Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10002_Rea_Asphalt_Plant_Amendment_20070314. :...: . \ Letter re: Lead Impacted Solis -Rea Contracting, LLC. Boyle Project No. 05-203 March 7, 2007 Final Thank you for you attention to this matter and please contact us with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, BOYLE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLLC ~f~:.p~ Project ~~~~st Registered, NC 2003 Attachments cc: Mr. Bill Copeland, Rea Contracting, LLC arl . oyle, P.E. Managmg Principal Registered, NC 19681 Mr. Dave Franchina, Kennedy Covington, w/attachments Mr. Dan Wendover, Citiline Development, w/attachments Ms. Roberta Proctor, NC HWS 2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I. • • • • • • • l e • • • • • -~-~----~--~ -~ -~---------~-I INITIAL SITE SAMPLING PLAN FORMER REA ASPHALT PLANT 2701 YOUNGBLOOD STREET CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Prepared for: Ms. Robin Proctor NCDENR Hazardous Waste Section On behalf of: Rea Contracting, LLC P.O. Box 32487 Charlotte, North Carolina (704 )553-6583 f '\. consufting /_..._.• __ ~ngineers BOYL,E 4340 Taggart Creek Road, Suite H Charlotte, NC 28208 (704) 676-0778 BOYLE Project No. 05-203 January 19, 2.007 't rf • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • INITIAL SITE SAMPLING PLAN Former Rea Asphalt Plant Charlotte, North Carolina BOYLE Project No. 05-203 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................... ,.. ................................................................................. 1 1.1 General Site History ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Known Releases of Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products ... 2 1.2.1 Previous Hazardous Substance Releases ............................................................. 2 1.2.2 Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Releases .............................................. 3 1.2.3 Aboveground Storage Tank Release ...................................................................... 3 1.2.4 Other Petroleum Releases ......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Site Topography ........................................................................................................ s 1.4 Geology and Hydrogeology ................................................................................... s 1.4.1 Regional Geology ........................................................................................................... s 1.4.2 Site Geology and Hydrogeology .............................................................................. 6 1.5 Summary of Area Land Use and Potential Receptors ................................ 6 2.0 Discovery and Source Characterization ..................................................... 8 2.1 Excavation ........................................ ~ .......................................................................... 8 2.2 Waste Characterization .......................................................................................... 8 2.3 Non-Hazardous Soil Disposal and Stabilization of Lead ............................ 9 . 2.4 Potential Source Identification .......................................................................... 10 2.4.1 Preliminary Soil Sampling ........................................................................................ IO 2.4.2 Preliminary Ground Water Assessment .............................................................. to 2.4.3 Potential Sources ......................................................................................................... II 3.0 Proposed Methods of Investigation ........................................................... 13 3.1 Constituents of Concern ....................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Arsenic ............................................................................................................................. 13 3.1.2 Cadmium ........................................................................................................................ 13 3.1.3 Chromium ....................................................................................................................... l3 3.1.4 Lead .................................................................................................................................. 14 3.1.5 Mercury ........................................................................................................................... 14 3.1.6 Silver ................................................................................................................................ 14 3.1.7 Soil Background Levels ............................................................................................. I4 3.2 Soil Sampling Plan ................................................................................................. 15 3.2.1 Soil Sample Depths .................................................................................................... 16 3.2.2 Soil Sample Collection Methods ............................................................................. 16 3.2.3 Soil Sample Analysis .................................................................................................. I6 3.3 Additional GW Assessment ................................................................................. 16 3.3.1 Groundwater Sample Collection Methods .......................................................... I? 3.3.2 Groundwater Sample Analysis ........ : ...................................................................... l7 3.4 Standard Field Protocols ...................................................................................... 17 3.4.1 Quality Control Samples ........................................................................... : ............... I? 3.4.2 Sample Location and Surveying ............................................................................ 17 3.4.3 Field Decontamination Procedures ....................................................................... 18 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • INITIAL SITE SAMPLING PLAN Former Rea Asphalt Plant Charlotte, North Carolina BOYLE Project No. 05-203 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.4.4 Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) ..................................................................... l8 4.0 Schedule ...................................................................................................................... 19 TABLES Table 1 -Previous Assessment Reports and Historical Resources Table 2-NCDOT Soil Sampling Results Summary Table 3 -NCDOT Groundwater Sampling Results Summary Table 4 -Preliminary Groundwater Sampling Results Summary Table 5 -Staging Pile Preliminary Sampling Results Summary Table 6 -Lead Composite Sample Results Summary Table 7 -Preliminary Soil Sampling Results Summary FIGURES Figure 1 -Site Location and Area Topography Figure 2 -Site Plan Figure 3 -NCDOT Soil TCE Detections Figure 4 -NCDOT Soil Vinyl Chloride Detections Figure 5 -NCDOT Estimated TCE Plume in Shallow GW (June 2006) Figure 6 -NCDOT Estimated Vinyl Chloride Plume in Shallow GW (June 2006) Figure 7 -Rea Asphalt Plant USTs, ASTs and Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Excavations Figure 8 -1958 City of Charlotte Topographic Map Figure 9 -Potentiometric Surface Map -November 2006 Figure 10 -Soil Excavation Area and Preliminary Soil Sample Results Figure 11-Proposed ISSP Sample Location Plan APPENDICES Appendix A -Initial Stockpile Sampling Laboratory Analytical Data Reports Appendix B -Preliminary Soils Investigation Laboratory Analytical Data Reports Appendix C -Preliminary Groundwater Investigation Laboratory Analytical Data Reports ii • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 1.0 INTRODUCTION January 19, 2007 Final The Subject Property consists of an approximate 8-acre site located at 2701 Youngblood Street (also formerly identified as 121 Lancaster Street, 2801 Southview Avenue and 2820 Griffith Street) in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The center of the rectangular-shaped site is located at approximately N35° 12' 8" and W80° 52' 6". The site is generally bounded by Youngblood Street to the northwest, Lancaster Street and the Mcleod Addictive Disease Foundation, Inc. to the northeast, the Charlotte Light-Rail lines to the southeast and commercial/industrial-use buildings along Griffith Street and Fairwood Street to the southwest . The property was most recently occupied by an asphalt plant owned and operated by Rea Contracting, LLC (Rea) that was recently dismantled and removed from the property. The former asphalt plant consisted of materials storage areas, aboveground storage tanks, conveyors, silos and an office building (reportedly constructed in 1970). Figure 2 is a 2004 aerial photograph showing the general layout of the property prior to removal of the plant . 1.1 General Site History The following site history summary is based upon a review of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report completed on the Subject Property by Geoscience Group, Inc., dated December 20, 2005 and a subsequent review of additional historical resources by Boyle Consulting Engineers, PLLC (BOYLE); as well as other referenced environmental assessment reports, information obtained from persons familiar with the site, and observations made during recent site activities. A list of the reports and historical resources reviewed is included as Table 1. From approximately 1931 to 1938, Charlotte Packing and Refining Company operated an animal slaughterhouse/meat packing facility at the Subject Property, as did Charlotte Abattoir from approximately 1940-1962. Based on a review of historical aerial photographs, and Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, this facility generally occupied the northern end of the Subject Property . By approximately 1966, an asphalt plant was operating in the southern end of the Subject Property, near Griffith Street. The operation's address was reportedly 2820 Griffith Street . Asphalt Materials Co., Inc./Carolina Paving Co., Inc. conducted operations there from 1967 through 1971. Based on conversations with Rea Contracting personnel familiar with the site, there may have been a concrete plant in the southeastern end of the site during this time . According to Mecklenburg County Tax Records, in 1970 the northern portion of the Subject Property, near Lancaster Street, was developed as an asphalt plant; Rea Construction Company operated the plant beginning around 1972. Southview Avenue, which was the operation's address, later became Youngblood Street. In 2003, the corporate parent of Rea Construction Company, J.A. Jones Construction Company, declared bankruptcy. In October, 2003, Lane Construction Corp. purchased certain assets of Rea Construction Company, including the Property, from the bankruptcy estate of J.A. Jones Construction Company, and formed Rea Contracting, LLC . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • -· • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 January 19, 2007 Final Asphalt operations ceased at the Property in January 2006 and dismantling of the asphalt plant began in March 2006. At this time, Rea Contracting LLC began removal of the recyclable asphalt, concrete and several large stockpiles of crushed stone that formerly covered most of the Property. In addition, as a condition of a pending property transaction, the grade of the site was generally lowered to elevations shown on a 1958 City of Charlotte Topographic Map and then generally raised to the elevations shown on a 1981 City of Charlotte Topographic Map. This was intended to facilitate removal of asphalt, aggregate and other debris associated with the former asphalt plant operations at the site . 1.2 Known Releases of Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products 1.2.1 Previous Hazardous Substance Releases From approximately 1970 through 1989, the North Carolina Department of Transportation ("NCDOT") operated an asphaltic testing laboratory on the Property. The laboratory was formerly located in the northern portion of the site in the southern corner of the one-story brick office building. The NCDOT laboratory reportedly utilized trichloroethene (TCE), 1,1,1- trichloroethene (1,1,1-TCA) and carbon tetrachloride (CCI4) in the asphaltic testing process. In June 1997, a Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) was completed for the Subject Property . The site was referred to as NCDOT Asphalt Testing Site No. 27-57 and was assigned North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Groundwater Incident Number 17443. The CSA and subsequent assessments examined the impact of chlorinated solvents on groundwater and soils. In August 2002, a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) proposing natural attenuation was submitted; it was approved in November 2002 by DENR's Aquifer Protection Section ("APS"). Currently, NCDOT is conducting groundwater monitoring at the Property under the direction of APS. Pursuant to a Memoranda of Agreement between the NCDOT and DENR, the scope of the CSA and CAP was specifically limited to assessment and remediation of TCE, 1,1,1-TCA, carbon tetrachloride, and their degradation products (cis-1,2- dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichloroethene, and vinyl chloride). For simplicity, thes~ constituents have been referred to as the "target compounds." Soil contamination with the above target compounds was found to be generally limited to the area immediately adjacent to the former laboratory (Figures 3 and 4 and Table 2). Other "non-target compounds", including benzene, n-butylbenzene, sec-butylbenzene, tert- butylbenzene, ethylbenzene, isopropylbenzene, p-Isopropyltoluene, methyl-tert-butyl ether, naphthalene, n-propylbenzene, toluene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene and xylenes, were also detected in the vicinity of the lab (Table 2). Concentrations of n- butylbenzene, naphthalene, tert-butylbenzene, xylenes and ethylbenzene that exceeded DENR Soil-to-Groundwater and/or Site Screening Levels (SSLs) were only detected at one sample location (DP-14) . Target compounds were also found in shallow ground water in the area around the laboratory (Figures 5 and 6 and Table 3). Concentrations of cis-1,1-dichloroethene, trichloroethene and vinyl chloride were detected above the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standards (2L) for these constituents. Non-target compounds, including benzene, bromodichloromethane, n- butylbenzene, tert-butylbenzene, dibromochloromethane, diisopropyl ether, p- isopropyltoluene, methyl-tert-butyl ether, naphthalene, n-propylbenzene, tetrachloroethene, toluene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene and xylenes, were also detected in the vicinity of the lab (Table 3). Concentrations of benzene, bromodichloromethane and 2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 January 19, 2007 Final dibromochloromethane were detected above the 2L groundwater quality standards for these constituents . 1.2.2 Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Releases In December 2005, an Underground Storage Tank (UST) Closure Report was submitted to DENR's UST Section on behalf of Rea Contracting, LLC regarding an investigation into the reported removal of an 8,000-gallon gasoline UST from the Subject Property in the mid-1980s . The UST Section assigned Incident Number 36019 in connection with the investigation. Subsequent investigation also found that two 20,000-gallon diesel USTs were also apparently removed from the property in the mid-1980s. In July 2006, a Phase I Limited Site Assessment (LSA) was completed. By letter dated August 14, 2006, the UST Section gave that incident "no further action" status, and on August 21, 2006 a Notice of Residual Petroleum (NORP) was recorded against the Property at the Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds' office. The NORP was required due to the identification of groundwater contamination in excess of the 2L groundwater quality standard. Benzene (6 ug/1), lead (310 ug/1), vinyl chloride (8.2 ug/1) and TCE (74 ug/1) were detected in temporary monitoring well TW-3 at concentrations that exceeded the 2L standard. The location of the former USTs and TW-3 are shown on Figure 7 .. 1.·2.3 Aboveground Storage Tank Release The Rea asphalt plant located in the northern portion of the Subject Property had two aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) that contained liquid asphalt that was supplied to the plant . by underground and aboveground piping. One of the liquid asphalt ASTs was an approximate 150,000-gallon vertical AST. The second liquid AST was an approximate 20,000-gallon horizontal AST. A third AST located in a concrete containment wall structure at the northwest end of the plant was another approximate 20,000-gallon AST that contained diesel fuel. The diesel fuel was also supplied to the plant via underground and aboveground piping . After removal of the asphalt plant, petroleum contaminated soils were encountered beneath the plant. Petroleum contaminated soils were excavated from an area approximately 90 feet long by 10 feet wide and approximately 9-10 feet deep. Another shallow excavation approximately 3-4 feet deep and covering an area approximately 10 feet by 20 feet, adjacent to the deeper excavation was completed when removal of a concrete pad encountered minor contamination directly beneath the pad. Analytical testing by Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) methods of soil samples from the horizontal and vertical extent of the excavations confirmed removal of TPH-impacted soils above DENR APS standards. A Soil Contamination Report (SCR) was submitted to the APS in· June 2006. In a letter dated, July 10, 2006, the APS gave Incident No. 87791 "no further action" status. The locations of the excavations are shown on Figure 7 . 1.2.4 Other Petroleum Releases Area 2 During site grading activities, petroleum contaminated soils were encountered in the eastern portion of the property (See Figure 7). Sampling and analytical testing of the soils found concentrations of gasoline-range and diesel-range Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) that exceeded the TPH Action Levels of 10 ppm and 40 ppm, respectively. Between May 31 and July 31, 2006, BOYLE observed the excavation of this impacted area. The limits of the excavation 3 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 January 19, 2007 Final were based upon field screening levels utilizing a Foxboro lVA-1000, visibly stained soils and petroleum odors. The final limits of the excavation were approximately 190 feet long by 110 feet wide and up to 9-10 feet deep . Confirmation samples collected from the sidewalls and bottom of the excavation and analyzed for gasoline-range TPH and diesel range TPH. The analysis confirmed that TPH contamination had been effectively removed from the lateral and horizontal extents of the excavation with the exception of two areas . In two areas, the excavation extended to depths of approximately 9-10 feet deep. Evidence of groundwater was encountered in these two areas. Subsequently, two shallow groundwater monitoring wells (SW-11 and SW-12) were installed and sampled. Laboratory analysis of the two wells detected concentrations of benzene (130 ug/1), 1,2-dichloroethane (0.63 ug/1) and diisopropyl ether (380 ug/1) in well SW-12 that exceed the 2L standards of 1 ug/1, 0.38 ug/1, and 70 ug/1, respectively. No constituents were detected at concentrations that exceed the 2L standards in monitoring well SW-:-11. The groundwater sample results are summarized in Table 4 . No apparent sources of the soil and groundwater contamination were readily identifiable during the excavation activities. Persons familiar with the site indicated that petroleum products were commonly utilized to free asphalt from the beds of asphalt trucks by spraying the bed with small amounts of petroleum products, but this has not been confirmed as the source . A Notice of Release (NOR) was sent to the APS on October 17, 2006. On December 6, 2006 a Notice of Violation (NOV) was received from the APS for violation of the 2L standards. The NOV assigned groundwater Incident No. 87948 to the release and required completion of a CSA by March 6, 2007 . On October 24.and 25, 2006, three shallow Type II groundwater monitoring wells (SMW-13, SMW- 14, and SMW-15) and one Type III groundwater monitoring well (DMW-3) were installed around SMW-12. The wells were subsequently developed and sampled on November 1, 2006. The concentration of benzene (1.1 ug/1) detected in DMW-3 was the only constituent detected above 2L standards. The groundwater sample results are summarized in Table 4. Based on the preliminary sample results it appears that the contamination around SMW-12 appears to be limited to the area defined by SMW-11, SMW-13, SMW-14 and SMW-15. The CSA for Incident No. 87948 is currently ongoing . Area 3 During site grading activities, petroleum contaminated soils were encountered in the western portion of the site, southwest of grade stake G-9 (See Figure 7). The petroleum contaminated· soils were originally encountered near the 1958 grade elevation. The initial excavation was generally a shallow (less than 2-3 feet) excavation below the 1958 grade until the vertical and horizontal extents of the contamination were removed. Four confirmatory samples were collected from the bottom of the shallow excavation and analyzed for gasoline-range TPH and diesel-range TPH . Gasoline-range TPH was detected in two samples at concentrations of 15 mg/kg and 21 mg/kg which exceed the APS action level of 10 mg/kg. Diesel-range TPH was also detected in the same two samples at concentrations of 900 mg/kg and 260 mg/kg which exceed the APS action level of 40 mg/kg . 