21010_Reman Properties_Phase I ESA_20170106

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

PHASE I
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

Reman Properties LLC Property
±20.375-Acre Site
270 Moncure Pittsboro Road
Pittsboro, Chatham County, North Carolina
WR Project No. 02160652.00

Prepared for:
Capital Ready Mix Concrete
512 Three Sisters Road
Knightdale, NC 27545

Prepared by:
WithersRavenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, North Carolina 27511
North Carolina Firm License No. C-0832
January 6, 2017

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

115 MacKenan Drive | Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 | f: 919.467.6008 | www.withersravenel.com | License No. C-0832
Cary | Greensboro | Pittsboro | Raleigh | Wilmington

January 6, 2017

Attn: Ms. Sara Lochren

Reference: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Reman Properties LLC Property
±20.375-Acre Site
270 Moncure Pittsboro Road
Pittsboro, Chatham County, North Carolina
WR Project No. 02160652.00

Mrs. Lochren:

WithersRavenel (WR) has completed the authorized environmental evaluation at the above referenced
property. The enclosed report presents the findings and recommendations of WR's assessment of existing
and past environmental conditions at the site. If changes in conditions or different conditions from those
detailed in this report are encountered, we request that we be contacted so that the change in conditions can
be properly reviewed and our report amended accordingly.

Sincerely
WithersRavenel

Patrick Farfour
Project Manager – Environmental Professional

R. S. (Butch) Lawter, Jr., P.E.
Senior Engineer – Environmental Professional
Director of Environmental Services

Capital Ready Mix Concrete
512 Three Sisters Road
Knightdale, NC 27545
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
i
Table of Contents
1.Introduction...................................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1
1.2. Scope of Services ............................................................................................................................................................ 1
1.3. Limitations and Exceptions ......................................................................................................................................... 2
1.4. Special Terms and Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 2
1.5. Reliance ............................................................................................................................................................................. 3
2.Site Description ............................................................................................................... 4
2.1. Site Reconnaissance Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 4
2.2. Onsite Reconnaissance/Occupants, Processes, and Equipment ..................................................................... 4
2.3. Description of Structures ............................................................................................................................................ 8
2.4. Current Uses of Adjoining Properties ................................................................................................................... 10
3.User-Provided Information ........................................................................................ 11
4.Records Review & Historical Use Information ...................................................... 13
4.1. Local State and Federal Environmental Regulatory Authorities and Databases .................................... 13
4.1.1. Database Findings ................................................................................................................................................... 14
4.2. Physical Setting and Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 15
4.3. Historical Use Information on the Property ....................................................................................................... 15
4.3.1. Ownership Review .................................................................................................................................................. 15
4.3.2. Aerial Photograph Review .................................................................................................................................... 16
4.3.3. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps .............................................................................................................................. 18
4.3.4. City Directory Search ............................................................................................................................................. 18
4.3.5. History of Property Use ......................................................................................................................................... 18
4.4. Historical Use Information on the Adjoining Properties ................................................................................ 18
5.Interviews ....................................................................................................................... 19
5.1. Interview with Mr. Auston Cox – Current Owner Representative ............................................................. 19
5.2. Interview with Mr. Jim Hendricks – Former Plant Engineer ......................................................................... 19
5.3. Interview with Mr. Alvin Gunther – Former Plant Employee ....................................................................... 20
5.4. Additional Interviews ................................................................................................................................................ 20
5.5. Interviews with Local Government Officials ...................................................................................................... 20
6.Data Gaps ........................................................................................................................ 21
7.Findings and Conclusions ............................................................................................ 22
8.References ...................................................................................................................... 25
8.1. Persons Interviewed .................................................................................................................................................. 25
8.2. Records and Documents Reviewed ....................................................................................................................... 25
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
ii
Appendix Included in this Report
A FIGURES Yes No
B ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REPORT Yes No
C SANBORN MAP REPORT Yes No
D DEEDS & OWNERSHIP RECORDS Yes No
E CITY DIRECTORIES Yes No
F PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD Yes No
G AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Yes No
H OWNER QUESTIONNAIRES Yes No
I PURCHASE PRICE QUESTIONNAIRE Yes No
J LIEN-AUL QUESTIONNAIRE (Blank) Yes No
K CLIENT/USER QUESTIONNAIRE Yes No
L REGULATORY FILE REVIEW INFORMATION Yes No
M HISTORICAL REPORTS Yes No
N OTHER Yes No
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
1

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. PURPOSE
This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was requested by Ms. Sara Lochren on behalf of Capital
Ready Mix Concrete, herein referred to as the Client, to identify, to the extent feasible, recognized
environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the subject property.

1.2. SCOPE OF SERVICES
WithersRavenel (WR) has performed a Phase I ESA for a ±20.375-acre site located approximately 785 feet
southeast of the intersection of Moncure Pittsboro Road and Sanford Road, Pittsboro, Chatham County,
North Carolina (Figure 1). According to Chatham County GIS records, the subject property consists of the
following parcel:
Tract # Parcel # Current Owner Address Acreage
Tract 1 60773 Reman Properties LLC 270 Moncure Pittsboro Road ±20.375

See Section 4.3.1 for information regarding past and present ownership records for the subject property.
WR understands that a Phase I ESA has been authorized as part of a potential property transaction. WR also
understands that the future use of the subject property will be industrial utilizing municipal water and sewer
services.
The Phase I ESA performed by WR included a limited site reconnaissance, historical research, municipal
research, and a database search for the above-referenced site. The Phase I ESA was completed in general
accordance with the guidelines set forth in Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (Title 40 of the
Code of Federal Register (CFR), Part 312); Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment Process (American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E-1527-
13); and WR’s Standard Contract Conditions for Engineering Services. Distances for vapor encroachment
screening of the site were generally followed in accordance with the guidelines set forth in ASTM E2600-10
“Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property involved in Real Estate Transactions” or the
Buonicore Methodology (See Section 9). WR has used these guidelines to serve as a baseline for customary
standards of environmental site assessments and to create a high quality, standardized environmental
assessment report.
Non-Scope Considerations
This report represents WR’s efforts to document the recognized environmental conditions on the site and
surrounding area that may adversely impact the subject site. However, ASTM E 1527-13 establish
environmental issues or conditions at a property that the Client may wish to assess in connection with the
subject property that are outside the scope of this practice (non-scope considerations). The standards state
that some substances may be present on a property in quantities and under conditions that may lead to
contamination of the property or nearby properties but are not included in CERCLA’s definition of hazardous
substances or do not present potential CERCLA liability. Assessment of such non-scope considerations is not
required for appropriate inquiry as defined by this practice. Therefore, the Phase I investigation does not
include inspection for items excluded by the ASTM E 1527-13 standards such as asbestos-containing
materials, biological agents, cultural and historic resources, ecological resources, endangered species, health
and safety, indoor air quality unrelated to releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products into the
environment, industrial hygiene, lead-based paint, copper or lead in drinking water, mold, radon, regulatory
compliance, wetlands, and high-voltage power lines. No implication is intended as to the relative importance
of inquiry into such non-scope considerations, and this list is not intended to be all-inclusive. All conclusions
made in this report are based upon the assessment performed by WR and are subject to the service
constraints presented below.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
2

1.3. LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS
This report presents the findings of WR's assessment of existing and past environmental conditions at the
site. Appropriate inquiry of information was utilized for this Phase I Site Assessment and included:
 A site reconnaissance,
 A historical source review that included certain aerial photographs and certain recorded land title
records,
 A limited Federal and State records review through EDR, Inc. (Please see the disclaimer on page 1 and
Section 4.1, of this report, for limitations of the EDR Report), and
 Interviews with an owner representative and when available certain individuals familiar with the
subject property.
Appropriate inquiry does not mean an exhaustive assessment of the property. All areas of the subject
property were accessible during WR’s site reconnaissance.
This environmental site assessment cannot entirely eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in
connection with the property. Performance of a Phase I ESA in accordance with ASTM E 1527-13 is intended
to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property based
on information obtained within reasonable limits of time and cost. There is always the possibility/risk that
sources or potential sources of environmental impacts have not been identified due to discrepancies such as,
but not limited to, the inaccuracies of the available records, environmental incidents/RECs not being
disclosed, or the limitations of the survey/assessment. If conditions at the site change or additional
information becomes available which would materially affect the nature of the report, we request that we be
contacted so that any change in conditions can be properly reviewed and our report amended accordingly.
This Phase I ESA does not, by itself, qualify the purchaser for CERCLA liability protection. The purchaser of
the site may have continuing obligations after the purchase.

1.4. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Site information and materials were obtained by WR through review of certain publicly available documents
and files pertaining to environmental assessment and remediation efforts for the subject property and certain
immediately adjoining properties. The resulting report is provided for sole use by Capital Ready Mix Concrete
on the project for which it was prepared. Use of this report by any third parties is at the sole risk of Capital
Ready Mix Concrete, and WR disclaims any such third party use of the report.
Draft/Preliminary Findings: If the report is stamped “DRAFT” or is identified as preliminary, the following
constraints apply: The Draft Report was prepared by WR at the specific request of a client. The information
and findings provided in the Draft Report are not WR’s final conclusions and recommendations, but merely
basic information requested by the client upon which the client may draw its own conclusions. Client agrees
that WR shall not be liable for any claims, loss, damage, or expenses incurred by the Client or others arising
out of the use of, or reliance on, any information contained with the Draft Report.
Report Purpose: The purpose of this report is as described in the Introduction of this report. The scope and
level of services provided were determined based on the stated purpose. If the purpose for which the report
is to be used, or the proposed use of the site changes, this report is no longer valid and use of this report by
the Client or others without WR’s review and written authorization shall be at the user’s sole risk. If review
of this report is required by WR after its date of submission, WR shall be entitled to additional compensation
at WR’s existing rates or such terms as agreed to between WR and the Client.
Scope of Services: Observations and conclusions provided in this report are based solely on the Scope of
Services between the Client and WR and summarized in the Introduction of this report. No additional
observations, investigations, studies, or testing not specifically stated in the Scope of Services have been
performed by WR. WR shall not be liable for the existence of any condition, the discovery of which required
the performance of services not authorized under the agreement. Unless specified in the Introduction of this
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
3

report, WR did not evaluate the presence of asbestos-containing materials, biological agents, cultural and
historic resources, ecological resources, endangered species, health and safety, indoor air quality unrelated
to releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products into the environment, industrial hygiene, lead-
based paint, copper or lead in drinking water, mold, radon, regulatory compliance, wetlands, and high-voltage
power lines.
Time: Technology, economic conditions, site variations, or regulatory provisions may change over time and
render the report inaccurate. If review of this report is required by WR after three months from its date of
submission, WR shall be entitled to additional compensation at WR’s existing rates or such terms as agreed
to between WR and the Client.
Conclusions: The conclusions stated in this report are based upon observations of existing physical and/or
economic conditions; WR’s interpretation of site history and site usage information; information provided by
the Client; and information and/or analyses provided by independent testing and information services or
laboratories upon which WR is entitled to reasonably rely. WR is not authorized and did not attempt to
independently verify the accuracy or completeness of information or materials received from third parties
during the performance of the Scope of Services associated with this report. WR shall not be liable for any
conditions, information, or conclusion, the discovery of which required information not available or
independent investigation of information provided to WR, unless otherwise indicated. Any site drawing(s)
provided within this report is not meant to be an accurate base plan, but is used to present the general, relative
locations of features on, and surrounding, the site.

1.5. RELIANCE
This report has been prepared exclusively for the Client. Except for Capital Ready Mix Concrete, no other
party is entitled to rely on the conclusions, observations, specifications, or data contained therein without the
express written consent of WR. This report has been prepared pursuant an agreement between the Client
and WR. All uses of and reliance upon this report are subject to, and deemed acceptance of, the conditions
and restrictions contained herein.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
4

2. SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1. SITE RECONNAISSANCE METHODOLOGY

On December 9, 2016, WR performed a reconnaissance of the subject property that involved traversing the
site and observing adjacent properties. Photographs taken document features and materials observed during
site reconnaissance activities, where possible. A photographic essay has been included in the Appendix F.
The site reconnaissance was performed to the extent possible within the means of time, cost, and safety.

2.2. ONSITE RECONNAISSANCE/OCCUPANTS, PROCESSES, AND EQUIPMENT
At the time of WR’s site reconnaissance, the subject property was vacant and had most recently been utilized
as a poultry processing facility. The site consists of a poultry processing plant with additional support
structures, which include a vehicle maintenance garage, truck scales, offal building, and live truck sheds. The
subject property is divided by Moncure Pittsboro Road. The portion of the property south of Moncure
Pittsboro Road contains the processing facility which is bordered along the western boundary by woodlands
and along the southern and eastern boundaries by woodlands and Turkey Creek. A guard shack and gate are
situated on the northwestern corner of this portion of the site, which provide access to the processing facility.
Two large aboveground water storage tanks are situated adjacent to the guard shack which provided
reclaimed and fresh water to the plant for processing activities. The western portion of the site is primarily
paved parking with a second access to the site from Moncure Pittsboro Road located east of the guard shack
which provided access to the facility for shipping and receiving. The primary processing plant is centrally
located along the northern boundary with the offal building to the east, and a plant maintenance building to
the south. A live truck shed is situated in the southwestern corner of the site and two wood barns are situated
along the southern portion of the site in an overgrown grassy area bordered by woodlands.
The portion of the site situated along the northern side of Moncure Pittsboro Road consist of a live truck
shed/truck maintenance garage located on the western portion of the site and a truck scale house with truck
scales on the eastern portion of the site. The majority of the area around the buildings consisted of gravel
driveways and parking areas with woodlands along the northern most boundaries.
At the time of WR’s site visit, the subject property was vacant and many of the buildings were in disarray with
all electrical wire, metals, and recyclable materials removed from the site. Specifics regarding the onsite
buildings are discussed in detail in Section 2.3.

Category Site Features Observed
Current Site Use/Operations
Residential
Agricultural
Industrial X
Manufacturing
Commercial X
Dry Cleaning
Fueling Systems X
Automotive Repair X
Paint Booths
Elevators
Waste Water Treatment
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
5

Category Site Features Observed
Utilities
Heating & Cooling Systems X
Municipal Water X
Municipal Sewer X
Private Water Supply Wells X
Private Septic Systems
Municipal Trash Services
Sumps, Cisterns, Catch Basins X
Floor Drains X
Pad or pole-mounted transformers
Other PCB Equipment
Oil & Hazardous Materials
Storage and Use
Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) X(former)
Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) X
Drums, barrels, and/or containers ≥ 5-gallons X(former)
Oil/Water Separators
Underground Hydraulic Lifts
Emergency Generators
Releases or Potential Releases
Stressed Vegetation
Staining X
Trash, Debris, and/or other waste materials X
Dumping or Disposal Area X
Construction debris, fill dirt X
Petroleum or Chemical Odors
Site Features
Groundwater Monitoring Wells X
Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons
Storm water Retention Ponds (BMPs)

Utilities
At the time of WR’s site reconnaissance, the site is supplied with municipal water and municipal sewer for
domestic waste, natural gas, and electricity. While the poultry plant was in operation all processing waste
water and stormwater from the property was collected and sent to a water treatment and reuse facility
located on the eastern adjacent property prior to discharge into a lagoon situated to the southeast of the
subject property. Numerous floor drains were noted in the processing area which were reportedly piped to
the Offal building prior to discharge to the water treatment facility. Currently, no process waste water has
been generated at the plant since operations were ceased in 2011. Stormwater continues to be directed
toward the adjacent wastewater treatment center; however, pumps utilized to move the stormwater are not
currently in operation. WR was informed by Mr. Jim Hendricks, former plant engineer, that while the plant
was in operation a stormwater permit was maintained and that stormwater runoff samples were collected at
outfall locations around the plant as required. Mr. Hendricks stated that he was not aware of any violations
with the permit or sampling while the plant was operating. Several outfall pipes were noted extending from
the bank of Turkey Creek along the southeastern boundary of the site. Mr. Hendricks stated that when the
plant was originally constructed stormwater was directed to Turkey Creek and the noted pipes are likely
associated with historical stormwater infrastructure.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
6

Several pole-mounted transformers were observed on the subject property. A few of the pole mounted
transformers were labeled as non-PCB while others were not labeled. However, no staining or stressed
vegetation was observed in the vicinity of the pole-mounted transformers.
Several areas were noted around the perimeter of the plant that had previously contained pad mounted
transformers. The former transformers were located onsite during WR’s site reconnaissance in 2013. At that
time many of the transformers were newer and most were labeled as “No PCBs”. In addition, no stains or
distressed vegetation was observed near any of the transformers at that time. WR was not informed if older
transformers containing PCB oils had ever been located onsite in the past.
An 80,000-gallon in-ground water tank is situated off the southwestern corner of the processing facility. The
tank provided additional water storage supplied from an onsite water supply well located on the southern
portion of the site (Figure 2). The underground water tank was utilized to store water for plant processing
activities and was used to offset the cost of the potable water supplied by the town.
Oil & Hazardous Materials Storage
USTS
The following historical USTs were identified on the subject property during the Phase I ESA:
10,000-gallon Diesel UST
A 10,000-gallon diesel UST was previously located southeast of the Live Truck Shed/Truck Maintenance
building north of Moncure-Pittsboro Road. The UST had approximately 70 feet of underground product line
which connected to a fuel dispenser located off the eastern exterior of the building. The UST was removed in
October 2015 and soil contamination was identified beneath the UST, product lines, and dispenser. See
Section 4.1.1 for more information regarding this former UST system. WR considers the remaining
contamination at the site to be a REC relative to the subject property.
550-gallon Gasoline UST
During WR’s assessment of the site in 2013, interviews indicated that an abandoned approximately 550-
gallon gasoline UST with approximately 50 feet of underground product line connected to a former dispenser
located at the Live Truck Shed/Truck Maintenance Shop north of Moncure Pittsboro Road. In addition, a site
plan obtained from the May 2013 Brightfields, Inc. Phase I ESA Update completed on the subject property
indicates that a 500-gallon gasoline UST was located in this location. During site reconnaissance, WR
observed a possible fill pipe attached to the northeast corner of the Truck Maintenance Shop. The location
of the pump island was visible but all dispensers had been removed from the site and the exact location of the
UST was not able to be determined during site reconnaissance. WR considers the 550-gallon gasoline UST to
be a REC relative to the subject property.

6,000-gallon Heating Oil UST
An approximately 6,000-gallon UST was used to store #2 fuel oil to fuel a boiler and was reportedly located
somewhere beneath the drum storage area near the Townsends, Inc. chicken plant. Mr. Jim Hendricks
indicated to WR during site reconnaissance that the UST was located somewhere in between the southern
extent of the plant and the maintenance building in the vicinity of the former boiler room. The Brightfields,
Inc. Phase I ESA mentioned that this tank was sampled in October 2001 with “minor concentrations of
petroleum near the tank and were submitted to the State of North Carolina for Review”. WR contacted
NCDEQ for further information on this UST and sampling; however, the NCDEQ-UST Section has no record
of the UST or sampling activities. Based on the lack of available information regarding the status of this UST
and any past sampling or closure activities at the site, WR considers this the 6,000-gallon kerosene/heating
oil UST to be a REC on the subject property.
10,000-gallon Gasoline UST
During WR’s preliminary assessment of the subject property in 2013, Mr. Bill Baker, a former Townsends
engineer indicated that a 10,000-gallon gasoline UST had been located near the truck scales on the northern
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
7

side of Moncure Pittsboro Road. Mr. Baker was interviewed during the December 2014 Spangler Phase I
ESA. The report indicates that Mr. Baker informed Spangler Environmental that additional USTs had been
used on the property in the past that had been abandoned and closed by S&ME in the past. The report did not
identify the locations of the USTs that Mr. Baker was referencing. The May 2013 Brightfields, Inc. Phase I
ESA Update reported that a 10,000 gallon gasoline UST was abandoned in place near the truck scale building.
Without review of assessment and closure information for this former UST, WR considers the UST to be a
REC relative to the subject site.

ASTS
1,000,000-gallon & 300,000-gallon ASTs
Two vertical ASTs are located on the western boundary of the site in the vicinity of the guard house on the
southern side of Moncure Pittsboro Road. The ASTs were used to store water for the processing activities at
the chicken plant. The larger 1,000,000-gallon AST was utilized to store re-use water and the smaller AST
stored potable water supplied by the town. Mr. Hendricks informed WR during site reconnaissance, that
process waste water generated at the plant was discharged through the Offal building to filter out the offal
chicken parts and was then sent to a water treatment plant west of the subject property. The treated waste
water was then returned to the re-use AST for reuse in processing.
Historic Onsite ASTs
During site reconnaissance, no additional ASTs were noted on the subject property; however, Mr. Hendricks
stated that there had been additional ASTs situated off the southern end of the processing facility. Mr.
Hendricks stated that ammonia ASTs had been situated off the southern exterior and oil tanks or
refrigeration tanks were located in the same vicinity and possibly in the engine room on the southwestern
corner of the plant. Historic site maps obtained from the May 2013 Brightfields, Inc. Phase I ESA Update
indicated that these tanks included a 22,801-pound Anhydrous Ammonia Receiver tank and two 25-gallon
Used Refrigeration Oil tanks. In addition, the historic site plan indicated that two 52,000-pound Liquid CO2
tanks had been located southwest of the plant in the vicinity of the underground water tank.
DRUMS, BARRELS, & CONTAINERS ≥5-GALLONS
At the time of WR’s site reconnaissance, all drums and containers greater than five gallons had been removed
from the subject property. A fenced area situated on the northern side of plant maintenance building and
south of the processing facility was a former drum storage area. Placards on the wall indicated storage areas
for Acetylene and Flammables and Oxygen Inert Gas. During WR’s inspection in 2013 numerous 55-gallon
and smaller drums were stored in this area which included waste water treatment chemicals and used or
virgin oil drums. Most of the drums were labeled and sealed at that time. Some staining was visible on the
concrete slab of the drum storage area. Previous assessment reports reviewed by WR indicated that drums
have been stored in the plant in the past which were typically water treatment chemicals with some oil drums
in the engine room of the plant. Based on the staining observed in the drum storage area in the past, WR
considers the drum storage area to be a REC.
WR obtained a copy of a Tier 2 Inventory report provide by the Chatham County Emergency Management
Department dated December 2010. The report list all chemicals stored and used at the facility which included
refrigeration chemicals associated with the coolers and ammonia refrigeration system at the plant, water
treatment chemicals, and chlorine cleaners utilized for cleaning the processing plant. Other materials
included salts and flavoring for the processed chicken, carbon dioxide, and diesel fuel at the garage building.
The inventory report is included in the Appendix N.
RELEASES OR POTENTIAL RELEASES
Chemical Storage Room
A chemical storage room is located off the northwestern corner of the plant maintenance building south of
the processing facility. Mr. Jim Hendricks stated that the room was used to store water treatment chemicals
and cleaning chemicals used to clean the plant. Mr. Hendricks stated that the cleaning chemicals were
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
8

chlorine based cleaners that were considered safe for food processing facilities. Mr. Hendrick stated that
heavy degreasers and chlorinated solvent based cleaners were not allowed inside the plant as they were not
considered safe for food processing. The storage room contained several drum pallet containment areas and
one drum of a powdered substance that was labeled corrosive and a placard above the drum stated “Danger
Chlorine”. A floor drain was located in the center of the room which is reportedly piped directly to the water
treatment facility located on the western adjacent property.
Debris/Landfill Area
An overgrown grassy area south of the processing facility is the location of a lay down yard that was used to
place concrete, steel, and miscellaneous building materials during plant expansions over the years. Based on
observations during site reconnaissance activities, the southern and eastern edge of this area is elevated
above the creek and concrete, steel, drum parts, and other miscellaneous materials were noted protruding
from the bank in this area. Mr. Hendrick stated that most of the time the items placed in that area were loaded
and hauled offsite for disposal; however, from time to time debris was covered with soil and buried. WR
considers this area of dumping and potential landfilling to be a REC.
SITE FEATURES
Two groundwater monitoring wells were observed in the vicinity of the diesel dispenser and former diesel
UST situated off the southeast corner of the Live Truck Shed/Truck Maintenance building on the north side
of Moncure Pittsboro Road. The monitoring wells are associated with the removal and assessment activities
associated with the diesel tank formerly located in this area. See Section 4.1.1 for detailed information on
the recent removal of the former diesel UST in this location.
Additional borings were noted around the perimeter of the plant that appeared to be related to past soil
and/or groundwater testing. WR was informed that environmental assessment and sampling had taken place
on the subject site within the past year but the report and findings were not able to be provided and no one
had direct knowledge of the findings.
2.3. DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURES
At the time of WR’s site reconnaissance, the subject property contained nine structures (Figure 2). Detailed
descriptions of the building’s construction, mechanical/electrical/plumbing systems, pavement condition, etc.
should be provided in reports completed by other professionals.
Poultry Processing Plant
The exterior of the chicken processing plant was constructed of prefabricated concrete, cinder block and
sheet metal exterior walls and a rubber membrane roof. The bottom floors of the plant were the processing
areas and were constructed with concrete slab floors and cinder block walls. General processing areas
consisted of deboning areas, portion control, large refrigerator space for shipping and receiving, boiler room,
and the engine room. Additional processing area was located on the upper floors along with office space and
storage areas. The offices were constructed with metal, carpeting, ceramic tile and vinyl floors, and sheet rock
and wood paneling walls, and suspend tile ceilings.
The engine room was located on the southern extent of the plant and had previously contained anhydrous
ammonia tanks to refrigerate the process areas. The engine room contained oil powered engines that
controlled the plant. At the time of WR’s site reconnaissance, the petroleum staining was noted around much
of the engine room. During WR’s past site inspection in 2013, several fuel ASTs and a hydraulic oil AST were
noted in this area with some petroleum staining noted around the tanks. Mr. Hendricks stated that,
historically, the engine room had a dirt floor which was eventually updated with a concrete slab during a plant
expansion. Mr. Hendricks stated that petroleum fuel powered engines would have been situated on the dirt
floor at one time.
Maintenance Building
The maintenance building was located on the south side of the processing facility in close proximity to the
main plant. The building was constructed on a concrete slab with cinder block walls. At the time of site
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
9

reconnaissance, a recent fire had destroyed much of the maintenance building. Generally, the building
contained a large space that had been used as a machine shop and parts storage for the processing plant. The
northwestern corner of the building contained the chemical storage room discussed in Section 2.2. The
southern portion of the building contained a storage area with storage shelves and was predominately empty.
Several small quantities (less than55 gallons) of a variety of solvent cleaners, equipment disinfectant, and
paints were observed in this area.
Parts Storage Building
The parts storage building was located southwest of the processing facility. The building was constructed on
a concrete slab with cinder block exterior walls and asphalt shingles. The interior consisted of empty space
previously utilized for parts storage. The building also contained a concrete covered area that provided
access to the 80,000-gallon underground water tank situated in this area.
Offal Building
The offal building is located west of the processing plant. The building was constructed on a concrete slab
with a metal frame and sheet metal walls and roof. Inside the building was a series of holding tanks and
screens used in filter wastewater that was collected from the processing plant. On the east side of the building
was a containment area which housed a sludge collection AST. Mr. Hendricks indicated that all floor drains in
the processing plant route wastewater to the Offal building where are the extra chicken parts and feathers
area screened out of the wastewater before being sent to the wastewater treatment plant. The offal
screening was then loaded into trucks and sold to dog food companies etc.
Live Truck Shed
The Live Truck Shed was located in the southwestern corner of the site. The building was a covered metal
structure with multiple bays for pulling in chicken trucks carrying live birds. Large fans would blow air across
the trucks to keep the birds cool until needed in the plant for processing. The building was only supplied with
electricity and no other utilities.
Live Truck Shed/Truck Maintenance Building
The Live Truck Shed/Truck Maintenance Building was the first live truck shed utilized at the facility and was
again open for truck trailer parking with large fans to keep live chickens cool. The far eastern end of the
building was closed in with two garage bay doors and was a former truck maintenance garage. The garage
was empty at the time of site reconnaissance with no materials remaining. No floor drains were noted within
the garage and the concrete slab was relatively free of petroleum staining. A truck pad was located on the
eastern exterior of the maintenance area which had a drain in the center of the wash pad. The drain was
reportedly connected to an oil water separator located on the east side of the wash area prior to discharge to
municipal sewer. WR was unable to locate the oil water separator during site reconnaissance.
Truck Scale House
The truck scale is located on the north side of Moncure Pittsboro Road. The building is constructed on a cinder
block foundation and tile covered exterior walls of an unknown material and asphalt shingle roof. The interior
was constructed of vinyl covered floors and sheet rock walls and ceiling. Based on interviews, this building
was utilized as a command post and truck scale house. A truck scale is situated off the southern exterior of
the building. Historical reports indicated that a former 10,000-gallon gasoline UST had been located in this
area in the past. WR did not observe any evidence of a former UST or dispensers during the site
reconnaissance. See Section 2.2 for more information on the historic gasoline UST.
Guard Shack and Water Tank Control Building
The Guard Shack and Water Tank Control buildings were located adjacent to southern side of Moncure
Pittsboro Road adjacent to the large water ASTs. Both buildings were constructed on a concrete slab, cinder
block walls and asphalt shingle roof. These buildings were used to house pump systems that sent the water
from the adjacent water ASTs to the processing facility and to provide office for the guard to work the gate
for access to the site.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
10

Old Pole Barns
Two old wooden pole barns are located on the southern portion of the site. The barns were reportedly used
for miscellaneous storage. The live shed was built on a concrete slab and steel frame with sheet metal roof.
The pole barns had dirt floors and sheet metal roof. These structures were cleared of debris. Two empty
polyethylene totes were stored in one of the barns. The totes were labeled as Polytec320 which is a
wastewater treatment additive and are likely associated with the water treatment of process water from the
plant. No evidence of spills or releases were noted around the totes and the totes appear to have been placed
in this location empty.

