded. In most cases this relationship will not be linear, but will still provide
concentration ranges for different FFD voltages. This procedure is not always practical
due to the difficulty in obtaining samples of the fuel in the geologic matrix as it occurs in
situ. An alternate approach is to conduct CPT soundings adjacent to areas of known
(documented) soil contamination. This way the FFD signal can be compared to actual
hydrocarbon concentrations in the soil.
If no assessment work has b.een performed at the site, the CPT can be used to collect
soil samples at locations where low, intermediate and high FFD readings were
measured. These soil samples can then be analyzed in the field or laboratory by EPA
method 418.1 to determine total hydrocarbon concentration. The concentrations can
then be compared to the FFD signals to determine a range of TPH concentrations for
different wavelength intensities (Volts) or FFD output.
~.HANDEX® -
. 6 Penetration Data Correction
A typical penetration profile is shown in Figure 2.2 -Typical CPT Penetration
ProfileFigure 2.2 -Typical CPT Penetration ProfileFigure 2.2 -Typical CPT Penetration
Profile. Plotted as a function of depth are the measured sleeve friction, tip resistance,
friction ratio, and pore pressure. When the surface elevation of the test location is
known, the penetration data is plotted against elevation, otherwise plots are prepared
in terms of depth.
Tip resistance, qc (lb/in2), is obtained by dividing the vertical force on the conical tip by
the effective tip area (1.550 in2). The tip resistance is then corrected for pore
pressures acting behind the conical tip as discussed in the next section. The corrected
tip resistance, qt (lb/in2), is plotted in the penetration profile. Sleeve friction, fs (lb/in2)
is obtained by dividing the total frictional force on the sleeve by the sleeve's surface
area (23.26 in2). The offset between the depth at the tip and the depth at the friction
sleeve is corrected by shifting the sleeve friction profile downward so that it
corresponds to the depth at the centroid of the tip. In addition to the tip resistance and
sleeve friction, a friction ratio profile is plotted for each location. This ratio is simply the
sleeve friction expressed as a percentage of the tip resistance at a given depth. In
uncemented soils, the friction ratio can be 9orrelated to soil type. The final profile
•
shown in (Figure 2.2) is the pore pressure that is measured as the probe is advanced. •
This measurement is useful for identifying clay layers as the pore pressure rises
significantly above the hydrostatic level when fine grained materials are encountered .
. 7 Pore Pressure Correction of Tip Stress ..
Cone penetrometers, by necessity, must have a joint between the tip and sleeve. Pore
pressure acting behind the tip decreases the total tip resistance that would be
measured if the penetrometer was without joints. The influence of pore pressure in
these joints is compensated for, by using the net area concept (Robertson and
Campanella, 1988). The corrected tip resistance is given by:
where:
q-r = q + u(J -A,,)
1: Ar
q't = corrected tip resistance
Qc = measured tip resistance
u = penetration pore pressure measured behind the tip
/\, = net area behind the tip not subjected to the pore
pressure ( 1.257 in2)
At = projected area of the tip (1.550 in2).
(2.1)
•
~~~HANDEX® ...........
•
•
•
Hence, for the ARA cone design, the tip resistance is corrected as:
qt =qc: + u(.1890)
Laboratory calibrations have verified Equation 2.2 for ARA'S piezo-cone design.
A joint also exists behind the top of the sleeve (see Figure 2.1 }. However, since the
sleeve is designed to have the same cross sectional area on both ends, the pore
pressures acting on the sleeve cancel out. Laboratory tests have verified that the
sleeve is not subjected to unequal end area effects. Thus, no correction for pore
pressure is needed for the sleeve friction data.
(2.2)
The net effect of applying the pore pressure correction is to increase the tip resistance
and to decrease the friction ratio. Generally, this correction is only significant when the
pore pressures are high while measured tip resistance is very low .
. 8 Depth Correction of the Pt?netration Data
When the cone penetrometer is stopped or pulled back during a test, misleading data
can result. For instance, when the probe is stopped to add the next push rod section.
or when a pore pressure dissipation test is run, the excess pore pressures will dissipate
towards the hydrostatic pore pressure. When the penetration is resumed, the pore
pressure generally rises very quickly to the pressures experienced prior to the pause in
the test. In addition, the probe is sometimes pulled back and ·cycled up and down at
intervals in deep holes to reduce soil friction on the push rods. This results in
erroneous tip stress dafa when the cone is advanced in the previously penetrated hole.
To eliminate this misleading data from the penetration profile, the data is numerically
edited before it is plotted or used in further analysis. Each time the penetrometer stops
or backs up, as apparent from the depth data, the penetration data is not plotted.
Plotting of successive data is resumed only after the tip is fully re-engaged in the soil
by one tip length (1.52 in) of new penetration. This algorithm also eliminates any data
acquired at the ground surface before the tip has been completely inserted into the
ground. The sleeve data is similarly treated and this results in the first data point not
occurring at the ground surface, as can be seen in some tip and sleeve profiles. These
procedures ensure that all of the penetration data that is plotted and used for analysis
was acquired with the probe advancing fully into undisturbed soil.
~HANQEX® -
. 11 Soil Sample Collection
Soil samples are collected with a 2 inch OD stainless steel discrete interval sampler.
The sampler closely resembles a standard split spoon in shape and size. It is 2 feet
long and contains a cylindrical sample chamber. However, it differs from a split spoon
in that the cutting mouth is fitted with a drive point which seals the sampling chamber
•
from the formation while the sampler is driven to the desired depth. The sample •
chamber is fitted with an inner sleeve which is either a solid tube or split tube in 2
halves. When the top of the sampling interval is reached, a wireline is lowered down
the push rods and attached to the drive point. The drive point is then unlocked from
the cutting mouth and retract~d to the top of the sample chamber. The open sampler is
then driven down through the soil. The sample is retained with a plastic basket fitted at
the bottom of the sampler chamber. Upon removal from the ground, the sampler is
opened and the sample removed by sliding out the inner sleeve. The sampler is easily
decontaminated with a steam cleaner or alconox and deionized water. The sample can
be easily sealed within the sample sleeve for preservation.
•
~-HANDEX® ..._..
••
•
•
3.0 DISCUSSION OF TEST DATA
.1 Soil Classification From the CPT
The tip resistance, friction ratio, and pore pressure values from CPT profiles can be
used to determine a soil stratigraphy profile. The methodology used in this report to
classify the soils is based on specific emplrical correlation's that were developed by
Timian et al., {1992) from modified Robertson {1988) charts. The method is
summarized in the chart shown in Figure 3.1 -Soil Classification Chart (Robertson
1990). In general, clean, coarse grained soils have high strengths (high tip resistance)
with relatively low sleeve friction, while finer grained soils have low strengths (low tip
resistance) and h'igh sleeve friction (cohesion).
Soil classification can be determi.ned from the charts by comparing the normalized tip
resistance to the normalized friction ratio. The tip resistance is normalized according
to:
where:
q-r-u q = . "° " . Uv'o
q0 = normalized tip stress
qr =corrected tip resistance from Equation 2.~
crvo = total overburden stress
crvo = effective overburden stress
and the normalized friction ratio, fSN is defined as:
I IN= I. XJOO%
q-r-u...,,
(3.1)
(3.2)
The plot of any point of the q0 versus fsN value normally falls in a classification zone of
Figure 3.1. The classification zone number corresponds to a soil type as shown in the
figure. The classification zone number is then used to determine the Unified Soil
Classification System {USCS) profile which is ·then plotted versus elevation for each
penetration test as shown in Figure 2.2. At some depths, the CPT data will fall outside
~HANDEX®
of ttie range of the classification chart. When this occurs, no data is plotted and a break
is seen in the classification profile.
The classification profiles are very detailed, frequently indicating significant variability
in soil types over small changes in elevation. In order to provide a simplified soil
stratigraphy for comparison to standard ·boring logs, a layering and generalized
classification system was implemented (i.e., soil unit descriptions located to the right of
the classification profile). A minimum layer thickness of 1.0 foot was selected. Layer
thicknesses are determined based on the variability of the soil classification profile.
The layer sequence is begun at the ground surface and layer thicknesses are
determined based on deviation from the running mean of the soil classification number.
Whenever an additional 6 inch increment deviates from the running mean by more
than 0.50, a new layer is started, otherwise, this material is added to the layer above
and the next 6 inch section is evaluated.
The soil type for the layer is determined by the mean value for the complete layer. The
ten types are classified as:
Profile Range
1.00-2.25
2.25 -2.75
2.75-3.25
3.25 -3.75
3.75-4.25
4.25-4.75
4.75 -5.75
5.75-6.75
6.75-7.50
7.50-9.00
Soil Type Description
Sensitive Clay Soft fine grained soils
Soft Clay Organic soils, peats
Clay Clay to silty clay
Silty Clay Silty clay to clayey silt
Clayey Silt Clayey silt to silt
Sand Fine Grained Sandy silts to sandy clay
Sand Mixture Silty fine sands
Sand Fine to coarse sands
Gravelly Sand Sands and gravels
Over Consolidated Heavily compacted or cemented soils
A more detailed classification can be determined from the classification profile plotted
just to the left of the soil type (unit) layers (Refer to class FR in Figure 3.2). The
layering provides a summary of the engineering classification of soil stratigraphy.
Minor bedding can be identified from the peaks and valleys on the individual tip,
sleeve, pore pressure and ratio profiles.
•
•
•
~-HANDEX® --
•
•
•
4.0 REFERENCES
American Society for. Testing Materials, "Standard Method for Deep Quasi-Static Cone
and Friction-Cone Penetration Tests of Soil," ASTM Designation: 03441, 1986.
Annan, A.P., P. Bauman, J.P. Greenhouse, and J.D. Redman, "Geophysics and
DNAPLS," Ground Water Management, No. 5, Proceedings of the Outdoor Action
Conference on Aquifer Restoration, Ground Water Monitoring and Geophysical
Methods, Las Vegas, NV, May 1991 .
Robertson, P.K. and R.G. Campanella, Guidelines for Using the CPT, CPTU and
Marchetti DMT for Geotechnical Design, Vol. II, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, BC, Canada, March 1988.
Saksa, P. and J. Korkealaakso, "Application of Geophysical Methods in Environmental
and Municipal Engineering Theoretical Study," Espco Technical Research Center of
Finland, October 1987.
Timian, D.A, W.L. Bratton, B.E. Fisk, "Piezo Electric Cone Penetration Tests In
Support of Geotechnical Investigation at Sections 617 and 1/9 of fresh kills Landfill,
Staten Island, New York-Development of correlation's for soil classification and In-Situ
Properties", Applied Research Associates, Inc., May, 1992 .
!_. HANDEX® -.
/
CABLE
HUD BLOCK
POLYPROPELENE
FILTER
•
---·SENSE FI BER
1i-.--~~SAPPHIRE ~fNDO~
HERCURY LAHP
•
_.,..---PCRE PRESSURE GAUGE
FRI CTI ON SLEEVE
60 CONI CAL TI P
ff f ftf t
Tl P STRESS • FIGURE 2.1
Schematic of Cone Penetrometer /Fuel Fluorescence Detector P~'t-IANDEX ® -
•
•
•
APPENDIXB
CPT/FFD BORING LOGS
~ 1-jcndax• CPT/FFD Profile: -F1 ~
Permit *= I Drill Date: 4/01/98 Use:
Location: Proctor Siiex Owner Loe #:
Owner: Radian Internat Handex Loe f: PROCTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 13.25 .ft. Diameter: L75 In.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: SCREEN -length:
Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
-Pore .... Graphic -Tip Ratio FFO Boring -Class FR Geoto9c Description ..c Pressll'e 0. (psi) Cil (V) Log Diagra11 ~ (psi)
-=:::;:-----l3, ? ........ ;:_ ' Sand :"::::::::':".:.: .. · ' Ff" -!·~-:;:\"Zf ~~=.~f.::f.: Sand Mixture ,..
5-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ........ :.::.:.:.::.:.:.:::.::~. --5 ·-· \ Sandy Fina Grained ~·-·-·-· -·-·-·-· ... -:.:::;::.:::.:. \ Sand Mixture -:;::;::.:::.:. -::::.:::.:::.:. Clayey Slit ..
10--·-·-·-· 1-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . .... . . . .
<~ :.)~: .: /~ :. Sand ::::::. -........
\Sand I 15-. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ........ ......... -i5
20-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ~o
,
25-. . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . , ........ . . . . . . . . . ........ -25
30-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... •'· .... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... ~o
..
• ..
35-. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... f-e5
40-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ........ -•$0
45-. . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . ......... ~5
50-. . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . " .. .......... f-50
00721.C2M25:.47 4!518J>7Cl712911 11 2 40 5 k) 0 I 2 3 0 2 4 a al
NOTES:· l .. Static Water Level; CPT Fiie Naf!le: XOIA809
Geologist: I CPT Operator: JM
Q 11andcz:c• CPT/FFD -Profile: F2 ~
-· Permit #: I Drill Date: 4/01/98 Use: '
Location: Proctor Silex Owner Loe *=
owner: Radian Internst Hand ex Loe#: PROCTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 13.19 ft. Diameter: L75 Jn.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
~ Tip Ratio Pore FFO Graphic Boring ..c Pressure Class FR Geologic Description c. (psi) (%) (V) Log Diagram QJ (psi) Cl
~-····· ~=:.:-~.:~.::·~} Gravelly· Sand r
.. -~~ Sandy Fine Grained
5-. . . . ............. . . . . . . .. . . ......... . . . . f-5 .. . -·-·-·-· -:.:::..:::.:::.:. Clayey Slit -·-·-·-· -·-·-·-· -·-·-·-· -:.:::;::.:::;.
10-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... ••IC . .. .o ::.•::.•::.·-·: Sand Mixture ...................... ::.•::.·::.·.·: • ::·:.::·:.::·::·~ Sand Mixture -~ ,r
15-. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -15
20-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . " .... . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . f-20
25-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . ............ . . . . .. . . . -25
30-. . . .. .. . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . . . . .. . ......... -30
-
35-. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . ~ ........ ........ -65
40-.. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. .. .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . ........ f-40
' 45-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . .......... . . . . . . . . -.t5
• 50-. . .. . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ......... HiO
00 721.C2K2Si3s.4:l 491516Jl 7G7?Z91111 II 2 40 5 ~o I 2 3Q 2 4 8 ~
NOTES: l = Static Water Level; CPT Fiie Name: XOIASIO
Geologist: I CPT Operator: JM
(\ 11~da:x:• CPT/FFD -Profile: F3 ~
Permit *: I Drill Date: 4/01/98 Use:
Location: Proctor Silex Owner Loe f:
Owner: Radian Internat Handex Loe f: PROCTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 12.82 ft Diameter: L75 In.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
~ Tip Ratio Pore FFD Graphic Boring ..c: Presstre Class FR Geolo~c Description 0. (psi) C~) (V) Log Diagra11 8 (psi)
L? ' "--.::::.-:.,::::·-~.: .. · , Gravely. Sand ~ /:._
:.::.:-:.::.:-:.::~:·.~ . ' /
.. ~ ........ "\ Sand MlxtLW"a f :-5 5-. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . .. . ... ·-·-·-·-~ -·-·-·-· Sand ·-·-·-·-I Slty Cay
, Clay I-
10-.. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . r HO : ·.·: ·.·:. I\_ : .~ ..... :_ .... · .. Sand :' :·:.: :·::·:
15-.. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. . . ........... -i5
20-. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... l-20
25-. . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. .. . . . .. . ......... l-25
30-. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~' . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .......... -ao
i:
I
35-............................. .. . . .. . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ......... ~5
I-
(1
' I 40-.. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . i .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . ........ f-.40
I
.
45-. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. ......... . . . . . . .. . -45
I
i I
50-.. . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . · 1 .... •'• ...... .. . . .. . .. . .. . ............ f-50 • 0 875 1350 2025 2700 0 2 40 5 no I 2 3 ~ 2 4 a re
NOTES: ' ,. Static Water Level; CPT Fiie Na~e: XOtA811
Geologist: I CPT Operator: JM
Q 11~dcz:c• CPT/FFD -Pro-file: F4 ........
• Permit #: I Drill Date: 4101/98 Use:
Location: Proctor Silex Owner Loe *=
Owner: Radian Internat Hand ex Loe*= PROCTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 13 ft. Diameter: L75 In.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: SCREEN -Length:
·Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
...... Pore ...... Tip Ratio FFO Graphic Boring ..:: Pressure Class FR Geologic Description 0. (psi} (%) (V) Log Diagram Q) (psi) c::i
~ ::::.~:;;·.:..::· ~ f <;;: 0 }:,,... ;;.. ~ ... d \ Gravelly Sand :.::;.:::':,:.:: ·.= ..... :.·:.=.·::·. ' ' :•.•:•.•:•,o,'• ·.=.·:}.•:.:.•:.\ Sand Mixture :;.•::.•::.•:: ~ 5-. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ..... ·-·-·-·-.., , -·-·-·-· Silty Clay
~ -~-·-·-· Clayey Slit \····· ..:::.::::::=.· -·-·-·-·
10-·······z··········· ·~· .. ····· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... <~:-~·/'..:/~ :. Sand rlO
: .: ..... :_ .... : . .. ... ... • 15-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . H5
20-. . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ -20
25-. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .............. . . . . . . .. . -25
30-.. .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . . .......... . . . . . .. .. . i-ao
35-.. . .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . . .. . .. .. . ......... ~5
40-. . .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . . .............. . . .. .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . l-40
45-. . . . . . . .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . .............. .. . .. .. .. . .. . -45
• 50-.......................... . .. .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. .. .. . . . .. .. ............ 1-50
0 500 klOO 500 2000 0 2 41) 5 no I 2 3 () 2 4 8 ~
NOTES: ! = Static Water Level; CPT Fiie Name: XOIA812
Geologist: I CPT Operator: JM
(\ 1-jandczx• CPT/FFD -Profile: F5 ~ I l
Permit #: I Drill Date~ 4/01/98 Use:
Location: Proctor Siiex I Owner Loe I:
Owner: Radian Internat I Handex Loe #: PROCTR
Owner Address: I BORING -Depth: 12.85 ft. Diameter: L15 In. I
Drilling Method: cone Penetrometer \ CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: I SCREEN -Length: I
Static Water Level: I I WELL -Depth:
g Tip Ratio Pore FFD Graphic Boring .c Pressll'e Class FR Geologic Description Q. (psi) ('.i) (V) Log Diagran ~ (psi)
__$ .:: ::.: .. ~ ::.: .. ~ (·./{ Sand Mixture ~ ·-·-·-·-· ' r -·-·-·-· Clayey Slit r
~ 5-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .... Clay -·-·-·-·-
~ SUty Clay r·
-·-·-·-· \Clay r
~~ :.:-:.~ :.:.:: ~::.:~ ~-1r -10 10-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . .
,.:::.....::.::.: , Clayey Slit r -Sand Mixture I ...
15-. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . ....... Clayey Slit -15
Clayey Slit
20-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . l-20
25-. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . .. . l-25
30-. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... .. .. .. . . . . . -ao
"
35-. . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . .......... . ........ f-35
40-. . . . .. .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . ............ ........ . .. . .. . . . . HO
45-. . .. .. . . .. . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. . .. .. . ........... -45
50-. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . . ..... . .. . . . . . ....... . ........ -50
0 75 60 2'25 300 0 2 40 a 60 I 2 31l 2 4 8 SI
NOTES: i "' Static Water Level; CPT Fiie Name: X01A813 I
Geologist: I I CPT Operator: JM I I
~ t-tanda:x:• CPT/FFD -Profile: FB ~
• Permit #: I Drill Date: 4/01/98 Use:
Location: Proctor Silex Owner Loe #:
Owner: Radian Internat Hard ex Loe*= PRO CTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 12.59 ft. Diameter: L75 In.
Drilling Method: cone Penetrometer CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
-Pore ..,.... Tip Ratio FFO Graphic Boring -.c Pressure Class FR Geologic Description 0. (psi) (:t;) (V) Log Diagram Q) (psi) Cl
-~ ~--. ] ji~:~[l Sand Mixture (-·· . . /· -5-.......... ··+·· ..,
~ ~=i:~){{J~ Sandy Fine Grained
•!:'.•'f/1:
I> r?··· 10-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·l· • . . . . . . . . . . . -iO
Clay • 15-. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . -i5
20-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ........ f-20
25-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ f-25
30-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ -ao
35-. . . . . . . . . " ........... . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . .......... . . . . . .. . . f-65
40-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ f-40
45-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ f-45
• 50-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ -60
0 300 8.00 900 t200 fiOIOO 0 2 4P 8 fj 0 1 2 3 0 2 4 8 8l
NOTES: ? = Static Water Level; CPT Fiie -Name: XOIA814
Geologist: I CPT Operator: JM
Q 1-j~dC!:x:· C,T/FFD -Profile: F7 ~
Permit *= I Drill Date: ~/01/98 Use:
Location: Proctor SJ/ex I Owner Loe I:
Owner: Radian Internat I Handex Loe *= PRO CTR
Owner Address: I BORING -Depth: 12.8 ft. Diameter: L15 In.
I Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer I CASING -Length: I
t
Sampling Method: i SCREEN -length:
Static Water Level: i WELL -Depth:
\ -Pore -6'aphic .... Tip Ratio FFO Boring -.s:: Pressure Class FR Geologic Description Q. (psi) ('.¥) (V) Log Oiagra11 ~ (psi)
~ I --~ .. ... ... • ---.·.:~·.·:'; ~-.:·_:} Sand • :~::.:.::::.:.::::<<( Sand Mixture
5-. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... . . ...... . . . ... .:;:::::::::: , Clayay Slit f-5 ·-·-·-·-/"'
-~ !'-·-·-·-· \ SUty Clay r ,..
' -·-·-·-· ,\ Clayey Slit t" 10-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . •I•••••• •• . .. . ... ~:-:~:. .. .f.i·:.i;~!;,iJ~ rrHO .:;::;::;::;: t SUty Clay
~--·-·-· ...... ______
Sandy Fine Grained ,. ' '
15-. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . ....... ........ 1 Clayey Slit Hs
20-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. ...... ......... f-eO
25-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
I
. . .. .. . . . .. . . . ....... ........ '-25
30-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. ....... ........ .-00
.
35-. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. . . . ...... ......... f-65
• 40-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... ......... f-.40
45-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . ...... ........... l-45
•
50-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. " .. " .. H>O
0 200 400 600 800 ll04!00 0 2 4b 1 2 3 .. 50 1 2 3b 2 4 e 81
NOTES: l "' Static Water Level; CPT File Name: XOIA815 I
Geologist: I I CPT Operator: JM I
0 11anda:x:• CPT/FFD -Pro-file: FB ~
• Permit *: I Drill Date: 4/01/98 use:
Location: Proctor Silex Owner Loe #:
Owner: Radian Internat Handex Loe #: PROCTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 12.82 ft Diameter: LT5 In.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: SCREE.N -Length:
Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
E Tip Ratio Pore FFD Graphic Boring ..c: Pressure Class FR Geologic Description -0. (psi) (%} (V) Log Diagram Q) (psi) c:i
........
~ Sand r
~~~:~:~~~{~:\} Sand Mixture
5-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ~;~:'.:'.;/;?} ~
P.-·-·-·-· Clayey Slit
;·:,
10-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . 'J: Sandy Fine Grained -10 ; ·;,. ·-·-·-·--·-·-·-· Siity Clay ,,-• 15-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . \ Siity Clay -;
-15
20-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . -........... . . . . .. .. . . f-20
25-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -25
:
30-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -ao
'·
35-. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... ~5
40-. . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . ............ . .. . . . . . . -40
45-. . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . ............ . . . . . . . . f-45
• 50-. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. ......... . . . . . . . . -{)Q
0 500 ~00 fiOO 2000 0 2 40 8 fi 0 1 2 3(1 2 4 8 81
NOTES: ? = Static Water Le"'.el; CPT Fiie Name: X01A816
Geologist: I CPT Operator: JM
(\ 1-tandax· C,T/FFD -Profile: F9 .......
Permit *: I Drill Date: ~/01/98 Use:
Location: Proctor 51/ex I Owner Loe*=
Owner: Radian Internat I Handex Loe *= PRO CTR I
Owner Address: l BORING -Depth: 12.72 ft. Diameter: t15 In.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer I CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: I SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
-:-Pore =-Tip Ratio FFD Graphic Boring
.&: Press1Se Class FR Geologic Description Q. (psi) (X) (V) Log Oiagra11 ~ (psi)
' ~ ~ ~ :·.·:·.·:· ~Sand . · ... ~ .. ~ /· :· .. :·.·:· .. :· l .::::::::::::::: Sand Mixture · !--·-·-·-·
5-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . :.::.:=.:=.· Clayey Slit -5 . . . -::::::::::::::: -·-·-·-· -·-·-·-· -::::::::::::::: • e
10-. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . ....... :;:. .... Clay HO
·-·-·-·-· ~::..:::..::-· , Clayey Slit /"""
15-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ,• ...... . . . . . . . . -i5
20-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ........ f-20
..
f-25 25-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .........
30-. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . ........ -ao
35-. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. .. . .. . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . ......... . .. . . . . . . -as
40-. . . .. .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . ..... . .. . . . .. . . -40
.
45-. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. ......... ~5
50-•' . . .. .. . . .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. . . .. . .. . . . . . . . ........... -50 .. .. .. . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . .
0 .,0 200 300 400 500800 0 2 40 I 2 3 4 50 2 3 0 2 4 e I
NOTES: 1 • Static Water Level; CPT Fiie Name: XOIA817
Geologist: \ I CPT Operator: JM
~ I-land ax• CPT/FFD -Pro-file: F10 .......
•• Permit #: I Drill Date: 4101/98 Use:
Location: Proctor Siiex Owner Loe #:
Owner: Radian Internat Hand ex Loe*= PRO CTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 12.71 ft. Diameter: L75 In.
Drilling Method: cone Penetrometer CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
l I ..... Pore I ~ Tip Ratio FFO Graphic Boring -I ~ Pressure Class FR Geologic Description I ..... (psi} (~} (V} Log Oiagra11 Q. (psi} .3
'
D .< ~ ... : .:. ~ ... ~ .. : :. Sand -~~~t~t~~~:~~~~ Sandy Fine Grained
5-. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . -~ .......... . . . . ... ~==:=.· Clayey Slit 1-5 -r-·-·-·-·--·-·-·-· Siity Clay ·-·-·-
I~···· /:'.:::·.:;:·.:,:_.· , Sand Mixture / Ho 10-. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .... ·-·-·-·--·-·-·-· Siity Clay ·-·-·-·----• \ Siity· Clay -;
H5 15-. . . . . .. . . . . " ........... . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . .
20-. . . . " ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .......... . . . . .. . . . hw
25-. . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .......... -es
30-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . -...... .. .. . . . . . . . ........... ~o
35-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . ........ ~5
40-. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ l-40
45-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ......... -45
• 50-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . ......... H5o
0 HT 234 351 488 5~i700 0 2 4~ I 2 3 4 50 I 2 JP 2 4 8 al
NOTES: i = Static Water Level; CPT F.lle Name: XOIA818
Geologist: I CPT Operator: JM
(\ I
1-tcnda%• I -CFf>T/FFD Profile: F11 ...,..._.
I I
I I
Permit #: Drill Date: \4/0t/98 Use:
Location: Proctor Silex I Owner Loe I:
Owner: Radian Internat I Handex Loe I: PRO CTR
Owner Address: I BORING -Depth: 12.J ft. Diameter: L15 In.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer I CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: I SCREEN' -·Length: I
Static Water Level: I WELL -Depth:
..... Pore Graphic -Tip Ratio FFO Boring -.s:: Press11e Class FR 6eologc Description a. (psi) (I) (V) Log Diagra11 c3 (psi)
~ I . l.. :~~~·;·~~~-;·~;)~ ;. ~ i~ Sand Mixture -......__ li~l!l!il~; Sandy Fine Grained
5-····7···· ·--~ . . . . . . . . . . ........ H;
~
,._,_,_, __
Clayey Slit .:::::::::::: .. ~·-·-·-· .. ...·-·-·-·
10-······~······ ~ ....... :. I••••••••. . . . ... l~{i:,.JF!.ifrt:.;.i: Sandy Fine Grained r r10
" ·-·-·-·-1 ~ Clay
suty aay
15-. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . -... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . .. . . . H5
I-
20-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ -eo
25-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... -es
I-
30-. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . ........ r-ao
I-
35-. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . ........ f-35
"
40-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ....... HO
45-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . ......... . ....... 1-45
50-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. . . . . . . .. . .. ........ -50
0 50 ~o 60 200 0 2 -40 I 2 3 4 50 I 2 30 2 4 e ai
NOTES·: ' • Static Water Level; CPT Fite Name: XOIA819 I
Geologist: I I CPT Operator: JM
Q 11anda:x:• CPT/FFD -Pro-file: F12 ~
• Permit *= I Drill Date: 4/02/98 Use:
Location: Proctor Silex owner Loe *:
Owner: R8dlan Internat Hand ex Loe *= PRO CTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 12.42 ft. Diameter: L15 In.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
-Pore --Tip Ratio FFO Gl'aphic Boring -.::: Pressure Class FR Geologic Description i5. (psi) (%) (V) Log Diagram ~ (psi)
7 ~ ~ ) .... ~; :·;·~~:·;·~·;)~ ; . Sand Mixture
-·-·-·-· ~ !'-·-·-·-· ~\ Clayey Slit !:.. f-5 5-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... ~;!J~lJ~!~~~~l . Sand Mixture
'i
•
.:> ·f""' .... ·-·-·-· ~ i
10-. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . >······ .. ......... . . . . . . . ,, Clayey Slit ;;. HO I ~ ; ... ; ... ,· ... j.:,; •• :j.
I ~~:~~:~?,H!!:~::~~:~ ' ,
I Sandy Fine Grained r
15-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i-15
20-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . -ea
25-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . f-25
30-. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . .......... .. .. .. . . . . .. i-30
35-.. .. . . .. . .. .. . . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . .......... :-95
40-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ............ . . .. . . .. . . HO
45-. . . . .. .. .. .. . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . ............. .. .. .. . .. . .. . -45
• 50-.. . .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . . .. . .. .. .. . . . . ........... 1-50
0 500 M>OO 500 2000 0 2 4P M> 20 30 41'.SO 0 1 2 30 2 4 B al
NOTES: l = Static Water Level; CPT Fiie Name: X02A801
Geologist: I CPT Operator: JM
('\ 11~da:x:• CPT/FFD -Profile: F14 ~
• Permit #: I Drill Date: 4/02/98 Use:
Location: Proctor Silex Owner Loe *:
Owner: Radian Internat Hand ex Loe*= PRO CTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 12.38 ft. Diameter: L75 In.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
~ Tip Ratio Pore FFD Graphic Boring. ..r:: Pressure Class FR Geologic Description '5. (psi) (%) (V) Log Diagram Q) (psi) CJ
1'.:X~i/~~:.:}:g.:~,
•
l ~ ~ :·.·:·.·:· Sandy Fine Grained
~· ~ :.:.~.: :.:.: ~:-::: ~· Sand ··~···· ........ 5-. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . Ii. ••••••••• . . . . . . . . . . ....... .:::.:::.:::.::· Sand Mixture -~ ~ j -~ Sand -·-·-·-·--·-·-·-· Clayey Slit -... -to 10-. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . ··~ ......... ........ 11~i 2rni~1i i; Clay
Silty Clay .....
15-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sandy Fine Grained -15
Sensitive Clay
20-. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . l-20
25-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . -25
30-. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . ........ r,30
35-. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. .......... -65
40-. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . ............. f-40
45-. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ........ 1-45
• 50-. . . -........ -. -...... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . .. .. . .. . . ......... ~o
0 200 400 600 800 XlOC!OO 0 2 40 (j 20 30 0 1 2 31) 2· 4 8 8l
NOTES: l = Static Water Level; CPT Fife Name: X02A808
Geologist: I CPT Operator: JM
(\ I 1-jan~ax· I -C/fT/FFD Profile: F15 ~ I I
Permit f: I Drill Date: \ 4/02/98 Use:
I
Location: Proctor Silex I Owner Loe*:
Owner: Radian Internal I Handex Loe *: PROCTR
Owner Address: I BORING -Depth: 13.08 ft. Diameter: L15 In.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer I CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: I SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: I WELL -Depth:
~ Tip Ratio Pore FFO Graphic Boring ..c Press1n Class FR Geolo~c Description Q. (psi) (X) (V) Log Diagrain ~ (psi)
I
I ........
1:..~ I' _\. Sand -~ ~= :-:<.: :-:<.:::.:~~. r ........ , Sand Mixture r 5-. . . . . . . . . . . .... ,:<{.{i;~~t ~~i:!1~{{f.' ' f-5 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~-· ·-·-·-·-, Sand r
IJ -·-·-·-· rr r:.:::.:::.::::. 1 Sandy Fine Grained ~·-·-·-· "'-·-----· 1 SMty Cay r 10-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p····· . . . .. . . . . . . . . ... :•.•:•.•:•.·.·· HO ','.·:.: .. :.'.·:.\ rr ~ ·-·-·-·-Clayey Slit -·-·-·-·
Sand Mixture r~
~
15-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ••••••• 1 ••• . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . ....... sny Clay l-i5 '
20-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... .......... f-20
25-. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . .. ....... ........ -25
• •
30-. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . ........ ......... ~o • •
35-. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. ........ ........ -35
40-.. .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .......... ~o
45-. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ....... ........ f-45
50-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .... ~ ....... . . .. . . . . . . ........ ~
0 217 434 851 888 lJSIOO 0 2 41> 20 40~ I 2 3~ 2 4 8 •
NOTES: l "' Static Water Level: CPT Fiie Name: X02A805 I
Geologist: I I CPT Operator: JM
~ 11anda:x:• CPT/FFD -Pro-file: FIB ........
• Permit #: I Drill Date: 4/02/98 Use:
Location: Proctor Silex Owner Loe *:
Owner: Radian Internat Handex Loe #: PRO CTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 13.14 ft. Diameter: LTS In.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
-Pore ~ Tip Ratio FFO Graphic Boring -~ Pressure Class FR Geologic Description 0. (psi) (%) (V) Log Diagram Q.) (psi) CJ
i:::;.;:,;.;,::
•
_,..? l.> ,, Gravelly Sand ;;. ~ ........ c:::.... .................. " JI t::> ·.: ... ·.=.·:.=.·:.". Sand ····r···· ~ :·: ... :: .. .::··:·:
5-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . Jr H; ,...._, ____
Sand Mixture . ~::.::-:.:::.: . . ,_.,_, ____
< 1--·-·-·-· Clayey Slit -·-·-·-· ...
to--. . . . . . . .. . . . . .... -~~;~';,/;~~~~~{!~~~ " Sandy Fine Grained Ho ··~············· . . . . . . . ..... ~ . ~:=::=::=:: /
I ·-·-·-·-,\ Clayey Slit '"'-.
Siity Clay
15-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . HS
Siity Clay
20-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. ......... . .. . .. . . . . l-20
25-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . ......... -25
30-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ............ . .. . .. .. . . . f-aO
35-. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. .. . -............ .. .. . . . .. . . . . ............... . .. .. . . . . . -95
40-. .. .. . . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . .. .. .. .. . . ......... f-40
45-. . . . .. . .. .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. f-45
• 50-. . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. . .. . . .. .. . . ............ ~o
0 )'.)0 200 300 -400 0 2 -41> 20 -400 1 2 31:) 2 -4 e 9l
NOTES: ? = Static Water Level; CPT Fiie Name: X02A804
Geologist: I CPT Operator: JM
Q I-land ax· I -CPr/FFD Profile: F17 .......
I I I Permit *= Drill Date: 4/02198 Use:
Location: Proctor Silex I Owner Loe f:
Owner: Radian Internat .. I Handex Loe #: PROCTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 12.91 ft. Diameter: L15 Jn.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer I CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: I SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: I WELL -Depth:
.-Pore -Tip Ratio FFD Graphic Boring -..c PresslJ'e Class FR Geolo!jc Description Q. (psi) (I) (V) Log Oiagra11 ~ (psi)
I ~ Over Consolidated • c_ .. .
·r··········· ~ 5-. . . . . . . . . . ·i· ••••••• . . . . ... -·-·-·-· , Clayey Slit ~ ·-·-·-·-· ,r
·<
-=====· I-'":,;::;:-:,:::;. Clayey Slit
~=:-:.::-:.:. , ":.:::::::::;. ·s: ........ -~··· ~·-·-·-· 10-. . . . . . . . . . .... -·-·-·-· -'0
Clay
15-. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... H5
20-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ~o
25-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . ........ ~5
30-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . ....... ~o
35-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . I•••••••• ......... -as
40-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... -40
45-. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... r-45
50-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... ........ -50
o k)02003004oosooeoorooaoo• o 2 41) 20 400 I 2 31) 2 4 e al
NOTES: i • Static Water Level; CPT Fiie Name: X02A803 I
Geologist: I I CPT Operator: JM I
(\ 11andC!x· CPT/FFD -Pro-file: F1B ...,.r
• Permit #: I Drill Date: 4/02/98 Use:
Location: Proctor Siiex Owner Loe#:
Owner: Radian Internat t Handex Loe #: PRO CTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 12.98 ft. Diameter: LT5 Jn.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
::: Pore .:::. Tip Ratio FFD Graphic Boring ..c: Pressure Class FR Geologic Description 0. (psi) (~) (V) Log Diagram Cl> (psi) CJ
•
7 ::.•::.•::.·.·: ' f
~ ~ _\ Sand Mixture !:. ~{~~:t~t~~~~!~~@ ' f " --!~-:1: .. 1:.:.•:"!~-:.': , Sandy Fine Grained = -~· ::.·::.•::.·.·: r H5 5-) . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . .... r .:::=.:.:::::· :-.. Sand Mixture
<
1r
:.:=.:.=.:.... \Clayey Slit r -·-·-·-· I-·-·-·-· Clay ,..
10-. . . . . . . . . . . . .. < .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ::.•::.•::.•.·: HO 1-·-·-·-· Clayey Slit L.-,_, ____ ,..
Sand Mixture
15-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ......... Clayey Slit H5
1 Clay
20-. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . --20
25-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ f-e5
30-. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ -ao
35-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ !-'35
40-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ f-40
45-. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -......... . . . . . . . . -45
• 50-.. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ f-50
0 125 250 375 500 0 2 40 .i 20 30 0 I 2 30 2 4 8 ai
NOTES: l = Static Water Level; CPT Fiie Name: X02A809
Geologist: I CPT Operator: JM
0 '1andax:• C,T/FFD -Profile: F19 ........
Permit #: I Drill Date: 14102198 Use:
Location: Proctor SJ/ex I Owner Loe #:
Owner: Radian Internat I Handex Loe #: PROCTR
Owner Address: I BORING -Depth: 13.13 ft. Diameter: L75 In.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer I CASING -Length: I
Sampling Method: I SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: I WELL -Depth:
-'"'1' Pore =-Tip Ratio FFO Graphic Boring .c Pressll'e Class FR 6eolo9c Descr~tion Q. (psi) eii (V) Log Diagra11 ~ (psi)
I ........ r " Sand ;;. ' ~~ ~:'.:'.i:::'.:'.~::~?: ~ Sand Mixture
5-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ........ . . . . . . . ~· ;~·;:~-;~·;:~;.:~/ ~ -·-·-·-· -·-·-·-· Clayey Slit I-~:=.:::::::.
<:: --·-·-·-· -·-·-·-· Clayey Slit -10 10-. . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . .. ,.::::::::::.·
·-·-·-·----·-·-· SUty Clay
15-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ -15
20-. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1• ......... ........ -20
25-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... -25
30-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . f-QO
I-
35-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ -es
40-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I••••••••• ........ -40
45-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ 1-45
50-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ....... ........ ~o
0 2'25 450 875 900 0 2 40 l) 20 30 I 2 30 2 4 ti s
NOTES: ? .. Static Water Level; CPT Fiie Name: X02A807 I
Geologist: I I CPT Operator: JM
I .
(\ 11anda:x:· CPT/FFD -Pro-file: F2D .......
• Permit #: I Drill Date: 4/02/98 Use:
Location: Proctor Silex owner Loe *=
Owner: Radian Internat ' Handex Loe *: PRO CTR
Owner Address: BORING -Depth: 13.15 ft. Diameter: L75 In.
Drilling Method: Cone Penetrometer CASING -Length:
Sampling Method: SCREEN -Length:
Static Water Level: WELL -Depth:
~ Tip Ratio Pore FFO Graphic Boring ..c: Pressure Class FR Geologic Description 0. (psi) (~) (V) Log Diagram i3 (psi)
•
~
.. ~ s r ! ~ ::;:~ ~ ::;:~ ~·:~.~~~· Over Consolidated r
~'. :.~-~ '.:·.~·~: ~:·/~: Sand Mixture / ....... ~·· -5-. . " ...... . . . .... ~:=.:=::=.· -
<
-·-·-·-· Clayey Slit 1--·-·-·-·--·-·-·-· -·-·-·-· -·-·-·-· -·-·-·-·
10-s····· ;···· . . . . . . . . .. . . . .... ::··.::··.::··:·: '-Sand Mixture r -10
Clay -
15-. . . . .. .. . . . .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . .. .. ............ \c1ay I -15
i
20-.. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . .. ................ . ........... f-20
25-.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. . .. . . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . .. .. .............. .. . . .. . . .. . -25
30-.. . . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . >-30
35-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . ........... '" ........ -65
40-. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . ......... . . . . . .. .. . -40
45-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ........ -45
• 50-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ f-50
0 no 200 300 400 500600 0 2 40 n 20 30 0 I 2 30 2 4 8 8l
NOTES: 1 = Static Water Level; CPT F.lle Name: X02A806
Geologist: I CPT Operator: JM
•
•
•
APPENDIXC
QUALIFIED ANALYTICAL DATA
•
•
•
Radian International collected five surface water samples on March 16, 1998 at the Hamilton
Beach-Proctor Silex facility in Washington, NC. The samples were submitted to Radian's
analytical laboratory in Austin, Texas for the analysis of volatile and semivolatile organics (SW-
846 8260B and 8270C), and total metals (SW-846 6010B and 7470C). A trip blank was also
received by the laboratory for the analysis of volatile organic compounds.
A review was conducted by Radian of the analytical results, which were reported by the
laboratory under work order numbers 9803361-364. The data evaluation was modeled after the
National Functional Guidelines for Organic and Inorganic Data Review (EPA, February 1994).
Accuracy was determined from the review of holding times, spike recoveries, initial and
continuing calibration, and blank contamination. Precision was based on the evaluation of
laboratory duplicate results. The results of the data evaluation are summarized below.
All samples were received intact and in good condition by the laboratory on March 17, 1998.
The temperature upon receipt was within the laboratory specification limits of 2-6°C. All
samples were prepared and analyzed within holding times.
The results of the laboratory control sample (LCS) analyses were reviewed for accuracy and
precision. Laboratory specifications were met during all analys~s; however, project limits of 60-
140% were exceeded during the following organic LCS analyses:
::_:·Merno.d::--· /. : ..... :: .. ::. : . : .. : ,:.L.CS:·: : . ... .. ·.
VOA
SVOA
VOA
SVOA
LCS
J+
R-
LCS98137/LCSD981328
LCS981329/LCSD981330
LCS981343/LCSD981344
LCS981432/LCSD981432
Volatile organic analysis
Semivolatile organic analysis
Laboratory control samlpe
Estimate positive values
Reject nondetects
.. :: .. ·.: .. · "· '·"' ·:. : .. Anal\'te::,.-.. ,,:.: :
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
Acetone
Benzi dine
Benzoic acid
Hexachlorocvclooentadiene
· :: '%R:ecoyetV/ \. Attfo:~i::::
57,55 J+/R-
147, 144 J+
57,56 J+/R-
154, 157 J+
58,56 J+/R-
0,0 J+/R-
32,22 J+/R-
21, 22 J+/R-
Associated sample results have been qualified as indicated above because the the recovery in both
the LCS and its duplicate did not meet project specification limits.
Surrogate recoveries were within laboratory specifications during all organic analyses.
Matrix spike (MS) analyses were performed by the laboratory at a frequency often percent. In
addition to batch quality control samples, surface water sample 0398HBWW81 was subjected to
an organic and inorganic MS analyses. Accuracy and precision criteria were met during the MS
and MS duplicate analysis of the project-specific sample, 0398HBWW81.
Page 1
All initial and continuing calibration IJboratory quality control criteria were met during the
organic and inorganic analyses. How~ver, during the volatile and semivolatile organic analyses,
project specifications were not met fol the following target analytes:
iJram11i:;•-eK!.::ni1i:m::#.Etittau~an&.f.ifJ.tiii:::a1lz.1:1tm1t1::::::I:1::t1mmrn:mti:::::m@;1m:1t::::::m:mm:t::1:1:::m:::::
Analyte Resul~ Acceotance Criteria Action 1
Acrolein 0.0158 RRF I >0.05 RRF J+/R-
Acetonitrile 0.0356 RRF I >0.05 RRF J+/R-
Acetone 45.3%RSD I <30%RSD J+/UJ-
Bromoform 39.7%RSD I <30%RSD J+/UJ-
lllil.!llilmilIIUlilililifiif.iiJ.!l~liU».m!!iilli~)~Jf~~~~:1:~1::~1111:11rfm11:~~ii::tI!iil!Il~1::1::::1::111I~;:I)!l~:::1:1:1:~;I~~j[~~I:::~:I~I:1:1::~1~I:m1
Calibration Date/Time I Results Action
3/19/98 @14:51 Analytes wit~ a recovery less than 80%: J+/UJ-
acetone (56), 1acrolein (21), methyl ethyl ketone
(78), trans-1,4f-dichloro-2-butene (74), 2-
3/20/98 @14:33
3/27 /98 @10:07
hexanone (781, tetrahydrofuran(76),vinyl
acetate ( 4 7)
Analytes with( a recovery greater than 120%:
Carbon disulfide (130), trichlorofluoromethane
04o> I
Analytes with! a recovery less than 80%:
acetone (55), acrolein (22), methyl ethyl ketone
(77), trans-l,t-dichloro-2-butene (75), 2-
hexanone (77~, tetrahydrofuran.(79), vinyl
, acetate (48) I
Analytes with! a recovery greater than 120%:
Carbon disulfide (124), trichlorofluoromethane
039) I
Analytes withl a recovery less than 80%:
acetone (59),
1
acrolein (19), trans-1,4-dichloro-
2-butene (70)l vinyl acetate (31)
Analytes with! a recovery greater than 120%:
trichlorofluoromethane (140)
J+
J+/UJ-
J+
J+/UJ-
J+
{s1mw.11151:::1•1fi:11m.t&Muatfl1t:mmn.B.ai:::atmm.s.1:::fi.E··.:'-ia:mm:::J::i:Mu::utrn::m:tmim:
Analyte Results Acceptance Criteria Action
2-Naohthvlamine 42.0%RSD I <30%RSD J+/UJ-
4-Aminobiphenvl 30.9o/oRSD I <30%RSD J+/UJ-
:::::§!m1m11::1m11::am!1:1i1Rf!i.1D.a:tm11vii»R!ill1:::m::::::::ii::::::::i:::::::::1:i::~:::::i:::::1:::t::::1:::::::m::::~:~:::::i:::::H::::i::::~i:::;;:::::::::::
Calibration Datelfime I Results Action
3/20/98@14:28 Analytes with!a recovery less than 80%: J+/UJ-
4-aminobiphenyl (75), benzoic acid (0), 2-
naphthvamin¢ (60).
RRF Average relative response ractlr
%RSD percent relative standard deviation
J+ Estimate positive values I
UJ-Analyte not detected and detecpon limit is estimated
R-Data unusable I
Methylene chloride, a common laboratbry contaminant, was detected at trace levels (0.0994 J to
Page2
•
•
•
•
•
•
0.437 parts per billion) in the method and trip blanks. No oiher volatile organic
contamination was detected in the blanks. ·In addition, semivolatile organic compounds
were not detected in the method blank. With the exception of mercury, cadmium and
chromium, inorganics were detected: in the initial and contim,1ing calibration blanks, and
method blank. Sample results not significantly greater (ten times for common
contaminants, five times for all others) than the maximum amount detected among the
blanks have been qualified as non-detect (ND) and the ~ample detection limit elevated to
the amount present in the sample and flagged with an "U''.
Multiple volatile organic analyses were performed because of elevated levels of
contaminants. Whenever the sample concentration exceeded the calibration range, the
results from the reanalysis that are within t~e calibration range are considered more
.accurate.
All inorganic results less than the detection limit have been qualified as non-detect (ND) .
Page3
~~ i:l :i 1: tt l
03/25/98 14:52:40
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
~ !i• ,.. l Lab ID: l File ID:
i Date Collected:
i' g l Date Prepared:
ii ~ Date Analyzed:
jl l:t. Dilution Factor:
Jl. l Matrix:
i';:. Units: t I Report as:·
0398HBWW81
9803361-0lA
W964'3
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 20:27
l
Water
ug/L
received
R B S U LT S S 0 N NA R y (Cont'd)
0398HBWW82
9803361-04A
W9646
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 22:26
1
Water
ug/L
received
039811BWW83
9803361·05A
W9647
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 23:06
l
Water
ug/L
received
Work Order U ~803361
Page _8 _
03981lBWWB4
9803361 ·06A
W9648
03/16hfU
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 23:46
l
Water
ug/L
received
_t_l.__ __ 1~co~ll.umn~:~~~~~·~~-l-~~-,.;;::=-~~~,~~-l-~~~ ~ i'1 Analyte Cone. DL co~n~c·-.----Dl:i ___ ---eon"-"·~. ----DL---.1----Con,~._ ____ D_L __ _
lf '4'
f
l
I
i I ·~
~
~
J
~ ~ r r
1 It
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Dimethylphenethylamine
2,4~0imethylphenol
Dimethylphthalate
4,6-0initro-2-methylphenol
1,3-0initrobenzene
2,4-0initrophenol
2,4-0initrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine/N-NitrosoOPA
Ethyl methanesulfonate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
•
NO 0.760
NO 0.369
NO 3.50
ND 12.4
NO 0.383
ND 0.258
NO 9.52
ND 0.502
ND 5.66
ND 0.426
ND 0.428
ND 0.612
ND 0.336
ND 4.88
ND 0.230
ND 0.307
ND 0.393
ND 0.624
~ -H6~..-~-~--.s:-~.~Ol
ND 0.306
ND 0.823
ND 0.399
ND 3. 79
ND 13. 4
ND 0.414
ND 0.279
ND 10. 3
ND 0 .543
ND 6.12
ND 0.461
ND 0.463
ND 0.663
ND 0.364
ND 5.28
ND 0.249
ND 0.332
ND 0.426
NU 0.675
. (<. ~115------.5-4.a.
ND 0.331
•
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0. 798
0.387
3.68
13 .0
0 .402
0.271
10.0
0.527
5. 94
0.447
0.449
0.643
0.353
5.12
0.242
0.322
o. 413
0.655
(L.--iw-...-~~~-s~.~2-6
ND 0.321
NO U.760
ND 0.369
ND 3.50
ND 12.4
ND 0.383
ND. 0.258
ND 9.52
ND 0.502
ND 5.66
ND 0.426
ND 0.428
ND 0.612
ND 0.336
ND 4. 88
ND 0.230
ND 0.307
ND 0.393
ND 0.624
f!.... t~ll't-T-----os,..., . .Q(,>'*-*
ND 0.306
•
•
•
•
Radian International collected seventeen soil samples on April 13 and 15, 1998 at the
Hamilton BeachOProctor-Silex facility in Washington, NC. All of the samples were
submitted to Radian's analytical laboratory in Austin, Te?Cas for the determination of
metals (SW-846 6010B and 7470e), pH (SW846 9045e), and percent moisture. Eight
samples were also analyzed for volatile and semivolatile organic compounds
(VOe/SVOe) by SW-846 Methods 8260B and 8270e, respectively; volatile and
extractable total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) by modified SW-846 Method 8015; and
oil & grease (O&G) by EPA Method 413.2. Total organic carbon was determined on
three soil samples. Sample 0498HBWF18B was subjected to toxicity characteristic
leaching procedure (TeLP) analyses. Equipment blank 0498HBWEO 1 was submitted to
the laboratory for the analysis of voe, SVOe, TPH, O&G, and metals. A trip blank was
also received by Radian's laboratory for the analysis of voe and volatile TPH.
