idX Impressions BPA-OCR

Brownfields Property Application
North Carolina Brownfields Program
www.ncbrownfields.org
I. PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPER (PD) INFORMATION {USE TAB KEY TO GET TO NEXT
DATA ENTRY LINE-DO NOT USE THE RETURN KEY}
A. PD information:
Entity name 234 Springs Rd., LLC
Principal Officer Terrence L. Schultz
Representative Matthew Posey
Mailing Address 3451 Rider Trail South
Earth City, MO 63045
E-mail address [e-mail]
Phone No. 314-801-6330
Fax No. 314-739-4129
Web site www.idxcorporation.com
B. PD contact person information (i.e .. individual who will serve as the NCBP's point of
contact if different than above):
Name
Company
Mailing Address
E-Mail Address
Phone No.
Fax No.
C. Information regarding all parent companies. subsidiaries or other affiliates of PD (attach
separate sheet(s) if necessary):
(Use for LLCs)
Member-managed or manager-managed? Answer: Manager-managed
4
If manager-managed, provide name of manager and percent of ownership:
Name
Ownership (%)
Mailing Address
E-Mail Address
Phone No.
Fax No.
idX Corporation
100%
3451 Rider Trail South
Earth City, MO 63045
[e-mail]
314-801-6330
314-739-4129
For fill LLCs, list all members of the LLC and provide their percent of ownership:
Name
Ownership (%)
Mailing Address
E-Mail Address
Phone No.
Fax No.
Name
Ownership(%)
Mailing Address
E-Mail Address
Phone No.
Fax No.
Name
Ownership (%)
Mailing Address
E-Mail Address
Phone No.
Fax No.
idX Corporation
100%
3451 Rider Trail South
Earth City, MO 63045
matt. [e-mail]
314-801-6330
314-739-4129
5
Managers of manager-managed LLCs are required to execute all brownfield documents for
the LLC; as to member-managed LL Cs, state name of member who will sign these
documents.
List all parent companies, subsidiaries and other affiliates:
idX Corporation operates its divisions through separate, wholly owned subsidiaries. The
Washington, North Carolina facility is operated by idX Impressions, LLC. idX Impressions
will lease the facility from PD upon PD's purchase of the facility.
(Use for Partnerships)
Check one: 0General Partnership Dlimited Partnership
List all partners and percent of ownership:
Name
Ownership(%)
Mailing Address
E-Mail Address
Phone No.
Fax No.
Is this person a general or limited partner?
Name
Ownership (%)
Mailing Address
E-Mail Address
Phone No.
Fax No.
Is this person a general or limited partner?
List all parent companies, subsidiaries and other affiliates:
6
(Use for corporations other than LLCs)
(If information is the same as shown in 1.A., please indicate "same as 1.A. "below.)
Name
Mailing Address
E-Mail Address
Phone No.
Fax No.
List all parent companies, subsidiaries and other affiliates:
(Use for individuals)
(If individual is the same as shown in 1.A., -please indicate "same as 1.A." above.)
Name
Mailing Address
E-Mail Address
Phone No.
Fax No.
D. Does PD have or can it obtain the financial means to fully implement a brownfields
agreement and assure the safe reuse of the property? (Attach supporting documentation
such as letters of credit, financial statements, etc.)
Answer Yes
Explanation PD is a wholly owned subsidiary of idX Corporation, one of the largest
manufacturers of retail environments. With nearly 1,500 employees and facilities across
North America and in Europe and Asia, idX is a leader in retail design solutions, fixture
manufacturing and program management. A privately held company, idX was incorporated
in 1999. idX has experienced continued growth throughout its history. Additional information
about idX, including financial information, is available upon request.
7
E. Does PD have or can it obtain the managerial means to fully implement a brownfields
agreement and assure the safe use of the property?
Answer Yes
Explanation The Washington operations are managed by Terry Phillips (General
Manager), Dave Anderson (Vice President of Quality Assurance) and Randy Roark (Director
of Operations). Mr. Phillips has been with idX Impressions, LLC and its predecessor,
Impressions Marketing Group, Inc. for 29 years, with 25 years as a manager. Mr. Anderson
has been with idX for 8 years and has 22 years previous experience focused on Quality
Management Systems in the automotive, aerospace and other manufacturing industries. Mr.
Roark has 24 years of experience as a plant manager, including 11 years as Director of
Operations at the Washington facility, where his duties include EPA reporting and permitting.
