19050_Kesler Mill_OAR_Asbestos_20160108

FORMER KESSLER MILL
DEBRIS PILES
LIMITED ASBESTOS-CONTAINING
MATERIALS SURVEY

Former Kessler Mill 423 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue
Salisbury, North Carolina
Survey Date: December 9, 2015
Report Date: January 8, 2016

Prepared For:

Cardno TBE 1233 Washington Street
Suite 1000
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

Prepared By:

Cardno 7606 Whitehall Executive Center Drive
Suite 800
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273 704-529-3200
Kevin Headd, NC Asbestos Inspector # BI-11002

January 8, 2016
Mr. Joseph Morici
CARDNO TBE 1233 Washington Street
Suite 1000 Columbia, South Carolina 29201
Re: Limited Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey
Former Kessler Mill 423 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue
Salisbury, North Carolina

Dear Mr. Morici: Cardno is pleased to submit the attached Limited Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey for the referenced site. This report includes the procedures and methodologies, analytical laboratory results, and applicable
conclusions and recommendations.
Cardno appreciates the opportunity to perform these services for Cardno, and we look forward to working with you in the future. If you have any questions please contact us at: 704-529-3200.
Sincerely, Cardno ATC
Kevin Headd, MS, MBA, CIH, PG, PMP Diana Lanier
North Carolina Asbestos Inspector # 11002 Project Scientist, Reviewer Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]

Former Kessler Mill – Salisbury, North Carolina January 8, 2016

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ............................................................................................i
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................... ii
1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ..................................................................... 1
2.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS .................................................................................... 1
3.0 LIMITED ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL SURVEY ........................................ 1 3.1 Homogeneous Areas ........................................................................................... 2
3.2 Hazard Assessment Factors ................................................................................ 2
3.3 Sampling Strategy ................................................................................................ 2
3.4 Sampling Limitations ............................................................................................ 3 3.5 Laboratory Analytical Results ............................................................................... 3
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................ 4
5.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS ........................................................................... 5
TABLE Table 1 - ACM PLM Survey Summary Table
Table 2 – Asbestos Sampling Table

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A: Site Map, Sampling Map, 2014 Aerial Photo, and 2006 Aerial Photo

APPENDIX B: Site Material Screening Photos
APPENDIX C: Laboratory Analytical Results
APPENDIX D: Laboratory and Inspector Credentials

Former Kessler Mill – Salisbury, North Carolina January 8, 2016

1

LIMITED ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY

Former Kessler Mill 425 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue
Robbins, North Carolina

1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
The purpose of this project was to survey the Former Kessler Mill site, observe the remaining debris
materials at the site, and note and/or sample potential asbestos-containing material (ACM), in preparation for site clearing activities. The clearing activities will include removal of demolition debris, concrete, wood, and other building materials. The identification of ACM and assumed ACM may make it possible to separate
the waste into general construction debris and ACM waste for disposal purposes. Cardno provided the services as outlined below for conducting a representative limited asbestos survey of identified building
materials at the site: 1. Review of existing asbestos reports for any previous building areas, if provided.
2. Survey the specified area to identify homogeneous areas (HAs). 3. Identify accessible suspect ACM using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asbestos
Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) protocols. 4. Collect and analyze bulk samples of suspect friable and non-friable materials to evaluate potential asbestos content. 5. Quantify ACM, including material condition, location, and potential for disturbance.
2.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS
The site was previously used as a textile mill. No building structures were standing at the time of the
survey. The survey area was limited to visible materials on the ground. The site was observed to be lightly vegetated and a moderate amount of building debris was present. An Aerial Photograph and a
Material Sampling Map are presented in Appendix A.
3.0 LIMITED ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL SURVEY

On December 9, 2015, Mr. Kevin Headd, a North Carolina licensed Asbestos Building Inspector and Austin Sipes an environmental technician, conducted the limited asbestos survey at the Former Kessler Mill site located at 423 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue in Salisbury, North Carolina. The area was
observed to be covered in general construction debris and vegetation. Debris piles of brick, concrete, and wood were observed in multiple areas of the property. The sample location map is provided in
Appendix A.
No previous asbestos surveys were available for the site. The site was visually assessed for the presence of building materials that are suspected to contain asbestos. Bulk samples of identified suspect ACM were
collected and placed into individual containers for transport to a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP)/American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)-accredited laboratory for analysis.
Materials visibly identified as non-asbestos (rubber, wood, vinyl wall panels, foam rubber, etc.) were not sampled. The asbestos survey consisted of three basic procedures: 1) conducting visual observations of
the structure; 2) identifying homogeneous areas (HAs) of suspect surfacing, thermal system insulation, and
miscellaneous materials; and 3) sampling accessible, friable and non-friable suspect ACM.