2.4. CURRENT USES OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES
The subject property is located in a rural residential area of Pittsboro, Chatham County, North Carolina. The
subject property is bordered to the west woodlands and residential properties; the north by residential
development; to the east by undeveloped land and the former poultry processing wastewater treatment
plant; and to the south by woodlands and agricultural land.
The adjacent properties were viewed by walking along the perimeter of the subject site. At the time of WR’s
site visit, no obvious environmental concerns were noted on these adjacent properties. The use of the
adjoining properties was also researched and provided in the aerial review and summary and city directories
in Section 4.3.2 of the report; the regulatory database findings in Section 4.1.1; and interviews presented in
Section 5.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
11

3. USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION
The following table summarizes information provided to WR by the Client during completion of this report.
User Provided Information Provided Not Provided Discussed Below
Title Records X
Environmental Liens X X
Historical Reports X X
Client/User Provided Information X X
Purchase Price & Fair Market Value X
Site Plans X

Environmental Liens
As of the date of this report, the environmental liens and activity and use limitations (AULs) search has not
been completed by a professional title company or title professional. However, WR observed no
environmental liens on file in the brief review of available deeds from the Chatham County Register of Deeds
Office and no environmental liens were revealed to WR by the client or current owner. WR believes that this
information should be completed along with title work for the property as typically coordinated by a real
estate attorney. If any environmental liens and/or AULs filed against the property are discovered, this
information should be provided to WR prior to any transfer of this property so that we may make a proper
review and issue an amended letter accordingly.
Client Provided Information
Capital Ready Mix Concrete was not aware of any environmental concerns with the subject property and did
not have specialized knowledge of releases or threatened releases at the site or surrounding property. The
client was aware of the past industrial use at the site and that previous assessment work had been completed
at the subject property in the past.
Historical Reports
December 19, 2014 – Phase I ESA
Spangler Environmental completed a Phase I ESA on the subject property in December 2014. The subject
property was in similar condition as observed; however, much of the plant infrastructure was still intact with
tanks and materials remaining onsite. The Phase I ESA concluded that two RECs were present at the site
which included a 10,000-gallon diesel tank located of the southeast corner of the Truck Maintenance Garage
and a drum storage area situated off the southern side of the processing facility adjacent to the facility
maintenance building.
May 9, 2013 – Phase I ESA Update
A Phase I ESA Update report was completed on the subject property in May 2013 by Brightfields, Inc
Environmental Services. The report was updating a previous assessment completed at the site in March 2007.
At the time of the report the facility was out of operation; however, much of the infrastructure remained
onsite. The report identified refrigeration oil drums and sanitation containers stored in the drum storage
area, a registered 10,000-gallon diesel UST, an unregulated 6,000-gallon heating oil tank, a 500-gallon
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
12

gasoline tank, and a “boneyard” for debris south of the plant to be potential RECs at the site. The report
recommended that the drums storage be placed in secondary containment and the 500-gallon gasoline tank
be further investigated.
July 2013 – Site Reconnaissance & Interviews
WR completed a site reconnaissance and interviews with key employees at the subject property in July 2013.
At that time the site was no longer in operation but much of the plant infrastructure remained at the site. WR
was able to view drum storage areas, ammonia refrigeration equipment, aboveground fuel tanks, and etc. at
the site. Information obtained by WR from this assessment have been included in the pertinent sections of
this report. RECs identified during the 2013 assessment activities correspond to WR’s current conclusions in
Section 7.
Additional Assessment Activities
WR was informed that soil and groundwater assessment was conducted at the site by Spangler
Environmental following the December 2014 Phase I ESA; however, the report was not available for review
and the findings were never shared with the current owner. In addition, references to past assessment on
historic USTs was mentioned in several of the historic reports for the site; however, the documentation was
not available and State regulatory bodies did not have further information on the historic USTs at the site.
RECs identified in the reviewed historical reports correspond to RECs identified by WR during the course of
this assessment. See Section 2 & Section 4.1.1 for more information on the historic USTs and other site
conditions identified as RECs by WR and Section 7 for WR’s conclusions. Reports reviewed by WR during
the course of this assessment have been included in Appendix M.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
13

4. RECORDS REVIEW & HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION
4.1. LOCAL STATE AND FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES
AND DATABASES
Through Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), an environmental database search firm, WR reviewed
files and databases of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) and the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to determine if either agency has been involved in any
regulatory activities at or in the vicinity of the site. Facilities that treat, store, generate, transport, or dispose
of hazardous substances or petroleum products and any incidents of leaks, spills and dumping of hazardous
substances or petroleum products may be found in one or more databases listed below.
A portion of the EDR report contains a section titled "Orphan Summary" whereby sites with registered USTs,
leaking USTs, landfills, environmental violations, etc. that have not been properly mapped by EDR are listed.
During completion of the Phase I ESA, WR observed the subject property and immediately adjacent
properties. The subject property and surrounding properties did not match any of the sites listed on the
Orphan Summary. WR did not, however, verify the actual location of each site appearing on the Orphan
Summary or find sites with improper or vague information provided in the Orphan Summary as this was not
considered reasonably ascertainable. In addition, WR cannot verify sites improperly mapped by the
individual government agency outside of the established search radius or beyond the adjacent properties of
the site as this is not considered reasonably ascertainable in the context of time and budget required to
complete the Phase I ESA.

DATABASE * RADIUS
(MILES)
# OF FACILITIES
IDENTIFIED
TARGET
PROPERTY REC(s)
(Yes/No) (Yes/No)
NPL 1.0 0 No N/A
CERCLIS 0.5 0 No N/A
CERC-NFRAP 0.5 0 No N/A
HSDS 1.0 0 No N/A
SHWS 1.0 0 No N/A
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.5 0 No N/A
BROWNFIELDS 0.5 0 No N/A
US ENG CONTROLS 0.5 0 No N/A
US INST CONTROL 0.5 0 No N/A
INST CONTROL 0.5 0 No N/A
CORRACTS 1.0 0 No N/A
RCRA-LQG 0.25 0 No N/A
RCRA-SQG 0.25 0 No N/A
RCRA-TSDF 0.5 0 No N/A
RCRA-CESQG 0.25 1 No No
RCRA-NonGen/NLR 0.25 0 No N/A
DOD 1.0 0 No N/A
FINDS 0.25 1 Yes No
ECHO 0.25 1 Yes No
RMP 0.25 1 Yes No
IMD 0.5 3 No No
HMIRS 0.25 0 No N/A
ERNS 0.25 1 Yes No
LUST 0.5 3 Yes Yes
LUST Trust 0.5 1 No No
RGA LUST 0.125 0 No N/A
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
14

DATABASE * RADIUS
(MILES)
# OF FACILITIES
IDENTIFIED
TARGET
PROPERTY REC(s)
UST ** 0.25 2 Yes Yes
AST 0.25 0 No N/A
LAST 0.5 2 No No
VCP 0.5 0 No N/A
SWF/LF 0.5 0 No N/A
OLI 0.5 0 No N/A
HIST LF 0.5 0 No N/A
SWRCY 0.5 0 No N/A
NPDES 0.25 0 Yes N/A
UIC 0.25 0 No N/A
SPILLS 0.125 0 No N/A
RGA LF 0.125 0 No N/A
Drycleaners 0.125 0 No N/A
US Hist Auto 0.25 0 No N/A
US Hist Cleaners 0.25 0 No N/A
* - For a complete list of databases searched and the definitions of these databases, see pages GR-1 through GR-26 of the EDR
Report in the Appendix.
N/A - Not Applicable; No sites listed in the EDR Report for that particular database.
** - It should be noted that registration with the NCDEQ of commercial USTs was not required prior to 1988. Additionally,
registration for non-commercial USTs (e.g. residential) less than 1,100 gallons in capacity is not required with the NCDENR.
Therefore, if a UST system was used to store fuel for any heating system on the property, or to support agricultural or other
operations there would be no written public record of its use.
Sites listed in the EDR Report and not discussed in the paragraphs below were deemed to be either located
beyond the search distances set forth in the ASTM E-1527-13 standard practice for Phase I ESAs or to be
listed under databases or for issues that do not represent a threat to the environmental quality of the subject
property under ASTM E-1527-13 standard practice. The sites can be viewed in the EDR report provided in
the Appendix. Details of the reported are noted below.

4.1.1. DATABASE FINDINGS
Target Property
Townsends Processing Plant

The target property was identified in the EDR report on several databases associated with the former poultry
processing activities at the site. The site was listed on the UST and the Leaking UST (LUST) databases for the
10,000-gallon diesel UST that was formerly located on the northern portion of the property in the vicinity of
the Truck Maintenance Garage and Live Truck Sheds. Based on information in the EDR report, this UST was
installed in 1961 and removed from the site in October 2015. WR reviewed available information on this
former UST and release at the NCDEQ - UST Section Raleigh Regional Office. A UST Closure Report
completed during the removal of the tank in October 2015 indicated that sidewall and floor samples collected
from the extents of the excavation indicated that soil remained impacted by diesel and gasoline range
organics. In addition, soil samples collected beneath the former product lines and dispenser identified diesel
and gasoline range organics above State standards. The report recommended further delineation of the
petroleum impacted soils at the site. No additional information was available for review in the provided files.
WR observed two groundwater monitoring wells at the site during the December 2016 site reconnaissance
activities indicating that additional assessment has occurred since the tank closure activities in 2015. One
monitoring well was located in the vicinity of the former UST and the other located in the location of the
former dispenser. WR contacted NCDEQ-UST Section to inquire about the additional assessment activities
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
15

at the site; however, at this time WR has not received a return phone call. WR considers the soil and
groundwater contamination at the site associated with the removal of the 10,000-gallon diesel UST to be a
REC for the site.
The former Townsends poultry processing plant was also identified in the EDR Report on the FINDS and
ECHO databases. The aforementioned databases typically refer to inspections or permits associated with
industrial facilities that store and utilize hazardous materials and do not always correlate to a release.
However, two additional listings were noted for the site in the Emergency Response Notification System
(ERNS), and Emergency Management Plan (EMP) databases which correlates to a leak of an unknown amount
of anhydrous ammonia from an ice maker was reported at the site on June 26, 2006. The release was
reportedly to the air/atmosphere. As an industrial facility that handles and stores hazardous substances, the
Townsends facility was required to submit a Risk Management Plan. WR requested a copy of the RMP from
the Town of Pittsboro Department of Emergency Management but a copy was not able to be located. In an
interview, Mr. Hendricks, a former engineer of Townsends, Inc., confirmed a release of less than100 lbs. of
ammonia from the refrigeration system; however, due to the volatility of the ammonia, no further action was
required regarding mitigation of the release. The EDR report did not list the site on other databases indicating
that other releases have occurred at the site in the past.
Additional USTs identified during historical research and interviews that are discussed in Section 2.2 were
not identified in the EDR report for the subject property.
Surrounding Properties
Additional Properties
Additional sites were identified in the EDR report; however, the identified sites were determined to be
greater than 500 feet away from the subject property, topographically down gradient from the subject site,
hydraulically separated, or apparent flow was away from the subject property. Therefore, based on the
distance and topographic situation of these additional sites from the subject site, WR does not consider the
additional identified sites to be a REC relative to the subject property.

4.2. PHYSICAL SETTING AND ANALYSIS
WR examined the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute series topographic map of the Pittsboro, North Carolina
Quadrangle (Figure 1). The subject property ranges in elevation from a maximum of approximately 380 feet
above mean sea level (MSL) along the western boundary of the site to a minimum of approximately 350 feet
above MSL in the eastern corners of the subject property. Surficial drainage from the subject property is
directed towards Turkey Creek which is situated along the southern, eastern, and northeastern property
boundaries.
Topographically, it appears that surficial drainage and groundwater flow from the immediately adjacent
properties to the northwest have the potential to flow toward the subject property. Adjacent properties to
the northwest are residential in nature and are not expected to impact the subject site.
WR believes that groundwater from the subject property would presumably flow in a southeasterly direction
toward Turkey Creek; however, WR cannot accurately predict the direction of groundwater flow based solely
on the topographic observations.

4.3. HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE PROPERTY
4.3.1. OWNERSHIP REVIEW
Information on the ownership history of the site was obtained by WR through an online review of the
Chatham County deed records, which are maintained at the Chatham County Register of Deeds Office in
Pittsboro, North Carolina. The ownership history of the property was reviewed for indications of past owners
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
16

who may have used, stored, or disposed of hazardous substances or petroleum products on the site. The
information was assembled for informational and historical purposes only for use in this report and should
not be construed as a legal chain-of-title for the site.
Deed Table
Book Page Date Grantor Grantee
1721 346 12/5/2013 OM-NC LLC Reman Properties LLC
1704 385 8/19/2013 Omtron USA, LLC OM-NC LLC
1556 1114 3/1/2011 Townsends, Inc. Omtron USA LLC
489 803 1/15/1986 Webster Poultry, Inc. Townsends, Inc.
466 751 12/28/1983 Lane Poultry of Carolina, Inc. Webster Poultry, Inc.
365 117 2/9/1972 Webster Poultry Company James A. Webster
357 54 2/9/1971 James A. Webster Webster Poultry Company
250 351 10/1/1957 J.A. Thomas J.A. Webster
J-O 430 1/22/1947 R. O. Roberson James A. Webster

Review of the deed records for the subject property revealed commercial/industrial ownership of the subject
site back to at least 1971 with several chicken processing entities owning the site over the years. Based on
WR’s review of aerial photographs, the original poultry processing facility was constructed onsite in the
1950’s and ceased operations in 2011. The property was purchased out of bankruptcy by the current owner,
Reman Properties LLC, through an auction of the property in November 2013. See Section 4.3.5 for a more
detailed description of the historical uses of the subject property. Copies of the deeds obtained by WR from
the Chatham County Register of Deeds website are provided in the Appendix D.

4.3.2. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW
WR reviewed aerial photographs covering the subject property from 1950 through 2014. See Section 9.2
for source references for the individual aerial photographs reviewed. Copies of the reviewed aerial
photographs are provided in the Appendix G.
WR has included the approximate subject property boundary on each of the aerial photograph copies provided in the
Appendix G. Please note that these lines, especially on the older aerial photographs, are approximations, and do not
represent an exact depiction of specific onsite and offsite features.

Date Range Onsite Offsite
1950 &
1955
 The subject site consist predominately
of undeveloped woodlands with open or
agricultural fields situated on the
northern portions of the site.
 The road is visible transecting the
northwestern corner of the site that is
located on the north side of Moncure
Pittsboro Road.
 By 1955 the first small processing
building is visible on the eastern portion
of the site.
 The site is split by Moncure Pittsboro
Road/Highway 87.
 The surrounding area is mostly agricultural
fields and undeveloped woodlands, with
sparse residential and farm structures.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
17

Date Range Onsite Offsite
1965
 The chicken processing plant has been
constructed on the eastern portion of
the site.
 The barn on the southern extent of the
site is visible.
 A rectangular building is situated south
of the plant.
 A small house is visible on the portion of
the site on the northern side of
Moncure Pittsboro Road.
 The surrounding vicinity is predominately
agricultural and undeveloped woodlands
with sparse residential development.
1973 –
1983
 The plant stays relatively unchanged.
 The residence on the northern side of
the road is no longer visible and the
Scale house is visible.
 By 1979 the Live Truck Shed is visible
on the north side of the road.
 The
 The surrounding vicinity is predominately
agricultural and undeveloped woodlands
with sparse residential development.
1987
 The chicken processing plant has
expanded.
 One of the large water ASTs is visible
along the western boundary of the site
with parking lot constructed around the
tank.
 The Offal building is visible east of the
plant.
 Truck trailers and material
storage/debris is visible on the southern
portion of the site between the barn
and the processing plant.
 The second barn is visible on the
southern portion of the site.
 The Live Truck Shed across Moncure
Pittsboro Road has been expanded and
numerous tractor trailers are noted
parked in the vicinity.
 The surrounding vicinity is predominately
agricultural and undeveloped woodlands
with sparse residential development.
1993 &
1997
 The western portion of the site has
been cleared and is in use for parking.
 The rectangular building south of the
processing plant is no longer onsite.
 The surrounding vicinity is predominately
agricultural and undeveloped woodlands
with sparse residential development.
2002
 The processing plant has expanded.
 The second water AST is located in the
western corner of the site.
 Scattered debris is visible on the
southern portion of the site.
 The water treatment building associated
with the processing plant has been
constructed on the southeastern adjacent
property.
 Residential development is underway to the
north of the site.
2007  The Live Truck Shed has been
constructed on the southwestern
portion of the site.
 Residential development is completed north
of the site.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
18

Date Range Onsite Offsite
2010 &
2013  The subject property remains largely
unchanged.
 The surrounding vicinity remains
predominately undeveloped woodlands and
residential properties.

Aerial Review Summary:
The subject property has been utilized for industrial chicken processing since 1955 and multiple expansions
of the processing plant throughout the years. Features visible at the site included the processing plant and
attached maintenance building, scale houses, large water ASTs, and live truck sheds. Debris and material
storage was visible on the southern portion of the site, south of the plant, in many of the aerial photographs
from 1987 through 2010. See Section 4.3.5 for information regarding historic property use.

4.3.3. SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS
Sanborn maps originated in the late 1800s and published around 1960. The maps were used by insurance
underwriters to determine the risk involved in insuring individual buildings in urban areas against loss in fires
or other disasters. These historical maps plot building details and provide comments concerning a building’s
former use. The availability of Sanborn Maps is limited to urban areas that historically presented fire hazards.
Sanborn Map coverage was not available for the subject property.

4.3.4. CITY DIRECTORY SEARCH
WR attempted to obtain additional information on the historical use of the subject property through a review
of city directories; however, city directory coverage of the subject property and the surrounding area was not
available.

4.3.5. HISTORY OF PROPERTY USE
The history of property use is based on the information obtained by WR from Chatham County Tax
information, ownership records, aerial photographs, and interviews. Based on available information, the
subject property was agricultural or wooded land until approximately 1955 when poultry processing first
began onsite. Over the years the processing plant was expanded and additional support buildings were
constructed onsite. The Live Truck Shed/Truck Maintenance garage was constructed on the north side of
Moncure Pittsboro Road by 1979. The large water ASTs and the Offal building were operating onsite by
1987. The site historically operated as Townsends Inc. which was purchased by Omtron USA, LLC in 2011.
Omtron ceased all operations at the plant shortly after purchase and began bankruptcy procedures. The
subject property was purchased by the current owner, Reman Properties LLC, through an auction of the
property in November 2013. The site has been vacant and unoccupied since 2011. At this time all bulk
material storage and much of the plant infrastructure has been removed from the site.

4.4. HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES
Historical use of adjoining properties was obtained from a review of available aerial photographs and city
directories provided in Section 4.3 of the report; the database report and review presented in Section 4.1;
and interviews presented in Section 5 of the report.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
19

5. INTERVIEWS
5.1. INTERVIEW WITH MR. AUSTON COX – CURRENT OWNER REPRESENTATIVE
WR interviewed Mr. Auston Cox on January 5, 2017. Conversation records are available upon request.
Mr. Cox stated he purchased the property through auction during the bankruptcy of the former poultry plant.
He stated that he purchased the site as an investment and was not aware of any historical processes with the
poultry processing. Mr. Cox stated that when he purchased the property much of the site had been vandalized
and recyclable wire and metal had been stolen. He stated that he pulled any remaining wire and metal to sale
as recycled materials. Mr. Cox stated that a few drums remained onsite when he purchased the property;
however, most were empty and he has since disposed of any of the remaining drum materials offsite. Mr. Cox
stated that the site has been vandalized by kids in the recent past and a fire occurred in the southern portion
of the plant. Mr. Cox stated that the Pittsboro Fire Department responded to the fire and the incident caused
some structural damage to the plant maintenance building but there were no materials left at the site that
would have caused any sort of spill, leak, or release of petroleum or hazardous materials from the fire.
Mr. Cox stated that he had no real environmental knowledge of the site other than the 10,000-gallon diesel
tank that he recently had removed from the north side of Moncure-Pittsboro Road. He stated that other than
some residual petroleum contamination from the former tank he was not aware of any other environmental
concerns at the site. Mr. Cox stated that the contamination from the diesel tank is being guided by the
NCDEQ UST Section for cleanup. Mr. Cox stated that since he had owned the property a Phase I was
conducted and soil and groundwater assessment had occurred. Mr. Cox stated that the prospective buyers
did not buy the property and to the best of his knowledge it was not because of any environmental concerns
identified. Mr. Cox stated that he did not know the outcome of the soil and groundwater testing at the site
and had not seen the assessment reports. Mr. Cox indicated that the former employees of the chicken
processing facility, that assisted WR during site reconnaissance, would be the most knowledge
representatives of the historic use of the property.
5.2. INTERVIEW WITH MR. JIM HENDRICKS – FORMER PLANT ENGINEER
WR interviewed Mr. Jim Hendricks on July 13, 2013, during a previous site reconnaissance and again on
December 9, 2016, during the completion of the Phase I ESA. Conversation records are available upon
request.
Mr. Hendricks stated he was the plant engineer for the processing plant for 17 years. He was intimately
involved with the operations and maintenance of the processing plant and waste water system. Historical
background provided by Mr. Hendricks indicated the original processing plant was built in the early 1950’s.
Prior to the construction of the plant the subject property was either developed as small family farm or were
undeveloped woodlands. He was not aware of any environmental issues on the subject property resulting
from the historical use of the property. Mr. Hendricks provided general information on the former plant
operations and material storage and use which has been provided throughout this report.
Mr. Hendricks stated that all of the wastewater from the processing plant was diverted to the offal building
which consisted of several screens that would remove feathers and bones from the process water. The waste
water was then diverted to a lagoon located southeast of the subject property. Mr. Hendricks stated that
eventually a wastewater treatment plant was constructed east of the subject property and the process water
was treated and sent back to the plant for reuse. He stated that the 1,000,000-gallon AST was used to store
the reuse water. Mr. Hendricks stated that all floor drains throughout the processing plant and property are
directed to the wastewater treatment system. He stated that only domestic waste goes to the municipal
sewer system. Mr. Hendricks stated that at this time all stormwater from the plant area is also directed to the
wastewater treatment system. He stated that originally stormwater was directed to Turkey Creek but they
were eventually required to collect all storm water. Mr. Hendricks stated that the plant did maintain a
stormwater permit which required testing stormwater at several designated outfall locations. He was not
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
20

aware of any past results being impacted by operations and he was not aware of any permit violations with
stormwater on the subject site.
Overall, Mr. Hendrix was not aware of any environmental issues with the Subject Property. He indicated the
location of a water supply well located on the subject property that was used to fill a large in ground water
tank for use in the processing. He stated that this water helped offset the cost of water supplied by the town.
Mr. Hendrick stated that there had been a release of ammonia at the site in the past but that it was small
release directly to the atmosphere so there was no clean up necessary. He was not aware of any other spills
or release of hazardous chemicals on the subject property. In addition, he was not aware of liens, land
restrictions, or cleanups associated with the subject property. Furthermore, he had not heard of any lawsuits
based on environmental regulations associated with the subject property.
5.3. INTERVIEW WITH MR. ALVIN GUNTHER – FORMER PLANT EMPLOYEE
WR interviewed Mr. Alvin Gunther on December 9, 2016. Conversation records are available upon request.
Mr. Gunther accompanied WR during site reconnaissance activities. He stated that he worked at the plant
for many years and had done a number of up-fits and repairs at the facility over the years and was very
knowledgeable of the site. Information provided by Mr. Gunther correlated to the information provided by
Mr. Hendricks. He stated that all cleaning within the plant was done with chlorine as it had been deemed safe
for food processing. He stated that some small quantity solvents may have been used in the plant
maintenance building but they would have been very limited use applications. Mr. Gunther was not aware of
any environmental concerns at the site.
5.4. ADDITIONAL INTERVIEWS
WR completed additional interviews with Mr. Fred Judge, Safety Officer for Townsends, and Mr. Bill Baker,
Townsends Engineer, during the preliminary assessment on the subject property in 2013. Information
provided at the time from these individuals has been included in pertinent sections of the report or confirmed
by Mr. Jim Hendricks or Mr. Alvin Gunther.
5.5. INTERVIEWS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
WR contacted Mr. Thomas Bender, Fire Marshal for Chatham County to ascertain if there had been any
reported environmental incidents (leaks, spills or dumping of petroleum liquids or hazardous substances) for
the subject property or surrounding properties. Mr. Bender responded to the inquiry stating the Chatham
County Fire Marshal had limited records on the subject property. Mr. Bender stated that he has no record of
any spills occurring on the subject property. He stated that the only records for the site are two permits for
tank abandonments. Mr. Bender stated that a permit was pulled to abandon an AST in 2002 and a UST in
2000. He stated that neither of the records indicate contents, size, or location for the tanks. In addition, Mr.
Bender stated that a permit was pulled in 2015 for the removal of a diesel UST adjacent to the truck
maintenance building (See Section 4.1.1 for more information on this UST). Mr. Bender stated that a fire
occurred at the site last spring which involved a group of juveniles who started a fire in the maintenance
building on the southern side of the plant. Mr. Bender stated that no hazardous chemicals or petroleum were
in the building and the fire would not have created an environmental situation at the property. Mr. Bender
stated that the former Safety Officer for Townsends was very thorough and all materials handling practices
were above average. Mr. Bender stated that the facility had a chemical room that was always neat and orderly
with proper containment in place. Mr. Bender was not aware of how many tanks have been located on the
site in the past or the locations of any former USTs.
During WR’s assessment of the site completed 2013, Mr. Tony Tucker, the Chatham County Emergency
Management Director indicated that the county was aware of an ammonia release and several chicken fat
releases at poultry processing plant. Limited details were provided to WR; however, Mr. Tucker stated that
the ammonia release quickly volatized into gas; therefore, there was no cleanup associated with the incident.
He also stated that the chicken fat consisted of releases into the creek; therefore, no cleanup was associated
with the releases.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
21

6. DATA GAPS
In accordance with the ASTM Standard E-1527-13, data gaps should be identified in the Phase I ESA report.
WR identified the following data gaps during Phase I ESA activities:
Client Provided Information
At the time of this report, the Questionnaire addressed as “Title and Judicial Records Review for
Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations” was not completed for this Phase I ESA. See Section
7 for more information.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
22

7. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
WR has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the ±20.375-acre property described in
Section 1.2. The findings contained herein are based on the results of the Phase I ESA performed by WR in
general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E-1527-13 and in accordance with WR’s
Standard Contract Conditions for Engineering Services. All conclusions made in this report are based upon
the assessment performed by WR and are subject to the Special Terms and Conditions outlined in Section
1.4 of this report. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in the report.

FINDINGS
Controlled RECs (CREC)
No CRECs were identified in connection with the subject property during the course of this assessment.
Historic RECs (HREC)
No HRECs were identified in connection with the subject property during the course of this assessment.
De Minimis Environmental Conditions
No de minimis environmental conditions were identified in connection with the subject property during the
course of this assessment.
RECs
The following recognized environmental conditions were identified in connection with the subject property
during the course of this assessment.
 A 10,000-gallon diesel fuel underground storage tank (UST) located southeast of the Truck Maintenance
Building north of Moncure Pittsboro Road along with approximately 70 feet of underground product line
and a fuel dispenser were removed within the last year and petroleum contamination has been identified
in soil. The release incident is open with the NCDEQ-UST Section in an assessment phase.

 An abandoned ~550 gallon gasoline UST with approximately 50 feet of underground product line
connected to the former dispenser area was identified off the northeast corner of Truck Maintenance
Building.

 The Truck Maintenance Building contains a shop with former truck maintenance activities and a truck
wash area with a floor drain/grate that connected to a settling basin.

 A former 10,000-gallon gasoline UST was reported in historical reports and past interviews located near
the truck scales on the north side of Moncure Pittsboro Road.

 An approximately 6,000 gallon UST was used to store heating fuel oil to fuel a boiler and was located
somewhere between the south end of the processing facility and the facility maintenance building .
Historical reports mentioned that this tank was sampled in 2001 with “minor concentrations of
petroleum near the tank and were submitted to the State of North Carolina for review”. However, the
NCDENR-UST Section has no record of this incident.

 A maintenance building is located on the south side of the plant that was formerly used for maintenance
activities and repairing of compressors and other equipment utilized in the main plant building.

 A 275-gallon used refrigeration oil AST was located on the south side of the plant near a 22,000-gallon
aboveground anhydrous ammonia receiver during past plant operations and other anhydrous ammonia
equipment on the southwestern portion of the site with obvious signs of oil staining.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
23

 The southern end of the plant contains the engine room which contained fuel powered equipment with
heavy petroleum staining noted throughout. In addition, this area of the plant was originally dirt floors
beneath the fuel powered equipment.

