19049_Regal_Mfg_Limited_Phase II_200706

Tech
3343 Peachtree Road N E • Suite M-20A • Atlanta GA 30326
CO:\riDE:'\'TIAL
LIMITED PHASE ll SITE INVESTIGATION
Prepared by :
Adrienne C. Brooks
Environn1cntal Consultant
TaMe
QA QC
FOR~1ER REGAL l\1A!\1JFACTURL'\G
212 12TII A VE!\'l:E 1\lE
HICKORY, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR
WORLDTEX, INC.
HICKORY, NOR Til CAROLINA
PREPARED BY
GAlA TECII L'\CORPORA TED
ATLA~TA, GEORGIA
JUNE2007
Technical Review and
Concurrence b> :
~cW~/~
Dave Buchal£er, P.E.
Environn1ental Manager -Atlanta
GAIA TECH PROJECT No. 6330-420-1
Al'anta • Cal.lorn•a ,OC) · Ch ca;o · Colorado · D-1llas • Oenve1 • Hartfor.:t • ~u 11 · Wanchester (UK)
CONFIDENTIAL
C \I~Tl::C:Il l\CORPORHED Confidential
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
EXECUTIVE Slr.\11\IARY ................................................................................. i
1.0 IN'TRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1
l.l Site Description and Background 0 0 •••• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 . 0 . 0 0 •••••• 0. 0 1
1.2 Scope of Work 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 •• 0 . 0 ••• 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 •• 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 •• 0 . 0 •• 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 •• 0 •• 0 ••• 0. 0 •• 0 ••• 0 0 •• 0. 0 2
1 03 Geology and Hydrogeology 00 o•··o 0 ·o 0 ·o···o 0 0 o ••••• o •• 0 •• o •••• o ·o 0 0 0 0 0 00 000 0 O o o o OoO oo •• 3
2.0 SOIL SA..\IPLING .................................................................................. 4
2.1 J\tethodology 0 0 ........ 0 .. 0 0 0 0 ............ 0 ... 0 ..... 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 .... 0 0 0 0 ......... 0 .. 0 0 0 0 ...... 0 4
202 Soil Regulatory Standards ............................................................... 5
203 Soil Sampling Resu lts .................................................................... 5
204 Sununary. 0 0. 0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 •• 0 0 0. 0 0 0 ••• 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0. 0 . 0 •• 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 •••• 0 •• 0. 0 0 •• 0 5
3.0 GROUNDWATER SAl\1PLING ................................................................ 6
3. I 1'v1ethodology 0 0 0. 0 . 0 0 0 0 ••• 0 ••••• 0 . 0. 0 0 0 0 ••• 0. 0 •• 0 ••••• 0 ••••• 0 •• 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0 6
3.2 Groundwater Regulatory Standards ................................................... 6
3.3 Groundwater Sampling Results ........................................................ 0 7
304 Sunm1ary. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0. 0 ••• 0 0 •• 0 0. 0. 0 0. 0 0 0 ••• 0 0 •• 0 0 0 0 •• 0. 0 0. 0 •••• 0. 0 0 •• 0 ••• 0 . 0 •• 0 •• 0 0 ••• 0 0 •• 0. 7
.t.O CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................... 8
5.0 LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................... 9
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Soil Analytical Resuhs
Groundwater Analytical Results
List of Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Site Location Map (Topographic)
Site Plan with Boring Locations
List of Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
Boring Logs
Laboratory Analytical Reports
Project No 6330-420-1 Fonner Regal Manufacrunng
llickory. North Carolina
.... ·····-·· .... ···········-.
G \II\ TECH hCORPOR.\TU> Confidernial
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Worldtex, Inc. (Worldtex) retained GaiaTecb Incorporated to conduct a Limited Phase II Site
Investigation of the Former Regal Manufacturing (Regal) facility located at 212 12lh Avenue NE in
Hickory, Catawba County, North Carolina. The purpose of this investigation was two-fold. The
first goal was to evaluate whether subsurface contamination existed on site. The second goal, if
contamination was tdentified on site, was to evaluate whether the site is the source of contaminants
or the source is off site and bas migrated onto the site.
