HomeMy WebLinkAbout20015_Camden Grandview EMP signed 201606291
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the
North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a project manager for the program.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments to their project manager prior to any site earthmoving or other
development related activities. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it must be completed,
reviewed by the program, and signed by all signers at the bottom. Consult your project
manager if you have questions.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date: 6/29/2016
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Camden Grandview II
Brownfields Project Number: 20015-16-060
Brownfields Property Address: 900 Block South Blvd., Charlotte
Brownfields Property Area (acres): 2.04
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.:
COMMUNICATIONS
Prospective Developer (PD): CUSA Holdings NC, LP
Phone Numbers: Office: (see below)…..Mobile:
Email:
Primary PD Contact: Will Smith
Phone Numbers: Office: 703-556-5755 Mobile: 713-858-2565
Email:
Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, Steve Hart
Phone Numbers: Office: (704) 887-4610…..Mobile: 704-576-0145
Email: shart@harthickman.com
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Carolyn Minnich
Office: (704) 661-0330
2
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
Email: carolyn.minnich@ncdenr.gov
Other DENR Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept minimum
notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:
On-site assessment or remedial activities: Within 10 days ☒
Construction or grading start: Within 10 days ☒
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: Within 48 hours ☒
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood, or soil erosion control
measures in area of contamination, venting of explosive environments):
Within 48 hours ☒
Installation of mitigation systems: Within 10 days ☐
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement
redevelopment activities: (as applicable): Within 30 days ☒
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☒ Residential ☐ Recreational ☐ Institutional ☐ Commercial ☐ Office ☐Retail ☐ Industrial
☐ Other specify: open space (Note – Residential Use will be “high-density”)
2) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (attach conceptual or detailed plans as available):
a) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
b) Do plans include removal of building foundation slab(s) or pavement:
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
c) Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement and other structures: The site is currently vacant and there are no structures.
The redevelopment activities include grading of site soil and imported fill soil, and
construction of residential townhomes. The most recent site redevelopment plan is included
as Attachment A.
3) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement?
☒ Residential ☐ Non-residential or Industrial/Commercial
3
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields
Agreement for comparison purposes.
4) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Phase I start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
9/1/2016
b) If applicable, Phase 2 start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each
phase): NA
c) Additional phases planned? If yes, specify activities if known:
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Not in the foreseeable future ☐Decision pending
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 12/1/2017
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Contaminated Media (attach tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with
sample locations):
Part 1. Soil: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
PART 1. SOIL – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list specific compounds): A cut/fill grading plan is
included in Attachment C. Site maps with previous soil samples locations are included in
Attachment B. Results of analysis of previous soil samples collected in 2006 and 2016 did
not indicate the presence of compounds above DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs (or typical background levels for metals).
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): There are no known or suspected soil impacts
at the site.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): Grading will be conducted across the site
prior to building construction. Grading activities will be conducted in accordance with a grading plan
(see Attachement A) utilizing grading equipment (i.e. backhoes, front end loaders, bull dozers etc.)
4
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
and the site development contractor will implement best management practices (i.e.
implementation of silt fencing, berming, and covering stockpiled soil with plastic) to manage soil on
site.
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): Based upon the preliminary cut/fill plan, cuts or up to 10 ft
will occur at the site, although most of the cut will be in the range of 5 ft or less. 5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): 3800 cubic yards
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
None anticipated.
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
None anticipated. Based upon the grading plan and cut/fill drigram, a net import of
approximately 6800 cubic yards of soil will be needed as part of site grading.
IMPORTED FILL SOIL
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported? 6,800 cubic yards
3) If yes, what is the depth of fill soil to be used at the property? Range of less than 1 ft to greater
than 10 ft (see attached preliminary cut/fill plan in Attachment C).
If a range of depths, please list the range.
4) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide plan to analyze fill soil to
demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards and can be considered clean for use at the
Brownfields property (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, lead,
selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☒ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated
according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver, thallium, and
zinc)
☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Click here to enter text.
☐ Known borrow material (DESCRIBE SOURCE AND ATTACH SAMPLING PROFILE):
If soil is obtained from a known permitted quarry, then one soil sample will be collected from the
borrow source prior to the soil being transported to the site. If fill soil is obtained from an off-site
property that is not a known permitted quarry, a sampling plan will be developed and submitted for
DEQ review. DEQ approval of the sampling plan and analytical results is required prior to bringing soil
on site. The specific sampling rate will be outline in the above workplan, however generally if the
proposed borrow source has not been previous developed (i.e. virgin land) soil samples at a rate of one
per 500-1000 cubic yards can be used as an estimate. If the borrow source property has been previously
developed, it should be estimated that soil samples will be collected at a rate of approximately one per
400 cubic yards. The burrow soil samples will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, HSL Metals plus hexavalent
chromium. Soil will be considered suitable for use at the site if it does not contain compound
5
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
concentrations above DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs or typical background levels for metals from samples
on the Brownfields Property or immediate surrounding area.
MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
1) If soil in known or suspected areas of contamination is anticipated to be excavated from the
Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields Property,or otherwise disturbed during site
grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates
areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only preliminary data
available).
2) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the
North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes generating the
waste( include pertinent analytical results as needed). Click here to enter text.
If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the North Carolina
Contained-In Policy? ☐ Yes ☐ No
NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE
CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED-IN POLICY THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR
HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
3) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?:
☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability
☐ Corrosivity
☐ Reactivity
☐ Toxicity
☐ TCLP results
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous
constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard)
If no, explain rationale: Soil impacts are associated with former USTs that stored virgin petroleum
products which are exempt from toxicity characteristic hazardous waste regulations.
NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL MAY NOT
BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR HAZARDOUS WASTE
SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
4) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs 4/1/2016
6
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
☐ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs Click here to enter a date.
☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level, or acceptable concentrations determined via
calculated cumulative risk. Enter details of methods used for determination/explanation:
NA
5) Check the following action(s) to be taken during excavation and management of said soils:
☒ Manage fugitive dust from site:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: Contaminated soil is not expected to be
encountered or disturbed during site redevelopment activities based upon previous soil sampling
data. The grading contractor will take into account conditions such as wind speed, wind direction,
and moisture content of soil during soil grading and stockpiling activities. In the unlikely event that
contaminated soil is encountered during site redevelopment that requires excavation, particular
attention will be paid by contractors to implement dust control measures and soil will be managed as
described below.
☒ Field Screening:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: During soil disturbance at the site, the contractors will observe soils for evidence of potential significantly impacted soil that may not be suitable to leave in place in exposed areas at a residential use site. Evidence of potential
significant impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or observance of filled
or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc). Should the above be noted during site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental consultant to observe the suspect condition. If the project environmental consultant confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented. In addition, the
environmental consultant will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within one business
day to advise that person of the condition.
☐ Soil Sample Collection:
☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, describe method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.); If no, explain rationale:
H&H does not anticpate collecting additional soil samples prior to construction activities based on previous site assessment activities. If significant soil impact is encountered during grading and/or installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only as far as needed to allow alternate corrective measures described below. Suspect significantly impacted soil excavated
during grading and/or utility line installation or removal may be stockpiled and covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress. Suspect impacted soil will be underlain by and covered with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting. At least one representative sample of the soil will be collected for analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, and hazardous substance list (HSL) metals plus hexavalent chromium. If the results of analysis of the sample indicate that the soil could
potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then the soil will also be
7
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
analyzed for toxicity characteristic leaching procedure TCLP VOCs and/or TCLP RCRA metals.
Impacted soil will be handled in the manner described below based upon the laboratory analyses: 1) If no organic compounds are detected in a composite sample (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are consistent with background levels, then the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on-site fill or as off-site fill. The proposed
location(s) for off-site placement of soil (other than a permitted facility) along with the receiving
facility’s written approval for acceptance of the soil will be provided to DEQ for approval prior to taking the soil off-site. 2) If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are
consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous
waste criteria, then the soil may be used on-site as fill without conditions. 3) If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria,
then the soil, with DEQ’s written approval, may be used on-site as fill below an impervious
surface, or at least 2 ft of compacted clean soil. If the impacted soil with concentrations above Residential PSRGs is moved to an on-site location, its location and depth will be documented, covered with a geotextile fabric so that its location can be identified if encountered in the future, and its location will be provided to DEQ in an updated survey plat.
4) Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a landfill provided that the
soil is accepted at the disposal facility. In the unlikely event that the composite sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then the soil must be transported off-site to a permitted disposal facility that can accept or treat hazardous waste.
☒ Stockpile impacted soil in accordance with NCDENR IHSB protocol in the current version of
the “Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup”, and providing erosion control, prohibiting
contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing
contaminated runoff. Explain any variances:
☒ Analyze potentially impacted soil for the following chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,
lead, selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)
☒ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Other Constituent(s) & Analytical Method(s):
If suspected contaminated soil is identified during site redevelopment activities, soil will be sampled
and analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and EPA Priority Pollutant Metals. VOC and SVOC concentrations will
be compared to DEQ Residential PSRGs. Metal concentrations will be compared to Residential PSRGs
and typical background metal concentrations.
8
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
☒ Proposed Measures to Obtain Pre-Approval for Reuse of Impacted Soil within the
Brownfields Property Boundary
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on
site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☐ Use geotextile to mark depth of fill material (provide description of material)
☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒
Describe cap or fill: No such placement is currently anticipated. If contaminated soil is
encountered and will be placed under impervious soil or at least 2 ft of clean fill. Potential
impervious caps at the site include the building foundations and paved areas. See attached
site development plan in Attachment A. (provide location diagram)
☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-
recorded if actions are Post-Recordation).
☐ Other: Note that impacted soil is that exceeds Residential PSRGs
☐ Final grade sampling of exposed soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or permanent
hardscape): [if not checked provide rationale for not needing]
Provide diagram of soil sampling locations, number of samples, and denote Chemical
Analytical Program with check boxes below (Check all that apply):
☐ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☐ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,
lead, selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Pesticides
☐ PCBs
☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method:
No final grade/post-construction sampling is proposed because most of the site will be covered by
pavement and buildings. In addition, a significant amount of fill soil will brought to the site and cover
much of the site, and the fill soil will have been documented as having concentrations below the
Resdidential PSRGs.
OFFSITE TRANSPORT & DISPOSITION OF EXCAVATED SOIL
NOTE: Unless soil will be transported offsite for disposal in a permitted facility under applicable
regulations, no contaminated or potentially contaminated soil may leave the site without approval
from the brownfields program. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields agreement,
endangering liability protections and making said action subject to enforcement. Justifications
provided below must be approved by the Program in writing prior to completing transport activities.
9
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
☒ Transport and dispose of impacted soil offsite (documentation of final disposition must be sent to
Brownfields Project Manager)
☒ Landfill – analytical program determined by landfill
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility Click here to enter text.
☐ Use as Beneficial Fill Offsite – provide justification: Click here to enter text.
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill at another Suitable Brownfields Site – (Note: a determination that a
site is a “Suitable Brownfields” site will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same
or similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil as beneficial soil will not
increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at that site, and that notarized
documentation of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the receiving site is
provided to Brownfields. Provide justification: No particular Brownfields sites have been
MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from
which it was excavated.
☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or
degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? Result: Yes □ No □
If no, include rationale here. Click here to enter text.