Mr. Roark has also coordinated with the Responsible Party on the Responsible Party's
remediation efforts at the property.
F. Does PD have or can it obtain the technical means to fully implement a brownfields
agreement and assure the safe use of the property?
Answer Yes
Explanation PD will engage environmental consultants to assess the severity and extent of
contamination on the site, assess exposure pathways and potentials for impact to human
health and the environment, and to design and implement any remediation strategy
necessary to protect human health and the environment and to facilitate potential expansion
of the existing facility or redevelopment of the site.
G. Does PD commit that it will comply (and has complied, if PD has had a prior project in the
NCBP) with all applicable procedural requirements of the NCBP, including prompt payment of
all statutorily required fees?
Answer Yes
(List all NCBP project name(s) and NCBP project ID numbers where PD or any parent
company, subsidiary and other affiliate of PD has been a party to.)
None
H. Does PD currently own the property?
Answer No
8
If yes, when did PD purchase the property and from whom? (Provide name, address,
telephone number and email address of the contact person for the current
property owner.)
If no, provide the name, address, telephone number and e-mail address of the contact
person for the current property owner
Matt Rauschenbach, C.F.O for the City of Washington
252-975-9312
[e-mail]
I. If PD does not currently own the property, does PD have the property under contract to
purchase?
Answer Yes
If yes, provide date of contract. November 25, 2013, as amended February 24, 2014
If no, when does the PD intend to purchase the property (e.g., after the project is determined
to be eligible for participation in the NCBP, after PD receives a draft BFA, after the
conclusion of the brownfields process)? Note: the Act requires the PD to demonstrate that it
intends to either buy or sell the property.
J. Describe all activities that have taken place on the property since PD or PD's parents,
subsidiaries and/or other affiliates, and/or lessees or sublessees of PD, took ownership of or
operated at the property (e.g., industrial, manufacturing or commercial activities, etc.).
(Include a list of all regulated substances as defined at NCGS § 130A-310.31(b)(11) that have
been used, stored on, or otherwise present at the property while those activities were
conducted, and explain how they were used.)
The manufacturing facility was constructed on the property in four stages between 1966 and
197 4. Between the date of construction and 1998, the facility was occupied by Hamilton Beach I
Proctor Silex and used to assemble small appliances. Hamilton Beach continued to occupy a small
portion of the facility for more administrative uses, including as a call center, until 2008. The facility
was occupied by Impressions Marketing Group, Inc. starting in 2001 . In 2013, idX Impressions. LLC
purchased substantially all of the assets of Impressions Marketing Group and continued its
operations at the facility. Those operations consist of assembling display cases, shelving units,
counter units and other fixtures for use in retail stores. The facility also houses project management
and other personnel responsible for the work produced there. All materials used in the assembly
process are delivered to the site and no raw material manufacturing or processing activities are
performed on the site. The assembly process uses water-based glue and spray cleaners, and the
only hazardous materials used are incidential quantities of paint, lacquer and lacquer thinner used
9
for assembly of specialty items. Limited quantities of hydraulic fluid and oil are used to operate and
maintain machinery used at the facility.
II. SITE INFORMATION
A. Information regarding the proposed brownfields property:
Proposed project name idX Impressions Facility -234 Springs Road
acreage 28.557 street address( es) 234 Springs Road
city Washington County Beaufort zip 27889
tax ID(s) or PIN(s) PIN-01008575, GPIN -5677-61-3599
past use(s) Light industrial I manufacturing
current use(s) Assembly of retail store fixtures
cause(s)/source(s) of contamination:
known Petroleum and solvent USTs
suspected NIA
B. Regulatory Agency Involvement: List the site names and all identifying numbers (ID No.)
previously or currently assigned by any federal, state or local environmental regulatory
agencies for the property. The ID No's may include CERCLIS numbers, RCRA generator
numbers for past and present operations, UST database, Division of Water Quality's incident
management database, and/or Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch inventory numbers. (In
many instances, the PD will need to actively seek out this information by reading
environmental site assessment reports, reviewing government files, contacting government
officials, and through the use of government databases, many of which may be available over
the internet.)