The site consists of three contiguous parcels totaling 2.03 acres of land located between 12lh
A venue NE and lllh A venue NE. These parcels make up the fonner manufacturing area of the
site. In addition to these parcels, a 0.61-acre parking area is located across lllh Avenue NE to the
south of the manufacturing portion of the site. Approximately 60% of the area of the
manufacturing portion of the site is occupied by buildings. The remainder consists of asphalt and
concrete-paved parking and loading areas and a small grassy tract along the northern side of the
building. The parking area across lllh Avenue NE is fenced and paved.
The site is currently vacant and unused. From as early as 1956, the site operated as a textile
manufacturing facility. Regal, the most recent occupant of the site, manufactured elastic yam on
site from the 1960s until 1999 when manufacturing operations ceased.
The surrounding properties consisted of primarily commercial and industrial properties from as
early as the 1950s.
GaiaTech conducted an Impact Review of the site in February 2007 that evaluated two previous
GaiaTech reports (2001 Phase I and 2002 Phase II) and an EnviroAssessments, PLLC (EA) report
(2007 Phase l), as well as regulatory documemation pertaining to several leaking underground
storage tank facilities in the vicinity of the site. This review identified tetrachloroethylene (PCE)
and trichloroeth}lene (TCE) on an adjacent property.
On February 28 and March 5-6, 2007, Gaia Tech installed and sampled a total of 6 soil borings
(SB-1 through SB-6) and four monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-4) at the site. Three soil
samples and four groundwater samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
Two soil samples were analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). In addition, a sample
of oil from the hydraulic lift on site was analyzed for the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs).
GaiaTech returned to the site on April 5, 2007 to install three soil borings (SB-8 through SB-10)
along the western property boundary. Three soil samples and three groundwater samples were
collected for analysis of VOCs.
Based on soil screening and sampling results, no evidence of impact to site soils was identified
during the installation of soil borings.
ProJect !'<o. 6330-420-1 Formcor Regal ~1anufacrunng
l11ckory. Nor!h Carolina
G \lA TECH l:\CORPORAT£0 Confidential
Analytical results indicated that PCE concemrations in MW-1, MW-2, and SB-9 and TCE
concentrations in MW -2 and SB-9 exceed the Class GA standard, the most stringent groundwater
standard in North Carolina. According to the regulatory standard, the discovery of these
concentrations must be reported tO the North Carolina Deparonent of Environmental and Natural
Resources' (NCDENR's) Inactive Site's Group within 90 days of discovery.
ProJect No. 6330410-1
ii
Former RL-gal .\1anufacwring
Hiclory. Nonh Carolina
G \I\ TECIII:O.CORI'OR \TU> Confidentilll
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Worldtex, Inc. (Worldtex) retained GaiaTech Incorporated to conduct a Limited Phase II Site
Investigation of the Former Regal Manufacturing (Regal) facility located at 212 12th Avenue NE in
Hickory. Catawba County, North Carolina. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate
whether subsurface impacts exist on site.
1.1 Site Description and Background
The site consists of three contiguous parcels totaling 2.03 acres of land located between
12111 A venue NE and 11 111 A venue NE. These parcels make up the manufacturing area of the
site. In addition to these parcels, a 0.61 -acre parking area is located across ll th Avenue NE
to the south of the manufacturing portion of the site. The northernmost parcel of the
manufacturing portion of the site is occupied by a large manufacturing building including
an office area and two smaller manufacturing buildings along the western property
boundary. The southern two parcels are occupied by a loading dock associated with the
manufacturing building and two smaller buildings. Approximately 60% of the area of the
manufacturing portion of the site is occupied by buildings. The remainder consists of
asphalt and concrete-paved parking and loading areas and a small grassy tract along the
northern side of the building.
