The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20021_Glen_Raven_EMP_201704051 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a project manager for the program. Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all pertinent attachments to their project manager prior to any site earthmoving or other development related activities. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it must be completed, reviewed by the program, and signed by all signers at the bottom. Consult your project manager if you have questions. GENERAL INFORMATION Date: 3/16/2017 Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Glen Raven Mills II Brownfields Project Number: 20012‐16‐54 Brownfields Property Address: 800 Manning Street, Kinston, NC Brownfields Property Area (acres): 11.7 Acres Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes enter Permit No.: Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, enter Permit No.: Click here to enter text. COMMUNICATIONS Prospective Developer (PD): City of Kinston Phone Numbers: Office: 252‐939‐3269…..Mobile: na Email: tony.sears@ci.kinston.nc.us Primary PD Contact: Mr. Adam Short Phone Numbers: Office: (252) 939‐3269 Mobile: na Email: adam.short@ci.kinston.nc.us Email: Environmental Consultant: Mid‐Atlantic Associates, Inc. Mr. Darin McClure Phone Numbers: Office: 919‐250‐9918…..Mobile: 919‐272‐7913 Email: dmcclure@maaonline.com Brownfields Program Project Manager: Mr. Lebeed Kady Office: 919‐707‐8378 2 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 Email: lebeed.kady@ncdenr.gov Other DENR Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch, Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste): Click here to enter text. NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM Advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept minimum notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task: On‐site assessment or remedial activities: Within 10 days ☒ Construction or grading start: Within 10 days ☒ Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously unknown contamination: Within 48 hours ☒ Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood, or soil erosion control measures in area of contamination, venting of explosive environments): Within 48 hours ☒ Installation of mitigation systems: Within 10 days ☐ Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment activities: (as applicable): Within 30 days ☒ REDEVELOPMENT PLANS 1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply): ☒ Residential ☒ Recreational ☒ Institutional ☒ Commercial ☒ Office ☒Retail ☒ Industrial ☒ Other specify: open space and parking 2) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (attach conceptual or detailed plans as available): a) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown b) Do plans include removal of building foundation slab(s) or pavement: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown c) Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building slabs/pavement and other structures: The City of Kinston plans to market the property to developers for a mixed use of retail, commercial, office, restaurant and residential use. Potential uses could also be institutional and open space/recreational. Although some demolition may take place, it is anticipated that the majority of the structures will be rehabilitated and remain in place. 3) Which category of risk‐based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the Brownfields Agreement? ☒ Residential ☐ Non‐residential or Industrial/Commercial 3 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes. 4) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule): a) Phase I start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase): Unknown b) If applicable, Phase 2 start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase): Unknown Click here to enter text. c) Additional phases planned? If yes, specify activities if known: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Not in the foreseeable future ☒Decision pending d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: Unknown CONTAMINATED MEDIA Contaminated Media (attach tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations): Part 1. Soil: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected Part 2. Groundwater: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected Part 3. Surface Water: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected Part 4. Sediment: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected Part 5. Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected Part 6. Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected Part 7. Indoor Air: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected PART 1. SOIL – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations. 