4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 January 19, 2007 Final On November 13, 2006, a shallow Type II groundwater monitoring well (SMW-20) was installed . On November 15, 2006 free product (diesel) was discovered in the well. On November 17, 2006, <0.01 ft of free product was measured in the well. On December 13, 2006 removal of a previously unidentified concrete slab revealed another area of petroleum contaminated soils with a heavy diesel odor adjacent to H-9. Between December 13 and December 15, 2006 petroleum contaminated soils were excavated and stockpiled. The excavation was extended to a depth of approximately 10-12 feet below grade where evidence of shallow groundwater was encountered. The horizontal limits of the excavation are shown on Figure 7. On December 15, 2006, eleven samples were collected from the sidewalls of the excavation. Diesel-range TPH was detected in one of the eleven samples at a concentration of 11,000 mg/kg, which exceeds the APS action level of 40 mg/kg. Gasoline-range TPH was also detected in that same sample at a concentration of 15 mg/kg, which exceeds the APS action level of 10 mg/kg. Additional excavation of this area was completed on January 16, 2006 . Laboratory analytical results are still pending for the confirmation samples collected . A NOR was submitted to the APS on January 5, 2007. No NOV assigning an Incident No. has yet been received . 1.3 Site Topography As indicated on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, Charlotte East, N.C. quadrangle, dated 1988 (photorevised 1993), the site is located at an elevation of approximately 730 ft above mean sea level (Figure 1). The topographic gradient at the site is generally to the west and northwest. The USGS topographic map shows a small water feature (pond) in the central portion of the site. No apparent evidence of the pond was observed in the recent or historical aerial photographs . The site topography has been altered by the development of the site. The. 1958 City of Charlotte Topographic Map {Figure 8), shows an intermittent drainage feature traversing the central portion of the site generally from the east-southeast to the west-northwest and site elevations ranging from approximately 741 ft to 722 ft above mean sea level. The intermittent drainage feature appears to have been piped and covered by 6 to 8 feet of fill in a 1981 City of Charlotte Topographic Map (amended with storm water drains in 1982). The site elevations generally range between 740 feet and 726 feet above mean sea level. 1.4 Geology and Hydrogeology 1.4.1 Regional Geology The Subject Property is located in the generally rolling terrain of the Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina. The Piedmont generally consists of low, rounded hills and long rolling (northeast to southwest trending) ridges with incised creeks and river channels . According to the Geologic Map of the Charlotte Region 1° x 2° Quadrangle, North Carolina, and South Carolina, dated 1988, the Subject Property is located in the Charlotte Belt geologic province and the underlying bedrock is composed of granitic rock (granodiorite) . In-place chemical and physical weathering of parent rocks typically form residual soils in this geologic region. This weathered rock is known as saprolite or residuum. Weathering is 5 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 January 19, 2007 Final facilitated by the presence of fractures, joints, and less resistant minerals in the rock. In areas not altered by erosion, alluvial deposition or the activities of man, the typical residual soil profile consists of clay-rich unconsolidated materials, transitioning to sandy silts and silty sands that generally become increasingly consolidated with depth. The boundary between soil and rock is not typically sharply defined. The transitional zone is termed "partially weathered rock" . The occurrence and movement of groundwater in the Piedmont is typically within two separate but interconnected water-bearing zones. A shallow water-bearing zone occurs within the saprolite, and a deeper water-bearing zone occurs within the underlying bedrock . Surface and subsurface drainage patterns provide an indication of the direction in which contaminants, if present, would be transported by surface waters or groundwater. The movement of groundwater through soil and rock is dependent upon the effects of geologic features, such as bedding, faults, folds or foliation planes. Groundwater recharge within the area occurs mostly from precipitation on upland areas above floodplains. The native soils act as an infiltration medium for precipitation to seep into the fractures and joints of the underlying bedrock. Discharge from the system occurs as seepage springs that are common near the bases of slopes and at the intersection with surface water features such as streams and lakes . 1.4.2 Site Geology and Hydrogeology Based on a review of the 1997 CSA, the 2002 CAP and the 2005 Preliminary Subsurface Exploration, the geology of the site generally consists of competent bedrock at approximately 50-60 feet below ground surface (bgs), overlain by unconsolidated saprolite (mostly silty clays) with areas of fill (sand, clay, asphalt, gravel, and debris) overlying the saprolite. The fill depths generally range from 2-3 feet up to 10-15 feet . Historical groundwater depths across the site generally range between 8 and 12 feet below ground surface. The overall groundwater flow direction at the site is generally toward the west- northwest. The hydraulic gradient in the northern portion of the site has been calculated at 0.03 ft/ft and the geometric mean hydraulic conductivity was previously calculated at 0.8 ft/day. The groundwater velocity was also calculated at approximately 6 ft per year. The estimated shallow groundwater potentiometric maps constructed from recent groundwater elevation data is shown on Figure 9 . 1.5 Summary of Area Land Use and Potential Receptors The Subject Property is located in an area characterized by mostly commercial and industrial- use properties. The site is currently zoned TOD-M for Transit Oriented District-Mixed Use . Preliminary development plans for the site have not been finalized, but BOYLE understands that plans include a large mixed-use commercial/residential development . The immediately surrounding area consists of mostly older light industrial and commercial development. The new light-rail transit line is under construction along the southeastern property boundary. The completion of the light-rail line is anticipated to increase redevelopment of properties in the vicinity of the light-rail corridor . Receptor surveys previously conducted as part of the CSA, CAP and Phase I LSA did not identify water supply wells within a 1,500 foot radius of the Subject Property. Municipal water and sewer are available to the Subject Property and surrounding area. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg 6 • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 January 19, 2007 Final Utilities Department obtains the municipal water supply from Mountain Island Lake, located approximately 10 miles north of the Subject Property . Based on a review of the USGS topographic map (Figure 1), the site and surrounding properties located on the northwest side of the adjoining railroad lines are located in the local drainage area for Irwin Creek, which is located approximately 4,000 feet to the northwest. The adjacent areas to the southeast of the railroad lines are located in the local drainage area for the Dairy Branch of Sugar Creek, which begins approximately 800 feet to the southeast of the site. There are no known surface water intakes in the vicinity of the Subject Property . There are no known wellhead protection areas located within 1,500 feet of the site . Given the location of the site within the Charlotte City limits and in an historically industrial and commercial area, the existence of any environmentally sensitive areas is considered to be low . 7 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 2.0 Discovery and Source Characterization 2.1 Excavation January 19, 2007 Final After removal of the former Rea asphalt plant facility in March and April of 2006, grading activities at the site began. The purpose of the grading operations was to remove any asphalt, asphalt by-product, aggregate, and/or aggregate by-product that was likely a result of the Rea asphalt plant operations. This generally entailed removal of these materials down to the grade shown on the 1958 City of Charlotte Topographic Map. Once this grade was reached, and the asphalt, aggregate, and by-products had been removed, the site was filled where necessary to reach the grade shown on the 1981 City of Charlotte Topographic Map . Due to the known soil contamination resulting from the former NCDOT asphalt testing operations, the area around the former laboratory was not disturbed during initial site grading activities. Based on the previous soil assessments, an area defined generally by grade stakes C8, Bll, Dll and E8/E9 was flagged and left undisturbed while grading operations continued to the north, south, and east of this area (See Figure 10). The vegetated area to the south around the stormwater drain area was also left undisturbed . On October 5, 6, 10 and 11, 2006, excavation of the flagged area was completed. The excavation depths ranged between 4-5 feet near C8, 3-4 feet near B11, 6 feet near EB, and 7 feet near 011. Some areas beneath the former laboratory building were excavated to depths of approximately 8-10 feet in order to remove the building foundation. Excavated materials were placed in staging piles in the northern portion of the site pending waste characterization analysis . The excavated materials consisted of a mixture of undifferentiated materials including sand, clay, gravels and miscellaneous metal, wood, plastic, concrete, and glass debris. No petroleum or otherwise unusual odors were noted during the excavation process. In general, excavation down to the 1958 grade removed the majority of the debris fill down to residual soils, which were generally a red I tan silty clay near C8 and B11 that transitions to a grey organic (alluvial) clay near E8 and 011. After the flagged area had been excavated to the 1958 grade, a geotextile fabric was placed across a large portion of the area to establish a firm base for placement of the engineered fill necessary to return the site to the 1981 grade. The fill materials utilized consisted of suitable materials screened to remove asphalt, debris and other unsuitable materials from other portions of the site that were previously excavated from areas unaffected by known sources of contamination . 2.2 Waste Characterization On October 11, 2006, composite samples of the excavated soils from the flagged area were collected for laboratory analysis. The analysis completed was based upon the known volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination and analysis necessary for disposal at the Allied Waste- CMS Landfill in Concord, North Carolina. Fourteen composite samples were collected for analysis based on the estimated size and configurations of the staging piles. The composite samples were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by EPA Methods 3550 and 5030, and Total RCRA 8 Metals by various methods. The laboratory results 8 • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 January 19, 2007 Final are summarized in Table 5. Copies of the laboratory analytical results are included in Appendix A . Concentrations of volatile organic compounds, TPH, and RCRA 8 Metals were detected in the composite samples analyzed. The concentrations detected were below levels acceptable for disposal in a municipal solid waste landfill (MSWLF) as specified in the DENR Hazardous Waste Section's "Contained-in" Policy for Soil Contaminated with Listed Hazardous Waste with the exception of lead. Lead concentrations ranging between 73 mg/kg and 2,400 mg/kg were detected. Thirteen of the fourteen samples contained concentrations of lead equal to or greater than the 100 mg/kg allowed for disposal in a MSWLF. Upon receipt of the preliminary laboratory results, the fourteen lab samples were analyzed by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Method {TCLP). Based on the results of the sampling, it was confirmed that two staging piles (containing an estimated 600 cubic yards of soil) contained levels of lead above the 5 mg/1 by TCLP allowable for disposal in a MSWLF. Notice of the discovery was made to Ms. Roberta Proctor, Hazardous Waste Section via US Mail in a letter dated November 1, 2006 . 2.3 Non-Hazardous Soil Disposal and Stabilization of Lead In November 2006, the non-hazardous excavated soils were hauled to the Allied Waste-CMS Landfill for disposal. Approximately 1,098 tons of non-hazardous soils were removed from the site . Approval to stabilize the lead in the excavated soils remaining at the site was received in a letter from Ms. Proctor, dated November 17, 2006. Between December 4 and December 8, 2006, A&D Environmental Inc. conducted the lead-stabilization activities. On December 4, 8, and 11, 2006, composite samples were collected for laboratory analysis in accordance with the guidelines specified in the November 17, 2006 letter. One composite sample was collected from each approximate 25-cubic yard aliquout of treated material. A total of thirty (30) composite samples were analyzed by TCLP for lead. In addition, one composite sample for each 200 yards of treated material was analyzed using the Multiple Extraction Method (MEM) for lead. The MEM samples were composited from the thirty (30) TCLP samples. The results are summarized in Table 6 . The results of the TCLP analysis only detected concentrations of lead above the method detection limit of 0.025 mg/1 in six (6) samples. The highest concentration was detected in sample LC-10A at 0.13 mg/1. This is less than the 5 mg/1, the concentration allowable for disposal in a MSWLF as specified in the HWS "Contained-in" Policy . Concentrations of lead were only detected above the method detection limit of 0.015 mg/1 in two of the four composite samples analzed by the MEM. The highest concentration detected in the Day 6 run for sample CB-lA, 0.0285 mg/1, is also less than 5 mg/1. The results were submitted in a report dated January 11, 2007 with a request for approval to submit the sample results to the Allied Waste-CMS Landfill for disposal as non-hazardous soils . On January 17, 2007 the soils were removed from the site and disposed at the Allied Waste-CMS Landfill . 9 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 2.4 Potential Source Identification January 19, 2007 Final The source of the lead contamination discovered in the excavated soils is unknown at this time. Preliminary investigations were begun to attempt to identify the source and/or remaining extent of contamination . 2.4.1 Preliminary Soil Sampling On October 30, 2006, twelve soil borings were advanced in and around the area between C8, B11, E8, and 011 (See Figure 10). Soil borings L-1 to L-12 were advanced utilizing direct-push drilling techniques. The borings were advanced to depths of approximately 10 feet below the existing grade (approximately the 1981 grade). Residual soils were encountered below the engineered fill at five locations (L-1, L-8, L-9, L-10, and L-11) at depths ranging between 4 and 7 feet below 1981 grade. Pre-existing undifferentiated fill materials were encountered below the engineered fill in the remaining seven locations (L-2, L-3, L-4, L-5, L-6, L-7 and L-12) at depths ranging between 5 and 9 feet below the 1981 grade. The depth to the bottom of the engineered fill was generally discernable by the presence of the geotextile fabric or other visually apparent evidence . Representative samples were collected from the residual soils or pre-existing fill materials for laboratory analysis. The samples were placed in the appropriate laboratory-supplied containers. The containers were labeled with pertinent sampling information (i.e. sample designation, date and time) and then placed in an ice-packed cooler. The samples were transported to Pace Analytical Services, Inc. (Huntersville, NC) for analysis of Total RCRA 8 Metals by various EPA Methods. The analytical results are summarized in Table 7. A copy of the laboratory analytical data reports is included in Appendix B . Concentrations of lead detected in residual soils ranged between 5.5 mg/kg and 12 mg/kg. The concentrations detected in the pre-existing fill ranged between 15 mg/kg and 620 mg/kg. Only the concentrations found in L-2, L-3 and L-5 were above the DENR Hazardous Waste Section Site Screening Levels (SSLs) of 270 mg/kg and the EPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs) of 400 mg/kg . Mercury (10 of 12 samples >0.0154 mg/kg), silver (2 of 12 samples >0.223 mg/kg), arsenic (2 of 12 samples >5.24 mg/kg), cadmium (9 of 12 samples >2.72 mg/kg) and chromium (8 of 12 samples >27.2 mg/kg) were also detected at concentrations that exceeded SSLs. Only arsenic (10 of 12 samples >0.39 mg/kg) was detected at concentrations that exceeded PRGs . 2.4.2 Preliminary Ground Water Assessment On November 13, 2006, five shallow groundwater monitoring wells were installed in the northern portion of the site (See Figure 9). Monitoring well SMW-18 was installed adjacent to L- 2 (where the highest level of lead was detected in soils). The location of SMW-18 was also located near the former western corner of the asphalt plant office building and TW-3 (where lead had been previously detected in ground water as part of the Phase I LSA investigation of the former gasoline UST). Monitoring well SMW-16 and SMW-17 were installed upgradient of SMW- 18 and monitoring well SMW-19 was installed downgradient of SMW-18 . On November 15, 2006, monitoring wells SMW-16, SMW-17, SMW-18 and SMW-19 were "developed" and groundwater samples obtained for laboratory analysis. The groundwater level 10 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 January 19, 2007 Final was initially measured and the volume of water in each well was calculated. The groundwater depths were measured utilizing an electronic water level indicator and were determined to be 14.9 (SMW-16), 14.27 (SMW-17), 14.25 (SMW-18), and 13.45 (SMW-19) feet below the top of casing. Groundwater removed from the wells as part of development was periodically sampled and tested for consistency of pH, temperature and conductivity. When relatively consistent readings of the above-described parameters were obtained, development was considered complete. A minimum of three well volumes of water were removed from each well. The wells were allowed to recharge to at least approximately 90 percent of the original volume prior to sampling . Well development and sampling were performed using a peristaltic pump with disposable polyethylene tubing dedicated to each well. The groundwater samples were placed in laboratory- supplied containers designated to each well. The containers were labeled with pertinent sampling information (i.e. sample designation, date and time) and then placed in an ice-packed cooler. The samples were transported to Pace Analytical Services, Inc. (Huntersville, NC) for analysis for Total RCRA 8 Metals by various EPA Methods. The results of the analytical testing are summarized in Table 4. A copy of the laboratory analytical data reports is included in Appendix C . Lead was only detected in one of the four wells sampled. The concentration of lead in SMW-19 (130 ug/1), exceeded the 2L standard of 15 ug/1. Concentrations of arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium and mercury were also detected in SMW-19. Only the concentration of cadmium detected (1.9 ug/1) exceeded the 2L standard (1.75 ug/1) . Barium was the only metal detected in the other three wells above laboratory detection limits . The concentrations of barium detected were below the 2L standard . 