If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil and/or vapors are encountered in the utility
trenches during redevelopment activities, the trench will be evacuated and appropriate safety
screening of the vapors will be performed to protect workers. If results indicate further action is
warranted in response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of
industrial fans) will be implemented.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below and attach figure showing
distribution of groundwater contaminants at site
What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? Due to significant variation in
current site topography, depth to groundwater at the site is in the range of approximately 12-42 ft bgs
depending upon location at the site. After site grading, groundwater below the site will be present at
depths of approximately 20 to 30 ft bgs.
Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite ☒ offsite ☐ both ☐ or unknown
sources? Describe source(s): The locations of previous groundwater samples and a summary of
previous groundwater data is provided in Attachment B. The chlorinated solvent
tetrachloroethene (PCE) has been detected in low levels in site groundwater from a former off-
10
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
site upgradient drycleaner (American Dry Cleaning Company, DSCA ID 60-0002). The DEQ
Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) program previously issued a no further action for the release incident.
What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property? Groundwater flow is to the
east and northeast (see Attachment B).
Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, describe these activities:
In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if
no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of
groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary
sewer, or sampling procedures): Athough not anticpated at this time, appropriate worker safety
measures will be undertaken if groundwater gathers in an open excavation within an area determined
to be impacted during construction activities. The accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate,
tested and disposed off-site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted
above DEQ surface water standards). Note that in the unlikely event groundwater containing PCE from
the adjacent drycleaner accumulates in an excavation and needs to be managed off-site, it will likely
need to be managed as a listed hazardous waste in accordance with DSCA Program requirements.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER – Please fill out the information below.
Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No
Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No
In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities, or
clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events (e.g.
flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation during construction and the soil in the excavation
is determined to be impacted, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken. The
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate, tested and disposed off-site (if impacted), or tested
and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards).
PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.
Is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No
Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
11
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.
Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following
vapor intrusion screening levels in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
Attach a map showing the location of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening levels.
If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated? 7 ft
Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities (trenches,
manways, basements or other subsurface work, list activities for management of such contact: No
compounds were detected above non-residential vapor intrusion screening levels in previous soil
vapor sampling. As such, it is unlikely that workers will encounter significantly contaminated soil
vapor during redevelopment. Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil vapors are
encountered during redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety
screening of the vapors will be performed. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate
engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.
PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR -please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
Are sub-slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing
the location of these exceedances.
At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐ 0-6 inches ☐ Other, If other
describe:
Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
12
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact: See above for soil vapor.
PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below .
Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
If yes, attach a map showing the location where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will not
be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated indoor air
during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact: No structures are present at the site. Based upon the
previous soil vapor sampling, DEQ concurred that indoor air risks were not significant for the
proposed site buildings and vapor mitigation is not warranted for the proposed site buildings.
PART 8 – Vapor Mitigation System – Please fill out the information below .
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
If yes, provide the date the plan was submitted to the Brownfields Program.
Attach the plan.
Has the vapor mitigation plan been approved by the NC Brownfields Program?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Has the vapor mitigation plan been signed and sealed by a North Carolina professional engineer?
☐ Yes ☐ No
What are the components of the vapor intrusion mitigation system?
☐ Sub-slab depressurization system