The site is currently vacant and unused. From as early as 1956, the site operated as a
textile manufacturing facility. Historical occupants include Reaco Hosiery Mills, Madaris
Hosiery Mills, the Elastic corporation, and Realspan Corporation. In the 1960s, an
automotive repair business operated in one of the smaller buildings located to the south of
the manufacturing building. Regal, the most recent occupant of the site, manufactured
elastic yarn on site from the 1960s until 1999 when manufacturing operations on site
ceased.
According to representatives of Worldtex, Regal utilize some hazardous chemicals in its
maintenance processes. Details regarding historical operations, prior to Regal's, are not
known. As a result, there is a potential for impacts to the site resulting from historical on-
site operations.
The surrounding properties consisted of primarily commercial and industrial properties
from as earl] as the 1950s. Two gasoline stations and a self-serve car wash have bordered
the manufacturing portion of the site to the west since at least 1961. The manufacturing
portion of the site was bordered to the north, across 12m Avenue NE, by a gasoline station,
dwelling, and textile manufacturing facility. These properties are currently occupied by a
church, TCBY Frozen Yogurt store, and a vacant paved parking lot (which was previously
occupied by DunMore Furniture). The site has been bordered to the east, across 3rd Street,
by Hickory High School since at least 1973. The manufacturing portion of the site is
Projc:c1 !'1/o. 6330-420-1 Former Regal Manufacrurmg
Hickory, 1'\onh Carolina
GAI\TECII hCORPORATED Confidential
bordered to the south across lllh A venue NE by the parking lot associated with Regal, a
restaurant, and commercial retail facilities. These properties were historically residential
and retail.
GaiaTech conducted a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the site in
November 2001 that identified potential impacts to the site from the former underground
storage tank (USn, hydraulic lift, historical textile manufacturing operations, and potential
impacts from leaking UST and hazardous waste generating facilities in the vicinity of the
site.
Subsequent to GaiaTech's Phase I ESA, a Focused Phase n Investigation was conducted by
GaiaTech in January 2002 to evaluate potential impacts in the vicinity of the former UST.
No evidence of in1pact to soil was identified. However, no groundwater san1ples were
obtained.
An Impact Review of the site was conducted by Gaia Tech in February 2007. Gaia Tech
evaluated the previous reports, as well as regulatory documents related to nearby UST
facilities including Viewmont Exxon and Servco, each located adjacent to the west of the
site. This review concluded that the Viewmont Exxon and Servco facilities have bad
releases of petroleum products. In addition, PCE and TCE were observed in groundwater
cotlected at the Servco facility.
In an effort to determine whether the site bas been impacted b) contaminants observed at
the adjacent property and whether these contaminants might have originated on site,
GaiaTech targeted the investigation to evaluate areas downgradient and upgradient of the
manufacturing plant. A comparison of these results will aid in pinpointing the source of
potential contaminants. It is possible that the PCE and TCE have multiple sources.
1.2 Scope of Work
On February 28 and March 5-6, 2007, Gaia Tech installed and san1pled a total of 6 soil
borings and four monitoring wells at the site. Three soil san1ples and four groundwater
san1ples were analyzed for: volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Two soil samples were
analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). In addition, a sample of oil from the
hydraulic lift on site was analyzed for the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
The locations of the borings are rationalized as follows.
• Two borings (SB-1 and SB-2) were installed in areas downgradient of the
manufacturing building and near the location of a monitoring well where elevated
concentrations of chlorinated solvents were observed at an adjacent property.
• Two borings (SB-3 and SB-4) were installed upgradient of the manufacturing
building to assess the potential for migration of contaminants to the site from an
upgradient off-site source.
Project No. 6330-U0-1
2
Former Regal Manufacturmg
Hickory. Nonh Carolina
0 L ••• 0 0 ee oo ••• -•• o • 00 e o --e ------· ... -e e-o o 00
GAIATECII "CORPOR\TI.D Confidential
• Two borings (SB-5 and SB-6) were installed to evaluate potential impacts from a
release of oil from the hydraulic lift on site.
On April 5, 2007, Gaia Tech returned to the site to install three soil borings along the
western property boundary. One soil sample and one groundwater sample was collected
from each boring for analysis of VOCs. The locations of the borings are rationalized as
follows.
