The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About19002_Thomasville Plant L_PRII_ Via FedEx August 27, 2015 Ms. Cindy J. Nolan Brownfields Section Chief Resource Conservation and Restoration Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 61 Forsyth St. SW Atlanta, GA 30303 Re: Phase II Site Assessment Former Thomasville Furniture Plant L 14 East Guilford Street Thomasville, NC PTRC Brownfield Assessment Grant # BF-00D12113-0 H&H Job No. PTR.001 Dear Cindy: As requested, enclosed is the above-referenced document on CD. We are also submitting it to PTRC, the NCDENR Brownfield Program and the Prospective Developer – Third Wave Housing. We’ll upload the report to ACRES as well. Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Hart & Hickman, PC Leonard Moretz, PG, RSM Senior Consultant Enclosure cc: Paul Kron - PTRC Brownfields Phase II Site Assessment Report Thomasville Plant L Site 14 East Guilford Street Thomasville, North Carolina Prepared by: Hart & Hickman, PC Prepared for: Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, North Carolina Agreement Number: BF-00D12113-0 H&H Job No. PTR-001.7 August 27, 2015 i \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx\\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx Brownfields Phase II Site Assessment Report Thomasville Plant L Site Thomasville, North Carolina H&H Job No. PTR-001.7 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Background ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 General Summary of Phase II Assessment Activities ................................................................ 4 3.0 Soil Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 5 3.1 Soil Sampling Methods ........................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Quality Control (QC) Soil Sample Collection ....................................................................... 6 3.3 Soil Assessment Results ......................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Groundwater Assessment .............................................................................................................. 9 4.1 Temporary Monitoring Well Construction ............................................................................ 9 4.2 Groundwater Occurrence ........................................................................................................ 9 4.3 Low Flow Well Purging and Sampling Methods ................................................................ 10 4.4 Groundwater Sampling ......................................................................................................... 10 4.5 QC Groundwater Sample Collection ................................................................................... 10 4.6 Groundwater Analytical Results .......................................................................................... 11 5.0 Lead-Based Paint Survey ............................................................................................................. 13 6.0 Asbestos Survey ............................................................................................................................. 14 7.0 Data Review, Verification, and Validation ................................................................................ 16 8.0 Data Evaluation Summary and Conclusions ............................................................................ 18 ii \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx\\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx List of Tables Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Data Table 2 Temporary Monitoring Well Details and Groundwater Elevations Table 3 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data List of Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Map Figure 3 Sample Location Map Figure 4 Potentiometric Surface Map List of Appendices Appendix A Site Photographs Appendix B Boring and Well Construction Logs Appendix C Laboratory Analytical Data Appendix D Groundwater Sampling Records Appendix E Lead-Based Paint Survey Report Appendix F Asbestos Survey Report – Not Part of the Brownfield Assessment Grant 1 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx Brownfields Phase II Site Assessment Report Thomasville Plant L Site Thomasville, North Carolina H&H Job No. PTR-001.7 1.0 Introduction and Background Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) completed Brownfields Phase II site assessment activities at the former Thomasville Furniture Plant L property located at 14 East Guilford Street, Davidson County, Thomasville, North Carolina. The property is owned by Acquired Capital, LLP and a Prospective Developer (Third Wave Housing), intends to purchase the property and repurpose the property for multi-family residences. A site location map and detailed site layout are included as Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. The Brownfields Phase II assessment was performed for the Piedmont Triad Regional Council (PTRC) under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Brownfields Assessment Grant BF-00D12113-0. Prior to this Phase II assessment, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), dated December 5, 2014, was completed by Apex Companies, LLC (Apex) for PTRC using Brownfield Grant funds. The Phase I ESA report provides detailed historic information and identifies the Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with the subject property. A brief site description and summary of historic uses are provided below: Site Description The site is comprised of one parcel totaling 5.92 acres with six former industrial buildings located on the property that are currently vacant. Property Ownership Acquired Capital, LLP currently owns the site. Proposed Future Reuse/Redevelopment Plans for the Property Based upon the results of this Phase II Assessment, Third Wave Housing plans to purchase the property and redevelop it for multi-family residential use. 2 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx Historic Site Use The site historically operated as a furniture manufacturing plant from as early as 1908 until the early 1990s. Since the early 1990’s, portions of the buildings were used for warehousing furniture or have been vacant and unused. Adjacent Property Uses Properties surrounding the site include a cemetery to the east, commercial buildings to the south and southwest, and single family residences to the north and west. Land use in the vicinity of the site has historically been similar to what it is today Known or Likely Chemicals/Contaminants of Concern H&H reviewed the previous Phase I (ESA) by Apex and conducted a site walk-over on April 20, 2015. H&H has identified the following areas of concern which are detailed in the EPA-Approved Site-Specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (SSQAPP):  Former above ground storage tanks (ASTs) identified in historical documents include a 550-gallon alcohol AST and a 550-gallon naphtha AST. Also, a former gasoline tank of unknown size was identified on historical Sanborn fire insurance maps.  A former oil house and boiler room were identified using historical Sanborn maps. The historical use and storage of heating oil and potential other petroleum products could have impacted the surrounding soil.  A former machine shop and paint storage building was identified in historical site records and observed during the site walk-over. Possible contaminants include volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and metals.  A former coal storage building currently full of coal was observed during the site walk- over. Potential contaminants include semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), specifically polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metals. 3 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx  Due to the age of the onsite structures there is the high probability of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint (LBP). The presence of ACM was verified in a study conducted by another consultant for the City of Thomasville. The results of that study are summarized in Section 6.0 and the full report is included in the appendices of this report for sake of completeness.  Properties adjacent to the south and topographically upgradient from the site consist of a former farm machinery sales and service shop, a former machine shop, and a former dry cleaner. According to historical Sanborn maps, former gasoline tanks were identified with the machine shop. The dry cleaner is also listed a potential Dry-cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) site by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). There is no record of soil or groundwater samples collected at these sites. There is a potential for impacts to groundwater from the historic operations conducted at these sites to migrate beneath the subject site.  During the site visit, several sumps as well as remnants of old piping were observed throughout the site. The exact use of these site features is unknown. The site has been listed as a Resource and Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) generator in its history, suggesting that hazardous materials and waste has been present on-site. Phase II Quality Assurance Project Plans As part of H&H’s Brownfields Phase II assessment planning, H&H prepared a Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan (Generic QAPP) for Piedmont Triad Regional Council Brownfield Phase II ESAs. In addition, a SSQAPP was completed specifically for the Former Thomasville Furniture Plant L site. These QAPPs outlined specific procedures to be implemented to assure and control the quality and integrity of sample collection and analysis during the course of the assessment. These procedures were followed as prescribed, unless noted otherwise in this report. Results of the Brownfields site assessment activities are presented in this report. Photographs showing general site conditions and field activities are included in Appendix A. 4 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx 2.0 General Summary of Phase II Assessment Activities Phase II assessment activities were conducted by H&H from June 29 to July 2 and July 13 - 14 2015. Field activities consisted of the following: 1) Marking underground utilities by the applicable public utility locators and a private utility locator was also contracted to locate and mark subsurface utilities in the areas of the borings. 2) Completion of 11 soil borings using direct push technology (DPT) methods and collection of three soil samples where potential impacts were observed for laboratory analysis. 3) Installation of eight temporary monitoring wells using DPT methods, collection of depth to groundwater measurements and collection of eight groundwater samples for laboratory analysis. 4) Completion of a lead-based paint (LBP) survey of the six-onsite manufacturing buildings by Get the Lead Out, a subcontractor to H&H. 5) Surveying by a registered land surveyor (Regional Land Surveyors) to determine the horizontal and vertical coordinates of all sample locations and top of casing elevations of temporary monitoring wells using a global positioning system (GPS). 5 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx 3.0 Soil Assessment 3.1 Soil Sampling Methods Carolina Soil Investigations (CSI), a North Carolina licensed well driller, was subcontracted to complete the drilling, well installation and well abandonment tasks. A H&H field geologist directed, oversaw and documented these tasks. Four borings (SB-1 through SB-4) were advanced using a Geoprobe 6610DT DPT rig. CSI utilized a hand auger to advance the first 5 feet (ft) of each boring to clear subsurface utilities. The soil boring locations are depicted on Figure 3 and boring logs are included in Appendix B. Soil borings were advanced to 5 ft below ground surface (bgs) unless indication of potential impacts to the soil was found that indicated impacts may extend deeper. Continuous soil cores were collected with a MacroCore® sampler within an acetate sleeve at five-foot intervals during the advancement of each soil boring. Soils were described for lithology, visually inspected, and field-screened for the presence of organic vapors with a calibrated photo-ionization detector (PID). Samples for laboratory analyses were not to be collected unless there was evidence of potential contamination using field evaluation criteria such as elevated PID readings, staining, odor, etc. There was no evidence of impacts in soil borings SB-1, SB-2, or SB-4. During the advancement of soil boring SB-3, the soil exhibited a petroleum-like odor and elevated PID readings were detected. PID readings ranged from 3.3 parts per million (ppm) at the 0 to 2-ft depth interval to 1,560 ppm at the 4 to 6-ft depth interval. In accordance with the SSQAPP, a sample was collected at the 4 to 6 ft depth interval to assess soil that exhibited the greatest field evidence of impacts. A shallow sample (0 to 2 ft) was also collected to assess for potential exposure to on-site workers/users of the area during redevelopment. After approval from EPA and DENR, several additional boring were completed to aid in the lateral delineation of this potentially impacted area. Soil boring SB-2 was used to delineate the potential soil impacts east of SB-3. Notably, there was no field evidence of impacts in any of the step out soil borings; therefore, no samples from these borings were submitted for laboratory analysis. 6 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx During advancement of the boring for temporary monitoring well TW-3 a similar petroleum- like odor and elevated PID readings were observed. PID readings ranged from 0.5 ppm at the 0 to 2-ft depth interval to 2,633 ppm at the 8 to 10-ft depth interval. A sample was collected at the 8 to 10-ft depth interval to assess soil that exhibited the greatest evidence of impacts. Again, after obtaining approval from EPA and DENR, four step out soil borings (SB-8 through SB-11) were advanced 20 ft from TW-3 to determine the lateral extent of potential soil impacts. Because elevated PID readings and a petroleum-like odor were observed in SB-9, an additional soil boring, designated SB-12, was advanced 10 ft from SB-9. The soil in SB-12 showed low PID readings with no odor observed therefore no sample was submitted for laboratory analysis. Soil samples submitted for laboratory analysis were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260B, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270D and RCRA metals by EPA Method 6010C and 7471B. Soil borings were abandoned by filling with bentonite. Prism Laboratories (Prism) conducted laboratory analyses of soil samples. Prism is certified by the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) to perform the requested laboratory analyses for the project. The State of North Carolina has approved the NELAP accreditation. A chain-of-custody (COC) record was completed for samples collected. The completed COC record was signed by H&H sampling personnel prior to placement in an iced cooler and transferred to a Prism Labs courier for delivery to the analytical laboratory in Charlotte, NC. The laboratory analytical data reports and COC records are provided in Appendix C. 3.2 Quality Control (QC) Soil Sample Collection A blind duplicate sample was submitted to the laboratory as a measure of laboratory repeatability. The duplicate sample results are included in Table 1 and in the laboratory analytical data report in Appendix C.  Duplicate analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals collected from boring TW-3 soil at the 8 to 10-ft depth interval The matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) soil sample listed below was collected and submitted to the analytical laboratory. 7 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx  MS/MSD analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals collected from SB-3 at the 0 to 2-ft depth interval. 3.3 Soil Assessment Results The soil analytical results were compared to the current DENR Inactive Hazardous Site Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Health Based Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) and are summarized in Table 2. Metal results were also compared to two times the average regional background metal concentrations obtained from published sources as documented on Table 1. The soil analytical data is discussed below for each area of concern: Former Oil House Petroleum related VOCs (1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes) were detected in the shallow soil sample (0 to 2 ft bgs) at SB-3; however, concentrations did not exceed their respective Industrial or Residential PSRGs. The RCRA metals barium, chromium, lead and mercury were also detected below their respective Industrial and Residential PSRGs. Arsenic was detected at 3.2 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), which is above the Industrial (3.0 mg/kg) and Residential (0.67 mg/kg) PSRGs. The PSRGs are conservative preliminary screening concentrations, adapted from the USEPA Regional Screening Tables, and not regulated standards. DENR allows calculation of site-specific cleanup criteria. The levels may be adjusted based on the individual contaminant’s health effects and the number of contaminants present at the site. When using the site-specific data and the calculation procedures provided in the current DENR REC Program Guidance, which is also applicable to the North Carolina Brownfield Program, the final site-specific unrestricted use health-based cleanup goal for arsenic is 67 mg/kg. Therefore, the detected arsenic is below the site-specific goal. Additionally, although the concentration of arsenic exceed the PSRGs, it is consistent with naturally occurring concentrations of arsenic in North Carolina, which average 4.8 mg/kg (Table 1). The other metal concentrations are also likely naturally occurring. 8 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx Several VOCs were detected in the deeper soil sample (4 to 6 ft bgs); however, concentrations did not exceed their respective Industrial or Residential PSRGs (Table 2). Barium, chromium, and lead were also detected below their respective PSRGs. Arsenic (1.6 mg/kg) exceeds the Residential PSRG of 0.67 mg/kg, but is well below the calculated site-specific cleanup goal of 67 mg/kg and is also considered to be naturally occurring as described above. No SVOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits in either soil sample collected at SB-3. Downgradient of Finishing Building The VOCs 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene and xylenes were detected above laboratory reporting limits in the deep soil sample (8 to 10 ft bgs) from TW-3, but were below their respective PSRGs (Table 1). Barium, chromium, and lead were also detected but below their respective PSRGs. Arsenic (0.89 mg/kg) exceeds the Residential PSRG but is well below the calculated site-specific cleanup goal of 67 mg/kg is also considered to be naturally occurring as described above. No SVOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits. 9 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx 4.0 Groundwater Assessment 4.1 Temporary Monitoring Well Construction As outlined in the approved SSQAPP, seven temporary groundwater monitoring wells (TW-1 through TW-7) were installed by CSI between June 29 and July 1, 2015. An additional temporary monitoring well (TW-8) was installed in soil boring SB-3 after field observations of soil impacts were observed. These wells were installed for groundwater monitoring to assess for potential impacts from former upgradient petroleum USTs and a former dry cleaner, downgradient of the finishing building, paint storage building, machine shop, machine shop sumps, and in the northeastern portion of the property. The surveyed temporary monitoring well locations are depicted on Figure 3. Each well was installed using DPT. Soil in the first ~5 ft of each temporary monitoring well was collected with a hand auger. Soil below 5 ft of each temporary monitoring well was collected with a MacroCore® sampler within an acetate sleeve at five-foot intervals until reaching the target depth or DPT refusal. The wells were constructed with a 10-ft length of 1-inch pre-packed PVC well screen to bracket the water table along with 1-inch PVC riser pipe. Following construction, the temporary wells were developed in accordance with the SSQAPP. Well construction details are summarized in Table 2 and well construction logs are included in Appendix B. 4.2 Groundwater Occurrence Prior to temporary monitoring well sampling, the depth-to-water in each monitoring well was obtained using an electronic water level meter. Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from 4.35 to 20.39 ft bgs (Table 2). The potentiometric surface is shown on Figure 4. Determining the true static water table elevation based upon temporary wells is at times difficult due to potential inaccuracies resulting from temporary well construction and varying geologic conditions. When looking solely at the groundwater elevation data, the implied groundwater flow direction would be to the northeast. This appears to be consistent with the topographic gradient for the site. 10 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx 4.3 Low Flow Well Purging and Sampling Methods Each well was purged by low flow methods using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump. During well purging, measurements of dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, temperature, and turbidity were collected using a water quality meter. Each well was purged until field parameters stabilized or the well went dry. Appropriate efforts were made to achieve optimal turbidity measurements of <10 nephelometric turbidity units (NTUs); however, turbidity levels remained elevated in several wells due to the fine-grained lithology and temporary well construction. Groundwater samples were then collected from each well for laboratory analysis as described below. Groundwater sampling records are provided in Appendix D. 4.4 Groundwater Sampling In accordance with the SSQAPP, temporary monitoring wells TW-1 through TW-8 were sampled for VOCs by EPA Method 8260 and SVOCs by EPA Method 8270. Laboratory analyses were conducted by Prism. A COC record was completed and signed by H&H sampling personnel prior to placement in an iced cooler and delivered to Prism by H&H sampling personnel. 