☐ Sub-membrane depressurization system
☐ Block-wall depressurization system
☐ Drain tile depressurization system
☐ Passive mitigation methods
☐ Vapor barriers
☐ Perforated piping vented to exterior
Printed Name/Title/Company
url LP
Brownfields Proj
14
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
I
Attachment A
Redevelopment Plan
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
D
N
U
P
U
P
D
N
U
P
U
P
D
N
D
N
D
N
U
P
U
P
D
N
U
P
U
P
D
N
D
N
D
N
U
P
U
P
D
N
U
P
U
P
D
N
D
N
U
P
U
P
D
N
U
P
U
P
E
J
O
H
N
B
E
L
K
F
R
E
E
W
A
Y
(
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
2
7
7
)
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
W
A
Y
SOUTH BOULEVARD
VARIABLE PUBLIC RIGHT
O
F
W
AY
NEW PUNCHED OPENING IN
EXISTING CONCRETE WALL
TO BE PERMITTED UNDER
SEPARATE COVER
BUILDING 1
BUILDING 2
BUILDING 3
BUILDING 4
T/FTG EL 724'-0"2
S3.0
___________
T/WALL EL 723'-6"
2
S3.0
___________
4
S3.0
___________
S
T/FTG EL 719'-6"
T/WALL EL 728'-8"
T/WALL EL 730'-8"
T/FTG EL 723'-4"
T/FTG EL 723'-4"
S
T/FTG EL 723'-0"T/WALL EL 731'-8"
S
T/WALL EL 728'-8"
4
S3.0
___________
S
2
S3.0
___________
T/WALL EL 727'-8"T/FTG EL 723'-0"
T/FTG EL 722'-4"
T/WALL EL 727'-8"
S
T/WALL EL 727'-8"
T/FTG EL 721'-8"
T/FTG EL 721'-0"
T/WALL EL 727'-8"
S
S
S
T/WALL EL 721'-8"
T/FTG EL 713'-0"
T/FTG EL 714'-0"
T/WALL EL 721'-8"
S
T/WALL EL 721'-8"
T/FTG EL 714'-8"
S
T/WALL EL 727'-8"
T/FTG EL 720'-4"
S
S
T/FTG EL 719'-8"
T/WALL EL 727'-8"
S
T/WALL EL 727'-8"
T/FTG EL 719'-0"
T/FTG EL 718'-4"
T/WALL EL 727'-8"
S
T/WALL EL 727'-8"
S
T/FTG EL 717'-0"
T/WALL EL 727'-8"
S
S
T/WALL EL 725'-8"
T/FTG EL 716'-4"
T/FTG EL 716'-4"
T/WALL EL 723'-8"
S
T/WALL EL 721'-8"
T/WALL EL 715'-0"
T/FTG EL 717'-8"
S
SS
T/FTG EL 712'-5"
T/FTG EL 713'-6"
T/FTG EL 715'-6"
T/WALL EL 724'-0"
T/WALL EL 725'-0"
T/WALL EL 726'-0"
T/WALL EL 726'-0"
T/FTG EL 717'-6"
S
T/FTG EL 722'-0"
T/FTG EL 717'-6"
T/WALL EL 725'-0"
T/WALL EL 726'-0"S
T/WALL EL 726'-0"T/FTG EL 717'-6"
T/FTG EL 713'-6"
T/FTG EL 715'-0"T/WALL EL 726'-0"
T/WALL EL 725'-0"
S
S
T/WALL EL 725'-0"
T/FTG EL 711'-6"
S
S S S S S
T/FTG EL 711'-6"
T/FTG EL 711'-6"
T/FTG EL 711'-6"
T/FTG EL 711'-6"
T/FTG EL 711'-6"
T/WALL EL 724'-0"
T/WALL EL 722'-0"
T/WALL EL 720'-0"
T/WALL EL 718'-0"
T/WALL EL 716'-0"
S
T/FTG EL 699'-6"T/WALL EL 709'-0"
S
T/FTG EL 701'-6"
T/FTG EL 702'-6"
T/FTG EL 703'-6"
S
S
T/WALL EL 710'-0"
T/WALL EL 711'-0"
S
S
T/FTG EL 704'-6"T/WALL EL 711'-0"
S
T/WALL EL 713'-0"
T/FTG EL 706'-6"
4
S3.0
___________
2
S3.0
___________
1
S3.0
___________
1
S3.0
___________
3
S3.0
___________
3
S3.0
___________
3
S3.0
___________
1
S3.0
___________
1
S3.0
___________
T/SLAB EL 718'-8"
T/SLAB EL 713'-6"
T/SLAB EL 715'-4"
T/SLAB EL 713'-0"
T/SLAB EL 712'-6"
S S S T/WALL EL 709'-0"
T/FTG EL 700'-6"
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
T/WALL EL 709'-0"
T/WALL EL 709'-0"T/WALL EL 709'-0"
T/WALL EL 708'-0"
T/FTG EL 706'-6"
T/FTG EL 704'-6"T/FTG EL 702'-6"
T/FTG EL 699'-6"
T/FTG EL 699'-6"
T/FTG EL 700'-6"
T/FTG EL 701'-6"
T/FTG EL 701'-6"
T/WALL EL 707'-0"
T/WALL EL 708'-0"
T/WALL EL 709'-0"
T/WALL EL 711'-0"
T/WALL EL 714'-0"
T/WALL EL 716'-0"
T/WALL EL 717'-0"
T/WALL EL 718'-0"
T/WALL EL 719'-8"
T/WALL EL 721'-8"
T/WALL EL 711'-0"
S
S
S
T/WALL EL 726'-0"T/FTG EL 721'-0"
T/WALL EL 726'-0"T/FTG EL 722'-0"
T/WALL EL 726'-0"T/FTG EL 719'-6"
T/FTG EL 708'-6"
T/FTG EL 710'-6"T/WALL EL 714'-0"
T/FTG EL 712'-6"
T/FTG EL 712'-6"
T/FTG EL 713'-6"
T/FTG EL 714'-6"
T/FTG EL 715'-6"
SITE FOUNDATION PLAN LEGEND:
DENOTES T/FOOTING OR T/WALL STEP.
SEE DETAIL 1/S3.1 FOR WALL FOOTING
STEP.
S
SITE FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES:
1.ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN
ARE BASED ON MSL ELEVATIONS. ALL
ELEVATIONS SHOWN SHALL BE
COORDINATED WITH CIVIL DRAWINGS
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
w w w . a x i o m a r c h i t e c t u r e . c o mF 704.343.9380T 704.927.9900
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202SUITE 200333 WEST TRADE ST.
AERRUTCETCHI
PROJECT A-1523
APRIL 29, 2016
E N G I N E E R I N G I N C
email: mail@McVeighMangum.com
Eng. of Record:License No.:
1610 East Morehead Street, Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28207Ph: (704) 547-9035 Fax: (704) 547-9036
DOUGLAS R. SWEENEY 25860
M VEIGH MANGUMC
C
H
A
R
L
O
T
T
E
,
N
O
R
T
H
C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
C
A
M
D
E
N
G
R
A
N
D
V
I
E
W
U
p
T
O
W
N
S
A
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
S
S
O
U
T
H
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
S1.0
OVERALL SITE PLAN
SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0"S1.0
1 OVERALL SITE PLAN N
Attachment B Contaminant Tables and Figures
Soil Sample Data and Figure
Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Data
City of Charlotte Parcel #4
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. CAM-003
File:S:\AAA-Master Projects\Camden - CAM\CAM-003\Tables\Analytical Data Tables.xlsx
Date:3/3/2016
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Sample ID SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5
Date 2/4/2016 2/4/2016 2/4/2016 2/4/2016 2/4/2016
Depth (ft)4-5 4-5 3-4 1-2 0-1 Range Mean
VOCs (8260B) (mg/kg)BRL BRL BRL BRL BRL ------
SVOCs (8270D) (mg/kg)
Benzoic Acid <1.2 <1.2 0.26 J <1.2 <1.2 50,000 ----
Metals (6010/6020) (mg/kg)
Arsenic 0.38 0.56 0.64 0.75 0.59 0.68 1.0 - 18 4.8
Beryllium 0.35 J 0.66 1.0 0.44 0.84 32 0 - 2.0 0.11
Chromium 12 20 150 130 57 24,000 7.0 - 300 65
Copper 13 B 29 B 73 B 73 32 B 620 3.0 - 100 34
Iron 13,000 23,000 37,000 33,000 26,000 11,000 100 - 100,000 25,000
Lead 6.2 7.7 4.6 16 5.7 400 0 - 50 16
Manganese 320 470 880 600 450 360 <2.0 - 7,000 640
Mercury 0.021 J 0.014 J 0.018 J 0.053 0.021 J 1.9 0.03 - 0.52 0.121
Nickel 6.9 J 12 57 51 24 300 0 - 150 23
Silver <0.13 <0.13 0.066 J 0.058 J <0.13 78 0 - 5.0 NE
Thallium 0.15 0.21 0.18 0.11 0.21 0.16 2.2 - 23 7.7
Zinc 24 40 61 61 49 4,600 25 - 124 56
Notes:
1) Concentrations were compared to the North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB)
Residential Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (SRGs) dated September 2015.