Agency Name/ID No: NCDENR Division of Water Quality -Aquifer Protection Section
Incident #14338
Agency Name/ID No: RCRA Non-Generator EPA ID NCD001839521
Agency Name/ID No: State Hazardous Waste Site -Active Eligible Projects site. Facility
ID's indicated as NONCD 0001814 and 14338
Agency Name/ID No:
Agency Name/ID No:
C. In what way(s) is the property abandoned. idled, or underused?
10
Neither Impressions Marketing Group nor idX Impressions has been willing as a lessee to
invest the funds necessary to keep the facility up to current industry standards. Add itionally,
portions of the property are unusable due to monitoring wells and residual contamination .
D. In what way(s) is the actual or possible contamination at the property a hindrance to
development or redevelopment of the property (attach anv supporting documentation such as
letters from lending institutions)?
PD and idX Impressions would like to purchase the property and invest approximately
$1 ,800,000 in building improvements and equipment upgrades. However, this investment would
not be possible without the protection that entry into the Brownfields Program would provide. In
addition to concerns about liability as an owner of the property, PD's lenders will not fund the
purchase of the property or the improvements without entry into the Brownfields Program. PD's
plans do not currently include expansion beyond the footprint of the existing building; however,
any such expansion in the future could, at that time, expose soil and shallow groundwater
contamination and require remediation of soil and groundwater, installation of engineering
controls, and possibly recordation of institutional controls.
E. In what way(s) is the redevelopment of the property difficult or impossible without a
brownfields agreement (attach anv supporting documentation such as letters form lending
institutions)?
As indicated above, PD will not improve the facility without entry into the Brownfields
Program, due to environmental liability concerns and funding difficulties.
F. What are the planned use(s) of the redeveloped brownfields property to which the PD will
commit? Be as specific as specific as possible.
PD intends to expand its fixture assembly operations at the property by investing
approximately $1,800,000 in equipment purchases and building improvements.
G. Current tax value of brownfields property: $2,896,062
H. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: $2,550,000
I. List and describe the public benefits that will result from the property's redevelopment. Be as
specific as possible. (Examples of public benefits for brownfields projects include job creation,
tax base increases, revitalization of blighted areas, preserved green space, preserved historic
places, improving disadvantaged neighborhood quality-of-life related retail shopping
opportunities, affordable housing, environmental cleanup activities or set asides that have
community or environmental benefits. In gauging public benefit, NCBP places great value
upon letters of support from community groups and local government that describe
anticipated improvements in quality of life for neighboring communities that the project will
bring about. The inclusion of such support letters with this application is recommended and
encouraged.)
If PD is unable to purchase and redevelop this facility due to environmental liability concerns,
it will have to consider moving its operations to one of idX' facilities in a different state. The
Springs Rd. facility currently employs approximately 140 individuals on a full time equivalent
11
basis. The planned improvements to this facility should result in the addition of approximately
103 full time jobs . Failure to enter into the Brownfields Program would jeopardize all 243 of
these jobs. Additionally, no real estate taxes are currently being paid on the property because it
is owned by the City of Washington. If PD purchases the property, PD will pay real estate taxes
and those taxes will be assessed at an increased valuation due to the redevelopment of the
property. The community benefits of the redevelopment are further evidenced by the letter of
support sent to DENR by the City of Washington.
Special Note: Please describe all environment-friendly technologies and designs PD plans
to utilize in its redevelopment strategy. For example, environment friendly redevelopment
plans could include: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Certification,
green building materials; green landscaping techniques such as using drought resistant
plants; energy efficient designs, materials, appliances, machinery, etc.; renewable sources of
energy, and/or recycling/reuse of old building materials such as brick or wood.
The intended building renovations will make use of various environmentally friendly
technologies and designs. New equipment will be more energy efficient than the current
equipment.
J. Who will own the brownfields property when the Notice of Brownfields Property is filed with
the register of deeds at the conclusion of the brownfields process? (If information is the
same as 1.A. above, please indicate.)
Name
Mailing Address
E-Mail Address
Phone No.
Fax No.
234 Springs Rd ., LLC
3451 Rider Trail South
Earth City, Missouri 63045
matt. [e-mail]
314-801-6330
314-739-4129
111. OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION
A. Brownfields Affidavit PD must provide its certification, in the form of a signed and
notarized original of the unmodified model brownfields affidavit provided by NCBP, that it
did not cause or contribute to contamination at the property and that it meets all other
statutory eligibility requirements. (Note: The form to use for this affidavit is attached to this
application. It must be filled out signed notarized, and submitted with this application.)