2.4.3 Potential Sources Observations made during original excavation activities, conversations' with Rea Contracting personnel, a review of historical site information, and the results of preliminary assessment activities have identified several hypothesis for the source of the lead and other metals identified . • An approximate 8,000-gallon gasoline UST was formerly located at the northwest end of the former one-story building. The UST was likely in-use from the initial construction of the plant (1970) until it was removed in the mid-1980s. Given the time that the UST was in service it may have contained leaded gasoline, which if spilled during fueling of the tank or that leaked from the tank or associated piping, may have caused or contributed to the lead levels discovered . During re-excavation of the former UST basin, petroleum-contaminated soils were encountered and removed. TCLP analysis of the soils prior to disposal did not contain levels of lead above 5 mg/1. As previously reported, lead was detected in temporary monitoring well TW-3 installed in the former UST basin at a concentration of 310 ug/1 . Development and sampling of the well was completed utilizing a disposable polyethylene bailer. This sampling method generally produces higher sediment content than the peristaltic pump used in the recent sampling and may be the cause of the higher concentration detected . 11 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 January 19, 2007 Final • A shop for repairing equipment and parts for the asphalt plant was located in the northwestern end of the former one-story building. Operations that occurred in this area likely involved the use of petroleum products, cleaners, paints and other chemicals which may have been spilled or disposed of on the ground surface inside or outside of the shop during early plant operations in the 1970s. BOYLE also understands that sand-blasting of plant parts possibly painted with lead-based paint may have also occurred in this area . • During excavation activities in the former lab area, pieces of hardened orange and red sand were observed at various points. Subsequent discussions with Rea personnel indicated that they may be pieces of foundry sand from the metal casting industry . Laboratory analysis of a sample of the suspected foundry sand for total RCRA 8 Metals only detected low levels of barium (2.7 mg/kg), chromium (0.81 mg/kg), lead (5.5 mg/kg) and mercury (0.0093 mg/kg). However, due to the limited sample collection and analysis, this sample should not be considered representative of the possible concentrations of metals found in foundry sand . • During excavation activities in the former lab area, various metal, wood, glass and other debris was discovered. This may be an indication that this area was filled with contaminated debris from an unknown source . 12 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 3.0 Proposed Methods of Investigation 3.1 Constituents of Concern January 19, 2007 Final The purpose of the Initial Site Sampling Plan is to delineate the horizontal and vertical extent of metals contamination at the site. Based on the preliminary sampling results we have identified the following metals of potential concern . 3.1.1 Arsenic Arsenic was detected above laboratory detection limits in 10 of the 12 preliminary soil samples (L-1 to L-9, and L-11). The concentrations ranged between 0.66 mg/kg and 12 mg/kg. Only the concentrations detected in L-6 (8.2 mg/kg) and L-5 (12 mg/kg) exceeded the SSL of 5.24 mg/kg. The concentrations detected in the 10 samples were all above the Region 9 PRG of 0.39 mg/kg. The detection limits (0.55 mg/kg and 0.64 mg/kg) for the other two samples also exceeded the PRG. The concentrations of arsenic generally increase from <1 mg/kg in the eastern portion of the sampling area to the highest levels of 8.2 mg/kg and 12 mg/kg in the western portion of the sampling area . Arsenic was only detected above laboratory detection limits in groundwater samples collected from SMW-19. The concentration detected, 6.8 ug/1, does not exceed the 2L standard of 50 ug/1 . 3.1.2 Cadmium -Cadmium was identified at concentrations ranging between 1 mg/kg and 8.4 mg/kg in the twelve preliminary soil samples (L-1 to L-12). With the exception of L-4, L-9 and L-11, the concentrations detected in the remaining samples all exceeded the SSL of 2.72 mg/kg. None of the concentrations exceeded the Region 9 RBSL of 37 mg/kg. The preliminary sampling results do not appear to do not delineate any discernable pattern of high and/or low concentrations . Cadmium was only detected above laboratory detection limits in groundwater samples collected from SMW-19. The concentration detected, 1.9 ug/1, slightly exceeds the 2L standard of 1.75 ug/1 . 3.1.3 Chromium Chromium was detected at concentrations ranging between 12 mg/kg and 180 mg/kg in the twelve preliminary soil samples (L-1 to L-12). With the exception of L-4, L-8, L-10 and L-12, the concentrations detected in the remaining samples all exceeded the SSL of 27.2 mg/kg . None of the concentrations exceeded the Region 9 PRG of 210 mg/kg. The highest concentrations appear to be located between L-1 (180 mg/kg) and L-2 (47 mg/kg) and also between L-6 (35 mg/kg) and L-7 (44 mg/kg) . Chromium was detected above laboratory detection limits in in groundwater samples collected from SMW-11, SMW-12 and SMW-19. The concentrations detected in SMW-11 (38 ug/1), SMW-12 (27 ug/1) and SMW-19 (7.9 ug/1) do not exceed the 2L standard of 50 ug/1. 13 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 3.1.4 Lead January 19, 2007 Final Lead was detected at concentrations ranging between 5.5 mg/kg and 620 mg/kg in the twelve preliminary soil samples (L-1 to L-12). The concentrations detected in L-2 (620 mg/kg), L-3 (530 mg/kg), and L-5 (620 mg/kg) exceeded the SSL of 270 mg/kg and the Region 9 PRG of 400 mg/kg. The preliminary sampling results indicate that the lead concentrations above the SSL and Region 9 PRG appear to be limited to the area beneath the northwest end of the former one-story building and the areas to the northwest and west of the former building . Lead was only detected above laboratory detection limits in groundwater samples collected from SMW-19. Lead was detected at a concentration of 130 ug/1, which exceeds the 2L standard of 15 ug/1. Lead was also previously detected in temporary monitoring well TW-3 at a concentration of 310 ug/1 . 3.1.5 Mercury Mercury was detected at concentrations ranging between 0.0077 mg/kg and 0.66 mg/kg in the twelve preliminary soil samples (L-1 to L-12). With the exception of L-8 and L-11, the concentrations detected in the remaining 10 samples exceeded the SSL of 0.0154 mg/kg . None of the concentrations exceeded the Region 9 PRG of 23 mg/kg. The preliminary sampling results indicate that the highest mercury concentrations are located at L-7 (0.66 mg/kg). Lower levels were found to the north (L-4, 0.042 mg/kg), east (L-8, 0.0077 mg/kg), west (L-6, 0.016 mg/kg), south (L-12, 0.031 mg/kg) and southeast (L-11, 0.0092 mg/kg). The area beneath the northwest end of the former building (L-2) and northwest (L-3) and west (L-5) of the building also had higher levels of mercury ranging between 0.12 mg/kg and 0.34 mg/kg . Mercury was only detected above laboratory detection limits in groundwater samples collected from SMW-19. The concentration detected, 0.31 ug/1, does not exceed the 2L standard of 1.05 ug/1 . 3.1.6 Silver Silver was only detected in two soil samples above laboratory detection limits ( <0.69) (L-3 and L-7). The concentrations of silver detected in L-3 {1.8 mg/kg) and L-7 (2 mg/kg) exceeded the SSL of 0.223 mg/kg but not the Region 9 PRG of 390 mg/kg . Silver was not detected above laboratory detection limits in groundwater samples collected from SMW-16, SMW-17, SMW-18 and SMW-19 . 3.1.7 Soil Background Levels Naturally-occurring metal concentrations can be established to determine site-specific screening and cleanup levels. Due to the extensive use of almost the entire site for the former asphalt plant operations as well as the proximity of the site to surrounding roadways, railroads and other industrial developments, it may be difficult to determine true natural metal concentrations in soil . Published data is limited in the area of naturally-occurring concentrations of metals in soil. The following table is a summary of data reviewed from the North Carolina Department of Agricultural and Consumer Services, New York State Department of Environmental 14 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 January 19, 2007 Final Conservation, the United States Geological Survey, the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and unpublished sample data from the DENR Mooresville Regional Office APS . Eastern US/NY Avg. NC APS SCDHEC USGS Background1 Levels2 MRO Data3 Data4 NC/SC/GA5 Arsenic 3-12** 5.0 <1.0-180 11 1.2-18 Cadmium 0.1-1.0 0.2 0.54-5.8 1 - Chromium 1.5-40** 0.3 2-150 29 10-300 Lead *** 4.0 7.6-52 16 ND-50 Mercury - -<0.02-0.16 0.18 0.02-0.52 Silver --<0.25 4 - Notes: Concentrations shown m mg/kg, NO-Not Detected 1 -Background levels are for eastern U.S. unless otherwise noted (N.Y. State Dept. of Environmental Conservation, 2001) . ** -Background levels are for N.Y. only *** -Background levels of lead vary widely. Avg. levels In undeveloped, rural areas may range from 4-61 ppm and from 200-500 ppm in metropolitan or suburban areas or near highways. 2 -Average heavy metal concentrations in N.C. soils (North Carolina Department of Agricultural and Consumer services (2003-2005). 3 -Compiled from unpublished data obtained from the DENR Mooresville Regional Office APS of 50 samples collected in Cleveland, Gaston, Mecklenburg, Uncoln, Catawba, Iredell, Alexander, Rowan, Cabarrus, Stanley and Union Counties (Summer 1998) . 4-Elements in South Carolina Inferred Background Soil and Stream Sediment Samples, Judy L. Canova, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, from South carolina Geology, 1999 v. 41, p. 11-25 • 5 -Range of Concentrations of Inorganic Compounds from Background Soils in the Piedmont of George, South Carolina, and North Carolina, from Chemical Analysis of Soils and other Surficial Materials fo the Conterminous United States, U.S. Geological Survey Report 81-197, 1981. 3.2 Soil Sampling Plan· BOYLE proposes to collect additional soil samples to further delineate the horizontal extent of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and silver in the former building area unless site- specific background levels can be established . An attempt will be made to obtain background samples in areas that have a lower likelihood of potential influence from facility activities, surrounding properties and transportation corridors . Five to ten samples will be collected from locations shown on Figure 11. If it is possible to establish reliable site-specific background levels for the site, the sampling locations detailed below may be altered accordingly . The existing grade stakes used for site grading are on approximately SO feet centers. Utilizing the existing grid as a base, we have adapted the grid to include 20 feet centers. At this time we propose to extend the search area by approximately 20-40 feet northwest, northeast and southeast from the preliminary sampling area based on the preliminary sampling locations . The area to the southwest will be extended approximately 40-80 feet from the preliminary sampling area. This will explore the still undisturbed and vegetated area around the stormwater detention feature for the site. Approximately 28 sample locations shown on Figure 11 will be sampled for the constituents of concern . 15 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 3.2.1 Soil Sample Depths January 19, 2007 Final Background Samples -Five to ten potential background samples will be collected from locations shown on Figure 11. The samples will be collected at depths greater than 2 feet below existing grade and no deeper than 8 feet below ground surface . Horizontal Extent of Contamination -Samples obtained· from locations in previously cut and filled areas will be sampled between· the base of the cut/fill and the shallow groundwater table . Water levels measured in monitoring wells SMW-16, 17, 18 and 19 have been measured at depths ranging between approximately 10.5 and 12 feet below existing grade. Only one composite sample will be collected from locations with five feet or less of separation between the cut elevation and the shallow groundwater table. Samples in undisturbed areas will be collected from depths of approximately 0.5-1.5 feet below ground surface and at approximately 5 feet intervals until the shallow groundwater table is reached. Based on the measured groundwater levels we anticipate sample collection depths at approximately 5-6 and 10-11 feet bgs . 3.2.2 Soil Sample Collection Methods Soil borings will be advanced utilizing direct-push methods wherever possible. The samples will be collected at 4 or 5 feet intervals utilizing a stainless-steel tube lined with a PVC/PETG sampling tube. Soil samples will be collected from the sampling tube utilizing disposable gloves and will be placed in laboratory-supplied 8 oz. glass jars with Teflon lids. The jars will be appropriately labeled and stored at 4°C for transportation to the laboratory under appropriate chain of custody procedures . It may be necessary to utilize stainless-steel hand augers to advance certain borings near utilities and/or difficult to access areas. If so, a decontaminated auger will be used to advance the boring just above the sample collection depth. The auger head will then be decontaminated or replaced with a new decontaminated auger head prior to advancing the auger head to the sample collection depth. After collection of the sample, the same auger head may be used to advance the boring to just above the next sample collection depth before being decontaminated or replaced as described above . 3.2.3 Soil Sample Analysis The soil samples and Field QC samples collected will be submitted to a NC Certified laboratory for analysis of total concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, and silver by EPA Method 6010B and mercury by EPA Method 7471. 3.3 Additional GW Assessment Based on the results of the soil assessment, additional shallow Type II groundwater monitoring wells will be installed. At this time, we anticipate installation of approximately 3 or 4 shallow groundwater monitoring wells in the vicinity of SMW-19. At a minimum, one well will be installed along the property boundary north of soil boring L-3; another well will be installed along the property boundary southwest of SMW-19, and another well will be installed 50-100 feet south of SMW-19 (See Figure 11). · 16 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 January 19, 2007 Final The monitoring wells will be installed using hollow-stem augers and will be installed to depths approximately 15-20 feet below existing grade. The bottom of the well will be set at a depth sufficient to screen the groundwater interface and allow for seasonal fluctuations in the groundwater elevation . No bedrock or deep monitoring wells will be installed at this time . 3.3.1 Groundwater Sample Collection Methods The monitoring wells will be developed and sampled using low-flow techniques. The wells will be developed and purged until pH, temperature, and specific conductivity stabilize. A minimum of three well volumes will be removed from each well prior to sampling or after the well has gone dry; purging twice . 3.3.2 Groundwater Sample Analysis The groundwater samples collected will be submitted to a NC Certified laboratory for analysis of total concentrations of lead and cadmium by EPA Method 6010 with Standard Method 3030C sample preparation . 3.4 Standard Field Protocols 3.4.1 Quality Control Samples The following Field QC samples will be collected: • One duplicate sample per field day • One field blank per field day •· One equipment rinse blank per sampling event • One trip blank per sampling event 3.4.2 Sample Location and Surveying Soil sampling and boring locations will be staked and flagged until the investigation is complete or until surveyed by a North Carolina Registered Professional Land Surveyor. In addition, all monitoring wells and water level measuring point locations will be surveyed . 17 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 3.4.3 Field Decontamination Procedures January 19, 2007 Final Sampling equipment will be decontaminated utilizing phosphate-free laboratory detergent and distilled water prior to being transported from the site. Cleaning will occur in a decontamination pad constructed in an area believed to be free of surface contamination and in a manner to prevent leakage and facilitate the removal of wastewater. Sampling equipment will be cleaned between each sample boring and/or as described in Section 3.2.2 . Cleaning of drilling equipment will also occur in the decontamination pad utilizing tap water and a steam cleaner and/or high pressure hot water washer with a soap compartment. The drill equipment will be cleaned between boreholes . 3.4.4 Investigation Derived Waste CIDWl IDW, including soil cuttings, wastewater from 9econtamination procedures, groundwater from well development or purging, and drilling mud or water will be placed into 55-gallon drums and stored on-site until appropriate waste characterization can be completed and a method of treatment and/or disposal is determined . Non-hazardous IDW such as personnel protective equipment (PPE), disposable sample equipment, and paper/plastic/cardboard wastes will be placed into municipal dumpsters for disposal. Any potentially hazardous IDW will be placed into 55-gallon drums or 5-gallon buckets and will be stored on-site for a maximum of 90 days while the appropriate waste characterization is completed and treatment and/or disposal is determined . 18 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Initial Site Sampling Plan -Former Rea Asphalt Plant Boyle Project No. 05-203 4.0 Schedule January 19, 2007 Final Upon approval of the proposed ISSP we propose the following schedule to conduct the ISSP: • Complete background soil sampling within one to two weeks of approval • Submit samples to laboratory for analysis on 7-10 business day turn around • Within one week of receipt of background soil sampling results, submit request to HWS for preliminary establishment of soil background levels • Amend soil sampling plan accordingly, if necessary • Within one to two weeks of approval from HWS complete soil sampling and submit samples to laboratory for analysis on 7-10 day business day turn • Within one week of receipt of soil sampling results, notify HWS of findings and proceed with initial ground water sampling, amend sampling plan accordingly • Within one to two weeks of approval from HWS complete groundwater sampling and submit sample to laboratory for analysis on 7-10 business day turn . • Within two to three weeks of receipt of groundwater sampling results submit findings along with proposal for Assessment and Cleanup Plan (ACP) to HWS 19 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • TABLES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • · Table 1 Previous Environmental Assessment Reports and Historical Resources Reports • Comprehensive Site Assessment Report, NC DOT Site No. 27-57, dated June 5, 1997 by Richard Catlin and Associates, Inc . • Corrective Action Plan, NC DOT Site No. 27-57, dated August 2, 2002 by Hart & Hickman, PC • Annual Ground Water Monitoring Reports, NC DOT Site No. 27-57, dated August 5, 2004, July 27, 2005, and August 2, 2006 by Hart & Hickman, PC • Report of Preliminary Subsurface Exploration, dated September 19, 2005 by Geoscience Group • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Rea/Youngblood Site, dated December 20, 2005 by Geoscience Group • UST Closure Report, Rea Contracting Site, dated December 12, 2005 by Boyle Consulting Engineers, PLLC • Addendum to UST Closure Report, dated January 11, 2006 by Boyle Consulting Engineers, PLLC • Soil Contamination Report -Underground Storage Tank Releases, dated June 14, 2006 by Boyle Consulting Engineers, PLLC • Soil Contamination Report-Aboveground Storage Tank Release, dated June 14, 2006 by Boyle Consulting Engineers, PLLC • Limited Site Assessment Report, dated August 9, 2006 by Boyle Consulting Engineers, PLLC Historical Resources • 7.5 Minute USGS 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Map~ Charlotte East, NC Quadrangle, dated 1988 (Figure 1) . • Aerial Photograph, Mecklenburg County POLARIS System, dated 2004 (Figure 2). • Aerial Photographs, Mecklenburg County Engineering Department, dated 1983, 1978, 1975, and 1966 • Aerial Photographs, Mecklenburg County Soil Conservation Service, dated 1956, 1951 and 1938 . • Topographic Maps, Mecklenburg County Engineering Department, dated 1958 (Figure 8) and 1981. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Sample ID Sample Date Depth (ft) Target: Compounds (1) Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Vinyl Chloride Non-Target Compounds Benzene n-Butylbenzene sec-Butyl benzene Tert-Butylbenzene Ethyl benzene Isopropyl benzene p-Isopropylbenzene Methyl tert butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Toluene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene m/p-Xylene a-Xylene 67-03-01 5/16/89 Surface NA NA 0.091 18 (5) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Table 2 (page 1 of 2) Summary of Soil Analytical Results (mg/kg) NC DOT Site No. 27-57 (REA Construction Company) Charlotte, North Carolina i ' I l i l ' I ' ' ' i i : DMW-1 9/12/96 5-7ft 0.0044 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 0.0046 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0023 <0.0023 <0.0023 DMW-1 9/12/96 10-12 ft 0.12 0.02 <0.0012 0.0026 0.018 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0025 <0.0025 <0.0025 j l ' ' l ' ! j ' j j i i ' ' : TW-4 6/25/96 8-9ft <0.0013 <0.0013 <0.0013 <0.0013 <0.0013 <0.0013 0.0027 0.0014 <0.0013 <0.0013 0.0015 <0.0013 <0.0013 0.016 <0.0013 <0.0013 <0.0013 <0.0025 <0.0025 <0.0025 TW-5 6/25/96 10-11 ft 0.15 0.029 <0.0014 0.0058 0.0058 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 0.044 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0028 <0.0028 <0.0028 ' l i l ' ) ' ; '• ~ ! TW-7 6/26/96 7-8 ft 0.035 0.0040 <0.0012 <0.0012 0.0019 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 0.0095 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0024 <0.0024 <0.0024 I I Clean-up Levels(2) (mg/kg) 0.35 0.38 1.617 .210 (3) (4) 0.00562 4.31 3.33 3.36 4.57 1.68 NS 0.916 0.585 1.71 7.27 7.49 7.33 4.96(6) 4.96(6) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Sample ID DP-11 l DP-12 Sample Date 1/22/97 1/22/97 Depth {ft) 5-6ft i 4-6 ft Target Compounds (1) Cis-1,2 -Dichloroethane <0.0005 • 0.0268 Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethane <0.0005 0.0043 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0005 <0.0005 Trichloroethene <0.0005 <0.0005 Vinyl Chloride <0.0005 <0.0005 Non-Target Compounds Benzene 0.0009 <0.0005 n-Butylbenzene 0.0037 0.0027 Sec-Butylbenzene 0.0007 0.0018 Tert-Butyl benzene 0.0028 0.0026 Ethyl benzene <0.0005 <0.0005 Isopropylbenzene <0.0005 0.0103 p-Isopropyltol uene 0.0013 0.0084 Methyl tert butyl ether NA NA Naphthalene 0.0218 0.008 n-Propylbenzene <0.0005 <0.0005 Toluene <0.0005 0.0015 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0005 <0.0005 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.001 0.0022 m/p-Xylene 0.0017 <0.001 a-Xylene <0.0005 j <0.0005 Notes. Table 2 (page 2 of 2) Summary of Soil Analytical Results (mg/kg) NC DOT Site No. 27-57 (Rea Construction Company) Charlotte, North Carolina DP-13 DP-14 DP-16 SMW-9 1/22/97 1/22/97 1/22/97 3/4/02 11-12 ft ! 4-5 ft 6-8 ft ' 6-8 ft . <0.0005 0.0031 <0.0005 0.019 0.0009 <0.002 <0.0005 <0.006 <0.0005 <0.002 <0.0005 <0.006 <0.0005 ' <0.002 <0.0005 <0.006 <0.0005 J <0.002 0.0042 0.032 f I ' <0.0005 0.0051 <0.0005 <0.006 <0.0005 5.0321 0.0028 <0.006 l <0.0005 0.2557. 0.002 <0.006 <0.0005 13.0424 0.0023 <0.006 <0.0005 9.7561 <0.0005 <0.006 <0.0005 0.2429 0.0046 <0.006 ! : <0.0005 0.0621 0.0042 <0.006 ' NA NA NA <0.006 <0.0005 8.3697 0.0572 <0.006 <0.0005 1.6945 <0.0005 ; <0.006 0.0012 0.0806 0.0006 <0.006 ; <0.0005 ' 0.0267 <0.0005 <0.006 ; i <0.0005 j 0.1900 <0.0005 <0.006 ' i i 0.0019 I 18.6907 0.0025 <0.006 !, 0.0008 ' 6.5726 0.0019 ' <0.006 • Source of data: Richard Catlin & Associates' June 1997 CSA and Hart and Hlcl<man August 2002 CAP: SoU samples collected below the water table not Included SB-1 3/4/02 6-8ft <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 0.0089 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 Only those compounds detected In at least one sample above quantftatfon limits are shown. Only those samples with at least one compound detected above quantftatfon limit are shown NO-Not Detected; NA-Not Analyzed; VOCs-Volattle Organic Compounds; NT-Non-Target Compound; NS-Not Specified Bold Indicates target compound concentration exceeds one or more standards. SB-2 SB-2 Clean-up 3/4/02 3/4/02 Levels (2) 1-2ft 7-8 ft (mg/kg) . ~ 0.110 <0.006 0.35 ' l <0.006 <0.006 ' 0.38 ; I ' <0.006 <0.006 1.617 0.140 <0.006 0.210 {3) 0.0073 0.010 (4) 1 l ; <0.006 <0.006 ~ 0.00562 1 ' <0.006 <0.006 4.31 ! !, <0.006 ' <0.006 3.33 <0.006 <0.006 3.36 ; <0.006 <0.006 l 4.57 <0.006 <0.006 1.68 ' <0.006 <0.006 ? <0.006 <0.006 0.916 <0.006 <0.006 0.585 <0.006 <0.006 1.71 <0.006 ; <0.006 7.27 ' <0.006 <0.006 7.49 <0.006 <0.006 7.33 I <0.006 <0.006 4.96** , <0.006 <0.006 4.96** ' (1) Potential NC DOT target compounds (2) Target compound clean-up levels from DENR Groundwater Section Guidelines for the Investigation and Remediation of SoU and Groundwater-July 2000. VInyl chloride and 1,1,1· TCA clean-up levels calculated per DENR screening model In Hart and Hlcl<man August 2002 CAP. Non Target compound levels from Hazardous Waste Section Generator Closure Guidelines (July 2002) (l)TCE screening level calculated using VI.EACH model (4) Calculated vinyl chlor1de standard Is 0.003 mg/kg; however, vinyl chlor1de detections appear to be from volatilization from ground water. (5)Sample collection methods are questionable; see CAP. (6) Standard for Total (m/p & o) Xylenes ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Table 4 Preliminary Groundwater Sampling Analytical Results Summary Former Rea Contracting Asphalt Plant Charlotte, North Carolina Monitoring Well 10. SMW-11 SMW-12 SMW-13 SMW-14 SMW-15 DMW-3 SMW-16 SMW-17 SMW-18 Sampling Date 9/12/06 9/12/06. 11/1/06 11/1/06 11/1/06 11/1/06 11/15/06 11/15/06 11/15/06 Total Met:als by EPA Methods 200.7 and 6010 and Mercury by 7470 arsenic NA NA NA NA NA NA <5 <5 <5 barium NA NA NA NA NA NA 84 210 66 cadmium NA NA NA NA NA NA <1 <1 <1 chromium 38 27 NA NA NA NA <5 <5 <5 lead <5 <5 NA NA NA NA <5 <5 <5 mercury NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 selenium NA NA NA NA NA NA <10 <10 <10 silver NA NA NA. NA NA NA <5 <5 <5 Extractables by EPA Method 625 phenol <5.1 42 NA NA I NA NA I NA I NA I NA Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 62100 benzene <0.5 130 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.1 NA NA NA chloroform <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 8.5 NA NA NA 1 2-dichloroethane <0.5 0.63 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NA NA NA diisooroovl ether <0.5 380 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.7 NA NA NA ethyl benzene <0.5 28 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NA NA NA isopropyl benzene <0.5 1.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NA NA NA naphthalene <2 2.3 <2 <2 <2 <2 NA NA NA n-propylbenzene <0.5 4.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NA NA NA toluene <0.5 32 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.8 NA NA NA 1 2 4-trimethylbenzene <0.5 25 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NA NA NA 1 3 5-trimethylbenzene <0.5 9.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NA NA NA xvlenes (total) <1 85.7 <1 <1 <1 <1 NA NA NA Note: Concentrations In ug/1, NA -Not Analyzed, NS -Not Sampled, Bold 1nd1cates concentration exceeds 2L Standard 2L Standard1 -15A NCAC 2L.0202 Groundwater Quality Standard (February 1, 2006) Only those compounds detected In at least one sample are shown I SMW-19 SMW-20 2L 11/15/06 Not Sampled Standard1 6.8 NS 50 840 NS 2 000 1.9 NS 1.75 7.9 NS 50 130 NS 15 0.31 NS 1.05 <10 NS 50 <5 NS 17.5 NA NS 300 NA NS 1 NA NS 70 NA NS 0.38 NA NS 70 NA NS 550 NA NS 70 NA NS 21 NA NS 70 NA NS 1 000 NA NS 350 NA NS 350 NA NS 530 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Table 5 (Page 1 of 4) Preliminary Staging Pile Sampling Analytical Results Summary Former Rea Contracting Asphalt Plant Charlotte, North Carolina MSWLF Sample ID. C1 C2A C2B C2C1 C2C2 C3A1 C3A2 Total Values1 (mg/ko) Total Metals (mg/kg) arsenic 3.2 3.9 2 5.5 7.7 5.7 5.7 100 barium 81 25 32 88 110 110 120 2 000 cadmium 1.3 4.9 6.4 2 2.8 4.3 7.4 20 chromium 22 40 57 26 30 86 40 100 lead 73 100 150 330 560 550 670 100 mercury 0.033 0.014 0.032 0.015 0.026 0.053 0.86 4 selenium <1.1 1.8 2.4 1.3 1.7 1.4 2.1 20 silver <0.56 <0.58 <0.64 <1.2 <0.62 <0.6 <0.58 100 Leachable Metals (mo/1 arsenic <0.025 <0.025 <0.25 <0.25 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 - barium 0.57 0.46 0.6 0.56 0.82 0.6 0.78 - cadmium <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.007 0.012 0.0060 - chromium <0.025 <0.25 <0.025 <0.025 <0.25 <0.025 <0.25 - lead 0.18 0.13 1 0.08 0.51 0.5 0.48 - mercurv 0.00032 <0.0002 0.00027 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 - selenium <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - silver <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.25 <0.025 <0.025 - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (mg/kol Diesel 77 50 370 340 I 220. 640 79 NS Gasoline <4.6 <4.6 7.1 11 <5.6 <5.2 <4.8 NS Total Volatile Organic Compounds mg/kgl Acetone <0.098 <0.098 <0.11 <0.093 <0.11 <0.11 <0.087 1 400 n-butvlbenzene <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 0.014 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 140 Sec-butvlbenzene <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 0.0093 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 140 chlorobenzene <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 0.012 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 2 000 1 2-dichiorobenzene <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 0.055 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 48 1 4-dichlorobenzene <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 0.0067 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 150 Cis-1 2-dichloroethene 0.036 0.0053 0.022 0.016 0.042 0.034 <0.0043 140 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 200 o-lsooroovitoluene <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 0.0062 0.012 <0.0053 <0.0043 NS naphthalene <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 0.005 0.0081 <0.0053 <0.0043 42 n-propyibenzene <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 0.0061 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 140 tetrachloroethene <0.0049 0.049 <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 . 14 1 2,4-trichlorobenzene <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 0.0084 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 14 MSWLF TCLP Values2 (moll) -------- <5 <100 <1 <5 <5 <0.2 <1 <5 NS NS ------------- ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Table 5 (Page 2 of 4) Preliminary Staging Pile Sampling Analytical Results Summary Former Rea Contracting Asphalt Plant Charlotte, North Carolina MSWLF Sample 10. C1 C2A C2B C2C1 C2C2 C3A1 C3A2 Total Values1 (mg/kg) Total Volatile Organic Compounds -continued (mg/kg 1,1 1-trichloroethane <0.0049 0.0077 <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 60 trichloroethene 0.16 0.17 0.027 0.019 0.035 0.026 <0.0043 10 1 2 4-trimethvlbenzene <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 0.017 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 170 1 3 5-trimethylbenzene <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 0.0079 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 70 vinyl chloride <0.0098 <0.0098 <0.011 <0.0093 <0.011 <0.011 <0.0087 4 xylenes (total)· <0.0049 <0.0049 <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0054 <0.0053 <0.0043 300 Note: NS -No Standard Established, Bold Indicates concentration exceeds corresponding MSWLF standard MSWLF TCLP Values2 (mg/1) ------ MSWLF Total Value1 -Levels for disposal In Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (MSWLF) by Totals analysis -North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section Contained-In Policy for Soil Contaminated with Listed Hazardous Waste, Appendix 1 (May 2005). MSWLF TCLP Value2 -Levels for disposal In Municipal Solid Waste Landfill by Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) analysis -North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section Contained-In Polley for Soil Contaminated with Listed Hazardous Waste, Appendix 1 (May 2005). Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Table 5 (Page 3 of 4) Preliminary Staging Pile Sampling Analytical Results Summary Former Rea Contracting Asphalt Plant Charlotte, North Carolina Sample 10. C3A3 C4A1 C4A2 C481 C482 C483 C484 MSWLF Total Values1 Cmo/ko) Total Metals (mgfkql arsenic 6.8 4.9 5.2 4.4 5.2 2.6 5.5 100 barium 140 100 76 92 100 80 110 2 000 cadmium 4.8 2.3 1.8 2.2 2.8 2 2.9 20 chromium 38 28 29 31 110 35 36 100 lead 730 BOO 340 2.400 730 130 730 100 mercurv 0.079 0.054 0.056 0.22 0.086 0.072 0.069 4 selenium 1.4 1.7 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 1.5 20 silver 0.97 <0.58 <0.58 <0.59 <0.58 <0.61 <0.6 100 Leachable Metals (mq/IJ arsenic <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.25 <0.025 - barium 0.84 1.3 0.98 0.83 1 0.96 1 - cadmium 0.0074 0.0068 0.0058 0.0089 0.0057 <0.005 0.0072 - chromium <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 - lead 0.67 8.8 11 16 5.8 2.7 6.2 - mercurv <0.0002 0.00024 <0.0002 <0.0020 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 - selenium <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 - silver <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 - Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (mq/kql Diesel 36 220 230 220 200 100 140 NS Gasoline <3.6 <4.6 <4 8.6 <4.3 <4.4 <4.5 NS Total Volatile Organic Compounds (mg/kq) Acetone <0.067 <0.092 <0.086 <0.094 <0.082 0.091 <0.93 1 400 n-butylbenzene <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 0.015 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 140 Sec-butvlbenzene <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 <0.0047 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 140 chlorobenzene <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 0.006 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 2 000 1 2-dichlorobenzene <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 0.01 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 48 1 4-dichlorobenzene <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 <0.0047 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 150 Cis-1 2-dichloroethene <0.0033 0.014 0.0094 0.013 <0.0041 0.022 ' 0.34 140 Trans-1 2-dichloroethene <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 <0.0047 <0.0041 <0.0045 0.017 200 p-isoproovltoluene <0.0033 0.028 <0.0043 0.0092 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 NS naphthalene <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 0.035 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 42 n-oroovlbenzene <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 0.0069 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 140 tetrachloroethene <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 <0.0047 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 14 1 2 4-trichlorobenzene <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 <0.0047 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 14 MSWLF TCLP Values2 Cmam -------- <5 <100 <1 <5 <5 <0.2 <1 <5 NS NS ------------- ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Table 5 (Page 4 of 4) Preliminary Staging Pile Sampling Analytical Results Summary Former Rea Contracting Asphalt Plant Charlotte, North Carolina Sample ID. C3A3 C4A1 C4A2 C4B1 C4B2 C4B3 C4B4 MSWLF Total Values1 (mg/kg) Total Volatile Organic Compounds -continued (mg/k!J) 1 1 1-trichloroethane <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 <0.0047 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 60 trichloroethene <0.0033 0.03 0.0056 <0.0047 <0.0041 <0.0045 0.045 10 1 ,2.4-trimethylbenzene <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 0.065 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 170 1,3,5-trimethvlbenzene <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 0.024 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 70 vinyl chloride <0.0067 <0.0092 <0.0086 0.012 <0.0082 0.019 0.023 4 xvlenes (total) <0.0033 <0.0046 <0.0043 0.015 <0.0041 <0.0045 <0.0046 300 Note: NS -No Standard Established, Bold 1nd1cates concentration exceeds corresponding MSWLF standard MSWLF TCLP Values2 (mglf) ------ MSWLF Total Value1 -Levels for disposal in Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (MSWLF) by Totals analysis -North Carolina Hazardous waste Section Contained-In Policy for Sol/ Contaminated with Listed Hazardous Waste, Appendix 1 (May 2005). MSWLF TCLP Value2 -Levels for disposal in Municipal Solid Waste Landfill by Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) analysis -North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section Contained-In Policy for Soil Contaminated with Listed Hazardous Waste, Appendix 1 (May 2005). On ty those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Sample TCLP Composite MEM ID Result Sample ID Day 1 LC-13A 0.041 LC-14A <0.025 LC-15A <0.025 LC-16A <0.025 CB-1A <0.015 LC-17A <0.025 LC-18A <0.025 LC-20A <0.025 LC-21A <0.025 LC-SA <0.025 LC-6A <0.025 LC-11A 0.048 .LC-12A <0.025 CB-2A <0.015 LC-19A <0.025 LC-25A <0.025 LC-29A <0.025 LC-30A <0.025 LC-lA <0.025 LC-2A <0.025 LC-3A <0.025 LC-4A <0.025 CB-3A <0.015 LC-7A <0.025 LC-8A 0.066 LC-9A 0.028 LC-10A 0.13 LC-22A 0.033 LC-23A <0.025 LC-24A <0.025 CB-4A <0.015 LC-26A <0.025 LC-27A <0.025 LC-28A <0.025 Table 6 Lead Composite Sample Results Summary Former Rea Contracting Asphalt Plant Charlotte, North Carolina MEM MEM MEM MEM MEM Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 0.0230 0.0285 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 . <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 0.0180 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 MEM Day 7 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Notes: Concentrations reported in mg/1. TCLP-Toxicity Charactenstic Leaching Procedure. MEM-Multiple Extraction Method MEM MEM MEM Day 8 Day_9 Da_y_10 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Sample ID L-1 L-2 Depth (ft) 7.5-10 5-10 arsenic 1.1 2.7 barium 180 120 cadmium 4.1 3.8 chromium 180 47 lead 5.8 620 mercury 0.023 0.34 selenium 1.7 1.4 silver <0.69 <0.63 L-3 8-10 4.3 340 6.3 32 560 Table 7 Preliminary Soil Sampling Analytical Results Summary Former Rea Contracting Asphalt Plant Charlotte, North Carolina L-4 L-5 L-6 L-7 L-8 L-9 L-10 L-11 7-10 9-10 7-10 8-10 6-10 6-10 4-10 5-10 4.5 12 8.2 4.8 1.4 0.66 <0.64 0.82 93 110 220 310 94 37 170 60 1.7 5.1 3.9 7.3 4.3 2.2 8.4 1 19 29 35 44 18 31 21 12 230 620 130 15 12 5.5 9.8 8.4 0.29 0.042 0.12 0.016 0.66 0.0077 0.032 0.026 0.0092 2.3 1.3 1.6 1.4 2.1 1.4 <1.2 2.3 <1.1 1.8 <0.56 <0.54 <0.62 2 <0.61 <0.6 <0.64 <0.53 Notes: Concentrations g1ven m mg/kg Bold indicates concentration exceeds NC HWS Site Screening Levels (SSL) Italics indicated concentration exceeds US EPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRG) L-12 SSL Region 9 5-10 PRG <0.55 5.24 0.39 35 848 5,400 4.2 2.72 37 28 27.2 210 160 270 400 0.031 0.0154 23 1.8 12.2 390 <0.55 0.223 390 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • FIGURES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • APPENDICES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • APPENDIX A Initial Stockpile Sampling Laboratory Analytical Data Reports • Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. • 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive Huntersville, NC 28078 Asheville, NC 28804 • ace Analytical® Phone: 104.875.9092 Phone: 828.254.7176 Fax: 704.875.