2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005,
except Thallium which is from USGS Professional Paper 1270 for Eastern US soil.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi volatile organic compounds
Only those compounds detected in at least one soil sample are included in the table.
B = Analyte is found in the associated blank as well as the sample.
J = Concentration is above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit; and therefore, is an estimated value.
BRL = no constituents detected above laboratory reporting limits; NE = value not established; -- = not applicable
Residential SRG(1)
(mg/kg)
Regional Background
Metals in Soil (mg/kg) (2)
S
G
-
3
S
G
-
4
S
B
-
4
S
B
-
5
S
G
-
2
S
B
-
3
S
G
-
1
S
B
-
2
S
B
-
1
LEGENDSITE PROPERTY BOUNDARYSOIL BORING LOCATIONSOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
J
O
B
N
O
.
C
A
M
-
0
0
3
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
N
O
.
0
D
A
T
E
:
2
-
8
-
1
6
F
I
G
U
R
E
N
O
.
2
C
I
T
Y
O
F
C
H
A
R
L
O
T
T
E
P
A
R
C
E
L
#
4
C
H
A
R
L
O
T
T
E
,
N
O
R
T
H
C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
S
A
M
P
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
M
A
P
2
9
2
3
S
o
u
t
h
T
r
y
o
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
-
S
u
i
t
e
1
0
0
C
h
a
r
l
o
t
t
e
,
N
o
r
t
h
C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
2
8
2
0
3
7
0
4
-
5
8
6
-
0
0
0
7
(
p
)
7
0
4
-
5
8
6
-
0
3
7
3
(
f
)
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
#
C
-
1
2
6
9
/
#
C
-
2
4
5
G
e
o
l
o
g
y
E. MOREHEAD STREET
S
O
U
T
H
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
E
.
J
O
H
N
B
E
L
K
F
R
E
E
W
A
Y
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Camden - CAM\CAM-003\Figures\Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 2, 3/3/2016 10:29:06 AM, zbarlow
P
a
r
c
e
l
4
Groundwater Data and Figures
Ta
b
l
e
3
:
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
W
e
l
l
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
D
a
t
a
DS
C
A
I
D
N
o
.
:
6
0
-
0
0
0
2
We
l
l
I
D
Da
t
e
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
S
a
m
p
l
e
s
We
l
l
D
e
p
t
h
W
e
l
l
D
i
a
m
e
t
e
r
S
c
r
e
e
n
I
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
S
t
a
t
u
s
TW
-
1
A
06
/
1
1
/
9
8
1
>4
5
Un
k
n
o
w
n
Un
k
n
o
w
n
Inactive
TW
-
1
11
/
1
7
/
0
8
1
15
1
10
-
1
5
Inactive
TW
-
2
11
/
1
7
/
0
8
1
30
2
15
-
3
0
Inactive
TW
-
3
11
/
1
7
/
0
8
1
31
2
21
-
3
1
Inactive
TW
-
4
11
/
1
7
/
0
8
1
40
2
30
-
4
0
Inactive
TW
-
5
11
/
1
8
/
0
8
1
20
2
10
-
2
0
Inactive
TW
-
6
11
/
1
9
/
0
8
1
48
2
38
-
4
8
Inactive
TW
-
1
1
05
/
2
2
/
0
9
11
81
8
-1 8I n a c t i v e
TW
-
1
4
08
/
2
6
/
1
0
1
28
1
24
-
2
8
Inactive
05
/
2
7
/
1
0
1
35
1
31
-
3
5
Inactive
08
/
2
6
/
1
0
1
35
1
31
-
3
5
Inactive
11
/
2
2
/
1
0
1
35
1
31
-
3
5
Inactive
03
/
1
4
/
1
1
1
30
1
26
-
3
0
Inactive
05
/
2
7
/
1
0
1
22
1
18
-
2
2
Inactive
08
/
2
6
/
1
0
1
22
1
18
-
2
2
Inactive
11
/
2
2
/
1
0
1
22
1
18
-
2
2
Inactive
03
/
1
4
/
1
1
1
22
1
18
-
2
2
Inactive
05
/
2
7
/
1
0
1
17
1
13
-
1
7
Inactive
TW
-
1
5
TW
-
1
6
ADT 3
08
/
2
6
/
1
0
1
20
1
16
-
2
0
Inactive
11
/
2
2
/
1
0
1
17
1
13
-
1
7
Inactive
03
/
1
4
/
1
1
1
19
1
15
-
1
9
Inactive
TD
M
W
-
1
03
/
1
6
/
1
1
1
64
2
59
-
6
4
Inactive
TW
-
1
7
No
t
e
s
:
1.
T
W
-
1
A
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
b
y
L
A
W
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
.
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
d
a
t
e
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
s
a
m
p
l
e
d
a
t
e
o
b
t
a
i
n
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
d
a
t
a
r
e
p
o
r
t
.
2.
T
D
M
W
-
1
w
a
s
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
a
s
a
t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
T
y
p
e
I
I
I
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
w
e
l
l
w
i
t
h
a
6
-
i
n
c
h
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
c
a
s
i
n
g
s
e
t
a
t
5
7
f
t
b
g
s
.