 A drum storage area and a chemical storage room are located on the north side of the plant maintenance
building. Currently all materials have been removed from the site; however, petroleum staining was
noted in the drum area during WR’s previous assessment at the property. In addition, a floor drain and
staining was noted during the current assessment within the chemical storage room.

 A former compressor area on the western portion of the site with significant amounts of oil located in the
containment wall. Signs of leakage outside the walls were observed during WR’s assessment in 2013.

 A grass area south of the plant was utilized for disposal of plant infrastructure during upgrades and
expansions. Concrete, steel, and 55-gallon drum parts were observed protruding from the berm along
the southern extent of this area and interviews indicated that materials may have been buried in this
location in the past.

CONCLUSIONS
Based on WR’s site reconnaissance in conjunction with review of historical information gathered from an
examination of ownership, aerial photographs, historical property uses, and public records, this assessment
has revealed recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the subject property.
The subject property has been utilized for industrial purposes since the late 1950’s with numerous
underground fuel tanks and petroleum powered equipment used onsite in the past. Based on the length of
time the site has been utilized for industrial operations and the RECs described above additional assessment
to include soil and groundwater assessment should be completed at the site. The assessment activities should
be completed in the areas of each identified RECs to determine the impacts to the site from this past industrial
use.
Though not considered RECs at this time, the following environmental concerns/Business Environmental Risks
(BERs) should be considered prior to any transaction of the property.
Groundwater Use
At least one water supply well is located onsite. Due to the commercial industrial use of the subject property,
WR recommends that groundwater not be used at the subject property for any purpose.
Data Gap – Client Provided Information
As of the date of this report, the environmental liens and activity and use limitations (AULs) search has not
been completed by a professional title company or title professional. WR believes that this information
should be completed along with title work for the property as typically coordinated by a real estate attorney.
If any environmental liens and/or AULs filed against the property are discovered, this information should be
provided to WR prior to any transfer of this property so that we may make a proper review and issue an
amended letter accordingly. If no environmental liens or AULs are discovered, the questionnaire addressed
as “Title and Judicial Records Review for Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations” provided by
WR should be filled out completely and placed inside the cover to accompany this report as an attachment.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
24

Please do not hesitate to contact us at [phone] should you have any questions or comments regarding
this investigation.
Sincerely,
WithersRavenel

We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental
Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. We have the specific qualifications based on education,
training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We
have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices
set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.

Patrick Farfour
Project Manager – Environmental Professional

R. S. (Butch) Lawter, Jr., P.E.
Senior Engineer – Environmental Professional
Director of Environmental Services

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

±20.375 Acre – Reman Properties LLC Property WR No. 02160652.0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment January 2017
25

8. REFERENCES
8.1. PERSONS INTERVIEWED
Cox, Auston – Current Owner Representative; January 7, 2017.
Hendricks, Jim – Former Plant Engineer; July 13, 2013 and December 9, 2016.
Gunther, Alvin – Former Plant Employee; December 9, 2016.
Bender, Thomas – Chatham County Fire Marshall; January 3, 2017.
8.2. RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Aerial photographs from were obtained from the USGS Earth Explore website
(http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/), Chatham County Soil & Water Conservation Office.
Aerial photographs from 2004, 2010, & 2013 were obtained from internal sources.
Buonicore, Anthony J., PE, BCEE, QEP, "Methodology for Identifying the Area of Concern around a Property
Potentially impacted by Vapor Migration from Nearby Contaminated Sources, Paper No. 2011-A-301,
Proceedings. Air & Waste Management Association, 104th Annual Meeting, Orlando, Fla., June 20-24,
2011."
Deeds viewed online through the Chatham County Register of Deeds Office and maintained at the Chatham
County Register of Deeds Office in Pittsbor, North Carolina.
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., Southport, Connecticut, regulatory information, December 9, 2016.
United Stated Geological Survey, Pittsboro, NC Topographical Quadrangle.

APPENDIX A

FIGURES
APPENDIX B

ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REPORT
FORM-LBF-CCA
tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Reman Properties LLC
270 Moncure Pittsboro Road
Moncure, NC 27559
Inquiry Number: 4802753.2s
December 09, 2016
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 34
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
GeoCheck - Not Requested
TC4802753.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4802753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
270 MONCURE PITTSBORO ROAD
MONCURE, NC 27559
COORDINATES
35.7029010 - 35˚ 42’ 10.44’’Latitude (North):
79.1751730 - 79˚ 10’ 30.62’’Longitude (West):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
665094.9UTM X (Meters):
3952331.5UTM Y (Meters):
403 ft. above sea levelElevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
5945569 PITTSBORO, NCTarget Property Map:
2013Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
20140619Portions of Photo from:
USDASource:
4802753.2s Page 2
B13 NCDOT-ASPHALTIC MATE SR1012 AND SR1962 LAST Higher 2575, 0.488, ESE
B12 NCDOT ASHPHALT SITE SR1012 IMD Higher 2573, 0.487, ESE
B11 LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CO 840 MONCURE-PITTSBOR LAST, IMD Lower 2358, 0.447, ESE
B10 LOUISIANA PACIFIC CO MONCURE RD P O BOX 9 LUST, UST, IMD Lower 2338, 0.443, ESE
9 BREWER PROPERTY, SAN 134 LOG BARN ROAD LUST, LUST TRUST Higher 1878, 0.356, WSW
8 CORNER VARIETY 935 SANFORD ROAD UST Higher 1158, 0.219, NNW
7 PITTSBORO BODY SHOP 1022 SANFORD RD RCRA-CESQG Higher 884, 0.167, NW
A6 PITTSBORO PROC PL 270 MONCURE PITTSBOR FINDS, ECHO TP
A5 270 MONCURE PITTSBOR ERNS TP
A4 TOWNSENDS, INC. 270 MONCURE-PITTSBOR LUST TP
A3 TOWNSENDS INCORPORAT 270 MONCURE PITTSBOR FINDS, ECHO TP
A2 TOWNSENDS, INC. - PI 270 MONCURE ROAD RMP TP
A1 FORMERLY TOWNSENDS, 270 MONCURE PITTSBOR UST TP
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
270 MONCURE PITTSBORO ROAD
MONCURE, NC 27559
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4802753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this
property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report:
EPA IDDatabase(s)Site
FORMERLY TOWNSENDS,
270 MONCURE PITTSBOR
PITTSBORO, NC 27312
N/AUST
Tank Status: Current
Facility Id: 00-0-0000032432
TOWNSENDS, INC. - PI
270 MONCURE ROAD
MONCURE, NC 27559
N/ARMP
TOWNSENDS INCORPORAT
270 MONCURE PITTSBOR
MONCURE, NC 27559
N/AFINDS
Registry ID:: 110000547800
ECHO
TOWNSENDS, INC.
270 MONCURE-PITTSBOR
PITTSBORO, NC 27312
N/ALUST
Incident Number: 39847
Current Status: File Located in House
270 MONCURE PITTSBOR
270 MONCURE PITTSBOR
MONCURE, NC 27559
N/AERNS
EDR ID:: 799322
PITTSBORO PROC PL
270 MONCURE PITTSBOR
MONCURE, NC 27559
N/AFINDS
Registry ID:: 110009856245
ECHO
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4802753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4802753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4802753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4802753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-CESQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)
of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or
dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally
exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of
acutely hazardous waste per month.
A review of the RCRA-CESQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/21/2016 has revealed that there is
1 RCRA-CESQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
PITTSBORO BODY SHOP 1022 SANFORD RD NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.167 mi.) 7 17
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incidents Management Database contains an inventory
of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Environment, &
Natural Resources’ Incidents by Address.
A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/29/2016 has revealed that there are 2
LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
BREWER PROPERTY, SAN 134 LOG BARN ROAD WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.356 mi.) 9 21
Incident Phase: Closed Out
Incident Number: 39512
Current Status: File Located in House
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
LOUISIANA PACIFIC CO MONCURE RD P O BOX 9 ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.443 mi.) B10 23
Incident Phase: Closed Out
Incident Number: 8215
Current Status: File Located in Archives
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4802753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
LAST: A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
A review of the LAST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/29/2016 has revealed that there are 2
LAST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
NCDOT-ASPHALTIC MATE SR1012 AND SR1962 ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.488 mi.) B13 31
Close Out: 08/29/2005
Incident Number: 87461
Current Status: C
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CO 840 MONCURE-PITTSBOR ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.447 mi.) B11 27
Close Out: 05/16/2001
Incident Number: 85715
Current Status: C
LUST TRUST: This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for
reimbursements for expenses incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
A review of the LUST TRUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/07/2016 has revealed that there is
1 LUST TRUST site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
BREWER PROPERTY, SAN 134 LOG BARN ROAD WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.356 mi.) 9 21
Site ID: 39512
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under
Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the Department of
Environment & Natural Resources’ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database.
A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/29/2016 has revealed that there is 1 UST
site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
CORNER VARIETY 935 SANFORD ROAD NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.219 mi.) 8 19
Tank Status: Removed
Facility Id: 00-0-0000004984
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Records of Emergency Release Reports
IMD: Incident Management Database.
A review of the IMD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/21/2006 has revealed that there are 3 IMD
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4802753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9
sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
NCDOT ASHPHALT SITE SR1012 ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.487 mi.) B12 30
Facility Id: 87461
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
LOUISIANA PACIFIC CO MONCURE RD P O BOX 9 ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.443 mi.) B10 23
Facility Id: 8215
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CO 840 MONCURE-PITTSBOR ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.447 mi.) B11 27
Facility Id: 85715
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4802753.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
4 00
400 400
4 00
400400400
4 4 0
4
4
0
3 6 0
4 00 4 0 0400400
4 40
3 60400
4 4 0
40
0
3 6 0
3
60 3 60
4 0 0
4
4
0
440360
4
0
0
3 6 0
360
400 4 4 0
4
0
0
440
4 0 0
400
400
4 4 0
4
4
0
3
6
0
4 00
4
0
0
4
0 04
0
0
4 00
4 00 4 00
4 0 0
4 0 0
4 00
4
0
0
440 4 40
4
4 00
4 4 0
4
00 4 40440 400
4 40
4 40
440
4 40
4 0 0
4
0
0
360
4
4
0
4 40
440
4
4
0
4 4 0
3 60440440
4
0
0 360
4 0 0
4
4
0 400 3 60
3 6 0
3 6 0
4
4
0
4
4
0 4 4 0
4
0
0
4
4
0
4 4 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
400
4 0 0
4 0 0
400
4 40
44 0
400
4 0 0
4004
0
0
400440 4 0 0440
440 440
4 00
4
400 4 40 4 0 0
4 0 0
400
4
400440
440 440
4 4 0 4
4
0
0
440
480
4 00
4 00
4 0 0
400
480
4 40
44 0
480
4 40 4
4
0
480
5 20
4 80
4
4
0 520
4
4
0
44
0
4 80
4
8
0
4 40
4 8 0
4
8
0
4 80 4
4
0
4 80
5 2 0
5
2
0
52
4
4 4 0
4 40
440
4
4
0
44 0
440440
4 4 0
4
4
0
440
40 4 4 0 44 0
4 4 0
4 40
4 0
5 2 0
4 8 0480
480
4 8 0
4 8 0
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
0
440
4 40
4 00480
4 00
360
4
4
0
440
4
0
0
360 440
400
4 0 0
4
4
0
4 4 0
440
4 0 0400
400 440
440
0
400
400
400
4 4 0
400
4
4
0
4 4 0
400
4 40
440
440
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPL LIENS
Federal Delisted NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Federal CERCLIS list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Federal RCRA generators list
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG
1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL
Federal ERNS list
1 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001 1ERNS
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NC HSDS
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500OLI
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
3 NR NR 2 0 0 0.500 1LUST
TC4802753.2s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
2 NR NR 2 0 0 0.500LAST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500LUST TRUST
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
2 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250 1UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
State and tribal Brownfields sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS
3 NR NR 3 0 0 0.500IMD
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 90
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 80
Other Ascertainable Records
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR
TC4802753.2s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD
1 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001 1RMP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
2 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001 2FINDS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPABANDONED MINES
2 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001 2ECHO
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA HWS
TC4802753.2s Page 6
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST
18 0 0 8 2 0 8- Totals --
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC4802753.2s Page 7
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
MLLDLeak Detection Name:
3Leak Detection Key:
Catchment BasinSpill Protection Name:
4Spill Protection Key:
Auto Shutoff DeviceOverfill Protection Name:
3Overfill Protection Key:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
UnknownPiping System Key:
Single Wall FRPPiping Construction:
Single Wall SteelTank Construction:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
0Manifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
10000Tank Capacity:
DieselProduct Name:
1Product Key:
Not reportedPerm Close Date:
02/20/1961Installed Date:
CurrentTank Status:
1Tank Id:
-79.17604Longitude:
35.70446Latitude:
ChathamFIPS County Desc:
REIDSVILLE, NC 27320Contact City/State/Zip:
Not reportedContact Address2:
1425A W HARRISON STREETContact Address1:
REMAN PROPERTIES, L.L.C.Contact:
00-0-0000032432Facility Id:
UST:
Site 1 of 6 in cluster A
Actual:
403 ft.
Property PITTSBORO, NC 27312
Target 270 MONCURE PITTSBORO ROAD N/A
A1 USTFORMERLY TOWNSENDS, INC U004241229
Not reportedFacility email:
Not reportedFacility telephone:
Not reportedHome page web address:
FCLatLong description:
I2LatLong method:
TIs facility in county box:
-079.175285Facility decimal longitude:
35.703087Facility decimal latitude:
Chatham County LEPCLEPC city:
1000007621Facility ID:
RMP:
Site 2 of 6 in cluster A
Actual:
403 ft.
Property MONCURE, NC 27559
Target 270 MONCURE ROAD N/A
A2 RMPTOWNSENDS, INC. - PITTSBORO PLANT 1012126615
TC4802753.2s Page 8
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
CENSUS-OTHERFRS Method:
PLANT ENTRANCE (GENERAL)FRS Description:
-79.176599999999993FRS longitude:
35.762700000000002FRS latitude:
1.0RMP version #:
FalseDoes RMP contain unsanitized CBI version:
FalseDoes RMP contain CBI data:
2014-06-23 00:00:00Aniversary date:
2012-08-31 00:00:00Date de-registration is effective:
2012-08-31 00:00:00Date of de-registration:
TrueIs RMP complete:
2009-06-23 00:00:00Date RMP postmarked:
FalseDoes RMP contain electronic waiver:
FalseDoes RMP contain CBI substantiation:
RMP*eSubmitRMP submission method:
TrueWas certification letter received:
FalseDoes RMP contain attachments:
FalseDoes RMP contain graphics files:
2009-06-23 00:00:00Date RMP received:
Not reportedDate of error Report:
2009-06-23 00:00:00Date RMP accepted by EPA:
FalseClaim # of employees as CBI:
Not reportedForeign owner’s country:
Not reportedForeign owner’s zip:
Not reportedForeign owner’s address:
FalseFacility has no accident hist. recs:
Not reportedRMP description:
ResubmissionSubmission type:
FalseWill RMP involve predictive filing:
FalseIs it OSHA approved with star/merit ranking:
Fire DepartmentInspected by:
2009-06-09 00:00:00Last safety insp. dat:
Not reportedClean air op. permit/State ID:
FIs fac. covered by CAA Title V 112(2):
TIs facility covered by EPCRA 302:
TIs facility covered by OSHA PSM:
100000077463Facility ID provided by CEPPO:
Not reportedEPA ID:
592Number of full time employees:
Not reportedEmergency contact ext/pin #:
919663205024 hour emergency telephone:
9196634116Emergency contact telephone:
Safety/Ergonomics ManagerEmergency contact title:
Fred JudgeEmergency contact:
Plant Operations ManagerRMP contact title:
Randy EvansRMP implementation contact:
Pittsboro, NC 27312Operators City,St,Zip:
PO Box 730Operator’s address:
9196632050Operator’s telephone:
Townsends, Inc.Operator’s name:
0Partner’s DUNS #:
0Parent’s DUNS #:
Not reportedPartner’s name:
Not reportedParent’s name:
6918676Facility DUNS #:
TOWNSENDS, INC. - PITTSBORO PLANT (Continued) 1012126615
TC4802753.2s Page 9
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedPassive mitigation:
Not reportedEnvironmental receptors:
Not reportedPublic receptors:
Not reportedResidential population:
Not reportedDistance to endpoint in miles:
Not reportedQuantity released in pounds:
Not reportedScenario:
Not reportedAnalytical basic:
Not reportedLFL value:
Not reportedEndpoint used:
RMP:
Not reportedPassive mitigation:
Not reportedEnvironmental receptors:
Not reportedPublic receptors:
Not reportedResidential population:
Not reportedDistance to endpoint in miles:
Not reportedTopography:
Not reportedStability class:
Not reportedWind speed in meters/second:
Not reportedRelease rate in pounds per second:
Not reportedRelease duration in minutes:
Not reportedQuantity released in pounds:
Not reportedScenario:
Not reportedAnalytical basic:
Not reportedPhysical state:
Not reportedPercent weight of chemical:
RMP:
Not reportedActive mitigation:
Not reportedPassive mitigation:
Not reportedEnvironmental receptors:
Not reportedPublic receptors:
Not reportedResidential population:
Not reportedDistance to endpoint in miles:
Not reportedTopography:
Not reportedStability class:
Not reportedWind speed in meters/second:
Not reportedRelease rate in pounds per second:
Not reportedRelease duration in minutes:
Not reportedQuantity released in pounds:
Not reportedScenario:
Not reportedAnalytical basic:
Not reportedPhysical state:
Not reportedPercent weight of chemical:
RMP:
Not reportedProcess flammable chemical name:
23000Process chemical qty in 100s lbs:
Ammonia (anhydrous)Chemical name:
RMP:
FalseRecord contains CBI data:
3Program level:
Ammonia RefrigerationOptional facility description:
Poultry ProcessingNAICS code description:
311615NA & Industry Classification Sys.code(s):
1000008814Process ID:
RMP:
TOWNSENDS, INC. - PITTSBORO PLANT (Continued) 1012126615
TC4802753.2s Page 10
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedMost recent incident investigation:
Not reportedExpected date of audit completion:
Not reportedMost recent compliance audit date:
Not reportedEquipment tested:
Not reportedMost recent equipment inspection date:
Not reportedMost recent maintenance review date:
Not reportedCompetency testing:
Not reportedTraining:
Not reportedExpected completion of review changes:
Not reportedMost recent training progs review/update:
Not reportedMost recent review of op. procedures:
Not reportedMost recent hazard review/update:
Not reportedChanges since the last process hazard analysis:
Not reportedMonitoring/Detection:
Not reportedMitigation Systems:
Not reportedProcess Control:
Not reportedMajor Hazard:
Not reportedFederal regulation comment:
Not reportedFederal Regulation:
Not reportedSafety review date:
Not reportedRecord has CBI data:
Not reportedDate of contractor safety eval. review:
Not reportedDate of contractor safety review:
Not reportedDate of hot work permit review:
Not reportedDate of participation plan review:
Not reportedExpected date of investigation changes:
Not reportedMost recent incident investigation:
Not reportedExpected date of audit completion:
Not reportedMost recent compliance audit date:
Not reportedDate of pre-start review:
Not reportedDate of most recent review/update:
Not reportedMost recent changes by mgmt:
Not reportedEquipment tested:
Not reportedMost recent equipment inspection date:
Not reportedMost recent maintenance review date:
Not reportedCompetency testing:
Not reportedTraining:
Not reportedMost recent training progs review/update:
Not reportedMost recent review of op. procedures:
Not reportedChanges since the last process hazard analysis:
Not reportedMonitoring/Detection:
Not reportedMitigation Systems:
Not reportedProcess Control:
Not reportedMajor Hazard:
Not reportedExpected PHA changes completion date:
Not reportedProcess Hazard Analysis:
Not reportedMost recent PHA date:
Not reportedSafety review date:
Not reportedPassive mitigation:
Not reportedEnvironmental receptors:
Not reportedPublic receptors:
Not reportedResidential population:
Not reportedDistance to endpoint in miles:
Not reportedQuantity released in pounds:
Not reportedAnalytical basic:
RMP:
Not reportedActive mitigation:
TOWNSENDS, INC. - PITTSBORO PLANT (Continued) 1012126615
TC4802753.2s Page 11
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedDistance to endpoint in miles:
Not reportedQuantity released in pounds:
Not reportedAnalytical basic:
RMP:
Not reportedActive mitigation:
Not reportedPassive mitigation:
Not reportedEnvironmental receptors:
Not reportedPublic receptors:
Not reportedResidential population:
Not reportedDistance to endpoint in miles:
Not reportedQuantity released in pounds:
Not reportedScenario:
Not reportedAnalytical basic:
Not reportedLFL value:
Not reportedEndpoint used:
RMP:
DrainsPassive mitigation:
Not reportedEnvironmental receptors:
Not reportedPublic receptors:
Not reportedResidential population:
Not reportedDistance to endpoint in miles:
bTopography:
FStability class:
1.5Wind speed in meters/second:
Not reportedRelease rate in pounds per second:
10Release duration in minutes:
Not reportedQuantity released in pounds:
Not reportedScenario:
EPA’s RMP*Comp(TM)Analytical basic:
bPhysical state:
Not reportedPercent weight of chemical:
RMP:
Not reportedActive mitigation:
DrainsPassive mitigation:
Not reportedEnvironmental receptors:
Not reportedPublic receptors:
Not reportedResidential population:
Not reportedDistance to endpoint in miles:
bTopography:
DStability class:
3Wind speed in meters/second:
Not reportedRelease rate in pounds per second:
Not reportedRelease duration in minutes:
Not reportedQuantity released in pounds:
Not reportedScenario:
EPA’s RMP*Comp(TM)Analytical basic:
bPhysical state:
Not reportedPercent weight of chemical:
RMP:
Not reportedProcess flammable chemical name:
0Process chemical qty in 100s lbs:
Public OCA ChemicalChemical name:
Not reportedDate of most recent changes:
Not reportedRecord has CBI data:
Not reportedExpected date of investigation changes:
TOWNSENDS, INC. - PITTSBORO PLANT (Continued) 1012126615
TC4802753.2s Page 12
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedER plan:
RMP:
Not reportedDate of most recent changes:
Not reportedRecord has CBI data:
Not reportedExpected date of investigation changes:
Not reportedMost recent incident investigation:
Not reportedExpected date of audit completion:
Not reportedMost recent compliance audit date:
Not reportedEquipment tested:
Not reportedMost recent equipment inspection date:
Not reportedMost recent maintenance review date:
Not reportedCompetency testing:
Not reportedTraining:
Not reportedExpected completion of review changes:
Not reportedMost recent training progs review/update:
Not reportedMost recent review of op. procedures:
Not reportedMost recent hazard review/update:
Not reportedChanges since the last process hazard analysis:
Not reportedMonitoring/Detection:
Not reportedMitigation Systems:
Not reportedProcess Control:
Not reportedMajor Hazard:
Not reportedFederal regulation comment:
Not reportedFederal Regulation:
Not reportedSafety review date:
Not reportedRecord has CBI data:
Not reportedDate of contractor safety eval. review:
Not reportedDate of contractor safety review:
Not reportedDate of hot work permit review:
Not reportedDate of participation plan review:
Not reportedExpected date of investigation changes:
Not reportedMost recent incident investigation:
Not reportedExpected date of audit completion:
Not reportedMost recent compliance audit date:
Not reportedDate of pre-start review:
Not reportedDate of most recent review/update:
Not reportedMost recent changes by mgmt:
Not reportedEquipment tested:
Not reportedMost recent equipment inspection date:
Not reportedMost recent maintenance review date:
Not reportedCompetency testing:
Not reportedTraining:
Not reportedMost recent training progs review/update:
Not reportedMost recent review of op. procedures:
Not reportedChanges since the last process hazard analysis:
Not reportedMonitoring/Detection:
Not reportedMitigation Systems:
Not reportedProcess Control:
Not reportedMajor Hazard:
Not reportedExpected PHA changes completion date:
Not reportedProcess Hazard Analysis:
Not reportedMost recent PHA date:
Not reportedSafety review date:
Not reportedPassive mitigation:
Not reportedEnvironmental receptors:
Not reportedPublic receptors:
Not reportedResidential population:
TOWNSENDS, INC. - PITTSBORO PLANT (Continued) 1012126615
TC4802753.2s Page 13
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedOther Regulations:
TrueEPCRA:
FalseOPA 90:
FalseRCRA:
TrueSPCC:
TrueOSHA 1910 120:
TrueFederal regulation:
9195422911Telephone of the coordinating local agency:
Chatham Co. Office of Emer. Mgmt.Local agency coordinating ER plan:
2009-02-05 00:00:00ER plan most recent employee training date:
2009-02-06 00:00:00ER plan most recent review date:
TOWNSENDS, INC. - PITTSBORO PLANT (Continued) 1012126615
http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110000547800DFR URL:
110000547800Registry ID:
1004550572Envid:
ECHO:
112(r) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
certain flammable or toxic substances, as required under section
plans reported by companies that handle, manufacture, use, or store
US EPA Risk Management Plan (RMP) database stores the risk management
the state of North Carolina.
comprehensive information about environmental regulated entities in
common facility identifier in order to improve accessibility to
(NCDENR) Facility Identification Template for States that provides a
is North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources’
NC-FITS (North Carolina - Facility Identification Template For States)
transported off-site.
these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are
from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that
US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information
Environmental Interest/Information System
110000547800Registry ID:
FINDS:
Site 3 of 6 in cluster A
Actual:
403 ft.
Property MONCURE, NC 27559
Target ECHO270 MONCURE PITTSBORO RD N/A
A3 FINDSTOWNSENDS INCORPORATED PITTSBORO PLANT 1004550572
TC4802753.2s Page 14
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedComments:
Not reportedRP County:
Reidsville, NC 27320RP City,St,Zip:
1452 A W. Harrison St.RP Address:
3363944600Telephone:
Austin CoxContact Person:
Remancenter CenterCompany:
RALRegion:
JFMRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
35.7044 -79.1760Lat/Long Decimal:
FalseValid:
NError Code:
0Error Flag:
FalseRPOP:
FalseRPOW:
0Reel Num:
0CD Num:
FalseRPL:
3PETOPT:
Not reportedRBCA GW:
File Located in HouseCurrent Status:
0Release Detection:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
NoFlag1:
NoFlag:
UnknownMTBE1:
NoMTBE:
Not reportedLand Use:
Not reportedSite Risk Reason:
Not reportedPhase Of LSA Req:
Not reportedSite Priority:
Not reportedNORR Issue Date:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Type:
URisk Class Based On Review:
LRisk Classification:
COMMERCIALCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
RTank Regulated Status:
Not reportedLevel Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
Not reportedClose Out:
Not reportedClosure Request:
Not reportedCleanup:
09/10/2015Date Occur:
10/15/2015Date Reported:
PProduct Type:
Leak-undergroundSource Type:
SLContamination Type:
39847Incident Number:
RA-7745UST Number:
0-0-0000Facility ID:
LUST:
Site 4 of 6 in cluster A
Actual:
403 ft.
Property PITTSBORO, NC 27312
Target 270 MONCURE-PITTSBORO ROAD N/A
A4 LUSTTOWNSENDS, INC.S118362116
TC4802753.2s Page 15
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
Not reportedIncident Phase:
Not reportedLast Modified:
PUst Number:
ASource:
4Cause:
2Err Type:
Not reportedSource Code:
Not reportedRelease Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
Not reported5 Minute Quad:
Y7#5 Minute Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
NWells Affected Y/N:
Not reportedPriority Update:
Not reportedSite Priority:
1Location:
3Type:
6Operation Type:
4Ownership:
Not reportedOwner/Operator:
One (01) 10K-gallon diesel UST removedDescription Of Incident:
2015-10-15 00:00:00Date Reported:
2015-09-10 00:00:00Date Occurred:
39847Facility Id:
PIRF:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
TOWNSENDS, INC. (Continued)S118362116
additional ERNS detail in the EDR Site Report.
Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access
Site 5 of 6 in cluster A
Actual:
403 ft.
Property MONCURE, NC 27559
Target 270 MONCURE PITTSBORO RD N/A
A5 ERNS 2006799322
TC4802753.2s Page 16
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110009856245DFR URL:
110009856245Registry ID:
1005540569Envid:
ECHO:
discharge does not adversely affect water quality.
requirements, and include other provisions to ensure that the
limits on what can be discharged, impose monitoring and reporting
States are required to obtain a permit. The permit will likely contain
discharge pollutants from any point source into waters of the United
issued under the Clean Water Act. Under NPDES, all facilities that
the Compliance Information System (ICIS) tracks surface water permits
US National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) module of
Environmental Interest/Information System
110009856245Registry ID:
FINDS:
Site 6 of 6 in cluster A
Actual:
403 ft.
Property MONCURE, NC 27559
Target ECHO270 MONCURE PITTSBORO RD N/A
A6 FINDSPITTSBORO PROC PL 1005540569
hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any
from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely
of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting
land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less
other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any
waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or
month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous
or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar
month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;
Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendarDescription:
Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification:
PrivateLand type:
04EPA Region:
Not reportedContact email:
[phone]Contact telephone:
USContact country:
PITTSBORO, NC 27312
1022 SANFORD RDContact address:
JOHN KROMBACHContact:
PITTSBORO, NC 27312
PO BOX 252Mailing address:
NCD982124414EPA ID:
PITTSBORO, NC 27312
1022 SANFORD RDFacility address:
PITTSBORO BODY SHOP INCFacility name:
05/07/1990Date form received by agency:
RCRA-CESQG:
884 ft.
0.167 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
414 ft.
1/8-1/4 PITTSBORO, NC 27312
NW 1022 SANFORD RD NCD982124414
7 RCRA-CESQGPITTSBORO BODY SHOP INC 1000420791
TC4802753.2s Page 17
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation:
05/04/1995Evaluation date:
StateEvaluation lead agency:
Not reportedDate achieved compliance:
Not reportedArea of violation:
COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE VISITEvaluation:
02/18/1998Evaluation date:
Evaluation Action Summary:
No violations foundViolation Status:
THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.
LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF
ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS
CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF
2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS
KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE,
THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name:
F005. Waste code:
IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name:
D001. Waste code:
NoUsed oil transporter:
NoUsed oil transfer facility:
NoUsed oil Specification marketer:
NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner:
NoUser oil refiner:
NoUsed oil processor:
NoUsed oil fuel burner:
NoFurnace exemption:
NoOn-site burner exemption:
NoUnderground injection activity:
NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW:
NoTransporter of hazardous waste:
NoRecycler of hazardous waste:
NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive):
NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste:
Handler Activities Summary:
Not reportedOwner/Op end date:
Not reportedOwner/Op start date:
OwnerOwner/Operator Type:
PrivateLegal status:
[phone]Owner/operator telephone:
Not reportedOwner/operator country:
PITTSBORO, NC 27312
1022 SANFORD RDOwner/operator address:
JOHN KROMBACHOwner/operator name:
Owner/Operator Summary:
hazardous waste
the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely
any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from
time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of
PITTSBORO BODY SHOP INC (Continued) 1000420791
TC4802753.2s Page 18
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
StateEvaluation lead agency:
Not reportedDate achieved compliance:
Not reportedArea of violation:
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation:
03/25/1994Evaluation date:
StateEvaluation lead agency:
Not reportedDate achieved compliance:
Not reportedArea of violation:
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation:
01/30/1995Evaluation date:
StateEvaluation lead agency:
Not reportedDate achieved compliance:
Not reportedArea of violation:
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation:
03/22/1995Evaluation date:
StateEvaluation lead agency:
Not reportedDate achieved compliance:
Not reportedArea of violation:
PITTSBORO BODY SHOP INC (Continued) 1000420791
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
1Spill Protection Key:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
1Overfill Protection Key:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
UnknownPiping System Key:
Single Wall FRPPiping Construction:
Single Wall SteelTank Construction:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
2000Tank Capacity:
Gasoline, Gas MixProduct Name:
3Product Key:
04/26/1999Perm Close Date:
05/07/1956Installed Date:
RemovedTank Status:
1Tank Id:
0Longitude:
0Latitude:
ChathamFIPS County Desc:
MONCURE, NC 27559Contact City/State/Zip:
Not reportedContact Address2:
RT 1 BOX 1160Contact Address1:
BETTY J WHITTContact:
00-0-0000004984Facility Id:
UST:
1158 ft.
0.219 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
425 ft.
1/8-1/4 PITTSBORO, NC 27312
NNW 935 SANFORD ROAD N/A
8 USTCORNER VARIETY U003562101
TC4802753.2s Page 19
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
-1Leak Detection Key:
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
1Spill Protection Key:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
1Overfill Protection Key:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
UnknownPiping System Key:
Single Wall FRPPiping Construction:
Single Wall SteelTank Construction:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
6000Tank Capacity:
Gasoline, Gas MixProduct Name:
3Product Key:
04/26/1999Perm Close Date:
05/07/1956Installed Date:
RemovedTank Status:
3Tank Id:
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
UnknownLeak Detection Name:
-1Leak Detection Key:
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
1Spill Protection Key:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
1Overfill Protection Key:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
UnknownPiping System Key:
Single Wall FRPPiping Construction:
Single Wall SteelTank Construction:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
6000Tank Capacity:
Gasoline, Gas MixProduct Name:
3Product Key:
04/26/1999Perm Close Date:
05/07/1956Installed Date:
RemovedTank Status:
2Tank Id:
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
UnknownLeak Detection Name:
-1Leak Detection Key:
CORNER VARIETY (Continued)U003562101
TC4802753.2s Page 20
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
UnknownLeak Detection Name:
-1Leak Detection Key:
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
1Spill Protection Key:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
1Overfill Protection Key:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
UnknownPiping System Key:
Single Wall FRPPiping Construction:
Single Wall SteelTank Construction:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
6000Tank Capacity:
DieselProduct Name:
1Product Key:
04/26/1999Perm Close Date:
05/07/1956Installed Date:
RemovedTank Status:
4Tank Id:
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
UnknownLeak Detection Name:
CORNER VARIETY (Continued)U003562101
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Type:
HRisk Class Based On Review:
HRisk Classification:
NON COMMERCIALCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
NTank Regulated Status:
Not reportedLevel Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
12/18/2014Close Out:
Not reportedClosure Request:
02/11/2014Cleanup:
02/11/2014Date Occur:
02/11/2014Date Reported:
PProduct Type:
Leak-undergroundSource Type:
GWContamination Type:
39512Incident Number:
RA-7388UST Number:
Not reportedFacility ID:
LUST:
1878 ft.
0.356 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
431 ft.
1/4-1/2 PITTSBORO, NC 27312
WSW LUST TRUST134 LOG BARN ROAD N/A
9 LUSTBREWER PROPERTY, SANDRA S116491523
TC4802753.2s Page 21
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
ASource:
3Cause:
2Err Type:
Not reportedSource Code:
Not reportedRelease Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
Not reported5 Minute Quad:
Y7#5 Minute Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
NWells Affected Y/N:
Not reportedPriority Update:
Not reportedSite Priority:
7Location:
4Type:
3Operation Type:
4Ownership:
Not reportedOwner/Operator:
Not reportedDescription Of Incident:
2014-02-11 00:00:00Date Reported:
2014-02-11 00:00:00Date Occurred:
39512Facility Id:
PIRF:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
received UST-61 Form on 2-11-14. CCWComments:
Not reportedRP County:
apex, NC 27502RP City,St,Zip:
1836 firenza driveRP Address:
9192109044Telephone:
Sandra brewerContact Person:
Not reportedCompany:
RALRegion:
ccwRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
35.6998 -79.1824Lat/Long Decimal:
FalseValid:
NError Code:
0Error Flag:
FalseRPOP:
FalseRPOW:
0Reel Num:
0CD Num:
FalseRPL:
4PETOPT:
Not reportedRBCA GW:
File Located in HouseCurrent Status:
0Release Detection:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
NoFlag1:
NoFlag:
UnknownMTBE1:
NoMTBE:
ResidentialLand Use:
Not reportedSite Risk Reason:
Not reportedPhase Of LSA Req:
Not reportedSite Priority:
Not reportedNORR Issue Date:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
BREWER PROPERTY, SANDRA (Continued) S116491523
TC4802753.2s Page 22
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
0Sum 3rd Party Amt Applied:
03rd Party Deductable Amt:
2000Deductable Amount:
Not reportedPriority Rank:
100% Non-CommercialCommercial Find:
TrueSite Eligible?:
reached. Then reimburse at 100%. [CGS 8/26/14]
subsequent approved costs until a maximum deductible of $2,000 is
Noncommercial; first apply a $1,000 deductible then reimburse 90% ofSite Note:
39512Site ID:
Not reportedFacility ID:
LUST TRUST:
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
Closed OutIncident Phase:
Not reportedLast Modified:
PUst Number:
BREWER PROPERTY, SANDRA (Continued) S116491523
Not reportedPhase Of LSA Req:
0Site Priority:
Not reportedNORR Issue Date:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Type:
LRisk Class Based On Review:
LRisk Classification:
COMMERCIALCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
RTank Regulated Status:
Not reportedLevel Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
06/05/1992Close Out:
Not reportedClosure Request:
Not reportedCleanup:
11/03/1989Date Occur:
02/15/1990Date Reported:
PProduct Type:
Leak-undergroundSource Type:
SLContamination Type:
8215Incident Number:
RA-1280UST Number:
00-0-000Facility ID:
LUST:
2338 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster B
0.443 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
400 ft.
1/4-1/2 IMDPITTSBORO, NC 27312
ESE USTMONCURE RD P O BOX 984 N/A
B10 LUSTLOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION U001189166
TC4802753.2s Page 23
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Closed OutIncident Phase:
1992-06-05 00:00:00Last Modified:
Not reportedUst Number:
Not reportedSource:
Not reportedCause:
Not reportedErr Type:
Min_SoilSource Code:
Not reportedRelease Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
Not reported5 Minute Quad:
Not reported7#5 Minute Quad:
0Samples Include:
Not reportedWells Affected Y/N:
Not reportedPriority Update:
Not reportedSite Priority:
1Location:
3Type:
5Operation Type:
4Ownership:
Not reportedOwner/Operator:
CONTAMINATION FOUND UPON REMOVAL OF USTDescription Of Incident:
1992-06-16 00:00:00Date Reported:
1989-11-03 00:00:00Date Occurred:
8215Facility Id:
PIRF:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reportedComments:
Not reportedRP County:
CONROE, TX 77305-RP City,St,Zip:
PO BOX 3107RP Address:
4097560511Telephone:
Not reportedContact Person:
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPCompany:
RALRegion:
MAFRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
35.7022 -79.1760Lat/Long Decimal:
FalseValid:
NError Code:
0Error Flag:
FalseRPOP:
FalseRPOW:
233Reel Num:
84CD Num:
FalseRPL:
3PETOPT:
Not reportedRBCA GW:
File Located in ArchivesCurrent Status:
0Release Detection:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
NoFlag1:
NoFlag:
UnknownMTBE1:
NoMTBE:
Not reportedLand Use:
Not reportedSite Risk Reason:
LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION (Continued) U001189166
TC4802753.2s Page 24
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
2000Tank Capacity:
Gasoline, Gas MixProduct Name:
3Product Key:
12/31/1989Perm Close Date:
01/01/1964Installed Date:
RemovedTank Status:
2Tank Id:
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
UnknownDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
UnknownLeak Detection Name:
-1Leak Detection Key:
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
1Spill Protection Key:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
1Overfill Protection Key:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
UnknownPiping System Key:
UnknownPiping Construction:
Single Wall SteelTank Construction:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
500Tank Capacity:
DieselProduct Name:
1Product Key:
11/03/1989Perm Close Date:
01/01/1964Installed Date:
RemovedTank Status:
1Tank Id:
0Longitude:
0Latitude:
ChathamFIPS County Desc:
PITTSBORO, NC 27312Contact City/State/Zip:
Not reportedContact Address2:
P.O. BOX 984Contact Address1:
LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATIONContact:
00-0-0000004668Facility Id:
UST:
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION (Continued) U001189166
TC4802753.2s Page 25
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedLatitude Number:
Not reportedLongitude:
Not reportedLatitude:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reported7.5 Min Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
Not reportedSampled By:
Not reportedWells Contam:
0Num Affected:
Not reportedWells Affected:
MAFDem Contact:
Not reportedPriority Update:
Not reportedPriority Code:
Not reportedSite Priority:
Not reportedRisk Site:
RuralSetting:
FacilityLocation:
Gasoline/dieselType:
Leak-undergroundSource:
Not reportedQty Recovered 1:
Not reportedQty Lost 1:
GASOLINEMaterial:
IndustrialOperation:
PrivateOwnership:
CONROE, TX 77305-Oper City,St,Zip:
CONROEOperator City:
PO BOX 3107Operator Address:
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPOwner Company:
4097560511Contact Phone:
Not reportedOperator:
CONTAMINATION FOUND UPON REMOVAL OF USTIncident Desc:
YesSoil Contam:
No Groundwater Contamination detectedGW Contam:
6/16/1992Submit Date:
11/3/1989Date Occurred:
8215Facility ID:
RALRegion:
IMD:
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
UnknownDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
UnknownLeak Detection Name:
-1Leak Detection Key:
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
1Spill Protection Key:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
1Overfill Protection Key:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
UnknownPiping System Key:
UnknownPiping Construction:
Single Wall SteelTank Construction:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION (Continued) U001189166
TC4802753.2s Page 26
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
6/5/1992Close-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Sighned:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
Closed OutIncident Phase:
5/3/2001Last Modified:
8215Facility ID:
DWMAgency:
NODGPS:
Not reportedLongitude Decimal:
Not reportedLatitude Decimal:
Not reportedLongitude Number:
LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION (Continued) U001189166
CCurrent Status:
0Release Detection:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
NoFlag1:
NoFlag:
NoMTBE1:
NoMTBE:
Not reportedLand Use:
Not reportedSite Risk Reason:
Not reportedPhase Of LSA Req:
110Site Priority:
Not reportedNORR Issue Date:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Type:
LRisk Class Based On Review:
HRisk Classification:
Not reportedCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
Not reportedTank Regulated Status:
S3Level Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
05/16/2001Close Out:
Not reportedClosure Request:
Not reportedCleanup:
01/25/1999Date Occur:
01/25/1999Date Reported:
PProduct Type:
14Source Type:
SLContamination Type:
85715Incident Number:
RA-85715UST Number:
N/AFacility ID:
LAST:
2358 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster B
0.447 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
400 ft.
1/4-1/2 PITTSBORO, NC 27559
ESE IMD840 MONCURE-PITTSBORO ROAD N/A
B11 LASTLOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION S105043237
TC4802753.2s Page 27
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
5/16/2001Last Modified:
0Source Type:
Not reportedSource:
Not reportedCause:
Not reportedRelease Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reported7#5 Min Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
Not reportedSamples Taken By:
0Wells Affected Number:
NWells Affected Y/N:
Not reportedPriority Update:
110BSite Priority:
Not reportedLocation:
Not reportedType:
8Operation Type:
5Ownership:
Not reportedOwner/Operator:
Not reportedDescription Of Incident:
Not reportedDate Reported:
Not reportedDate Occurred:
85715Facility Id:
PIRF:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
impacted soil removed to bedrock and GW BDL. - CED ////
DOT Asphalt testing plant. GW sampled - BDL. Recommends Closure as
installed on-site, but not from this Inc - they are associated with
> S-GW MSCCs. SSE conducted. 4 WSWs (including on-site well). MWs
to bedrock. Clean closure from sawmill area. AST area indicated Soils
demolished. Approx. 1800 tons impacted soil removed. Soils excavated
reservoirs). Soils > TPH. Soils were not excavated until building
conducted adj to diesel AST and former saw mill (hydraulic oil
facility closed 1997. Prior to closure (06/96) soil assessment was
1/25/99 - Soil remediation/GW sampling rpt: Soil remediation Rpt: L-PComments:
Not reportedRP County:
SAMOA, CA 95564RP City,St,Zip:
#1 L-P DRIVERP Address:
Not reportedTelephone:
Not reportedContact Person:
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATIONCompany:
RALRegion:
CEDRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
35.69861 -79.16805Lat/Long Decimal:
35 41 54.96 79 10 4.98Lat/Long:
FalseValid:
Not reportedError Code:
0Error Flag:
FalseRPOP:
FalseRPOW:
0Reel Num:
0CD Num:
FalseRPL:
3PETOPT:
G1RBCA GW:
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION (Continued) S105043237
TC4802753.2s Page 28
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
7/23/2003Last Modified:
85715Facility ID:
DWQAgency:
ESTGPS:
Not reportedLongitude Decimal:
Not reportedLatitude Decimal:
Not reportedLongitude Number:
Not reportedLatitude Number:
Not reportedLongitude:
Not reportedLatitude:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reported7.5 Min Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
Not reportedSampled By:
Not reportedWells Contam:
0Num Affected:
NoWells Affected:
ERIC RICEDem Contact:
Not reportedPriority Update:
BPriority Code:
Not reportedSite Priority:
Not reportedRisk Site:
Not reportedSetting:
Not reportedLocation:
Other inorganicsType:
Dredge SpoilSource:
Not reportedQty Recovered 1:
Not reportedQty Lost 1:
Not reportedMaterial:
8Operation:
FederalOwnership:
SAMOA, CAOper City,St,Zip:
SAMOAOperator City:
#1 L-P DRIVEOperator Address:
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATIONOwner Company:
Not reportedContact Phone:
,Operator:
Not reportedIncident Desc:
Not reportedSoil Contam:
No data entered (data entry person submitted a blank fieldGW Contam:
5/16/2001Submit Date:
1/25/1999Date Occurred:
85715Facility ID:
RALRegion:
IMD:
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
COIncident Phase:
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION (Continued) S105043237
TC4802753.2s Page 29
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Sighned:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
REIncident Phase:
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION (Continued) S105043237
Not reportedLongitude Number:
Not reportedLatitude Number:
-79.1664Longitude:
35.6982Latitude:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reported7.5 Min Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
Not reportedSampled By:
Not reportedWells Contam:
Not reportedNum Affected:
YesWells Affected:
Not reportedDem Contact:
Not reportedPriority Update:
APriority Code:
90Site Priority:
Not reportedRisk Site:
Not reportedSetting:
Not reportedLocation:
Gasoline/dieselType:
UnknownSource:
Not reportedQty Recovered 1:
Not reportedQty Lost 1:
Not reportedMaterial:
MiningOperation:
8Ownership:
GREENSBORO, NCOper City,St,Zip:
GREENSBOROOperator City:
1429 WESTOVER TERRACEOperator Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONOwner Company:
Not reportedContact Phone:
,Operator:
DETECTION OF TOLUENE IN SOIL 2.9 PPB. MTBE IN GW AT 4 PPB.Incident Desc:
Not reportedSoil Contam:
Yes, Groundwater Contamination has been detectedGW Contam:
8/29/2005Submit Date:
5/22/1997Date Occurred:
87461Facility ID:
RALRegion:
IMD:
2573 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster B
0.487 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
409 ft.
1/4-1/2 PITTSBORO, NC
ESE SR1012 N/A
B12 IMDNCDOT ASHPHALT SITE #30 S107405386
TC4802753.2s Page 30
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
8/11/1997Close-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Sighned:
8/11/1997Corrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
Closed OutIncident Phase:
8/29/2005Last Modified:
87461Facility ID:
DWQAgency:
ESTGPS:
Not reportedLongitude Decimal:
Not reportedLatitude Decimal:
NCDOT ASHPHALT SITE #30 (Continued) S107405386
G1RBCA GW:
CCurrent Status:
0Release Detection:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
NoFlag1:
NoFlag:
YesMTBE1:
NoMTBE:
RESLand Use:
Not reportedSite Risk Reason:
Not reportedPhase Of LSA Req:
90Site Priority:
Not reportedNORR Issue Date:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Type:
LRisk Class Based On Review:
LRisk Classification:
Not reportedCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
Not reportedTank Regulated Status:
S3Level Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
08/29/2005Close Out:
Not reportedClosure Request:
05/22/1997Cleanup:
05/22/1997Date Occur:
05/22/1997Date Reported:
PProduct Type:
1Source Type:
GWContamination Type:
87461Incident Number:
RA-87461UST Number:
N/AFacility ID:
LAST:
2575 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster B
0.488 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
409 ft.
1/4-1/2 PITTSBORO, NC
ESE SR1012 AND SR1962 N/A
B13 LASTNCDOT-ASPHALTIC MATERIALS TEST LAB SITE #30 S110628718
TC4802753.2s Page 31
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
COIncident Phase:
8/29/2005Last Modified:
0Source Type:
Not reportedSource:
Not reportedCause:
Not reportedRelease Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reported7#5 Min Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
Not reportedSamples Taken By:
1Wells Affected Number:
YWells Affected Y/N:
Not reportedPriority Update:
90ASite Priority:
Not reportedLocation:
Not reportedType:
7Operation Type:
8Ownership:
Not reportedOwner/Operator:
Not reportedDescription Of Incident:
Not reportedDate Reported:
Not reportedDate Occurred:
87461Facility Id:
PIRF:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
(<2L). WSW sample BDL. Recommended NFA. - CED ////
ppb, no chlorinated solvents. MTBE was identified in GW at 4 ppb
DTW=2 to 5’bls. Flows N-NE. Soil sampling detected toluene at 2.9
quantitative extraction of bitumen from Bituminous pavnig mixtures.
to 03/97. Procedure of testing Asphalt used chlorinated solvents for
05/22/97 - CSA submitted: Soil and GW assessment conducted from 01/97Comments:
Not reportedRP County:
GREENSBORO, NC 27408RP City,St,Zip:
1429 WESTOVER TERRACERP Address:
Not reportedTelephone:
Not reportedContact Person:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIOCompany:
RALRegion:
CEDRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
35.6982 -79.16639Lat/Long Decimal:
35.6982 79 9 59.04Lat/Long:
FalseValid:
Not reportedError Code:
0Error Flag:
FalseRPOP:
FalseRPOW:
0Reel Num:
0CD Num:
FalseRPL:
3PETOPT:
NCDOT-ASPHALTIC MATERIALS TEST LAB SITE #30 (Continued) S110628718
TC4802753.2s Page 32
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
8/11/1997Close-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
NCDOT-ASPHALTIC MATERIALS TEST LAB SITE #30 (Continued) S110628718
TC4802753.2s Page 33
OR
P
H
A
N