A review was conducted by Radian of the analytical results, which were reported by the
laboratory under work order numbers 9804412 through 9804436. The data evaluation
was modeled after the National Functional Guidelines for Organic and Inorganic Data
Review (EPA, February 1994). Accuracy was determined from the review ofholding
times, spike recoveries, initial and continuing calibration, and blank contamination.
Precision was based on the evaluation of laboratory duplicate results. The results of the
data evaluation are summarized below.
Except for samples 0498HBWW91through93, and the trip and equipment blanks, all
samples were received intact and in good condition by the laboratory on April 16, 1998 .
The temperature of the samples upon receipt was within laboratory specification limits of
2-6°e. Air bubbles were found in the volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials for samples
0498HBWW91 through 93, and trip blank upon· receipt at the laboratory. Except for the
trip blank, VOA of these samples was conducted on vials containing no headspace. The
results of the trip blank vial that contained headspace were qualified as estimated (J/UJ).
The equipment blank (0498HBWE01) was received by the laboratory for the analysis of
O&G at a pH of 7. The blank was preserved upon receipt with H2S04 to a pH less than 2.
The O&G result for 0498HBWE01 was qualified as estimated (UJ). All samples were
prepared and analyzed within holding times.
The results of the laboratory control sample (LeS) analyses were reviewed for accuracy
and precision. Laboratory specifications were met during all analyses; however, project
limits of 60-140% were exceeded during the following organic Les analyses:
0498_S-l.DOC
Page I of5
06/22/98
''. .. :-Met.h.oo·::·::: )i'})}:. ::):'}':::.:-;:-:::JCCS''/'·.:-.,~.'i:.,,(·::·;.rc: ·:':· >t·"\-.:·,:.':/\,;//::Aiiilv.&.=::·:::\}f/:::.:.:·:,:{/t;: .. ')::%.~~:Y6'VJi. ('..ACti'CShL •
VOA LCS981928/LCSD981929 I Carbon disulfide 204, 199% None1
SVOA LCS981997/LCSD981997 I Benzoic acid 50, 55% J+/ R-
Hexachlorocvclopentadiene 16, 19%
LCS982118/LCSD982213 Benzoic acid 16, 30%
LCS982013/LCSD982013 Benzoic acid . 26, 23%
VOA Volatile organic analysis
SVOA Semivolatile organic analysis
LCS Laboratory control sample
J+ Estimate positive values
R-Reject non-detects
Associated sample results have bee ri qualified as indicated above because the recovery in
both the LCS and its duplicate did tot meet project specification limits.
Surrogate recoveries fell within laboratory specifications during all organic analyses I except for the VOA of samples 0498HBWF14B, 18A, and 18B, and extractable TPH
analysis of sample 0498HBWFI8Al. During the VOA of samples 0498HBWF14B, ISA,
and 18B, the surrogate recovery f~~ 1,2-dichloroethane-d4 was less than the laboratory's
lower control limit. VOA results fdr these three soil samples were estimated (J/UJ) due
to matrix interference. The surrogate recovery was greater than the upper control limit
during the extractable TPH analysiJ of sample 0498HBWF18A The positive result for •
diesel was qualified as estimated (J} in sample 0498HBWF18A
Acceptable results were obtained fJr the internal standards during ~11 organic analyses.
Batch quality control (QC) samples! soil samples 0498HBWF14A and-18B, and the e~uip.ment blank wer~ subjected to ~atrix spi~e (MS) an~lyses. ~ccuracy and precision
cntena were met dunng the MS an<ll MS duplicate analysis of equipment blank
0498HBWE01 for volatile TPH; o498HBWF14Afor SVOC, TPH, O&G; 0498HBW18B
for TCLP VOC, SVOC, pesticides, [and herbicides; and batch QC samples for extractable
TPH and metals. Laboratory QC criiteria were not met during the following project-
specific sample MS/MSD analyses:
1 No action required because the analyte T not detected in any of the samples associated with the QC •
analysis.
0498 S-1.IX>C
Page 2 of5
06/22/98
::_t9it::r .G~aH#~•#:&.:c:~~~r.~'io~:t:lt::,:,'::i:i:t:{:::::=:::,=_ :=:r::=:?:r:=:::=:::::::::;''::f=::;::::::::::::::r::::::·.::::::=:::::t::::'::::.::::::==:==:=t:t:::::::i:::::::.:::t.:,:::::.':i\/?::(:::::,::~,)::':;1;:
Calibration Date/Time I Results Action
4/22/98 @10:23 Analytes withj a recovery greater than 120%: I+
Acrolein (279~, dichlorodifluoromethane (131),
4/24/98 @10:00
4/23/98 @15:32
and trichlorofluoromethane (126)
Analytes with a· recovery greater than 120%:
Acrolein (239~
Analytes wit~ a recovery less than 80%:
2-chloroethylyinyl ether (38), vinyl acetate (47)
Analytes wit~ a recovery greater than 120%:
Carbon disulflde ( 185), tetrachloroethene
(122), trichlorofluoromethane (158)
I+
J+/UJ-
J+
:. s~m.V·oJaiili'::Oreanic==A:ui&ili'''.lsvoA1':F.i"iil'iilarutmratiQn:::ot:=31231'-3 .. 'ftilll:i44}::t=-·,::'.·:::=:·:.-=:::·:-.:.
Analvte Resultls Acceptance Criteria Action
4-aminobiphenyl 35.2%RSD I <30%RSD J+/UJ-
1-Naphthylamine 49.1%RSD <30%RSD J+/UJ-
2-Naphthylamine 39.8%RSD <30%RSD J+/UJ-
Benzidine 0.0482 RRF I >0.05 J+/R-
:::s"\t.(l~f:4:::t'.(>J!t~-~~g,·P.at!~~t!~lf~:1:::::t=~:tt::::;':::}:':=:':.:~:=:r{::iii::::::::::::f:::t··::=:r~::::::i::f:::{:t:::::::,:::::,j,:.:==::::::::=,::::I::'.::I:f'.:::::::::::::tt:=:.:=:r:(:·::==:'.':;::,;::::::::t:::
Calibration Date/Time I Results Action
4/22/98@12:47 Analytes withi a recovery less than 80%: J+/UJ-
Benzoic acid (o), kepone (67), 2-naphthyamine
(67) I
4/23/98 @09: 13
4/28/98 @06:56
Analytes with a recovery greater than 120%:
Benzidine (q4), carbazole (153), 3,3-
dirnethylbenzidine (150), 4,6-dinitro-2-
methylphenoll (122), methapyriline (144), 1-
naphthylaminb (141), and 4-nitroaniline 028)
Analytes wi~ a recovery less than 80%:
4-Aminobiphenyl (78), benzoic acid (5.1),
kepone (22), i-naphthyamine (34)
Analytes wi~ a recovery greater than 120%:
carbazole (147), dirnethylbenzidine (127), 4,6-
dinitro-2-methylphenol (131), 2,4-
dinitrophenol I< 121)
Analytes wit~ a recovery less than 80%:
Benzidine (2~), benzoic acid (0),
hexachlorocyclopentadiene (76), kepone (48),
1-naphthyan$e (60), 2-naphthylamine (11)
I+
J+/UJ-
J+
J+/UJ-
:.·$,yo~:,:;;t~!•*-iij~~i::~#J~j)~##:ijs!(~~latji.!~~)iilif::{:::r::::;=:i!fft::;:':::::=:;rf:{:::,:::::::{it:::':::=}{:'.\:::?:?t·:::··,:-:::,t.··:::.:.:,/:·:'===::::''·:.t\'::,
RRF
%RSD
J+
UJ-
R-
Analytes withj a recovery greater than 120%: J+
carbazole (152), 4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol
(126), 4-nitrobline (121)
Average relative response factor
percent relative standard deviation
Estimate positive values
Analyte not detected and detection limit is estimated
Data unusable
0498 S-1.DOC
Page4of5
06/22/98
•
•
•
•
•
••
• l
Three common laboratory contaminants (acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, and methylene
chloride) were detected during the VOA of the method, trip, and equipment blanks .
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, a semivolatile organic common contaminant, was detected in
the equipment blank. Acetonitrile, benzene, chloroform, 1,1-DCE, tetrahydrofuran,
1,1,1-TCA, TCE, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, m&p-xylenes, u~own TPH, heptachlor, and
heptachlor epoxide were also detected in the blanks during the organic analyses. With
the exception of arsenic, selenium, zinc, and mercury, inorganic contamination was not
detected in the initial and continuing calibration blanks, and method blank. Sample
results not significantly greater (ten times for common contaminants, five ~imes for all
others) than the maximum amount detected among the blanks have been qualified as non-
detect (ND) and the sample detection limit elevated to the amount present in the sample
and flagged with an "U''.
Precision was deemed acceptable for pH and percent moisture during the laboratory
duplicate analyses of sample 0498HBWF14A.
During the SVOA of samples 0498HBWF06A and-14A, 3-methylphenol co-eluted with
4-methylphenol. The result for 4-methylphenol in these two samples was reported as
estimated (J) since it may be the sum of the two indistinguishable isomers.
Multiple analyses were performed because of poor surrogate recovery, elevated levels of .
contaminants, or the potential for cross-contamination. The justification for qualifying
extraneous data as unusable (R) was as follows:
• The potential exists for results to be biased high or low whenever the surrogate
recovery exceeds the upper or lower control limit, respectively; sample results
associated with the reanalysis are more accurate whenever acceptable recoveries are
obtained.
• When sample concentrations exceed the calibration range, the results from the
reanalysis that are within the calibration range are considered more accurate (unless
diluted out).
• Data that has been R-flagged by the laboratory are considered unusable (R) when the
potential for cross-contamination exists.
All inorganic results less than the detection limit have been qualified as non-detect (ND) .
0498_8-1.DOC
Page 5 of5
06/22/98
•
SOIL SAMPLES
•
•
•
TCLP RESULTS
•
•
t 1
•
REPLICATE GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
•
•
•
•
•
Radian International collected eleven groundwater and two soil samples on May 12 and
13, 1998 at the Hamilton Beach¢Proctor-Silex facility in Washington, NC. All of the
samples were submitted to Radian's analytical laboratory in Austin, Texas for the
determination ofinetals (SW-846 6010B and 7470C): Nine groundwater and two soil
samples were also analyzed for volatile and semivolatile organic compounds
(VOC/SVOC) by SW-846 Methods 8260B and 8270C, respectively. The soil samples
were analyzed for volatile and extractable total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) by
modified SW-846 Method 8015, oil & grease (O&G) by EPA Method 413.2, pH(SW-
846 9045C) and moisture (SW846). An equipment blank was submitted to the laboratory
for the analysis of VOC, SVOC, TPH, and metals. A trip blank was also received by
Radian's laboratory with each shipment of samples submitted for the analysis of voe
and volatile TPH.
A review was conducted by Radian of the analytical results, which were reported by the
laboratoryunderworkordernumbers 9805166-5169, 9805171-5190, and 9805249-5252.
The dat~ evaluation was modeled a~er the National Functional Guidelines for Organic
and Inorganic Data Review (EPA, February 1994). Accuracy was determined from the
review of holding times, spike recoveries, initial and continuing calibration, and blank
contamination. Precision was based on the evaluation of laboratory duplicate results.
The results of the data evaluation are summarized below.
Except for the trip blanks, all samples were received intact 'and in good condition by the
laboratory on May 13 and 14, 1998. The temperature of the samples upon receipt was
within laboratory specification limits of2-6°C. Air bubl;>les wern found in one of the two
volatile organic analysis (VOA) trip blank vials received on May 13 and 14th. The
analysis of the trip blanks for voe was conducted on vials containing no headspace (i.e.,
vial containing an air bubble greater than 8 mm). Therefore, qualification of the trip
blank VOA results was not required. All samples were prepared and analyzed within
holding times. ·
The results of the laboratory control sample (LCS) analyses were reviewed for accuracy
and precision. Laboratory specifications were met during all analyses except the SVOA
and mercury. The relative percent difference exceeded laboratory specifications during
the semivolatile organic analysis ofLCS/LCSD-982349 for 3,3-dichlorobenzidine and
analysis ofLCS/LCSD-982362 for mercury. Results for 3,3-dichlorobenzidine in
samples 0598HBWW216 and 217 and mercury in samples 0598HBWF21A and 21B
were qualified as estimated (UJ). Project limits of 60-1400/o were also exceeded during
the following organic LCS analyses:
0598HB-G
Page 1 ofS
06/22/98
,:;::Methid!I ~ttift}::;,;t=tl:/,::t:cs:tt::tf?:=::·::?:::.:::::f(,' fhilf\/\":t?Analfte/f./{tf,:):::::::::~:'::, ;;::.~.11titee:mr.v1 t.Aaion:/:
VOA LCS981906/LCSD981907 Carbon disulfide 141, 142% None1
LCS982440/LCSD98244 l Carbon disulfide 50%, 59% J+/ R-
SVOA LCS982329/LCSD982329 Benzidine 0%, 0%
Benzoic Acid 51 %, 56%
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 34%, 33%
LCS982349/LCSD982349 Aniline 41 %,50%
Benzidine Oo/o, 0%
HexachlorocycloDentadiene 22%, 28%
LCS98231'4/LCSD982314 Aniline 55%, 54%
Benzidine 0%. 0%
VOA Volatile organic analysis
SVOA Semivolatile organic analysis
LCS Laboratory control sample
J+ Estimate positive values
R-Reject non-detects
Associated sample results have been qualified as indicated above because the recovery in both the
LCS and its duplicate did not meet project specification limits.
•
Surrogate recoveries fell within laboratory specifications during all organic analyses except for
the SVOA of sample 0598HBWW206. ·The surrogate recovery for 2-fluorobiphenyl and
terphenyl-d14 was greater than the laboratory's upper specification limit during the undiluted •
analysis of 0598HBWW206. Positive results for base/neutral compounds in this sample were
estimated (J) due to matrix interference.
Acceptable sample resulw were obtained for ~e internal standards during all organic analyses.
Soil samples 0598HBWF21A, 0598HBWF21B and 0598HBWS01, an~ groundwater sample
0598HBWW206 were subjecioo to mattix spike (MS) analyses. Accuracy and precision criteria
were met during the MS and MS duplicate analysis of 0598HBWF21A for TPH as diesel;
0598HBWF21B for oil and grease; 0598HBWS01for TPH as gasoline; 0598HBWW206 for
VOC. Laboratory QC criteria were not met during the following project-specific sample
MS/MSD analyses:
1 No action required because the analyte was not detected in any of the samples associated with the QC
analysis.
0598HB-G
Page2 of5
06122/98
•
analytes during the volatile and semivolatile organic initial and continuing calibrations. •
During the February 1 oth and May 11th volatile organic initial calibrations, the average
response factor (RF) was less than 0.05 for acrolein and acetonitrile. Non-detect results
for these two VOC in the associated samples have been qualified as unusable (R). The
percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) between RFs exceeded 30 for acetone,
bromofonn, and vinyl acetate during one or more volatile orManic initial calibrations.
During the semivolatile organic initial calibrations Qf May 6 and 7th, the %RSD for 2-
naphthylamine and benzidine was greater than 30. Associated sample results for the
above-mentioned compounds were qualified as estimated (J/UJ) due to poor precision.
Project specifications were not met for some analytes during the volatile and semivolatile
organic continuing calibrations. Positive results in the associated samples were qualified
as estimated (J) whenever the recovery for a continuing calibration standard exceeded
project specification limits of 80-120%. Whenever the recovery was less than 80%
during a continuing calibration, non-detect results for associated samples were qualified
as estimated (UJ).
Two common laboratory contaminants (acetone and methylene chloride) were detected
during the VOA of the ~ethod, trip, and equipment blanks. Benzene, chloroform, 1,2-
dichlorobenzene, phenols, and unidentified TPH were also detected in the blanks during
the organic analyses. Except for copper, mercury, thallium, and vanadium, all inorganic
target analytes were detected in the initial and continuing calibration blanks, method
blank, and equipment blanks. Sample results not significantly greater (ten times for
common contaminants, five times for all others) than the maximum amount detected
among the blanks.have been qualified as n.on-detect (ND) and the sample detection limit •
elevated to the amount present in the sample and flagged with an "U'.
Precision was deemed acceptable for pH and percent moisture during the laboratory
duplicate analyses of sample 0598HBWF21A and 21B, respectively.
During the SVOA of sample 0598HBWW206, 3-methylphenol co-eluted with 4-
methylphenol. The res.ult for 4-methylphenol in this sample was reported as estimated (J)
since it may be·the su1 of the two indistinguishable isomers. .
Multiple analyses were performed because of poor surrogate recovery, elevated levels of
contaminants, or the !1 tential for cross-contamination. The justification for qualifying
extraneous data as unu hie (R) was as follows:
• The potential exist for results to be biased high or low whenever the surrogate
recovery exceeds the upper or lower control limit, respectively; sample results
associated with th~ reanalysis are more accurate whenever acceptable recoveries are
obtained. I
• When sample conc
1
entrations exceed the calibration range, the results from the
reanalysis that are within the calibration range are considered more accurate (unless
diluted out). ·
0598HB-G
Page 4 ofS
06122/98
•
•
•
•
• Data that has been R-flagged by the labo{'.atory are considered unusable (R) when the
potential for cross-contamination ·exists.
Toluene and 1,1-dichloroethene were detected at a trace level during the reanalysis of
sample 0598HBWW222. The results for these two volatile organic analytes were
estimated (J/UJ) in sample 0598HBWW222 because they were not detected during the
initial analysis.
Tentative identified compounds (TIC) were determined during the SVOA of the
groundwater samples. All TIC results have been qualified as estimated (J/UJ).
All inorganic results less than the detection limit have been qualified as non-detect (ND) .
0598HB-G
Page 5 of5
06/22/98
•
GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
•
•
• 05/19/98 10:43:36
~~ Method ICP Analysis by SW6010B a-i (. • Test Code ICTSW5AF Ii Ii ll f:: -
[i ;!
g i-
§ f ~l i1
11
ii l
f
l
I
i
I ~
~
! i ·-
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution F&ctor:
Matrix: -Unita:
Report aa:
Column:
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Araenic
Barium
Bexyllium
Cadmiwa
Calciwa
Chrotai Ulll
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magneaium
Manganeae
Molybdenwa
Nickel
PotaaaiWll
SeleniWll
Silver
Sodium
J NI> Not cktec-k.J
-r\~
. "
f \f" ~ ¥\\r)\£1...~ vaJ2,ve.
0598HBWE01
9805166-08A
J61E0515-60
05/12/98
05/14/98
05/15/98
1
Nater
f/113/L
received
Cone. DL
~ 0·00¥440:; e.ee 1 ~ 0.0152
!Pl6o. 000140 J 0.00141
t-11>-t. eeun =ii 0.00327
~0.000440 0.000190
0.000'30. 0.000270
t.lb~ 0.000260
1.04" 0.0360
i.t> .. 0. 000520 i] 0.000400
fij) -Q OQ8HO SJ 0.000500
~ 8 QQlllliill -tr 0.000420
l'lb II. 18J:ll l 1117' 0.0201
0.00114 ti 0.00128
)l\) ... Q3.0ilo ~ 0.00426
0.0000700 J 0.000390
14~ l.80U30"'iJ 0.00100
0.000540 p 0.000610
l.01, 0.0328
t{b ·e.gg;i.'1 r 0.00144
h..n. . -·---.. -0.000630
0.442 0.102
• RBSULTS SUMMARY
0598HBWW206 0598HBWW207
9805166-09A 9805166-03A
J61E0515-62 J61E0515-55
05/12/98 05/12/98
05/14/98 05/14/98
05/15/98 05/15/98
l l
Water Water
mg/L mg/L
received received
Cone. DL Cone. DL
50.3 0.0152 50.7 0.0152
~ 1.100010~ 0.00141 NI>, o. 00116 v--~
rt(), 0. 00802 \A... e. eutt-0.0460 0.00327
0.445 0.000190 0.751 0.000190
0.00500 ~ 0.000270 0.0117 ~ 0.000270
t-l~. 0. 000290 Ii\. O...tl0021SO f\t> 0. QQQllct"OT 0.000260
79. 9 'II ;:)" 0.0360 8.94 Ji 0.0360
~B:UUlll_,,. 0.000400 0.0848 0.000400
0.0105 ~ 0.000500 0.0524 ' 0.000500
0.0106 0.000420 0.0729 0.000420
85.3 ;-:r 0.0201 56. 7" 0.020).
0.0376 ~ 0.00128 0.126 ; 0.00128
11.3 0.00426 6.18 0.00426
0.456 ::r 0.000390 0.370 0.000390
0.0311 0 .. 00100 t4I> 8. 8887911 ft 0.00100
0.0187 f 0.000610 0.0887_. 0.000610
6.18 P" 0.0328 5.31,lf' 0.0328
0.00320 0.00144 ~ 11.888'111 d 0.00144
til> g. 00151 .J. 0.000630 NL) -o. 00153 J 0.000630
131 :s 0.102 ll.l 0.102
( ~ No\-pv-e~ ~--+tu. o..SSvcA~te.ol le..vel ~ b(et.~~ Co\-d-a..~u..l·~O'K. ~ ~
1 ~
• Work Order # 9805166
Page _s _
0598HBWW218
9805166-06A
J61E0515-58
05/12/98
05/14/98
05/15/98
l
Water
mg/L
received
Cone. DL
f'\D 0.0232} IA. -~
~D 1.e9i9'-:r 0.00141
Nt>.o-.~oa20 ~ 0.00327
0.0395 0.000190
Nl>,0.000460 ,J!IA-O,QQlla1&·
~ B.QOQUO ~ 0.000260
85.6 ,.. 0.0360
tJi)"8 .11oono 'J" 0.000400
>lb 0. 880920 917 0,000500
0.000630 0.000420
3.35 ,. 0.0201
tt Cl. 9188188 Bet 0.00128
2 .. 18 0.00426
0.0867 0.000390
0.00238 0.00100
tJt>, 0.00174 ;a lA. ~l-6-
N(), l. 77 ~IA-~
hit> • Q OOQ8110 if-0.00144
0.00101 0.000630
9.19 0.102
• 05/21/98 16:46:13
~ ~ Method Mercury by SW7470A &! Test Code HGCSWAOO
!: i ii' Ji" Ii ll n :a n i1 g 5-
l f i;p
'i I i'
lf l
f
l
f
i
' ~
' I ·-~
f
i
1 1!'
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix: -Units:
Report as:
Collllllrl:
Analyte
Mercury
0598HBWW223
9805167-0lA
Z4051810-16
05/12/98
05/15/98
05/18/98 11:27:00
1
Water
-.g/L
received
Cone. DL
ti) •. 8888fiil." 0.000057
• ll B S U LT S S U II II All Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone. DL
Work Order # 9805167
Page _8 _
Cone. DL
•
~ r 05/20/98 16:54 ,45 E-;.
~ ~ Method Volatile Organics SW82608
1 i Test Code 826SWACM
:a 11::-l t
f:: ~ n :a ,. R
--U-9 !ir §~ ~1 i;:.
tt I i1
1f l
f
l
I
i
I ~
' f ·-l
I
<r I
l a.
Project Sample IO:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
n~re Preoared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
o-Xylene
Surrogate(sl
l,4-Bromofluorobenzene
l,2-0ichloroethane-d4
Toluene-dB
•
0598H8WW206
9805168-08A
80514825
05/12/98
05/U/98 23:57:00
10000
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. · OL
ND 414
Recovery
'
93
92
103
R KS U LT S S UM MAR Y (Cont'd)
059t!HliWW218 0598H8WW219
9805168-05A 9805168-06A
80514823 80514824
05/12/98 05/12/98
05/14/98 23:01:00 05/14/98 23:29:00
l l
Water Water
ug/L ug/L
received received
Cone. DL Cone. DL
ND 0.0414 ND 0. 0414
Recovery Recovery
' '
93 91
94 94
103 93
•
Work Ordtr H 9tl05lbH
Pagt lQ__
U598H8WW220
9805168-04A
80514822
05/12/98
05/14/98 22:34:00.
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0 .0414
Recovery
'
91
92
103
•
~ ~ 05/20/98 16: 54 :45
il I ~ Method Volatile Organics SW8260B f l Test Code 826SWACM
:at 1=-i. (:: -() :a
rl i.
i
I" I 9 s;.
11 t;p
!I il 11 11·
l
l
l
I i
I ~
' ~ ~ ·-i 1!
f
i
i ~ t
Project Sample JD:
Lab ID:
File ID: -
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
n-Propylbenzene
Styrene
l,l,l,2-Tetrachloroethane
l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
l,l,l-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorof luoromethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
m&.p-Xylene
•
0598HBWW221
9805168-03A
1i10514821
05/12/98
05/lt/98 22:06:00
l
Nater
ug/L
received
Cone. •DL
ND 0.0577
ND 0.0578
ND 0. 0848
ND 0.102
ND 0.0515
ND 0.489
ND 0.0522
ND 0.0896
ND 0.113
ND 0.0658
ND 0.0602
t-IO, 0.474 /."'-cr.ettn
ND 0. 0473
ND 0.0514
ND 0.0986
ND 0.0952
ND 0.0800
ND 0.0929
ND 0.0639
ND 0.115
R K S U L T S S U M M A R Y (Cont'd)
0598HBWW222 0598H8WW222
9805168-02A 9805168-028
80514820 80514931
05/12/99 05/12/98
05/l4/9tl .t.l:J9:UU --, •'>I~<> •v: •
l l
Water Water
ug/L ug/L
received received
Cone. DL Cone.
