21014_Dicey Mills_Soil and Soil Vapor Assessment_20161019

i
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc
Soil and Soil Vapor Assessment Report
Former Dicey Mills Facility
430 Neisler Street
Shelby, North Carolina H&H Job No. DCY-001 Table of Contents
Section Page No.
1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................1
1.1 General Site Information .......................................................................................................1
1.2 Brief Assessment History ......................................................................................................2
2.0 Soil Assessment ........................................................................................................................6
2.1 Sampling Methodology .........................................................................................................6
2.2 Soil Results ............................................................................................................................7
3.0 Soil Vapor Assessment ............................................................................................................9
3.1 Sampling Methodology .........................................................................................................9
3.2 Sub-Slab Soil Vapor Results ...............................................................................................10
4.0 Receptor Survey ....................................................................................................................11
5.0 Summary ................................................................................................................................12

List of Tables

Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Table 2 Summary of Sub-Slab Soil Vapor Analytical Results

List of Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Receptor Survey
Figure 4 Soil Sample Location Map
Figure 5 Sub-Slab Sample Location Map
ii
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc

List of Appendices

Appendix A Brownfields Property Receptor Survey Form
Appendix B Boring Logs
Appendix C Laboratory Analytical Reports

1
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc
Soil and Soil Vapor Assessment Report Former Dicey Mills Facility 430 Neisler Street Shelby, North Carolina
H&H Job No. DCY-001

1.0 Introduction

Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) has prepared this Soil and Soil Vapor Assessment Report for the
former Dicey Mills facility located at 430 Neisler Street in Shelby, Cleveland County, North
Carolina (site or subject site). A Site Location Map is provided as Figure 1. A brief summary of
background information is provided below, and the methods and results of the soil and sub-slab
soil vapor assessment activities are provided in Sections 2.0 and 3.0. In addition, as part of the
assessment activities, H&H performed a receptor survey, and the results of the receptor survey
are presented in Section 4.0.

1.1 General Site Information

The site consists of three parcels that total 23.893 acres and is developed with an approximately
160,000 sq ft manufacturing building, an approximately 4,000 sq ft storage building, four process
water ponds, one freshwater pond, and associated parking areas. Dicey Mills currently owns the
site, which is leased to Valdese Weavers for yarn manufacturing. A Site Map is provided as
Figure 2.

The site was developed in the late 1950s with portions of the current building. The building was
expanded over time until the mid-1990s. From the late 1950s to the early 2000s, the site building
was utilized for weaving, fabric finishing, yarn manufacturing, olefin filament yarn extrusion,
and textile dyeing/printing operations. The site was used for weaving, fabric finishing, and olefin
filament yarn extrusion from the early 2000s until March 2015. Since that time, the site has been
used only for olefin filament yarn extrusion and yarn production by Valdese Weavers. It is
anticipated that Valdese Weavers will be moving from the facility in the near future.
2
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc

1.2 Brief Assessment History

Prior to conducting the Phase II ESA activities, H&H reviewed previously completed
environmental assessment reports prepared by H&H and others for the site. A brief summary of
the previous assessment activities is provided below.

UST Closure Report (Incident AS-1676)
H&H reviewed a UST Closure report from October 1996 completed by Royster Oil Company,
Inc. (Royster). Royster reported that a 20,000-gallon fuel oil UST and a 10,000-gallon fuel oil
UST were removed from the site from within two separate containment basins and confirmation
samples were collected from the base of the excavations. The soil samples were analyzed for oil
and grease by EPA Method 9071. Soil impacts were not identified above the DEQ action levels
at that time. DEQ initially registered the closure documentation as a leaking UST incident with
impacts present above action levels. However, following correspondence between the Site
owner, DEQ, and Royster, a Notice of No Further Action (NFA) was issued for the fuel oil
USTs.

UST Closure Report (Incident AS-1648)
H&H reviewed a UST Closure Report from February 1997 completed by Southeastern Geologic
Services, Inc. (SES). SES reported that a 1,000-gallon gasoline UST was discovered in January
1997 during construction of an addition to the site building. Following removal of the orphaned
UST, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) were identified above DEQ action levels in soil and
petroleum constituents were identified in groundwater above DEQ 2L Groundwater Standards
but below DEQ-defined Gross Contaminant Levels (GCLs) in a monitoring well located
immediately adjacent to the orphaned UST location. Downgradient monitoring wells did not
contain impacts above laboratory method detection limits.

DEQ issued a Notice of NFA for the release in August 1998. The NFA indicates that
groundwater on the site is not suitable for use as a water supply well and that the site is not
suitable for residential use (including homes, daycare centers, schools, or recreation areas).
3
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc
Limited Phase II ESA
H&H was provided with a Limited Phase II ESA completed by Blue Ridge Environmental
Services, Inc. (BRE) in February 2016. BRE advanced two soil borings and installed two
temporary monitoring wells to evaluate the potential for impact associated with the ponds. The
soil borings were advanced within Pond #1 and Pond #2, and the temporary monitoring wells
were installed south of Pond #2 and west of Pond #4. Results of analysis of the samples
indicated bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, antimony, and cobalt were detected at concentrations
above the DEQ Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Protection of Groundwater Preliminary
Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs), although background concentrations of metals were not
determined. The results of analysis of the groundwater samples indicated the presence of
trichloroethene (TCE) downgradient of Pond #2 at a concentration of 9.10 µg/L (versus the North
Carolina 2L Groundwater Standard of 3 µg/L). Several metals were also detected above 2L
Standards in the samples but may have been associated with sample turbidity.

Phase I ESA
In June 2016, H&H conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the site.
Based on the findings of the Phase I ESA, we identified the following Recognized Environmental
Conditions (RECs) in connection with the site:

• The site building was utilized for yarn manufacturing and textile dyeing/printing from the
late 1950s to early 2000s (approximately 45 years). The site contact reported that
chemical usage associated with the former dyeing/printing operations included the use of
solvent based dyes. Multiple floor drains were identified in the former dye and printing
areas that collect wastewater from site operations. This historically included wastewater
from the dye house and printing operations and currently includes wastewater from the
active operations including the yarn extrusion area, small air compressor room floor
drain, boiler room, and yarn weaving area.

• H&H observed a 500-gallon used oil aboveground storage tank (AST) located northeast
of the site building within a concrete block secondary containment system with a concrete
4
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc
base. H&H observed staining to the exterior of the containment system onto an unpaved
surface that appeared to be leaking from the containment basin. H&H also observed two
air compressor rooms located on the northern portion of the site building. The larger of
the two air compressor room contains approximately six compressors that discharge oily
water from the system to a concrete floor within a secondary containment dike. H&H
observed evidence of overflowing of the concrete dike and migration of oily water to an
unpaved gravel surface.

