Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19034_IRC_Limited Sub-Slab Investigation_20130917Limited Sub-Slab Investigation Report Former International Resistive Company 736 Greenway Drive Boone, Watauga County, North Carolina September 17, 2013 Terracon Project No. 86127103 Prepared for: International Resistive Company, Inc. 4222 S. Staples Street Corpus Christi, Texas Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. 3534 Rutherford Road Taylors, South Carolina TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION ................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Soil Boring Installation ........................................................................................................ 1 2.2 Soil Sample Collection and Field Screening ........................................................................ 2 3.0 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL AND RESULTS ............................................................... 2 3.1 Laboratory Analytical Program ............................................................................................ 2 3.2 Soil Analytical Results ......................................................................................................... 2 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................. 3 4.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 3 4.2 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 4 5.0 QUALIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................ 4 FIGURES Figure 1 -Sub-Slab Soil Boring Location Map Figure 2 -Estimated Extent of Sub-Slab Impact LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Table 1 Soil Boring Logs Laboratory Analytical Report LIMITED SUB-SLAB INVESTIGATION FORMER INTERNATIONAL RESISTIVE COMPANY 736 GREENWAY DRIVE BOONE, WATAUGA COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA TERRACON PROJECT NO. 86127103 1.0 INTRODUCTION Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) has completed a Limited Sub-Slab Investigation (LSSI) at the former International Resistive Company (IRC) plant located at 736 Greenway Drive in Boone, Watauga County, North Carolina. The general layout of the site and sampling locations are illustrated on Figure 1. Laboratory data results are summarized in Table 1, Appendix A. Soil boring logs are presented in Appendix B. A copy of the laboratory analytical data report is provided in Appendix C. The former IRC plant was demolished to the building slab in June 2013. Future redevelopment plans for the site include removal of the slab and potential re-grading of the site. The purpose of the LSSI was to assess sub-slab soils in selected areas of the building for potential impacts from former facility operations. Reliance This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of International Resistive Company, Inc. Authorization for use or reliance by any other party (except a governmental entity having jurisdiction over the site) is prohibited without the expressed written authorization of International Resistive Company, Inc. and Terracon. Any unauthorized distribution or reuse is at the client's sole risk. Reliance by authorized parties will be subject to the terms, conditions and limitations stated in the Agreement for Services. 2.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION 2.1 Soil Borings On July 25, 2013, ten soil borings (labeled "SSS-1" through "SSS-10") were advanced at the site using a track-mounted GeoProbe® rig operated by SAEDACCO, Inc. of Fort Mill, South Carolina. Borings SSS-1 through SSS-3 were located adjacent to the former Boiler Room. Boring SSS-4 was located in the Recovery Room adjacent to a former wastewater sump. Borings SSS-5 and SSS-6 were located in the old Plating Room adjacent to a trench drain and sump, respectively. Boring SSS-7 was located in the Sludge Accumulation Area adjacent to a floor drain. Borings SSS-8 and SSS-10 were located adjacent to trench drains in the Plating Room (Dept. 20). Boring SSS-9 was located adjacent to the Tresco Warehouse in an area where a former waste sump was reportedly maintained. Boring locations are depicted on Figure 1. Borings were advanced to approximate depths of 8-9 feet below the ground surface (bgs). Soils at the 8-9 foot interval were damp to wet, indicative of the presence of groundwater. Limited Sub-Slab Investigation IRC-Former Boone Facility • Boone, Watauga County, NC September 17, 2013 • Terracon Project No. 86127103 2.2 Soil Sample Collection and Field Screening lrerracon Soil samples were collected from each boring within clear plastic liners. Sample characteristics were described by the field professional and then screened with a MiniRae2000 photo-ionization detector (PID) for the presence of organic vapors. The lithology of the soils generally consisted of silty/sandy clay or clayey/sandy silt. Soil lithology and data from field screening activities are presented on the boring logs included in Appendix B. One soil sample per boring (except for SSS-6) was selected for laboratory analysis based upon field screening results, odors, staining, or other indicators of potential impact. Two soil samples were collected from boring SSS-6 based upon observed changes in soil coloration and odors. Prior to sample collection, non-dedicated sampling equipment was decontaminated using a Liquinox®/water wash and scrubbing, followed by a distilled water rinse. Soil cuttings and decontamination fluids were containerized in 55-gallon drums pending off-site disposal. Following sample collection, the soil borings were backfilled to the ground surface using a bentonite-grout slurry. 3.0 LABORATORY ANALYSES AND RESULTS 3.1 Laboratory Analyses Eleven soil samples were submitted for analysis to Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. in West Columbia, SC (NC DENR No. 329). The soil samples were submitted for analysis of vo latile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B (all samples), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 82700 (samples SSS-1-8, SSS-2-8, SSS-3-6, and SSS- 9-6), and lead and nickel by EPA Method 6010C (samples SSS-4-2, SSS-5-6, SSS-6-2, SSS-6- 6, SSS-7-4, SSS-8-6, SSS-9-6, and SSS-10-8). Please refer to Appendix C for a copy of the laboratory analytical report and associated chain of custody. 