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 • www.pacelabs.com ., • • Lab Sample No: 927544395 Client Sample ID: C2A • • Parameters GC Volatiles • GAS. Soil, North Carolina • Gasoline 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) • • GC/MS Volatiles GC/MS VOCs 5035/8260 low level • Acetone • Benzene Bromobenzene • Bromochloromethane • Bromodichloromethane Bromoform • Bromomethane • 2-Butanone (MEK) n-Butylbenzene • sec-Butylbenzene • tert-Butylbenzene Carbon tetrachloride • Chlorobenzene • Chloroet'hane Chloroform • Chloromethane • 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene • 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane • Dibromochloromethane 1.2-Dibromoethane CEDB) • Dibromomethane • 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene • 1.4-Dichlorobenzene • Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.1-Dichloroethane •• 1,2-Dichloroethane • 1.1-Dichloroethene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene • trans-1.2-Dichloroethene • 1.2-Dichloropropane • • Date: 10/23/06 • • • Asheville Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 eNc Drinking Water 37712 sc 99030 eFL NELAP E87648 • Lab Project Number: 92129806 Client Project ID: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05·203 Project Sample Number: 92129806·002 Date Collected: 10/11/06 10:00 Matrix: Soil Results Units ReQort Limit _Q£__ Anal :tzed B:t Method: EPA 8015 ND mg/kg 4.6 0.9 10/13/06 13:28 DHW 86 X 1.0 10/13/06 13:28 DHW Method: EPA 8260 NO ug/kg 98. 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9. 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK ND ug/kg 9.8 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 98. 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 9.8 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 9.8 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 9.8 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9. 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK 5.3 ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK NO ug/kg 4.9 1.0 10/13/06 21:39 DLK REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. \tl ACCo lh~l~?~ Date Received: 10/11/06 15:10 CAS No. lli@l_ Reglmt 460-00-4 67-64-1 71-43·2 .108-86-1 74-97-5 75-27·4 75-25·2 74-83-9 78-93-3 104-51-8 135-98-8 98-06·6 56-23·5 108·90-7 75-00·3 67-66-3 74-87-3 95-49·8 106-43-4 96-12·8 124-48-1 106-93-4 74-95·3 95-50·1 541-73-1 106-46-7 75-71·8 75-34-3 107-06-2 75-35-4 156-59-2 156-60-5 78-87-5 Page: 6 of 61 Charlotte Certification IDs NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37706 sc 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. • 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive Huntersvilfe, NC 28078 Ashevi/fe, NC 28804 • ace Analytical® Phone: 704.875.9092 Phone: 828.254.7176 Fax: 704.815.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 • www.pacelabs.com el • • Lab Sample No: 927544403 Client Sample ID: C2B • • Parameters GC Volatiles • GAS, Soil, North Carolina • Gasoline 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) • • GC/MS Volatiles GC/MS VOCs 5035/8260 low level • Acetone • Benzene Bromobenzene • Bromochloromethane • Bromodichloromethane Bromoform • Bromomethane • 2-Butanone CMEK> n-Butylbenzene • sec-Butylbenzene • tert-Butylbenzene Carbon tetrachloride • Chlorobenzene • Chloroethane Chloroform • Chloromethane • 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene • 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane • Dibromochloromethane 1.2-Dibromoethane (EDB> •• Dibromomethane • 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene • 1.4-Dichlorobenzene • Oichlorodifluoromethane 1,1-0ichloroethane • 1,2-Dichloroethane • 1.1-0ichloroethene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene • trans-1.2-Dichloroethene • 1.2-Dichloropropane • • Date: 10/23/06 • • ~sheville Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 .C Drinking Water 37712 sc 99030 .L NELAP E87648 • Lab Project Number: 92129806 Client Project 10: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05-203 Project Sample Number: 92129806·003 Date Collected: 10/11/06 10:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 10/11/06 15:10 Results Units ReQort Limit ...QL Anal:tzed By CAS No. Q!!ll_ RegLmt Method:· EPA 8015 7.1 mg/kg 5.3 1.1 10/13/06 14:26 DHW 85 .\' 1.0 10/13/06 14:26 DHW Method: EPA 8260 NO ug/kg 110 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 OLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 11. 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 110 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 OLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 11. 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 11. 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 OLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 . 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 11. 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 OLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK 22. ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 OLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. '"' ACc0., tr:l~l~~~ 460-00-4 67-64-1 71-43-2 108-86-1 74-97-5 75-27-4 75-25-2 74-83-9 78-93-3 104-51-8 135-98·8 98·06-6 56·23·5 108-90-7 75-00 ·3 67·66-3 74-87-3 95-49-8 106-43-4 96-12-8 124-48-1 106-93-4 74-95-3 95·50-1 541-73-1 106-46-7 75-71-8 75-34-3 107-06-2 75-35-4 156-59-2 156-60-5 78-B7-5 Page: 9 of 61 Charlotte Certification IDs NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37706 sc 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. • 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive Huntersville, NC 28078 Asheville, NC 28804 •• ace Analytical® Phone: 704.875.9092 Phone: 828.254.7176 Fax: 704.875.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 • www.pacelabs.com Lab Project Number: 92129806 ., • • Lab Sample No: 927544403 Client Sample ID: C28 • • Parameters 1.3-Dichloropropane • 2.2-Dichloropropane • 1,1-Dichloropropene cis-1.3-Dichloropropene • trans·1.3·Dichloropropene • Diisopropyl ether Ethyl benzene • Hexachloro-1.3-butadiene • 2-Hexanone Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) • p-Isopropyltoluene • Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone CMIBK) • Methyl-tert-butyl ether • Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene • Styrene • 1,1.1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane • Tetrachloroethene • Toluene 1.2.3-Trichlorobenzene • 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene • 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.1.2-Trichloroethane • Trichloroethene • Trichlorofluoromethane 1.2.3-Trichloropropane • 1.2.4-Trimethylbenzene • 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl acetate • Vinyl chloride • Xylene CTota l) m&p·Xylene • o-Xylene • Toluene·d8 (S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) • Dibromofluoromethane (S) • 1.2·Dichloroethane·d4 (S) • • Date: 10/23/06 • • ~sheville Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 .C Drinking Water 37712 sc 99030 e};L NELAP E87648 • Client Project ID: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05·203 Project Sample Number: 92129806·003 Date Collected: 10/11/06 10:20 Matrix: Soil Results Units ReQort Limit ....QL Analyzed By NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 '21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 54. 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 54. 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4. 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK 27. ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg s:4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 54. 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 11. 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 11. 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 21:57 DLK 101 .f 1.0 10/13/06 21:57 DLK 98 .f 1.0 10/13/06 21:57 DLK 90 .f 1.0 10/13/06 21:57 DLK 91 .f 1.0 10/13/06 21:57 DLK REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. I;) \t& __ .~~;o'ttJ ,,; . .: r·'<; --.·~~ lneac~ Date Received: 10/11/06 15:10 CAS No. !h!ll. ReqLmt 142·28·9 594·20-7 563·58-6 10061·01·5 10061·02·6 108·20·3 100·41·4 87-68-3 591·78·6 98·82·8 99·87·6 75·09·2 108·10·1 1634-04·4 91·20·3 103·65·1 100·42-5 630·20-6 79-34-5 127·18·4 108·88·3 87-61·6 120·82·1 71·55·6 79·00·5 79·01·6 75-69-4 96-18·4 95·63·6 108·67-8 108·05-4 75·01·4 1330·20·7 95·47 ·6 2037·26·5 460·00·4 1868·53·7 17060·07·0 Page: 10 of 61 Charlotte Certification IDs NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37706 sc 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. • 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive Huntersville, NC 28078 Asheville, NC 28804 • o.ce Analytical® Phone: 704.815.9092 Phone: 828.254.7116 Fax: 704.875.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 • www.pacelabs.com ., • • Lab Sample No: 927544411 Client Sample 10: C2C1 • • Parameters GC Volatiles • GAS, Soil, North Carolina • Gasoline 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) • • GC/MS Volatiles GC/MS VOCs 5035/8260 low level • Acetone • Benzene Bromobenzene • Bromochloromethane • Bromodichloromethane Bromoform • Bromomethane • 2-Butanone CMEK) n-Butylbenzene • sec-Butylbenzene • tert-Butylbenzene Carbon tetrachloride • Chlorobenzene • Chloroethane Chloroform • Chloromethane • 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene • 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane • Oibromochloromethane 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) • Dibromomethane • 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene • 1,4-0ichlorobenzene • Dichlorodifluoromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane • 1,2-Dichloroethane • 1.1-Dichloroethene cis-1.2-0ichloroethene • trans-1.2-Dichloroethene • 1,2-Dichloropropane • • Date: 10/23/06 • • «,sheville Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 .C Drinking Water 37712 sc 99030 .L NELAP E87648 • Lab Project Number: 92129806 Client Project 10: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05·203 Project Sample Number: 92129806·004 Date Collected: 10/11/06 10:45 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 10/11/06 15:10 Results Units ReQort Limit _Q[_ Anal_yzed By CAS No. lli!El_ RegLmt Method: EPA 8015 11. mg/kg 4.5 0.9 10/13/06 14:54 DHW 104 % 1.0 10/13/06 14:54 DHW Method: EPA 8260 ND ug/kg 93. 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK NO ug/kg 4.7. 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK NO ug/kg 9.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK NO ug/kg 93. 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK 14 . ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK 9.3 ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK 12. ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK NO ug/kg 9.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND uglkg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 9.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK NO ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK NO ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 OLK NO ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK 55. ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK NO ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK 6.7 ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 9.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK NO ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 OLK 16. ug/kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK ND ug!kg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK NO uglkg 4.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:15 DLK REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 'i) \" .... --~-:-c~"o lhel~?~ 460-00-4 67-64-1 71-43-2 108-86-1 74-97-5 75-27-4 75-25-2 74-83-9 78-93-3 104-51-8 135-98-8 98-06-6 56-23-5 108-90-7 75-00·3 67-66-3 74-87-3 95-49-8 106-43-4 96-12-8 124-48-1 106-93-4 74-95-3 95-50-1 541-73-1 106-46-7 75-71-8 75-34-3 107-06-2 75-35-4 156-59-2 156-60-5 78-87-5 Page: 12 of 61 Charlotte Certification IDs NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37706 sc 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. • 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive Huntersville, NC 28078 Asheville, NC 28804 • o.ce Analytical® Phone: 704.875.9092 Phone: 828.254.7176 Fax: 704.875.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 • www.pacelabs. com ., • • Lab Sample No: 927544437 Client Sample ID: C2C2 • • Parameters GC Volatiles • GAS, Soil. North Carolina •• Gasoline 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) • • GC/MS Volatiles GC/MS VOCs 5035/8260 low level • Acetone • Benzene Bromobenzene • Bromochloromethane • Bromodichloromethane Bromoform • Bromomethane • 2-Butanone CMEK) n-Butylbenzene • sec-Butylbenzene • tert-Butylbenzene Carbon tetrachloride • Chlorobenzene • Chloroethane Chloroform • Chloromethane • 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene • 1.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane • Dibromochloromethane 1,2-Dibromoethane CEDB) • Dibromomethane • 1.2-Dichlorobenzene 1.3-Dichlorobenzene • 1,4-Dichlorobenzene • Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.1-Dichloroethane • 1.2-Dichloroethane • 1.1-Dichloroethene cis-1.2-0ichloroethene • trans-1.2-0ichloroethene • 1,2-Dichloropropane • • Date: 10/23/06 • • • Asheville Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 e NC Drinking Water 37712 sc 99030 • FL NELAP E87648 • Lab Project Number: 92129806 Client Project ID: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05-203 Project Sample Number: 92129806-005 Date Collected: 10/11/06 11:00 Matrix: Soil Results Units ReQort Limit __Qf_ Analyzed By Method: EPA 8015 NO mg/kg 5.6 1.1 10/13/06 15:23 DHW 96 X 1.0 10/13/06 15:23 DHW Method: EPA 8260 NO ug/kg 110 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23;28 DLK · NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 11. 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK ND ug/kg 110 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 . 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 11 . 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 11. 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK NO ug/kg 11. 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK 42. ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. lh~ti?~ Date Received: 10/11/06 15:10 CAS No. Qual RegLmt 460-00-4 67-64-1 71-43-2 108-86·1 74-97-5 75-27-4 75·25-2 74-83-9 78-93-3 104-51-8 135·98-8 98-06-6 56·23-5 108·90-7 75-00-3 67·66-3 74·87-3 95-49-8 106-43-4 96-12-8 124-48-1 106-93-4 74-95-3 95·50-1 541-73-1 106-46-7 75·71·8 75·34-3 107·06-2 75-35·4 156·59-2 156-60-5 78·87-5 Page: 15 of 61 Charlotte Certification IDs NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37706 sc 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. • 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive Huntersville, NC 28078 Asheville, NC 28804 • ace Analytical® Phone: 704.875.9092 Phone: 828.254.7176 Fax: 704.875.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 • www.pacelabs.com • •' • Lab Sample No: 927544437 Client Sample ID: C2C2 • • Parameters 1,3·Dichloropropane • 2,2-Dichloropropane • 1,1-Dichloropropene cis-1.3-Dichloropropene • trans-1.3-Dichloropropene • Diisopropyl ether Ethyl benzene • Hexachloro-1,3·butadiene • 2-Hexanone Isopropylbenzene CCumene) • p-Isopropyltoluene • Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone CMIBK) • Methyl-tert·butyl ether • Naphthalene n·Propylbenzene •• Styrene • 1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane • Tetrachloroethene • Toluene 1,2.3-Trichlorobenzene • 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene • 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.1.2-Trichloroethane • Trichloroethene • Trichlorofluoromethane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane • 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene • 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl acetate • Vinyl chloride • Xylene (Total) m&p·Xylene • a-Xylene • Toluene-dB (S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) • Oibromofluoromethane CS) • 1.2·0ichloroethane·d4 CS) • • Date: 10/23/06 • • e Ashevilfe Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 e NC Drinking Water 37712 • sc 99030 FL NELAP E87648 • Lab Project Number: 92129806 Client Project ID: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05·203 Project Sample Number: 92129806·005 Date Collected: 10/11/06 11:00 Matrix: Soil Results Units Re~ort Limit _QL_ Anal ~zed 8~ ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 54. 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK 12. ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 54. 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK 8.1 ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK 35. ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK NO ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK NO ug/kg 54. 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK NO ug/kg 11. 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK ND ug/kg 11. 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 OLK ND ug/kg 5.4 1.1 10/13/06 23:28 DLK 93 .\' 1.0 10/13/06 23:28 OLK 89 .\' 1.0 10/13/06 23:28 DLK 99 .\' 1.0 10/13/06 23:28 OLK 99 .\' 1.0 10/13/06 23:28 OLK REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shaH not be reproduced, except in furr, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc . \"' ACCo !h~l~i~ Date Received: 10/11/06 15:10 CAS No. Q@l_ Reglmt 142-28-9 594-20-7 563-58-6 10061-01-5 10061-02-6 108-20-3 100-41-4 87-68-3 591-78·6 98-82-8 99-87-6 75-09·2 108-10·1 1634-04·4 91-20·3 103-65-1 100-42-5 630-20·6 79-34-5 127-18-4 108-88-3 87-61-6 120-82-1 71-55-6 79-00·5 79·01-6 75·69-4 96-18-4 95-63-6 108-67-8 108-05-4 75·01;4 1330-20-7 95·47·6 2037-26·5 460·00·4 1868-53-7 17060·07·0 Page: 16 of 61 Charlotte Certification IDs NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37706 sc 99006 FL NELAP E87627 •• Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. • 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive Huntersville, NC 28078 Asheville, NC 28804 • ace Analytical® Phone: 704.875.9092 Phone: 828.254.7176 Fax: 704.875.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 • www.pacelabs.com • e' • Lab Sample No: 927544452 Client Sample ID: C3A2 • • Parameters 1.3-Dichloropropane • 2.2-Dichloropropane • 1.1-Dichloropropene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene • trans-1,3-Dichloropropene • Diisopropyl ether Ethyl benzene • Hexachloro-1.3-butadiene • 2-Hexanone Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) • p-Isopropyltoluene • Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone CMIBK) • Methyl-tert-butyl ether • Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene • Styrene • 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane • Tetrachloroethene • Toluene 1.2.3-Trichlorobenzene • 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene • 1.1.1-Trichloroethane 1,1.2-Trichloroethane • Trichloroethene • Trichlorofluoromethane 1.2.3-Trichloropropane • 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene • 1.3.5-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl acetate • Vinyl chloride • Xylene (Total) m&p-Xylene • a-Xylene • Toluene·d8 (S) 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) • Dibromofluoromethane (S) • 1.2·Dichloroethane-d4 CS> • • Date: 10/23/06 • • • Asheville Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 e NC Drinking Water 37712 esc 99030 FL NELAP E87648 • Lab Project Number: 92129806 Client Project ID: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05·203 Project Sample Number: 92129806·007 Date Collected: 10/11/06 12:00 Matrix: Soil Results Units ReQort Limit ...QL Analyzed By ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 43. 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 43. 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3. 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 43. 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 8.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 8.7 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK ND ug/kg 4.3 0.9 10/13/06 22:51 DLK 99 ~ 1.0 10/13/06 22:51 DLK 98 ~ 1.0 10/13/06 22:51 DLK 93 ~ 1.0 10/13/06 22:51 DLK 95 ~ 1.0 10/13/06 22:51 DLK REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. ';) ,~ --~·e_co11D ...... "'-.l:·-;;---"'•" fnPI::a·~~ Date Received: 10/11/06 15:10 CAS No. Qual RegLmt 142-28-9 594-20-7 563-58-6 10061-01·5 10061-02·6 108-20-3 100-41-4 87-68-3 591·78-6 98-82-8 99-87-6 75-09-2 108-10·1 1634-04-4 91-20-3 103-65-1 100-42-5 630-20-6 79-34-5 127-18·4 108-88·3 87-61·6 120-82-1 71-55-6 79·00-5 79-01·6 75-69·4 96-18-4 95-63·6 108-67-8 108-05-4 75-01·4 1330-20-7 95-47-6 2037-26-5 460-00-4 1868-53-7 17060-07·0 Page: ZZ of 61 Charlotte Certification IDs NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37706 sc 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. • 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive Huntersville, NC 28078 Asheville, NC 28804 • ace Analytical® Phone: 704.875.9092 Phone: 828.254.7176 • Fax: 704.875.