S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
Cit
y
ED
R

I
D
Si
t
e

N
a
m
e
Si
t
e

A
d
d
r
e
s
s
Zip Database(s)
Co
u
n
t
:

0

r
e
c
o
r
d
s
.
NO

S
I
T
E
S

F
O
U
N
D
TC
4
8
0
2
7
5
3
.
2
s

P
a
g
e

3
4
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC4802753.2s Page GR-1
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 09/14/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/04/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/30/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC4802753.2s Page GR-2
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/30/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 06/27/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC4802753.2s Page GR-3
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators
(CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 05/09/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/01/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 93
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 05/09/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/01/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 93
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4802753.2s Page GR-4
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 09/26/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 43
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 08/08/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 03/17/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 48
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/30/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 03/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2015
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/14/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4802753.2s Page GR-5
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 10/13/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 118
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 01/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 41
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 02/25/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
TC4802753.2s Page GR-6
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 112
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 12/11/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 105
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 02/05/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 10/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 67
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 07/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 48
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/12/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
TC4802753.2s Page GR-7
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 02/10/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 01/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 41
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 02/25/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 01/26/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 119
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 12/03/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/04/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
TC4802753.2s Page GR-8
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 65
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 02/05/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 67
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 08/08/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4802753.2s Page GR-9
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 08/08/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/14/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 09/20/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 51
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/21/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC4802753.2s Page GR-10
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 08/04/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/08/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 58
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 08/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2016
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC4802753.2s Page GR-11
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2016
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 06/27/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/28/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2016
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 09/09/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 07/21/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2006
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
TC4802753.2s Page GR-12
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/14/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 339
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/14/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2017
Data Release Frequency: N/A
TC4802753.2s Page GR-13
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011
Number of Days to Update: 54
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 65
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2017
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TC4802753.2s Page GR-14
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 133
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 08/01/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC4802753.2s Page GR-15
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 01/20/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 127
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/14/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 43
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC4802753.2s Page GR-16
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
Date of Government Version: 10/03/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
TC4802753.2s Page GR-17
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012
Number of Days to Update: 42
Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2016
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Telephone: Varies
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2015
Number of Days to Update: 218
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/14/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 07/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2016
Number of Days to Update: 59
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
TC4802753.2s Page GR-18
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 146
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 148
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/16/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2016
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
TC4802753.2s Page GR-19
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 07/15/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 65
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/06/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 10/25/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 67
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/30/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 06/02/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 91
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
TC4802753.2s Page GR-20
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 71
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
Date of Government Version: 09/14/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/20/2017
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC4802753.2s Page GR-21
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/09/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 09/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/20/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 31
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/20/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 08/22/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 59
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4802753.2s Page GR-22
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014
Number of Days to Update: 196
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013
Number of Days to Update: 172
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
TC4802753.2s Page GR-23
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013
Number of Days to Update: 45
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2015
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 10/12/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/23/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 08/01/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/09/2016
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2016
Number of Days to Update: 123
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 10/14/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/30/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/06/2017
Data Release Frequency: Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: PennWell Corporation
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant
its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: PennWell Corporation
This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
TC4802753.2s Page GR-24
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
TC4802753.2s Page GR-25
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC4802753.2s Page GR-26
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
™tropeR etiS RDE
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
270 MONCURE PITTSBORO RD
MONCURE, NC 27559
Inquiry Number:
January 3, 2017
The EDR-Site Report is a comprehensive presentation of government filings on a facility identified inTM
a search of federal, state and local environmental databases. The report is divided into three sections:
Section 1: Facility Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 3
Summary of facility filings including a review of the following areas: waste management,
waste disposal, multi-media issues, and Superfund liability.
Section 2: Facility Detail Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 4
All available detailed information from databases where sites are identified.
Section 3: Databases and Update Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 7
Name, source, update dates, contact phone number and description of each of the databases
for this report.
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources , Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANYSUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purchaser accepts this report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
or risk codes provided in this report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assesment performed by an environmental professional can produce information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Report# Prepared for / January 3, 2017 Page# 2 of 7
FACILITY 1 FACILITY