Is the required affidavit. as described above. included with this application?
Answer Yes
B. Proposed Brownfields Agreement Form: PD must provide the completed form Proposed
Brownfields Agreement. (Note: The form to use for this document is attached to this
application. It must be filled out, initialed, and attached on your submittal.)
12
Is the required Proposed Brownfields Agreement . as described above. included with this
application?
Answer Yes
C. Location Map: PD must provide a copy of the relevant portion of the 1 :24,000 scale
U.S.G.S. topographic quadrangle map that shows the property clearly plotted, and that
measures at least an 8 Y2 by 11 inches. (Note: these maps can be purchased through the
above link, or often through retail outdoor recreation stores that can print out the relevant
map. Often environmental reports have location maps that use this type of map as the base
for its location map.)
Is the required location map included with this application?
Answer Yes -hard copy and on CD
D. Survey Plat: PD must provide a preliminary survey plat of the brownfields property with the
property boundaries clearly identified, and a metes and bounds legal description that
matches the property description on the plat. At this stage of the brownfields process; one
or more existing survey plats from a previous property conveyance will suffice. (Before the
brownfields project enters the public comment phase of the brownfields process, the PD will
be required to submit a final brownfields survey plat which includes the information listed in
the brownfields survev plat guidance.)
Is the required preliminary survey plat included with this application?
Answer Yes -hard copy and on CD
E. Site Photographs: PD must provide at least one pre-redevelopment photograph of the
property, in either hard copy or electronic format that shows existing facilities and
structures. Please note that the NCBP prefers to have electronic photos instead of or
in addition to hard copies. Electronic copies of photographs should be emailed to:
[e-mail] with a clear indication as to which Brownfields
Application they apply to.
Are photographs of the property included with this application?
Answer Yes -hard copy and on CD
Have electronic copies of the photographs been emailed to NCBP?
Answer No -provided on CD
F. Environmental Reports/Data: If it makes an affirmative eligibility determination, the NCBP
will request that PD provide any and all existing environmental reports and data for the
property on CD only. The brownfields process may be expedited if PD submits such
reports/data with this application.
Are any environmental reports/data being submitted with this application?
Answer Yes -on CD only
13
If environmental reports/data are being submitted with this application. please provide the title.
date and author of each item being submitted:
See Attached Index of Reports
IV. ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FORMS
The following forms are to be filled out and submitted with the application including the
Responsibility and Compliance Affidavit and the Proposed Brownfields Agreement.
Submittal of the Affidavit requires signature and notarization, and the Proposed
Brownfields Application requires an initial.
14
Preliminary Proposed Brownfields Agreement
I. Property Facts
a. Property Address( es): 234 Springs Road, Washington , North Carolina
b. Property Seller: City of Washington, North Carolina
c. Property Buyer: 234 Springs Rd., LLC
d. Brief Property Usage History: The manufacturing facility on the property was constructed in
four stages between 1966 and 1974. Between the date of construction and 1998, the facility was
occupied by Hamilton Beach I Proctor Silex and used to assemble small appliances. Hamilton
Beach continued to occupy a small portion of the facility for more administrative uses, including
as a call center, until 2008. The facility was occupied by Impressions Marketing Group, Inc.
starting in 2001. In 2013, idX Impressions, LLC purchased substantially all of the assets of
Impressions Marketing Group and continued its operations at the facility. Those operations
consist of assembling display cases, shelving units, counter units and other fixtures for use in
retail stores. The facility also houses project management and other personnel responsible for
the work produced there.
e. The planned reuse will potentially involve the following use classification(s) (check all that
apply):
0 School/childcare/senior care
D
D
D
D
~
D
D
D
D
Residential
Commercial, retail (specify)
Other commercial (specify)
Office
Light industrial
Heavy industrial
Recreational
Open space
Other (specify)
II. Contaminant Information
a. The contaminant situation at the property is best described by the following (check all that
apply):
~ Contaminants are from an on-property source( s)
0 Contaminants are from an off-property source(s)
D
D
Contaminants are from an unknown source(s)
Contaminants have not yet been documented on the property
16
final brownfields agreement generated by the NCBP, land use restrictions will ultimately
come with the continuing obligation to submit an annual certification that the Land Use
Restrictions are being complied with and are recorded at the applicable register of deeds
office.)