3.1 Homogeneous Areas

Prior to collecting samples, HAs were identified to develop a sampling strategy. A homogeneous sampling
Former Kessler Mill – Salisbury, North Carolina January 8, 2016

2

area can be described as one or more areas of material that are similar in appearance and texture and that
have the same known or apparent installation date and function. The actual number of samples collected from each homogeneous sampling area may vary, based on the type of material and the professional
judgment of the inspector.
3.2 Hazard Assessment Factors From the list of suspect homogeneous materials, a physical assessment was performed for each material
on the list. A physical assessment includes evaluating the condition, assessing the potential for disturbance, and determining the friability of each material. Friability is a term used to describe the ease in which a building material inherently lends itself to disturbance. By definition, "friable" materials are those that can be
crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Each material on the list was further classified into one of three categories, which have specific sampling requirements for each category.
Surfacing Materials: Refers to spray-applied or troweled surfaces such as joint compound, plaster ceilings and walls, fireproofing, textured paints, textured plasters,
and spray-applied acoustical surfaces.
Thermal System Insulation: Refers to insulation used to inhibit heat gain or loss on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and various other building components.
Miscellaneous Materials: Refers to friable and non-friable products and materials that do not fit in any of the above two categories such as resilient floor covering,
baseboards, mastics, adhesives, roofing material, caulking, glazing, and siding. This category also contains wallboard and ceiling tile.
Potential ACM were then assessed by their condition as good (intact), fair (damaged) or poor (significantly damaged) per Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 763. Material with localized significant damage
was identified as poor if and when observed.
3.3 Sampling Strategy
The asbestos survey was conducted in general accordance with the AHERA requirements (which also meets the sampling requirements found in 29 CFR 1926.1101), and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP).
Sample collection depended on the category into which the HA was classified and the amount of material present, as follows:

AHERA GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF SAMPLES TO COLLECT
HA CATEGORY HA SIZE SAMPLES REQUIRED
Surfacing Materials <1,000 SF 3
1,000-5,000 SF 5
>5,000 SF 7 or more
Thermal System Insulation No stipulation 3+ (Must also sample all repair patches)
Miscellaneous Materials No stipulation Per AHERA, these materials must be sampled "in a manner sufficient to determine whether or not they contain asbestos" typically 1-3 samples based upon inspector judgment.
Miscellaneous materials require adequately representative sampling, which is typically done by collecting
from one to three samples per material. Inspectors typically rely on other survey observations such as the
Former Kessler Mill – Salisbury, North Carolina January 8, 2016

3

condition, friability, and quantity of material to determine what would be a sufficient amount of samples to
accurately evaluate the presence or absence of asbestos content.
Actual collection of a bulk asbestos sample involves physically removing a small piece of material and placing it in a marked, airtight container. Sample containers are marked with a unique identification number, which is recorded in the field notes.

3.4 Sampling Limitations
During the survey, Cardno conducted observations and efforts were made to identify building materials
remaining at the site. Materials were generally observed to be in debris piles and the site was lightly vegetated. Additional suspect materials are likely to be present in these debris piles.
Cardno did not conduct sampling of suspect materials that may be present in movable equipment such
as freezers, kitchen equipment, and hoods. Additional ACM may be present at the site in inaccessible or concealed spaces, or areas below trash and/or vegetation. These spaces include, but are not limited to, pipe chases, spaces between wall/ceiling/door/floor cavities, interior of mechanical components such as
boiler cavities, interior ducts, beneath foundation pads, etc. If future demolition activities render these areas exposed, Cardno recommends further assessment of these spaces be conducted at that time to
identify and confirm the presence or absence of additional ACM. Until then, all such unidentified materials should be treated as Presumed ACM (PACM) in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101 and 1910.1001.

3.5 Laboratory Analytical Results
Bulk samples were analyzed by EMSL laboratory located in Charlotte, North Carolina using polarized light
microscopy (PLM) according to EPA Method 600/M4-82-020. This laboratory participates in the NVLAP, a quality assurance program for PLM, and is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST). Cardno collected fifty five (55) bulk asbestos samples from the site on December 9, 2015 to screen for ACM
in the debris piles. Eighty eight (88) layers were analyzed by PLM, based on the number of distinct layers (materials) associated with each bulk sample. For example, floor tile and associated mastic are collected as
one bulk sample but are analyzed as two distinct materials by the asbestos laboratory, as required by NVLAP.
A summary of sampling results by PLM is located in Table 1.
The following materials were identified as ACM:
• Roofing Materials – Gray fibrous layer (20% Chrysotile) – Limited Area
• White Floor Tile (3% Chrysotile) – Limited Area
• Green Floor Tile and Mastic (4% Chrysotile) – Limited Area (The Green Floor Tile - Mastic is <1%
Chrysotile, however it is considered as ACM, because it is in contact with the ACM floor tile.)
• Transite siding or shingles (10% Chrysotile) – Limited Area.
No other tested materials were found to contain asbestos. Copies of the laboratory analytical report and corresponding chain-of-custody documents are included in Appendix C. Results are reported in percent asbestos by volume and indicate the types of asbestos. Other common non-asbestos components may also be noted on the analytical reports. PLM laboratory results of suspect materials indicating asbestos content of greater than 1% are by definition considered ACM.