T
h
e
w
e
l
l
w
a
s
a
b
a
n
d
o
n
e
d
a
f
t
e
r
s
a
m
p
l
e
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
ADT 3
Ta
b
l
e
4
:
G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
D
a
t
a
DS
C
A
I
D
N
o
.
:
6
0
-
0
0
0
2
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Sa
m
p
l
i
n
g
P
o
i
n
t
Sa
m
p
l
i
n
g
D
a
t
e
(m
m
/
d
d
/
y
y
)
TO
C
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
[f
e
e
t
]
De
p
t
h
t
o
W
a
t
e
r
[f
e
e
t
b
g
s
]
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
[f
e
e
t
]
De
p
t
h
t
o
N
A
P
L
[f
e
e
t
b
g
s
]
NA
P
L
T
h
i
c
k
n
e
s
s
[f
e
e
t
]
Corrected* Groundwater Elevation [feet]
TW
-
1
11
/
1
9
/
0
8
82
.
2
1
15
.
8
3
66
.
3
8
TW
-
2
11
/
1
9
/
0
8
89
.
9
4
19
.
5
0
70
.
4
4
TW
-
3
11
/
1
9
/
0
8
10
0
.
0
0
28
.
9
5
71
.
0
5
TW
-
4
11
/
1
9
/
0
8
10
9
.
5
0
42
.
1
0
67
.
4
0
TW
-
5
11
/
1
9
/
0
8
79
.
1
8
12
.
6
8
66
.
5
0
TW
-
6
11
/
1
9
/
0
8
11
0
.
5
9
34
.
1
3
76
.
4
6
No
t
e
s
:
1.
T
O
C
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
t
o
a
s
s
u
m
e
d
s
i
t
e
d
a
t
u
m
o
f
1
0
0
'
a
t
T
W
-
3
T
O
C
.
2.
T
O
C
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
e
r
e
n
o
t
o
b
t
a
i
n
e
d
f
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
w
e
l
l
s
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
.
ADT 4
Ta
b
l
e
5
:
A
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
D
a
t
a
f
o
r
G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
DS
C
A
I
D
N
o
.
:
6
0
-
0
0
0
2
1
,
1
,
1
-
T
r
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
1
,
1
,
2
,
2
-
T
e
t
r
a
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
1
,
1
,
2
-
T
r
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
a
e
1
,
1
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
1
,
1
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
1
,
2
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
(
E
D
C
)
B
e
n
z
e
n
e
B
e
n
z
o
(
a
)
p
y
r
e
n
e
C
a
r
b
o
n
t
e
t
r
a
c
h
l
o
r
i
d
e
C
h
l
o
r
o
f
o
r
m
c
i
s
-
1
,
2
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
E
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
M
e
t
h
y
l
t
e
r
t
-
b
u
t
y
l
e
t
h
e
r
(
M
T
B
E
)
N
a
p
h
t
h
a
l
e
n
e
T
e
t
r
a
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
T
o
l
u
e
n
e
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene Trichloroethylene Vinyl chloride Xylenes (total)
TW
-
1
11
/
1
7
/
0
8
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
1
1
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
1
2
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
TW
-
2
11
/
1
7
/
0
8
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
1
2
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
0
8
9
J
<0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
1
4
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
TW
-
3
11
/
1
7
/
0
8
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
4
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
1
3
<0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
4
1
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
TW
-
4
11
/
1
9
/
0
8
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
5
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
TW
-
5
11
/
1
8
/
0
8
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
0
8
1
J
NA
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
3
5
<0.002
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
TW
-
6
11
/
1
9
/
0
8
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
0
5
6
J
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
TW
-
1
1
05
/
2
2
/
0
9
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
2
0.
0
0
8
7
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
4
3
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
TW
-
1
4
08
/
2
6
/
1
0
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
2
0.
0
0
5
0
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
1
6
<0.002
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
05
/
2
7
/
1
0
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
2
0.
0
0
6
3
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
0
9
7
J
<0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
4
2
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
08
/
2
6
/
1
0
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
2
0.
0
0
6
7
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
0
8
5
J
<0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
3
9
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
11
/
2
2
/
1
0
<0.
0
0
1
<0.
0
0
1
<0.0
0
1
<0.
0
0
1
<0.
0
0
1
<0.
0
0
1
<0.
0
0
1
NA
<0.
0
0
2
0.
0
0
5
3
<0.
0
0
1
<0.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
0
8
3
J
<0.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
3
6
0.0
0
0
8
3
J
<0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.003
G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
S
a
m
p
l
i
n
g
P
o
i
n
t
S
a
m
p
l
i
n
g
D
a
t
e
(
m
m
/
d
d
/
y
y
)
[m
g
/
L
]
TW
-
1
5
ADT 5
11
/
2
2
/
1
0
<0
.00
1
<0
.00
1
<0
.00
1
<0
.00
1
<0
.00
1
<0
.00
1
<0
.00
1
NA
<0
.00
2
0 .00
5
3
<0
.00
1
<0
.00
1
0 .00
0
8
3
J
<0
.00
1
0 .00
3
6
0 .00
0
8
3
J
<0 .002 <0 .002 <0 .002 <0 .003
03
/
1
4
/
1
1
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
2
0.
0
0
7
4
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
4
6
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
05
/
2
7
/
1
0
<0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
4
0.
0
0
5
6
<0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
4
<
0
.
0
0
4
<
0
.
0
0
4
<
0
.
0
0
6
08
/
2
6
/
1
0
<0
.
0
1
0
<
0
.
0
1
0
<
0
.
0
1
0
<
0
.
0
1
0
<
0
.
0
1
0
<
0
.
0
1
0
<
0
.
0
1
0
N
A
<
0
.