270 MONCURE PITTSBORO RD
MONCURE, NC 27559
AREA EDR ID #2006799322

WASTE MANAGEMENT
NOFacility generates hazardous waste (RCRA)
Facility treats, stores, or disposes of hazardous waste
NOon-site (RCRA/TSDF)
NOFacility has received Notices of Violations (RCRA/VIOL)
Facility has been subject to RCRA administrative
NOactions (RAATS)
NOFacility has been subject to corrective actions (CORRACTS)
NOFacility handles PCBs (PADS)
NOFacility uses radioactive materials (MLTS)
NOFacility is a FUSRAP Site
NOFacility is a UXO Site
NOFacility is a FUELS Site
NOFacility is an DockHWC/ECHO Site
Facility manages registered aboveground storage
NOtanks (AST)
Facility manages registered underground storage
NOtanks (UST)
Facility has reported leaking underground storage
NOtank incidents (LUST)
YES - p4 Facility has reported emergency releases to the soil (ERNS)
Facility has reported hazardous material incidents
NOto DOT (HMIRS)
WASTE DISPOSAL
NOFacility is a Superfund Site (NPL)
Facility has a known or suspect abandoned, inactive or
NOuncontrolled hazardous waste site (SEMS)
NOFacility has a reported Superfund Lien on it (LIENS)
NOFacility is listed as a state hazardous waste site (SHWS)
NOFacility has disposed of solid waste on-site (SWF/LF)
MULTIMEDIA
NOFacility uses toxic chemicals and has notified EPA
under SARA Title III, Section 313 (TRIS)
NOFacility produces pesticides and has notified EPA
under Section 7 of FIFRA (SSTS)
Facility manufactures or imports toxic chemicals
NOon the TSCA list (TSCA)
Facility has inspections under FIFRA, TSCA
NOor EPCRA (FTTS)
NOFacility is listed in EPA’s index system (FINDS)
NOFacility is listed in other database records (OTHER)
POTENTIAL SUPERFUND LIABILITY
NOFacility has a list of potentially responsible parties PRP
TOTAL (YES) 1
SECTION 1: FACILITY SUMMARY
Report# Prepared for / January 3, 2017 Page# 3 of 7
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Facility has reported emergency releases to the soil
DATABASE: Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS)
270 MONCURE PITTSBORO RD
MONCURE, NC 27559
EDR ID #2006799322
Incident Commons:
799322NRC Report #:
////////////WEB REPORT/////////////// A LEAK OF ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FROM AN ICEDescription of Incident:
MAKER.
FIXEDType of Incident:
EQUIPMENT FAILUREIncident Cause:
2006-06-02 01:30:00Incident Date Time:
DISCOVEREDIncident DTG:
ICE MAKER ROOMIncident Location:
270 MONCURE PITTSBORO RDLoaction Address:
Not reportedLocation Street 1:
Not reportedLocation Street 2:
MONCURELocation Nearest City:
NCLocation State:
CHATHAMLocation County:
27559Location Zip:
Not reportedDistance From City:
Not reportedDistance Units:
Not reportedDirection From City:
Not reportedLat Deg:
Not reportedLat Min:
Not reportedLat Sec:
Not reportedLat Quad:
Not reportedLong Deg:
Not reportedLong Min:
Not reportedLong Sec:
Not reportedLong Quad:
Not reportedLocation Section:
Not reportedLocation Township:
Not reportedLocation range:
Not reportedPotential Range:
Incidents:
799322NRC Report #:
Not reportedAircraft Type:
Not reportedAircraft Model:
Not reportedAircraft ID:
Not reportedAircraft Fuel Capacity:
Not reportedAircraft Fuel Capacity Units:
Not reportedAircraft Fuel on Board:
Not reportedAircraft Fuel on Board Units:
Not reportedAircraft Spot Number:
Not reportedAircraft Hanger:
Not reportedAircraft Runway Number:
Not reportedRoad Mile Marker:
Not reportedBuilding ID:
OTHERType of Fixed Object:
NPower Generating Facility:
Not reportedGenerating Capacity:
Not reportedType of Fuel:
Not reportedNPDES:
UNPDES Compliance:
Not reportedPipeline Type:
UDOT Regulated:
ABOVEPipeline Above Ground:
NExposed Underwater:
UPipeline Covered:
Not reportedRailroad Hotline:
NGrade Crossing:
Not reportedLocation Subdivision:
Not reportedRailroad Milepost:
Not reportedType Vehicle Involved:
Not reportedCrossing Device Type:
YDevice Operational:
Not reportedDOT Crossing Number:
NBrake Failure:
Not reportedDescription of Tank:
ABOVETank Above Ground:
UTransportable Container:
UTank Regulated:
SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS
Report# Prepared for / January 3, 2017 Page# 4 of 7
Not reportedTank Regulated By:
Not reportedTank ID:
Not reportedCapacity of Tank:
Not reportedCapacity of Tank Units:
Not reportedActual Amount:
Not reportedActual Amount Units:
Not reportedPlatform Rig Name:
Not reportedPlatform Letter:
Not reportedLocation Area ID:
Not reportedLocation Block ID:
Not reportedOCSG Number:
Not reportedOCSP Number:
Not reportedState Lease Number:
Not reportedPier Dock Number:
Not reportedBerth Slip Number:
Not reportedContinuous Release Type:
Not reportedInitial Continuous Release No:
Not reportedContinuous Release Permit:
NAllision:
Not reportedType of Structure:
Not reportedStructure Name:
UStructure Operational:
Not reportedAirbag Deployed:
Not reportedDate Tiem Normal Service:
Not reportedService Disruption Time:
Not reportedService Disruption Units:
Not reportedTransit Bus Flag:
Not reportedCR Begin Date:
Not reportedCR End Date:
Not reportedCR Change Date:
Not reportedFBI Contact:
Not reportedFBI Contact Date Time:
XXXSub Part C Testing Req:
Not reportedConductor Testing:
Not reportedEngineer Testing:
Not reportedTrainman Testing:
Not reportedYard Foreman Testing:
Not reportedRCL Operator Testing:
Not reportedBrakeman Testing:
Not reportedTrain Dispatcher Testing:
Not reportedSignalman Testing:
Not reportedOther Employee Testing:
Not reportedUnknown Testing:
Not reportedPassenger Handling:
XXXPassenger Route:
XXXPassenger Delay:
Incident Details:
799322NRC Report #:
NFire Involved:
UFire Extinguished:
NAny Evacuations:
Not reportedNumber Evacuated:
Not reportedWho Evacuated:
Not reportedRadius of Evacuation:
NAny Injuries:
Not reportedNumber Injured:
Not reportedNumber Hospitalized:
NAny Fatalities:
Not reportedNumber Fatalities:
NAny Damages:
Not reportedDamage Amount:
NAir Corridor Closed:
Not reportedAir Corridor Desc:
Not reportedAir Closure Time:
NWaterway Closed:
Not reportedWaterway Desc:
Not reportedWaterway Closure Time:
NRoad Closed:
Not reportedRoad Desc:
Not reportedRoad Closure Time:
Not reportedClosure Direction:
NMajor Artery:
NTrack Closed:
Not reportedTrack Desc:
Not reportedTrack Closure Time:
NONEMedia Interest:
AIRMedium Desc:
/ ATMOSPHEREAdditional Medium Info:
Not reportedBody of Water:
Not reportedTributary of:
URelease Secured:
Not reportedEstimated Duration of Release:
Not reportedRelease rate:
SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS
...Continued...
Report# Prepared for / January 3, 2017 Page# 5 of 7
UNKNOWNDesc Remedial Action:
Not reportedState Agency on Scene:
Not reportedState Agency Report Number:
Not reportedOther Agency Notified:
UNKNOWNWeather Conditions:
Not reportedAir Temperature:
Not reportedWind Speed:
Not reportedWind Direction:
UWater Supply Contaminated:
Not reportedSheen Size:
Not reportedSheen Color:
Not reportedDirection of Sheen Travel:
Not reportedSheen Odor Description:
Not reportedWave Condition:
Not reportedCurrent Speed:
Not reportedCurrent Direction:
Not reportedWater Temperature:
Not reportedTrack Close Dir:
Not reportedEmpl Fatality:
Not reportedPass Fatality:
NCommunity Impact:
Not reportedWind Speed Unit:
Not reportedEmployee Injuries:
Not reportedPassenger Injuries:
Not reportedOccupant Fatality:
Not reportedCurrent Speed Unit:
Not reportedRoad Closure Units:
Not reportedTrack CLosure Units:
Not reportedSheen Size Units:
/////////WEB REPORT//////////// THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONAdditional Info:
Not reportedState Agency Notified:
Not reportedFederal Agency Notified:
Not reportednearest River Mile Marker:
Not reportedSheen Size Length:
Not reportedSheen Size Length Units:
Not reportedSheen Size Width:
Not reportedSheen Size Width Units:
NOffshore:
Not reportedDuration Unit:
Not reportedRelease Rate Unit:
Not reportedRelease Rate Rate:
NOPassengers Transferred:
Calls:
799322NRC Report #:
2006799322Site ID:
2006-06-02 13:52:36Date Time Received:
2006-06-02 14:00:09Date Time Complete:
INCCall Type:
TOWNSENDSResponsible Company:
PRIVATE ENTERPRISEResponsible Org Type:
MONCUREResponsible City:
NCResponsible State:
27559Responsible Zip:
Not reportedOn Behalf:
WEB REPORTSource:
Material Involved:
799322NRC Report #:
AMAChris Code:
007664-41-7Case Number:
Not reportedUN Number:
0Amount of Material:
UNKNOWN AMOUNTUnit of Measure:
AMMONIA, ANHYDROUSName of Material:
NOIf Reached Water:
Not reportedAmount in Water:
Not reportedUnit of Measure Reach Water:
SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS
...Continued...
Report# Prepared for / January 3, 2017 Page# 6 of 7
To maintain currency of the following federal, state and local databases, EDR contacts the appropriate government agency on a monthly
or quarterly basis as required.
Elapsed ASTM days:Provides confirmation that this report meets or exceeds the 90-day updating
requirement of the ASTM standard.
DATABASES FOUND IN THIS REPORT
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Telephone: [phone]
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases
of oil and hazardous substances.
Date of Government Version: 09/26/2016 Date of Last EDR Contact: 09/29/2016
Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled Update: 01/09/2017
SECTION 3: DATABASES AND UPDATE DATES
Report# Prepared for / January 3, 2017 Page# 7 of 7
APPENDIX C

SANBORN MAP REPORT
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com
Reman Properties LLC
270 Moncure Pittsboro Road
Moncure, NC 27559
December 09, 2016
4802753.5
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Certified Sanborn Results:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
page-
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &
Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track
historical property usage in approximately 12,000
American cities and towns. Collections searched:
Library of Congress
University Publications of America
EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™
Limited Permission To Make Copies
Sanborn® Library search results
Certification #
Contact:EDR Inquiry #
Site Name: Client Name:
PO #
Project
12/09/16
Reman Properties LLC Withers & Ravenel Inc.
270 Moncure Pittsboro Road 111 MacKenan Dr.
Moncure, NC 27559 Cary, NC 27511
4802753.5 Patrick Farfour
The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Withers & Ravenel Inc.
were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection
includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is
authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results
can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.
The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the
day this report was generated.
E4F6-40BD-8088
NA
02160652.0 - Phase I ESA
UNMAPPED PROPERTY
This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library,
LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target
property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property
were not found.
Certification #: E4F6-40BD-8088
Withers & Ravenel Inc. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this
report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive,
the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their
agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
4802753 5 2
APPENDIX D
DEEDS & OWNERSHIP RECORDS
APPENDIX E

CITY DIRECTORIES
(Not Included)
APPENDIX F

PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 1

Description: View of the poultry processing facility.

Frame No. 2

Description: View of the facility maintenance building.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 3

Description: View of fire damage to the facility maintenance building.

Frame No. 4

Description: View of the interior of the chemical storage room on the northern end of the
facility maintenance building.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 5

Description: View of the southern end of the processing facility and location of engine room and
all former ammonia tanks and infrastructure.

Frame No. 6

Description: View of the interior of the engine room.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 7

Description: Additional view of the engine room.

Frame No. 8

Description: View of heavy staining in the engine room.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 9

Description: Additional view of heavy staining in the engine room.

Frame No. 10

Description: View of the former boiler room.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 11

Description: View of the interior of the processing facilty.

Frame No. 12

Description: View of office space in the interior of the processing facility.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 13

Description: View of the Offal building.

Frame No. 14

Description: View of the pumps and equipment in the Offal building.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 15

Description: View of truck loading area in the Offall building.

Frame No. 16

Description: View of the shipping and receiving area on the northwestern portion of the plant.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 17

Description: View of the Live Truck Shed on the southwestern corner of the site.

Frame No. 18

Description: View of the pole barn on the southern portion of the site.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 19

Description: View of the processing plant from the south.

Frame No. 20

Description: View of the area of suspected landfilling.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 21

Description: View of concrete and drum debris protruding from the berm in the suspected
landfill area.

Frame No. 22

Description: View of the drum storage area south of the plant.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 23

Description: View of potable and reuse water ASTs.

Frame No. 24

Description: View of the Parts Storage Building locate west of the plant.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 25

Description: View of the Live Truck Shed/Truck Maintenance garage north of Moncure-
Pittsboro Road.

Frame No. 26

Description: View of the interior of the Truck Maintenance Building.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 27

Description: View of the truck wash area with former diesel/gasoline pump island.

Frame No. 28

Description: View of the Scale house located north of Pittsboro-Moncure Road.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 29

Description: View of the diesel/gas station dispenser island at the Truck Maintenance building.

Frame No. 30

Description: View of monitoring well in the location of the former diesel UST at the Truck
Maintenance building.
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 31

Description: View of the Parts Storage building west of the processing plant.

Frame No. 32

Description: View of the parts storage building west of the plant with the facility parking lot in
the distance.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 33

Description: View of the floor drains within the processing area of the plant.

Frame No. 34

Description: View of the entrance to the site.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.

20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017

Frame No. 35

Description: View of the facility from the parking lot along the western portion of the site.

Frame No. 36

Description: View of the parking lot with the Live Truck Shed in the distance.

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
20.375-acre Reman Properties LLC: Pittsboro, NC WR No. 02160652.0
Photographic Record January 2017
Frame No. 37
Description: View of the location of the former CO2 tanks and the general area of the
underground water tank.
Frame No. 38
Description: View of the boiler room on the south side of the processing facility.
APPENDIX G

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
1950 Aerial
1 inch = 500 feet
µ
1955 Aerial
1 inch = 500 feet
µ
1965 Aerial
1 inch = 400 feet
µ
1973 Aerial
1 inch = 400 feet
µ
1979 Aerial
1 inch = 500 feet
µ
1983 Aerial
1 inch = 500 feet
µ
1987 Aerial
1 inch = 200 feet
µ
1993 Aerial
1 inch = 400 feet
µ
1997 Aerial
1 inch = 300 feet
µ
2002 Aerial
1 inch = 300 feet
µ
2007 Aerial
1 inch = 300 feet
µ
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board
2010 Aerial
1 inch = 300 feet
µ
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board
2013 Aerial
1 inch = 300 feet
µ
2014 Aerial
1 inch = 300 feet
µ
APPENDIX H
OWNER QUESTIONNAIRES
(Not Included)
APPENDIX I
PURCHASE PRICE QUESTIONNAIRE
(Not Included)
APPENDIX J
LIEN – AUL QUESTIONNAIRE
(Blank)
TITLE AND JUDICIAL RECORDS REVIEW FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS AND
ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS
Per the standards for conducting All Appropriate Inquiries under 40 CFR Part 312 and Standard Practice
for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM E1527-13),
reasonably ascertainable recorded land title and lien records that are filed under federal, tribal, state, or
local law should be reviewed to identify environmental liens or activity and use limitations, if any, that are
currently recorded against the property. The following information should be completed and submitted along
with the Phase I ESA prior to any transaction of the referenced property. THIS FORM SHOULD BE
FILLED OUT BY AN INDIVIDUAL QUALIFIED TO CONDUCT THIS SEARCH (I.E. A PROFESSIONAL
TITLE COMPANY, TITLE PROFESSIONAL, ETC).
Note: In certain jurisdictions, federal, tribal, state, or local statutes, or regulations specify that environmental liens
and AULs be filed in judicial records rather than in land title records. In such cases judicial records must be
searched for environmental liens and AULs.
The complete and correct address for the subject property:
Property Owner:
Address:
Legal Description:
Found Not Found ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN
If found, please describe*:
Found Not Found OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE
LIMITATIONS If found, please describe*:
*This information should be provided to W&R prior to completion of the Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment report to ensure compliance with ASTM E1527-13. Discovery of AULs/ELs/ICs may
jeopardize the user’s ability to obtain AAI protection mechanisms. Therefore, if such information is
discovered subsequent to the date of W&R’s Phase I ESA report then it should be provided to W&R so that
we may make a proper review and issue an amended letter accordingly.
Signed: Date:
Printed Name: Title:
Company:
APPENDIX K
CLIENT/USER QUESTIONNAIRE
(Not Included)
APPENDIX L
REGULATORY FILE INFORMATION
Subject Property
LUST Incident
APPENDIX M
HISTORICAL REPORTS
2014 Phase I ESA

7

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Property
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road
Moncure, NC
27559
Prepared for:
Lonerider Brewing Company
8816 Gulf Ct #100
Raleigh, NC 27617
Prepared by:
Spangler Environmental, Inc.
4338 Bland Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
December 19, 2014
© Spangler Environmental Inc., 2014
Tomas G. Will
Environmental Project Manager
Adam Callahan. Rieder
Environmental Professional

Table of Contents

Page i

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

1.0 Executive Summary 1..............................................................................................................
2.0 Introduction 2...........................................................................................................................
3.0 Site Description 4.....................................................................................................................
4.0 User Provided Information 6..................................................................................................
5.0 Records Review 7.....................................................................................................................
6.0 Site Reconnaissance 13............................................................................................................
7.0 Interviews 15.............................................................................................................................
8.0 Findings 16................................................................................................................................
9.0 Opinions 19...............................................................................................................................
10.0 Conclusions 19........................................................................................................................
11.0 Deviations 21...........................................................................................................................
12.0 Warrants and Confidentiality 21..........................................................................................
13.0 References 21..........................................................................................................................
14.0 Signature of Environmental Professional 23.......................................................................
15.0 Qualifications of Environmental Professionals 23..............................................................
Appendix A: Figures
Topo Map - 1981 121214100136
NRCS Web Soil Survey Map 121214041413
Site Map 121214041742
FEMA 3710974100J Map 121214042454
Facility Overview Map 121914045625
Appendix B: EDR Radius Map with GEOcheck
Appendix C: Findings for Historical Sanborn Insurance Maps
Appendix D: Site Documentation Photos
Appendix E: Site Reconnassiance & Interview Checklists
Appendix F: Deed For Subject Property
Appendix G: Historical Aerials
Appendix H: Other Supporting Documentation

- 1 -

1.0 Executive Summary
This report details the findings of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment ("ESA") for aproperty located along 270 Moncure- Pittsborro Road, Moncure, Chatham County, NorthCarolina. The approximately 20.375 acre subject property consists of one parcel which isdivided by Moncure Pitssboro Road. The parcel ID number for the subject property as listed inthe Chatham County tax database is 60773. The current deed for the parcel that makes up thesubject property are found in the Chatham County Register of Deeds Book 1721 Page 0346.The objective of this ESA was to identify recognized environmental conditions ("RECs") inconnection with the subject property. This ESA was performed in conformance with the scope,methodology, and limitations described in ASTM E 1527-13 -- Standard Practice forEnvironmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. Limitationsand exceptions to this practice are described in Section 2.4; deviations are described in Section11. Spangler Environmental, Inc. ("SEI") conducted this ESA in accordance with the agreedupon scope of work. Activities included review of government records, review of historicaldata, review of available mapping resources, and site reconnaissance to determine existingconditions and past land use activities. The subject property is currently vacant and developed with a poultry processing facility. Areasaround the perimeter of the property are wooded. The property contains a guardhouse, twopump buildings, an assembly building, a barn, a shed, a workshop building, two officebuildings, a vehicle maintenance building, and a main facility comprised of several adjacent andadjoining structures. Municipal water, sewer, and electricity are available to the subjectproperty (See Site Photographs). Under contract with SEI, Environmental Data Resources, Inc. ("EDR") of Milford, Connecticutprepared an EDR Radius Map (RM) for the subject property. SEI provided EDR with thelocation of the subject property based on information provided to SEI by representatives ofLonerider Brewing Co. EDR analyzed federal, state, and tribal government environmentaldatabases and EDR proprietary records for information on sites or facilities with known orexpected environmental conditions within minimum search distances of the subject property, asspecified by ASTM E 1527-13. The RM listed no individual sites that were not mapped due to missing or inadequate addressinformation (i.e., Orphan Summary). Analysis of the RM indicated that the subject property was listed on the searched databases(RM# A1&A2&A3 Townsends Inc. Pittsboro Plant). Records identified four (4) mapped siteslocated within the minimum search distances of the subject property (RM# 2 Quick Change Oiland Lube, 20 Deegan Dr., RM# 5 Brewer Property, Sandra, 134 Log Barn Rd., RM# 6&B7Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, 840 Moncure-Pittsboro Rd., RM# B8&B9 NCDOT AsphaltSite #30, SR 1012and SR 1962), located within the minimum search as defined by ASTM E1527-13. The corresponding documentation for these databases is included in Appendix B. The physical setting (i.e., location of drainage features and/or relative topographical position) ofeach of the four discrete locations listed in the RM were evaluated to determine the potential forimpact to the likely presence of recognized environmental conditions on the subject property. Based on distance to the subject property, topographical features, remediation efforts, and thetype of contaminant known to have impacted these sites, in our best professional judgment, thefour discrete mapped sites have minimal potential to impact the subject property. During sitereconnaissance and review of regulatory records, observations were made which lead to theidentification of environmental concerns. As a result of these observations and the findings ofthis assessment, evidence suggests the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substanceor petroleum products on the property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a pastrelease, or a material threat of release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products ontostructures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 2 -

Therefore, two RECs in association with the subject property have been identified in thisassessment:•A 10,000 gallon diesel UST is located southeast of the service garage. According to thelatest inspection performed in February 2014, the tank appears to be empty. The tank waswas originally installed in 1961, is of single walled steel construction, and does notcurrently have a functioning corrosion prevention system. An NOV has been issued dueto the failure to maintain the corrosion prevention system and for having improperregistration. Due to the age of the tank, type of construction, and nonfunctional corrosionprevention system, this tank is identified as posing a material threat of release and istherefore considered an REC.•Several 55 gallon storage drums, some full, some partially full, some empty, wereobserved on the northern exterior of the maintenance building on a concrete pad. Thelabels on the drums identified various types of oil, hydraulic fluid, and polymers. Some ofthe storage drums observed on the northern exterior of the maintenance building did nothave labels that were legible. Furthermore, some of the drums appeared to only bepartially full. As a result, SEI was not able to reasonably identify the contents of thesedrums. Staining of the floor of the concrete storage area was observed in the vicinity ofthe drums. The staining was confined to the concrete pad. Due to the unknown contents ofthese drums and the observed staining, an REC has been identified.
2.0 Introduction
2.1 Purpose
The objective of this ESA is to identify, to the extent feasible, recognized environmentalconditions in connection with the subject property pursuant to the process described in ASTMStandard E 1527-13 -- Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase IEnvironmental Site Assessment Process. This involved evaluating the property forcontaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,and Liability Act (CERCLA) and for petroleum products and other environmental conditions.
2.2 Scope-of-Services
Spangler Environmental, Inc. has (SEI) completed this ESA in accordance with methodologydescribed in ASTM E 1527-13. Achieving assessment objectives entailed the following: •Identifying historic uses of the property from the present to the property's first developeduse, or 1940, whichever is earlier.•Reviewing and interpreting reasonably ascertainable and practically reviewable federal,state, and local public records for the subject property and immediate vicinity.•Performing visual inspection and walk-through of the subject property and immediatevicinity, including photographic documentation.•Performing a Vapor Intrusion Screen for the subject property. This ESA did not include any sampling or testing of materials. Environmental issues orconditions specifically outside the scope of this assessment include, but are not limited to,asbestos-containing materials, radon, lead-based paint, lead in drinking water, wetlands,regulatory compliance, cultural and historical resources, industrial hygiene, health and safety,ecological resources, endangered species, indoor air quality, and high voltage power lines. Deviations from the methodology described in ASTM E 1527-13 are mentioned in Section 11.0of this report.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 3 -

2.3 Significant Assumptions
No significant assumptions were required to satisfy the scope of services of this ESA.
2.4 Limitations and Exceptions
Consistent with good commercial or customary practice, the level of inquiry for this report hasbeen guided by the type of property and the information developed in the course of inquiry. Thework performed in conjunction with this ESA is based upon the described scope of services,and not on tasks or procedures beyond the scope of services or the time constraints imposed bythe client. All data developed and the findings, opinions, and conclusions discussed herein arerelevant to the subject property and to the dates of the site work and should not be relied uponto represent conditions on other properties or dates. SEI did not perform a 50-year title searchfor the subject property as per ASTM 1527-13. All surface environmental assessments are inherently limited in that conclusions are drawn andrecommendations developed from information obtained from limited research and siteevaluation at a specific time. Environmental circumstances at the subject property andsurrounding properties may change with the passage of time. Hazardous materials beneath thesurface or covered by debris may be present but undetectable during site reconnaissance.Verification of subsurface conditions, including the hazard potential of buried or covereddebris, is beyond the scope of this investigation. This assessment was performed in a professional manner using the degree of skill and careexercised for similar projects under similar conditions by reputable and competentenvironmental consultants. SEI made a reasonable attempt to seek out all relevant facts to theextent that such information was reasonably ascertainable and practically reviewable. SEI shallnot be responsible for conditions or consequences arising from relevant facts that wereconcealed, withheld, or not fully disclosed at the time the evaluation was performed. The findings and conclusions contained in this report are partly based upon, and limited by, thegovernment data and other information made available for the locations considered at the datesgiven. While SEI has used reasonable care to avoid reliance on faulty information, it is not ableto verify the accuracy of all data and information provided by government entities and thirdparties. Therefore, SEI is not responsible for any finding, opinion, or conclusion contained inthis ESA that is based, in whole or in part, upon inaccurate or incomplete data, or that wasobtained directly or indirectly from third parties. Unless otherwise indicated in this report, no attempt was made to check on the compliance ofpresent or past owners of the site with federal, state, or local laws and regulations. This ESA shall be used solely for its intended purpose and by the intended client. This reportdoes not constitute an environmental regulatory compliance audit and shall not be used as such.The conclusions presented in this report are scientific rather than legal in nature, unlessspecified otherwise. Any person or entity considering the use, acquisition, or the like, of thesubject property does so on the sole reliance of his or her own judgment and on his or her ownpersonal investigation of such property, and not in reliance upon any representation by SEIregarding such property, the character, quality, or value thereof. The following limitations were encountered during the preparation of this report:-The historic use of the subject property dating back to 1940 could not be established throughthe review of available historical resources-The historical use of the subject property could not be verified at 5 year intervals due to gaps inthe available historical resources. However, review of historical aerial photography indicatesthat the use of the subject property did not singificantly change from the time the property wasfirst documented in aerial photography to the present.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 4 -

2.5 Special Terms and Conditions
The term "recognized environmental condition" means the presence or likely presence of anyhazardous substance or petroleum products on the property under conditions that indicate anexisting release, a past release, or a material threat of release of any hazardous substance orpetroleum products onto structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surfacewater of the property. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generallydo not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generallywould not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriategovernmental agencies. The term "historical recognized environmental condition" describes anenvironmental condition which in the past would have been considered a recognizedenvironmental condition, but which may or may not be considered a recognized environmentalcondition currently. The term "controlled recognized environmental condition" means arecognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances orpetroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatoryauthority (e.g., as evidenced by the issuance of a NFA letter or equivalent, or meetingrisk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleumproducts allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (e.g.,property use restrictions, AULs, institutional controls, or engineering controls). The term"vapor intrusion condition" is described as the presence or likely presence of any chemical ofconcern in existing or planned structures on a property resulting from an existing release or apast release from contaminated soil or groundwater on the property or within close proximity tothe property, at a concentration that presents or may present a human health risk. As such, theterm "potential vapor intrusion condition" describes where vapors of hazardous substances orpetroleum products have the potential to intrude into a building or planned building location.The term "vapor encroachment condition" describes the presence or likely presence of chemicalof concern vapors in the subsurface of the property caused by the release of vapors fromcontaminated soil or groundwater or both either on or near the property as identified by the Tier1or Tier 2 procedures. The term "subject property" means the real property consisting of the 20.375 acre tract of landthat consists of one parcel identified in the Chatham County tax database as PIN# 60773. Thecurrent deed for the parcel that makes up the subject property is found in the Chatham CountyRegister of Deeds Book 1721 Page 0346. The subject property is defined in greater detail inSection 3.0.
2.6 User Reliance
Lonerider Brewing Co. are intended to be the only recipients of this report, and may distributethe report and its findings as necessary, at the discretion of Lonerider Brewing Co. This reportis work product of SEI. Additional replication and distribution of this report is strictlyprohibited by SEI, unless permission has been granted by SEI.
3.0 Site Description
3.1 Location and Legal Description
Based on the information provided by the User, the 20.375 acre subject property consists of oneparcel which is divided by Moncure Pitssboro Road. The parcel ID number for the subjectproperty as listed in the Chatham County tax database is 60773. The current deed for the parcelthat makes up the subject property is found in the Chatham County Register of Deeds Book1721 Page 0346. A Location Map is provided in Appendix A as Figure 1.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 5 -

3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics
Geologically, the subject property is mapped as Felsic Metavolcanic Rock in the Charlotte andMilton Belt (North Carolina Department of Natural Resources Geological Survey, 1985). Thisrock unit is described as "metamorphosed dacitic to rhyolitic flows and tuffs, light gray togreenish gray; interbedded with mafic and intermediate metavolcanic rock, meta-argillite, andmetamudstone." This unit is identified as Cambrian/Late Proterozoic in age. The site is located on the USGS 7.5 Pittsboro, NC topographic quadrangle. The generaltopography of the site is sloped toward the southeast, with mild topographic relief across mostof the subject property. Surface drainage appears to flow towards the south and eastern portionsof the property. A copy of the USGS Topographical Map is included as Figure 1. According toEDR databases, the subject site is at elevation + 418 NGVD. Soils at the subject property (see Soils Report in Appendix H) are mapped by the United StatesDepartment of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS) as four individual soiltypes. These soil types consist of the following: Georgeville Silt Loam, Georgeville - BadinComplex, Goldston - Badin Complex, and Georgeville - Urban Land Complex. The majority ofthe soils at the property are described as silty loams. The majority of the property is identifiedas Georgeville Silt Loam which is described as well drained silt loam found on 2-6% and6-10% slopes with a parent material of residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite.Georgeville - Badin Complex is described as well drained silt loam found on 10-15% slopeswith a parent material of residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. Goldston -Badin Complex is described as well drained very channery silt loam found on 15-35% slopeswith a parent material of residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. Georgeville -Urban Land Complex is described as well drained silt loam found on 2-10% slopes with aparent material of residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or argillite. A more detaileddescription of the individual soil types and their location can be found in the Soils Report inAppendix H. These soil conditions appear to be present at the subject site based on sitereconnaissance. Portions of the southern and eastern regions of the property are located in flood zone AEaccording to the FEMA Floodplain Map # 3710974100J. The developed portions of the targetproperty do not lie within a flood hazard area. The FEMA data is shown within the EDRphysical setting source summary provided as Appendix B as well as Appendix H.
3.3 Current Use of the Property
The property is currently developed with a poultry processing facility as well as numerousoutbuildings that support the facility's operations. The facility was once operated byTownsends, Inc. The property is currently vacant and the facility appeared to have not been inoperation for a significant period at the time of the site visit. According to the review ofregulatory documents the facility closed down in 2011.
3.4 Site Improvements
The subject property consists of one 20.375 acre parcel which is divided by Moncure PitssboroRoad. The parcel ID number for the subject property as listed in the Chatham County taxdatabase is 60773. This parcelis currently zoned as Heavy Industrial (M-2) by the Town ofPittsboro Planning Department. The subject property is improved with several buildings. The portion of the property south ofMoncure-Pittsboro Road contains the following structures: a guard house, two pump buildings,a barn, a shed, an assembly building, an office and storage building, a maintenance building, onoffal processing building, and the main poultry processing facility which itself is made up of a
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 6 -

collection of buildings. The property is believed to have been originally developed with apoultry processing facility in the early 1960s. The portion of the property north ofMoncure-Pittsboro Road contains the following structures: an office building and a servicegarage. The property contains a 1,000,000 gallon upright AST, a 300,000 gallon upright AST,and a third upright AST of unknown capacity. The main facility is heated and cooled byroof-mounted air handling units. Two truck scales are located on the property. The property isdeveloped with parking areas for the main facility as well as the service garage. The property isserviced by overhead power lines and appears to be serviced by municipal water and sewer.
3.5 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties
Properties within the vicinity of the subject property are generally residential. Adjoining to thewest of the subject property are residential single family homes. Adjoining to the south of thesubject property appears to be a partially wooded agricultural tract. Adjoining to the north ofthe subject property are residential single family homes. Adjoining to the northeast of thesubject property is undeveloped wooded land. Adjoining to the east of the subject propertyappears to be a water treatment facility (See Site Photos).
4.0 User Provided Information
SEI was provided limited data and information by the intended User(s) of this Phase IEnvironmental Site Assessment. Information provided was verified, to the extent practicable, asdescribed in the following Subsections of this Section 4.0. The lack of information, if noted, hasbeen considered by the Environmental Professional(s) in the preparation of this report, and doesnot materially condition or limit any conclusions or opinions given by the EP in this Section 4.0or elsewhere unless otherwise specifically stated. SEI has no specialized knowledge of the Subject Property outside of the research which wasconducted and reported as part of this report. The property ownership and tenants as well as all individuals who were interviewed as part ofthis investigation, have not reported any specialized knowledge of this Subject Property outsideof what is contained in this report.
4.1 Title Records
According to the Chatham Tax Department, Reman Properties LLC currently owns the subjectproperty. Records in the Chatham County Register of Deeds indicate that Reman PropertiesLLC has been in possession of the property since November 19, 2013. Prior to that the propertywas owned by OM-NC LLC. No further title information was provided to SEI and,consequently, was not reviewed for this ESA.
4.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations
No environmental liens or activity or use limitations for the subject property were identified byLonerider Brewing Co. during the course of investigation.
4.3 Specialized Knowledge
SEI was provided with no specialized direction by Lonerider Brewing Co. and therefore had nospecialized knowledge of the subject property prior to the site assessment.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 7 -