• The EDR environmental database report indicates that the site contains a 20,000-gallon
fuel oil underground storage tank (UST) that was installed in 1975. H&H observed a
vent pipe and fill port to the east of the site building that the site contact indicated are
associated with the UST. He indicated that the UST was previously filled with sand but
was not aware of closure documentation. H&H removed the fill port for the UST and
observed standing water at a depth of approximately 10 ft bgs.

• The floor drains that collect wastewater connect to an outfall pipe to the south of the site
building, which discharges into a series of ponds located south and west of the building.
The outfall pipe from the plant discharges to Pond #1, Pond #1 discharges into Pond #2,
Pond #2 discharges into Pond #4, and the discharge from Pond #4 enters the municipal
sewer system. The ponds are unlined and the site contact indicated they currently contain
predominantly rainwater based on the small scale of operations. An out of use process
water pond (Pond #3) is also located south of the site building that was historically
utilized to store excess process water prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer. At that
time, the process water was routed from the discharge pipe to Pond #1, Pond #2, Pond #3,
Pond #4, and finally the sanitary sewer system.
To further assess the potential for impact from historical operations, H&H performed soil and
soil vapor assessment activities at the site in August 2016. H&H’s assessment activities focused
on evaluating potential risks associated with redevelopment of the site and included collection
and analysis of soil samples from exterior locations on the site to evaluate potential concerns
associated with direct contact with soil and collection and analysis of sub-slab soil vapor samples
5
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc
to evaluate the vapor intrusion pathway. Please note that concurrent with the soil and soil vapor
assessment, H&H also conducted assessment of sediment in the ponds at the site. The methods
and results of the pond sediment assessment are contained in a separate report.

6
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc
2.0 Soil Assessment

On August 12, 2016, H&H completed soil assessment activities at the site to evaluate the
potential for shallow soil impacts in exterior areas. Details of soil sampling activities and results
are provided in the following sections.

Prior to conducting the assessment activities, H&H contacted North Carolina One-Call, the
public utility locator, to mark subsurface utilities located on the site. H&H also contracted with
Probe Utility Locating, a private utility locator, to screen the proposed boring locations for
subgrade utilities.

2.1 Sampling Methodology

To evaluate the potential for shallow soil impacts, H&H advanced six soil borings at the site.
The soil borings were advanced in the following locations:
• at the fill port (SB-1) and adjacent to the downgradient end of the fuel oil UST (SB-2);
• adjacent to the air compressor room with observed staining (SB-3);
• adjacent to the waste oil AST with observed staining (SB-4);
• adjacent to the wastewater outfall pipe south of the main site building (SB-5); and
• adjacent to the former dye house (SB-6).

The soil boring locations are presented on Figure 4.

At each soil boring location, a decontaminated stainless steel hand auger was used to advance the
borings to a depth of up to 10 ft below ground surface (bgs). During boring advancement, soil
was logged for lithological description and field screened for indications of potential impacts by
visual observation of staining and the presence of organic vapors using a calibrated
photoionization detector (PID). Based upon field screening results, one soil sample was
collected from each soil boring at the interval most likely to be impacted based on the field
screening results. Boring logs for each soil boring are included in Appendix B.

7
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc
Following collection, the soil samples were placed into dedicated laboratory-supplied sample
containers and then packed in an iced cooler. The samples were delivered under chain-of-
custody protocol to Con-Test Analytical Laboratory (Con-Test). All soil samples were analyzed
for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 and semi-volatile organic
compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270. The sample collected from the air compressor
staining location (SB-3) was also analyzed for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by EPA Method
8082; and the samples collected from the waste oil AST (SB-4), near the wastewater outfall pipe
(SB-5), and near the dye house (SB-6) were also analyzed for Hazardous Substance List (HSL)
metals plus hexavalent chromium by EPA Methods 6020/7471/7196.

Additionally, H&H advanced two background soil borings from areas on the site that do not
appear to have been impacted by historical operations to evaluate site-specific background
concentrations of naturally occurring metals in soil for comparison to those detected in the soil
boring samples. The background samples were collected from the southwestern portion of the
site. The locations of the background samples, labeled Background-1 and Background-2, are
indicated in Figure 4. The background samples were collected from shallow soil (0-2 ft) at each
location. The background samples were shipped to Con-Test for analysis of HSL metals plus
hexavalent chromium by EPA Methods 6020/7471/7196.

Upon completion, the boreholes were abandoned by backfilling the holes with soil and bentonite.

2.2 Soil Results

Laboratory analytical results were compared to the DEQ IHSB Protection of Groundwater,
Residential, and Industrial PSRGs dated April 2016. Metal concentrations were first compared
to the site-specific background levels and regional background metals levels for North Carolina
soils as published in Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri (2005) before
comparison to the PSRGs. The results of analysis of the soil samples are summarized in Table 1,
and the laboratory analytical report is provided in Appendix C.

8
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc
VOCs
Laboratory analytical results indicate low levels of acetone were detected in two soil samples
(SB-2 and SB-5) at concentrations exceeding the laboratory reporting limits, but well below
PSRGs. The low level acetone detections are most likely a laboratory artifact.

SVOCs
Laboratory analytical results indicate that low concentrations of bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate were
detected in every soil sample and the associated laboratory method blank at estimated J-flagged
concentrations (a J-flag indicates a concentration exceeding the laboratory method detection
limits but below laboratory reporting limits). The estimated concentrations of bis (2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate are well below PSRGs. Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate is a common sampling and
laboratory artifact and, based upon its detection in the laboratory method blank, is most likely a
laboratory artifact.

Metals
The results of the metals analysis of the samples indicate that metals concentrations in the
potential areas of concern are consistent with site-specific and regional background levels, except
for the detection of hexavalent chromium at a concentration of 0.87 mg/kg in sample SB-5
(adjacent to the wastewater outfall pipe south of the main site building). The detected
concentration slightly exceeds the Residential PSRG of 0.3 mg/kg, but is below the Protection of
Groundwater and Industrial PSRGs.

PCBs
PCBs were not detected in the soil sample collected from boring SB-3.

9
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc
3.0 Soil Vapor Assessment

3.1 Sampling Methodology

On August 16, 2016, H&H collected eight sub-slab soil vapor samples to assess the potential for
vapor intrusion into the site buildings from underlying soil and/or groundwater impacts. The
locations of the sub-slab soil vapor samples are indicated in Figure 5. The sub-slab vapor
samples were collected from the following locations:
• in the vacant storage building (SS-1);
• in the former fabric printing area (SS-2);
• in the former dyehouse (SS-3 and a Duplicate);
• in the southeast portion of the main building (SS-4);
• in the west-central portion of the main building (SS-5);
• in the south-central portion of the main building (SS-6);
• in the north-central portion of the main building (SS-7); and
• in the northern portion of the main building (SS-8).