0
2
0
0.0
0
6
6
J
<0
.
0
1
0
<
0
.
0
1
0
<
0
.
0
1
0
<
0
.
0
1
0
<
0
.
0
1
0
<
0
.
0
1
0
<
0
.
0
2
0
<
0
.
0
2
0
<
0
.
0
2
0
<
0
.
0
3
0
11
/
2
2
/
1
0
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
2
0.
0
0
7
7
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
1
8
0.0
0
0
6
4
J
<0.002
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
03
/
1
4
/
1
1
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
2
0.
0
0
7
9
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
2
5
<0
.
0
0
1
<0.002
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
05
/
2
7
/
1
0
<0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
4
0.
0
0
2
1
<0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
4
<
0
.
0
0
4
<
0
.
0
0
4
<
0
.
0
0
6
08
/
2
6
/
1
0
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
2
0.
0
0
0
7
8
J
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
11
/
2
2
/
1
0
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
2
0.
0
0
3
0
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
0
5
0.0
0
0
5
9
J
<0.002
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
03
/
1
4
/
1
1
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
2
0.
0
0
2
8
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
0
5
<0
.
0
0
1
<0.002
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
TD
M
W
-
1
3
/
1
6
/
1
1
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
N
A
<
0
.
0
0
2
0.
0
1
0
<0
.
0
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
0
6
4
J
<0
.
0
0
1
0.
0
0
5
3
<0
.
0
0
1
<0.002
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
2
<
0
.
0
0
3
0.
2
0
.
0
0
0
2
N
E
0
.
0
0
6
0
.
0
0
7
0
.
0
0
0
4
0
.
0
0
1
0
.
0
0
0
0
5
0
.
0
0
0
3
0
.
0
7
0
.
0
7
0
.
6
0
.
0
2
0
.
0
0
6
0
.
0
0
0
7
0
.
6
0
.
1
0
.
0
0
3
0
.
0
0
0
0
3
0
.
5
NC
2
L
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
No
t
e
s
:
Bo
l
d
v
a
l
u
e
e
x
c
e
e
d
s
N
C
2
L
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
0
)
.
NA
d
e
n
o
t
e
s
N
o
t
A
n
a
l
y
z
e
d
;
N
E
d
e
n
o
t
e
s
N
o
t
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
TW
-
1
6
TW
-
1
7
ADT 5
Ta
b
l
e
5
(
1
)
:
A
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
D
a
t
a
f
o
r
G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
(
U
s
e
r
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
C
h
e
m
i
c
a
l
s
)
DS
C
A
I
D
N
o
.
:
6
0
-
0
0
0
2
A
c
e
t
o
n
e
M
e
t
h
y
l
E
t
h
y
l
K
e
t
o
n
e
TW
-
1
11
/
1
7
/
0
8
0
.
0
1
1
<0
.
0
0
5
TW
-
2
11
/
1
7
/
0
8
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
5
TW
-
3
11
/
1
7
/
0
8
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
5
TW
-
4
11
/
1
9
/
0
8
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
5
TW
-
5
11
/
1
8
/
0
8
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
5
TW
-
6
11
/
1
9
/
0
8
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
5
TW
-
1
1
05
/
2
2
/
0
9
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
5
TW
-
1
4
08
/
2
6
/
1
0
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
5
05
/
2
7
/
1
0
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
5
08
/
2
6
/
1
0
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
5
11
/
2
2
/
1
0
0.
0
6
8
0.
0
0
2
8
J
S
a
m
p
l
i
n
g
D
a
t
e
(
m
m
/
d
d
/
y
y
)
[m
g
/
L
]
G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
S
a
m
p
l
i
n
g
P
o
i
n
t
TW
-
1
5
ADT 5 (1 )
11
/
2
2
/
1
0
0 .06
8
0 .00
2
8
J
03
/
1
4
/
1
1
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
5
05
/
2
7
/
1
0
<0
.
0
2
<
0
.
0
1
08
/
2
6
/
1
0
<0
.
1
0
0
<
0
.
0
5
0
11
/
2
2
/
1
0
0
.
0
1
2
<0
.
0
0
5
03
/
1
4
/
1
1
<0
.
0
1
<0
.
0
0
5
05
/
2
7
/
1
0
<0
.
0
2
<
0
.
0
1
08
/
2
6
/
1
0
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
5
11
/
2
2
/
1
0
0
.
0
0
9
3
J
<0
.
0
0
5
03
/
1
4
/
1
1
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
1
TD
M
W
-
1
3
/
1
6
/
1
1
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
0
5
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
NC
2
L
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
No
t
e
s
:
Bo
l
d
v
a
l
u
e
e
x
c
e
e
d
s
N
C
2
L
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
0
)
.