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 www.pacelabs.com Lab Project Number: 92129806 • • • . Lab Sample No: 927544460 • Client Sample ID: C3A3 • Parameters • GC Volatiles GAS, Soil, North Carolina • Gasoline 4·Bromofluorobenzene (S) • • GC/MS Volatiles GC/MS VOCs 5035/8260 low level • Acetone • Benzene Bromobenzene • Bromochloromethane • Bromodichloromethane Bromoform • Bromomethane • 2-Butanone CMEKl n-Butylbenzene •• sec-Butyl benzene • tert-Butylbenzene • Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene • Chloroethane Chloroform • Chloromethane • 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene • 1,2-0ibromo·3·chloropropane • Dibromochloromethane 1,2·0ibromoethane (EDBl • Dibromomethane • 1,2-0ichlorobenzene • 1.3-Dichlorobenzene 1.4-0ichlorobenzene • Dichlorodifluoromethane • 1.1-Dichloroethane 1,2-0ichloroethane • 1,1·0ichloroethene • cis-1.2-Dichloroethene trans-1.2-Dichloroethene • 1.2·Dichloropropane • • Date: 10/23/06 • • • Asheville Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 • NC Drinking Water 37712 esc 99030 FL NELAP E87648 • Client Project ID: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05·203 Project Sample Number: 92129806-008 Date Collected: 10/11/06 12:10 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 10/11/06 15:10 Results Units ReQort Limit ...QL Anal ~zed 8~ CAS No. Qual RegLmt Method: EPA 8015 NO mg/kg 3.6 0.7 10/13/06 16:49 DHW 88 X 1.0 10/13/06 16:49 DHW Method: EPA 8260 NO ug/kg 67. 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 6.7 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 67. 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 OLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 OLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 OLK NO ug/kg 6.7 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 6.7 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06.23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3. 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 OLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 OLK NO ug/kg 6.7 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 OLK NO ug/kg 3.3 0.7 10/13/06 23:10 DLK REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. fh~f~i~ 460-00-4 67·64-1 71·43-2 108·86-1 74·97-5 75-27·4 75·25-2 74-83-9 78·93-3 104·51-8 135·98·8 98·06-6 56-23-5 108·90·7 75·00-3 67·66-3 74·87·3 95·49·8 106-43-4 96-12-8 124·48-1 106·93-4 74·95·3 95-50·1 541·73·1 106·46·7 75·71·8 75·34·3 107·06·2 75·35-4 156·59·2 156-60-5 78·87·5 Page: 24 of 61 Charlotte Certification IDs NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37706 sc 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. • 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive Huntersville, NC 28078 Asheville, NC 28804 • ace Analytical® Phone: 704.875.9092 Phone: 828.254.7176 • Fax: 704.875.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 www.pacelabs.com Lab Project Number: 92129806 • •' • Lab Sample No: 927544478 • Client Sample ID: C4A1 • Parameters • GC Volatiles GAS, Soil, North carolina • Gasoline 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) • • GC/MS Volatiles • GC/MS VOCs 5035/8260 low level Acetone • Benzene • Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane • Bromodichloromethane Bromoform • Bromomethane • 2-Butanone (MEK) • n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene • tert-Butylbenzene • Carbon tetrachloride · Chlorobenzene • Chloroethane • Chloroform Chloromethane • 2-Chlorotoluene • 4-Chlorotoluene 1.2·Dibromo·3·chloropropane •• Dibromochloromethane • 1.2·Dibromoethane (EDB> Oibromomethane • 1.2-Dichlorobenzene • 1.3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene • Dichlorodifluoromethane • 1,1-0ichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane • 1,1-Dichloroethene • cis·1.2·Dichloroethene trans-1.2-Dichloroethene • 1,2-Dichloropropane • • Date: 10/23/06 • • e Asheville Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 • NC Drinking Water 37712 • sc 99030 FL NELAP E8764B • Client Project ID: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05·203 Project Sample Number: 92129806·009 Date Co 11 ected: 10/11/06 13:05 Matrix: Soil Results Units ReQort Limit _Q[_ Analyzed By Method: EPA 8015 ND mg/kg 4.6 0.9 10/13/06 17:18 DHW 92 .t 1.0 10/13/06 17:18 DHW Method: EPA 8260 NO ug/kg 92. 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 OLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK ND ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 9.2 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 92. 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6. 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 9.2 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 9.2 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 OLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 OLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 9.2 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK 14. ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6. 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DLK NO ug/kg 4.6 0.9 10/14/06 00:40 DUK REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc . (;) '"---~·c,.c~~o fh~~~-?~ Date Received: 10/11/06 15:10 CAS No. ~ RegLmt 460-00·4 67-64·1 71·43·2 108-86·1 74-97·5 75·27·4 75·25·2 74-83·9 78·93·3 104·51·8 135-98·8 98-06·6 56-23·5 108·90·7 75-00·3 67-66·3 74-87·3 95-49-8 106-43·4 96-12-8 124-48·1 106-93·4 74-95·3 95-50-1 541-73·1 106-46-7 75·71·8 75-34-3 107-06·2 75-35·4 156-59·2 156-60·5 78-87·5 Page: 27 of 61 Charlotte Certification IDs · NG Wastewater 12 NG Drinking Water 37706 SG 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. • 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive Huntersville, NC 28078 Asheville, NC 28804 • ace Analytical® Phone: 704.875.9092 Phone: 828.254.7176 • Fax: 704.875.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 www.pacelabs.com lab Project Number: 92129806 • • • Lab Sample No: 927544510 • Client Sample ID: C4B2 • Parameters • 1.3-0ichloropropane 2.2-0ichloropropane • 1.1-0ichloropropene • cis-1,3-0ichloropropene trans-1,3-0ichloropropene • Oiisopropyl ether • Ethyl benzene Hexachloro·1,3·butadiene • 2-Hexanone • Isopropylbenzene (Cumenel p-Isopropyltoluene • Methylene chloride • 4-Methyl-2-pentanone CMIBKJ Methyl·tert-butyl ether • Naphthalene • n·Propylbenzene Styrene • 1,1,1.2-Tetrachloroethane • 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene • Toluene • 1,2.3-Trichlorobenzene 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene • 1.1.1-Trichloroethane • 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene • Trichlorofluoromethane • 1.2.3-Trichloropropane 1.2.4-Trimethylbenzene • 1.3.5-Trimethylbenzene • Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride • Xylene (Total) • m&p-Xylene a-Xylene • Toluene-dB (S) • 4-Bromofluorobenzene (SJ Oibromofluoromethane (S) • 1.2·0ichloroethane-d4 (S) • • Date: 10/ZJ/06 • • e Asheville Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 • NC Drinking Water 37712 • sc 99030 FL NELAP E87648 • Client Project ID: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05·203 Project Sample Number: 92129806·012 Date Collected: 10/11/06 13:50 Matrix: Soil Results Units ReQort Limit JL. Analyzed By NO ug/l<:g 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 DLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK ND ug/kg 4.1. 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK ND ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 41. 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 DLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK ND ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 41. 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK ND ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 DLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 41. 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 8.2 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 8.2 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK NO ug/kg 4.1 0.8 10/14/06 00:22 OLK 91 .t 1.0 10/14/06 00:22 OLK 79 .t 1.0 10/14/06 00:22 OLK 118 .t 1.0 10/14/06 00:22 OLK 118 .t 1.0 10/14/06 00:22 OLK REPORT OF LABORATORY Ar~ALVSIS This report shall not be reprodtJced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc . .... ~ ~"----~~'...!.~~0 .. .fn;pJ~-?~ Date Received: 10/11/06 15:10 CAS No. Qual RegLmt 142-28·9 594·20·7 563·58·6 10061·01·5 10061·02·6 108·20·3 100·41·4 87·68·3 591·78·6 98·82·8 99·87·6 75·09·2 108·10·1 1634-04-4 91·20·3 103·65·1 100-42·5 630-20·6 79·34·5 127·18·4 108·88·3 87·61·6 120·82·1 71·55·6 79·00·5 79·01·6 75·69·4 96·18·4 95-63·6 108·67·8 108-05·4 75·01·4 1330·20·7 95·47 ·6 2037·26·5 460·00·4 1868·53·7 17060·07·0 Page: 37 of 61 Charlotte Certification IDs NG Wastewater 12 NG Drinking Water 37706 SG 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive Huntersville, NC 28078 Asheville, NC 28804 • • ace Analytical® Phone: 704.875.9092 Phone: 828.254.7176 Fax: 704.875.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 • WIWJ.pacelabs.com • • • Lab Sample No: 927544528 Client Sample ID: C4B3 • • Parameters GC Volatiles • GAS, Soil, North Carolina • Gasoline 4·Bromofluorobenzene (S) • GC/MS Volatiles • GC/MS VOCs 5035/8260 low level • Acetone • Benzene Bromobenzene • Bromochloromethane • Bromodichloromethane Bromoform • Bromomethane • 2-Butanone (MEK) n-Butylbenzene • sec-Butylbenzene • tert-Butylbenzene Carbon tetrachloride • Chlorobenzene • Chloroethane Chloroform • Chloromethane • 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene • 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane • Dibromochloromethane 1,2-Dibromoethane CEDB> • Dibromomethane • 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene • 1.4-Dichlorobenzene • Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.1-Dichloroethane • 1,2·Dichloroethane • 1.1-Dichloroethene cis-1.2-Dichloroethene • trans-1,2-Dichloroethene • 1.2·Dichloropropane • • Date: 10/23106 • • • Asheville Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 ~C Drinking Water 37712 sc 99030 .L NELAP E87648 • Lab Project Number: 92129806 Client Project ID: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05·203 Project Sample Number: 92129806·013 Date Collected: 10/11/06 14: 10 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 10/11/06 15: 10 Results Units Re~ort Limit _Q[__ Anal :t::zed By CAS No. lli!.ll_ RegLmt Method: EPA 8015 ND mg/kg 4.4 0.9 10/13/06 20:10 DHW 96 .t 1.0 10/13/06 20:10 DHW Method: EPA 8260 91. ug/kg 90. 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5. 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 9.0 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 90. 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 9.0 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 9.0 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK NO ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 OLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5. 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 9.0 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 OLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK 22. ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK ND ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK NO ug/kg 4.5 0.9 10/14/06 00:58 DLK REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. '" Acc0_, tti~l~?~ 460-00-4 67-64-1 4 71-43-2 108-86-1 74-97-5 75-27-4 75-25-2 74-83·9 78-93-3 104-51-8 135-98-8 98-06·6 56-23-5 108-90-7 75-00-3 67-66-3 74·87-3 95·49-8 106-43-4 96·12-8 124-48-1 106-93-4 74·95-3 95-50-1 541-73-1 106-46-7 75-71-8 75-34-3 107-06-2 75-35-4 156-59·2 156-60-5 78-87-5 Page: 39 of 61 Charlotte Certification IDs NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37706 sc 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. • 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive Huntersville, NC 28078 Asheville, NC 28804 • ace Analytical® Phone: 704.875.9092 Phone: 828.254.7176 • Fax: 704.875.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 QUALITY CONTROL DATA www.pacelabs.com = • • METHOD BLANK: 927553636 • Associated Lab Samples: • • • Parameter 1,1-Dichloroethene • cis-1.2-Dichloroethene • trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.2-Dichloropropane • 1,3-Dichloropropane • 2.2-Dichloropropane 1.1-Dichloropropene • cis-1,3-Dichloropropene • trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Diisopropyl ether • Ethyl benzene • Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 2-Hexanone • Isopropylbenzene CCumene) • p-Isopropyltoluene Methylene chloride • 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK> • Methyl-tert-butyl ether Naphthalene • n-Propylbenzene • Styrene 1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane • 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane • Tetrachloroethene Toluene • 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene • 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1,1,1-Trichloroethane • 1,1.2-Trichloroethane • Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane • 1,2,3-Trichloropropane • 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.3.5-Trimethylbenzene • Vinyl acetate • • Date: 10/23/06 • • e Asheville Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 • NC Drinking Water 37712 • sc 99030 FL NELAP E87648 • Lab Project Number: 92129806 Client Project ID: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05-203 927544361 927544395 927544403 927544411 927544437 927544460 927544478 927544486 927544502 927544510 Blank Reporting Units Result Limit Footnotes ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 50. ug/kg NO 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0. ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg NO 50. ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 5.0 ug/kg ND 50. REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc . .._~ ~~-·-~·'f.o~o., lriPr;r:~ 927544445 927544452 927544528 927544536 Page: 48 of 61 Charlotte Certification IDs NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37706 sc 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc . • 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 2225 Riverside Drive • Huntersville, NC 28078 Asheville, NC 28804 ace Analytical® Phone: 704.875.9092 Phone: 828.254.7176 • Fax: 704.815.9091 Fax: 828.252.4618 www.pacelabs.com QUALITY CONTROL DATA • • Lab Project Number: 92129806 • Client Project ID: REA/YOUNG BLOOD 05·203 • LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 927553644 • • Spike LCS LCS Parameter Units Cone. Result X Rec Footnotes • Dibromomethane ug/kg 50.00 53.42 1'07 • 1.2-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 50.00 55.73 111 1.3-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 50.00 52.77 106 • 1.4-Dichlorobenzene ug/kg 50.00 52.54 105 • Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/kg 50.00 55.96 112 1.1-Dichloroethane ug/kg 50.00 57.97 116 • 1,2-Dichloroethane ug/kg 50.00 54.96 110 • 1.1-Dichloroethene ug/kg 50.00 78.64 157 2 cis-1.2-Dichloroethene ug/kg 50.00 60.77 122 • trans·l,2·Dichloroethene ug/kg 50.00 73.47 147 • 1,2-Dichloropropane ug/kg 50.00 56.58 113 1,3-Dichloropropane ug/kg 50.00 57.47 115 • 2.2-Dichloropropane ug/kg 50.00 55.02 110 • 1.1-Dichloropropene ug/kg 50.00 57.42 115 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/kg 50.00 56.12 112 • trans-1.3-Dichloropropene ug/kg 50.00 56.21 112 • Diisopropyl ether ug/kg 50.00 62.95 126 3 Ethyl benzene ug/kg 50.00 57.43 115 • Hexachloro·1,3·butadiene ug/kg 50.00 59.33 119 • 2-Hexanone ug/kg 100.00 137.1 137 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) ug/kg 50.00 58.99 118 • p-Isopropyltoluene ug/kg 50.00 51.19 102 • Methylene chloride ug/kg 50.00 50.70 101 4·Methyl·2·pentanone (MIBK) ug/kg 100.00 117.4 117 • Methyl-tert-butyl ether. ug/kg 50.00 75.72 151 2 • Naphthalene ug/kg 50.00 49.46 99 n-Propylbenzene ug/kg 50.00 54.68 109 • Styrene ug/kg 50.00 59.30 119 • 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg 50.00 58.24 116 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane ug/kg 50.00 56.61 113 • Tetrachloroethene ug/kg 50.00 56.89 114 • Toluene ug/kg 50.00 56.61 113 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/kg 50.00 56.05 112 • 1,2,4·Trichlorobenzene ug/kg 50.00 49.86 100 • 1,1.1-Trichloroethane ug/kg 50.00 57.12 114 1.1.2-Trichloroethane ug/kg 50.00 53.73 107 • Trichloroethene ug/kg 50.00 54.73 109 • • Date: 10/23/06 Page: 50 of 61 • • • Asheville Certification IDs REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Qharlotte Certification ID~ • NC Wastewater 40 NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37712 This report shall not be reprodOced, except in full, NC Drinking Water 37706 • sc 99030 without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc . sc 99006 • FL NELAP E87648 .._., ~--~-ct~~~" FL NELAP E87627 ~, ·-. r· ··~ ... ff.np~r~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • APPENDIX B Preliminary Soils Investigation Laboratory Analytical Data Reports • • • • •' • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ace Analytical® www.pacelabs.com November 08. 2006 .Mr. Todd Spanish Boyle Consulting Engineers 4340 Taggart Creek Rd . Suite H Charlotte. NC 28208 RE: Lab Project Number: 92131066 Client Project ID: YOUNG BLOOD 05.203 Dear Mr. Spanish: Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 Phone: 704.875.9092 Fax: 704.875.9091 Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 2225 Riverside Drive Asheville, NC 28804 Phone: 828.254.7176 Fax: 828.252.4618 Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on October 31. 2006. Results reported herein conform to the most current NELAC standards. where applicable. unless otherwise narrated in the body of the report . Inorganic Wet Chemistry and Metals Analyses were performed at our Pace Asheville laboratory and Organic testing was performed at our Pace Charlotte laboratory unless otherwise footnoted . If you have any questions concerning this report please feel free to contact me . . r '-" --Sine~ ~ 5.Sr- .. ~~ l.