• One boring (SB-9) was installed within the plant building near the southwestern corner
of the site building. This boring was placed in an area upgradient of a monitoring well
where elevated concentrations of chlorinated solvents were observed at an adjacent
property.
• Two borings (SB-8 and SB-10) were installed in the northwestern corner of the sire in
areas upgradient and cross gradient of the manufacturing building to assess the potential
for migration of contaminants to the site from an off-site source.
1.3 Geology and Hydrogeology
According to the Soil Survey of Catawba County, N011h Carolina, site soils are classified
as Cecil Sandy Loam with 2 to 6 percent slopes. The Cecil series consists of well-drained
soils on uplands. These soils formed in residuum from acidic rock, including granite-gneiss
and granite. It is a well-drained soil on fairly smooth, broad ridges and uplands. Typically,
the surface layer is dark grayish-brown and brown sandy loam approximately 7 inches
thick. The subsoil is approximately 43 inches thick and is dominantly red, firm clay in the
upper part and red, friable clay loam monied with brown in the lower part. The
substratum, to a depth of approximately 75 inches, is mottled red and brown sandy loam.
During GaiaTecb's investigation, the subsurface materials typically encountered in the soil
borings consisted of micaceous silty sands that were mottled with (red, black, and yellow)
clayey pockets and intersected by loose seams of weathered rock fragments. In general,
GaiaTech observed severely weathered rock at depths ranging from approximately 20 feet
to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) across the site. Less severely weathered rock was
encountered at depths ranging from approximately 30 to 40 feet bgs across the site. Within
the 40-45 ft bgs extent of this investigation, competent rock was encountered in the area
approximated by the southwestern corner of the plant at approximately 35 feet bgs.
Groundwater was observed ar depths ranging from approximately 30 to 37 feet bgs
throughout the site. Based on measurements collected during the field component of this
assessment, groundwater at the site is flowing in a southwesterly direction.
ProJeCt No. 6330-<120-1
3
Former Regal Manufacturing
Htc~ory. North Carolina
G 'lA TLCII l''CORPORATED Confidential
2.0 SOIL SAMPLING
2.1 Methodology
Prior to conducting field activities, GaiaTech completed a subsurface utility clearance
through the North Carolina One Call Center.
On February 28, March 5-6, 2007, and Apri15, 2007, GaiaTech supervised the installation
of 8 soil borings using a truck-mounted Geoprobe~ unit to depths ranging from 12 to 40
feet bgs. During boring installation, continuous soil samples were collected using a five-
foot stainless steel macrocore sampling system with disposable acetate liners. Upon
retrieval from the sample liner, soils were visually inspected for evidence of contamination
and described on the basis of lithology, color, texture, odor, and relative moisture. Boring
logs are presented in Appendix A.
Representative samples from each tube were split into separate sample bags: one used for
field screening and the other for laboratory analyses (as described below). Field screening
was accomplished using a portable photo-ionization detector (PID) equipped with a l0.6eV
lamp, calibrated to a 100 volumetric parts per million (ppmv) isobutylene standard.
Specific procedures in screening soils are as follows:
• The soil sample was sealed in a ziploc bag.
• The sample bag was labeled with the boring number and sample interval.
• The sample was allowed to reach ambient temperature.
• The PID was inserted into the headspace above the soil-air interface.
• The maxin1um PID reading was recorded for each sample.
The soil sample from each boring that exhibited the highest PID reading was selected for
laboratory analysis. The bagged portions of selected san1ples were placed into laboratory
prepared sample bottles and submitted under strict chain-of-custody procedures to
Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia.
To avoid cross contanlination. all down-hole soil boring and non-dedicated sampling
equipmem was decomarninated using an Alconox·/water solution and water rinse.