1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list specific compounds): Environmental assessments conducted at the subject site have identified low levels of contaminants in soil near a former waste house and coal pile formerly present on the subject site. The contaminants include the volatile organic compound (VOC) methylene chloride and two semi-volatile organic compounds (1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene). The detected concentrations were above the protection of groundwater preliminary soil remediation goals (PSRGs) but below the health-based residential and industrial/commercial PSRGs. The site-specific risk of the carcinogenic and non- 4 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 carcinogenic contaminants were subsequently evaluated and found to be below the target cancer risk sum of 1.0E-04 and the non-cancer hazard index of 1.0. 2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): NA 3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): Unknown at this time but data does not suggest soil is present with contaminants above the Unrestricted Use Health Based PSRGs. 4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): Unknown at this time but it is anticipated that soil grading at the site will be minimal. 5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): Unknown 6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants: None at this point. 7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable: None. IMPORTED FILL SOIL 1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☒ Unknown 2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported? Click here to enter text. 3) If yes, what is the depth of fill soil to be used at the property? Click here to enter text. If a range of depths, please list the range. 4) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide plan to analyze fill soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards and can be considered clean for use at the Brownfields property (Check all that apply): ☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, lead, selenium and silver) ☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List ‐14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc) ☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc) ☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Click here to enter text. ☐ Known borrow material (DESCRIBE SOURCE AND ATTACH SAMPLING PROFILE): At the present time there is no plan to import soil onto the site. If imported soil (other than clean quarry stone/crush and run, etc.) is to be used it will be sampled and analyzed in accordance with the methods above for every 200 cubic yards brought on site. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL 1) If soil in known or suspected areas of contamination is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields Property,or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates 5 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only preliminary data available). 2) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes generating the waste( include pertinent analytical results as needed). Click here to enter text. If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained‐Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the North Carolina Contained‐In Policy? ☐ Yes ☐ No NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE CONTAINED‐OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED‐IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 3) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?: ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results). ☐ Ignitability ☐ Corrosivity ☐ Reactivity ☐ Toxicity ☐ TCLP results ☒ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard) If no, explain rationale: Based on the analytical data collected to date, the rule of 20, and the identified historical uses at the site, these soils are not anticipated to be impacted by a characteristic hazardous waste. NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 4) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite): ☒ Preliminary Health‐Based Residential SRGs Click here to enter a date. ☐ Preliminary Health‐Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs Click here to enter a date. ☐ Site‐specific risk‐based cleanup level, or acceptable concentrations determined via calculated cumulative risk. Enter details of methods used for determination/explanation: 6 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 5) Check the following action(s) to be taken during excavation and management of said soils: ☒ Manage fugitive dust from site: ☒ Yes ☐ No If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: Standard construction dust suppression methods will be employed as needed. ☒ Field Screening: ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: Data does not suggest that contaminated soils are present at the site. However, site soils that are disturbed will be observed for visual and olfactory evidence of contamination by the construction/development team. If suspect soils are encountered, an environmental professional will be called to the site to evaluate the newly encountered conditions (including screening with appropriate instrumentation). If it appears the impacted material is contaminated, the soils will be sampled using the methods outlined below. Any impacted (or potentially impacted) soils will be segregated, properly stockpiled, and relocated to another area of the site using the “last out first in” method, covered by the building footprint or other impervious surface, or properly disposed of off site. If soils are to be staged or reused on site, they will be segregated, properly stockpiled, and sampled/analyzed by the methods described in the next section. Soil slated for off‐site disposal may be sampled in accordance with the program established by the disposal facility. All impacted soils that will be relocated on site shall be under impervious surfaces and not directly in contact with the foundation slab(s) for residential spaces. They are also to be covered with a geotextile fabric or other material to denote that they are located beneath it. ☒ Soil Sample Collection: ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, describe method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.); If no, explain rationale: At this time we do not expect to conduct further soil sampling or analysis. However, if needed to arrange for off‐site soil management, sample collection and analysis will be conducted in accordance with IHSB protocol with the number of samples and analyses dictated by the disposal facility. For soils potentially impacted by sources other than petroleum, sample collection will be conducted in accordance with IHSB protocol with the sample analyses outlined below. ☒ Stockpile impacted soil in accordance with NCDENR IHSB protocol in the current version of the “Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup”, and providing erosion control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances: Click here to enter text. ☒ Analyze potentially impacted soil for the following chemical analytes: ☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, lead, selenium and silver) 7 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 ☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List ‐14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc) ☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc) ☐ Other Constituent(s) & Analytical Method(s): Only soil that appears to be impacted by sources other than petroleum. In addition, soils that will be taken off site for disposal will be sampled and analyzed for any additional parameters required by the disposal facility. ☒ Proposed Measures to Obtain Pre‐Approval for Reuse of Impacted Soil within the Brownfields Property Boundary ☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager ☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known ☒ Use geotextile to mark depth of fill material (provide description of material) ☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☐ Describe cap or fill: Impacted soil will remain or be placed under the building footprint or other impervious surface. As such final grade sampling will not be necessary. (provide location diagram) ☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re‐ recorded if actions are Post‐Recordation). ☐ Other: Click here to enter text. ☐ Final grade sampling of exposed soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or permanent hardscape): [if not checked provide rationale for not needing] Provide diagram of soil sampling locations, number of samples, and denote Chemical Analytical Program with check boxes below (Check all that apply): ☐ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ☐ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, lead, selenium and silver) ☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List ‐14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc) ☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc) ☐ Pesticides ☐ PCBs ☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Click here to enter text. OFFSITE TRANSPORT & DISPOSITION OF EXCAVATED SOIL NOTE: Unless soil will be transported offsite for disposal in a permitted facility under applicable regulations, no contaminated or potentially contaminated soil may leave the site without approval from the brownfields program. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields agreement, 8 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 endangering liability protections and making said action subject to enforcement. Justifications provided below must be approved by the Program in writing prior to completing transport activities. ☒ Transport and dispose of impacted soil offsite (documentation of final disposition must be sent to Brownfields Project Manager) ☐ Landfill – analytical program determined by landfill ☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility Click here to enter text. ☐ Use as Beneficial Fill Offsite – provide justification: Click here to enter text. ☐ Use as Beneficial Fill at another Suitable Brownfields Site – (Note: a determination that a site is a “Suitable Brownfields” site will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil as beneficial soil will not increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at that site, and that notarized documentation of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Provide justification: Click here to enter text. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES ☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill (Preferred) ☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from which it was excavated. ☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? Result: Yes □ No □ If no, include rationale here. Based on the soil and groundwater data collected at the site, vapor intrusion mitigation measures are not warranted for the redevelopment. If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches: Click here to enter text. PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below and attach figure showing distribution of groundwater contaminants at site What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? Approximately 5‐9 feet bgs Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite ☐ offsite ☐ both ☐ or unknown sources? Describe source(s): Groundwater collected at the site did not exhibit constituents above the North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property? To the south toward the Neuse River. Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No 9 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 If yes, describe these activities: Click here to enter text. In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, or sampling procedures): If contaminated groundwater is encountered at the site it will be temporarily containerized, a sample from the container will be collected for laboratory analysis, and the results compared to applicable surface water quality standards. If results of the laboratory testing reveal concentrations above applicable surface water quality standards, with prior approval the water will be discharged to the City of Kinston POTW. If no concentrations exist above the applicable surface water quality standards, then the water will be discharged to the city stormwater system as permitted by rule. PART 3. SURFACE WATER – Please fill out the information below. Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property. Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts): Surface water is not present at the site and storm water sampling would only be considered if surface water runoff intersects an area of contaminated soil. PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below. Is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property. In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): There are no streams or sediments at the subject site. PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below. Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following vapor intrusion screening levels in the following media: 10 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 IHSB Residential Screening Levels: Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown Groundwater: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown Groundwater: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown Attach a map showing the location of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening levels. If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated? Click here to enter text. Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work, list activities for management of such contact: Soil vapor is not expected to be encountered during construction activites. If soil vapor is encountered an environmental professional will be called to the site and we will contact Mr. Lebeed Kady with the NCDEQ Brownfields Program at 919‐707‐8378. PART 6. SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR ‐please fill out the information below if existing buildings or foundations will be retained in the redevelopment. Are sub‐slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown If data indicate that sub‐slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing the location of these exceedances. At what depth(s) is sub‐slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐ 0‐6 inches ☐ Other, If other describe: Click here to enter text. Will workers encounter contaminated sub‐slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such contact: Sub‐slab vapor is not expected to be encountered during construction activites. If sub‐slab vapor is encountered an environmental professional will be called to the site and we will contact Mr. Lebeed Kady with the NCDEQ Brownfields Program at 919‐707‐8378. 