-
ND 0.0577 ND
ND 0.0578 ND
ND 0.0848 ND
ND 0.102 ND
ND 0.0515 ND
ND 0.489 ND
ND u.;> 0.0522 0.156 :r
ND 0.0896 ND
ND 0.113 ND
ND 0.0658 ND
ND 0.0602 ND
il 9.618 It 0."11'!12 ND
ND 0.0473 ND
ND 0. 0514 ND
ND 0.0986 ND
ND 0.0952 ND
ND 0.0800 ND
ND 0.0929 ND ~1
ND 0.0639 ND
ND 0.115 ND
•
:uu
DL
0.0577
0.0578
0.0848
0.102
0.0515
0.489
0.0522
0.0896
0.113
0.0658
0.0602
0.0892
0.0473
0.0514
0.0986
0.0952
0.0800
0. 0929
0.0639
0.115
Work Order # 98U~1Gli
Page~
U598HBWW223
9805H8-0lA
B0!::.14819
05/12/98
-
U;Jf.1.1/JO ~-.1:.•~.uu
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.0577
ND 0.0578
ND 0.0848
ND 0.102
NO 0.0515
ND 0.489
ND 0.0522
ND 0. 0896
ND 0.113
ND 0.0658
ND 0.0602
(l._ 2.iill R 9.9!19~
ND 0. 0473
ND 0. 0514
ND 0.0986
ND 0.0952
ND 0.0800
ND 0. 0929
ND 0.0639
ND 0 .115
•
~ ~ 05/22/98 08: 50; 58 RBS 0 LT S (Cont'd)
Tentatively Identified C<wipno•oo•
Extraction Batch # 3520980514105400
Analysis Batch # MSMSD180519084601
tl
.,..,1!
i:-Project Sample ID ..:.0..:.5~9..:.8H~B~W~W~2~1~9;;._ ______ _ l l Lab Sample ID 9805169-06A
~ i Fil-e # ..:.V..:.8.:.1.:.16..:._ __ ....._ __
~t-hed--SemUml.atiles by SW8i7QC
~~ .est Code 827SWBCM
i1 9 lr !f n n l
f
l
I i
I
~
' f ·-~ -::
f
I
l •
Results
Analyte ug/L
Ethyl E•ter Acetic Acid 8 0
Unknown ketone I, tlD, 71/J
Unknown t-11>, 70 l)..J"
Cyclohexenone J' NI>, 10 [,\}
Unknown 20 ::r
Unknown organic acid lOj
Unknown 5 ,j
Unknown 5.J
Unknown organic acid 40 :>
Unknown 7 "J'
•
Work Order N 9805169
Page .!!..1.._
Retention
Time
4.28
5.17
5.40
6.74
8 .37
9.93
10.94
11.19
15.88
16.77
•
05/21/98 16:49:08
0::-r Method Mercury by SW74 70A ll Test Code HGCSWAOO
l ~ n ll ~i u i1 9 s;. !I i)
(l
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID;
Date Collected:
·Date Prepared:
1"ate Anal:·--..J.
Dilution Factor:
Matrix: .
Units:
Report as:
ColulN):
Analyte
Mercury
1 t.· I ~~~-
l
f
l
f
i
I ~
' f ·-~
f
i
l •
RBSOLTS SUMMARY
0598HBWW201S 0598HBWW216
9805250-0JA 9805250-0lA
Zt051810-37 Z4051810-35
05/13/98 05/13/98
05/15/98 05/15/98
ftr #1<1/a9 12:19:00 05/18/98 12:15:00
.1 1
WAter Water
""iJ/L mg/L
received received
Cone. DL Cone. DL
1.;;•a .11111111~1 " 0.000057 ~6.0000'0 i:J 0.000057
•
0598HBWW217
9805250-02A
Z4051810-36
05/13/98
05/15/98
05/18/98 12:17:00
1
Water
mg/L
received
Cone. DL
N[) Cl.1181111~11 ~ 0.000057
Work Order # 9805250
Page _6 _
Cone. DL
•
• 05/22/98 08:54:30
~~Method Semivolatiles by SW8210C ll Test Code 821~WBCM
!: ~ lli Ii ll (:: -
11:a ; gl
lf i) It H l
f
l
f
i
I
~
~
i ·-
Project sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix: .. -Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Aeenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
2-Acetylaminofluorene
4-Aminobiphenyl
Aniline
Anthraeene
Benz(alanthraeene
Benz{a)pyrene
Benzidine
Benzo(blfluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzolklfluoranthene
Benzoie acid
Benzyl alcohol.
4-Bromophenylphenyl ether
Butylbenzylphthalate
Carbazole
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
p-Chloroaniline
0598HBWW216
9805251-0lA
V8130
05/ll/98
05/14/98 15:40:00
05/20/98 15:49
1
Nater
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.386
ND 0.356
ND 0.833
ND 0.410
ND 1.36
~ N9 J , ....
ND 0.408
ND 0.296
ND 0.269
~ ND 9.11
ND 0.336
ND 0.151
ND 0.335
ND vs 32.5
ND 0. 719
ND 0.211
ND 0.206
ND 0.239
ND 0.110
ND 1.14
!~) 1'kt dc\<3.+~ ~ 3 u..t.,~ v.i..e.v<. . . .
• RBSULTS SUMMARY
0598HBWW211
9805251-02A
V8131
05/13/98
05/14/98 15:40:00
05/20/98 16:30
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.386
ND 0.356
ND 0.833
ND 0.410
ND 1.36
~Na 1. ll!S
ND 0.408
ND 0.296
ND 0.269
f_-Htr" 9.81
ND 0.336
ND 0.151
ND 0.335
ND 1.A.-:S 32.5
ND 0.119
ND 0.211
ND 0.206
ND 0.239
ND 0.110
ND 1.14
f"° f'lo\-ckktW a.....&.~ c..l.R...-leC.lillY\ l1.w\ '~ e~~
(1.>-.. 'No\-~re.~ cJ1.A.Jy~..\t..JL (1.';>~.i.~ l~el1 "1l<U-IL ~IJ...~~Ci~'
1 R. W\~~ do.-tit..
l.-1!'
Cone. DL
Work Order # 9805251
Page L
Cone. DL
•
05/22/98 08:5•:30
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date l'repared:
""'~~··--~.
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report •S:
ColUlllll:
Andyte
Chlorobenziiate
bi•l2-Chloroethoxy)111ethAne
bial2-Chloroethyllether
bia(:l-Chloroiaopropyl)ether
:1-ChloronilphthAlene
:1-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
Chryaene
Di-n-butylphthAl•te
Di-n-octylphthill•te
Di•ll•te
Dibenzl•,hl•nthr•cene
Dibenzofur•n
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
l,•-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Diethylphthalate
•
0598HBWW216
9805:151-0lA
VIUO
05/13/98
05/U/H l5:•o:·oo
-:5/a#il-l:: .. ft
1
Nater
1.19/L
received
Cone. DL
MD o.:iu
MD 0.303
llD 0.156
ND O.l9:Z
llD 0.557
HD 0.337
III> 0.366
ND 0.380
HD 0.199
HD 0.228
ND 0.251
HD 0.171
HD 0.350
HD 0.627
ND 0.05
ND 0.513
ND l."3° 0.972
ND 0.571
ND 0.527
ND 0.277
llKSOLTS SUMMARY (ClaDl:'dl
0598HBWW217
9805251-02A
V813l
05/13/98
05/14/~8 15:•0:00
..,_, ..... · :ra .i..o =~-u
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.2U
ND 0.303
ND 0.156
ND 0.19:1
ND 0.557
ND 0.337
ND 0.366
ND 0.380
ND 0.199
ND 0.228
ND 0.251
ND 0.171
ND 0.350
ND 0.627
ND 0 ... 95
ND 0.513
ND w 0. 972
ND 0.571
ND 0.527
ND 0.277
•
Cone. DL
Work Order # 9805251
Page _6 _
Cone. DL
•
05/22/98 08:54:30
ii I~
I,...,! Project Sample 10 0598HBWW216
~Lab Sample 10 9805251-0lA l t File # .:.V.::.8:..13,.,,0,__ ___ _
J::~Method Semivolatiles by ~W8270C
l
!
~ l Tm Cod• ms"'°'
-. I g i;.
ll i;,
fl
11 l
l l
f
i
I ~
~
f
!
f
i
l
-
•
Analyte
K K S 0 L T S (Cont'd)
Teot.iltively Identified Owpoi•nd•
Extraction Batch # 3520980514154000
Analysis Batch H MSMS0180520085101
Results
ug/L
Ethyl E•ter Acetic Acid 20 J"
Unknovn ketone l\ll), 81.'J
Unknovn £ t.!I>, 501A'.l°
cyclohexenone ;: \')t:l1 7 \l..J
Unknovn ND, 5 llJ
Unknovn organic acid 10 ·;r
•
Work Order # 9805251
Page E_
Retention
Time
4.28
-5-:"tt" 5. tb
5.'1.0 '""::J•'" ·-
J' ·~ ;~o\G~ 6.75
8.97
16.76
•
• 05/22/98 08:54:30
~~
tl ... ii!
Ii I:° Project Sample ID 0598HBWW217 l. Lab Sample ID 9805251-02A l t File II ~V~81~3~1~----
l:: ~Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C i l:ii Test Code 827SWBCM
l .
i
f 1 9 !;. !f i;p
Ii 11 11 l
i
l
f
i
I ~
' I
~
f
i
l
Analyte
• R B S 0 L T S (Qlot•d)
Tent<ltively Identified ~·nil•
Extraction Batch # 3520980514154000
Analysis Batch H MSMSD180520085101
Results
ug/L
Ethyl Ester Acetic Acid 5 '3
Unknown ketone Nl>1 4~
Unknown ;4 r-11), 1011-3
Unknown ,a I'll>, 10 \kS
Unkno111n ~ Ni>, 8 I.IS
Unknown organic acid 7 "S
Unknown organic acid 20 :r
Unknown alkane 4 'S
Unknown alkane f\1~1 11XS'
Work Order N 9805251
Page l.L
Retention
Time
4.29
5.16
5.40
6.95
10.34
13 .55
16. 71
26.44
27.94
•
•
SOIL SAMPLES
•
•
•
•
•
APPENDIXD
RAW ANALYTICAL DATA
(Arranged by Work Order Number)
06/11/98 10:33:05
Report RADIAN CORPORATION
To 3200 E. CHAPEL HILL RD.
P.O. BOX 13000
Attention JIM NARKUNAS
Prepared -~R_a_d_i_a_n_I~n~t_e_r_n_a_t_i_o_n_a_1_,~L-L ... c .....
By 14046 Sununit Dr., Bldg. B
P. o. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1088
CSC JALINDSEY
Project Sample ID/
Description
0398HBWW81
0398HBWW82
0398HBWW83
0398HBWW84
0398HBWW85
•
NOR~ ORDBR SUMMARY
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON,NC
Work ID VOLATILES
Case # ~N~A~-------­
SDG # -NA:..:....~~~~~~~­
RAS # 80304AJAL
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s)
OlA 352SWAOO
827SWBCM
CKlSWAOO
02A MS 352SWAOO
827SWBMS
CKlSWAOO
03A MSD 352SWAOO
827SWBMS
CKlSWAOO
04A 352SWAOO
827SWBCM
CKlSWAOO
04B SPAREBOO
05A 352SWAOO
827SWBCM
CKlSWAOO
05B SPAREBOO
06A 352SWAOO
827SWBCM
CKlSWAOO
06B SPAREBOO
07A 352SWAOO
827SWBCM
•
Work Order # 9803361
Page,!.__
RCN 650138.0502
New York ELAP ID #: 10915
Method Desciption
Liquid(Liq Extract SW846
Semivolatiles by GC/MS
Primary KD cone. SW846
Liquid/Liq Extract SW846
Semivolatiles by GC/MS
Primary KD cone. SW846
Liquid/Liq Extract SW846
Semivolatiles by GC/MS
Primary KD cone. SW846
Liquid/Liq Extract SW846
Semivolatiles by GC/MS
Primary KD cone. SW846
Spare Sample
Liquid/Liq Extract SW846
Semivolatiles by GC/MS
Primary KD cone. SW846
Spare Sample
Liquid/Liq Extract SW846
Semivolatiles by GC/MS
Primary KD cone. SW846
Spare Sample
Liquid/Liq Ex~ract SW846
Semivolatiles by GC/MS
•
• 06/11/98 10:33:05
Report RADIAN CORPORATION
To 3200 E. CHAPEL HILL RD.
P.O. BOX 13000
Attention JIM NARKUNAS
Prepared _ _;.R:.:a:.:d;.;;i:.:a"'n;.....;::I"'n"'t""e"'r"'n"'a""t""i"'o"'n"'a"'l'-''-=L;L:.:C:...
By ---"l'-'4"'0"'4'-"6-=S"'u"'m"'m"'i"'t:.....!:D'-"r'-'.-''-"'B"'l"'d"'q'-'.-=B:....
P. 0. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1088
CSC JALINDSEY
Project Sample ID/
Description
0398HBWW85
•
If 0 R )( 0 R D B R S U M M A R Y (Cont'd)
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON NC
Work ID VOLATILES
Case# ~N::.A=---------­
SDG # ~N~A~~~~~~~~
RAS # 80304AJAL
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s)
07A CKlSWAOO
07B SPAREBOO
Work Order # 9803361
Page L
RCN 650138.0502
New York ELAP ID #: 10915
Method Desciption
Primary KD cone. SW846
Spare Sample
•
06/11/98 10:33:05
State
Arkansas
California
Kansas
------ana
North Carolina
New Jersey
New York
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Utah
Wisconsin
•
STATR C R R T I F I C A T I 0 II S
Agency
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology
California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
New York State Department of Health
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Department of Health and Environmental Control
Utah Department of Health
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources -
•
Work Order # 9803361
Page _3_
Certification ID
2257
E-10165
LA 97-29
302
82005
10915
8720
82003001
RADC
99885260
•
• • 06/11/98 10:33:05 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
FLAG DBFIHITIOHS
Fl:ag Definition
< DL Result less than stated Detection Limit and greater than or equal to zero.
Analyte concentration not available for this analysis. NA
NC
ND
NR
NS
RPO and/or ~ Recovery not calculated. See Narrative for explanation.
Not detected. No instrument response for analyte or result less than zero.
Not reported. Result greater than or equal to stated Detection Limit and less than specified Reporting Limit.
Analyte not spiked.
A Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Lube Oil range. The pattern does not match that of Lube Oil.
B
c
Analyte detected in method blank at concentration greater than the Reporting Limit (and greater than zero) .
Confirming data obtained using second GC column or GCMS.
D Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Diesel range. The pattern does not match that of Diesel.
E Analyte concentration exceeded calibration range.
F Interference or coelution suspected. See Narrative for explanation.
G Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Jet Fuel range. The pattern does not match that of Jet Fuel.
H Presence of analyte previously confirmed by historical data.
I Analyte identification suspect. See Narrative for explanation.
J Result is less than stated Detection Limit but greater than or equal to specified Reporting Limit.
K Peak did not meet method identification criteria. Analyte not detected on other GC column.
M Result modified from previous Report. See Narrative for explanation.
p Analyte not confirmed. Results from primary and secondary GC columns differ by gr~ater than a factor of 3.
Q QC result does not meet tolerance in Protocol Specification.
R Result reported elsewhere.
S Analyte concentration obtained using Method of Standard Additions (MSA).
T Second column confirmational analysis not performed.
X See Narrative for explanation.
Y See Narrative for explanation.
Z See Narrative for explanation.
Work Order # 9803361
Page L
•
06/11/98 10:33:05
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Method Method SW8270C plus extras
Project Sample ID/Description
n :Ml-SHB .... --
0398HBWW82
0398HBWW83
0398HBWW84
0398HBWW85
•
AHALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
Extraction/Digestion
Lab Sample ID Test ~ode (s) . Batch II
~<>vJ361-01A 827SWBCM 3520980318112200
9803361-04A 827SWBCM 3520980318112200
9803361-05A 827SWBCM 3520980318112200
9803361-0GA 827SWBCM 3520980318112200
9803361-07A 827SWBCM 3520980318112200
•
Work Order II 9803361
Page _5_
Analysis Batch II
MSMSD280320074501
MSMSD280320074501
MSMSD280320074501
MSMSD280320074501
MSMSD280320074501
•
• 06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Ano.lyt'-'
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
2-Acetylaminofluorene
4-Ami.nobiphenyl
Aniline
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benz(a)pyrene
Benzidine
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
4-Bromophenylphenyl ether
Butylbenzylphthalate
Carbazole
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
p-Chloroaniline
0398HBWWB1
9603361-0lA
W9643
03/16/96
03/16/96 11:22:00
03/20/98 20:27
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.459
0.370
0.165
0.498
6.35
0.666
0.363
0.193
0.290
28.2
0.267
0.306
0.582
30.2
0.682
0.423
0.106
0.0571
0 .451
0. 849
• RESULTS SUMMARY
0398HBWW82
9803361-04A
W9646
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 22:26
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.497
0.400
0.178
0.539
9.04
0.723
0.414
0.209
0.313
30.5
0.310
0.331
0.630
32.7
0.738
0.456
0 .114
0.0619
0.489
0.919
0398HBWW83
9803361-05A
W9647
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 23:06
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.482
0.388
0.173
0.523
8.77
0.701
0.402
0.203
0.304
29.6
0.301
0.321
0.611
31. 7
0. 716
0.444
0.111
0.0600
0 .474
0.891
• Work Order # 9803361
Page _6_
0398HBWW84
9803361-06A
W9648
03/16/98
03/16/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 23:46
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.459
0.370
0.165
0.498
8.35
0.668
0.383
0.193
0.290
28.2
0.287
0.306
0.582
30.2
0.682
0.423
0.106
0.0571
0 .451
o. 849
• 06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Dimethylphenethylamine
2,4-bimethylphenol
Dimethylphthalate
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
1,3-Dinitrobenzene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine/N-NitrosoDPA
Ethyl methanesulfonate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
0398HBWW81
9803361-0lA
W9643
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 20:27
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.760
0.369
3.50
12.4
0.383
0.258
9.52
0.502
5.66
0.426
0.428
0.612
0.336
4.88
0.230
0.307
0.393
0.624
. 5. 01
0.306
• R B S ULT S S UM MAR Y (Cont'd)
0398HBWW82
9803361-04A
W9646
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 22:26
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.823
0.399
3.79
13.4
0.414
0.279
10.3
0.543
6.12
0.461
0.463
0.663
0.364
5.28
0 .249
0.332
0.426
0.675
5.42
0.331
0398HBWW83
9803361-0SA
W9647
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 23:06
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0. 798
0.387
3.68
13:0
0 .402
0.271
10.0
0.527
5.94
0 .447
0 .449
0.643
0.353
5.12
0.242
0.322
0.413
0.655
5.26
0.321
Work Order # 9803361
Page _8_
0398HBWW84
•
9803361-06A
W9648
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 23:46
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.760
0.369
3.50
12.4
0.383
0.258
9.52
0.502
5.66
0.426
0.428
0.612
0.336
4.88
0.230
0.307
0.393
0.624
5.01
0.306
06/ll/98 10:33:05
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report -=\[":
Column:
Analyte
Hexachloropropene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Isosafrole
Ke pone
Methapyrilene
Methyl methanesulfonate
3-Methylcholanthrene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol/3-Methylphenol
2-Methylphenol
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
N-Nitrosomorpholine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
Naphthalene
•
0398HBWW8l
9803361-0lA
W9643
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 20:27
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.781
ND 0.202
ND 0.0943
ND l.21
ND 18.l
ND 9.00
ND 0.401
ND 7.00
ND 0.292
ND 0.217
ND 0.204
ND 0.541
ND 0.343
ND 0.514
ND 0.587
ND 0.766
ND 0.924
ND 0.183
ND 0.766
ND 0.382
RBS ULT S SUMMAR y (Cont'd)
0398HBWW82 0398HBWW83
980336l-04A 9803361-0SA
W9646 W9647
03/16/98 03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00 03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 22:26 03/20/98 23:06
l l
Water Water
ug/L ug/L
received received
Cone. DL Cone. DL
ND 0.845 ND 0.820
ND 0.219 ND 0.212
ND 0.102 ND 0.0990
ND l. 31 ND l.27
ND 19.6 ND 19.0
ND 9.74 ND 9.45
ND 0.434 ND 0.421
ND 7.58 ND 7.35
ND 0.316 ND 0.307
ND 0.235 ND 0.228
ND 0.221 ND 0.214
ND 0.586 ND 0.568 . ND 0.371 ND 0.360
ND 0.557 ND 0. 540
ND 0.635 ND 0.616
ND 0.829 ND 0.804
ND l.000 ND 0.970
ND 0.198 ND 0.192
ND 0.829 ND 0.804
ND 0.413 ND 0.401
•
Work Order # 9803361
Pa03e ._9_
0398HBWW84
980336l-06A
W9648 --
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03120199 23·A6
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.781
ND 0.202
ND 0.0943
ND l.21
ND 18.l
ND 9.00
ND 0.401
ND 7.00
ND 0.292
ND 0.217
ND 0.204
ND 0.541
ND 0.343
ND 0.514
ND 0.587
ND 0.766
ND 0.924
ND 0.183
ND 0.766
ND 0.382
•
• 06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
1,4-Naphthoquinone
1-Naphthylamine
2-Naphthylamine
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
2_-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
!?entachlorobenzene
J?entachloroethane
Pentachloronitrobenzene
J?entachlorophenol
Phenacetin
J?henanthrene
Phenol
2-J?icoline
Pronamide
0398HBWW81
9803361-0lA
W9643
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 20:27
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.512
8.76
10.2
0.502
0.623
0.572
0.562
0.570
0.550
8.21
4.85
0.331
0.518
1.13
6.38
0.180
0.297
0.230
1.13
0.392
• R B S 0 LT S S 0 H HA R Y (Cont'd)
0398HBWW82
9803361-04A
W9646
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 22:26
1
Water
ug/L
receiv~d
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.555
9.48
11. 0
0.543
0.674
0.620
0.608
0.618
0.595
8.89
5.25
0.359
0.561
1.23
6.91
0.195
0.322
0.249
1.23
0.425
0398HBWW83
9803361-05A
W9647
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 23:06
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0 .53_8
9.20
10.7
0.527
0.654
0.601
0.590
0.599
0. 577
8.62
5.09
0.348
0.544
1.19
6.70
0.189
0.312
0.242
1.19
0 .412
Work Order # 9803361
!?age lQ_
0398HBWW84
9803361-06A
W9648
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 23:46
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
l'!D
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.512
8.76
10.2
0.502
0.623
0.572
0.562
0.570
0.550
8.21
4.85
0.331
0.518
1.13
6.38
0.180
0.297
0.230
1.13
0.392
•
06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed: ..
i: ............... .
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Pyrene
Pyridine
Saf role
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,3;4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
o-Toluidine
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
sym-Trinitrobenzene
•
0398HBWW81
9803361-0lA
W9643
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 20:27
J.
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.269
0.803
0.487
0.370
0.668
1.35
0.328
0.900
0.350
1.23
R B S U LT S S U K KAR Y (Cont'd)
0398HBWW82
9803361-04A
W9646
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 22:26
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
•
DL
0.291
0.869
0.527
0.401
0. 723
1.46
0.355
0.974
0.379
1. 33
0398HBWW83
9803361-05A
W9647
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 23:06
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.282
0.843
0.511
0.389
0.701
1.42
0.344
0.945
0.368
l.29
Work Order # 9803361
Page 1.L
0398HBWW84
9803361-06A
W9648
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 23:46·
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND_ 0.269
ND 0.803
ND 0 .487
ND 0.370
ND 0.668
ND l. 35
ND 0.328
ND 0.900
ND 0.350
ND l.23
•
•
06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Sernivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units·:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Surrogate(s)
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Nitrobenzene-d5
Phenol-d5
Terphenyl-dl4
2,4,6-Tribrornophenol
0398HBWW81
9803361-0lA
W9643
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 20 :27
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
Recovery
\
91
87
90
98
91
90
• RBSOLTS S 0 M MA R Y (Cont'd)
0398HBWW82 0398HBWW83
9803361-04A 9803361-05A
W9646 W9647
03/16/98 03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00 03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 22:26 03/20/98 23:06
1 1
Water Water
ug/L ug/L
received received
Cone. DL Cone. DL
Recovery Recovery
\ \
90 84
85 77
90 85
98 87
93 88
92 87
Work Order tt 9803361
Page ]1_
0398HBWW84
9803361-06A
W9648
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/20/98 23:46
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. Dj:,
Recovery
'!;
82
78
86
85
86
85
•
06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
llJl.1-Uioion racioor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
2-Acetylaminofluorene
4-Affiinobiphenyl
Aniline
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benz(a)pyrene
Benzidine
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,ilperylene
Benzo{k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
4-Bromophenylphenyl ether
Butylbenzylphthalate
Carbazole
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
p-Chloroaniline
•
0398HBWW85
9803361-07A
W9649
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/21/98 00:26
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.459
ND 0.370
ND 0.165
ND 0.498
ND 8.35
ND 0.668
ND 0.383
ND 0.193
ND 0.290
ND 28.2
ND 0.287
ND 0.306
ND 0.582
ND 30.2
ND 0.682
ND 0.423
ND 0.106
ND 0.0571
ND 0.451
ND 0. 849
R B S U L T S S U M M A It Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone.
•
DL
Work Order # 9803361
Page lL
Cone. DL
•
••
06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Anc.lyt~
Chlorobenzilate
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
Chrysene
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Diallate
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Diethylphthalate
0398HBWW85
9803361-07A
W9649
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/21/98 00:26
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.196
ND 0.239
ND 0.150
ND 0.193
ND 0.565
ND 0.116
ND 0.338
ND 0.276
ND 0.170
ND 0.170
ND 0.225
ND 0.242
ND 0.140
ND 0.343
ND 0.489
ND 0.446
ND 1.10
ND Q.381
ND 0.257
ND 0.209
• R B S U L T S S 0 MM AR Y (Cont:•d)
Cone. DL Cone. DL
Work Order tt 9803361
Page ll_
Cone. DL
•
06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code ,827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
I_.._...,. .... ·-· "' ·----:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Dimethylphenethylamine
2,4:Dimethylphenol
Dimethylphthalate
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
1,3-Dinitrobenzene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine/N-NitrosoDPA
Ethyl methanesulfonate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
••
0398HBWW85
9803361-07A
W9649
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/21/98 00:26
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.760
ND 0.369
ND 3.50
ND 12.4
ND 0.383
ND 0.258
ND 9.52
ND 0.502
ND 5.66
ND 0.426
ND 0.428
ND 0.612
ND 0.336
1.27 J 4.88
ND 0.230
ND 0.307
ND 0.393
ND 0.624
ND 5.01
ND 0.306
R B S U L T S S UM MA R Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone.
•
DL
Work Order # 9803361
Page 1L
Cone. DL
•
. l
•
06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Sernivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Hexachloropropene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Isosaf role
Ke pone
Methapyrilene
Methyl rnethanesulfonate
3-Methylcholanthrene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol/3-Methylphenol
2-Methylphenol
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylarnine
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylarnine
N-Nitrosodiethylarnine
N-Nitrosodirnethylarnine
N-Nitrosornethylethylarnine
N-Nitrosornorpholine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
Naphthalene
0398HBWW85
9803361-07A
W9649
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/21/98 00:26
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.781
ND 0.202
ND 0. 0943
ND 1.21
ND 18.1
ND 9.00
ND 0.401
ND 7.00
ND 0.292
ND 0.217
ND 0.204
ND 0 .541
ND 0.343
ND 0.514
ND 0.587
ND 0.766
ND 0.924
ND 0.183
ND 0.766
ND 0.382
•
RBSULTS S U M M A R Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone. DL
·.