Soil borings SB-1 through SB-4 were converted to temporary 2-inch diameter monitoring
wells (see Section 3.0) to facilitate the collection of groundwater samples. Soil borings SB-
8 through SB-9 were converted to temporary l-inch diameter temporary monitoring wells
(see Section 3.0) to facilitate the collection of groundwater samples. Upon receipt of
analytical results, GaiaTech along with Worldtex determined that the wells should be
converted to permanent monitoring wells to facilitate furure sampling needs at the site.
In addition to these borings, GaiaTech collected soil samples from a depth of
approxinlately 1.5 feet bgs from two shallow hand auger borings installed near the
ProJect No. 6330-420-1
4
Former Regal!>.bnufacturmg
HiclOI), North Carolina
G \ lA TECH l '\C'ORPORATI:.D C01ifide11tial
hydraulic lift on site. These samples were placed directly into laboratory prepared bottles
and submitted under strict chain-of-custody procedures to Analytical Environmental
Services, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia.
2.2 Soil Regulatory Standards
Comaminated Soil Clean-Up Levels (Table 3) of the Groundwater Section Guidelines for
the Investigation and Remediation of Soil and Groundwater prepared by the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water establish target concentrations for
contaminants in soil.
2.3 Soil Sampling Results
The soil analytical results are presented in Table l. The approximate locations of the
borings are shown on Figure 2. Complete laboratory analytical reports are included in
Appendix B. No chemicals were identified at concentrations greater than the laboratory
detection limits in any soil boring.
2.4 Summary
Based on soil screening and sampling results, no evidence of impact to site soils was
identified during the installation of soil borings.
ProJect :-;o. 6330-420-1
5
Former R~al Manufacruriog
Hickory, l\orth Carolina
.. ········ .... ~-........... ·····-··· ·------
G \L~ Tf.CIIl'I;CORPORATEO Conjidmtial
3.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
3.1 Methodology
In order to evaluate potential impacts to groundwater, four borings SB-1, SB-2, SB-3, and
SB-4) were over-drilled using hollow-stem augers (SB-1) and air rotary (SB-2, SB-3, and
SB-4) in order to construct permanent groundwater monitoring wells. Permanent wells
were constructed by inserting 2-inch diameter PVC screen and riser into the borehole.
Temporary wells were screened to intercept the shallow groundwater table using 0.010-
inch rnachine-sloned screen. A silica-sand pack was placed in the annulus to a depth of one
foot above the top of the screen. A two-foot bentonite plug was then placed over the sand
pack to seal the screen, and prevent the infiltration of surface water. Cemem grout was
used to fill the remainder of the borehole to a depth of approximately 6 inches bgs.
Permanent wells were completed with flush-mount man hole covers.
The monitoring wells were purged and sampled using a submersible pump utilizing
disposable/dedicated tubing. The submersible portions of the pump were decontaminated
using an Alconox·/water solution and water rinse. Groundwater samples were collected
directly into laboratory prepared containers with the appropriate preservative, labeled and
placed on ice for transportation. Samples were delivered under strict chain-of-custody
procedures to Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. of Norcross, Georgia.
After receipt of groundwater analytical results, the temporary wells were converted to
permanent groundwater monitoring wells b) grouting from the bentonite plug to the
surface and finishing with a flush mount manhole cover and concrete pad.
On April5, 2007, GaiaTech collected an additional three groundwater samples from soil
borings SB-8, SB-9, and SB-10. Soil borings were converted to temporary wells by
inserting a length of l-inch diameter PVC screen and riser into the borehole. Using a
peristaltic pump with dedicated tubing, one groundwater san1ple was collected from each
boring. Following san1ple collection, the PVC screen and riser were removed and the
boring backfilled with bentonite and grout.
3.2 Groundwater Regulatory Standards
Class GA Standards outlined in the North Carolina Administrative Code Title 15A,
Subchapter 2L, Section 0202 (15A NCAC 2L.0202 are the applicable regulatory standards
for this investigation.
ProJecl 1\o. 6330-420-1
6
Former Regal Manufactunng
Hickory. Nonh Carolina
G \1 \ TECill,CORPOR \ Tl:.O Co11fidt11tial
3.3 Groundwater Sampling Results
The groundwater sampling results are presented below and are summarized in Table 2.