11 EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below . Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown If yes, attach a map showing the location where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels. If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk‐based screening levels will not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such contact: Contaminated indoor air is not expected to be encountered during construction activites. If contaminated indoor air is encountered an environmental professional will be called to the site and appropriate engineering controls implemented to mitigate exposure. If adequate mitigation cannot be implemented, we will contact Mr. Lebeed Kady with the NCDEQ Brownfields Program at 919‐707‐8378. PART 8 – Vapor Mitigation System – Please fill out the information below . Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system proposed for this Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown If yes, provide the date the plan was submitted to the Brownfields Program. Click here to enter a date. Attach the plan. Has the vapor mitigation plan been approved by the NC Brownfields Program? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown Has the vapor mitigation plan been signed and sealed by a North Carolina professional engineer? ☐ Yes ☐ No What are the components of the vapor intrusion mitigation system? ☐ Sub‐slab depressurization system ☐ Sub‐membrane depressurization system ☐ Block‐wall depressurization system ☐ Drain tile depressurization system ☐ Passive mitigation methods ☐ Vapor barriers ☐ Perforated piping vented to exterior ☐ Other method: PART 9. CONTINGENCY FOR ENCOUNTERING UNKNOWN TANKS, DRUMS, OR OTHER WASTE I I M A T E R I A L S I I 1 1 P l e a s e p r o v i d e a c o n t i n g e n c y p l a n i n t h e e v e n t u n k n o w n t a n k s , d r u m s , f u e l l i n e s , l a n d f i l l s , o r o t h e r w a s t e m a t e r i a l s a r e e n c o u n t e r e d d u r i n g s i t e a c t i v i t i e s . C h e c k t h e f o l l o w i n g a c t i v i t i e s t h a t w i l l b e c o n d u c t e d p r i o r t o c o m m e n c i n g e a r t h - m o v i n g a c t i v i t i e s a t t h e s i t e : 1 8 1 R e v i e w o f h i s t o r i c m a p s ( S a n b o r n M a p s , f a c i l i t y m a p s ) D C o n d u c t i n g g e o p h y s i c a l s u r v e y s t o e v a l u a t e t h e l o c a t i o n o f s u s p e c t U S T , f u e l l i n e s , u t i l i t y l i n e s , e t c . 1 8 1 I n t e r v i e w s w i t h e m p l o y e e s / f o r m e r e m p l o y e e s / f a c i l i t y m a n a g e r s / n e i g h b o r s N o t i f i c a t i o n t o S t a t e B r o w n f i e l d s P r o j e c t M a n a g e r , U S T S e c t i o n , F i r e D e p a r t m e n t , a n d / o r o t h e r o f f i c i a l s , a s n e c e s s a r y a n d a p p r o p r i a t e , i s r e q u i r e d w h e n n e w p o t e n t i a l s o u r c e ( s ) o f c o n t a m i n a t i o n a r e d i s c o v e r e d . S e e N o t i f i c a t i o n S e c t i o n o n P a g e 1 f o r n o t i f i c a t i o n r e q u i r e m e n t s . P O S T - R E D E V E L O P M E N T R E P O R T I N G I n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e s i t e ' s B r o w n f i e l d A g r e e m e n t , p r o v i d e a r e p o r t w i t h i n t h e d e s i g n a t e d s c h e d u l e t o t h e S t a t e B r o w n f i e l d s P r o j e c t M a n a g e r . 1 8 1 C h e c k b o x t o a c k n o w l e d g e c o n s e n t t o p r o v i d e a r e d e v e l o p m e n t s u m m a r y r e p o r t i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e s i t e ' s B r o w n f i e l d s A g r e e m e n t . A P P R O V A L S I G N A T U R E S 9 r e , p e l r t i v e D e v e l o p e r A d « " " ' ~ h o " ' - t D a t e . P i : i R t e e ~ a m e / T i t l e f C u 1 1 1 p a n y P l t : v t n 1 n . j ' D 1 r < c . - h - > r ) - t e A s u l t a 1 1 t - , D A ~ t N M c ! ~ L . u r < : : , E ' D a t e - : > r i n t e d N a m e / T i t f e f E o m p a n y f R E S . / 0 1 : : : 1 - . n - . , . H i b " ' A T L A N 1 C . J : l , . S ( O C I A T E = S . / ' J : ' W C 1 2 E M P F o r m v e r . 