4.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues
SEI is not aware of any known value reduction being contemplated by Lonerider Brewing Co.for environmental issues.
4.5 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information
No written or verbal communication with the property owner revealed any information whichsuggested that there are currently or historically any recognized environmental conditionsassociated with the subject property.
Property Owners Property Occupants Reman Properties, LLC.Vacant
4.6 Reason for Performing Phase I
This ESA was performed by SEI by request of Lonerider Brewing Co. as part of theirpre-acquisition environmental due diligence for the purchase of the subject property.
5.0 Records Review
5.1 Standard Environmental Records Sources
Under contract with SEI, Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) of Shelton, Connecticutprepared an EDR Radius Map (RM) for the subject property. SEI provided EDR with thelocation of the subject property based on site information provided to SEI by representatives ofLonerider Brewing Co. EDR analyzed federal, state, and tribal government environmental databases and EDRproprietary records for information on sites or facilities with known or expected environmentalconditions within minimum search distances of the subject property, as specified by ASTM E1527-13. A complete copy of the RM is provided in Appendix B. The following Federal databases were searched: CERCLIS, CERCLIS-NFRAP, CONSENT,CORRACTS, DOD, ERNS, FINDS, FTTS, FUDS, NPL-Liens, HMIRS, ICIS, MLTS, MINES,NPL, NPLL-RECOVERY, ODI, PADS, Proposed NPL, Delisted NPL, RAATS, RCRA-TSD,RCRA-LQG, RCRA-SQG, ROD, SSTS, TRIS, TSCA, UMTRA, US BROWNFIELDS, USENG CONTROLS, and US INST CONTROLS. The following State databases were searched: AST, BROWNFIELDS, DRYCLEANERS, IMD,INST CONTROL, LUST, LUST TRUST, NC HSDS, OLI, SHW, State Landfill, UST, andVCP. The following Tribal databases were searched: INDIAN RESERV, INDIAN LUST, andINDIAN UST. The search also included the following EDR Proprietary databases: HistoricalAuto Station, Historical Cleaners, and Manufactured Gas Plants. These Federal, State, Tribal, and EDR proprietary databases are described in Appendix B.
Radius Map Findings Summary
Database TargetProperty SearchDistance(Miles)
< 1/8 1/8 -1/4 1/4 -1/2 1/2 -1 > 1 TotalPlotted
NPL 1 0 0 0 0 NR 0Proposed NPL 1 0 0 0 0 NR 0NPL LIENS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 8 -

Database TargetProperty SearchDistance(Miles)
< 1/8 1/8 -1/4 1/4 -1/2 1/2 -1 > 1 TotalPlotted
DELISTED NPL 1 0 0 0 0 NR 0CERCLIS0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0CERCLIS-NFRAP 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0CORRACTS10000NR0RCRA-TSDF 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0RCRA-LQG 0.25 0 0 NR NR NR 0RCRA-SQG 0.25 0 0 NR NR NR 0RCRA-CESQG 0.25 0 0 NR NR NR 0US ENG CONTROLS 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0US INST CONTROL 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0ERNSXTPNRNRNRNRNR1HMIRSTPNRNRNRNRNR0DOD10000NR0FUDS10000NR0US BROWNFIELDS 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0CONSENT10000NR0UMTRA0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0ODI0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0TRISTPNRNRNRNRNR0TSCATPNRNRNRNRNR0FTTSTPNRNRNRNRNR0SSTSTPNRNRNRNRNR0LUCIS0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0DOT OPS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0ICISTPNRNRNRNRNR0HIST FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0RADINFOTPNRNRNRNRNR0LIENS 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0PADSTPNRNRNRNRNR0MLTSTPNRNRNRNRNR0FINDSXTPNRNRNRNRNR1RAATSTPNRNRNRNRNR0PCBTRANSFORMERTPNRNRNRNRNR0
LEAD SMELTER 1 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0FTTS INSP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0SCRDDRYCLEANERS0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0
COAL ASH EPA 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0EPA WATCH LIST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0LEAD SMELTER 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0US MINES 0.25 0 0 NR NR NR 0PRPTPNRNRNRNRNR0EDR US HistCleaners 0.25 0 0 NR NR NR 0
US FIN ASSUR TP NR NR NR NR NR 02020 COR ACTION 0.25 0 0 NR NR NR 0USGS WATERWELLS 1 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR US Hist AutoStat 0.25 0 1 NR NR NR 1
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 9 -

Database TargetProperty SearchDistance(Miles)
< 1/8 1/8 -1/4 1/4 -1/2 1/2 -1 > 1 TotalPlotted
FEDERALFACILITY 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ROD 1 0 0 0 0 NR 0RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.25 0 0 NR NR NR 0US AIRS (AFS)TP NR NR NR NR NR 0US HIST CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0PWSTPNRNRNRNRNR0COAL ASH DOE TP NR NR NR NR NR 0RMPXTPNRNRNRNRNR1FEMA UST 0.25 0 0 NR NR NR 0HIST FTTS INSP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0US CDL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0US AIRS MINOR TP NR NR NR NR NR 0SHWS10000NR0SWF/LF 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0HIST LF 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0UICTPNRNRNRNRNR0LUST0.5 0 0 2 NR NR 2LUST TRUST 0.5 0 0 1 NR NR 1UST0.25 0 0 NR NR NR 0LAST0.5 0 0 2 NR NR 2AST0.25 0 0 NR NR NR 0SPILLSTPNRNRNRNRNR0INST CONTROL 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0VCP0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0DRYCLEANERS0.25 0 0 NR NR NR 0BROWNFIELDS0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0DAY CARE TP NR NR NR NR NR 0RGA HWS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0SPILLS 90 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0NPDESTPNRNRNRNRNR0COAL ASH 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0SWRCY0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0WELLS10000NR0Financial Assurance 3 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0HSDS10000NR0Financial Assurance 2 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0IMD0.5 0 0 3 NR NR 3OLI0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0Financial Assurance 1 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0RGA LUST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0RGA LF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0SPILLS 80 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0INDIAN LUST 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0INDIAN UST 0.25 0 0 NR NR NR 0INDIAN VCP 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0INDIAN ODI 0.5 0 0 0 NR NR 0INDIAN RESERV 1 0 0 0 0 NR 0EDR MGP 1 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 10 -

Detail Findings Summary
Site Name:Townsends Inc. Pittsboro PlantDatabases:ERNS, RMP, FINDSAddress:270 Moncure-Pittsboro RdDistance:N/A (Subject property)Direction:N/A (Subject property)Elevation:N/A (Subject property)Comments:On June 2, 2006 an unknown volume of of anhydrous ammonia was reported tohave leaked from an ice maker. It appears that only gas was released as a resultof the leak. The available documentation does not indicate that the releasewould have affected the soil or surface water at the subject property. As anindustrial facility that is involved with the handling and storage of hazardoussubstances, the Townsends facility was required to submit a Risk ManagementPlan. A copy of the RMP was requested by the Town of Pittsboro Departmentof Emergency Management but a copy was not able to be located. The facilty islisted on the EPA's Toxics Release Inventory System due to toxic chemicalsthat were either transported offsite or discharged into the air, water, or land. Sitereconnaissance and records review did not reveal any indication of chemicaldischarges to water or land that would have been associated with the facility.
Site Name:Quick Change Oil and LubeDatabases:EDR US Hist AutoAddress:20 Deegan DrDistance:0.17 milesDirection:NWElevation:HigherComments:An automotive service station is currently located at this address. No gasdispensers were observed onsite. There is no indication of a release inconnection with this property. Based on the absence of regulatory recordsindicating a release and distance to the subject property, the above referencedinformation does not indicate a material threat as defined by the ASTM E1527-13 standard.
Site Name:Brewer Property, SandraDatabases:LUST, LUST TrustAddress:134 Log Barn RdDistance:0.36 milesDirection:WSWElevation:HigherComments:The files for this property were reviewed at the NCDENR Raleigh RegionalOffice. A Limited Site Assessment performed in 2014 indicated that a leakingresidential heating UST was removed and contaminated soil was detected.Contaminated soil was excavated from the site and properly disposed of.Petroleum contaminants that exceeded 2L standards were detected in thegroundwater at the site. The contaminant plume was not delineated. A Notice ofResidual Petroleum was filed for the property. A letter of No Further Actionwas not observed within the regulatory files, however, the files were stored in asection reserved for closed out incidents. Based on the regulatory status,distance to the subject property, nature of the release, and levels ofcontamination detected in the groundwater, the above referenced informationdoes not indicate a material threat as defined by the ASTM E 1527-13 standard.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 11 -

Site Name:Louisiana-Pacific CorporationDatabases:LUST, LAST, UST, IMDAddress:840 Moncure-Pittsboro RdDistance:0.45 milesDirection:ESEElevation:LowerComments:A leaking diesels AST was detected in 1999. Concentrations of TPH thatexceeded soil to groundwater MSCCs were detected. 1,800 tons of impactedsoil were removed. No groundwater contamination was detected. The site alsocontained hydraulic oil reservoirs that they did not appear to be associated withany releases. The release incident related to the AST was closed out in 2001. In1989 a 2,000 gallon gasoline UST and a 500 gallon Diesel UST were removedfrom the site. Soil contamination was detected. No groundwater contaminationwas detected. The incident relating to the two USTs was closed out in 2001,indicating that either the contaminated soil was removed to the satisfaction ofthe governing regulatory agency or that the level of contamination was lowenough that active remediation was not required. Based on the regulatory status,distance to the subject property, topographic position of the site, nature of therelease, and lack of groundwater contamination, the above referencedinformation does not indicate a material threat as defined by the ASTM E1527-13 standard.
Site Name:NCDOT Asphalt Site #30Databases:LAST, IMDAddress:SR 1012and SR 1962Distance:0.498 milesDirection:ESEElevation:LowerComments:A leaking AST, most likely containing petroleum, was detected in 1997.Chlorinated solvents were used at this facility for asphalt testing procedures. Nochlorinated solvents were detected in the soil. MTBE was detected ingroundwater but at levels that did not exceed 2L standards. This site was closedout in 2005. Based on the regulatory status, distance to the subject property,topographic position of the site, nature of the release, and levels ofcontamination detected in the groundwater, the above referenced informationdoes not indicate a material threat as defined by the ASTM E 1527-13 standard.
5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources
Water Wells EDR also prepared a GeoCheck® Physical Setting Source Summary (PSSS) for the subjectproperty. The PSSS revealed that there are no public water supply wells located near the subjectproperty.
5.3 Physical Setting
The PSSS contains a physical setting source map at a scale of approximately 1"=2000' and isprovided in Appendix B.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 12 -

5.4 Historical Use Information on the Property and Adjacent Properties
Aerial Photographs
Available aerial photographs dated 1965, 1983, 1993, 199, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010, and2012 from EDR were reviewed for this Environmental Site Assessment. Copies of selectedphotographs are included in Appendix C of this report. No RECs were identified during the review of Aerial photographs.
Date(s)Property Comments Surrounding Area Comments1965The subject property is developedwith a large industrial building.There appear to be two outbuildingssouth of the main facility building.There appears to be a singlestructure on the northern region ofthe property.
Adjoining areas appear to be vacant,wooded, and undeveloped
1983 Additional parking areas have beenadded to the property. The northernregion of the property has beendeveloped with what appears to be aservice garage and an officebuilding. 1993, 1999 A new outbuilding has beendeveloped south of the main facility.A new outbuilding believed has beendeveloped east of the main facility.A large upright AST can be seennear the entrance to the facility.
A residence has been developed tothe west
2005, 2006 A new outbuilding has beendeveloped southwest of the mainfacility. An additional large uprightAST can be seen near the entrance tothe facility.
A residential subdivision has beendeveloped to the north. Whatappears to be a water treatmentfacility has been developed to thewest2008, 2009,2010, 2012 On of the southern outbuildingsappears to have been removed
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
According to the Certified Sanborn Map Report, no maps were found for the target propertyand surrounding area.
Topographic Maps
Available topographic maps from EDR dated 1981 were reviewed for this Environmental SiteAssessment. Copies of selected maps are included in Appendix C of this report. A summary oftopographic maps are provided below
Summary
Date(s)Quad Property Comments Surrounding Area Comments1981PittsboroThe service garage and officebuildings are represented in thenorth region of the property.
The surrounding areas appearprimarily undeveloped withsmall structures represented to
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 13 -

The main facility and fiveoutbuildings are represented inthe central and southern regionsof the property.
the east and north of theproperty
City Directories
SEI did not review city directories for the subject property and adjoining properties. Othersupporting historical documentation was deemed sufficient to identify the possible presence ofRECs.
6.0 Site Reconnaissance
6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions
The site reconnaissance was conducted on December 10, 2014 by Tomas Will with SEI,accompanied by Austin Cox of Reman Properties, LLC. Weather conditions at the time of thesite reconnaissance were clear and cold. The visual reconnaissance consisted of observing theboundaries of the property and systematically traversing the site to provide an overlapping fieldof view, wherever possible. The periphery of the on-site structure was observed along withinterior accessible common areas, processing, storage and maintenance areas. Photographs ofpertinent site features identified during the site reconnaissance are included in the appendices.
6.2 General Site Setting
Based on the information provided by the User, the Site Assessment ("ESA") for a propertylocated along Moncure-Pittsboro Road, Moncure, Chatham County, North Carolina. Theapproximately 20.375 acre subject property consists of one parcel which is divided by MoncurePitssboro Road. The parcel ID number for the subject property as listed in the Chatham Countytax database is 60773. The current deed for the parcel that makes up the subject property arefound in the Chatham County Register of Deeds Book 1721 Page 0346. A Location Map isprovided in Attachment A as Figure 1. The subject property is east of the intersection ofMoncure-Pittsboro Rd. and Farmingdale Ln. Site reconnaissance conducted by SEI personnel did not reveal the presence of hazardoussubstances or petroleum products under conditions that indicate an existing release, past releaseor material threat of a release in connection with past and current uses of the subject propertywith the exception of the following;-A 10,000 gallon diesel UST located near the service garage that was later found to be out ofcompliance, does not have functioning corrosion protection, is of single-walled steelconstruction, and was originally installed in 1961-Several 55 gallon storage drums, some full, some partially full, some empty, are stored on thenorth end of the maintenance building. Some drums were not identifyable due to fadedlabelling. Staining of the floor of the concrete storage area was observed in the vicinity of thedrums. The property is currently developed with a poultry processing facility as well as numerousoutbuildings that support the facility's operations. The interior of the facility was largely empty,with most of the equipment having been previously removed. Turkey Creek runs through thesouthern and eastern sections of the property. Municipal water, sewer, and electricity areavailable to the subject property (See Site Photographs). The buildings located on the subject property consist of the following:-The service garage located in the far northwest of the subject property. This building containsvarious bays and workspaces presumably used to maintain the fleet of trucks as well as forklifts
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 14 -

and other equipment that would have been used in relation the facility. A fuel dispenser wasobserved to the immediate east of the service garage. Southeast of the fuel dispenser a concretepad with fill ports for a UST was observed.-The office building located in the far north of the property, east of the service garage. Thisbuilding is believed to have been used as office space to process the logistics of the incomingchicken shipments. A truck scale is located on the south side of this building.-The guardhouse is located in the northwest of the subject property, near the entrance to thesouthern portion of the parcel.-The two pumphouses are located directly west of the guardhouse. These buildings containpump and piping infrastructure associated with the two nearby upright ASTs.-The main poultry processing facility. This facility is made up of a collection of buildings. Thefacility appears to be four stories tall. In addition to large spaces believed to have been used forprocessing the chickens, this building contains offices, break rooms, and changing areas.Several trench drains are located in the areas belived to have been used for poultry processing.Pump systems and engine rooms are located in the interior of the southern portion of thefacility. Very little equipment remained inside the facility. There are two main loadings baysassociated with this facility. On the southern exterior of the facility is an upright AST ofunknown capacity. On the southwestern exterior of the facility a secondary containment areawas observed that was believed to have once contained two ASTs. Staining was observedwithin the secondary containment area. An upright AST containing ammonium gas wasadjacent to the secondary containment area. A concrete pad was observed on the southeasternexterior of the building which is believed to have been the location of an AST containign CO2.A network of pipes is located at the southern exterior of the facility. The network of pipesincludes an orange AST believed to have been used to store ammonia gas. Several markedstorage drums containing deoderants and petroleum products were observed periodically aroundthe exterior of the facility.-To the far southwest of the main facility is the assembly building which is believed to havebeen where the chickens were unloaded from trucks.-At the far south of the property is a barn and shed. These buildings are believed to have beenused for storage. Two large labelled containers were observed inside the barn containing achemical whose use was not able to be identified.-Immediately southwest of the main facility is a storage and office building. This building waslargely empty. A concrete pad was observed to the south of this building which is believed tohave been the site of a former AST or possible UST.-Immediately south of the main facility is a maintenance building. This building is believed tohave been used to perform routine maintenance on the equipment associated with the facility.The remnants of a freight elevator or loading arm was observed on the second story of thisbuilding. Several 55 gallon storage drums, some full, some partially full, some empty, werestored on the north end of the maintenance building on a concrete pad. The drums appeared toall be labelled howver some h were not identifiable due to faded labelling. Staining of the floorof the concrete storage area was observed in the vicinity of the drums. The staining wasconfined to the concrete pad.-To the east of the main facility and across the stream is a building belived to have been usedfor offal processing. There are pipes, pumps, and tumblers located in this building. Two loadingbays are located at the building exterior. The possible location of a former AST is located onthe eastern exterior of the building. As a result of these observations, evidence was found of the presence or likely presence of anyhazardous substance or petroleum products on the property under conditions that indicate anexisting release, a past release, or a material threat of release of any hazardous substance orpetroleum products onto structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surfacewater of the property. Appendix D contains Site Reconnaissance Photographs and Appendix Eincludes a Site Reconnaissance Checklist.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 15 -

7.0 Interviews
SEI made reasonable effort to ascertain actual knowledge of items of significance from theUser(s) of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Information provided was verified, tothe extent practicable, as described in the following Subsections of this Section 7.0. Theappropriate level of assessment has been guided by the type of property subject to assessment,the identified expertise and risk tolerance of the User(s) if so identified to the EP, and theinformation developed in the course of assessment of the property and inquiry. The lack ofinformation, if noted, has been considered by the Environmental Professional(s) in thepreparation of this report, and does not materially condition or limit any conclusions or opinionsgiven by the EP in this Section 7.0 or elsewhere unless otherwise specifically stated.
7.1 Interview with Property Owner/Operator
The Owner/Operator interview is attached in Appendix H. The Owner identified that a previousPhase I Environmental Site Assessment had been conducted on the subject property but that hewas unable to provide SEI with a copy. The Owner interview revealed that a Notice ofViolation (NOV) had been issued by the UST section of the North Carolina Deptartment ofEnvironment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) due to the tank needing updated registration.The Owner/Operator interview did not reveal the presence of any RECs. The Owner of the property recommended that SEI contact Mr. Bill Baker, a retired engineerwho was involved with designing the facility. Mr. Baker was able to provide SEI with anaccount of how the poultry processing facility functioned as well as where hazardoussubstances and petroleum products were stored. Mr. Baker confirmed the presence of a 10,000gallon diesel UST located near the service garage. Mr. Baker stated the following; the two largeupright ASTs near the entrance to the facility were used to store water, underneath the concretepad located south of the office and storage building which is immediately southwest of the mainfacility is an 80,000 gallon UST used to store water, the secondary containment area locatednear the southeast exterior of the main facility was likely used to store tanks containedhydraulic fluid, the concrete pad located on the eastern exterior of the main facility was used fora CO2 AST, chlorine was stored in carboys at the southeast loading dock for the main facility,and the eastern outbuilding was used to process offal that was generated during the processingof the chicken which was loaded onto trucks then taken offsite. According to Mr. Baker, therewere additional USTs that were once associated with the property that were removed byS&ME. Mr. Baker represented that confirmation soil sampling was performed during theremoval of the tanks to rule out the presence of a release. Mr. Baker was not aware of anyrelease incidents that would have resulted in contamination of the soil or groundwater.
7.2 Interviews with Government Officials
SEI contacted Thomas Bender with the Chatham County Fire Department (CCFD) forinformation concerning storage or release of hazardous substances or petroleum products at ornear the subject property. Mr. Hodge indicated that they had a record of a diesel UST but thatthere are no records related to the release of hazardous substances or petroleum products on thesubject property. Based on this information, no concerns were noted for the subject property. SEI also contacted the Pittsboro Department of Emergenecy Management (PDEM). A copy ofthe Risk Management Plan was requested from PDEM but copies of the plan could not belocated. However, PDEM was able to provide an inventory of the various chemicals stored onthe property which has been included in Appendix H. The PDEM did not have any records thatwould indicate the release of hazardous substances or petroleum products on the subjectproperty. Based on this information, no concerns were noted for the subject property.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 16 -

SEI also contacted Clark Wipfield with NCDENR-UST branch. Mr. Wipfield is the projectmanager for corrective actions in Chatham County. Mr. Wipfield did not have any records forthe facility other than an NOV that had been issued in relation to the 10,000 gallon diesel USTon the property. Mr. Wipfield was not able to identify any records that indicated any registeredtanks on the property. SEI also contacted Rose Pruitt with NCDENR-UST branch. Ms. Pruitt is an inspector with thePermits and Inspections division of the UST section. Ms. Pruitt provided SEI with a copy of theNOV for the diesel UST issued Octover 6, 2014 as well as the most recent inspection reportfrom February 26, 2014 (see Appendix H). The inspection records indicate that the tank is ofsingle wall steel construction, the piping in fiberglass, originally installed in 1961, and wasempty on the day of inspection. The NOV was issued because the corrosion prevention systemfor the tank is nonfunctional and because the tank is improperly registered. Based on thisinformation, the 10,000 gallon diesel UST was identified as an REC due to their being amaterial threat of past release.
7.3 Interviews with User
An User Interview was not performed as part of this assessment. Based on the informationobtained from other sources, an User Interview was not expected to reveal relevant informationabout the property that could not be ascertained through standard record review.
8.0 Findings
8.1 Hazardous Substances in Connection with Identified Uses
SEI found evidence of anhydrous ammonia, diesel, caustic soda, hydraulic fluid, chlorine, andvarious other hazardous substances during the inspection of the Subject Property. Several smallcontainers of solvents, oils, and various cleaners were observed in various areas dedeicated tomaintenance. These materials appeared to be properly stored. The anyhydrous ammonia wascontained in ASTs located near the southern exterior of the main facility and piping systemsused to transport both liquid and gaseous anyhdrous ammonia were observed throughout themain facility. No indications of a release were observed in connection with the anhydrousammonia tanks and piping. A fuel dispenser and UST believed to contain diesel were observednear the exterior of the service garage. The tank is believed to have a capacity of 10,000gallons, is of single walled steel construction, and was installed in 1961. No staining ordistressed soils were observed in connection with the UST or dispenser. Concrete staining wasobserved within the secondary containment area observed near the southeastern exterior of themain facility. An interview with one of the engineers who designed the facility indicates thathydraulic fluid was stored in this area. While the secondary containment area was observed tocontain cracks, SEI did not observe evidence that would indicate that the contents of whateverwas stored in this area seeped through the pad or through the containment walls. Two largelabelled containers were observed inside the barn containing a chemical whose use was not ableto be identified. No indications of a release were observed in connection with these containers.Several 55 gallon storage drums, some full, some partially full, some empty, were observed onthe north end of the maintenance building on a concrete pad. The labels on the drums identifiedvarious types of oil, hydraulic fluid, and polymers. The drums appeared to all be labelledhowever some were not identifiable due to faded labelling. Staining of the floor of the concretestorage area was observed in the vicinity of the drums. The staining was confined to theconcrete pad (see Site Photos).
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 17 -

8.2 Hazardous and/or Unidentified Substance Containers and Storage Tanks
Some of the storage drums observed on the northern exterior of the maintenance building didnot have labels that were legible. Furthermore, some of the drums appeared to only be partiallyfull. As a result, SEI was not able to reasonably identify the contents of these drums. Staining ofthe floor of the concrete storage area was observed in the vicinity of the drums. The stainingwas confined to the concrete pad (see Site Photos). As a result of the unknown contents of thesedrums and the observed staining, an REC has been identified.
8.3 Indications of PCBs
No indications of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) that would result in an enforcement action ifbrought to the attention of the appropriate government agencies were identified in thisassessment.
8.4 Indications of Solid Waste Disposal
No indications of Solid Waste Disposal that would likely result in an enforcement action ifbrought to the attention of the appropriate government agencies were identified in thisassessment. SEI did observe the remains of a discarded 55 gallon storage drum in the woodsnear the stream south of the main facility.
8.5 Hazardous Substances on Adjacent Properties
No indications of Hazardous Substances on Adjacent Properties that would likely result in anenforcement action if brought to the attention of the appropriate government agencies wereidentified in this assessment.
8.6 Vapor Intrusion Conditions (VIC)
Based on records review and site reconnaissance, no vapor intrusion conditions were identifiedon the subject property.
8.7 Potential Vapor Intrusion Conditions (pVIC)
In accordance with the ASTM E2600-10 standard, a non-invasive Tier-1 assessment of pVICswas performed for the subject property to identify potential Vapor Intrusion Conditions. TheTier-1 assessment involves a search distance test that evaluates the proximity of the planned orexisting structures on the subject property to the nearest known edge of contamination (100 feetfor volatile contaminants other than dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon chemicals and 30 feet forpetroleum chemicals). This Tier-1 pVIC assessment did not reveal any chemicals of concern orcontamination under conditions that indicate a release within the search radius. Therefore apVIC can be ruled out. Should contamination be discovered on the subject property, theseconditions would need to be reassessed.
8.8 Vapor Encroachment Conditions (VEC)
As directed in the ASTM E2600-10 standard, "Standard Guide for Vapor EncroachmentScreening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions", a vapor encroachment screen wasperformed to identify VECs for the subject property. A Tier 1 vapor encroachment screen is thereview of state and federal database records to identify those sites within the 1/10 mile, with thepotential to affect subsurface vapor conditions at the subject property. The review of thesedatabases did not reveal any release of any chemicals of concern within the search radius.Therefore a VEC can be ruled out.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 18 -

8.9 Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC)
Based on records review and site reconnaissance, the following Recognized EnvironmentalConditions were identified on the subject property:-A 10,000 gallon diesel UST is located southeast of the service garage. According to the latestinspection performed in February 2014, the tank appears to be empty. The tank was wasoriginally installed in 1961, is of single walled steel construction, and does not currently have afunctioning corrosion prevention system. An NOV has been issued due to the failure tomaintain the corrosion prevention system and for having improper registration. Due to the ageof the tank, type of construction, and nonfunctional corrosion prevention system, this tank isidentified as posing a material threat of release and is therefore considered an REC.-Several 55 gallon storage drums, some full, some partially full, some empty, were observed onthe northern exterior of the maintenance building on a concrete pad. The labels on the drumsidentified various types of oil, hydraulic fluid, and polymers. Some of the storage drumsobserved on the northern exterior of the maintenance building did not have labels that werelegible. Furthermore, some of the drums appeared to only be partially full. As a result, SEI wasnot able to reasonably identify the contents of these drums. Staining of the floor of the concretestorage area was observed in the vicinity of the drums. The staining was confined to theconcrete pad. Due to the unknown contents of these drums and the observed staining, an REChas been identified.
8.10 Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HREC)
Based on records review, and site reconnaissance, no historical recognized environmentalconditions were identified on the subject property.
8.11 Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CREC)
Based on records review, and site reconnaissance, no controlled recognized environmentalconditions were identified on the subject property.
8.12 De Minimis Conditions
Based on records review, and site reconnaissance, no de minimis conditions were identified onthe subject.
8.13 Historical Agricultural Use
According to the review of historical aerial photographs dating from 1961 to the present, thesubject property was not used for agricultural purposes.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 19 -