- Richard Swartz richard.swartz@pacelabs.com (704) 875-9092 ext. 237 Project Manager Enclosures Aheville Certification IDs REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Charlotte Certification IDs ., Wastewater 40 ~ Drinking Water 37712 • 99030 i NELAP E87648 • This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37706 sc 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • • • • Oce Analytical® Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 Phone: 704.875.9092 Fax: 704.875.9091 Pace Analytical Services, Inc • 2225 Riverside Drive Asheville, NC 28804 Phone: 828.254.7176 Fax: 828.252.4618 www.pacelabs.com • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Lab Sample No: 927620963 Client Sample ID: L5 Parameters Metals Metals. Trace ICP Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Selenium Silver Date Digested Mercury, CVAAS, in Soil Mercury Wet Chemistry Percent Moisture Percent Moisture Date: 11/08/06 • Asheville Certification IDs eNG Wastewater 40 • NG Drinking Water 37712 sc 99030 • FL NELAP E87648 • Lab Project Number: 92131066 Client Project ID: YOUNG BLOOD 05.203 Project Sample Number: 92131066-005 Date Collected: 10/30/06 10:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 10/31/06 16:30 Results Units Report Limit _Qf__ Analyzed By CAS No. Qual RegLmt Prep/Method: EPA 3050 I EPA 6010 12. mg/kg 0.54 1.1 11/05/06 16:25 JDA1 7440-38·2 110 mg/kg 0.54 1.1 11/05/06 16:25 JDA1 7440-39·3 5.1 mg/kg 0.11 1.1 11/05/06 16:25 JDAl 7440-43·9 29. mg/kg 0.54 1.1 11/05/06 16:25 JDA1 7440-47·3 620 mg/kg 0.54 1.1 11/05/06 16:25 JDA1 7439-92·1 1.6 mg/kg 1.1 1.1 11/05/06 16:25 JDAl 7782·49·2 ND mg/kg 0.54 1.1 11/05/06 16:25 JDAl 7440-22·4 11/02/06 12:30 11/02/06 12:30 Method: EPA 7471 0.12 mg/kg 0.0048 1.0 11/01/06 14:45 ALV 7439-97·6 Method: X Moisture 17.1 X 1.0 10/31/06 18:52 KDF Page: 5 of 19 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Charlotte Certification IDs NG Wastewater 12 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. ,, ACco., ll1~a~~ NG Drinking Water 37706 SG 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • • • • el • aeAnalyticar www.pacelabs. com Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100 Huntersville, NC 28078 Phone: 704.875.9092 Fax: 704.875.9091 QUALITY CONTROL DATA Lab Project Number: 92131066 Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 2225 Riverside Drive Asheville, NC 28804 Phone: 828.254.7176 Fax: 828.252.4618 • Client Project ID: YOUNG BLOOD 05.203 • QC Batch: 171758 • · QC Batch Method: EPA 7471 Associated Lab Samples: • • • • METHOD BLANK: 927621961 Associated Lab Samples: • • • Parameter • Mercury • 927620922 927620971 927621029 Analysis Method: EPA 7471 Analysis Description: Mercury, CVAAS. in Soil 927620930 927620948 927620955 927620963 927620989 927621037 927620997 927621003 927621011 927620922 927620930 927620948 927620955 927620963 927620971 927620997 927621003 927621011 927621029 927621037 Blank Reporting Units Result Limit Footnotes mg/kg ND 0.0050 927620989 • LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 927621979 • • Parameter Mercury • • MATRIX SPIKE: 927621987 • • Parameter • Mercury • • SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 927621995 • • Parameter • Mercury • • • • • • • • Date: 11/08/06 • Asheville Certification IDs NC Wastewater 40 • NC Drinking Water 37712 sc 99030 • FL NELAP E87648 • Units mg/kg Units mg/kg Units ug/g Spike Cone. 0.0667 927613521 Result 0 927613539 Result ND LCS Result 0.0725 Spike Cone. 0.0606 DUP Result ND LCS X Rec Footnotes 109 MS MS Result X Rec Footnotes 0.0158 26 1 RPD NC Footnotes REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. .._f:l ;,~--~-~~~!D<f {nel~c~ Page: 14 of 19 Charlotte Certification IDs NC Wastewater 12 NC Drinking Water 37706 sc 99006 FL NELAP E87627 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • APPENDIX C Preliminary Groundwater Investigation Laboratory Analytical Da a Reports • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • BOYLE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLLC Development and Construction Project Services January 11, 2007 Via Email and US Mail Ms. Robin Proctor NCDENR-Hazardous Waste Section P. 0. Box 384 Lake Lure, North Carolina 28746 Subject: Stabilization for Lead-Impacted Soils Former Rea Contracting Asphalt Plant 2701 Youngblood Street Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina BOYLE Project No. 05-203 Dear Ms. Proctor: 4340-H Taggart Creek Road Charlotte, NC 28208 Phone: {704) 676-0778 Fax: {704) 676-0596 www .boyleconsulting.com In accordance with your letter, dated November 17, 2006, Boyle Consulting Engineers, PLLC (BOYLE) has been requested by Mr. Bill Copeland, Rea Contracting, LLC., to provide you with the analytical results for the above-referenced site . Between December 4 and December 8, 2006, A&D Environmental Inc. stabilized approximately 750 cubic yards of lead-impacted soils by the addition of TSP in accordance with the guidelines established in the November 17, 2006 letter. On December 4, 8, and 11, 2006, one composite sample was collected from each 25- yard aliquot of treated material. A total of thirty (30) composite samples were collected for laboratory analysis by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure {TCLP) for lead. In addition, one composite sample for each 200 yards of treated material was collected for analysis using the Multiple Extraction Method (MEM) for lead. The MEM samples were composited from the thirty (30) TCLP samples The sample analytical results are summarized in the attached Table 1. Copies of the laboratory analytical data reports are also attached . The results of the TCLP analysis only detected concentrations of lead above the method detection limit of 0.025 mg/kg in six (6) of the thirty samples. The highest concentration detected in sample LC-10A at 0.13 mg/1. This is less than 5 mg/1, the concentration allowable for disposal in a municipal solid waste landfill (MSWLF) as specified in the · DENR Hazardous Waste Section's "Contained-in" Policy for Soil · Contaminated with Listed Hazardous Waste . Concentrations of lead were only detected above the method detection limit of 0.015 mg/1 in two of the four composite samples analyzed by the MEM. The highest concentration detected in the Day 6 run for sample CB-1A, 0.0285 mg/1, is also less than 5 mg/1 . Based on the analytical results of the composite samples collected, we request your approval to submit the sample results to the Allied Waste-CMS Landfill for disposal as non-hazardous soils . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Lead Impacted Soils Composite Sample Results -Rea Contracting, LLC. Boyle Project No. 05-203 January 11, 2007 Final Please note that daily inspections of the staging piles have been conducted since stabilization activities began and will continue until notified otherwise or the soils are removed from the site . Thank you for you attention to this matter and please contact us with any questions or concerns . Sincerely, Attachments cc: Mr. Bill Copeland, Rea Contracting, LLC Mr. Andrew Pitner, NCDENR-MRO, Via Email 2 C£.~,P.E . Managing Principal Registered, NC 19681 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Sample TCLP Composite MEM ID Result Sample ID Day 1 LC-13A 0.041 LC-14A ·<0.025 LC-15A <0.025 LC-16A <0.025 CB-1A <0.015 LC-17A <0.025 LC-18A <0.025 LC-20A <0.025 LC-21A <0.025 LC-5A <0.025 LC-6A <0.025 LC-11A 0.048 LC-12A <0.025 CB-2A <0.015 LC-19A <0.025 LC-25A <0.025 LC-29A <0.025 LC-30A <0.025 LC-1A <0.025 LC-2A <0.025 LC-3A <0.025 LC-4A <0.025 LC-7A <0.025 CB-3A <0.015 LC-8A 0.066 LC-9A 0.028 LC-lOA 0.13 LC-22A 0.033 LC-23A <0.025 LC-24A <0.025 CB-4A <0.015 LC-26A <0.025 LC-27A <0.025 LC-28A <0.025 Table 1 Lead Composite Sample Results·Summary Former Rea Asphalt Plant Site Charlotte, North Carolina MEM MEM MEM MEM M.EM Day_2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 0~_6 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 0.0230 0.0285 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 0.0180 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 MEM Day 7 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 Notes: Concentrations reported In mg/1. TCLP-Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure. MEM -Multiple Extract1on Method T-1 MEM MEM MEM DC!Y 8 Day 9 Day 10 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 <0.015 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Mr. Richard Swartz PACE Incorporated 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite I 00 Huntersville NC 28078 ReportNumber: GIS0-378 Client Project: 92133 803 Dear Mr. Swartz: Enclosed are the results of the analyt!cal services performed under the referenced project. The samples ~e certified to meet the requirements of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference Standards. Copies of this report and .supporting data will be retained in our files for a period of five years in the event they are required for future reference. Any samples submitted to our laboratory will will be retained for a maximum of thirty (30) days from the date of this report unless other arrangements are requested . If there are any questions about the report or the services performed during this project, please call SGS/Paradigm at (910) 350-1903. We will be happy to answer any questions or concerns which you may have . Thank you for using SGS/Paradigm Analytical Labs for your analytical services. We look forward to working with you again on any additional analytical needs which you may have . Sincerely, SGS/Paradigm Analytical Laboratories, Inc . IL~ 1/:, -L. I I -1 1?-rK>) Laooratory/D.-.Jlre-e=ct\-o-'-r __:c_ _____ _,,r-.,..D.-a-+t'e____..~-- J. Patrick Weaver N.C, CERTIFICATION #481 1 of 43 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . · SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777193/CB-1A (Day 1) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: 8150-378-1 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6937 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N.r.. r.FRTIFJr.ATION #481 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:45 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Method Leachate Date Analyzed 60108 12/19/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 2 of43 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777201/CB-2A (Day 1) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-2 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6937 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF= Dilution Factor J =Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank> MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:50 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method 60108 Date Analyzed 12/19/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_UMS_~.1 3 of43 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777219/CB-3A {Day 1) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-3 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6937 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L 1\1 r. r.I=RTII=Jr.ATJnJ\1 :ff.d.A 1 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:00 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Method 6010B Leachate Date Analyzed 12/19/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 A. nf A.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777227/CB-4A (Day 1) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-4 Lab Project 10: G150-37B Batch ID: 6937 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L 11.1 f" f"COTICif"J\TII"\11.1 -#1101 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:05 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 60108 12/19/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_ 4.1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777193/CB-1A (Day 2) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-5 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6949 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank> MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N.r.. r.FRTIFir.ATION #4R1 Analyzed By: Date Collected: PSW 12/11/2006 9:45 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 60108 12/21/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_liMS_~.1 n of43 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777201/CB-2A (Day 2) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-6 lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch JD: 6949 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N.r.. r.EORTIFJr.ATION #481 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:50 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Method Leachate Date Analyzed 60108 12/21/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_~.1 7 of43 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777219/C8-3A (Day 2) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-7 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6949 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL DF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N r. r.I=RTII=Ir.ATI()N ~4R1 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 1 0:00 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 12/21/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_UMS_~.t A nf4::\ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777227/CB-4A (Day 2) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-8 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6949 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N r. r.J=RTII=Ir.ATI()N if.d.R1 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/200610:05 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 12/21/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_UMS_4.1 ~ of4::\ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777193/CB-1A (Day 3) Client Project 10: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-9 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6967 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L 1\1 r: f":I=QTII=If":l!.TI()I\1 :!f.d.R1 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:45 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 12/27/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 10 nf A.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample 10: 927777201/CB-2A (Day 3) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-10 Lab Project 10: G150-378 Batch 10: 6967 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF= Dilution Factor J =Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL . 0.0150 DF Units 1 MGIL 1\1 (' ('t:OTit::l('t.TI()f\1 -HAQ1 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:50 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 12/27/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 11 nf A.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777219/CB-3A (Day 3) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-11 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6967 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF= Dilution Factor J =Between MDL and RL 8= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL DF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:00 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 60108 12/27/2006 RevlewedB~ MET_LIMS_4.1 12 of 43 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777227/CB-4A (Day 3) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: 8150-378-12 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6967 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF= Dilution Factor J =Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:05 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 12/27/2006 Reviewed By:~ MET_LIMS_4.1 1~ nf A.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777193/CB-1A (Day 4) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: 8150-378-13 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6983 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank> MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG!L 1\1 r ri=RT11=1rii.T1()1\1 :lt.dA1 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:45 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 60108 12/28/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 1A. nf A.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample 10: 927777201/CB-2A (Day 4) Client Project 10: 92133803 Lab Sample 10: G150-378-14 Lab Project 10: G150-378 Batch 10: 6983 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF= Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL 8= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L I\ I (' f'CCTII:If' 1\Tif"\1\1 #JIQ1 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:50 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 12/28/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 1~ nf .d.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777219/CB-3A (Day 4) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: 8150-378-15 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6983 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank> MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L 1\1 (' f't=OTit='lf'liTif'\1\1 ,YJ!SH Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:00 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 12/28/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 1R nf .d.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG~ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777227/CB-4A (Day 4) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: 8150-378-16 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6983 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL 8= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 MG/L ~If" f"CDTICif"/\TI/"\~1 #AQ1 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:05 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 60108 12/28/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 17nf.d.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777193/CB-1A (Day 5) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-17 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6984 Metals Result TCLP Lead 0.0230 Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount. in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L 11.1 f' f't:DTII:'If't.TI/"'111.1 -HAQ1 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:45 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 12129/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 1A nf .d.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample 10: 927777201/CB-2A {Day 5) Client Project 10: 92133803 Lab Sample 10: 8150-378-18 Lab Project 10: G150-378 Batch 10: 6984 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L 1\1 r r'COTII=Ir'ATII"\1\I.YAlH Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:50 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 12/29/2006 Reviewed By:~ MET_LIMS_4.1 1Q nf .d.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample 10: 927777219/CB-3A (Day 5) Client Project 10: 92133803 Lab Sample 10: G150-378-19 Lab Project 10: G150-378 Batch 10: 6984 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount In Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG!L N C. CERTIFICATION #481 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:00 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 12/29/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_.ol.1 20 of 43 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample 10: 927777227/CB-4A (Day 5) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G 150-378-20 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch 10: 6984 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount In Prep Blank> MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:05 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 12/29/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_UMS_ •. 1 · ?1nfA~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777193/CB-1A (Day 6) Client Project 10: 92133803 Lab Sample 10: G 150-378-21 Lab Project 10: G150-378 Batch 10: 6998 Metals Result TCLP Lead 0.0285 ·comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N C: C:FRTIFIC:ATION #4R1 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:45 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 12/29/2006 ReviewedB~ MET_LIMS_4.1 22 of 43 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777201/CB-2A (Day 6) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: 8150-378-22 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6998 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF = Dilution Factor J =Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blanl< > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L 11.1 f' f'CDTIC:If'IITI"II.I .UAQ~ Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/1112006 9:50 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 60108 12/29/2006 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 ?~nf.d.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG~·· Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777219/CB-3A (Day 6} Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G 150-378-23 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6998 Metals Result TCLP Lead 0.0180 Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank> MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L 1\1 f' f'C:CTIClf'ATir"II\I.U,HI-1 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/200610:00 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 601 OS 12/29/2006 ReviewedB~ MET_LIMS_4.1 ?..1 nf..1~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777227/CB-4A (Day 6) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-24 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 6998 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount In Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L J\1 (' f'r::RTit:::lf't.Tif"'IJ\1 HAA1 Analyzed By: AEC Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:05 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 60108 12/29/2006 Reviewed By:~ MET_UM5_4.1 ?F\ nf A.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777193/CB-1A (Day 7) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample 10: G150-378-25 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7014 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J =Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank> MDL RL DF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L 11.1 f' f'COTIJ::lf'II.TJ()II.J HAR1 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:45 Date Received: 12112/2006 Matrix: Method Leachate Date Analyzed 6010B 1/3/2007 Reviewed By~ MET_UMS_4.1 ?~ nf .d.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample 10: 927777201/CB-2A {Day 7) Client Project 10: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G 150-378-26 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7014 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L 1\1 (' rr::RTir::lr'6Tif"\l\l oiJ<.d.R1 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:50 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 1/3/2007 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 ?7 nf 4:1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777219/CB-3A (Day 7) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-27 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7014 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MGIL 1\1 (' f't:OTII:'If'l'!.TII"'II\1 -HIIR1 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:00 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 60108 1/3/2007 ReviewedB~ MET_LIMS_4.1 ?A nf A.