IV. Fees
In connection with a brownfields agreement, the Act requires that the developer pay fees to
offset the cost to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Department of
Justice. In satisfaction of the Act, the following fees apply to any brownfields agreement that is
developed for this project, subject to negotiation of the brownfields agreement:
a. A $2,000 initial fee will be due from the applicant PD when both of the following occur:
1) NCBP receives this application and proposed brownfields agreement, AND
2) NCBP notifies the applicant in writing that the applicant PD and the project are eligible for
participation in the NCBP and continued negotiation of a brownfields agreement.
b. A second fee of $6,000 will be due from the PD prior to execution of the brownfields
agreement. Should the prospective developer choose to negotiate changes to the agreement
that necessitate evaluation by the Department of Justice, additional fees shall apply.
c. Any addendum/modifications to the BF A or NBP after they are in effect will result in an
additional fee of at least $1 ,000.
d. In the unexpected event that the environmental conditions at the property are unusually
complex, such that NCBP's costs will clearly exceed the above amounts, NCBP and PD will
negotiate additional fees.
~ !If! Please check this box and initial in space provided to indicate your
acknowledgement of the above fee structure.
Date of Submittal: )/I)/ tOf'f
18
Report Title
Groundwater Monitoring Report July 1999
Groundwater Monitoring Report October 1999
Groundwater Monitoring Report for February 2000
Groundwater Monitoring Report May 2000
Groundwater Monitoring Report September 2000
Groundwater Monitoring Report November 2000
Groundwater Monitoring Report for February 2001
Groundwater Monitoring Report May 2001
Groundwater Monitoring Report August 2001
Groundwater Monitoring Report November 2001
Groundwater Monitoring Report for February 2002
Groundwater Monitoring Report May 2002
Groundwater Monitoring Report for August 2002
Groundwater Monitoring Report for November 2002
Injection Summary Report
Long Term Monitoring Report Oct 2008 -without App B
Long Term Monitoring Report for April and October 2010
Long Term Monitoring Report for April and October 2011
Long Term Monitoring Report for April and October 2012
Zero-Valent Iron Bench-Scale Test Report
ZVl/Molasses Pilot Test Report
Electrical Resistance Heating Background Information,
Preparation for the Forthcoming Corrective Action Plan
Reports for 234 Springs Road
Page 1
Report Date Report Prepared By
8-99 Radian International
11-99 Radian International
4-18-00 Radian International
9-00 Radian International
11-00 Radian International
1-01 Radian International
4-01 Radian International
7-01 Radian International
9-28-01 URS-Radian
1-02 URS Corporation
3-02 URS Corporation
6-02 URS Corporation
10-02 URS Corporation
12-02 URS Corporation
10-06 US Corporation
AST Environmental Inc.
Remediation Products Inc.
2-09 URS Corporation
1-1 1 URS Corporation
5-12 URS Corporation
4-13 URS Corporation
5-8-01 Radian Internation I URS
Corporation
7-02 URS Corporation
8-30-02 URS Corporation
Report file name
GW Monitoring Report July 1999
(SF _F _NONCD0001814_19991005_1HS_PRGMON).pdf
GW Monitoring Report Oct 1999
(BF _F_l 1042-07-007_10-31-1999_EA_O).pdf
GW Monitoring Report Feb 2000
(SF _F _NONCD0001814_20000418_IHS_PRGMON).pdf
GW Monitoring Report May 2000
(SF _F _NONCD0001814_20000908_IHS_PRGMON).pdf
GW Monitoring Report Sep 2000