Former Kessler Mill – Salisbury, North Carolina January 8, 2016

4

Any material that contains > 1% asbestos by PLM is considered an ACM and must be handled according to
the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and applicable state and local regulations.

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General construction debris including concrete, asphalt roofing, cinder blocks, bricks, wood, etc. were
observed in debris piles on the site. These materials were visually assessed to identify potential ACM materials. Fifty five (55) suspect materials with eighty eight (88) layers were collected and tested by PLM. The following materials were identified as ACM:

• Roofing Materials – Gray fibrous layer (20% Chrysotile) – Limited Area
• White Floor Tile (3% Chrysotile) – Limited Area
• Green Floor Tile and Mastic (4% Chrysotile) – Limited Area (The Green Floor Tile - Mastic is <1%
Chrysotile, however it is considered as ACM, because it is in contact with the ACM floor tile.)
• Transite siding or shingles (10% Chrysotile) – Limited Area.
During the survey the identified ACM materials were observed to be in localized areas. It may be possible for the general debris at the site to be screened by a North Carolina licensed Asbestos Building Inspector during demolition and clean-up activities. There is the possibility of separating ACM from non-
ACM debris. There is also the possibility for additional suspect ACM to be present at the site. Any observed suspect ACM should not be disturbed, and should be treated as ACM, unless analytical testing
proves otherwise. A work plan addressing both general construction debris and ACM debris should be generated before work begins. Considerations of the worker training, air monitoring, and a review of disposal facilities should also be included in the work plan. The North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) should be consulted about the demolition plans, necessary permits, methods, and disposal methods.
Contractors and employees working at the site should be made aware of the possibility that concealed
ACM may be found during demolition and debris removal and appropriate actions taken (employee training, personal protective equipment, etc.). They should be advised not to disturb known or suspect
ACM without owner approval. Any concealed building materials discovered during demolition and disposal activities, which are suspected to contain asbestos, should be sampled and analyzed to confirm
the presence of asbestos prior to disturbing. During demolition and excavation, if a material that is a
suspect ACM material is observed, the material should be sampled and analyzed to confirm
asbestos content prior to disturbing. 5.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the report are based only on conditions that were noted during Cardno’s assessment of the Former Kessler Mill site located at 423
Martin Luther King Avenue in Salisbury, North Carolina. The selection of sample locations and frequency of sampling was based on Cardno’s observations and
the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in content. Concealed ACM may exist in concealed areas not surveyed or identified.
The report is designed to aid the client in understanding the extent of ACM issues as they pertain to the
planned demolition of the site building. Under no circumstances is the report to be utilized as a
bidding document or as a project specification document since it does not have all the components required to serve as an Asbestos Abatement Project Design document or an Abatement Workplan.

Former Kessler Mill – Salisbury, North Carolina January 8, 2016

5

Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions and
recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or
implied. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated. Cardno, by virtue of providing the services described in this report, does not assume the responsibility of the person(s) in charge of the
site, or otherwise undertake responsibility for reporting the conditions at the site that may present a potential danger to public health, safety, or the environment to local, state, or federal public agencies. It
is Cardno’s understanding that the client will notify the appropriate regulatory agencies as required and will also notify the structure owners and/or operators (and hence the structure tenants) as legally and ethically required. Cardno assumes no responsibility for the investigation, remediation, abatement, or other potential liabilities associated with environmental impact at, or from, the project site or structure, regardless of the date of occurrence