H&H installed each sub-slab soil vapor monitoring point (VMP) by drilling through the concrete
floor utilizing a concrete hammer drill with an approximate 0.75-inch diameter bit. Through
each of the drilled holes, H&H installed an approximate 0.625-inch diameter stainless steel probe
with approximate 2-inch long bottom screen point. The probes were installed through the gravel
beneath the concrete slab and seated in the underlying soil so that the soil gas probe screen is
present in both the soil and overlying gravel.

Each point was connected to the surface with Teflon tubing and sealed below the surface of the
concrete slab using hydrated bentonite. Prior to sampling, a field leak check was conducted at
each VMP by constructing a shroud around the sampling point and saturating the air within the
shroud with helium gas. A helium gas detector was then used to determine that the concentration
of helium in the shroud was a minimum of 80%. Using a syringe, a sample was collected from
the VMP and purged into a Tedlar® bag outside of the shroud. The helium gas detector was then
10
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc
used to measure helium concentrations in the Tedlar® bag and insure that any helium detected in
the bag was no more than 5% of the helium concentration detected in the shroud.

Following a successful field leak check, vapor samples were collected into six-liter Summa
canisters for laboratory analysis. The Summa canisters were allowed to fill slowly using an
airflow regulator set to 100 mL/min. Following collection of the sub-slab vapor samples, the
canisters were shipped under chain-of-custody protocol to Con-Test for analysis of VOCs by
EPA Method TO-15.

3.2 Sub-Slab Soil Vapor Results

The results of analysis of the sub-slab soil vapor samples are summarized in Table 2, and the
laboratory analytical data are provided in Appendix C. The data were compared to the DEQ
Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non-Residential Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs).

Analytical results indicate trichloroethylene (TCE) was detected in the sub-slab samples SS-1
(23,000 µg/m3), SS-5 (1,400 µg/m3), SS-6 (400 µg/m3), and SS-7 (2,900 µg/m3) at
concentrations exceeding the DWM Non-Residential SGSL of 175 µg/m3. These samples are
located below the storage building, and the western, north-central, and south-central portions of
the main building, respectively. Additionally, TCE was detected in sub-slab sample SS-8 at a
concentration of 160 µg/m3, which is slightly below the DWM Non-Residential SGSL. SS-8 is
located in the northern portion of the main building. No other VOCs were detected in the sub-
slab vapor samples above the DWM Non-Residential SGSLs.

11
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc
4.0 Receptor Survey

On August 18, 2016, H&H performed a receptor survey in accordance with Brownfields Program
guidance. A Receptor Survey Map is provided as Figure 3 and the Brownfields Receptor Survey
Form is presented in Appendix A. The survey included identification of surrounding and nearby
land use and an intensive pedestrian and vehicular survey for possible potable water supply
wells, surface water bodies, and surface water intakes used as a source of water within a 0.5-mile
radius of the site.

The site is bordered to the north by a solar farm, to the east by commercial warehouses, to the
west by the First Broad River with agricultural land located beyond, and to the north by vacant
land. The closest residential structure is located approximately 200 ft north of the site. Other
residences are located greater than 500 ft from the site.

The First Broad River borders the site to the west. Historical site operations were located
approximately 900 ft from the First Broad River. An intermittent tributary of the river borders
and crosses the southwest portion of the site.

H&H did not identify potable wells or surface water intakes in the search radius during the
survey. In addition, there are no sources of public drinking water identified within 0.5 mile of
the site based on the DEQ Source Water Assessment Program’s geographic information system
map. H&H contacted the City of Shelby Utility Department which indicated that municipal
water is available to the site and the area within a 0.5-mile radius of the site. The City of Shelby
obtains its water from the First Broad River which is located adjacent to the west of the site. The
City of Shelby water treatment plant intake is located approximately 5,800 ft northeast and
upriver from the site.
12
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Soil & SS Report\Ph II ESA Report.doc
5.0 Summary

In order to assess the potential risks associated with redevelopment of the site, H&H completed
soil and sub-slab soil assessment at the former Dicey Mills facility in August 2016. The
assessment activities included collection and analysis of samples from six soil borings and eight
sub-slab vapor samples. The results of our assessment are summarized below:

• The results of analysis of the soil samples did not indicate significant soil impacts in
exterior areas of the site. Hexavalent chromium was detected in the soil boring located
adjacent to the wastewater outfall pipe south of the main site building at a concentration
of 0.87 mg/kg, which slightly exceeds the Residential PSRG of 0.3 mg/kg, but is below
the Protection of Groundwater and Industrial PSRGs.

• The results of analysis of the sub-slab soil vapor samples indicate that TCE was detected
at concentrations exceeding the DWM Non-Residential SGSL in samples collected from
the vacant storage building, and the western, north-central, and south-central portions of
the main building. No other VOCs were detected at concentrations above the DWM
Non-Residential SGSLs.

• Potential receptors identified in the vicinity of the site are the First Broad River and its
tributary which border the site to the west and southwest. Historical site operations were
located approximately 900 ft from the First Broad River.