Monitoring well locations are shown on Figure 1. The laboratory analytical data sheets are
included in Appendix B.
PCE was identified in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, and SB-9 at concentrations of 84,
280, and 120 JLg/L, respectively. These concentrations exceed the 0.7 JLg/L Class GA
Standard for PCE. TCE was identified in monitoring wells MW-2 and SB-9 at
concentrations of 58 and 5.9 JLgi L, which exceed the 2.8 p..g/L Class GA Standard. No
other contaminants were identified at concentrations greater than the Class GA
Groundwater Standards.
3.4 Summary
Analytical results indicated that PCE concentrations in MW -1, MW -2, and SB-9 and TCE
concentrations in MW-2 and SB-9 exceed the Class GA standard. According to the
regulatory standard, the discovery of these concentrations must be reported to the North
Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources' (NCDENR's) Inactive
Site's Group within 90 days of discovery.
ProJ~"CI !';o. 633()..420-1
7
Former Regal Manufacruring
Hcckory . North Carohna
G \I \ TECII b CORPOR,\ TED Confidential
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
On February 28 and March 5-6, 2007, Gaia Tech installed and sampled a total of 6 soil borings and
four monitoring wells at the site. Three soil samples and four groundwater samples were analyzed
for: VOCs. Two soil samples were analyzed for TPH. In addition, a sample of lift oil from the
hydraulic on site was analyzed for the presence of (PCBs.
GaiaTech returned to the site on April 5, 2007 to install three soil borings (SB-8 through SB-10)
along the western property boundary. Three soil samples and three groundwater samples were
collected for analysis of VOCs
Based on soil screening and sampling results, no evidence of impact to site soils was identified
during the installation of soil borings.
Analytical results indicated that PCE concentrations in MW-1, MW-2, and SB-9 and TCE
concentrations in MW-2 and SB-9 exceed the Class GA standard. According to the regulatory
standard, the discovery of these concentrations must be reported to the NCDENR's Inactive Sire's
Group within 90 days of discovery.
ProJeCl :-lo 6330-U0-1
8
Fonner Regal !l.tanufacwring
Hic~ory. Nonh Carolina
GAIATECII l'CORPOR\TED Confidential
5.0 LIMITATIONS
This report is prepared for the sole benefit Worldtex, Inc. and may not be relied upon by any other
person or entity. This report and the findings shaH not, in whole or in part, be distributed or
transmitted to any other party, nor used by any other party, without the prior written consent of
Gaia Tech.
Gaia Tech has conducted these professional services in accordance with current scientific principles
and industrial standards of practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering on the
date the work was conducted and in the same geographical area of the subject site for similar
studies. GaiaTech's findings and recommendations must be considered as professional opinions
based upon the limited data collected during the course of the environmental site investigation,
which is Limited in time and scope. Gaia Tech makes no warranty, express or implied.
Only a limited number of soil and groundwater samples were collected from widely spaced soil
borings. The variations among these samples and results may not become evident until further
investigation. In the event that more data are available, it may be necessary to re-assess the
conditions of the subject site in order to revise the conclusions and recommendations contained in
this report.
An independent laboratory has performed chemical analyses. GaiaTech has derived the findings
and recommendations, in part, from these reports. These findings are contingent upon the validity
of the analytical reports.
Limited soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for specific parameters as detailed in the
report. Other chemical compounds, which were nor analyzed for, may exist at the site, although
unlikely based upon available information.