Work Order tt 9803361
Page 1.§_
Cone.
•
DL
06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
lhTution Factor:
Matrix:
Units.:
Repo>:t =tf"!
Column:
Analyte
1,4-Naphthoquinone
1-Naphthylamine
2-Naphthylamine
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
?-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloroethane
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
2-Picoline
Pronamide
•
0398HBWW85
9803361-0?A
W9649
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/21/98 00:26
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.512
ND 8.76
ND 10.2
ND 0.502
ND 0.623
ND 0.572
ND 0.562
ND 0.570
ND 0.550
ND 8.21
ND 4.85
ND 0.331
ND 0.518
ND 1.13
ND 6.38
ND 0.180
ND 0.297
ND 0.230
ND 1.13
ND 0.392
R B S UL T S S UM MARY (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone.
•
DL
Work Order # 9803361
Page 11._
Cone. DL
•
• 06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code . 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Pyrene
Pyridine
Saf role
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,3,"4, 6-Tetrachlorophenol
o-Toluidine
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
sym-Trinitrobenzene
0398HBWW85
9803361-07A
W9649
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/21/98 00:26
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.269
ND 0. 803
ND 0.487
ND 0.370
ND 0.668
ND 1.35
ND 0.328
ND 0.900
ND 0.350
ND 1.23
•
RESULTS S 0 MM A R Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone. DL
Work Order tt 9803361
Page l.!!_
Cone.
•
DL
06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
' . -
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Surrogate(s)
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Nitrobenzene-dS
Phenol-dS
Terphenyl-dl4
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
•
0398HBWW85
9803361-0?A
W9649
03/16/98
03/18/98 11:22:00
03/21/98 00:26
...
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
Recovery
\
94
88
96
99
91
97
R K S UL T S S UM MAR Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone.
Recovery Recovery
% \
•
DL
Work Order ff 9803361
Page lL
Cone. DL
Recovery
\
•
•
06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Method SW8270C plus extras
Test Code 827SWXIX
Initial Calibration # MSD2980226090300
Calibration Date ~0=2~/=2~6~/~9~8~~~~-
Sequence/Analysis Time
1 03/20/98 07:45
2 03/20/98 08:10
3 03/20/98 10:02
4 03/20/98 10:42
5 03/20/98 11:22
6 03/20/98 12:03
7 03/20/98 12:43
8 03/20/98 13:22
9 03/20/98 14: 02
10 03/20/98 14:28
11 03/20/98 15:08
12 03/20/98 15:48
13 03/20/98 16:28
14 03/20/98 17; 08
15 03/20/98 17:48
16 03/20/98 18:27
17 03/20/98 19:07
18 03/20/98 19:47
19 03/20/98 20:27
20 03/20/98 21:07
21 03/20/98 21:46
22 03/20/98 22:26
23 03/20/98 23:06
24 03/20/98 23:46
25 03/21/98 00:26
26 03/21/98 01:05
27 03/21/98 01:45
•
ANALYSIS BATCH SUMMARY
Analysis Batch # MSMSD280320074501
Analysis Start Date/Time 03/20/98 07:45:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 03/21/98 01:45:00
Work Order # 9803361
Page ~
Instrument ~
Analyst §Jlli
Reviewer ~KM:..:.:G~~~~~~~~
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type Analysis File #
TUNE GC/MS tune files W9625
SSTD050 Continuing Calibration Verification W9626
LCS981432 Lab Control Sample W9627
LCSD981432 Lab Control Sample Duplicate W9628
BLK98961 Blank, Method W9629
9803332-05A Sample W9630
9803332-0GA Matrix Spike W9631
9803332-07A Matrix Spike Duplicate W9632
TUNE GC/MS tune files W9633
SSTD050 Continuing Calibration Verification W9634
9803332-0lA Sample W9635
9803332-02A Sample W9636
9803332-03A Sample W9637
9803332-04A Sample W9638
9803332-08A Sample W9639
9803332-09A Sample W9640
9803332-lOA Sample W9641
9803332-llA Sample W9642
0398HBWW81 9803361-0lA Sample W9643
0398HBWW81 9803361-02A Matrix Spike W9644
0398HBWW81 9803361-03A Matrix Spike Duplicate W9645
0398HBWW82 9803361-04A Sample W9646
0398HBWW83 9803361-05A Sample W9647
0398HBWW84 9803361-06A Sample W9648
0398HBWW85 9803361-07A Sample W9649
9803343-0lA Sample W9650
DCS981433 Detectability Check Sample W9651
•
06/11/98 10:33:05
Method Method SW8270C plus extras Specification# ~8~2~7~S~~
Lab Sample ID
File ID
•
Project Sample
ID/Description Analyte
ARALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
COMMBRTS/RARRATIVK
Flag Comment/Narrative
•
Corrective Action
Work Order # 9803361
Page £L
•
• 06/11/98 10:31:40
Previously Reported on 04/01/98.
Report Form
Work Order Summary
State Certifications
Flag Definitions
• RADIAN ANALYTICAL SBRVICBS
FPAS RBPORT
TABLB OF CONTBNTS
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON,NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Analytical Batch ID
Protocol Summary for Analysis by TRACE ICP
Results Summary
Analysis Batch Summary EM61E280331123801
Comments/Narrative
• Work Order # 9803362
Certified By~~ Datet~f'£
Pages
From To
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 6
7 8
9 9
06/11/98 10:31:40
Report RADIAN CORPORATION
To 3200 E. CHAPEL HILL RD.
P.O. BOX 13000
Attention JIM NARKUNAS
Prepared ___ R_a_d_i_a~n~I~n_t_e_r_n_a_t_i_o.n.a.1., ..... LL .... c_
By --=1~4~0~4~6-=S-u~mm==i~t-=D-r~·••-=B~l~d~q~·-=B._
P. O. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1088
CSC JALINDSEY
Project Sample
Description
0398HBWW81
0398HBWW82
0398HBWW85
•
ID/
KOR~ ORDKR SUMMARY
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON,NC
Work ID VOLATILES
Case # ~N-A~-------­
SDG # ~NA=-=--~~~~~~~­
RAS # 80304AJAL
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s)
OlA DGTSWAOO
ICTSW5AF
OlB SPAREBOO
02A MS DGTSWAOO
ICTSWSAF
03A MSD DGTSWAOO
ICTSW5AF
04A DGTSWAOO
ICTSWSAF
OSA DGTSWAOO
ICTSWSAF
•
Method
Acid Digestion
Metals by ICP
Spare Sample
Acid Digestion
Metals by ICP
Acid Digestion
Metals by ICP
Acid Digestion
Metals by ICP
Acid Digestion
Metals by ICP
Work Order # 9803362
Page _1_
RCN 650138.0502
New York ELAP ID #: 10915
Desciption
for Metals
for Metals
for Metals
for Metals
for Metals
•
• 06/11/98 10:31:40
State
Arkansas
California
Kansas
Louisiana
North Carolina
New Jersey
New York
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Utah
Wisconsin
• STATB CBRTIFICATIOBS
Agency
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology
California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
New York State Department of Health
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Department of Health and Environmental Control
~tah Department of Health .
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Work Order # 9803362
Page L
Certification ID
2257
E-10165
LA 97-29
302
82005
10915
8720
82003001
RADC
99885260
•
06/11/98 10:31:40 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
FLAG DBFilllITIOlllS
Flag Definition
< DL
NA
NC
Result less than stated Detection Limit and greater than or equal to zero.
Analyte concentration not available for this analysis.
RPD and/or % Recovery not calculated. See Narrative for explanation.
ND
NR
NS
A
B
c
Not detected. No instrument response for analyte or result less than zero.
Not reported. Result greater than or equal to stated Detection Limit and less than specified Reporting Limit.
Analyte not spiked.
Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Lube Oil range. The pattern does not match that of Lube Oil.
Analyte detected in method blank at concentration greater than the Reporting Limit (and greater than zero) .
Confirming data obtained using second GC column or GCMS.
D Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Diesel range. The pattern does not match that of Diesel.
E Analyte concentration exceeded calibration range.
F Interference or coelution suspected. See Narrative for explanation.
G Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Jet Fuel range. The pattern does not match that of Jet Fuel.
H Presence of analyte previously confirmed by historical data.
I Analyte identification suspect. See Narrative for explanation.
J Result is less than stated Detection Limit but greater than or equal to specified Reporting Limit.
K Peak did not meet method identification criteria. Analyte not detected on other GC column.
M Result modified from previous Report. See Narrative for explanation.
P Analyte not confirmed. Results from primary and secondary GC columns differ by greater than a factor of 3.
Q QC result does not meet tolerance in Protocol Specification.
R Result reported elsewhere.
S Analyte concentration obtained using Method of St~ndard Additions (MSAJ .
T Second column confirmational analysis not performed.
X See Narrative for explanation.
Y See Narrative for explanation.
Z See Narrative for explanation .
• •
Work Order tt 9803362
Page _3_
•
•
06/11/98 10:31:40
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON.NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Method Analysis by TRACE ICP
Project Sample ID/Description
0398HBWW81
0398HBWW82
0398HBWW85
•
ARALYT:CCAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
Extraction/Digestion
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s) Batch #
9803362-0lA ICTSWSAF IDIG980320060000
9803362-04A ICTSWSAF IDIG980320060000
9803362-0SA ICTSWSAF IDIG980320060000
Work Order # 9803362
Page _4_
Analysis Batch #
EM61E280331123801
EM61E280331123801
EM61E280331123801
•
06/11/98 10:31:40
Method ICP Analysis by SW6010B
Test Code ICTSW5AF
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
rac<eor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
•
0398HBWW81
9803362-0lA
61E20331-33
03/16/98
03/20/98
03/31/98
l
Water
mg/L
received
Cone. DL
0.670 B 0.0239
0.00127 BJ 0.00266
0.00112 BJ 0.00173
0.116 B 0.000302
-0.000320 BJ 0.000988
-0.000140 J 0.000362
14.8 B 0.0355
-0.000290 J 0.000610
0.000440 BJ 0.000979
0.00618 0.000832
0.579 B 0.0252
0.00201 B 0. 00136
3.47 B 0. 00460
0.0181 B 0.000498
0.150 B 0. 000770
0.00110 B 0.000927
4.35 B 0.0631
0.00165 0.00149
-0.000870 J 0.000626
50.5 B 0.351
R. B S U L T S S U M M A R. Y
0398HBWW82
9803362-04A
61E20331-41
03/16/98
03/20/98
03/31/98
l
Water
mg/L
received -
Cone. DL
0.562 B 0. 0239
-0.00127 BJ 0.00266
0.00116 BJ 0.00173
0.127 B 0.000302
0.000240 BJ 0. 0.00988
-0.000180 J 0.000362
11. 7 B 0.0355
0.000220 J 0.000610
0.000580 BJ 0.000979
0.00235 0.000832
0.508 B 0.0252
0.00256 B 0.00136
3.46 B 0.00460
0.0171 B 0.000498
0.166 B 0.000770
0.00126 B 0.000927
4.58 B 0.0631
0.00104 J 0.00149
-0.000660 J 0.000626
43.1 B 0.351
•
0398HBWW85
9803362-05A
61E20331-42
03/16/98
03/20/98
03/31/98
l
Water
mg/L
received
Cone. DL
l.47 B 0.0239
-0.00109 BJ 0.00266
0.0000300 BJ 0.00173
0.0699 B 0.000302
0.000280 BJ 0.000988
-0.000160 J 0.000362
13.8 B 0.0355
0.000820 0.000610
0.0000800 BJ 0.000979
0.000930 0.000832
l.26 B 0.0252
0.00365 B 0.00136
2.10 B 0.00460
0.0340 B 0.000498
0.0000100 BJ 0.000770
0.000880 BJ 0. 000927
2.64 B 0.0631
-0.00109 J 0.00149
-0.00137 J 0.000626
4.52 B 0.351
Work Order # 9803362
Page _5 _
Cone. DL
•
• 06/11/98 10:31:40
Method ICP Analysis by SW6010B
Test Code ICTSWSAF
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
0398HBWW81
9803362-0lA
61E20331-33
03/16/98
03/20/98
03/31/98
1
Water
mg/L
received
Cone. DL
-0.00134 J 0.00274
0.000410 J 0.000707
0.0289 B 0.00426
• R B S U L T S S U M M A R Y (Cont'd)
0398HBWW82 0398HBWW85
9803362-04A 9803362-0SA
61E20331-41 61E20331-42
03/16/98 03/16/98
03/20/98 03/20/98
03/31/98 03/31/98
1 1
Water Water
mg/L mg/L
received received
Cone. DL Cone. DL
-0.00165 J 0.00274 -0. 000720. J 0.00274
0.000530 J 0.000707 0.00282 0.000707
0.0148 B 0.00426 0. 0112 B 0.00426
Work Order # 9803362
Page _6_
Cone. DL
•
06/ll/98 10:31:40
Method Analysis by TRACE ICP
Test Code ICTSW5EC
Initial Calibration #.~N~A'--~~~~~~­
Calibration Date ~N~A'--~~~~~~
Sequence/Analysis Time
1 03/31/98
2 03/31/98
3 03/31/98
4 03/31/98
5 03/31/98
6 03/31/98
7 03/31/98
8 03/31/98
9 03/31/98
10 03/31/98
11 03/31/98
12 03/31/98
13 03/31/98
14 03/31/98
15 03/31/98
16 03/31/98
17 03/31/98
18 03/31/98
19 03/31/98
20 03/31/98
21 03/31/98
22 03/31/98
23 03/31/98
24 03/31/98
25 03/31/98
26 03/31/98
27 03/31/98
28 03/31/98
29 03/31/98
30 03/31/98
•
AllALYSIS BATCH SUMMARY
Analysis Batch # EM61E280331123801
Analysis Start Date/Time 03/31/98 12:38:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 03/31/98 18:32:00
Work Order # 9803362
Page _7 _
Instrument ~
Analyst lifil!
Reviewer ~D-LC~~~~~~~~
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type Analysis File #
STDl-BLANK Initial Calibration Standard 1 61E2033l-l
STDl-BLANK Initial Calibration Standard 1 6lE20331-2
S2_05 Sample 61E20331-3
s2_1 Sample 61E20331-4
s2_1 Sample 61E20331-5
s5_o5 Sample 61E20331-6
S5_1 Sample 61E2033l-7
S3_05 Sample 61E2033l-8
S3_1 Sample 61E20331-9
ICV-3-W Continuing Calibration Verification 61E20331-10
ICV-2-W Continuing Calibration Verification 61E2033l-11
ICV-1-W Continuing Calibration Verification 61E20331-12
CICSA-W Interference Check Sample-Majors 61E2033l-l3
CICSAB-W Interference Check Sample-Majors/Minors 61E20331-14
CCV-2-W Continuing Calibration Verification 6lE2033l-15
CCV-5-W Continuing Calibration Verification 61E20331-16
CCV-3-W Continuing Calibration Verification 61E20331-17
ICB-W Blank, Initial Calibration 61E20331-18
BLK98998 Blank, Method 6lE2033l-19
RLCS2 Reporting Limit Check Standard 61E20331-20
LCS981493 Lab Control Sample 61E20331-21
LCSD981493 Lab Control Sample Duplicate 61E20331-22
9803399-0lA Sample 6lE20331-23
9803399-02A Sample 61E20331-24
9803399-03A Sample 61E20331-25
9803399-04A Serial Dilutions 61E20331-26
9803399-04A Sample 61E20331-27
9803399-04A Analytical Spike 61E20331-28
9803399-05A Matrix Spike 6H::G0331-29
9803399-0GA Matrix Spike Duplicate 61E20331-30
• •
•
06/11/98 10:31:40
Method Analysis by TRACE ICP
Test Code ICTSW5EC
Initial Calibration # ~N~A=--------~
Calibration Date ~N~A=---------
Sequence/Analysis Time
31 03/31/98
32 03/31/98
33 03/31/98
34 03/31/98
35 03/31/98
36 03/31/98
37 03/31/98
38 03/31/98
39 03/31/98
40 03/31/98
41 03/31/98
42 03/31/98
43 03/31/98
44 03/31/98
45 03/31/98
46 03/31/98
47 03/31/98
48 03/31/98
49 03/31/98
50 03/31/98
51 03/31/98
52 03/31/98
53 03/31/98
54 03/31/98
55 03/31/98
56 03/31/98
57 03/31/98
58 03/31/98
59 03/31/98
60 03/31/98
•
AH ALYS I S BAT CB SUMMARY (cont'd)
Analysis Batch # EM61E280331123801
Analysis Start Date/Time 03/31/98 12:38:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 03/31/98 18:32:00
Work Order # 9803362
Page _8_
Instrument 61E2
Analyst !fil:
Reviewer :D~L~C=----------
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type Analysis File #
9803347-0lA Sample 61E20331-31
0398HBWW81 9803362-0lA Serial Dilutions 61E20331-32
0398HBWW81 9803362-0lA Sample 61E20331-33
0398HBWW81 9803362-0lA Analytical Spike 61E20331-34
0398HBWW81 9803362-02A Matrix Spike 61E20331-35
0398HBWW81 9803362-03A Sample 61E20331-36
0398HBWW82 9803362-04A Sample 61E20331-37
0398HBWW81 9803362-03A Sample 61E20331-38
0398HBWW82 9803362-04A Sample 61E20331-39
0398HBWW81 9803362-03A Matrix Spike Duplicate 61E2033l-40
0398HBWW82 9803362-04A' Sample 61E20331-41
0398HBWW85 9803362-05A Sample 61E20331-42
CCV-2-W Continuing Calibration Verification 61E20331-43
ccv-5-W Continuing Calibration Verification 61E20331-44
CCV-3-W Continuing Calibration Verification 61E20331-45
CCB-W Blank, Continuing Calibration 61E20331-46
ICB-W Blank, Initial Calibration 61E20331-47
9803498-0lA Sample 61E20331-4B
9803498-02A Sample 61E20331-49
9803498-03A Sample 61E20331-50
9803478-0lA Sample 61E20331-51
9803372-0lA Sample 61E20331-52
9803372-02A Sample 61E20331-53
CICSA-W Interference Check Sample-Majors 61E20331-54
CICSAB-W Interference Check Sample-Majors/Minors 61E20331-55
CCV-2-W Continuing Calibration Verification 61E20331-56
CCV-5-W Continuing Calibration Verification 61E20331-57
CCV-3-W Continuing Calibration Verification 61E20331-58
CCB-W Blank, Continuing Calibration 61E20331-59
ICB-W Blank, Initial Calibration 61E20331-60
•
06/11/98 10:31:40
Method Analysis by TRACE ICP
Lab Sample ID
File ID
•
Project Sample
ID/Description
Specification# ~I~C~P~s __
Analyte
ARALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
COMMBRTS/RARRATIVB
Flag Comment/Narrative
•
Corrective Action
Work Order # 9803362
Page _9_
•
• 06/15/98 16:21:39
Previously Reported on 03/26/98.
Report Form
Work Order Summary
Work Order Comments
State Certifications
Flag Definitions
• RADIAR ARALYTICAL SERVICES
FPAS REPORT
TABLE OF CORTERTS
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON,NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Analytical Batch ID
Protocol Summary for Mercury by SW-846
Results Summary
Analysis Batch Summary AAZ4 80325112204 -
Comments/Narrative
• Work Order # 9803363
Certified By~fi«r
Date 1.f I
Pages
From To
·1 l
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 8
9 9
06/15/98 16:21:39
Report RADIAN CORPORATION
To 3200 E. CHAPEL HILL RD.
P.O .. BOX 13000
Attention JIM NARKUNAS
Prepared _.....:;R:::a:.::d:.:i:::a::;n:.....::I::;n:::t:.::e:.:r"'n:::a:.:t:..:i..::o .. n,.a:.:l'-'''--"L:::L:.:C._
By --"1'"'4"'0'"'4"'6-"S"'u:::rrun=i:.:t'""'D:..:r'"'.'-''-"B:..:l:.:d::;qa.:.-"B.._
P. o. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1088
CSC JALINDSEY
.Project Sample
Description
0398HBWW81
0398HBWW82
0398HBWW85
•
ID/
WORK ORDBR SUMMARY
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON NC
Work ID VOLATILES
Case II "'N"-'A'----------
SDG II "'N""'A'---------
RAS II 80304AJAL
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s)
OlA HGCSWAOO
02A MS HGCSWAOO
03A MSD HGCSWAOO
04A HGCSWAOO
05A HGCSWAOO
•
. -
Method
Mercury by CVAAS
Mercury by CVAAS
Mercury by CVAAS
Mercury by CVAAS
-.
Work Order II 9803363
Page _1_
RCN 650138.0502
New York ELAP ID II: 10915
Desciption
Mercury by CVAAS
•
• 06/15/98 16:21:39 • If 0 R It 0 R D B R C 0 M M B .H T S
Post digestion spikes not pe~formed on all GFAAS analyses per Item 271
of the New York ELAP manual. Post digestion spikes were performed,
as necessary, when recoveries for serial dilutions or matrix spikes
for an analytical batch did not fall within recovery tolerances.
• Work Order ff 9803363
Page _2_
06/15/98 16:21:39
State
Arkansas
California
Kansas -
North Carolina
New Jersey -New York
Okl,alw!lla --
South Carolina
Utah
Wisconsin
•
STATE C R R T I F I C A T I 0 II S
Agency
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology
California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
... ou1s1ana uepari:mem: oi: tteaitn and Hospitals
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
New York State Department of Health
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Department of Health and Environmental Control
Utah Department of Health
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
•
Work Order tt 9803363
Page _3_
Certification ID
2257
E-10165
LA 97-29
302
82005
10915
8720 ---
82003001
RADC
99885260
•
• • 06/15/98 16:21:39 AHALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
FLAG DBFIHITIOHS
Flag Definition
< DL Result less than stated Detection Limit and greater than or equal to zero.
NA Analyte concentration not available for this analysis.
NC RPO and/or \ Recovery not calculated. See Narrative for explanation.
ND Not detected. No instrument response for analyte or result less than zero.
NR Not reported. Result greater than or equal to stated Detection Limit and less than specified Reporting Limit.
NS Analyte not spiked.
A Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Lube Oil range. The pattern does not match that of Lube Oil.
B "Analyte detected in method blank at concentration greater· than the Reporting Limit (and greater than zero).
C Confirming data obtained using second GC column or GCMS.
D Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Diesel range. The pattern does not match th .• t of Diesel.
E Analyte concentration exceeded calibration range.
F Interference or coelution suspected. See Narrative for explanation.
G Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Jet Fuel range. The pattern does not match that of Jet Fuel.
H Presence of analyte previously confirmed by historical data.
I Analyte identification suspect. See Narrative for explanation.
J Result is less than stated Detection Limit but greater than or equal to specified Reporting Limit.
K Peak did not meet method identification criteria. Analyte not detected on other GC column.
M Result modified from previous Report. See Narrative for explanation.
P Analyte not confirmed. Results from primary and secondary GC columns differ by greater than a factor of 3.
Q QC result does not meet tolerance in Protocol Specification.
R Result reported elsewhere.
S Analyte concentration obtained using Method bf Standard Additions (MSA) .
T Second column confirmational analysis not performed.
X See Narrative for explanation.
Y See Narrative for explanation.
Z See Narrative for explanation.
Work Order # 9803363
Page L_
•
06/15/98 16:21:39
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON,NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Method Mercury by SW-846
Project Sample ID/Description
-u3'IB HllWW 81
0398HBWW82
039BHBWWB5
•
A II A L Y T I C A L P R 0 T 0 C 0 L S U M M A II. Y
Extraction/Digestion
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s) Batch #
9803363-0lA HGCSWAOO GDIG980324102000
9803363-04A HGCSWAOO GDIG980324102000
9803363-0SA HGCSWAOO GDIG980324102000
•
Work Order # 9803363
Page _5_
Analysis Batch #
AAZ4 80325112204 -
AAZ4 80325112204 -
AAZ4 80325112204 -
•
• 06/15/98 16:21:39
Method Mercury by SW7470A
Test Code HGCSWAOO
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Mercury
0398HBWW81
9803363-0lA
Z4032511-118
03/16/98
03/24/98
03/25/98 16:23:00
1
Water
mg/L
received
Cone.
-0.000040 J
DL
0.000057
• RBSDLTS SUMMARY
0398HBWW82
9803363-04A
Z4032511-121
03/16/98
03/24/98
03/25/98 16:30:00
1
Water
mg/L
received
Cone.
-0.000010 J
DL
0.000057
0398HBWW85
9803363-05A
Z4032511-122
03/16/98
03/24/98
03/25/98 16:33:00
1
Water
mg/L
received
Cone.