1 , O c t o b e r 2 3 , 2 0 1 4 I I I ! I I 't. ,~/ ~o ,-, Date 13 EMP Form ver.l, October 23, 2014 DRAWINGS ´ DRAWN BY:DATE: ENG. CHECK: JOB NO: APPROVAL: DRAFTCHECK:GIS NO: DWG NO: REFERENCES:SCALE: LENOIR JONES PITT CRAVEN DUPLIN WAYNE GREENE AREA SHOWNWITHIN LENOIR COUNTY OCTOBER 2016 000R2611.00 T4055 03G-R2611.00-4055-11.1 1. KINSTON, NC DIGITAL RASTER GRAPHIC, USGS. SCANNED FROM 1:12,000-SCALE KINSTON, NC TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, PUBLISHED 2013, USGS.2. INSET MAP DIGITAL DATA FROM 2002 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION ATLAS, BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS, WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTOUR INTERVAL = 5 FEET 0 1,000 2,000Feet 1:12,000 SITE TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAPFORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL800 MANNING STREETKINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA !R !R !R !R!R !R !A !A !A !A !A !A X Y X Y X Y X Y X Y X Y ´ AREAS OF CONCERN AND SOIL BORING, SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS, AND MONITORING WELL LOCATION MAPFORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL800 MANNING STREETKINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA DRAWN BY: DRAFT CHECK BY: ENGINEER CHECK BY: APPROVED BY: DATE: OCTOBER 2016 JOB NO.: 000R2611.00 T4055 GIS NO.: 3G-R2611.00 T4055-3 DRAWING NO.: 2.1 REFERENCES: APRIL 2012 ORTHOPHOTOGRAPH PROVIDED BY NC ONEMAP. MID-ATLANTIC FIELD NOTES. PARCEL AND ROAD GIS DATA PROVIDED BY LENOIR CO. GIS. 0 125 250 375 50062.5 Feet Legend SUBJECT SITE PROPERTY LINES AREA OF CONCERN !R SOIL BORING LOCATION !A GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL X Y SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION VP-1 VP-2 VP-3 VP-4 VP-5 VP-6 MW-1 MW-3 MW-5 MW-4 MW-6 MW-2 SB-3 SB-4SB-5 / DUPLICATE SB-6 SB-1 SB-2 TA TA TB TC TF TD TE ATLANTIC AVENUE/NCRR MANNING STREET R H E M S T R E E T H O O D S T R E E T Approximate Location of 55-gallon Drums Building 1 Building 2 Building 3 MW-5 VP-6 SB-1 !A !A !A !A !A !A ´ ESTIMATED WATER TABLE CONTOUR MAPAUGUST 23, 2016FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL800 MANNING STREETKINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA DRAWN BY: DRAFT CHECK BY: ENGINEER CHECK BY: APPROVED BY: DATE: OCTOBER 2016 JOB NO.: 000R2611.00 T4055 GIS NO.: 3G-R2611.00 T4055-4 DRAWING NO.: 2.2 REFERENCES: APRIL 2012 ORTHOPHOTOGRAPH PROVIDED BY NC ONEMAP. MID-ATLANTIC FIELD NOTES. PARCEL AND ROAD GIS DATA PROVIDED BY LENOIR CO. GIS. 0 125 250 375 50062.5 Feet Legend SUBJECT SITE PROPERTY LINES !A GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (AT LOCATION) ESTIMATED WATER TABLE CONTOUR $GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION MW-1 MW-3 MW-5 MW-4 MW-6 MW-2 ATLANTIC AVENUE/NCRR MANNING STREET R H E M S T R E E T H O O D S T R E E T 89.5 ' 87.0 ' 84.5 ' 82.0 ' (91.66') (89.47') (88.49') (88.62') (79.35') (91.52') $ 8 2 . 0 ' 8 4 . 5 ' 8 7 . 0 ' 89.5 ' $ $ $ $ $ (89.47') 89.5 ' MW-5 TABLES WELL NUMBER DATE TOC (ft) DTW (ft), BTOC SWLE (ft) 0 MW-1 8/23/16 98.71 7.19 91.52 MW-2 8/23/16 87.63 8.28 79.35 MW-3 8/23/16 96.41 4.75 91.66 MW-4 8/23/16 92.04 3.42 88.62 MW-5 8/23/16 97.77 8.30 89.47 MW-6 8/23/16 97.27 8.78 88.49 Notes and Abbreviations: 2. Measuring point is top of well (TOC) casing unless otherwise noted. DTW - Depth-to-Water in feet SWLE - Static Water Elevation in feet 1. All elevations shown relative to site benchmark (base of fire hydrant in front of main warehouse) - Assumed datum 100.00 feet. BTOC - Below Top of Casing (TOC). Top of monitoring well pipe is 2 to 3 inches below the land surface. TABLE 2.1 WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL 800 MANNING STREET KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 000R2611.00 T4055 SB ‐1S B ‐2S B ‐3S B ‐4S B ‐5 DU P L I C A T E (O F SB ‐5) SB ‐6 EP A ME T H O D 82 6 0 B Ac e t o n e ‐‐ 0. 0 3 9 J . 0 4 4 J 0 . 0 3 8 J ‐‐ ‐ ‐ 0. 0 3 5 J 12 2 0 0 100000 24 Me t h y l e n e Ch l o r i d e ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0. 0 3 9 0 . 0 2 7 ‐‐ 57 640 0.023 Na p h t h a l e n e ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0. 5 2 J 0 . 0 0 5 5 J 0 . 0 0 4 3 J ‐‐ 3. 8 17 0.21 1, 2 , 3 ‐Tr i c h l o r o b e n z e n e ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0. 0 0 4 4 J ‐‐ ‐ ‐ 12 . 6 186 NL 1, 2 , 4 ‐Tr i c h l o r o b e n z e n e ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0. 0 0 4 6 J ‐‐ ‐ ‐ 11 . 6 52 2.2 EP A ME T H O D 82 0 7 D Ac e n a p h t h y l e n e ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1. 6 J ‐‐ NL NL 21 1 ‐Me t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e 0. 1 7 J 0 . 6 8 J ‐‐ 0. 6 0 J 2 . 2 3 . 6 J ‐‐ 18 73 0.055 2 ‐Me t h y l n a p h t h a l e n e 0. 2 1 J 0 . 7 3 J ‐‐ 0. 7 2 J 2 . 5 4 . 3 J ‐‐ 48 600 1.6 Be n z o ( a ) p y r e n e ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1. 2 J 0 . 6 2 J ‐‐ ‐ ‐ 0. 0 1 6 0.29 0.059 Be n z o ( a ) a n t h r a c e n e ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1. 