Table 1 Page 1 of 1)
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Dicey Mills
Shelby, North Carolina
H&H Job No. DCY-001
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Tables\Data Tables 2.xls
10/19/2016
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Location
Fuel Oil
UST
Fuel Oil
UST
Air
Compressor
Waste Oil
AST
Maintenance
Shop/Outfall
Pipe
Outside
Dyehouse
Sample ID Background-1 Background-2 SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 SB-6
Date 8/12/2016 8/12/2016 8/12/2016 8/12/2016 8/12/2016 8/12/2016 8/12/2016 8/12/2016
Depth (ft)Range Mean 0-2 0-2 0-2 6-8 0-2 0-2 0-2 0-2
VOCs (8260B) mg/kgAcetone 24 12,200 100,000 ----NA NA <0.12 0.18 <0.097 <0.12 0.8 <0.11
SVOCs (8270D) mg/kg
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 7.2 39 160 ----NA NA 0.29 J B 0.41 J B 0.34 J B 0.27 J B 0.29 J B 0.34 J B
PCBs (8082A) mg/kg -- -- -- -- -- NA NA NA NA ND NA NA NA
Metals (6020A/7471B/7196A) mg/kg
Antimony 0.9 6.2 94 <1.0 - 8.8*0.76 0.062 J <3.4 NA NA NA 0.034 J 0.051 J <3.3
Arsenic 5.8 0.68 3.0 1.0 - 18 4.8 4.2 5.2 NA NA NA 8.4 3.7 8.1
Beryllium 63 32 460 ND - 2.0 0.11 1.2 2.3 NA NA NA 0.82 1.1 1.7
Copper 700 620 9,400 3 - 100 34 4.4 J 7.7 J NA NA NA 3.1 J 3.6 J 8.9
Lead 270 400 800 ND - 50 16 20 25 NA NA NA 33 31 16
Manganese NS 360 5,200 <2.0 - 7,000*640 340 670 NA NA NA 150 280 390
Mercury 1.0 2.2 3.13 0.03 - 0.52 0.121 0.052 0.037 NA NA NA 0.026 J 0.056 0.034
Nickel 130 300 4,400 ND - 150 23 4.0 J 4.9 J NA NA NA 2.0 J 8.2 5.2 J
Silver 3.4 78 1,160 ND - 5.0 NS 0.042 J 0.052 J NA NA NA <0.13 <0.13 0.13 J
Thallium 0.28 0.156 2.4 NS NS 0.54 0.94 NA NA NA 0.25 0.4 1.1
Zinc 1,230 4,600 70,000 25 - 124 56 53 55 NA NA NA 23 38 80
Chromium NS NS NS 7.0 - 300 65 18 28 NA NA NA 18 8.2 18
Hexavalent Chromium 3.8 0.3 6.3 NS NS <0.91 <0.40 NA NA NA <0.39 0.87 <0.38Trivalent Chromium 360,000 24,000 100,000 NS NS 18 28 NA NA NA 18 7.33 18
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB)
Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (April 2016)
2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in
North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005
* = Range and mean values of background metals for Southeastern USA soils
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Only compounds detected in at least one sample shown
Bold values exceed background concentrations for metals and DEQ IHSB Protection of Groundwater PSRGs.
Bold and underlined indicates exceeds background for metals and Protection of Groundwater and Industrial PSRG
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses
ND = Not Detected; VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds; SVOCs = Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds; PCBs = polychlorinated biphenyls
J = estimated value between the laboratory detection limit and the laboratory reporting limit
B = analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample
NA = Not Analyzed; NS = Not Specified; -- = Not Applicable
Protection of
Groundwater
PSRGs (1) (mg/kg)
Residential
PSRGs (1)
(mg/kg)
Regional Background
Metals in Soil (2)
Background
Soil Borings
Industrial
PSRGs (1)
(mg/kg)
Screening Criteria
Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)
Summary of Sub-Slab Soil Vapor Analytical Results
Dicey Mills
Shelby, North Carolina
H&H Job No. DCY-001
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dicey Mills - DCY\Phase II ESA\Tables\Data Tables 2
10/13/2016
Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Ac
e
t
o
n
e
Be
n
z
e
n
e
2-
B
u
t
a
n
o
n
e

(
M
E
K
)
Ca
r
b
o
n

D
i
s
u
l
f
i
d
e
Ch
l
o
r
o
f
o
r
m
Cy
c
l
o
h
e
x
a
n
e
1,
4
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
Di
c
h
l
o
r
o
d
i
f
l
u
o
r
o
-
me
t
h
a
n
e

(
F
r
e
o
n

1
2
)
ci
s
-
1
,
2
-
Di
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
tr
a
n
s
-
1
,
2
-
Di
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
Et
h
a
n
o
l
Et
h
y
l

A
c
e
t
a
t
e
Et
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
He
p
t
a
n
e
SS-1 Storage Bldg 8/16/16 <190 <6.4 <240 <62 450 <6.9 <12 <9.9 92 <7.9 <150 <7.2 <8.7 <8.2
SS-2 Fabric Printing 8/16/16 180 <0.64 30 <6.2 <0.98 <0.69 7.4 1.6 <0.79 <0.79 90 5.5 <0.87 <0.82
SS-3 Dyehouse 8/16/16 130 0.65 <24 <6.2 <0.98 <0.69 5.8 1.5 <0.79 0.86 <15 <0.72 <0.87 <0.82
Duplicate (SS-3)Dyehouse 8/16/16 140 <0.64 <24 <6.2 <0.98 <0.69 5.5 1.3 <0.79 0.79 <15 6.4 <0.87 <0.82
SS-4 Southeast Bldg 8/16/16 340 <0.64 52.0 8.7 <0.98 <0.69 16 1.8 <0.79 9.6 <15 <0.72 1.10 <0.82
SS-5 West Bldg 8/16/16 120 <0.64 <24 <6.2 18 0.95 15 1.3 <0.79 9.4 <15 <0.72 <0.87 <0.82SS-6 South Central Bldg 8/16/16 140 1.5 <24 12 34 <0.69 10 1.7 4.4 5.3 <15 4.9 <0.87 1.2
SS-7 North Central Bldg 8/16/16 250 <0.64 45 17 30 <0.69 8.8 1.7 4.7 3.5 <15 <0.72 <0.87 <0.82
SS-8 North Bldg 8/16/16 97 <0.64 <24 <6.2 14 <0.69 20 1.7 4.1 34 <15 2.6 <0.87 <0.82
2,720,000 1,570 438,000 61,300 533 526,000 1,110 8,760 472 472 NS 6,130 4,910 NS
2-
H
e
x
a
n
o
n
e

(
M
B
K
)
Me
t
h
y
l

t
e
r
t
-
B
u
t
y
l

E
t
h
e
r

(M
T
B
E
)
4-
M
e
t
h
y
l
-
2
-
p
e
n
t
a
n
o
n
e

(M
I
B
K
)
Na
p
h
t
h
a
l
e
n
e
Te
t
ra
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
Te
t
r
a
h
y
d
r
o
f
u
r
a
n
To
l
u
e
n
e
1,
1
,
1
-
T
r
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
Tr
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
Tr
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
f
l
u
o
r
o
m
e
t
h
a
n
e

(F
r
e
o
n

1
1
)
1,
2
,
4
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
m&
p
-X
y
l
e
n
e
o-
X
y
l
e
n
e
SS-1 Storage Bldg 8/16/16 <8.2 <7.2 <8.2 <10 44 <5.9 <7.5 22 23,000 <45 <9.8 <17 <8.7
SS-2 Fabric Printing 8/16/16 10 <0.72 4.5 1.5 23 5.7 6.6 <1.1 <1.1 <4.5 1.8 <1.7 <0.87
SS-3 Dyehouse 8/16/16 2.3 <0.72 0.88 <1.0 46 2.3 1.1 <1.1 <1.1 7.3 1.4 <1.7 <0.87
Duplicate (SS-3)Dyehouse 8/16/16 1.3 <0.72 <0.82 <1.0 46 5.6 2.5 <1.1 <1.1 7.4 0.98 <1.7 <0.87
SS-4 Southeast Bldg 8/16/16 13 <0.72 3.0 1.5 260 6.7 2.4 <1.1 <1.1 <4.5 2.7 3.5 2.0SS-5 West Bldg 8/16/16 <0.82 0.75 1.5 <1.0 220 5.0 2.0 <1.1 1,400 <4.5 1.6 <1.7 0.99
SS-6 South Central Bldg 8/16/16 2.9 <0.72 1.6 1.1 260 3.5 1.6 <1.1 400 <4.5 1.7 <1.7 <0.87
SS-7 North Central Bldg 8/16/16 8.5 <0.72 6.5 1.4 210 8.4 6.3 <1.1 2,900 <4.5 1.9 <1.7 0.97
SS-8 North Bldg 8/16/16 11 <0.72 4.4 1.0 1,100 2.9 2.1 <1.1 160 <4.5 2.2 <1.7 1.2
2,630 47,200 263,000 263 3,500 175,000 438,000 438,000 175 NS 613 8,760 8,760
Notes
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM)
Non-Residential Sub-Slab Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (March 2016)
Bold values exceed a Non-Residential Sub-Slab Screening Level
Only compounds detected in at least one sample shown
NS = Not Specified
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
TO-15
Sa
m
p
l
e