9.0 Opinions
SEI has prepared this Phase I ESA on the subject property totaling approximately 27.375 acreslocated in Chatham County, NC in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E1527-13. Exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 2; deviationsare described in Section 11. There are no mapped or unmapped sites located within the minimum search distances of thesubject property as defined by ASTM Standard E1527-13 in the above referenced databases thathad a likely potential for impact to the subject property based on the review of availableinformation. Based on the absence of any information concerning the release of hazardoussubstances or petroleum products under conditions that create an environmental concern, thereis no indication of a material threat from nearby properties as defined by the ASTM StandardE1527-13. Site reconaissance and interviews with regulatory officials has led to the identification ofseveral environmental concerns with relation to the subject property, including, theidentification of two RECs. As a result SEI recommends the following actions: -Removal or closure in place of the 10,000 gallon diesel UST located near the service garage inaccordance with the UST guidelines set by NCDENR-Take confirmation samples of the soil in the immediate vicinity of the tank to rule out a releasefrom the tank.-Conduct a soil boring underneath the secondary containment area near the southeasternexterior of the main facility where staining was observed and hydraulic fluid is believed to havebeen stored to rule out impacts to the soil.-Characterize the contents of the 55 gallon storage drums which are partially full or that can notbe identified with labels and properly dispose of them.-Conduct a soil boring underneath the concrete pad on the northern exterior of the maintenancebuilding where the 55 gallon drums are stored and where staining was observed to rule outimpacts to the soil.-Properly dispose of all storage containers including those which may contain hazardoussubstances or petroleum products.-Obtain and review a copy of the previous Phase I for the subject property-Obtain and review reports from S&ME that document the location of USTs that were removedfrom the property, what their contents were, and what the analytical results of the soil samplingwas.
10.0 Conclusions
Records review and site reconnaissance indicated two incidents causing potential soil and/orgroundwater contamination by hazardous substances or petroleum products were identified onthe subject property. Nearby properties within the minimum search radius with documentedrelease incidents were determined to not constitute a material threat based on the availabledocumentation. As a result of these observations and the findings of this assessment, evidencesuggests the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substance or petroleum products onthe property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threatof release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products onto structures on the property orinto the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. Therefore, two RECs inassociation with the subject property have been identified in this assessment:-A 10,000 gallon diesel UST is located southeast of the service garage. According to the latestinspection performed in February 2014, the tank appears to be empty. The tank was wasoriginally installed in 1961, is of single walled steel construction, and does not currently have afunctioning corrosion prevention system. An NOV has been issued due to the failure tomaintain the corrosion prevention system and for having improper registration. Due to the age
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 20 -

of the tank, type of construction, and nonfunctional corrosion prevention system, this tank isidentified as posing a material threat of release and is therefore considered an REC.-Several 55 gallon storage drums, some full, some partially full, some empty, were observed onthe northern exterior of the maintenance building on a concrete pad. The labels on the drumsidentified various types of oil, hydraulic fluid, and polymers. Some of the storage drumsobserved on the northern exterior of the maintenance building did not have labels that werelegible. Furthermore, some of the drums appeared to only be partially full. As a result, SEI wasnot able to reasonably identify the contents of these drums. Staining of the floor of the concretestorage area was observed in the vicinity of the drums. The staining was confined to theconcrete pad. Due to the unknown contents of these drums and the observed staining, an REChas been identified.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 21 -

11.0 Deviations
SEI did not perform a minimum 50-year chain-of-title search for the subject property.Consequently, recorded land title records, property tax files, and/or zoning/land use recordswere not thoroughly reviewed as part of this ESA. SEI did not perform a User or Ownerinterview as part of this ESA. A User Interview was not performed. The lack of information from these deviations has been considered by the EnvironmentalProfessional(s) in the preparation of this report, and does not materially condition or limit anyconclusions or opinions given by the EP otherwise specifically stated.
12.0 Warrants and Confidentiality
12.1 Warrants
This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed or implied. The work performed in conjunction with this ESA, all data developed, and the findings,opinions, and conclusions discussed herein are relevant to the subject property and to the datesof the site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other properties ordates. This ESA makes no warranty or guarantee of site conditions. No statement or opinion containedin this report shall be construed to create any warranty or representation that the real propertyon which the evaluation was conducted is free of pollution or complies with any or allapplicable regulatory or statutory requirements, or that the property is fit for any particularpurpose. This assessment is intended to reduce, not eliminate, the potential for recognized environmentalconditions, within reasonable limits on time and cost. SEI is not responsible for anyenvironmental conditions that may be present prior to, during, or after the site assessment wasconducted.
12.2 Confidentiality
The information presented in this ESA is confidential and is prepared by SEI for the exclusiveuse of Lonerider Brewing Co. and its designated recipients. SEI does not authorize and is notresponsible for use of this information by any other parties.
13.0 References
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard practice for environmental siteassessments: Phase I environmental site assessment process. Designation E 1527-13 American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard guide for vapor encroachmentscreening on property involved in real estate transactions. Designation E 2600-10 Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1985 Geologic Map of North Carolina1:500,000 scale. NC Geological Survey, Raleigh, NC. FEMA Map Services Center's website (http://www.msc.fema.gov/), December 12, 2014.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 22 -

Soil Survey of Chatham County, North Carolina USDA, Soil Conservation Service and NorthCarolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Washington, DC United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service NRCSwebsite (online soil survey) (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/), December 12, 2014.
Phone Interviews:
Mr. Clark Wipfield, Project Manager - NCDENR UST section, December 10, 2014 Mr. Bill Baker, Engineer - retired, December 15, 2014 Ms. Rose Pruitt, Inspector - NCDENR UST section, December 16, 2014 Mr. Thomas Bender, Fire Marshal - Chatham County Fire Department, December 17, 2014
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

- 23 -

14.0 Signature of Environmental Professional
We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition ofEnvironmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. We have the specificqualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature,history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the allappropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part312.
This ESA was prepared by:
Tomas G. WillEnvironmental Project Manager
Reviewed by:
Adam Callahan. RiederEnvironmental Professional
15.0 Qualifications of Environmental Professionals
The personnel responsible for this report possess sufficient training and experience necessary toconduct the activities required by the Scope of Services in accordance with this ASTM E1527-13 and has the ability to develop opinions and conclusions, from the informationgenerated by such activities, regarding recognized environmental conditions. Tomas Will has a Bachelor's Degree in Earth and Ocean Science from Duke University (2009).He has over 3 years of experience performing field work associated with Phase I ESA's. A. Callahan Rieder has over 11 years of experience as an Environmental Field Technicianperforming field work associated with Phase I ESA's.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road Phase I ESA
Moncure, Chatham County, NC
December 19, 2014

Appendix A:
Figures
PREPARED FOR:
PROJ. MGR: DATE:
DRAWN BY: PROJ. #:
Image Provided By EDR USGS Topographic Maps
Boundaries are approximate
TOPO MAP - 1981
Moncure North Carolina 27559
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road
270 MONCURE-PITTSBORO ROAD PHASE I ESA
Lonerider Brewing Company
12/12/2014
Cal Rieder 201412010
PREPARED FOR:
PROJ. MGR: DATE:
DRAWN BY: PROJ. #:
Image Provided By Spangler Environmental, Inc.
Boundaries are approximate
NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY MAP
Moncure North Carolina 27559
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road
270 MONCURE-PITTSBORO ROAD PHASE I ESA
Lonerider Brewing Company
12/12/2014
Cal Rieder 201412010
PREPARED FOR:
PROJ. MGR: DATE:
DRAWN BY: PROJ. #:
Image Provided By DigitalGlobe
Boundaries are approximate
SITE MAP
Moncure North Carolina 27559
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road
270 MONCURE-PITTSBORO ROAD PHASE I ESA
Lonerider Brewing Company
12/12/2014
Cal Rieder 201412010
PREPARED FOR:
PROJ. MGR: DATE:
DRAWN BY: PROJ. #:
Image Provided By Spangler Environmental, Inc.
Boundaries are approximate
FEMA 3710974100J MAP
Moncure North Carolina 27559
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road
270 MONCURE-PITTSBORO ROAD PHASE I ESA
Lonerider Brewing Company
12/12/2014
Cal Rieder 201412010
PREPARED FOR:
PROJ. MGR: DATE:
DRAWN BY: PROJ. #:
Image Provided By Spangler Environmental, Inc.
Boundaries are approximate
FACILITY OVERVIEW MAP
Moncure North Carolina 27559
270 Moncure-Pittsboro Road
270 MONCURE-PITTSBORO ROAD PHASE I ESA
Lonerider Brewing Company
12/19/2014
Cal Rieder 201412010
A Center for Effective Government website
Home | Email List | Contact
Search the Site GO
DATABASES
Search all Databases by City(beta)
Toxic Releases (TRI)
Spills and Accidents (ERNS)
Risk Management (RMP)
Hazardous Waste (BRS)
Hazardous Waste - Violations
and Permits (RCRIS)
Other Databases
ISSUES
Pollution
Health
Access Policies & Tools
Science
Emergencies
ADVOCACY CENTER
Action Alerts
Legislation
Toolbox
MAP ROOM
EMAIL LIST
NEWS IN BRIEF
ABOUT US
CONTACT
A PROJECT OF
DONATE TO THE CENTER FOR EFFECTIVE
GOVERNMENT
RELATED ARTICLES
Americans Want Safer Chemical Facilities, but
the Shutdown Stalled Reform Efforts
Chlorine Gas Is a Major Risk across theCountry, but Needn't Be
President Obama Signs Executive Order onImproving Chemical Facility Safety & Security
PROTECTING ACCESS TO ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
Resources Donate Center sites
Printer-friendly
ERNS
ERNS Incidents by Consequence
ERNS Incidents by State
ERNS Incidents by Substance
Search ERNS by Name GO
Search ERNS by City, State GO
Advanced Search | About the Data
ERNS | RTKNet.org: The Right-to-Know Network http://www.rtknet.org/db/erns/erns.php?reptype=f&seqnos=799322&dat...
1 of 3 12/12/2014 4:03 PM
2013 Phase I ESA Update Report

801 INDUSTRIAL STREET; SUITE 1  WILMINGTON, DE 19801  [phone]  FAX [phone]

May 9, 2013

Brendan Murphy, Esq.
Duff and Phelps
55 East 52nd Street; Floor 31 New York, NY 10055

RE: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update Pittsboro Processing Plant
Pittsboro, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Murphy:
BrightFields, Inc. herein presents our report for the above referenced Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Update. Duff & Phelps requested that BrightFields conduct this ESA
Update for asset management and/or reallocation purposes. This ESA Update was performed in
accordance with standard practices and policies following the ASTM Standard Number E1527-05.
The purpose of the ESA Update was to: 1) identify existing and potential releases of
hazardous substances on or around the site; 2) inquire into the previous ownership and uses of the
property; and 3) identify other recognized environmental conditions (RECs) on the site. According to the Standard, a REC is defined as:
“The presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum
products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum
products into structures on the property or into the ground, ground water, or
surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is
not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a
material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of
appropriate governmental agencies.”
In addition, in order to assess the business environmental risk associated with the subject property, additional non-scope considerations (not required in the ASTM Standard) may be evaluated. These may include: asbestos-containing materials, radon, lead-based paint, lead in the
drinking water, wetlands and a cursory view of regulatory compliance. Based on the client’s choice as per our contract dated February 8, 2013, a Basic Phase I ESA Update (not including non-scope considerations) was completed.
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 1 of 214]

Phase I ESA Update Page 2 Pittsboro Processing Plant May 9, 2013 2972.01.11
FINDINGS/OPINIONS
The following items of interest were identified during the Phase I ESA:
1) Drums and containers/vessels of potentially hazardous materials and/or wastes were
noted within the processing plant and maintenance buildings during the on-site
investigation. Most of the materials were wastewater treatment or cleaning
chemicals. Some drums that appeared to be waste refrigeration or hydraulic oil
were noted in the plant building. The drums appeared to be in good condition and
no leaks or spills were observed. BrightFields observed piping and lines or
reservoirs in systems that previously used hydraulic oil, refrigeration oil and/or
other materials. Mr. Hendrick indicated that he believed the refrigeration oil had
been drained from various tanks but is still in the compressors and that hydraulic
oil, stored in a 250-gallon reservoir inside the lean-to shed between the plant and
employee parking lot and in hydraulic lines is still present. BrightFields did not
observe indication that a release had occurred from these systems.
Universal wastes, such as florescent light tubes, ballasts that contain PCBs,
equipment containing refrigerants such as air conditioners, chillers, and water
fountains, mercury switches/thermostats, and other materials were not surveyed as
part of this Phase I ESA. These items can require special disposal but no action is
necessary if they are to remain in use.
2) There is a 275-gallon used refrigeration oil AST located in the engine room of the processing plant. The tank appears to be maintained in an environmentally safe
manner. Therefore, it does not appear to be an environmental concern to the site at
this time.
3) Indication of two underground storage tanks (USTs) was observed on the subject
property. a registered 10,000-gallon diesel tank and a 500-550-gallon gasoline tank,
both of which are located near the former truck shop building. According to Mr.
Jim Hendrick, the tanks have been pumped empty, however no documentation was
available.
BrightFields interviewed Ms. Pam Harrelson, Inspector for the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources to ascertain the status of the
permitted underground storage tank at the facility. Ms. Harrelson indicated that she
had last inspected the subject property in early 2011 and had since put the site UST
permit into “temporary closure” status. She indicated that the facility had fallen out
of compliance for failing to submit corrosion protection monitoring results, leak
detection results and annual tank tightness testing results. NCDENR
documentation, provided by Ms. Harrelson, is provided in Appendix D.
When active, the tanks reportedly had spill/overfill protection, cathodic corrosion
protection and in-tank computerized leak detection systems. The tanks, installed in
1961 according to checklists provided by Ms. Harrelson which are included in
Appendix D, historically appeared to have been properly maintained and serviced.
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 2 of 214]

Phase I ESA Update Page 3 Pittsboro Processing Plant May 9, 2013 2972.01.11
Due to the maintenance status of the tanks and lack of reviewable maintenance
records on the tanks, including documentation that the tanks are empty, it is the
opinion of BrightFields, Inc. that the USTs represent a REC for the subject property
and that additional investigation is warranted. If proper maintenance activity
records are made available, the systems may be brought back into compliance, if the
systems are still intact.
BrightFields’ 2007 Phase I ESA stated the following about two UST systems that
had been abandoned in-place:
“An October, 2001 letter from TerraTech to Townsends is included in
Appendix F. The letter refers to an unregulated 6,000-gallon heating oil tank
that was abandoned in place between the plant and the maintenance building.
The tank was abandoned in place by TerraTech of Raleigh, NC. Soil samples
were collected around the tank in June 2001. The sample results indicated
minor concentrations of petroleum near the tank and were submitted to the
State of North Carolina for review. Because the site is not on the state LUST
list, it appears that no further action will be required for the tank
abandonment. Based on our review of this information the abandoned tank
does not appear to represent an environmental concern at this time.
“According to Mr. Judge, a Chatham County Fuel Storage Tank Installation,
Removal and Abandonment Record refers to a 10,000-gallon gasoline tank
abandoned in place near the truck scale building on the subject site.
“Mr. Judge does not have documentation on the 500-gallon gasoline tank that
appears on the Site Plan…The Site Plan indicates the tank has been
abandoned. Documentation was not available for review. Mr. Roger
Mashburn (formerly with Townsends, Inc.) stated in an email dated March 19,
2007 to BrightFields that the tank is 550-gallons and ‘is still in the ground
empty’.”
4) Numerous above ground storage tanks (ASTs) were located on the grounds at the time of the inspection, including: a 1 million-gallon reuse water tank, a 300,000-
gallon potable water tank, a self-contained 275-gallon used refrigeration oil tank, a
52,000-pound liquid CO2 tank, a 18,000-pound anhydrous ammonia tank, and an out-of-service 275-gallon used motor oil tank. The tanks have reportedly been
pumped empty since the plant closed in September 2011. These tanks appear to be
maintained in an environmentally safe manner. No staining was noted in proximity to the tanks.
5) Numerous 55-gallon and smaller drums of cleaning and wastewater treatment
chemicals were located on a concrete pad inside a fenced storage area near the maintenance building. The materials appear to be properly labeled and stored and the drums were observed to be in intact condition.
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 3 of 214]

Phase I ESA Update Page 4 Pittsboro Processing Plant May 9, 2013 2972.01.11
6) Several production wells are reportedly located on the subject property. The wells
were used when the plant was in operation and they supply water to the plant. In
addition, the site receives potable water from the public water utility.
CONCLUSIONS
We have performed a Phase I ESA Update in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-05 of the (site name) property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from this
practice are described in Sections 1.0 and 3.0 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property except for the following:
1. Due to the maintenance history of the underground storage tank located at the
subject property, it is the opinion of BrightFields, Inc. that the UST represents a REC for the subject property and that additional investigation is warranted.
DISCLAIMER
While every attempt is made to provide as thorough a review as possible it is not practical
to provide a 100% survey of the surface and subsurface areas of any site. As such, the findings and recommendations are, by necessity, based on the information and specific locations reviewed, and the conditions of the parcel and facility at the time of the on-site survey. BrightFields, Inc. does
not warrant its findings or conclusions beyond this information and survey.
The following portions of the subject property were not made available for inspection to
BrightFields, Inc. at the time of the site visit:
1) BrightFields did not have access to the interior of the former truck shop/maintenance
building (located on the north side of Moncure Pittsboro Rd.). Jim Hendrick stated that the
shop was “empty” and contained no parts washers, hydraulic lifts or drums.
BrightFields was able to trace the history of the property back to 1955, when aerials show
the property was already commercially developed. BrightFields, Inc. was not able to determine the prior usage of the property dating back to the property’s obvious first developed use of the site
(including agricultural uses), or back to 1940 using readily available, reasonably ascertainable and
useful information (see Section 2.1). However, it is the opinion of BrightFields that determining the prior usage of the subject property dating back to the first developed use would not be likely to
provide additional useful information or identify environmental issues that were not already
identified by this survey.
Pursuant to our contract, this report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Duff &
Phelps, their client, their client’s lending institutions and/or legal representatives. The information
contained herein may not be reproduced, used or relied upon by any other parties without the prior written consent of BrightFields, Inc. BrightFields acknowledges that this report may be used in
bankruptcy proceedings.
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 4 of 214]
[
1
6
.
6
]

[
P
h
a
s
e

I

E
S
A

U
p
d
a
t
e

-

P
i
t
t
s
b
o
r
o

P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g

P
l
a
n
t
.
p
d
f
]

[
P
a
g
e

5

o
f

2
1
4
]
[
1
6
.
6
]

[
P
h
a
s
e

I

E
S
A

U
p
d
a
t
e

-

P
i
t
t
s
b
o
r
o

P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g

P
l
a
n
t
.
p
d
f
]

[
P
a
g
e

6

o
f

2
1
4
]
[
1
6
.
6
]

[
P
h
a
s
e

I

E
S
A

U
p
d
a
t
e

-

P
i
t
t
s
b
o
r
o

P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g

P
l
a
n
t
.
p
d
f
]

[
P
a
g
e

7

o
f

2
1
4
]
[
1
6
.
6
]

[
P
h
a
s
e

I

E
S
A

U
p
d
a
t
e

-

P
i
t
t
s
b
o
r
o

P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g

P
l
a
n
t
.
p
d
f
]

[
P
a
g
e

8

o
f

2
1
4
]
[
1
6
.
6
]

[
P
h
a
s
e

I

E
S
A

U
p
d
a
t
e

-

P
i
t
t
s
b
o
r
o

P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g

P
l
a
n
t
.
p
d
f
]

[
P
a
g
e

9

o
f

2
1
4
]
[
1
6
.
6
]

[
P
h
a
s
e

I

E
S
A

U
p
d
a
t
e

-

P
i
t
t
s
b
o
r
o

P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g

P
l
a
n
t
.
p
d
f
]

[
P
a
g
e

1
0

o
f

2
1
4
]
[
1
6
.
6
]

[
P
h
a
s
e

I

E
S
A

U
p
d
a
t
e

-

P
i
t
t
s
b
o
r
o

P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g

P
l
a
n
t
.
p
d
f
]

[
P
a
g
e

1
1

o
f

2
1
4
]
[
1
6
.
6
]

[
P
h
a
s
e

I

E
S
A

U
p
d
a
t
e

-

P
i
t
t
s
b
o
r
o

P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g

P
l
a
n
t
.
p
d
f
]

[
P
a
g
e

1
2

o
f

2
1
4
]
[
1
6
.
6
]

[
P
h
a
s
e

I

E
S
A

U
p
d
a
t
e

-

P
i
t
t
s
b
o
r
o

P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g

P
l
a
n
t
.
p
d
f
]

[
P
a
g
e

1
3

o
f

2
1
4
]

Phase I ESA Update Page 6 Pittsboro Processing Plant May 9, 2013 File: 2972.01.11
2.5.1 Building Inspection
The building inspection concentrated on the identification of environmental concerns
within the buildings such as storage of hazardous materials. There are seven main buildings on the site: the processing plant, a maintenance building, the “command post”/truck scale
building, a wastewater treatment/“reuse” building, an offal building, a live shed and the old
live sheds/truck shop/maintenance building (located on the north side of Moncure Pittsboro Rd.). There are also several smaller sheds and outbuildings on the site. The following
paragraphs summarize the findings of the investigation of the building interiors.
Materials Storage/Disposal
Drums and containers/vessels of potentially hazardous materials and/or wastes were
noted within the processing plant and maintenance buildings during the on-site
investigation. Most of the materials were wastewater treatment or cleaning
chemicals. Some drums that appeared to be waste refrigeration or hydraulic oil were
noted in the plant building. The drums appeared to be in good condition and no leaks
or spills were observed. BrightFields observed piping and lines or reservoirs in
systems that previously used hydraulic oil, refrigeration oil and/or other materials.
Mr. Hendrick indicated that he believed the refrigeration oil had been drained from
various tanks but is still in the compressors and that hydraulic oil, stored in a 250-
gallon reservoir inside the lean-to shed between the plant and employee parking lot
and in hydraulic lines is still present. BrightFields did not observe indication that a
release had occurred from these systems.
Universal wastes, such as florescent light tubes, ballasts that contain PCBs,
equipment containing refrigerants such as air conditioners, chillers, and water
fountains, mercury switches/thermostats, and other materials were not surveyed as
part of this Phase I ESA. These items can require special disposal but no action is
necessary if they are to remain in use.
Floor Drains
Floor drains were noted throughout the processing plant. The floor drains lead to the
on-site wastewater treatment plant. After being treated at the plant, the water was
pumped to a large water treatment lagoon on the Pittsboro Farm property owned by
Omtron USA, LLC. Some water from the lagoon was applied to spray irrigation crop
fields and some water from the lagoon was fed back to the “reuse” portion of the
water treatment plant. After undergoing a series of processing, the treated water was
pumped from the reuse plant to the on-site 1-million gallon water storage tank to be
reused in the plant for cleaning.
No hazardous materials were observed to be stored or spilled in the area of the floor
drains. Based on this information it appears that the floor drains do not represent an
environmental concern at this time.

[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 14 of 214]

Phase I ESA Update Page 7 Pittsboro Processing Plant May 9, 2013 File: 2972.01.11
Interior Staining
Minor interior staining was noted during the building inspection in areas unlikely to
be an environmental concern for the subject property.
Sewer, Water and Utilities
Sewage disposal is to an on-site and off-site wastewater treatment system. Water
service is supplied by on-site wells and the public water utility. Progress Energy
provides the electrical service.
Above Ground Storage Tanks
There is a 275-gallon used refrigeration oil tank located in the engine room of the
processing plant. The tank appears to be maintained in an environmentally safe
manner. Therefore, it does not appear to be an environmental concern to the site at
this time.
Truck/Car Fleets
No truck or car fleets are currently maintained on the property.
Odors
No strong, pungent, or noxious odors were noted in the buildings.

2.5.2 Survey of Property Grounds
The visual inspection of the grounds associated with the property concentrated on the
identification of soil discolorations, disruptions to vegetative cover, solid waste disposal areas and other indicators of potential environmental hazards. The grounds associated with the (site
name) property are open, vegetated and wooded land. The following paragraphs describe the
findings of this survey.
Underground Storage Tanks
Indication of two underground storage tanks (USTs) was observed on the subject
property. a registered 10,000-gallon diesel tank and a 500-550-gallon gasoline tank,
both of which are located near the former truck shop building. According to Mr. Jim
Hendrick, the tanks have been pumped empty, however no documentation was
available.
BrightFields interviewed Ms. Pam Harrelson, Inspector for the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources to ascertain the status of the
permitted underground storage tank at the facility. Ms. Harrelson indicated that she
had last inspected the subject property in early 2011 and had since put the site UST
permit into “temporary closure” status. She indicated that the facility had fallen out
of compliance for failing to submit corrosion protection monitoring results, leak
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 15 of 214]

Phase I ESA Update Page 8 Pittsboro Processing Plant May 9, 2013 File: 2972.01.11
detection results and annual tank tightness testing results. NCDENR documentation,
provided by Ms. Harrelson, is provided in Appendix D.
When active, the tanks reportedly had spill/overfill protection, cathodic corrosion
protection and in-tank computerized leak detection systems. The tanks, installed in
1961 according to checklists provided by Ms. Harrelson which are included in
Appendix D, historically appeared to have been properly maintained and serviced.
Due to the maintenance status of the tanks and lack of reviewable maintenance
records on the tanks, including documentation that the tanks are empty, it is the
opinion of BrightFields, Inc. that the USTs represent a REC for the subject property
and that additional investigation is warranted. If proper maintenance activity records
are made available, the systems may be brought back into compliance, if the systems
are still intact.
BrightFields’ 2007 Phase I ESA stated the following about two UST systems that had
been abandoned in-place:
“An October, 2001 letter from TerraTech to Townsends is included in Appendix
F. The letter refers to an unregulated 6,000-gallon heating oil tank that was
abandoned in place between the plant and the maintenance building. The tank
was abandoned in place by TerraTech of Raleigh, NC. Soil samples were
collected around the tank in June 2001. The sample results indicated minor
concentrations of petroleum near the tank and were submitted to the State of
North Carolina for review. Because the site is not on the state LUST list, it
appears that no further action will be required for the tank abandonment. Based
on our review of this information the abandoned tank does not appear to represent
an environmental concern at this time.
“According to Mr. Judge, a Chatham County Fuel Storage Tank Installation,
Removal and Abandonment Record refers to a 10,000-gallon gasoline tank
abandoned in place near the truck scale building on the subject site.
“Mr. Judge does not have documentation on the 500-gallon gasoline tank that
appears on the Site Plan…The Site Plan indicates the tank has been abandoned.
Documentation was not available for review. Mr. Roger Mashburn (formerly with
Townsends, Inc.) stated in an email dated March 19, 2007 to BrightFields that the
tank is 550-gallons and ‘is still in the ground empty’.”
Above Ground Storage Tanks
Numerous above ground storage tanks (ASTs) were located on the grounds at the time
of the inspection, including: a 1 million-gallon reuse water tank, a 300,000-gallon
potable water tank, a self-contained 275-gallon used refrigeration oil tank, a 52,000-
pound liquid CO2 tank, a 18,000-pound anhydrous ammonia tank, and an out-of-
service 275-gallon used motor oil tank. The tanks have reportedly been pumped
empty since the plant closed in September 2011. These tanks appear to be maintained
in an environmentally safe manner. No staining was noted in proximity to the tanks.
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 16 of 214]

Phase I ESA Update Page 9 Pittsboro Processing Plant May 9, 2013 File: 2972.01.11
Solid Waste Disposal Areas
No areas of solid waste disposal were noted during the on-site investigation.
Materials Storage
Numerous 55-gallon and smaller drums of cleaning and wastewater treatment
chemicals were located on a concrete pad inside a fenced storage area near the
maintenance building. The materials appear to be properly labeled and stored and the
drums were observed to be in intact condition.
Wells
Several production wells are reportedly located on the subject property. The wells
were used when the plant was in operation and they supply water to the plant. In
addition, the site receives potable water from the public water utility.
Septic Systems
No evidence of septic tanks was observed on the subject property. However, based on
the size and/or age of the property, septic systems may be present on the site.
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)/PCB Containing Equipment
PCBs are a group of chlorinated organic compounds primarily used in electrical
transformers, capacitors, heat transfer and hydraulic systems, adhesives, paints and
sealants. Their widespread use has resulted mainly from their chemical stability, low
water solubility, low vapor pressure, low flammability, high heat capacity and low
electrical conductivity. World production of PCBs ended in 1983, however most
manufacturers halted production in the 1970s due to the evidence of highly
carcinogenic nature of the compounds.
Pole and pad-mounted transformers were noted on the property. No stains, leaks or
distressed vegetation was noted in association with these transformers. The
transformers are reportedly owned by Progress Energy. The transformers did not have
labeling indicating that they were PCB-free in open view. However, based on the fact
that the transformers are owned by Progress and that there was no sign of leakage, the
transformers do not appear to represent an environmental concern at this time.
There are two truck scales on the subject property grounds. According to Jim
Hendrick, the scales are electronic and do not contain hydraulic oils.
Stained Soils and Distressed Vegetation
No signs of stained soils or distressed vegetation were noted during the on-site
investigation.