Project No. 6330420-1
9
Former Regal Manufacrunng
Htcl..ory. Nonh Carohna
Tables
• Table 1 Soil Analytical Results
• Table 2 Groundwater Analytical Results
Project No. 6330-420-1
Sample Identification SB-1
Depth in ft hgs 25'-27'
Date 2/28/07
Table 1
Soil Analytical Results
February/March 2007
SB-3 SB-4 SB-5
10'-12' 33 '-35' 1.5 '
2/28/07 2/28/07 3/5/07
SB-6
1.5'
3/5/07
VOC's-EPA Method mg/kg mg/J.;g
82608
All Consutuents <BRL <BRL <BRL NA NA
frPII-EPA Method 90718 mg/kg mg. kg
rr_Pn
BRL-below laboratory reporting limit
NA -Not analyzed
NA NA NA < 136
•Results compared to Cleanup Requirements for contaminated Soil outlined in
Grou ndwater Secuon Guidelines for the lnvcstigauon and Remediation ul Soil and
Groundwater (July 2000)
< 134
SB-8 SB-9
23'-25' 7'-10'
4/5/07 4/5/07
<BRL <BRL
NA NA
l'omltl Rt.:gal Manufacturing
212 12th Avenue NE
Hickory, North Carolina
SB-10
15'-17'
4/5/07
<BRL
NA
ProJ~Ct No 6330-420-1
Sample ldenuficauon Class GA
Date Standard~
\ OC~ -El• A Met hod pg!L 82608
Acetone 700
·ts-1.2-Dtchlnro~thenc 70
ifetrachloroethenc 07
fnchloroethcne 2 8
Notes
MW-1
3/5/2007
59
<5.0
84
<5 o•
Table 2
Groundwater Analltical Results
February/March 2007
MW-2 MW-3 MW-4
3/6/2007 3/6/2007 3/6/2007
N:IL
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0
62 <5.0 <5.0
280 <5.0 <5.0
58 <5.0* <s.o•
I . Results compared to Class GA Standards outhned 111 North Caroltna AdmmtstratJvc Code
Tule 15A. Subchapter 2L, Sec11on 0202 (15A NCAC 2L.0202)
2. NA -Not Anal}'?.ed
3. Rt'Sults in Bold and Shaded exceed the ('lass GA Standarcl~
•Laboratory\ practJcal lJUltntttatJon ltmu exceeds the Class GA St;mdan.l Per 15A NC AC
21. 0202 the ltmtt acts as the standard
SB-8 SB-9
4/5/2007 4/5/2007
<50 <50
<5.0 <5 0
<5.0 120
<50 5.9
Former Rega l Manufacturmg
212 12th Avenue NE
lltckory, North Carolina
SB-10
4/512007
<50
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
Figures
• Figure 1 Site location Map (Topographic)
• Figure 2 Site Plan with Boring Locations
Quadrangle Location
Former Regall\lanufncturing
Hkkol"). North Carolina
Project No. 6330-420-1
1000
Scale I 24 000
Contour Interval 20 Feet
t 0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 fiOOO 7000 FH T
l .5 0
E3 E3 E3 E3 E3
1 KILOMETER
~~CE~~~~===========s
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
HICKORY A/1.'"0 BETHLEHEM QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROUNA-CATAWBA COUNTY
7 5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
1993
Site Location Map
l MIL£
Tech
CHURCH
PARKING
>-0.. 0 z
<(
(.)
w z
1-w w
C( EXXON 1-(/)
0 z N
SERVCO
CHEMICALS OF CONCERN IN GROUNDWATER INFORMATION
COC CONCENTRATION
IIWI PCE 14UGIL SB.a BRL
MW2 PCE 2IOUGIL ~-6.1 UGIL
TCE UUGIL TCE-120 UGIL
~ ~ ~
-ItT( IOU~QAR)'
D
12TH AVENUE NE
SB-8 ..
I
I
I SB-9 • l!::: ·-·
11TH AVENUE NE
-
1.00
PARKING
AREA
ASPHALT
PARKING
·-·-
w z
1-w w
C(
1-(/)
0 C(
('")
Tech
t -N-
I
...J
0 0 I (.)
(/)
I
<!)
I
SITE LAYOUT GROUNOWATER CONTOUR
ANO BORING LOCATION MAP
FORMER REGAL MANUFACTURING
212 12TH AVENUE NE En~ronmeatal Ronnmg fer Business HICKORY NC
OlliE SJirU 011»1\J ... .....
RJ ~111107 NTS 63~2().1