4.5 QC Groundwater Sample Collection The blind duplicate sample listed below was submitted to the laboratory as a measure of laboratory repeatability.  Duplicate for VOCs and SVOCs, from TW-1 The MS/MSD groundwater sample listed below was collected and submitted to the analytical laboratory.  MS/MSD for VOCs and SVOCs, from TW-4 Additionally, a trip blank accompanied the groundwater samples during delivery to the laboratory and was analyzed for VOCs. 11 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx 4.6 Groundwater Analytical Results The groundwater data were compared to the current DENR Title 15A NCAC 2L Standards (2L Standards) and the current DENR Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non-Residential and Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels (VISLs). Groundwater analytical results as compared to the screening criteria are summarized in Table 3. The analytical laboratory data reports are provided in Appendix C. Off-site/Upgradient Former Dry Cleaner and Historic Gasoline Tanks Groundwater samples were collected from TW-1 and TW-2 to assess for potential impacts from the upgradient former dry cleaner and historic off-site gasoline tanks have migrated toward the site. No VOCs or SVOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits. Finishing Building Groundwater samples were collected from TW-3 and TW-4 to assess for potential releases from the finishing building and if any potential releases from the upgradient former dry cleaner and/or off-site gasoline tanks have migrated beneath the building. Several VOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits in TW-3 but did not exceed their respective 2L Standards or VISLs. The VOCs detected in groundwater were consistent with VOCs detected in the soil collected at the 8 to 10-ft depth interval in this location. The VOC methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) was detected at 3.2 micrograms per liter (μg/L), below the 2L Standard (20 μg/L) and Non-residential (19,700 μg/L) and Residential (4,500 μg/L) VISLs. No SVOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits in either well. Paint Storage Building and Machine Shop A groundwater sample was collected from TW-5 installed to assess groundwater conditions downgradient of the paint storage building and machine shop. The VOCs acetone (15 μg/L) and methylene chloride (3.69 μg/L) were detected above laboratory reporting limits but did not exceed their respective 2L Standard or VISL. These two VOCs are common laboratory artifacts. Therefore these detections do not likely represent actual groundwater conditions. No SVOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits in TW-5. 12 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx Machine Shop Sumps A groundwater sample was collected from TW-6 to assess groundwater conditions downgradient of the sumps located in the northeast corner of the machine shop. Acetone was detected at a concentration of 67 μg/L, well below the 2L Standard and VISLs (Table 3). No SVOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits in TW-6. Northeast Portion of the Site A groundwater sample was collected from TW-7 to monitor overall downgradient groundwater quality and determine if a potential plume from the site is migrating towards the property boundary. Acetone was detected at a concentration of 30 μg/L, well below the 2L Standard and VISLs (Table 3). No SVOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits in TW-7. Former Oil House/Boiler Room As mentioned above, an additional groundwater sample was collected from TW-8 that was installed in the soil boring SB-3. This boring/well is located in an open paved area approximately 50 ft from two onsite buildings. Several potential soil impacts were observed in SB-3, and laboratory analytical results indicated petroleum related VOCs were detected in groundwater above screening criteria. The VOC 1,2,4–trimethylbenzene was detected at 51 µg/L, exceeding both the Residential and Non-Residential VISLs. Total xylenes (111 µg/L) exceeded the Residential VISL of 99 µg/L. Benzene (7.1 µg/L) and naphthalene (8.9 µg/L) concentrations exceeded the 2L Standard of 1 µg/L and 6 µg/L, respectively; however, the concentrations did not exceed VISLs. Concentrations of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, 4-isopropyltoluene, acetone, ethylbenzene, n-propylbenzene, o-xylene, sec-butylbenzene, tert-butylbenzene, and toluene were detected above laboratory reporting limits but did not exceed the screening criteria. No SVOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits in TW-8. 13 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx 5.0 Lead-Based Paint Survey H&H contracted Get the Lead Out, a certified North Carolina Lead Risk Assessor, to conduct a LBP survey on July 13 & 14, 2015. Get the Lead Out identified LBP in several painted components on the interior and exterior of the site buildings. Although there are painted objects at the site that had negative results, Get the Lead Out noted that these areas could create a risk of LBP exposure if the paint is turned into a dust (i.e. scraping or sanding). The results of the survey are documented in the report Lead Paint Survey Report Thomasville Plant L dated July 24, 2015 by Get the Lead Out (Appendix E). 14 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx 6.0 Asbestos Survey (Not Part of Brownfield Assessment Grant Activities) Pyramid Environmental for the City of Thomasville completed an asbestos survey in April 2014 on this property when the City was evaluating the property for potential purchase. The laboratory result indicated that ACM were identified in the buildings at 14 E. Guilford Street. Below are the summary and conclusions of that report which is included as Appendix F. The EPA’s National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requires an asbestos survey and a ten working day notification prior to the demolition and/or renovation of all commercial, institutional or industrial buildings. Demolition activities that disturb or may potentially disturb ACMs are regulated by the requirements of NESHAP. Non-friable ACM must be classified under NESHAP as either Category I or Category II ACM. Category I ACM includes intact roofing materials, gaskets, packing materials, resilient floor coverings and floor mastics and is less likely to release fibers when disturbed or damaged. Friable ACM is considered to be a Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM). All Category II non-friable ACM that is deemed to have a high probability of becoming friable during renovation or demolition activities must be considered RACM unless it can be removed intact in whole pieces. In addition, all Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable or will be subjected to sanding, cutting, grinding, or abrading during demolition activities must be treated as RACM. Current (2014) regulations require the removal of RACM prior to disturbance through renovation or demolition. Regulated and Category I ACMs were identified at the site. The regulated ACMs include the air- cell and block style TSI. The Category I ACMs include the roll-out vinyl flooring and floor tile, the roofing materials and the window caulking. According to the current (2014) NESHAP requirements, no person shall remove more than 35 cubic ft, 160 square ft, or 260 linear ft of friable ACM or non-friable ACM that may become friable during handling without a permit. This work must also be performed by trained and 15 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx accredited asbestos personnel with the proper air emission controls and the asbestos must be disposed of at a permitted facility. 16 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx 7.0 Data Review, Verification, and Validation In accordance with the Generic QAPP and Site-Specific QAPP Addendum, the field and laboratory analytical data were subjected to review, verification, and validation to ensure that the quality and validity of the data were acceptable for the stated Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). The laboratory quality assurance data are provided in the laboratory analytical report in Appendix C. The final data review was conducted by John Reuscher, P.G. of H&H, the project QA/QC Manager. The following is a summary of the data review, verification, and validation: Field Data  The proper laboratory analyses were requested for each sample.  Sample chain-of-custody protocols were properly followed.  The field procedures for decontamination, calibration, etc. were followed in accordance with the Generic QAPP and Site-Specific QAPP Addendum procedures. Field activities were appropriately documented in the field log book and groundwater sampling records.  Although efforts were made to minimize turbidity of temporary monitoring well samples to collect representative groundwater samples for metals analyses, measured turbidities prior to sample collection were higher than the optimal <10 NTUs in the groundwater sample collected from TW-3, TW-4, TW-5,.TW-6, and TW-7. However, based on the groundwater analytical results, the elevated sample turbidity did not impact the usability of the corresponding analytical data.  Soil samples collected for submittal to the laboratory for analysis of SVOCs and metals were collected as grab samples from hand augers or direct-push acetate sleeves. Based on the subsurface lithologies identified in the soil borings and temporary monitoring wells, the deviation from homogenization of the soil samples in accordance with SESDPROC- 300-R2 should not impact the usability of the corresponding laboratory data. 17 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx Laboratory Data  The requested laboratory analyses were performed by the laboratory on each sample. All samples were properly preserved.  The laboratory analyses were conducted within the method holding times.  The soil and groundwater samples were received at the laboratory in good condition, within the proper temperature range, and were properly preserved.  The analytical results for the duplicate samples indicated good repeatability in the laboratory analysis.  No compounds were detected in the field trip blanks that accompanied the samples for analysis of VOCs.  Laboratory reporting limits (LRLs) for several VOCs, SVOCs, and metals and method detection limits (MDLs) for several metals were slightly higher than those summarized in Table 3 of the Site-Specific QAPP Addendum. However, the elevated LRLs and MDLs should not impact the usability of the corresponding laboratory data considering the analytical sensitivity and project criteria. Data Review Conclusions The conclusions of the data review are that field and laboratory data generally meet QA objectives and are usable for the intended purpose. 18 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx 8.0 Data Evaluation Summary and Conclusions This Phase II Brownfield Environmental Site Assessment was completed to evaluate, through the collection and analysis of various samples, the areas of concern outlined in the SSQAPP. The primary purpose of the Phase II assessment was to determine if these concerns represent actual environmental impacts and pose a potential environmental risk for future site redevelopment and use. Based on the results from this investigation, it appears there’s environmental impacts associated with the former oil house area. Below is a summary of the assessment findings coupled with some conclusions which should be considered when assessing site risk and evaluating redevelopment plans. Soil Based upon the findings of this investigation, site soils in general do not present a problem/risk for the site to be redeveloped for multifamily residential use. Soil data collected from the former oil house area and downgradient of the finishing building indicated low levels of petroleum related VOCs; however, concentrations of these VOCs were below the Industrial and Residential PSRGs. Although arsenic was detected at concentrations above its PSRGs at both sample locations, the detected concentrations are well below the adjusted site-specific health based cleanup criteria of 67 mg/kg and are consistent with naturally occurring concentrations of arsenic in North Carolina. Groundwater Several petroleum related VOCs were detected in groundwater samples collected from TW-3 and TW-8. No compounds in groundwater samples collected from TW-3 exceeded applicable groundwater screening criteria; however, concentrations of 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene and total xylenes exceeded residential VISLs at TW-8. Also, benzene and naphthalene concentrations exceeds 2L Standards but did not exceed VISLs in TW-8. Lead Based Paint LBP was detected in the site buildings and should be properly addressed during site redevelopment. 19 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Thomasville Plant L Phase II Report.docx Conclusions Based upon the results of this investigation, impacted groundwater in the vicinity of the former oil house may pose an exposure risk to construction workers and/or future site occupants via direct contact or inhalation of organic vapors (i.e. vapor intrusion). VI sampling was not conducted during this assessment. Based on the results of the groundwater samples collected at TW-8, additional evaluation of potential vapor intrusion may be necessary, depending upon the final site redevelopment plans. Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, Davidson County, North Carolina H&H Job No. PTR.001-7 Sample Location Sample ID TW-3 Soil Duplicate (TW-3 Soil) Sample Depth (ft)0-2 4-6 8-10 8-10 Sample Date 6/29/2015 6/29/2015 6/30/2015 6/30/2015 VOCs (8260) (mg/kg) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.0062 0.22 <0.0041 <0.0045 48 12 ---- 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0052 0.15 0.0044 <0.0045 1,600 240 ---- 4-Isopropyltoluene <0.0052 0.063 <0.0041 <0.0045 NE NE ---- Acetone <0.052 0.061 <0.041 0.045 100,000 12,000 ---- Ethylbenzene 0.0088 0.026 <0.0041 <0.0045 25 5.8 ---- Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)<0.0052 0.025 <0.0041 <0.0045 270 270 ---- Naphthalene <0.010 0.016 <0.0081 <0.0090 17 3.8 ---- n-Propylbenzene <0.0052 0.021 <0.0041 <0.0045 260 260 ---- sec-Butylbenzene <0.0052 0.032 <0.0041 <0.0045 150 150 ---- Total Xylenes4 0.021 0.089 0.017 <0.014 260 120 ---- SVOCs (8270) (mg/kg) ND ND ND ND -------- RCRA Metals (6010/7471) (mg/kg) Arsenic 3.2 1.6 0.89 0.76 3/300*0.67/67*1.0-18 4.8 Barium 37 19 19 14 44,000 3,000 50-1,000 356 Chromium 21 16 10 13 100,000 24,000 7.0-300 65 Lead 37 2.2 2.1 1.6 800 400 ND - 50 16 Mercury 0.14 <0.027 <0.026 <0.022 8.0 1.9 0.03-0.52 0.121 Notes: 1. NC DENR IHSB Preliminary Industrial Health Based Soil Remediation Goals (PSRG) - March 2015 2. NC DENR IHSB Residential Health Based PSRG - March 2015 3. Range and Mean background values for North Carolina or Southeast soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005 4. Total xylenes = the sum of o, m, & p-xylene concentrations * indicates an adjusted SRG per DENR Registered Environmental Consultant Program Guidance document Appendix E - November 2014 Only those compounds detected above laboratory reporting limits are shown EPA Method follows parameter in parenthesis VOCs=volatile organic compounds; SVOCs=semi-volatile organic compounds ND = no SVOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits; NE = Not established; -- = Not Applicable; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Former Oil House Downgradient of Finishing Building Screening Criteria IHSB Industrial PSRG (mg/kg)1 IHSB Residential PSRG (mg/kg)2 Background Metals Mean (mg/kg)3 Background Metals Range (mg/kg)3 SB-3 S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Tables 1-3.xls 8/20/2015 Table 2 Hart & Hickman, PC Table 2 Temporary Monitoring Well Details and Groundwater Elevations Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, Davidson County, North Carolina H&H Job No. PTR.001-7 TW-1 6/29/2015 22 10 856.67 15.70 840.97 TW-2 6/29/2015 24 10 856.27 20.39 835.88 TW-3 6/30/2015 17 10 847.25 12.53 834.72 TW-4 6/30/2015 19 10 845.93 10.85 835.08 TW-5 6/30/2015 15 10 841.68 4.35 837.33 TW-6 6/30/2015 15 10 841.62 12.95 828.67 TW-7 6/30/2015 14.5 10 833.14 8.85 824.29 TW-8 6/30/2015 20 10 858.47 15.05 843.42 Notes: TOC elevations surveyed by Regional Land Surveyors, Inc. on July 2, 2015 amsl = above mean sea level using the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) TOC = top of casing; ft bgs = feet below ground surface Total Depth (ft bgs) Screen Length (ft) Depth-to-Water (ft below TOC) Groundwater Elevation (ft amsl) Well ID Date Installed TOC Elevation (ft amsl) S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Tables 1-3.xls 8/20/2015 Table 1 Hart & Hickman, PC Table 3 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, Davidson County, North Carolina H&H Job No. PTR.001-7 Sample Location Paint Storage & Machine Shop Machine Shop Sumps Northeast Portion of Site Former Oil House Sample ID TW-1 Duplicate (TW-1)TW-2 TW-3 TW-4 TW-5 TW-6 TW-7 TW-8 Sample Date 6/29/2015 6/29/2015 6/29/2015 6/30/2015 6/30/2015 7/1/2015 7/1/2015 7/1/2015 6/30/2015 2L Standard (μg/L)1 Non-Residental VISL (μg/L)2 Residental VISL (μg/L)3 VOCs (8260) 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.8 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 51 400 24.4 5.8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 26 400 NE NE 4-Isopropyltoluene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 3.9 NE NE NE Acetone <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 25 <5.0 15 67 30 27 6,000 19,000,000 4,520,000 Benzene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 7.1 1 69.3 15.9 Ethylbenzene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 32 600 152 34.9 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 4 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 18 70 745 177 Methylene Chloride <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 3.69 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 5 3,960 942 Methyl-tert-Butyl Ether <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 3.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 20 19,700 4,500 Naphthalene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 8.9 6 145 34.8 n-Propylbenzene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 9 70 2,040 486 sec-Butylbenzene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 f 3.4 70 NE NE tert-Butylbenzene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.68 70 NE NE Toluene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 7.2 600 16,100 3,840 Total Xylenes4 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 32.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 111 500 414 99 SVOCs (8270) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ------ Notes: 1. NCAC 2L Groundwater Quality Standards (April 2013) 2. DENR Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels (VISLs), Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs), revised June 2014 3. DENR DWM Residential VISLs, GWSLs, revised June 2014 4. Total xylenes = the sum of o, m, & p-xylene concentrations EPA Method follows parameter in parenthesis Only those compounds detected above laboratory reporting limits are shown Bold indicates an exceedance of the Residential VISL Underline indicates an exceedance of the Non-Residential VISL Grey shading indicates an exceedance of the 2L Standard VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds ND = no SVOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits; NE = not established; -- = not applicable Screening Criteria Former Dry Cleaner and Historical USTs Finishing Building S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\Thomasville Plant L Site\Phase II Assessment\Report\Tables 1-3.xls 8/20/2015 Table 3 Hart & Hickman, PC TITLE PROJECT SITE LOCATION MAP THOMASVILLE PLANT L SITE 14 EAST GUILFORD STREET THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA DATE: JOB NO: REVISION NO: FIGURE NO: 4/21/2015 0 1PTR-001 0 2000 4000 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET N U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP QUADRANGLE 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) HIGH POINT WEST, NC 2013 3334 Hillsborough StreetRaleigh, North Carolina 27607919-847-4241 (p) 919-847-4261 (f) SITE Appendix A Site Photographs Picture 2: Drilling contractor working on installing TW-2 in East Guilford Street Site PTR.001-7 14 East Guilford Street Thomasville, NC, 27360 3334 Hillsborough St Raleigh, NC 27607 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) Picture 1: Drilling contractor working on installing TW-1 in East Guilford Street Picture 4: Work being performed at SB-1 location. Site PTR.001-7 14 East Guilford Street Thomasville, NC, 27360 3334 Hillsborough St Raleigh, NC 27607 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) Picture 3: Patched asphalt after abandoning wells in East Guilford Street. Picture 6: Moving drill rig into position under building for TW-5 and TW-6. Site PTR.001-7 14 East Guilford Street Thomasville, NC, 27360 3334 Hillsborough St Raleigh, NC 27607 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) Picture 5: Moving drill rig into position under building for TW-5 and TW-6. Picture 8: Soil cores showing staining for TW-3 location. Site PTR.001-7 14 East Guilford Street Thomasville, NC, 27360 3334 Hillsborough St Raleigh, NC 27607 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) Picture 7: Staining of SB-3/TW-8 soil core 13-15’ at the water table. Picture 10: Regional Land Surveyors surveying the site Site PTR.001-7 14 East Guilford Street Thomasville, NC, 27360 3334 Hillsborough St Raleigh, NC 27607 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) Picture 9: Regional Land Surveyors setting up to survey the site. Picture 12: Furniture left inside plant building Site PTR.001-7 14 East Guilford Street Thomasville, NC, 27360 3334 Hillsborough St Raleigh, NC 27607 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) Picture 11: Interior of furniture plant building. Picture 14: Interior of furniture building lowest level. Site PTR.001-7 14 East Guilford Street Thomasville, NC, 27360 3334 Hillsborough St Raleigh, NC 27607 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) Picture 13: Interior of furniture building second floor. Site PTR.001-7 14 East Guilford Street Thomasville, NC, 27360 3334 Hillsborough St Raleigh, NC 27607 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) Picture 15: Interior of furniture building lowest level. Appendix B Boring and Well Construction Logs ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Dry, medium stiff, tan silty CLAY Slightly moist, stiff, brown and tan sandy SILT Bottom of borehole at 5.0 feet. 