6 J 0 . 8 1 J 2 . 0 J ‐‐ 0. 1 6 2.9 0.18 Be n z o ( g , h , i ) p e r y l e n e ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0. 7 9 J ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ NL NL 7,800 Be n z o ( b ) f l u o r a n t h e n e 0. 1 4 J ‐‐ 1. 8 J 0 . 9 5 J 2 . 2 J ‐‐ 0. 1 6 2.9 0.6 Ch r y s e n e ‐‐ 0. 6 6 J ‐‐ 1. 9 J 1 . 3 J 3 . 7 J ‐‐ 16 290 18 Di b e n z o f u r a n ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0. 8 2 J ‐‐ ‐ ‐ 14 . 6 200 5.2 Fl u o r a n t h e n e ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2. 5 1 . 2 J 3 . 5 J ‐‐ 48 0 6,000 330 In d e n o ( 1 , 2 , 3 ‐cd ) p y r e n e ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0. 8 9 J ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0. 1 6 2.9 2 Ph e n a n t h r e n e 0. 3 9 J 0 . 9 1 J ‐‐ 2. 1 2. 7 6. 6 0 . 6 2 JN L N L 6 8 Py r e n e ‐‐ 0. 5 4 J ‐‐ 3 1 . 4 J 4 . 3 J 0 . 5 5 J 36 0 4,600 220 Na p h t h a l e n e 0. 1 6 J ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1. 7 J 6. 1 J ‐‐ 3. 8 17 0.21 EP A ME T H O D 60 1 0 D Ar s e n i c 4. 9 7 . 3 4 . 3 1 1 2 4 2 0 1 0 0. 6 8 3 5.8 Ba r i u m 13 0 2 7 4 8 8 7 7 4 8 3 2 4 0 3, 0 0 0 44,000 580 Ch r o m i u m 3. 7 3 . 3 8 . 4 4 . 3 3 . 6 4 . 0 7 . 8 24 , 0 0 0 * 100,000*360,000* Le a d 5. 4 4 . 8 1 1 2 9 1 9 1 6 1 5 40 0 800 270 Se l e n i u m 0. 9 6 1 . 4 1 . 2 1 . 6 2 . 0 2 . 2 0 . 8 3 78 1,160 2.1 EP A ME T H O D 74 7 1 B Me r c u r y ‐‐ 0. 2 3 J ‐‐ 0. 1 2 0 . 1 2 0 . 1 4 0 . 0 2 5 2. 2 3.13 1 IH S B RE S I D E N T I A L SC E N A R I O RI S K CA L C U L A T I O N S Sa m p l e Ca n c e r Ri s k Su m 7. 2 E ‐06 1 . 1 E ‐05 6 . 3 E ‐06 1 . 6 E ‐05 3 . 5 E ‐05 2 . 9 E ‐05 1 . 5 E ‐05 Sa m p l e Cu m u l a t i v e No n ‐ca n c e r Ha z a r d In d e x 0. 1 5 0 . 2 1 0 . 1 3 0 . 3 4 0 . 7 2 0 . 6 0 0 . 3 1 No t e s : Bo l d va l u e s de n o t e th a t an a l y t e wa s de t e c t e d ab o v e it s IH S B Re s i d e n t i a l He a l t h Ba s e d Pr e l i m i n a r y So i l Re m e d i a t i o n Go a l (P S R G ) (A p r i l 20 1 6 ) Or a n g e sh a d e d va l u e s de n o t e th a t an a l y t e wa s de t e c t e d ab o v e it s IH S B Pr o t e c t i o n of Gr o u n d w a t e r PS R G (A p r i l 20 1 6 ) Bo l d an d Re d sh a d e d va l u e s de n o t e th a t an a l y t e wa s de t e c t e d ab o v e it s IH S B In d u s t r i a l / C o m m e r c i a l He a l t h Ba s e d PS R G (A p r i l 20 1 6 ) J = De t e c t e d ab o v e th e Me t h o d De t e c t i o n Li m i t bu t be l o w th e Re p o r t i n g Li m i t , th e r e f o r e , re s u l t is an es t i m a t e d co n c e n t r a t i o n ‐ ‐ = An a l y t e no t de t e c t e d ab o v e th e Me t h o d De t e c t i o n Li m i t Cu m u l a t i v e no n ‐ca n c e r ha z a r d in d e x as s u m e s si m i l a r cr i t i c a l he a l t h ef f e c t s fo r al l an a l y t e s Co m p o u n d s de t e c t e d at es t i m a t e d co n c e n t r a t i o n s (b e l o w th e la b o r a t o r y re p o r t i n g li m i t ) we r e no t us e d fo r ri s k ca l c u l a t i o n s * = Ch r o m i u m (I I I ) , In s o l u b l e Sa l t s we r e us e d fo r th e PS R G s NL = No t Li s t e d fo r An a l y t e Ta r g e t Cu m u l a t i v e Hazard Index for Non ‐Carcinogens (HI=1) Ta r g e t Ca n c e r Risk Sum for Carcinogens (1.0E ‐04) TA B L E 3. 1 SU M M A R Y OF CH E M I C A L CO N S T I T U E N T S DE T E C T E D IN SO I L FO R M E R GL E N RA V E N MI L L 80 0 MA N N I N G ST R E E T KI N S T O N , NO R T H CA R O L I N A MI D ‐AT L A N T I C JO B NO . R2 6 1 1 . 0 0 T4 0 5 5 Pr e l i m i n a r y Re s i d e n t i a l He a l t h Ba s e d So i l Re m e d i a t i o n Go a l (m g / K g ) Preliminary In d u s t r i a l / C o m m e r c i a l Health Based Soil Remediation Goal (mg/Kg)Protection of Groundwater (PSRG) (mg/Kg) SO I L BO R I N G LO C A T I O N S CO N C E N T R A T I O N (m g / K g ) MW - 1 M W - 2 Du p l i c a t e (o f M W - 2 ) MW - 3 M W - 4 M W - 5 M W - 6 Ac e t o n e - - - - - - - - 1 9 - - - - 6 , 0 0 0 Ch l o r o f o r m - - - - - - - - 4 . 8 - - 1 . 1 7 0 Di e t h y l p h t h a l a t e - - - - - - - - 4 . 2 J - - - - 6 , 0 0 0 Me t h y l E t h y l K e t o n e - - - - - - - - 0 . 5 7 J - - - - 4 , 0 0 0 Me t h y l I s o b u t y l K e t o n e - - - - - - - - 7 . 0 - - - - N L Na p h t h a l e n e - - - - - - - - 0 . 8 6 J - - - - 6 To l u e n e - - - - - - - - 0 . 5 7 - - - - 6 0 0 Xy l e n e s , t o t a l - - 0 . 5 9 J 0 . 5 6 J 0 . 7 4 J 0 . 6 5 J 0 . 5 7 J - - 5 0 0 No t e s : -- = A n a l y t e N o t D e t e c t e d A b o v e t h e M e t h o d D e t e c t i o n L i m i t J = D e t e c t e d a b o v e t h e M e t h o d D e t e c t i o n L i m i t b u t b e l o w t h e R e p o r t i n g L i m i t ; t h e r e f o r e , r e s u l t i s a n e s t i m a t e d c o n c e n t r a t i o n NL = N o N C G Q S l i s t e d f o r a n a l y t e MI D ‐AT L A N T I C JO B NO . R2 6 1 1 . 