APPENDIX A

Site Map, Sampling Map, 2014 Aerial Photo, and 2006 Aerial Photo
FIGURE 2: Site and Sample Location Map
423 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue
Salisbury, North Carolina
DWG #:
DATE: 1/8/2016
DRAWN BY: KOH
LEGEND:
Not to Scale
NORTH
Kessler Mill
2014 Aerial Photo - Rowan County GIS
S-1A, 1B, 1C
S-2A, 2B, 2C S-3A, 3B, 3C S-4A, 4B, 4C
S-5A, 5B, 5CS-6A, 6B, 6C
S-7A, 7B, 7C
S-8A, 8B, 8C
S-9A, 9B, 9C
S-10A, 10B, 10C
S-11A, 11B, 11C
S-12A, 12B, 12C
S-13A, 13B, 13C
S-14A, 14B, 14C
S-14D, 14E, 14F, 14G
S-15A, 15B, 15C
S-16A, 16B, 16C
ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Black = No Asbestos Detected by PLM (Non ACM)
Blue = <1% Chrysotile by PLM (Non ACM)
Red = >1% Chrysotile by PLM (ACM)
1A, 1B, 1C - Asbestos Sample Locations
6A, 6B, 6C - Gray Material in Roofing
10A, 10B, 10C - White 1' x 1' Floor Tile
12A, 12B, 12C - Green 1' x 1' Floor Tile and Mastic
ABESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS (ACM)
3A, 3B, 3C - Transite Shingles
FIGURE 3: 2014 Aerial Photo
423 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue
Salisbury, North Carolina
DWG #:
DATE: 1/8/2016
DRAWN BY: KOH
LEGEND:
Not to Scale NORTH
Kessler Mill
2014 Aerial Photo - Rowan County GIS
2014 Aerial Photo
FIGURE 4: 2006 Aerial Photo
423 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue
Salisbury, North Carolina
DWG #:
DATE: 1/8/2016
DRAWN BY: KOH
LEGEND:
Not to Scale NORTH
Kessler Mill
2006 Aerial Photo - Rowan County GIS
2006 Aerial Photo

APPENDIX B

Site Material Screening Photos
Site Material Screening Former Kessler Mill
Salisbury, North Carolina

Cardno

Photo #1: General view of the debris on the site.

Photo #2: Roof Debris – Sample S-1A, B, C – non-detect for asbestos by PLM.

Site Material Screening Former Kessler Mill
Salisbury, North Carolina

Cardno

Photo #3: Wall Felt-like Debris – Sample S-2A, B, C – non-detect for asbestos by PLM.

Photo #4: Transit Shingle – Sample S-3A, B, C – 10% Chrysotile - ACM.
Site Material Screening Former Kessler Mill
Salisbury, North Carolina

Cardno

Photo #5: Roofing felt/Tar w/rocks – Sample S-4A, B, C – non-detect for asbestos by PLM.

Photo #6: Felt/Tar Roofing – Sample S-5A,B,C – non-detect for asbestos by PLM.
Site Material Screening Former Kessler Mill
Salisbury, North Carolina

Cardno

Photo #7: View of Silver Paint on Roofing material – Sample S-6A, B, C – 20% Chrysotile only on sample S-6A Fibrous Layer.

Photo #8: View of White Layered Material – Sample S-7A, B, C – Non-detect for asbestos by PLM.

Site Material Screening Former Kessler Mill
Salisbury, North Carolina

Cardno

Photo #9: View of area with felt roofing w/glass layer – Sample S-8A, B, C – non-detect for asbestos by PLM.

Photo #10: View of roofing debris – Sample S-9A, B, C – non-detect for asbestos by PLM.

Site Material Screening Former Kessler Mill
Salisbury, North Carolina

Cardno

Photo #11: Thick Floor Tiles – Sample S-10A, B, C – 3% Chrysotile - ACM.

Photo #12: General view of debris observed on the site.

Site Material Screening Former Kessler Mill
Salisbury, North Carolina

Cardno

Photo #13: View of roofing materials area – Tar/Glass layers – Sample S-11A, B, C – non-detect
for asbestos by PLM.

Photo #14: View of white/green floor tiles – Sample S-12A, B, C – 4% and <1% Chrysotile –
ACM. j
Site Material Screening Former Kessler Mill
Salisbury, North Carolina

Cardno

Photo #15: View of Tan floor tiles – Sample S-13A, B – non-detect for asbestos by PLM.
Photo #16: View of Aero cell/Cardboard – Sample S-14A, B, C, D, E, F, G – non-detect for
asbestos by PLM.

Site Material Screening Former Kessler Mill
Salisbury, North Carolina

Cardno

Photo #17: View of Shingles – Sample S-15A, B, C – non-detect for asbestos by PLM.

Photo #18: View of shingles – Sample S-16A, B, C – non detect for asbestos by PLM.

Site Material Screening Former Kessler Mill
Salisbury, North Carolina

Cardno

Photo #19: View of Shingles – Sample S-17A, B, C – non detect for asbestos by PLM.

Photo #20: View of Felt roofing materials – Sample S-18A, B, C – non detect for asbestos by PLM.