[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 17 of 214]

Phase I ESA Update Page 10 Pittsboro Processing Plant May 9, 2013 File: 2972.01.11
Ponds and Surface Water
Turkey Creek bisects a portion of the subject property and flows between the
processing plant and the wastewater treatment building. Oil sheen was not noted on
the creek.
Odors
No strong, pungent, or noxious odors were noted on the grounds.
2.5.3 Surrounding Land Use
The surrounding land uses are generally open land, farm land and wooded land. No
obvious environmental hazards were noted on the adjoining properties. The Omton, LLC-
owned Pittsboro Farm, which is contains a wastewater treatment lagoon and spray irrigation
fields that process waste water from the plant, adjoins the south side of the subject property.
3.0 DISCLAIMER
While every attempt is made to provide as thorough a review as possible it is not
practical to provide a 100% survey of the surface and subsurface areas of any site. As such,
the findings and recommendations are, by necessity, based on the information and specific locations reviewed, and the conditions of the parcel and facility at the time of the on-site
survey. BrightFields, Inc. does not warrant its findings or conclusions beyond this
information and survey.
The following portions of the subject property were not made available for inspection to BrightFields, Inc. at the time of the site visit:
1) BrightFields did not have access to the interior of the former truck shop/maintenance building (located on the north side of Moncure Pittsboro Rd.). Jim Hendrick stated that the shop was “empty” and contained no
parts washers, hydraulic lifts or drums.
BrightFields was able to trace the history of the property back to 1955, when aerials show the property was already commercially developed. BrightFields, Inc. was not able to
determine the prior usage of the property dating back to the property’s obvious first
developed use of the site (including agricultural uses), or back to 1940 using readily available, reasonably ascertainable and useful information (see Section 2.1). However, it is
the opinion of BrightFields that determining the prior usage of the subject property dating
back to the first developed use would not be likely to provide additional useful information or identify environmental issues that were not already identified by this survey.
4.0 FINDINGS/OPINION
The following items of interest were identified during the Phase I ESA:
1) Drums and containers/vessels of potentially hazardous materials and/or wastes were
noted within the processing plant and maintenance buildings during the on-site
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 18 of 214]

Phase I ESA Update Page 11 Pittsboro Processing Plant May 9, 2013 File: 2972.01.11
investigation. Most of the materials were wastewater treatment or cleaning
chemicals. Some drums that appeared to be waste refrigeration or hydraulic oil were
noted in the plant building. The drums appeared to be in good condition and no leaks
or spills were observed. BrightFields observed piping and lines or reservoirs in
systems that previously used hydraulic oil, refrigeration oil and/or other materials.
Mr. Hendrick indicated that he believed the refrigeration oil had been drained from
various tanks but is still in the compressors and that hydraulic oil, stored in a 250-
gallon reservoir inside the lean-to shed between the plant and employee parking lot
and in hydraulic lines is still present. BrightFields did not observe indication that a
release had occurred from these systems.
Universal wastes, such as florescent light tubes, ballasts that contain PCBs,
equipment containing refrigerants such as air conditioners, chillers, and water
fountains, mercury switches/thermostats, and other materials were not surveyed as
part of this Phase I ESA. These items can require special disposal but no action is
necessary if they are to remain in use.
2) There is a 275-gallon used refrigeration oil AST located in the engine room of the processing plant. The tank appears to be maintained in an environmentally safe
manner. Therefore, it does not appear to be an environmental concern to the site at
this time.
3) Indication of two underground storage tanks (USTs) was observed on the subject
property. a registered 10,000-gallon diesel tank and a 500-550-gallon gasoline tank,
both of which are located near the former truck shop building. According to Mr. Jim
Hendrick, the tanks have been pumped empty, however no documentation was
available.
BrightFields interviewed Ms. Pam Harrelson, Inspector for the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources to ascertain the status of the
permitted underground storage tank at the facility. Ms. Harrelson indicated that she
had last inspected the subject property in early 2011 and had since put the site UST
permit into “temporary closure” status. She indicated that the facility had fallen out
of compliance for failing to submit corrosion protection monitoring results, leak
detection results and annual tank tightness testing results. NCDENR documentation,
provided by Ms. Harrelson, is provided in Appendix D.
When active, the tanks reportedly had spill/overfill protection, cathodic corrosion
protection and in-tank computerized leak detection systems. The tanks, installed in
1961 according to checklists provided by Ms. Harrelson which are included in
Appendix D, historically appeared to have been properly maintained and serviced.
Due to the maintenance status of the tanks and lack of reviewable maintenance
records on the tanks, including documentation that the tanks are empty, it is the
opinion of BrightFields, Inc. that the USTs represent a REC for the subject property
and that additional investigation is warranted. If proper maintenance activity records
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 19 of 214]

Phase I ESA Update Page 12 Pittsboro Processing Plant May 9, 2013 File: 2972.01.11
are made available, the systems may be brought back into compliance, if the systems
are still intact.
BrightFields’ 2007 Phase I ESA stated the following about two UST systems that had
been abandoned in-place:
“An October, 2001 letter from TerraTech to Townsends is included in Appendix
F. The letter refers to an unregulated 6,000-gallon heating oil tank that was
abandoned in place between the plant and the maintenance building. The tank
was abandoned in place by TerraTech of Raleigh, NC. Soil samples were
collected around the tank in June 2001. The sample results indicated minor
concentrations of petroleum near the tank and were submitted to the State of
North Carolina for review. Because the site is not on the state LUST list, it
appears that no further action will be required for the tank abandonment. Based
on our review of this information the abandoned tank does not appear to
represent an environmental concern at this time.
“According to Mr. Judge, a Chatham County Fuel Storage Tank Installation,
Removal and Abandonment Record refers to a 10,000-gallon gasoline tank
abandoned in place near the truck scale building on the subject site.
“Mr. Judge does not have documentation on the 500-gallon gasoline tank that
appears on the Site Plan…The Site Plan indicates the tank has been abandoned.
Documentation was not available for review. Mr. Roger Mashburn (formerly
with Townsends, Inc.) stated in an email dated March 19, 2007 to BrightFields
that the tank is 550-gallons and ‘is still in the ground empty’.”
4) Numerous above ground storage tanks (ASTs) were located on the grounds at the time
of the inspection, including: a 1 million-gallon reuse water tank, a 300,000-gallon
potable water tank, a self-contained 275-gallon used refrigeration oil tank, a 52,000-pound liquid CO2 tank, a 18,000-pound anhydrous ammonia tank, and an out-of-
service 275-gallon used motor oil tank. The tanks have reportedly been pumped
empty since the plant closed in September 2011. These tanks appear to be maintained in an environmentally safe manner. No staining was noted in proximity to the tanks.
5) Numerous 55-gallon and smaller drums of cleaning and wastewater treatment
chemicals were located on a concrete pad inside a fenced storage area near the maintenance building. The materials appear to be properly labeled and stored and the
drums were observed to be in intact condition.
6) Several production wells are reportedly located on the subject property. The wells were used when the plant was in operation and they supply water to the plant. In addition, the site receives potable water from the public water utility.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
We have performed a Phase I ESA Update in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-05 of the Pittsboro Processing Plant property. Any
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 20 of 214]

Phase I ESA Update Page 13 Pittsboro Processing Plant May 9, 2013 File: 2972.01.11
exceptions to, or deletions from this practice are described in Sections 1.0 and 3.0 of this
report. This assessment has revealed no RECs for the subject property except for the
following:
1) Due to the maintenance status of the tanks, it is the opinion of BrightFields, Inc.
that the USTs represent a REC for the subject property and that additional
investigation is warranted.
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 21 of 214]
Site Boundary
Path: N:\Aerials and maps\Working GIS Files (Do Not Edit)\11 Phase I\2972.01.11 - Omtron Properties\MXD\Pittsboro Processing\Fig1SiteLoc.mxd
BrightFields, Inc.
Environmental EvaluationInvestigation, and Remediation
801 Industrial Street, Suite 1Wilmington, Delaware 19801 302-656-9600302-656-9700 fax
Site Location/Topographic MapPittsboro Processing Plant
Pittsboro, North Carolina
By
Drawn
Checked
Date
Project #
Scale: File Name:
Fig. No.
ADS
MHJ
2972.01.11 Figure 1
0 500 1,000Feet
Fig1SiteLoc.mxd
NCSite Location
VA
SCGA
TN
KY
/
2/28/2013
2/28/2013
1:12,000
Source: USGS - © 2010 National Geographic Society.Site Boundary
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 22 of 214]

SIte BoundaryTax Parcel #
9741-80-2713.000
USTs
Sheds & Old
MaintenanceBuilding
WastewaterReuse Building
OffalBuilding
Live
Shed
Plant
Moncure

P
i
t
t
s
b
o
r
o

R
d
May Farm

R
d
Farm
i
n
g
d
a
l
e

L
n
BrightFields, Inc.
Environmental EvaluationInvestigation, and Remediation
801 Industrial Street, Suite 1Wilmington, Delaware 19801 302-656-9600302-656-9700 fax
By
Drawn
Checked
Date
Project #
Scale: File Name:
Fig. No.
ADS
MHJ
3/6/2013
3/6/2013
2972.01.11 Figure 2
0 125 250Feet
Fig2SiteLayout.mxd
/
Site Layout and Surrounding Land UsesPittsboro Processing Plant
Pittsboro, North Carolina
1:3,000
Path: N:\Aerials and maps\Working GIS Files (Do Not Edit)\11 Phase I\2972.01.11 - Omtron Properties\MXD\Pittsboro Processing\Fig2SiteLayout.mxd
Source: (c) 2010 Microsoft Corporation and its data suppliers.
Site Boundary
Tax Parcels
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 23 of 214]

APPENDIX A
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES

The following professionals were responsible for the completion of this Environmental Assessment:

James A. Manna, Program Manager. B.A., Biological Sciences, University of Delaware. Nineteen
years of experience performing Preliminary Environmental Assessments (modified Transaction
Screens) and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments of real properties and/or facilities which
included a review of Federal, State and local environmental regulations and agency records, historic
aerial photographs, and title information, completion of on-site investigations, identification of areas
of potential environmental concern based on the investigative results, and preparation of appropriate
sampling and/or remediation programs. Twelve years experience performing instrumental and
microbiological analysis of soil and water/wastewater. Four years experience performing asbestos
analysis of air and bulk samples using Polarized Contrast Microscopy (PCM) and Polarized Light
Microscopy (PLM). Skilled in data review, validation and technical report preparation. Board
Member of: Commercial/Industrial Realty Council, Chamber of Commerce for Greater Milford.
Specialized training and courses include: OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations Safety
Training, Red Cross Standard First Aid and CPR Training, Microscopical Identification of Asbestos,
Quality Assurance of Chemical Measurements, DC Briefing on Environmental Due Diligence, Due
Diligence at Dawn Educational Forums, ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for
Commercial Real Estate, completed courses toward Certificate in Environmental Studies, University
of Delaware.

Gregg H. Crystall, Program Manager. M.S. Environmental Science, Drexel University; B.S.
Biology, SUNY College at Oneonta, NY. Thirty one years experience in environmental project and
program management including site assessment, inspections and health and safety plan preparation
and implementation, Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Studies and Remedial Action planning and
implementation. Experience in managing projects and personnel in federal government Remedial
and Emergency Response and Removal programs. Project Manager for numerous Delaware and
Pennsylvania Brownfield and Act 2 Investigations. Managed technical experts and community
outreach staff for the Mid Atlantic Region of the USEPA. Served as health and safety officer for
numerous private party environmental cleanups and has been a trainer for the 40 hour OSHA
Hazardous Waste Operations Safety Training. Has On-site Supervisor training, Confined Space
entry and rescue training, American Red Cross Heart-saver First Aid certification, current OSHA 40-
hour and 8-hour HAZWOPER certified.

Matthew H. Jones, Project Manager. B.A., Physical Geography, University of Delaware.
Seventeen years experience performing Preliminary Environmental Site Assessments and Phase I
Environmental Assessments environmental site inspections. Other pertinent experience includes:
lead paint inspections, risk assessment and abatement project designs, soil and groundwater sampling
projects, bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil, asbestos sampling, magnetometer surveys
designed to identify hidden underground storage tanks, asbestos, tap water and paint sampling; and
the preparation of Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plans, Facility Response Plans and
Stormwater Management Plans. Certifications include: Delaware-Licensed Lead Risk Assessor, and
Lead Abatement Project Designer; Pennsylvania-certified Lead Risk Assessor, Maryland-certified
Lead Risk Assessor, U.S. EPA/New York State Lead Risk Assessor. Specialized training and courses
include: Graduate coursework in Geographic Information Systems; Certificate in Environmental
Studies, University of Delaware; OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations Safety Training;
OSHA Confined Space Entry Training, OSHA On-Site Supervisor Training, Red Cross CPR and
First Aid training.
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 24 of 214]

Appendix D

Interviews

Pittsboro Processing Plant

[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 168 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 169 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 170 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 171 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 172 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 173 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 174 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 175 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 176 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 177 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 178 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 179 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 180 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 181 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 182 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 183 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 184 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 185 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 186 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 187 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 188 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 189 of 214]

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly E. Perdue, Governor Dee A. Freeman, Secretary
July 18, 2011

CERTIFIED MAIL 7010 0780 0001 9852 9388
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Service of Process Agent
NC Secretary of State
PO Box 29622
Raleigh, NC 27626-0622

Re: Service of Process of Notice of Violation for Violation(s) of:
15A NCAC 2N .0303, .0402, .0502, .0505, .0506 and Article 21A of the NCGS Chapter 143-
215.94QQ by Townsends, Inc.
Townsends, Inc., 2701 Moncure Rd., Pittsboro, NC 27312
Chatham County
Facility ID#: 0-032432

Dear Sir or Madam:

Enclosed for Service of Process on Townsends, Inc., please find an original and one copy of a Notice of
Violation in the above-referenced matter. Per the application for certificate of Withdrawal on the
Secretary of State database, this Notice could not be served directly to the corporation of Townsends, Inc.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 910-867-6869.

Sincerely,
Pamela Harrelson
Environmental Specialist
Enclosures

cc: Ruth Strauss, Permits and Inspection Branch
Files

An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled \ 10 % Post Consumer Paper
Division of Waste Management/UST Section, 1637 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1637 Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 190 of 214]

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly E. Perdue, Governor Dee A. Freeman, Secretary

July 18, 2011

VIA SECRETARY OF STATE
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Corporation Service Company, Registered Agent
Townsends, Inc.
327 Hillsborough St.
Raleigh, NC 27603

Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF 15A NCAC 2N .0303 (RGS1), .0402 (MT3), .0502 (LD1 and LD12),
.0505 (LD18), .0506 (RCD5) and NCGS 143-215.94QQ (OPTR2)
Townsends, Inc., 2701 Moncure Road, Pittsboro, NC 27312
Chatham County
Facility ID# 0-032432

Dear Sir or Madam:

On March 25, 2011, I conducted a compliance inspection at the above-referenced facility. I observed that
underground storage tanks (USTs) at Townsends, Inc. are not in compliance with North Carolina UST
regulations (North Carolina Administrative Code [NCAC] 2N "Criteria and Standards Applicable to
Underground Storage Tanks and/or North Carolina General Statutes [NCGS]). According to 15A NCAC 2N
.0203 Townsends, Inc. is identified as the owner and/or operator of UST(s) at Townsends, Inc..

The enclosed Notice of Violation (NOV) details the violation(s) noted on March 25, 2011 at Townsends, Inc.
and the actions required by Townsends, Inc. to correct the violation(s). Assessment of civil penalties may be
recommended for violations described in this NOV, as well as, operating permit revocation/denial unless the
violations are corrected. If Townsends, Inc. believes that the inspection findings are in error, or if Townsends,
Inc. has any questions pertaining to the enclosed NOV and/or “Violations and Corrective Actions for 2N
Compliance Inspection (Attachment)” please have it contact me at 910-867-6869.

Sincerely,
Pamela Harrelson
Environmental Specialist
Enclosures

cc: Michael Phelps, WSRO
Files

An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled \ 10 % Post Consumer Paper

Division of Waste Management/UST Section, 1637 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1637 Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 191 of 214]
NC Division of Waste Management / Underground Storage Tank Section
NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NOV)
Facility I.D. #: 0-032432 Facility Name: Townsends, Inc. Inspection Date: 3/25/2011 Permit Expires on: 09/2011

X 15A NCAC 2N Sect.# Description of Violation (Violation Code) X 15A NCAC 2N Sect.# Description of Violation (Violation Code)
1. .0303 Failure to Register or Update Registration for a UST System (RGS1) 4. .0502 Failure to Provide Leak Detection for Piping (LD12)
2. .0402 Failure to inspect a UST System with an Impressed Current System Every
60 days (MT3) 5. .0505 Failure to Perform Annual Test of Operation for Automatic Line Leak
Detector (LD18)
3. .0502 No Leak Detection for Tanks (LD1) 6. .0506 Failure to Maintain Records demonstrating Compliance with Leak
Detection requirements. (RCD5)
7. Article 21A of NCGS Chapter 143- 215.94QQ Failure to complete Primary Operator
training (OPTR2)
Additional Information:

1. .0303 RGS1: During the inspection Roger Mashburn, a representative for Townsends, Inc., told me that Townsends, Inc. was bought out
of bankruptcy in December 2010 by OMTRON USA, LLC. On March 30, 2011, Townsends, Inc. filed a Certificate of Withdrawal with the
Secretary of State. Ownership has not been changed and it appears that Townsends, Inc. is no longer a company that is registered to
conduct business with the State of North Carolina. Please have the registration updated to show the correct owner of the UST system
located at this facility. A UST-8 form, “Notification for Activities Involving UST’s” and a UST-15A form, “Change of Ownership of UST
Systems” has been enclosed for your convenience.

2. .0402 MT3: The volt and amp meters on the Impressed Current System must be recorded at least once every 60 days. The volt and amp
readings have not been recorded. Please record the volt and amp meter readings at least once every 60 days and submit a copy of the next 2
meter readings to the UST Section.

3. .0502 LD1: Leak detection records were not available for the Diesel UST during the inspection. Please have a Tank Tightness Test
conducted on the Diesel UST. Please submit a copy of the results and a copy of the next months leak detection records to the UST Section.

4. .0502 LD12: A line tightness test must be conducted on a pressurized piping system every year. Please have a line tightness test
conducted on the Diesel UST pressurized piping system and submit a copy of the test results to the UST Section.

5. .0505 LD18: The automatic line leak detector (ALLD) that is installed on the Diesel pressurized piping system must be tested every year.
Please have the ALLD tested and submit a copy of the test results to the UST Section.

6. .0506 RCD5: Leak detection records were missing for the Regular UST tank and piping. Any sampling, monitoring or testing must be
maintained for at least one year. Please maintain the required records and submit a copy of any testing results and the next months leak
detection records to the UST Section.

7. G.S. 143-215.94QQ OPTR2: The Primary Operator for this facility must go to the following website
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/ust/registration and register for one of the next Tank School courses being conducted over the next 6
months. Tank School must be completed and a Primary Operator training certificate achieved within 6 months of receipt of this notice.

Separate page(s) that cite the full violation and explain the required corrective action for each violation indicated above are attached to this Notice. Please take the necessary corrective action(s) for the
above violation(s) to bring the site into compliance, or complete the requirements for permanent closure in accordance with 15A NCAC 2N .0405, .0802 and .0803 and the most recent UST Section site
assessment and cleanup guidance. Corrective actions must be taken and reported to the appropriate DWM regional office within 30 days of receipt of this notice, unless otherwise noted, to avoid
recommendation of civil penalties for continuing violations. Continued non-compliance could result in revocation or non-renewal of an UST operating permit.

Assessment of civil penalties may automatically be recommended for violations described within this NOV. Your prompt attention to the items herein is required. Failure to comply with the state's
rules, in the manner and time specified, may result in the assessment of additional civil penalties and/or the use of other enforcement mechanisms available to the state. Each day that a violation
continues may be considered a separate violation.

UST-14 (9/14/10)
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 192 of 214]

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Dee Freeman, Secretary
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled \ 10 % Post Consumer Paper

Division of Waste Management/UST Section, 1637 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-1637
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us
September 09, 2011

CERTIFIED MAIL 70100780000198529487
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
CT Corporation System, Registered Agent Omtron USA, LLC
150 Fayetteville St., Box 1011 Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF 15A NCAC 2N.0402(MT3), .0502(LD12, LD1), .0506(RCD5),
.0505(LD18), .0303(RGS1), NCGS143-215.94QQ(OPTR2) Townsends, Inc
270 Moncure Road, Pittsboro, NC 27312 Chatham County
Facility ID#: 00-0-0000032432
Dear Ct Corporation System:
On March 25, 2011, I conducted a compliance inspection at the above-referenced facility. I observed that underground storage tanks (USTs) at Townsends, Inc are not in compliance with North Carolina UST regulations
(North Carolina Administrative Code [NCAC] 2N "Criteria and Standards Applicable to Underground Storage Tanks). According to those rules (15A NCAC 2N .0203) Omtron USA, LLC is identified as the owner and/or
operator of UST(s) at Townsends, Inc.
The following violations of the state rules (15A NCAC 2N) were observed on March 25, 2011 at Townsends, Inc. Following each violation are the actions required to correct the violations:

Violation 1: NCGS143-215.94QQ OPTR2; Failure to complete Primary Operator training as required by NCGS
143-215.94QQ.
Corrective Action(s):
1) The Primary Operator designated for this facility must go to the following website http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/ust/registration and register for one of the next Tank School courses being
conducted over the next 6 months. Tank School must be completed and a Primary Operator training certificate achieved within 6 months of receipt of this notice.

Violation 2: 15A NCAC 2N.0402 MT3; Failure to inspect a UST system with an impressed current cathodic protection system every 60 days as required by federal regulation 40 CFR 280.31(c) (as incorporated by 15A
NCAC 2N .0402).
Corrective Action(s):
1) Please inspect the ampere and volt meters associated with the impressed current cathodic protection system every 60 days and maintain records of the ampere readings noted during your inspection. The results of the
last 3 meter readings must be available for review by a Division of Waste Management UST Section inspector during a compliance inspection.

[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 193 of 214]

Corrective Action Ending: Please submit copies of the next 2 meter readings to the inspector at the address
provided.

Violation 3: 15A NCAC 2N.0502 LD12; Failure to provide leak detection for pressurized piping systems associated with regulated tanks in accordance with federal regulation 40 CFR 280.41(b)(1)(ii) (as incorporated
by 15A NCAC 2N .0502).
Corrective Action(s): 1) Conduct a line tightness test for each piping system associated with the regulated tank(s). Line tightness
testing is required annually for pressurized piping systems. Within 30 days of receipt of this notice, please submit a copy of the line tightness test results to the inspector at the address provided; OR

Violation 4: 15A NCAC 2N.0506 RCD5; Failure to maintain records demonstrating compliance with the leak detection requirements as required by federal regulation 40 CFR 280.45(b) (as incorporated by 15A NCAC 2N
.0506).
Corrective Action(s): 1) The cited rule requires that results of any sampling, testing, or monitoring must be maintained for at least 1 year. Please maintain the required records and submit to the inspector, at the address provided, a copy of the
following: A. Submit, within 30 days of receipt of this notice, any testing results (tank tightness tests, line tightness tests, etc.); AND B. Submit, within 30 days of receipt of this notice, a copy of your leak detection
records for your chosen method of leak detection for the month following the date of receipt of this notice.
Violation 5: 15A NCAC 2N.0502 LD1; Failure to provide leak detection for a regulated tank in accordance with federal regulation 40 CFR 280.41 (as incorporated by 15A NCAC 2N .0502, 15A NCAC 2N .0301, 15A NCAC
2N .0302 and/or 15A NCAC 2N .0304).
Corrective Action(s): 1) Single-wall monitored UST: Please immediately conduct a tank tightness test (note: an Automatic Tank
Gauge can not be used to conduct the tank tightness test) on all applicable USTs.
Corrective Action Ending: Please submit, within 30 days of receipt of this notice, a copy of the tank tightness test results (and if applicable, interstitial space tightness test results) and submit, within 30 days of receipt of this notice,
a copy of your leak detection records (for your chosen leak detection method(s)) for the month following the date of receipt of this notice to the inspector at the address provided.

Violation 6: 15A NCAC 2N.0505 LD18; Failure to conduct an annual test of the operation of an automatic line leak detector (MLLD or ELLD) of a pressurized piping system associated with a regulated tank in accordance
with federal regulation 40 CFR 280.44(a) (as incorporated by 15A NCAC 2N .0505).
Corrective Action(s): 1) Please conduct a test of the operation of the automatic line leak detector and submit a copy of the results
within 30 days of receipt of this notice to the inspector at the address provided.

Violation 7: 15A NCAC 2N.0303 RGS1; Failure to register or update the registration for a UST system as required by federal regulation 40 CFR 280.22 (as incorporated by 15A NCAC 2N .0303).
Corrective Action(s): 1) Submit a UST-8 form Notification for Activities Involving USTs
2) Submit a UST-15 form Change of Ownership of UST systems
Corrective Action Ending: Please send the completed UST-8 and/or UST-15 form to the address located on the form and send a copy to the inspector at the address provided in this notice. It is recommended that you also keep a
copy for your records.

[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 194 of 214]

Corrective actions must be completed and reported to the inspector at the address provided within 30 days of receipt
of this notice, unless otherwise noted in one of the corrective actions listed above. Assessment of civil penalties may
be recommended for violations described in this NOV, as well as, operating permit revocation/denial unless the violations are corrected. If Omtron USA, LLC believes that the inspection findings are in error, or if Omtron USA, LLC has any questions pertaining to this NOV and/or corrective actions please have it contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Pam Harrelson
Environmental Specialist Enclosures cc: Michael Phelps w/ Enclosures
Files
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 195 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 196 of 214]

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Dee Freeman, Secretary
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled \ 10 % Post Consumer Paper

Division of Waste Management/UST Section, 1637 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1637
Phone and Fax: [phone] \ Internet: portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm
November 17, 2011
CERTIFIED MAIL 70111150000028818713
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED CT Corporation System, Registered Agent Omtron USA, LLC
150 Fayetteville St., Box 1011
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Recommendation for Enforcement Action Townsends, Inc
270 Moncure Road, Pittsboro, NC 27312
Chatham County Facility ID#: 00-0-0000032432
Dear Ct Corporation System:

This letter is to notify you that this office is considering recommending enforcement action to the Director of the Division of Waste Management. The recommendation for enforcement concerns the
violations cited in the Notice of Violation (NOV) dated September 9, 2011 which was previously
sent to you. Specifically: NCGS 143-215.94QQ for Failure to complete Primary Operator training,
15A NCAC 2N.0402 for Failure to perform 60 day CP Checks., 15A NCAC 2N.0502 for Failure to provide LD for pressurized piping., 15A NCAC 2N.0506 for Failure to maintain LD records., 15A NCAC 2N.0502 for Failure to provide tank leak detection., 15A NCAC 2N.0505 for Failure to do
annual test of ALLD., 15A NCAC 2N.0303 for Failure to register or update registration.

If there is an explanation for the violations cited, or if you believe there are other factors which should be considered, please submit your response to me in writing within 10 days of receipt of this
notice. Your explanation will be reviewed, and if enforcement action is still deemed appropriate,
your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his
consideration. In accordance with NCGS 143-215.94U, continued non-compliance can result in
revocation of the current operating permit or non-renewal of future operating permits for this facility.

[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 197 of 214]

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at [phone].

Sincerely,
Pamela Harrelson
Environmental Specialist
cc: Ruth Strauss, Permits and Inspection Branch (electronic)
Files (electronic)
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 198 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 199 of 214]

Appendix E

Past Reports and Documents

Pittsboro Processing Plant

[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 200 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 201 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 202 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 203 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 204 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 205 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 206 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 207 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 208 of 214]
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 209 of 214]
Appendix F- Site Photographs
Pittsboro Processing Plant – BrightFields # 2972.01.11

PHOTOGRAPH A

Processing plant

PHOTOGRAPH B

Old live sheds/truck shop building
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 210 of 214]
Appendix F- Site Photographs
Pittsboro Processing Plant – BrightFields # 2972.01.11

PHOTOGRAPH C

Pole barn

PHOTOGRAPH D

Fueling station outside former truck shop
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 211 of 214]
Appendix F- Site Photographs
Pittsboro Processing Plant – BrightFields # 2972.01.11

PHOTOGRAPH E

Drums of waste fluid inside plant building

PHOTOGRAPH F

Transformers outside plant building
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 212 of 214]
Appendix F- Site Photographs
Pittsboro Processing Plant – BrightFields # 2972.01.11

PHOTOGRAPH G

Electronic truck scale behind plant

PHOTOGRAPH H

Compressors inside containment outside plant engine room
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 213 of 214]
Appendix F- Site Photographs
Pittsboro Processing Plant – BrightFields # 2972.01.11

PHOTOGRAPH I

Drum and AST outside new engine room

PHOTOGRAPH J

1,000,000-gallon and 300,000-gallon water storage tanks
[16.6] [Phase I ESA Update - Pittsboro Processing Plant.pdf] [Page 214 of 214]
APPENDIX N
OTHER