0 0 T4 0 5 5 Vo l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o m p o u n d s - 8 2 6 0 B B o l d v a l u e s d e n o t e t h a t a n a l y t e w a s d e t e c t e d a b o v e i t s 2 L N o r t h C a r o l i n a G r o u n d w a t e r Q u a l i t y S t a n d a r d CH E M I C A L C O N S T I T U E N T CO N C E N T R A T I O N ( µ g / L ) NC Groundwater Quality Standards TA B L E 3. 2 SU M M A R Y OF CH E M I C A L CO N S T I T U E N T S DE T E C T E D IN GR O U N D W A T E R FO R M E R GL E N RA V E N MI L L 80 0 MA N N I N G ST R E E T KI N S T O N , NO R T H CA R O L I N A VP ‐1 8/ 1 9 / 2 0 1 6 VP ‐2 8/ 1 9 / 2 0 1 6 VP ‐3 8/ 1 9 / 2 0 1 6 VP ‐4 8/ 1 9 / 2 0 1 6 VP ‐5 8/19/2016DUPLICATE (OF VP ‐5)8/19/2016VP‐6 8/19/2016 Tr i c h l o r o f l u o r o m e t h a n e (F 1 1 ) ~ ~ 12 8. 2 20 64 24 28 64 Di c h l o r o d i f l u o r o m e t h a n e (F 1 2 ) 69 5 8, 7 6 0 ‐‐ ‐‐ 4. 0 ‐‐‐‐‐‐18 Me t h y l e n e ch l o r i d e (D i c h l o r o m e t h a n e ) 4, 1 7 0 52 , 6 0 0 ‐‐ ‐‐ 2. 0 QL ‐1H 8. 3 QL ‐1H ‐‐‐‐‐‐ Ca r b o n di s u l f i d e 4, 8 7 0 61 , 3 0 0 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3. 0 ‐‐‐‐2.3 3 . 9 tr a n s ‐1, 2 ‐Di c h l o r o e t h e n e ~~ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3.3 ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 ‐Bu t a n o n e (M E K ) 34 , 8 0 0 43 8 , 0 0 0 6. 2 7. 2 9. 0 43 8.2 7.4 5.7 ci s ‐1, 2 ‐Di c h l o r o e t h e n e ~~ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3.4 ‐‐1.8 ‐‐ Ch l o r o f o r m 40 . 7 53 3 ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐1.7 1.7 ‐‐ 1, 1 , 1 ‐Tr i c h l o r o e t h a n e 34 , 8 0 0 43 8 , 0 0 0 ‐‐ ‐ ‐ 15 3 . 4 ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Be n z e n e 12 0 1, 5 7 0 1. 0 2. 0 4. 7 1.4 2.3 1.8 2.5 Tr i c h l o r o e t h e n e 13 . 9 17 5 ‐‐ 4. 2 ‐‐ 6.5 ‐‐12 ‐‐ 4 ‐Me t h y l ‐2 ‐pe n t a n o n e (M I B K ) 20 , 9 0 0 26 3 , 0 0 0 ‐‐ 4. 5 3 . 8 4 . 2 ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ To l u e n e 34 , 8 0 0 43 8 , 0 0 0 7. 0 13 20 3.6 5.2 4.2 13 Te t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e 27 8 3, 5 0 0 ‐‐ 2. 9 3. 9 7.2 5.0 5.2 ‐‐ Et h y l b e n z e n e 37 4 4, 9 1 0 ‐‐ 2. 4 4. 0 2.5 ‐‐‐‐2.9 m, p ‐Xy l e n e 69 5 8, 7 6 0 5. 1 8. 7 14 5.0 3.1 2.5 11 St y r e n e 6, 9 5 0 87 , 6 0 0 ‐‐ 5. 3 12 ‐‐‐‐‐‐6.3 o ‐Xy l e n e 69 5 8, 7 6 0 ‐‐ 4. 1 5. 5 ‐‐‐‐‐‐3.8 Ch l o r o m e t h a n e 62 6 7, 8 8 0 ‐‐ ‐‐ 3. 2 1.8 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1, 2 , 4 ‐Tr i m e t h y l b e n z e n e 48 . 7 61 3 2. 0 3. 3 5. 5 ‐‐‐‐‐‐4.4 1, 4 ‐Di c h l o r o b e n z e n e 85 . 1 1, 1 1 0 ‐‐ 3. 5 3. 2 ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3.2 NO T E S : ‐ ‐ = An a l y t e No t De t e c t e d Ab o v e th e Me t h o d De t e c t i o n Li m i t QL ‐1H = Th e LC S an d / o r LC S D re c o v e r i e s fe l l ab o v e th e es t a b l i s h e d co n t r o l sp e c i f i c a t i o n s fo r th i s an a l y t e . An y re s u l t fo r th i s co m p o u n d is qu a l i f i e d an d sh o u l d be co n s i d e r e d bi a s e d high ~ = No DW M Re s i d e n t i a l or No n ‐Re s i d e n t i a l sc r e e n i n g le v e l Bo l d va l u e s ex c e e d th e re s i d e n t i a l so i l ga s sc r e e n i n g le v e l Ri s k Ca l c u l a t i o n s we r e on l y pe r f o r m e d fo r sa m p l e s th a t co n t a i n e d on e or mo r e an a l y t e co n c e n t r a t i o n in ex c e e d e n c e of th e DW M Re s i d e n t i a l Sc r e e n i n g Le v e l s TA B L E 3 . 3 SU M M A R Y O F C H E M I C A L C O N S T I T U E N T S D E T E C T E D I N S U B - S L A B S O I L G A S FO R M E R G L E N R A V E N M I L L 80 0 M A N N I N G S T R E E T KI N S T O N , L E N O I R C O U N T Y , N O R T H C A R O L I N A MI D - A T L A N T I C P R O J E C T N O . 0 0 0 R 2 6 1 1 . 0 0 T 4 0 5 5 AN A L Y T E DW M Re s i d e n t i a l So i l Ga s Va p o r In t r u s i o n Sc r e e n i n g Le v e l s Ma r c h 20 1 6 (µ g / m ³ ) DW M No n ‐ Re s i d e n t i a l So i l Ga s Va p o r In t r u s i o n Sc r e e n i n g Le v e l s Ma r c h 20 1 6 (µ g / m ³ ) SA M P L E LOCATION CO L L E C T I O N DATE AN A L Y T E CONCENTRATION (µ g / m ³ ) CONTINGENCY PLAN CONTINGENCY PLAN If the event unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, potentially contaminated soil or other waste materials are encountered during construction or during post construction activities at the site (landscaping, utility repair, etc.), all activities in the area will stop and the area will be cordoned off with caution tape (or similar). An environmental professional will be called to the site and Mr. Kady with the NCDEQ Brownfields Program will be contacted at 919-707-8378. If Mr. Kady is not available actions will be reported to another member of the NCDEQ Brownfields Program staff.