APPENDIX C

Laboratory Analytical Results

EMSL Analytical, Inc.
376 Crompton Street Charlotte, NC 28273
Tel/Fax: [phone]
http://www.EMSL.com / [e-mail]
411509313EMSL Order:
Customer ID: ATCA72
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Attention:Phone:Kevin Headd [phone]
Fax:Cardno [phone]
Received Date:7606 Whitehall Executive Center Drive 12/10/2015 8:00 AM
Analysis Date:Suite 800 12/10/2015
Collected Date:Charlotte, NC 28273 12/ 9/2015
Project:Kessler Mill
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
S-1A-Tar
411509313-0001
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-1A-Felt
411509313-0001A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing60%Cellulose 40%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-1B-Tar
411509313-0002
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing<1%Cellulose 100%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-1B-Felt
411509313-0002A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing60%Cellulose 40%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-1C-Tar
411509313-0003
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing<1%Cellulose 100%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-1C-Felt
411509313-0003A
Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing55%Cellulose 45%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-2A
411509313-0004
Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFelt80%Cellulose 20%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-2B
411509313-0005
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFelt80%Cellulose 20%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-2C
411509313-0006
Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFelt70%Cellulose 30%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-3A
411509313-0007
Gray/White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Transite Shingle 20%
70%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
10%Chrysotile
S-3B
411509313-0008
Gray
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Transite Shingle 20%
70%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
10%Chrysotile
S-3C
411509313-0009
Gray
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Transite Shingle 15%
75%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
10%Chrysotile
S-4A-Tar w/Rocks
411509313-0010
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing20%
80%
Quartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-4A-Felt
411509313-0010A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing20%Cellulose 80%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-4B-Tar w/Rocks
411509313-0011
White/Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing20%
5%
75%
Quartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-4B-Felt
411509313-0011A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing20%Cellulose 80%Non-fibrous (Other)
Initial Report From: 12/10/2015 16:52:00
Page 1 of 6PLM - 1.65 Printed: 12/10/2015 3:52 PM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
376 Crompton Street Charlotte, NC 28273
Tel/Fax: [phone]
http://www.EMSL.com / [e-mail]
411509313EMSL Order:
Customer ID: ATCA72
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
S-4C-Tar w/Rocks
411509313-0012
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing<1%Cellulose 10%
90%
Quartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-4C-Felt
411509313-0012A
Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing25%Cellulose 75%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-5A-Tar
411509313-0013
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-5A-Felt
411509313-0013A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing30%Cellulose 70%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-5B-Tar
411509313-0014
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing<1%Cellulose 5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-5B-Felt
411509313-0014A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing30%Cellulose 70%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-5C-Tar
411509313-0015
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing<1%Cellulose 100%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-5C-Felt
411509313-0015A
Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing25%Cellulose 75%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-6A-Tar
411509313-0016
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-6A-Fibrous Layer
411509313-0016A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Roofing 20%
10%
Cellulose
Glass
50%Non-fibrous (Other)20%Chrysotile
S-6B-Silver Paint
411509313-0017
Silver
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing1%Cellulose 99%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-6B-Tar
411509313-0017A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-6B-Fibrous Layer
411509313-0017B
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing10%
5%
5%
Cellulose
Synthetic
Glass
80%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-6C-Silver Paint
411509313-0018
Silver
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing1%Cellulose 99%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-6C-Tar
411509313-0018A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing8%
92%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-6C-Fibrous Layer
411509313-0018B
Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing1%
8%
Cellulose
Glass
5%
86%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-7A
411509313-0019
Tan
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedWhite Layered
Material
95%Cellulose 5%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-7B
411509313-0020
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedWhite Layered
Material
95%Cellulose 5%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-7C
411509313-0021
Brown/White
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedWhite Layered
Material
98%Cellulose 2%Non-fibrous (Other)
Initial Report From: 12/10/2015 16:52:00
Page 2 of 6PLM - 1.65 Printed: 12/10/2015 3:52 PM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
376 Crompton Street Charlotte, NC 28273
Tel/Fax: [phone]
http://www.EMSL.com / [e-mail]
411509313EMSL Order:
Customer ID: ATCA72
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
S-8A-Tar
411509313-0022
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFelt Roofing 5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-8A-Glass Layer
411509313-0022A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFelt Roofing 10%Glass 90%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-8B-Tar
411509313-0023
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFelt Roofing 5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-8B-Glass Layer
411509313-0023A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFelt Roofing 10%Glass 90%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-8C-Tar
411509313-0024
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFelt Roofing 1%Glass 99%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-8C-Glass Layer
411509313-0024A
Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFelt Roofing 15%Glass 85%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-9A-Tar w/Rocks
411509313-0025
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBlack Roofing 2%Cellulose 20%
5%
73%
Quartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-9A-Cellulose Layer
411509313-0025A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBlack Roofing 15%Cellulose 85%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-9B-Tar w/Rocks
411509313-0026
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBlack Roofing 2%Cellulose 20%
5%
73%
Quartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-9B-Cellulose Layer
411509313-0026A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBlack Roofing 20%Cellulose 80%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-9C-Tar w/Rocks
411509313-0027
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBlack Roofing <1%Cellulose 10%
90%
Quartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-9C-Cellulose Layer
411509313-0027A
Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedBlack Roofing 10%Cellulose 90%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-10A-Thick Floor Tile