I
D
Sa
m
p
l
i
n
g

D
a
t
e

An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

M
e
t
h
o
d
Non-Residential Screening Level (1)
µg/m3
Non-Residential Screening Level (1)
µg/m3An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l

M
e
t
h
o
d
Sa
m
p
l
i
n
g

D
a
t
e

Sa
m
p
l
e

I
D
TO-15
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
SITE LOCATION MAP
DICEY MILLS430 NEISLER STREETSHELBY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE NO:
6/15/2016 0
1DCY-001
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
N
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f)
SHELBY, NORTH CAROLINA 2002
SITE
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
HIGH-TENSION POWER LINES
JOB NO. DCY-001
REVISION NO. 0DATE: 10-14-16
FIGURE NO. 2
DICEY MILLS
430 NEISLER STREET
SHELBY, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE MAP
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
W
.

D
I
X
O
N

B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
COMMERCIAL WAREHOUSE
(439 NEISLER STREET)
NE
I
S
L
E
R

S
T
R
E
E
T
ME
L
O
D
Y

L
A
N
E
ST
R
O
U
D

R
O
A
D
VACANT
LAND
VACANT
LAND
COMMERCIAL WAREHOUSE
(NO ADDRESS)
DAYS INN
(1431 W. DIXON BOULEVARD)
VACANT LAND
SOLAR FARM
(NO ADDRESS)
RESIDENCE
(1609 W. DIXON BOULEVARD)
FIR
S
T

B
R
O
A
D

R
I
V
E
R
I
N
T
E
R
M
I
T
T
E
N
T

S
T
R
E
A
M
S:\
A
A
A
-
M
a
s
t
e
r

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
D
i
c
e
y

M
i
l
l
s

-

D
C
Y
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
S
i
t
e

M
a
p
.
d
w
g
,

F
I
G

2
,

1
0
/
1
4
/
2
0
1
6

3
:
5
0
:
2
0

P
M
,

z
b
a
r
l
o
w
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
JOB NO. DCY-001
REVISION NO. 0DATE: 10-14-16
FIGURE NO. 3
DICEY MILLS
430 NEISLER STREET
SHELBY, NORTH CAROLINA
RECEPTOR SURVEY
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
ANDREW JA
C
K
S
O
N

H
W
Y
1,500'
BUFFERW
.

D
I
X
O
N

B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
NE
I
S
L
E
R

S
T
R
E
E
T
ME
L
O
D
Y

L
A
N
E
ST
R
O
U
D

R
O
A
D
CH
A
R
L
E
S

R
O
A
D
WESSON

R
O
A
D
BEVERLY AVE
N
U
E
L
A
C
K
E
Y

S
T
R
E
E
T
B
R
A
N
T
O
N

D
R
I
V
E
TI
N
A

D
R
I
V
E
FIRST BROAD RIVER
INTERMITTENT STREAM
S:\
A
A
A
-
M
a
s
t
e
r

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
D
i
c
e
y

M
i
l
l
s

-

D
C
Y
\
R
e
c
e
p
t
o
r

S
u
r
v
e
y
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
R
e
c
e
p
t
o
r

S
u
r
v
e
y
.
d
w
g
,

F
I
G

3
,

1
0
/
1
4
/
2
0
1
6

3
:
3
7
:
5
3

P
M
,

z
b
a
r
l
o
w
SB-6
SB-5
SB-1 SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
BACKGROUND-1
BACKGROUND-2
LEGEND
SITE PARCEL BOUNDARY
ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
DUMPSTER
SOIL BORING LOCATION
JOB NO. DCY-001
REVISION NO. 0DATE: 10-14-16
FIGURE NO. 4
DICEY MILLS
430 NEISLER STREET
SHELBY, NORTH CAROLINA
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
OUT OF USE
FUEL OIL AST
NE
I
S
L
E
R

S
T
R
E
E
T
FORMER FUEL OIL
UST & GASOLINE UST
AIR COMPRESSOR W/
OBSERVED STAINING
AIR COMPRESSORS W/
OBSERVED STAINING
WASTE OIL AST(2) PLASTIC PELLET SILO
TRANSFORMER
SUBSTATION
FUEL OIL USTOUT OF USE VARSOL AST
FORMER FABRIC
PRINTING OPERATION
FORMER
DYEHOUSE
POND #1: PROCESS WATER
POND #2: PROCESS WATERFRESH WATER POND
SETTLING PIT FOR
FRESHWATER INTAKE
PUMP HOUSE
MAINTENANCE
SHOP
VACANT STORAGE
BUILDING
POND #4: PROCESS WATER
MANUFACTURING
BUILDING
PLASTIC YARN
EXTRUSION OPERATION
WEAVING / SPINNING
OPERATION
POND #3: OUT OF USE
PROCESS WATER
HYDRAULIC ELEVATOR
PUMP HOUSE
OUTFALL PIPE
S:\
A
A
A
-
M
a
s
t
e
r

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
D
i
c
e
y

M
i
l
l
s

-

D
C
Y
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
.
d
w
g
,

F
I
G

4
,

1
0
/
1
4
/
2
0
1
6

3
:
3
8
:
5
9

P
M
,

z
b
a
r
l
o
w
SS-2
SS-1
SS-3
SS-4
SS-6
SS-5
SS-7
SS-8
LEGEND
SITE PARCEL BOUNDARY
ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
DUMPSTER
SUB-SLAB VAPOR SAMPLE LOCATION
JOB NO. DCY-001
REVISION NO. 0DATE: 10-14-16
FIGURE NO. 5
DICEY MILLS
430 NEISLER STREET
SHELBY, NORTH CAROLINA
SUB-SLAB SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
OUT OF USE
FUEL OIL AST
NE
I
S
L
E
R