(SF _F _NONCD0001814_20001009 _IHS_PRGMON).pdf
GW Monitoring Report Nov 2000
(SF_F_NONCD0001814_20010104_IHS_PRGMON).pdf
GW Monitoring Report February 200 I
(SF_F_NONCDOOOl814_20010409_IHS_PRGMON).pdf
GW Monitoring Report May 2001
(SF _F _NONCDOOOl 814_20010703 _IHS_PRGMON).pdf
GW Monitoring Report Aug 2001
(SF _F _NONCD0001814_20010928_1HS_PRGMON).pdf
GW Monitoring Report Nov 2001
(SF _F _NONCD000 1814_20020116_IHS_PRGMON).pdf
GW Monitoring Report Feb 2002
(SF _F _NONCD000 1814_200203 l 8_D-IS_PRGMON).pdf
GW Monitoring Report May 2002
(SF_ F _NONCDOOO 1814 _ 20020605 _ D-IS _PRGMON). pdf
GW Monitoring Report for Aug 2002
(SF_F_NONCD00018 14_20021002_fHS_PRGMON).pdf
GW Monitoring Report for Nov 2002
(SF _F _NONCDOOOl814_20021219 _D-IS_PRGMON).pdf
Injection Summary Report
(SF_ F _NONCDOOO 1814 _ 20061020 _ IHS _ PRGMON).pdf
LTM Report Oct 2008 HBB Washington -without App
B.pdf
LTM Report -AprilOct 2010.pdf
LTM Report -Apri 1 Oct 2011.pdf
LTM Report -Hamilton Beach_LTM Rpt_AprilOct
2012.pdf
SF _F _NONCD0001814_20010614_1HS_PIL.pdf
SF _F _NONCDOOOl814_20020719 _IHS_PIL.pdf
SF_F_NONCD0001814_20020830_D-IS_PIL.pdf
Preliminary Corrective Action Plan & Appendices
Response to Comments In: Review of Preliminary
Corrective Action Plan, Addendum to Preliminary
Corrective Action Plan, and The Injection Well Permit
Application for Clean Ox Technology
Soil Sampling and Analysis of Soil Stockpile
Environmental Feasability Assessment of Non-Discharge
Wastewater Disposal Alternatives
Limited Site Investigation Technical Data
On-Site Assessment Report (July 1998) & Appendices
Comprehensive Site Assessment Report & Appendices
One Year Post Injection Performance Monitoring Report
Draft Revision I, Vapor Intrusion Work Plan
Final Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Report
Air Monitoring for Groundwater Contaminants
Reports for 234 Springs Road
Page 2
7-28-99 Radian Engineering Inc.
3-17-00 Radian Engineering, Inc.
8-95 Radian Corporation
11-95 Radian Corporation
3-98 GMA
7-98 Radian International LLC
1-99 Radian International LLC
1-07 URS Corporation
8-20-08 URS Corporation
11-20-08 URS Corporation
5-5-98 Health & Hygiene/ELB
SF _F _NONCDOOOl 814_19990728_IBS_RAP (Segment
l).pdf
SF _F _NONCD0001814_19990728_IBS_RAP (Segment
2).pdf
SF _F _NONCD0001814_19990728_IBS_RAP (Segment
3).pdf
SF _F _NONCD0001814_19990728_IBS_RAP (Segment
4).pdf
SF _F _NONCD0001814_19990728_IBS_RAP (Segment
5).pdf
SF _F _NONCD0001814_19990728_IBS_RAP (Segment
6).pdf
SF _F _NONCDOOOl 814_200003 17 _IBS_RAP.pdf
SF_F_NONCD0001814_19950927_IBS_SAR.pdf
SF _F _NONCD0001814_19951130_IBS_SAR.pdf
SF_ F _NONCDOOO 18l4_19980313 _ IBS _ SAR.pdf
On-Site Assessment Report (July 1998) (Segment 1 ).pdf
On-Site Assess Report Appendix A-C (July 1998) (Segment
2).pdf
On-Site Assess Report Appendix C (July 1998) (Segment
3).pdf
On-Site Assess Report Appendix C-E (July 1998) (Segment
4).pdf
SF _F_NONCD00018 14_1999010l_IBS_SAR (Seg l).pdf
SF _F _NONCDOOOl8 14_1999010l_IBS_SAR (Seg 2).pdf
SF_F _NONCD0001814_19990101_IBS_SAR (Seg 3).pdf
SF _F _NONCDOOOl 814_19990!0l_lHS_SAR (Scg 4).pdf
SF_F _NONCDOOOl 814_19990101_lHS_SAR (Scg 5).pdf
SF _F _NONCDOOOl814_19990101_IBS_SAR (Seg 6).pdf
SF _F_NONCDOOOI814_19990!0l_IBS_SAR (Seg 7).pdf
SF _F _NONCDOOO I 814_1999010l_IBS_SAR (Seg 8).pdf
SF _F _NONCDOOOl814_1999010l_lHS_SAR(Seg 9).pdf
SF _F _NONCD0001814_200701 Ol_IBS_SAR.pdf
BF _F_l 1042-07-007_08-20-2008_EA_ VJA.pdf
HB-Washington VI Evaluation (Final).pdf
Air Monitoring for GW Contaminants -HB Washington.pdf