411509313-0028
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedWhite Tile 12"x12"30%
70%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-10A-Mastic
411509313-0028A
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedWhite Tile 12"x12"<1%Cellulose 5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-10A-Thin Floor Tile
411509313-0028B
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
White Tile 12"x12"30%
67%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
3%Chrysotile
S-10B-Thick Floor Tile
411509313-0029
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedWhite Tile 12"x12"30%
70%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-10B-Mastic
411509313-0029A
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedWhite Tile 12"x12"5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-10B-Thin Floor Tile
411509313-0029B
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
White Tile 12"x12"25%
72%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
3%Chrysotile
S-11A-Tar
411509313-0030
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
Initial Report From: 12/10/2015 16:52:00
Page 3 of 6PLM - 1.65 Printed: 12/10/2015 3:52 PM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
376 Crompton Street Charlotte, NC 28273
Tel/Fax: [phone]
http://www.EMSL.com / [e-mail]
411509313EMSL Order:
Customer ID: ATCA72
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
S-11A-Glass Layer
411509313-0030A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing10%Glass 5%
85%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-11B-Tar
411509313-0031
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-11B-Glass Layer
411509313-0031A
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing10%Glass 5%
85%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-11C-Tar
411509313-0032
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing1%Glass 99%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-11C-Glass Layer
411509313-0032A
Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedRoofing10%Glass 90%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-12A-White Floor Tile
411509313-0033
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFloor Tile 12"x12"30%
70%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-12A-Mastic
411509313-0033A
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFloor Tile 12"x12"100%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-12A-Green Floor Tile
411509313-0033B
Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Floor Tile 12"x12"30%
66%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
4%Chrysotile
S-12A-Mastic
411509313-0033C
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Floor Tile 12"x12"100%Non-fibrous (Other)<1%Chrysotile
Possible contamination
S-12B-White Floor Tile
411509313-0034
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFloor Tile 12"x12"35%
65%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-12B-Mastic
411509313-0034A
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFloor Tile 12"x12"<1%Cellulose 100%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-12B-Green Floor Tile
411509313-0034B
Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Floor Tile 12"x12"20%
76%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
4%Chrysotile
S-12B-Mastic
411509313-0034C
Gray/Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Floor Tile 12"x12"5%
95%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
<1%Chrysotile
Possible contamination
S-13A
411509313-0035
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFloor Tile 12"x12"30%
70%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-13B
411509313-0036
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFloor Tile 12"x12"<1%Cellulose 35%
65%
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-14A
411509313-0037
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedAerocell/Cardboard 99%Cellulose 1%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-14B
411509313-0038
Gray/Tan
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedAerocell/Cardboard 99%Cellulose 1%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-14C
411509313-0039
Tan
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
None DetectedAerocell/Cardboard 99%Cellulose 1%Non-fibrous (Other)
Initial Report From: 12/10/2015 16:52:00
Page 4 of 6PLM - 1.65 Printed: 12/10/2015 3:52 PM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
376 Crompton Street Charlotte, NC 28273
Tel/Fax: [phone]
http://www.EMSL.com / [e-mail]
411509313EMSL Order:
Customer ID: ATCA72
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
S-14D
411509313-0040
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedAerocell/Cardboard 99%Cellulose 1%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-14E
411509313-0041
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedAerocell/Cardboard 99%Cellulose 1%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-14F
411509313-0042
Brown
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedAerocell/Cardboard 98%Cellulose 2%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-14G
411509313-0043
Brown
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedAerocell/Cardboard 98%Cellulose 2%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-15A
411509313-0044
White/Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
None DetectedShingles20%Cellulose 5%
75%
Quartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-15B
411509313-0045
White/Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedShingles20%Cellulose 5%
75%
Quartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-15C
411509313-0046
Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedShingles30%Cellulose 5%
65%
Quartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-16A
411509313-0047
White/Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
None DetectedShingles8%Glass 5%
5%
82%
Quartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-16B
411509313-0048
White/Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
None DetectedShingles5%Glass 5%
5%
85%
Quartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-16C
411509313-0049
Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedShingles5%Glass 5%
10%
80%
Quartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-17A
411509313-0050
White/Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
None DetectedShingles20%Cellulose 5%
75%
Quartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-17B
411509313-0051
White/Black
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
None DetectedShingles20%Cellulose 5%
75%
Quartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-17C
411509313-0052
White/Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedShingles30%Cellulose 5%
65%
Quartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
S-18A
411509313-0053
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFelt60%Cellulose 40%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-18B
411509313-0054
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFelt60%Cellulose 40%Non-fibrous (Other)
S-18C
411509313-0055
Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
None DetectedFelt65%Cellulose 35%Non-fibrous (Other)
Initial Report From: 12/10/2015 16:52:00
Page 5 of 6PLM - 1.65 Printed: 12/10/2015 3:52 PM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
376 Crompton Street Charlotte, NC 28273
Tel/Fax: [phone]
http://www.EMSL.com / [e-mail]
411509313EMSL Order:
Customer ID: ATCA72
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
Analyst(s)
Erin Guzowski (32)
Eric Loomis (56)
Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or Other Approved Signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no
responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim
product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL
recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless
requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1%
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC NVLAP Lab Code 200841-0, VA 3333 00312
Initial Report From: 12/10/2015 16:52:00
Page 6 of 6PLM - 1.65 Printed: 12/10/2015 3:52 PM
OrderID: 411509313
Page 1 Of 2
OrderID: 411509313
Page 2 Of 2