-0.000030 J
DL
0.000057
Work Order # 9803363
Page _6_
Cone. DL
•
06/15/98 16:21:39
Method Mercury by SW-846
Test Code HGCSWAOO
Initial Calibration # Z4980325112200
Calibration Date ~0~3L/~2~5~/~9~8'--~~~-
Sequence/Analysis Time
l U.j/:l5/9H 11:21:00
2 03/25/98 11:24:00
3 03/25/98 11:26:00
4 03/25/98, 11:29:00
5 03/25/98 11 :31 :-00
6 03/25/98 11:34:00
7 03/25/98 11:36:00
93 03/25/98 15:18:00
94 03/25/98 15:21:00
95 03/25/98 15:23:00
96 03/25/98 15:26:00
97 03/25/98 15:28:00
98 03/25/98 15:30:00
99 03/25/98 15:33:00
100 03/25/98 15:35:00
101 03/25/98 15:38:00
102 03/25/98 15:40:00
103 03/25/98 15:43:00
104 03/25/98 15:45:00
105 03/25/98 15:48:00
106 03/25/98 15:50:00
107 03/25/98 15:53:00
108 03/25/98 15:57:00
109 03/25/98 16:01:00
110 03/25/98 16:03:00
111 03/25/98 16:06:00
112 03/25/98 16:08:00
113 03/25/98 16:11:00
114 03/25/98 16:13:00
115 03/25/98 16:15:00
-
ABALYSIS BATCH SUMMARY
Analysis Batch # AAZ4 80325112204
Analysis Start Date/Time 03/25/98 11:22:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 03/25/98 16:40:00
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type
s_o Initial Calibration
s_o5 Initial Calibration
S_l Initial Calibration
S_2 Initial Calibration
S_4 Initi:al Cal±bration
S_lO Initial Calibration
s_20 Initial Calibration
Blank
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Work Order # 9803363
Page ]__
Instrument ~
Analyst ML
Reviewer ~D~L~C~~~~~~~~-
Analysis File #
Z4032511-l
1 Z4032511-2
2 Z4032511-3
3 Z4032511-4
4 Z4032511-5
5 Z4032511-6
6 Z4032511-7
CCV Continuing Calibration Verification Z4032511-93
CCB Blank, Continuing Calibration Z4032511-94
BLK981061 Blank, Method Z4 032511-95
DCS981604 Detectability Check Sample Z4 032511-96
LCS981605 Lab Control Sample Z4032511-97
LCSD981605 Lab Control Sample Duplicate Z4032511-98
A98034580lA Sample Z4032511-99
9803458-0lA Sample Z4032511-100
A980345802A Sample Z4032511-101
9803514-0lA Sample Z4032511-102
9803561-0lA Sample Z4032511-103
9803350-0lA Sample Z4032511-104
9803402-0lA Sample Z4032511-105
CCV Continuing Calibration Verification Z4032511-106
CCB Blank, Continuing Calibration Z4032511-107
9803458-02A Sample Z4032511-108
9803402-02A Sample Z4032511-109
9803402-03A Sample Z4032511-110
9803402-04A Sample Z4032511-lll
9803402-04A Serial Dilutions Z4032511-112
9803402-04A Analytical Spike Z4032511-113
9803402-05A Matrix Spike Z4032511-114
9803402-06A Matrix Spike Duplicate Z4032511-115
• •
• 06/15/98 16:21:39
Method Mercury by SW-846
Test Code HGCSWAOO
Initial Calibration # Z4980325112200
Calibration Date ~0~3~/_2_5~/_9_8 ____ _
Sequence/Analysis Time
116 03/25/98 16:18:00
117 03/25/98 16:20:00
118 03/25/98 16:23:00
119 03/25/98 16:25:00
120 03/25/98 16:28:00
J...<l 03/25/98 16:30:00
122 03/25/98 16:33:00
123 03/25/98 16:35:00
124 03/25/98 16:38:00
• AR AL y s I s B AT c H s u MM AR y (cont'd)
Analysis Batch # AAZ4 80325112204
Analysis Start Date/Time 03/25/98 11:22:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 03/25/98 16:40:00
Work Order # 9803363
Page _8_
Instrument ~
Analyst lli._
Reviewer =D~L~C ________ _
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type Analysis File #
9803439-0lA Sample Z4032511-116
9803421-0lA Sample Z4032511-117
0398HBWW81 9803363-0lA Sample Z4032511-118
0398HBWW81 9803363-02A Matrix Spike Z4032511-119
0398HBWW81 9803363-03A Matrix Spike Duplicate Z4032511-120
0398HBWW82 9803363-04A Sample Z4032511-121
0398HBWW85 9803363-05A Sample Z4032511-122
CCV Continuing Calibration Verification Z4032511-123
CCB Blank, Continuing Calibration Z40325ll-124
•
06/15/98 16:21:39
Method Mercury by SW-846
Lab Sample ID
File ID
•
Project Sample
ID/Description
Specification# ~H~G~C~S~-
Analyte
ABALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
COMMBBTS/BARRATIVB
Flag Comment/Narrative
•
Corrective Action
Work Order # 9803363
Page _9_
•
06/11/98 10:35:49
Report RADIAN CORPORATION
To 3200 E. CHAPEL HILL RD.
P.O. BOX 13000
Attention JIM NARKUNAS
Prepared _ _.,R,,.a,_,,d,_.i,,.a'""n~I"'n"'t"'e"'r"'n"'a"'t"'i~o"'n"'a._.1 .... .....,.L.,.L.,.C'-
By --=1:..:4'-"0'-'4"'6'-=S"'u::.:m::.:m::::i;.::t'-""D"'r:..:._,_,'-""B:..;l:.::d:;,q'-'.-"B'-
P. 0. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1088_
CSC JALINDSEY
Project Sample
Description
0398HBWW81
0398HBWW82
0398HBWW83
0398HBWW84
0398HBWW85
TRIP BLANK
•
ID/
NOR~ ORDBR SUMMARY
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON NC
Work ID VOLATILES
Case# ~N"'A'"--------­
SDG # ~N~A~~~~~~~~
RAS # 80304AJAL
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s)·
OlA 826SWACM
OlB SPAREBOO
OlC SPAREBOO
02A MS 826SWAMS
03A MSD 826SWAMS
04A 826SWACM
04B SPAREBOO
04C SPAREBOO
OSA 826SWACM
OSB SPAREBOO
osc SPAREBOO
06A 826SWACM
06B SPAREBOO
06C SPAREBOO
07A 826SWACM
07B SPAREBOO
07C SPAREBOO
OBA 826SWACM
OBB SPAREBOO
•
----
Work Order # 9803364
Page _1_
RCN 650138. 0502
New York ELAP ID #: 10915
Method Desciption
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Spare Sample
Spare Sample
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Spare Sample
Spare Sample
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Spare Sample
Spare Sample
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Spare Sample
Spare Sample
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Spare Sample
Spare Sample
Volatile Organics by GC/MS
Spare Sample
•
• 06/11/98 10:35:49 • llORJ[ ORD BR COMMBRTS
The standard Method 8260A.surrogate tolerances are laboratory derived from
historical data. Project specific tolerances may differ.
• Work Order ~ 9803364
Page~
06/11/98 10:35:49
State
Arkansas
California
Kansas -
North Carolina
New Jersey
New York
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Utah
Wisconsin
•
STATK CKRTIFICATIOllS
Agency
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology
California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
......... t"_. ............................... ------------.... ..., .... t" .... g.~ ....
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
New York State Department of Health
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Department of Health and Environmental Control
Utah Department of Health
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
•
Work Order # 9803364
Page _3_
Certification ID
2257
E-10165
==--,,_,,
302
82005
10915
8720
82003001
RADC
99885260
•
• • 06/11/98 10:35:49 ARALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
Flag
< DL
NA
NC
ND
NR
NS
A
B
c
D
E
F
G
H -I
J
K
M
p
Q
R
s
T
x
y
z
F L A G D B P I R I T I 0 Jil S
Definition
Result less than stated Detection Limit and greater than or equal to zero.
Analyte concentration not available for this analysis.
RPO and/or \ Recovery not calculated. See Narrative for explanation.
Not detected. No instrument response for analyte or result less than zero.
Not reported. Result greater than or equal to stated Detection Limit and less than specified Reporting Limit.
Analyte not spiked.
Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Lube Oil range. The pattern does not match that of Lube Oil.
Analyte detected in method blank at concentration greater than the Reporting Limit (and greater than zero) .
Confirming data obtained using second GC column or GCM:S.
Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Diesel range. The pattern does not match that of Diesel.
Analyte concentration exceeded calibration range.
Interference or coelution suspected. See Narrative for explanation.
Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Jet Fuel range. The pattern does not match that of Jet Fuel.
Presence of analyte previously confirmed by historical data.
Analyte identification suspect. See Narrative for explanation.
Result is less than stated Detection Limit but greater than or equal to specified Reporting Limit.
Peak did not meet method identification criteria. Analyte not detected on other GC column.
Result modified from previous Report. See Narrative for explanation.
Analyte not confirmed. Results from primary and secondary GC columns differ by greater than a factor of 3.
QC result does not meet tolerance in Protocol Specification.
Result reported elsewhere.
Analyte concentration obtained using Method of Standard Additions (MSA) .
Second column confirmational analysis not performed.
See Narrative for explanation.
See Narrative for explanation.
See Narrative for explanation.
Work Order U 9803364
Page _4_
•
06/11/98 10:35:49
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON,NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Project Sample ID/Description
0398HBWW81
0398HBWW81
0398HBWW82
039RHl3WW82
0398HBWW82
0398HBWW83
0398HBWW84
0398HBWW85
TRIP BLANK
•
AHALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
Extraction/Digestion
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s) Batch #
9803364-0lA 826SWACM NA
9803364-0lB 826SWACM NA
9803364-04A 826SWACM NA
9803364-04B 826SWACM NA
9803364-04C 826SWACM NA
9803364-0SA 826SWACM NA
9803364-06A 826SWACM NA
9803364-0?A 826SWACM NA
9803364-0BA 826SWACM NA
•
Work Order # 9803364
Page _s _
Analysis Batch #
MSMSDA80319102101
MSMSDA80320143301
MSMSDA80319102101
MSMSDA80320143301
MSMSDA80327100701
MSMSDA80319102101
MSMSDA80319102101
MSMSDA80319102101
MSMSDA80319102101
•
• 06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
1-Bromo-2-chloroethane
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromof orm
Bromomethane
2-Butanone(MEK)
n-Butylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
tert-Butylbenzene
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
2-Chloro-1,3-butadiene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
0398HBWW81
9803364-0lA
A0319832
03/16/98
03/20/98 01:42:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND"
ND
ND
ND
ND
13.5
DL
0.757
5.10
1.66
0.220
0.0786
0.0756
0.125
0.112
0.117
0.133
0.222
0. 729.
0.369•
0.261
0.174
0.106
0.168
0.0831
0.0968
0.172
• RESULTS SUMMARY
0398HBWW81
9803364-018
A0320807
03/16/98
03/20/98 17:05:00
10
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
13.l
DL
7.57
51.0
16.6
2.20
0.786
0.756
1.25
1.12
1.17
1. 33
2.22
7.29
3.69
2.61
1.74
1.06
1.68
0.831
0.968
1. 72
0398HBWW82
9803364-04A
A0319833
03/16/98
03/20/98 02:12:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
0.898 R
DL
0.757
5.10
1.66
0.220
0.0786
0.0756
0.125
0.112
0.117
0.133
0.222
o. 729
0.369
0.261
0.174
0.106
0.168
0.0831
0.0968
0.172
Work Order # 9803364
Page _6_
0398HBWW82
9803364-048
A0320806
03/16/98
•
03/20/98 16:34:00
20
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
15.l
102
33.2
4.40
1. 57
1.51
2.50
2.24
2.34
2.66
4.44
14. 6
7.38
5.22
3.48
2.12
3.36
1.66
1. 94
3.44
06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
D1.Lut1on r'actor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
1-Chlorohexane
Chloromethane
3-Chlo.ropropene
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
Dibromomethane
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodif luoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
•
0398HBWW81
9803364-0lA
A0319832
03/16/98
03/20/98 01:42:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
0.249
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
30.7
ND
32.9
105 ER
DL
0.225
0.0927
0.166
0.115
0.112
0.209
0.245
1.24
0.134
0.168
0.175
0.707
0.128
0.0938
0.177
0.0783
0.0566
0.116
0.145
0.152
R B S 0 L T S S 0 MM AR Y (Cont'd)
0398HBWW81
9803364-018
A0320807
03/16/9B
0398HBWW82
9803364-04A
A0319833
03/16/98
03/20/98 17:05:00 03/20/98 02:12:00
10
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
31.6
ND
37.0
115
•
DL
2.25
0.927
1.66
1.15
1.12
2.09
2.45
12.4
1.34
1. 6B
1.75
7.07
1.2B
0.938
1.77
0.7B3
0.566
1.16
1.45
1.52
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
10.8 R
ND R
81.4 R
47.6 R
DL
0.225
0.0927
0.166
0.115
0.112
0.209
0.245
1.24
0.134
0.16B
0.175
0.707
0.12B
0.0938
0.177
0.0783
0.0566
0.116
0.145
0.152
Work Order # 9803364
Page _7_
039BHBWW82
9B03364-04B
A0320806
03/16/9B
03/20/98 16:34:00
20
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
36.4
22.7
DL
4.50
1. B5
3.32
2.30
2.24
4.lB
4.90
24.B
2.6B
3.36
3.50
14.1
2.56
1. BB
3.54
1.57
1.13
2.32
2.90
3.04
•
• 06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichloropropane
2,2-Dichloropropane
l,i-Dichloropropene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethyl methacrylate
Ethylbenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
2-Hexanone
Iodomethane
Isopropylbenzene
p-Isopropyltoluene
Methyl methacrylate
Methyl t-butyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Propanenitrile
0398HBWW81
9803364-0lA
A0319832
03/16/98
03/20/98 01:42:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
2.00 0.221
ND 0.0847
ND 0.131
ND 0.253
ND 0.151
ND 0.123
ND 0.0582
ND 0.220
0.222 0.206
ND 0.768
ND 0.314
ND 0.0866
ND 0.178
ND 0.188
ND 0.242
ND 0.139
2.73 0.294
1.11 B 0.122
ND 0.181
ND 1.60
• R K S U L T S S UM M ARY (Cont'd)
0398HBWW81 0398HBWW82
9803364-0lB 9803364 -04A
A0320807 A0319833
03/16/98 03/16/98
03/20/98 17:05:00 03/20/98 02:12:00
10 1
Water water
ug/L ug/L
received received
Cone. DL Cone. DL
1.39 J 2.21 0.779 R 0.221
ND 0.847 ND R 0.0847
ND 1.31 ND R 0.131
ND 2.53 ND R 0.253
ND 1.51 ND R 0.151
ND 1.23 ND R 0.123
ND 0.582 ND R 0.0582
ND 2.20 ND R 0.220
ND 2.06 ND R 0.206
ND 7.68 ND R 0.768
ND 3.14 ND R 0.314
ND 0.866 ND R 0.0866
ND 1. 78 ND R 0.178
ND 1. 88 ND R 0.188
ND 2.42 ND R 0.242
ND ;i..39 ND R 0.139
ND 2.94 ND R 0.294
1. 60 B 1.22 0.157 R 0.122
ND 1. 81 ND R 0.181
ND 16.0 ND R 1.60
work order tt 9803364
Page _8_
0398HBWW82
9803364-048
A0320806
03/16/98
•
03/20/98 16:34:00
20
water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 4.42
ND 1. 69
ND 2.62
ND 5.06
ND 3.02
ND 2.46
ND 1.16
ND 4.40
ND 4.12
ND 15.4
ND 6.28
ND 1. 73
ND 3.56
ND 3.76
ND 4.84
ND 2.78
ND 5.88
ND 2.44
ND 3.62
ND 32.0
06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
-Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
n-Propylbenzene
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
m&p-Xylene
•
0398HBWW81
9803364-0lA
A0319832
03/16/98
03/20/98 01:42:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
11. 9
ND
o. 728
ND
ND
171 ER
ND
214 ER
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.63
0.403
DL
0.238
0.124
0.224
0.173
0.184
0.437
0.0973
0.343
0.263
0.168
0.147
0.181
0.103
0.232
0.123
0.137
0.149
0.273
0.128
0.230
R B S U L T S S U M M A R Y (Cont'd)
0398HBWW81
9803364-018
A0320807
03/16/98
03/20/90 17:o5.oo
10
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
11.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
170
ND
219
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.69
ND
•
DL
2.38
1.24
2.24
1.73
1.84
4.37
0.973
3.43
2.63
1.68
1.47
1.81
1.03
2.32
1.23
1.37
1.49
2.73
1.28
2.30
0398HBWW82
9803364-04A
A0319833
03/16/98
03/20/98 02:12:00
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND R
ND R
ND R
ND R
2.59 R
ND R
0.232 R
ND R
ND R
490 ER
ND R
134 ER
ND R
ND R
0.0649 RJ
ND R
ND R
ND R
2.65 R
ND R
DL
0.238
0.124
0.224
0.173
0.184
0.437
0.0973
0.343
0.263
0.168
0.147
0.181
0.103
0.232
0.123
0.137
0 .149
0.273
0.128
0.230
Work Order # 9803364
Page _9_
0398HBWW82
9803364-04B
A0320806
03/16/98
03/20/98 16:34:00
20
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
157
ND
40.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
4.76
2.48
4.48
3.46
3.68
8.74
1. 95
6.86
5.26
3.36
2.94
3.62
2.06
4.64
2.46
2.74
2.98
5.46
2.56
4.60
•
• 06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
7\na 1 :·t -
o-Xylene
Surrogate(s)
1,4-Bromofluorobenzene
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-dB
0398HBWW81
9803364-0lA
A0319832
03/16/98
03/20/98 01:42:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
0.151 0.126
Recovery
%
98
88
98
• RESULTS S 0 MM AR Y (Cont'd)
0398HBWW81 0398HBWW82
9803364-018 9803364-04A
A0320807 A0319833
03/16/98 03/16/98
03/20/98 17:05:00 03/20/98 02:12:00
10 1
Water Water
ug/L ug/L
received received
Cone. DL Cone. DL
ND 1.26 ND R 0.126
Recovery Recovery
% %
98 100 R
91 74 R
98 98 R
Work Order # 9803364
Page 1Q_
0398HBWW82
9803364-048
A0320806
03/16/98
03/20/98 16:34:00
20
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
•
ND 2.52
Recovery
%
98
94
100
06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Aero le in
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
l-Brorno-2-chloroethane
Brornobenzene
Brornochlorornethane
Brornodichlorornethane
Brornof orrn
Brornornethane
2-Butanone (MEK)
n-Butylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
tert-Butylbenzene
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
2-Chloro-l,3-butadiene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
•
0398HBWW82
9803364-04C
A0327806
03/16/98
03/27/98 12:05:00
20
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
15.l
102
33.2
4.40
1.57
1.51
2.50
2.24
2.34
2.66
4.44
14.6
7.38
5.22
3.48
2.12
3.36
1.66
1.94
3.44
RBS ULT S SUMMARY (Cont'd)
0398HBWW83
9803364-05A
A0319812
03/16/98
03/19/98 15:50:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
21.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.653
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
•
DL
0.757
5.10
l.66
0.220
0.0786
0.0756
0.125
0.112
0.117
0.133
0.222
0.729
0.369
0.261
0.174
0.106
0.168
0.0831
0.0968
0.172
0398HBWW84
9803364-06A
A0319813
03/16/98
03/19/98 16•20:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.757
5.10
1.66
0.220
0.0786
0.0756
0.125
0.112
0.117
0.133
0.222
o. 729
0.369
0.261
0.174
0.106
0.168
0.0831
0.0968
0.172
Work Order # 9803364
Page ll-
0398HBWW85
9803364-07A
A0319814
03/16/98
03/19/98 16-: 50-: 00
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.757
5.10
1. 66
0.220
0.0786
0.0756
0.125
0.112
0.117
0.133
0.222
0. 729
0.369
0.261
0.174
0.106
0.168
0.0831
0.0968
0.172
•
• 06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
1-Chlorohexane
Chloromethane
3-Chloropropene
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
Dibromomethane
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
0398HBWW82
9803364-04C
A0327806
03/16/98
03/27/98 12:05:00
20
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.14
ND
36.6
13.8
DL
4.50
1. 85
3.32
2.30
2.24
4.18
4. 90
24.8
2.68
3.36
3.50
14.1
2.56
1. 88
3.54
1.57
1.13
2.32
2.90
3. 04
• R RS ULT S SUMMARY (Cont'd)
0398HBWW83
9803364-05A
A0319812
03/16/98
03/19/98 15:50:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.219
0.0827 J
DL
0.225
0.0927
0.166
0.115
0.112
0.209
0.245
1.24
0.134
0.168
0.175
o. 707
0.128
0.0938
0.177
0.0783
0.0566
0.116
0.145
0.152
0398HBWW84
98P3364-06A
A0319813
03/16/98
03/19/98 16:20:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
Nb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND·
ND
ND
ND
0.213
DL
0.225
0.0927
0.166
0.115
0.112
0.209
0.245
1.24
0.134
0.168
0.175
0.707
0.128
0.0938
0.177
0.0783
0.0566
0.116
0.145
0.152
• Work Order # 9803364
Page 1.L
0398HBWW85
9803364-07A
A0319814
03/16/98
03/19/98 16:50~00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DL
0.225
0.0927
0.166
0.115
0.112
0.209
0.245
1.24
0.134
0.168
0.175
0.707
0.128
0.0938
0.177
0.0783
0.0566
0.116
0.145
0.152
06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code . 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Di.Lution ~-actor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichloropropane
2,2-Dichloropropane
1,1-Dichloropropene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethyl methacrylate
Ethylbenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
2-Hexanone
Iodomethane
Isopropylbenzene
p-Isopropyltoluene
Methyl methacrylate
Methyl t-butyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Propanenitrile
•
0398HBWW82
9803364-04C
A0327806
03/16/98
03/27/98 12:05:00
20
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 4.42
ND 1.69
ND 2.62
ND 5.06
ND 3.02
ND 2.46
ND 1.16
ND 4.40
ND 4.12
ND 15.4
ND 6.28
ND 1. 73
ND 3.56
ND 3.76
ND 4.84
ND 2.78
ND 5.88
1. 95 BJ 2.44
ND 3.62
ND 32.0
R BS 0 LT S S 0 MM ARY (Cont'd)
0398HBWW83 0398HBWW84
9803364-05A 9803364-06A
A0319812 A0319813
03/16/98 03/16/98
03/19/98 15:50:00 03/19/98 16.:20: 00
1 1
Water Water
ug/L ug/L
received received
Cone. DL Cone. DL
ND 0.221 ND 0.221
ND 0. 0847 ND 0.0847
ND 0.131 ND 0.131
ND 0.253 ND 0.253
ND 0.151 ND 0.151
ND 0.123 ND 0.123
ND 0.0582 ND 0.0582
ND 0.220 ND 0.220
ND 0.206 ND 0.206
ND 0.768 ND 0.768
ND 0.314 ND 0.314
ND 0.0866 ND 0.0866
ND 0.178 ND 0.178
ND 0.188 ND 0.188
ND 0.242 ND 0.242
ND 0.139 ND 0.139
ND 0.294 ND 0.294
0.127 B 0.122 0.250 B 0.122
ND 0.181 ND 0.181
ND 1.60 ND 1. 60
•
Work Order # 9803364
Page 11...
0398HBWW85
9803364-07A
A0319814
03/16/98
03/19/98 16:50:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.221
ND 0.0847
ND 0.131
ND 0.253
ND 0.151
ND 0.123
ND 0.0582
ND 0.220
ND 0.206
ND 0.768
ND 0.314
ND 0.0866
ND 0.178
ND 0.188
ND 0.242
ND 0.139
ND 0.294
0.165 B 0.122
ND 0.181
ND l.60
•
• 06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ,ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
ColuTIUl: ·
Analyte
n-Propylbenzene
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
l,l,2~Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
m&p-Xylene
0398HBWW82
9803364-04C
A0327806
03/16/98
03/27/98 12:05:00
20
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 4.76
ND 2.48
ND 4.48
ND 3.46
ND 3.68
ND 8.74
ND 1.95
ND 6.86
ND 5.26
159 3.36
ND 2.94
35.9 3.62
ND 2.06
ND 4.64
ND 2.46
ND 2.74
ND 2.98
ND 5.46
ND 2.56
ND 4.60
• RB S 0 LT S S 0 MM ARY (Cont'd)
0398HBWW83 0398HBWW84
9803364-05A 9803364-06A
A0319812 A0319813
03/16/98 03/16/98
03/19/98 15:50:00 03/19/98 16:20:00
1 l
Water Water
ug/L ug/L
received received
Cone. DL Cone. DL
ND 0.238 ND 0.238
ND 0.124 ND 0.124
ND 0.224 ND 0.224
ND 0.173 ND 0 .17.3
ND 0.184 ND 0.184
ND 0.437 ND 0.437
ND 0.0973 ND 0.0973
ND 0.343 ND 0. 343
ND 0.263 ND 0.263
0.601 0.168 ND 0.168
ND 0.147 ND 0.147
ND 0.181 ND 0.181
ND 0.103 ND 0.103
ND 0.232 ND 0.232
ND 0.123 ND 0.123
ND 0.137 ND 0.137
ND 0.149 ND 0.149
ND 0.273 ND 0.273
ND 0.128 ND 0.128
ND 0.230 ND 0.230
• Work Order # 9803364
Page li.__
0398HBWW85
'l803364-07A
A0319814
03/16/98
03/19/98 16:50:00
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.238
ND 0.124
ND 0.224
ND 0.173
ND 0.184
ND 0.437
ND 0.0973
ND 0.343
ND 0.263
ND 0.168
ND 0.147
ND 0.181
ND 0.103
ND 0.232
ND 0.123
ND 0.137
ND 0 .149
ND 0.273
ND 0.128
ND 0.230
06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
o-Xylene
-
Surrogate(s)
1,4-Bromofluorobenzene
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-dB
•
0398HBWW82
9803364-04C
A0327806
03/16/98
03/27/98 12:05:00
20
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 2.52
Recovery
\
97
96
98
RESULTS SUMMARY (Cont'd)
0398HBWW83 0398HBWW84
9803364-0SA 9803364-06A
A0319812 A0319813
03/16/98 03/16/98
03/19/98 15: so :-00 03/19/98 16 :-20: 00
1 1
Water Water
ug/L ug/L
received received
Cone. DL Cone. DL
ND 0.126 ND 0.126
Recovery Recovery
\ \
99 97
94 94
98 96
•
Work Order tt 9803364
Page .!L
0398HBWW85
9803364-07A
A0319814
03/16/98
03/19/98 16:50:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.126
Recovery
\
98
93
97
•
• 06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
l-Bromo-2-chloroethane
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
2-Butanone (MEK)
n-Butylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
tert-Butylbenzene
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
2-Chloro-1,3-butadiene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
TRIP BLANK
9803364-08A
A0319815
03/16/98
03/19/98 17:19:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.757
·ND 5.10
ND 1.66
ND 0.220
ND 0.0786
ND 0.0756
ND 0.125
ND 0.112
ND 0.117
ND 0.133
ND 0.222
ND 0. 729
ND 0.369
ND 0.261
ND 0.174
ND 0.106
ND 0.168
ND 0.0831
ND 0.0968
ND 0.172
• RESULTS S UM MAR Y (Cont'd)
.
Cone. DL
.
Cone. DL
Work Order # 9803364
Page 1.§_
Cone.