S
T
R
E
E
T
FORMER FUEL OIL
UST & GASOLINE UST
AIR COMPRESSOR W/
OBSERVED STAINING
AIR COMPRESSORS W/
OBSERVED STAINING
WASTE OIL AST(2) PLASTIC PELLET SILO
TRANSFORMER
SUBSTATION
FUEL OIL USTOUT OF USE VARSOL AST
FORMER FABRIC
PRINTING OPERATION
FORMER
DYEHOUSE
POND #1: PROCESS WATER
POND #2: PROCESS WATERFRESH WATER POND
SETTLING PIT FOR
FRESHWATER INTAKE
PUMP HOUSE
MAINTENANCE
SHOP
VACANT STORAGE
BUILDING
POND #4: PROCESS WATER
MANUFACTURING
BUILDING
PLASTIC YARN
EXTRUSION OPERATION
WEAVING / SPINNING
OPERATION
POND #3: OUT OF USE
PROCESS WATER
HYDRAULIC ELEVATOR
PUMP HOUSE
OUTFALL PIPE
S:\
A
A
A
-
M
a
s
t
e
r

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
D
i
c
e
y

M
i
l
l
s

-

D
C
Y
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
.
d
w
g
,

F
I
G

5
,

1
0
/
1
4
/
2
0
1
6

3
:
3
8
:
4
0

P
M
,

z
b
a
r
l
o
w

Appendix A
Brownfields Property Receptor Survey Form
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
DRAFT - Subject to Change
Rev. 09/2015 Page 1 of 5
Site:Dicey Mills
Address:430 Neisler Street
City:Shelby
County:Cleveland
Brownfields Project Number:
Property and Building Characteristics
a. Provide occupancy and use information.
c. Describe the foundation construction. Include details on type, floor construction, and depth below grade.
e. Are any subslab ventilation systems or moisture barriers in place? If so, please provide details.
There is no subslab ventilation system. It appears that there is a moisture barrier.
% of property that is wooded/brush
If an existing building is on-site, please respond to the following. Information can be provided on additional sheets as needed. If numerous
buildings are on-site, consult with your PM as only information on specific buildings may be needed.
b. Describe the construction of the building including materials (e.g. wood frame, block), type and size of openings (e.g. windows, bay
doors), and height (number of stories).
% of property that is covered by buildings
d. Describe the HVAC system in the building. Include available details on type, equipment location, source of air return, and design
considerations (e.g. positive pressure?).
16
HVAC systems present on the roof of the Site building and were not observed.
17
23.893
57
10
16
17
The Site building was constructed in the late 1950s with expansions through the mid-1990s by Dicey Mills, a textile manufacturer. The Site
buildings have been occupied by textile manufacturing operations since initial construction and currently operates on a limited scale.
0
57
10
0
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY RECEPTOR SURVEY
This form was created to clarify and simplify preparing a receptor survey for a brownfield site. Please provide the information requested
below. Distances are measured from the site property boundary unless otherwise indicated by the DEQ Brownfield’s Project Manager (PM).
Current Usage Proposed Usage
NA
Surface Conditions
Size of Property (acres)
% of property that is paved
% of property that is grassed areas
% of property that is agricultural crops
The Site contains an approximately 160,000-square ft manufacturing building and a 4,000-square foot storage building. The Site buildings are
slab-on-grade floors with concrete block and steel panel walls. Approximate ceiling height is 15 feet. The office portion of the manufacturing
building is is finished with stud walls and drywall. Bay doors are present along the northern, eastern, and western portions of the Site for
access to the warehouse areas. Standard doors are located throughout the Site building entering into the industrial space. A single door to
the offices is located on the north side. The office is constructed with standard size windows to the exterior.
Specific details are not known. The floor is poured concrete and constructed on grade. Dyeing pits that previously held textile machinery
are present in the southern portion of the manufacturing building.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
DRAFT - Subject to Change
Rev. 09/2015 Page 2 of 5
Surrounding Property Land Use
North
South
East
West
N --
1000 southwest
900 southwest
1000 south
900 southeast
900 southeast
800 southeast
800 southeast
700 southeast
700 east
600 east
600 east
1000 southeast
1000 east
900 east
900 east
900 east
900 east
900 east
1000 east
1000 east
1000 east
1000 northeast
1000 northeast
900 northeast
900 northeast
700 north
200 north
900 north
900 north
900 north
900 north
Utilities
Current Use/Occupant Proposed Usage
DirectionDistance (ft)
1605 W Dixon Blvd Shelby NC 28152
* If numerous facilities of interest are present, their locations can be placed on a map in lieu of providing specific addresses.
same
same
Is a school or daycare center within 1,000 ft of the
Property?
Specific Land Uses of Interest
Is there a basement within 1,000 ft of the Property
-
Address
Please provide information on the following land uses in the vicinity of the subject site, including a map of the surrounding areas. If specific
receptors are present, please provide addresses of the facilities.
same
Solar Farm
Zoning/Land Use
same
Vacant Land
Commercial Warehouses
First Broad River followed by agricultural land
Y/N *
Y
1607 Lackey Street Shelby NC 28152
1602 Lackey Street Shelby NC 28152
Is there a residence within 1,000 ft of the Property?
1406 Beverly Ave Shelby NC 28152
420 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
418 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
416 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
414 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
412 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
410 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
406 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
404 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
419 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
417 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
415 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
413 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
411 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
1601 W Dixon Blvd Shelby NC 28152
1506 W Warren Street Shelby NC 28150
1508 W Warren Street Shelby NC 28150
1510 W Warren Street Shelby NC 28150
1512 W Warren Street Shelby NC 28150
1009 W Warren Street Shelby NC 28150
1509 W Dixon Blvd Shelby NC 28152
1511 W Dixon Blvd Shelby NC 28152
1601 W Dixon Blvd Shelby NC 28152
1605 W Dixon Blvd Shelby NC 28152
409 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
405 Melody Lane Shelby NC 28152
408 Stroud Road Shelby NC 28512
404 Stroud Road Shelby NC 28512
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
DRAFT - Subject to Change
Rev. 09/2015 Page 3 of 5
Is there a septic system on-site? (Y or N) _______N
Please provide the utility providers for the subject property
a. Natural Gas ___City of Shelby
b. Sewer ___City of Shelby
c. Electricity __Duke Power
d. Other ___
For surrounding properties, please complete the following table with available information.
Y 20 ft east
Y 20 ft east
N
Y 20 ft east
Y 20 ft east
unknown
N
* If yes, please provide a map or detailed information (distance, direction, depth) of the utility in correlation with the subject property.
Is a water line main within 100 ft of Property boundary?
Is a natural gas line main within 100 ft of the Property boundary?
For the subject property, please provide a map of known buried utilities. If available, include depth to top, construction material, and
diameter of the utilities. In addition, please provide the following information on utility providers. If additional assessment is required, the
public utility locators should be contacted. This information can then be added to a site map.
Y/N *
Is a septic system leach field within 500 ft of the Property boundary?
Direction
Is a buried electrical cable main within 100 ft of Property boundary?
Is a sanitary sewer within 100 ft of the Property boundary?
Is a storm water pipe within 100 ft of the Property boundary?
Utility/Potential Receptor
Is a buried telephone/ cable main within 100 ft of the Property boundary?
Distance
(ft)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
DRAFT - Subject to Change
Rev. 09/2015 Page 4 of 5
Water Supply
What is the potable water supply for the property? Public ___X___ Private ______
N
N
Distance
(ft)Direction AddressY/NWater Supply Wells
Please provide the following information regarding water supply wells in the vicinity of the Property. At a minimum, a windshield survey
within 1,500 ft of the property boundaries should be completed to determine if water supply or irrigation wells may be present. Information
from applicable databases can and should be utilized; however, should not be utilized in lieu of the windshield survey. If multiple wells are
present within the requested radius, please provide a map of the well locations. Please note, the PM may opt for a more extensive water
supply well survey if needed.
Is a public water supply well within 1 mile of the Property boundary?
Is an irrigation well within 1,500 ft of the Property boundary?
Is a private water supply well within 1,500 ft of the Property
boundary?
N
If Private, please provide details of the water supply source (i.e. well location, well construction, etc). If public, please include the water
providers name.
The purpose of this section is to provide information on the water supply for the site and surrounding areas.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
DRAFT - Subject to Change
Rev. 09/2015 Page 5 of 5
Surface Water & Wetlands
Response/Comments
Are there any wetlands present on the
property? If no wetlands on-site, are wetlands
suspected on adjoining properties?
Are there surface water features on the
property? (If yes, please complete a. to d.)Yes
a. Is the water body naturally developed or
man-made?Both, four process water ponds and one freshwater intake pond are present on the Site
that are manmade. The First Broad River is present to the west of the Site and its
intermittent tributary is located southwest of the Site.
See above for ponds. The First Broad River may be used for recreation purposes.
Provide Information regarding Surface Water
and Wetlands
First Broad River for the freshwater intake pond and stormwater runoff and process
water from the Site building for the process water ponds
The purpose of this section is to provide information on the presence of surface waters and/or wetlands on, or in the vicinity of the Property.
Unlined clay
According to a review of the NWI map, a surface water pond is present in the western
portion of the Site and wetlands are present on the west adjacent property across the First
Broad River
b. List the uses of the water body.
c. What is the source of the water for the
water body?
d. What is the nature of the bottom of the
water body (e.g., rocky or concrete bottom,
drainage ways or impoundments)
If no on-site surface water features, what is the
nearest surface water body?