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/29/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Hand Auger / Hand Auger SAMPLING METHOD:Auger Cuttings Hand auger to 5' , no signs of impactfound. BORING STARTED:6/29/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 5 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-1 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Very moist, loose, tan sandy clayey SILT with gravel Moist, stiff, tan sandy clayey SILT. Potential light blue staining, no odor Very moist, loose, tan sandy SILT with partially weatheredrock. Potential light blue staining, no odor Wet, loose, tan sandy SILT with partially weathered rock.Potential light blue staining, no odor Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. 0.3 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:7/1/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Hand auger to 5' , DPT to 10'. BORING STARTED:7/1/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 10 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-10 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Moist, stiff, tan sandy clayey SILT with gravel Moist, stiff, tan sandy clayey SILT Very moist, stiff, tan sandy clayey SILT Very moist, loose, tan sandy SILT with partially weatheredrock. Wet, loose, tan sandy SILT with partially weathered rock. Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. 3.5 2.3 6.7 4.5 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:7/1/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Hand auger to 5' , DPT to 10'. BORING STARTED:7/1/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 10 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-11 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Very moist, medium stiff, tan sandy SILT trace clay Very moist, stiff, tan sandy clayey SILT. Potential lightblue staining, no odor Very moist, loose, tan sandy clayey SILT. Potential lightblue staining, no odor Wet, loose, tan sandy clayey SILT. Potential light bluestaining, no odor Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. 32.4 43.1 44 63.3 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:7/1/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Hand auger to 5' , DPT to 10'. BORING STARTED:7/1/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 10 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-12 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Slightly moist, stiff, brown sandy SILT trace clay withasphalt fragments throughtout Slightly moist, stiff, brown and tan sandy SILT with traceclay and partially weathered rock. Bottom of borehole at 5.0 feet. 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/29/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Hand Auger / Hand Auger SAMPLING METHOD:Auger Cuttings Hand auger to 5' , no signs of impactfound. BORING STARTED:6/29/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 5 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-2 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Moist, stiff, tan and brown sandy clayey SILT Moist, stiff, tan and brown sandy clayey SILT. Potentiallight blue staining, petroleum-like odor Wet, loose, tan and gray sandy SILT with relic structure.Potential light blue staining, petroleum-like odor Refusal at 20.0 feet.Bottom of borehole at 20.0 feet. 3.3 56.4 1560 1181 1134 1150 176.3 143.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1" PVCRiser Filter SandPack 1" PVC0.010 SlottedScreen DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/29/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Installed temporary monitoring well, wellscreen from 10' to 20'. Soil samplestaken from (0'- 2') and (4'- 6') intervals. BORING STARTED:6/29/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 20 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-3/TW-8 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20 CONCRETE Moist, stiff, tan and red clayey SILT with partially weathered rock Bottom of borehole at 5.0 feet. 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/29/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Hand Auger / Hand Auger SAMPLING METHOD:Auger Cuttings Hand auger to 5' , no signs of impactfound. BORING STARTED:6/29/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 5 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-4 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Moist, stiff, red and brown sandy clayey SILT mixed with gravel Moist, medium stiff, brown and tan sandy clayey SILT Moist, medium stiff, brown and tan sandy clayey SILT. Potential light blue staining, no odor Dry, loose, brown sandy SILT trace clay with partiallyweathered rock Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. 1.1 0.9 3.1 3.3 3.8 0 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/30/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Hand auger to 5' , DPT to 10'. BORING STARTED:6/30/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 10 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-5 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 Grass and organic TOPSOIL Dry, loose, gray brown sandy SILT Slightly moist, stiff, brown clayey SILT Moist, hard, gray and brown clayey SILT with partially weathered rock Moist, stiff, gray and brown sandy SILT with partiallyweathered rock Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. 1 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/30/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Hand auger to 5' , DPT to 10'. BORING STARTED:6/30/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 10 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-6 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Dry, loose, tan and brown sandy SILT with gravel Moist, stiff, tan and brown clayey SILT Moist, very stiff, tan and brown clayey SILT with partiallyweathered rocks and manganese oxide fragments Moist, stiff, tan and brown clayey SILT with partiallyweathered rock Very Moist, medium stiff, gray and tan clayey SILT withpartially weathered rock. Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/30/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Hand auger to 5' , DPT to 10'. BORING STARTED:6/30/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 10 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-7 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Moist, loose, tan sandy SILT with gravel Very moist, stiff, tan and brown clayey SILT Wet, stiff, tan sandy clayey SILT. Potential blue staining,no odor Very moist, medium stiff, tan and brown sandy SILT Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. 0.3 0.2 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:7/1/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Hand auger to 5' , DPT to 10'. BORING STARTED:7/1/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 10 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-8 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Moist, slightly stiff, tan sandy clayey SILT with gravel, staining and odor Moist, slightly stiff, tan sandy clayey SILT with stainingand odor Very moist, slightly stiff, tan sandy clayey SILT withpartially weathered rock. Potential light blue odor, petroleum-like odor Wet, slightly stiff, tan sandy clayey SILT with partiallyweathered rock staining and odor Bottom of borehole at 10.0 feet. 84.2 73.6 41.3 9.8 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:7/1/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Hand auger to 5' , DPT to 10'. BORING STARTED:7/1/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 10 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-9 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Moist, slightly stiff, red and tan sandy CLAY Moist, stiff, red and tan silty CLAY Moist, slightly stiff, tan sandy clayey SILT with partially weathered rock Very moist, loose, red and gray sandy SILT with partiallyweathered rock Wet, loose, brown and gray sandy SILT with relic structure Wet, loose, brown and gray sandy SILT with relic structureand partially weathered rock Refusal at 22.0 feet. Bottom of borehole at 22.0 feet. 96.4 8.3 1 0.2 0.1 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1" PVC Riser Filter SandPack 1" PVC0.010 SlottedScreen DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/29/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Installed temporary monitoring well, wellscreen from 12' to 22'. BORING STARTED:6/29/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 22 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER TW-1 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Slightly moist, slightly stiff, gray red clayey SILT Moist, stiff, gray and red sandy clayey SILT with partiallyweathered rock Moist, stiff, gray and red clayey SILT, with partiallyweathered rock and manganese oxide fragments Wet, slightly stiff, red and gray sandy SILT trace clay withpartially weathered rock Wet, loose, red clayey SILT with partially weathered rock Refusal at 24.0 feet.Bottom of borehole at 24.0 feet. 1.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1" PVCRiser Filter SandPack 1" PVC 0.010SlottedScreen DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/29/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Installed temporary monitoring well, wellscreen from 14' to 24'. BORING STARTED:6/29/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 24 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER TW-2 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Moist, stiff, tan clayey SILT trace sand. Potential light blue staining, petroleum-like odor Moist, stiff, tan and brown clayey SILT trace sand.Potential light blue staining, petroleum-like odor Moist, loose, brown sandy SILT with partially weatheredrock. Potential light blue staining, petroleum-like odor Very moist, loose, tan SILT with partially weathered rock Wet, loose, tan sandy SILT with partially weathered rockand relic structure Refusal at 17.0 feet. Bottom of borehole at 17.0 feet. 0.5 0.6 23.7 56.1 2633 2070 0 0 0 0 0 0 1" PVCRiser Filter SandPack 1" PVC 0.010SlottedScreen DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/30/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Installed temporary monitoring well, wellscreen from 7' to 17'. Soil sample takenfrom (8' - 10') interval. BORING STARTED:6/30/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 17 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER TW-3 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Moist, medium stiff, tan sandy SILT trace clay with staining Moist, very stiff, tan and brown silty CLAY. Potential lightblue staining, no odor Moist, stiff, tan and brown silty CLAY with partially weathered rock. Potential light blue staining, no odor Very moist, stiff, tan and brown clayey SILT with partiallyweathered rock Wet, stiff, tan sandy SILT with partially weathered rockand relic structure. Potential light blue staining, no odor Refusal at 19.0 feet. Bottom of borehole at 19.0 feet. 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.8 1.5 0.7 0.3 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1" PVCRiser Filter SandPack 1" PVC0.010Slotted Screen DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/30/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Installed temporary monitoring well, wellscreen from 9' to 19'. BORING STARTED:6/30/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 19 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER TW-4 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20 Moist, loose, tan silty SAND trace clay Dry, loose, tan silty SAND with partially weathered rock Moist, loose, tan silty SAND with partially weathered rock Very moist, loose, tan silty SAND with partially weatheredrock and relic structure Refusal at 15.0 feet.Bottom of borehole at 15.0 feet. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0 0 1" PVCRiser Filter SandPack 1" PVC0.010 SlottedScreen DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/30/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Installed temporary monitoring well, wellscreen from 5' to 15'. BORING STARTED:6/30/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 15 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER TW-5 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20 Dry, loose, tan sandy SILT Moist, loose, tan sandy SILT trace clay Very moist, stiff, red and brown sandy clayey SILT with crushed bricks, and partially weathered rock Wet, stiff, red and brown sandy clayey SILT with crushedbricks, and partially weathered rock Wet, stiff, tan sandy SILT with relic structure and partially weathered rock Refusal at 15.0 feet.Bottom of borehole at 15.0 feet. 0.1 0.1 0 0 1" PVCRiser Filter SandPack 1" PVC0.010 SlottedScreen DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/30/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Installed temporary monitoring well, wellscreen from 5' to 15'. BORING STARTED:6/30/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 15 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER TW-6 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20 ASPHALT Poorly graded GRAVEL Dry, loose, brown sandy SILT Very moist, slightly stiff, borwn silty CLAY. Potential lightblue staining, no odor Wet, loose, brown and black silty SAND with partiallyweathered rock. Potential light blue staining, no odor Wet, stiff, brown silty SAND trace clay, with relic structure Refusal at 14.5 feet.Bottom of borehole at 14.5 feet. 0.6 0.8 1.6 0 0 0 1" PVCRiser Filter Sand Pack 1" PVC0.010Slotted Screen DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:6/30/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:Geoprobe 6610DT / DPT SAMPLING METHOD:DPT Sleeves Installed temporary monitoring well, wellscreen from 4.5' to 14.5'. BORING STARTED:6/30/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 14.5 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t )MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LI T H O L O G Y SA M P . BK G . BL O W CO U N T S (N V A L U E ) WELL DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER TW-7 PROJECT:Thomasville Plant L JOB NUMBER:PTR.001-7 LOCATION:Thomasville, NC WE L L L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 7 / 1 5 / 1 5 1 5 : 4 3 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ P T R . 0 0 1 - 7 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20 Appendix C Laboratory Analytical Data Page 1 of 62 Page 2 of 62 Page 3 of 62 Page 4 of 62 Page 5 of 62 Page 6 of 62 Page 7 of 62 Page 8 of 62 Page 9 of 62 Page 10 of 62 Page 11 of 62 Page 12 of 62 Page 13 of 62 Page 14 of 62 Page 15 of 62 Page 16 of 62 Page 17 of 62 Page 18 of 62 Page 19 of 62 Page 20 of 62 Page 21 of 62 Page 22 of 62 Page 23 of 62 Page 24 of 62 Page 25 of 62 Page 26 of 62 Page 27 of 62 Page 28 of 62 Page 29 of 62 Page 30 of 62 Page 31 of 62 Page 32 of 62 Page 33 of 62 Page 34 of 62 Page 35 of 62 Page 36 of 62 Page 37 of 62 Page 38 of 62 Page 39 of 62 Page 40 of 62 Page 41 of 62 Page 42 of 62 Page 43 of 62 Page 44 of 62 Page 45 of 62 Page 46 of 62 Page 47 of 62 Page 48 of 62 Page 49 of 62 Page 50 of 62 Page 51 of 62 Page 52 of 62 Page 53 of 62 Page 54 of 62 Page 55 of 62 Page 56 of 62 Page 57 of 62 Page 58 of 62 Page 59 of 62 Page 60 of 62 Page 61 of 62 Page 62 of 62 Page 1 of 83 Page 2 of 83 Page 3 of 83 Page 4 of 83 Page 5 of 83 Page 6 of 83 Page 7 of 83 Page 8 of 83 Page 9 of 83 Page 10 of 83 Page 11 of 83 Page 12 of 83 Page 13 of 83 Page 14 of 83 Page 15 of 83 Page 16 of 83 Page 17 of 83 Page 18 of 83 Page 19 of 83 Page 20 of 83 Page 21 of 83 Page 22 of 83 Page 23 of 83 Page 24 of 83 Page 25 of 83 Page 26 of 83 Page 27 of 83 Page 28 of 83 Page 29 of 83 Page 30 of 83 Page 31 of 83 Page 32 of 83 Page 33 of 83 Page 34 of 83 Page 35 of 83 Page 36 of 83 Page 37 of 83 Page 38 of 83 Page 39 of 83 Page 40 of 83 Page 41 of 83 Page 42 of 83 Page 43 of 83 Page 44 of 83 Page 45 of 83 Page 46 of 83 Page 47 of 83 Page 48 of 83 Page 49 of 83 Page 50 of 83 Page 51 of 83 Page 52 of 83 Page 53 of 83 Page 54 of 83 Page 55 of 83 Page 56 of 83 Page 57 of 83 Page 58 of 83 Page 59 of 83 Page 60 of 83 Page 61 of 83 Page 62 of 83 Page 63 of 83 Page 64 of 83 Page 65 of 83 Page 66 of 83 Page 67 of 83 Page 68 of 83 Page 69 of 83 Page 70 of 83 Page 71 of 83 Page 72 of 83 Page 73 of 83 Page 74 of 83 Page 75 of 83 Page 76 of 83 Page 77 of 83 Page 78 of 83 Page 79 of 83 Page 80 of 83 Page 81 of 83 Page 82 of 83 Page 83 of 83 Appendix D Groundwater Sampling Records Appendix E Lead-Based Paint Survey Report Lead Paint Survey Report Thomasville Plant L 14 East Guilford Street Thomasville, NC PTR-001-7 Prepared for: Aaron Oswald Hart & Hickman, PC 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 Greensboro, NC 28203 July 24, 2015 Prepared by: Get The Lead Out, LLC 2121 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 202 Charlotte, North Carolina 28205 704-376-3594 i CERTIFICATION AND REVIEW PAGE Lead Paint Survey of Thomasville Plant L, Thomasville NC I hereby certify that the Surveys described herein were completed under my supervision. Get the Lead Out cannot warrant that the surveyed property does not contain lead in locations other than those surveyed and identified in this report. This Survey is based solely on the spaces accessed and information provided by the owner. Kathryn O. Hubicki Get The Lead Out, LLC NC Risk Assessor 120243 Date: July 23, 2015 DISCLAIMER AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Disclaimer This report summarizes Get The Lead Out’s evaluation of the subject property for the presence of lead-based paint. Our findings are based upon our observations at the property and sampling performed at the time of the Survey activities; conditions at the property may change due to deterioration or maintenance, and Get The Lead Out is not responsible for such changes. Additional lead-based paints may exist in other portions of the property, but were undetected due to inaccessibility or due to an imperceptible change in paints. Any conditions discovered which deviate from the data contained in this report should be presented to us for our evaluation. The observations, results and conclusions contained in this report are time dependent and are subject to changing site conditions and revisions to federal, state and local regulations. Ongoing monitoring by the owner is usually necessary. Except for our evaluation of the subject property for the presence of lead-based paint, no other environmental concerns were addressed during this Survey. Reliance or use of the information or conclusions of this report by a third party (i.e. a party other than the one for whom it was prepared) without explicit authorization shall be at the third party’s sole risk. Get The Lead Out makes no warranties or representations, express or implied in this report, to any such third parties. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DISCLAIMER I DISCLOSURE ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ............................................................................. 2-1 3.0 LEAD SURVEY ................................................................................................. 3-1 4.0 RESULTS .......................................................................................................... 4-1 5.0 XRF TESTING PROCEDURE ........................................................................... 5-1 5.1 TEST EQUIPMENT…………………………………………………………. 5-2 5.2 EXPLANATION OF SAMPLE NUMBERING……………………………..5-2 5.3 QUALITY CONTROL…………………………………………………………5-3 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 6-1 7.0 APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………… 7-1 APPENDIX A – ALL XRF TEST RESULTS APPENDIX B – FLOOR PLAN APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX D – RISK ASSESSOR AND FIRM CREDENTIALS APPENDIX E – GLOSSARY Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC 1-1 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Get The Lead Out, LLC was retained by Hart & Hickman, PC to perform a lead-based paint survey at the Thomasville Plant L located at 14 East Guilford in Thomasville, North Carolina. Get The Lead Out employees Kathryn Hubicki and Don Suleski, licensed lead risk assessors in the state of North Carolina, tested painted components according to the specifications described in the HUD Lead-Evaluation Chapter 7 (2nd edition) for lead- based paint testing on July 13 & 14, 2015. Additionally, all Federal, State and City Regulations governing the survey of lead based paint for the site of the Survey were followed. The credentials of the risk assessors and their firm are in Appendix D. Wipe and soil samples were not included in the scope of work. Get The Lead Out test results do indicate the presence of (=/>1.0 mg/cm2) lead- based paint as well as elevated levels of lead exist in the building. The lead-based paint results identified apply to all similar surfaces on the property, not just the surfaces that were sampled. Lead-based paint could exist in other portions of the property, but could be undetected due to inaccessibility or due to an imperceptible change in paints. All untested components must be assumed to contain lead-based paint. Under 29 CFR 1926.62, OSHA requires worker protection from all levels of lead. This report presents the areas tested and the levels of lead found. This report should be kept by the risk assessor and should also be kept by the owner and all future owners for the life of the property. Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC 2-1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The building is located at 14 East Guilford Street in Thomasville, North Carolina. The site includes a three-story facility with three main buildings encompassing approximately 190,000 square feet of interior space. According to the tax records, the original building was constructed in 1927 with subsequent additions until 1970, and was formerly used a furniture manufacturing plant. A water tank tower is also present on the site. The buildings are constructed of brick and wood. Parts of the buildings’ exteriors have been covered with asphaltic faux brick siding. Some of the exteriors near the rear dock have aluminum siding. There are several aluminum and wood overhead doors at docks around the building. The regular doors are both metal and wood. The windows were predominantly metal. The roof consisted of a membrane roof. There were several elevator mechanical rooms accessible from the roof. They were predominately unpainted on the interior. The interiors of the buildings generally had wood floors and ceilings, with wood or brick walls. Some of the office areas had vinyl floor tiles and acoustic ceiling tiles. Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC 3-1 3.0 LEAD SURVEY This lead-based paint survey is an interior and exterior investigation to identify suspect lead-based paint on a surface-by-surface basis. A lead-based paint survey tests suspect paint and other accessible painted areas. It is not designed to test every single surface, but to provide a representative idea of where lead-based paint can be found on the property. A drawing of the building has been provided in Appendix B. The drawing identifies room locations and wall labels (A, B, C, D wall etc.) that are used to identify XRF locations. Testing was performed by Don Suleski, a North Carolina licensed Lead Risk Assessor (license number 120249), using a Niton XLp300 Lead Analyzer, serial #7415 and Kathryn Hubicki (license number 120243), a North Carolina licensed Lead Risk Assessor using a Niton XLp300 Series Lead Analyzer, serial #8876. The radioactive sources were replaced in December 2014 and January 2015, respectively. Their credentials are provided in Appendix D: Risk Assessor Credentials. The XRF analyzer is designed to measure the lead content of surface coatings on a variety of building surfaces, substrates, and components. The measurement is rapid and nondestructive and, according to the manufacturer, is capable of detecting lead concentrations that occur within numerous layers of various surface coatings. All testing was non-destructive. Please refer to the Appendix A: All XRF Test Results, Positive XRF Test Results and Positive and Elevated Test Results for the detailed analytical testing results for each distinct area inspected, a table of positive lead painted areas located and a third table of elevated and positive lead-based paint found. Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC 4-1 4.0 RESULTS Get the Lead Out determined that several of the components tested during this survey contain lead in amounts greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 in paint in the surfaces tested. Traffic yellow paint was found on handrail, elevator door panels, roll up door panels and wall areas. All yellow paint should be considered to contain lead based paint. White columns, located in Room 10, had positive lead painted paint. All similar columns should be considered to have lead based paint. The white paint on the floor in Room 6 was positive for lead. Also red columns in Room 6 were positive. Room 9 Side A has a positive grey door. On the exterior, side A there is faux brick over wood and over insulation. The white painted wood under the faux brick is positive for lead. Interior yellow, red and white paint should be treated as having positive or elevated levels of lead. On the exterior, the white paint under the asphaltic faux brick should be treated as having elevated or positive amounts of lead. Some of the remaining XRF test locations exhibited lead-in-paint levels below the level that North Carolina identifies as lead-based paint, namely 1.0 mg/cm2. Such surfaces could create dust-lead or soil-lead hazards if the paint is turned into dust by abrasion, scraping, or sanding. Should these or any lead containing components or surfaces be disturbed in any manner that generates dust, care should be taken to limit its spread. See Appendix B for all elevated XRF Readings. Please refer to the Appendix A - All XRF Test Results, Positive Test Results and Positive and Elevated Test results for the detailed analytical testing results for each distinct area inspected. Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC 5-1 5.0 XRF TESTING PROCEDURE The Niton XLp Model 300A is a hand-held, portable lead detector, designed to make fast, accurate non-destructive measurements of lead concentration in lead-based paint. The XLp displays lead levels, indicates precision of measurement and stores up to 3000 readings and spectra. The accuracy and precision of the data is a function not only of the instrument, but also of how well the operator is trained. Get The Lead Out, LLC has developed a standardized test procedure to be followed by technicians as they make measurements. Procedure for XLp 300 1. Turn on the XLp. 2. Log-in to begin self-calibration. 3. When the XLp emits a tone, calibration is complete. 4. Place the Niton XLp on calibration standard block of known 1. 0 mg/cm2 lead content and test for accuracy. Repeat three times. 5. Begin the test by entering into the XLp the structure type, location and substrate of the surface to be tested. 6. Place the XLp on the painted surface, push in the shutter release, and firmly press the XLp flat against the surface. 7. The XLp's time tones will decide when the test has reached the desired level of accuracy. For readings of approximately 1. 0 mg/cm², a 20 source second reading is advisable. For lead-free areas or high lead areas, a reading of 2-4 source seconds is needed. 8. Lift the XLp from the surface to end the test. 9. To take additional readings, simply repeat steps 7 through 10. 10. At the conclusion of the testing at the site, three additional calibration checks are made. Or, alternatively, calibration checks are made every four hours during continuous testing. The first step is to conduct an inventory of the painted components in interior rooms, of the exterior walls and surfaces, and of the other exterior areas such as play areas and garages. An area is chosen at the sample location for paint testing. A diagram is made of the exterior of the building, the floor plan and the individual rooms. Each area is numbered so that sample identification is consistent and the location of each sample taken can be found on the diagram. Perimeter walls are identified as A, B, C and D. Each room equivalent was orientated so that the wall that the “A Wall” corresponds directly with the main entrance wall. Each room equivalent’s side identification follows the scheme for the whole housing unit. A site sketch designating rooms by expected use (kitchen, bathroom, etc) and walls by orientation (A through D) is located in Appendix C. Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC 5-2 Before beginning XRF testing, sample readings are taken as described above. If the reading is not within the accuracy of the range of deviation, the instrument is out of control. For example, if the reading of the 1.0 mg/cm² standard is shown to be 0. 9 ± 0. 2 mg/cm², it is within the range of standard deviation. If the instrument is out of control, it must be sent back to Niton before any further testing can occur. The shipping, handling and transportation manual must be consulted for instructions. To minimize the potential adverse effects of frequent substrate changes on the Niton instrument, every effort is made to test the substrates within each room in order. All painted wood, for example, could be tested first, then plaster, drywall, concrete, brick and metal. The Niton is retested for accuracy each day or after it has been turned off for breaks or lunch. If continuous testing occurs for more than four hours, the instrument is rechecked. After completing the specific project or at the end of the day, all data is downloaded into a computer using the Niton proprietary software. Then a copy is created for additional safety. This test procedure was developed using the HUD 1997 procedure for XRF testing instruments. 5.1 TEST EQUIPMENT The field measurements were taken with a Niton XLp Model 300A. This is a handheld instrument with sophisticated integrated software that allows the specific identification of sample structure type and location. Containing a Cadmium-109 radioactive isotope as a power source, the XLp has been proven during HUD and Air Force studies to give accurate measurements of the presence and amount of lead-based paint. The PCS (Performance Characteristic Statement) is attached in Appendix IV. Both false positive results and false negative results are minimized when using this equipment. Copies of the Georgia License and Operator Certificates are located at the end of this report in Appendix E. 5.2 EXPLANATION OF SAMPLE NUMBERING Referring to the pages of sample data in Appendix A, one can see that the Niton XLp 300 consecutively numbers the samples. The results are presented in ascending numerical order, just as they were taken. One can see from the Time column the sequential nature of these values. The following chart is an explanation of the columns present in the XRF results. Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC 5-3 Heading Explanation No. Test number in this file. Room Type of room, i. e. , kitchen, bath, etc. , with an identifying room number Side The side of the room, building or area is assigned a letter (A, B, C or D) for later identification. Component Wall, door, window, etc. Feature Further delineation of the part of the structure tested. Condition Condition of paint, intact, poor, etc. Substrate Type of substrate, plaster, wood, metal, concrete, etc. PbC Concentration of lead-based paint found, measured in mg/cm² Date & Time Date of test and the time of the test 5.3 QUALITY CONTROL Assurance of accurate and proper field measurements taken with the Niton XLp is accomplished in four ways. a. The accuracy and precision of the calibration of the instrument is verified routinely. A new calibration is performed every time the instrument is turned on. These "checks" must be within specification in order for the instrument to permit measurements to be taken. In addition, the calibration check is run when the testing is complete, or every four hours. b. The actual spectrum of energies detected during an analysis is recorded, evaluated and saved in memory by the instrument. This spectrum is actually the fingerprint or X-ray print of each sample. The spectrum reveals numerous items of detail about the sample. Details about the information in each column of the printout are explained in Section 5. 2. In addition, the graphs of the actual energy spectra are stored in the data field. This information can be further analyzed if necessary for legal means. c. All samples are numbered, recorded, location and structural information is entered and checked against the floor plan drawings. d. An encrypted, sequential list of each and every measurement is recorded and reported. The combination of all four controls provides empirical, defensible proof that measurements were taken according to plan and indications of whether (or not) the instrument was performing properly. Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC 6-1 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The presence of lead in paint means that any contractor performing demolition and/or renovations is required to make provisions for worker protection by complying with North Carolina OSHA regulations, 29 CFR 1926.62 Construction Standard for Lead. Regulated work activities that may generate airborne lead levels (and may require air testing) include torch burning, abrasive blasting, welding, sawing, and grinding. If any of these activities need to occur on lead-based painted surfaces during demolition or renovation, methods such as HEPA vacuums, wet-stripping, water spray or others should be considered to reduce the potential for lead-dust or fume emissions to surrounding areas and workers. At the minimum, GTLO recommends that contract construction workers be told of the presence of lead paint, be given access to Appendices A and B of the OSHA lead standard, and that a negative exposure assessment occur according to OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1926.62. Demolition waste that contains lead is recommended to have representative testing using TCLP to determine appropriate disposal options, depending on whether the debris is considered hazardous waste. This report should be kept by the risk assessor and should also be kept by the owner and all future owners for the life of the property. Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC 7-1 7. 0 APPENDICES Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC APPENDIX A ALL XRF TEST RESULTS POSITIVE XRF TEST RESULTS POSITIVE AND ELEVATED XRF TEST RESULTS Thomasville Plant L Site, Thomasville, NC.xlsx All XRF Test Results Reading No Time Floor Rooms Side Component Feature Condition Substrate Color PbC Results 1 7/13/2015 8:22 65.41 2 7/13/2015 8:23 Calibration 0.01 Negative 3 7/13/2015 8:24 Calibration 0.01 Negative 4 7/13/2015 8:24 Calibration 0.01 Negative 5 7/13/2015 8:25 Calibration 0.02 Negative 6 7/13/2015 8:27 5.71 7 7/13/2015 8:57 Calibration 1.00 Positive 8 7/13/2015 8:58 Calibration 0.80 Negative 9 7/13/2015 8:59 Calibration 0.90 Negative 10 7/13/2015 8:59 Calibration 0.90 Negative 11 7/13/2015 9:02 First Room 10 A Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.01 Negative 12 7/13/2015 9:04 First Room 10 A Floor Floor Deteriorated Concrete Grey 0.00 Negative 13 7/13/2015 9:05 First Room 10 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 14 7/13/2015 9:05 First Room 10 A Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 15 7/13/2015 9:05 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 16 7/13/2015 9:05 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 2.40 Positive 17 7/13/2015 9:06 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 3.20 Positive 18 7/13/2015 9:06 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 19 7/13/2015 9:06 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 20 7/13/2015 9:06 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 5.30 Positive 21 7/13/2015 9:07 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Black 0.01 Negative 22 7/13/2015 9:07 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.00 Negative 23 7/13/2015 9:08 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 0.16 Negative 24 7/13/2015 9:08 First Room 10 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.03 Negative 25 7/13/2015 9:08 First Room 10 C Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 3.90 Positive 26 7/13/2015 9:09 First Room 10 C Stairs Tread Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.01 Negative 27 7/13/2015 9:09 First Room 10 C Stairs Stringer Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 28 7/13/2015 9:09 First Room 10 C Stairs Stringer Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.00 Negative 29 7/13/2015 9:12 First Room 10 B Door, Slider Door Deteriorated Wood Red 0.90 Negative 30 7/13/2015 9:12 First Room 10 B Wall, Int. Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 3.80 Positive 31 7/13/2015 9:19 First Room 1 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 32 7/13/2015 9:20 First Room 1 A Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 33 7/13/2015 9:20 First Room 1 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 34 7/13/2015 9:20 First Room 1 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 35 7/13/2015 9:20 First Room 1 D Door, Slider Door Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 36 7/13/2015 9:21 First Room 1 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 37 7/13/2015 9:21 First Room 1 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 38 7/13/2015 9:21 First Room 1 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.00 Negative 39 7/13/2015 9:22 First Room 1 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.00 Negative 40 7/13/2015 9:22 First Room 1 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.00 Negative 41 7/13/2015 9:23 First Room 2 D Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.06 Negative 42 7/13/2015 9:23 First Room 2 D Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 43 7/13/2015 9:23 First Room 2 D Ceiling Ceiling pipe Deteriorated Metal White 0.00 Negative 44 7/13/2015 9:24 First Room 2 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.02 Negative 45 7/13/2015 9:24 First Room 2 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 46 7/13/2015 9:24 First Room 2 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Black 0.06 Negative 47 7/13/2015 9:25 First Room 2 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.02 Negative 48 7/13/2015 9:25 First Room 2 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 49 7/13/2015 9:27 First Room 2 D Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.02 Negative 50 7/13/2015 9:27 First Room 2 D Door, Int. Jamb Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 51 7/13/2015 9:27 First Room 2 D Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 52 7/13/2015 9:28 First Room 2 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.00 Negative 53 7/13/2015 9:29 First Room 3 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick Red 0.01 Negative 54 7/13/2015 9:29 First Room 3 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 55 7/13/2015 9:30 First Room 3 D Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.70 Negative 56 7/13/2015 9:30 First Room 3 A Door, Int. Jamb Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.07 Negative 57 7/13/2015 9:30 First Room 3 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 58 7/13/2015 9:31 First Bath 4 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.00 Negative 59 7/13/2015 9:31 First Bath 4 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.00 Negative 60 7/13/2015 9:32 First Bath 4 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.02 Negative 61 7/13/2015 9:32 First Bath 4 D Wall, Int. Wall pipe Deteriorated Metal Beige 0.00 Negative 62 7/13/2015 9:32 First Bath 4 B Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.00 Negative 63 7/13/2015 9:33 First Bath 4 B Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.00 Negative 64 7/13/2015 9:33 First Bath 4 B Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.09 Negative 65 7/13/2015 9:34 First Room 5 B Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 66 7/13/2015 9:34 First Room 5 B Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 67 7/13/2015 9:34 First Room 5 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 68 7/13/2015 9:35 First Room 5 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.00 Negative 69 7/13/2015 9:35 First Room 5 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick Purple 0.00 Negative 70 7/13/2015 9:35 First Room 5 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Purple 0.00 Negative 71 7/13/2015 9:37 First Room 6 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 72 7/13/2015 9:37 First Room 6 C Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 73 7/13/2015 9:38 First Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 74 7/13/2015 9:38 First Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 75 7/13/2015 9:38 First Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 76 7/13/2015 9:38 First Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.01 Negative Thomasville Plant L Site, Thomasville, NC.xlsx All XRF Test Results Reading No Time Floor Rooms Side Component Feature Condition Substrate Color PbC Results 77 7/13/2015 9:39 First Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal White 0.02 Negative 78 7/13/2015 9:40 First Room 6 C Ceiling Ceiling pipe Deteriorated Metal White 0.03 Negative 79 7/13/2015 9:40 First Room 6 C Ceiling Ceiling pipe Deteriorated Metal White 0.02 Negative 80 7/13/2015 9:41 First Room 6 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 81 7/13/2015 9:41 First Room 6 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.00 Negative 82 7/13/2015 9:41 First Room 6 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 83 7/13/2015 9:42 First Room 6 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.00 Negative 84 7/13/2015 9:42 First Room 6 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick Red 0.00 Negative 85 7/13/2015 9:47 First Room 6 C Door, Slider Door Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 86 7/13/2015 9:47 First Room 6 C Door, Slider 2 Door Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 87 7/13/2015 9:52 First Room 7 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 88 7/13/2015 9:53 First Room 7 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.01 Negative 89 7/13/2015 9:53 First Room 7 A Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 90 7/13/2015 9:53 First Room 7 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.01 Negative 91 7/13/2015 9:54 First Room 8 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 92 7/13/2015 9:54 First Room 8 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.01 Negative 93 7/13/2015 9:54 First Room 8 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 94 7/13/2015 9:54 First Room 8 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 95 7/13/2015 9:54 First Room 8 A Door, Int. Jamb Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 96 7/13/2015 9:55 First Room 8 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Tan 0.00 Negative 97 7/13/2015 9:55 First Room 8 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Tan 0.00 Negative 98 7/13/2015 9:56 First Room elevator 9 D Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.13 Negative 99 7/13/2015 9:56 First Room elevator 9 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.01 Negative 100 7/13/2015 9:57 First Room elevator 9 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.10 Negative 101 7/13/2015 9:57 First Room 10 B Ceiling Wall heater Deteriorated Metal Red 0.07 Negative 102 7/13/2015 11:41 Second Room 1 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 103 7/13/2015 11:41 Second Room 1 A Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.07 Negative 104 7/13/2015 11:41 Second Room 1 A Ceiling beam Deteriorated Metal White 0.01 Negative 105 7/13/2015 11:42 Second Room 1 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.19 Negative 106 7/13/2015 11:42 Second Room 1 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 0.16 Negative 107 7/13/2015 11:42 Second Room 1 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 108 7/13/2015 11:43 Second Room 1 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 109 7/13/2015 11:43 Second Room 1 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Drywall Beige 0.00 Negative 110 7/13/2015 11:43 Second Room 1 D Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 111 7/13/2015 11:44 Second Room 1 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.02 Negative 112 7/13/2015 11:44 Second Room 2 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 113 7/13/2015 11:44 Second Room 2 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 114 7/13/2015 11:44 Second Room 2 D Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.02 Negative 115 7/13/2015 11:45 Second Room 2 D Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 116 7/13/2015 11:45 Second Room 2 D Ceiling pipe Deteriorated Metal White ‐0.20 Negative 117 7/13/2015 11:46 Second Room 2 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.26 Negative 118 7/13/2015 11:46 Second Room 2 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 0.14 Negative 119 7/13/2015 11:46 Second Room 2 B Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 120 7/13/2015 11:47 Second Room 2 A Win., Int. Sash Deteriorated Metal Black 0.00 Negative 121 7/13/2015 11:47 Second Room 2 A Win., Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 122 7/13/2015 11:48 Second Room 2 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 123 7/13/2015 11:48 Second Room 2 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 124 7/13/2015 11:49 Second Room 2 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.08 Negative 125 7/13/2015 11:49 Second Room 2 B Wall, Int. pipe Deteriorated Metal White 0.04 Negative 126 7/13/2015 11:50 Second Room 2 C Door, Int. elev Door Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.60 Positive 127 7/13/2015 11:50 Second Room 2 C Door, Int. elev Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.07 Negative 128 7/13/2015 11:50 Second Room 2 C Door, Int. elev Jamb Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.03 Negative 129 7/13/2015 11:51 Second Room 2 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 130 7/13/2015 11:52 Second Room 2 D Wall, Int. Wall, Upper Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 131 7/13/2015 11:52 Second Room 2 D Wall, Int. Wall, Lower Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 132 7/13/2015 11:53 Second Room 3 D Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 133 7/13/2015 11:54 Second Room 3 D Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.05 Negative 134 7/13/2015 11:54 Second Room 3 D Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Metal White 0.02 Negative 135 7/13/2015 11:54 Second Room 3 D Ceiling Ceiling pipe Deteriorated Metal White 0.00 Negative 136 7/13/2015 11:55 Second Room 3 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Blue 0.06 Negative 137 7/13/2015 11:55 Second Room 3 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.08 Negative 138 7/13/2015 11:55 Second Room 3 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.19 Negative 139 7/13/2015 11:56 Second Room 3 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 140 7/13/2015 11:56 Second Room 3 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 141 7/13/2015 11:57 Second Room 3 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.01 Negative 142 7/13/2015 11:57 Second Room 3 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Metal Red 0.04 Negative 143 7/13/2015 11:58 Second Room 3 A Door, Int. Door Intact Metal Grey 0.06 Negative 144 7/13/2015 11:59 Second Room 3 D Door, Int. elev Door Intact Wood Grey 0.08 Negative 145 7/13/2015 11:59 Second Room 3 D Door, Int. elev Door Intact Metal Red 0.30 Negative 146 7/13/2015 12:00 Second Room 4 B Door, Int. elev Jamb Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 147 7/13/2015 12:00 Second Room 4 B Door, Int. elev Casing Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 148 7/13/2015 12:00 Second Room 4 C Win., Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 149 7/13/2015 12:00 Second Room 4 C Win., Int. Sash Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 150 7/13/2015 12:01 Second Room 4 C Wall, Int. Wall, Upper Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 151 7/13/2015 12:01 Second Room 4 D Wall, Int. Wall, Upper Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 152 7/13/2015 12:01 Second Room 4 D Wall, Int. Wall, Lower Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative Thomasville Plant L Site, Thomasville, NC.xlsx All XRF Test Results Reading No Time Floor Rooms Side Component Feature Condition Substrate Color PbC Results 153 7/13/2015 12:01 Second Room 4 D Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 154 7/13/2015 12:02 Second Room 5 D Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 155 7/13/2015 12:02 Second Room 5 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 156 7/13/2015 12:02 Second Room 5 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 157 7/13/2015 12:03 Second Room 5 D Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 158 7/13/2015 12:03 Second Room 5 D Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 159 7/13/2015 12:03 Second Room 5 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 160 7/13/2015 12:04 Second Room 6 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 161 7/13/2015 12:04 Second Room 6 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Tan 0.00 Negative 162 7/13/2015 12:04 Second Room 6 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Tan 0.01 Negative 163 7/13/2015 12:04 Second Room 6 D Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Tan 0.00 Negative 164 7/13/2015 12:04 Second Room 6 D Door, Int. Jamb Deteriorated Wood Tan 0.00 Negative 165 7/13/2015 12:06 Second Room 6 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood White 1.40 Positive 166 7/13/2015 12:06 Second Room 6 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 167 7/13/2015 12:06 Second Room 6 D Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.03 Negative 168 7/13/2015 12:06 Second Room 6 D Ceiling Ceiling eam Deteriorated Wood White 0.05 Negative 169 7/13/2015 12:07 Second Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.22 Negative 170 7/13/2015 12:07 Second Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Blue 0.20 Negative 171 7/13/2015 12:08 Second Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Red 0.90 Null 172 7/13/2015 12:08 Second Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 1.20 Positive 173 7/13/2015 12:08 Second Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.30 Negative 174 7/13/2015 12:10 Second Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Red 0.60 Negative 175 7/13/2015 12:10 Second Room 6 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 176 7/13/2015 12:10 Second Room 6 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 177 7/13/2015 12:11 Second Room 6 D Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Metal White 0.07 Negative 178 7/13/2015 12:11 Second Room 6 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal White 0.00 Negative 179 7/13/2015 12:13 Second Bath 8 D Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 180 7/13/2015 12:14 Second Bath 8 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick Beige 0.05 Negative 181 7/13/2015 12:14 Second Bath 8 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.00 Negative 182 7/13/2015 12:14 Second Bath 8 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.00 Negative 183 7/13/2015 12:14 Second Bath 8 B Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.02 Negative 184 7/13/2015 12:14 Second Bath 8 B Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.00 Negative 185 7/13/2015 12:21 Second Room 9 B Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 186 7/13/2015 12:21 Second Room 9 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 187 7/13/2015 12:21 Second Room 9 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 188 7/13/2015 12:22 Second Room 9 C Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.12 Negative 189 7/13/2015 12:22 Second Room 9 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Grey 1.30 Positive 190 7/13/2015 12:22 Second Room 9 A Door, Int. Jamb Deteriorated Wood White 0.09 Negative 191 7/13/2015 12:24 Second Room 10 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 192 7/13/2015 12:25 Second Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.25 Negative 193 7/13/2015 12:25 Second Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 0.14 Negative 194 7/13/2015 12:25 Second Room 10 A Ceiling pipe Deteriorated Metal White 0.00 Negative 195 7/13/2015 12:26 Second Room 10 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 196 7/13/2015 12:26 Second Room 10 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 197 7/13/2015 12:26 Second Room 10 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.02 Negative 198 7/13/2015 12:26 Second Room 10 C Wall, Int. Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 6.80 Positive 199 7/13/2015 12:27 Second Room 10 C Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.90 Positive 200 7/13/2015 12:27 Second Room 10 C Stairs Stringer Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 201 7/13/2015 12:27 Second Room 10 C Stairs Tread Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.20 Negative 202 7/13/2015 12:30 Second Room 10 D Wall, Int. Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.40 Positive 203 7/13/2015 12:31 Second Room 10 D Wall, Int. Wall, Lower Deteriorated Wood Yellow 0.00 Negative 204 7/13/2015 12:31 Second Room 10 D Door, Slider Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.16 Negative 205 7/13/2015 12:31 Second Room 10 D Door, Slider Door Deteriorated Metal White 0.05 Negative 206 7/13/2015 12:35 Second Room 10 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 207 7/13/2015 12:35 Second Room 10 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Drywall White 0.00 Negative 208 7/13/2015 12:36 Second Room 10 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.40 Negative 209 7/13/2015 12:37 Second Room 11 D Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Drywall White 0.00 Negative 210 7/13/2015 12:38 Second Room 11 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 211 7/13/2015 12:38 Second Room 11 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 212 7/13/2015 12:38 Second Room 11 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 213 7/13/2015 12:38 Second Room 11 B Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal White 0.03 Negative 214 7/13/2015 12:38 Second Room 11 B Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.01 Negative 215 7/13/2015 12:39 Second Room 12 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.01 Negative 216 7/13/2015 13:02 Second Room 13 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.07 Negative 217 7/13/2015 13:02 Second Room 13 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 218 7/13/2015 13:03 Second Room 13 C Win., Int. Stool Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 219 7/13/2015 13:03 Second Room 13 C Win., Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.01 Negative 220 7/13/2015 13:03 Second Room 13 C Win., Int. Sash Deteriorated Metal Black 0.03 Negative 221 7/13/2015 13:03 Second Room 13 B Wall, Int. Shelf Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 222 7/13/2015 13:03 Second Room 13 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 223 7/13/2015 13:04 Second Room 13 A Door, Int. Jamb Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.04 Negative 224 7/13/2015 13:04 Second Room 13 A Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 225 7/13/2015 13:04 Second Room 14 C Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 226 7/13/2015 13:04 Second Room 14 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 227 7/13/2015 13:04 Second Room 14 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 228 7/13/2015 13:05 Second Room 14 D Win., Int. Stool Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative Thomasville Plant L Site, Thomasville, NC.xlsx All XRF Test Results Reading No Time Floor Rooms Side Component Feature Condition Substrate Color PbC Results 229 7/13/2015 13:05 Second Room 14 D Win., Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 230 7/13/2015 13:05 Second Room 14 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 231 7/13/2015 13:06 Second Room 14 C Door, Slider Door Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 232 7/13/2015 13:06 Second Room 14 C Wall, Int. Hand Rail Intact Metal Yellow 1.80 Positive 233 7/13/2015 13:06 Second Room 14 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.14 Negative 234 7/13/2015 13:07 Second Room 14 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 0.08 Negative 235 7/13/2015 13:07 Second Room 14 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 236 7/13/2015 13:07 Second Room 14 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 237 7/13/2015 13:08 Second Room 14 C Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 238 7/13/2015 13:12 Calibration 1.00 Positive 239 7/13/2015 13:13 Calibration 1.00 Positive 240 7/13/2015 13:13 Calibration 1.00 Positive 241 7/14/2015 7:58 5.97 242 7/14/2015 7:58 Calibration 1.00 Positive 243 7/14/2015 7:59 Calibration 0.90 Negative 244 7/14/2015 8:00 Calibration 1.10 Positive 245 7/14/2015 8:01 Calibration 0.90 Negative 246 7/14/2015 8:12 Second Room 7 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.11 Negative 247 7/14/2015 8:12 Second Room 7 A Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.15 Negative 248 7/14/2015 8:13 Second Room 7 A Ceiling Ceiling pipe Deteriorated Metal White 0.00 Negative 249 7/14/2015 8:13 Second Room 7 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 250 7/14/2015 8:14 Second Room 7 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 251 7/14/2015 8:14 Second Room 7 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 252 7/14/2015 8:15 Second Room 7 D Win., Int. Sash Deteriorated Metal Black 0.01 Negative 253 7/14/2015 8:15 Second Room 7 D Win., Int. Stool Deteriorated Wood White 0.04 Negative 254 7/14/2015 8:15 Second Room 7 A Win., Int. Stool Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 255 7/14/2015 8:16 Second Room 7 A Win., Int. Sash Deteriorated Metal Black 0.01 Negative 256 7/14/2015 8:16 Second Room 7 A Ceiling beam Deteriorated Metal White 0.00 Negative 257 7/14/2015 8:17 Second Room 7 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Tan 0.00 Negative 258 7/14/2015 8:17 Second Room 7 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 259 7/14/2015 8:17 Second Room 7 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood White 0.26 Negative 260 7/14/2015 8:18 Second Room 7 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal White ‐0.36 Negative 261 7/14/2015 8:18 Second Room 7 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Beige 0.01 Negative 262 7/14/2015 8:18 Second Room 7 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Blue 0.00 Negative 263 7/14/2015 8:18 Second Room 7 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Red 0.40 Negative 264 7/14/2015 8:22 Second Room 7 C Closet Door Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 265 7/14/2015 8:22 Second Room 7 C Closet Jamb Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 266 7/14/2015 8:22 Second Room 7 C Closet Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 267 7/14/2015 8:22 Second Room 7 D Closet Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 268 7/14/2015 8:23 First Bath 15 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.03 Negative 269 7/14/2015 8:23 First Bath 15 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 270 7/14/2015 8:23 First Bath 15 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 271 7/14/2015 8:23 First Bath 15 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 272 7/14/2015 8:24 First Bath 15 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 273 7/14/2015 8:24 First Bath 15 A Ceiling pipe Deteriorated Metal White 0.16 Negative 274 7/14/2015 8:24 First Bath 15 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.00 Negative 275 7/14/2015 8:25 First Bath 15 A Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.00 Negative 276 7/14/2015 9:18 First Room 14 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Ceiling Tile White 0.00 Negative 277 7/14/2015 9:18 First Room 14 C Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 278 7/14/2015 9:18 First Room 14 C Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 279 7/14/2015 9:19 First Room 14 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Other 0.01 Negative 280 7/14/2015 9:19 First Room 15 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Other 0.01 Negative 281 7/14/2015 9:19 First Room 15 C Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 282 7/14/2015 9:19 First Room 15 C Door, Int. Jamb Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 283 7/14/2015 9:20 First Room 15 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Ceiling Tile White 0.00 Negative 284 7/14/2015 9:21 First Room 16 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Ceiling Tile White 0.00 Negative 285 7/14/2015 9:21 First Room 16 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Other 0.02 Negative 286 7/14/2015 9:21 First Room 16 C Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 287 7/14/2015 9:21 First Room 16 C Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 288 7/14/2015 9:22 First Room 16 C Closet Casing Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 289 7/14/2015 9:22 First Room 16 C Closet Door Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 290 7/14/2015 9:23 First Room 17 C Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Metal White 0.00 Negative 291 7/14/2015 9:23 First Room 17 C Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 292 7/14/2015 9:24 First Room 17 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Ceiling Tile White 0.00 Negative 293 7/14/2015 9:24 First Room 18 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Ceiling Tile White 0.00 Negative 294 7/14/2015 9:25 First Bath 19 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 295 7/14/2015 9:25 First Bath 19 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Laminate White 0.00 Negative 296 7/14/2015 9:26 First Bath 19 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Laminate White 0.00 Negative 297 7/14/2015 9:26 First Bath 19 A Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Laminate White 0.00 Negative 298 7/14/2015 9:27 First Room 20 D Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 299 7/14/2015 9:28 First Room 20 D Door, Int. Jamb Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 300 7/14/2015 9:28 First Room 20 D Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 301 7/14/2015 9:30 First Room 21 D Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 302 7/14/2015 9:30 First Room 21 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 303 7/14/2015 9:30 First Room 21 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 304 7/14/2015 9:30 First Room 21 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative Thomasville Plant L Site, Thomasville, NC.xlsx All XRF Test Results Reading No Time Floor Rooms Side Component Feature Condition Substrate Color PbC Results 305 7/14/2015 9:31 First Room 21 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated ashphalt White 0.00 Negative 306 7/14/2015 9:32 First Room 21 A Door, Roll‐Up Door Intact Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 307 7/14/2015 9:33 First Room 22 D Door, Int. Jamb Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 308 7/14/2015 9:33 First Room 23 D Door, Int. Jamb Deteriorated Metal White 0.05 Negative 309 7/14/2015 9:34 First Room 23 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.01 Negative 310 7/14/2015 9:34 First Room 23 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 311 7/14/2015 9:34 First Room 23 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 312 7/14/2015 9:35 First Room 23 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 313 7/14/2015 9:35 First Room 23 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.02 Negative 314 7/14/2015 9:36 First Room 24 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 315 7/14/2015 9:36 First