3.2 Soil Analytical Results Results generated from soil sample analysis were compared to the Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) established by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) -Inactive Hazardous Site Branch (IHSB), updated July 13, 2013. The IHSB has established health-based PSRGs for residential and industrial settings as well as for Protection of Groundwater (PoG). Several VOCs were detected in the analyzed samples (see Table 1 ). Based on the results, tetrachloroethylene (commonly referred to as "perc" or "PCE") was detected at concentrations exceeding the applicable PSRG for PoG of 5 IJg/kg in four of the 11 samples analyzed. Trichloroethylene (TCE) was detected in one sample (SSS-4-2) at a concentration exceeding the applicable PSRG for PoG of 18 IJg/kg. The remaining detected VOCs were below their respective applicable PSRGs. 2 Limited Sub-Slab Investigation IRC-Former Boone Facility • Boone, Watauga County, NC September 17, 2013 • Terracon Project No. 86127103 lrerracon It should be noted that PCE was reported in sample SSS-7-4 at a concentration of 19 IJg/kg; this sample was orig inally analyzed at a 50-times dilution based upon a laboratory screening error (see letter from Shealy in Appendix C) before being re-analyzed at a zero-dilution but outside of the holding time. The results of the zero-dilution analysis are presented in Table 1. It is Shealy's opinion that the reported PCE value for sample SSS-7-4 is likely to be biased low meaning that the detected PCE value analyzed under normal conditions would be higher. Fluoranthene was detected in one of the four samples analyzed for SVOCs (SSS-3-6) at a concentration of 660 IJg/kg . The detected concentration is significantly below the applicable PSRGs for fluoranthene. No other SVOCs were detected in the samples analyzed. Lead and nickel were detected in all eight of the samples analyzed for these metals. The lead detections were significantly less than the applicable PSRGs. The IHSB has not established PSRGs for nickel; however, the reported concentrations appear to be indicative of naturally occurring nickel concentrations in this area of North Carolina and not from anthropogenic sources (reference: Geochemical Landscapes of the Conterminous United States-New Map Presentations for 22 Elements, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1648). 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the above information, we offer the following conclusions and recommendations. 4.1 Conclusions PCE was detected above the PSRG for PoG in samples collected from borings SSS-4, SSS-6, SSS-7, and SSS-8. TCE was also detected above the PSRG for PoG in the sample collected from boring SSS-4. Boring SSS-4 was advanced near a former industrial wastewater discharge sump within the Recovery Room. Borings SSS-6 through SSS-8 were advanced adjacent to former trench drains in the old Plating Room, Sludge Accumulation Area, and Plating Room, respectively. Based on the laboratory results, past facility operations have apparently impacted sub-slab soils in the vicinity of the floor drains and wastewater discharge sump. Figure 2 depicts the estimated lateral extent of soil impact based on the analytical data derived during this investigation. Based on the apparent depth and magnitude of impact to the soils and the estimated depth to groundwater (approximately 9-10 feet below ground surface), it is Terracon's opin ion that groundwater in these areas may also be impacted by PCE and/or TCE. 3 Limited Sub-Slab Investigation IRC-Former Boone Facility 11 Boone, Watauga County, NC September 17, 2013 • Terracon Project No. 86127103 4.2 Recommendations lrerracan Additional soil sampling for VOCs is recommended along the trench drain systems and in the vicinity of the former wastewater sump to more adequately assess the extent of soil impact in these areas. Terracon also recommends sampling of the groundwater in these areas. Based on the uncertainty of site redevelopment plans, we recommend that sub-slab soils impacted above PSRGs be remediated prior to site redevelopment. The find ings presented herein and from any subsequent assessment should be provided to the NCDENR-I HSB for review. 5.0 QUALIFICATIONS Terracon's services were performed in a manner consistent with generally accepted practices of the profession undertaken in similar studies in the same geographic area during the same period. Terracon makes no warranties, expressed or implied, regarding its services, findings, conclusions, or recommendations. Please note that Terracon does not warrant the work of laboratories, regulatory agencies or other third parties supplying information used in the preparation of the report. Our services were performed in accordance with the scope of work agreed with you, our client, as set forth in our proposal and are not intended to be in strict conformance with ASTM E1903-11. Findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented herein are based upon information derived from on-site activities and other services performed under this scope of work; such information is subject to change over time. Certain indicators of the presence of hazardous substances, petroleum products, or other constituents may have been latent, inaccessible, unobservable, non-detectable, or not present during these services; thus, we cannot represent that the site is free of hazardous substances, toxic substances, petroleum products, or other latent conditions beyond those identified during this LSSI. Subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at specific borings or wells or during other surveys, tests, assessments, investigations or exploratory services; the data, interpretations, findings and our recommendations are based solely upon data obtained at the time and within the scope of these services. 4 FIGURES APPENDIX A TABLE 1