APPENDIX D

Laboratory and Inspector Credentials

Un
i
t
e
d

S
t
a
t
e
s

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

o
f

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e

Na
t
i
o
n
a
l

I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
e

o
f

S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s

a
n
d

T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
Ce
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
e

o
f

A
c
c
r
e
d
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

t
o

I
S
O
/
I
E
C

1
7
0
2
5
:
2
0
0
5
NV
L
A
P

L
A
B

C
O
D
E
:

2
0
0
8
4
1
-
0
EM
S
L

A
n
a
l
y ti
c
a
l
,

I
n
c
.
Ch
a
r
l
o
t
t
e
,

N
C
is

a
c
c
r
e
d
i
t
e
d

b
y

t
h
e

N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

V
o
l
u
n
t
a
r
y

L
a
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y

A
c
c
r
e
d
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
g
r
a
m

f
o
r

s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c

s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
,

li
s
t
e
d

o
n

t
h
e

S
c
o
p
e

o
f

A
c
c
r
e
d
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
,

f
o
r
:
As
b
e
s
t
o
s

F
i
b
e
r

A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
20
1
5
-
0
6
-
0
2

t
h
r
o
u
g
h

2
0
1
6
-
0
6
-
3
0
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e

D
a
t
e
s
Fo
r

t
h
e

N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

V
o
l
u
n
t
a
r
y

L
a
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y

A
c
c
r
e
d
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Th
i
s

l
a
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y

i
s

a
c
c
r
e
d
i
t
e
d

i
n

a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e

w
i
t
h

t
h
e

r
e
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
d

I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d

I
S
O
/
I
E
C

1
7
0
2
5
:
2
0
0
5
.

Th
i
s

a
c
c
r
e
d
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
s

t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l

c
o
m
p
e
t
e
n
c
e

f
o
r

a

d
e
f
i
n
e
d

s
c
o
p
e

a
n
d

t
h
e

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

a

l
a
b
o
r
a
t
o
r
y

q
u
a
l
i
t
y

ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

s
y
s
t
e
m

(
r
e
f
e
r

t
o

j
o
i
n
t

I
S
O
-
I
L
A
C
-
I
A
F

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
q
u
e

d
a
t
e
d

J
a
n
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
9
)
.
1DWLRQDO9ROXQWDU\
/DERUDWRU\$FFUHGLWDWLRQ3URJUDP
6&23(2)$&&5(',7$7,2172,62,(&
3DJHRI
For the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program
Effective 2015-06-02 through 2016-06-30
(06/$QDO\WLFDO,QF
&URPSWRQ6WUHHW
&KDUORWWH1&
0U/HH3OXPOH\
3KRQH)D[
(PDLOOSOXPOH\#HPVOFRP
KWWSZZZHPVOFRP
$6%(6726),%(5$1$/<6,6 19/$3/$%&2'(
%XON$VEHVWRV$QDO\VLV
Code Description
$ (3$0,QWHULP0HWKRGIRUWKH'HWHUPLQDWLRQRI$VEHVWRVLQ%XON,QVXODWLRQ6DPSOHV
$ (3$50HWKRGIRUWKH'HWHUPLQDWLRQRI$VEHVWRVLQ%XON%XLOGLQJ0DWHULDOV
$LUERUQH$VEHVWRV$QDO\VLV
Code Description
$86(3$
V,QWHULP7UDQVPLVVLRQ(OHFWURQ0LFURVFRS\$QDO\WLFDO0HWKRGV0DQGDWRU\DQG
1RQPDQGDWRU\DQG0DQGDWRU\6HFWLRQWR'HWHUPLQH&RPSOHWLRQRI5HVSRQVH$FWLRQVDVIRXQGLQ
&)53DUW6XESDUW($SSHQGL[$