-··
•
DL
06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
rnr.rut:TOIT -r·actor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
1-Chlorohexane .
Chloromethane
3-Cl:iloropropene
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
Dibromomethane
tians-l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
l,l-Dichloroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
•
TRIP BLANK
9803364-0SA
A0319815
03/16/98
03/19/98 17:19:00
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.225
ND 0.0927
ND 0.166
ND 0.115
ND 0.112
ND 0.209
ND 0.245
ND 1.24
ND 0.134
ND 0.168
ND 0.175
ND 0.707
ND 0.128
ND 0.0938
ND 0.177
ND 0.0783
ND 0.0566
ND 0.116
ND 0 .145
ND 0.152
RESULTS S 0 MM A R Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone.
•
DL
Work Order # 9803364
Page !]_
Cone. DL
•
•
06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Ar.:1!y~ -
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichloropropane
2,2-Dichloropropane
1,l:Dichloropropene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethyl methacrylate
.Ethylbenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
2-Hexanone
Iodomethane
Isopropylbenzene
p-Isopropyltoluene
Methyl methacrylate
Methyl t-butyl ether
4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK)
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
Propanenitrile
TRIP BLANK
9803364-08A
A0319815
03/16/98
03/19/98 17:19:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.221
ND 0.0847
ND 0.131
ND 0.253
ND 0.151
ND 0.123
ND 0.0582
ND 0.220
ND 0.206
ND 0.768
ND 0.314
ND 0.0866
ND 0.178
ND 0.188
ND 0.242
ND 0.139
ND 0.294
0.160 B 0.122
ND 0.181
ND 1.60
•
RESULTS S UHM AR Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone. DL
Work Order U 9803364
Page 1.!L_
Cone.
•
DL
06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
n-Propylbenzene
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,l-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorof luoromethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
m&p-Xylene
•
TRIP BLANK
9803364-08A
A0319815
03/16/98
03/19/98 17:19:00
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.238
ND 0.124
ND 0.224
ND 0.173
ND 0.184
ND 0.437
ND 0.0973
ND 0.343
ND 0.263
ND 0.168
ND 0.147
ND 0.181
ND 0.103
ND 0.232
ND 0.123
ND 0.137
ND 0.149
ND 0.273
ND 0.128
ND 0.230
RKSOLTS S 0 MM ARY (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone.
•
DL
Work Order # 9803364
Page ll_
Cone. DL
•
• 06/ll/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWACM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
o-Xylene
Surrogate(s)
1,4-Bromofluorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-dB
TRIP BLANK
9803364-0SA
A0319815
03/16/98
03/19/98 17:19:00
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.126
Recovery
'
98
93
98
•
RESULTS S 0 M M A R Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone.
Recovery Recovery
' %
DL
Work Order # 9803364
Page ~
Cone. DL
Recovery
%
•
06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWAOO
Initial Calibration # MSDA980210000000
Calibration Date ~0~2~/~l~0~/~9~8'--~~~-
Sequence/Analysis Time
1 03/19/98 10:21:00
2 03/19/98 10:21:00
3 03/19/98 10:50:00
4 03/19/98 11:20:00
5 03/19/98 11:50:00
6 03/19/98 12:20:00
7 03/19/98 12:51:00
8 03/19/98 13:22:00
9 03/1.9/98 13:51:00
10 03/19/98 13:51:00
11 03/19/98 14:21:00 -12 03/19/98 14:51:00
13 03/19/98 14:51:00
14 03/19/98 15:20:00
15 03/19/98 15:50:00
16 03/19/98 16:20:00
17 03/19/98 16:50:00
18 03/19/98 17:19:00
19 03/19/98 17:49:00
20 03/19/98 18:18:00
21 03/19/98 18:48:00
22 03/19/98 19:17:00
23 03/19/98 19:47:00
24 03/19/98 20:16:00
25 03/19/98 20:46:00
26 03/19/98 21:16:00
27 03/19/98 21:45:00
28 03/19/98 22:15:00
29 03/19/98 22:44:00
30 03/19/98 23:14:00
•
AllALYSIS BATCH SUMMARY
Analysis Batch # MSMSDA80319102101
Analysis Start Date/Time 03/19/98 10:21:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 03/20/98 02:12:00
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type
BFB GC/MS tune
VSTDCAL Continuing
LCS981327 Lab Control
files
Calibration
Sample
Work Order # 9803364
Page ~
Instrument ~
Analyst ~
Reviewer ~A~P~S~~~~~~~~-
Analysis File #
A0319801
Verification A0319801
A0319802
LCSD981328 Lab Control Sample Duplicate A0319803
BLK98897 Blank, Method A0319804
9803303-03A Sample A0319805
9803303-07C Sample A0319806
9803371-0lA Sample A0319807
BFB GC/MS tune files A0319808
VS TD CAL Continuing Calibration Verification A031980B
9803371-0lB Sample A0319809
BFB GC/MS tune files A0319810
VSTDCAL Continuing Calibration Verification A0319810
SB Blank, System A0319811
0398HBWW83 9803364-05A Sample A0319812
0398HBWW84 9803364-0GA Sample A0319813
0398HBWW85 9803364-07A Sample A0319814
TRIP BLANK 9803364-08A Sample A0319815
9803367-0lB Sample A0319816
9803342-0lA Sample A0319817
9803342-02A Sample A0319818
9803342-03A Sample A0319819
9803342-04A Sample A0319820
9803342-05A Sample A0319821
9803342-08A Sample A0319822
9803342-09A Sample A0319823
9803342-lOA Sample A0319824
9803342-llA Sample A0319825
9803342-12A Sample A0319826 ·
9803342-06A Matrix Spike A0319827
•
I
•
• 06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWAOO
Initial Calibration # MSDA980210000000
Calibration Date ~0=2~/=l~0~/~9=8~~~~-
Sequence/Analysis Time
31 03/19/98 23:44:00
32 03/20/98 00:13:00
33 03/20/98 00:43:00
34 03/20/98 01:13:00
35 03/20/98 01:42:00
36 03/20/98 02:12:00
• A Ill A L Y S I S B AT C H S U MM AR y (cont'd)
Analysis Batch # MSMSDA80319102101
Analysis Start Date/Time 03/19/98 10:21:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 03/20/98 02:12:00
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type
9803342-07A Matrix Spike Duplicate
0398HBWW81 9803364-02A Matrix Spike
0398HBWW81 9803364-03A Matrix Spike Duplicate
SB Blank, System
0398HBWW81 9803364-0lA Sample
0398HBWW82 9803364-04A Sample
Work Order # 9803364
Page ~
Instrument !:!§illL_
Analyst JEC
Reviewer ~A~P=S~~~~~~~~-
Analysis File #
A0319828
A0319829
A0319830
A0319831
A0319832
A0319833
•
06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWAOO
Initial Calibration # MSDA980210000000
Calibration Date -0~2~/~l~0~/~98,._~~~~
Sequence/Analysis Time
1 U~/~U/~H 14:04:00
2 03/20/98 14:33:00
3 03/20/98 14:33:00
4 03/20/98 15:03:00
5 03/20/98 15:33:00
6 03/20/98 16:02:00
7 03/20/98 16:34:00
8 03/20/98 17:05:00
9 03/20/98 17:34:00
10 03/20/98 18:04:00
11 03/20/98 18:33:00
12 03/20/98 19:03:00
13 03/20/98 19:33:00
14 03/20/98 20:02:00
15 03/20/98 20:32:00
16 03/20/98 21:02:00
17 03/20/98 21:32:00
18 03/20/98 22:01:00
19 03/20/98 22:31:00
20 03/20/98 23:01:00
21 03/20/98 23:30:00
22 03/21/98 00:00:00
23 03/21/98 00:30:00
24 03/21/98 00:59:00
25 03/21/98 01:29:00
26 03/21/98 01:59:00
27 03/21/98 02:28:00
28 03/21/98 02:58:00
~
•
A II A L Y S I S B A T C B S U M M A R. y
Analysis Batch # MSMSDA80320143301
Analysis Start Date/Time 03/20/98 14:33:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 03/21/98 02:58:00
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type
SB Blank, System
BFB GC/MS tune files
Work Order # 9803364
Page £1._
Instrument ~
Analyst JEC
Reviewer ~A~PS""-~~~~~~~
Analysis File #
A0320801
A0320802
Vg'):'DCAL Continuing Calibi:ation y.,rifici<t:!.on A032Q802
LCS981329 Lab Control Sample A0320803
LCSD981330 Lab Control Sample Duplicate A0320804
BLK98898 Blank, Method A0320805
0398HBWW82 9803364-04B Sample A0320806
0398HBWW8l 9803364-0lB Sample -A0320807
9803330-06A Sample A0320808
9803330-0J.A Sample A0320809
9803330-02A Sample A0320810
9803330-03A Sample A03208ll
9803330-04A Sample A0320812
9803330-05A Sample A0320813
9803390-0lA Sample A0320814
9803390-02A Sample A0320815
9803390-03A Sample A0320816
9803390-04A Sample A0320817
9803390-05A Sample A0320818
9803390-06A Sample A0320819
9803390-07A Sample A0320820
9803390-08A Sample A032082l
9803407-03A Sample A0320822
9803407-04A Sample A0320823
9803407-07A Sample A0320824
9803407-05A Matrix Spike A0320825
9803407-06A0 Matrix Spike Duplicate A0320826
SB Blank, System A0320827
• •
• 06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Test Code 826SWAOO
Initial Calibration # MSDA980210000000
Calibration Date ~0~2~/~l~0~/~9~8'--~~~-
Sequence/Analysis Time
1 03/27/98 09:37:00
2 03/27/98 10:07:00
3 03/27/98 10:07:00
4 03/27/98 10:36:00
5 03/27/98 11:06:00
6 03/27/98 11:34:00
7 03/27/98 12:05:00
8 03/27/98 12:37:00
9 03/27/98 13:08:00
10 03/27/98 13:39:00
11 03/27/98 14:10:00
12 03/27/98 14:42:00
13 03/27/98 15:10:00
14 03/27/98 15:40:00
15 03/27/98 16:08:00
16 03/27/98 16:38:00
17 03/27/98 17:08:00
18 03/27/98 17:37:00
19 03/27/98 18:07:00
20 03/27/98 18:37:00
21 03/27/98 19:06:00
22 03/27/98 19:36:00
23 03/27/98 20:06:00
• ANALYSIS BATCH SUMMARY
Analysis Batch # MSMSDA80327100701
Analysis Start Date/Time 03/27/98 10:07:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 03/27/98 20:06:00
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type
SB Blank, System
BFB GC/MS tune files
VSTDCAL Continuing Calibration
LCS981343 Lab Control Sample
Work Order # 9803364
Page~
Instrument ~
Analyst~
Reviewer ~A~P~S~~~~~~~~-
Analysis File #
A0327801
A0327802
Verification A0327802
A0327803
LCSD981344 Lab Control Sample Duplicate A0327804
BLK98903 Blank, Method A0327805
0398HBWW82 9803364-04C Sample A0327806
9803490-02C Sample -A0327807 -
9803492-06C Sample A0327808
9803492-07C Sample A0327809
9803492-08C Sample A0327810
9803492-09C Sample A0327811
9803612-04A Sample A0327812
9803612-05A Sample A0327813
9803612-0lA Sample A0327814
9803612-02A Sample A0327815
9803612-03A Sample A0327816
9803490-068 Sample A0327817
9803769-0lA Sample A0327818
9803769-02A Sample A0327819
9803612-07A Matrix Spike A0327820
9803612-08A Matrix Spike Duplicate A0327821
9803490-06C Sample A0327822
•
06/11/98 10:35:49
Method Volatile Organics SW8260B
Lab Sample ID
File ID
9803364-04A
A0319833
9803364-04C
A0327806
•
Project Sample
ID/Description
0398HBWW82
0398HBWW82
Specification# ----
Analyte
All analytes
All analytes
ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
COMMBBTS/BARRATIVB
Flag Comment/Narrative
R This sample was reanalyzed because some
targets were outside of the range of
calibration. The reanalysis did not match
these results so the sample was reanalyzed
a third time. The second and third
analyses match. The discrepancies are
This analysis was performed to confirm the
results from a previous analysis of this
sample. The results from this analysis and
A0320806 match and should be used for all
analytes .
•
Corrective Action
Work Order # 9803364
Page~
probably due to vial non-homogeneity. Since
both the second and third analyses match,
those results should be used for all
anal-ytes.
•
06/05/98 15:06:41
Report RADIAN CORPORATION
To 3200 E. CHAPEL HILL RD.
P.O. BOX 13000
Attention JIM NARKUNAS
Prepared --'-R""a"'d""i"'a"'n;....::I"'n"'t"'e"'r""n""a"'t"'i"'o"'n"'a"'l'"',-"L"'L""C._
By _ _.1"'4"'0-'4"'6-"S"'u'"'m""'m"'i"'t'-"D"'r"'._,,_.B ... l,...d..,g ..... _.B._
P. o. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1088
CSC JALINDSEY
Project Sample
Description
0498HBWE01
•
ID/
WOR~ ORDBR SUMMARY
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON NC
Work ID VOLATILES
Case II ~N"'A'---------­
SDG II .:cN::..:A'---------
RAS II 80304AJAL
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s)
OlA 352SWAOO
CKlSWAOO
DSLSWAEL
•
Work Order II 9804412
Page _1_
RCN 650138.0502
New York ELAP ID II: 10915
Method Desciption
Liquid/Liq Extract SW846
Primary KO cone. SW846
TPH Extractables
•
• 06/05/98 15:06:41
State
Arkansas
California
Kansas
Louisiana
North Carolina
New Jersey
New York
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Utah
Wisconsin
• STATB CBRTIFICATIORS
Agency
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology
California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
New York State Department of Health
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Department of Health and Environmental Control
Utah Department of Health
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Work Order # 9804412
Page _2_
Certification ID
2257
E-10165
LA 97-29
302
82005
10915
8720
82003001
RADC
99885260
•
..
-
06/05/98 15:06:41 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
Flag
< DL
NA
NC
NU
NR
NS
A
B.
c
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
M
p
Q
R
s
T
x
y
z
•
FLAG DEFINITIONS
Definition
Result less than stated Detection Limit and greater than or equal to zero.
Analyte concentration not available for this analysis.
RPD and/or \ Recovery not calculated. See Narrative for explanation.
Not aetectea. No instrument response for analyte or result less than zero.
Not reported. Result greater than or equal to stated Detection Limit and less than specified Reporting Limit.
Analyte not spiked.
Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Lube Oil range. The pattern does not match that of Lube Oil.
Analyte detected in method blank at concentration greater than the Reporting Limit (and greater than zero) .
Confirming data obtained using second GC column or GCMS.
Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Diesel range. The pattern does not match that of Diesel.
Analyte concentration exceeded calibration range.
Interference or coelution suspected. See Narrative for explanation.
Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Jet Fuel range. The pattern does not match that of Jet Fuel.
Presence of analyte previously confirmed by historical data.
Analyte identification suspect. See Narrative for explanation.
Result is less than stated Detection Limit but greater than or equal to specified Reporting Limit.
Peak did not meet method identification criteria. Analyte not detected on other GC column.
Result modified from previous Report. See Narrative for explanation.
Analyte not confirmed. Results from primary and secondary GC columns differ by greater than a factor of 3.
QC result does not meet tolerance in Protocol Specification.
Result reported elsewhere.
Analyte concentration obtained using Method of Standard Additions (MSA) .
Second column confirmational analysis not performed.
See Narrative for explanation.
See Narrative for explanation.
See Narrative for explanation.
•
Work Order n 9804412
Page _3_
•
•
06/05/98 15:06:41
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON,NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Method TPH-Diesel by mod. SW8015
Project Sample ID/Description
0498HBWE01
•
ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
Extraction/Digestion
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s) Batch #
9804412-0lA DSLSWAEL 3520980416164500
Work Order # 9804412
Page i._
Analysis Batch #
TPGC1280422120001
•
06/05/98 15:06:41
Method TPH-Diesel by mod. SW8015
Test Code DSLSWAEL
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepar!'!d:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Diesel
Jet fuel JP4
Kerosene
Unidentified organics
Surrogate(s)
Octacosane
•
0498HBWE01
9804412-0lA
U8D22017
04/15/98
04/16/98
04/23/98 05:33:00
1.0000
Water
mg/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.0198
ND 0. 0716
ND 0.0340
0.0174 B
Recovery
%
108
RBSULTS SUMMARY
Cone. DL Cone.
Recovery Recovery
% %
•
DL
Work Order # 9804412
Page _5_
.
Cone.
Recovery
%
DL
•
• 06/05/98 15:06:41
Method TPH-Diesel by mod. SW8015
Test Code DSLSWAEL
Initial Calibration # GC12980401120000
Calibration Date _0_4~/_0_l~/~9~8 ____ _
Sequence/Analysis Time
1 04/22/98 16:52:00
2 04/22/98 17:40:00
3 04/22/98 18:28:00
4 04/22/98 19:16:00
5 04/22/98 20:03:00
6 04/22/98 20:51:00
7 04/22/98 21:39:00
8 04/22/98 22:26:00
9 04/22/98 23:14:00
10 04/23/98 00:02:00
11 04/23/98 00:49:00
12 04/23/98 01:36:00
13 04/23/98 02:24:00
14 04/23/98 03:11:00
15 04/23/98 03:59:00
16 04/23/98 04:46:00
17 04/23/98 05:33:00
18 04/23/98 06:21:00
19 04/23/98 07:08:00
20 04/23/98 07:55:00
21 04/23/98 08:42:00
22 04/23/98· 09:30:00
23 04/23/98 10:17:00
24 04/23/98 11:03:00
25 04/23/98 11:51:00 /
26 04/23/98 12:39:00
27 04/23/98 13:28:00
28 04/23/98 14:16:00
29 04/23/98 15:05:00
30 04/23/98 15:54:00
• ANALYSIS BATCH SUMMARY
Analysis Batch # TPGC1280422120001
Analysis Start Date/Time 04/22/98 12:00:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 04/23/98 21:34:00
Work Order # 9804412
Page _6_
Instrument Q£!l..__
Analyst !':!fill,
Reviewer =J~S~E'----------
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type Analysis File #
SB Blank, System U8D2200l
PRIMER_LUBE Sample U8D22002
SB Blank, System U8D22003
CCV_JET Continuing Calibration Verification U8D22004
CCV_KER Continuing Calibration Verification U8D22005
CCV_DSL Continuing Calibration Verification U8D22006
BLK981354 Blank, Method U8D22007
LCS982007 Lab Control Sample U8D22008
LCSD982007 Lab ·control Sample Duplicate U8D22009
DCS982008 Detectability Check Sample U8D22010
9804398-0lA Sample U8D22011
9804398-02A Matrix Spike U8D22012
9804398-03A Matrix Spike Duplicate U8D22013
9804396-0lA Sample U8D22014
9804396-02A Sample U8D22015
9804396-03A Sample U8D22016
0498HBWE01 9804412-0lA Sample U8D22017
9804398-04A Sample U8D22018
9804398-05A Sample U8D22019
9804398-06A Sample U8D22020
9804398-07A Sample U8D2202l
9804398-08A Sample U8D22022
SB Blank, System U8D22023
CCV_JET Continuing Calibrat:j.on Verification U8D22024
CCV_KER Continuing Calibration Verification U8D22025
CCV_DSL Continuing Calibration Verif icar.ion U8D22026
9804398-09A Sample U8D22027
9804398-lOA Sample U8D22028
9804398-llA Sample U8D22029
9804398-12A Sample U8D22030
•
06/05/98 15:06:41
Method TPH-Diesel by mod. SW8015
Test Code DSLSWAEL
Initial Calibration # GC12980401120000
Calibration Date ~0~4L/~0~1L/~9~8 ____ _
Sequence/Analysis Time
31 04/23/98 16:43:00
32 04/23/98 17:32:00
33 04/23/98 18:21:00
34 04/23/98 19:09:00
35 04/23/98 19:58:00
36 04/23/98 20:46:00
37 04/23/98 21:34:00
•
A If AL Y S I S B AT C H S UM MAR Y (cont'd)
Analysis Batch # TPGC1280422120001
Analysis Start Date/Time 04/22/98 12:00:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 04/23/98 21:34:00
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type
9804398-13A Sample
9804398-14A Sample
9804398-15A Sample
SB Blank, System
ccv_JET Continuing Calibration
Work Order # 9804412
Page _7_
fnstrument QgL
Analyst ~
Reviewer ~J~S~E ________ _
Analysis File #
U8D22031
U8D22032
U8D22033
U8D22034
Verification USD22035
CCV_KER Continuing Calibration Verification USD22036
CCV_DSL Continuing Calibration Verification USD22037
• •
•
06/05/98 15:06:41
Method TPH-Diesel by mod. SW8015
Lab Sample ID
File ID
Project Sample
ID/Description
Specification# zDzS=LzS __
Analyte
•
ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
COMMBHTS/HARRATIVR
Flag Comment/Narrative Corrective Action
•
Work Order # 9804412
Page _8_
06/05/98 15:17:41
Report RADIAN CORPORATION
To 3200 E. CHAPEL HILL RD.
P.O. BOX 13000
Attention JIM NARKUNAS
Prepared _ _::R;:::a;:::d;;::i;:::a::,:n~I::.:n.::t~e;;r~n~a.::t~i"'o~n~a~l'"',.....=L~L~C=­
By --"1"'4..::0.;,4..::6c....:::S:>:u::.:mm=i"=t'-"D"'r'-'."''-!:B:.::l"'d::;qi.:·-.::B:....
P. O. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78~20-1088
CSC JALINDSEY
Project Sample
Description
0498HBWE01
•
ID/
NOR~ ORDER SUMMARY
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON NC
Work ID VOLATILES
Case II ,.N"'A'----------
SDG II "'N=A~~~~~~~~
RAS 11 80304AJAL
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s)
OlA 352SWAOO
827SWBCM
CKlSWAOO
•
Work Order II 9804413
Page _l_
RCN 650138.0502
New York ELAP ID II: 10915
Method Desciption
Liquid/Liq Extract SW846
Semivolatiles by GC/MS
Primary KD cone. SW846
•
•
06/05/98 15:17:41
State
Arkansas
California
Kansas
Louisiana
North Carolina
New Jersey
New York
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Utah
Wisconsin
•
STATE CBRTIFICATIOHS
Agency
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology
California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
New York State Department of Health
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Department of Health and Environmental Control
Utah Department of Health
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Work Order # 9804413
Page L
Certification ID
2257
E-10165
LA 97-29
302
82005
10915
8720
82003001
RADC
99885260
•
06/05/98 15:17:41 A .Iii A L Y T I C A L P R 0 T 0 C 0 L S U M M A R Y
FLAG DRFI.lilITIO.lilS
Flag Definition
< DL Result less than stated Detection Limit and greater than or equal to zero.
NA Analyte concentration not available for this analysis.
NC RPD and/or \ Recovery not calculated. See Narrative for explanation.
ND Not detected. No instrument response for analyte or result less than zero.
NR Not reported. Result greater than or equal to stated Detection Limit and less than specified Reporting Limit.
NS Analyte not spiked.
A Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Lube Oil range. The ~attern does not match that of Lube Oil.
B . Analyte detected in method blank at concentration greater than the Reporting Limit (and greater than zero) .
C Confirming data obtained using second GC column or GCMS.
D Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Diesel range. The pattern does not match that of Diesel.
E Analyte concentration exceeded calibration range.
F Interference or coelution suspected. See Narrative for explanation.
G Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Jet Fuel range. The pattern does not match that of Jet Fuel.
H Presence of analyte previously confirmed by historical data.
I Analyte identification suspect. See Narrative for explanation.
J Result is less than stated Detection Limit but greater than or equal to specified Reporting Limit.
K Peak did not meet method identification criteria. Analyte not detected on other GC column.
M Result modified from previous Report. See Narrative for explanation.
P Analyte not confirmed. Results from primary and secondary GC columns differ by greater than a factor of 3.
Q QC result does not meet tolerance in Protocol Specification.
R Result reported elsewhere.
S Analyte concentration obtained using Method of Standard Additions (MSA) .
T Second column confirmational analysis not performed.
X See Narrative for explanation.
Y See Narrative for explanation.
Z See Narrative for explanation .
• •
Work Order # 9804413
Page _3_
•
• 06/05/98 15:17:41
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Project Sample ID/Description
0498HBWE01
• ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
Extraction/Digestion
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s) Batch #
9804413-0lA 827SWBCM 3520980416165500
Work Order # 9804413
Page _4_
Analysis Batch #
MSMSD280423085302
•
06/05/98 15:17:41
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date -Analyzed:
' . IU.l.1.u .... ~ .... u .u.._...,...,.._ !
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetophenone
2-Acetylaminofluorene
4-Aminobiphenyl
Aniline
Anthracene
Benzlalanthracene
Benz(a)pyrene
Benzidine
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
4-Bromophenylphenyl ether
Butylbenzylphthalate
Carbazole
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
p-Chloroaniline
•
0498HBWE01
9804413-0lA
W9979
04/15/98
04/16/98 16:55:00
04/23/98 17:13
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.463
ND 0.373
ND 0.166
ND 0.503
ND 8.43
ND 0.674
ND 0.387
ND 0.195
ND 0.292
ND 28.5
.ND 0.289
ND 0.309
ND 0.587
ND 30.5
ND 0.688
ND 0.427
ND 0.107
ND 0.0577
ND 0.456
ND 0.857
RESULTS SUMMARY
Cone. DL Cone.
.
•
DL
Work Order # 9804413
Page _5_
Cone. DL
•
• 06/05/98 15:17:41
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Chlorobenzilate
bis(2-Chl9roethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenylphenyl ether
Chrysene
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Diallate
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
Diethylphthalate
0498HBWE01
9804413-0lA
W9979
04/15/98
04/16/98 16:55:00
04/23/98 17:13
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.198
ND 0.241
ND 0.152
ND 0.195
ND 0.570
ND 0.117
ND 0.341
ND 0.279
ND 0.172
ND 0.172
ND 0.227
ND 0.244
ND 0.141
ND 0.346
ND 0 .493
ND 0.450
ND 1.12
ND 0 .. 385
ND 0.260
ND 0 .211
• R B S U L T S S 0 MM A R Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone. DL
Work Order # 9804413
Page _6_
Cone.