Appendix B
Boring Logs
Organic TOPSOIL
Slight moist, stiff, red orange silty SAND
Poorly graded GRAVEL
Slight moist, stiff, red orange silty SAND
Moist, stiff, dull red sandy SILT
Moist, stiff, tan red sandy SILT
Moist, stiff, tan red sandy SILT with cobbles
Moist, very stiff, red sandy SILT (moderately micaceous)
Very moist, very stiff, red sandy SILT (moderately micaceous)
Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet.
0
0
0
0
0
2.1
0
0
0
0
DRAWN BY:KJW
BORING COMPLETED:8/12/16
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:H&H Remarks:
DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Hand Auger / Hand Auger
SAMPLING METHOD:Auger Bucket Soil sampled collected from 8'-10' bgs foranalytical
BORING STARTED:8/12/16
LOGGED BY:KJW
TOTAL DEPTH: 10 ft.
TOP OF CASING ELEV:
DEPTH TO WATER:
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
)
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
)
LI
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RE
C
O
V
E
R
Y

(
%
)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
NU
M
B
E
R
OV
A

(
p
p
m
)
BK
G
.
SA
M
P
.
BORING DIAGRAM
Sheet 1 of 1
BORING NUMBER SB-1
PROJECT:Dicey Mill
JOB NUMBER:DCY-001
LOCATION:430 Neisler Street Shelby, NC
BO
R
I
N
G

L
O
G

-

H
A
R
T

H
I
C
K
M
A
N
.
G
D
T

-

1
0
/
1
1
/
1
6

0
9
:
3
1

-

S
:
\
B
B
B

M
A
S
T
E
R

G
I
N
T

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
D
C
Y
-
0
0
1
.
G
P
J
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
3334 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f)
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
ASPHALT
Poorly graded GRAVEL
Slightly moist, stiff, red brown SILT
Poorly graded GRAVEL
Moist, stiff, tan red sandy SILT
Moist, stiff, red sandy SILT
Moist, stiff, red sandy SILT with gray staining
Moist, very stiff, dull red SILT with trace sand (slightly micaceous)
Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.8
2.3
2.1
DRAWN BY:KJW
BORING COMPLETED:8/12/16
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:H&H Remarks:
DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Hand Auger / Hand Auger
SAMPLING METHOD:Auger Bucket Soil sampled collected from 6'-8' bgs foranalytical
BORING STARTED:8/12/16
LOGGED BY:KJW
TOTAL DEPTH: 10 ft.
TOP OF CASING ELEV:
DEPTH TO WATER:
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
)
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
)
LI
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RE
C
O
V
E
R
Y

(
%
)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
NU
M
B
E
R
OV
A

(
p
p
m
)
BK
G
.
SA
M
P
.
BORING DIAGRAM
Sheet 1 of 1
BORING NUMBER SB-2
PROJECT:Dicey Mill
JOB NUMBER:DCY-001
LOCATION:430 Neisler Street Shelby, NC
BO
R
I
N
G

L
O
G

-

H
A
R
T

H
I
C
K
M
A
N
.
G
D
T

-

1
0
/
1
1
/
1
6

0
9
:
3
2

-

S
:
\
B
B
B

M
A
S
T
E
R

G
I
N
T

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
D
C
Y
-
0
0
1
.
G
P
J
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
3334 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f)
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
Well graded GRAVEL
Moist, stiff, red orange clayey SILT
Moist, stiff, orange tan clayey SILT
Bottom of borehole at 5.0 feet.
0
0
0
1.6
1.8
2.4
DRAWN BY:KJW
BORING COMPLETED:8/12/16
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:H&H Remarks:
DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Hand Auger / Hand Auger
SAMPLING METHOD:Auger Bucket Soil sampled collected from 0'-2' bgs foranalytical
BORING STARTED:8/12/16
LOGGED BY:KJW
TOTAL DEPTH: 5 ft.
TOP OF CASING ELEV:
DEPTH TO WATER:
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
)
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
)
LI
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RE
C
O
V
E
R
Y

(
%
)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
NU
M
B
E
R
OV
A

(
p
p
m
)
BK
G
.
SA
M
P
.
BORING DIAGRAM
Sheet 1 of 1
BORING NUMBER SB-3
PROJECT:Dicey Mill
JOB NUMBER:DCY-001
LOCATION:430 Neisler Street Shelby, NC
BO
R
I
N
G