TABLE
ACM PLM Survey Summary Table Asbestos Sampling Table
Table 1 : Positive ACM - Sampled Material Found to Contain >1% Asbestos for Limited Asbestos Survey on December 09, 2015.
Former Kesler Mill
423 North Martin Luther King Jr. AvenueSalisbury, North Carolina
Bulk Sample Homogeneous Material Surfacing, TSI,
roof, or miscellaneous
Location Observed Condition Friability Potential for
Disturbance
Amount
(SF/LF)
Result
S-3A, 3B, 3C Transite Shingle Roof?East Area Damaged Yes Moderate Limited
<100 SF
10% Chryostile
S-6A Fibrous Layer Roof?North Central Area Damaged Yes Moderate Limited
<100 SF
20% Chryostile
S-10A, 10B White Thin Floor Tile Miscellaneous West Area Damaged Yes Moderate 100 SF 3% ChrysotileS-12A, 12B Green Floor Tile Miscellaneous South Area Damaged Yes Moderate 150 SF 4% Chrysotile
S-12A, 12B Mastic Miscellaneous South Area Damaged Yes Moderate 150 SF <1% Chrysotile
Notes:ACM = Asbestos Containing Material
Samples analyzed for asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM)TSI = Thermal System Insulation
SF = Square Feet LF = Linear Feet
Bold = ACMSP = Stop Positive

Table 2 : Results of the Limited Asbestos Survey on December 09, 2015.
Former Kesler Mill
423 North Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue
Salisbury, North Carolina
Bulk Homogeneous Area Result
Sample Material
S-1A, 1B, 1C Tar North Area ND, ND, ND
S-1A, 1B, 1C Felt North Area ND, ND, NDS-2A, 2B, 2C Felt North Area ND, ND, NDS-3A, 3B, 3C Transite Shingle East Area 10% ChryostileS-4A, 4B, 4C,Tar w/ Rocks East Area ND, ND, NDS-4A, 4B, 4C,Felt East Area ND, ND, ND
S-5A, 5B, 5C Tar East Area ND, ND, ND
S-5A, 5B, 5C Felt East Area ND, ND, ND
S-6A, 6B, 6C Tar North Central Area ND, ND, ND
S-6A Fibrous Layer North Central Area 20% Chryostile
S-6B, 6C Silver Paint North Central Area ND, ND
S-6B, 6C Tar North Central Area ND, ND
S-7A, 7B, 7C Layered Material North Central Area ND, ND, ND
S-8A, 8B, 8C Tar North Area ND, ND, ND
S-8A, 8B, 8C Glass Layer North Area ND, ND, ND
S-9A, 9B, 9C Tar w/ Rocks North Central Area ND, ND, ND
S-9A, 9B, 9C Cellulose Layer North Central Area ND, ND, ND
S-10A, 10B Thick Floor Tile - 12"x12" Tile West Area ND, ND
S-10A, 10B Mastic - 12"x12" Tile West Area ND, ND
S-10A, 10B Thin Floor Tile - 12"x12" Tile West Area 3% Chryostile
S-11A, 11B, 11C Tar West Area ND, ND, ND
S-11A, 11B, 11C Glass Layer West Area ND, ND, ND
S-12A, 12B White Floor Tile - 12"x12"South Area ND, ND
S-12A, 12B Mastic - 12"x12"South Area ND, ND
S-12A, 12B Green Floor Tile - 12"x12"South Area 4% Chryostile
S-12A, 12B Mastic - 12"x12"South Area <1% Chryostile
S-13A, 13B Floor Tile - 12"x12"South Area ND, ND
S-14A, 14B, 14C, 14D, 14E,
14F, 14G
Aerocell/Cardboard South Area ND, ND, ND, ND, ND, ND, ND
S-15A, 15B, 15C Shingles Central Area ND, ND, ND
S-16A, 16B, 16C Shingles South Area ND, ND, ND
S-17A, 17B, 17C Shingles Central Area ND, ND, ND
S-18A, 18B, 18C Felt Central Area ND, ND, ND
Notes:ACM = Asbestos Containing Material
Samples analyzed for asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM)
ND = No Asbestos Detected
SP - Stop Positive
Bold = ACM