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777227/CB-4A (Day 7) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G 150-378-28 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7014 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank> MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L "-I(' f'CDTIC::If'/\TI'"'"-1 #ACH Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:05 Date Received: 1211212006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 1/3/2007 . ~ · Reviewed By:_ 17tf7::::>_ MET_LIMS_4.1 ?Q nf 4~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample 10: 927777193/CB-1A (Day 8) Client Project 10: 92133803 Lab Sample 10: 8150-378-29 Lab Project 10: G150-378 Batch 10: 7015 Metals Result RL OF Units TCLP Lead BQL 0.0150 1 MG/L Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits · OF = Dilution Factor J =Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL 1\1 r. r.I=RTII=Jr.ATJ()I\J :ft.4A1 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12111/2006 9:45 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: · Leachate Method 6010B Date Analyzed 1/3/2007 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_ 4.1 ~n nf A.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777201/CB-2A (Day 8) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-30 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7015 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments · BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank> MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L Analyzed By: Date Collected: PSW 12/11/2006 9:50 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 60108 1/3/2007 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 ~1 nf A.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777219/CB-3A (Day 8) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: 8150-378-31 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7015 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF =Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount In Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N r. r.I=RTII=Ir.ATI()N :ttAR1 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:00 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 1/3/2007 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_~.1 ::\?of 4~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777227/CB-4A (Day 8} Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G 150-378-32 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7015 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12111/2006 10:05 Date Received: 1211212006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 1/3/2007 R'eviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 ?.?. nf .d.?. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777193/CB-1A (Day 9) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G150-378-33 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7015 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J =Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N r. r.r=RTII=Ir.ATI()N :IMA1 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:45 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method 60108 Date Analyzed 1/3/2007 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 ~A. nf A.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: Client Project ID: 927777201/CB-2A (Day 9) 92133803 Lab Sample ID: Lab Project ID: Batch ID: Metals TCLP Lead Comments G150-378-34 G150-378 7015 Result BQL SOL = Below Quantitation Limits OF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL 0.0150 DF 1 Units MG/L Analyzed By: Date Collected: PSW 12/11/2006 9:50 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 1/3/2007 R~viewed By~ ~E~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777219/CB-3A (Day 9) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G 150-378-35 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7015 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N r. r.I=RTII=Ir.ATION :lt.d~1 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:00 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate . Method Date Analyzed 60108 1/3/2007 Reviewed By~:?::> MET_LI S_<1.1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777227/CB-4A (Day 9) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G 150-378-36 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7015 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF =Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:05 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 6010B 1/3/2007 Reviewed By~ MET_LIMS_4.1 ~7 nf 4~ • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777193/CB-1A (Day 10) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: 8150-378-37 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7028 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount In Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N r. r.I=RTII=Jr.ATJ()N :lt.d.A1 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:45 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Method 6010B Leachate Date Analyzed 1/4/2007 Reviewed By~ ME _U 5_4.1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample 10: 927777201/CB-2A (Day 10} Client Project 10: 92133803 Lab Sample 10: G150-378-38 Lab Project 10: G150-378 Batch 10: 7028 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits OF= Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N.C. CERTIFICATION #481 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 9:50 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Method Leachate Date Analyzed 60108 114/2007 Reviewed By~ ~E~ 39 of 43 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777219/CB-3A (Day 10) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G 150-378-39 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7028 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF = Dilution Factor J = Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank > MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N r. r.FRTII=Ir.ATinN :1!4R1 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 1 0:00 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Leachate Method Date Analyzed 601 OB 1/4/2007 Reviewed By~ MET_LIM$_4.1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ Results for Metals Client Sample ID: 927777227/CB-4A (Day 10) Client Project ID: 92133803 Lab Sample ID: G 150-378-40 Lab Project ID: G150-378 Batch ID: 7028 Metals Result TCLP Lead BQL Comments BQL = Below Quantitation Limits DF =Dilution Factor J =Between MDL and RL B= Amount in Prep Blank> MDL RL OF Units 0.0150 1 MG/L N.r.. r.FRTIFJr.ATION :tt.dfl1 Analyzed By: PSW Date Collected: 12/11/2006 10:05 Date Received: 12/12/2006 Matrix: Method 6010B Leachate Date Analyzed. 1/4/2007 -~ Reviewed By: MET_LIMS_4.1 A.1 nf A.~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC . SG$ List of Reporting Abbreviations . and Data Qualifiers 8 = Compound also detected in batch blank BQL = Below Quantitation Limit (RL or MDL) OF = Dilution Factor Dup = Duplicate D = Detected, but RPD is > 40% between results in dual column method . E = Estimated concentration, exceeds calibration range . J = Estimated concentration, below calibration range and above MDL LCS(D) ·= Laboratory Control Spike (Duplicate) MDL = Method Detection Limit MS(D) = Matrix Spike (Duplicate) POL = Practical Quantitation Limit RL =Reporting Limit RPD = Relative Percent Difference mg/kg = milligram per kilogram, ppm, parts per million ug/kg = micrograms per kilogram, ppb, parts per billion mg/L = milligram per liter, ppm, parts per million ug/L = micrograms per liter, ppb, parts per billion % Rec = Percent Recovery % soilds = Percent Solids Special Notes: 1) Metals and mercury samples are digested with a hot block, see the standard operating procedure document for details . 2) Uncertainty for all reported data is less than or equal to 30 percent. N.C. CERTIFir.ATION #4R1 Ml34.030606.3 A.? nf A.~ IJ~::C?'A --;_I.~ --;;, ~--NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Michael F. Easley, Governor Via Certified Mail Todd Spanish Boyle Consulting Engineers 4340-H Taggart Creek Rd Charlotte, North Carolina William G. Ross Jr . Secretary November 17, 2006 Re: Stabilization for Lead-impacted Soil at Former Rhea Contracting Asphalt Plant, Charlotte, NC Dear Mr. Spanish: I reviewed the information you submitted for the stabilization of lead in excavated soil at the above site. The stabilization process is approved with the following guidelines: 1 The soil must be analyzed to ensure that there are no constituents of concern above the NC Hazardous Waste Section SSLs that would not be stabilized by the addition of the TSP. 2 The soil must be treated in no more than 25-yard aliquots. A composite sample must be collected of each 25 yard aliquot that is treated to ensure that soil is adequately stabilized. 3 After treatment and sampling, the soil may be placed into a soil pile following standard practices for ensuring that run-on/ run-off is controlled, the pile is inspected each day (including weekends) and a log of inspections maintained . 4 If the soil is to be placed on-site after treatment, the soil must be analyzed for all constituents of concern and the levels must be below the level for unrestricted use as specified in the Hazardous Waste Section's "Contained-in" Policy for Soil Contaminated with Listed Hazardous Waste" located on our web-site at: http://www. wastenotnc.org!hwhome/ guidance/pdf/Containedinpol icyMay2 00 5. pdf. 5 One composite sample of each 200 cubic yards of treated material must be analyzed using the Multiple Extraction Method for lead. 6 The analysis in items 4 and 5 above must be reviewed by the Hazardous Waste Section Compliance Branch Chemist prior to placing the soil on the land. 7 The treatment process must be completed within one month of the date of this approval and all soil analysis submitted to this office within 6 weeks of the date of this approval. BOYLE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLLC Development and Construction Project Services November 1; 2006 Via Email (Roberta.proctor@ncmail.net) Ms. Robin Proctor NCDENR-Hazardous Waste Section 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Subject: Discovery of Lead Impacted Soils Former Rea Contracting Asphalt Plant 2701 Youngblood Street Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina BOYLE Project No. 05-203 Dear Ms. Proctor: 4340-H Taggart Creek Road Charlotte, NC 28208 Phone: (704) 676-0778 Fax : (704) 676-0596 www.boyleconsulting.com Boyle Consulting Engineers, PLLC (BOYLE) has been requested by Mr. Bill Copeland, Rea Contracting, LLC. to notify you of a discovery of lead-impacted soils at the above referenced site. The lead-impacted soils were discovered during pre-disposal sampling for suspected non-hazardous soils. The Subject Property consists of an approximate 8-acre site that was most recently occupied by a Rea Contracting asphalt plant. The site is currently undergoing excavation and filling activities as part of grading activities for a pending real estate transaction and eventual site redevelopment. BOYLE understands that an asphalt testing facility was operated on the Subject Property by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT Site No. 27- 57) from around 1970 until about 1989. Chlorinated solvents reportedly used at the facility included trichloroethene (TCE), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), and carbon tetrachloride (CCI 4). Chlorinated solvents were first detected in groundwater in 1989 (Groundwater Incident No . 17443). Additional assessment confirmed soil and groundwater contamination at the site. A Corrective Action Plan (CAP) was approved by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) in November 2002 that included monitored natural attenuation for groundwater and required no soil remediation. As part of the pending real estate transaction, the site grade was to be returned to pre-development elevations shown on a 1958 City of Charlotte Topographic Map and then returned to elevations shown on a 1981 City of Charlotte Topographic Map. Since the excavations in the vicinity of the former NCDOT asphalt laboratory could potentially disturb impacted soils, the excavated soils were temporarily stockpiled on-site and sampled. Composite samples were collected and analyzed for contaminants previously detected at the site (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 along with gasoline and diesel-range Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH). In addition, at the request of the intended disposal landfill, samples were also analyzed for Total RCRA 8 Metals. Upon receipt of the preliminary laboratory results, it was discovered that some of the stockpiled soils contained total lead concentrations that exceeded the Discovery of Lead Impacted Solis -Rea Contracting, LLC. Boyle Project No. 05-203 November 1, 2006 Final allowable concentrations for disposal in a Subtitle D Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (MSWLF). Subsequent analysis by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Method (TCLP) confirmed that two stockpiles (containing an estimated 600 cubic yards) contained levels of lead above 5 mg/1 by TCLP. The laboratory results are summarized in the attached Table 1. At this time, there is no known or readily identifiable source for the lead concentrations found. Additional assessment work to determine the potential extent of residual lead contamination has begun but laboratory results are still pending. Proposals for on-site treatment of the lead contaminated soils have been obtained. The on-site treatment proposed will involve stabilization of the lead by the addition of Triple Super Phosphate (TSP), with the intent of reducing the concentrations of leachable lead below levels suitable for disposal in a Subtitle D MSWLF. The proposals have been obtained from firms with recent experience on similar projects in North Carolina under the supervision of the NCDENR Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch. Upon receiving approval, the selected firm is prepared to mobilize to the site to begin operations within approximately one week. With this letter we are notifying you of our discovery and requesting your assistance in insuring that the lead-contaminated soils are handled in accordance with applicable regulations. A copy of this letter is also being provided to the Mr. Andrew Pitner of the NCDENR Aquifer Protection Section, Mooresville Regional Office who is currently overseeing the NCDOT Groundwater Incident. Thank you for you attention to this matter and please contact us with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, BOYLE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLLC 1afd.et~;(t Project Ge~~~t F Registered, NC 2003 Attachments cc: Mr. Bill Copeland, Rea Contracting, LLC Mr. Andrew Pitner, NCDENR-MRO, Via Email 2 Discovery of Lead Impacted Soils -Rea Contracting, LLC. Boyle Project No. 05-203 Table 1 Stockpile Sampling Results Summary Area Pile Sample Constituent Result MSWLFTotal ID Total mg/kg mg/kg 1 1 C1 Mercury 0.033 4 Arsenic 3.2 100 Barium 81 2 000 Cadmium 1.3 20 Chromium 22 100 Lead 73 100 TPH-Diesel 77 NAP Cis-1,2-0.036 140 dichloroethene Trichloroethene 0.160 10 2 A C2A Mercury 0.014 4 Arsenic 3.9 100 Barium 25 2 000 Cadmium 4.9 20 Chromium 40 100 Lead 100 100 Selenium 1.8 20 Diesel 50 NAP Cis-1-2-0.0053 140 dichloroethene Tetrachloroethene 0.019 14 1 1 1-trichloroethane 0.0077 60 Trichloroethene 0.170 10 2 B1B2 C2B Mercury_ 0.032 4 Arsenic 2.0 100 Barium 32 2 000 Cadmium 6.4 20 Chromium 57 100 Lead 150 100 Selenium 2.4 20 Diesel 370 NAP Gasoline 7.1 NAP Cis-1-2-0.022 140 dichloroethene Trichloroethene 0.027 10 3 November 1, 2006 Final Result MSWLF TCLP Leach mg/1 Mg/1 0.00032 <0.2 ND <5 0.57 <100 ND <1 ND <5 0.18 <5 NA - NA - NA - ND <0.2 ND <5 0.46 <100 ND <1 ND <5 0.13 <5 ND <1 NA - NA - NA - NA - NA <0.5 0.00027 <0.2 ND <5 0.6 <100 ND <1 ND <5 1.0 <5 ND <1 NA - NA - NA - NA - Discovery of Lead Impacted Solis -Rea Contracting, LLC. Boyle Project No. 05-203 Table 1 Stockpile Sampling Results Summary Area Pile Sample Constituent Result MSWLFTotal ID Total mg/kg mgfkg 2 C1 C2C1 Mercury 0.015 4 Arsenic 5.5 100 Barium 88 2 000 Cadmium 2.0 20 Chromium 26 100 Lead 330 100 Selenium 1.3 20 Diesel 340 NAP Gasoline 11 NAP n-butylbenzene 0.014 140 Sec-butyl benzene 0.0093 140 Chlorobenzene 0.012 2 000 1 2-dichlorobenzene 0.055 48 1 4-dichlorobenzene 0.0067 150 Cls-1,2-0.016 140 dichloroethene p-lsoproplvtoluene 0.0062 NS Naphthalene 0.005 42 n-propylbenzene 0.0061 140 1,2,4-0.0084 22 trlchlorobenzene Trlchloroethene 0.019 10 1,2,4-0.017 170 trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-0.0079 70 trlmethvlbenzene 2 C2 C2C2 Mercury 0.026 4 Arsenic 7.7 100 Barium 110 2 000 Cadmium 2.8 20 Chromium 30 100 Lead 560 100 Selenium 1.7 20 Diesel 220 NAP Cis-1-2-0.042 140 dichloroethene p-isoproolvtoluene 0.012 NS Naphthalene 0.0081 42 Trichloroethene 0.035 10 3 A1 C3A1 Mercury 0.053 4 Arsenic 5.7 100 Barium 110 2 000 Cadmium 4.3 20 Chromium 86 100 Lead 550 100 Selenium 1.4 20 Diesel 640 NAP Cls-1-2-0.034 140 dichloroethene Trlchloroethene 0.026 10 4 November 1, 2006 Final Result MSWLF TCLP Leach mg/1 Mg/1 ND <0.2 ND <5 0.56 <100 ND <1 ND <5 0.08 <5 ND <1 NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - ND <0.2 ND <5 0.82 <100 0.007 <1 ND <5 0.51 <5 ND <1 NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - ND <0.2 ND <5 0.6 <100 0.012 <1 ND <5 0.50 <5 ND <1 NA - NA - NA - ' . Discovery of Lead Impacted Solis -Rea Contracting, LLC. Boyle Project No. 05-203 Table 1 Stockpile Sampling Results Summary Area Pile Sample Constituent Result MSWLFTotal ID Total mg/kg mg/kg 3 A2 C3A2 Mercury 0.086 4 Arsenic 5.7 100 Barium 120 2 000 Cadmium 7.4 20 Chromium 40 100 Lead 670 100 Selenium 2.1 20 Diesel 79 NAP 3 A3 C3A3 Mercurv 0.079 4 Arsenic 6.8 100 Barium 140 2 000 Cadmium 4.8 20 Chromium 38 100 Lead 730 100 Selenium 1.4 20 Diesel 36 NAP 4 A1 C4A1 Mercury 0.054 4 Arsenic 4.9 100 Barium 100 2 000 Cadmium 2.3 20 Chromium 28 100 Lead 800 100 Selenium 1.7 20 Diesel 220 NAP Cis-1-2-0.014 140 dichloroethene p-isoproplytoluene 0.028 NS Trichloroethene 0.030 10 4 A2 C4A2 Mercurv 0.056 4 Arsenic 5.2 100 Barium 76 2 000 Cadmium 1.8 20 Chromium 29 100 Lead 340 100 Diesel 230 NAP Cis-1-2-0.0094 140 dichloroethene Trichloroethene 0.0056 10 5 November 1, 2006 Final Result MSWLF TCLP Leach mg/1 Mg/1 ND <0.2 NO <5 0.78 <100 0.006 <1 ND <5 0.48 <5 ND <1 NA - ND <0.2 NO <5 0.84 <100 0.0074 <1 NO <5 0.67 <5 ND <1 NA - 0.00024 <0.2 NO <5 1.3 <100 0.0068 <1 NO <5 8.8 <5 ND <1 NA - NA - NA - NA - NO <0.2 NO <5 0.98 <100 0.0058 <1 NO <5 11 <5 NA - NA - NA - f ' l ' Discovery of Lead Impacted Solis -Rea Contracting, LLC. Boyle Project No. 05-203 Table 1 Stockpile Sampling Results Summary Area Pile Sample Constituent Result MSWLFTotal ID Total mg/kg mg/kg 4 B1 C4B1 Mercury 0.22 4 Arsenic 4.4 100 Barium 92 2 000 Cadmium 2.2 20 Chromium 31 100 Lead 2400 100 Diesel 220 NAP Gasoline 8.6 NAP n-butvlbenzene 0.015 140 Chlorobenzene 0.0060 2 000 1 2-dichlorobenzene 0.010 48 Cis-1-2-0.013 140 dichloroethene o-isooroplytoluene 0.0092 ? Naphthalene 0.035 42 n-orooylbenzene 0.0069 140 1,2,4-0.065 170 trimethylbenzene 1,3,5-0.024 70 trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride 0.012 4 Xylenes (total) 0.015 300 4 B2 C4B2 Mercury 0.086 4 Arsenic 5.2 100 Barium 100 2 000 Cadmium 2.8 20 Chromium 110 100 Lead 730 100 Diesel 200 NAP 4 B3 C4B3 Mercury 0.072 4 Arsenic 2.6 100 Barium 80 2 000 Cadmium 2.0 20 Chromium 35 100 Lead 130 100 Diesel 100 NAP Acetone 0.091 1400 Cis-1-2-0.022 140 dichloroethene Vinyl Chloride 0.019 4 4 B4 C4B4 Mercury 0.069 4 Arsenic 5.5 100 Barium 110 2 000 Cadmium 2.9 20 Chromium 36 100 Lead 730 100 Selenium 1.5 20 Diesel 140 NAP Cis-1-2-0.340 140 dichloroethene Trans-1-2-0.017 200 dichloroethene Trichloroethene 0.045 10 Vii}YI Chloride 0.023 4 Notes: Bolded Concentrations Exceed Corresponding Bolded Standard November 1, 2006 Final Result MSWLF TCLP Leach mg/1 Mg/1 NO <0.2 NO <5 0.83 <100 0.0089 <1 NO <5 16 <5 NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NO <0.2 NO <5 1.0 <100 0.0057 <1 NO <5 5.8 <5 NA - 0.00055 <0.2 NO <5 0.96 <100 NO <1 NO <5 2.7 <5 NA - NA - NA - NA - 0.00024 <0.2 NO <5 1.0 <100 0.0072 <1 NO <5 6.2 <5 NO <1 NA - NA - NA - NA - NA - NA -Not Analyzed, NS -No Standard Established, NAP -Not Applicable, NO -Not Detected above laboratory detection limits 6