NA
d
e
n
o
t
e
s
N
o
t
A
n
a
l
y
z
e
d
;
N
E
d
e
n
o
t
e
s
N
o
t
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
TW
-
1
6
TW
-
1
7
ADT 5 (1 )
Soil Vapor Data and Figures
Table 2
Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Results
City of Charlotte Parcel #4
Charlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. CAM-003
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Camden - CAM\CAM-003\Tables\Analytical Data Tables.xlsx
3/3/2016
Table 2 (1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Date 2/5/2016 2/5/2016 2/5/2016 2/5/2016
VOCs (TO-15) (µg/m3)
Acetone 110 30 21 18 J 216,000
Benzene 0.68 0.92 0.55 J 0.65 120
2-Butanone (MEK)11 J 3.0 J 2.6 J 2.2 J 34,800
Carbon disulfide 8.2 2.6 J 6.2 J 6.5 4,870
Chloroform 0.25 J 0.53 J 11 8.2 40.7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.46 J 1.1 J <1.2 <1.2 85.1
Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.8 2.2 2.2 2.6 695
Ethanol 7.1 J, L-05 <15 <15 <15 NE
Ethylbenzene 0.57 J 17 0.69 J 1.1 374
4-Ethyltoluene 0.43 J 16 <0.98 2.7 NE
Heptane 0.41 J 0.44 J 1.0 <0.82 NE
Hexane <28 <28 2.1 J <28 4,870
2-Hexanone 1.2 0.64 J <0.82 <0.82 209
Isopropanol 2.1 J 1.4 J 1.1 J 1.0 J 1,390
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 0.85 0.75 J <0.82 <0.82 20,900
Naphthalene <1.0 V-05 7.5 V-05 <1.0 V-05 <1.0 V-05 20.9
Propene 4.7 J 2.1 J 13 J 5.4 J 20,900
Styrene 0.20 J, L-03 0.72 J, L-03 <0.85 L-03 <0.85 L-03 6,950
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)10 68 230 14 278
Tetrahydrofuran <0.59 0.45 J <0.59 <0.59 13,900
Toluene 1.8 16 1.6 1.1 34,800
Trichloroethene (TCE)<1.1 <1.1 0.73 J <1.1 13.9
Trichlorofluromethane 1.0 J 1.1 J 1.2 J 1.2 J 4,870
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 0.49 J 0.49 J 0.46 J 0.55 J 209,000
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.4 230 0.55 J 24 48.7
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.77 J 91 0.39 J 7.4 NE
Xylenes (total)3.6 171 6.0 10.8 695
Notes:
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).
1) North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste
Management (DWM) Residential Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSL) (September 2015).
Bold values exceed a Residential SGSL
VOCs = Volatile organic compounds
NE = Not established
J = Compound detected above laboratory method detection limit, but below laboratory reporting limit; and therefore
reported value is an estimated value.
L-03 = Laboratory control sample recovery outside of acceptable limits. Reported value is likely to be biased low.
L-05 = Laboratory control sample recovery outside of acceptable limits. Reported value is likely to be biased high.
V-05 = Continuing calibration sample recovery outside of acceptable limits. Reported value is likely to be biased low.
Sample ID SG-1 SG-2 Residential SGSL
(µg/m3)1
SG-3 SG-4
S
G
-
3
S
G
-
4
S
B
-
4
S
B
-
5
S
G
-
2
S
B
-
3
S
G
-
1
S
B
-
2
S
B
-
1
LEGENDSITE PROPERTY BOUNDARYSOIL BORING LOCATIONSOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
J
O
B
N
O
.
C
A
M
-
0
0
3
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
N
O
.
0
D
A
T
E
:
2
-
8
-
1
6
F
I
G
U
R
E
N
O
.
2
C
I
T
Y
O
F
C
H
A
R
L
O
T
T
E
P
A
R
C
E
L
#
4
C
H
A
R
L
O
T
T
E
,
N
O
R
T
H
C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
S
A
M
P
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
M
A
P
2
9
2
3
S
o
u
t
h
T
r
y
o
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
-
S
u
i
t
e
1
0
0
C
h
a
r
l
o
t
t
e
,
N
o
r
t
h
C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
2
8
2
0
3
7
0
4
-
5
8
6
-
0
0
0
7
(
p
)
7
0
4
-
5
8
6
-
0
3
7
3
(
f
)
L
i
c
e
n
s
e
#
C
-
1
2
6
9
/
#
C
-
2
4
5
G
e
o
l
o
g
y
E. MOREHEAD STREET
S
O
U
T
H
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
E
.
J
O
H
N
B
E
L
K
F
R
E
E
W
A
Y
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Camden - CAM\CAM-003\Figures\Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 2, 3/3/2016 10:29:06 AM, zbarlow
Attachment C Cut/Fill Plan
Job: 012116 ACAD-5297_AGTEKUnits: Ft-CYThu Jan 21, 2016 09:09:38 Page 1
Volume Report Subgrade vs. Stripped
Area Volume Comp/Ratio Compact Export Change Total Cut Fill OnGrade Cut Fill Cut Fill Cut Fill -Import Per .1 Ft REGION 94,493 32,692 59,769 2,032 3,808 9,235 1.00 1.15 3,808 10,620 -6,812 402
Plane Slope Stripping Qtys Area Area Depth Volume STRIPPING 94,493 97,237 0.670 2,413
Plane Slope Sectional Qtys Area Area Depth Volume BUILDINGS 3,902 3,902 1.000 145 BUILDINGS 1,492 1,493 1.000 55 BUILDINGS 5,588 5,588 1.000 207 BUILDINGS 10,441 10,541 1.000 390
BUILDINGS Sub: 21,423 21,524 797
L-SITE-BOC 23,449 23,497 1.000 870
Sectional Total 44,872 45,021 1,667
CAMDEN TOWNHOMES 01/21/16
Attachment D
Contingency Plan
Please provide a contingency plan in the event unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered during site activities.
If a sub-grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, it
will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed. Where appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation. If the pit has waste in it, the waste may be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals and disposed off-site at a permitted facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with Part 1 above, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste present. If the pit must be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the concrete may potentially be contaminated to a significant degree, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed by
methods specified by the disposal facility.
If buried piping is encountered and must be removed to allow development to proceed, the contractor will inspect the pipe for fluids, collect the fluids where appropriate, and look for signs of a release using field methods. The collected fluids will be sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals to determine appropriate disposition of the fluid.
In the event that impacts associated with an underground storage tank (UST) release are found to be present on the subject site, they will be addressed through the Brownfields Program.
If buried materials or other waste materials which do not appear to be hazardous are identified at the site, then the material will be left in place unless it needs to be removed for geotechnical purposes. The locations of the materials will be documented in the final EMP Report. If the non-hazardous waste materials need to be removed, they will be disposed off-site. If buried materials appear to be hazardous (such as buried drums), then grading will stop and a plan for managing the materials will be developed for DEQ approval.