Room 24 C Wall, Int. Wall, Upper Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 316 7/14/2015 9:36 First Room 24 A Wall, Int. Wall, Upper Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 317 7/14/2015 9:36 First Room 24 A Wall, Int. Wall, Lower Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.01 Negative 318 7/14/2015 9:37 First Room 24 B Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 319 7/14/2015 9:37 First Room 24 B Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 320 7/14/2015 9:38 First Room 24 B Door, Int. elevator Gate Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.18 Negative 321 7/14/2015 9:38 First Room 24 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.17 Negative 322 7/14/2015 9:39 First Bath 25 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 323 7/14/2015 9:39 First Bath 25 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 324 7/14/2015 9:39 First Bath 25 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 325 7/14/2015 9:40 First Bath 25 B Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 326 7/14/2015 9:40 First Bath 25 B Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 327 7/14/2015 9:41 First Room 26 C Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 328 7/14/2015 9:41 First Room 26 C Wall, Int. Wall, Lower Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 329 7/14/2015 9:41 First Room 26 C Wall, Int. Wall, Upper Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 330 7/14/2015 9:41 First Room 26 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 331 7/14/2015 9:42 First Room 27 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 332 7/14/2015 9:43 First Room 27 C Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 333 7/14/2015 9:43 First Room 27 C Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Metal White 0.01 Negative 334 7/14/2015 9:43 First Room 27 C Ceiling pipe Deteriorated Metal White 0.06 Negative 335 7/14/2015 9:44 First Room 27 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal White 0.03 Negative 336 7/14/2015 9:44 First Room 27 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 337 7/14/2015 9:44 First Room 27 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.05 Negative 338 7/14/2015 9:44 First Room 27 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Red 0.09 Negative 339 7/14/2015 9:45 First Room 27 C Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 340 7/14/2015 9:45 First Room 27 D Win., Int. Sash Deteriorated Metal Black 0.01 Negative 341 7/14/2015 9:45 First Room 27 D Win., Int. Sill Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 342 7/14/2015 9:47 First Bath 28 D Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 343 7/14/2015 9:47 First Bath 28 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.01 Negative 344 7/14/2015 9:47 First Bath 28 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 345 7/14/2015 9:47 First Bath 28 A Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 346 7/14/2015 9:48 First Bath 28 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 347 7/14/2015 9:48 First Bath 28 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 348 7/14/2015 9:49 First Room 27 A Stairs Stringer Deteriorated Metal White 0.02 Negative 349 7/14/2015 9:50 First Room 27 A Stairs Tread Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.06 Negative 350 7/14/2015 9:50 First Room 27 A Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 4.20 Positive 351 7/14/2015 9:55 First Room 29 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 352 7/14/2015 9:55 First Room 29 A Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 353 7/14/2015 9:56 First Room 29 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 354 7/14/2015 9:56 First Room 29 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 355 7/14/2015 9:56 First Room 29 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 356 7/14/2015 9:56 First Room 29 A Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 357 7/14/2015 9:57 First Room 29 A Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 358 7/14/2015 9:57 First Room 29 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 359 7/14/2015 9:57 First Room 29 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 360 7/14/2015 9:58 First Room 29 A Door, Roll‐Up Casing Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.01 Negative 361 7/14/2015 9:58 First Room 29 A Door, Roll‐Up Door Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.08 Negative 362 7/14/2015 9:59 First Bath 30 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 363 7/14/2015 9:59 First Bath 30 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 364 7/14/2015 10:00 First Bath 30 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 365 7/14/2015 10:00 First Bath 30 B Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 366 7/14/2015 10:00 First Bath 30 B Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 367 7/14/2015 10:00 First Bath 31 B Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 368 7/14/2015 10:01 First Bath 31 B Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 369 7/14/2015 10:01 First Bath 31 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 370 7/14/2015 10:01 First Bath 31 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 371 7/14/2015 10:01 First Bath 31 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 372 7/14/2015 10:02 First Bath 31 C Wall, Int. pipe Deteriorated Metal White 0.00 Negative 373 7/14/2015 10:02 First Bath 31 C Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 374 7/14/2015 10:03 First Room 32 C Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 375 7/14/2015 10:03 First Room 32 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 376 7/14/2015 10:03 First Room 32 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 377 7/14/2015 10:03 First Room 32 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 378 7/14/2015 10:04 First Room 32 D Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 379 7/14/2015 10:04 First Room 32 D Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 380 7/14/2015 10:04 First Room 32 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative Thomasville Plant L Site, Thomasville, NC.xlsx All XRF Test Results Reading No Time Floor Rooms Side Component Feature Condition Substrate Color PbC Results 381 7/14/2015 10:04 First Room 32 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 382 7/14/2015 10:05 First Room 32 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 0.04 Negative 383 7/14/2015 10:23 First Exterior B water tower Column Deteriorated Metal White 0.03 Negative 384 7/14/2015 10:24 First Exterior B water tower Column ladder Deteriorated Metal White 0.06 Negative 385 7/14/2015 10:31 Third Exterior B rooftop ladder Deteriorated Metal Brown 0.00 Negative 386 7/14/2015 10:32 Third Exterior B rooftop Floor pipe Deteriorated Metal Brown 0.04 Negative 387 7/14/2015 10:33 Third Exterior B rooftop int ladder Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 388 7/14/2015 10:33 Third Exterior B rooftop Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.01 Negative 389 7/14/2015 10:33 Third Exterior C rooftop Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.02 Negative 390 7/14/2015 10:34 Third Exterior D rooftop cage ladder Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.02 Negative 391 7/14/2015 10:35 Third Exterior D rooftop hoist beam Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 392 7/14/2015 10:35 Third Exterior D rooftop hoist beam Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 393 7/14/2015 10:39 Third Exterior C rooftop pipe Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.01 Negative 394 7/14/2015 10:39 Third Exterior C rooftop pipe frame Deteriorated Metal Beige 0.01 Negative 395 7/14/2015 10:43 Second Exterior C rooftop stack Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.04 Negative 396 7/14/2015 10:45 Third Exterior C rooftop stack Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.08 Negative 397 7/14/2015 10:46 Third Exterior A rooftop elevator 2 wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 398 7/14/2015 10:46 Third Exterior B rooftop elevator 2 wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 399 7/14/2015 10:47 Third Exterior C rooftop elevator 2 wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 400 7/14/2015 10:47 Third Exterior D rooftop elevator 2 wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 401 7/14/2015 10:47 Third Exterior D rooftop elevator 2 door Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 402 7/14/2015 10:50 Third Exterior A rooftop elevator 1 door Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 403 7/14/2015 10:50 Third Exterior A rooftop elevator 1 wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 404 7/14/2015 10:50 Third Exterior B rooftop elevator 1 wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.06 Negative 405 7/14/2015 10:52 Third Exterior B rooftop elevator 1 pump Intact Metal Brown 0.13 Negative 406 7/14/2015 10:54 Third Exterior C rooftop cage ladder Intact Metal Brown 0.00 Negative 407 7/14/2015 10:56 Second Exterior C Stairs Hand Rail Intact Metal Yellow 0.60 Negative 408 7/14/2015 10:57 Second Exterior C Stairs Stringer Intact Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 409 7/14/2015 10:57 Second Exterior C Stairs Tread Intact Metal Silver 0.18 Negative 410 7/14/2015 10:58 First Exterior C Stairs Tread Intact Metal Silver 0.01 Negative 411 7/14/2015 10:58 First Exterior C Stairs Stringer Intact Metal Grey 0.01 Negative 412 7/14/2015 10:58 First Exterior C Stairs Hand Rail Intact Metal Yellow 2.00 Positive 413 7/14/2015 11:07 Basement Basement C Ceiling beam Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.01 Negative 414 7/14/2015 11:08 Basement Basement C Ceiling pipe Deteriorated Metal Brown 0.06 Negative 415 7/14/2015 11:08 Basement Basement C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 416 7/14/2015 11:08 Basement Basement C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Brown 0.05 Negative 417 7/14/2015 11:10 Basement Basement 1 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Red 0.06 Negative 418 7/14/2015 11:10 Basement Basement 1 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Red 2.40 Positive 419 7/14/2015 11:23 Basement Basement 2 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Brown 0.00 Negative 420 7/14/2015 11:23 Basement Basement 2 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Red 0.50 Negative 421 7/14/2015 11:24 Basement Basement 2 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Brown 0.01 Negative 422 7/14/2015 11:24 Basement Basement 2 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal White 0.02 Negative 423 7/14/2015 11:24 Basement Basement 2 C Ceiling beam Deteriorated Metal White 0.01 Negative 424 7/14/2015 11:25 Basement Basement 2 C Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.60 Negative 425 7/14/2015 11:25 Basement Basement 2 C Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 426 7/14/2015 11:25 Basement Basement 2 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 427 7/14/2015 11:26 Basement Basement 2 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 428 7/14/2015 11:26 Basement Basement 2 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.07 Negative 429 7/14/2015 11:27 Basement Basement 2 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.03 Null 430 7/14/2015 11:29 Basement Basement elevator A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.00 Negative 431 7/14/2015 11:29 Basement Basement elevator D Door, Int. Gate Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.08 Negative 432 7/14/2015 11:30 Basement Basement 3 B Door, Int. Casing Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Null 433 7/14/2015 11:30 Basement Basement 3 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 434 7/14/2015 11:31 Basement Basement 3 C Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 435 7/14/2015 11:31 Basement Basement 3 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.00 Negative 436 7/14/2015 11:31 Basement Basement 3 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 437 7/14/2015 11:31 Basement Basement 3 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.06 Negative 438 7/14/2015 11:32 Basement Basement 2 A Stairs1 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.50 Positive 439 7/14/2015 11:33 Basement Basement 2 A Stairs2 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 4.30 Positive 440 7/14/2015 11:33 Basement Basement 2 A Stairs2 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.50 Positive 441 7/14/2015 11:34 Basement Basement 2 A Oil Tank Wall Deteriorated Metal Red 0.02 Negative 442 7/14/2015 11:35 Basement Basement 4 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.01 Negative 443 7/14/2015 11:36 Basement Basement 4 A Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 444 7/14/2015 11:36 Basement Basement 4 C Wall, Int. Wall, Upper Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 445 7/14/2015 11:37 Basement Basement 4 C Wall, Int. Wall, Lower Deteriorated Brick White 0.00 Negative 446 7/14/2015 11:37 Basement Basement 4 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.02 Negative 447 7/14/2015 11:37 Basement Basement 4 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 0.30 Negative 448 7/14/2015 11:38 Basement Basement 4 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Beige 0.04 Negative 449 7/14/2015 11:42 First Exterior C Door, Ext. Door Intact Metal White 0.00 Negative 450 7/14/2015 11:42 First Exterior C Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.01 Negative 451 7/14/2015 11:43 First Exterior C Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.00 Negative 452 7/14/2015 11:43 First Exterior C Stairs1 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.80 Positive 453 7/14/2015 11:45 Second Exterior C Stairs2 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.80 Negative 454 7/14/2015 11:45 Second Exterior C Stairs2 Stringer Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 455 7/14/2015 11:45 Second Exterior C Stairs2 Tread Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 456 7/14/2015 11:46 First Exterior B Stairs2 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.30 Positive Thomasville Plant L Site, Thomasville, NC.xlsx All XRF Test Results Reading No Time Floor Rooms Side Component Feature Condition Substrate Color PbC Results 457 7/14/2015 11:46 First Exterior B Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.01 Negative 458 7/14/2015 11:46 First Exterior B Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.02 Negative 459 7/14/2015 11:47 First Exterior C Stairs3 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.70 Positive 460 7/14/2015 11:47 First Exterior C Stairs3 Stringer Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 461 7/14/2015 11:50 First Exterior D Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Wood Varnish 0.00 Negative 462 7/14/2015 11:50 First Exterior D Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.02 Negative 463 7/14/2015 11:52 First Exterior C Stairs4 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.90 Negative 464 7/14/2015 11:53 Second Exterior C Stairs5 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.50 Negative 465 7/14/2015 11:53 Second Exterior C Stairs5 Stringer Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.04 Negative 466 7/14/2015 11:53 Second Exterior C Stairs5 Column Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.00 Negative 467 7/14/2015 12:01 First Exterior A Siding, Ext. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.02 Negative 468 7/14/2015 12:02 First Exterior D Siding, Ext. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.01 Negative 469 7/14/2015 12:02 First Exterior D Door, Ext.1 Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.12 Negative 470 7/14/2015 12:02 First Exterior D Door, Ext.1 Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.01 Negative 471 7/14/2015 12:02 First Exterior D Door, Ext.2 Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.07 Negative 472 7/14/2015 12:03 First Exterior D Door, Ext.2 Door Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.03 Negative 473 7/14/2015 12:03 First Exterior D Door, Ext.3 Door Deteriorated Metal White 0.10 Negative 474 7/14/2015 12:03 First Exterior D Door, Ext.3 Casing Deteriorated Metal White 0.05 Negative 475 7/14/2015 12:04 First Exterior D Door, Ext.4 Casing Deteriorated Wood Tan 0.00 Negative 476 7/14/2015 12:04 First Exterior D Door, Ext.4 Door Deteriorated Wood Tan 0.02 Negative 477 7/14/2015 12:05 First Exterior C Win., Ext. Sash Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 478 7/14/2015 12:05 First Exterior C Door, Slider Door Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.21 Negative 479 7/14/2015 12:06 First Exterior C Door, Slider2 Door Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.18 Negative 480 7/14/2015 12:06 Second Exterior C Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.06 Negative 481 7/14/2015 12:07 Second Exterior C Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 482 7/14/2015 12:08 Second loading dock C Ceiling beam Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.05 Negative 483 7/14/2015 12:09 Second loading dock C Ceiling pipe Deteriorated Metal Black 0.01 Negative 484 7/14/2015 12:09 Second loading dock C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.04 Negative 485 7/14/2015 12:10 Second loading dock C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Beige 0.12 Negative 486 7/14/2015 12:10 Second loading dock C Stairs Stringer Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.10 Negative 487 7/14/2015 12:10 Second loading dock C Stairs Tread Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.10 Negative 488 7/14/2015 12:11 Second loading dock C Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.10 Positive 489 7/14/2015 12:13 Second loading dock C Floor trim Deteriorated Metal Yellow 10.00 Positive 490 7/14/2015 12:19 Calibration 1.00 Positive 491 7/14/2015 12:21 Calibration 0.90 Negative 492 7/14/2015 12:23 Calibration 0.90 Negative 493 7/14/2015 11:17 Shutter 5.32 494 7/14/2015 11:18 Calibration 0.90 Negative 495 7/14/2015 11:19 Calibration 0.90 Negative 496 7/14/2015 11:19 Calibration 0.90 Negative 497 7/14/2015 11:27 Roof Roof Deteriorated Asphalt Shingle Silver 0.02 Negative 498 7/14/2015 11:28 Roof HVAC Pipe Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.01 Negative 499 7/14/2015 11:42 roof elev room Wall beam Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.00 Negative 500 7/14/2015 11:43 roof elev room C Door, Int. Jamb Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 501 7/14/2015 11:43 roof elev room C Door, Int. Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.00 Negative 502 7/14/2015 11:43 roof elev room C Door, Ext. Deteriorated Metal Pink 0.00 Negative 503 7/14/2015 11:44 roof elev room C Siding, Ext. Wall Deteriorated Wood Pink 0.00 Negative 504 7/14/2015 11:46 Roof C Siding, Ext. ladder Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.90 Positive 505 7/14/2015 11:52 chase hall C Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 506 7/14/2015 11:53 chase hall C Win., Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.20 Negative 507 7/14/2015 11:54 chase hall C Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.05 Negative 508 7/14/2015 11:54 chase hall C Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 509 7/14/2015 12:15 Exterior A Siding, Ext. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 1.70 Positive 510 7/14/2015 12:17 Exterior A Siding, Ext. Downspout Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.01 Negative 511 7/14/2015 12:17 Exterior A Win., Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.04 Negative 512 7/14/2015 12:19 Exterior A Siding, Ext. patch Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.00 Negative 513 7/14/2015 12:20 Exterior A,B Siding, Ext. pole Intact Metal Yellow 0.03 Negative 514 7/14/2015 12:21 Exterior 5 star C Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.05 Negative 515 7/14/2015 12:21 Exterior 5 star C Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.04 Negative 516 7/14/2015 12:22 Exterior 5 star C Siding, Ext. stack Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.02 Negative 517 7/14/2015 12:22 Exterior 5 star B Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 3.80 Positive 518 7/14/2015 12:24 Exterior 5 star B Door, Roll‐Up dock Casing Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.00 Negative 519 7/14/2015 12:24 Exterior 5 star B Door, Roll‐Up dock base Deteriorated Metal Yellow 4.50 Positive 520 7/14/2015 12:26 Exterior 5 star B ramp Hand Rail Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 521 7/14/2015 12:26 Exterior 5 star B Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Wood Pink 0.00 Negative 522 7/14/2015 12:26 Exterior 5 star B Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Wood Pink 0.00 Negative 523 7/14/2015 12:27 Exterior 5 star B Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.11 Negative 524 7/14/2015 12:27 Exterior 5 star B Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Wood White 0.09 Negative 525 7/14/2015 12:28 Exterior 5 star A Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.09 Negative 526 7/14/2015 12:29 Exterior 5 star D Door, Ext. Door Intact Metal Brown 0.03 Negative 527 7/14/2015 12:29 Exterior 5 star D Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 528 7/14/2015 12:30 Exterior 5 star D parking lot lines Deteriorated Concrete Yellow 0.00 Negative 529 7/14/2015 12:30 Exterior 5 star D parking lot hydrant Deteriorated Metal Red 0.50 Negative 530 7/14/2015 12:31 Exterior 5 star D parking lot hydrant barrier Deteriorated Metal Red 0.27 Negative 531 7/14/2015 12:32 Exterior 5 star A Siding, Ext. gutter Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.07 Negative 532 7/14/2015 12:33 Exterior exec furniture B Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.06 Negative Thomasville Plant L Site, Thomasville, NC.xlsx All XRF Test Results Reading No Time Floor Rooms Side Component Feature Condition Substrate Color PbC Results 533 7/14/2015 12:34 Exterior exec furniture B Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.00 Negative 534 7/14/2015 12:34 Exterior exec furniture B Door, Ext. Door, security Deteriorated Metal Black 0.00 Negative 535 7/14/2015 12:35 Exterior exec furniture B Siding, Ext. Downspout Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.02 Negative 536 7/14/2015 12:36 Exterior exec furniture B Win., Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.01 Negative 537 7/14/2015 12:36 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Roll‐Up Casing Deteriorated Wood Yellow 0.30 Negative 538 7/14/2015 12:36 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Roll‐Up Casing Deteriorated Wood Yellow 1.40 Positive 539 7/14/2015 12:37 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Roll‐Up Casing Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 540 7/14/2015 12:38 Exterior exec furniture A Siding, Ext. Wall Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 541 7/14/2015 12:38 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Roll‐Up Door Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.01 Null 542 7/14/2015 12:38 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Roll‐Up Door Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.06 Negative 543 7/14/2015 12:38 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Roll‐Up Casing Deteriorated Metal Yellow 7.60 Positive 544 7/14/2015 12:39 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Roll‐Up Casing Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 545 7/14/2015 12:40 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 546 7/14/2015 12:40 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.00 Negative 547 7/14/2015 12:42 Exterior exec furniture A Siding, Ext. Column Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.04 Negative 548 7/14/2015 12:51 engine hall A Siding, Ext. Deteriorated Metal Peach 0.01 Negative 549 7/14/2015 12:52 engine hall A Siding, Ext. Deteriorated Metal Blue 0.00 Negative 550 7/14/2015 12:52 engine hall D Cabinet Door Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.80 Positive 551 7/14/2015 12:52 engine hall D Cabinet Casing Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.10 Positive 552 7/14/2015 13:00 Exterior C Door, Roll‐Up Column Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.70 Positive 553 7/14/2015 13:01 Exterior C Door, Roll‐Up base Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.01 Negative 554 7/14/2015 13:01 Exterior C Door, Roll‐Up Jamb Deteriorated Brick White 0.04 Negative 555 7/14/2015 13:01 Exterior C Door, Roll‐Up Jamb Deteriorated Wood White 0.00 Negative 556 7/14/2015 13:01 Exterior C Door, Roll‐Up Door Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.01 Negative 557 7/14/2015 13:02 Exterior C Door, Roll‐Up base Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.70 Negative 558 7/14/2015 13:03 Exterior C Door, Roll‐Up base Deteriorated Metal Yellow 5.80 Positive 559 7/14/2015 13:04 Exterior docks by fence B Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 560 7/14/2015 13:04 Exterior docks by fence B Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.00 Negative 561 7/14/2015 13:04 Exterior docks by fence D Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.00 Negative 562 7/14/2015 13:05 Exterior docks by fence D Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.16 Negative 563 7/14/2015 13:05 Exterior docks by fence B Stairs Stringer Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.15 Negative 564 7/14/2015 13:05 Exterior docks by fence B Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 4.40 Positive 565 7/14/2015 13:06 Exterior docks by fence C Siding, Ext. Column Deteriorated Metal Yellow 7.40 Positive 566 7/14/2015 13:06 Exterior docks by fence C Siding, Ext. Column Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.01 Negative 567 7/14/2015 13:08 Exterior docks middle C Deck base Deteriorated Metal Yellow 5.50 Positive 568 7/14/2015 13:09 Exterior docks middle C Door, Roll‐Up Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.06 Negative 569 7/14/2015 13:09 Exterior docks middle C Door, Roll‐Up Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.30 Negative 570 7/14/2015 13:14 Calibration 1.00 Positive 571 7/14/2015 13:14 Calibration 1.00 Positive 572 7/14/2015 13:15 Calibration 1.00 Positive Thomasville Plant L Site, Thomasville, NC.xlsx Positive XRF Test Results Reading No Time Floor Rooms Side Component Feature Condition Substrate Color PbC 16 7/13/2015 9:05 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 2.40 17 7/13/2015 9:06 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 3.20 20 7/13/2015 9:06 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 5.30 25 7/13/2015 9:08 First Room 10 C Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 3.90 30 7/13/2015 9:12 First Room 10 B Wall, Int. Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 3.80 126 7/13/2015 11:50 Second Room 2 C Door, Int. elev Door Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.60 165 7/13/2015 12:06 Second Room 6 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood White 1.40 172 7/13/2015 12:08 Second Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 1.20 189 7/13/2015 12:22 Second Room 9 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Grey 1.30 198 7/13/2015 12:26 Second Room 10 C Wall, Int. Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 6.80 199 7/13/2015 12:27 Second Room 10 C Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.90 202 7/13/2015 12:30 Second Room 10 D Wall, Int. Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.40 232 7/13/2015 13:06 Second Room 14 C Wall, Int. Hand Rail Intact Metal Yellow 1.80 350 7/14/2015 9:50 First Room 27 A Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 4.20 412 7/14/2015 10:58 First Exterior C Stairs Hand Rail Intact Metal Yellow 2.00 418 7/14/2015 11:10 Basement Basement 1 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Red 2.40 438 7/14/2015 11:32 Basement Basement 2 A Stairs1 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.50 439 7/14/2015 11:33 Basement Basement 2 A Stairs2 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 4.30 440 7/14/2015 11:33 Basement Basement 2 A Stairs2 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.50 452 7/14/2015 11:43 First Exterior C Stairs1 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.80 456 7/14/2015 11:46 First Exterior B Stairs2 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.30 459 7/14/2015 11:47 First Exterior C Stairs3 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.70 488 7/14/2015 12:11 Second loading dock C Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.10 489 7/14/2015 12:13 Second loading dock C Floor trim Deteriorated Metal Yellow 10.00 504 7/14/2015 11:46 Roof C Siding, Ext. ladder Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.90 509 7/14/2015 12:15 Exterior A Siding, Ext. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 1.70 517 7/14/2015 12:22 Exterior 5 star B Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 3.80 519 7/14/2015 12:24 Exterior 5 star B Door, Roll‐Up dock base Deteriorated Metal Yellow 4.50 538 7/14/2015 12:36 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Roll‐Up Casing Deteriorated Wood Yellow 1.40 543 7/14/2015 12:38 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Roll‐Up Casing Deteriorated Metal Yellow 7.60 550 7/14/2015 12:52 engine hall D Cabinet Door Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.80 551 7/14/2015 12:52 engine hall D Cabinet Casing Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.10 552 7/14/2015 13:00 Exterior C Door, Roll‐Up Column Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.70 558 7/14/2015 13:03 Exterior C Door, Roll‐Up base Deteriorated Metal Yellow 5.80 564 7/14/2015 13:05 Exterior docks by fence B Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 4.40 565 7/14/2015 13:06 Exterior docks by fence C Siding, Ext. Column Deteriorated Metal Yellow 7.40 567 7/14/2015 13:08 Exterior docks middle C Deck base Deteriorated Metal Yellow 5.50 Thomasville Plant L Site, Thomasville, NC.xlsx Positive & Elevated XRF Results Reading No Floor Rooms Side Component Feature Condition Substrate Color PbC Results 16 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 2.40 Positive 17 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 3.20 Positive 20 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 5.30 Positive 23 First Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 0.16 Negative 25 First Room 10 C Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 3.90 Positive 29 First Room 10 B Door, Slider Door Deteriorated Wood Red 0.90 Negative 30 First Room 10 B Wall, Int. Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 3.80 Positive 55 First Room 3 D Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.70 Negative 98 First Room elevator 9 D Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Brown 0.13 Negative 100 First Room elevator 9 B Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.10 Negative 105 Second Room 1 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.19 Negative 106 Second Room 1 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 0.16 Negative 117 Second Room 2 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.26 Negative 118 Second Room 2 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 0.14 Negative 126 Second Room 2 C Door, Int. elev Door Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.60 Positive 138 Second Room 3 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.19 Negative 145 Second Room 3 D Door, Int. elev Door Intact Metal Red 0.30 Negative 165 Second Room 6 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood White 1.40 Positive 169 Second Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.22 Negative 170 Second Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Blue 0.20 Negative 172 Second Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 1.20 Positive 173 Second Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.30 Negative 174 Second Room 6 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Red 0.60 Negative 188 Second Room 9 C Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.12 Negative 189 Second Room 9 A Door, Int. Door Deteriorated Wood Grey 1.30 Positive 192 Second Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood White 0.25 Negative 193 Second Room 10 A Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 0.14 Negative 198 Second Room 10 C Wall, Int. Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 6.80 Positive 199 Second Room 10 C Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.90 Positive 201 Second Room 10 C Stairs Tread Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.20 Negative 202 Second Room 10 D Wall, Int. Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.40 Positive 204 Second Room 10 D Door, Slider Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.16 Negative 208 Second Room 10 D Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Brick White 0.40 Negative 232 Second Room 14 C Wall, Int. Hand Rail Intact Metal Yellow 1.80 Positive 233 Second Room 14 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.14 Negative 246 Second Room 7 A Ceiling Ceiling Deteriorated Wood White 0.11 Negative 247 Second Room 7 A Ceiling Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.15 Negative 259 Second Room 7 D Floor Floor Deteriorated Wood White 0.26 Negative 263 Second Room 7 D Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Red 0.40 Negative 273 First Bath 15 A Ceiling pipe Deteriorated Metal White 0.16 Negative 320 First Room 24 B Door, Int. elevator Gate Deteriorated Wood Grey 0.18 Negative 321 First Room 24 A Wall, Int. Wall Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.17 Negative 350 First Room 27 A Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 4.20 Positive 405 Third Exterior B rooftop elevator 1 pump Intact Metal Brown 0.13 Negative 407 Second Exterior C Stairs Hand Rail Intact Metal Yellow 0.60 Negative 409 Second Exterior C Stairs Tread Intact Metal Silver 0.18 Negative 412 First Exterior C Stairs Hand Rail Intact Metal Yellow 2.00 Positive 418 Basement Basement 1 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Red 2.40 Positive 420 Basement Basement 2 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Red 0.50 Negative 424 Basement Basement 2 C Ceiling beam Deteriorated Wood White 0.60 Negative 438 Basement Basement 2 A Stairs1 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.50 Positive 439 Basement Basement 2 A Stairs2 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 4.30 Positive 440 Basement Basement 2 A Stairs2 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.50 Positive 447 Basement Basement 4 C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Wood Red 0.30 Negative 452 First Exterior C Stairs1 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.80 Positive 453 Second Exterior C Stairs2 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.80 Negative 456 First Exterior B Stairs2 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.30 Positive 459 First Exterior C Stairs3 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.70 Positive 463 First Exterior C Stairs4 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.90 Negative 464 Second Exterior C Stairs5 Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.50 Negative 469 First Exterior D Door, Ext.1 Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.12 Negative 473 First Exterior D Door, Ext.3 Door Deteriorated Metal White 0.10 Negative 478 First Exterior C Door, Slider Door Deteriorated Wood Blue 0.21 Negative 479 First Exterior C Door, Slider2 Door Deteriorated Wood Beige 0.18 Negative 485 Second loading dock C Ceiling Column Deteriorated Metal Beige 0.12 Negative 486 Second loading dock C Stairs Stringer Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.10 Negative 487 Second loading dock C Stairs Tread Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.10 Negative 488 Second loading dock C Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.10 Positive 489 Second loading dock C Floor trim Deteriorated Metal Yellow 10.00 Positive 504 Roof C Siding, Ext. ladder Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.90 Positive 506 chase hall C Win., Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.20 Negative 509 Exterior A Siding, Ext. Wall Deteriorated Wood White 1.70 Positive 517 Exterior 5 star B Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 3.80 Positive 519 Exterior 5 star B Door, Roll‐Up dock base Deteriorated Metal Yellow 4.50 Positive 523 Exterior 5 star B Door, Ext. Casing Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.11 Negative 529 Exterior 5 star D parking lot hydrant Deteriorated Metal Red 0.50 Negative Thomasville Plant L Site, Thomasville, NC.xlsx Positive & Elevated XRF Results Reading No Floor Rooms Side Component Feature Condition Substrate Color PbC Results 530 Exterior 5 star D parking lot hydrant barrier Deteriorated Metal Red 0.27 Negative 537 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Roll‐Up Casing Deteriorated Wood Yellow 0.30 Negative 538 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Roll‐Up Casing Deteriorated Wood Yellow 1.40 Positive 543 Exterior exec furniture A Door, Roll‐Up Casing Deteriorated Metal Yellow 7.60 Positive 550 engine hall D Cabinet Door Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.80 Positive 551 engine hall D Cabinet Casing Deteriorated Metal Yellow 1.10 Positive 552 Exterior C Door, Roll‐Up Column Deteriorated Metal Yellow 2.70 Positive 557 Exterior C Door, Roll‐Up base Deteriorated Metal Yellow 0.70 Negative 558 Exterior C Door, Roll‐Up base Deteriorated Metal Yellow 5.80 Positive 562 Exterior docks by fence D Door, Ext. Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.16 Negative 563 Exterior docks by fence B Stairs Stringer Deteriorated Metal Silver 0.15 Negative 564 Exterior docks by fence B Stairs Hand Rail Deteriorated Metal Yellow 4.40 Positive 565 Exterior docks by fence C Siding, Ext. Column Deteriorated Metal Yellow 7.40 Positive 567 Exterior docks middle C Deck base Deteriorated Metal Yellow 5.50 Positive 569 Exterior docks middle C Door, Roll‐Up Door Deteriorated Metal Grey 0.30 Negative Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC APPENDIX B – FLOOR PLAN Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC APPENDIX C – PHOTOGRAPHS Building - Side A Building - Side B Building - Side C Building - Side D 2nd Floor Room 6 Pos. LBP on Column Room 1 Handrail Pos. LBP Handrail Ext. Side B Pos. LBP Basement Handrail Pos. LBP Room 10 Typical POS Column Room 2 Second Floor Elevator Dooer Room 10 Handrail Room 14 Handrail and wall base Room 27 Stairs Ext Stairs Side C412 Basement 1 Typical PB Column Basement 2 Stairs Basement 2 Stairs 2 Ext Side C Stairs 1 Ext Side B Stairs Ext Side C Roll up Door Base Loading Dock Handrail and Floor Trim Pos. LBP Room 27 Handrail Pos. LBP Door Header Exteropr Stairs Representative of Interior Representative of Interior Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC APPENDIX D – RISK ASSESSOR AND FIRM CREDENTIALS RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS BRANCH RADIATION PROTECTION SECTION N. C. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS LICENSE Pursuant to North Carolina Regulations for Protection Against Radiation and in reliance on statements and representations heretofore made by the licensee, a license is hereby issued authorizing the licensee to receive, acquire, own, possess, transfer, and import the accelerator(s) listed below; and use such accelerator(s) for the purpose(s) and at the place(s) designated below. This License is subject to all applicable rules and regulations of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services now and hereafter in effect and to any conditions specified below. Page 1 of 3 1. 2a. Mailing Address: b. Physical Address: c. Radiation Safety Officer: 3. License No: 060-0989-1 License Type 4. Expiration Date: December 31, 2019 5. a. Amendment No.: 12 b. Issuance Date: May 09, 2014 00310 8. Maximum Amount of Radioactivity and/or Quantity of Radioactive material which Licensee May Possess at Any One Time. 6. Radioactive Material (element and mass no.) 7. Chemical and/or Physical Form Cobalt 57 Sealed Source Total Possession not to exceed 60.00 mCi No Single source to exceed 12.00 mCi A. A. A. Cadmium 109 Sealed Source Total Possession not to exceed 500.00 mCi No Single source to exceed 50.00 mCi B. B. B. Americium-241 / Beryllium Sealed Source Total Possession not to exceed 50.00 mCi No Single source to exceed 10.00 mCi C. C. C. Application Type: Amendment Application Peter M. Hubicki, Get the Lead Out, LLC 2121 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 220 Charlotte, NC 28205-5120 Licensee Name: 2121 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 220 Charlotte, NC 28205-5120 Authorized Use: 9. To be used in an RMD Model LPA-1 X-ray Fluorescence Analyzer to test for lead content in paint. Sealed Source & Device Registry No. MA-0573-D-103-B, with a leak test frequency of twelve months. A. To be used in a Niton Model XLp 300 analyzer to test for lead content in paint. Sealed Source & Device Registry No. MA-1159-D-101-B, with a leak test frequency of six months. B. To be used in a Niton Model XLp 300 analyzer to test for lead content in paint. Sealed Source & Device Registry No. MA-1159-D-101-B, with a leak test frequency of six months. C. CONDITIONS The authorized place of receipt and storage of radioactive material is the licensee’s address stated in condition 2b. above. A. 10. Additional authorized places of receipt and use of radioactive material are listed below if applicable: B. No Additional Locations Radioactive materials may be used at temporary jobsites of the licensee throughout the State of North Carolina in areas not under exclusive Federal jurisdiction (Federal installations such as military bases, V.A. Hospitals, etc.). Authorization for the use of radioactive materials at temporary jobsites under exclusive Federal Jurisdiction shall be obtained either by (1) filing a NRC Form 241 [10 CFR 150.20(b)], or (2) applying for reciprocity, or (3) applying for a specific license from the NRC if the length of the job is to exceed six (6) months. 11. The licensee shall comply with the provisions of 15A NCAC 11 .1600 “Standards for Protection Against Radiation,” and 15A NCAC 11 .1000 “Notices, Instructions, Reports and Inspections.” (The North Carolina Regulations for Protection Against Radiation are contained in 15A NCAC 11.) C. This condition does not prohibit the use of radioactive materials in other states; however, before radioactive materials can be used at a temporary jobsite in another state, authorization must be obtained from the State, if it is an Agreement state, or from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for any non-Agreement State, either by filing for reciprocity or applying for a specific license. D. WITHHOLD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE UNDER N.C.G.S. 104E-9(a)(4) EXCEPT TO INDIVIDUALS WITH A NEED TO KNOW Page 2 of 3 License No.: 060-0989-1 RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS BRANCH RADIATION PROTECTION SECTION N. C. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS LICENSE 12. A. Licensed material shall only be used by: Peter Hubicki OR individuals who (1) have successfully completed a manufacturers training program for gauge users, (2) have been instructed in the licensee’s routine operating and emergency procedures, and (3) have been designated in writing as having completed these requirements by the Radiation Safety Officer. Records of these designations shall be maintained for three (3) years after the company no longer employs the individual. B. The licensee shall establish a method of identification and documentation of training for the persons authorized in condition A above. This shall be made available for review by the agency at the time of either a field or home office inspection. C. The Radiation Safety Officer for the activities authorized under this license shall be Peter M. Hubicki. D. The licensee may transport licensed material or deliver licensed material to a carrier for transport in accordance with the provision of Section 71.5, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 71, “Packaging of Radioactive Material For Transport.” 