•
DL
06/05/98 15:17:41
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
'"' -~·-n-F~·
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Dimethylphenethylamine
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Dimethylphthalate
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
1,3-Dinitrobenzene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine/N-NitrosoDPA
Ethyl methanesulf onate
bis(2-Ethylhexyllphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
••
0498HBWE01
9804413-0lA
W9979
04/15/98
04/16/98 16:55:00
04/23/98 17:13 . -
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.767
ND 0.372
ND 3.54
ND 12.5
ND 0.387
ND 0.261
ND 9.62
ND 0.507
ND 5.71
ND 0.430
ND 0.432
ND 0.618
ND 0.339
2.10 J 4.92
ND 0.233
ND 0.310
ND 0.397
ND 0.630
ND 5.06
ND 0.309
R B S U L T S S UM MA R Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone.
'
'
•
DL
Work Order ff 9804413
Page _7_
Cone. DL
'
•
•
06/05/98 15:17:41
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Hexachloropropene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Isosafrole
Kepone
Methapyrilene
Methyl methanesulfonate
3-Methylcholanthrene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol/3-Methylphenol
2-Methylphenol
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
N-Nitrosomorpholine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
Naphthalene
0498HBWE01
9804413-0lA
W9979
04/15/98
04/16/98 16:55:00
04/23/98 17:13
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.788
ND 0.204
ND 0.0952
ND 1.22
ND 18.3
ND 9.09
ND 0.405
ND 7.07
ND 0.295
ND 0.219
ND 0.206
ND 0.546
ND 0.346
ND 0.519
ND 0.592
ND 0.773
ND 0.933
ND 0.185
ND 0.773
ND 0.386
•
R B S U L T S S UM MA R Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone.
.
DL
Work Order # 9804413
Page _8_
Cone. DL
•
06/05/98 15;17;41
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
1,4-Naphthoquinone
1-Naphthylamine
2-Naphthylamine
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloroethane
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
2-Picoline
Pronamide
•
0498HBWE01
9804413-0lA
W9979
04/15/98
04/16/98 16:55:00
04/23/98 17:13
1
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.517
ND 8.85
ND 10.3
ND 0.507
ND 0.629
ND 0.578
ND 0.567
ND 0.576
ND 0.555
ND 8.29
ND 4.89
ND 0.335
ND 0.523
ND 1.14
ND 6.44
ND 0.182
ND 0.300
ND 0.233
ND 1.14
ND 0.396
R E S U L T S S UH HAR. Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone.
•
DL
Work Order # 9804413
Page _9_
Cone. DL
•
•
06/05/98 15:17:41
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Pyrene
Pyridine
Saf role
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
o-Toluidine
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
sym-Trinitrobenzene
0498HBWE01
9804413-0lA
W9979
04/15/98
04/16/98 16:55:00
04/23/98 17:13
l
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 0.271
ND 0.811
ND 0.491
ND 0.374
ND 0.674
ND 1.37
ND 0.331
ND 0.909
ND 0.354
ND 1.24
•
R B S U L T S S UM MA R Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone. DL
Work Order # 9804413
Page lQ_
Cone. DL
•
.
06/05/98 15:17:41
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBCM
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed: ·-· -·~· ·~~
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Surrogate(s)
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Nitrobenzene-dS
Phenol-dS
Terphenyl-dl4
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
•
049BHBWEOl
9804413-0lA
W9979
04/15/98
04/16/98 16:55:00
04/23/98 17:13
-.1.
Water
ug/L
received
Cone. DL
Recovery
\
89
BS
88
96
88
84
R B S U L T S S UM MA R Y (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone.
Recovery Recovery
\ %
•
DL
Work Order # 9804413
Page .!L
Cone.
Recovery
\
DL
.
•
•
06/05/98 15:17:41
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Test Code 827SWBAB
Initial Calibration # MSD2980323124400
Calibration Date ~0~3L/~2~3L/~9~8~~~~-
Sequence/Analysis Time
1 04/23/98 08:53
2 04/23/98 09:13
9 04/23/98 15:14
10 04/23/98 15:54
11 04/23/98 16:34
12 04/23/98 17:13
13 04/23/98 17:53
•
ANALYSIS BATCH SUMMARY
Analysis Batch tt MSMSD280423085302
Analysis Start Date/Time 04/23/98 08:53:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 04/23/98 18:32:00
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type
TUNE GC/MS tune files
Work Order # 9804413
Page 1d._
Instrument ~
Analyst MCL
Reviewer ~S~D~K'--~~~~~~~-
Analysis File tt
W9966
SSTD050 Continuing Calibration Verification W9967
LCS981997 Lab Control Sample W9976
LCSD981997 Lab Control Sample Duplicate W9977
BLK981349 Blank, Method W9978
0498HBWE01 9804413-0lA Sample W9979
DCS981998 Detectability Check Sample W9980
•
06/05/98 15:17:41
Method Semivolatiles by SW8270C
Lab Sample ID
File ID
•
Project Sample
ID/Description
Specification# 827S
Analyte
ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
COMMBHTS/HARRATIVB
Flag Comment/Narrative
•
Corrective Action
Work Order # 9804413
Page ll_
•
• • 06/05/98 15:18:27
Pr-eviously Reported on 04/23/98.
RADIAH AHALYTICAL SBRVICBS
FPAS RBPORT
Report Form
Work Order Summary
State Certifications
Flag Definitions
Protocol Summary for IR Analysis
Results Summary
Analysis Batch Summary
Comments/Narrative
TABLB OF COHTBHTS
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON,NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Analytical Batch ID
WLPEIR80421093003
Quality Control Exception Report Summary
• Work Order # 9804414
certified By (j/f-r:.ef .. Q±,
Date le I .3-/ri' '
Pages
From To
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
06/05/98 15:18:27
Report RADIAN CORPORATION
To 3200 E. CHAPEL HILL RD.
P.O .. BOX 13000
Attention JIM NARKUNAS
Prepared _ _;;R:;:a"'d:;:i"'a:::n:......:I:::no.::t"'e"'r"'n"'a"'t"'i"'o"'n"'a"'l"',-..:::L;;;L;;;C._
By _ _;1~4~0~4~6:.....::S:.:;:Uo::mo::m:::i'-"t:.....::D:..r"'._.,--"B:;:l'-"d:::qi..:·--':B:....
P. O. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1088
CSC JALINDSEY
Project Sample
Description
0498HBWE01
•
ID/
WORK ORDER SUMMARY
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON NC
Work ID VOLATILES
Case # ~N~A~-------­
SDG # ~N~A'---------­
RAS # 80304AJAL
i;.ab Sample ID Test Code{s)
OlA IRXEWAOG
SEPEWAOO
02A MS IRXEWAOG
SEPEWAciO
03A MSD IRXEWAOG
SEPEWAOO
•
Work Order # 9804414
Page _1_
RCN 650138.0502
New York ELAP ID #: 10915
Method Desciption
IR analysis
Sep Funnel Extraction
IR analysis
Sep Funnel Extraction
IR analysis
Sep Funnel Extraction
•
• 06/05/98 15:18:27
State
Arkansas
California
Kansas
Louisiana
North Carolina
New Jersey
New York
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Utah
Wisconsin
• STATB CBRTIPICATIORS
Agency
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology
California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
New York State Department of Health
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Department of Health and Environmental Control
Utah Department of Health
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
Work Order # 9804414
Page L
Certification ID
2257
E-10165
LA 97-29
302
82005
10915
8720
82003001
RADC
99885260
•
06/05/98 15:18:27 AlllALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
F L A G D B F r Ill r T r 0 Ill s
Flag Definition
< DL
NA
NC
Nf>
NR
NS
Result less than stated Detection Limit and greater than or equal to zero.
Analyte concentration not available for this analysis.
RPO and/or % Recovery not calculated. See Narrative for e><Planation.
Not-detected. No instrument response for analyte or result less than zero.
Not reported. Result greater than or equal to stated Detection Limit and less than specified Reporting Limit.
Analyte not spiked.
A
B
c
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Lube Oil range. The pattern does not match that of Lube Oil.
Analyte detected in method blank at concentration greater than the Reporting Limit (and greater than zero) .
Confirming data obtained using second GC column or GCMS.
Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Diesel range.
Analyte concentration exceeded calibration range.
The pattern does not match that of Diesel.
Interference or coelution suspected. See Narrative for explanation.
Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Jet Fuel range. The pattern does not match that of Jet Fuel.
Presence of analyte previously confirmed by historical data.
Analyte identification suspect. See Narrative for explanation.
Result is less than stated Detection Limit but greater than or equal to specified Reporting Limit.
Peak did not meet method identification criteria. Analyte not detected on other GC column.
M Result modified from previous Report. See Narrative for explanation.
P Analyte not confirmed. Results from primary and secondary GC columns differ by greater than a factor of 3.
Q QC result does not meet tolerance in Protocol Specification.
R Result reported elsewhere.
S Analyte concentration obtained using Method of Standard Additions (MSA) .
T Second column confirmational analysis not performed.
X See Narrative for explanation.
Y See Narrative for explanation.
Z See Narrative for explanation .
• •
Work Order # 9804414
Page _3_
•
• 06/05/98 15:18:27
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON.NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Method IR Analysis
Project Sample ID/Description
0498HBWE01
• ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
Extraction/Digestion
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s) Batch #
9804414-0lA IRXEWAOG DIST980420083100
Work Order # 9804414
Page _4_
Analysis Batch #
WLPEIR80421093003
•
06/05/98 15:18:27
Method Oil and Grease by E413.2
Test Code IRXEWAOG
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
·Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Oil and Grease
•
0498HBWE01
9804414-0lA
PEIR0421-29
04/15/98
04/20/98
04/21/98 09:30:00
1
Water
mg/L
received
Cone. DL
ND 1. 03
RBSOLTS SUMMARY
Cone. DL Cone.
•
DL
Work Order # 9804414
Page _s_
Cone. DL
•
• 06/05/98 15:18:27
Method IR Analysis
Test Code IRXESAOG
Initial Calibration # PEIR980421093000
Calibration Date ~0~4·/~2~1·/~9~8 ____ _
Sequence/Analysis Time
1 04/21/98 09:30:00
2 04/21/98 09:30:00
3 04/21/98 09:30:00
4 04/21/98 09:30:00
5 04/21/98 09:30:00
6 04/21/98 09:30:00
7 04/21/98 09:30:00
8 04/21/98 09:30:00
24 04/21/98 09:30:00
25 04/21/98 09:30:00
26 04/21/98 09:30:00
27 04/21/98 09:30:00
28 04/21/98 09:30:00
29 04/21/98 09:30:00
30 04/21/98 09:30:00
31 04/21/98 09:30:00
32 04/21/98 09:30:00
33 04/21/98 09:30:00
•
AlifALYSIS BATCH SUMMARY
Analysis Batch # WLPEIR80421093003
Analysis Start Date/Time 04/21/98 09:30:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time
Work Order # 9804414
Page _6_
Instrument PEIR
Analyst ill:!!:!
Reviewer ~D~L~C'----------
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type Analysis File #
CAL_STDl Initial Calibration Standard 1 PEIR0421-1
CAL_STD2 Initial Calibration Standard 2 PEIR0421-2
CAL_STD3 Initial Calibration Standard 3 PEIR0421-3
CAL_STD4 Initial Calibration Standard 4 PEIR0421-4
CAL_STD5 Initial Calibration Standard 5 PEIR0421-5
CAL_STD6 Initial Calibration Standard 6 PEIR0421-6
rsv Second Source Standard PEIR0421-7
rev Initial Calibration Verification PEIR0421-8
REAG_BLK Blank, Reagent PEIR0421-24
CCV Continuing Calibration Verification PEIR0421-25
BLK981386 Blank, Method PEIR0421-26
LCS982056 Lab Control Sample PEIR0421-27
LCSD982056 Lab Control Sample Duplicate PEIR0421-28
0498HBWE01 9804414-0lA Sample PEIR0421-29
0498HBWE01 9804414-02A Analytical Spike PEIR0421-30
0498HBWE01 9804414-03A Analytical Spike Duplicate PEIR0421-31
REAG_BLANK Blank, Reagent PEIR0421-32
CCV Continuing Calibration Verification PEIR0421-33
•
06/05/98 15:18:27
Method IR Analysis Specification# ~H~CT.-..=E~~
Lab Sample ID Project Sample
File ID ID/Description Analyte
•
ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
COMMRHTS/HARRATIVR
Flag Comment/Narrative
•
Corrective Action
Work Order # 9804414
Page _7~
•
• 06/05/98 15:18:27 • QUALITY CONTROL RXCRPTIOH REPORT
SUMMARY
QCER # Analysis Batch Number
980416-05
Work Order # 9804414
Page _8 _
•
• 06/05/98 15:24:56
Previously Reported on 04/29/98.
Report Form
Work Order Summary
State Certifications
Flag Definitions
• RADIAR ARALYTICAL SBRVICBS
PPAS RBPORT
TABLB OP CORTBRTS
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Analytical Batch ID
Protocol Summary for Analysis by TRACE ICP
Results Summary
Analysis Batch Summary EMJ61E80428130601
Comments/Narrative
• Work Order # 9804415
Certified By ~(ph,J};;.._.,
Date -& /6-/ff"
Pages
From To
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 6
7 8
9 9
06/05/98 15:24:56
Report RADIAN CORPORATION
To 3200 E. CHAPEL HILL RD.
P.O. BOX 13000
Attention JIM NARKUNAS
Prepared _.....:;R:::a:.::d"'i"'a"'n'-"I;.:.n:.::t"'e"'r""n:.::a:.::t:.::i"'o""n:.::a,,:l:..1,__.L,.L:.::C'-
By --=1~4~0~4~6-=S~u~m~m:.:i~t-=D:.:r~·~'-=B:.:l~d~q~·-=B'­
P. 0. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1088
CSC JALINDSEY
Project Sample
Description
0498HBWE01
•
ID/
WORK ORDBR SUMMARY
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON,NC
Work ID VOLATILES
Case # ~N~A ________ _
SDG # ~N~A _______ _
RAS # 80304AJAL
Lab Sample ID Test Code (s)
OlA DGTSWAOO
ICTSWSAF
•
Method
Acid Digestion
Metals by ICP
Work Order # 9804415
Page _l_
RCN 650138.0502
New York ELAP ID #: 10915
Desciption
for Metals
•
• 06/05/98 15:24:56
State
Arkansas
California
Kansas
Louisiana
North Carolina
New Jersey
New York
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Utah
Wisconsin
• STATB CBRTIFICATIONS
Agency
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology
California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
New York State Department of Health
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Department of Health and Environmental Control
Utah Department of Health
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources .
Work Order # 9804415
Page _2_
Certification ID
2257
E-10165
LA 97-29
302
82005
10915
8720
82003001
RADC
99885260
•
06/05/98 15:24:56 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
FLAG DBFINITIONS
Flag Definition
c DL Result less than stated Detection Limit and greater than or equal to zero.
Analyte concentration not available for this analysis. NA
NC
ND
NR
NS
A
B
c
RPD and/or \ Recovery not calculated. See Narrative for explanation.
Not detected. No instrument response for analyte or result less than zero.
Not reported. Result greater than or equal to stated Detection Limit and less than specified Reporting Limit.
Analyte not spiked.
Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Lube Oil range. The pattern does not match that of Lube Oil.
Analyte detected in method blank at concentration greater than the Reporting Limit (and greater than zero) .
Confirming data obtained using second GC column or GCMS.
D Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Diesel range. The pattern does not match that of Diesel.
E Analyte concentration exceeded calibration range.
F Interference or coelution suspected. See Narrative for explanation.
G Presence of hydrocarbon mix eluting in the Jet Fuel range. The pattern does not match that of Jet Fuel.
H Presence of analyte previously confirmed by historical data.
I Analyte identification suspect. See Narrative for explanation.
J Result is less than stated Detection Limit but greater than or equal to specified Reporting Limit.
K Peak did not meet method identification criteria. Analyte not detected on other GC column.
M Result modified from previous Report. See Narrative for explanation.
P Analyte not confirmed. Results from primary and secondary GC columns differ by greater than a factor of 3.
Q QC result does not meet tolerance in Protocol Specification.
R Result reported elsewhere.
S Analyte concentration obtained using Method of Standard Additions (MSA) .
T Second column confirmational analysis not performed.
X See Narrative for explanation.
Y See Narrative for explanation.
Z See Narrative for explanation .
• •
Work Order # 9804415
Page _3_
•
• 06/05/98 15:24:56
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON,NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Method Analysis by TRACE ICP
Project Sample ID/Description
0498HBWE01
• ABALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
Extraction/Digestion
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s) Batch #
9804415-0lA ICTSW5AF IDIG980420083000
Work Order It 9804415
Page _4_
Analysis Batch It
EMJ61E80428130601
•
06/05/98 15:24:56
Method ICP Analysis by SW6010B
Test Code ICTSW5AF
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
•
0498HBWE01
9804415-0lA
J61E0428-28
04/15/98
04/20/98
04/28/98
1
Water
mg/L
received
Cone. DL
0.0192 B 0.0152
0.000100 BJ 0. 00141
-0.000830 J 0.00327
0.000180 BJ 0.000190
0.000180 BJ 0.000270
0.000120 BJ 0.000260
0. 0460 B 0.0360
0.0000200 BJ 0.000400
-0.000010 BJ 0.000500
0.000580 0.000420
-0.00351 BJ 0.0201
0. 00110 J 0.00128
-0.0159 J 0.00426
0.000180 BJ 0.000390
0.000600 BJ 0.00100
-0.000530 BJ 0.000610
0.881 B 0.0328
-0.00!85 J 0.00144
0.000620 J 0.000630
0.444 B 0.102
RBSOLTS SUMMARY
Cone. DL Cone.
•
DL
Work Order tt 9804415
Page _5_
Cone. DL
•
•
06/05/98 15:24:56
Method ICP Analysis by SW6010B
Test Code ICTSW5AF
Project Sample ID:
Lab ID:
File ID:
Date Collected:
Date Prepared:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Matrix:
Units:
Report as:
Column:
Analyte
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
0498HBWE01
9804415-0lA
J61E0428-28
04/15/98
04/20/98
04/28/98
1
Water
mg/L
received
Cone. DL
-0.00235 BJ 0.00387
0.000740 0.000720
-0.000080 J 0.00174
•
R BS ULT S SUMMARY (Cont'd)
Cone. DL Cone. DL
Work Order # .2.J!.Q.'!..i12___
Page _6 _
Cone. DL
•
06/05/98 15:24:56
Method Analysis by TRACE ICP
Test Code ICTSW5AF
Initial Calibration II ~N~A'--------~
Calibration Date ~N~A'------~--
Sequence/Analysis Time
1 04/28/98
2 04/28/98
3 04/28/98
4 04/28/98
5 04/28/98
6 04/28/98
7 04/28/98
8 04/28/98
9 04/28/98
10 04/28/98
11 04/28/98
12 04/28/98
13 04/28/98
14 04/28/98
15 04/28/98
16 04/28/98
17 04/28/98
18 04/28/98
19 04/28/98
20 04/28/98
21 04/28/98
22 04/28/98
23 04/28/98
24 04/28/98
25 04/28/98
26 04/28/98
27 04/28/98
28 04/28/98
29 04/28/98
30 04/28/98
•
AlilALYSIS BATCH SUMMARY
Analysis Batch # EMJ61E8042813060l
Analysis Start Date/Time 04/28/98 13:06:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 04/28/98 17:36:00
Work Order II 9804415
Page _7_
Instrument ~
Analyst ~
Reviewer =D~L~C'----------
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type Analysis File II
STDl-BLANK Initial Calibration Standard 1 J61E0428-1
s2_os Sample J61E0428-2
s2_1 Sample J61E0428-3
S5_05 Sample J61E0428-4
S5_1 Sample J61E0428-5
S3_05 Sample J61E0428-6
S3 Initial Calibration Standard 1 J61E0428-7
ICV-3-W Continuing Calibration Verification J61E0428-8
ICV-2-W Continuing Calibration Verification J61E0428-9
ICV-1-W Continuing Calibration Verification J61E0428-l0
CICSA-W Interference Check Sample-Majors J61E0428-ll
CICSAB-W Interference Check Sample-Majors/Minors J61E0428-12
CCV-2-W Continuing Calibration Verification J61E0428-13
CCV-5-W Continuing Calibration Verification J61E0428-14
CCV-3-W Continuing Calibration Verification J61E0428-15
CCB-W Blank, Continuing Calibration J61E0428-16
ICB-W Blank, Initial Calibration J61E0428-17
BLK981373 Blank, Method J61E0428-18
RLCS2 Reporting Limit Check Standard J61E0428-19
LCS982045 Lab Control Sample J61E0428-20
LCSD982045 Lab Control Sample Duplicate J61E0428-21
9804384-0lA Sample J61E0428-22
9804384-02A Sample J61E0428-23
9804440-0lA Sample J61E0428-24
9804440-02A Sample J61E0428-25
9804440-03A Sample J61E0428-26
9804440-04A Sample J6lE0428-27
0498HBWE01 9804415-0lA Sample J61E0428-28
9804454-0lA Sample J6lE0428-29
9804286-0lA Sample J61E0428-30
• •
• 06/05/98 15:24:56
Method Analysis by TRACE ICP
Test Code ICTSW5AF
Initial Calibration # ~N~A'--------­
Calibration Date ~N~A~-------
Sequence/Analysis Time
31 04/28/98
32 04/28/98
33 04/28/98
34 04/28/98
35 04/28/98
36 04/28/98
37 04/28/98
38 04/28/98
39 04/28/98
40 04/28/98
41 04/28/98
42 04/28/98
43 04/28/98
44 04/28/98
45 04/28/98
46 04/28/98
47 04/28/98
48 04/28/98
49 04/28/98
50 04/28/98
51 04/28/98
52 04/28/98
53 04/28/98
54 04/28/98
55 04/28/98
• AN ALYS I S BATCH SUMMARY (cont'd)
Analysis Batch # EMJ61E8042813060l
Work Order # 9804415
Page _8_
Analysis Start Date/Time 04/28/98 13:06:00
Analysis Stop Date/Time 04/28/98 17:36:00
Instrument ~
Analyst MOS
Reviewer :D=L~C'----------
Project Sample ID Lab Sample ID Sample Type Analysis File #
9804288-0lA Sample .:161E0428-3l
9804288-02A Matrix Spike J61E0428-32
9804288-03A Matrix Spike Duplicate J61E0428-33
CCV-2-W Continuing Calibration Verification J6lE0428-34
CCV-5-W Continuing Calibration Verification J6lE0428-35
CCV-3-W Continuing Calibration Verification J61E0428-36
CCB-W Blank, Continuing Calibration J61E0428-37
ICB-W Blank, Initial Calibration J61E0428-38
9804288-04A Serial Dilutions J61E0428-39
9804288-04}\ Sample J61E0428-40·
9804288-04A Analytical Spike J61E0428-4l
9804288-05A Sample J61E0428-42
9804288-0GA Sample J61E0428-43
9804288-07A Sample J61E0428-44
9804384-0lA Sample J61E0428-45
9804384-02A Sample J61E0428-46
9804440-0lA Sample J61E0428-47
9804440-02A Sample J61E0428-48
9804454-0lA Sample J61E0428-49
CICSA-W Interference Check Sample-Majors J61E0428-50
CICSAB-W Interference Check Sample-Majors/Minors J61E0428-51
CCV-2-W Continuing Calibration Verification J61E0428-52
CCV-5-W Continuing Calibration Verification J61E0428-53
CCV-3-W Continuing Calibrat;.ion Verification J61E0428-54
CCB-W Blank, Continuing Calibration J61E0428-55
•
06/05/98 15:24:56
Method Analysis by TRACE ICP Specification# _I_C~P-S_~
Lab Sample ID
File ID
•
Project Sample
ID/Description Analyte
ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL SUMMARY
COMMBMTS/NARRATIVB
Flag Comment/Narrative
•
Corrective Action
Work Order # 9804415
Page _9_
•
• 06/05/98 15:25:56
Previously Reported on 04/21/98.
Report Form
Work Order Summary
Work Order Comments
State Certifications
Flag Definitions
• RADIAN ANALYTICAL SBRVICBS
FPAS REPORT
TABLB OF CONTENTS.
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON NC
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Analytical Batch ID
Protocol Summary for Mercury by SW-846
Results Summary
Analysis Batch Summary AAZ4 -80420104702
Comments/Narrative .
• Work Order # 9804416
Certified By t;J!!'~ ~
Date ~/£.-/f~
Pages
From To
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4 ..
5 5
6 6
7 8
9 9
06/05/98 15:25:56
Report RADIAN CORPORATION
To 3200 E. CHAPEL HILL RD.
P.O. BOX 13000
Attention JIM NARKUNAS
Prepared ~_..,R~a~d;i~a~n-=I~n~t~e=r~n~a~t;i~o~n~a;l~·-=L~L~C._
By ~-=1~4~0~4~6....:::S~u~m~m~i~t....:::D=r~·~'-=B~l~d~g~·-=B._
P. o. Box 201088
Austin, TX 78720-1088
CSC JALINDSEY
Project Sample
Description
0498HBWE01
•
ID/
NOR~ ORDBR SUMMARY
Client Code HAM BEACH NC
Client HAMILTON BEACH
Facility WASHINGTON NC
Work ID VOLATILES
Case # _N_A~-------­
SDG # ~NA~~~~~~~~­
RAS # 80304AJAL
Lab Sample ID Test Code(s)
OlA HGCSWAOO
•
Work Order # 9804416
Page _1_
RCN 650138.0502
New York ELAP ID #: 10915
Method Desciption
Mercury by CVAAS
•
• 06/05/98 15:25:56 •
WORK ORD BR COMMBJilTS
Post digestion spikes not performed on all GFAAS analyses per Item 271
of the New York ELAP manual. Post digestion spikes were performed,
as necessary, when recoveries for serial dilutions or matrix spikes
for an analytical batch did not fall within recovery tolerances.
• Work Order ~ 9804416
Page _2_
06/05/98 15:25:56
State
Arkansas
California
Kansas
Louisiana
North Carolina
New Jersey
New York
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Utah
Wisconsin
•
ST.II.TB C B R T I F I C A T I 0 JI S
Agency
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology
California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
Kansas Department of Health and Environment
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
New York State Department of Health
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Department of Health and Environmental Control
Utah Department of Health
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources .
•
Work Order # 9804416
Page _3_
Certification ID
2257
E-10165
LA 97-29
302
82005
10915
8720
82003001
RADC
99885260 .
•