L
O
G

-

H
A
R
T

H
I
C
K
M
A
N
.
G
D
T

-

1
0
/
1
1
/
1
6

0
9
:
3
2

-

S
:
\
B
B
B

M
A
S
T
E
R

G
I
N
T

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
D
C
Y
-
0
0
1
.
G
P
J
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
3334 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f)
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
Well graded GRAVEL
Slightly moist, stiff, red brown clayey SILT
Slightly moist, soft, tan sandy SILT
Bottom of borehole at 5.0 feet.
0
0
0
2.1
2
1.5
DRAWN BY:KJW
BORING COMPLETED:8/12/16
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:H&H Remarks:
DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Hand Auger / Hand Auger
SAMPLING METHOD:Auger Bucket Soil sampled collected from 0'-2' bgs foranalytical
BORING STARTED:8/12/16
LOGGED BY:KJW
TOTAL DEPTH: 5 ft.
TOP OF CASING ELEV:
DEPTH TO WATER:
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
)
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
)
LI
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RE
C
O
V
E
R
Y

(
%
)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
NU
M
B
E
R
OV
A

(
p
p
m
)
BK
G
.
SA
M
P
.
BORING DIAGRAM
Sheet 1 of 1
BORING NUMBER SB-4
PROJECT:Dicey Mill
JOB NUMBER:DCY-001
LOCATION:430 Neisler Street Shelby, NC
BO
R
I
N
G

L
O
G

-

H
A
R
T

H
I
C
K
M
A
N
.
G
D
T

-

1
0
/
1
1
/
1
6

0
9
:
3
2

-

S
:
\
B
B
B

M
A
S
T
E
R

G
I
N
T

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
D
C
Y
-
0
0
1
.
G
P
J
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
3334 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f)
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organic TOPSOIL
Poorly graded GRAVEL
Slightly moist, medium, tan brown sandy SILT
Slight moist, soft, brown silty SAND
Bottom of borehole at 5.0 feet.
0
0
0
1.8
2.1
2.9
DRAWN BY:KJW
BORING COMPLETED:8/12/16
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:H&H Remarks:
DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Hand Auger / Hand Auger
SAMPLING METHOD:Auger Bucket Soil sampled collected from 0'-2' bgs foranalytical
BORING STARTED:8/12/16
LOGGED BY:KJW
TOTAL DEPTH: 5 ft.
TOP OF CASING ELEV:
DEPTH TO WATER:
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
)
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
)
LI
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RE
C
O
V
E
R
Y

(
%
)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
NU
M
B
E
R
OV
A

(
p
p
m
)
BK
G
.
SA
M
P
.
BORING DIAGRAM
Sheet 1 of 1
BORING NUMBER SB-5
PROJECT:Dicey Mill
JOB NUMBER:DCY-001
LOCATION:430 Neisler Street Shelby, NC
BO
R
I
N
G

L
O
G

-

H
A
R
T

H
I
C
K
M
A
N
.
G
D
T

-

1
0
/
1
1
/
1
6

0
9
:
3
2

-

S
:
\
B
B
B

M
A
S
T
E
R

G
I
N
T

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
D
C
Y
-
0
0
1
.
G
P
J
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
3334 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f)
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organic TOPSOIL
Moist, stiff, red brown sandy SILT
Moist, stiff, red brown sandy SILT with trace clay and gravels
Bottom of borehole at 5.0 feet.
0
0
0
0.9
2
1.5
DRAWN BY:KJW
BORING COMPLETED:8/12/16
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:H&H Remarks:
DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Hand Auger / Hand Auger
SAMPLING METHOD:Auger Bucket Soil sampled collected from 0'-2' bgs foranalytical
BORING STARTED:8/12/16
LOGGED BY:KJW
TOTAL DEPTH: 5 ft.
TOP OF CASING ELEV:
DEPTH TO WATER:
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
)
DE
P
T
H
(f
t
)
LI
T
H
O
L
O
G
Y
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
RE
C
O
V
E
R
Y

(
%
)
SA
M
P
L
E

T
Y
P
E
NU
M
B
E
R
OV
A

(
p
p
m
)
BK
G
.
SA
M
P
.
BORING DIAGRAM
Sheet 1 of 1
BORING NUMBER SB-6
PROJECT:Dicey Mill
JOB NUMBER:DCY-001
LOCATION:430 Neisler Street Shelby, NC
BO
R
I
N
G

L
O
G

-

H
A
R
T

H
I
C
K
M
A
N
.
G
D
T

-

1
0
/
1
1
/
1
6

0
9
:
3
2

-

S
:
\
B
B
B

M
A
S
T
E
R

G
I
N
T

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
\
D
C
Y
-
0
0
1
.
G
P
J
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
3334 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f)
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
1
2
3
4
5

Appendix C
Laboratory Analytical Reports

Page 1 of 76
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Sample Summary 4
Case Narrative 5
Sample Results 9
16H0670-01 9
16H0670-02 14
16H0670-03 19
16H0670-04 25
16H0670-05 31
16H0670-06 37
16H0670-07 43
16H0670-08 45
Sample Preparation Information 47
QC Data 49
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS 49
B156427 49
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS 54
B156043 54
Polychlorinated Biphenyls By GC/ECD 62
B156165 62
Metals Analyses (Total) 63
B156087 63
B156169 64
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 65
B156135 65
B156139 65
Page 2 of 76
Table of Contents
Table of Contents (continued)
Dual Column RPD Report 66
Flag/Qualifier Summary 68
Certifications 69
Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt 74
Page 3 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 4 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 5 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 6 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 7 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 8 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 9 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 10 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 11 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 12 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 13 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 14 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 15 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 16 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 17 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 18 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 19 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 20 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 21 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 22 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 23 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 24 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 25 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 26 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 27 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 28 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 29 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 30 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 31 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 32 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 33 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 34 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 35 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 36 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 37 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 38 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 39 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 40 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 41 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 42 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 43 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 44 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 45 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 46 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 47 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 48 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 49 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 50 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 51 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 52 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 53 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 54 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 55 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 56 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 57 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 58 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 59 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 60 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 61 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 62 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 63 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 64 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 65 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 66 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 67 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 68 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 69 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 70 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 71 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 72 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 73 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 74 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 75 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 76 of 76
Table of Contents
Page 1 of 37
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Sample Summary 3
Case Narrative 4
Sample Results 7
Sample Preparation Information 25
QC Data 26
Air Toxics by EPA Compendium Methods 26
B156890 26
B156893 29
Flag/Qualifier Summary 32
Certifications 33
Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt 35
Page 2 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 3 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 4 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 5 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 6 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 7 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 8 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 9 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 10 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 11 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 12 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 13 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 14 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 15 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 16 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 17 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 18 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 19 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 20 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 21 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 22 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 23 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 24 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 25 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 26 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 27 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 28 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 29 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 30 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 31 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 32 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 33 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 34 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 35 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 36 of 37
Table of Contents
Page 37 of 37
Table of Contents