14. Sealed sources containing radioactive material shall not be opened or removed from their respective source holders by the licensee. 15 16. The licensee shall keep records for each device authorized in this license showing which authorized user has the device, the time and date the device was removed from storage, job where device was used and the time and date the device was placed back into storage. Records of use shall be kept for two (2) years for inspection by the agency or until they have been reviewed by the agency and if the records are determined to be satisfactory, then they may be disposed of. 17. The licensee shall conduct a physical inventory of all sealed sources received and possessed under this license at intervals not to exceed six (6) months. Records of the inventories shall be maintained for inspection by the agency and shall include the quantities and kinds of radioactive material, location of sources and the date of the inventory. 18. In addition to the possession limits in condition 8 above, the licensee shall further restrict the possession of licensed material to quantities below the minimum limit specified in 15A NCAC 11 .0353 for establishing decommissioning financial assurance. 19. The licensee shall annually review its Radiation Protection Program for content and implementation [Reference 15A NCAC 11 .1603(c)]. Documentation of the Radiation Protection Program reviews shall be retained for inspection by the agency [Reference: 15A NCAC 11 .1636]. 20. The licensee shall institute the provisions of 15A NCAC 11 .1610 when an occupationally exposed woman voluntarily informs her supervisor, in writing, of the pregnancy and the estimated date of conception. 13. Each sealed source containing radioactive material, other than Hydrogen 3 with a half-life greater than thirty (30) days and in any form other than gas, shall be tested for leakage and/or contamination at intervals prescribed in the respective Registry of Radioactive Sealed Sources and Devices sheet. In the absence of a Registry of Radioactive Sealed Sources and Devices sheet, tests for leakage and/or contamination shall be conducted at intervals not to exceed six (6) months, except that each source designed for the purpose of emitting alpha particles shall be tested at intervals not to exceed three (3) months. In the absence of a certificate from a transferor indicating that a test has been made within six (6) months prior to the transfer, the sealed source shall not be put into use until tested. A. The test shall be capable of detecting the presence of 0.005 microcurie of radioactive material on the test sample. The test sample shall be taken from the sealed source or from the surfaces of the device in which the sealed source is permanently mounted or stored on which one might expect contamination to accumulate. Records of leak test results shall be kept in units of microcuries and maintained for inspection by the agency. B. If the test reveals the presence of 0.005 microcurie or more of removable contamination, the licensee shall immediately withdraw the sealed source from use and shall cause it to be decontaminated and repaired or to be disposed of in accordance with agency regulations. A report shall be filed within five (5) days of the test with the Radioactive Materials Branch, Radiation Protection Section, 1645 Mail Service, Raleigh, NC 27699-1645, describing the equipment involved, the test results, and the corrective action taken. C. D. Tests for leakage and /or contamination shall be performed by persons specifically authorized by the agency to perform such services. WITHHOLD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE UNDER N.C.G.S. 104E-9(a)(4) EXCEPT TO INDIVIDUALS WITH A NEED TO KNOW Page 3 of 3 License No.: 060-0989-1 RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS BRANCH RADIATION PROTECTION SECTION N. C. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS LICENSE 21. The licensee shall ensure that no individual “member of the public” [Reference: 15A NCAC 11 .0104(81)] receives a radiation dose in excess of the limits specified in 15A NCAC 11 .1611(a) while conducting licensed activities. 22. This license may be subject to amendment, revision, modification, suspension, or revocation in accordance with the provisions of 15A NCAC 11 .0344. 23. In addition to the possession limits referenced in condition 8. above, the licensee shall further restrict possession of radionuclides listed in the table below to the quantities noted within the table. Sum of fractions for the radionuclides listed below shall not exceed Am-241 Am-241: Be Cf-252 Cm-244 Co-60 Cs-137 Gd-153 Ir-192 Pm-147 Pu-238 Pu-239:Be Ra-226 Se-75 Sr-90 (Y-90) Tm-170 Yb-169 16 16 5.4 13.5 8.1 27 270 21.6 10,800 16 16 10.8 54 270 5,400 81 Radionuclide Quantity (curies) Quantity (curies) Radionuclide 24. Except as specifically provided otherwise by this license, the licensee shall possess and use radioactive material described in conditions 6., 7., and 8. of this license in accordance with statements, representations and procedures and attachments listed below. The North Carolina Regulations for Protection Against Radiation shall govern unless the statements, representations, and procedures in the licensee’s application and correspondence are more restrictive than the regulations. A. Letter with attachments dated May 12, 2011, signed by Peter M. Hubicki, RSO, email received May 18, 2011, and an administrative amendment to list Total Possession Limits and implement several updates. B. Application with attachments dated October 2, 2009, signed by Peter M. Hubicki, RSO. C. Application for with attachments, dated April 29, 2014, signed by Peter M. Hubicki, Asst. VP, RSO. Chief, Radiation Protection Section For: W. Lee Cox, III WITHHOLD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE UNDER N.C.G.S. 104E-9(a)(4) EXCEPT TO INDIVIDUALS WITH A NEED TO KNOW Niton XLp 300, 9/24/2004, ed. 1 1 of 3 Performance Characteristic Sheet EFFECTIVE DATE: September 24, 2004 EDITION NO.: 1 MANUFACTURER AND MODEL: Make: Niton LLC Tested Model: XLp 300 Source: 109Cd Note: This PCS is also applicable to the equivalent model variations indicated below, for the Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode, in the XLi and XLp series: XLi 300A, XLi 301A, XLi 302A and XLi 303A. XLp 300A, XLp 301A, XLp 302A and XLp 303A. XLi 700A, XLi 701A, XLi 702A and XLi 703A. XLp 700A, XLp 701A, XLp 702A, and XLp 703A. Note: The XLi and XLp versions refer to the shape of the handle part of the instrument. The differences in the model numbers reflect other modes available, in addition to Lead-in- Paint modes. The manufacturer states that specifications for these instruments are identical for the source, detector, and detector electronics relative to the Lead-in-Paint mode. FIELD OPERATION GUIDANCE OPERATING PARAMETERS: Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode. XRF CALIBRATION CHECK LIMITS: 0.8 to 1.2 mg/cm2 (inclusive) The calibration of the XRF instrument should be checked using the paint film nearest 1.0 mg/cm2 in the NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) used (e.g., for NIST SRM 2579, use the 1.02 mg/cm2 film). If readings are outside the acceptable calibration check range, follow the manufacturer's instructions to bring the instruments into control before XRF testing proceeds. SUBSTRATE CORRECTION: For XRF results using Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode, substrate correction is not needed for: Brick, Concrete, Drywall, Metal, Plaster, and Wood INCONCLUSIVE RANGE OR THRESHOLD: K+L MODE READING DESCRIPTION SUBSTRATE THRESHOLD (mg/cm2) Results not corrected for substrate bias on any substrate Brick Concrete Drywall Metal Plaster Wood 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Niton XLp 300, 9/24/2004, ed. 1 2 of 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION EVALUATION DATA SOURCE AND DATE: This sheet is supplemental information to be used in conjunction with Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing ("HUD Guidelines"). Performance parameters shown on this sheet are calculated from the EPA/HUD evaluation using archived building components. Testing was conducted in August 2004 on 133 testing combinations. The instruments that were used to perform the testing had new sources; one instrument’s was installed in November 2003 with 40 mCi initial strength, and the other’s was installed June 2004 with 40 mCi initial strength. OPERATING PARAMETERS: Performance parameters shown in this sheet are applicable only when properly operating the instrument using the manufacturer's instructions and procedures described in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines. SUBSTRATE CORRECTION VALUE COMPUTATION: Substrate correction is not needed for brick, concrete, drywall, metal, plaster or wood when using Lead-in- Paint K+L variable reading time mode, the normal operating mode for these instruments. If substrate correction is desired, refer to Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for guidance on correcting XRF results for substrate bias. EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF XRF TESTING: Randomly select ten testing combinations for retesting from each house or from two randomly selected units in multifamily housing. Use the K+L variable time mode readings. Conduct XRF retesting at the ten testing combinations selected for retesting. Determine if the XRF testing in the units or house passed or failed the test by applying the steps below. Compute the Retest Tolerance Limit by the following steps: Determine XRF results for the original and retest XRF readings. Do not correct the original or retest results for substrate bias. In single-family housing a result is defined as the average of three readings. In multifamily housing, a result is a single reading. Therefore, there will be ten original and ten retest XRF results for each house or for the two selected units. Calculate the average of the original XRF result and retest XRF result for each testing combination. Square the average for each testing combination. Add the ten squared averages together. Call this quantity C. Multiply the number C by 0.0072. Call this quantity D. Add the number 0.032 to D. Call this quantity E. Take the square root of E. Call this quantity F. Multiply F by 1.645. The result is the Retest Tolerance Limit. Compute the average of all ten original XRF results. Compute the average of all ten re-test XRF results. Find the absolute difference of the two averages. Niton XLp 300, 9/24/2004, ed. 1 3 of 3 If the difference is less than the Retest Tolerance Limit, the inspection has passed the retest. If the difference of the overall averages equals or exceeds the Retest Tolerance Limit, this procedure should be repeated with ten new testing combinations. If the difference of the overall averages is equal to or greater than the Retest Tolerance Limit a second time, then the inspection should be considered deficient. Use of this procedure is estimated to produce a spurious result approximately 1% of the time. That is, results of this procedure will call for further examination when no examination is warranted in approximately 1 out of 100 dwelling units tested. TESTING TIMES: For the Lead-in-Paint K+L variable reading time mode, the instrument continues to read until it is moved away from the testing surface, terminated by the user, or the instrument software indicates the reading is complete. The following table provides testing time information for this testing mode. The times have been adjusted for source decay, normalized to the initial source strengths as noted above. Source strength and type of substrate will affect actual testing times. At the time of testing, the instruments had source strengths of 26.6 and 36.6 mCi. Testing Times Using K+L Reading Mode (Seconds) All Data Median for laboratory-measured lead levels (mg/cm2) Substrate 25th Percentile Median 75th Percentile Pb < 0.25 0.25 < Pb<1.0 1.0 < Pb Wood Drywall 4 11 19 11 15 11 Metal 4 12 18 9 12 14 Brick Concrete Plaster 8 16 22 15 18 16 CLASSIFICATION RESULTS: XRF results are classified as positive if they are greater than or equal to the threshold, and negative if they are less than the threshold. DOCUMENTATION: A document titled Methodology for XRF Performance Characteristic Sheets provides an explanation of the statistical methodology used to construct the data in the sheets, and provides empirical results from using the recommended inconclusive ranges or thresholds for specific XRF instruments. For a copy of this document call the National Lead Information Center Clearinghouse at 1-800-424-LEAD. This XRF Performance Characteristic Sheet was developed by the Midwest Research Institute (MRI) and QuanTech, Inc., under a contract between MRI and the XRF manufacturer. HUD has determined that the information provided here is acceptable when used as guidance in conjunction with Chapter 7, Lead-Based Paint Inspection, of HUD’s Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing. Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC APPENDIX E – GLOSSARY Lead Paint Survey Thomasville Plant L Thomasville, NC COMMON LEAD-BASED PAINT TERMS Lead-Based Paint: HUD’s definition is any paint, varnish, shellac, or other coating that contains lead equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2 as measured by XRF or laboratory analysis, or 0.5 percent by dry weight (5,000 mg/g, 5,000 ppm, or 5,000 mg/kg) as measured by laboratory analysis. Lead-Based Paint Hazards: Housing conditions that cause human exposure to unsafe levels of lead from paint. These conditions include deteriorated lead-based paint; friction, impact or chewable painted surfaces; lead-contaminated dust; or lead- contaminated soil. Physical Terms Building Component: Any element of a building that may be painted or have dust on its surface, e. g. walls, stair treads, floors, railings, doors, window sills, etc. Building component replacement: See Replacement. Deteriorated Lead-Based Paint: Any lead-based paint coating on a damaged or deteriorated surface or fixture, or any interior or exterior lead-based paint that is peeling, chipping, blistering, flaking, worn, chalking, alligatoring, cracking, or otherwise becoming separated from the substrate. Lead Hazard Evaluation Clearance Examination: Clearance is performed after hazard reduction, rehabilitation or maintenance activities to determine if a unit is safe for occupancy. It involves a visual assessment, analysis of dust and/or soil samples, and preparation of report. A certified risk assessor, paint risk assessor, or clearance technician (independent from entity/individual conducting paint stabilization or hazard reduction) conducts clearance. Paint Testing: Testing of specific surfaces, by XRF (x-ray fluorescence) or lab analysis, to determine the lead content of these surfaces, performed by a certified lead-based paint risk assessor or certified risk assessor. Risk Assessment: A comprehensive evaluation for lead-based paint hazards that includes paint testing, dust and soil sampling, and a visual evaluation. The risk assessment report identifies lead hazards and appropriate lead hazard reduction methods. A certified risk assessor must conduct the assessment. Visual Assessment: A visual evaluation of interior and exterior painted surfaces to identify specific conditions that contribute to lead-based paint hazards. A certified risk assessor or Housing Quality Standards (HQS) risk assessor trained in visual assessment performs the assessment. Lead Hazard Reduction Abatement: A measure or set of measures designed to permanently (i.e. 20 or more years) eliminate lead-based paint hazards or lead-based paint. Abatement strategies include the removal of lead-based paint, enclosure, encapsulation, replacement of building components coated with lead-based paint, removal of lead-contaminated dust, and removal of lead-contaminated soil or overlaying of soil with a durable covering such as asphalt (grass and sod are considered interim control measures). All of these strategies require preparation; cleanup; waste disposal; post abatement clearance testing; record keeping; and, if applicable, monitoring. See also Complete abatement and Interim controls. Complete abatement: Abatement of all lead-based paint inside and outside a property or building and reduction of any lead-contaminated dust or soil hazards. All of these strategies require preparation; cleanup; waste disposal; post-abatement clearance testing; recordkeeping; and, if applicable, reevaluation and on-going monitoring. See also Abatement. Cleaning: The process of using a HEPA vacuum and wet cleaning agents to remove leaded dust; the process includes the removal of bulk debris from the work area. OSHA prohibits the use of compressed air to clean lead-contaminated dust from a surface. Encapsulation: Any covering or coating that acts as a barrier between lead-based paint and the environment, the durability of which relies on adhesion and the integrity of the existing bonds between multiple layers of paint and between the paint and the substrate. See also Enclosure. Enclosure: The use of rigid, durable construction materials that are mechanically fastened to the substrate to act as a barrier between the lead-based paint and the environment. Lead-based Paint Hazard Control: Activities to control and eliminate lead-based paint hazards, including interim controls, abatement, and complete abatement. Maintenance: Work intended to maintain adequate living conditions in a property, which has the potential to disturb lead-based paint or paint that is suspected of being lead- based. Monitoring: Surveillance to determine (1) that known or suspected lead-based paint is not deteriorating, (2) that lead-based paint hazard controls, such as paint stabilization, enclosure, or encapsulation have not failed, (3) that structural problems do not threaten the integrity of hazard controls or of known or suspected. Paint Film Stabilization: An interim control method that stabilizes painted surfaces and addressed the underlying cause of deterioration. Steps include repairing defective surfaces, wet scraping, priming, and repainting surfaces coated with deteriorated lead- based paint; paint film stabilization includes cleanup and clearance. Paint Removal: An abatement strategy that entails the removal of lead-based paint from surfaces. For lead hazard control work, this can mean using chemicals, heat guns below 1,100 °F, and certain contained abrasive methods. Open flame burning, open abrasive blasting, sandblasting, water blasting, and extensive dry scraping are prohibited paint removal methods. (Methylene chloride paint removers and dry scraping are also not recommended. ) Reevaluation: In lead hazard control work, the combination of a visual assessment and collection of environmental samples performed by a certified risk assessor to determine if a previously implemented lead-based paint hazard control measure is still effective and if the property remains lead-safe. Also known as reSurvey. Replacement: Replacement of existing features can be an appropriate abatement technique if the feature is deteriorated beyond repair or if the feature is of minor significance Treatment: In residential lead-based paint hazard control work, any method designed to control lead-based paint hazards. Treatment includes interim controls, abatement, and removal. Hazardous waste “treatment” is a method, technique, or process (such as neutralization) that is designed to change the physical, chemical, or biological character or composition of hazardous waste to neutralize it; render it non-hazardous or less hazardous; recover it; make it safer to transport, store, or dispose; or allow for easier recovery, storage, or volume reduction. Lead Poisoning Environmental Intervention Blood Lead Level: The level of lead in blood that requires intervention in a child under age six. This is defined as a blood lead level of 20 g/dL (micrograms per deciliter) of whole blood or above for a single test, or blood lead levels of 15-19 g/dL in two tests taken at least three months apart. LEAD-BASED PAINT – KEY UNITS OF MEASUREMENT g (Microgram): A Microgram is 1/1000th of a milligram (or one millionth of a gram). To put this unit into perspective, a penny weighs 2 grams. To get a microgram, you would need to divide the penny into 2 million pieces. A microgram is one of those two million pieces. ft2 (Square foot): One square foot is equal to an area that has a length of one foot (12 inches) and a width of one foot (12 inches). g/dL: Micrograms per deciliter used to measure the level of lead in children’s blood to establish whether intervention is needed. A deciliter (1/10th of liter) is a little less than half a cup. As noted above, a microgram is the same weight as one penny divided into two million parts. mg/cm2: Milligrams per square centimeter, used for paint by XRF machines. percent: Percent by weight, used usually for lead-based paint (1 percent = 10,000 g/gram. ppm: Parts per million by weight, equivalent to g/gram (10,000 ppm = 1 percent). Used to measure lead in paint and soil. LEAD-BASED PAINT STANDARDS Paint – Definition of Lead-Based Paint In North Carolina, paint that contains at least:  1 milligram per centimeters square (mg/cm2) of lead;  0.5 percent lead; or  5,000 parts per million (ppm) lead by dry weight. Appendix F Asbestos Survey Report (Not completed as part of the Brownfield Assessment Grant)